You are on page 1of 52

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT

Transportat
ion of
Employees
(Bus /
pickup /
truck)

R
/
N

Noncompliance to
or violation of
Qatar Traffic
Law.

Damaged
or
slippery stairs

FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE


TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Penalty

Physical
injuries

Legal requirements are


being complied.
Drivers
are
licensed,
trained and have the
functional capability to
operate the vehicle.

Maintenance
and
inspection is being done
regularly.

Significance

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Spread (1 to 5)

Gaps, if
any

Existing Control

Additional controls required

Ensure continuous
compliance
High

Page

1 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Severity (1 to 5)

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Others

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Visitors

ME- 4894

Sub-Contractors

Job
No.

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Remarks

Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-25

Low

First aid kit is provided in


the vehicle.
Condition of
Vehicle (Noise,
Vibration, Dust
and Heat)

Crowd during
embarking
and
disembarking

Health issues

Physical
injuries

Maintenance
and
inspection is being done
regularly.

Queue
is
maintained
embarking
disembarking.

being
during
&

Low

Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-26

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Spread (1 to 5)

Gaps, if
any

Existing Control

Page

2 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Severity (1 to 5)

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Others

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Visitors

ME- 4894

Sub-Contractors

Job
No.

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

First aid kit is provided in


the vehicle.
Unsafe driving

Transportat
ion of
material

R
/
N

Noncompliance to
or violation of
Qatar Traffic
Law.

Condition
of
Vehicle (Noise,
Vibration, Dust
and Heat)

Fatalities,
Physical
injuries,
Property
damage

Penalty

Health issues

Competent driver
been assigned.

has

18
Mediu
m

Traffic rules & regulations


are being complied

Legal requirements are


being complied.
Drivers
are
licensed,
trained and have the
functional capability to
operate the vehicle.

Maintenance
and
inspection of vehicles are
being done regularly

Provide defensive driving


training

Ensure continuous
compliance
High

Low

Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-13
Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-26

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT

Material
handling
(Manual)
by workers

R
/
N

Loading /
unloading
material

FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE


TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Property
damage,
Physical
injuries,
Fatalities
Physical
injuries,
property
damage

Competent driver
been assigned.

has

Significance

18
Mediu
m

Traffic rules & regulations


are being complied
If possible Trolleys or
wheelbarrows are being
used.
For heavy loads lifting
equipment is being used
to
load
/
unload
materials from vehicle.
When lifting a load along
with another person(s),
communication with the
other
person(s)
is
maintained
before
lowering the load.

Page

3 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Gaps, if
any

Existing Control

Others

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Visitors

Adequacy of existing control measures

Spread (1 to 5)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Sub-Contractors

ME- 4894

Severity (1 to 5)

Job
No.

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

Unsafe driving

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Low

Additional controls required

Remarks

Provide defensive driving


training

Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-02

For lifting heavy loads


assistance is taken.
Do not twist your body
while carrying a heavy
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

ME- 4894

FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE


TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Adequacy of existing control measures

Personnel at risk

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

Severity (1 to 5)

Spread (1 to 5)

Required PPE is utilized.

Slips & falls


due
to
imbalance

Physical
injuries.

Based on requirement
additional personnel are
utilized
for
manual
handling.
Walkways
and
Passageways are kept
clear.

Gaps, if
any

Others

Physical
injuries.

Existing Control

Visitors

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Sub-Contractors

Sharp edges of
material.

Hazards

Page

4 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Significance

Job
No.

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

load
Appropriate PPE is being
used

Lifting
(Material
Handling Mechanical
)

R
/
N

Incorrect
information on
permit/clearan
ce

D
/I

Physical
injuries,
Property
damage

Ground
conditions

D
/I

Property
damage,

Low

Low

18
Mediu
m

18

Mediu
m

Work Permit system shall


be followed.

Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-10

Attention shall be paid on

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Gaps, if
any

Spread (1 to 5)

Existing Control

Page

5 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Severity (1 to 5)

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Others

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

ME- 4894

Visitors

Job
No.

Sub-Contractors

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Physical
injuries.

Remarks

Additional controls required

uneven terrain structure.


Hold
pre-job
meeting

safety

Work Permit system shall


be followed..
Site safety
followed
Defective
lifting
equipment

D
/I

Property
damage,
Physical
injuries.

18

Mediu
m

rules

are

Work Permit system shall


be followed.
Ensure lifting equipment
(appliances
and
accessories) has valid
certification.
Ensure
that
lifting
accessories are correctly
colour coded
Inspect equipment prior
to use
Ensure
equipment
regularly maintained

is

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Spread (1 to 5)

Gaps, if
any

Existing Control

Page

6 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Severity (1 to 5)

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Others

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

ME- 4894

Visitors

Job
No.

Sub-Contractors

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

Only
approved
lifting
equipment is being used.
Improper
lifting

D
/I

Physical
injuries,
property
damage

Certified operators are


operating equipment
Banks man
provided.

is

18

Work Permit system shall


be followed.

being

Lifting plan is prepared


and followed prior to
lifting of equipment /
objects.
Surrounding area is being
barricaded
wherever
lifting activity is going to
be done.

Mediu
m

Supervisor shall ensure


that
maintenance
of
lifting equipment / lifting
gears is being done
regularly.
Check
for
the
environmental conditions
prior to lift.
Keep
all
emergency
sources ready
Follow
manufacturers
instruction.

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT

Incorrect
information on
permit/clearan
ce

D
/I

FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE


TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Physical
injuries,
Property
damage

Page

7 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Significance

Others

Gaps, if
any

Visitors

Existing Control

Personnel at risk

Sub-Contractors

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Adequacy of existing control measures

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

ME- 4894

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Job
No.

Spread (1 to 5)

24-11-2013

Severity (1 to 5)

Working in
Confined
space

Hazards

Rev
Date

00
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

Activity

Rev No.

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

12

Additional controls required

Work
permit
system
shall be followed.

Mediu
m

Have
a
clear
understanding of work to
be
performed
and
location

Remarks

Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-08

Use all the emergency


equipments mentioned
in the work permit.
Maintain entry / exit log.
Lack
of
Communicatio
n

D
/I

Physical
injuries,
Property
damage

12

Mediu
m

Work
permit
system
shall be followed.
Plan the work involving
personnel responsible for
preparation
(isolation,
depressurization,
draining,
venting,
flushing, purging, gas
testing etc.) of confined
space.
Place a Standby Person

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

Gaps, if
any

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Existing Control

Page

8 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Spread (1 to 5)

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Severity (1 to 5)

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Others

ME- 4894

Visitors

Job
No.

Sub-Contractors

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

near to confined space


to maintain contact with
the entrant and record
entry / exit.
Effective
means
of
communication shall be
established
and
maintained
between
personnel in the confined
space and the standby
man.
Communication shall be
visual, voice or a signal
line.
Keep emergency sources
ready
Train all the personnel
involved
in
confined
Space.
Flammable &
or Toxic
Atmosphere

D
/I

Health
issues, burns,
Fatalities

It is being ensured that


the confined space is

16

Mediu
m

Maintain
awareness

gas
leak
by location

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Spread (1 to 5)

Gaps, if
any

Existing Control

flushed,
purged
and
thoroughly ventilated as
required
Work permit
taken.

is

being

Ensure
the
space
has
oxygen
for
breathing.

Appropriate PPE is being


used.

D
/I

Property
damage,
Physical
injuries

Suitable lights are being


used
for
additional
illumination working in
confined space or as
appropriate.

Additional controls required

Remarks

and wind direction.

H2S monitor is provided.

9 of
52

If
monitor
warning
actuates leave area and
use
a
predetermined
escape
route
across
wind.

Gas test is being carried


out regularly.

Dark
Insufficient
Illumination

Page

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Severity (1 to 5)

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Others

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

ME- 4894

Visitors

Job
No.

Sub-Contractors

Hazards

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

confined
sufficient
normal

Use Breathing Apparatus


(BA) if needed.
-

12

Mediu
m

Ensure safe illumination


suitable to hazardous
area classification.
Have adequate lighting
to ensure the area is
sufficiently illuminated at
all time.
Natural light is preferred
because
of
access

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

Gaps, if
any

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Existing Control

Page

10 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Spread (1 to 5)

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Severity (1 to 5)

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Others

ME- 4894

Visitors

Job
No.

Sub-Contractors

Hazards

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

restrictions, fouling of air


hoses etc.

Heat
Humidity

&

Improper
emergency
Equipment
/
Rescue team

D
/I

D
/I

Health issues

Health issues

Sufficient ventilation and


air
circulation
inside
confined
space
is
provided
whenever
required.
Provision
of
periodic
break / rest to the
entrant is being done.

Low

12

Mediu
m

Trained Standby man and


Rescue Team shall be
assigned.
An emergency response
plan shall be drawn up
and well understood by
all role players of the

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

Gaps, if
any

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Existing Control

Page

11 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Spread (1 to 5)

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Severity (1 to 5)

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Others

ME- 4894

Visitors

Job
No.

Sub-Contractors

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

rescue team. Standby


man
shall
call
immediately
to
the
rescue team in case of
confined
space
emergencies.
Instruct the employees
not
to
attempt
any
rescue operation if they
see any person collapsed
in the confined space or
no communication from
the employees working in
the
confined
space
unless they know the real
situation
(Risks
and
Hazards) and properly
protected against the
hazards. Call immediately
the
assigned
rescue
team.
Instruct the employees
that they should not take
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

Gaps, if
any

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Existing Control

Page

12 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Spread (1 to 5)

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Severity (1 to 5)

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Others

ME- 4894

Visitors

Job
No.

Sub-Contractors

Hazards

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

Sl No

Activity

(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

any step in emotions to


save
their
friends
/
colleagues
during
confined
space
emergencies. Ask them
to call immediately to the
emergency rescue team.
Instruct the employees to
remember
emergency
contact numbers of the
rescue team
6

Gas
Cutting

Defective
Tools
Equipment

Physical
injuries,
burns,
property
damage

Prior to work it is ensured


that the cutting torch,
hoses & gas cylinders are
free from defect.
The equipment and tools
are adequately grounded
to prevent accumulation
of electrostatic charges.
Maintenance
of
equipment
is
done
regularly.

Low

Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-17

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

Gaps, if
any

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Existing Control

Page

13 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Spread (1 to 5)

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Severity (1 to 5)

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Others

ME- 4894

Visitors

Job
No.

Sub-Contractors

Hazards

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

Required PPE is used.

Fire
Explosion

&

Heat Radiation

Property
damage,
Physical
injuries,
environment
al issues

Health issues

Isolation of equipment is
being done from all
source of energy when
not in use.
Work location is shielded
prior to work.
Working areas are kept
clean
with
no
combustible
material
exists at work site.
Fire extinguishers & fire
hoses at work areas are
kept ready.
Firefighting & first aid
training is provided.

Required PPE is provided.


Periodic Rest is being
provided.

Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-ERPOHS-10
Low

Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-ERPOHS-11

Low

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Burns,
Property
damage.

Work location is shielded


prior to work.

Significance

Gaps, if
any

Page

14 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Existing Control

Others

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Visitors

Adequacy of existing control measures

Spread (1 to 5)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Sub-Contractors

ME- 4894

Severity (1 to 5)

Job
No.

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

Falling Sparks

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

Fire extinguishers are


available at work place.

Low

Firefighting & first aid


training is provided.
Gas Cylinder

Property
damage,
Physical
injuries

Isolation
valve
of
cylinder is kept closed
when not in use.
Fire extinguishers are
available at work place.

Mediu
m

Keep Cylinders safely at


least 5 meters away from
the work location.

Firefighting & first aid


training is provided.
Appropriate PPE is used.

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT

Grinding /
Metal
cutting by
cutter
grinder

Falling Sparks.

FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE


TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Physical
injuries

Eye injury

Proper
wind
up
&
housekeeping is being
done at worksite.
The accessories (torch,
hoses & cylinders) not in
use are disconnected and
stored separately.

Face shield, goggles are


used

Page

15 of
52

Significance

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Gaps, if
any

Others

Existing Control

Visitors

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Sub-Contractors

Adequacy of existing control measures

Spread (1 to 5)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Severity (1 to 5)

ME- 4894

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

Scattered
Material

Job
No.

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

6
Low

6
Low

Hot material

Burn injuries.

Required PPE is Provided.

Low

Slip of grinding
machine

Physical
injury

Required PPE is provided.

Low

Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-17

Grinding machine has


appropriate
guarding
system.

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Physical
Injury.

Grinding
wheels
are
inspected and wheels are
removed if expired or
damaged.

Page

16 of
52

Significance

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Others

Gaps, if
any

Existing Control

Visitors

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Sub-Contractors

Adequacy of existing control measures

Spread (1 to 5)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Severity (1 to 5)

ME- 4894

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

Breakage of
grinding wheel

Job
No.

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

Low

Grinding machine has


appropriate
guarding
system.
Required PPE is provided.
Electricity

Noise

Electrocution,
burns,
electric
shock.

Hearing
impairment,
deafness

M/C & wire condition is


monitored.

6
Low

Maintenance
of
equipment is being done
regularly.

Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-03

Low

Duration and intensity of


exposure to noise is
monitored.
Appropriate

work

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Page

17 of
52

Significance

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Spread (1 to 5)

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Severity (1 to 5)

Gaps, if
any

Existing Control

Others

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Visitors

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

ME- 4894

Sub-Contractors

Hazards

Job
No.

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

schedules with adequate


rest
period
are
maintained.
Proper PPEs (Ear Plugs or
Ear Muffs) are used.
8

Welding

Defective
Tools
Equipment

Physical
injuries,
Property
damage

Required
used

PPE

is

being

18

Mediu
m

Ensure the gas Welding


equipment
(blowpipe,
hoses,
oxy-acetylene
cylinders,
pressure
gauge) are free from
defect.

Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-17

Supervisor shall ensure


that
maintenance
is
being done regularly.
Welding fumes

Health Issues

Required PPE is provided.

Low

Proper ventilation and


fume
extraction
equipment in case of
welding
inside
an
enclosure is provided.
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Fire extinguishers & fire


hoses are kept ready
prior to work.

Significance

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Others

Low

Work location is being


shielded.
Areas are kept clean with
no combustible material
exists at work site.

Radiation from
Welding Flame
/
Rays
(Flash
Eye)

D
/I

Eye injuries

has

been

Wear the required PPE


(Long Sleeve Coverall,
apron,
safety
Goggle
etc.)

18 of
52

Additional controls required

Remarks

Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-ERPOHS-10

Isolation of equipment is
done from all source of
energy when not in use.

Fire fighter
provided.

Page

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Spread (1 to 5)

Property
damage,
Physical
injuries,
environment
al issues

Gaps, if
any

Existing Control

Visitors

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Sub-Contractors

Adequacy of existing control measures

Severity (1 to 5)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

ME- 4894

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

&

Job
No.

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Fire
Explosion

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-ERPOHS-11

Low

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT

Physical
injuries,
property
damage

Flash
Fire

Scattered
Material

Back

D
/I

D
/I

Work location is shielded


while work is in process.

Property
damage,
burns,
environment
al issues

Property
damage,
Physical

19 of
52

Additional controls required

Remarks

6
Low

aid

Equipment
&
wire
condition is monitored.
Welding equipment
grounded.

Significance

Fire extinguishers are


available at work place.

Electrocution,
burns,
electric
shock.

Page

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Others

Gaps, if
any

Existing Control

Visitors

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Sub-Contractors

Adequacy of existing control measures

Firefighting & first


training is provided.
Electricity

FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE


TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Spread (1 to 5)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Severity (1 to 5)

D
/I

ME- 4894

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

Falling Sparks

Job
No.

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

is

Low

It is ensured that the


flash back arrestor is in
place
between
oxyacetylene hose & gas
regulator.

Ensure proper wind up &


housekeeping
at
worksite.

Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-03

6
Low

6
Low

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Spread (1 to 5)

Gaps, if
any

Page

20 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Severity (1 to 5)

injuries,
environment
al issues

Existing Control

Others

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Visitors

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

ME- 4894

Sub-Contractors

Job
No.

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

The
accessories
(regulator,
blowpipe,
hose, isolation valve, and
gauge) not in use is
disconnected from gas
cylinder
and
stored
separately.
Walk ways and staircases
are
kept
clear
of
materials,
equipments
and other items.

Scaffolding
(Erection)

Incorrect
information on
permit/clearan
ce

Physical
injuries,
Property
damage

18

Mediu
m

Work permit system shall


be followed.
Have
a
clear
understanding of work to
be
performed
and
location.

Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-14

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Others

Gaps, if
any

Page

21 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Spread (1 to 5)

Physical
injuries,
Property
damage

Existing Control

Visitors

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Sub-Contractors

Adequacy of existing control measures

Severity (1 to 5)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

ME- 4894

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

Ground
conditions

Job
No.

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

18

Additional controls required

Remarks

Attention to be paid on
uneven terrain structure.
Mediu
m

Do a Pre-job safety
meeting prior to work.
Site safety rules shall be
followed.

Improper
Transportation

Physical
injuries,
Property
damage

Traffic rules & regulations


are followed.
All loads transported in a
pick-up (or utility) truck
or other cargo vehicle is
securely fastened and
not
exceeding
the
manufacturers
specifications and legal
limits for the vehicles.

12

Mediu
m

Shut off the engine and


hand brake shall be
applied when leaving the
vehicle.
The driver must leave his
vehicle and not return to
it until the loading /
unloading
activity
is
complete.
Ensure
that
contractors shall
traffic
Rules
Regulations.

subfollow
&

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Physical
injuries,
Property
damage

If possible Trolleys or
wheelbarrows are used.
When lifting a load along
with another person(s),
communication with the
other
person(s)
is
maintained
before
lowering the load.

Page

22 of
52

Significance

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Gaps, if
any

Others

Existing Control

Visitors

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Sub-Contractors

Adequacy of existing control measures

Spread (1 to 5)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Severity (1 to 5)

ME- 4894

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

Material
Handling
(Manual)

Job
No.

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

Low

Appropriate PPE is being


used
Dropping tools
&
scaffold
components,
clips

Scaffold
Collapse

Physical
injuries,
Property
damage

Physical
injuries,
Property
damage

Hoists are used for lifting


and dropping the loads.

It is ensured that tools


belts
are
in
good
condition
and
are
capable of securing tools.
Inspection for all stages
is being done.
Graded wood is used.

Low

6
Low

Required PPE is used.

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT

Significance

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Gaps, if
any

Page

23 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Spread (1 to 5)

Physical
injuries,
Property
damage

Existing Control

Others

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Visitors

Adequacy of existing control measures

Severity (1 to 5)

FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE


TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

Unstable
scaffold

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

ME- 4894

Sub-Contractors

Hazards

Job
No.

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

18

Mediu
m

Additional controls required

Remarks

Inspect Scaffold prior to


Handover
for
secure
access,
boards
are
adequate
and
any
lapboard or plies are
secured.
Scafftag is secured to
scaffold and is dated,
signed off by qualified
person.

Weak
Damaged
Scaffold

Physical
injuries,
Property
damage

18

Mediu
m

The scaffold tag must


indicate the maximum
load that it can bear.
The scaffold shall be
inspected, certified &
tagged by the competent
person
confirming
its
stability & suitability.
The scaffolding shall be
inspected at least weekly
for any damage due to
weather condition (rain,

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Spread (1 to 5)

Gaps, if
any

Page

24 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Severity (1 to 5)

Existing Control

Others

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Visitors

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

ME- 4894

Sub-Contractors

Job
No.

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

high wind etc) or other


unsafe conditions.

10

Scaffolding
(Dismantlin
g)

Modified
Scaffold

Unauthorized
Removal
of
scaffolding

Incorrect
information on
permit/clearan
ce

Physical
injuries,
Property
damage

Physical
injuries,
Property
damage

Physical
injuries,
Property
damage

18
Mediu
m

18
Mediu
m

18

Mediu
m

In
case
of
any
modification, addition in
the scaffold, it shall be
re-inspected & certified
by competent person.
Work permit system shall
be followed

Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-14

Work
permit
system
shall be followed.
Have
a
clear
understanding of work to
be
performed
and
location.

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Others

Gaps, if
any

Page

25 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Spread (1 to 5)

Physical
injuries,
Property
damage

Existing Control

Visitors

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Sub-Contractors

Adequacy of existing control measures

Severity (1 to 5)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

ME- 4894

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

Fall
of
objects / Tools

Job
No.

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

18

Mediu
m

Remarks

Additional controls required

Take proper care while


dismantling the scaffold
to prevent fall of scaffold
parts.
Use proper PPE during
removal of scaffold.
If required barricade the
area during dismantle
work.

Unstable
Scaffold

Physical
injuries,
Property
damage

18
Mediu
m

Inspect the scaffold for


its stability & support
before
removing
in
sequence.
Required
used.

Loaded
Scaffolding

Physical
injuries,
Property
damage

18

Mediu
m

PPE

shall

be

Remove safely the load /


equipment / tools from
the
scaffold
before

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Spread (1 to 5)

Gaps, if
any

Page

26 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Severity (1 to 5)

Existing Control

Others

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Visitors

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

ME- 4894

Sub-Contractors

Job
No.

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Remarks

Additional controls required

dismantling the scaffold.


Required
used

11

Painting

Unauthorized
person

Incorrect
information on
permit/clearan
ce

Physical
injuries,
Property
damage

Physical
injuries,
Property
damage

18

18

PPE

shall

be

Mediu
m

Only authorized person


shall remove the scaffold
under the supervision of
certified supervisor

Mediu
m

Work Permit system shall


be followed.
Have
a
clear
understanding of work to
be
performed
and
location.

Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-12

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

If possible Trolleys or
wheelbarrows are used.
When lifting a load along
with another person(s),
communication with the
other
person(s)
is
maintained
before
lowering the load.

Significance

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Others

Page

27 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Spread (1 to 5)

Property
damage,
Physical
injuries

Gaps, if
any

Existing Control

Visitors

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Sub-Contractors

Adequacy of existing control measures

Severity (1 to 5)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

ME- 4894

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

Material
Handling
(Manual)

Job
No.

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Low

Additional controls required

Remarks

Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-02

Lifting of heavy load is


avoided.
Appropriate
provided.
Defective
Tools
/
Equipment
(Spray
Paint
Gun,
Hoses,
pump)

Property
damage,
Physical
injuries.

PPE

is

Inspection is done for the


equipment / tool that
shall be used for painting
(such as Spray Paint
Gun, Hoses, pump etc.)
prior to work.

Low

The equipment and tools


are grounded to prevent
electricity hazards.
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

is

Significance

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Spread (1 to 5)

Maintenance
regularly.

Page

28 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Severity (1 to 5)

Gaps, if
any

Existing Control

Others

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Visitors

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

ME- 4894

Sub-Contractors

Hazards

Job
No.

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

done

Required PPE is being


used.
Harmful
vapour

Fire
Explosion

&

Health issues

Property
damage,
Physical
injuries,
environment
al issues

Required
provided.

Suitable
extinguishers
ready.

PPE

is

8
Mediu
m

are

fire
kept

Isolation of equipment is
done from all source of
energy when not in use.
Firefighting & first aid
training is provided

18

Mediu
m

Obtain MSDS for the


paint as well as thinner.
Ensure proper ventilation
of the area.
Store paint & thinners in
safe
&
designated
location
away
from
source of ignition.
Do not leave unattended
the Spray Paint Gun &
Hose with on condition
Ensure there is no naked
flame
or
spark
generating equipment in
the area where spray
painting is to be done.

Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-ERPOHS-10
Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-ERPOHS-11

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT

12

Sand / Grit
Blasting

Incompetent
workers

of
&

FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE


TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Environment
al issues

Physical
injuries,
property
damage

Washing
&
cleaning
facilities for personnel is
provided.

Competent
assigned.

is

Significance

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Others

12
Mediu
m

Paints & thinners are


stored
in
safe
&
designated
location
away from source of
ignition.
person

Page

29 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Spread (1 to 5)

Health issues

Gaps, if
any

Existing Control

Visitors

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Sub-Contractors

Adequacy of existing control measures

Severity (1 to 5)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

ME- 4894

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

Contaminated
Clothing

Job
No.

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Unsafe
Storage
Paint
Thinner

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

Do not eat or smoke


wearing paint soaked
coverall / gloves.
Wash hands properly
before consuming any
food.

4
Low

Low

Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-23

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Physical
injuries,
property
damage

Page

30 of
52

18

Significance

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Gaps, if
any

Others

Existing Control

Visitors

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Sub-Contractors

Adequacy of existing control measures

Spread (1 to 5)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

ME- 4894

Severity (1 to 5)

Job
No.

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Defective
Tools
Equipment

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Mediu
m

Additional controls required

Remarks

Only approved material


& Equipment shall be
used
for
blasting
operations.
Ensure the respiratory
equipment such as air
line
hose,
pressure
regulator, filter is free
from defect.
Ensure
flexible
hose
clamps & joints for
blasting that shall be
suitable
for
pressure
rating of the system and
shall be fastened.
The equipment and tools
shall be grounded to
prevent electricity.
Supervisor shall ensure
the
maintenance
of
equipment & tools are
done regularly.

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

Gaps, if
any

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Existing Control

Page

31 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Spread (1 to 5)

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Severity (1 to 5)

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Others

ME- 4894

Visitors

Job
No.

Sub-Contractors

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

Required PPE & RPE shall


be used.

Dust

Noise

Scattered
Material

Health
issues,
injury

eye

Required PPE is provided.

18
Mediu
m

Health
issues,
environment
al issues

B Ear muffs / ear plugs are


used.

environment
al issues

B Proper
wind
up
&
housekeeping is done.

Enclose the blasting area


with sheets and post
warning notice.
Sprinkle water prior to
blasting
activity
on
nearby surface.

Low

Maintenance of equipment
is done regularly.
-

Low

Walk ways, aisle are clear


of
materials,
equipments and other
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Gaps, if
any

Spread (1 to 5)

Existing Control

Page

32 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Severity (1 to 5)

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Others

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

ME- 4894

Visitors

Job
No.

Sub-Contractors

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

Sl No

(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

items.

13

Work
height

at

Improper
protection

D
/I

Property
damage,
Physical
injuries

16

Mediu
m

Fall protection devices


such as harnesses shall be
worn by all personnel if
fixed access cannot be
provided.
Safety equipment shall be
checked before use.
All personnel shall ensure
that they are capable of
undertaking the task,
both
physically
and
mentally and do not work
outside
their
own
capabilities - as this may
put both themselves and

Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-01

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Gaps, if
any

Spread (1 to 5)

Existing Control

Page

33 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Severity (1 to 5)

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Others

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

ME- 4894

Visitors

Job
No.

Sub-Contractors

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

others in danger.
Suitable breaks shall be
taken as and when
required (this will vary as
to the type of work, i.e.
hard or easy, hot or cold).
Report any
sign
of
dizziness
,
vertigo
immediately
to
the
Supervisor.
R

Floor and Wall


Openings and
Stairways

Physical
injuries

16

Mediu
m

All floor, grating or roof


openings within a building
or other structure during
the
course
of
construction, alterations
or repairing shall be
closed with rigid covers
(e.g. planks, concrete,
metal etc.), fenced on all

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

Gaps, if
any

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Existing Control

Page

34 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Spread (1 to 5)

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Severity (1 to 5)

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Others

ME- 4894

Visitors

Job
No.

Sub-Contractors

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

sides by a standard railing


and toe-board and safety
notices placed.
Every open-sided floor or
platform 1.8 meters or
more; above adjacent
floor or ground level must
be guarded by standard
guardrail and toe board.
Regardless
of
height,
open-sided
floors,
walkways, platforms or
runways
above
or
adjacent to dangerous
equipment
must
be
guarded.
Crossing over the open
trenches
shall
be
designed & constructed
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

Gaps, if
any

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Existing Control

Page

35 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Spread (1 to 5)

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Severity (1 to 5)

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Others

ME- 4894

Visitors

Job
No.

Sub-Contractors

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

appropriately with proper


hand rails & guardrails
14

Working on
ladders

Defective
stepladders

Physical
injuries,
Property
damage

Required PPE is used.

16

Mediu
m

Supervisor / Personnel
shall visually examine
stepladders prior to use to
ensure that they are free
from any defects.
Stepladders shall never
be painted, unless for
identification, as this will
hide any defects.
Provide Tool box talk to
workers.

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Physical
injuries,
Property
damage

Required PPE is used

Significance

Gaps, if
any

16

Mediu
m

Instability

Physical
injuries,
Property
damage

Required PPE is used

Page

36 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Existing Control

Others

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Visitors

Adequacy of existing control measures

Spread (1 to 5)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Sub-Contractors

ME- 4894

Severity (1 to 5)

Job
No.

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

Overloading

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

16

Mediu
m

Additional controls required

Remarks

Stepladders
are
not
designed to support more
than one person at any
one time and personnel
shall ensure that they do
not overload stepladder.
Alternative access shall
be considered if two or
more
personnel
are
required to work in the
same area.
Personnel shall ensure
that stepladders have
been levelled on an even
surface and that they do
not overreach and/or
over-balance
whilst
working
on
the
stepladder.

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Spread (1 to 5)

Gaps, if
any

Existing Control

Page

37 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Severity (1 to 5)

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Others

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

ME- 4894

Visitors

Job
No.

Sub-Contractors

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

A second person shall be


in attendance at the
bottom of the ladder at
all times.

15

Working in
adverse
environmen
tal
conditions

High
temperatures
(hot)

Health issues

B
/
L

Working
hours
followed
as
regulations.

are
per

Rest time is provided to


reduce the effect of heat
related disorders.
Potable
provided.

Low
temperatures
(cold)

Health issues

B
/
L

water

Mediu
m

Train
employees
to
recognize the warning
signs / symptoms of early
heat related disorders
and work methods best
suited to avoid heat.

Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-27

Insists
workers
to
consume more water
during summer.

is

12

Mediu
m

Wear several layers of


clothing rather than one
thick layer.
Wear
gloves
and
a
woollen liner / scarf / face

Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-35

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

Gaps, if
any

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Existing Control

Page

38 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Spread (1 to 5)

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Severity (1 to 5)

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Others

ME- 4894

Visitors

Job
No.

Sub-Contractors

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

mask under the hard hat.


Cover the ears too.
Wear warm footwear with
one or two pairs of warm
socks.
Workers taking certain
medications or in poor
physical
condition
or
suffer from illnesses such
as diabetes, high blood
pressure,
or
cardiovascular
disease
are at increased risk and
shall
therefore
check
with
a
doctor
for
additional advice.

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Gaps, if
any

Mediu
m

16

Drilling

Particles while
drilling

Physical
injuries

Required PPE is used

17

Hammerin
g

Improper
handling
hammer
/Damaged.

Physical
injuries

Hammers are inspected


before use and defective
hammers are removed.
Required PPE is being
provided.

of

Page

39 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Spread (1 to 5)

Physical
injuries,
Property
damage.

Existing Control

Others

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Visitors

Adequacy of existing control measures

Severity (1 to 5)

D
/I

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

ME- 4894

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

Strong winds

Job
No.

Sub-Contractors

Hazards

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

Sl No

Activity

(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01

HRA No.

Low

Additional controls required

Remarks

Where work is to be
carried out at heights or
in places where potential
falls are present, then
suitable fall protection
devices
shall
be
implemented (such as
harnesses, etc.).
If at any time personnel
feel risk on the job in
hand, then stop work and
report to the Supervisor.

Low

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT

FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE


TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Physical
injuries,
Property
damage

The equipment and tools


are adequately grounded
to
prevent
electric
hazard.

Page

40 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Significance

Others

Visitors

Gaps, if
any

Sub-Contractors

Existing Control

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Spread (1 to 5)

Defective
Tools
Equipment

ME- 4894

Adequacy of existing control measures


(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Hazards

Job
No.

24-11-2013

Severity (1 to 5)

Rev
Date

00

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

Brazing

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

Sl No

18

Activity

(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

Low

Required PPE is used


Fire
Explosion

&

Property
damage,
Physical
injuries,
environment
al issues

Fire extinguishers & fire


hoses are kept ready.

Isolation of equipment is
done from all source of
energy when not in use.
Low

Work location is being


shielded.
Areas are kept clean with
no combustible material
exists at work site.
Fire fighter is assigned.

Radiation from
Welding Flame
/
Rays
(Flash

Eye injuries

Required PPE is used.

Low

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Spread (1 to 5)

Gaps, if
any

Existing Control

Page

41 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Severity (1 to 5)

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Others

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Visitors

ME- 4894

Sub-Contractors

Job
No.

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

Eye)

Falling Sparks

Physical
injuries,
property
damage

Work location is being


shielded.

Pressure
Testing

Bursting
of
component
/
equipment

Rupture
of
Nitrogen
Supply Hoses
& Couplings

Physical
injuries

Physical
injuries,
Health issues

Fire extinguishers are


available at work place.
Firefighting & first
training is provided.

19

Low

aid

Manufacturer
instructions
are
followed.
Required PPE is being
used.

Assigned persons are


handling the pressure
testing work.
Manufacturer
instructions
are

Low

Low

Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-44

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

Gaps, if
any

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Existing Control

Page

42 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Spread (1 to 5)

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Severity (1 to 5)

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Others

ME- 4894

Visitors

Job
No.

Sub-Contractors

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

followed.
Supply
hoses
and
couplings are rated for
the required service and
pressure.
Regular monitoring is
done by the supervisors
and technicians.
20

Working in
office

Slips and trips

Physical
injuries

Work areas are kept


clear of obstructions.

2
Low

Inspection is being done


regularly.
Electrical
equipment
(electric
shocks
or
burns
from
using
faulty
electrical
equipment)

Electrocution,
Electric
shock, burns,
fires

Electrical equipment is
operated in accordance
with
manufacturers'
instructions.

12

Mediu
m

Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-09

Provide
training
on
usage
of
firefighting
equipment

Firefighting equipment is
being provided.

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Health issues
(postural
problems,
eyestrains,
headaches)

Significance

12

Additional controls required

Mediu
m

Stress

Health issues

Working
hours
are
followed according as per
company schedule.

Page

43 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)
(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Gaps, if
any

Others

Existing Control

Visitors

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Sub-Contractors

Adequacy of existing control measures

Spread (1 to 5)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

ME- 4894

Severity (1 to 5)

Job
No.

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

Display Screen
Equipment

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

12

Mediu
m

Remarks

Work
planned
shall
include regular breaks
from the computer.
Tell
staff
to
take
medical consultation of
any pain they have that
may
be
linked
to
computer use.
Reassessment shall be
carried out at any
change
to
work
feature, eg. equipment,
furniture or the work
environment.

Remind staff that they


can speak confidentially
to
manager
or
supervisors (on a noblame basis!) if they are

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

Gaps, if
any

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Existing Control

Page

44 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Spread (1 to 5)

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Severity (1 to 5)

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Others

ME- 4894

Visitors

Job
No.

Sub-Contractors

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

feeling unwell or ill at


ease because of work.

21

Removing
Bolts and
Replacing
parts

Improper tools

Improper
handling of
tools

Ergonomics

Physical
injuries

Physical
injuries

Health issues

Proper tools are used.


Tools are inspected prior
to use.
Workers are aware about
the appropriate tools
that shall be used.
Require PPE is used.

Care is taken while


working with hand tools.
Required
PPE
is
provided.

Working long hours in an


uncomfortable posture is
avoided.

Low

Low

4
Low

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT

Improper
Housekeeping

Environment
al
issues,
physical
injuries,
Health issues

Grouting

cement,
aggregates,
limestone,
silica and dust

Health issues

Proper
wind
up
&
housekeeping is done
regularly.

Walk ways, aisles are


clear
of
materials,
equipments and other
items.

Page

45 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Significance

Others

Gaps, if
any

Existing Control

Visitors

Personnel at risk

Sub-Contractors

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Adequacy of existing control measures

spillages are
immediately

23

FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE


TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

ME- 4894

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Job
No.

Spread (1 to 5)

24-11-2013

Severity (1 to 5)

House
Keeping

Hazards

Rev
Date

00
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

Activity

Rev No.

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

22

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-28

Low

cleaned

Regular monitoring
being done.

is

Required
provided.

is

PPE

Low

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT

Collapse
of
structure, fall
of
objects,
unstable
erection.

FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE


TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Physical
injuries,
property
damage

Proper fall protection


measures are in place

Page

46 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Significance

Gaps, if
any

Others

Existing Control

Personnel at risk

Visitors

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Adequacy of existing control measures

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Sub-Contractors

ME- 4894

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Job
No.

Spread (1 to 5)

24-11-2013

Severity (1 to 5)

Steel
Erection

Hazards

Rev
Date

00
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

Activity

Rev No.

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

24

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

12

Additional controls required

Remarks

Lifting plan (sequence of


erection,
securing,
temporary
supports,
crane access restriction
etc.) is in place.
Cranes
&
lifting
accessories required for
the job, are inspected
maintained and valid
certificate available from
the third party.

Mediu
m

Trained & competent


erection personnel are
employed.
Warning
signs
and
barricades are in place.

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT

26

DyePenetrating
Test

Dust
and
flying particles

Penetrating
material

FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE


TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Health issues

Skin irritation

Required
provided.

PPE

is

Washing
provided.

facility

is

Safety
goggles
and
coverall is being used
during the test.

Radiograph
y Testing

Radiations

Health issues

47 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Significance

Others

Page

Additional controls required

Remarks

Low

Low

All waste materials are


being
disposed
off
properly
27

Visitors

Gaps, if
any

Existing Control

Sub-Contractors

Personnel at risk

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Adequacy of existing control measures

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

ME- 4894

Spread (1 to 5)

Job
No.

24-11-2013

Severity (1 to 5)

Insulation

Hazards

Rev
Date

00
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

Activity

Rev No.

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

25

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

High

Legal requirements are


being complied.
Use
of
radioactive
substances
shall
be
carried out in strict
compliance
with
the
Qatars Decree Law no
31 of the Year 2002
concerning
Radiation
Protection
and
the

Please
Refer
Procedure
No. PSL0000-OCPOHS-45

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

Gaps, if
any

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Existing Control

Page

48 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Spread (1 to 5)

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Severity (1 to 5)

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Others

ME- 4894

Visitors

Job
No.

Sub-Contractors

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

Executive Rules of The


Decree-Law no. (31) of
the
year
2002
concerning
Radiation
Protection.
Petroservs radiography
sub-contractor shall in
addition to the above,
comply with the safety
requirements.
Clear warning notices (in
Arabic/English) shall be
displayed at the point of
access to the facility,
and inventory checks
carried out to confirm
the location of sources
and equipment.
Required PPE shall be
used.

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT

Live Energy /
Utility
Services.

FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE


TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Physical
Injuries,
Health
issues.

Page

49 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

24

Significance

Others

Gaps, if
any

Visitors

Existing Control

Personnel at risk

Sub-Contractors

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Adequacy of existing control measures

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

ME- 4894

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Job
No.

Spread (1 to 5)

24-11-2013

Severity (1 to 5)

LOTO
(Isolation
of Service
Utility &
Rerouting
of Service
Utility)

Hazards

Rev
Date

00
(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

Activity

Rev No.

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

28

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

High

Additional controls required

Remarks

A safe Lockout and


Tagout procedure shall
be implemented prior to
work
on
or
near
electrical equipment or
lines,
Mechanical
pressure systems and
lines
or
equipment
containing dangerous or
hazardous
material
which can be energized,
pressurized, activated, or
released inadvertently.
A safe lockout and
tagout procedure is an
operating procedure by
which a person or a
member of maintenance
crew,
may
have
a
machine / equipment or
part of the machine or
equipment
removed
from and held out of
service
till
the

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

Gaps, if
any

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Existing Control

Page

50 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Spread (1 to 5)

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Severity (1 to 5)

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Others

ME- 4894

Visitors

Job
No.

Sub-Contractors

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

completion of the job. A


tag indicating Danger!
Do Not Operate or
equivalent
shall
be
placed at the source of
the equipment being
serviced.
The supervisor shall be
responsible for ensuring
that all personnel in his
group understand the
use and purpose of Locks
and Hold Tags. He shall
authorize
attachment
and removal of Locks
and Hold Tags and
ensure that locks and
tags are installed and
attached to the proper
equipment.
If Locks and Hold Tags
are required on systems
or equipment where hot
work/cold work is to be
Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Gaps, if
any

Spread (1 to 5)

Existing Control

Page

51 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Severity (1 to 5)

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Others

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

ME- 4894

Visitors

Job
No.

Sub-Contractors

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

performed, attachment
and/or removal of Locks
and Hold Tags shall be
authorized only by those
persons authorized to
issue/receive
hot
work/cold work permits.
29

PreCommissio
ning /
Commissio
ning

System
/
Service failure

Physical
injuries,
Property
damage.

24

High

All the internals of the


system
pipes
and
equipment
must
be
cleaned out to ensure
they are free from dirt,
scale and construction
debris
and
prevent
damage
to
rotating
equipment,
control
valves or cause line
blockage
during
commissioning.
The
area
shall
be
barricaded
and
all
unsecured
materials
likely to be affected by

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00

HEALTH & SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT


FABRICATION, ERECTION AND COMMISSIONING OF 14 NOS STORAGE
TANKS AND TANK FARM FOUNDATION WORK

Significance

Gaps, if
any

(Likely hood x severity x spread)Risk level

Existing Control

Page

52 of
52

Risk Assessment
(See Risk management matrix)

Spread (1 to 5)

Loss
(Risk Consequence)

Personnel at risk

Severity (1 to 5)

Adequacy of existing control measures

Likely hood of harm (1 to 3)

PROJECT
DESCRIPTION

Others

ME- 4894

Visitors

Job
No.

Sub-Contractors

24-11-2013

All Employees - 2Some Employees 1/

Hazards

Rev
Date

00

(Refer table 3 of procedure)Concern (L/I/B)

Activity

Rev No.

(Refer table 2 of procedure)Hazard Category (D/I)

PSL-ME-4894HRA-01
(Refer table 1 of procedure)Operating Condition (R/N/E)

Sl No

HRA No.

Additional controls required

Remarks

discharged air during


blowing operations are
to
be
removed
or
secured.
Approved
Method
statements
shall
be
strictly
implemented
along with Job safety
analysis.

Risk Assessment shall be done in accordance with the IMS Procedure No. PSL-IMSP-10 (Health and Safety Hazard Identification, Risk Assesment and Control.) ,Loss (Risk consequences)= Physical injury, Health issues, Environmental Issues, Property damage etc
Risk Level Significance: 1 to 6 (Low) are not significant and no further action is required. 8 to 20 (Medium) are Significant Risk and shall be reduced so that they are tolerable / acceptable. 24 -75 (High) are Unacceptable and work activity shall be halted until risk
controls are implemented that reduce the risk so that it is no longer very high.
Project Engineer
(Name, Signature & Date)
Review By:
Review By:
As per IMSP Proc. No.
As per IMSP Proc. No.
Supervisor
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
PSL-IMSP-10 & Date
HSE Representative
Format No: PSL-IMSP-10-F-01, Rev 00