Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Candidate 316773
MHRA Citation
3352 Words
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
December/January 2002
Introduction
This essay will examine point of view in extracts from Ian McEwan’s Atonement and
David Mitchell’s Number 9 Dream (both reproduced here as appendixes). It aims to
disprove formalist ideas of character as a ‘function’ of plot (Chatman 1978, 111) by
demonstrating instead that plot can serve as a function of character. Three strategies
will be identified, in which point of view constructs the narrator as a character:
• In both extracts the perception and reporting of story events overshadows the
events themselves.
• The narrator’s perspective normally aligns the reader with a focalised
character (in Number 9 Dream the narrator himself). Sometimes, however, it
invites the reader to read against the focalised/narrator’s discourse, to discover
what this character is ‘really’ like.
• Both extracts contain several narrative layers, the ‘deepest’ of which is purely
a form of characterisation, narrativising personality traits.
Diagrams of narrative levels (Figs 1&2) and narrative elements (Figs 3&4) are
produced at the end of the essay to demonstrate these points.
2
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
‘limited’ perspective Eiji is more fully characterised by analeptic traces in his FDT.
We infer that he does not know who his father is from his comment that the rest of the
public “know who ushered them on to Earth” (33). The obvious orientating function
of Eiji’s diegesis does not, however, prevent an extremely strong sense of mimesis
being created through the immediacy of this first person orientation.
This immediacy is created by the dominance of Free Direct Thought2. The
form is rarer in novels than indirect thought (IT) as it professes to a verbatim
knowledge of a character’s thoughts, but this is exactly the effect required here,
aligning the reader to Eiji’s direct perceptions in the present tense, as though he or she
were ‘really there’3. The inevitable distortions caused by indirect thought’s selection
process are eliminated. This technique is supported by the almost exclusive reporting
of speech in a free direct form, in which the framing clause is ellipted. Characters
speak without the narrator as an intermediary. Events maintain a more natural
chronology where a framing clause would slow down text pace. On the surface text
duration appears to be ‘scene’, but since Eiji lights a cigarette in sentence 27 and
“entombs” it by sentence 46 there must be some summary. If anything, this
demonstrates the arbitrariness of any relationship between text time and ‘ideal natural
chronology’ when a reader decodes text4 (see Toolan 2001, 43).
The closeness of reader-alignment to the narrator is heightened by the use of
the ‘close’ deictic adverb here rather than the more remote adverbial there (six
instances to three):
It would be so much simpler if you would just drop by here for a sandwich (35)
‘Is there a machine in here?’ (507)
while I stand here nitpicking with you, I got ninety angel-fish at the
Metropolitan City Office in danger of asphyxiation (176)
Had a hell of time getting in here, y’know (222)
you burst in here, expecting to intimidate me (284)
‘Security will be here within thirty seconds.’ (307)
The last four instances are taken from Eiji’s imagined adventure, demonstrating that
this close alignment is retained even when he is the imagined subject of an embedded
narrative layer. This directly contrasts Atonement’s third-person strategy, in which a
greater mix of direct and indirect reporting means that exceptional narrative shifts are
made when Briony becomes focaliser. In this more ‘distanced’ account there are as
many instances of the adverbial there as here (two of each):
3
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
in a prized varnished cabinet, a secret drawer was opened by pushing against the
grain of a cleverly turned dovetail joint, and here she kept a diary locked by a
clasp (23)
Briony felt suddenly ashamed . . . [she] struggled to grasp the difficult thought,
wasn't there manipulation here . . . now her play seemed a miserable,
embarrassing thing” (140-145)
The first instance is pure narration (PN) from the third-person omniscient narrator –
here is used simply to create a sense of closeness in a relatively distanced form of
reporting. Both grammatically and semantically, there would serve just as well. The
second instance demonstrates the use of lexical and graphological features associated
with DT to provide ‘speech colouring’ inside a segment of indirect thought. The use of
here combined with the index of temporal-closeness now creates a vivid impression of
Briony’s direct perception, without sacrificing the diegetic distance from which the
narrator analyses her.
“Briony heard at last the sound of wheels on the gravel below her bedroom
window, and snatched up her pages and ran down the stairs, across the hallway
and out into the blinding light of midday” (72).
The actual actions described here are probably PN (Briony would hardly have thought
“I am snatching up my pages, I am running down the stairs”), but the expressive
adjunct “at last” and the impression of “the blinding light of midday” are definitely
4
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
orientated from Briony, as she has been couped-up inside waiting for her cousins’ with
anticipation. This sentence marks a shift from the narrator’s summary, which has been
an external intradiegetic analepsis, to ideal natural chronology in a ‘narrative present’.
It sets up the first DS in the extract – Briony’s – and demonstrates her immersion in
her play and alienation from the outside world: “I’ve got your parts, all written out.
First performance tomorrow! Rehearsals start in five minutes!” (73-5). The first
descriptions of her cousins all relate to their suitability for various parts in the play, so
are clearly orientated from Briony’s point of view7. By shifting from the perspective
of a (seemingly) extradiegetic narrator to an intradiegetic focaliser, the reader is
brought closer to story events, to directly sympathise with Briony.
5
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
Briony’s perceptions and demonstrate what she is ‘really’ like. In sentences 17-20
action is abandoned entirely and pace freezes to ‘descriptive pause’ in order to
describe Briony’s room. Such setting-description is, for Rimmon-Kennan, the
strongest marker of narratorial presence (see Toolan 2001, 69) and this is indeed
where the narrator becomes most fully realised as an independent voice, describing
elements of Briony’s personality that she would not be able to identify herself.
Briony’s room is described using particularly mediated stasis statements, where
identificatory information such as the positioning of Briony’s toys are described as
being directly attributive of various personality traits. Her room is therefore not “tidy”
but “a shrine to her controlling demon” (18).10 This narrator purports to have absolute,
objective authority in describing Briony. When describing personality traits it
demonstrates the status to make foundational orientations using unmodalised
relational processes, many of which are identificatory:
The narrator also gives Briony’s play a ‘definitive’ interpretation. In announcing that
“the piece was intended to inspire not laughter, but terror, relief and instruction, in that
order” s/he implies that it is likely to make an adult audience laugh (59). This
sentence is prefaced by a sentence that uses may have been idiomatically to mean
was: “The Trials of Arabella may have been a melodrama”. It then makes a statement
that is vital in the construction of an implied reader: “its author had yet to hear the
term” (58). This implies a reader who has a more advanced grasp of narrative
conventions than Briony, who would find the heightened emotions of her melodrama
distasteful and who is complicit with the third person narrator in this view. This is not
to say that we feel any less sympathy towards Briony, especially as the narrator builds
on our new orientation looking at Briony rather than with her to create suspense.
6
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
The declaration that “the innocent intensity with which Briony set about the
project - the posters, tickets, sales booth - made her particularly vulnerable to failure”
(59) is stylistically similar to a Labovian evaluation, explaining the relevance of all
this reporting about Briony’s writing. It implies a tragic hypothetical outcome in
which “vulnerable” Briony is hurt by the reception of her play. A Barthesian narrative
‘fork’ is thus created to which the text is heading, in which Briony either will be hurt
or avoid being hurt. Briony cannot conceive this, thus making her behaviour more
poigniant whenever she becomes focaliser. There is in fact no resolution to these
conditions, as the events of the following evening mean that the play is not performed
for another sixty years, when Briony is much changed. The purpose of this potential
kernel, therefore, is as a plot action that contributes to characterisation. The
combination of our focalised closeness to Briony and our narrator-orientated
impression of her vulnerability create a particularly vivid impression of character.
The dual perspective of Briony’s FIT is ‘ironising’ in precisely the form
identified by Leech and Short, as it creates a “contrast in values associated with two
different points of view” (1981, 278). The information that the busy composition of
the play caused Briony to ‘miss a breakfast and a lunch’ (2) could be oriented from
her perspective or even that of her mother or sister. The implication is that this is an
exceptional event that illustrates the magnitude of Briony’s fervour. In the context of
the entire third-person opening sentence, however, it serves more as a form of
affectionate (for it is surely intended humorously) bathos. The play initially appears to
be a large-scale undertaking with posters, programmes and tickets, but the missing of
two meals as a consequence readjusts the scale to instead emphasise the relative
triviality of young Briony’s existence. Similarly, when we enter Briony’s FIT, with the
hint that she has been left to “contemplate her finished draft” (2), we regard the
statement that the play is “at some moments chilling, at others desperately sad” (4) as
Briony’s intention rather than the actual effect of the as yet unperformed artifice. 11
However the narrator’s authority shifts outside the extract, in Atonement’s
Epilogue, when it transpires to be intra- rather than extradiegetic. The narrator is
revealed to have actually been an elderly Briony, recounting her life. Like
Number9Dream’s imagined adventure story, then, the primary narration is a conceit.
David Lodge regards McEwan’s technique here as being particularly emblematic of
“an increasing reluctance among literary novelists to assume the narrative stance of
godlike omniscience that is implied by any third person representation of
7
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
consciousness, however covert and impersonal” (2002, 86). This technique certainly
raises Atonement above the criticisms levelled at many Nineteenth Century novels
written in the third person. This seemly ‘aloof’ external narrator actually transpires to
be an internal one after all, so its internal focalisation of Briony’s thoughts becomes
more plausible since her reporting is an older version of that same consciousness.
However, we should note the importance of retroversion here, as the revelation only
occurs in the final chapter. Though this changes the entire tone of the text, it does so
retroactively – reading the text for the first time the narrator is interpreted as an
external third-person figure, so this interpretation dominates.
8
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
9
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
This pattern is repeated in Atonement, where Briony is only the ‘doer’ in processes
that refer to her writing: designed, constructed, written, studied, collecting, browsing.
Prior to the conceit, Eiji hints at his inclination to daydreaming: “How do
daydreams translate into reality?” Not very well, not very often” (37-39). This is very
much the theme of the extract. The reader is therefore unsurprised that when the real
kernel of entering the PanOpticon13 occurs, it transpires to be a disappointment. Eiji is
simply turned away. The extract satirises the way in which teenage boys view their
lives as heavily functional narratives, such as sci-fi movies or video games, when
actually their narrative is heavily indicial, a psychological story or daydream.
10
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
Eiji first notices something about a character’s personality, and then nominalises this
to subsequently name them:
An old man (75) He is identical to Lao Tzu Lao Tzu (80, 86, 104, 492,
from my school textbook - 496)
bald, nutty, bearded (77)
a security guard (391) He has the mass and Minotaur (395, 399, 407,
nostrils of a minotaur. 409)
(392)
11
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
12
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
Conclusion
Detailed linguistic analysis proves my opening three assertions and overall point that
‘plot’ actions can serve a characterisation function. These two novels certainly
demonstrate a general shift towards the representation of thought as the primary mode
of novels over the last fifty years. My analysis does however demonstrate that this
type of systematic language analysis remains party to the same intuitive and
impressionistic trappings of conventional literary criticism that it was supposed to
eliminate. As Leech and Short note, ‘it is impossible to tell by the use of formal
linguistic criteria alone whether one is reading the thoughts of the character or the
views of the narrator/author’ (1981, 338). Unpacking the unconscious presuppositions
and cultural codes that establish character is a sure-fire way of falling victim to one’s
own cultural prejudices. My analysis applies a ‘top-down’ structure onto these
extracts and judges them on the terms of this external structure. The story/discourse
divide, upon which my first point relies is especially dangerous as there can be no
form without content and no content without form. Ultimately, however, this
systematic does provide valuable insights into point of view.
13
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
Addresser 1 Addressee 1
(David Mitchell) (Reader)
Conflated Layers
Message
(Novel)
Addresser 2 Addressee 2
(Implied Author) (Implied Reader)
Message
(Novel)
Addresser 3 Addressee 3
(Eiji Miyake) (Eiji Miyaje/Implied Reader)
Message
Conflated Layers
(superordinate story)
Addressers 4b Addressees 4b
Addresser 4a Addressee 4a
(Characters) (Characters)
(Eiji’s (Eiji Miyake)
imagination)
Message Message
(dialogue)
(adventure story)
Addresser 5 Addresser 5
(characters) (characters)
Message
(dialogue)
14
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
Addresser 1 Addressee 1
(Ian McEwan) (Reader)
Conflated Layers
Message
(Novel)
Addresser 2 Addressee 2
(Implied Author) (Implied Reader)
Message
(Novel)
Addresser 3 Addressee 3
(Third Person (Implied Reader)
Narrator - actually
elderly Briony)
Message
(superordinate story)
Message Message
(superordinate story) (dialogue)
Addresser 5 Addressees 5
(Briony as focaliser) (Implied audience –
Miyake) Emilly Tallis, Leon )
Message
(The Trials of Arabella & Briony’s
other fantasies)
15
Events Actions & smoking
Happenings thinking
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001 talking to Lao Tzu
running
Fig 3: Diagram of Narrative Elements In Number9Dream threatening
coercing
lying
Story shooting
(Content) obtaining the folder
Characters
Eiji Miyake / Ran So
Akiko Kato*
Eiji’s Father*
Clientele of the Jupite
‘The biker ahead of m
Passers by (28)
Existents Waitresses – Do
Do
The
Recruitment Officer
Narrative
Lao Tzu†
Text
Ice Maiden*†
(Number9
The Receptionist*
Dream)
Minotaur*†
Terrified public outsi
Anju*
Setting
Tokyo
Jupiter Café
Panopticon (* interio
Yakushima (Eiji’s ho
Story elements,
Eiji Miyake sits in the Jupiter
pre-processed
those around him and fanta
by author’s
future meeting with a lawye
cultural codes
able to identify his father.
Structure of
Narrative First person narration orie
Transmission view (allowing reading agai
to establish some character
begins with observations
situation – postmodern ur
interspersed with analeptic
traces. Then rapid a
sequence, which is (vit
afterwards as imagin
Discourse homodiegetic prolepsis. Va
(Expression) extract is of ‘scene’ dura
ideal natural chronology.
other characters allows
KEY reinterpret Eiji’s situation.
* Imagined by Eiji
16
Events Actions & writing, contemp
Happenings encouraging, orga
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
divorcing, rehears
Psychological Novels of 2001
dripping, dressing
17
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
18
Appendix I: Extracts from Number9Dream
1. 'It is a simple matter. 2. I know your name, nd
you knew mine, once upon a time: Eiji Miyake. 3.
Yes, that Eiji Miyake. 4. We are both busy
people, Ms Kato, so why not cut the small talk?
5. I am in Tokyo to find my father. 6. You know
his name and you know his address. 7. And you
are going to give me both. 8. Right now.' 9. Or
something like that. 10. A galaxy of cream
unribbons in my coffee cup, and the background
chatter pulls into focus. 11. My first morning in
Tokyo, and I am already getting ahead of myself.
12. The Jupiter cafe sloshes with lunch-hour
laughter, Friday plottings, clinking saucers. 13.
Drones bark into mobile phones. 14. She-drones
hitch up sagging voices to sound more feminine.
15. Coffee, seafood sandwiches, detergent,
steam. 15. I have an across-the-street view of
the PanOpticon's main entrance. 16. Quite a
sight, this zirconium gothic skyscraper. 17. Its
upper floors are hidden by clouds. 18. Under it's
tight-fitting lid, Tokyo steams -34C with 86%
humidity. 19. A big Panasonic display says so.
20. Tokyo is so close up you cannot always see
it. 21. No distances. 22. Everything is over your
head - dentists, kindergartens, dance studios.
23. Even the roads and walkways are up on
murky stilts. 24. Venice with the water drained
away. 25. Reflected airplanes climb over
mirrored buildings. 26. I always thought
Kagoshima was huge, but you could lose it down
a side alley in Shinjuku. 27. I light a cigarette -
Kool, the brand chosen by a biker ahead of me
in the queue - and watch the traffic and passers-
by on the intersection between Omekaido
Avenue and Kita Street. 28. Pin-striped drones, a
lip-pierced hairdresser, midday drunks, child-
laden housewives. 29.Not a single person is
standing still. 30. Rivers, snowstorms, traffic,
bytes, generations, a thousand faces per
minute. 31. Yakushima is a thousand minutes
per face. 32. All of these people with their boxes
of memories labelled 'Parents'. 33. Good shots,
bad shots, frightening figures, tender pictures,
fuzzy angles, scratched negatives - it doesn't
matter, they know who ushered them on to
Earth. 34. Akiko Kato, I am waiting. Jupiter Cafe
is the nearest lunch place to PanOpticon. 35. It
would be so much simpler if you would just drop
by here for a sandwich and a coffee. 36. I will
recognize you, introduce myself, and persuade
you that natural justice is on my side. 37. How
do daydreams translate into reality? 38. I sigh.
39. Not very well, not very often. 40. I will have
to storm your fortress in order to get what I
want. 41. Not good. 42. A building as huge as
the PanOpticon probably has other exits, and its
own restaurants. 43.You are probably an
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
20
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
21
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
145.'Beg pardon.'
160.'Bosugi.'
22
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
23
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
206.'Yes, but-'
230.'Where do I look?'
24
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
25
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
318.'So?'
26
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
348.'Drop it.'
27
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
398.'Huh?'
28
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
417.'Oh.'
448.'This?'
449.'That.'
29
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
490.Page one.
30
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
31
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
32
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
33
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
34
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
35
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
36
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
37
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
120. 'Definitely.'
38
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
39
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
162. But she had said no, and now Lola was
saying sweetly, 'In that case, do you mind if I
play her? 163. I think I could do it very well. 164.
In fact, of the two of us...'
40
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
41
Candidate 316773 First Narrative Analysis Assessed Essay: Narrators as Characters in Two
Psychological Novels of 2001
Sources Cited
Chatman, S 1978 Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film
Ithica/London: Cornell Univ. Press
Lodge, David 2002 Consciousness and the Novel: Connected Essays London: Secker
& Warburg
42
1
Notes
Number9Dream is orientated from the spatio-temporal setting of late-Twentieth Century Tokyo, a
Jamesonian postmodern city indexed by deictic items such as the coffee house (the Jupiter Café),
electronic gadgets like Lao Tzu’s vidboy (a thinly-veiled Nintendo Gameboy) and observations of
enormous dehumanising commotion: “Not a single person is standing still. 30. Rivers, snowstorms,
traffic, bytes, generations, a thousand faces per minute” (29-30). Under Liddel’s relations of setting to
plot and character, Number9Dream is ‘kaleidoscopic’, it shifts rapidly between the physical world and
the world of the imagination (1947, 124-5). Temporal and spatial deixis combine to make this highly
‘proximal’ (see Simpson 1993, 18).
2
FDT never extends to stream of consciousness, the ‘closest’ form of reporting. Though Eiji’s thoughts
are presented in the present tense and first-person, they are still ordered and grammaticised in a
conventional fashion.
3
Our sense of space is very much Eiji’s, as indicated by his verbal qualifiers: “A big Panasonic display”
(19), “A building as huge as the PanOpticon” (42).
4
The reader is aligned so closely to Eiji that it is difficult to differentiate definite FDT statements such
as:
from PN:
The Jupiter cafe sloshes with lunch-hour laughter, Friday plottings, clinking saucers. Drones bark
into mobile phones. She-drones hitch up sagging voices to sound more feminine. Coffee, seafood
sandwiches, detergent, steam. I have an across-the-street view of the PanOpticon's main entrance.
(12-15)
I light a cigarette . . . and watch the traffic and passers-by on the intersection between Omekaido
Avenue and Kita Street. Pin-striped drones, a lip-pierced hairdresser, midday drunks, child-laden
housewives. Not a single person is standing still. (27-29)
The last instance seemingly combines PN with FDT, as it is not only an accurate description but a
modal statement expressing Eiji’s negative attitude towards Tokyo’s extreme bustle. In first person
discourse Free Direct Thought appears to be indistinct from Pure Narration, as all external events must
be perceived by the narrator and expressed in thought if they are to be described to the reader. FDT is
only set aside by obvious mediation such as the expressive aside “quite a sight” (16). Eiji’s presence is
constant in PN, in deliberate lexis choices such as his use of bark rather than speak to describe people
on mobile phones, indicating his country-boy disdain of urban behaviour (sentence 13). But he would
be unlikely to think in this kind of vocabulary when he perceived the people on the phone (if he
thought anything at all, as it is very difficult to establish what, if any, kind of cognitive experiences are
pre-linguistic). This is diegesis, told to us by Eiji, in the middle of what purports to be experiential,
mimetic text. What a reader easily interprets through the conventions of novel-writing does not unpack
satisfactorily on an extra-textual level. As Leech & Short put it: “the thoughts of characters . . . are
ultimately an artifice. We cannot see inside the minds of other people, but if the motivation for the
actions and attitudes of characters is to be made clear to the reader, the representation of their thoughts,
like the use of soliloquy on stage, is a necessary licence” (1981, 337).
5
Atonement is orientated from the spatio-temporal setting of an English Country house at the beginning
of the Twentieth Century, as indexed by deictic items such as a house library (43), bedrooms with
dressing tables (9), cocktails (15) and characteristically large families. These serve as a generic marker
of ‘the English Country House novel’, a mode utilised from Jane Austen to Agatha Christie, and
associated information from these texts is reapplied by the reader. As in Austen, the relationship of
setting to plot and character is ‘utilitarian’. It is minimally necessary, “simple, low-toned, descriptive
writing, intended to throw the human drama into relief” (Liddel 1947, 113-15). At points, however, it
becomes ‘symbolic’ (1947, 115), relating Briony’s organised space to her organised nature.
6
To fully convey the impact of Briony’s disillusionment in attempting to actually stage her play, the
text pace slows to ‘stretch’. During her free direct thought ‘yes’, which will mark her defeat, an
enormous amount of complex emotions strike Briony, including several proleptic scenes (running
away, hiding in her room, her mother’s neglect and ultimately her death) must happen in moments.
7
Other characters are portrayed foremost through Briony’s FIT, our opinion of them is initially
conditioned by Briony’s: “Cecilia's enthusiasm, for example, seemed a little overstated, tainted with
condescension perhaps, and intrusive too” (46)
8
The (relative) preponderance of discourse over story in Atonement is a feature of this extract, rather
than the novel as a whole. Its purpose is to give the reader such a sense of Briony’s mindset that they
understand her subsequent behaviour, which results in Robbie Turner being sent to prison for rape. The
interiority of young Briony is never investigated in this kind of detail again, instead moving around
other character’s consciousness to observe events.
9
To use Simpson’s typology of narrative modes, Atonement oscillates between types B(R) and B(N)
(that is, third person character-mediated narration or entirely impersonal third person narration) (see
Toolan 2001, 70). Both are positively modalised, demonstrating an ‘objective’ view of character and a
definite purpose.
10
Her toys are not so much organised, as a direct representation of her desire for order and control.
Metaphor and similie are used to turn what are effectively relational processes (“Her room was tidy.
Her toy animals and dolls were well organised”) into the dynamic material processes of break, instruct,
touch and awaiting:
the model farm spread across a deep window ledge consisted of the usual animals, but all facing
one way - towards their owner - as if about to break into song . . . Her straight-backed dolls in
their many-roomed mansion appeared to be under strict instructions not to touch the walls; the
various thumb-sized figures to be found standing about her dressing table - cowboys, deep-sea
divers, humanoid mice - suggested by their even ranks and spacing a citizen's army awaiting
orders (18-20).
11
Briony’s discourse is undermined, finally, by other character-alignments. In Number9Dream the sole
character-viewpoint is Eiji’s, despite the presence of fifteen other characters (see Fig 3). This is not the
case in Atonement where traces of Emily Tallis and the twins’ thoughts are reported. As Leech and
Short put it, “even by the mere use of thought act reporting, [a writer] is inviting us to see things from
that character’s point of view” (1981, 338). When Briony shows her play to her mother, the pace slows
from summary to scene for the first time, to allow what is undoubtedly a report of FIT:
She took her daughter in her arms, onto her lap - ah, that hot smooth little body she remembered
from its infancy, and still not gone from her, not quite yet - and said that the play was 'stupendous'
(11)
The use of dashes demonstrates a shift to Emily Tallis’ direct perceptions, still more so the internal
marker of emotion ah. This thought confirms what the reader has probably already interpreted of
Briony, that her bold drama marks the naivety and powerlessness of a child. The reporting of the twins’
FIT contributes to the impression that Briony, as a child, has a limited view of the outside world:
Pierrot glanced across his sister's lap towards Jackson. This warlike name [“Shakespeare”] was
faintly familiar, with its whiff of school and adult certainty, but the twins found their courage in
each other. (117-18).
This thought process indicates a whole world that is very different to Briony’s. Shakespeare does not
connotate joyous cultural value to the twins, but school. While Shakespeare symbolises the freedom to
express oneself through writing for Briony, for them it is a form of oppression, indissolubly tied an
external adult world The narrator makes Briony’s alienation from the external world even explicit in an
external, heterodiegetic aside: “Like re-armament and the Abyssinia Question and gardening, it was
simply not a subject” (72).
12
However transitivity processes are not as useful in other texts, as Eiji’s mode of presentation often
elipts processes which are interpreted from the dialogue, and often opts to perceive actions which have
happened due to his material processes. So instead of saying “I shot the telephone” he says the
telephone “explodes in a plastic supernova” (297)
13
The PanOpticon is itself intertextual, a reference to Nineteenth Century prisons where every prisoner is
under constant surveillance. As Akiko Kato says, “We saw you coming!” (356)
14
The embedded narrative layer has its own chronology, even its own external homodiegetic analepsis:
“I paid the finest freelance master hacker in Tokyo a fortune for those nine numbers”.
15
The foregrounding of narrative construction is not only described as a facet of Eiji’s narration, but
also as an inherent property of the consumer-capitalist world. Eiji attempts to construct his identity by
smoking a brand called Kool, a straightforward representation of the semes (signifieds of connotation)
utilised in the world of advertising, where a brand name is created by nominalising an attractive
attribute (with associated pop culture misspelling). It echoes Martin Amis’ nominalising of attributes to
name cars in Money, where the central protagonist rides a Fiasco. Here the associated detail that this
was “the brand chosen by a biker ahead of me in the queue” (97) indicates the type of image that Eiji is
trying to cultivate, connotating the ‘typical’ idolising nature of an adolescent. This nominalising
process is not restricted to Eiji, however. Akiko Kato’s obsession with her “Van Gogh” (301)
demonstrates that the same process occurs in the adult world, masking aesthetic objects with
nominalised connotations of false value systems.
16
If a character is defined by a sole trait, they are the ultimate ‘flat’ character in EM Forster’s terms (see
Chatman 1978, 132). By contrast the waitress ‘with the perfect neck’ is full of indeterminancies, and
will develop into a ‘round’ character as the novel progresses.
17
This micro-linguistic strategy of symbolic construction serves a particularly postmodern purpose. It is
metafictional in that it draws attention to the fact that our perception is this novel is entirely
conditioned by Eiji’s perceptions.
18
The idea that Eiji is constructing himself through his discourse reaches new complexity on the level of
the adventure story, in which he plays out another identity (Ran Sogabe) which, in itself, has two layers
(Ran is imitated by Joji, ‘Ran’s apprentice’). Unpacked, Eiji is pretending to be a proleptic version of
himself who is pretending to be a fishtank repairman who is in turn pretending to be another fishtank
repairman.
The repetitive frequency of the opening lines of the extract (lines 1-8 are repeated as lines 260-
271, in a slightly refined version), seemingly shifted from an imagined to a real context the second
time, emphasise the crucial elements of Eiji’s characterisation – he is Eiji Miyake, he does not know
the identity of his father, and he is in Tokyo to find this out. This is expanded as a theme, through the
use of a lexical cohesive chain relating to identity:
I know your name, and you knew mine, once upon a time (2)
Eiji Miyake. Yes, that Eiji Miyake. (2-3)
You know his name and you know his address (6)
they know who ushered them on to Earth (34)
sipping from this part of the bowl constitutes a kiss with a stranger (95)
State your name (118)
My name is Ran Sogabe (123)
'That was the access code I was given by Ms' - a doleful glance at my clipboard - 'Akiko Kato
(159)
What did you say your name was?' (166)
but I have to insist on your name for our legal waiver form.' (177)
If my hacker got my alias wrong too, I am already burger-meat. (185)
'Let me guess! Kazuyo, Kazuyo, am I right?' (205)
'Your name is?' (209)
'Ran's apprentice! Joji. (210)
Mr Joii, I have to ask you for a retinal scan.' (226)
'Goldfish Pal, Ms Kato!' (241)
'You are not the ordinary fish man.' (254)
'I am no fish man at all.' (257)
I know your name, and you knew mine, once upon a time (261)
.Eiji Miyake. Yes, that Eiji Miyake. (262-3)
You know his name and you know his address (269)
'Eiji Miyake?' (274)
'Not Luke Skywalker? 278.Not Zax Omega? (277)
Were news of his whored bastard offspring brat - you, that is - to leak out (316)
MIYAKE - EIJI - PATERNITY. (346)
'A bioborg, dummy! 354.A replicant! (353)
Our spy picked you up in Jupiter Cafè - the old man you bought cigarettes for (357)
A Zuvre at this range will scramble your face so badly your own mother wouldn't recognize you.
But then, that never was her strong point, was it?' (362-3)
'You an industrial spy, or what?' (396)
'The gun is registered under Akiko Kato's name.' (444)
'Here he is. His name, his face, his house, who he is, what he is. (482-3)
EIJI MIYAKE. IDENTITY OF FATHER (487-8)
19
The repetitive frequency of Lao Tzu’s comment, occurring immediately before and after descent into
the imagined narrative level, serves as a marker of the third (narrative) layer, another form of bathos
which implies that excitement in the superordinate world can only be found by entering an embedded
narrative layer, by immersing oneself in a game.