N25 Waterford Bypass, Contract 3. Final Report On Archaeological Investigations at Site 34 in The Townland of Newrath, Co Kilkenny Volume 2

Project Code: NWB 03
Client: Waterford Co. Council
Date: May 2009

N25 Waterford Bypass, Contract 3. Final Report on
Archaeological Investigations at Site 34 in the townland of
Newrath, Co. Kilkenny
Volume 2

Appendix 8: Integrated wood report for Site 34, Newrath Townland,
Co. Kilkenny

By: Susan Lyons & Lorna O’Donnell
Excavated under Licence: 04E0319
Director: Brendon Wilkins
Chainage: 670
NGR: 25921 11446

Project Code: NWB 03
Client: Waterford Co. Council
Date: May 2009

N25 Waterford Bypass, Contract 3. Final Report on
Archaeological Investigations at Site 34 in the townland of
Newrath, Co. Kilkenny
Volume 2

Appendix 8: Integrated wood report for Site 34, Newrath Townland,
Co. Kilkenny

By: Susan Lyons & Lorna O’Donnell
Excavated under Licence: 04E0319
Director: Brendon Wilkins
Chainage: 670
NGR: 25921 11446

Headland Archaeology (Ireland) Ltd: N25 Waterford Bypass, Contract 3, Site 34, Volume 2
Table of Contents Page

1. INTRODUCTION 1
2. SCOPE OF WOOD ANALYSIS 2
3. SAMPLING STRATEGY 3
3.1 On‐site strategy 3
3.2 Wood analysis strategy 3
4. METHODOLOGY 4
4.1 Wood identification 4
4.2 Wood size 4
4.3 Growth ring count & ring width analysis 5
4.4 Preservation & evidence of decay 5
4.5 Toolmarks 6
4.5.1 Background to the analysis of worked wood and the tools used 6
4.5.2 Toolmarks from metalworking implements 7
5. RESULTS 8
5.1 Results of the wood identification and analysis 8
5.2 Wood size 9
5.3 Ring count analysis 10
6. CHARACTERISTICS OF WOOD SPECIES 11
7. WOOD RESULTS AND THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL CHRONOLOGY 15
7.1 Early/Middle Bronze Age period 15
7.2 Later Bronze Age period 16
7.3 Iron Age period 16
7.4 Medieval period 17
7.5 Overview of the wood assemblage from the Bronze Age to the medieval period 18
8. WORKED WOOD ANALYSIS 22
8.1 Individual structures 22
8.2 Worked ends 25
8.3 Jam curves 26
8.4 Facets 30
8.5 Toolmarks and the archaeological chronology 32
8.6 Differences in spit levels 34
8.7 Analysis of signatures 36
8.8 Tree felling 38
8.9 Cleft timbers 39
8.10 Woodcarving and fine woodworking 40
ii

8.11 Notched or holed timbers 41

9. AGE PROFILE OF THE TIMBERS/WOODLAND MANAGEMENT 42
10. COMPARISONS BETWEEN THE WOOD AND POLLEN RECORD 45
11. DISCUSSION 46
12. SUMMARY 50
13. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 50
14. REFERENCES 51

iii

List of Figures Page
Fig. 1 Percentage of wood species identified from Site 34 9
Fig. 2 Percentage of the general wood sizes recorded from Site 34 10
Fig. 3 Age profiles of wood recorded from Site 34 10
Fig. 4 Distribution of wood species from EBA/MBA dated structure 16
Fig. 5 Distribution of wood species from Iron Age dated structures 17
Fig. 6 Distribution of wood species from Medieval dated structures 18
Fig. 7 Wood species identified from dated structures 20
Fig. 8 Wood sizes identified from dated structures 21
Fig. 9 Total worked ends from Site 34 25
Fig. 10 End types and diameters from Site 34 26
Fig. 11 Jam curves from Site 34 28/29
Fig. 12 Total facet characters from Site 34 30
Fig. 13 Total facet dimensions from Site 34 31
Fig. 14 Features of a facet (After Sands 1997, 12) 31
Fig. 15 Worked ends per time period 33
Fig. 16 Facet profiles per time period 33
Fig. 17 Facet dimensions per time period 34
Fig. 18 Conversion processes from Site 34 39
Fig. 19 Cleft timbers; tangential, radial and half‐split (After O’Sullivan 1996, 305). 39
Fig. 20 Age profiles of the wood taxa from Site 34 42
Fig. 21 Age profiles of wood identified from dated structures 44

iv

List of Plates Page

Plate 1 Medieval jam curve on 34W3524 27
Plate 2 Blade signature on 34W047 36
Plate 3 Oak trunk 34W001 38
Plate 4 Notched radially split ash 34W2010 41
Plate 5 Probable coppiced alder heels from Site 34 43

v


1. INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of the wood analysis carried out on a number of wooden structures
excavated at Site 34 in the townland of Newrath, Co. Kilkenny. Archaeological excavations were
undertaken at the site under excavation licence number 04E0319 by Brendon Wilkins of Headland
Archaeology Ltd on behalf of Waterford City Council and the National Road Authority (NRA) in
2004, as part of the archaeological mitigation program associated with the N25 Waterford Bypass. A
total of 22 structures were identified at the site dating from the Bronze Age to the medieval period
and potentially into Early Modern times. The structures themselves ranged in form from large
trackways and platforms, primarily constructed of timbers and large roundwood elements, to lighter
brushwood scatters of small and medium roundwoods.
The analysis of the wood from Site 34 was undertaken by Susan Lyons and Lorna O’Donnell from
2005 to 2006. The wood identification and analysis of bulk wood samples was carried out by Susan
Lyons, formerly of Headland Archaeology Ltd, while the wood identification and tool technology
analysis of the individual worked wood elements was recorded by Lorna O’Donnell of Margaret
Gowen & Co. Ltd. Both authors have combined their results for the purpose of this report, to create
one wood report which would incorporate the results from all wood identifications and worked
wood analysis.
The report will discuss the wood assemblage chronologically according to time periods based on
known radiocarbon dates obtained for the site. It will be structured to outline the scope of wood
identification analysis, the sampling strategies and methodologies employed, along with a series of
discussion points, which will include the total results of wood identifications from sampled elements,
the characteristics of the wood species identified at Site 34, results of the wood analysis with reference
to the archaeological chronology for the site and comparisons with the results from the pollen study
undertaken by Dr. Scott Timpany (2006). The discussion will also incorporate the results of the
worked wood assemblage, carried out by Lorna O’Donnell and will detail the evidence for possible
woodland management and selection at the site.
Due to the large volume of raw data collated during this project, a more detailed description of the
wood results of the individual structures and a table of all wood identifications recorded will be
available to view on a CD disc with will accompany this report.
1

2. SCOPE OF WOOD ANALYSIS
The overall aim of the wood study from Site 34 was to provide a sufficient record of the wood species
selected for the construction of the structures recorded at the site along with a record of the types of
tools used. The wood results would also give information on the species composition of the marginal
woodland and perhaps some indication of the wider wooded landscape. By comparing these results
with those from the pollen analysis, it is envisaged that changes or trends in how the local woodland
was utilised from the Bronze Age to the medieval period may be highlighted. The wood analysis
would also serve to identify if woodland management or a selection process was employed at the site
by studying the size (diameter), age ranges and growth ring patterns of the material.
2

3. SAMPLING STRATEGY
3.1 On‐site strategy
A comprehensive wood sampling strategy was devised in consultation with a number of
environmental and wood specialists. The sampling strategy was also formulated to accommodate
inevitable project constraints and the seasonal flooding experienced at the site, which made for
difficult working conditions. It was recommended that at least one third (30%) of the exposed wood
assemblage at Site 34 be sampled. This strategy is commonplace on wetland sites that produce a large
number of wooden elements and follows a similar strategy that was employed at Derryville Bog in
Co. Tipperary (Stuijts, 2005) and by the wetland excavations undertaken by the Irish Archaeological
Wetland Unit (IAWU) between1998 to 2005.
On‐site sampling of the wood assemblage from Site 34 was carried out two ways:
1) individual worked wood pieces were recorded and sampled as single entities, each getting a
separate sample and find number. The worked wood sampling strategy evolved during the course of
the excavation. Initially all worked wood elements were sampled but this strategy was subsequently
followed by a representative portion of the worked elements being sampled.
2) bulk wood samples, where each sample contained multiple wood elements, were randomly
sampled from each known structure and recorded as one whole sample, with each sample allocated a
bulk sample number.
Each sample was packed in a peat matrix to aid preservation and appropriately wrapped for ease of
storage and transportation.
3.2 Wood analysis strategy
The sampling procedure used in the analysis of the bulk samples was developed in consultation with
Dr. Tim Holden and Mhairi Hastie of Headland Archaeology Ltd, whereby a representative number
of the bulk wood samples from each sampled structure would undergo species identification and
analysis. It was agreed that where there were several hundred wood elements associated with any
one structure, between 30% and 50% of the assemblage would be studied which would reflect a good
representation of the wood used within each structure. The only exception was from Structure 34505
in Area 2 Cutting G, where a small number of wood elements were sampled on site. As a result all
wood from bulk sample numbers 59 and 60 were identified and analysed. All of the individual wood
3

pieces present in Headland Archaeology’s post excavation facility were selected for identification and
analysed for wood working techniques by Lorna O’Donnell.
4. METHODOLOGY
The wood samples were washed and prepared for analysis at the Headland Archaeology Ltd post‐
excavation facility located in the Europa Business Park, Midleton Co. Cork between May 2005 and
October 2005.
The individual worked wood and each wood element from the bulk wood samples were unwrapped,
washed and visually examined for the presence of bark, bubs and any other obvious external features
which would aid identification. The individual worked wood elements were analysed and recorded
separately (Lorna O’Donnell), while the multiple wood fragments from the bulk samples were
categorised according to size (diameter width), colour and texture (knottiness) by Susan Lyons.
Where worked wood was recorded from bulk samples, these were merged with the worked wood
assemblage and analysed for wood working technology.
4.1 Wood identification
Wood species identifications were undertaken in accordance with Section 25 of the National
Monuments Act 1930, as amended by Section 20 of the National Monuments Amendment Act 1994, to
alter an archaeological object. A portion of each wooden element was sawn off to reveal an
unexposed surface. Exposing a fresh surface would rid the wood of any degradation or possible
fungal attack which may hinder species identification. Thin slivers were cut with a razor blade to
obtain the three sectional planes (transverse, radial and tangential sections) necessary for microscopic
wood identification. The thin sections were mounted onto a glass slide with a temporary water
medium and sealed with a cover slip. Identifications were conducted under a transcident light
microscope at magnifications of 40x to 400x where applicable. Wood species identifications were
made using wood keys devised by Franklin and Brazier (1961), Schweingruber (1978) and the
International Association of Wood Anatomists (IAWA) wood identification manuals by Wheeler, Bass
and Gasson (1989).
4.2 Wood size
Each wood piece chosen for analysis was also measured along the cross section (mm) to determine
the size of the element, which would be useful with interpreting if a selection process based on
4

physical size was being used at the site. The wood elements were categorised into those that were
identified as timbers (split radially or tangentially), roundwoods and root material. Due to the large
number of roundwood elements from the assemblage, this category was further divided into sub
categories of small roundwoods (<25mm), medium roundwoods (26mm‐60mm) and large
roundwoods (61mm‐100mm). Irregular fragments which did not fit into any of the aforementioned
categories are grouped as miscellaneous.
4.3 Growth ring count & ring width analysis
Where possible each of the wood pieces selected for species identification were also studied for
growth ring count and ring width analysis in order to determine an age profile for the wood and
evidence for possible woodland management, in the form of coppicing. This was undertaken by using
a calibrated stereoscopic microscope.
4.4 Preservation & evidence of decay
The study of wood can also reveal evidence of decay which can help to determine the environmental
conditions to which the various components of the structures had been exposed. Fungi are
responsible for most wood degradation, while bacteria accounts for a limited amount of decay under
specialized conditions.
White rot is when the wood appears white, is very soft and fibrous, while brown rot, where the wood
is brown, causes the wood to become powdery and cracks cubically when dry. These are both
produced by Basidiomycetes (eg toadstools) and are not found in waterlogged conditions or
environments devoid of oxygen, which indicates that the wood was exposed to the air when they
invaded it (Carruthers, 1978). Wood which has been in very wet conditions experience soft rot, which
is when the outer layer of wood becomes very soft. Here the rate of decay is much slower and is
caused by Ascomycetes and Hyphomycetes (eg cup fungi) (Carruthers 1978). Where wood is attacked
by bacteria the cell walls become thin, and in extreme cases give the wood the pliability of plasticine.
This type of decay is also found in very wet anaerobic conditions and usually observed in extremely
old wood (Carruthers, 1978).
In the case of the wood assemblage from Site 34, the majority of the material was in a relatively good
state of preservation, where wood could be easily sectioned for identification. The only evidence for
poor degradation was noted in some of the roundwoods and root material from Structures 34005,
34007, 34015 and 34017 from Area 1, Structure 34507 from Area 2 and Structure 341513 from Area 4.
5

The wood recorded here was very soft and in some cases hindered full species identification or ring
counts. This could indicate a degree of soft rot in the material, which would be consistent with the
waterlogged environment from which the wood was subjected to.
4.5 Toolmarks
Toolmark analysis followed methods employed by O’Sullivan (1996), O’Neill (2005) and Coles and
Orme (1985). Facet measurements were taken using calipers. Each piece of wood was also examined
for blade signatures. Worked ends were classified in three different ways; chisel, wedge and pencil
ended. Chisel ends are worked on one side, wedge‐ends worked on both sides and pencil ends are
worked on three sides or more. Facets were recorded in millimeters.
4.5.1 Background to the analysis of worked wood and the tools used
The excavation and publication of wooden trackways and platforms from the Somerset levels have
provided the background to current worked wood analysis (e.g. Orme and Coles, 1983; Coles and
Orme 1985). Other British work includes the wood assemblage from Caldicot, South Wales (Brunning
and O’Sullivan 1997). A considerable amount of woodworking evidence has been published from a
Late Bronze Age platform at Flag Fen in Cambridgeshire (Pryor et al 1986; Taylor and Pryor 1990),
and individual issues such as blade signatures have been addressed in Sands (1997). Recent Irish
work comes from excavations along the Mountdillon trackways (O’Sullivan 1996), Mount Gabriel
mines (Mc Keown 1994), Derryville Bog (O’Neill 2005) and various excavations by the Irish
Archaeological Wetland unit (Maloney 1993a and b; 1995).
By analysing the conversion process, facets and worked ends from Site 34, the woodworking evidence
can be compared to the existing body of data form Irish archaeological sites. Many important changes
occurred from the Bronze Age to the medieval period, such as hafting mechanisms, blade edge
diameters and the evolution of specialist tools. These changes are reflected in the shape of the facets,
and the diversity of timber joinery. For this reason a brief overview of the published corpus of Bronze,
Iron and Medieval woodworking tools is presented below.
Early Bronze Age
The earliest Irish metal axes were made from copper and were flat, trapezoidal axes with thick butts
and straight sides. These developed into thick‐butted axes with a slightly curving edge. The last truly
copper axe had curved sides and thin butts (Burgess 1979). When the technology to make harder
bronze was introduced, the first widespread bronze axes in Ireland were broad and approximately
6

triangular in shape, with a shallow crescent shaped cutting edge. Most are flat with thin butts and
some are decorated. Important changes occur with the development of axes when low raised edges
were put on the faces, creating slight flanges and a transverse bevel which appears on the middle of
the axe (O’Sullivan 1996, 313). One of the last axe types in the Early Bronze Age are fairly small, with
straight and more or less parallel sides which curve out abruptly to an expanded crescentic cutting
edge. Butts are usually flat, low hammered flanges are present in many cases, and a median
thickening or ridge often occurs (Harbison, 1969).
Middle Bronze Age
There is a large range of palstaves and flanged axes in the Middle Bronze Age however the cutting
edges remain very similar in terms of width, cross‐section and curvature (Herity and Eogan 1977).
Flanged axes and palstaves are characterised by the height of flanges and nature of the stop. The
flanges and stops introduced increase the weight of the axehead (O’Sullivan 1996).
Late Bronze Age
Possible wood working tools from the Late Bronze Age include socketed axes and gouges, knives and
tanged chisels (Herity and Eogan 1977; O’Sullivan 1996, 321). The weight and the cutting edge width
of socketed axes were smaller than previously. As these flanged, socketed and looped axes and
palstaves were smaller, they probably would not have suited purposes such as tree felling, but would
have been suitable for chopping smaller roundwoods (Edlin 1973; O’Sullivan 1996, 321).
Iron Age
A small number of looped, socketed axeheads and shaft‐hole axeheads are known from Ireland in the
Iron Age (Herity and Eogan 1977). These shaft‐hole axes had a wider cutting edge than the looped
and socketed axes, being up to 9cm in width. Iron Age adzes have also been identified, for example
the small socketed adze from Newgrange, Co. Meath (O’Sullivan 1996, 331). Dedicated chisels also
emerge in the Late Bronze Age (O’Neill 2005, 335).
Medieval period
During the Medieval period, woodworking tools would have consisted of axes, billhooks, adzes,
knives, chisels, saws and augers (Wallace 1982).
4.5.2 Toolmarks from metal woodworking implements
7

Metal axes can produce flat, slightly concave or concave facets. The facet junctions are normally clean
or stepped, as the metal can cut far more cleanly through the wood than stone axes. Roundwoods are
cut at quite shallow angles, and are generally not snapped or torn.
5. RESULTS
The results of the wood analysis from Site 34 will be outlined and discussed under a) results of the
wood identifications and analysis and b) results of the worked wood analysis.
Approximately 30% of the wood assemblage from Site 34 was chosen for full identification and
analysis. Of the 22 structures identified at the site, fourteen structures contained a workable number
of wood samples suitable for wood identification and analysis. Eleven wood taxa totalling 2,191
identifications were recorded from structures 34005, 34006, 34007, 34014, 34015, 34017, 34504, 34505,
34507, 341501, 341507, 341509, 341512 and 341513. The majority of the wood samples still had the bark
or traces of still attached, and in some cases, elements from the bulk wood samples were noted as
being knarled and/or knotty. Most of the wood was free of any obvious insect damage and suggests
that the wood used in the construction of these structures may have been chopped down just before
deposition. Approximately 5% of the wood assemblage analysed had insect damage, which may
indicate that some woods were lying exposed or used for other purposes prior to being utilised in the
structures.
5.1 Results of the wood identification and analysis (Fig. 1)
The majority of the wood elements were in a relatively good state of preservation and identifications
could be made to genus level for the most part, i.e. Quercus (oak), Betula (birch), Salix (willow),
Sambucus (elder), Taxus baccata (yew), Cornus (dogwood) and Carpinus (hornbeam). In cases where the
species was considered to be the most likely represented, these included Alnus glutinous (alder/black
alder), Fraxinus excelsior (ash) and Corylus avellana (hazel). The identification of the Pomoideae group
proved more difficult to separate. The pomaceous fruit wood species includes the genera Malus
(apple), Pyrus (pear), Sorbus (rowan or whitebeam) and Crataegus (hawthorn). They are anatomically
very similar and in the absence of bark, buds and leaves cannot be differentiated between each other
very often.
8

Alder (Alnus glutinous) was by far the most dominant wood species recorded from the study,
accounting for 72% of the identifiable material. Ash (Fraxinus excelsior) was the second most
significant wood type making up 10% of the assemblage. Almost equal quantities of oak (Quercus sp.)
and willow (Salix sp.) were recorded at 6% each, while just 2% of birch (Betula sp.), and 1% or less of
hazel (Corylus avellana), pomaceous woods (Pomoideae spp.), elder (Sambucus sp.), yew (Taxus baccata),
dogwood (Cornus sp.) and hornbeam (Carpinus sp.) were identified. The preservation quality of some
wood fragments hindered further identification in some cases and this material was labelled as
indeterminate wood (wood indet.) and accounted for 2% of the analysed material.
<1%
<1% <1% <1%
<1% <1%
1%
1% <1%
<1%
<1%
<1% 2%
2%
2%
2%
6%
6% Alder
Alder
Ash
Ash
6%
6%
Willow
Willow
Oak
Oak
Birc
Birchh
10% Hazel
Hazel
10%
Pomac
Pomaceous spp
eous spp
Elder
Elder
Dogwood
Dogwood
Yew
Yew
Hornbeam
Hornbeam
Wood Indet
Wood Indet
72%
72%

Fig. 1 Percentage of wood species identified from Site 34
5.2 Wood size (Fig. 2)
The majority of the wood analysed from Site 34 was made up of small roundwoods (<25mm diameter
width), which accounted for 48% of the assemblage. Medium roundwoods (26mm‐60mm) made up
14% of the assemblage, while just 5% of the wood analysed was categorised as larger roundwoods
(61mm‐100mm). Split timbers and root material each accounted for just 3% of the assemblage. Up to
9

27% of the wood samples were noted as irregular fragments and therefore categorised as
miscellaneous wood. While all the miscellaneous wood fragments underwent wood species
identification, they were deemed unsuitable for growth ring count analysis or ring width analysis and
will therefore not be included in these sections. Structures 34006, 34007, 34014, 34017, 34504 and
341512 contained the majority of the small and medium roundwoods recorded, while the only
structures to contain a notable number of larger roundwoods and timbers were Structures 34007,
34015, 34505 and 341507.

3%
3% 5%
5%

27%
27% 14%
14%

Timbers
Timbers
Lrg rwds
Lrg rwds
Med rwds
Med rwds
SSm rwds
m rwds
3%
3%
Root
Root
Misc
Misc

48%
48%
Fig. 2 Percentage of the general wood sizes recorded from Site 34
5.3 Ring count analysis (Fig. 3)
Where possible, the number of growth rings was recorded from each of the roundwood elements. A
total of 1518 roundwoods were sectioned and the growth rings counted. The majority of the analysed
wood elements (51%) were aged to between 11 and 20 years, with 40% of the assemblage aged to
between 1 and 10 years. More mature trees were recorded in much lesser numbers, where 6% were
aged to between 21 and 30 years with just 3% accounting for elements aged over 30 years.
10

3%
6% 3%
6%

40% 1‐10 yrs
1‐10 yrs
40%
11‐20 yrs
11‐20 yrs

21‐30 yrs
21‐30 yrs
30+ yrs
30+ yrs
51%
51%
Fig. 3 Age profiles of wood recorded from Site 34
6. CHARACTERISTICS OF WOOD SPECIES
Alnus glutinous L. Gärtner (alder or black alder)
Alder is usually found growing close to running water, rivers or in damp woodland, in the latter
often with oak (Orme and Coles, 1985; Rackham, 1995). In marshland alder grows as a shrub
frequently mixed with willow and alder buckthorn to form alder carr (Cutler and Gale, 2000). It can
also grow well in and on fen peat. Germination and early growth of alders requires a constant supply
of water, however once the tree reaches maturity its root system makes the tree less dependent on
high water levels (Stuijts, 2005). Alders commonly produce root nodules which contain nitrogen‐
fixing bacteria, known as Schinzia alni which enables alder to enrich soils through its fallen leaves
hence allowing the tree to survive in poorer soil conditions (Milner cited in Culter and Gale, 2000; van
der Meiden cited in Stuijts, 2005). In suitable conditions alder growth is fast, usually reaching a height
of 25m with a maximum girth of 1m and can grow to an age of sixty to one hundred years (Strotelder
cited in Stuijts, 2005). While alder makes for poor fuel, it produces good quality charcoal (Edlin, 1951).
The wood can quickly turn a reddish colour after cutting and once dry it is water resistant and does
not split easily. Once in a waterlogged state, alder is very durable and is often used in the
construction of underwater bridge piles, houses and scaffolding (Culter and Gale, 2000). Alder is
traditionally used in the making of smaller objects such as bowls, handles and broomsticks and its
bark can be used in the tanning of leather (Rackham, 1980).
11

Fraxinus excelsior L. (ash)
Ash is a wood that thrives well on nutrient‐rich soils but is also a common woodland species and
grows in mixed woodland with oak on damp, slightly acidic soils (Gale & Culter, 2000). It generally
avoids very wet environments although where soils are mineral‐rich, it can sometimes be found in
marginal forests and on stream beds. While ash is a light‐loving species, the seedlings prefer shaded
areas to grow. It can grow up to 45m in height and can reach an age of 150 years. It produces very
good firewood and its timber is valued for its durability and elasticity and is commonly used in
making furniture, shafts, spears, handles and agricultural equipment. Upon exposure, ash is prone to
rotting.
Pollen analysis indicates that ash became more common in the pollen record from the Neolithic
period onwards (Mitchell, 1953/4). This could be as a result of more clearance due to agricultural
practices at the time, where ash was able to germinate and grow more vigorously as secondary
woodland and in marginal areas and hedges (Kelly, 1976).
Quercus spp. L. (oaks)
Oak is a tall deciduous woodland tree, often growing in association with hazel and ash. Most species
prefer damp, non‐calcareous soils on lowland or montane sites. Of the 27 European species,
pedunculate oak (Quercus robur) and sessile oak (Quercus petraea) are native to Ireland. Pedunculate
oak is common on heavy clay lowland soils whereas sessile oak thrives on the lighter loams
characteristic of higher ground (Culter & Gale, 2000). The two native Irish oaks are usually
distinguished by their acorns: the sessile oak has acorns with no stalks, while the pedunculate oak has
acorns with long stalks (peduncles). Sessile oak can be found on less fertile, acidic soils than the
pedunculate oak. The latter is usually found growing on heavy, lowland soils where it can also
tolerate flooding. Oaks can reach a height of 40 metres and live for 1,000 years or more (Hickie, 2002,
60). It makes excellent firewood. It splits and works well, which combined with durable heartwood
makes it a preferred species for all larger structural timbers.
Salix spp. (willows).
There are a number of different species of willow which cannot be differentiated through wood
anatomy. They grow rapidly, and can be easily propagated from cuttings. General comments only
about the genus can be made, as there are different varieties of it. They are not naturally a woodland
species, although shrubby growth may occur under light woodland cover. All willows appear to
favour wet conditions, and it may be a pioneer species on wet soils. The use of willow depends on the
12

species concerned, for some grow as shrubs and others as trees, and a species may be particularly
suited to some purpose. In general, the flexibility of willow shoots has led to coppicing or pollarding
to produce the raw materials for baskets, frames, hurdling etc. (Orme & Coles, 1985). The main Irish
native willows are grey willow (Salix cinera), goat willow (Salix caprea) and eared willow (Salix aurita).
Betula spp. (birches)
Birch was one of the first tress to arrive to Ireland after the end of the last glaciation. It grows as trees
or shrubs with a preference for light and thrives on non‐calcareous soils. It is often associated with
heathland and successional oak woods, but can rapidly form secondary woodland in cleared areas
and on abandoned peat cuttings. Birch species are generally short‐lived, although some examples
have known to reach ages of up to 70 and 80 years. Through most of its woodland history, birch
played a minor role since its timber was too weak for structural purposes and rots easily outdoors
and therefore not greatly valued. Birch wood however, makes a hot but short‐lived fuel and produces
high quality charcoal (Lines cited in Gale & Culter, 2000). It is best suited in the manufacturing of fine
objects, such as furniture, bowls and tool handles. Birch bark has also been used in making shoes and
roofs.
Corylus avellana L. (hazel)
Hazel woodlands replaced birch in the early post‐glacial forests and remains on some shallow
limestone soils to the present day (Pilcher & Hall, 2001). The species can tolerate most soil types, but
not waterlogged conditions and forms a small deciduous tree or shrub. It commonly occurs in the
understorey of oak and/or ash woodlands, where it may grow to a height of 10m or more. In open
areas or woodland glades hazel grows as a shrub. Hazel is a common species recorded from Irish
archaeological sites and its widespread presence is highlighted in pollen diagrams from the Neolithic
to the medieval period (Caseldine, 1996). It produces good firewood and is a suitable wood for
kindling. The wood is soft enough to be split yet flexible and strong enough to be used in rope
making and basketry. It has also proved a useful resource in the construction of hurdles, wattling,
palisades and trackways from prehistoric times (Pilcher & Hall, 2001).
Pomoideae spp. (pomaceous fruit woods)
The pomaceous fruit wood species includes the genera Malus (apple), Pyrus (pear), Sorbus (rowan or
whitebeam) and Crataegus (hawthorn). They are anatomically very similar and in the absence of bark,
buds and leaves cannot be differentiated between each other very often. The pomaceous wood types
are small deciduous spiny trees or shrubs and are common to the scrub margins of woodlands and
13

hedgerows (Gale & Culter, 2000). The apple species, often crab apple (Malus sylvertris) in woodlands,
is a light‐demanding tree and is often found in open oak woods. When dry, crab apple makes for
good firewood. While its wood is durable and tough, its crooked trunks and small branches make this
species unsuitable for most construction works and instead it is used in making small implements,
such as tool handles, bodkins and screws.
Pear, grown as wild pear (Pyrus pyraster), is good as fuel. Its wood is hard and fine grained and used
in high‐quality turning and making instruments. Rowan and whitebeam grow well in light soils and
avoids clays and limestone. Their timber is durable yet not of any economic value, since large trees
are scarce. The wood is smooth, fine‐grained and suitable for turnery, household utensils and small
decorative woodwork. Hawthorn is shade‐tolerant and forms understorey in ash and hazel
woodland. Both hawthorn and apple‐type (Malus sp.) produce edible fruits which would have been
gathered as a foodstuff from the prehistoric period (Greig, 1991). These wood types burn slow and
steady and provide excellent heat with minimal smoke (Culter & Gale, 2000).
Sambucus nigra L. (elder)
This is a small tree or shrub of fertile soils in a wide range of habitats, including woodland,
hedgerows, grassland, scrub and waste ground (Preston et al 2002, 597). Elder is normally shrubby, it
can become arborescent with a trunk up to 25m in diameter. It is synathropic, thriving on the
nitrogen‐rich soils associated with human habitation. The trunk wood is extremely hard (Gale &
Cutler, 2000). It burns quickly and with little heat.
Taxus baccata (yew)
Yew has been a component of the Irish native woodland since the post‐glacial period, although not as
prominent as scots pine or the deciduous species of oak, elm, ash, hazel and birch. It grows on many
soil types, usually under the shade of other trees and often as a solitary tree. Its timber is of great
strength and elasticity and resists decay when exposed. It makes for very good firewood and is
traditionally used in the manufacturing of bows, turned domestic objects, furniture and fence posts
(Cutler and Gale 2000). Just four wood elements were identified as yew and confined to Early/Middle
Bronze Age structures 34017 and 341512.
Cornus sp. (dogwood)
14

This shrub can be found in woodlands, scrub and hedgerows, on limestone soils or base rich clays,
sometimes dominant in hedges and scrub on chalk (Preston et al 2002, 422).
Carpinus sp. (hornbeam)
This is a long lived deciduous tree, found in pure and mixed woodland on base‐poor sandy or loamy
clays, or clay‐with‐flints (Preston et al 2002, 135).
7. WOOD RESULTS AND THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL CHRONOLOGY
Of the fifteen structures studied as part of this wood analysis report, eleven dates from the following
structures were obtained from single wood elements by AMS dating:
Early/Middle Bronze Age (EBA/MBA)
Structure 34005: 1680‐1500 cal BC
Later Bronze Age (LBA)
Iron Age
Structure 34007: 173 cal BC‐cal AD 4
Structure 34015: 256 cal BC‐cal AD 414
Medieval period
Structure 34504: 1324‐1441 cal AD
Structure 34507: 1316‐1436 cal AD
15

From this point forward it will be these dated structures [34005, 34006, 34007, 34015, 34017, 34504,
34505, 34507, 341501, 341512 and 341514], which will be discussed in relation to the archaeological
chronology recorded at the site.
7.1 Early/Middle Bronze Age period
Five structures were dated to the Early/Middle Bronze Age [34005, 34017, 341501, 341512 and 341514].
The structures were primarily constructed of alder, with much lesser evidence for ash, willow and
birch (Fig 4). Oak, hazel and dogwood were only recorded from Structure 34005 and this seems to be
the most substantial structure dating to this period. The only evidence for yew was recorded from
Structures 34017 and 341512. Structures 34017 and 341501 contained very few wood elements (<100
elements each) and therefore may not be a viable assemblage from which to draw any interpretations
from. It is possible that these structures are more scatters of wood which may
be a) the remnants of an existing structure, b) have been deposited to facilitate the maintenance or
repair of an existing structure or c) may represent the dislodged remains of another structure.
200
200
180
180

160
160
Alder
140 Alder
140
Ash
Ash
No. of wood pieces
No. of wood pieces
120
120 Willow
Willow

Birc
Birchh
100
100
Oak
Oak
80
80 Hazel
Hazel
Dogwood
Dogwood
60
60
Yew
Yew

40
40

20
20

00
34005
34005 34017
34017 341501
341501 341512
341512 341514
341514

Structures
Structures

Fig. 4 Distribution of wood species from Early/Middle Bronze Age dated structures
16

7.2 Later Bronze Age period
Structure 34505 was dated to the early later Bronze Age period and represents the only structure to
date to this period. All woods were recorded as brushwood elements. Just forty five wood samples
were identified from one bulk sample associated with 34505 and as a result very little can be
postulated about this particular feature. Alder, oak and ash were recorded from here, but with values
of less than twenty for each species, it is difficult to ascertain the composition of wood species used in
constructing this feature or indeed how this reflects on the local woodland during this period. Once
again it is possible that 34505 represents the remains of a once larger structure, or may be a scatter of
wood deposited for repair, or as part of a foundational layer.
7.3 Iron Age period
Three structures were dated to the Iron Age [34006, 34007 and 34015]. Alder is the dominant wood
species identified within these structures, however there is obviously more ash and willow recorded
from this assemblage (Fig. 5). Oak too is present, but values for hazel still remains low. The slight
emphasis on more ash and willow here may just reflect the nature of the wood composition in this
structure rather than an increase in the use of these wood types or a change in local woodland
resources during the Iron Age. The use of alder, ash and oak together in more notable quantities may
also reflect the construction of more durable structures in the Iron Age period. All three species are
renowned for their timber strength and sustainability when deposited in waterlogged conditions.

70
70

60
60

50
50 Alder
Alder
No. of wood pieces
No. of wood pieces
Ash
Ash
40
40
Willow
Willow
30 Oak
Oak
30
Hazel
Hazel
20 Pomac
20 Pomaceous
eous
Elder
Elder
10
10

00

34006
34006 34007
34007 34015
34015

Structures
Structures
17


Fig. 5 Distribution of wood species from Iron Age dated structures
7.4 Medieval period
The structures dating to the medieval period [34505 and 34507] were predominantly constructed of
alder, while less than 10 identifications of ash, willow, birch, pomaceous fruit woods and hornbeam
were also recorded (Fig 6). Structure 34504 was possibly the more substantial structure since it
contained almost 600 wooden elements. The majority of the wood was brushwood, with
approximately 15 timbers identified as oak from Structure 34504.
700
700
600
600
500
500 Alder
Alder
Ash
Ash
No. of wood pieces
No. of wood pieces
400 Willow
Willow
400
Birc
Birchh
Oak
Oak
300
300 Pomac
Pomaceous
eous
Dogwood
Dogwood
200 Wood indet
Wood indet
200
Hornbeam
Hornbeam
100
100
00
34504
34504 34507
34507
Structures
Structures

Fig. 6 Distribution of wood species from Medieval dated structures
18

7.5 Overview of the wood assemblage from the Bronze Age to the medieval period
The wood species identified from the structures associated with each of these time frames are
presented in Fig. 7 and help to highlight the composition of wood types that were present from the
Bronze Age to the medieval dated structures.
Alder is the dominant wood species recorded at Site 34 from the Early Bronze Age to the medieval
period, while values for all other wood species identified from the assemblage were recorded in much
lower incidences. Accounting for just 220 identifications, ash is the second most used wood at the site
during the Early Bronze Age/Middle Bronze Age and Iron Age periods. Since the ash counts from the
Late Bronze Age structure 34505 were based on such a small number of wood identifications, it may
be too ambitious to discuss the low incidences of this species here. During the medieval period
however, the use of ash has noticeably declined at the site.
Oak has been a popular choice of wood used in construction from the prehistoric period, but plays
but a minor role in the construction of the structures at Site 34. Oak values, while low, remain
relatively consistent from the Early Bronze Age/Middle Bronze Age to the Late Bronze Age and
into the Iron Age. A slight rise in the use of oak is evident during the medieval dated phase at the site
and it becomes the second to alder in the construction of these features.
While values for willow are also low throughout the construction phases at the site, it too remains
consistent during the Early Bronze Age/Middle Bronze Age, Iron Age and medieval periods. The use
of birch at the site is noted during the Early Bronze Age/Middle Bronze Age phase of the site, but fails
to make an appearance in the structures again until the medieval phase of construction and at that is
not used in the same capacity as in the Early Bronze Age/Middle Bronze Age phase. Birch is not
favoured for the structural quality of its wood and may have proved useful elsewhere.
The scrubby wood species of the pomaceous woods are absent from the earlier construction phases at
the site and instead make an appearance in the Iron Age and medieval dated structures along with
dogwood and hornbeam. Similarly, elder is recorded in the Iron Age structures only, but was not in
use beyond this. In later prehistoric periods, pomaceous woods are more prevalent in the landscape,
perhaps as a result of more opening up of larger areas of land or the fencing off of certain areas
(Stuijts, 2003/4, 20).
19

An interesting observation is the low values for hazel at the site during all four phases of
construction. Hazel is identified in very low numbers from the Early Bronze Age/Middle Bronze Age
dated structures and again in the Iron Age structures, but fails to become a prominent wood species
used in these construction phases. Although not a water tolerant species, hazel is a hardy shrub that is
quick to colonise marginal areas, growing close to oak and ash especially in areas exposed to light.
Traditionally it is the wood of choice for making brushwood or hurdles and would have been most
suitable in the construction of the structures recorded at Site 34.

800
800

750
750

700
700

650
650

600
600

550
550 Alder
Alder
No. of wood pieces
No. of wood pieces
500
500 Ash
Ash
Willow
Willow
450
450
Oak
Oak
400
400 Birc
Birchh
350 Hazel
Hazel
350
Pomac
Pomaceous spp
eous spp
300
300 Dogwood
Dogwood

250
250 Elder
Elder
Hornbeam
Hornbeam
200
200

150
150

100
100

50
50

00

EBA/MBA
EBA/MBA LBA
LBA Iron Age
Iron Age Medieval
Medieval

PPeriods
eriods

Fig. 7 Wood species identified from dated structures
20

While there are slight shifts in some woods used in the structures at Site 34, the composition of the
wood species generally stays relatively uniform from period to period and suggests that the local
vegetation did not alter too much during this time. The similarity of wood results from each structure
in each phase indicates that the local woodland was primarily used in the construction of these
features. The use of alder at the site certainly highlights that this species was growing in plentiful
supply in and around the site and as such would have been frequently exploited. Since all categories
of woods (timbers, large, medium and small roundwoods and roots) were represented by alder, it
reaffirms the availability of this wood species in and around the site as all parts of the tree were
potentially used in constructing or maintaining the structures at the site.
The measurements taken from the diameter of the roundwood samples revealed that smaller
roundwood material (<25mm diameter) was commonly used in the construction of the structures
specifically from the Early/ Middle Bronze Age and in particularly the medieval period. This would
support the on‐site interpretation of brushwood elements being commonplace at the site and as Fig. 8
below shows, very little in the way of larger roundwoods or timbers being present within these
structures. Based on the wood size alone, if a selection process was in place to collect woods of a
certain size, then perhaps the people constructing these structures were in need of small but compact
and durable wooden structures to allow for easy access or increase stability across pockets of wetter
areas of the site that would have become more waterlogged during times of flash flooding.

700
700

600
600

500
500 Timbers
Timbers
No. of wood counts
No. of wood counts
Lrg rwds
Lrg rwds
400
400
Med rwds
Med rwds

SSm rwds
m rwds
300
300

Root
Root
200 Misc
Misc
200

100
100

00
EBA/MBA
EBA/MBA LBA
LBA Iron Age
Iron Age Medieval
Medieval

PPeriods
eriods

Fig. 8 Wood sizes identified from dated structures
21

A degree of organisation and effort would have been needed if larger roundwoods and timbers were
used at the site. These elements would need to have been felled, perhaps stripped of branches and
twigs and, if timbers, split and possibly worked around the edges. Perhaps then the present of bark
from the many of the samples analysed and little in the way of smoothing out the wood surface
suggests that very little preparation was used in dressing the wood for use in such structures. Where
timbers of oak and ash and larger roundwoods of alder, ash, oak and willow are used, it is possible
that they were brought to the site for other constructive purposes and re‐used in the structures
themselves from time to time.
8. WORKED WOOD ANALYSIS
8.1 Individual structures
Early/Middle Bronze Age
[34005]
This structure was roughly linear, and mainly made of brushwood, secured by upright posts and
stakes. The material was primarily composed of alder, followed by ash and birch. Hazel, willow oak
and dogwood were also identified. Three end types were recorded, the main one was chisel, followed
by wedge and pencil, all cut at very shallow angles. The largest facet was 55m long and 50mm wide.
An ash pencil ended stake from here was blunted at one end, showing where it was hammered into
the ground.
[34017]
This was a small arrangement of stakes. Alder, ash and yew were present. Three worked pieces only
were recorded, with mixed end types, the largest facet was flat measuring 40mm wide, 53mm long
and blunted at one end, showing where it was hammered into the ground.
[341512]
This was either a small trackway or platform. It was dominated by alder with some pomaceous
fruitwood, ash, oak and yew. The end types were wedge and chisel. Flat facets were present, the
largest of which was 60mm wide and 75mm long.
22

Later Bronze Age
[34505]
This was made from upright vertical posts and pegs, brushwood and lesser amounts of larger
roundwood elements. Alder, oak and ash were mainly used for construction, although hazel, willow
and pomaceous fruitwood were also identified. The predominant end type was chisel, all cut at
shallow angles. Facets were flat, the largest of which was 35mm wide and 76mm long.
Iron Age
[34006]
This was rough platform or dump, composed mainly of brushwood with some larger roundwoods.
Alder, ash and willow were the main woods used for this structure. The worked ends were chisel,
and two flat facets were recorded, the largest of which was 25mm wide and 35mm long.
[34007]
This was a north/south running liner arrangement of brushwood and roundwoods. A number of
individual worked pieces were recorded from here and comprised of alder, oak and pomaceous
fruitwood. The pieces were pencil, chisel and wedge ended. Cutting angles were shallow. Flat and
slightly concave facets were recorded, the largest of which was 62mm wide and 71mm long. Willow,
ash, oak, elder and hazel were also identified from here.
[34015]
This structure was defined as a spread of brushwood. Alder, ash, oak, pomaceous fruitwood and
willow were identified from here. No worked ends were evident. Worked wood was composed of
mainly half split ashes and oaks. A radially cleft ash with a rectangular shaped notch was excavated
from here.
Medieval
[34504]
This was the main part of a continuous linear spread of brushwood. It has been dated to the medieval
period. Alder was the main component, while other wood such as oak, pomaceous fruitwood,
willow, ash, dogwood and birch were also used. A high number of chisel ended pieces (46) were
recorded from this structure, with a small percentage of wedge and pencil ends. Facets were
23

predominantly flat, the largest of which was 71 x 62mm. A large rectangular shaped jam curve was
lifted from an oak roundwood, which was 83mm in width.
[34507]
This structure was mostly composed of brushwood branches laid parallel and adjacent to each other.
Again, alder was the dominant wood selected, with lesser amounts of hazel, willow and pomaceous
fruitwood. The worked ends were mainly chisel, cut at shallow angles. Three flat facets were
recorded, the largest of which was 50mm long and 48mm wide.
Undated
[34014]
This was a linear arrangement of brushwood and roundwood. A large amount of worked wood was
analysed from here. Alder, willow and ash were the main wood types identified. Hazel, yew,
pomaceous fruitwood and oak were also present. The roundwoods were mainly chisel ended, with
flat facets. Nineteen facets were recorded, the largest of which was 36mm wide and 75mm long. An
alder half split with a notch was identified.
[34519]
This was located underneath structure [34505] and may be part of its substructure. Alder was the
main wood used, with some hazel. A variety of facet types were recorded, these were concave,
slightly concave and flat. Some of these were quite long, one being 82mm long by 21mm in width.
One of the wood pieces from this structure has been dated to the Early Bronze Age.
[341501]
Alder, hazel and ash were identified from here. Worked ends were wedge, pencil and chisel. Facets
ranged in length from 93 to 37mm. Concave, slightly concave and flat facets were evident. An
interesting aspect of this site was an alder roundwood log (34W4595), which had a very well
preserved concave shaped void profile of an axe preserved in it. It was difficult to measure this
accurately however the base of the axe would have been at least 79mm in width. A positive silicone
gel mould will be made of this, which will provide details of the width of the axe blade.
24

25

8.2 Worked ends
Three types of worked ends were represented in the Site 34 material, these were chisel, wedge and
pencil ends. The main roundwood species used was alder. This can be chopped cleanly, the bark does
not strip or tear but there is a tendency for the roundwood to split (Orme and Coles 1985, 32). The
predominant end type was clearly chisel (Fig. 9) which may be a reflection of the diameters of the
roundwoods, which tended to range between 11 and 55mm. It appears that it was simply unnecessary
to chop many of the roundwoods more than once to fell them, and demonstrates the efficiency of the
axe blades. The cutting angles of the material were all very similar, tending to be very shallow (0‐20°)
and shallow (20‐40°). This strongly suggests the use of metal axes, with sharp blades, which could cut
the wood fibres at acute angles (O’Sullivan 1996, 314). The similar cutting angles were dispersed
throughout Areas 1, 2 and 4, an indication that metal axes were used across the site.
When the end types were plotted against the diameter, pieces of smaller diameter tended to be cut on
one side, while pencil and wedge ends were used throughout (Fig. 10). In the Derryville bog
excavations, a simple but definite pattern emerged, that of wedge ends displacing chisel‐ends as the
predominant type, with a concurrent increase in diameters. Pencil ends would then displace wedge
ends for large diameters (O’Neill 2005, 333). Split and axed ends as evidenced in the Neolithic period
from the Mountdillon trackways (O’Sullivan 1996) were totally absent in the Site 34 material, which
suggests that splitting techniques were no longer necessary and that larger trees could now be felled
exclusively by means of an axe.
180
180
160
160
140
140
pieces
of pieces
120
120
100
100
80
amt. of
80
amt.
60
60
40
40
20
20
00
chisel
chisel wedge
wedge pencil
pencil
end
end type
type

Fig. 9 Total worked ends from Site 34
26


25
25

20
20
pieces
of pieces
15 chisel
chisel
15
pencil
pencil
amt. of
10
10 wwedge
edge
amt.
55

00
1-5
1-5 11-
11- F 21-
21- 31-
31- 41-
41- 51-
51- 61-
61- 71-
71- 81-
81- 91-
91-
15
15 25
25 35
35 45
45 55
55 65
65 75
75 85
85 95
95
i
diameter
diameter (mm)
(mm)
g
Fig. 10 End types and diameters from Site 34
8.3 Jam curves
These occur when the blade gets jammed in the wood and had to be withdrawn, effectively leaving a
clear imprint of the axe blade. It is the most effective method for accurately recording blade
dimensions. Jam curves were recorded from six structures in Site 34; 34504, 34519, 34005 and 34017
from Area 2 and 341501 and 341512 from Area 4 (Fig. 11). Three of the structures with clear jam
curves were dated‐ Structures 34519 and 341501 were dated to the Early Bronze Age, while Structure
34504 yielded a medieval date.
Broad jam curves were recorded from the Early Bronze Age structures, reflecting wide, convex edged
blades. The jam curves from 34W3026 (Structure 34519) and 34W4602 (Structure 341501) were both
very similar in dimensions and curve profile, broad and widely curved, 58mm and 68mm in width
respectively. However, in contrast to this, from Structure 34519, two tightly curved jam curves were
lifted from 34W3029 and 34W3019, of dimensions 23 and 30mm in width. While some of the larger
jam curves are comparable within the Early Bronze Age material, clearly different axes were used on
the same structure.
The Medieval axe mark was extremely different to those from the earlier periods. This jam curve was
83mm in width, and was very rectangular shaped, with a straight cutting edge (34W3524, Structure
27

34504). This straight edge was very different to the curved edges of the earlier material. It was
obviously a heavy axe, capable of cutting deeply into oak heartwood (Plate 1).
Similar jam curves were also identified from the same structure, for example from 341512 in Area 4,
where four broad, convex shaped jam curves were recorded (ca. 60mm in length).
Therefore, distinctly different axe shapes can be discerned from the jam curves. Some of the curves
showed the use of broad, heavy blades with curved edges, for example in Structure 341512. In
contrast, smaller, more tightly curved convex edged blades were recorded from Structure 34519. A
flat, broad, almost rectangular edged blade with almost straight cutting edges was used on Structure
34504 (Fig. 7).

9
Plate 1. Rectangular edged jam curve from 34W3524
10
11
28

12
13 Fig. 11 Jam curves from Site 34
14
29

15
Fig.
11
Jam
curv
es
from
Site
34
(cont
’d)
16
30

8.4 Facets
In all events, one should measure the most complete facet (O’Sullivan 1996) but when working with
roundwoods as small as 20mm in diameter, the full facet will not always be preserved. This is why
the comparability of the larger facets probably reflects more accurately the dimensions of the axes
used to fell and shape the trees. The facet junction, where the blade has not gone straight through the
wood but has come out across a previous facet (Coles and Orme 1985, 27) was clean or stepped in all
cases, which suggests the use of metal axes . Stone axes tend to leave ‘ragged’ facet junctions, as they
are not as capable of cutting the wood cleanly as metal axes. Facets were recorded from fifty six pieces
of wood from Site 34. The predominant profile from the site was clearly flat (Fig. 12), although
slightly concave and concave were also represented. The facet dimensions can be seen in Fig. 13. The
facet study from Site 34 demonstrated that metal axes with blade widths of at least 62mm were used
to chop the wood. The various features of a facet can be seen in Fig. 14.
50
50
45
45
40
40
samples
of samples
35
35
30
30
25
25
amt. of
20
20
amt.
15
15
10
10
55
00
flat
flat slightly
slightly concave
concave concave
concave
Facet
Facet profile
profile

Fig. 12 Total facet characters from Site 34

31

100
100
90
90
80
80
70
70
(mm)
width (mm)
60
60
50
50
width
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
00
00 10
10 20
20 30
30 40
40 50
50 60
60 70
70
length
length (mm)
(mm)

Fig. 13 Total facet dimensions from Site 34
Fig. 14 Features of a facet (After Sands 1997, 12)
32

8.5 Toolmarks and the archaeological chronology
Worked wood was examined from Early/Middle Bronze Age structures [34005, 34017 and 341512],
Later Bronze Age [34505], Iron Age [34006, 34007 and 34015] and from the Medieval period [34504,
34507]. The main end types present during all periods is chisel (Fig. 15), which probably reflects the
limited diameter of the material (Fig. 10). In comparison the character of the facets are mainly flat
throughout the different time periods (Fig. 16). The Early/Middle Bronze Age facet widths cluster
mainly between 27 and 45mm, although there is one example at 60mm (Fig. 17). The Late Bronze Age
facets are slightly smaller, clustering mainly between 20 and 34mm in width. The Iron Age facets
range from 27 to 62mm in width, while the medieval facets are widely spread, from 22 to 71mm in
size.
There are no statistical criteria established for dating structures from their toolmarks, indeed two of
the major Irish publications (O’Sullivan 1996; O’Neill 2005) which address this issue had quite
different results. Bronze Age sequences from the Mountdillon trackways exhibited mainly flat facets,
with a small proportion being concave and slightly concave (O’Sullivan 1996). In contrast, in the
Lisheen Mine excavations, the Early and Middle Bronze Age facets were concave, with a variation in
the depth of the concavity. In the Late Bronze Age, profiles were also concave, although facets were
generally smaller and the concavity more pronounced. On structures from the end of the seventh
century, the profile changed to being dished, with a wide flat base and very short, curved sides. On
structures dating from around 460‐450BC the profiles were very flat. This also includes the Medieval
structures (O’Neill 2005). On Iron Age structures at the Mountdillon bogs, the facets were always flat,
with very distinct or clean facet junctions. There is some variance in the size of the facets from
different time periods, for example O’Sullivan (1996) found that the Early Bronze Age ones were
slightly wider than later Bronze Age, and that Iron Age facets were longer. The results from Site 34
show that flat facets predominated on the site from the Early/Middle Bronze Age through to the
medieval period.
33

14
14
12
12
samples
of samples
10
10
chisel
chisel
88
wwedge
edge
66
amt. of
pencil
pencil
amt.
44
22
00
Early/Middle
Early/Middle Late
LateBronze
BronzeAge
Age Iron
IronAge
Age Medieval
Medieval
Bronze
BronzeAgeAge
time
time period
period

Fig. 15 Worked ends per time period

88
77
samples
66
of samples
55
flat
flat
44
amt. of
33 slightly
slightly
amt.
concave
concave
22
11
00
Early/Middle
Early/Middle Late
LateBronze
Bronze Iron
IronAge
Age Medieval
Medieval
Bronze
BronzeAgeAge Age
Age
time
time period
period

Fig. 16 Facet profiles per time period

34


80
80
70
70
60
60
(mm)

width (mm)
50
50 Early
Early Middle
Middle
Bronze
BronzeAgeAge
40
40 Late
LateBronze
BronzeAge
Age
width

30
30
Iron
IronAge
Age
20
20

10
10 Medieval
Medieval
00

00 20
20 40
40 60
60 80
80 100
100
length
length (mm)
(mm)

Fig. 17 Facet dimensions per time period
8.6 Differences in spit levels
It was considered whether differences in the wood composition would be noted between the different
spit levels in structures. Due to the nature of the environment, it may be possible that different
structures were repaired, reused or relocated, and sometimes due to adverse excavation conditions,
this may not have become immediately apparent. Therefore, the spit results within structures will be
compared. This is not applicable to the individual worked wood samples, as it was not generally
recorded which spit they were from, but it is applicable to the bulk sample results. As a result of the
study, some differences were noted between spit levels in the same structure. In Structure 34005, Spits
2 & 3 and Spit 4 are dominated by roots, whereas in Spit 1 the wood pieces were between 10‐35mm.
In Structure 34007, there are more worked pieces in Spit 5 than in Spit 1 and 2. Willow was also
identified in Spit 5, while it is not present in Spit 1. In Structure 34015, there are distinctly larger
timbers and a greater variety of species in Spit 2 than in Spit 1. In Structure 34507, there are more
worked pieces in Spit 1 than in Spit 3 and 5. Therefore, it does appear that there are some definite
differences, both in species, level of working and dimensions between spits of the same structure.
The most definite of these is in Structure 34007 and Structure 34015. It is likely that the different spit
levels in these structures were constructed at different times, or re‐used timbers were used from other
constructions.
35

It was possible that some of the structures were related to each other, particularly Structures 34015
and 34006 in Area 1 (Wilkins 2005). While the wood types used in the two structures was similar,
most worked wood from Structure 34006 were chisel ends with flat facets, while no worked ends or
facets were recorded from Structure 34015, any worked wood was in the form of radially split
ash. Therefore, there is no worked wood evidence to link the two structures. The excavator noted that
many of the structures in Area 1 may be related to each other. Based on the worked wood and species
analysis, this is a very real possibility, as similar results were found from many of the structures.

36

8.7 Analysis of signatures
Facet marks may record the individual details of a tools edge. Points of damage on a blade, such as a
break or a bend, can be registered on the wood surface as either a ridge or groove running down the
long axis of the facet produced. The sequence of ridges or grooves created can act like a signature for the
use of that particular tool. When the same sequence is found on toolmarks from different timbers, then
those timbers may be associated through the single tool used in their working (Sands 1997, 6).
As the majority of the wood from Site 34 was in very good condition and mainly composed of alder, it
posed a good basis for a signature study. It is more likely that signatures would survive on alder
roundwoods as opposed to harder trees such as oak. Every piece of wood that had a preserved
signature, however faint, was noted and put aside for further analysis.

Plate 2 Blade signature on 34W047

Thirty‐one pieces were identified in this manner, primarily roundwoods. All of the wood was laid out
together in natural light. The majority of the pieces had depressed, in some cases rather faint lines,
caused by a bulge on the axe blade (Plate 2). Approximately 4 to 5 pieces had a raised groove, caused
by a nick in the axe blade. The signatures were grouped together based on the six point scale
developed by Sands (1997, 19). This basically helps group the signatures together by common
patterns. A number of observations were made. 34W4502, Area 4 Structure 341512 had three chop
marks, with a distinctive raised ridge. 34W008, Structure 34005, Area 1 also had a very distinctive
37

raised ridge. There was a positive match of signatures from Structure 34504 [Area 2, Spit 1, Bulk
Sample number 62], between
three pieces. There was also a positive match between two pieces from Structure 34507 [Spit 5, Bulk
Sample number 53].
This work shows that the same axe was used on two different wood pieces in Structure 34504, and on
Structure 34507. The use of the same axe on the same structure is not in itself surprising, and it would
have been more rewarding to link separate structures through signatures, but this was not possible.
The fact that thirty‐one separate signatures were identified does not necessarily man that this amount
of separate axes were used, it just indicates thirty‐one separate episodes of use.
When metal and stone axes were sharpened before use in experimental work from the Somerset
levels, various irregularities were noted on the blades, which would lead to signatures. By the end of
the work, when many hundred blows had been delivered to each tool, almost all of the signatures
were smoothed out (Orme and Coles 1985, 30). This suggests that only a matter of days, if not hours
passed between the creation of imperfections on the axe blade, and their eradication through work.
This contrasts by work from Derryville, where O’Neill (2005) found the same signature on wood cut
in the summer and winter. Could this suggest that the wood was felled in its relevant seasons, but
worked at the one time?
38

8.8 Tree felling
One of the elements (34W4001) (Plate 3) from Area 2 showed excellent evidence of felling techniques.
This oak trunk had been felled at least 40cm above the ground. The tree was felled in quite a specific
manner, mainly to control the direction that it would fall in. Two opposing notches were used. A
steeply angled notch was cut deep into one side of the trunk, across the pitch, in the direction of
where it was to fall. Another notch was then cut higher up into the opposing side of the trunk. The
trunk was then axed the whole way through before it fell, as there is no surviving fibrous ridge
remaining where the tree fell over. The oak itself was very fast growing, and extremely knotty,
showing that it had a lot of branches trimmed off. It is not the ideal choice when prospecting, as the
felled roundwood would have been difficult to split, due the fact that the knots would interfere with
the cleaving process. However, its rate of fast growth may be what made it desirable, as fast grown
oak is more dense and useful than slow grown (Damian Goodburn, pers comm.). The felling and
presumably use of such a knotty, oak log indicates that (a) there wasn’t a high availability of straight
grown oak trees in the vicinity and (b) the tree grew in fairly optimum conditions, i.e. in an open,
non‐woodland, with space to branch out.
Plate 3 Felled oak log 34W001
39

8.9 Cleft timbers
The majority of the wood remains from Site 34 were in the form of roundwoods. However, some of
the alder, oak, ash and willow stakes and planks were converted radially, tangentially and half‐ split
(Fig. 18). Converting wood radially takes advantage of the natural planes of weakness of the wood.
These splitting techniques could have been achieved using heavy mallets, wooden or bone wedges as
well as axes (Fig. 19). Seasoned oak chips could have been used as wedges. Radials can be produced
by splitting a trunk in quarters, and then by splitting “slices” off each quarter. In experimental work
oak has been shown to split easily and cleanly (Orme & Coles, 1983). The side branches, which
contained knots showing where the branches would have been, were cleaned off.
12
10
amt. of samples
0
half split radial tangential
conversion process

Fig. 18 Conversion processes from Site 34
40


Fig. 19 Cleft timbers; tangential, radial and half‐split (After O’Sullivan 1996, 305).

8.10 Woodcarving and fine woodworking
One chisel ended piece, 34W1057 was split on one side, and hollowed out. Its minimum and
maximum external diameters were 30 and 42mm, while the internal diameters were 20 and 28mm. It
is unclear how this piece was hollowed out, as there were no chisel marks present. It is likely that it
was half the remains of a hollowed out pipe, which would have joined at the sides. It had striations
inside which were similar to the Charlesland pipes, a probable Early Bronze Age musical instrument
(O’Donnell 2004).
41

8.11 Notched or holed timbers
Two of the elements (34W1595 and 34W2010) (Plate 4) had rectangular to semi‐circular notches
carved out of them. 34W1595 was a half‐split alder piece, and its notch was 65 x 30mm. 34W2010 was
a radially cleft, fast grown ash. The remains of the notch measured 95mm x 160mm. The plank was
insect ridden; probably indicating that it was exposed for a time before use. Both of the pieces were
excavated from Area 1, 34W1595 from Structure 34014 and 34W2010 was from Structure 34015. The
notches did not serve any function within the structures (Mick Drumm, pers. comm.), so they must
have been re‐used from other structures. The notches were quite rectangular in plan, similar to those
identified from the Middle and Later Bronze Age levels of the Mountdillon trackways (O’Sullivan
1996). The notches in both cases were cut at right angles to the grain. They were either the remains of
full mortices and some of the timber broke away, or they were intentionally carved into half‐ notches.

Plate 4 Notched ash piece (34W2010)

42

9. AGE PROFILE OF THE TIMBERS/WOODLAND MANAGEMENT
Woodmanship involves the management of woodlands for the production of timber, firewood and
rods for assorted uses (Tierney 1998). Evidence of this type of management in Ireland has been found
from the Early Bronze Age in Lisheen (Stuijts 2005). Coppicing is a traditional method of woodland
management, where young stems are cut down to a low level, or sometimes right down to the
ground. In subsequent growth years, many new shoots will grow up, and after a number of years the
cycle begins again and the coppiced tree or stool is ready to be harvested again. When let grow for
some years, the sucker or shoot produces a long pole, which is straighter and better for working than
naturally grown trees which have bends and forks. Frequently there may be remains of heels, i.e. the
join between the stump or stool and the rod. When trees are coppiced, often their first one to three
rings are fast, probably as a result of increased space for growth. Subsequent extreme regularity in the
growth ring pattern is another indicator of the uniform conditions of coppiced growth. Pollarding is
similar to coppicing, but the trunk is cut some 2 to 3m above the ground to prevent browsing
(Moloney 1993a). The main tree species identified from Site 34 was alder, which is suitable for
coppicing, and can be cut about every ten years in the winter. Where possible, the age of each piece
was counted. When the results were plotted (Fig. 20), it is clear that there is a very distinct peak in
ages between 6‐10 and 11‐15 years old, in fact over 87% of the aged alder roundwoods fall into this
category.
500
450
400 alder
350 ash
amt. of pieces
300 hazel
250 pomaceous
200 birch
150 w illow
100 oak
50
0
0-5
6-10
11-15
16-20
21-25
26-30
31-35
36-40
41-45
46-50
51-55
years

Fig. 20 Age profiles of the main wood taxa from Site 34
43

Most of the material from Site 34 can be classified as brushwood, i.e. less than 60mm in diameter
(Moloney 1993a). Therefore, one may expect the wood to have fairly low ages. However, when the
ages of the material are compared to the diameters of the bulk samples, age appears to be the
discriminatory factor, i.e. there are pieces of ten to fifteen years that measure up to seventy mm in
diameter. There is a general trend that larger pieces tend to be older, but in all, it seems that most of
the alder selected for construction at Site 34 was based more on age than on size. The concentration of
wood between 5 and 15 years of age, combined with the regular spread may indicate a managed as
opposed to natural situation. Some of the alder pieces also showed evidence of probable coppiced
heels (Plate 5).

Plate 5 Probable coppiced alder heels from Site 34
Where the age patterns of the material were grouped according to time period, the majority of the
brushwood elements were commonly recorded from the structures dating to the medieval period (Fig
21). During the Medieval period, it appears that there was a good supply of young roundwoods
growing in the vicinity of the site.
44


450
400
350
No. of wood counts
300 1‐10 yrs
250 11‐20 yrs

200 21‐30 yrs

150 30+ yrs
100
50
0
EBA/MBA LBA Iron Age Medieval

P eriods

Fig. 21 Age profiles of wood identified from dated structures
10. COMPARISONS BETWEEN THE WOOD AND POLLEN RECORD
Since a pollen record was established for Site 34, this offered a unique opportunity for the wood and
pollen results to be compared and to establish any trends or changes that may have occurred in the
local woodland. It is important to mention however that pollen dispersal is a natural occurrence that
is dependent on wind, water or insects for transportation, while wood recorded from archaeological
sites, as at Site 34, represents a bias selection of materials brought to a site by human activity. It is also
important to note that certain species such as willow and crab apple are insect‐pollinated and
therefore can be under‐represented in the pollen rain, while species such as alder and hazel are wind
pollinated and can be over‐represented in the pollen record so this should be taken into account when
comparing both results.
On the pollen diagram, Units III to IV correspond with the Bronze Age wooden structures. Oak with
a probable understory of hazel was present throughout this time. This contrasts with the wood
results, where the values for oak are consistently low. Betula pubescens (hairy/downy birch) was also
identified. It is not possible to discriminate between the two species of birch (hairy and silver)
through wood anatomy, but the pollen indicates that it may represent the downy variety. Alder and
45

willow were also important during this time, and may signify an alder‐ sedge carr woodland as
indicated in the pollen results (Timpany 2006, 11).
The Iron Age structures are represented in the pollen diagram by Units VI to VII. At this stage there is
a significant decline in oak, followed by hazel and alder declines. They recover towards the end of the
zone. Carr – woodland dominated by alder, with birch and willow are still present (Timpany 2006,
13). The wood identifications from the Iron Age are dominated by alder, followed by ash. In general,
the pollen and wood remains correlate well as both point to the presence of alder carr woodland.
11. DISCUSSION
The estuarine setting of Site 34 facilitated the growth alder carr. A variety of primarily native Irish
species were also used to construct the trackways, platforms and structures across the
alluvial/estuarine wetland. The main wood used was alder, which would have been freely available
in the surrounding environment.
Alder also has the added advantage of resisting decay in a wet environment almost indefinitely, a
property which would have made it very suitable and long lasting in the wetland environment of Site
34. One of the premise of wood analysis from archaeological sites is the theory that structural wood
and firewood will probably be gathered from as near to the site as possible, for convenience. The
weight and density of large trees would have prohibited them being carried long distances, and there
is no need to go further to gather firewood, presuming there is suitable material in the vicinity.
Therefore, it is most likely that the people building the brushwood trackways and platforms at Site 34
had easy access to alder forest or carr. The people building their trackways and platforms at Site 34,
Newrath didn’t feel it necessary to bring wood in from the nearby marginal and dryland areas, which
the pollen evidence shows had ample oak and hazel growing.
The smaller roundwood nature of the material from Site 34 indicates that larger, well built trackways
or platforms were simply not necessary to go across the estuarine area. This may have some reflection
on the use of the site if animals were being herded across the area then more substantial plank built
trackways would be necessary, while the more insubstantial structures at the site were more likely for
human use. The estuarine area would have provided resources, such as fish, birds, tubers, reeds for
weaving, sedges which could be used for bedding etc.
46

Where bark was present on the roundwoods, in a number of cases it was noted that the pieces had a
full outer ring. This means they were cut at the end of the growth season, in winter or early spring.
This was probably the season when the greatest need was for platforms or trackways, for example
when the water‐table would be high and the area liable to flooding. Interestingly, while under
excavation, the area completely flooded in winter 2004.
Much of the wood was also quite crudely prepared, with bark still present and some of the material
was knarled or twisted. This could signify that little was done to dress the wood for construction of
these structures and perhaps they were viewed as necessary but temporary features which only
served a short‐term practical purpose. The relatively haphazard nature of the construction also
indicates that it
was simply unnecessary to carefully lay down carefully built, dressed trackways, of the calibre found
at Mountdillon (Raftery 1996) , that dumps of alder brushwood would suffice perfectly well.
The dynamic landscape in which the site was situated would have inevitably been unpredictable
from time to time and so maybe these wooden structures needed to be of a more make‐shift design.
This too may explain the use of brushwood elements within the structures, where there would have
been low‐level felling and gathering involved. The tool mark evidence is dominated by worked ends,
indicating the alder roundwoods were probably simply chopped down where they grew.
Alder is frequently used for building in wetland settings. This is presumably because of easy access
due to its common presence in the local environment. Another lactustrine site at Clowanstown, Co.
Meath contained wood from Mesolithic and Neolithic levels dominated by alder, followed by hazel,
while the charcoal results were dominated by hazel (O’Donnell 2008). At a probable Late Bronze Age
fulacht fiadh trough at Coonagh West, Co. Limerick, alder was gathered from the surrounding area, as
it would have grown well in the wetland area which surrounded the site. These trees grew in a
natural situation, and were between thirty and sixty years old. Growth was slow, indicating marginal
conditions (O’Donnell 2005). At Inchagreenoge, Co. Limerick, wood from an Early Bronze Age fulacht
fiadh was identified as mainly alder, with some hazel and ash also recorded (Taylor 2007, 281‐284).
At Derryville bog, Co. Tipperary hazel, followed by alder, ash and willow was the most commonly
used wood on archaeological sites. The marginal forest was composed primarily of alder (Stuijts
47

2005). At the Mountdillon trackway, Co. Longford, again hazel dominated the brushwood and lighter
woods, while oak was the main species for larger split timbers (Moloney 1996). In comparison, at the
Mount Gabriel mines, Co. Cork, hazel again was the dominant species, followed by oak (Mc Keown
1994). At Clonfinlough, Co. Offaly ash was the dominant species (Moloney et al 1993b), while in the
Blackwater survey, Co. Mayo, birch, followed by ash and hazel were the dominant wood types
(Moloney et al 1995).
At a Late Bronze Age fulacht fiadh at Cahiracon, Co. Clare, oak was used to line the trough, while
alder, hazel and holly stakes were used to peg it into position (Dennehy 2007, 188‐189).
The high values for alder from the estuarine site at Site 34 highlights the key difference between
alluvial and bog land archaeological results. Few trees will generally grow in raised bogs, with the
exception of trees such as birch and yew. Therefore, trees are generally brought in from the nearby
marginal woodlands for construction (for example Stuijts 2005). In the estuarine site of Site 34, and
similarly at Clowanstown, people used the trees which were growing naturally on the lake edge, in
each case alder, for building.
There was no evidence for stone axes being used anywhere on the site. Across the three areas, the
worked end type was typically chisel, cut at shallow or very shallow angles. The size of most of the
roundwoods (typically smaller than 60mm in diameter) probably influenced this worked end pattern.
Flat facets with clean or stepped junctions predominate, demonstrating that axes with a blade width
of at least 60mm were used in all areas, the size of which does not vary greatly between areas. Jam
curves demonstrated that during the Early Bronze Age, tools with tightly curved blades of widths
from 23 30mm were used, along with broader curved convex shaped blades of up to 68mm in width.
However, a jam curve recorded from the medieval contexts was markedly different, it was longer
(83mm), and more rectangular shaped. The study of signatures from various wood pieces showed
that there were at least thirty one episodes of tool use, with some very distinct signatures. Signatures
were positively matched between roundwoods from Structures 34507 and 34504. Split planks were
quite rare, but were generally radial or half‐splits. The remains of notched holes or possible mortices
were identified from two split pieces. Most of the alder roundwoods were between five and fifteen
years old, which, coupled with even growth rates indicates that some form of management was
probably being practiced in the area.
48

Adzing was not recorded from the Site 34 material. This is sometimes a difficult toolmark to
recognize, and as the whole point of adzing is to finish the timber, as generally a skilled adze person
will leave no marks. Good examples of adzing an oak plank have been found by the author from a
fulacht fiadh site in Clare (Dennehy 2007) and also by O’Sullivan at the Iron Age trackway site of
Corlea 1, Co. Longford (1996). There is also no evidence for sawing from the Site 34 material. The first
conclusive evidence for the use of a saw in Dublin comes from Dublin Castle excavations, from the
16th century, where the marks were found on timber framed house‐beams. Evidence for sawing
includes a distinctive type of tool mark of closely parallel, straight ridges across the width of the
timber (O’Sullivan, 2000).
In the worked wood from the Mountdillon trackways, O’Sullivan (1996) examined wood from
Neolithic through to Iron Age contexts. He realized that the Neolithic facets were characterised by
relatively narrow, short concave shaped facets, with ragged facet junctions. The dominant end type
was wedge, while split and split‐and‐axed ends were also common. Cutting angles tended to be
shallow. When axe marks from the Early Bronze Age were compared to the Neolithic results, it
became apparent that the facets were broader and longer, with clean junctions. The cutting angles
were reduced on the worked ends, and split and split‐and‐axed ends disappeared from the
archaeological record. In their place, chisel and wedge ends were the main end type. These were also
the predominant end type in the Middle and Later Bronze Age, and minimum cutting angles were
also similar. During the Middle and Late Bronze Age, facets tended to be typically flat and of medium
size, less wide than the Early Bronze Age examples. Planks with mortices were used in the Late
Bronze Age. During the Iron Age, the facets tended to be longer and thinner, with an almost complete
dominance of very shallow cutting angles. The worked ends were typically chisel or wedge ends
(O’Sullivan 1996).
The wood from Site 34 compares to that of the Mountdillon trackways in a number of ways. The most
common end types in the Bronze Age/Iron Age material was chisel, followed by wedge, although
there is more of a definite bias towards chisel ends in the Site 34 material than in the Mountdillon
trackways. All facets from metal toolmarks had clean or stepped junctions. While the dimensions of
the Site 34 Early Bronze Age facets and the jam curves are very similar to those from the Mountdillon
trackways, the facet profile is not predominantly flat as it is during that time period at Mountdillon.
In the Site 34 Iron Age wood, the facets are mainly, flat, similar to those from the Iron Age material in
Mountdillon. However, while some of the Iron Age facets from Site 34 were as long as those from
49

Iron Age worked ends in Mountdillon, many were not. Comparative results were encountered by
Sands, in his analysis of Iron Age toolmarks from the Oakbank Crannóg excavations. Here he found
that the facets appeared to be generally shorter than those established for Iron Age material by
O’Sullivan, but longer than those characterised by the Middle to Bronze Age in his work (Sands 1997).
Interestingly, the jam curve from the medieval structure in Site 34 (34504) was very comparable to
those from an Iron Age structure at Derraghan More (O’Sullivan 1996).
12. SUMMARY
The structures recorded at Site 34 were composed mainly of alder roundwoods, which could have
been chopped easily at the lakes edge, and would have survived well in a waterlogged environment.
Alder was the main tree used from all time periods identified on the site. Pollen results indicate that
during the Bronze Age and Iron Age, an alder‐sedge carr was present near the site, which correlates
well with the wood results. The wood is dominated by roundwoods, with a focus on young stems of
limited diameter, between 20mm and 50mm. The roundwoods were predominantly chisel ended,
with shallow to very shallow cutting angles. This, coupled with the clean or stepped facet junctions,
indicates that metal axes were used on all the timbers examined. When the material between different
areas and structures were compared, the results were very similar, with chisel ended, flat facetted
alder roundwoods used frequently. Jam curves lifted from Early Bronze Age and medieval dated
wood demonstrated different cutting edges. The Bronze Age axes tended to have broad, convex edges
or smaller tightly curved ones, while the Medieval jam curve showed the use of an axe which had a
wider blade, and was more rectangular. A pattern was noted within the Early Bronze Age material, of
mixed facet profiles and end types, compared to the Iron Age and Medieval material, which tended to
have flat facets and chisel ends. Few of the timbers were split, but when they were the main
converting processes were half‐split and radially. When comparisons were made between signatures
from different pieces of wood, they were both from the same structure. The age profile of the alder
roundwoods was concentrated between five and fifteen years, there was also evidence of coppiced
heels within the material. Most of the material examined was cut at the end of the growth season, in
winter or early spring. This may have been a time of increased wetness on the site and therefore a
greater need to build such structures across these alluvial sediments.
50

13. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Thanks to Dr. Tim Holden and Mhairi Hastie of Headland Archaeology Ltd for their thoughts and
advice on the sampling strategies and to Dr. Scott Timpany for his help with interpreting the
palaeoenvironmental results from the site. Thanks also to Brendon Wilkins and Mick Drumm for their
help with the on‐site interpretations of the material and finally a special thanks to Clodagh Carroll,
Ian Dorgan and Noirín Gleeson who helped with the post‐excavation works.
51

14. REFERENCES
Brazier, J D and Franklin, G L, 1961 Identification of hardwoods: a microscopic key. London: H.M
Stationary Office
Brunning, R and O’ Sullivan, A, 1997 ‘Late Bronze Age species selection, woodworking techniques
and tools at Caldicot’, in N. Nayling (ed.) Excavations at Caldicot, Gwent: Bronze Age palaeochannels in
the Lower Nedern Valley. York: Council for British Archaeology, 157‐291
Burgess, C, 1979 ‘The background of early metalwork in Ireland and Britain’, in M. Ryan (ed.) The
Origins of Metallurgy in Atlantic Europe, Proceedings of the Fifth Atlantic Colloquium. Dublin: Stationary
Office, 207‐214
Carruthers, S, 1978 ‘Examination of timbers for evidence of decay and microbial activity’, in J.M.
Coles (ed) Somerset Levels Papers Number 4, 10
Caseldine, C J and Hatton, J M, 1996 ‘Early land clearance and wooden trackway construction in the
third and fourth millennium BC at Corlea, C. Longford’, Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 95B, 1‐9
Coles, J M, 1978 Somerset Levels Papers 4. Hertford: Stephen Austin & Sons Ltd
Coles, J M, and Orme, B J, 1985 ‘Prehistoric woodworking from the Somerset Levels: 3. Roundwood’,
Somerset Levels Papers 11, 25‐50
Dennehy, E, 2007 ‘122a Cahiracon’, in E. Grogan, L. O’Donnell and P. Johnston (eds) The Bronze Age
Landscapes of the Pipeline to the West: An integrated archaeological and environmental assessment, 188‐189
Edlin, H L, 1951 British plants and their uses London: B T Batsford
Edlin, H L, 1973 Woodland crafts in Britain. Devon: David and Charles Newtown Abbot
Gale, R & Cutler, D, 2000 Plants in Archaeology: Identification manual of artefact of plant origin from Europe
and the Mediterranean. Westbury and the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew
Greig, J, 1991 ‘The British Isles’ in van Zeist, Wasylikowa & Behre (eds) Progress in Old World
Palaeoethnobotany, 299–334. Rotterdam
Harbison, P, 1969 ‘The axes of the Early Bronze Age in Ireland’, Prahistorische Bronzefunde 9 (1)
Munchen: C.H. Beck
Herity, M & Eogan, G, 1977 Ireland in Prehistory., Dublin: Routeledge and Kegan
Hickie, D, 2002 Native trees & forests of Ireland. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan
Kelly, F, 1976 ‘The old Irish tree‐list’, Celtica, 11, 107‐124
Milner, J E, 1992 The tree book. Collins and Brown
Mitchell, G F, 1953/4. ‘A Pollen Diagram from Lough Gur, Co. Limerick’. Proceedings of the Royal Irish
Academy Vol 56, Sec C, 481‐488
52

Moloney, A, Jennings, D, Keane, M and McDermott, C, 1993a Irish Archaeological Wetland Unit
Transactions: Volume 1 Survey of the raised bogs of County Longford. Dublin: Crannóg Publication
Moloney, A, Jennings, D, Keane, M and McDermott, C, 1993b Irish Archaeological Wetland Unit
Transactions: Volume 2. Excavations at Clonfinlough, Co. Offaly. Dublin: Crannóg Publication
Maloney, A, Bermingham, N, Jennings, D, Keane, M, McDermott, C, and O’Carroll, E, 1995. Irish
Archaeological Wetland Unit. Transactions; Volume 4. Blackwater Survey and excavations Artefact
deterioration in peatlands Loughmore, Co. Mayo. Dublin: Crannóg Publication
Moloney, A, 1996 ‘Wood analysis’ in B. Raftery (ed) Trackway excavations in the Mountdillon Bogs, Co.
Longford 1985 – 1991. Dublin: Crannòg publication 343‐358
Mc Keown, S, 1994 ‘The analysis of wood remains from Mine 3, Mount Gabriel’ in W O’Brien (ed)
Mount Gabriel, Bronze Age mining in Ireland. Galway: Galway University Press, 135‐162
O’Donnell, L, 2005 ‘Analysis of the worked wood from Coonagh West, Co. Limerick (A005/2021)’.
Unpublished report for TVAS Ltd
O’Donnell, L, 2008 ‘Analysis of the worked wood from Clowanstown, Co. Meath (E3064 A008/011)’
Unpublished report for ACS Ltd’
O’Neill, J, 2005 ‘Worked wood’, in M. Gowen, J. O Neill and M. Philips (eds) The Lisheen Mine
Archaeological Project 1996‐8. Wordwell: Bray 329‐340
O’Sullivan, A, 1996 ‘Neolithic, Bronze Age and Iron Age’, in B. Raftery (ed) Trackway excavations in the
Mountdillon Bogs, Co. Longford 1985 – 1991. Dublin: Crannóg Publication 291 – 243
Orme, B J & Coles, J M, 1983 ‘Prehistoric woodworking from the Somerset Levels: 1: Timbers’,
Somerset Levels Papers 9, 19 – 43
Orme, B J and Coles, J M, 1985 ‘Prehistoric woodworking from the Somerset levels: 2: Species
selection and prehistoric woodlands’. Somerset Levels papers, 11, 7‐24
Pilcher, J and Hall, V, 2001 Flora Hibernica. The wild flowers, plants and trees of Ireland. Cork: The Collins
Press
Preston, C D, Pearman, D A and Dines, T D, 2002 New Atlas of the British & Irish Flora. Oxford: Oxford
University Press
Pryor, F French, C & Taylor, M, 1986 ‘Flag Fen, Fengate, Peterborough I: discovery, reconnaissance
and initial excavation (1982‐1985)’. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 52, 1‐24
Rackham, O, 1980 Ancient woodland: its history, vegetation and uses in England. London: Arnold
Rackham, O, 1995 Trees and woodland in the British landscape. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson
Raftery, B, 1996 Trackway excavations in the Mountdillon Bogs, Co. Longford 1985 – 1991. Dublin:
Crannóg Publication
Sands, R, 1997 Prehistoric woodworking: the analysis and interpretation of Bronze & Iron Age toolmarks.
London: London Institute of Archaeology
53

Schweingruber, F H, 1978 Microscopic wood anatomy. Birmensdorf: Swiss Federal Institute for Forest,

Snow and Landscape Research
Stuijts, I, 2003‐2004 ‘Appendix II. Charcoal remains’, in O’Donovan, E ‘A Neolithic House at Kishoge,
Co. Dublin’, The Journal of Irish Archaeology XII and XIII, 18‐21.
Stuijts, I, 2005 ‘Wood and charcoal identification’, in M. Gowen, J. O Neill and M. Philips (eds) The
Lisheen Mine Archaeological Project 1996‐8. Wordwell: Bray 137‐186
Taylor, K, 2008 ‘Inchagreenoge’, in E. Grogan, L. O’Donnell and P. Johnston (eds) The Bronze Age
Landscapes of the Pipeline to the West: An integrated archaeological and environmental assessment, 281‐284
Taylor, M & Pryor, F, 1990 ‘Bronze Age building techniques at Flag Fen, Peterborough, England’,
World Archaeology 21 (3), 425‐434
Tierney, J, 1998 ‘Wood and woodlands in Early Medieval Munster’, in Michael A. Monk and John
Sheehan (eds) Early Medieval Munster Archaeology, History and Society. Cork: Cork University Press, 53‐
58
Timpany, S, 2006 ‘New Waterford Bypass, Site 34 Palaeoenvironmental Assessment Report’,
Unpublished technical report for Headland Archaeology Ltd
Van der Meiden, H A, 1961 ‘De els in populierenbeplantingen’, Nederlands Bosbouwtijdschrift 33 (6),
168‐71
Wallace, P, 1992 The Viking Age Buildings of Dublin, National Museum of Ireland Medieval Dublin
Excavations 1962‐81, Series A, Vol 1, Parts 1‐2. Royal Irish Academy: Dublin: Royal Irish Academy
Wheeler, E A, Bass, P & Gasson, P E, 1989 IAWA list of microscopic features for hardwood identification.
IAWA Bulletin nos. 10 (3): 219‐332. Rijksherbarium: Leiden
Wilkins, B, 2005 ‘Structure sequence from Site 34’, Unpublished report for Headland Archaeology Ltd
54

N25 Waterford Bypass, Contract 3. Final Report On Archaeological Investigations at Site 34 in The Townland of Newrath, Co Kilkenny Volume 2

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

N25 Waterford Bypass, Contract 3. Final Report On Archaeological Investigations at Site 34 in The Townland of Newrath, Co Kilkenny Volume 2

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

lifted from 34W3029 and 34W3019, of dimensions 23 and 30mm in width. While some of the larger

Plate 3 Felled oak log 34W001

EBA/MBA LBA Iron Age Medieval

Schweingruber, F H, 1978 Microscopic wood anatomy. Birmensdorf: Swiss Federal Institute for Forest,

You might also like