Professional Documents
Culture Documents
: 07-cv-4808 MJD/AJB
I, Thomas J. Lyons, Esq. declare as follows: 1. I am the president of the Lyons Law Firm, P.A. I am submitting this
Affidavit in support of Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs in connection with services rendered in the above-entitled action (the "Action"). 2. Attached as Exhibit 1 is information concerning the background and
experience (e.g., curriculum vitae) of my law firm and myself. 3. Attached as Exhibit 2, is a true and correct copy of Defendant Diversified
Consultants Inc. Rule 68 Off er of Judgment and Plaintiff Waverly Young's Acceptance of Defendant Diversified Consultants Inc. Rule's 68 Off er of Judgment. 4. Attached as Exhibit 3, is a true and correct copy of time records for Lyons
The schedule for the hourly rate charged by Plaintiff's attorneys is listed
below in paragraph 7. These rates are comparable to hourly rates being charged by me
and other consumer class action attorneys in the Minnesota District and around the country and within the range charged by attorneys with comparable experience levels for consumer litigation of a similar nature. 6. As set forth in Exhibit 3 is the hourly rate charged by myself, which is
$400.00 an hour. This rate for attorneys is reasonable and within the range charged by attorneys with comparable experience levels for consumer litigation of a similar nature. Further, my hourly rate has increased over that past years as follows:
Baier, et al
v.
Keener, et al
v.
Nienaber
v.
Citibank, USDC SD, CV Civ. No. CIV 04-4054, the South Dakota
Court approved my rate at $350.00. (See Exhibit 6) 7. As set forth in Exhibit 3 is the lodestar devoted to the case by the Lyons
Law Firm, P.A. for work performed with respect to this case is as follows: Attorneys Thomas J. Lyons, Sr.
TOTAL FEES:
Hours 7. 1 0 $2,845.09
$2,845.09
8.
The lodestar figures are based upon the firms' billing rates, which rates do
not include charges for expense items. Expense items are billed separately and such charges are not duplicated in the billing rates. 9. Attached as Exhibit 7 is a true and correct copy of the Affidavit of Peter
Barry, Esq. dated January 24, 2008, previously submitted to the court in Bankey vs. Phillips and Burns, LLC., Civ. No. 07-cv-2200 (affirming the reputation, skill and expertise possessed by me in the area of consumer iaw). 10. Attached as Exhibit 8 is a true and correct copy of the Affidavit of William
Crowder, Esq. dated January, 24, 2008 previously submitted to the court in Bankey vs. Phillips and Burns, LLC., Civ. No. 07-cv-2200 (affirming the reputation, skill and
expertise possessed by me in the area of consumer law). 11. Attached as Exhibit 9 is a true and correct copy of the Consumer Law
Attorney Fee Survey conducted by Ronald Burdge in 2007. 12. Attached as Exhibit 10, is a true and correct copy of the redacted retainer
agreement signed by Plaintiff Waverly Young. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Lyons Law Firm, P.A. 367 Commerce Court Vadnais Heights, Minnesota 55 127 (65 1) 770-9707 d and sworn to before me uay of March, 2008.