Copyright 2006 by Roy A.

Reinhold

Use of the Name of God (YH H! in the Ne" #estament$

And the %i&inity of 'es(s (Yesh(a!

Personally, I've encountered many Christians from a number of denominations who question whether Yeshua (Jesus) was just a man, od, or both a man and od! Perha"s their confusion arises because "astors avoid this com"licated subject somewhat# or "erha"s it is because they don't listen to the evidence their "astor $ives them on the subject# or more li%ely it is due to wea%nesses in &n$lish 'ible translations which are confusin$ to the reader on this subject! (ecently I scanned the entire Peshitta )ramaic *ew +estament and "ic%ed out all verses that show the divine name of od (Y,-,) used for Yeshua (Jesus)! +here are over ./ verses that contain this clear messa$e! 0nly the Peshitta )ramaic *ew +estament has the divine name of od (Y,-,)# while the ree% *+ manuscri"ts use kurios (1ord) or theos ( od) in the same "lace where the divine name is used in Peshitta )ramaic *+! ranted, many &n$lish translations try to ma%e a distinction and use 'the 10(2' for the divine name (Y,-,) in the 0ld +estament (the +ana%h)! +he divine name of od (Y,-,) in the te3t is direct evidence for the ree% *+ manuscri"ts bein$ translations from the Peshitta )ramaic *+, and not vice4versa! ) short history of the Peshitta )ramaic *+5 +he a"ostle Peter and other a"ostles went to the very lar$e Jewish community in Iraq ('abylon) and Persia twenty years before Peter went to (ome! 6 Peter 756. records that the boo% was li%ely written while Peter was in 'abylon (89he who is in 'abylon sends you $reetin$s!!!:)! +hey "reached the $os"el and established the church of the *a;arenes there accordin$ to Church of the &ast written history! +heir history also relates that they received the boo%s com"risin$ the Peshitta )ramaic *ew +estament directly from the a"ostles in their native )ramaic! +here was no translation necessary# since the same )ramaic s"o%en in Israel was s"o%en in 'abylon! +his area of the world (Iraq, Persia, and "oints north and east) was never under (oman rule# and Constantine never invited any re"resentatives of the Church of the &ast to the *icean Council of .<7 )2! Consequently, the Church of the &ast maintained the ancient manuscri"ts of the Peshitta )ramaic *+ without (oman or Catholic church interference! =inally, the 9yriac )ramaic manuscri"ts were based out of )ntioch in 9yria and in +ur%ey! (esearch has shown corru"tion of the 9yriac manuscri"ts, while that is not true for the "ristine manuscri"ts maintained by the Church of the &ast (church of the *a;arenes)! >uch scholarly research su""orts "rimacy for the Peshitta )ramaic *+ from the Church of the &ast# and we should be $rateful that we have the ori$inal *+ faithfully %e"t by them! ?e have a written record of certain boo%s bein$ written with ,ebrew letters (written in )ramaic with )shurri bloc% letters, also called ,ebrew@)ramaic bloc% letters) and translated into ree% by the a"ostles! 'isho" Pa"ias of )ntioch wrote, that the a"ostles translated >atthew from the ori$inal )ramaic@Palestinian ,ebrew into ree%, and that it was not a very $ood translation! Clement of )le3andria wrote, that Paul authored the boo% of ,ebrews in ,ebrew (letters), and that 1u%e carefully translated it into ree% for distribution to ree%s! Irenaeus wrote, that >atthew was written in the dialect used by the ,ebrews (Israelis)! Jerome wrote, that Paul bein$ a ,ebrew, wrote in his own ton$ue and most fluently, while thin$s were eloquently turned (translated) into ree%! +he evidence is that the *+ boo%s were authored in )ramaic with ,ebrew@)ramaic bloc% letters boo%s, and translated 6

into ree% (corroberatin$ the Church of the &ast history)! =urther, recent research shows Peshitta )ramaic *+ "rimacy usin$ a number of scientific and lin$uistic methods! &ven the (oman Catholic church advisors to >el ibson for his movie, The Passion of the Christ, advised him that Yeshua and the a"ostles s"o%e )ramaic# and that is why the movie was done in )ramaic! I thin% you will see that the "resence of the divine name of od (Y,-,)Aonly in the Peshitta )ramaic *+Alends credence to it bein$ ori$inally written in )ramaic!

Arianism
&m"eror Constantine le$ali;ed Christianity in the (oman &m"ire in .6. )2! +he Council of *icea was ordered by Constantine in .<7 )2 to eliminate the main conflict in ChristianityAover the nature of od and nature of Yeshua (Jesus)! It was this controversy that $ave birth to the *icene CreedAafter much rancorous debate! .6B of the .6C attendees (none from the Church of the &ast) si$ned the *icene Creed! B would not si$n it# because they held )rian beliefsAnamed after bisho" )rius of )le3andria, the main teacher of )rianism! &m"eror Constantine e3iled the B non4si$ners (bisho" )rius of )le3andria, deacon &u;oios, bisho" 9ecundus of >amarica in 1ibya, and bisho" +heonas of Ptolemais in 1ibya)! ,e also e3iled bisho" &usebius of *icomedia and bisho" +heo$nis of *icea# because, althou$h they si$ned the *icene Creed, they would not condemn )rius and )rianism! )dditionally, Constantine ordered all co"ies of )rius' boo%, Thalia, to be burnedAfrom which he tau$ht )rianism! +hese decisive actions by &m"eror Constantine were done to show that 8he was in char$e over "olitical and reli$ious matters: in the (oman &m"ire! )rianismAthe doctrine of bisho" )rius of )le3andria, who tau$ht that Jesus (Yeshua) was *0+ of the same substance as od (the =ather), but a created bein$ e3alted above all other creatures! +hey believed that the =ather and Yeshua (Jesus) are not co4eternal, with the "re4incarnate Yeshua (Jesus) a created bein$ li%e the an$els! 9ome $nostic )rians even believed that the "re4incarnate Yeshua (Jesus) was >ichael the archan$el! )rianism is different from )ryanism, which was a ??II4era *)DI racial theory! )ryanism is a racial theory distin$uishin$ a "erson or descendant of "rehistoric "eo"le s"ea%in$ Indo4&uro"ean lan$ua$es! +he *)DIs went further and meant an )ryan to be a Caucasian of non4Jewish descent! I want to ma%e sure the readers don't associate )rianism with some war"ed belief of )dol"h ,itler! ?e are tal%in$ here about a central ar$ument in the early church about the divinity of Jesus (Yeshua)! In the *icene Creed they use the central ree% term, homoousios (of the same substance, or, oneness of substance), to say that the =ather and Yeshua (Jesus) are od! +he semi4)rians tried and failed to $et the Council of *icea to substitute the ree% term, homoiousios (li%e in substance), as a com"romise, but failed! +he semi4)rians also believed that Yeshua (Jesus) was a created bein$ elevated to become od! )s you can tell from use of these ree% terms, the Council of *icea used the ree% *+ manuscri"ts and not the Peshitta )ramaic *+! +he &bionites (denied divinity and vir$in birth of Jesus) are one $rou" in the early church who held the rejected )rian or semi4)rian view"oints! +oday, we have $rou"s who hold views somewhat similar to )rianism5 6! UnitariansAwho believe in one od as o""osed to a tri4unity or trinity, and many of whom believe in the moral authority of, but not the deity, of Yeshua (Jesus)! <! 'eho&ah)s *itnessesAwho have some beliefs similar to )rius, where Yeshua (Jesus) had a "re4human e3istence as the 1o$os (word of od)! +hey view the ,oly 9"irit as a force from the =ather! +hey do not believe in a disembodied soul or s"irit after death, or eternal "unishment of <

the unre"entantly wic%ed! +hey believe also that the =ather is od# and Yeshua (Jesus) is a lesser deity (substantially Enitarian in belief)! .! ChristadelphiansAbelieve that Yeshua's (Jesus') "re4natal e3istence was a conce"tual 1o$os, rather than a literal 1o$os (word of od)! +hey believe the =ather alone is od (Enitarian)! B! +glesia ni CristoAanother Enitarian $rou" who rele$ate Yeshua (Jesus) to less than od! 7! ,(slimsAwho believe that Jesus ($enerally called Isa) was only a "ro"het of the one od# but not himself divine and not the son of od! (in s"ite of wim"y "astors and a"olo$etic theolo$ians who say )llah is the same as the od Y,-, of the 'ible! )llah is not Y,-,!)
Sura An-Nisa 4-171 (Koran) "O People of the ook! Commit no e"#esses in $our reli%ion& Nor sa$ of 'o( au%ht )ut the truth* Jesus Christ, the son of Mary, was (no more than) a messenger of God+ an( ,is -or(+ .hi#h ,e )esto.e( on /ar$+ an( a spirit pro#ee(in% from ,im& so )elie0e in 'o( an( ,is messen%ers* Say not "Trinity"& (esist& it .ill )e )etter for $ou& for God is one God: Glory be to Him: (far e alted is He) abo!e ha!ing a son* To ,im )elon% all thin%s in the hea0ens an( on earth* An( enou%h is 'o( as a 1isposer of affairs*"

F! )lso, most -riends, some ,ethodists and many members of the United Ch(r.h have )rian or semi4)rian beliefs! +he question is, 8do we have the $oodsGAdoes the Peshitta )ramaic *+ clear u" this matter about the divinity of Yeshua (Jesus)G: +he answer is, YesAas you shall see in the followin$! =irst, some definitions! ,arA)ramaic meanin$ >aster@1ord! ,ari means 'my 1ord'! AdonA,ebrew meanin$ 1ord! Adonai means 'my 1ord'! YH HA(Yah"eh) ,ebrew name of od used throu$hout the +ana%h (0ld +estament) over F7// times! +his is the eternal, memorial name of od! YahAshort version of Y,-, (Yahweh) used in 8hallelu4Yah ("raise Yah): and in a number of verses li%e &3odus 675< (Yah is my stren$th and son$), &3odus 6H56F, Isaiah 6<5<, .C566, Psalms FC56I, HH56<, CI5I, IB5H and many more! Yah was also a""ended as the last "art of the name for %in$s and "ro"hets li%e &lijah (&liYah, my od is Yah), %in$ ,e;e%iah (Jhi;qiYah, Yah has stren$thened), etc! ,arYahAcontraction of >ar and Yah, meanin$ '>aster@1ord Yah'! ?hen the (abbis translated the +ana%h (0ld +estament) to )ramaicAcirca 7/ 'C to 7/ )2Athey (sed ,arYah in all 6/000 pla.es "here YH H "as (sed in the original Hebre"! +hey needed to translate the 'ible to )ramaic because durin$ the 'abylonian ca"tivity "eo"le's first lan$ua$e became )ramaic, the lan$ua$e of the lands where they were ta%en! )lso, only "art of the ca"tives returned after the H/ years, with the rest remainin$ in lands where )ramaic was the lan$ua$e! >arYah is used e3tensively throu$hout the Peshitta )ramaic *+!

(Aramai. N# 1 2#! ,arYah 3 YH H (Hebre" 2#! or (N#! 4ord Yah 3 Yah"eh (YH H5 2#!
*ow that we all %now that >arYah (1ord Yah) is used in )ramaic to mean Y,-, from the ,ebrew +ana%h (0+), the e3tensive use of the divine name in the Peshitta )ramaic *+ becomes readily a""arent! It starts out at the birth of Yeshua (Jesus)! 1u%e <566 (an$el announcement) =or today is born to you in the city of 2avid, a 6a&io(r5 "ho is ,arYah ,eshi7ha ( 5 4ord Yah #H8 ,essiah3YH H #H8 ,essiah!! .

+he above verse clearly states that the 9avior born in 'ethlehem is Y,-, (>arYah, 1ord Yah) +,& >essiah! It leaves no doubt at all, and is just the be$innin$ of what is weaved throu$hout the entire Peshitta )ramaic *+! ?e then jum" to the forerunner, John the 'a"ti;er! >atthew .5<4. (e"ent, for the %in$dom of heaven is at hand! =or this is the one referred to by Isaiah the "ro"het (B/5.), sayin$, 8+he voice of one cryin$ in the wilderness, ma7e ready the "ay of ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H!, ma%e ,is "aths strai$ht!: >ar% 65. 8+he voice of one cryin$ in the wilderness, ma7e ready the "ay of ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H!, ma%e ,is "aths strai$ht!: 1u%e .5B )s it is written in the boo% of the words of Isaiah the "ro"het, who said, 8+he voice of one cryin$ in the wilderness, ma7e ready the "ay of ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H! , ma%e ,is "aths strai$ht!: John 65<. (John the 'a"ti;er s"ea%in$) ,e said, 8I am the voice of one cryin$ in the wilderness, ma7e straight the "ay of ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H!, as Isaiah the "ro"het said!: John the 'a"ti;er %new who he was and who the 9avior wasAthat he announced as comin$ soon, durin$ his ministry! +he 9avior was >arYah (Y,-,, Yahweh) +,& >essiah! *ow, $oin$ on to the ministry of Yeshua (Jesus)5 >atthew B5H (tem"tation of Yeshua by 9atan) Yeshua (Jesus) said to him, 80n the other hand, it is written, 'yo( shall not tempt ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H! yo(r God!': 1u%e B56< (tem"tation of Yeshua by 9atan) )nd Yeshua (Jesus) answered and said to him, 8It is said, yo( shall not tempt ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H! yo(r God!: 1u%e B5C (tem"tation of Yeshua by 9atan) )nd Yeshua (Jesus) answered and said to him, 8It is written, 'yo( shall "orship ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H! yo(r God5 and ser&e Him only!': 0f course in the above verses, many of us have been tau$ht it is s"ea%in$ of od the =ather when it mentions 'the 1ord your od' from the &n$lish translations of the ree% manuscri"ts# but the name '>arYah' a""lies to Yeshua tooAas the an$els announced, as Isaiah "ro"hesied, and as John the 'a"ti;er tau$ht! >arYah is Y,-, (Yahweh), and it a""lies to Yeshua and to the =ather! =rom the Peshitta )ramaic *+ it seems clear that Yeshua is tal%in$ about ,imself bein$ tem"ted, and callin$ ,imself '>arYah your od' to 9atan! 1et's $o on to further use in the ministry of Yeshua (Jesus)5 John C566 (woman cau$ht in adultery) And she said5 9No one5 ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H!!: )nd Yeshua (Jesus) said, 8*either do I condemn you# $o your way# from now on sin no more!: *otice that Yeshua did not say she was wron$ in addressin$ ,im as >arYah (Y,-,, or 1ord Yah)! ?hy is thatG 'ecause ,e is >arYah (Y,-,, or 1ord Yah)! +he last set of scri"tures in the os"els are from the +rium"hal &ntry to Jerusalem and events surroundin$ ,is crucifi3ion5 B

>atthew <65I )nd the multitudes $oin$ before ,im, and those who followed after were cryin$ out, sayin$, 8,osanna to the son of 2avid# blessed is He "ho .omes in the name ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H!# ,osanna in the hi$hest!: )ctually, in the above scri"ture, ,osanna is a conflation of two words 8hosha4na: in ,ebrew, and in )ramaic 8oshana:! +he ,ebrew word 8hosha: is a ,i"hil im"erative male sin$ular word from the root word 8yasha: (to save)! +he ,i"hil is causitive, so when they were sayin$ 8hosha4na: it should have been translated as 8Cause me to be savedA"lease, 0 son of 2avid:# and 8Cause me to be savedA "lease, in the ,i$hest!: +his is a case of the translators just transliteratin$ two ,ebrew words and ma%in$ them one fun%y word, of which most Christians "robably have no understandin$ what they were sayin$! +hat said, the "oint was they were sayin$ that Yeshua on the don%ey was >arYah (1ord YahKY,-,)! >atthew <.5.I =or I say to you, from now on yo( shall not see ,e (ntil yo( say5 9:lessed is He "ho .omes in the name ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H!! >ar% 665I46/ )nd those who went before, and those who followed after, were cryin$ out, 8,osanna, blessed is He "ho .omes in the name ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H!# blessed is the comin$ %in$dom of our father 2avid# ,osanna in the hi$hest! 1u%e 6.5.7 'ehold, your house is left to you desolate# for I say to you, that you will not see >e until you say, 8:lessed is He "ho .omes in the name ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H!!: 1u%e 6I5.C (+rium"hal &ntry) sayin$, 8:lessed is the ;ing "ho .omes in the name ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H!# "eace in heaven and $lory in the hi$hest!: John 6<56. (+rium"hal &ntry) too% branches of the "alm trees, and went out to meet ,im, and be$an to cry out, 8,osannaL :lessed is the ;ing of +srael "ho .omes in the name ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H!!: It is clear from the os"els that Yeshua (Jesus) had come in the name >arYah (1ord YahKY,-,)# and ,e was hailed as the Jin$ of Israel! It will be even clearerAas we move throu$h )cts and the &"istlesAthat the a"ostles also understood that Yeshua was >arYah (1ord YahKY,-,, Yahweh)! )cts <5<6 (concernin$ the end4times, Peter s"ea%in$) )nd it shall be that e&ery one "ho .alls on the name ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H! shall be sa&ed! (not 'the 1ord' where you fill in the blan% with whatever name you decide to use to be saved! Peter used the name to call u"on to be savedA>arYah!) )cts <5.F (Peter s"ea%in$) +herefore let all the house of Israel %now for certain that od has made this very Yesh(a ('es(s! "hom yo( ha&e .r(.ified5 both ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H! and #H8 ,essiah! )cts <5.C (Peter s"ea%in$) +hen 9himon (Peter) said to them, 8(e"ent and be bapti<ed5 e&ery one of yo(5 in the name ,arYah Yesh(a (4ord Yah Yesh(a3YH H Yesh(a! for the for$iveness of sins, so that you may receive the $ift of the ,oly 9"irit (d'(u%ha d'Mudsha in )ramaic, (uach ,aJodesh in ,ebrew)! 7

)cts 756B )nd the n(mber of those "ho belie&ed in ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H! was $reatly increased by multitudes, both of men and women! )cts I567 (Paul's 2amascus conversion e3"erience, where I57 identified the s"ea%er as sayin$ ,e was the ascended Yeshua of *a;areth) 'ut ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H5 "ho "as Yesh(a! said to him, 8)rise and $o# he (Paul) is the a$ent whom I have chosen to carry >y name to the entiles and %in$s, and the children of Israel! )cts I5<H 'ut 'arnabas too% him (Paul) and brou$ht him to the a"ostles, and told them he had seen ,arYah (YH H5 "ho "as Yesh(a! on the "ay, and how ,e had s"o%en to him, and how in 2amascus he had s"o%en o"enly in the name of Yeshua (Jesus)! )cts 6/5.F (Peter s"ea%in$) =or od sent the word to the children of Israel, "reachin$ "eace and tranquility by Yesh(a #H8 ,essiah5 He is ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H! of all! )cts 665<6 )nd the hand of ,arYah (1ord Yah, who is Yeshua) was with them# and a $reat number belie&ed5 and t(rned to ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H5 "ho is Yesh(a!! +he boo% of )cts of the )"ostles ma%es it clear that Yeshua is >arYah (Y,-,) and the >essiah! It's too bad that "eo"le for centuries have focused on the translations from the ree% *+Awhere the name of od has been erased# and they used a $eneric term, 8the 1ord:! &ven then, many times it is 1ord and not the divine name of od! ?e have to $o to the Peshitta )ramaic *+ to see where the name of od is actually used in the te3t! James 75H 'ut you, my brethren, be "atient (ntil the .oming of ,arYah (YH H3Yesh(a!# just as the farmer waits for the "recious cro"s of his field, and has lon$ "atience for it, until he receives the early and late rains! (a "ro"hecy of >arYah Yeshua comin$ to rei$n on the earth in the end4times)! 6 Peter .567 'ut san.tify ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H! #H8 ,essiah in yo(r hearts# and be ready to $ive an answer in mee%ness and reverence to everyone who see%s from you a word concernin$ the ho"e of your faith! Jude 656B )nd &noch also, the seventh from )dam, "ro"hesied of these, sayin$, 8:ehold5 ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H! .omes "ith ten tho(sands of His holy ones! (end4times "ro"hecy about the comin$ of Yeshua, who is >arYah, to rei$n on the earth)! )s shown, we have cited e3am"les in the e"istles of James (Yacov), Peter (9himon) and Jude (Yehuda) where their writin$s ma%e clear that Yeshua (Jesus) is +,& >essiah and ,e is >arYah or Y,-, (Yahweh)! *e3t, we $o on to the e"istles of Paul (9haul)! (omans 6/56. =or "hoe&er .alls on the name ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H! shall be sa&ed! (omans 6B5I =or to this end even +,& >essiah both died and came bac% to life, and rose to be ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H! both of the dead and li&ing! (omans 6B56/466 !!!=or we must all stand before the jud$ment seat of +,& >essiah! =or it is written, 8As + li&e5 said ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H3Yesh(a!, every %nee shall bow to >e, and every ton$ue shall confess >e!: F

(omans 6B56B =or + 7no" and ha&e .onfiden.e in ,arYah Yesh(a (4ord Yah Yesh(a!, that nothin$ unclean comes from ,im5 but to him who believes a thin$ to be unclean, to him only it is unclean! 6 Corinthians B5B47 =or I (Paul) %now nothin$ of which I am $uilty, yet I am not by this acquitted, but my =(dge is ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H3Yesh(a!! +herefore, do not jud$e before the time, (ntil ,arYah .omes (4ord Yah3YH H!, and ,e brin$s to li$ht the hidden thin$s of dar%ness, and reveals the thou$hts of the heart5 then shall e&ery man ha&e praise from God! N"ro"hecy of >arYah comin$ to rei$n on the earth, and equated with odO! 6 Corinthians C5F yet for us there is one God, the =ather, from whom comes every thin$ and by whom we live# and one ,arYah Yesh(a ,eshi7ha (4ord Yah Yesh(a #H8 ,essiah!5 by "hom are all things, and we by ,im! 6 Corinthians 665<H +herefore, whoever shall eat of the bread of ,arYah (4ord Yah!, and drin7 of His .(p5 (n"orthily, shall be $uilty of the body and blood of ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H!! 6 Corinthians 665<I =or he who eats and drin%s unworthily, eats and drin%s to his condemnation# for he does not dis.ern the body of ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H!! 6 Corinthians 6<5. +herefore, I want you to understand that no one, s"ea%in$ by the 9"irit of od, calls Yeshua accursed5 and that no man .an say that Yesh(a is ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H!5 b(t by the Holy 6pirit! 6 Corinthians 675BH +he first )dam (man) is of the earth, earthy# the se.ond Adam (man! is ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H! from hea&en! < Corinthians .56F46H *evertheless "hene&er a man t(rns to ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H!, the veil is ta%en away! *ow ,arYah is that &ery 6pirit> and "here the 6pirit of ,arYah is5 there is liberty! Phili""ians <5I466 +herefore od has hi$hly e3alted ,im, and $iven ,im a name which is above every name# that at the name Yeshua every %nee shall bow, of those in heaven, and those on the earth, and those under the earth! )nd e&ery tong(e shall .onfess that Yesh(a #H8 ,essiah is ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H!, to the $lory of od ,is =ather! Colossians .5<B Jnowin$ that from our 1ord you shall receive the reward of inheritance# for yo( ser&e ,arYah #H8 ,essiah (4ord Yah #H8 ,essiah3YH H #H8 ,essiah!! ,ebrews 6.57 1et your way of life be free from the love of money, bein$ content with what you have# for ,arYah (4ord Yah3YH H! Himself has said5 9+ "ill ne&er lea&e yo( nor forsa7e yo(!: +he e"istles of Paul contained an e3tensive number of verses that clearly show the divinity of Yeshua in the Peshitta )ramaic *+ (obscured in the ree% manuscri"ts indicatin$ that they are a translation from the ori$inal Peshitta )ramaic *+)! 0ur last two e3am"les are from +he (evelation $iven to the a"ostle John! H

(evelation 65C + am the Aleph and #a(? says ,arYah the God5 "ho is5 and "ho "as5 and "ho is to .ome5 the Almighty!
*ote5 2r! eor$e >! 1amsa, in his &n$lish translation of the Peshitta )ramaic *+, notes that manuscri"ts from the Church of the &ast have )le"h and +au whereas the ree% manuscri"ts of the ?est have )l"ha and 0me$a! 'oth mean5 be$innin$ and endin$! +he same is true for (evelations <65F and <<56.!

(evelation <<5</ ,e who testifies to these thin$s says, 86(rely + am .oming soon@A Amen. Come5 ,arYah Yesh(a (4ord Yah Yesh(a3YH H Yesh(a!! +he above verses should be more than sufficient to "rovide direct "roof of the divinity of >arYah Yeshua +,& >essiah (10(2 Jesus Christ, for those of you thorou$hly indoctrinated in the ree% manner from the ree% translations of the *+)! I mentioned in the be$innin$ that there were over ./ verses tyin$ Yeshua (Jesus) to the divine name of od# and the above are actually B< s"ecific e3am"les! ?hy is this subject im"ortantG +he ,ebrew +orah and +ana%h directly states somethin$ that many Christian theolo$ians, "astors and teachers have shied away from! +a%e a loo%! Isaiah B.56/466 Yo( are ,y "itnesses5 de.lares YH H (Yah"eh5 ,arYah in Aramai.!, and >y servant whom I have chosen, in order that you may %now and believe >e, and understand that + am He! 'efore >e there was no od formed, and there will be none after >e! + am5 + am YH H (Yah"eh5 ,arYah in Aramai.!5 and besides ,e there is N2 6a&ior! Isaiah B.56B +hus says YH H (Yah"eh5 ,arYah in Aramai.! yo(r Redeemer5 the Holy 2ne of +srael!!! Isaiah B.567 + am YH H (Yah"eh5 ,arYah in Aramai.! yo(r Holy 2ne5 the Creator of +srael5 yo(r ;ing! I could cite many more scri"tures from the +ana%h showin$ that there is *0 9avior, *0 (edeemer, besides Y,-, (Yahweh)! Perha"s you've $lossed over these verses yourself in teachin$, to e3"lain it away! ,owever, the "ur"ose of this "a"er is to show everyone that the Peshitta )ramaic *ew +estament clearly and decisively shows that >arYahKY,-, I9 the 9avior and (edeemer of Israel, and the Jin$ of Israel in accordance with the scri"tures! +he an$el announced at ,is birth in 1u%e <566, that >arYah (1ord YahKY,-,) is the >essiah and 9avior! In 1u%e 6I5.C and John 6<56. they cried out at the +rium"hal &ntry, 8,osannaL :lessed is the ;ing of +srael "ho .omes in the name ,arYah (YH H!!: Isaiah B.567 says that Y,-, (>arYah) is the Jin$ of Israel# and 1u%e 6I5.C and John 6<56. confirms that in the Peshitta )ramaic *+, that it is >arYah Yeshua +,& >essiah! ,ere is another odd and difficult verse for the (abbis, and "robably for many Christians as well! It is from the 9on$ of >oses and Israel, after Pharaoh and his army were drowned in the 9ea of 9uf! &3odus 675<4B Yah is my stren$th and son$# and ,e has become my salvation! +his is my od and I will "raise ,im# od of my father, and I will e3alt ,im! YH H (Yah"eh3,arYah in Aramai.! is a man of "ar5 YH H (Yah"eh3,arYah in Aramai.! is His name! Pharaoh's chariots and his army ,e has thrown into the sea# and his chosen ca"tains are drowned in the 9ea of 9uf! C

+he above verse is "u;;lin$ to my Jewish friends, since how could Y,-, (YahwehK>arYah in )ramaic) be a manG# and how could he be a man of warG od is not a man as everyone surmises! ,owever, the B< e3am"les I cited in this article show that >arYah Yeshua +,& >essiah was Y,-,# and that ,e was a man! Jude 656B is a "ro"hecy about >arYah comin$ with ten thousands of ,is ,oly 0nes at the end of days (end4times)! ,e is comin$ as the 1ion of Judah, a man of war! )re not the "ro"hecies clearG =or e3am"le5 Dechariah 6B5.4B +hen YH H (,arYah! "ill go o(t5 and He "ill fight against those nations5 as His day of fighting on a day of battle. And in that day His feet "ill stand on the ,o(nt of 2li&es, which is in front of Jerusalem on the east# and the >ount of 0lives will be s"lit in its middle from east to west by a very lar$e valley, so that half the mountain will move to the north and the other half to the south! Y,-, (Yahweh, >arYah in )ramaic) will stand on the >ount of 0lives with ,is own feet, on the east side of Jerusalem! +his is >arYah Yeshua +,& >essiah who stands on the >ount of 0lives! +he evidence is so blindin$ly clear, as shown "reviously, that no one can deny it! ?hat "eo"le can do is try to deny that the Peshitta )ramaic *ew +estament is the ori$inal *+# so that they can %ee" their muddled conce"ts e3tra"olated from the ree% manuscri"ts translated to &n$lish! >arYah Yeshua is not a conce"tual 1o$os (?ord of od) in ,is "re4natal e3istence as the Christadel"hians and Jehovah ?itnesses claim! ,e was >arYah and the Jin$ of Israel from the be$innin$! ,e was not elevated to od status as the )rians, semi4)rians and $nostics thin%Abased on ,is successfully carryin$ out the crucifi3ion assi$nment! +he evidence in this "a"er shows clearly that >arYah Yeshua was Y,-, (Yahweh) before ,e came into the body as Yeshua some </// years a$o!

+he evidence is in, are you willin$ to acce"t itG

You can contact the author, (oy, at "ro"hecy/BPcomcast!net Additional Reso(r.es on Beshitta Aramai. Ne" #estament prima.y$
)ndrew abriel (oth has two e3cellent boo%s available that directly loo% at Peshitta "rimacy usin$ s"ecific verse e3am"les! +hey can be obtained at5 htt"5@@www!tushiyah!or$ 2ua#h 3a(im& Aramai# Ori%ins of the Ne. Testament 2ua#h 3a(im& The Path to 4ife )ndrew's teachin$ website also has free articles on "rimacy (but not all the evidence in his boo%s), and other )ramaic related articles at5 htt"5@@aramaicnttruth!or$ Pastor 2ave 'auscher has many articles e3aminin$ *+ "rimacy usin$ a number of scientific and lin$uistic methods (free)! ,e also has com"leted a fresh new 'ible translationAInterlinear and Plain &n$lish 'ibleAfrom the Peshitta )ramaic *+ to &n$lish! 'uy the InterlinearL ,is website is at5 htt"5@@aramaicnt!com Christo"her 1ancaster has written two boo%s e3aminin$ Peshitta versus ree% *+ "rimacy, and they are su"erb (and com"letely free as P2=)! htt"5@@aramaic"eshitta!com -as the Ne. Testament 2eall$ -ritten in 'reek5 (<I< "a$es in P2=) Aramai# Peshitta Prima#$ 6or 1ummies (short 7/ "a$e version of the <I< "a$e boo%, in P2=)