Proposed LDP Environmental Report

EnvironmentalAssessment(Scotland)Act2005
ClackmannanshireLocalDevelopmentPlan ProposedPlan EnvironmentalReport

October2013

Nontechnicalsummary
Nontechnicalsummary
ThisEnvironmentalReportpresentsthefindingsofthestrategicenvironmentalassessment(SEA) carriedoutontheClackmannanshireProposedLocalDevelopmentPlan. ClackmannanshireLocalDevelopmentPlan TheClackmannanshireLocalDevelopmentPlanisalanduseplan,andisarequirementoftheTown andCountryPlanning(Scotland)Act1997,asamendedbythePlanningEtc(Scotland)Act2006.It setsoutpoliciesandproposalsfordevelopmentanduseoflandinClackmannanshireto2024.The ProposedPlanisthesecondsignificantstageinthedevelopmentplanprocess,andsetsoutthe Council'sviewofwhattheadoptedPlanshouldbe. TheProposedLocalDevelopmentPlanhasbeeninfluencedbyarangeoflegislationandpolicy documents;somekeydriversincludetheClimateChange(Scotland)Act,ScottishPlanningPolicy, ClackmannanshireSustainabilityandClimateChangeStrategyandtheClackmannanshireSingle OutcomeAgreements. TheProposedLocalDevelopmentPlansetsoutavisionandspatialstrategyforClackmannanshire, andpoliciesandsupplementaryguidancerelatingtosustainablecommunities,employmentand prosperity,andenvironmentalassets.Italsocontainsascheduleofsitesproposedfordevelopment, includingdevelopmentrequirementsanddevelopercontributions. Clackmannanshire'senvironment ThefollowingarethekeyissuesforClackmannanshire'senvironment: Biodiversity,floraandfauna:Clackmannanshirehasadiverserangeofhabitatsandspecies,anda numberofdesignatedsites;problemsincludehabitatlossandnonnativeinvasivespecies. ClackmannanshireCouncilhasadutytofurthertheconservationofbiodiversity. Populationandhumanhealth:Clackmannanshirehasasignificantlyhigherthanaveragepercentage ofpeoplelivinginthe15%mostdeprivedareasofScotland;expectedyearsoflifeingoodhealthare significantlyworsethantheScottishaverage.PolicyrequiresClackmannanshireCounciltosupport humanhealth,forexamplethroughfacilitatingoutdooraccessandaddressingenvironmental quality. Water:WaterstatusinClackmannanshireisgenerallymoderate,andthereispotentialfloodrisk associatedwiththearea'srivers.ClackmannanshireCouncilisrequiredtoprotectthewater environment,reducefloodrisk,andprotectandenhancewaterstatus. Soil:Clackmannanshire'srelativelyhighpopulationdensityputspressureonitsavailableland resource;thetotalareaofvacantandderelictlandinClackmannanshirehasincreased. Air:AirpollutioninClackmannanshireisbelowthethresholdssetbytheScottishGovernment. Climaticfactors:Clackmannanshire'spercapitagreenhousegasemissionsarehigherthanthe Scottishaverage.ClackmannanshireCouncilhasadutytocontributetothereductioningreenhouse gasemissionsinScotland,andtocontributetoadaptingtotheeffectsofclimatechange. Materialassets:Clackmannanshirehasmadesignificantprogresswithwastemanagement,andits recyclingrateisaheadofnationaltargets. i
Nontechnicalsummary Culturalheritage:Clackmannanshirehasarichculturalheritage,withanumberofScheduled Monuments,listedbuildingsandconservationareas.Thesefeaturescanbethreatenedby inappropriatedevelopment,lossofviableuse,populationchange,landusechangeandneglect. ClackmannanshireCouncilisrequiredtoprotectculturalheritageandthebuiltenvironment. Landscape:ClackmannanshirehastwoAreasofGreatLandscapeValue,andanumberofareasof greenbelt.Clackmannanshirehasahighlevelofdevelopedland,andthereisaneedtosafeguard andenhancethesettingsofClackmannanshire'stownsandvillages. WithouttheClackmannanshireLocalDevelopmentPlan,existingtrendsarelikelytocontinue. EnvironmentalImpacts TheProposedLocalDevelopmentPlancontainsproactivepoliciesrelatingtoprotectionand enhancementofthenaturalhistoricenvironment,andincorporatesmeasurestomitigate environmentaldamageintopoliciesrelatingtosustainablecommunitiesandenterpriseand prosperity. TheProposedPlanstrategyislikelytoleadtoanincreaseingreenhousegasemissionsandinair pollution,andhasthepotentialtohaveadverseimpactsonbiodiversity,thewaterenvironment, landscapeandthehistoricenvironment.However,thepotentialfordamagehasbeentakeninto accountinthedevelopmentoftheplan'spoliciesandscheduleofsites:measurestoavoid,reduce ormitigatedamagehavebeenincludedwhereverpossible.Developmentalsohasthepotentialto deliverimprovementstotheseaspectsoftheenvironmentforexamplethroughhabitatcreation, renaturalisationofengineeredwatercourses,andbyprovidingtheinfrastructureforwalkingand cyclingandtheseopportunitieshavealsobeenincludedintheProposedPlan. TheProposedPlanhasthepotentialtodeliversignificantimprovementstohealth,particularly throughenablingimprovedaccesstotheoutdoors,aswellasbyimprovingairandwaterquality, andpotentiallyreducingsoilcontaminationthroughthedevelopmentofderelictland.Itisalso likelytocontributetotowncentreregenerationandtocommunitycohesionandsafety. Nextsteps TheProposedLocalDevelopmentPlanandthisenvironmentalreportaresubjecttoaneightweek publicconsultation[datetobeconfirmedfollowingCouncilmeeting].Pleasesubmitanycomments inwritingto: JulieHamilton,DevelopmentServicesManager ServicestoCommunities,ClackmannanshireCouncil Kilncraigs,GreensideStreet,Alloa,FK101EB. or devplan@clacks.gov.uk AllrepresentationsontheLocalDevelopmentPlanwillbeconsideredbytheCouncilbeforetheplan issubmittedtotheScottishMinisters.Anyrepresentationsthatcannotberesolvedwillbe consideredthroughanExamination,ledbyaReporter,whomayrecommendchangestotheplan beforeitcanbeadopted.
ii
Contents
Contents................................................................................................................................................. iii ListofTables ........................................................................................................................................... v Abbreviations ......................................................................................................................................... vi 1. 2. Introduction/KeyFacts..................................................................................................................1 Context............................................................................................................................................3 2.1 2.2 2.3 3. TheClackmannanshireLocalDevelopmentPlan...................................................................3 ProposedLocalDevelopmentPlan........................................................................................4 Clackmannanshire'senvironment .........................................................................................5
Method .........................................................................................................................................17 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 Assessmentofpolicyelementsoftheplan.........................................................................17 Scheduleofsites ..................................................................................................................20 ActionProgramme...............................................................................................................21 HabitatsRegulationsAppraisal............................................................................................21 Difficultiesencounteredincompilingtheenvironmentalreport .......................................22
4.
Results...........................................................................................................................................23 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 Visionandobjectives ...........................................................................................................23 Spatialcontextandareastatements...................................................................................23 Policiesandsupplementaryguidance .................................................................................24 Scheduleofsites ..................................................................................................................47
5 6.
Monitoring ....................................................................................................................................48 Nextsteps .....................................................................................................................................51 6.1 6.2 Publicconsultation ..............................................................................................................51 Nextstagesintheplanmakingprocess ..............................................................................51
References ............................................................................................................................................53
iii
Appendix1: Appendix2: MainIssuesReportEnvironmentalReport
Consultationauthorities'commentsontheMainIssuesReport EnvironmentalReport Blankassessmentmatrix Policydevelopmentprocess RelationshipbetweenSEAobjectivesandsiteassessmentcriteria Completedfinalassessmentmatricesforpolicyelementsoftheplan SEAsummariesforearlieriterationsofpolicies AssessmentoftheProposedLocalDevelopmentPlanVision Siteassessments
Appendix3: Appendix4: Appendix5: Appendix6: Appendix7: Appendix8: Appendix9:
Appendix10: ListofsitesintheProposedLocalDevelopmentPlan Annex1: Siteassessments(carriedoutforLocalPlanAlterationandLDP MainIssuesReport)
iv
ListofTables
Table2.1: Table2.2: Table2.3:
DesignatedsitesinClackmannanshire Relevantenvironmentalproblems Summaryofimplicationsofotherrelevantplans,programmesandstrategies(PPS) andenvironmentalprotectionobjectives SEAobjectivesandtheirsources SEAcriteriaforsiteassessments Likelyenvironmentalimpactsofpoliciesandsupplementaryguidance Suggestedmonitoringindicators
Table3.1: Table3.2: Table4.1: Table5.1
Abbreviations
CA Consultationauthority
CSGN CentralScotlandGreenNetwork HRA HS LDP MIR SEA SEPA SG SNH HabitatsRegulationsAppraisal HistoricScotland LocalDevelopmentPlan MainIssuesReport StrategicEnvironmentalAssessment ScottishEnvironmentProtectionAgency Supplementaryguidance ScottishNaturalHeritage
vi
1.Introduction/KeyFacts
1.
Introduction/KeyFacts
ThisEnvironmentalReportpresentsthefindingsofthestrategicenvironmentalassessment(SEA)of theProposedClackmannanshireLocalDevelopmentPlan. Strategicenvironmentalassessmentoflocaldevelopmentplans(aswellasotherqualifyingplans, programmesandstrategies)isrequiredbytheEnvironmentalAssessment(Scotland)Act.This requirestheresponsibleauthoritywhoispreparingtheplan(inthiscase,ClackmannanshireCouncil) toassessthelikelyimpactsoftheplanontheenvironment.ThisEnvironmentalReportisintended toaccompanytheProposedLocalDevelopmentPlan,andprovidesbackgroundinformationtoassist inrespondingtopublicconsultationtheProposedPlan. ThemethodforassessingthelikelyenvironmentalimpactsoftheClackmannanshireLocal DevelopmentPlanwasagreedwiththeenvironmentalconsultationauthorities(HistoricScotland, ScottishNaturalHeritageandtheScottishEnvironmentProtectionAgency),followingsubmissionof anSEAScopingReportinJanuary2010.Astrategicenvironmentalassessmentwascarriedout,and anenvironmentreportwasprepared,fortheMainIssuesReport(MIR),thefirststageofpublic engagementonthelocaldevelopmentplan(Appendix1).Thisenvironmentalreportforthe ProposedLocalDevelopmentPlanbuildsonthatearlierwork,andhastakenintoaccountthe commentsmadeonitbytheconsultationauthorities(seeAppendix2).TheSEAhasbeencarried outwithregardtoPlanningAdviceNote1/2010:StrategicEnvironmentalAssessmentof DevelopmentPlans. ThisenvironmentalreportshouldbereadinconjunctionwiththeMainIssuesReportEnvironmental Report,whichgivesmoredetailaboutthelegislative,policyandenvironmentalcontextofthe assessment,andsetsoutthefindingsoftheenvironmentalassessmentofthemainissuescoveredin theplan.TheMIREnvironmentalReportisavailableonlineat http://www.clacksweb.org.uk/site/documents/environment/clackmannanshiredevelopmentplanmai nissuesreportenvironmentalreportdecember2010/,orinhardcopyatClackmannanshireCouncil's Kilncraigsoffice,duringnormalworkinghours. Keyfacts: Titleoftheplan: ClackmannanshireLocalDevelopmentPlan Responsibleauthority:ClackmannanshireCouncil Requiredby: TownandCountryPlanning(Scotland)Act1997(as amended) Subject: Landuseplanning Periodcovered: 20142034 Frequencyofupdates:Every5years Areacovered: Clackmannanshire Contact: JulieHamilton,DevelopmentServicesManager ServicestoCommunities,ClackmannanshireCouncil, Kilncraigs,GreensideStreet,Alloa,FK101EB
1.Introduction/KeyFacts TheProposedLocalDevelopmentPlanandthisenvironmentalreportaresubjecttoaneightweek publicconsultationundertheEnvironmentalAssessment(Scotland)Act 1 [datetobeconfirmed followingCouncilmeeting].Pleasesubmitanycommentsinwritingto: JulieHamilton,DevelopmentServicesManager ServicestoCommunities,ClackmannanshireCouncil Kilncraigs,GreensideStreet,Alloa,FK101EB. or devplan@clacks.gov.uk
ThiseightweeksistheperiodforrepresentationsontheProposedLocalDevelopmentPlanunderthe PlanningEtc(Scotland)Act
2.Context
2.
Context
TheClackmannanshireLocalDevelopmentPlan
2.1
TheClackmannanshireLocalDevelopmentPlan(LDP)isarequirementoftheTownandCountry Planning(Scotland)Act1997,asamendedbythePlanningetc.(Scotland)Act2006,andwillreplace thecurrentClackmannanshireandStirlingStructurePlan,andClackmannanshireLocalPlan. FollowingpublicconsultationontheMainIssuesReport(MIR)inearly2011,theProposedLocal DevelopmentPlanhasbeenprepared.TheProposedLDPisthesecondsignificantstageinthe DevelopmentPlanprocessandrepresentstheCouncil'spositionintermsofthepoliciesitwishesto adoptandthesitesandprojectsitwishestopromoteandsupport.ItthereforesetsouttheCouncil's viewofwhattheadoptedPlanshouldbe. TheProposedLocalDevelopmentPlanhasbeenpreparedinadifferentpolicylandscapetothat whichexistedwhentheLocalandStructurePlanswereadopted.Someofthekeypolicyand legislativeinfluencesarelistedbelow;afulllistoflegislation,plans,programmesandstrategies whichaffectthePlancanbefoundinAppendix2oftheMIREnvironmentalReport. TownandCountryPlanning(Scotland)Act1997(asamended)thissetstherequirementfora LocalDevelopmentPlan,andarequirementforplanningauthoritiestocontributetosustainable development. ClimateChange(Scotland)Act2010thissetsarequirementforlocalauthoritiestocontributeto reducinggreenhousegasemissions,andadaptingtotheimpactsofclimatechange.Itcontains specificprovisionsfordevelopmentplanstocontributetogreenhousegasemissionsreduction targets. ScottishPlanningPolicy2009thissetsthepolicyframeworkfordevelopmentplanninginScotland, andincorporatesrequirementsfromotherpolicyandlegislation. ClackmannanshireSustainabilityandClimateChangeStrategy2010thisstrategysetsa frameworkforimprovingsustainabilityperformanceinClackmannanshire,andincludesactions relatingtodevelopmentplanning. ClackmannanshireSingleOutcomeAgreementsthesesetouthowClackmannanshire'scommunity planningpartnershipwillcontributetotheScottishGovernment'sobjectives,anditspurpose"to focusgovernmentandpublicservicesoncreatingamoresuccessfulcountry,withopportunitiesfor allofScotlandtoflourish,throughincreasingsustainableeconomicgrowth."
2.Context
2.2
ProposedLocalDevelopmentPlan
TheClackmannanshireProposedLocalDevelopmentPlaniscomprisedof: VisionandObjectives ThevisionsetsouttheaspirationforwhattheLocalDevelopmentPlanwillachievein Clackmannanshireby2035;thestrategicobjectivessetouttheframeworkforhowtheplan's policiesandproposalsshoulddeliverthis.
SpatialContextandAreaStatements
ThissectionsetsoutthestrategyfordevelopmentinClackmannanshirebyarea,indicatingwhere theplanningsystemcanmakeasignificantcontributiontoregenerationandidentifyingwhere investmentisneededtohelpachievetheplan'svisionandobjectives.
CreatingSustainableCommunities
Thischaptersetsoutpoliciesrelatingtohousing;socialinfrastructure;services;anddevelopmentin thecountrysideandtheruraleconomy.
EmploymentandProsperity
Thischaptersetsoutpoliciesrelatingtobusiness,employment,retailandtowncentres.
EnvironmentalAssets
Thischaptersetsoutpoliciesrelatingtothenaturalenvironment,protectingnaturalresources,and thebuiltenvironment.
ScheduleofSites
Thissectiondescribesthesitesproposedfordevelopmentintheplan,andsetsoutdeveloper requirementsanddevelopercontributionsforeachsite.
Maps
Mapsshowingtheproposalsandopportunitiesforeacharea,aswellasdesignatedsitesandthe greennetwork.
SupplementaryGuidance
Supplementaryguidanceprovidingfurtherinformationanddetailinrespectofpoliciesondeveloper contributions;onshorewindenergy;placemaking;water;affordablehousing;greeninfrastructure; andenergyefficiencyandlowcarbondevelopment. ActionProgramme ThissetsoutactionsfordeliveringtheLocalDevelopmentPlan:theseincludemeasurestomitigate theenvironmentalimpactsofdevelopment.
2.Context
2.3
Clackmannanshire'senvironment
TheenvironmentalinformationcontainedinthissectionwasoriginallyproducedbyLandUse ConsultantsfortheClackmannanshireLocalPlan1stAlterationSEA(LandUseConsultants2009).It hasbeenreproducedhere,withrevisionswherenewinformationbecameavailablefortheMain IssuesReportEnvironmentalReport,andwithadditionalinformationrequestedbytheconsultation authorities.
2.3.1 CurrentstateofClackmannanshire'senvironment
ThefollowingisasummaryofthecurrentstateofClackmannanshire'senvironment.Moredetailed environmentaldatacanbefoundinAppendixBofLandUseConsultants(2009),andadditional informationcanbefoundinAppendix5oftheMainIssuesReportEnvironmentalReport. Biodiversity,floraandfauna Clackmannanshirehasadiverserangeofvaluedhabitatsandspecieswithaseriesofdesignated Sites.Clackmannanshirecontains10SitesofSpecialScientificInterest(SSSI).Approximately249 hectaresofClackmannanshirearewithintheFirthofForthSpecialProtectionArea(SPA)andRamsar Site.Table2.1givesmoreinformationaboutthedesignatedsites: Table2.1:DesignatedsitesinClackmannanshire Sitename Designation Features BackBurnWood Lowlandacidgrassland SSSI andMeadows Uplandmixedashwoodland Northernbrownargus CraigLeithand Rockyslopes SSSI MyretonHill Uplandassemblage Stickycatchfly Uplandoakwoodland CraigmadWood SSSI Lowlanddryheath DamheadWood SSSI Wetwoodland DevonGorge SSSI Uplandmixedashwoodland Uplandmixedashwoodland Subalpinecalcareousgrassland DollarGlen SSSI Subalpineflushes CarboniferousPermianigneouspetrology Beetle Breedingandnonbreedingbirds(30species) Northernbrownargus Transitiongrassland CoastalgeomorphologyofScotland CarboniferousPermianigneouspetrology SSSI Salinelagoon RamsarSite Saltmarsh FirthofForth Special Mudflats Protection MineralogyofScotland Area Lowlandneutralgrassland Beetleassemblage Palaeontology:arthropoda,palaeozoicpalaeobotanyand permiancarboniferousfish/amphibia QuaternaryofScotland Uppercarboniferousandlowercarboniferousstratigraphy 5
2.Context Sitename Designation Features Maritimecliff Sanddunes Vascularplantassemblage Openwatertransitionfen Eutrophicloch Uplandmixedashwoodland Oldredsandstoneigneouspetrology
GartmornDam LinnMill MillGlen
SSSI LocalNature Reserve CountryPark SSSI SSSI
Clackmannanshireswoodlandaccountsfor2446haor16.2%ofthetotallandareaofthecounty, whichisasignificantproportionincomparisonwithnationalaverages.Plantationconiferwoodlands ofpine,mixedspruceandlarchaccountfor36%ofthetotalwoodedarea.Theremaining1564ha consistsofarangeofbroadleavedwoodlandtypes.Broadleavedwoodscover9.6%ofthetotalland area,whichismuchhigherthantheScottishaverageof4.5%andthenationalaverageof3.5%and thereforerepresentsanimportanthabitatforthedistrict.Themajorityofthebroadleavedwoods (1,091haor69.8%)consistofrecentbroadleavedormixedplantations.Oftheremainingsemi naturalwoodlandresource,only197ha(12.6%)arelongestablishedwoodlands,withatiny proportion(38haor2.4%)ofancientwoodlands. ThereareimportantfisheriesontheDevonforbrowntroutandsalmon,whichisprotectedunder AnnexIIoftheECSpeciesandHabitatsDirective.ThethreeBritishspeciesoflampreyarealso coveredbythelatterpieceoflegislation,andallareknownintheForthcatchment.Main implicationsofdevelopmentonthewidergeographicalarearelatetoimpactsonthewater environmentoftheFirthofForth,andhabitatconnectivitythroughthewoodlandstotheeastofthe area. PopulationandHumanHealth Clackmannanshireis15,809hainarea,withpopulationdensityoverfourtimeshigherthanthe Scottishaverage(308personspersquarekmforClackmannanshire:66personspersqkmfor Scotland).ThemainemploymentareainClackmannanshireisinservicessuchaspublic administration,Education,Healthandotherservices,withthissectorcoveringapproximately43%of jobs,significantlyhigherthanthenationalfigures(36%).Othermajorsourcesofemploymentarein theareasofretail,wholesaleandhotels,manufacturing,financeandbusiness,constructionand transport.Clackmannanshirehassignificantlylowerfiguresthanthenationalaverageforjobsin financeandbusiness,andinenergyandwater,butisaboveintheareasofmanufacturingand construction. HealthtrendsandlifeexpectancyaretypicallyinlinewiththerestofScotland.Howeverinrelation todeprivation,ClackmannanshireCommunityHealthPartnershiphasasignificantlyworse(higher) thanaveragepercentageofpeoplelivinginthe15%mostdeprivedareasofScotland.Thisis reflectedintheeducation,employment&prosperityindicators,withthearearatingsignificantly worsethantheScotlandaverageonanumberofthese. Water Clackmannanshireisrelativelypoorlyservedbyopenwater,withGartmornDamthesinglelargest areaofopenwater.ClackmannanshireCouncilmanagesGartmornDamaspartoftheGartmorn DamCountryPark.TheRiverDevonandtheRiverBlackDevonaretheprincipalriversinthearea. TheRiverDevonrisesintheOchilHillstothenorthoftheareaandflowseasttowest.The catchmentcomprisesamountainousuppercatchmentandalowerfloodplain.TheRiverBlack 6
2.Context DevonflowsfromeasttowestthroughthenorthernedgeofClackmannan.Itrisesasaseriesof smalltributariesinlowlyinghillstotheeastandoutwiththeCouncilarea. TheEUWaterFrameworkDirectiverequireswaterbodies(rivers,lochs,groundwater,artificial watersandcoastalwaters)tobeclassifiedonastatusbasisrelatedtoanumberofcharacteristics includingecology,geomorphology,andchemistrytogiveaholisticoverviewofeachwaterbody. Basedon2010SEPAdata,ingeneralthesignificanthillburnsfeedingintotheRiverDevonhavegood status,withthemajorityofotherwaterbodiesinClackmannanshirehavingamoderatestatusdue tonumberoffactorsincludingurbandevelopmentanddiffusepollution.TheForthEstuaryin Clackmannanshireisclassifiedashavingpoorecologicalpotential,duetoanumberofissues includingfloodbanks,diffusepollutionandsignificantdomesticandindustrialdischarges. TheSEPAindicativefloodmapforScotlandidentifiesareasatpotentialriskoffloodingfromrivers andthesea.Thisdoesnottakeintoaccountallflooddefenceswhichmaybeinplace,howeverit providesanindicationofareasatrisk.LowlyingareasadjacenttotheRiverFortharepotentiallyat riskfromfloodingalongtheestuary.ThereisalsofloodriskassociatedwiththecourseoftheRiver Devon,theRiverBlackDevon,andtheoutflowfromGartmornDam Soils Clackmannanshireholdsapproximately1%oftotalvacantandderelictlandbyarea,asapercentage oftotalvacant/derelictlandrecordedinScotland.Thelowlyingagriculturallandscapesof Clackmannanshireareproductivefarmland,andtherelativelyhighpopulationdensityofthearea putspressureontheavailablelandresource.Clackmannanshirehasasignificantresourceofcarbon richsoils,particularlyintheOchilHills. TherearefourGeologicalConservationreview(GCR)sitesinClackmannanshire: GCR3102 MineralogyofScotland AlvaMine,Alva GCR2509 OldRedSandstoneIgneous SheriffmuirRoadtoMenstrieBurn GCR2504 OldRedSandstoneIgneous Tillicoultry(withinMillGlenSSSI) GCR1383 CarboniferousPermianIgneous GloomHill,Dollar(withinDollarGlenSSSI) Air TrafficisthemainsourceofairpollutioninClackmannanshire:figuresfromtheDepartmentfor TransportshowthattrafficinClackmannanshirehasrisenbyabout8%between2000and2012, peakingin2010. Themajorityofthecountyisrural,althoughthereissomeindustrialactivity.Clackmannanshirehas fivesitesontheScottishPollutantReleaseInventorywhichregistertheiremissionstoair:two intensivepoultryfarms,inCambusandHelensfield(ammonia,PM10sandotherparticulates);aglass manufacturerinAlloa(particularlyantimony,arsenic,CO2,nitrogenoxides,seleniumandsulphur oxides);alandfillsiteinAlloa(methane),andprintingactivitiesinAlva(belowthereporting thresholdforemissionstoairin2012). Climateandenergy Predictedclimatechangeimpactsindicateanincreasingtrendinmaximumandminimum temperatures,adecreaseinthelengthofwintercoldspellsandoccurrenceofairandgroundfrost, anupwardtrendinthedaysofheavyraineachyearandintheaveragerainfallintensity.Thishas implicationsforidentifyingandmitigatingfuturefloodrisk. Aspartofanationalproject,ClackmannanshireCouncilhasundertakenresearchtoproduceaLocal ClimateImpactsProfiletoascertainthenumberandnatureofsevereweathereventsin 7
2.Context Clackmannanshireintheperiod2000mid2009.Thisestablishedthattherehadbeen38eventsin thatperiod,andgenerallyanincreasingnumberofeventsyearonyear.Themostprominentissue highlightedbytheresearchwasheavyrainfallandsubsequentflooding,followedbyhighwinds,and oneheatwaveevent. FiguresreleasedbytheDepartmentofEnergyandClimateChange(DECC)showClackmannanshire's percapitagreenhousegasemissionstobehigherthantheScottishaverage:thisismostlybecauseof highemissionsfromindustrialandcommercialsources;percapitaemissionsfromdomesticand transportsourcesarebelowtheScottishaverage. Wasteandresources Significantprogresshasbeenmadeinrecentyearswithregardtowastemanagementin Clackmannanshire.TheZeroWastePlanandtheEuropeanCouncilLandfillDirectiveestablisha frameworkforreformingthewastemanagementsysteminScotlandandsetstargetsforimproving thesustainabilityofwastemanagementupuntiltheyear2025.Clackmannanshireiscurrentlyahead ofthenationaltargetsandcontinuingtoimprove.Thepercentageofmunicipalwasterecycledor compostedrosefrombelowfivepercentin2001/2002to46.7%in2009/2010. Culturalheritage Clackmannanshirehasarichculturalhistory,withvisiblesignsacrossthecounty.Thereare17 ScheduledAncientMonumentswithinClackmannanshire,whichincludeatombstone,acairn,Castle CampbellandClackmannanStone,amongstothers.ThereisoneHistoricGardenandDesigned LandscapeatCastleCampbell2 ,301listedbuildingsandsevenconservationareas. Landscape Clackmannanshireisbroadlycharacterisedasruralintermsoflandscapeandsettlementpattern, butwiththebulkofthepopulation,employmentanddevelopmentactivityconcentratedinasmall numberofthelargerurbancommunitiesintheCoreArea.Agricultureisthemostextensivelanduse withintheareaandisverydiverse,reflectingthearea'svariedtopography,climateandsoils. Forestryistheothermajorlanduse.TherearetwodesignatedAGLVs 3 withinClackmannanshire whichincludetheOchilHillstothenorthandTheForesttotheeast. Themaponthefollowingpageshowsthekeydesignatedsitesandotherenvironmentalissuesin Clackmannanshire.NotethatunnotifiedGeologicalConservationReviewsitesarenotshown,as mapdatawasnotavailable.
Sincetheenvironmentalassessmentwascarriedout,afurthersiteinClackmannanshire,CowdenJapanese StyleGarden,hasbeenaddedtotheInventoryofGardensandDesignedLandscapes.
Thedesignation"AGLV"hasbeenreplacedby"SpecialLandscapeArea"(SLA)intheProposedLocal DevelopmentPlan.
2.Context
3.Method
2.3.2 Environmentalproblems
ThefollowingtableshowstheenvironmentalproblemsinClackmannanshire. Table2.2:Relevantenvironmentalproblems HowcantheLocal DevelopmentPlan contributeto tacklingthe problem? Protectionand enhancementof designatedareas, FirthofForthSPA andRamsarand importanthabitats includingprotection ofancient woodland.
Topic
Problem
Supportingdata
Biodiversity, Clackmannanshireincludesa floraand numberofprotectedareas, fauna includingtheinternationally protectedFirthofForthSPA, RamsarandSSSI.Important habitatsincludelowlandraised bogwhichisanationallyscarce resource. Clackmannanshirehasa relativelyhighlevelofwoodland andforestrycovercomparedto therestofScotland;howeverit hasaverylimitedextentof ancientwoodland. Thedeclineofbiodiversityand associatedhabitatsisakeyissue forClackmannanshire, particularlythrough developmentpressure,land managementpracticesand intensificationoffarming. Significanthabitatlosseshave occurredinrelationtonative woodlands,speciesrichgrassland andhedgerows. Thereisaneedtoincrease awarenessandunderstandingof thenaturalheritageinterests. Thereisaneedtoimprovethe naturalheritageoffarmedland toimprovebiodiversity,increase landscapediversityandexpand nativewoodlands.Existing coniferouswoodlandsshouldbe managedforenhancednatural heritagevalue. Nonnativeinvasiveplantand animalspeciesareathreatto localbiodiversity.Thisis particularlyaproblemalong watercourses.
SNHNaturalHeritage Trends Clackmannanshire BiodiversityActionPlan.
10
3.Method
Topic
Problem
Supportingdata
HowcantheLocal DevelopmentPlan contributeto tacklingthe problem? Promotingaccessto employment, supporting accessibilityand healthimprovement Supportingurban renewal
Population andhuman health
Clackmannanshirehasslightly lowerthanScotlandaverage levelsofemployment Thereisahigherthanaverage percentageofadultsclaiming incapacitybenefitorsevere disabilityallowance. Althoughthereisnodivergence fromtheScotlandaverageforall indicatorsintheillhealthand injurydomain,expectedyearsof lifeingoodhealthare significantlyworsethanthe Scotlandaveragesformenand women. Clackmannanshirealsohasa significantlyworsethanaverage percentageofpeoplelivinginthe 15%mostdeprivedareasof Scotland. Clackmannanshirehasalimited quantityofopenwaterbut includesthemainriver catchmentsoftheRiverDevon, RiverBlackDevonandRiver Forth.Waterstatusisgenerally moderateinClackmannanshire's rivers,withtheestuarinewaters beingofpoorecologicalstatus. Thisreflectspastandpresent urban/industrialpressureson thesewaterbodies. Thereispotentialfloodrisk associatedwiththeRiverDevon, RiverBlackDevonandRiver Forth. Thereisaneedtoallow freshwatersystemstofunction naturallywhereverpossible
ScottishPublicHealth ObservatoryCommunity HealthandWellbeing Profiles(2008)
Water
SEPARiverBasin ManagementPlanMaps
Protectionand enhancementof waterstatusand avoidanceofflood riskareasandareas whichwould contributeto increasedfloodrisk.
11
3.Method
Topic
Problem
Supportingdata
HowcantheLocal DevelopmentPlan contributeto tacklingthe problem? The Clackmannanshire LocalDevelopment Planshouldseekto ensureabalancein theuseofvacant andderelictlandin thesiteoptions identified. Oneofthemain sourcesofnitrogen dioxideemissionsis roadtraffic;road trafficisalsoa contributortoPM10 emissions. Sustainable transportwillbea keyissueforthe Clackmannanshire LocalDevelopment Plan.
Soil
Thetotalareaofvacantand TheScottishGovernment derelictlandin (2013)ScottishVacantand Clackmannanshirehasdecreased DerelictLandSurvey2012 since2006,to21hain2012. 24/2%ofClackmannanshire's populationlivewithin500mof derelictland.
AirQuality and Transport
Nitrogendioxideemissionsare ClackmannanshireCouncil currentlybelowthe LAQMProgressReport concentrationsidentifiedasair 2010 qualityobjectivesforScotlandby 2010.Howeverlevelsatsome monitoringlocationsarecloserto theairqualityobjectivelevels andtheimplicationsofincreased trafficonthesesroadsshouldbe carefullyconsideredinthe assessment. PM10sareemittedthrough combustion,androadtrafficisa contributortothis.Monitoring withinClackmannanshirehas identifiedthatPM10levelshad notexceededairquality objectivesforScotlandin2009. Climatechangecouldhavemany differentimpactsonthe environmentincludingwater resources,flooding,biodiversity, populationandhealthand wellbeing.Detailedinformation ontheimpactsofclimatechange isnotavailablefor Clackmannanshire;however issuessuchasfloodingand landslipsarelikelytoresult. UKCIP02ClimateChange Scenarios SNIFFER(2006)Online handbookofClimate TrendsAcrossScotland
Climatic Factors
Policiesandthe locationandextent ofthesites identifiedshould seektominimise contributionstothe emissionsof greenhousegases andseektoavoid locationsvulnerable totheeffectsof climatechange.
12
3.Method
Topic
Problem
Supportingdata
HowcantheLocal DevelopmentPlan contributeto tacklingthe problem? Wastedisposal incurssignificant transport implications. Supportfor increasedlevelsof recyclingand compostingand wasteminimisation.
Material Assets
Therearenolandfillsiteswithin thearealicensedtoacceptnon inertwaste.Awastetransfer facilityislocatedinStirlingwhich bulkswastefortransporttothe landfillsiteatPolmont,Falkirk. Trendsinrecyclingandwaste generationshowanincreasein levelsofrecyclingand composting. Shallowcoalreservesthatmay besuitableforopencastworking arefoundacrossmuchof Clackmannanshire. Clackmannanshirehasarich culturalheritagewithanumber ofScheduledMonuments,listed buildingsandconservationareas. Inadditionnondesignatedsites contributetothewidercultural heritageresource. Theseresourcescontribute positivelytothelandscapeand townscapeoftheareaand providevisibleconnectionsto theindustrialheritageofthe area.Thesefeaturescanbe threatenedbyinappropriate development,lossofviableuse, populationchangeandneglect. Landusechangecanalsoimpact onthehistoricenvironment. Clackmannanshireis distinguishedbythecontrast betweenthehighgroundofthe OchilHillsandtheflatcarselands oftheDevonandForthValleys. TheprincipalareasofGreenBelt inClackmannanshireare betweenAlloaandClackmannan, TullibodyandalongtheHillfoots Meanderingwatercourses, hedgerowsandfieldtrees,policy influencesandtheimportanceof viewstotheOchilHillsare
SEPAdata
Cultural Heritage
HistoricScotlandData Services:ListedBuildings, ScheduledMonuments, GardensandDesigned Landscapes
The Clackmannanshire LocalDevelopment Planshouldsupport theprotectionand enhancementofthe culturalheritage resource,including through considerationofthe locationsand impactsonspecific resourcesandthe widerhistoric landscape.
Landscape
ASH(1998) Clackmannanshire LandscapeCharacter Assessment
The Clackmannanshire LocalDevelopment Planshouldseekto ensurethat developmenttakes accountofthe important landscape characteristicsand protected landscapeswithin Clackmannanshire.
13
3.Method
Topic
Problem
Supportingdata
HowcantheLocal DevelopmentPlan contributeto tacklingthe problem?
landscapefeatureswhichare threatenedbysettlement expansion,transportand infrastructure.TwoAGLVextend acrossthearea. Clackmannanshirehasahigh levelofdevelopedlandandthere isaneedtosafeguardand enhancethesettingsof Clackmannanshirestownsand villages
2.3.3 LikelyevolutionofClackmannanshire'senvironmentwithouttheLocal DevelopmentPlan

WithouttheClackmannanshireLocalDevelopmentPlantheexistingenvironmentaltrendsarelikely tocontinue. Continueddevelopmentpressuremayimpactonbiodiversityandhabitats. Currentissuesofemployment,healthanddeprivationmaycontinue,howeverinmigration andpopulationchangemayaltercurrentpatterns. Waterstatusislikelytocontinuetoimproveinriversandstreams;howeveritisunlikelyto improvesignificantlyintheUpperForthEstuary. Quantitiesofvacantandderelictlandmayincrease,followingrecenttrends,however developmentpressuremayresultinmoreofthesesitesbeingreclaimedfordevelopment. Trafficlevelswillcontinuetoincreaseandthismayimpactonairquality. Theimpactsofclimatechangemayresultinfloodingandlandinstability. Developmentandlandusechangemayimpactontheculturalheritageresourcesofthe area. Developmentmayimpactonthelandscapecharacterandqualityofthelowlands
14
3.Method
2.3.4 EnvironmentalprotectionobjectivesrelevanttotheLocalDevelopmentPlan
Thefollowingtablesummarisestheenvironmentalprotectionobjectivesarisingfromrelevantpolicy andlegislation.Forfulldetailsoflegislation,plans,programmesandstrategiesthathaveanimpact ontheplan,seeAppendix2oftheMainIssuesReportEnvironmentalReport. Table2.3:Summaryofimplicationsofotherrelevantplans,programmesandstrategies(PPS)and environmentalprotectionobjectives Topic Summaryofimplicationsofotherrelevantplans,programmes andstrategiesfortheClackmannanshireLocalPlan1stAlteration ConsultativeDraft Biodiversity,floraand fauna Requirementtoensuretheprotectionofenvironmentalresources includingconservingandprotectingdesignatedsitesandwider biodiversity. Requirementtoprotectandenhancethenaturalenvironment, includingpriorityhabitatsandspecies. Improvehealth. Supportinghumanhealththroughprotectingaccessresourcesand promotingoutdoorrecreation. Addressingenvironmentalqualitythroughpromoting regenerationandimprovingqualityoflife. Ensuringadequateopenspaceprovisiontofacilitateaccessand recreation. Providingforsustainabledevelopmentwithjobs,homesand communityfacilities,whilstrecognisingenvironmental constraints. Avoidingnoiseandotheramenityissues. Asfaraspossible,eradicatefuelpoverty. Thereisaneedtoensuretheprotectionofthewaterenvironment andprotectionofaquaticecosystems. Otherobjectivesincludereducingwateruse,reducingpollution andmitigatingtheeffectsoffloodsanddroughts. Itisofparticularimportancetoavoiddevelopmentinareasof floodrisk. Thereisarequirementtopromotetheimprovementofwater bodiestoagoodstatus. Protectandenhancesoil. Thecontinuedremediationandreuseofcontaminatedland shouldbesupported. Ensuringsustainablelocationchoicefordevelopmentcansupport improvementandprotectionofairquality. Thereisaneedforwiderprotectionoftheenvironmentandto supporthealthimprovement. Supporthealthandwellbeingthroughconnectingremoteand disadvantagedcommunities. Thereisaneedforcontinuousimprovementofroadsafety. Reducinggrowthinlevelsofroadtraffic.
Populationandhuman health
Water
Soil
AirQualityandTransport
15
3.Method
Topic
Summaryofimplicationsofotherrelevantplans,programmes andstrategiesfortheClackmannanshireLocalPlan1stAlteration ConsultativeDraft Contributetoreducinggreenhousegasemissions,andtoclimate changeadaptation. Developmentlocationsshouldfacilitateclimatechange adaptationandreduceemissionofgreenhousegases. Reduceoverallfloodriskandmanagefloodriskinasustainable way. Developmentshouldminimiseenvironmentalimpactsand promoteefficientenergyandwateruseandminimiseresource use. Preventwasteandpromotesustainabledesign. Thereisaneedtosupportrenewableenergygenerationand recyclingopportunitiesandreducingwastegeneration. Deliveringwastemanagementfacilitiesforallwaste. Thereisarequirementfortheprotectionandenhancementof culturalheritageandthebuiltenvironment. Promotingqualityinurbandesign. Protectingenvironmentalresourcesandensuringdevelopmentis inkeepingwithlocalcharacter. Protectionandenhancementofthelandscapeanditsheritage features. Protectionandenhancementofdesignatedgreenbeltand provisionofopenspace. Protectionofthecoastalresource.
Climate
MaterialAssets
Culturalheritage
Landscape
16
3.Method
3.
Method
Thissectionsetsoutthemethodforassessingthelikelyenvironmentalimpactsofthe ClackmannanshireProposedLocalDevelopmentPlan.
3.1
Assessmentofpolicyelementsoftheplan
TheProposedLocalDevelopmentPlan'svision,strategicobjectives,spatialcontextandarea statements,policiesandsupplementaryguidancehavebeenassessedusingthemethodologythat wasusedtoassessvision,strategyandpolicyoptionsattheMIRstage. TheassessmenthasconsideredimpactsonallthetopicsidentifiedintheEnvironmentalAssessment (Scotland)Act:biodiversity,floraandfauna;populationandhumanhealth;soil;water;air;climatic factors;culturalheritage;andlandscape.Theinterrelationshipsbetweentheseissueswerealso considered,asweresecondary,cumulativeandsynergisticimpacts;longandshorttermimpacts; andtemporaryandpermanentimpacts. AsetofSEAobjectiveswasdevelopedtoaidassessmentoftheimpacts.Thesearebasedon environmentalprotectionobjectivesinlocalandnationalpolicyandlegislationandidentifiedlocal environmentalissues;theywereamendedinaccordancewithcommentsfromtheconsultation authoritiesatthescopingstageandafterconsultationontheMainIssuesReportenvironmental report.TheSEAobjectivesaresetoutintable3.1. Table3.1:SEAobjectivesandtheirsources Source Code4 SEAobjective CulturalHeritage 8d 1a Protectand,whereappropriate,enhance thehistoricenvironment RegenerateClackmannanshire'stown centres Ourcommunitiesaresafer SuggestedbyHistoricScotlandatscoping stage ClackmannanshireSustainabilityandClimate ChangeStrategy ClackmannanshireSingleOutcome Agreement ClackmannanshireSingleOutcome Agreement ClackmannanshireSingleOutcome Agreement SuggestedbyScottishNaturalHeritageat scopingstage
Populationandhumanhealth 5b 5a
Ourcommunitiesaremorecohesiveand inclusive Improvehealthandreducehealth 6a inequalities Encouragepromotionandconnectivityof theCentralScotlandGreenNetwork 7a withinandlinkingbeyond Clackmannanshire Biodiversity,flora,fauna

4
CodesforSEAobjectivesarenotsequentialbecausetheSEAwascarriedoutaspartofa"visionassessment", whichaimedtoensurethatthepoliciesandstrategyoftheplancomplywiththeplan'svisionandstrategic objectives.Ablankassessmentmatrixshowingallthevisioncriteriacanbefoundinappendix3.Thenon environmentalpartsofthevisionassessmenthavenotbeenconsideredinthisenvironmentalreport.
17
3.Method Code 4 SEAobjective 7b 7c Furthertheconservationofbiodiversity Avoidadverseeffectsontheintegrityof theFirthofForthSPAandRamsarsite Maintainandenhancethepopulationsof EuropeanProtectedSpecies,including protectionoftheirrestingplaces ProtectandenhanceSSSIs Protectandenhancepriorityspeciesand habitatsinClackmannanshire Increasehabitatconnectivityand ecosystemfunctiontoassistlocal biodiversityinresponsetoclimatechange Reducetheimpactofinvasivespecies
Source NatureConservation(Scotland)Act SuggestedbyScottishNaturalHeritageat scopingstage SuggestedbyScottishNaturalHeritageat scopingstage SuggestedbyScottishNaturalHeritageat scopingstage SuggestedbyScottishNaturalHeritageat scopingstage DraftClackmannanshireBiodiversityAction Plan DraftClackmannanshireBiodiversityAction Plan
7d 7e 7f
7g 7h
Landscape Protectandenhancethedistinctive characterofthelandscapeandensure ParaphrasedfromtheOchilsLandscape 7i newdevelopmentdoesnotexceedthe Partnershipvision;amendmentsuggestedby capacityofthelandscapetoaccommodate ScottishNaturalHeritageatscopingstage it 7j Protectandenhanceareasdesignatedfor theirnationalorlocallandscape importancee.g.AGLVs Protectandenhancegeodiversity, particularlyingeologicalSitesofSpecial ScientificInterest Reducecontaminationandsafeguardsoil qualityandquantity Protectcarbonrichsoilsfromdisturbance orloss Preventdeteriorationandenhancethe statusofthewaterenvironment Achievegoodecologicalstatus Reducewaterpollution Promotesustainablewateruse Contributetothemitigationoffloodsand droughts KeepairpollutionbelowLocalAirQuality Managementthresholds SuggestedbyScottishNaturalHeritageat scopingstage
7k Soil 30 3f Water 3k 3l 3m 3n 3i Air 3j
SuggestedbySNHatMIRstage
ClackmannanshireSustainabilityandClimate ChangeStrategySEA SuggestedbySNHandSEPAatMIRstage
WaterFrameworkDirective WaterFrameworkDirective WaterFrameworkDirective WaterFrameworkDirective WaterFrameworkDirective paraphrasedfrom2009Clackmannanshire AirQualityUpdatingandScreening Assessment 18
3.Method Code 4 SEAobjective Climaticfactors 3b Reducegreenhousegasemissions 3c 3g 3h 9a Improveenergyconservationand efficiencythroughoutClackmannanshire ImproveClackmannanshire'sresilienceto climatechange Reduceoverallfloodriskinasustainable way Reducetheenvironmentalimpactoftravel
Source ClimateChange(Scotland)Act ClackmannanshireSustainabilityandClimate ChangeStrategy ClackmannanshireSustainabilityandClimate ChangeStrategy FloodRiskManagement(Scotland)Act ClackmannanshireSustainabilityandClimate ChangeStrategy ClackmannanshireSustainabilityandClimate ChangeStrategy ClackmannanshireSustainabilityandClimate ChangeStrategy
Materialassets 3p 3q Minimisewastegeneration Maximiserecyclingandcomposting
TheassessmentswerecarriedoutbytheauthoroftherelevantsectionoftheplanandtheCouncil's SustainabilityOfficer:thisalloweddiscussionandagreementofthelikelyimpactsofeachoption,as wellasprovidingclarificationonbothplanningandenvironmentalissueswherenecessary.The resultsoftheassessmentofeachelementwererecordedinamatrix,givinganindicationofwhether itwasconsideredlikelytocontributeto,orconflictwith,eachoftheSEAcriteria;whetheritwas consideredunlikelytohaveanyimpact;andwhethertheimpactscouldnotbedeterminedatthat stage.Supplementarycommentswereincludedinthematrix,justifyingtheassessmentsmade,and suggestingmeasuresformitigatingadverseimpacts,andenhancingbeneficialimpacts.Ablank matrixandakeycanbefoundinAppendix3.
3.1.1 Visionandstrategicobjectives
Eachdraftofthevisionandstrategicobjectiveswasassessedtoensurethattheyincorporated, eitherexplicitlyorimplicitly,alloftheSEAobjectives.
3.1.2Spatialcontextandareastatements
ThespatialstrategyfortheProposedLocalDevelopmentPlanisarticulatedinmoredetailthrough theLDPaimsforeacharea(Forth,WestOchilsandEastOchils).Thesesetsofaimsofwereassessed, takingintoaccountthefindingsoftherelevantsiteassessments(seesection3.2),andtheir cumulativeimpactsareconsideredtorepresenttheimpactsofthespatialstrategy.
3.1.3Policies
SEAhasbeencentraltopolicydevelopment,withtherecommendationsfromtheMIR environmentalreporttakenintoaccountwhiledraftingpolicies.Allpolicieshavebeenassessedat leasttwiceduringthepreparationoftheProposedPlan:atleastoncewhenindraftform,thenagain whenfinalised.Thefindingsoftheassessmentsofdraftpolicieswereusedtoproduceasummaryof thelikelysignificantimpacts,whichwasreturnedtotheauthorofthepolicy,alongwitha compilationofissuesraisedoruncertaintiesremainingaftertheassessments.Whererelevant, policieswereamendedtotaketheserecommendationsintoaccountandtoensurethatwherever possiblemitigationandenhancementoflikelyenvironmentalimpactswasincludedinthepolicy. Finalpolicieswereassessedusingthesamecriteria,andtheoutstandingmitigationmeasures 19
3.Method recordedand,whereappropriate,notedintheActionProgramme.Appendix4containsa descriptionofthepolicydevelopmentprocess,andtherolethatSEAplayedinit. SummariesofthelikelyenvironmentalimpactsofeachpolicyareincludedintheProposedLocal DevelopmentPlan,sothatthereaderanddecisionmakercaneasilyseethelikelyenvironmental impactsoftheirdecisions.ThesesummariesarereproducedintheResultssectionofthis environmentalreport,alongwithanassessmentofthelikelycumulativeimpactoftheplan.
3.1.4Supplementaryguidance
Supplementaryguidance(SG)wasassessedinthesamewayasthepolicies,andwithreferenceto thepolicyorpoliciestowhichtheSGrelates.ThefollowingSGswereassessedandhavebeen includedinthisenvironmentalreport:DeveloperContributions;OnshoreWindEnergy;Placemaking; Water;AffordableHousing;GreenInfrastructure;andEnergyEfficiencyandLowCarbon Development.
3.1.5Alternatives
Thedraftversionsofthepolicyelementsoftheplanareconsideredtobealternativestothe finalisedpolicies.Somedraftpolicieswerepreparedandassessed,butnotincludedintheProposed Plan.
3.2
Scheduleofsites
SitesconsideredforinclusionintheplanwereassessedusingthemethodologydescribedintheMIR environmentalreport.SiteswereassessedagainstarangeofcriteriaaddressingalltheSEAtopics, aslistedinthetablebelow.Followingrecommendationsfromtheconsultationauthoritiesatthe MIRstage,additionalcriteriawereaddedtotheassessment,andallsitesassessedattheMIRstage andlaterwereconsideredinrelationtotheseadditionalcriteria.Appendix7showshowthecriteria usedtoassessthepolicyelementsrelatetothecriteriausedtoassesssites. Table3.2:SEAcriteriaforsiteassessments

Biodiversity,floraandfauna Doesthesiteimpactondesignatedsites? Doesthesiteimpactonpriorityhabitatsorspecies? Populationandhumanhealth Isthesiteconnectedtothelocalcorepathnetwork? HowdoesthesiterelatetoareaswithhighSIMD? Whatistherelationshipofthesitewithexistingopenspaceresources? DoesthesiteimpactontheconnectivityoftheCentralScotlandGreenNetwork[criterionaddedafterMIR stage] Water Isthesiteatriskofflooding? Aretherewatercourseswithinthesiteorwhichwouldbeaffectedbyincreasedlevelsofpollution,orother pressures,fromdevelopmentwithinthesite?["orotherpressures"addedafterMIRstage] Aretherewatercourseswithinthesiteorwhichwouldbeaffectedbyincreasedlevelsoffloodingresulting fromdevelopmentofthesite? Arethereopportunitiestoimprovethestatusofwatercourses?[criterionaddedafterMIRstage] Soil Doesthesiteincludeareasofvacantorderelictland? Isthesiteprimeagriculturalland? Doesthesiteincludecarbonrichsoil?[criterionaddedafterMIRstage] AirQualityandTransport
20
3.Method
Isthesiteeasilyaccessiblebythelocalpathnetwork,andprovideaccesstosettlementsandservices? Isthesiteeasilyaccessiblebypublictransport? Doesthesiteliewithinanareawherelevelsofairpollutionareclosetocurrentlimitvalues? Woulddevelopmentonthesitecontributetohighertrafficflowsalongtransportroutesoratkeyjunctions (potentiallyoutwiththelocalauthorityarea)wherelevelsofairpollutionareclosetocurrentlimitvalues? ClimaticFactors Doesthelocationofthedevelopmentreducetheneedtotravel? Isthesiteatriskofincreasedfloodingorinstabilityasaresultofclimatechange? MaterialAssets Isthesitelocatedclosetoexistingtransport,services,waterandenergyinfrastructure? Isthesitelocatedtomakebestuseofshelter,solargainandreducetheneedtotravel? Woulddevelopmentonthesitereducefuturepotentialformineralextraction? Doesthesiteincludeanyhazardareas?(oilorgaspipelines) Doesthesitereducewastegenerationandpromotewasterecovery,recyclingandcomposting? CulturalHeritage Woulddevelopmentwithinthesiteimpactontheintegrityofsites,monuments,buildingsorareas designatedfortheirculturalheritagevalue? Woulddevelopmentwithinthesiteimpactonarchaeologicalremains? Landscape Doesthesiteliewithinanareadesignatedforitslandscapevalue? Woulddevelopmentwithinthesiteimpactonsettlementsettingandidentity(drawingonissuesof landscapecharacterandcapacityfordevelopment)? Woulddevelopmentwithinthesiteimpactonkeyviewstolandscapefeaturesorfromkeytransportroutes? Doesthesitecontainanygeologicalconservationreview(GCR)sites?[criterionaddedafterMIRstage]
Allhousing,mixeduse,businessandsocialinfrastructuresiteshavebeenassessed,exceptforthe following:siteswhichhadplanningpermissionwhentheywereconsideredfortheplan;siteswhere constructionhasstarted;proposalsforthereuseofanexistingbuilding;anddevelopmentswhich areidentifiedas"opportunities"ratherthan"proposals."Transportproposalshavegenerallynot beenassessed,astheyflowfromtheobjectivesoftheLocalTransportStrategy(whichwassubject toSEA),andtheirdesignandlocationwillgenerallydependonthenatureofthedevelopmentsites theyarerelatedto;thereforetheenvironmentalimpactsoftheseproposalswillbeassessedatthe planningapplicationstage.
3.3 ActionProgramme
TheActionProgrammehasnotbeensubjecttoSEAbecausetheactionsitcontainsalleither: Relatetoplanningmanagementandprocedure; Requiretheproductionorimplementationofplans,programmesandstrategiesthatwill themselvesbesubjecttoSEA; Havebeenconsideredaspartofthepolicyandsiteassessments; AredrawnfromtheSEAoftheProposedPlan;or AreproposalsfortransportimprovementsinaccordancewiththeLocalTransportStrategy theenvironmentalimpactsofthesearelikelytobeconsideredattheplanningapplication stage,whenmoredetailisavailable.
3.4
HabitatsRegulationsAppraisal
AHabitatsRegulationsAppraisaloftheClackmannanshireLDPhasbeenundertaken.Theplanwas screenedforlikelysignificanteffectsuponEuropeansites,andnumberofproposalswithintheplan
21
3.Method wereidentifiedaslikelytohavesignificanteffectsupontheFirthofForthSPAand/ortheRiverTeith SAC,eitheraloneorincombinationwithotherprojectsandplans. Anappropriateassessmentwasundertaken,andmitigationmeasureswereappliedtoanumberof theproposals.Withtheinclusionofthismitigation,ithasbeenconcludedthatthe ClackmannanshireLDPwillnothaveaneffectontheintegrityoftheFirthofForthSpecialProtection AreaorRiverTeithSpecialAreaofConservationinlightofeachsitesconservationobjectives. TheHabitatsRegulationsAppraisalwillbeavailableonwww.clacksweb.org.uk
3.5
Difficultiesencounteredincompilingtheenvironmentalreport
Thefollowingdifficultieshavebeenencounteredincompilingtheenvironmentalreport: Assessingeffectsofpolicieswhereimpactsofthepolicydependonthelocationofthedevelopment: aguidingprincipleoftheProposedLocalDevelopmentPlanisthatallpoliciesapplytoall developments,whichshouldmeanthatmostenvironmentalimpactsofdevelopmentwillbe mitigatedbytheapplicationofpoliciestoprotecttheenvironment.TheSEAhasassumedthatthis willbethecase,andsoincaseswherethepotentialenvironmentalimpactsofapolicywould dependonthelocationofdevelopment,thisisusuallyassessedas"noimpact"ratherthan "uncertain". Makingassumptionsabouthowpolicieswillbeinterpretedorimplemented:wheretheimpactofa policyislikelytodependonhowitisinterpretedorimplemented,itsimpacthasgenerallybeen assessedas"uncertain".Likewise,whereapolicyhasthepotentialtodeliverpositiveornegative impacts,butthiswoulddependonindividualcircumstances,ithasalsobeenassessedas"uncertain" Lackofdetailedknowledgeofalloftheenvironmentalissuesconsidered:assessmentsofthepolicy elementsoftheplanarestrategic,andhavebeenbasedonprofessionaljudgementratherthan modellingorscientificanalysis.Siteassessmentsweremostlycarriedoutbyconsultants,and includedfieldworkaswellasdeskbasedanalysis.
22
4.Results
4.
Results
Thissectionpresentstheresults ofthestrategicenvironmentalassessmentoftheProposedLocal DevelopmentPlan.Thelikelyimpactsofthevisionandobjectives;spatialcontextandarea statements;policiesandsupplementaryguidance;andscheduleofsitesareconsideredseparately. Completedmatricesforfinalversionsofthevisionandstrategicobjectives;spatialcontextandarea statements,policiesandsupplementaryguidancecanbefoundinAppendix6.Atableshowingthe textofearlieriterationsofpolicies,andsummariesoftheassessmentofthelikelyenvironmental impacts,canbefoundinAppendix7. Theoverallimpactsoftheplanareconsideredtoberelativelybeneficialbecauseallpoliciesare expectedtoapplytoalldevelopments,thereforeenvironmentalimpactsshouldbemitigatedby environmentalprotectionpolicies,andenhancedbyproactivepoliciesforenvironmental improvement.Theresultsofthesiteassessmentsshowthatmanyofthesiteshavepotentialfor adverseenvironmentalimpacts,althoughoftenthereispotentialformitigationmeasuresthatcan reducethedamage.
4.1
Visionandobjectives
Betweenthem,thevisionandstrategicobjectivesaddressalloftheSEAcriteria,sodevelopmentin accordancewiththeseislikelytohavebeneficialenvironmentalimpacts.Appendix8containsthe earlierdraftsofthevision,andshowshowthestrategicenvironmentalassessmentinfluencedits development.
4.2
Spatialcontextandareastatements
ThespatialstrategyandLDPaimsarelikelytoleadtoanincreaseingreenhousegasemissionsdue toincreasedbuiltdevelopment;however,supportforwalkingandcyclinginfrastructureand improvedprovisionoflocalshopsislikelytocontributetomitigatinggreenhousegasemissionsfrom transport. Thestrategyislikelytocontributestronglytotowncentreregeneration;protectionand enhancementofthehistoricenvironment;healthimprovement;communitysafetyandcohesion; andtheprinciplesoftheCentralScotlandGreenNetwork.Therearealsolikelytobebeneficial impactsonsoils,prioritisingbrownfielddevelopmentandprotectingcarbonrichsoils;however,in EastOchilsthestrategyislikelytoleadtosomelossofgreenfieldland. Theimpactonfloodingandresiliencetoclimatechangeisuncertain,asthisisnotexplicitlycovered intheaims;however,reinforcementofthegreennetwork,andsupportfortheInnerForth LandscapeInitiativeandOchilsLandscapePartnership,arelikelytocontributepositively.These initiativesarealsolikelytocontributetoprotectingandenhancingbiodiversity,andtowaterstatus improvement,whichmaymitigatethepotentialadverseimpactsofdevelopmentonwatercourses onornearallocatedsites. Thereispotentialforadverseimpactsonbiodiversityasaresultofdevelopment,particularlyon greenfieldsites,whichwillneedtobeconsideredandmitigatedattheplanningapplicationstage: theLDPpoliciesonbiodiversityprovideforprotectionandenhancementoftheenvironmentand makeprovisionforecologicalappraisalincertaincircumstances.Thereisalsopotentialforadverse impactsonlandscapecharacter,despitethestrategy'ssupportfortheOchilsLandscapePartnership andInnerForthlandscapeInitiative:thesewillneedtobeconsideredattheplanningapplication stage. 23
4.Results
4.3
Policiesandsupplementaryguidance
ThepoliciesintheplanarelikelytodeliverbeneficialimpactsforalltheSEAtopics.Policiesin,and supplementaryguidancerelatingto,theEnvironmentalAssetschaptertakeaproactiveapproachto environmentalimprovement,whilepoliciesin,andsupplementaryguidancerelatingto,theCreating SustainableCommunitieschapterincorporatemeasurestomitigatedamagetotheenvironment, andinmanycaseshavethepotentialtoenhancetheenvironment.ThepoliciesintheEmployment andProsperitychapterhavethepotentialfornegativeimpactsontheenvironment,particularlyby increasinggreenhousegasemissions,butalsowiththepotentialtoincreaseair,waterandsoil pollution,andtoadverselyaffecthumanhealth;thereisthepotentialfordamagetobiodiversity frommineralworking,althoughthereisalsothepotentialforimprovementstohabitatsaspartof restorationplans. Theimpactsofsomepoliciesonsomeelementsoftheenvironmentareuncertain,astheywill dependonhowthepoliciesareimplemented.Theseuncertaintieshavebeennotedasissuestobe consideredattheplanningapplicationstage. Table4.1summarisestheenvironmentalimpactsidentifiedforeachpolicyandsupplementary guidanceateachstageoftheSEAprocess,andshowshowpolicieswererevisedinlightofthese assessments.Itshowsthelikelyenvironmentalimpactsofthefinalpolicies,andanymeasures recommendedtomitigateorenhancetheseimpacts. Theearlieriterationsofpoliciesareconsideredtobealternativestothefinalpolicies;inallcases, theenvironmentalimpactsofthefinalpoliciesarebetterthanthoseoftheearlierdrafts.
24
4.Results Table4.1:Likelyenvironmentalimpactsofpoliciesandsupplementaryguidance
Policy Maintaininga HousingLand Supply Purpose/Aims Toensurethemaintenanceofa robustanddeliverablehousing landsupply Tosetoutcriteriaforthe deliveryofaffordablehousing andidentifiesdifferent mechanismsfordeliveryand levelsofprovision.Further guidanceisprovidedinthe AffordableHousingSG. Toassistinguidingthe successfuldeliveryofaffordable housing Toidentifytheconsiderations whichwillbetakenintoaccount whenconsideringproposalsfor privatesitesforGypsies, TravellersandTravelling Showpeople. RecommendationsfromMIRstage SEA 5 None RecommendationsfromProposedPlan stageSEA SEAoftheearlieriterationofthepolicy foundnolikelynegativeenvironmental impacts. Changesmadetopolicyasaresultof ProposedPlanstageSEA Nosignificantchangestopolicythroughthe SEAprocess Environmentalimpactsoffinal policy Nosignificantenvironmental impactshavebeenidentifiedfor thispolicy. Mitigation/enhancementto betakenforward
SC1
SC2
Affordable Housing
None
SEAoftheearlieriterationofthepolicy foundnolikelynegativeenvironmental impacts.
Nosignificantchangestopolicythroughthe SEAprocess
Thispolicyislikelytocontribute toimprovedhealth,and improvedcommunitycohesion andinclusion.
SG5
Supplementary guidance: Affordable Housing Gypsies, Travellersand Travelling Showpeople
None
None
None
Nosignificantenvironmental impactshavebeenidentifiedfor thissupplementaryguidance
SC3
None
Nosignificantenvironmental impactshavebeenidentifiedfor thispolicy.
SC4
Residential CareFacilities
Todirectresidentialcare facilitiestothemost appropriatesitesandensure thatthedesigniscarefully considered
None
Thispolicyislikelytocontribute toimprovinghealthand improvingcommunityinclusion, cohesionandsafety.Itisalso likelytocontributetoreducing theenvironmentalimpactof travelassociatedwithsuch facilities.
NBmanyoftheserecommendationshavebeenmetbytherequirementthatallpoliciesapplytoalldevelopments,sohavenotbeenexplicitlyaddressedinindividualpolicies
25
4.Results
RecommendationsfromMIRstage SEA 5 RecommendationsfromProposedPlan stageSEA Environmentalimpactsoffinal Mitigation/enhancementto policy betakenforward Thispolicyislikelytoreduce greenhousegasemissionsand improveenergyefficiency.Itis SEAoftheearlieriterationofthepolicy likelyhavesignificantpositive Policyamendedtoincludewater recommendedthatthepolicyinclude impactsonClackmannanshire's conservationandrecycling,including considerationofclimatechangeimpacts, resiliencetoclimatechange, throughsitingandorientation;require particularlytheneedforwater throughtherequirementfor appropriatenativespeciesinlandscaping; conservation,andflooding;sustainable developmentstomanageflood requiredevelopmentstobedesignedin drainage;addresswaterpollutionthrough riskinasustainableway;air accordancewithpolicyEA18;andrequire landscaping;requireplantingappropriate quality;thewaterenvironment; developmentstocontributepositivelyto totheclimate;requirefacilitiesrelatingto soilquality;wastegeneration; thelandscape/townscapeandecology. storage/collectionofwaterandfacilities communitysafety;humanhealth; forcomposting;strengthenthe theCentralScotlandGreen Theprinciplethatallpoliciesapplytoall requirementfordevelopmentstotake developmentsshouldmeanthatsustainable Network;theconservationof accountofthelandscape/townscapeand drainageandwaterpollutionaretakeninto biodiversity,includinghabitat ecology;requireplantsusedinlandscaping provisionandenhancement; account. arenativespecies. protectionandenhancementof landscapecharacter;andthe environmentalimpactsoftravel. Thispolicyislikelytoresultin positiveimpactsonprotectionof thehistoricenvironmentand areasdesignatedfortheir landscapeimportance. Thissupplementaryislikelyto leadtoimprovedenergy conservationandefficiency,safer communities,improved connectivityoftheCentral ScotlandGreenNetwork,and reducetheenvironmental impactsoftravel,throughits emphasisonplacesthataresafe andpleasant,easytomove around,andresourceefficient. Thispolicyislikelytoleadto reducedgreenhousegas emissionsandimprovedenergy conservationandefficiency. Changesmadetopolicyasaresultof ProposedPlanstageSEA
Policy
Purpose/Aims
SC5
Layoutand Design Principles
Tosetoutcriteriathatshouldbe followedinthedesignofallnew residentialdevelopmentsto None ensuretheyaredesignedto highstandardsandcontribute positivelytotheirlocal environmentandcommunity.
SC6
Additional Design Information
Tosetoutcircumstanceswhere higherqualitydesignwillbe expectedandthereforethe Councilwillexpectproposalsto besupportedbyadditional designinformation
None
SEAoftheearlieriterationofthepolicy Policyamendedtoclarifythatadesign recommendedthatthepolicybeamended statementisneededwhenhigherquality toclarifythepurposeofadesign designisexpected statement
SG3
Supplementary guidance: Placemaking
TosetouttheCouncil's approachtoplacemakinginthe planningofnewdevelopments inClackmannanshire
None
SEAoftheearlieriterationoftheSG recommendedthatthesupplementary guidancebeamendedtoaddressclimate changeadaptation,flooding,droughts, waterstatusandsustainablewateruse.
Supplementaryguidanceamendedto includeamentionofclimatechange adaptation.
Considerfloodingand droughtsaspartofclimate changemitigation;consider designandlayoutforwater statusimprovementsand waterconservationthough theWaterSG.
SC7
SG7
Energy Efficiencyand LowCarbon Development Supplementary guidance: Energy Efficiencyand LowCarbon Development
TosetouttheCouncil's expectationswithregardstothe None energyefficiencyofnew buildings. Toprovideadviceandguidance onvariousaspectsofenergy efficiencyandlowcarbon development
SEAoftheearlieriterationofthepolicy foundnolikelynegativeenvironmental impacts. SEAofthedraftoftheSGfoundnolikely significantenvironmentalimpacts.It recommendedthattheSGberevisedto givemoredirectionontheuseof renewables,andtogivemoreguidanceon energyefficiencyrequirements
Policyamendedtoapplytononresidential, aswellasresidential,development.
None
NosignificantchangestotheSGasaresult oftheSEAprocess
26
4.Results
RecommendationsfromMIRstage SEA 5 RecommendationsfromProposedPlan stageSEA Changesmadetopolicyasaresultof ProposedPlanstageSEA Environmentalimpactsoffinal policy Thispolicyislikelytoleadto reducedgreenhousegas emissionsfrom,andimproved energyandwaterefficiencyin, existingdevelopments.Itisalso likelytoprotectthedistinctive characterofthelandscape. Mitigation/enhancementto betakenforward
Policy
Purpose/Aims
SC8
Domestic Developments
Tosetoutcriteriaforthe assessmentofdomestic developments.
None
SEAoftheearlieriterationofthispolicy recommendedthatthepolicybeamended Policyamendedtoaddressenergyand toaddressenergyefficiency,water waterefficiency efficiencyandclimatechangeadaptation
Addressclimatechange adaptationpotentialof domesticdevelopmentsin supplementaryguidance
SC9
Developer Contributions
Toensurethat,whereanew developmenthasanimpacton infrastructurecapacityorgives risetotheneedfor environmentalmitigation measures,developersmitigate theimpactbycontributingnew orimprovedinfrastructureor facilities. Toprovideguidanceonhow policySC9willbeapplied
SEAoftheMIRrecommendedthatthe policyshouldbeclearaboutwhat issues(particularlyenvironmental issues)developercontributionswould cover.
SEAoftheearlieriterationofthepolicy identifiedthatthelikelyenvironmental impactsareuncertain,becauseitis unclearhowcontributionswillbe prioritised
Nosignificantchangestopolicythroughthe SEAprocess.
Thelikelyenvironmentalimpacts ofthispolicyareuncertain:ithas thepotentialtodeliverarangeof environmentalbenefits, dependingonhowthepolicyis implemented.
SG1
Supplementary guidance: Developer Contributions
None
Thereisthepotentialforpositive environmentalimpacts,butcontributions willbenegotiatedattheplanning applicationstage
Thereisthepotentialforpositive Nosignificantchangestothesupplementary environmentalimpacts,but guidancethroughtheSEAprocess. contributionswillbenegotiated attheplanningapplicationstage.
SC10
Education, Community Facilitiesand OpenSpaces
Toretainandenhancethe provisionofeducationfacilities, communityfacilitiesandopen spaces.
SEAoftheMIRrecommendedthat maintenanceofopenspaceshould contributetopromotionand connectivityoftheCentralScotland GreenNetwork;andtakeintoaccount biodiversity,includinghabitat connectivityandinvasivespecies;soil andwaterquality;andcomposting
Thispolicyislikelytohave positiveimpactsonhealthandon communityinclusion,cohesion andsafety.
27
4.Results
Recommendationsfrom ProposedPlanstageSEA Changesmadetopolicyasa Environmentalimpactsof resultofProposedPlanstage finalpolicy SEA Thispolicyislikelyto reducetheenvironmental impactsoftravel,including greenhousegasemissions, Policyamendedtoinclude safeguarding,promotionand airpollutionandimpactson biodiversity.Itaimsto enhancementofthecore pathnetwork,andprovision safeguard,promoteand ofimprovementandlinksto enhancethecorepath network,whichcontributes thecorepathnetwork totheCentralScotland throughnewdevelopment. GreenNetwork,andshould Policyamendedtoinclude bringhealthbenefitsfor landscapeconsiderations. users.Itisalsolikelyto contributetocommunity safety. Mitigation/ enhancementto betakenforward
Policy
Purpose/Aims
RecommendationsfromMIRstageSEA SEAoftheMIRrecommended: Thereareopportunitiesforleisure/tourismbusinessesaroundcycling/walking;and supplyingandservicingbicyclesandactivetravelequipment Newrouteswouldneedtobedesignedinawaythatdoesn'tadverselyaffectthe historicenvironment.CCTVandlightingwouldneedtobesensitivelylocated Offroadroutescouldbedesignedtoservebusstops/railwaystation,andgive accesstogreenspaces. Deprivedareastendtohavelowercarownershipsuggesttargetingthemfirst (althoughthiswouldhavelessimpactongreenhousegasemissionsandair pollutionthantargetingmoreaffluentareas) Thereareopportunitiesfornew/improvedroutestocontributetoimprovedquality ofopenspace Ensurenewpathsavoiddamagingkeyhabitats;thereistheopportunityforhabitat creatione.g.hedgerows Avoidimpactsonpriorityhabitatsandspeciesanddesignatedsites. Beawareofinvasiveplantspecieswhenconstructingpaths. Thereistheopportunitytoreduceaccessibilityrelatedbarrierstoemployment. Thereistheopportunityforimprovedpublictransportfacilitiesintowncentres. Policymakerscouldstrengthenthewordingrelatingtomakingsettlements"capable ofbeingservedbyabusroute". Therightbusroutescouldimproveaccessibilityofgreenspaces. Thepolicycouldbemoreexplicitaboutconvenience/easeofusebydisabledand vulnerablepeople. Thereisthepotentialtoencouragefreightmovementforexisting/newbusinesses. Uncertaintiesdependonthenatureofanydevelopment/infrastructure requirements. Thefollowingshouldbeconsideredinrelationtoanynewrailfacilities:thehistoric environment;ensureanydevelopmentdoesnotadverselyimpacttowncentres; avoidadverseeffectsonbiodiversity(includingthroughappropriateassessment); beawareofinvasivespecies. MitigationandenhancementmeasuresincludeSUDSetcandwalkingroutestoany newstations
SC11
Transport Networks
Toensurethattheimpactsof developmentonthewider transportnetworkare considered,andthat opportunitiestoenhancethe networkareidentifiedatan earlystage.
SEAoftheearlieriterationof thispolicyrecommended thatthepolicyprioritise activetravel,requirethe provisionofwalkingand cyclingroutesinnew neighbourhoods,and considerlandscapeimpacts
SC12
Development Proposals Accessand Transport Requirements
Toensurethatsustainable transportinfrastructureisfully integratedintothedesignof newdevelopments.
SEAoftheearlieriterations ofthepolicyrecommended thatitrefertotheCSGN
Policyamendedtoplace greateremphasisonwalking andcycling.
Thispolicyislikelyto reducetheenvironmental impactoftravel,including greenhousegasemissions andairpollution.Itislikely tohavesignificantpositive impactsforhealth,andfor communitysafetyand inclusion.
Considerhow walkingand cycling infrastructure relatestothe CSGNatplanning applicationstage.
28
4.Results
Policy Purpose/Aims RecommendationsfromMIRstageSEA RecommendationsfromProposedPlan stageSEA Changesmadetopolicyasaresultof ProposedPlanstageSEA Environmentalimpactsoffinal policy Thispolicyislikelytoleadto reducedgreenhousegas emissionsandimprovedenergy conservationandefficiency.Ithas thepotentialtocontributeto healthimprovementthroughthe alleviationoffuelpoverty;there isalsothepotentialfora reductioninairquality,butthis canbeaddressedthroughpolicy EA11. Thispolicyislikelytoleadto reducedgreenhousegas emissions.Itislikelytoavoid impactsoncarbonrichsoils, primeagriculturalland, designatedsites,landscapeand builtheritage. Thispolicyislikelytoleadto reducedgreenhousegas emissions.Itislikelytoavoid impactsonthewater environment,carbonrichsoils, primeagriculturalland, biodiversity,designatedsites, healthandthehistoric environment.Itislikelytoprotect thedistinctivecharacterofthe landscape. Mitigation/enhancementto betakenforward
SC13
DecentralisedEnergy
Toencouragethe provisionofdecentralised energyfromappropriate sourcesandwithin suitabledevelopments.
SEAoftheMIRrecommendedthatthe policyshouldclarifythetypesofenergy generationtechnologiesthatwouldbe supported:this,alongwithlocation wouldbetterdeterminetheimpactson landscapeandculturalheritage; impactsonmaterialassetswould dependonwhetherbiomassgeneration wouldincludeenergyfromwaste.
SEAoftheearlieriterationofthispolicy recommendedthatitbeamendedto includeastrongerrequirementfor renewableheat/decentralisedenergyin newdevelopments,andincludecriteria relatingtotheprotectionofthehistoric environment.
Policyamendedtorequiredecentralised energygenerationindevelopmentsovera certainsize.Theprinciplethatallpolicies applytoalldevelopmentsshouldmeanthat airqualityandthehistoricenvironmentare takenintoaccount.
SC14
RenewableEnergy
Toencouragethe incorporationanduseof renewableenergy technology.
None
SEAoftheearlieriterationofthispolicy recommendedthatitbemoresupportive ofrenewableenergy.
Policyamendedtoencouragerenewable energygeneration.
SC15
WindEnergy Development
Toprovidedetailsofareas wherewindenergy developmentproposals willbelikelytobemost acceptable.
None
SG2
Supplementary guidance:Onshore WindEnergy
Toassistinpositively planningforwindenergy developmentin Clackmannanshireby providingadditional guidanceandadvice designedtosupplement theSpatialFrameworks forWindEnergyand relevantpolicies containedinthe ClackmannanshireLocal DevelopmentPlan(LDP)
None
Thissupplementaryguidancerecognises thepotentialfordamagetocarbonrich soils;increasedflooding;airpollution; damagetothewaterenvironment; damagetodesignatedsitesandspecies; impactsonlandscape;andimpactsonthe historicenvironment.Itrequiresmeasure toavoid,reduceandmitigateanyadverse impacts.
Thissupplementaryguidance recognisesthepotentialfor damagetocarbonrichsoils; increasedflooding;airpollution; damagetothewater Nosignificantchangestothesupplementary environment;damageto Mitigationmeasuresare guidancethroughtheSEAprocess. designatedsitesandspecies; includedintheSG. impactsonlandscape;and impactsonthehistoric environment.Itrequiresmeasure toavoid,reduceandmitigateany adverseimpacts.
29
4.Results
RecommendationsfromProposedPlan stageSEA Changesmadetopolicyasaresultof ProposedPlanstageSEA Environmentalimpactsoffinal policy Thispolicyislikelytoleadto reducedgreenhousegas emissions.Itislikelytoavoid impactsoncarbonrichsoils, primeagriculturalland, designatedsites,landscapeand builtheritage.Ithasthepotential tocontributetotheconservation ofbiodiversitythrough environmentalenhancements associatedwiththereuseof existinginstreamstructures. Thispolicyislikelytocontribute toreducedgreenhousegas emissionsbutthereisalsothe potentialforareductioninair quality.However,thiscanbe addressedthroughpolicyEA11.It islikelytoavoidimpactson carbonrichsoils,prime agriculturalland,airquality, designatedsites,landscapeand builtheritage. Thispolicyislikelytoleadto reducedgreenhousegas emissions.Itislikelytoavoid impactsoncarbonrichsoils, primeagriculturalland, designatedsites,landscapeand builtheritage. Thispolicyislikelytocontribute toreducedgreenhousegas emissions.Itislikelytoavoid impactsoncarbonrichsoils, primeagriculturalland,air quality,thewaterenvironment, designatedsites,protected species,landscapeandbuilt heritage. Mitigation/enhancementto betakenforward
Policy
Purpose/Aims
RecommendationsfromMIRstageSEA
SC16
Hydroelectricity Development
Toidentifythe circumstancesunder whichhydroelectricity schemesmaybe supported.
None
Whereexistinginstream structuresarereused, ensuretheyremovebarriers tofishpassage
SC17
Biomass
Toidentifythe circumstancesunder whichbiomassproposals maybesupported.
None
Addressairqualityby consideringinconjunction withpolicyEA11.
SC18
LargeSolarArrays
Toidentifythe circumstancesunder whichlargesolararray proposalsmaybe supported.
None
SC19
DeepGeothermal
Toidentifythe circumstancesunder whichdeepgeothermal proposalsmaybe supported.
None
30
4.Results
RecommendationsfromProposedPlan stageSEA Changesmadetopolicyasaresultof ProposedPlanstageSEA Environmentalimpactsoffinal Mitigation/enhancementto policy betakenforward Thispolicyislikelytocontribute totheprotectionofthewater environment,andreductionof floodrisk.Itislikelytocontribute toprotectionandenhancement ofthelandscape,andthe Considerhabitatandhabitat connectivityoftheCentral ScotlandGreenNetwork.Thereis connectivityopportunities thepotentialforSUDSfeaturesto offeredbySUDSatthe contributetotheconservationof planningapplicationstage. biodiversity,andtoecosystem connectivity:theopportunities forhabitatcreationor enhancementshouldbe consideredattheplanning applicationstage.
Policy
Purpose/Aims
SC20
WaterandDrainage Infrastructureand Capacity
Toensurethat developmentsareserved bytherequiredstandards ofwateranddrainage infrastructure.
None
SEAofearlieriterationsofthispolicy recommendedthatitbeamendedto directdevelopmentawayfromsitesthat cannotconnecttoapublicsewer
Policyamendedtorequireallsiteswithinor closetourbanareastoconnecttoapublic sewer
SC21
PipelineandHazard ConsultationZones
SC22
Hazardous SubstancesConsent
Toensurethatproposed developmentswithin ConsultationZonesare compatiblewiththe existingoperationaluses. Toensurethat developmentsrequiring HazardousSubstances Consentarelocatedon themostappropriate sites.
None
SEAofearlieriterationsofthepolicyfound Nosignificantchangestopolicythroughthe nolikelynegativeenvironmentalimpacts. SEAprocess.
None
SC23
SC24
SEAoftheMIRrecommendedthat policyondevelopmentintheruralarea shouldtakeintoaccountbiodiversity, floraandfauna;soil;water;climate Tosafeguardthe changemitigationandadaptation;the countrysidebysupporting Developmentinthe historicenvironment;activetravel; CountrysideGeneral developmentswhichmeet CentralScotlandGreenNetwork; thecriteriaoftherelevant Principles landscapecharacterandcapacity;and policies. habitatconnectivitywhendefiningthe circumstancesinwhichdevelopmentin thecountrysidewouldbepermitted. TheSEAalsorecommendedthatthe policyshouldrequireenergyefficient Residential Tosetcriteriafor designandsustainablewateruse. Developmentinthe residentialdevelopmentin Countryside thecountryside
SEAoftheearlieriterationofthispolicy recommendedthatitbeamendedto encourageaccessibilitybypublicand activetravel,andrequiretravelplanning; thatbusinessdevelopmentsberequiredto beofahighstandardofenergyefficiency; andto"require"ratherthan"encourage" environmentalenhancement,andbe specificaboutthenatureofthe enhancementsrequired.
Policyamendedtorequiredevelopmentto contributetogreennetworkobjectivesas setoutintheGreenNetworkSG.The principlethatallpoliciesapplytoall developmentsshouldmeanthattraveland energyefficiencyaretakenintoaccount
SEAofearlieriterationsofthepolicyfound Nosignificantchangestopolicythroughthe nolikelynegativeenvironmentalimpacts, SEAprocess. beyondthoseidentifiedforSC23.
Thispolicyislikelytoprotectand enhancethedistinctivecharacter ofthelandscape,andcontribute tothepromotionand connectivityoftheCentral ScotlandGreenNetwork.Itis likelytoavoidadverseimpactson soilqualityandbiodiversity,and avoidincreasesingreenhousegas emissionsfromtransport associatedwithrural development. Nosignificantenvironmental impactshavebeenidentifiedfor thispolicy,beyondthose identifiedforpolicySC23.
31
4.Results
RecommendationsfromProposedPlan stageSEA Changesmadetopolicyasaresultof ProposedPlanstageSEA Environmentalimpactsoffinal policy Nosignificantenvironmental impactshavebeenidentifiedfor thispolicy,beyondthose identifiedforpolicySC23. Mitigation/enhancementto betakenforward
Policy Business Developmentinthe Countryside
Purpose/Aims Tosetcriteriaforbusiness developmentinthe countryside Toprovideaframework fordeterminingplanning applicationsforenabling developmentinthe countrysidewhichmaybe requiredtofinance another,proposed development.
SC25
SC26
Enabling Developmentinthe Countryside
Nosignificantenvironmental impactshavebeenidentifiedfor thispolicy,beyondthose identifiedforpolicySC23.
EP1
StrategicLandfor Business
Tosupportbusinessand SEAoftheMIRrecommendedthat industrialdevelopments businessandindustrialdevelopments onstrategicsitesallocated meetbiodiversitycriteria. inthisPlan.
SEAoftheearlieriterationofthispolicy recommendedthatthepolicybeamended Nosignificantchangestopolicythroughthe torequirebuildingstobeenergyefficient, SEAprocess. andtorequireaccessibilitybypublic transport
Thispolicyislikelytoleadto increasedgreenhousegas emissions,andhasthepotential toleadtoincreasedairpollution andlandcontamination(although mayalsoprovideopportunitiesto remediateexisting contamination):theseissues shouldbeconsideredand addressedattheplanning applicationstage. Thispolicyislikelytoleadto increasedgreenhousegas emissions,andhasthepotential toleadtoincreasedairpollution andlandcontamination(although mayalsoprovideopportunitiesto remediateexisting contamination):theseissues shouldbeconsideredand addressedattheplanning applicationstage.Thepolicy avoidsadverseimpactsonthe FirthofForthSPAandRamsar site.
Requireplanningproposals todemonstratehownew business/industrial developmentwouldaddress potentialincreasesin greenhousegasemissions. Potentialtorequireenergy efficientdevelopments. Considerrisktoairandsoil quality,andmitigation,at planningstage. Requireplanningproposals todemonstratehownew business/industrial developmentwouldaddress potentialincreasesin greenhousegasemissions. Potentialtorequireenergy efficientdevelopments. Considerrisktoairandsoil quality,andmitigation,at planningstage.
EP2
ExistingBusiness Sites
Tosupporttheretention andpromotionofthe existingbusinessand industrialsitesidentified inthisPlan.
SEAoftheearlieriterationofthepolicy recommendedthatbusiness developmentsbeinaccordancewiththe layoutanddesignpolicyandSG
PolicySC7amendedtoincludenon residentialdevelopment
32
4.Results
RecommendationsfromProposedPlan stageSEA Changesmadetopolicyasaresultof ProposedPlanstageSEA Environmentalimpactsoffinal policy Mitigation/enhancementto betakenforward Requireplanningproposals todemonstratehownew Thepolicyislikelytoleadto business/industrial increasedgreenhousegas developmentwouldaddress emissions,andhasthepotential toleadtoincreasedairpollution: potentialincreasesin theseissuesshouldbeconsidered greenhousegasemissions. Potentialtorequireenergy andaddressedattheplanning efficientdevelopments. applicationstage.Thepolicy avoidsadverseimpactsonthe Considerrisktoairquality, FirthofForthSPAandRamsar andmitigation,atplanning site. stage. Thereisthepotentialforthis Requiredesignand policytohavebeneficialimpacts onthelandscapeandtheCentral landscapingtocontributeto theCentralScotlandGreen ScotlandGreenNetwork:this dependshowtherequirementfor Networkandtolandscape characterattheplanning visualand/orenvironmental enhancementsisimplementedat applicationstage. theplanningapplicationstage. Nosignificantenvironmental impactshavebeenidentifiedfor thispolicy. Thispolicyhasthepotentialfora rangeofpositiveenvironmental impacts,dependingonthenature ofthegreenbusinessesthatthe policyattracts.
Policy
Purpose/Aims
EP3
Businessand IndustrialUses OutwithExistingor AllocatedBusiness Sites
Tosetoutcriteriafor considerationofother employmentgenerating usesoutwithexistingor allocatedbusinesssites.
SEAoftheearlieriterationofthepolicy recommendedthatbusiness developmentsbeinaccordancewiththe layoutanddesignpolicyandSG
PolicySC7amendedtoincludenon residentialdevelopment
EP4
NonEmployment GeneratingUseson ExistingorAllocated BusinessSites
Tosetoutcriteriafor considerationofnon employmentgenerating usesonexistingor allocatedbusinesssites.
EP5
HomeWorking
EP6
GreenBusiness
EP7
Telecommunications DevelopmentCriteria
EP8
Telecommunication Development Additional Information
Tosupporttheprincipleof homeworkingsubjectto None detailedcriteria. SEAoftheMIRrecommendedthatthe definitionof"greenbusiness"should Toprovidesupportand includereducinggreenhousegas encouragementtoGreen emissions,transportandwaste,and Business. improvingenergyefficiency. SEAoftheMIRrecommendedthatthe Tosetoutcriteriaforthe considerationofproposals policybemorespecificabouthow visualimpactwillbedealtwithin fortelecommunications relationtodesignatedlandscapesand developments. thehistoricenvironment.It Tosetoutthelevelof recommendedthatpolicysupportfor informationrequiredin WiMAXcouldcontributetoenabling ordertoallowtheCouncil disabledandvulnerablepeopletolive toconsiderapplications independently;promotingregeneration fortelecommunication inthemostdeprivedareas;and developments. achievingmixedusedevelopments.
SEAoftheearlieriterationofthepolicy foundnolikelynegativeenvironmental impacts. SEAoftheearlieriterationofthepolicy foundnolikelynegativeenvironmental impacts.
Thispolicyavoidsadverseimpacts ontheFirthofForthSPAand Ramsarsite.
EP9
Protectionof MineralsResources
Toprotectmineral resourcesfrom sterilisationby development.
None
SEAoftheearlieriterationofthepolicy foundthatithadpotentialtoincrease greenhousegasemissionsanddamage soils;however,theseimpactsarelikelyto comeasaresultofresourcesbeing worked,ratherthanasaresultofthe policyitself,andthuswouldbecoveredby policiesEP1013
33
4.Results
RecommendationsfromProposedPlan stageSEA Changesmadetopolicyasaresultof ProposedPlanstageSEA Environmentalimpactsoffinal policy Thispolicyislikelytoincrease greenhousegasemissionsandair pollution,anddamagesoils (althoughthiscanbemitigatedby therequirementforrestoration). Thereisthepotentialforthe policytohavepositiveimpactson communitycohesionand inclusion,dependingonhowthe requirementforcommunity benefitsisimplemented.Thereis thepotentialforthepolicyto adverselyaffecthealthand exacerbateexistingconditions,so thehealthprofileofareas affectedbydevelopmentshould beconsideredattheplanning applicationstage.Thereis potentialfornegativeimpactson geodiversity,biodiversity,species, habitatsandtheCentralScotland GreenNetwork,dependingonthe locationofproposals;these issues,andthepotentialfor habitatimprovementsandgreen networkimprovementsthrough siterestoration,shouldbe consideredattheplanning applicationstage. Mitigation/enhancementto betakenforward
Policy
Purpose/Aims
EP10
MineralsGeneral Principles.
Toensurethatminerals extractiondoesnothavea significantadverseimpact None onClackmannanshire's environmentand communities.
SEAoftheearlieriterationofthepolicy identifiedthattherewerelikelytobe significantnegativeimpactson greenhousegasemissions;airquality;soil quality;biodiversity,includinghabitat connectivityprotectedandprioritysites andspecies;landscapeandtheCSGN.The SEAalsofoundthatimpactsoncarbonrich soils;flooding;wateruse;health; geodiversityandthehistoricenvironment wereuncertain.TheSEArecommended thatrestorationcouldcontributeto sustainablefloodmanagement,to enhancementofthenaturalenvironment andimprovementstovisualamenity;it alsoregulatedthatwateruseand emissionsfromplantbecontrolled.
Nosignificantchangestopolicythroughthe SEAprocess.Detailedinformationon restorationandonprocessesislikelytobe includedintheSGandcoveredby regulationbySEPA
Considerlocalcommunity healthprofilesatplanning applicationstage. Considerthepotentialfor impactson,orenhancement of,theCentralScotland GreenNetwork,biodiversity conservation,European protectedspecies,priority species,andhabitat connectivityatplanning applicationstage. Considerpotentialfor adverseimpactson geodiversityatplanning applicationstage.
34
4.Results
Policy
Purpose/Aims
EP11
OpencastCoal Extraction
Tosetoutadditional criteriainrelationto opencastcoalextraction.
None
SEAoftheearlieriterationofthepolicy identifiedthattherewerelikelytobe significantnegativeimpactson greenhousegasemissions;airquality;soil quality;health;biodiversity,including habitatconnectivityprotectedandpriority sitesandspecies;landscapeandthe CSGN.TheSEAalsofoundthatimpactson carbonrichsoils;flooding;wateruse; health;geodiversityandthehistoric environmentwereuncertain.TheSEA recommendedthatcarbonrichsoilsbe includedinthecriteriaforidentifyinglevel ofconstraint;thatthepolicyinclude criteriarelatingtoparticulates,andthat developersberequiretoimplement measurestoreducedustandparticulates.
Carbonrichsoilsareincludedasareasof mediumconstraint.Detailedinformation relatingtomanagingparticulatesislikelyto beincludedintheSGandcoveredby regulationbySEPA.
35
4.Results
Policy
Purpose/Aims
EP12
AggregateMinerals
Tosetoutadditional criteriainrelationto aggregateminerals.
None
SEAofearlieriterationsofthepolicy identifiedthattherewerelikelytobe significantnegativeimpactson greenhousegasemissions;airquality;soil quality;biodiversity,includinghabitat connectivityprotectedandprioritysites andspecies;landscapeandtheCSGN.The Nosignificantchangestopolicythroughthe SEAalsofoundthatimpactsoncarbonrich SEAprocess. soils;flooding;wateruse;health; geodiversityandthehistoricenvironment wereuncertain.Otherthanthose suggestedforpolicyEP10,no recommendationstomitigatetheimpacts ofthepolicy.
36
4.Results
RecommendationsfromProposedPlan stageSEA Changesmadetopolicyasaresultof ProposedPlanstageSEA Environmentalimpactsoffinal policy Thispolicyislikelytoincrease greenhousegasemissionsandair pollution,anddamagesoils (althoughthiscanbemitigatedby therequirementforrestoration). Thepolicyislikelytohavea negativeimpactonthewater environment.Thereisthe potentialforthepolicytohave positiveimpactsoncommunity cohesionandinclusion, dependingonhowthe requirementforcommunity benefitsisimplemented.Thereis thepotentialforthepolicyto adverselyaffecthealthand exacerbateexistingconditions,so thehealthprofileofareas affectedbydevelopmentshould beconsideredattheplanning applicationstage.Thereis potentialfornegativeimpactson geodiversity,biodiversity,species, habitatsandtheCentralScotland GreenNetwork,dependingonthe locationofproposals;these issues,andthepotentialfor habitatimprovementsandgreen networkimprovementsthrough siterestoration,shouldbe consideredattheplanning applicationstage. Nosignificantenvironmental impactshavebeenidentifiedfor thispolicy. Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveeffectson towncentreregeneration, protectionandenhancementof builtheritage,andreducingthe environmentalimpactsoftravel. Mitigation/enhancementto betakenforward
Policy
Purpose/Aims
EP13
CoalBedMethane
Tosetoutadditional criteriainrelationtocoal bedmethane.
None
SEAoftheearlieriterationofthepolicy identifiedthattherewerelikelytobe significantnegativeimpactson greenhousegasemissions;airquality;soil quality;biodiversity,includinghabitat connectivityprotectedandprioritysites andspecies;landscapeandtheCSGN.The Nosignificantchangestopolicythroughthe SEAalsofoundthatimpactsoncarbonrich SEAprocess. soils;flooding;wateruse;healthand safety;geodiversityandthehistoric environmentwereuncertain.Otherthan thosesuggestedforpolicyEP10,no recommendationstomitigatetheimpacts ofthepolicy.
EP14
RetailNetwork CentreandHierarchy
Toprotectandenhance theroleandfunctionof thenetworkandhierarchy None ofretailcentresin Clackmannanshire. Tosupportdevelopments thatwillcontributeto towncentreregeneration, inaccordancewiththe LDPStrategy.
EP15
PromotingTown CentreRegeneration
None
SEAoftheearlieriterationofthispolicy recommendedcriteriatoprotectand enhancethehistoricenvironment
Nosignificantchangestopolicythroughthe SEAprocess,althoughtheprinciplethatall policiesapplytoalldevelopmentsshould meanthatthehistoricenvironmentistaken intoaccount
37
4.Results
RecommendationsfromProposedPlan stageSEA SEAoftheearlieriterationofthispolicy recommendedtheadditionofcriteria relatingtowastemanagementandthe historicenvironment Changesmadetopolicyasaresultof ProposedPlanstageSEA Nosignificantchangestopolicythroughthe SEAprocess,althoughtheprinciplethatall policiesapplytoalldevelopmentsshould meanthatwastemanagementandthe historicenvironmentistakenintoaccount Environmentalimpactsoffinal policy Mitigation/enhancementto betakenforward
Policy
Purpose/Aims Tosetoutcriteriaforthe assessmentofnewretail andcommercialleisure developments,in accordancewiththeLDP Strategy. Tosetoutcriteriafor supermarketand superstoreproposalsin accordancewiththeLDP Strategy. Tosetoutcriteriaforfood anddrinkproposalsin accordancewiththeLDP Strategy,andtaking particularaccountof issuesofamenity. Tosetoutcriteriafor proposalstositemobile snackvansinaccordance withtheLDPStrategy,and takingparticularaccount ofissuesofamenityand roadsafety. Tosetcriteriaforthe locationofmotorvehicles salesandserviceareas Toprotecttheroleoflocal shopsinaccordancewith theLDPStrategy,andset outcriteriaforassessment ofproposalstochange theiruse. Tosetoutcriteriafor shopfront,advertisement andsecurityproposals,in accordancewiththeLDP Strategyandwithan emphasisontheimpact onthecharacterand visualamenity.
EP16
NewRetailand CommercialLeisure Development
EP17
Supermarketand Superstore Development
SEAoftheMIRrecommendedthat policyoncomparisonretailshould includethefollowinginitssustainability criteria:conservationofbiodiversity; habitatconnectivity;abilityofthe landscapetoaccommodate development;soilandwaterquality issues;floodrisk.
Thispolicyavoidsadverseeffects oftheFirthofForthSPAand Ramsarsite.
EP18
FoodandDrink
None
EP19
SitingofMobile SnackBars
None
Thispolicyhasthepotentialfor positiveandnegativeimpactson health,andontheenvironmental impactoftravel.
EP20
MotorVehicleSales andServiceAreas
None
EP21
LocalShops
None
EP22
ShopFrontDesign, Advertisingand ExternalSecurity Measures
None
Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveimpactsonthe protectionandenhancementof thehistoricenvironment.
38
4.Results
RecommendationsfromProposedPlan stageSEA Changesmadetopolicyasaresultof ProposedPlanstageSEA Environmentalimpactsoffinal policy Thispolicyencouragespromotion andconnectionoftheCentral ScotlandGreenNetwork.This policyislikelytohavesignificant positiveimpactsonimproving Clackmannanshire'sresilienceto climatechange,includingthe abilityoflocalbiodiversityto adapttoachangingclimate.Itis likelytohavesignificantbeneficial impactsonairquality,thewater environment,biodiversityand landscape.Throughenabling accesstotheoutdoorsitislikely toimprovecommunitycohesion andsafety,andimprovehealth;it islikelytoreducethe environmentalimpactsoftravel, andconsequentlyreduce greenhousegasemissions. SEAoftheearlieriterationofthe SGfoundthatitwaslikelytohave significantbeneficialimpactson communitycohesion,safetyand health;promotionand connectivityoftheCentral ScotlandGreenNetwork; biodiversity,includinghabitat connectivityandreducingthe impactofinvasivespecies;and reducingtheenvironmental impactoftravel. Mitigation/enhancementto betakenforward
Policy
Purpose/Aims
EA1
Clackmannanshire GreenNetwork
Tosupportthe implementationofthe CentralScotlandGreen Networkbyensuringthat newdevelopment contributestoits objectiveswherepossible.
None
SG6
Supplementary guidance:Green Infrastructure
Toensurethatdevelopers, thepublic,landand propertyownersare awareofthecontribution None thatgreeninfrastructure canmaketoachievinga successfulplace.
SEAoftheearlieriterationoftheSGfound thatitwaslikelytohavesignificant beneficialimpactsoncommunity cohesion,safetyandhealth;promotion andconnectivityoftheCentralScotland GreenNetwork;biodiversity,including habitatconnectivityandreducingthe impactofinvasivespecies;andreducing theenvironmentalimpactoftravel.
NosignificantchangesweremadetotheSG throughtheSEAprocess
39
4.Results
RecommendationsfromProposedPlan stageSEA Environmentalimpactsoffinal policy Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveimpactsfor biodiversity,includingpriority SEAoftheearlieriterationofthispolicy speciesandhabitats,and recommendedthatthepolicybeamended designatedsites.Itsfocuson toensurethatnewdevelopment Policyamendedtostrengthenthe habitatnetworksislikelytohelp contributestothedevelopmentofhabitat requirementfornewdevelopmentto biodiversityadapttoachanging networks;toensurethathabitatnetworks contributetobiodiversityconservationand climate;habitatcreationalsohas contributetosustainablefloodrisk enhancement.Theprinciplethatallpolicies potentialtoenhancethe managementandcomplementriverbasin applytoalldevelopmentsshouldmeanthat distinctivecharacterofthe managementplanning;toensureprojects flooding,thewaterenvironment,soilsand landscape,andcontributeto haveregardforsoilquality;andensurethe landscapearetakenintoaccount. sustainablefloodmanagement. creationofnewhabitatsdoesnot Thispolicyislikelytocontribute adverselyimpactonthelandscape tothepromotionand character connectivityoftheCentral ScotlandGreenNetwork. Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveimpactsfor SEAofearlieriterationsofthepolicy biodiversity,particularly recommendedthatthepolicybeamended Policyamendedtoincludegeology. designatedsitesandprotected toincludeSSSIsdesignatedfortheir species;geodiversity;and geodiversity landscapecharacter. Thispolicyislikelytohave significantbeneficialimpactsfor protectionandenhancementof thedistinctivecharacterofthe landscape,including,butnot limitedto,areasdesignatedfor theirlandscapeimportance. Changesmadetopolicyasaresultof ProposedPlanstageSEA Mitigation/enhancementto betakenforward
Policy
Purpose/Aims
EA2
HabitatNetworks andBiodiversity
Toencouragethe protectionand enhancementof biodiversityandhabitat networksbysafeguarding theintegrityoffeaturesof SEAoftheMIRrecommendedthatthe policyshouldincludereducingthe thelandscapewhichare importantbecauseoftheir impactofnonnativespecies linearandcontinuous structureorfunctionas intermediatesitesforthe movementofbothfauna andflora.
EA3
Protectionof DesignatedSitesand ProtectedSpecies
Toprotectdesignated sitesandprotected species.
None
EA4
LandscapeQuality
Tosetaframeworkforthe protectionand enhancementofthe qualityanddistinctive None characterof Clackmannanshire's landscapeandtoprotect theSpecialLandscape Areas ToprotectGeological ConservationReview (GCR)sites.
EA5
Geological ConservationReview Sites
None
Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveimpactsonthe protectionandenhancementof geodiversity.
40
4.Results
RecommendationsfromProposedPlan stageSEA Changesmadetopolicyasaresultof ProposedPlanstageSEA Environmentalimpactsoffinal policy Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveimpactson promotionandconnectivityof theCentralScotlandGreen Network;itislikelytocontribute toareductioningreenhousegas emissions,andislikelytobe Policyamendedtobecleareraboutits purpose.Theprinciplethatallpoliciesapply beneficialforbiodiversitythrough anincreaseinwoodlandhabitat toalldevelopmentsshouldmeanthat andimprovedhabitat biodiversityandlandscapearetakeninto connectivity.Thereisthe account potentialforfurtherbiodiversity benefits:opportunitiesforhabitat creationandprotection, particularlyforprotectedspecies, shouldbeconsideredatthe planningapplicationstage. Thispolicyislikelytohave positiveimpactsonbiodiversity, includingpriorityspeciesand habitats,andadaptationto climatechange.Itislikelyto Nosignificantchangestopolicythroughthe contributetosustainableflood SEAprocess management,andtotheCentral ScotlandGreenNetwork,aswell astocommunitycohesionand thedistinctivecharacterofthe landscape. Thispolicyislikelytoprotectand enhancethelandscape;itisalso likelytocontributetotown centreregeneration.Ithasthe Policywordingamendedtorequire potentialtoenhancethehistoric developmentstocontributetotheCSGN environmentthroughsupporting "whereverpossible" thereuseofhistoricbuildings: thisshouldbedoneinaccordance withthehistoricenvironment policies. Mitigation/enhancementto betakenforward
Policy
Purpose/Aims
EA6
Woodlandsand Forestry
Toprotectandexpand Clackmannanshire's woodlandresources.
None
SEAofearlieriterationsofthepolicy recommendedthatitbecleareraboutthe WoodlandandForestStrategy'saimsand policydirection,andthatitsetcriteria relatingtobiodiversityandlandscape.
Ensurenewwoodland plantingconsidersthe potentialtocontributeto habitatconnectivityandthe conservationofbiodiversity, includingEuropeanprotected species
EA7
Hedgerows,Trees andTree PreservationOrders
Toretaintrees,woodland andhedgerowsthatmake apositivecontributionto localamenity.
None
EA8
GreenBelt
Toexplainrestrictionson developmentwithinareas designatedasGreenBelt, theexceptionstothese restrictionsand requirementswhere developmentispermitted withintheGreenBelt.
SEAoftheMIRrecommendedthatthe policyshouldprotectthehistoric environmentandsupportmeasures suchasSUDS
SEAoftheearlieriterationofthispolicy recommendedthatthepolicywording regardingcontributiontotheCSGNbe strengthened
Ensureanyconversionorre useofbuildingofhistoricor architecturalvalueisdonein accordancewithhistoric environmentpolicies
41
4.Results
RecommendationsfromProposedPlan stageSEA Environmentalimpactsoffinal policy Thispolicyislikelytosignificantly improveClackmannanshire's resiliencetoclimatechange,and reduceoverallfloodriskina sustainableway.Sustainable floodmanagementmeasuresare likelytoenhancethestatusofthe SEAoftheearlieriterationofthepolicy Nosignificantchangestopolicythroughthe waterenvironment,including foundnolikelynegativeenvironmental reducingpollution;theyalsohave SEAprocess impacts. thepotentialtocontributetothe conservationofbiodiversity throughhabitatenhancement. Reducingtheriskoffloodingis likelytoleadtoimproved communitysafety,andislikelyto havehealthbenefits. Thispolicyislikelytocontribute tosustainablefloodmanagement andtoenhancementofwater Nosignificantchangestopolicythroughthe status.Itislikelytohave significantbeneficialimpactsfor SEAprocess.However,the biodiversity,includinghabitat ClackmannanshireBiodiversityActionPlan SEAoftheearlieriterationofthepolicy connectivity,andislikelyto (withwhichfloodmanagementprovisions recommendedthatthecriteriabe protectandenhancethe mustbecompatible)includesactionsto amendedtoconsiderthepotentialto addressnonnativeinvasivespecies;andthe landscapeandculturalheritageof tackleinvasivespeciesandsoil thecoastalmargin.Thispolicyis principlethatallpoliciesapplytoall contamination. likelytocontributetothe developmentsshouldmeanthat objectivesoftheCentralScotland contaminatedlandistakenintoaccount. GreenNetwork,andislikelyto helptoreducetheenvironmental impactoftravel. Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveimpactsforair, SEAofearlieriterationsofthepolicy waterandsoilquality,andis recommendedthatthepolicybeamended Policyamendedtoincludesoil. consequentlylikelytocontribute toincludesoilasoneofthemediatobe toimprovedhealth,andbenefits protectedfrompollution. forbiodiversity. Changesmadetopolicyasaresultof ProposedPlanstageSEA Mitigation/enhancementto betakenforward
Policy
Purpose/Aims
EA9
ManagingFloodRisk
Tomanagetheriskof floodingfromallsources: river,coastal,surface water,sewers, groundwater,reservoirs andotherinfrastructure.
None
EA10
CoastalPlanning
Topromoteanintegrated approachtodevelopment inthecoastalzone, supportingtheprovisions oftheForthArea ManagementPlan,and ensuringprotectionof designatedhabitatsites andthelandscape,open spaceandcultural heritageofthecoastal margin.
None
EA11
Environmental Quality
Toprotectthequalityof theenvironment.
None
42
4.Results
RecommendationsfromProposedPlan stageSEA Changesmadetopolicyasaresultof ProposedPlanstageSEA Environmentalimpactsoffinal Mitigation/enhancementto policy betakenforward Thispolicyislikelytomakea significantcontributionto improvingClackmannanshire's resiliencetoclimatechange, throughaddressingtheriskof floodsanddrought;thisisalso likelytohavesignificantbeneficial impactsforcommunitysafetyand health.Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveimpactsonthe waterenvironment,onthe CentralScotlandGreenNetwork, andonbiodiversity,particularly onpriorityspeciesandhabitats relatingtothewater environment.Improvementsto thewaterenvironmentarelikely toleadtopositiveimpactson soils,andcontributetoprotecting andenhancingthedistinctive characterofthelandscape.The policyislikelytoreducethe impactofnonnativeinvasive species.
Policy
Purpose/Aims
EA12
WaterEnvironment
Toprotectandenhance thewaterenvironment
None
SG4
Supplementary guidance:Water
Toensurethatall stakeholdersareawareof therelationshipofwater issuestoplanning,andto raiseawarenessand provideguidance regardingriskstothe waterenvironment, flooding,drainage,green infrastructureandgood design.
None
Thesupplementaryguidanceislikelyto havebeneficialimpactsonthewater environment,floodrisk,resilienceto climatechange,carbonrichsoils, communitysafety,health,biodiversity.
Thesupplementaryguidanceis likelytohavebeneficialimpacts Nosignificantchangestothesupplementary onthewaterenvironment,flood guidancethroughtheSEAprocess risk,resiliencetoclimatechange, carbonrichsoils,community safety,health,biodiversity.
43
4.Results
RecommendationsfromProposedPlan stageSEA Changesmadetopolicyasaresultof ProposedPlanstageSEA Environmentalimpactsoffinal Mitigation/enhancementto policy betakenforward Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveimpactsonthe protectionofcarbonrichsoils, andconsequentlyislikelyto contributetoareductionin greenhousegasemissions.Itis likelytohavesignificantpositive impactsonbiodiversity,including priorityspeciesandhabitats.This policyislikelytosafeguardsoils qualityandquantity,whichis likelytocontributetothe protectionofthewater environment. Thispolicyislikelytohave significantbenefitsfor communityinclusionand cohesion,communitysafety,and health.Itislikelytocontributeto reducinggreenhousegas emissions,resiliencetoclimate change,andincreasing composting.Itcontributes stronglytotheCentralScotland GreenNetwork,andhasthe potentialforbeneficialimpacts onbiodiversity,ifwildlifefriendly growingandplantingare encouraged.
Policy
Purpose/Aims
EA13
SignificantSoil Resources
Toprotecttheareasof primeagriculturalland andcarbonrichsoils, identifiedonthe ConstraintsMap,from inappropriate development.
None
SEAofearlieriterationsofthepolicyfound Nosignificantchangestopolicythroughthe nolikelynegativeenvironmentalimpacts. SEAprocess
EA14
Supportingthe Deliveryof CommunityGrowing Spaces
Tosupportthedeliveryof communitygrowing spaces,anddirectthemto locationsthatencourage activetraveland sustainabledevelopment.
SEAoftheMIRrecommendedthatthe policy: Directnewprovisiontoareaswith vacant/derelictsites,orgreenspaces thatareunderused/subjectto vandalismorantisocialbehaviour Requireallotmentstobedesignedtobe wildlifefriendly;organicorotherwise reducingthepotentialimpactof pesticideandweedkilleronwater supply;andplantedwithnativespecies only Locateallotmentstoconnectexisting areasofhabitat Encourageaccessibilitybyactiveand publicmodesoftransport.
SEAofearlieriterationsofthispolicy recommendedthatthepolicybeamended totakeintoaccountthefollowingissues: encouragetowncentrelocationsfor communitygardens;encourage accessibilitybyactivetravel;designsites forfloodriskmanagement;ensuresites useminimalchemicals;ensuresitesuse waterbuttsandcomposting;encourage sitesthatenhancetheconnectivityofthe greennetwork;encouragebiodiversity friendlygardeningandnativetree planting;takeintoaccountwhethersites areusedbybirdsfromtheFirthofForth SPA;ensurelocationissensitiveto landscapecharacterandtakelandscape designationsintoaccount. SEAoftheearlieriterationofthepolicy foundnolikelynegativeenvironmental impacts.
Policyamendedtoensurenodetrimental impactsonthelandscape;policyamended totakeintoaccountimpactsontheFirthof Forth(throughtheHRAprocess). Suggestionsaroundthemanagementand plantingofthesitearebestaddressed throughotherchannels.Theprinciplethat allpoliciesapplytoalldevelopmentsshould meanthattowncentreregeneration, accessibilitybyactivetravel,andfloodrisk aretakenintoaccount.
Encouragewildlifefriendly growingandplanting
EA15
ClassificationofLand thathasbeenused forCommunity Growing
Toensureappropriate remediationforanyland thatceasestobeusedfor communitygrowing.
None
Nosignificantenvironmental impactshavebeenidentifiedfor thispolicy. Thispolicyislikelytoreduce greenhousegasemissions, minimisewastegeneration,and maximiserecyclingand composting.Bydivertingwaste fromlandfill,itislikelytohave positiveimpactsonsoilquality andquantity.Thispolicyislikely toavoidadverseimpactsonair qualityorontheFirthofForth SPA.
EA16
WasteManagement Facilities
Tosupportthe developmentofsuitable SEAoftheMIRrecommendedthe wastemanagement policyaddresslandscapeimpact facilitieswhile safeguardingthe environmentandamenity.
SEAofearlieriterationsofthepolicy recommendedthatthepolicybe consideredinrelationtopolicies protecting:carbonrichsoils,CSGN, biodiversity,naturalenvironment, landscape,geodiversity,builtheritage; thatsitesbelocatedinareasthatareless sensitivetoincreasesinairpollution
Nosignificantchangestopolicythroughthe SEAprocess,althoughtheprinciplethatall policiesapplytoalldevelopmentsshould meanthattheseissuesaretakeninto account
44
4.Results
RecommendationsfromProposedPlan stageSEA SEAoftheearlieriterationofthispolicy recommendedthattheproposalsbe consideredinrelationtopolicies protectingcarbonrichsoils,CSGN, biodiversity,naturalenvironment, landscape,geodiversityandbuiltheritage. TheSEAalsorecommendedthatthepolicy considerimpactsofairpollutionand ensureenergyisonlyrecoveredfrom wastestreamsthatcannotpracticablybe recoveredandrecycled;however,these issuesarecoveredinSEPA'sThermal TreatmentofWasteguidelines,withwhich thepolicyrequiresproposalstocomply. Changesmadetopolicyasaresultof ProposedPlanstageSEA Environmentalimpactsoffinal policy Mitigation/enhancementto betakenforward
Policy
Purpose/Aims
EA17
EnergyfromWaste Facilities
Tosetcriteriafor proposalstogenerate energyfromwaste.
None
Nosignificantchangestopolicythroughthe SEAprocess.Theprinciplethatallpolicies applytoalldevelopmentsshouldmeanthat theissuesraisedaretakenintoaccount.
Thispolicyislikelytocontribute toimprovingenergyconservation andefficiency,andreducing greenhousegasemissions.Ithas thepotentialforpositiveimpacts oncommunitycohesion.
EA18
MinimisingWastein NewDevelopment
Tominimisethewaste generatedduringthe constructionanduseof newdevelopments.
None
EA19
Scheduled Monuments
ToprotectScheduled Monumentsandother identifiednationally importantarchaeological resources. Toprotectother archaeologicalresources andpreservetheminsitu whereverpossible. Toprotectandenhance historicgardensand designedlandscapes.
None
EA20
OtherArchaeological Resources
None
Nosignificantchangestopolicythroughthe SEAofearlieriterationsofthepolicyfound SEAprocess. nolikelynegativeenvironmentalimpacts.
EA21
HistoricGardensand DesignedLandscapes
None
EA22
ListedBuildings
Toprotectlistedbuildings andtheirsettings.
None
Thispolicyislikelytominimise wastegenerationandmaximise recyclingandcomposting; consequently,itislikelyto contributetoareductionin greenhousegasemissions. Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveimpactsonthe protectionandenhancementof thehistoricenvironment;itisalso likelytocontributetothe protectionandenhancementof landscapecharacter. Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveimpactsonthe protectionandenhancementof thehistoricenvironment Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveimpactsonthe protectionandenhancementof thehistoricenvironment. Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveimpactsonthe protectionandenhancementof thehistoricenvironment;itisalso likelytocontributetothe protectionandenhancementof landscapecharacter.
45
4.Results
RecommendationsfromProposedPlan stageSEA Changesmadetopolicyasaresultof ProposedPlanstageSEA Environmentalimpactsoffinal policy Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveimpactsonthe protectionandenhancementof thehistoricenvironment;itisalso likelytocontributetothe protectionandenhancementof landscapecharacterandthe regenerationoftowncentres. Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveimpactsonthe protectionandenhancementof thehistoricenvironmentandthe landscape;itisalsolikelyto contributetotheregenerationof towncentres. Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveimpactson soils,andcontributestronglyto theCentralScotlandGreen Network.Itislikelytocontribute totowncentreregeneration, minimisingwaste,protectingthe landscapeandimproving communitysafetyandhealth Mitigation/enhancementto betakenforward
Policy
Purpose/Aims
EA23
ConservationAreas
Topreserveandenhance thecharacterof Clackmannanshire's conservationareas.
SEAoftheMIRsuggestedthatpolicy shouldincludeconsiderationof biodiversityinoldbuildings.
EA24
BuildingsatRiskand NonDesignated HeritageAssets
Tosupporttherenovation andreuseofbuildingsat risk.
None
SEAofearlieriterationsofthispolicy foundnolikelynegativeenvironmental impacts,butrecommendedtheinclusion oflandscapeasaconsiderationinthe policy,andraisedtheopportunityto requireenergyefficiencymeasuresinre usedbuildings
Policychangedtoincludelandscapeasa consideration.
EA25
TheDevelopmentof Brownfieldand ContaminatedLand
Toencouragethereuse ofbrownfieldand contaminatedland.
None
SEAofearlieriterationsofthispolicy recommendedthatitbeamendedto requireimprovementstowatercourseson brownfieldsites,andtomoreactively encouragetheremediationof contaminatedland.
Policyamendedtoencouragethereuseof contaminatedland.Theprinciplethatall policiesapplytoalldevelopmentsshould meanthatthewatercoursesaretakeninto account.
46
4.Results
4.4
Scheduleofsites
TheresultsofthesiteassessmentsthatwerecarriedoutaftertheMainIssuesReportstagecanbe foundinAppendix9;theresultsofearliersiteassessments(carriedoutfortheLocalPlanfirst alterationandtheLDPMainIssuesReport)canbefoundinAnnex1.Thesitesselectedforinclusion intheplan(seeAppendix10)arelikelytohavesignificantcumulativeenvironmentalimpacts; however,thesecanbereducedthroughsitespecificmitigationmeasures,andthroughthe implementationofthepoliciesintheplan.Sitespecificmitigationmeasuresshouldbeincludedin thescheduleofsitesandintheactionplan.Thepotentialforarangeofpositiveimpacts,andfor potentialenvironmentalenhancements,hasalsobeenidentified. Cumulatively,theproposalsintheplanarelikelytohavesignificantadverseimpactsonairquality andgreenhousegasemissions,particularlythroughincreasedemissionsfromroadtransportand domesticenergyconsumption.However,mostofthesitesareaccessiblebyactivetravelandpublic transport,sothereisthepotentialtopromoteandencouragethesemodes. Thereispotentialforsignificantnegativeimpactsonhistoricsitesandbuildings,andonlandscape character:wherepossible,recommendationsformitigatingtheseimpactshavebeenmadeinthe siteassessments;andtheapplicationofhistoricenvironment,landscapeandlayoutanddesign policiesintheplanshouldalsohelpreducetheimpacts. Thereispotentialforsignificantimpactstothewaterenvironment,andforincreasedfloodrisk; however,assessmentshavealsoidentifiedanumberofopportunitiestoimprovethewater environment,forexamplethroughrenaturalisinganddecanalisingwatercoursesonthesites. Opportunitiesformitigatingsignificantimpacts,includingfloodriskassessmentandavoiding developmentoncertainpartsofsiteshavebeenidentifiedinthesiteassessments;theapplicationof waterandfloodingpoliciesintheplanshouldalsoreducetheimpactsofnewdevelopments. Thereisalsothepotentialforadverseimpactsonspeciesandhabitats:sitespecificmitigation measures,includingsurveys,arerecommendedinthesiteassessments;andimplementationofthe plan'sbiodiversityandgreennetworkpolicies,includingecologicalappraisal,shouldreducethe negativeimpactsanddeliverenvironmentalimprovements. Thesiteshavethepotentialtodeliversignificanthealthbenefits:almostallofthesitesare connectedtothecorepathnetworkandclosetoexistingopenspaces;opportunitiestocontribute totheCentralScotlandGreenNetwork,particularlythroughimprovementstopathnetworks,have beenidentifiedinthesiteassessmentsandincludedindeveloperrequirements.Thisissupported bypolicyEA1,whichrequiresthatnewdevelopmentscontributetotheobjectivesoftheCSGN whereverpossible.Healthbenefitsarealsolikelytocomefromredevelopmentofvacantand derelictland;thesitesmostlyavoiddevelopmentonagriculturalland,andnoneofthemcontain carbonrichsoils,soimpactsonsoilsqualityandquantityaregenerallylikelytobepositive.
4.4.1 Alternatives
Theenvironmentalimpactsoftheproposalsintheplancouldhavebeenmoresignificantifother siteshadbeenincludedinstead:anumberofthesitesthatwereassessedbutnotincludedinthe planhadthepotentialforsignificantimpactsonthehistoricenvironment,thelandscape,prime agriculturallandandthewaterenvironment,andhadthepotentialforsignificantfloodrisk.Many ofthesesitesareinlocationsthatwouldbelikelytoincreasetheimpactsassociatedwithroad transport.
47
5.Monitoring
Monitoring
AdraftindicatorsethasbeendevelopedtomonitortheenvironmentalimpactsoftheProposed LocalDevelopmentPlan:thishasbeenputtogetherfollowinginformalconsultationwiththe consultationauthorities,butsomeindicatorsstillneedtoberefined,anddatasourcesidentified. Thefinalisedindicatorsetwillbeincorporatedintothemonitoringstrategyfortheplan. Table5.1:Suggestedmonitoringindicators SEAobjective Indicator NumberofbuildingsinClackmannanshireontheBuildingsat RiskRegister Protectand,whereappropriate, enhancethehistoricenvironment Numberofsuccessfulregenerationprojectsresultingin buildingsbeingremovedfromtheBuildingsatRiskRegister Numberofplanningapplications,affectinghistoric environmentassets,whichhavebeenapprovedwhere significanteffectswerepredicted RegenerateClackmannanshire's towncentres Ourcommunitiesaresafer Ourcommunitiesaremore cohesiveandinclusive Numberoftowncentreregenerationactions(asidentifiedin thepublicrealmstrategies)completed Numberoftowncentreregenerationactionsinprogress NumberofdevelopmentsbuiltinaccordancewithPAN77or SecuredbyDesign Numberofdevelopmentsdesignedinaccordancewith DesigningStreets,PAN77andArchitectureandPlacePolicy Statement ProportionofClackmannanshireHealthierLivesclients reportingimprovedphysicalhealth Improvehealthandreducehealth inequalities ProportionofClackmannanshireHealthierLivesclients reportingimprovedpsychologicalhealth/wellbeing Totalnumberofpathusersinkeylocations Encouragepromotionand connectivityoftheCentral ScotlandGreenNetworkwithin andlinkingbeyond Clackmannanshire Furthertheconservationof biodiversity Avoidadverseeffectsonthe integrityoftheFirthofForthSPA andRamsarsite Maintainandenhancethe populationsofEuropean ProtectedSpecies,including protectionoftheirrestingplaces
Proportionofnaturallandunderpositiveconservation management(cfCSGNbaseline)
Percentageoftheyear'sBiodiversityActionPlanactions completed Conditionofqualifyingfeatures Numberofplanningapplicationsconsentedthatarelikelyto adverselyimpactEuropeanProtectedSpecies Numberofplanningapplicationsrefusedthatwouldbelikely toadverselyimpactEuropeanProtectedSpecies
48
5.Monitoring
SEAobjective
Indicator Percentageofplanningapplicationslikelytoadverselyimpact EuropeanProtectedSpeciesthatareconsented Conditionofqualifyingfeatures Numberofplanningapplicationsconsentedthatareonor adjacenttoSSSIs
ProtectandenhanceSSSIs
Numberofplanningapplicationsrefusedthatareonor adjacenttoSSSIs PercentageofplanningapplicationsonoradjacenttoSSSIs thatareconsented
Protectandenhancepriority speciesandhabitatsin Clackmannanshire Increasehabitatconnectivityand ecosystemfunctiontoassistlocal biodiversityinresponsetoclimate change Reducetheimpactofinvasive species Protectandenhancethe distinctivecharacterofthe landscapeandensurenew developmentdoesnotexceedthe capacityofthelandscapeto accommodateit Protectandenhanceareas designatedfortheirnationalor locallandscapeimportancee.g. AGLVs Protectandenhancegeodiversity, particularlyingeologicalSitesof SpecialScientificInterest
Percentageoftheyear'sBiodiversityActionPlanhabitatand speciesactionscompleted ExtentofpriorityhabitatswithinanetworkacrosstheCouncil area Areaofwoodlandcover Extentandimpactofinvasivespecies
Numberofapplicationsapprovedcontrarytolandscape policy
Measureagainstspecialqualitiesanddetailincitations
ConditionofnotifiedEarthSciencefeaturesinSSSIs Areaofcontaminatedlandremediated/redeveloped
Surfaceareaoflandsealedbydevelopment Reducecontaminationand safeguardsoilquantityandquality Surfaceareaofprimeagriculturallandsealedby developmentorlosttomineralworkings Surfaceareaofsoilslosttomineralworkings Protectcarbonrichsoilsfrom disturbanceorloss Preventdeteriorationand enhancethestatusofthewater environment Areaofcarbonrichsoilsdeveloped Waterstatusforeachwaterbody/lengthofwaterbodyat eachstatus
49
5.Monitoring
SEAobjective Achievegoodecologicalstatus Reducewaterpollution Promotesustainablewateruse Contributetothemitigationof floodsanddroughts KeepairpollutionbelowLocalAir QualityManagementthresholds
Indicator Proportionofwaterbodiesatgoodecologicalstatus Proportionofwaterbodiesatgoodecologicalpotential IndicatortobebasedonControlledActivityRegulations authorisations/ScottishPollutantReleaseInventory Totalwaterusage(m3) Wateruse(m3)percapita NumberoffloodanddroughtactionsinActionPlandelivered Airpollution NumberandincreasestoexistingAirQualitymanagement Areas(AQMA) TotalgreenhousegasemissionsforClackmannanshire(kt CO2)(DECC)
Reducegreenhousegasemissions
PercapitagreenhousegasemissionsforClackmannanshire (ktCO2)(DECC) Greenhousegasemissionsfromlanduse,landusechange andforestry(ktCO2)(DECC)
Improveenergyconservationand efficiencythroughout Clackmannanshire ImproveClackmannanshire's resiliencetoclimatechange Reduceoverallfloodriskina sustainableway Reducetheenvironmentalimpact oftravel Minimisewastegeneration Maximiserecyclingand composting
Numberofdevelopmentsbuiltinaccordancewiththe sustainabledesignandconstructionSPG Indicatortobedetermined Numberofpropertiesatriskofflooding Trafficemissionlevels Totalwaste(tonnes) Percentageofhouseholdwasterecycled/composted
50
6.Nextsteps
6.
Nextsteps
Publicconsultation
6.1
TheProposedLocalDevelopmentPlanandthisenvironmentalreportaresubjecttopublic consultationundertheEnvironmentalAssessment(Scotland)Act 6 [datetobeconfirmedfollowing Councilmeeting].Pleasesubmitanycommentsinwritingto: JulieHamilton,DevelopmentServicesManager ServicetoCommunities,ClackmannanshireCouncil Kilncraigs,GreensideStreet,Alloa,FK101EB. or devplan@clacks.gov.uk
6.2
Nextstagesintheplanmakingprocess
FollowingconsultationontheProposedPlananditsenvironmentalreport,officerswillconsiderall oftherepresentationssubmittedandreportbacktotheCouncil,withrecommendationsoneach. Alongwiththesummaryofunresolvedissues,theCouncilwillbeaskedtoconsiderandapprovea 'ReportofConformity'withthestepssetoutintheParticipationStatement.Thesewillthenbe submittedtotheScottishMinisterswhowillappointaReporterfromtheDirectorateforPlanning andEnvironmentalAppeals(DPEA)toholdanexaminationintotheunresolvedobjections. TheCouncilmaymakePreexaminationModificationstothePlanbeforesubmittingittoScottish Ministers:thesewouldhavetobeconsultedupon(6weeksminimum)andownersandneighbours ofproposedsitesbenotified.Iftheproposedmodificationschangedtheunderlyingaimsorstrategy oftheProposedLocalDevelopmentPlan,theCouncilwouldberequiredtoprepareandpublisha newProposedLocalDevelopmentPlan. AnyoutstandingrepresentationstotheProposedLocalDevelopmentPlanwhichcannotberesolved willbeconsideredthroughanExaminationoftheLocalDevelopmentPlan.Responsibilityfor arrangingandconductinganysuchExaminationfallstotheDirectorateforPlanningand EnvironmentalAppeals(DPEA)andwouldbelikelytotakeplacein2014.TheDPEAwillappointa ReporterwhowillleadtheExaminationandtheywilldeterminehowrepresentationswillbe considered,eitherthroughwrittensubmissions,hearings,inquirysessions,oracombinationofthese methods. OncetheExaminationiscomplete,theReporterwillprepareareportsettingouttheirfindingsand givingreasonsfortheirconclusions.InachangetothepreviousInquiryprocess,whereplanning authoritiescouldchoosenottoacceptaReporter'srecommendationiftheyfelttherewasgood reason,Examinationreportsarenowbindingontheplanningauthorityinallbutaverylimited numberofexceptionalcases.
6
ThiseightweeksistheperiodforrepresentationsontheProposedLocalDevelopmentPlanunderthe PlanningEtc(Scotland)Act
51
6.Nextsteps ShouldtheReporterrecommendchangestotheProposedLocalDevelopmentPlanfollowingthe Examination,theCouncilwillberequiredtomodifythePlanandpublishit.Itwillalsobenecessary topublishpublicnoticesadvertisingtheCouncil'sintentiontoadopttheModifiedPlan.Within4 weeksofpublishingtheModifiedPlan,theCouncilisrequiredtoadoptthePlan.
52
References
ClackmannanshireCouncil(2010a),ClackmannanshireLocalDevelopmentPlanMainIssuesReport. Availableat:http://www.clacksweb.org.uk/property/ldpmir2011/accessed08/10/13 ClackmannanshireCouncil(2010b),ClackmannanshireLocalDevelopmentPlanMainIssuesReport EnvironmentalReport.Availableat: http://www.clacksweb.org.uk/site/documents/environment/clackmannanshiredevelopmentp lanmainissuesreportenvironmentalreportdecember2010/accessed08/10/13 LandUseConsultants(2008),ClackmannanshireLocalPlan1stAlterationConsultativeDraft EnvironmentReport.Availableat http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Environment/SustainableDevelopment/14587/SEAG,last accessed01/12/10 LandUseConsultants(2009),ClackmannanshireLocalPlan1stAlterationFinalisedDraft(Housing Land)EnvironmentalReport.Availableat http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Environment/SustainableDevelopment/14587/SEAG,last accessed01/12/10. LandUseConsultants(2010),ClackmannanshireMainIssuesReportSiteAppraisal.Availableat: http://www.clacksweb.org.uk/property/ldpmir2011/accessed08/10/13 SueBellEcology(2013),ClackmannanshireCouncilProposedLocalDevelopmentPlanHabitat RegulationsAppraisalincorporatingAppropriateAssessment.Thiswillbeavailableon www.clacksweb.org.uk.
53
ClackmannanshireLocalDevelopment Plan ProposedPlan EnvironmentalReport

October2013
Appendix1:MainIssuesReport EnvironmentalReport

ClackmannanshireLocalDevelopmentPlan MainIssuesReport EnvironmentalReport

December2010

Nontechnicalsummary
Nontechnicalsummary
ThisEnvironmentalReportpresentsthefindingsofthestrategicenvironmentalassessment(SEA) carriedoutontheClackmannanshireLocalDevelopmentPlanMainIssuesReport(MIR). ClackmannanshireLocalDevelopmentPlan TheClackmannanshireLocalDevelopmentPlanisalanduseplan,andisarequirementofthe PlanningEtc(Scotland)Act2006.Itsetsoutpoliciesandproposalsfordevelopmentanduseofland inClackmannanshireto2024.TheMainIssuesReportisthefirststageintheLocalDevelopment Planprocess,andisthemainopportunityforpublicengagementandconsultationonthePlan. TheMainIssuesReporthasbeeninfluencedbyarangeoflegislationandpolicydocuments;some keydriversincludetheClimateChange(Scotland)Act,ScottishPlanningPolicy,Clackmannanshire SustainabilityandClimateChangeStrategyandtheClackmannanshireSingleOutcomeAgreements. TheMainIssuesReportisadiscussiondocument,andassuchcontainspreferredandalternative optionsfortheplan'svision,growthstrategy,andlocationsfordevelopment.Therearesixmain issuesaddressedintheMIR:climatechange;sustainableeconomicgrowth;housingandassociated services;infrastructureandconnectivity;thenaturalenvironment;andthebuiltenvironment. Preferredandalternativeoptionsfordealingwiththetopicsineachmainissuearepresented. FollowingconsultationontheMainIssuesReport,andtakingintoaccountthecommentsmadeon it,aProposedLocalDevelopmentPlanwillbeprepared. Clackmannanshire'senvironment ThefollowingarethekeyissuesforClackmannanshire'senvironment: Biodiversity,floraandfauna:Clackmannanshirehasadiverserangeofhabitatsandspecies,anda numberofdesignatedsites;problemsincludehabitatlossandnonnativeinvasivespecies. ClackmannanshireCouncilhasadutytofurthertheconservationofbiodiversity. Populationandhumanhealth:Clackmannanshirehasasignificantlyhigherthanaveragepercentage ofpeoplelivinginthe15%mostdeprivedareasofScotland;expectedyearsoflifeingoodhealthare significantlyworsethantheScottishaverage.PolicyrequiresClackmannanshireCounciltosupport humanhealth,forexamplethroughfacilitatingoutdooraccessandaddressingenvironmental quality. Water:WaterstatusinClackmannanshireisgenerallymoderate,andthereispotentialfloodrisk associatedwiththearea'srivers.ClackmannanshireCouncilisrequiredtoprotectthewater environment,reducefloodrisk,andprotectandenhancewaterstatus. Soil:Clackmannanshire'shighpopulationdensityputspressureonitsavailablelandresource;the totalareaofvacantandderelictlandinClackmannanshirehasincreased. Air:AirpollutioninClackmannanshireisbelowthethresholdssetbytheScottishGovernment. Climaticfactors:Clackmannanshire'spercapitagreenhousegasemissionsarehigherthanthe Scottishaverage.ClackmannanshireCouncilhasadutytocontributetothereductioningreenhouse gasemissionsinScotland,andtocontributetoadaptingtotheeffectsofclimatechange.
Nontechnicalsummary Materialassets:Clackmannanshirehasmadesignificantprogresswithwastemanagement,andits recyclingrateisaheadofnationaltargets. Culturalheritage:Clackmannanshirehasarichculturalheritage,withanumberofScheduled Monuments,listedbuildingsandconservationareas.Thesefeaturescanbethreatenedby inappropriatedevelopment,lossofviableuse,populationchange,landusechangeandneglect. ClackmannanshireCouncilisrequiredtoprotectculturalheritageandthebuiltenvironment. Landscape:ClackmannanshirehastwoAreasofGreatLandscapeValue,andanumberofareasof greenbelt.Clackmannanshirehasahighlevelofdevelopedland,andthereisaneedtosafeguard andenhancethesettingsofClackmannanshire'stownsandvillages. WithouttheClackmannanshireLocalDevelopmentPlan,existingtrendsarelikelytocontinue. EnvironmentalImplications TheoptionsandlocationsintheMainIssuesReportwereassessedagainstasetofSEAobjectives. Theseobjectivescoverarangeofenvironmentaltopics,andweredevelopedinconsultationwith ScottishNaturalheritage,ScottishEnvironmentProtectionAgencyandHistoricScotland. SincetheMainIssuesReportcontainsbroadoptionsfordiscussion,itwasnotpossibletopredictall ofthelikelyenvironmentalimpactsoftheplan.Therewillneedtobefurtherassessmentatthe ProposedPlanstage,oncethedetailofthepolicyoptionshasbeendeveloped. Thepreferredvisionandpreferredoptionsinthemainissueschaptersarelikelytohavemostly beneficialimpactsontheenvironment,althoughthereareanumberofuncertaintiessurrounding theimpactsofthemainissuesoptions. ThepreferredgrowthstrategyistheelementoftheMainIssuesReportwhichisconsideredlikelyto havethemostsignificantimpactsontheenvironment.Thisisbothduetolossofgreenfieldland andthegeneralincreaseingreenhousegasemissionsfromtheincreasingenergyandtransportuse ofagrowingpopulation. Lossofgreenfieldlandhasthepotentialtoleadtosignificantnegativeimpactsonbiodiversity,with lossofspeciesandhabitat,aswellasthehabitatconnectivitywhichallowsthemtoadapttoclimate change.Itcouldalsoleadtoimpactsonsoilandwaterquality,andanincreasedriskofflooding;the severityoftheseimpactsdependsonthesiteschosen,housingdensityandthedesignand constructionmethodsemployed.Increaseddevelopmentislikelytoleadtoincreasedpressureon thecapacityofthelandscapeandhistoricenvironmenttoaccommodatenewbuilding. Regardlessofwheredevelopmentissited,itislikelytoresultinanincreaseingreenhousegas emissionsfromdomesticenergyuseandincreasedwastegenerationfromhouseholdactivity.An increasingpopulationislikelytouseprivatetransportmore,contributingtohighergreenhousegas emissionandincreasedairpollution;thisislikelytobeexacerbatedifdevelopmentisdispersed, withgreaterdistancestotravelandloweravailabilityofpublictransport. Policiesandcriteria,asdiscussedinthemainissueschaptersoftheMIR,wouldneedtobeinplace tomitigatelocalimpacts,includingspecificmitigationmeasuresidentifiedatthesitelevel.Further mitigationoftheimpactsofincreaseddevelopmentcanbeachievedthroughtheprovisionofpublic transportandactivetravelroutes,aswellashighlevelsofdesignforenergyefficiency,community safetyandamenity. ii
Nontechnicalsummary Nextsteps TheMainIssuesReportandthisenvironmentalreportaresubjecttopublicconsultationfrom 10Januaryto11March2011.Pleasesubmitanycommentsinwritingto: JulieHamilton,DevelopmentServiceManager ServicestoCommunities,ClackmannanshireCouncil Kilncraigs,GreensideStreet,Alloa,FK101EB. or devplan@clacks.gov.uk Followingpublicconsultation,andtakingintoaccounttheEnvironmentalReportandtheviews expressedonitandontheMainIssuesReport,aProposedPlanwillbeprepared.Thelikely environmentalimpactsoftheLocalDevelopmentPlanwillbereassessed,andarevised EnvironmentalReportprepared.Atthatstage,proposalsformonitoringtheenvironmentalimpacts oftheLocalDevelopmentPlanwillbeproducedandagreed.
iii
Contents
Contents................................................................................................................................................. iv ListofTables .......................................................................................................................................... vi Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................................ vii 1. 2. Introduction/KeyFacts..................................................................................................................1 Context............................................................................................................................................2 2.1 2.2 2.3 3. TheClackmannanshireLocalDevelopmentPlan...................................................................2 MainIssuesReport ................................................................................................................3 Clackmannanshire'senvironment .........................................................................................9
Method .........................................................................................................................................20 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 Assessmentofvision,growthstrategyandpolicyoptions .................................................20 Visionassessment................................................................................................................23 Locationaloptions ...............................................................................................................23 Difficultiesencounteredincompilingtheenvironmentalreport .......................................30
4.
Results...........................................................................................................................................31 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 EnvironmentalImpacts:Vision............................................................................................35 EnvironmentalImpacts:GrowthStrategy ...........................................................................35 EnvironmentalImpacts:MainIssues...................................................................................35 EnvironmentalImpacts:Potentialsitesfordevelopment...................................................37 InfluenceoftheSEAontheMainIssuesReport .................................................................49 IssuestoconsiderwhendevelopingtheProposedPlan .....................................................49 Monitoring...........................................................................................................................52
5.
Nextsteps .....................................................................................................................................53 5.1 5.2 Publicconsultation ..............................................................................................................53 Nextstagesintheplanmakingprocess ..............................................................................53
References ............................................................................................................................................54
iv
Appendix1:Howconsultationauthorities'commentsonthescopingreporthavebeen incorporatedintotheSEA Appendix2:Reviewofplans,programmesandstrategies Appendix3:MainIssuesReportsitesmap Appendix4:MainIssuesReportoptions. Appendix5:Additionalenvironmentalbaselineinformation 56
58 89 90 96 99 101 112 578 597
Appendix6:Consultationauthorities'scopingcommentsonSEAobjectives Appendix7:Assessmentmatrixforpolicyoptions Appendix8:Completedmatrices
Appendix9:Summariesofassessments Appendix10:Initialassessmentsofoptionsthatweresubsequentlyrevised
ListofTables
Table2.1:Listofsitesassessed Table2.2:Relevantenvironmentalproblems Table2.3:Summaryofimplicationsofotherrelevantplans,programmesandstrategies(PPS)and environmentalprotectionobjectives Table3.1:SEAobjectivesandtheirsources Table3.2:Datasources Table3.3:SEAcriteria Table3.4:AssumptionsofSiteDevelopmentImpacts Table3.5:Additionalassessmentcriteria Table3.6:Sitescoringcategories Table4.1:Environmentalimpactsofeachoption Table4.2:Environmentalimpactsofpreferredoptions Table4.3:Resultsofenvironmentalappraisalandkeyconstraints Table4.4:Siteswithclearpotentialforproposeddevelopment Table4.5:Siteswithgoodpotentialforproposeddevelopmentandrequiringlowlevelmitigation Table4.6:Lowerscoringsiteswithdevelopmentpotential Table4.7:Siteswithpotentialfordevelopmentwheremitigationcanbeguaranteed Table4.8:Siteswithgoodpotentialfordevelopment,butrequiringsignificantmitigation Table4.9:Siteswithsomedevelopmentpotential,butrequiringextensivemitigation Table4.10:Siteswheresignificantmitigationcouldreleaselimiteddevelopmentpotential Table4.11:Sitesunsuitablefordevelopment Table4.12:OptionsrewrittenasaresultoftheSEA Table4.13:Issuestoconsiderwhendevelopingtheproposedplan
vi
Abbreviations
CA Consultationauthority
GROS GeneralRegisterOffice(Scotland) HS LDP MIR SEA SEPA SNH HistoricScotland LocalDevelopmentPlan MainIssuesReport StrategicEnvironmentalAssessment ScottishEnvironmentProtectionAgency ScottishNaturalHeritage
vii
1.Introduction/KeyFacts
1.
Introduction/KeyFacts
ThisEnvironmentalReportpresentsthefindingsofthestrategicenvironmentalassessment(SEA)of theClackmannanshireLocalDevelopmentPlanMainIssuesReport. Strategicenvironmentalassessmentoflocaldevelopmentplans(aswellasotherqualifyingplans, programmesandstrategies)isrequiredbytheEnvironmentalAssessment(Scotland)Act.This requirestheresponsibleauthoritywhoispreparingtheplan(inthiscase,ClackmannanshireCouncil) toassessthelikelyimpactsoftheplanontheenvironment.ThisEnvironmentalReportisintended toaccompanytheMainIssuesReport,andprovidesbackgroundinformationtoassistinresponding topublicconsultationtheMIR. ThemethodforassessingthelikelyenvironmentalimpactsoftheClackmannanshireLocal DevelopmentPlanhasbeenagreedwiththeenvironmentalconsultationauthorities(Historic Scotland,ScottishNaturalHeritageandtheScottishEnvironmentProtectionAgency),following submissionofanSEAScopingReportinJanuary2010(seeAppendix1forasummaryofthese commentsandhowtheyhavebeenaddressed).TheSEAhasbeencarriedoutwithregardto PlanningAdviceNote1/2010:StrategicEnvironmentalAssessmentofDevelopmentPlans. Keyfacts: Titleoftheplan: ClackmannanshireLocalDevelopmentPlan Responsibleauthority:ClackmannanshireCouncil Requiredby: Planningetc.(Scotland)Act2006 Subject: Landuseplanning Periodcovered: 20142024 Frequencyofupdates:Every5years Areacovered: Clackmannanshire Contact: JulieHamilton,DevelopmentServicesManager ServicestoCommunities,ClackmannanshireCouncil, Kilncraigs,GreensideStreet,Alloa,FK101EB TheMainIssuesReportandthisenvironmentalreportaresubjecttopublicconsultationfrom 10Januaryto11March2011.Pleasesubmitanycommentsinwritingto: JulieHamilton,DevelopmentServiceManager ServicestoCommunities,ClackmannanshireCouncil Kilncraigs,GreensideStreet,Alloa,FK101EB. or devplan@clacks.gov.uk
2.Context
2.
Context
TheClackmannanshireLocalDevelopmentPlan
2.1
TheClackmannanshireLocalDevelopmentPlan(LDP)isarequirementofthePlanningetc.(Scotland) Act2006,andwillreplacethecurrentClackmannanshireandStirlingStructurePlan,and ClackmannanshireLocalPlan. TheMainIssuesReport(MIR),whichisthesubjectofthisstrategicenvironmentalassessment EnvironmentalReport,isthefirststageinthepreparationoftheLDP,andisthefirstandmain opportunityforthepublictobeconsultedonthePlan.CommentsontheMainIssuesReportand Environmentalreportwillbecarefullyconsideredandwillhaveastronginfluenceonthecontentof theLocalDevelopmentPlan.FollowingconsultationontheMIR,aProposedPlanwillbeprepared;it islikelythatthiswillbesubjecttofurtherstrategicenvironmentalassessment,andwillconsequently besubjecttopublicconsultation. TheLocalDevelopmentPlanisbeingpreparedinadifferentpolicylandscapetothatwhichexisted whentheLocalandStructurePlanswereadopted.Someofthekeypolicyandlegislativeinfluences arelistedbelow;afulllistoflegislation,plans,programmesandstrategieswhichaffectthePlancan befoundinAppendix2. Planningetc(Scotland)Act2006thissetstherequirementforaLocalDevelopmentPlan,anda requirementforplanningauthoritiestocontributetosustainabledevelopment. ClimateChange(Scotland)Act2009thissetsarequirementforlocalauthoritiestocontributeto reducinggreenhousegasemissions,andadaptingtotheimpactsofclimatechange.Itcontains specificprovisionsfordevelopmentplanstocontributetogreenhousegasemissionsreduction targets. ScottishPlanningPolicy2009thissetsthepolicyframeworkfordevelopmentplanninginScotland, andincorporatesrequirementsfromotherpolicyandlegislation. ClackmannanshireSustainabilityandClimateChangeStrategy2010thisstrategysetsa frameworkforimprovingsustainabilityperformanceinClackmannanshire,andincludesactions relatingtodevelopmentplanning. ClackmannanshireSingleOutcomeAgreement2009thissetsouthowClackmannanshire's communityplanningpartnershipwillcontributetotheScottishGovernment'sobjectives,andits purpose"tofocusgovernmentandpublicservicesoncreatingamoresuccessfulcountry,with opportunitiesforallofScotlandtoflourish,throughincreasingsustainableeconomicgrowth."
2.Context
2.2
MainIssuesReport
TheMainIssuesReportfortheClackmannanshireLocalPlancontainsthefollowing: Vision TheMIRcontainsapreferredvisionandthreealternativevisions,whichcanbesummarisedas follows: Preferredvision:TheLocalDevelopmentPlanwillstrivetocontributetoappropriate economicgrowth,improvedqualityoflifeandanenhancedenvironmentin Clackmannanshire. AlternativevisionA:Economicgrowthasapriority. AlternativevisionB:Improvedsocialinclusionandqualityoflifeaspriorities. AlternativevisionC:Environmentalprotectionasapriority.
GrowthandSpatialStrategy
TheMIRcontainsapreferredoptionandtwoalternativeoptionsforthegrowthstrategyfor Clackmannanshire;italsocontainsoptionsforthelocationofdevelopment. Preferredgrowthstrategy:AspiretomeetthelatestGROSgrowthfigures. Alternativegrowthstrategy:PlanformorethantheGROSfigures. Alternativegrowthstrategy:Planforno,orslowgrowth. SitesforhousingdevelopmentinClackmannanshirewererecentlyrevisedaspartofthe ClackmannanshireLocalPlan1stAlteration,anditisintendedthatthesewillbecarriedforwardin theClackmannanshireLocalDevelopmentPlan.Furthersitesforhousing,business,communityand leisureandconservationareincludedintheMIRandhavebeensubjecttoSEA;thosesitesare showninthetableoverleaf,andinmapsonthesubsequentpages.Amapshowingallsites consideredintheMIRcanbefoundinAppendix3.
2.Context Table2.1:Listofsitesassessed(takenfromLandUseConsultants(2010:4))
Reference 2 3 5 6 10 11 12 13 14 18 20 22 23 24 25 26 42 43 45 47 49 50 57 68 77 80 81 89 97 99 100 101 103 106 108 115 118 120 126 131 132 138 141 145 151 153 Sitename ElmGrove Claremont FormerCollege TheShore AlloaCoop HealthCentre AshleyTerrace CentralParkland MainStreet,Sauchie CarsebridgeRow FairfieldSchool AlloaPark Kelliebank/Bowhouse Forthbank CarsebridgeRoadNorth NorthCastleStreet SunnysideRoad Carsebridge ChurchGrove BraeheadGolfCourse AlloaWest(OrchardFarm) SauchieWest/Tullygarth NorthStreet/MainStreet Tullygarthbrickworks TheOrchard,Tullibody DumyatBusinessParkPhase2 StationRoad(westside) AbercrombyPlace GlenochilYeast BeauclercStreet ParkStreet BrookStreet/BackRoad FormerAlvaGlen Glentana Alvacemetery DevonparkMills CoalsnaughtonNorth DevonparkMills SterlingMillsOutletVillage UpperMillStreet CommunityCentreSite DollarGolfClub Kellybank Muckhartcemeteryextension Garvelfarm ManorPowis Location Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Clackmannan Rural(Alloa) Tullibody Tullibody Tullibody/Cambus Tullibody Rural(Menstrie) Alva Alva Alva Alva Alva Alva Coalsnaughton Coalsnaughton Coalsnaughton Coalsnaughton Tillicoultry Tillicoultry Dollar Dollar Muckhart Rural(Tullibody) Rural(Tullibody)
TakenfromLandUseConsultants(2010:68)
2.Context
Reference 154 155 156 158 Sitename TillicoultryQuarry SauchieTower FormerDevonEquestrianCentre BessieMine Location Rural(Tillicoultry) Rural(Alva) Rural(Alva) Rural(Tillicoultry)
Clackmannanshire Council Clackmannanshire Council

TakenfromLandUseConsultants(2010:68) 5
2.Context
2.Context
2.Context
MainIssues
TheMIRhasidentifiedsixmainissuesfordevelopmentinClackmannanshire: Howcanwereduceourgreenhousegasemissionsandadapttotheconsequencesof climatechange? Preferredandalternativeoptionsarepresentedforaddressing:lowcarbondevelopment; decentralisedenergy;decarbonisedenergygeneration;andsustainablefloodmanagement. Howcanweencourageandpromotesustainableeconomicgrowth? Preferredandalternativeoptionsarepresentedforaddressing:businessandindustrialland supply;businessparksandindustrialestates;derelictandredundantbuildings;green business;employmentprovision;comparisonretailopportunities;towncentreregeneration; ruraldevelopment;andtourism. Howcanwedeliverappropriatehousingandassociatedservices? Preferredandalternativeoptionsarepresentedforaddressing:thechallengesandneedsof anageingpopulation;affordablehousing;housingdevelopmentinthecountryside; communityfacilitiesandsocialinfrastructure;anddevelopercontributions. Howcanwebestdeliverinfrastructureandimproveconnectivity? Preferredandalternativeoptionsarepresentedforaddressing:sustainabletransport; improvingpublictransportandintegrationwithnewdevelopments;railnetwork;and telecommunicationsinfrastructureandintegratingnewtechnologyintodevelopment. Howcanweconserveandenhancethenaturalenvironment? Preferredandalternativeoptionsarepresentedforaddressing:landscape;greenbelt; ecosystemsandhabitatnetworks;waste;allotmentsandlocalfoodproduction;accessing thenaturalenvironment;andmaintenanceofopenspaceinnewdevelopment. Howcanweconserveandenhancethebuiltenvironment? Preferredandalternativeoptionsarepresentedforaddressing:conservationareas; brownfieldandcontaminatedland;designstatements;developmentdensity;andinfilland backlanddevelopment. ThetextofalltheoptionsconsideredintheMainIssuesReportcanbefoundinAppendix4.
2.Context
2.3
Clackmannanshire'senvironment
TheenvironmentalinformationcontainedinthissectionwasoriginallyproducedbyLandUse ConsultantsfortheClackmannanshireLocalPlan1stAlterationSEA(LandUseConsultants2009).It hasbeenreproducedhere,withrevisionswherenewinformationhasbecomeavailable.
2.3.1 CurrentstateofClackmannanshire'senvironment
ThefollowingisasummaryofthecurrentstateofClackmannanshire'senvironment.Moredetailed environmentaldatacanbefoundinAppendixBofLandUseConsultants(2009),andadditional informationcanbefoundinAppendix5ofthisEnvironmentalReport. Biodiversity,floraandfauna Clackmannanshirehasadiverserangeofvaluedhabitatsandspecieswithaseriesofdesignated Sites.Clackmannanshirecontains9SSSIs.Approximately249hectaresofClackmannanshireare withintheFirthofForthSpecialProtectionArea(SPA)andRamsarSite.Theareawasdesignated primarilyfortheprotectionofmigratorybirdspeciesvisitingtheForthEstuary. Clackmannanshireswoodlandaccountsfor2446haor16.2%ofthetotallandareaofthecounty, whichisasignificantproportionincomparisonwithnationalaverages.Plantationconiferwoodlands ofpine,mixedspruceandlarchaccountfor36%ofthetotalwoodedarea.Theremaining1564ha consistsofarangeofbroadleavedwoodlandtypes.Broadleavedwoodscover9.6%ofthetotalland area,whichismuchhigherthantheScottishaverageof4.5%andthenationalaverageof3.5%and thereforerepresentsanimportanthabitatforthedistrict.Themajorityofthebroadleavedwoods (1,091haor69.8%)consistofrecentbroadleavedormixedplantations.Oftheremainingsemi naturalwoodlandresource,only197ha(12.6%)arelongestablishedwoodlands,withatiny proportion(38haor2.4%)ofancientwoodlands. ThereareimportantfisheriesontheDevonforbrowntroutandsalmon,whichisprotectedunder AnnexIIoftheECSpeciesandHabitatsDirective.ThethreeBritishspeciesoflampreyarealso coveredbythelatterpieceoflegislation,andallareknownintheForthcatchment.Main implicationsofdevelopmentonthewidergeographicalarearelatetoimpactsonthewater environmentoftheFirthofForth,andhabitatconnectivitythroughthewoodlandstotheeastofthe area. PopulationandHumanHealth Clackmannanshireis15,809hainarea,withpopulationdensityoverfourtimeshigherthanthe Scottishaverage(308personspersquarekmforClackmannanshire:66personspersqkmfor Scotland).ThemainemploymentareainClackmannanshireisinservicessuchaspublic administration,Education,Healthandotherservices,withthissectorcoveringapproximately43%of jobs,significantlyhigherthanthenationalfigures(36%).Othermajorsourcesofemploymentarein theareasofretail,wholesaleandhotels,manufacturing,financeandbusiness,constructionand transport.Clackmannanshirehassignificantlylowerfiguresthanthenationalaverageforjobsin financeandbusiness,andinenergyandwater,butisaboveintheareasofmanufacturingand construction. HealthtrendsandlifeexpectancyaretypicallyinlinewiththerestofScotland.Howeverinrelation todeprivation,ClackmannanshireCommunityHealthPartnershiphasasignificantlyworse(higher) thanaveragepercentageofpeoplelivinginthe15%mostdeprivedareasofScotland.Thisis reflectedintheeducation,employment&prosperityindicators,withthearearatingsignificantly worsethantheScotlandaverageonanumberofthese. Water Clackmannanshireisrelativelypoorlyservedbyopenwater,withGartmornDamthesinglelargest areaofopenwater.ClackmannanshireCouncilmanagesGartmornDamaspartoftheGartmorn 9
2.Context DamCountryPark.TheRiverDevonandtheRiverBlackDevonaretheprincipalriversinthearea. TheRiverDevonrisesintheOchilHillstothenorthoftheareaandflowseasttowest.The catchmentcomprisesamountainousuppercatchmentandalowerfloodplain.TheRiverBlack DevonflowsfromeasttowestthroughthenorthernedgeofClackmannan.Itrisesasaseriesof smalltributariesinlowlyinghillstotheeastandoutwiththeCouncilarea. TheEUWaterFrameworkDirectiverequireswaterbodies(rivers,lochs,groundwater,artificial watersandcostalwaters)tobeclassifiedonastatusbasisrelatedtoanumberofcharacteristics includingecology,geomorphology,andchemistrytogiveaholisticoverviewofeachwaterbody. Basedon2010SEPAdata,ingeneralthesignificanthillburnsfeedingintotheRiverDevonhavegood status,withthemajorityofotherwaterbodiesinClackmannanshirehavingamoderatestatusdue tonumberoffactorsincludingurbandevelopmentanddiffusepollution.TheForthEstuaryin Clackmannanshireisclassifiedashavingpoorecologicalpotential,duetoanumberofissues includingfloodbanks,diffusepollutionandsignificantdomesticandindustrialdischarges. TheSEPAindicativefloodmapforScotlandidentifiesareasatpotentialriskoffloodingfromrivers andthesea.Thisdoesnottakeintoaccountallflooddefenceswhichmaybeinplace,howeverit providesanindicationofareasatrisk.LowlyingareasadjacenttotheRiverFortharepotentiallyat riskfromfloodingalongtheestuary.ThereisalsofloodriskassociatedwiththecourseoftheRiver Devon,theRiverBlackDevon,andtheoutflowfromGartmornDam. Soils Clackmannanshireholdsapproximately1%oftotalvacantandderelictlandbyarea,asapercentage oftotalvacant/derelictlandrecordedinScotland.Thelowlyingagriculturallandscapesof Clackmannanshireareproductivefarmland,andthehighpopulationdensityoftheareaputs pressureontheavailablelandresource. Air ThemainsourceofairpollutioninClackmannanshireistraffic.InClackmannanshirethereisonlya littleindustrialactivitywithinAlloawiththemajorityofthecountybeingruralinnature.Thereare currentlynodeclaredAirQualityManagementAreasinClackmannanshire.Trendsinroadtraffic showanoverallincreasingquantityofvehiclesontheroad,withinClackmannanshire.Roadswhich experiencedthegreatestchange(>5%)intrafficcountsbetween2006and2007includetheA907at Blackgrange,atFairfieldontheB908northofAlloa,theB9140atMuirsidenorthofTullibodyand theTullibodybypass.ThereopeningofthepassengerrailwaybetweenStirlingandAlloainJune 2008hasincreasedtheopportunitiesforsustainabletravelwithinClackmannanshire. Climateandenergy Predictedclimatechangeimpactsindicateanincreasingtrendinmaximumandminimum temperatures,adecreaseinthelengthofwintercoldspellsandoccurrenceofairandgroundfrost, anupwardtrendinthedaysofheavyraineachyearandintheaveragerainfallintensity.Thishas implicationsforidentifyingandmitigatingfuturefloodrisk. Aspartofanationalproject,ClackmannanshireCouncilhasundertakenresearchtoproduceaLocal ClimateImpactsProfiletoascertainthenumberandnatureofsevereweathereventsin Clackmannanshireintheperiod2000mid2009.Thisestablishedthattherehadbeen38eventsin thatperiod,andgenerallyanincreasingnumberofeventsyearonyear.Themostprominentissue highlightedbytheresearchwasheavyrainfallandsubsequentflooding,followedbyhighwinds,and oneheatwaveevent. FiguresreleasedbytheDepartmentofEnergyandClimateChange(DECC)showClackmannanshire's percapitagreenhousegasemissionstobehigherthantheScottishaverage.
10
2.Context Wasteandresources Significantprogresshasbeenmadeinrecentyearswithregardtowastemanagementin Clackmannanshire.TheZeroWastePlanandtheEuropeanCouncilLandfillDirectiveestablisha frameworkforreformingthewastemanagementsysteminScotlandandsetstargetsforimproving thesustainabilityofwastemanagementupuntiltheyear2025.Clackmannanshireiscurrentlyahead ofthenationaltargetsandcontinuingtoimprove.Thepercentageofmunicipalwasterecycledor compostedhasrisenfrombelowfivepercentin2001/2002to46.7%in2009/2010. Culturalheritage Clackmannanshirehasarichculturalhistory,withvisiblesignsacrossthecounty.Thereare17 ScheduledAncientMonumentswithinClackmannanshire,whichincludeatombstone,acairn,Castle CampbellandClackmannanStone,amongstothers.ThereisoneHistoricGardenandDesigned LandscapeatCastleCampbell,301listedbuildingsandsevenconservationareas. Landscape Clackmannanshireisbroadlycharacterisedasruralintermsoflandscapeandsettlementpattern, butwiththebulkofthepopulation,employmentanddevelopmentactivityconcentratedinasmall numberofthelargerurbancommunitiesintheCoreArea.Agricultureisthemostextensivelanduse withintheareaandisverydiverse,reflectingthearea'svariedtopography,climateandsoils. Forestryistheothermajorlanduse.TherearetwodesignatedAGLVswithinClackmannanshire whichincludetheOchilHillstothenorthandTheForesttotheeast. Themaponthefollowingpageshowsthekeydesignatedsitesandotherenvironmentalissuesin Clackmannanshire.
11
2.Context
12
2.Context
2.3.2 Environmentalproblems
ThefollowingtableshowstheenvironmentalproblemsinClackmannanshire. Table2.2:Relevantenvironmentalproblems Topic Problem Supportingdata SNHNaturalHeritage Trends LBAP DraftClackmannanshire BiodiversityActionPlan. Implicationsfor Clackmannanshire LocalDevelopment Plan Protectionand enhancementof designatedareas, FirthofForthSPA andRamsarand importanthabitats includingprotection ofancient woodland.
Biodiversity, Clackmannanshireincludesa floraand numberofprotectedareas, fauna includingtheinternationally protectedFirthofForthSPA, RamsarandSSSI.Important habitatsincludelowlandraised bogwhichisanationallyscarce resource. Clackmannanshirehasa relativelyhighlevelofwoodland andforestrycovercomparedto therestofScotland,howeverit hasaverylimitedextentof ancientwoodland. Thedeclineofbiodiversityand associatedhabitatsisakeyissue forClackmannanshire, particularlythrough developmentpressure,land managementpracticesand intensificationoffarming. Significanthabitatlosseshave occurredinrelationtonative woodlands,speciesrichgrassland andhedgerows. Thereisaneedtoincrease awarenessandunderstandingof thenaturalheritageinterests. Thereisaneedtoimprovethe naturalheritageoffarmedland toimprovebiodiversity,increase landscapediversityandexpand nativewoodlands.Existing coniferouswoodlandsshouldbe managedforenhancednatural heritagevalue. Nonnativeinvasiveplantand animalspeciesareathreatto localbiodiversity.Thisis particularlyaproblemalong watercourses.
13
2.Context
Topic Population andhuman health
Problem Clackmannanshirehasslightly lowerthanScotlandaverage levelsofemployment Thereisahigherthanaverage percentageofadultsclaiming incapacitybenefitorsevere disabilityallowance. Althoughthereisnodivergence fromtheScotlandaverageforall indicatorsintheillhealthand injurydomain,expectedyearsof lifeingoodhealthare significantlyworsethanthe Scotlandaveragesformenand women. Clackmannanshirealsohasa significantlyworsethanaverage percentageofpeoplelivinginthe 15%mostdeprivedareasof Scotland. Clackmannanshirehasalimited quantityofopenwaterbut includesthemainriver catchmentsoftheRiverDevon, RiverBlackDevonandRiver Forth.Waterstatusisgenerally moderateinClackmannanshire's rivers,withtheestuarinewaters beingofpoorecologicalstatus. Thisreflectspastandpresent urban/industrialpressureson thesewaterbodies. Thereispotentialfloodrisk associatedwiththeRiverDevon, RiverBlackDevonandRiver Forth. Thereisaneedtoallow freshwatersystemstofunction naturallywhereverpossible
Supportingdata ScottishPublicHealth ObservatoryCommunity HealthandWellbeing Profiles(2008)
Implicationsfor Clackmannanshire LocalDevelopment Plan Promotingaccessto employment, supporting accessibilityand healthimprovement Supportingurban renewal
Water
SEPARiverBasin ManagementPlanMaps
Protectionand enhancementof waterstatusand avoidanceofflood riskareasandareas whichwould contributeto increasedfloodrisk.
14
2.Context
Topic Soil
Problem Thetotalareaofvacantand derelictlandin Clackmannanshirehasincreased between2002and2007,andat 45hacomprises0.28%ofthe landarea,whichisabovethe Scottishaverageof0.10%.
Supportingdata
Implicationsfor Clackmannanshire LocalDevelopment Plan
TheScottishGovernment The (2008)ScottishVacantand Clackmannanshire DerelictLandSurvey2007 LocalDevelopment Planshouldseekto ensureabalancein theuseofvacant andderelictlandin thesiteoptions identified. Oneofthemain sourcesofnitrogen dioxideemissionsis roadtraffic,road trafficisalsoa contributortoPM10 emissions. Sustainable transportwillbea keyissueforthe Clackmannanshire LocalDevelopment Plan.
AirQuality and Transport
Nitrogendioxideemissionsare ClackmannanshireCouncil currentlybelowthe LAQMProgressReport concentrationsidentifiedasair 2010 qualityobjectivesforScotlandby 2010.Howeverlevelsatsome monitoringlocationsarecloserto theairqualityobjectivelevels andtheimplicationsofincreased trafficonthesesroadsshouldbe carefullyconsideredinthe assessment. PM10sareemittedthrough combustion,androadtrafficisa contributortothis.Monitoring withinClackmannanshirehas identifiedthatPM10levelshad notexceededairquality objectivesforScotlandin2009. Climatechangecouldhavemany differentimpactsonthe environmentincludingwater resources,flooding,biodiversity, populationandhealthand wellbeing.Detailedinformation ontheimpactsofclimatechange isnotavailablefor Clackmannanshire,however issuessuchasfloodingand landslipsarelikelytoresult. UKCIP02ClimateChange Scenarios SNIFFER(2006)Online handbookofClimate TrendsAcrossScotland
Climatic Factors
Policiesandthe locationandextent ofthesites identifiedshould seektominimise contributionstothe emissionsof greenhousegases andseektoavoid locationsvulnerable totheeffectsof climatechange.
15
2.Context
Topic Material Assets
Problem
Supportingdata
Implicationsfor Clackmannanshire LocalDevelopment Plan Wastedisposal incurssignificant transport implications. Supportfor increasedlevelsof recyclingand compostingand wasteminimisation.
Therearenolandfillsiteswithin SEPAdata thearealicensedtoacceptnon inertwaste.Amajornewfacility hasplanningpermissionat Muirpark,Tullibodywhichwill providesufficientinertcapacity toservetheareaforanumberof years.Awastetransferfacilityis locatedinStirlingwhichbulks wastefortransporttothelandfill siteatPolmont,Falkirk.Trends inrecyclingandwastegeneration showanincreaseinlevelsof recyclingandcomposting. Shallowcoalreservesthatmay besuitableforopencastworking arefoundacrossmuchof Clackmannanshire. Clackmannanshirehasarich HistoricScotlanddata culturalheritagewithanumber ofScheduledMonuments,listed buildingsandconservationareas. Inadditionnondesignatedsites contributetothewidercultural heritageresource. Theseresourcescontribute positivelytothelandscapeand townscapeoftheareaand providevisibleconnectionsto theindustrialheritageofthe area.Thesefeaturescanbe threatenedbyinappropriate development,lossofviableuse, populationchangeandneglect. Landusechangecanalsoimpact onthehistoricenvironment. Clackmannanshireis distinguishedbythecontrast betweenthehighgroundofthe OchilHillsandtheflatcarselands oftheDevonandForthValleys. TheprincipalareasofGreenBelt inClackmannanshireare betweenAlloaandClackmannan, TullibodyandalongtheHillfoots Meanderingwatercourses, ASH(1998) Clackmannanshire LandscapeCharacter Assessment
Cultural Heritage
The Clackmannanshire LocalDevelopment Planshouldsupport theprotectionand enhancementofthe culturalheritage resource,including through considerationofthe locationsand impactsonspecific resourcesandthe widerhistoric landscape.
Landscape
The Clackmannanshire LocalDevelopment Planshouldseekto ensurethat developmenttakes accountofthe important landscape characteristicsand
16
2.Context
Topic
Problem hedgerowsandfieldtrees,policy influencesandtheimportanceof viewstotheOchilHillsare landscapefeatureswhichare threatenedbysettlement expansion,transportand infrastructure.TwoAGLVextend acrossthearea. Clackmannanshirehasahigh levelofdevelopedlandandthere isaneedtosafeguardand enhancethesettingsof Clackmannanshirestownsand villages
Supportingdata
Implicationsfor Clackmannanshire LocalDevelopment Plan protected landscapeswithin Clackmannanshire.
2.3.3 LikelyevolutionofClackmannanshire'senvironmentwithouttheLocal DevelopmentPlan

WithouttheClackmannanshireLocalDevelopmentPlantheexistingenvironmentaltrendsarelikely tocontinue. Continueddevelopmentpressuremayimpactonbiodiversityandhabitats. Currentissuesofemployment,healthanddeprivationmaycontinue,howeverinmigration andpopulationchangemayaltercurrentpatterns. Waterstatusislikelytocontinuetoimproveinriversandstreams,howeveritisunlikelyto improvesignificantlyintheUpperForthEstuary. Quantitiesofvacantandderelictlandmayincrease,followingrecenttrends,however developmentpressuremayresultinmoreofthesesitesbeingreclaimedfordevelopment. Trafficlevelswillcontinuetoincreaseandthismayimpactonairquality. Theimpactsofclimatechangemayresultinfloodingandlandinstability. Developmentandlandusechangemayimpactontheculturalheritageresourcesofthe area. Developmentmayimpactonthelandscapecharacterandqualityofthelowlands
17
2.Context
2.3.4 EnvironmentalprotectionobjectivesrelevanttotheLocalDevelopmentPlan
Thefollowingtablesummarisestheenvironmentalprotectionobjectivesarisingfromrelevantpolicy andlegislation.Forfulldetailsoflegislation,plans,programmesandstrategiesthathaveanimpact ontheplan,seeAppendix2. Table2.3:Summaryofimplicationsofotherrelevantplans,programmesandstrategies(PPS)and environmentalprotectionobjectives Topic Summaryofimplicationsofotherrelevantplans,programmes andstrategiesfortheClackmannanshireLocalPlan1stAlteration ConsultativeDraft Biodiversity,floraand fauna Requirementtoensuretheprotectionofenvironmentalresources includingconservingandprotectingdesignatedsitesandwider biodiversity. Requirementtoprotectandenhancethenaturalenvironment, includingpriorityhabitatsandspecies. Improvehealth. Supportinghumanhealththroughprotectingaccessresourcesand promotingoutdoorrecreation. Addressingenvironmentalqualitythroughpromoting regenerationandimprovingqualityoflife. Ensuringadequateopenspaceprovisiontofacilitateaccessand recreation. Providingforsustainabledevelopmentwithjobs,homesand communityfacilities,whilstrecognisingenvironmental constraints. Avoidingnoiseandotheramenityissues. Asfaraspossible,eradicatefuelpoverty. Thereisaneedtoensuretheprotectionofthewaterenvironment andprotectionofaquaticecosystems. Otherobjectivesincludereducingwateruse,reducingpollution andmitigatingtheeffectsoffloodsanddroughts. Itisofparticularimportancetoavoiddevelopmentinareasof floodrisk. Thereisarequirementtopromotetheimprovementofwater bodiestoagoodstatus. Protectandenhancesoil. Thecontinuedremediationandreuseofcontaminatedland shouldbesupported. Ensuringsustainablelocationchoicefordevelopmentcansupport improvementandprotectionofairquality. Thereisaneedforwiderprotectionoftheenvironmentandto supporthealthimprovement. Supporthealthandwellbeingthroughconnectingremoteand disadvantagedcommunities. Thereisaneedforcontinuousimprovementofroadsafety. Reducinggrowthinlevelsofroadtraffic.
Populationandhuman health
Water
Soil
AirQualityandTransport
18
2.Context
Topic
Summaryofimplicationsofotherrelevantplans,programmes andstrategiesfortheClackmannanshireLocalPlan1stAlteration ConsultativeDraft Contributetoreducinggreenhousegasemissions,andtoclimate changeadaptation. Developmentlocationsshouldfacilitateclimatechange adaptationandreduceemissionofgreenhousegases. Reduceoverallfloodriskandmanagefloodriskinasustainable way. Developmentshouldminimiseenvironmentalimpactsand promoteefficientenergyandwateruseandminimiseresource use. Preventwasteandpromotesustainabledesign. Thereisaneedtosupportrenewableenergygenerationand recyclingopportunitiesandreducingwastegeneration. Thereisarequirementfortheprotectionandenhancementof culturalheritageandthebuiltenvironment. Promotingqualityinurbandesign. Protectingenvironmentalresourcesandensuringdevelopmentis inkeepingwithlocalcharacter. Protectionandenhancementofthelandscapeanditsheritage features. Protectionofgreenbeltsandprovisionofopenspace. Protectionofthecoastalresource.
Climate
MaterialAssets
Culturalheritage
Landscape
19
2.Context
3.
Method
Thissectionsetsoutthemethodforassessingthelikelyenvironmentalimpactsofthe ClackmannanshireLocalDevelopmentPlanMainIssuesReport.
3.1
Assessmentofvision,growthstrategyandpolicyoptions
TheMainIssuesReportidentifiesanumberofapproachesforaddressingeachofthemainissues: eachoftheseapproacheshasbeendevelopedintoasetoftwoorthreeoptions.Eachofthese options,andthepreferredandalternativevisions,hasbeenassessedagainstasetofSEAcriteria. TheoptionshavebeenassessedfortheirimpactsonallthetopicsidentifiedintheEnvironmental Assessment(Scotland)Act:biodiversity,floraandfauna;populationandhumanhealth;soil;water; air;climaticfactors;culturalheritage;andlandscape.Theinterrelationshipsbetweentheseissues werealsoconsidered,asweresecondary,cumulativeandsynergisticimpacts;longandshortterm impacts;andtemporaryandpermanentimpacts. AsetofSEAobjectiveswasdevelopedtoaidassessmentoftheimpacts.Thesearebasedon environmentalprotectionobjectivesinlocalandnationalpolicyandlegislationandidentifiedlocal environmentalissues;theywereamendedinaccordancewithcommentsfromtheconsultation authoritiesatthescopingstage(seeAppendix6fordetails).TheSEAobjectivesaresetoutoverleaf.
20
2.Context Table3.1:SEAobjectivesandtheirsources Code SEAobjective CulturalHeritage A6 A7 Protectand,whereappropriate,enhance thehistoricenvironment RegenerateClackmannanshire'stown centres Ourcommunitiesaresafer Ourcommunitiesaremorecohesiveand inclusive Improvehealthandreducehealth inequalities
Source
SuggestedbyHistoricScotland ClackmannanshireSustainabilityandClimate ChangeStrategy ClackmannanshireSingleOutcome Agreement ClackmannanshireSingleOutcome Agreement ClackmannanshireSingleOutcome Agreement
Populationandhumanhealth B8 B9 C1 C4
Encouragepromotionandconnectivityof theCentralScotlandGreenNetworkwithin SuggestedbyScottishNaturalHeritage andlinkingbeyondClackmannanshire NatureConservation(Scotland)Act SuggestedbyScottishNaturalHeritage
Biodiversity,flora,fauna D1 Furthertheconservationofbiodiversity D2 Avoidadverseeffectsontheintegrityof theFirthofForthSPAandRamsarsite Maintainandenhancethepopulationsof EuropeanProtectedSpecies,including protectionoftheirrestingplaces ProtectandenhanceSSSIs Protectandenhancepriorityspeciesand habitatsinClackmannanshire Increasehabitatconnectivityand ecosystemfunctiontoassistlocal biodiversityinresponsetoclimatechange Reducetheimpactofinvasivespecies
D3 D4 D5
SuggestedbyScottishNaturalHeritage SuggestedbyScottishNaturalHeritage SuggestedbyScottishNaturalHeritage DraftClackmannanshireBiodiversityAction Plan DraftClackmannanshireBiodiversityAction Plan
D6 D7
Landscape Protectandenhancethedistinctive ParaphrasedfromtheOchilsLandscape characterofthelandscapeandensurenew Partnershipvision;amendmentsuggestedby developmentdoesnotexceedthecapacity ScottishNaturalHeritage ofthelandscapetoaccommodateit Protectandenhanceareasdesignatedfor theirnationalorlocallandscape importancee.g.AGLVs Reducecontaminationandsafeguardsoil qualityandquantity SuggestedbyScottishNaturalHeritage
D8
D9 Soil D10 Water
ClackmannanshireSustainabilityandClimate ChangeStrategySEA
21
2.Context
Code SEAobjective D11 D12 D13 D14 E5 Air D15 KeepairpollutionbelowLocalAirQuality Managementthresholds Preventdeteriorationandenhancethe statusofthewaterenvironment Achievegoodecologicalstatus Reducewaterpollution Promotesustainablewateruse Contributetothemitigationoffloodsand droughts
Source WaterFrameworkDirective WaterFrameworkDirective WaterFrameworkDirective WaterFrameworkDirective WaterFrameworkDirective
paraphrasedfrom2009ClackmannanshireAir QualityUpdatingandScreeningAssessment ClimateChange(Scotland)Act ClackmannanshireSustainabilityandClimate ChangeStrategy ClackmannanshireSustainabilityandClimate ChangeStrategy FloodRiskManagement(Scotland)Act ClackmannanshireSustainabilityandClimate ChangeStrategy ClackmannanshireSustainabilityandClimate ChangeStrategy ClackmannanshireSustainabilityandClimate ChangeStrategy
Climaticfactors E1 Reducegreenhousegasemissions E2 E3 E4 E6 Improveenergyconservationand efficiencythroughoutClackmannanshire ImproveClackmannanshire'sresilienceto climatechange Reduceoverallfloodriskinasustainable way Reducetheenvironmentalimpactoftravel
Materialassets E7 E8 Minimisewastegeneration Maximiserecyclingandcomposting
Theassessmentswerecarriedoutbytheauthoroftherelevantsectionoftheplanandthe SustainabilityOfficer:thisalloweddiscussionandagreementofthelikelyimpactsofeachoption,as wellasprovidingclarificationonbothplanningandenvironmentalissueswherenecessary.The resultsoftheassessmentofeachoptionwererecordedinamatrix,givinganindicationofwhether theoptionwasconsideredlikelytocontributeto,orconflictwith,eachoftheSEAcriteria;whetherit wasconsideredunlikelytohaveanyimpact;andwhethertheimpactscouldnotbedeterminedat thatstage.Supplementarycommentswereincludedinthematrix,justifyingtheassessmentsmade, andsuggestingmeasuresformitigatingadverseimpacts,andenhancingbeneficialimpacts. AblankmatrixandakeycanbefoundinAppendix7.Completedmatricesforeachoptioncanbe foundinAppendix8. Thefindingsoftheseassessmentswereusedtoproduceasummaryofthelikelysignificantimpacts ofeachoption,whichwasreturnedtotheauthoroftherelevantsection,alongwithacompilation ofissuesraisedoruncertaintiesremainingaftertheassessments.Someoptionswereamendedasa resultoftheSEAprocess;thesewerethenreassessedfortheirenvironmentalimpacts.Theoptions thathavebeenredraftedarelistedintheresultssectionofthisreport,withabriefexplanationof whytheywerechanged.
22
2.Context SummariesofthelikelyenvironmentalimpactsofeachoptionareincludedintheMainIssues Report,sothatthereaderanddecisionmakercaneasilyseethelikelyenvironmentalimpactsof theirdecisions.ThesesummariesarereproducedintheResultssectionofthisenvironmental report,alongwithanindicationofthelikelycumulativeimpactoftheplan.
3.2
Visionassessment
ThepreferredvisionfortheMIRwasassessedforitsenvironmentalimplicationsagainsttheSEA criteria,andthenrevisedtoensureitmorefullycontributestothosecriteria.Toensurethatthe optionsintheMIRalignwiththepreferredvision,asetof'visioncriteria'weredeveloped,against whichalltheoptionswereassessed.ThevisioncriteriaincorporatethefullsetofSEAcriteria (primarily,butnotexclusively,underprotectingandenhancingtheenvironmentforalland addressingclimatechange),alongwithfurthercriteriarelatingtotheotheraimsofthevision: Providingtherightconditionstoattractpeopleandbusiness,andtoenablecontinued economicregeneration Deliveringsaferandmoreinclusiveandcohesivecommunities Improvinghealthandreducinghealthinequalities Creatingsuccessfulandsustainableplaces Thematricesincludedinappendix8ofthisreportarethoseusedinthevisionassessment,andthus showtheperformanceofeachoptionagainstthevisioncriteria.Pleasenote,however,thatthis environmentalreportdealsonlywiththestrategicenvironmentalassessment,andtheSEAcriteria, whichareshadedingreeninthematrices.
3.3
Locationaloptions
In2008,analterationtotheClackmannanshireLocalPlanwasproduced,focusingonhousing allocations.Aspartofthestrategicenvironmentalassessmentofthatalteration,thesites consideredinthealterationwereassessedfortheirenvironmentalimpact.Sitesthatwere identifiedintheClackmannanshireLocalPlanFirstAlterationareintendedtobecarriedforwardin theClackmannanshireLocalDevelopmentPlan.Sincethisworkwascarriedoutveryrecently,itwas agreedwiththeconsultationauthoritiesthatthesesiteswouldnotneedtobereassessedaspartof theSEAoftheLocalDevelopmentPlan.OthersiteswhichwereconsideredaspartoftheLDPbut whichhadnotpreviouslybeensubjecttoSEA(eitherbecausetheywerenonhousingsites,or becausetheyweresitesthathadbeenincludedintheadoptedLocalPlan,whichwasnotsubjectto SEAlegislation)wereassessedusingthesamemethodologyastheLocalPlanAlterationsite assessments,inordertoensureaconsistentapproach.Thissiteassessmentworkwascarriedoutby LandUseConsultants;relevantsectionsoftheirreportClackmannanshireMainIssuesReportSite Appraisal,October2010arereproducedinthisEnvironmentalReport;thefullLandUseConsultants reportanditsappendicesareavailableasaseparatedocument. ThefollowinginformationaboutthesitesassessmentmethodologyistakenfromLandUse Consultants(2010:1014)
23
2.Context
3.3.1 BaselineDataCollection
BaselineenvironmentaldatawascollectedaspartoftheSEAprocessandthesiteassessment.Data sourcesusedintheassessmentarelistedinTable2.1below. Table3.2:Datasources
Topic Biodiversity,floraandfauna Data Nationalandlocal designations Populationchangeand migration Populationandhuman health Socioeconomicissues Healthtrends Corepaths Towncentres Localfloodarea Water Waterandwaste infrastructurecapacity SEPAfloodmap Soil Derelictandcontaminated land Airqualitymonitoringdata Dataunavailable AirQualityandTransport Roadnetwork Roadtrafficdata Dataunavailable UKCIP02climatechange scenariosandSNIFFER (2006)AHandbookof ClimateTrendsAcross Scotland Mineralresources Gaspipelinehazardzones HistoricGardensand DesignedLandscapes Culturalheritage ScheduledAncient Monuments ListedBuildings Conservationareas HistoricLanduseAssessment Locallandscapedesignations Landscape Genericdatasources Dataformat Shapefile SIMDandROAareas Reports/statistics Electronicsourcedfrom OpenSpaceAudit Shapefile Shapefile ClackmannanshireCouncil BiennialFloodReport(2007) InformationfromScottish Water Shapefile Shapefile ClackmannanshireCouncil LAQMProgressReport2008 Shapefile Clackmannanshirecouncil alsocollecttrafficdataat16 permanentmonitoringsites
Climate
Electronic
MaterialAssets
Shapefile Shapefile Shapefile Shapefile Shapefile Shapefile Shapefile Shapefile
ClackmannanshireLandscape Shapefile CharacterAssessment Aerialphotography 1:10000mapbase 1:25000mapbase Rasterdata Rasterdata Rasterdata
24
2.Context
Topic Data Localplandevelopmentsites Informationwhichhasbeen previouslysubmittedin relationtoanyofthesites forpreviousdevelopment enquiries. Dataformat Shapefile
Electronic/papercopies
TheSEAandsiteassessmentcriteriawereinformedbytheprojectbrief,previousphasesofworkon theforegoingLocalPlanAlteration. TheSEAandsiteassessmentcriteriaaresetoutintable3.3:SEAcriteria Table3.3:SEAcriteria

Biodiversity,floraandfauna Doesthesiteimpactondesignatedsites? Doesthesiteimpactonpriorityhabitatsorspecies? Populationandhumanhealth Isthesiteconnectedtothelocalcorepathnetwork? HowdoesthesiterelatetoareaswithhighSIMD? Whatistherelationshipofthesitewithexistingopenspaceresources? Water Isthesiteatriskofflooding? Aretherewatercourseswithinthesiteorwhichwouldbeaffectedbyincreasedlevelsof pollutionfromdevelopmentwithinthesite? Aretherewatercourseswithinthesiteorwhichwouldbeaffectedbyincreasedlevelsof floodingresultingfromdevelopmentofthesite? Soil Doesthesiteincludeareasofvacantorderelictland? Isthesiteprimeagriculturalland? AirQualityandTransport Isthesiteeasilyaccessiblebythelocalpathnetwork,andprovideaccesstosettlementsand services? Isthesiteeasilyaccessiblebypublictransport? Doesthesiteliewithinanareawherelevelsofairpollutionareclosetocurrentlimit values?
25
2.Context
Woulddevelopmentonthesitecontributetohighertrafficflowsalongtransportroutesor atkeyjunctions(potentiallyoutwiththelocalauthorityarea)wherelevelsofairpollution areclosetocurrentlimitvalues? ClimaticFactors Doesthelocationofthedevelopmentreducetheneedtotravel? Isthesiteatriskofincreasedfloodingorinstabilityasaresultofclimatechange? MaterialAssets Isthesitelocatedclosetoexistingtransport,services,waterandenergyinfrastructure? Isthesitelocatedtomakebestuseofshelter,solargainandreducetheneedtotravel? Woulddevelopmentonthesitereducefuturepotentialformineralextraction? Doesthesiteincludeanyhazardareas?(oilorgaspipelines) Doesthesitereducewastegenerationandpromotewasterecovery,recyclingand composting? CulturalHeritage Woulddevelopmentwithinthesiteimpactontheintegrityofsites,monuments,buildings orareasdesignatedfortheirculturalheritagevalue? Woulddevelopmentwithinthesiteimpactonarchaeologicalremains? Landscape Doesthesiteliewithinanareadesignatedforitslandscapevalue? Woulddevelopmentwithinthesiteimpactonsettlementsettingandidentity(drawingon issuesoflandscapecharacterandcapacityfordevelopment)? Woulddevelopmentwithinthesiteimpactonkeyviewstolandscapefeaturesorfromkey transportroutes?
Inrelationtoeachofthesiteappraisalcriteria,eachsiteisassessedashavingastronglypositive effect(++)positiveeffect(+)aneutraleffect(0),anegativeeffect(),orastronglynegativeeffect ().Optionsformitigationandenhancementareoutlinedintheassessmenttableandtheoverall outcomefollowingtheapplicationofmitigationandenhancementoptionsisidentified.These mitigatedscoresforeachsitemustbetakenasindicative,astheyarepredicatedonthesuccessful applicationoftheproposedsolutions.Giventhescaleoftheassessmentexerciseandthestrategic levelatwhichithasbeenconductednodetailedanalysisofthefeasibilityofthesesolutionshas beenundertaken.
3.3.2 BaselineScenarioforEachSite
26
2.Context Baselinescenariosweregeneratedonwhichtobasethesiteappraisal.Thisprovidesthebasison whichtocarryouttheindividualsiteassessmentstakingthesitespecificissuesintoaccount,but ensuringaconsistentapproachtothepotentialimpactsofasitecomingforwardfordevelopment. Table3.4:AssumptionsofSiteDevelopmentImpacts

Assumption Potentialassociatedimpact Lossandseveranceofhabitats Increasedrecreationalpressure Increaseddisturbancetowildlife,pressuresfromdomesticpets Introductionofbuiltfeaturesintothelandscapeimpactonlocal landscapecharacterandsetting. Impactsonwateranddrainageincludingincreaserunoff,diffuse pollution Soilsealing Increasedrequirementforwastedisposal Increasedcongestion Increasedairpollution Reductioninperceivedsafetyforpedestrians,cyclistsand recreationalusers Negativeimpactsonhumanhealthandqualityoflife
Housingdensityof20 houses/ha
Anincreaseintraffic volume(relatedto numberofhouseholds persite)
3.3.3 SiteAssessment
ThebaselinedataformsthebasisforthesiteassessmentandtheSEA.Followingtheestablishment andreviewofthebaselinedata,thekeyenvironmentalproblemswithinClackmannanshirewere identifiedandsetoutintheScopingReport.Thedatarelevanttoeachsiteissetoutinthe assessmentmatricesinAppendix1,andindividualsitemapsillustratingthesitefeaturesand constraintsareassociatedwitheachassessmentmatrix. Inadditiontothesiteassessmentcriteria,additionalbackgroundinformationoneachsiteis summarisedintheassessmentmatrix.Thisincludes: Table3.5:Additionalassessmentcriteria
Sitereferenceandlocation Size(ha) Summarydescription Overridingconstraintstodevelopment Sitespecificinvestigations Constraintstodevelopment Summaryofarearemainingfollowingmitigation Environmentalfeatures Siteownership Sitetype
27
2.Context
Sitereferenceandlocation Currentlanduse Surroundinglanduse
3.3.4 Fieldsurvey
Thefieldsurveyinvolvedsitevisitsand,wherepossible,walkoverinspectionstoidentifysite featuresandsupplementthedeskbasedreview.Additionalinformationgatheredfromthefield surveyisincorporatedwithintheassessmentmatrixforeachsite,andsitephotographsareprovided inAppendix1.
3.3.5 CollationofAssessmentResults
ThesiteassessmentgeneratesacombinationofpositiveandnegativescoresagainsteachSEA objectivereflectingthepredictedenvironmentalimpactofdevelopingthesite.Usinganumerical scoringprocess(i.e.assigningscoresbasedonlinearscaleforinstance,between1and5)would havemaskedthevariationsbetweenpositiveandnegativescores.Inordertoillustratethebalance betweenpositiveandnegativescoresandtomaintaincompatibilitywithacceptedSEAassessment practicethefollowingapproachwasadopted: Thepositiveandnegativescoreswereconvertedtonumbersbasedontheirfacevaluewhereby++ or=2;+or=1;and0/+or0/=0.5. Thesescoreswerethentotalledtoprovideanoverallscorereflectingthenumberofpositiveeffects ofthesiteandanoverallscorereflectingthenumberofnegativeeffectsofthesite.Thedifference betweenthesescoresisthenusedtoprovideanindexscoreforthesite. Theseindexscoreswerethengroupedintofourcategoriesfromhigh(A)tolow(D),basedonthe quartilebandingofthescoresasillustratedinTablebelow.Thesiteswerethenassignedacategory basedontherelativeproportionofpositivescorestonegativescores,asillustratedbelow.
28
2.Context NBQuartilebandsprovidesausefulvisualkeytotherelativemeritsofthesiteswithinthe assessmentgroup.However,theymustnotbeusedtodirectlycomparethequalitiesofthisgroup ofsiteswiththoseassessedpreviouslysincethebandingsonlyhaveinternallogic.Section4ofthis reportsetsoutarelativeassessmentofallsiteswithrecalculatedscorebands. Table3.6:Sitescoringcategories

Higher number of positive scores Lower number of positive scores
Explanation
Lowernumber ofnegative scores
A1
A2
A3
A4
Scoresgreaterthan3rd quartile Scoresbetweenmedian value(2ndquartile)and 3rdquartile Scoresbetween1st quartileandmedian Scoreslessthan1st quartilevalue
B1
B2
B3
B4
Highernumber ofnegative scores
C1
C2
C3
C4
D1
D2
D3
D4
Theresultsofthisgroupingfacilitateacomparisonbetweenthesitesintermsoftheiroveralleffect.
29
3.Method
3.4
Difficultiesencounteredincompilingtheenvironmentalreport
Themaindifficultyencounteredincompilingthisenvironmentalreporthasbeenthelackofdetailin theoptionsattheMainIssuesReportstage.ThisisinherenttotheLocalDevelopmentPlanprocess, asbroadoptionsaredevelopedfordiscussionatthisstage:itmeansthattherearealargenumber ofuncertaintiesrelatedtotheenvironmentalimpactsoftheoptionsandgrowthstrategy.These uncertaintieswillneedtobeaddressedattheProposedPlanstage.
30
4.Results
4.
Results
Thissectionpresentstheresults ofthestrategicenvironmentalassessmentoftheMainIssues Report.Thelikelyimpactsofthevision,growthstrategy,locationaloptionsandmainissuesare consideredseparately.CompletedchecklistsforeachoptioncanbefoundinAppendix8; summariesoftheSEAassessmentscanbefoundinAppendix9. Thecumulativeimpactsofthepreferredoptionsareuncertainatthisstage;themajorityofimpacts identifiedintheSEAarelikelytobebeneficialtotheenvironment,althoughtherearemany uncertaintieswhichdependonissuessuchaslocation,designandimplementationofpolicyoptions. ThegrowthstrategyislikelytohavenegativeimpactsonmostoftheSEAtopics,althoughthesecan bemitigatedbothbystrengtheningpolicy,andbyapplyingsitespecificmeasures. Thetablesoverleafshowsthelikelyimpactsofeachoftheoptionsforthevision,growthstrategy andmainissues;andthelikelyimpactsofthepreferredoptions.
31
4.Results Table4.1:Environmentalimpactsofeachoption Key:

YY Y Strongbeneficialimpact Beneficialimpact NN N Strongnegativeimpact NegativeImpact ? Uncertainimpacts Noimpact
ForSEAobjectivecodes,seetable3.1
SEAtopic: Cultural heritage Populationand humanhealth Biodiversity,floraandfauna D1 D2 YY YY NN N YY Y ? ? ? ? ? N N Y Y ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? D3 Y N Y ? ? ? N Y ? ? ? ? ? ? ? D4 D5 D6 D7 Y Y ? ? ? Landscape Soil D8 YY NN N ? NN ? ? ? ? ? N N Y YY ? ? ? ? Y ? Y ? D9 YY N Y ? ? N N Y YY Y ? Y ? Water E5 Y N YY ? ? YY NN ? ? ? ? Air D15 YY NN Y Y N NN Y Y Y N N Y Y N N N ? ? Y E1 YY NN Y YY N NN YY YY YY YY Y YY N Y Y N N Y ? Y N N ? N ? ? Y Climaticfactors E2 E3 E4 E6 Material assets E7 YY ? N NN ? ? Y N ? E8 Y ? ? ?
SEA A6 A7 B8 B9 C1 C4 objective: PreferredVision YY YY YY YY YY YY AlternativeVisionA N N N NN AlternativeVisionB Y YY YY YY YY Y AlternativeVisionC ? Y Y Y Y YY Growthstrategy Option1(a) ? ? ? ? Growthstrategy Option1(b) ? ? ? ? Growthstrategy Option1(c) ? ? ? Lowcarbondevelopment Option2(a) Y Y Lowcarbondevelopment Option2(b) Lowcarbondevelopment Option2(c) Y Y Decentralisedenergy Option3(a) Decentralisedenergy Option3(b) N Y Decentralisedenergy Option3(c) N Decarbonisedelectricitygeneration Option4(a) Y Decarbonisedelectricitygeneration Option4(b) NN Decarbonisedelectricitygeneration Option4(c) Sustainablefloodmanagement Option5(a) Y Y Sustainablefloodmanagement Option5(b) N Businessandindustriallandsupply Option6(a) ? ? Y Businessandindustriallandsupply Option6(b) ? N Businessandindustriallandsupply Option6(c) Y Businessparksandindustrialestates Option7(a) Businessparksandindustrialestates Option7(b) Derelictandredundantbuildings Option8(a) Y Y Y Derelictandredundantbuildings Option8(b) N N Greenbusiness Option9(a) Greenbusiness Option9(b) Employmentprovision Option10(a) Y Employmentprovision Option10(b) Comparisonretailopportunities Option11(a) ? Comparisonretailopportunities Option11(b) Towncentreregeneration Option12(a) Y YY Y Towncentreregeneration Option12(b) ? ? Ruraldevelopment Option13(a) Ruraldevelopment Option13(b) ? Tourismdevelopment Option14(a) ? Y Tourismdevelopment Option14(b) ? ? ? Ageingpopulation Option15(a) Y ? Ageingpopulation Option15(b) Affordablehousing Option16(a) Y Y
D10 D11 D12 D13 D14 YY NN N Y N N ? ? ? Y ? ? ? ? ? ? ? N ? ? Y NN N Y N N ? ? Y ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Y NN N Y N N Y ? ? ? ? Y NN N Y ? ? ? Y ? ? ? ? ? ? Y Y ? ? ? Y ? N ? ?
YY YY YY N NN NN N ? Y Y YY ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? N N N Y Y Y ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
YY YY YY YY N N NN YY YY YY YY YY ? ? N ? ? NN ? YY YY Y YY N YY YY N NN Y N N Y Y N ? Y N ? N ? ? ? ? ? ? N ? ? ? ? Y
Housing and services
Sustainableeconomicgrowth
Climatechange
32
4.Results
Cultural heritage Populationand humanhealth C1 Y YY N Y ? ? YY Y YY N ? ? ? ? Y C4 ? ? YY N YY Y Y NN Y N YY N YY N ? ? ? ? ? ? Material assets E6 N Y Y YY NN Y NN Y ? Y ? N ? Y ? ? ? Y N E7 N N ? Y ? ? E8 ? N ? ? Y ? ?
Affordablehousing Housinginthecountryside Housinginthecountryside Communityfacilitiesetc Communityfacilitiesetc Developercontributions Developercontributions Sustainabletransport Sustainabletransport Publictransport Publictransport Railnetwork Railnetwork Telecommunicationsetc Telecommunicationsetc Landscape Landscape Landscape Landscape Greenbelt Greenbelt Greenbelt Ecosystemsandhabitatnetworks Ecosystemsandhabitatnetworks Waste Waste Waste Alllotmentsetc Alllotmentsetc Accessingthenaturalenvironment Accessingthenaturalenvironment Maintenanceofopenspace Maintenanceofopenspace Conservationareas Conservationareas Brownfieldandcontaminatedland Brownfieldandcontaminatedland Designstatements Designstatements Developmentdensity Developmentdensity Infillandbacklanddevelopment Infillandbacklanddevelopment
SEAtopic:
Biodiversity,floraandfauna D1 D2 ? ? N ? YY ? Y N YY Y N ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Y N ? ? ? ? Y ? ? YY N ? ? ? N ? ? ? D3 ? ? Y YY N ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? D4 ? ? Y YY N ? ? D5 ? ? Y ? Y ? ? YY Y N ? ? ? ? ? ? ? M ? ? D6 D7 ? YY ? Y ? NN YY N Y YY N ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Landscape Soil D8 ? Y ? ? Y ? YY ? YY Y Y Y N ? ? YY N ? Y Y N Y D9 ? Y ? ? Y ? YY YY ? Y ? ? Y ? Y Y Y
Water E5 ? Y ? Y Y N ? ?
Air D15 N Y Y N Y NN Y ? ? ? ? ? ? Y N E1 N Y Y N Y NN Y ? Y ? N Y Y N Y Y ? ? ? ? Y N
Climaticfactors E2 E3 ? Y ? ? ? Y ? Y ? Y ? N Y N Y Y ? ? E4 ? Y ? ?
SEA A6 A7 B8 B9 objective: Option16(b) Option17(a) ? Option17(b) ? Option18(a) Y Y Option18(b) Option19(a) Option19(b) Option20(a) Y Y Y Option20(b) Option21(a) Y Y Option21(b) N N Option22(a) Option22(b) Option23(a) ? Option23(b) ? Option24(a) Y Y Option24(b) ? ? Option25(a) Y Option25(b) Option26(a) ? Option26(b) ? Option26(c) ? Option27(a) Option27(b) Option28(a) Option28(b) ? Option28(c) Option29(a) Y Option29(b) Option30(a) Y Y Option30(b) Option31(a) Option31(b) Option32(a) YY Y Option32(b) N ? Option33(a) Option33(b) Option34(a) ? ? Option34(b) ? ? Option35(a) Y Y Y Option35(b) Y Option36(a) Y Y Option36(b)
D10 D11 D12 D13 D14 ? Y ? N ? ? Y ? ? ? Y Y Y ? ? YY Y N ? ? ? ? N ? ? Y ? ? ? Y ? ? Y ? Y ? ? Y ? Y N ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Builtenvironment
Naturalheritage
Infrastructureand connectivity
33
4.Results Table4.2:Environmentalimpactsofpreferredoptions
SEAtopic: Cultural heritage Populationand humanhealth B9 YY Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y C1 YY Y Y ? Y Y YY Y YY YY ? ? Y Biodiversity,floraandfauna Landscape Soil D8 YY NN ? ? Y ? ? Y Y ? ? Y YY YY Y ? YY ? Y Y D9 YY ? Y Y Y ? ? Y YY Y ? Y ? Y Y Water Air D15 E1 YY N Y Y Y Y ? Y N Y Y Y Y ? ? Y YY N YY YY Y Y Y Y ? Y ? ? Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y ? ? Y Climaticfactors E2 YY YY Y ? ? Y ? ? Y E3 YY ? YY ? ? Y Y ? Y Y Y ? E4 YY ? YY ? ? ? ? Y ? E6 YY N Y Y Y ? Y ? Y N Y YY Y Y Y ? Y ? Y Material assets E7 YY N ? Y ? N Y ? E8 Y ? N Y ?
SEA A6 A7 B8 objective: PreferredVision YY YY YY Growthstrategy Option1(a) ? ? ? Lowcarbondevelopment Option2(a) Y Decentralisedenergy Option3(a) Decarbonisedelectricitygeneration Option4(a) Y Sustainablefloodmanagement Option5(a) Businessandindustriallandsupply Option6(a) ? ? Businessparksandindustrialestates Option7(a) Derelictandredundantbuildings Option8(a) Y Y Y Greenbusiness Option9(a) Employmentprovision Option10(a) Comparisonretailopportunities Option11(a) ? Towncentreregeneration Option12(a) Y YY Ruraldevelopment Option13(a) Tourismdevelopment Option14(a) ? Ageingpopulation Option15(a) Affordablehousing Option16(a) Housinginthecountryside Option17(a) ? Communityfacilitiesetc Option18(a) Y Developercontributions Option19(a) Sustainabletransport Option20(a) Y Y Publictransport Option21(a) Y Railnetwork Option22(a) Telecommunicationsetc Option23(a) ? Landscape Option24(a) Y Landscape Option25(a) Y Greenbelt Option26(a) ? Ecosystemsandhabitatnetworks Option27(a) Waste Option28(a) Alllotmentsetc Option29(a) Accessingthenaturalenvironment Option30(a) Y Maintenanceofopenspace Option31(a) Conservationareas Option32(a) YY Y Brownfieldandcontaminatedland Option33(a) Designstatements Option34(a) ? ? Developmentdensity Option35(a) Y Y Infillandbacklanddevelopment Option36(a) Y Y
C4 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 YY ? Y Y ? YY YY Y Y YY YY ? ? ? YY ? Y ? ? ? ? ? YY Y YY Y ? ? ? ? Y ? YY ? Y ? ? ? ? Y ? YY ? ? N ? Y ? Y ? ? ? ? Y YY ? ? ? ? ? YY ? Y ? ? ? ? Y YY ? YY ? Y ? ? ? ? Y Y ? YY Y ? ? ? ? ? YY ? Y ? ? ? ? ? YY Y ? YY Y YY ? ? ? ? ? Y ? ? ? ?
D10 D11 D12 D13 D14 E5 YY N ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Y ? Y Y Y ? YY Y ? Y N ? Y ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Y ? Y ? Y Y N Y ? ? ? Y Y Y ? Y ? ? ? Y ? Y ? Y ? ? ? ? ? Y ? YY ? ? ? Y ? Y ?
Built environment
Naturalheritage
Infrastructur Housingand Sustainableeconomicgrowth eand services connectivity
Climate change
34
4.Results
4.1
EnvironmentalImpacts:Vision
Thepreferredvisionisunlikelytohaveanysignificantnegativeimpactsontheenvironment. Followingitsfirstassessment,thevisionwasrewordedtospecificallyaddressanumberof environmentalissues;forthisreasonitisconsideredtobelikelytohavebeneficialimpactsonallof theSEAtopics.
4.2
EnvironmentalImpacts:GrowthStrategy
ThepreferredgrowthstrategyistheelementoftheMainIssuesReportwhichisconsideredlikelyto havethemostsignificantimpactsontheenvironment.Thegreatertherateofhousebuilding,the greaterthepotentialimpactontheenvironment.Thisisbothduetolossofgreenfieldlandandthe generalincreaseingreenhousegasemissionsfromtheincreasingenergyandtransportuseofa growingpopulation. Lossofgreenfieldlandhasthepotentialtoleadtosignificantnegativeimpactsonbiodiversity,with lossofspeciesandhabitat,aswellasthehabitatconnectivitywhichallowsthemtoadapttoclimate change.Itcouldalsoleadtoimpactsonsoilandwaterquality,andanincreasedriskofflooding;the severityoftheseimpactsdependsonthesiteschosen,housingdensityandthedesignand constructionmethodsemployed.Increaseddevelopmentislikelytoleadtoincreasedpressureon thecapacityofthelandscapeandhistoricenvironmenttoaccommodatenewbuilding. Regardlessofwheredevelopmentissited,itislikelytoresultinanincreaseingreenhousegas emissionsfromdomesticenergyuseandincreasedwastegenerationfromhouseholdactivity.An increasingpopulationislikelytouseprivatetransportmore,contributingtohighergreenhousegas emissionandincreasedairpollution;thisislikelytobeexacerbatedifdevelopmentisdispersed, withgreaterdistancestotravelandloweravailabilityofpublictransport. Policiesandcriteriawouldneedtobeinplacetomitigatelocalimpacts,includingspecificmitigation measuresidentifiedatthesitelevel.Furthermitigationoftheimpactsofincreaseddevelopment canbeachievedthroughtheprovisionofpublictransportandactivetravelroutes,aswellashigh levelsofdesignforenergyefficiency,communitysafetyandamenity.
4.3
EnvironmentalImpacts:MainIssues
Thefollowingsectionssummarisethelikelyenvironmentalimpactsofthepreferredoptions assessedundereachofthemainissues.Summariesofthelikelyimpactsofalltheoptionsassessed canbefoundinAppendix9. Howcanwereduceourgreenhousegasemissionsandadapttotheconsequencesofclimate change? Thepreferredoptionsforthismainissuearelikelytohavebeneficialimpactsonculturalheritage; populationandhumanhealth;water;air;andclimaticfactors.Nonegativeenvironmentalimpacts havebeenidentified,althoughthereareuncertaintiesaroundthelikelyimpactsonlandscape,soil, andmaterialassets. Howcanweencourageandpromotesustainableeconomicgrowth? Nonegativeenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthepreferredoptionsforthismain issue;however,thereareanumberofuncertaintiesaroundimpactsonbiodiversity,floraandfauna; soils,water;culturalheritage;landscape;climaticfactors;andmaterialassets.Somebeneficial impactshavebeenidentifiedforculturalheritage;populationandhumanhealth;landscape;water; air;climaticfactorsandmaterialassets. 35
4.Results Howcanwedeliverappropriatehousingandassociatedservices? Thepreferredoptionsforthismainissuearelikelytohavesomebeneficialimpactsoncultural heritage;andpopulationandhumanhealth.Therearelikelytobemixedimpactsonairandclimatic factors.Therearealsoanumberofuncertainties,particularlyaroundimpactsonbiodiversity;flora andfauna;landscape;soilandwater. Howcanwebestdeliverinfrastructureandimproveconnectivity? Thepreferredoptionsforthismainissuearelikelytohavebeneficialimpactsonpopulationand humanhealth;airandclimaticfactors.Nonegativeenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentified; however,thereareuncertaintiesaroundimpactsonculturalheritage;biodiversity,floraandfauna; landscape;soil;andwater. Howcanweconserveandenhancethenaturalenvironment? Someuncertaintiesremainaroundthelikelyenvironmentalimpactsofthepreferredoptionsforthis mainissue.However,thepreferredoptionsaregenerallylikelytohavebeneficialimpactson culturalheritage;populationandhumanhealth;biodiversity,floraandfauna;landscape;soil;water; andclimaticfactors.Therearelikelytobemixedimpactsonmaterialassets. Howcanweconserveandenhancethebuiltenvironment? Thepreferredoptionsforthismainissuearelikelytohavebeneficialimpactsonculturalheritage; landscapeandsoil.Therearealsoanumberofuncertaintiesaroundthelikelyimpactson populationandhumanhealth;biodiversity,floraandfauna;water;air;climaticfactors;andmaterial assets.
36
4.Results
4.4
EnvironmentalImpacts:Potentialsitesfordevelopment
ThefollowingtableshowstheresultsoftheenvironmentalappraisaloftheMIRsitesandthekeyconstraints.FullresultsofthesiteassessmentscanbefoundinLandUseConsultants(2010). Table4.3:Resultsofenvironmentalappraisalandkeyconstraints(TakenfromLandUseConsultants(2010:1617)) Siteconstraints Siteinformation

SiteID Nameand Location Sitearea(ha) Summary score
Mitigation
Overridingconstraints
Major
Moderate
Minor
Approxarearemaining
Possiblemitigationoptions
ALLOA 2 3 5 6 10 11 12 13 14 18 22 23 ElmGrove Claremont FormerCollege TheShore AlloaCoop HealthCentre AshleyTerrace CentralParkland MainStreet,Sauchie CarsebridgeRow AlloaPark Kelliebank/Bowhouse
1.3 4.5 5.5 4.9 0.46 1.1 0.6 1.01 0.3 0.7 1.6 B1 C1 B2 D2 A2 A1 B2 D2 B4 C1 A2 Floodrisk (riskassessmentand proposalsinplace) Proximitytosewageworks Potentiallandstabilityissues FirthofForthSPA; Scheduledmonument Significantlossofgreenspace Conservationarea;Listed buildingsonsite;potential forpresenceofbats Historicbuildingonsite; characterofarea Lossofopenspace;possible relictdesignedlandscape features Roadaccesstosite Groundstability;Potential futurefloodrisk AdjacenttoConservation Area ProximitytoConservation Area AdjacenttoConservation Area Landraising;freeboardallowanceon development Developmentbriefforretentionof extantbuildings Geotechnicalsurvey;SuDS;floodrisk assessment; Floodriskassessment;reinforcing coastaldefence; AppropriateAssessment(dependingon changeinuse) Mitigationoffloodriskdependenton offsitecoastaldefences Floodriskassessment;SuDS; developmentbrief Offsitemarineflooddefences Developmentbrief Floodriskassessment;SuDS Floodriskassessment;SuDS;landscape design Partialdevelopmentofsite
31.9
C4
Floodrisk
Proximitytosewageworks; AdjacenttoOilandGas pipelinesafeguardingzone Futurefloodrisk;Tree PreservationOrder;potential forimpactsonsettingof ListedBuilding Futurefloodrisk Schoolbuildingonsite; Characterofarea Lossofgreenspace; topography
24
Forthbank
1.07
D2
Floodrisk
Highvoltageoverheadlines;
25 26 20 42 43 45
CarsebridgeRoadNorth NorthCastleStreet FairfieldSchool SunnysideRoad Carsebridge ChurchGrove
C3
0.45 0.39 5.25 17.6 1.6
A1 C3 A2 A3 C2
Floodrisk
Futurefloodrisk
0.7
37
4.Results
Siteinformation
Siteconstraints
Mitigation
Major
Moderate
Minor
Approxarearemaining
CLACKMANNANANDKENNET 57 NorthStreet/MainStreet
0.1 A3 ConservationArea;historic buildingonsite Developmentbrief
TULLIBODY,GLENOCHILANDCAMBUS
ScheduledMonument; potentialforimpactson protectedspecies HSEriskzoneassociatedwith adjacentbondedwarehouses Partiallywithinsafeguarded openspacealthough compatiblewithproposed use AppropriateAssessmentmaybe requireddevelopmentcouldresultin lossofwintergrazingforpinkfooted goose(SPAinterest)orpollution; Floodriskassessment;SuDS Lowsensitivitydevelopment(e.g. industry)likelytobeacceptabletoHSE
80
DumyatBusinessParkPhase2
10.8
D4
Floodrisk
81 77 89 ALVA 99 100 101 103 106 108
StationRoad(westside) TheOrchard,Tullibody AbercrombyPlace
0.5 0.37
A4 B2
0.56
B1
BeauclercStreet ParkStreet BrookStreet/BackRoad FormerAlvaGlenHotel Glentana AlvaCemetery
1.13 1.9 0.3 0.1 1.3 1.3
D2 A3 C4 B3 A2 C4
Floodrisk
Floodrisk Floodrisk(commontomuch ofcentralAlva)
ListedBuildingonsite Existinghotelbuildingonsite ListedBuildingonsite; potentialforbatsinbuilding Floodrisk;topography
ProximitytoOchilHillsAGLV ProximitytoOchilHillsAGLV Potentialforarchaeological remains
Floodriskassessment;development brief Floodriskassessment Appropriateuseanddesignsolution;off sitefloodattenuation Batsurvey;developmentbrief Floodriskassessment/hydrological survey;landraising;archaeological assessment
TILLICOULTRYANDCOALSNAUGHTON 115 DevonparkMills

0.23 B2 Futurefloodrisk Localcharacter;lossofviews toOchilHills;potentialfor impactsonarchaeological remains;lossofprime agriculturalland Floodriskassessment(impactslikelyto bemitigatedbysitetopographyand appropriatesitingofbuildings) Archaeologicaldeskbasedassessment/ watchingbrief Floodriskassessment;onsitewater management;developmentbrief Flooddefencestransferringimpacts up/downstream Floodriskassessment;avoidanceofat riskarea;developmentbrieftoensure preservationofhistoriccharacterand
118
CoalsnaughtonNorth
12
D2
120 126 132 131
DevonparkMills SterlingMillsOutletVillage CommunityCentresite UpperMillStreet
0.8 1.9 0.75 1.09
C2 D3 B3 C1
Floodrisk
Floodrisk Floodrisk
Existingmillbuildingsonsite Remainsofmillbuildingson site
38
4.Results
Siteinformation
Siteconstraints
Mitigation
Major
Moderate
Minor
Approxarearemaining
appropriatewatermanagement
DOLLAR 138 DollarGolfClub

0.08 D2 Floodrisk DollarConservationArea ExpansionofDollar settlementboundary; Undevelopedsitetherefore somearchaeological potential Floodriskassessment(onsitemitigation throughdefenceunlikelytobefeasible) SuDS;archaeologicaldeskbased assessmentandwatchingbrief
141
Kellybank
2.2
C1
Potentialforfuturefloodrisk
MUCKHARTAREA 145 Muckhartcemeteryextension

2.2 C4 Adjacentwatercourses OchilHillsAGLV; MuckhartConservationArea SEPA50mwatercoursebuffer
RURALAREA 97 GlenochilYeast
5.5 B2 Potentialadditionalrunoff SuDS Partdevelopmentofsite Appropriateassessmentmaybe requireddependingonwhethersiteis usedbySPAspeciesandproposeduse; Confinedevelopmenttoeasternpartof site;SuDS Accessimprovement Partdevelopmentofsite AppropriateAssessmentmaybe necessaryalthoughunlikely; Onsitewatermanagement; Improvedaccess Upgradingroadaccess
151
GarvelFarm
20.2
D4
Floodrisk(partofsite)
Futurefloodrisk; Accessvialevelcrossing; potentialforimpactson priorityspecies
17.7ha
153
ManorPowis
2.71
D3
Futurefloodrisk; Accessvialevelcrossing Roadaccesscurrentlyvery pooralsopotentialfor disturbanceofcommunity ScheduledMonument (althoughconservationuse) Futurefloodrisk;Firthof ForthSPA/Ramsar/SSSI (potentiallossofgoose grazinghabitat/direct impactsonwaterquality)
c.1ha
154
TillicoultryQuarry
10.8
C1
OchilHillsAGLV;adjacentto MillGlenSSSI(although impactsunlikely) GreenBelt(althoughuse likelytobecompatible)
Potentialimpactonsetting ofScheduledmonument (unlikely) Undevelopedsitepotential forunrecordedarchaeology Futurefloodrisk
156 50 155
FormerDevonEquestrianCentre SauchieWest/Tullygarth SauchieTower
24.5 22.5 2.2
B1
Archaeologicaldeskbasedassessment ConservationManagementPlanforsite andenvirons(shouldbeproducedby developer) Makespacefornaturalfloodplain processescompatiblewith conservationuse AppropriateAssessmentmaybe required;floodriskassessment; avoidanceofriskareas;SuDS; Archaeologicaldeskbasedassessment andwatchingbrief
A2 C1
158
Bessiemine
8.3
A3
Floodrisk
49
AlloaWest(OrchardFarm)
39.5
D3
Greenfieldsitepotentialfor impactsonunrecorded archaeology
39
4.Results
Siteinformation
Siteconstraints
Mitigation
Major
Moderate
Minor
Approxarearemaining
68
Tullygarthbrickworks
9.9
A4
Futurefloodrisk Potentialforpresenceof protectedspecies;severance ofCorePathnetwork; impactsoncharacterofarea
Allowspaceforpreservationofnatural floodplainprocesses(compatiblewith conservationuse) Developmentwouldinevitablyresultin lossofveterantrees;
47
BraeheadGolfCourse
1.4
C3
GreenBelt;Veterantreesin goodcondition
ThetablesandtextonthefollowingpagessummarisetherecommendationsofthesiteappraisalscarriedoutbyLandUseConsultants.Theseidentifythesitesthatareconsideredmost,andleast,suitablefordevelopment,and includesuggestionsforthemitigationofnegativeenvironmentalimpacts.ThetablesandtextaretakenfromLandUseConsultants(2010:2936).
40
4.Results
4.4.1 Siteswithpotentialfordevelopment
TheassessedsitesaregroupedbyperformanceagainstSEAobjectiveandlevelofaddition constraint.Whereoverriding'constraintshavebeenidentified,siteshavebeenrejectedduetothe likelydifficultiesinsatisfactorilymitigatingimpacts.Anyexceptionstothisrulearehighlighted. Highscores,lowconstraints Thefollowingsiteshaveclearpotentialfordevelopment,astheyperformwellagainsttheSEA objectives,generatinghighnumbersofpositivescoreswithfewobviousenvironmentalimpacts,and arenotsubjecttosignificantadditionalconstraints.Thisgroupshouldrepresentthefirstchoice Table4.4:Siteswithclearpotentialforproposeddevelopment
MIRID SCORE Rank Score band a1 a2
Overriding Major Moderate Minor
Commentary
Futurefloodriskmustbeaddressedto safeguardmuchofwaterfrontAlloasite willthereforebenefit
26 22
9.5 9
2 3
( )
SiteisintheGreenBelt,howeverlikely useofsiteforplayingfieldsetc. associatedwithLornshillAcademywillbe generallycompatible Developmentlikelytoenhanceadjacent Conservationarea,particularlyinrelation tocurrent buildingonsite Futurefloodriskeasilyaddressedthrough designofdevelopmentsafeguarding likelyriskareainopenspace
50
a2
10
7.5
a2
42 100 2 5 77 97 132
7.5 7 5.5 5 5 5 4.5
5 8 14 17 17 17 22
a2 a3 b1 b2 b2 b2 b3
Minorimpactsfromadditionalrunoff easilyaddressedthroughrequirementfor SuDSsystem
(Whereconstraintsareindicatedby( )itisunlikelytheywillpresentasignificantissue,buthave beenhighlightedforconsistency).
4.4.2 Highscores,moderateconstraints
41
4.Results ThefollowinggroupofsitesreturnsimilarlypositivescoresagainsttheSEAobjectivesbutare subjecttoadditionalconstraints.Relativelylowlevelmitigationmeasureswillberequiredtoensure proposeddevelopmentsconveypositiveenvironmentaleffects. Table4.5:Siteswithgoodpotentialforproposeddevelopmentandrequiringlowlevelmitigation

Score Overriding band
MIRID
SCORE Rank
Major
Moderate
Minor
Commentary
11
10
a1
PreparationofDevelopmentBriefforsite shouldensureproposalsretainListed Buildinganddesignenhances ConservationArea DevelopmentBriefrequiredtoensure appropriateprotectionandenhancement ofListedschoolbuilding Conservationuseofsiteshouldbe compatiblewithmakingspacefornatural floodingprocesseswithoutcompromising environmentalqualityorlikely enhancements InfluenceofHSEriskzone(inner)on rangeofdevelopmentspossibleonsite however,industrialuselikelytobe acceptable Conservationuseofsitelikelytobe compatiblewithsustainableflood managementonsite.Makingspacefor naturalfloodplainprocessesshouldbea priorityforenhancement. Safeguardedopenspaceonsitelikelyto becompatiblewithproposeduse Developmentofsiteasanimalrescue centreunlikelytohaveadetrimental effectonthesettingofSM Preparationofdevelopmentbrief prioritisingretentionofhistorichospital building Futurefloodriskcanbemitigatedthrough appropriatedesignofresidential developmentlocatingonhigherground Althoughatriskofflooding,thesiteis currentlydevelopedandliesincentral Alva. Anymitigationsolutionwouldhavetobe townwideandcouldnotbeimplemented atsinglesitelevel.
106
7.5
a2
158
a3
( )
81
12
a4
68
12
a4
( )
89 156
5.5 5.5
14 14
b1 b1
12
17
b2
115
17
b2
103
4.5
22
b3
Ingeneralterms,developmentofthesesiteswouldhaveapositiveeffectontheenvironmentof Clackmannanshire.Theadditionalconstraintsidentifiedthroughtheassessmentprocessshouldbe relativelyeasytomitigatethroughthedesignandplanningprocess,ratherthanrequiringextensive retrofittedsolutions.Positiveplanningmeasures,suchastheproductionofDevelopmentBriefs
42
4.Results forsensitivesites,willprovideameasureofcertaintyandclearguidanceonexpectedstandardsfor prospectivedevelopers. Site103,theformerAlvaGlenHotel,lieswithinsoutheastAlvaandis,likemuchofthisareaofthe town,atsignificantriskfromflooding.Mitigationcannotbeappliedatthesitespecificleveland couldnotreasonablybesecuredthroughredevelopmentofthesite.However,proposalsforreuse orredevelopmentofthesitewillhavetotakethisriskintoaccountandmakeuseofcreativedesign solutionstoreducethepotentialimpactoffloodingonresidentsorusersofthedevelopment.The viewsofSEPAwillbecriticalinensuringanyproposalisappropriateandisnotatunduerisk.
4.4.3 Lowerscores,lesssignificantconstraints
WhilethesiteslistedbelowdonotreturnparticularlyhighscoresagainsttheSEAobjectives,they arenotsubjecttosignificantconstraintsandcouldmakeapositivecontributiontolandsupplyand theenvironmentwithlimitedmitigation. Table4.6:Lowerscoringsiteswithdevelopmentpotential
MIRID SCORE Rank Score band
Commentary
Sensitivedesignofproposed developmentshouldeffectivelymitigate likelyeffectsthroughthepreservationof keyviewsandprovisionofwelldesigned openspace Adverseeffectslargelyrelatedto greenfieldlocation. Proposalsmusttakeintoaccount potentialforfuturefloodriskand incorporatesensitiveplantingand landscapedesigntoensuredevelopment isrootedinthelandscape. WhilepresenceofSMis,strictly,amajor constraintthecontinuedConservation useofthesiteisunlikelytohavea significantimpactanyphysicalworks willrequireSMConsentfromtheScottish Ministers. Developingonlypartofthesitecould obviatethemajorityofnegativescores
3.5
26
c1
141
3.5
26
c1
( )
155
3.5
26
c1
( )
45
31
c2
Site155isanobviousanomaly,asitissubjecttoamajorconstraintthepresenceofaScheduled Monumentonsite.However,astheproposeduseiscontinuedconservationofthemonument (SauchieTower)inpracticeimpactsareunlikely.AnyproposedworkstotheTowerwillrequire ScheduledMonumentConsentfromScottishMinisters,whichwillensurethatthecharacterand significanceofthemonumentarepreserved. TakenfromLandUseConsultants(2010:2936) 43
4.Results Sitesrequiringmoreextensivemitigation Thefollowingsiteshavesomepotentialfordevelopmenthowever,becauseoftheirlower assessmentscoresand/oradditionalconstraints,theymayrequiremoreextensivemitigation measurestoensurepositiveenvironmentaloutcomes.
4.4.4 Moderatescores,minormoderateconstraints
Table4.7:Siteswithpotentialfordevelopmentwheremitigationcanbeguaranteed
Commentary
Geotechnicalinvestigationsand avoidanceofareaslikelytobeaffectedby futurefloodriskshouldenableresidential developmentonthesite Detailedfloodriskassessmentis necessarytodeterminetheactualriskto thesiteasiselevatedandmaybe partiallyprotectedbystonerevetment andmadegroundonwhichtheformer millswerebuilt. Preparationofadevelopmentbriefcould ensurethatproposalsretainsurviving elementsofhistoricfabric. Preparationofadevelopmentbriefcould secureappropriateschemeswhich conserveandenhancehistoricinterest; Appropriateonsitewatermanagement couldavoidfuturefloodingimpactsfrom adjacentwatercourses Retentionofschoolbuildingshouldbe prioritisedifpossible;wouldavoidcultural heritageimpactsandpreservecharacter ofarea Subjecttosignificantfloodrisk,hasaSM onsiteandisadjacenttoFirthofForth SPA. However,redevelopmentisunlikelyto resultinadditionalimpactsonSMorSPA, andfloodriskislikelytobeaddressedto safeguardexistingindustry ApplicationofSEPAstandardsfor cemeterydevelopmentshouldavoidany potentialpollutionissues (NB.assessmentdoesnotinclude potentialimpactsofproposedlandraising tomitigatepossiblefloodingissues insufficientdetailavailable) ApplicationofSEPAstandardsfor cemeterydevelopmentshouldavoid potentialpollutionissues(andalsodeal withpotentialfloodrisk)althougha relativelysmallareawillremainfor cemeteryexpansion.
18
3.5
26
c1
131
3.5
26
c1
25
2.5
33
c3
20
2.5
33
c3
23
36
c4
( )
108
36
c4
145
36
c4
TakenfromLandUseConsultants(2010:2936) 44
4.Results Themitigationmeasuresproposedtoenabledevelopmentonthesesitesshouldnotprovean unnecessaryburdenonprospectivedevelopersandwouldconveysignificantenvironmental benefits.Thetwocemeteryexpansionsites(108and145)willbesubjecttonecessaryassessments tosatisfySEPAofacceptabilityinrelationtoimpactsonsurfaceandgroundwater.Shouldthese assessmentsindicatethatimpactsareunlikely,thesitesshouldbeconsideredtobeacceptable. Exceptions Site23,althoughidentifiedasbeingsubjecttooverridingfloodrisk,iscurrentlyinindustrialuseand islikelytobenefitfromenhancedfloodprotectionmeasuresastheareaisanimportanteconomic asset.Similarly,asthesiteisalreadywhollyinindustrialuse,anyredevelopmentisunlikelyto generateadditionalimpactsonthedesignatedinterestsoftheFirthofForthSPAortheAlloa GlassworksConeScheduledMonument.However,operationalimpactswillbelargelydependenton theproposeduseandcouldbelesssignificantthanhistoricallevels,butcouldequallybethesameor moreseverethanatpresent.Thepossibilityofshortterm,butpotentiallysignificant,impacts duringtheconstructionphasemaybeofparticularimportance.AppropriateAssessmentmaybe requiredfordevelopmentsthatwouldrepresentamajorchangeinscaleortypeofuseofthesite.
4.4.5 Highscores,majorconstraints
AlthoughthissiteperformswellagainsttheSEAobjectives,significantadditionalconstraintsmustbe overcomebeforeitsdevelopmentpotentialcanbereleased. Table4.8:Siteswithgoodpotentialfordevelopment,butrequiringsignificantmitigation
Commentary
Redevelopmentofsitewouldconvey significantbenefitstoConservationArea however,developmentbriefrequiredto ensureappropriateprotectionand enhancementofhistoricbuildingonsite.
57
6.5
10
a3
TheextantCooperativeBuilding,whilenotListed,isanimportantaspectoflocalcharacterand shouldberetainedifpossible.Thispotentiallylimitstherangeofdevelopmentthatwouldbe suitableonthesite.
4.4.6 Moderatescores,majorconstraints
Thesiteslistedbelowhavesomedevelopmentpotential,butarelikelytorequireextensive mitigationtorealisethispotential. Table4.9:Siteswithsomedevelopmentpotential,butrequiringextensivemitigation
MIRID SCORE Rank
14 154
Score band b4 b4
Overriding
Major
Moderate
Minor
Commentary
Potentiallandstabilityissuesrelatedto mineralsextractioninthearea Potentialbusiness/industrialusestrongly constrainedbyfragileroadaccessand natureofsite
4 4
24 23
45
4.Results
120
29
c2
Sitepartiallyatriskofflooding
Forthepurposesoftheassessment,itisassumedthatSite154TillicoultryQuarrywillnotbesubject tocontinuedmineralextractionbutwillbeputtoanotherindustrial/businessuse.Potentialuses arestronglyconstrainedbytheverypoorroadaccessthroughTillicoultrywhich,ifheavyuseis required,couldresultinsignificantadverseimpactsonthecommunityandwouldalsonecessitate majorupgradingofthelocalroadnetwork.Similarly,thenatureofthesiteislikelytolimittherange ofusesthatwouldbeappropriateasthefloorofthequarryislikelytobeindeepshadethroughout muchoftheday.ShouldtheCouncilhaveparticularaspirationsforthesite,thepreparationofa developmentbrieformasterplancouldstimulate/steerappropriateandinnovativesolutions.
4.4.7 Lowscoringsites
Thefollowingsiteshavesomepotentialtobedevelopedinasustainablemanner,butcurrently requireproactivemeasurestobeputinplacetoavertthepotentialforadverseenvironmental effects. Table4.10:Siteswheresignificantmitigationcouldreleaselimiteddevelopmentpotential
Commentary
Whilepartofthesiteiscurrentlyatrisk fromfloodingariskthatwillincrease withclimatechangethemajorityofthe sitecouldsafelybedeveloped. Thepreparationofadevelopmentbrief forthesite,highlightingthepreservation andenhancementoftheListedBuilding, safeguardingoftheAlvaGlenaccess facilitiesandavoidingfloodriskcould enablepositivedevelopment Sitereturnsalowscorebecauseitisina greenfieldlocationandisintrinsicallyless sustainablethanbrownfielddevelopment closertomajorcentresofpopulation Sitewithinbothfluvialandmarineflood riskzone (NBassessmentdoesnotincludeproposed landraising) Thesitesuffersfrompooraccessibility anddevelopmentcouldresultinrelease ofpollutantsfromcollieryspoilintothe RiverForth. Riskcouldbelargelyavoidedbyonly developingeasternportionofsite.Any significantdevelopmentwouldrequire enhancementofrailwaycrossing
99
0.5
40
d2
118
0.5
40
d2
0.5
40
d2
( )
153
47
d3
Whilereturningalowoverallscore,Site118hasconsiderablepotentialfordevelopment.However, asagreenfieldsiteonprimeagriculturalland,itissignificantlylesssustainablethanthemajorityof brownfieldsitesexaminedinthecourseoftheassessmenthenceitslowrank. TakenfromLandUseConsultants(2010:2936) 46
4.Results Thepotentialexiststoavoidfloodingimpactsontheothersitesbyexcludingatriskareasfrom developmentandensuringthatproposalsconveywiderbenefitswhichcouldoffsetanyrisk.Site99 couldbedevelopedwheresuitableprovisionismadetosecureasustainablefuturefortheListed buildingonsiteandwherefloodriskcanbeappropriatelymitigated. ItisourunderstandingthatSite6hasbeensubjecttodetailedfloodriskassessmentandactive developmentproposalsincorporatesufficientmitigationtosatisfySEPA.Noinformationisavailable astowhetherotheridentifiedimpactscanbesatisfactorilyaddressed.
4.4.8 Sitescurrentlyunsuitablefordevelopment
Thefollowingsitesareeithersubjecttoconstraintsthatcannotbemitigatedwithoutmajor interventions,ordonotconveysufficientpositivebenefitstotheareaorsometimesacombination ofthetwo. Thesiteslistedbelowarecurrentlyunsuitablefordevelopmentandwouldeitherrequiremajor mitigationmeasureswhichcouldhavesignificantenvironmentalimpactsintheirownrightor wouldresultinunjustifiableimpacts. Table4.11:Sitesunsuitablefordevelopment
MIRID SCORE Rank Score band a3
Commentary
Sitealmostentirelywithinfloodriskzone defencewouldincreasedownstream risk Developmentofsitewouldinevitably lead tolossofveterantreespotentialfor presenceofbats. Wouldresultinexpansionofsettlement intoGreenBelt. Smallsitealmostentirelywithinfloodrisk zone(whereSEPAdatacorrectedto streamcorridor)defencewouldincrease downstreamrisk Detailedfloodriskassessmentcould unlockdevelopmentpotential Sitelieswithinfloodriskzone,isadjacent totheOilandGasPipelinesafeguarding zoneandissituatednexttoalarge sewageworks.Itisalsospannedbyhigh voltagepowerlines. Thesefactorssignificantlyconstrain developmentpotential Siteislargelywithinthefloodriskzone althoughuseasGolfClubhouse potentiallyatlessriskthanresidential development Developmentwouldresultinlossofopen spaceresourceandpossiblehistoric designedlandscapefeatures Siteisalmostentirelywithinfluvialflood riskzonedefencewouldsignificantly increasedownstreamrisk Thesiteislikelytobeatconsiderablerisk offloodingasaresultofclimatechange.
43
6.5
10
47
2.5
33
c3
101
39
d1
24
43
d2
138
43
d2
13
0.5
45
d3
126 49
4 5
46 47
d3 d3
47
4.Results
MIRID SCORE Rank
Score band
Overriding
Major
Moderate
Minor
Commentary
Developmentcouldalsoresultinalossof grazinghabitatforoverwinteringwildfowl (notifiedinterestoftheadjacentSPA)
80
5.5
49
d4
Siteislargelywithinthefluvialfloodrisk zone.Developmentcouldresultinlossof grazinghabitatforoverwinteringwildfowl andcouldpotentiallygeneratepollution Atleast30%ofsitewithinfloodriskzone. Developmentcouldresultinlossof habitatforoverwinteringwildfowl;Siteis currentlyonlyaccessibleviasmallscale levelcrossing,thereforeanysignificant commercialdevelopmentwouldhaveto beaccompaniedwithprovisionofbridge
151
13.5
50
d4
ImpactsonNatura2000sites Anumberofsites(49,80and151)abovehaveincurrednegativescoresforpotentialimpactsonthe FirthofForthSPA/Ramsar/SSSI.AppropriateAssessmentmayrevealthatimpactsareunlikely howeveraprecautionaryapproachhasbeenappliedforthepurposesofthisassessment. Floodrisk Sites24,49and151above(inadditiontoSite23,6and153)aresubjecttosignificantriskofmarine floodingeithernoworasaresultofclimatechangeandcannotreadilybedevelopedwithout addressingthisissue.AlthoughtherearelikelytobeimprovementsinAlloasmarinedefences potentiallyprotecting6and23anywiderdevelopmentofharddefenceislikelytoplace unsustainablepressureonsensitiveintertidalhabitats,suchassaltmarsh,throughtheeffectsof coastalsqueeze.Theremaybeopportunitiestosetthelimiteddevelopmentofthesesitesinthe contextofabroaderstrategyfortheFirthofForthwhichincludesmakingspaceformanaged realignmenttoallowinternationallysignificanthabitatstomoveinlandassealevelsrise. Sites43,101,138,126and80areatsignificantriskoffluvialflooding,whichcreatesratherdifferent issuesrelatingtoreductionsinthebufferingcapacityoffloodplainstoaccommodatefloodwaters andattenuatethedestructiveeffectsofsevereweatherevents.Developmentintheselocations couldnecessitatetheconstructionofadditionalharddefenceswhich,inturn,transfersimpactsto downstreamassetsandcommunities. Giventheavailabilityofgoodquality,sustainablesitesavailablefordevelopmentacross Clackmannanshire,itisrecommendedthatthisgroupofsitesberejected.
48
4.Results
4.5
InfluenceoftheSEAontheMainIssuesReport
TheSEAwascarriedoutduringthepreparationoftheMainIssuesReport,whichmeantthatthe authorsoftheplanwereabletousethefindingsoftheSEAtorewritethetextofseveraloptions, whicharedetailedinthetablebelow.Checklistsandsummariesoftheinitialassessmentsofthese optionscanbefoundinAppendix10. Table4.12:OptionsrewrittenasaresultoftheSEA Option Summaryof/reasonforchanges Preferredvision Option5(a)(Sustainablefloodmanagement) Option13(a)(Ruraldevelopment) Revisedtoprovidemoreclarityonparticular environmentalissues. Revisedtoincludeprotectionofdesignatedsites Revisedtoprovidemoreclarityonthe circumstancesunderwhichruraldevelopment wouldbepermitted.
Followingsiteassessments,andtakingintoaccountotherconsiderations,potentialdevelopment sitesintheMainIssuesReporthavebeencategorisedasfollows: EstablishedSites:wherethereisgenerallyaplanningpermissioninplaceorsupportfor developmentfromtheCouncil(thisincludessiteswhichmaybesubjecttoexaminationor appeal,wheretheCouncilsupportsapproval). Potentialadditionalsites:whichtheCouncilfeelsmaybeconsideredi.e.thesewouldlikely bethefirst'additional'siteswhichwouldbeallocatedifrequired. Nonfavouredsites:wherethereisaknowninterest,butdevelopmentprospectsare currentlyconsideredunlikely. Theselectionofpreferredoptionsforthegrowthstrategyandmainissueshastakenintoaccount thefindingsoftheSEA,aswellasothersocialandeconomicfactors.Thefindingsand recommendationsoftheSEA,alongwithresponsestotheconsultation,willbegivenclose considerationindevelopingtheProposedPlan.
4.6
IssuestoconsiderwhendevelopingtheProposedPlan
ThereareanumberofuncertaintiesaboutthelikelyenvironmentalimpactsoftheLocal DevelopmentPlanthesearemostlyduetothebroadnatureoftheoptionssuggestedintheMain Issuesreport,andwillbeeasiertoassessatthenextstageofplanmaking,thepreparationofthe ProposedPlan.Atthatstage,proposedsiteallocationsandthewordingofpolicieswillbedeveloped andconfirmed,andthestrategicenvironmentalassessmentwillcontinuetobepartofthatprocess. TheSEAoftheMainIssuesReporthighlightedsomeparticularenvironmentalissuestobe consideredatthenextstage,andthesearelistedinthetablebelow.Theseissuesincludemeasures tomitigatethelikelyimpactsoftheoptionsintheplan.
49
4.Results Table4.13:Issuestoconsiderwhendevelopingtheproposedplan Option Issuesraised/mitigation Choosesiteswithminimalimpactonthehistoricenvironment. Requiredesignforcommunitysafety. Ensurethatnewhousingdevelopmentscontributetohabitatnetworks, greenspaceprovision,andenhancingpopulationsofEuropeanProtected Specieswhereverpossibleandensurethatadverseeffectsonbiodiversity aremitigated,e.g.throughproductionofanenvironmentalreport(see Option28). Improvepublictransport;encourageactivetravel.Encouragelocal employment. Newdevelopmentshouldincludesustainabledrainageschemesandnotbe constructedinlocationswheretheycouldcontributetofloodrisk. Encourageconstructionpracticesthatminimisewaste. Ensurethatnewdevelopmentisdesignedinawaythatcontributesto enhancingthedistinctivecharacterofthelandscape(seeOption26).
GrowthStrategy (Option1)
Howcanwereduceourgreenhousegasemissionsandadapttotheconsequencesofclimate change? Considerclarifyingthetypesofenergygenerationtechnologiesthatwillbe supported. Landscapeandculturalheritageimpactdependsonthenatureofthe technologiesthatwillbesupported,aswellasthelocationofsitesthatare identifiedashavingpotentialfordecentralisedenergy. Impactsonmaterialassets(waste)dependonwhetherbiomasswould includeenergyfromwaste
Option3 (decentralised energy)
Howcanweencourageandpromotesustainableeconomicgrowth? Option6 (businessand industrialland supply) Option9 (greenbusiness) Option11 (comparisonretail) Option13 (developmentinthe ruralarea) Option14 (tourism development) Ensuresitesandproposalsmeetbiodiversitycriteria. Includereducinggreenhousegasemissions,transportandwaste,and improvingenergyefficiencyinthedefinitionof'greenbusiness' Includethefollowinginsustainabilitycriteria:conservationofbiodiversity; habitatconnectivity;abilityofthelandscapetoaccommodatedevelopment; soilandwaterqualityissues;floodrisk. Takeintoaccountbiodiversity,floraandfauna;soil;water;andclimate changemitigationandadaptationwhendefiningthecircumstanceinwhich developmentwouldbepermitted.Requireenergyefficientdesign Includethefollowinginthecriteriabasedpolicy:greeneconomy;protection andenhancementofthehistoricenvironment;highstandardsofdesignand energyefficiency;activetravel;biodiversity,includinghabitats,species, habitatconnectivityanddesignatedsites;soil;water;accessibilitybypublic transport;floodrisk;mixedusedevelopments.
Howcanwedeliverappropriatehousingandrelatedservices?
50
4.Results
Option Option17 (housing developmentinthe countryside) Option19 (developer contributions)
Issuesraised/mitigation Considerthefollowinginthepolicy:thehistoricenvironment;energy efficiency;activetravel;CentralScotlandGreenNetwork;species,habitats andhabitatconnectivity;designatedsites;landscapecharacterandcapacity; soilquality;waterqualityandflooding;sustainablewateruse. Needtobeclearaboutwhatissuesdevelopercontributionswouldcover habitatloss?,openspace?Etc
Howcanwebestdeliverinfrastructureandimprovedconnectivity? Opportunitiesforleisure/tourismbusinessesaroundcycling/walking;and supplyingandservicingbicyclesandactivetravelequipment Newrouteswouldneedtobedesignedinawaythatdoesn'tadverselyaffect thehistoricenvironment.CCTVandlightingwouldneedtobesensitively located Offroadroutescouldbedesignedtoservebusstops/railwaystation,and giveaccesstogreenspaces. Deprivedareastendtohavelowercarownershipsuggesttargetingthem first(althoughthiswouldhavelessimpactongreenhousegasemissionsand airpollutionthantargetingmoreaffluentareas) Opportunitiesfornew/improvedroutestocontributetoimprovedquality ofopenspace Ensurenewpathsavoiddamagingkeyhabitats.Possibilityforhabitat creatione.g.hedgerows Opportunitiesforhabitatcreation.Avoidimpactsonpriorityhabitatsand speciesanddesignatedsites. Beawareofinvasiveplantspecieswhenconstructingpaths. Impactonjobopportunitiesdependsonnatureofdevelopment;reduce accessibilityrelatedbarrierstoemployment. Opportunityforimprovedpublictransportfacilitiesintowncentres. Mightwanttoimproveontheideaofmakingsettlements"capableofbeing servedbyabusroute". Therightbusroutescouldimproveaccessibilityofgreenspaces. Couldbemoreexplicitaboutconvenience/easeofusebydisabledand vulnerablepeople. Potentialtoencouragefreightmovementforexisting/newbusinesses. Uncertaintiesdependonthenatureofanydevelopment/infrastructure requirements.Thefollowingneedtobeconsideredinrelationtoanynew facilities:thehistoricenvironment;ensureanydevelopmentdoesnot adverselyimpacttowncentres;avoidadverseeffectsonbiodiversity (includingthroughappropriateassessment);beawareofinvasivespecies. Mitigation/enhancementmeasuresincludeSUDSetcandwalkingroutesto anynewstations Couldbemoreexplicitabouthowvisualimpactwillbedealtwithinrelation todesignatedlandscapesandthehistoricenvironment. CouldincludesupportforWiMAX,whichwouldcontributetocriteriarelating toincreasedjobopportunities;economicdiversification;enablingdisabled andvulnerablepeopletoliveindependently;promotingregenerationinthe mostdeprivedareas;andachievingmixedusedevelopments. 51
Option20 (sustainable transport)
Option21 (publictransport)
Option22 (railnetwork)
Option23 (telecommunications infrastructureand integratingnew technologyinto development)
4.Results
Option Issuesraised/mitigation Howcanweconserveandenhancethenaturalenvironment? Option26 (greenbelt) Option27 (ecosystemsand habitatnetworks) Option28 (waste management) Ensurepolicyprotectsthehistoricenvironment.Useofmeasuressuchas SUDS. Opportunitytoincludereducingtheimpactofnonnativespeciesinthe policy. Wordpolicytoaddresslandscapeimpact.
Newprovisioncouldbedirectedtoareaswithvacant/derelictsitesorgreen spacesthatareunderused/subjecttovandalismorantisocialbehaviour. Allotmentcanbedesignedtobewildlifefriendlywecouldspecifythis. Option29 Potentialforgardenerstousepesticides/weedkillerthatcouldgetinto (allotmentsandlocal watersupply.Recommendorganicallotments. foodproduction) Locateallotmentstoconnectexistingareasofhabitat. Couldrequirenativespeciesonly. Encourageaccessibilitybyactive/publicmodesoftransport. Option30 (accessingthe natural environment) Option31 (maintenanceof openspaceinnew development) Option32 (conservationareas) Option35 (development density) Option36 (infillandbackland development) Couldidentifyareaswhereactivetravelroutesneedimprovingandpossibly deliverthemthroughnewdevelopment. Biodiversityimpactdependshownewgreenspacesaredesigned Newgreenspacesshouldtakeaccountoftheintegratedhabitatnetwork dataandcontributetofillingthegaps. Maintenanceregimeshouldtakeintoaccountpromotionandconnectivityof theCentralScotlandGreenNetwork;biodiversity,includinghabitat connectivityandinvasivespecies;soilandwaterquality;andcomposting.
Howcanweconserveandenhancethebuiltenvironment? Suggestincludinghowbiodiversityinoldbuildingswillbeaddressed Considerthenaturalenvironment,particularlybiodiversityandaccessto greenspaceinsettingdensitiesfordevelopment Considerbiodiversityinpolicycriteria
4.7
Monitoring
ProposalsformonitoringthelikelyimpactsoftheLocalDevelopmentPlanwillbeproducedatthe ProposedPlanstage.
52
5.Nextsteps
5.
Nextsteps
Publicconsultation
5.1
TheMainIssuesReportandthisenvironmentalreportaresubjecttopublicconsultationfrom 10Januaryto11March2011.Pleasesubmitanycommentsinwritingto: JulieHamilton,DevelopmentServiceManager ServicetoCommunities,ClackmannanshireCouncil Kilncraigs,GreensideStreet,Alloa,FK101EB. or devplan@clacks.gov.uk
5.2
Nextstagesintheplanmakingprocess
FollowingpublicconsultationontheMainIssuesReport,aProposedLocalDevelopmentPlanwillbe produced.TheProposedPlanwillbesubjecttoSEA;theProposedPlananditsEnvironmental ReportareexpectedtobeavailableforpublicconsultationfromaroundAugust2011.
53
References
ClackmannanshireCouncil(2010),ClackmannanshireLocalDevelopmentPlanMainIssuesReport. Thiswillbeavailableonwww.clacksweb.org.uk,pendingCouncilapproval. LandUseConsultants(2008),ClackmannanshireLocalPlan1stAlterationConsultativeDraft EnvironmentReport.Availableat http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Environment/SustainableDevelopment/14587/SEAG,last accessed01/12/10 LandUseConsultants(2009),ClackmannanshireLocalPlan1stAlterationFinalisedDraft(Housing Land)EnvironmentalReport.Availableat http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Environment/SustainableDevelopment/14587/SEAG,last accessed01/12/10. LandUseConsultants(2010),ClackmannanshireMainIssuesReportSiteAppraisal.Thiswillbe availableonwww.clacksweb.org.uk,pendingCouncilapproval.
54

October2013
Appendix2:Consultationauthorities' commentsontheMainIssuesReport EnvironmentalReport

Consultationauthorities'(CAs)commentsontheMainIssuesReportEnvironmentalReportwerecirculatedtotheplannersworkingontheProposedPlan,sothat commentsrelatingtoparticularsitesandpoliciescouldbeincorporatedintheProposedPlan,theScheduleofSitesand/ortheActionProgramme. ThistableliststhecommentsthatrecommendchangestotheEnvironmentalReportortotheSEAapproach,andexplaintheactionthathasbeentakeninresponseto them. CA Comment Actiontaken
AlthoughtherequirementformitigationmeasuresisidentifiedwithintheEnvironmentalReport,in ordertoensurethatproposalsareimplementeditisimportantthatthemeasuresrequiredareclearly Mitigationmeasuresaresetoutinthe detailedandreferenceismadetothemechanismsofimplementation,whentheywouldberequired SEPA andwhowillberequiredtoimplementthem.Assuranceshouldbeprovidedthatthemeasureswillbe Environmentalreportandhavebeenincluded intheActionProgramme takenforwardanditwouldbehelpfulfortheSEAStatementtoincludethisinformation.Ifarevised EnvironmentalReportispreparedthenitwouldalsobehelpfultosetoutdetailedinformationon mitigationmeasures. YoumaywishtoupdatethelistofplanstoincludetheScotlandsZeroWastePlan(ZWP)2010which replacestheNationalWasteStrategy(NWS)1999,NationalWastePlan(NWP)2003andthearea wasteplans.ThePlansobjectiveistoachieveazerowasteScotland,wherewemakethemost SEPA efficientuseofresourcesbyminimisingScotlandsdemandonprimaryresources,andmaximisingthe reuse,recyclingandrecoveryofresourcesinsteadoftreatingthemaswaste.However,wenote referencestotheZeroWastePlanhavebeenmadethroughouttheEnvironmentalReportand consideredintheMIR.
Tableofenvironmentalprotectionobjectives fromotherplans,programmesandstrategies updatedtoincludetheobjectivetotheZero WastePlantoprovidewastemanagement facilitiesforallwaste.
CA
Comment
Actiontaken
FloodingwasrecognisedasanimportantconsiderationinthepreparationoftheMIR,inthe assessmentofthespatialstrategyandtheindividualsiteassessment.Thereisaclearsteertowardsa moreproactiveapproachtofloodriskmanagementwithinthenewFloodRiskManagement ClackmannanshireCounciliscollating SEPA (Scotland)Actandplanninghasacrucialroleinreducingoverallfloodrisk.Thisisclearlyrecognisedin information,inconjunctionwithSEPA,toput togetherahazardmapforfloodrisk Appendix2oftheEnvironmentalReport.Wewelcomethisandgenerallyconsiderthatfloodriskhas beentakenintoaccountintheassessment,howeverwewouldhaveexpectedadditionalbaseline informationonfloodriskfortheLDPareatobedescribedintheEnvironmentalReport. WerecommendedatscopingstagethataStrategicFloodRiskAssessment(SFRA)becarriedoutto informandsupporttheLDPprocess.ASFRAwouldcomprisethecollationofallexistingandreadily availablefloodriskinformationtoenableacomprehensiveunderstandingofthefloodriskinthearea andtoidentifyareaswhicharefreefromtheriskoffloodingandthereforesuitableforfuture development,areastoavoidorwheredevelopmentmaybeconstrained.TheSFRAwouldhave allowedtheMIRtoidentifybroadareaswhereconsiderationofpotentialfloodriskor mitigation/managementmeasureswillberequiredinorderthatfuturefloodingproblemsarenot SEPA createdbynewdevelopment.ASFRAwouldhaveidentifiedallareasatriskfromfloodingfromall sourcesasrequiredbytheFloodRiskManagementAct.TheSFRAcouldhavehighlightedwhereflood riskissueswouldneedtoformpartofastrategicdevelopmentapproache.g.AlloaorTillicoultry.This strategicapproachcouldsupporttheconstructionofFloodPreventionSchemesorhighlighttheneed foranyoverarchingmasterplansofareastoavoidadhocdevelopmentwhichmaylimitfuture opportunitiestoresolveexistingfloodingissues.Itwouldalsopreventapiecemealapproachto mitigationwhichhasthepotentialtoincreasetheriskoffloodingelsewhere.
AlthoughaStrategicFloodRiskAssessment hasnotbeencarriedout,thepreparationof theProposedPlanhastakenaccountofthe SEPAfloodmapandinputfrombothCouncil sourcesandSEPA,withtheresultthatsome siteshavenotbeenincludedintheplan.A FloodRiskAssessmentisincludedinthe DevelopmentRequirementsforsitesthatare consideredtobeatriskofflooding;the WaterSGoutlinestherequirementsforthis.
CA
Comment Wenotethatascoringapproachwasusedforthecollationofassessmentresults.Pleasenotethatin linewiththeguidanceprovidedintheSEAtoolkit,whenassessingoverallimpactitisnotdesirableto addupscoresacrossanassessmentanditisnotappropriatetooffsetnegativeandpositiveeffectsin ordertodeterminelikelysignificance.
Actiontaken
SEPA Weconsiderthattotallingnegativeandpositivescorescouldpotentiallybeoffsettingnegativeeffects ononeSEAtopicwithpositiveeffectsonanotherSEAtopic,asanexample,positiveeffectson materialassetscouldbeoffsettingnegativeeffectsonfloodrisk.Wethereforeconsiderthatthe findingsofthecollationoftheassessmentresultsshouldbeusedwithcautionandplanningdecisions shouldbebasedonafullunderstandingofwhattheimpactsareontheindividualaspectsofthe environment,fromindividualsites. WenotethattheoptionswereassessedfortheirimpactsonallSEAtopicsandinterrelationships betweentheseissues,aswellasthesecondary,cumulativeandsynergisticimpacts,longandshort termsimpactsandtemporaryandpermanentimpacts.Wewouldhavewelcomedfurtherdiscussion onthepotentialforcumulativeeffectsandacleardescriptionofthepotentialforcumulativeeffects arisingfromtheproposedandpreferredoptionstobeincludedintheEnvironmentalReport.Itwould SEPA havebeenparticularlyhelpfultosummarisethefindingsoftheassessmentinrelationtothe cumulativeandsynergisticeffectswithintheEnvironmentalReportandlinksignificantcumulative effectsarisingfromeachofthecomponentsoftheplanwiththeproposedmitigationmeasures.It wouldalsohaveprovidedanopportunitytoconsiderthecumulativeeffectsoftheallocationsmaking uptheGrowthandSpatialStrategyoptions.
Thisapproachhasnotbeenusedinthe ProposedPlanEnvironmentalReport
Cumulativeimpactshavebeenbetter describedintheProposedPlan EnvironmentalReport
SEPA
Wenotethatpoliciesandcriteriawillneedtobeinplacetomitigatelocalimpacts,includingspecific mitigationmeasuresatsitelevel.
Mitigationmeasureshavebeenincorporated intopoliciesandsuplementaryguidance,and intotheActionProgrammeandScheduleof Sites
CA
Comment
Actiontaken
TheassessmentofthemainissuesinrelationtoClimateChangeSustainableFloodManagement highlightsthepotentialbeneficialeffectsofthepreferredOption5(a)andwegenerallyagreewiththe findings.However,weconsiderthatthepotentialforpositiveeffectswouldbesignificantlyenhanced iftheprimarymitigationmeasureidentifiedfordevelopmentinGreenfieldsitesatriskoffloodingis avoidance.Avoidanceofdevelopmentatfloodriskandinthefunctionalfloodplainrepresentsthe mostsustainablesolutionintermsofsustainablefloodmanagement.Planning,andparticularlylocal developmentplanning,hasacrucialroletoplayinensuringthatdueweightisaffordedtofloodrisk Noted SEPA and,whereverpossible,unnecessaryrisksareavoided.Newdevelopmentshouldnotleadtoan increaseinfloodriskortotheneedforadditionalfloodalleviationorpreventionmeasuresandnew propertiesshouldbefullyinsurable.Thereisalsoabenefittotheenvironmentandbiodiversityin adoptinganavoidanceofriskprinciple.Avoidingdevelopmentuptotheedgesofawatercourseis consistentwithmaintainingwatercourserivercorridorsmaintainingpathwaysforwildlifeand biodiversity.Theuseoffloodriskmitigationmeasuresotherthanavoidancemaybeappropriatefor Brownfielddevelopmentbutdevelopmentmaybeconstrainedatsitesifadequatefloodrisk mitigationcannotbeprovided. TheassessmentofthemainissuesinrelationtoClimateChangeappearstohaveonlylimitedeffects ontheSEAtopicsoil.WerecommendedatscopingstagethattheSEAcriteriashouldincludethe considerationoftheprotectionofpeatresourcesandwenoticethattheMIRreferstotheprotection SEPA ofcarbonrichpeatlandfromunnecessarydevelopmentasanimportantaspectofreducingclimate changeimpacts.Weconsiderthatthereiscurrentlyagapwithinthepreferredoptionsinrelationto theprotectionofcarbonrichsoilsandweconsiderthatthepreferredoptionscouldbefurther enhancedwithaspecificreferencetotheprotectionandenhancementofcarbonrichsoils.
Carbonrichsoilshavebeenincludedin assesmentcriteriaforsitesandpolicy elementsoftheProposedPlan.Carbonrich soilsareincludedinthe"significantSoil Resources"policy
CA
Comment
Actiontaken
TheassessmentofthemainissuesinrelationtoEcosystemsandHabitatNetworkshighlightsthe potentialbeneficialeffectsofthepreferredOption27(a)andwegenerallyagreewiththefindings. However,weconsiderthatthepotentialforpositiveeffectswouldbesignificantlyenhancedifa specificreferencetoensuringthatthewaterenvironmentwithintheLDPareawillbesafeguarded fromdeteriorationandrestoredtogoodstatusisincluded.TheLDPcouldemphasisetherequirement SEPA fornewdevelopmenttocontributetothedeliveryofthetargetsandactionsintheRiverBasin ManagementPlanfortheScotlandRiverBasinDistrictandtheForthAreaManagementPlan,interms ofbothprotectingandimprovingthewaterenvironment.Pleasenotethatpublicbodieswhoseplans andactivitiesarelikelytoimpactonthewaterenvironment,shouldaimtosecurecompliancewith theobjectivesoftheRiverBasinManagementPlans,astheycarryouttheirnormalstatutory functions. TheassessmentofthemainissuesinrelationtoWastehighlightsthepotentialfornegativeeffectson materialassets(waste)ofthepreferredOption28(a).However,weconsiderthatthecommitment underthepreferredoptiontoidentifypossiblelocationsforwastemanagementfacilitieswithinthe LDPhasthepotentialforpositiveeffectsonmaterialsassetsasitcontributestotheobjectivesofthe ZeroWastePlan.Thepositiveeffectsonmaterialassets(waste)couldalsobefurtherenhancedifthe SEPA preferredoptionforDecentralisedEnergyincludesaspecificreferencetoenergyfromwaste.The effectsofthepreferredoptionsforBusinessParksandIndustrialEstates,andGreenBusinesson materialsassets(waste)couldalsobefurtherenhancediftheuseofindustrialandemploymentland forwastemanagementfacilitieswasencouragedandwastemanagementfacilitieswereincludedin thegroupinggreenbusiness,inlinewithScottishPlanningPolicyandtheZeroWastePlan,andZero WastePlanAnnexB. Wewelcometable4.11highlightingthesitesunsuitablefordevelopmentfollowedbythe SEPA recommendationthatthisgroupofsitesisrejected.Wesupportthisasamitigationmeasuretoavoid significantenvironmentaleffects
Noted
Noted
Noted
CA
Comment
Actiontaken
BusinessSite126StirlingMillsOutletVillageisidentifiedthroughtheenvironmentalassessmentas havingoverridingconstraintsonfloodriskandtheSEArecommendsthatispartofthegroupof rejectedsites.Weagreewiththesefindingsandrecommendationshoweverwenotethatthissitehas beenincludedintheMIRasapotentialadditionalsite.Accordingtotheinformationwehold,we SEPA considerthatthemajorityofthissiteislikelytobewithinthe1:200yearfluvialfloodoftheRiver Devon.Weconsiderthatthedevelopmentofthissitemayresultinsignificantadverseeffectsin relationtofloodrisk.Inordertoavoidsignificantadverseeffectsonfloodingwewouldrecommend thatasamitigationmeasure,thissiteisnotincludedinthefinalplan. Site80DumyatBusinessParkPhase2andSite151GarvelFarmhavebeenidentifiedinthe EnvironmentalReportashavinganoverridingconstraintfromfloodriskandareincludedinTable 4.11sitesunsuitablefordevelopment.Werecommendthatthefindingsandrecommendations SEPA withintheSEAaretakenintoaccountinthepreparationofthefinalplan.Inordertoavoidsignificant adverseeffectsonfloodingwewouldrecommendthatthesitesidentifiedatsignificantfloodriskare notincludedinthefinalplan.Theprimarymitigationmeasureinrelationtofloodriskshouldbefood riskavoidanceinlinewiththeprinciplescontainedinSPPandtheFloodRiskManagementAct.
Noted
Noted
CA
Comment
Actiontaken
Othersitesarepartlywithinoradjacenttothefloodmapandmayalsobeatrisk,examplesinclude Sites18,23,24,25,43,49,99,101,118,138,131,141(Table4.3oftheEnvironmentalReport).We notethatmitigationmeasuresforthemajorityofthesesitesrefertotheneedtoprovideaFloodRisk Assessment(FRA).PotentialadditionalhousingsitesH56andH63shownintheMainIssuesReport mayalsobeatrisk(thesesiteshavenotbeenincludedintheSEA).Itmaybepossibletomitigateflood riskatsomeallocationsbyadequatedesignandlayouti.e.reducingthesizeofthesiteandtolimit Noted SEPA developmenttocertainareas,andfurtherstudieswillberequiredtoinformthisdecision.Forthese allocationsitisappropriatetorefertoadetailedFRAasameasuretoensurepotentialsignificant environmentaleffectsonfloodingareadequatelymitigated.Mitigationmeasuresshouldalso highlightthat,subjecttothefindingsoftheFRA,notallareaswithinthesiteboundarieswillbe availablefordevelopment.Werecommendthattheallocationtextintheplananddeveloper requirementsidentifyfloodriskasaconstraintandtheneedforaFRA,andhighlightthatnotallareas withinthesiteboundarieswillbeavailablefordevelopment. Thereareanumberofsettlementswherepressuresontheseweragenetworkcurrentlyexistsuchas Alloa,AlvaandDollaranddevelopmentintheseareashasthepotentialtoresultinadverseeffectson thewaterenvironment.Inordertoavoidsignificantadverseeffectsonthewaterenvironmentitis keytoensurethatsufficientcapacityisavailableatSTW,sewerageinfrastructureandthereceiving watercourses.Mitigationmeasuresforeachofthesettlementsshouldrefertotheneedtotakeinto Noted SEPA accountsewerinfrastructureandSTWcapacity,includeareferencetotheneedtoprevent proliferationofprivatewastewatertreatmentworks(asopposedtothosemanagedbyScottish Water)andfordeveloperstoseekadvicewiththeappropriateorganisations.Dueaccountshouldbe takentothecapacityofthewaterenvironment.Mitigationmeasuresshouldalsospecifythatthere shouldbenodeteriorationinthestatusofthewaterenvironmentasaresultofpointsourcepollution fromsewagedisposal.
CA
Comment
Actiontaken
Theincreasedpressurefromdevelopmentmaypresentchallengestoachievinggoodecologicalstatus andavoidingdeteriorationinstatusinlinewithWFDobjectives.Careshouldbetakentoensurethat alldevelopmentsareassessedtoensuretheycontributetothedeliveryofthetargetsandactionsin theRBMP.Pressuresonthewaterenvironmentinclude:physicalimpacts/engineeringworks(e.g.as SEPA aresultofurbandevelopmentorenergygeneration);diffusepollution(e.g.asaresultofurban developmentoractivitiessuchasforestry);pointsourcepollution(e.g.thecollectionandtreatment ofsewage);abstractionandflowregulation(e.g.asaresultofelectricitygenerationandwater supply);thepresenceofinvasivenonnativespecies. WenotethattheprovisionofSUDSisindentifiedasmitigationmeasureforsomeallocations.Please notethatSUDSarealegalrequirementandtheplanningsystemhasakeyroleinensuringthatland useproposalsareabletoincorporatethenecessarylevelofSUDSrequiredtopreventadverseeffects SEPA onthewaterenvironment.Itisimportantthatsitedesignandlayoutallowsforsufficientspaceto accommodatethenecessarySUDS.Youmaywishtoconsiderfurthermitigationmeasurestosupport andpromoteacoordinatedapproachtoSUDSandhowthiscanbetakenforwardwithintheLDP.
Siteshavebeenasessedtotakewater environmentissuesintoaccount
Noted.Drainageiscoveredinthe supplementaryguidanceonWater
Developmentcouldalsobringpositiveimpactstothewaterenvironmentthroughtheprovisionof newwastewatertreatmentfacilitiestoimprovewaterqualityorthroughaddressingphysicalchanges Noted SEPA whicharecausingadeteriorationtothewaterenvironmente.g.culverts,bankreinforcementor barrierstofishpassage.Wewouldwelcomeclearreferencewithintheproposedmitigationmeasures totheaboveissues.
CA
Comment Opportunitiesforenhancementofthewaterenvironmentshouldalsobeconsideredaspartofthe detailedsiteassessment.Asanexample,ifSite43Carsebridgeistakenforwardasapreferredoption, developmentcouldbedesignedinordertogenerateimprovementstotheriparianhabitatofthe BrothieBurn,includingtheremovaloftheexistingculvert.Thiscouldresultinanimprovementin statusofthewaterbodyandresultinanenhancementofthewaterenvironment.Pleasenotethat theexistingculvertwillneedtobeconsideredaspartofaFloodRiskAssessment.Thepotentialfor improvingthewaterenvironmentbyremovingtheculvertandrestoringthewatercoursecouldbe identifiedasanenhancementmeasureforthissiteandincludedasadevelopmentrequirement.
Actiontaken
SEPA
ForsitesaffectingwaterbodiesclassifiedunderWFD,aswellaspreventingthedeteriorationofthe waterenvironment,opportunitiesforenhancementshouldbeconsideredandthedeliveryofsomeof thesemeasuresidentifiedthroughtheRBMPprocessshouldbepromotedthroughthedevelopment process.PleasenotethatthesmallerwaterbodiesarenotclassifiedunderWFDandassuchhaveno specificmeasuresidentifiedthroughtheRBMPprocess.However,impactsonthesewaterbodies shouldalsobeavoidedandanyopportunitiesforenhancementshouldalsobeconsideredaspartof thedevelopment.
Siteshavebeenassessedtodetermine whethertheyofferopportunitiestoenhance thewaterenvironment
PleaserefertoourresponsetotheMIRfordetailedcommentsinrelationtothecurrentstatusofthe waterenvironmentandexistingpressures,whichincludeseweragenetworkcapacityissues,andhow SEPA thesepressuresmaybeaddressedbytheLDPtoavoidadverseeffectsonthewaterenvironment.We alsoprovidesomeadviceinrelationtoopportunitiesforenhancement. Pleasealsorefertoourcommentsaboveregardingtheprotectionofpeatlandandcarbonrichsoils. SEPA Furthermitigationmeasurescouldbeconsideredtoensuretheprotectionandenhancementof carbonrichsoils.
Noted
TheSignificantSoilResourcespolicyincludes protectionofcarbonrichsoils
CA
Comment
Actiontaken
InordertoensurethatthewaterenvironmentwithintheLDPareawillbesafeguardedfrom deteriorationandrestoredtogoodstatus,furthermitigationmeasurescouldbeconsideredtosecure ThesupplementaryguidanceonWater SEPA compliancewiththeobjectivesoftheRiverBasinManagementPlansandyoumaywishtoincludethis supportstheRBMP referenceunderOptions1GrowthStrategyand27EcosystemsandHabitatNetworks. WeconsidermitigationtobeacrucialpartofSEAinthatitoffersanopportunitytonotonlyaddress potentialadverseeffectsofaplan,butalsotomakeaplanevenmorepositivethanitalreadymaybe MitigationhasbeenincorporatedintoLDP (enhancementmeasures).Detaillevelmitigationisidentifiedthroughoutthedetailedassessmentof policies,supplementaryguidance,the SEPA theallocationsanditwouldhavebeenhelpfultoprovideintheEnvironmentalReportanindicationof ScheduleofSitesandtheActionProgramme. howthisisintendedtobetakenforwardintheLDPtoensurethatmeasuresareactually implemented. Wehaveprovidedsomedetailedcommentsonmitigationmeasuresforspecificallocationswithinour commentstotheassessmentfindingsabove.Wewouldparticularlydrawyourattentiontoour commentsregardingmitigationoffloodrisk.Themostappropriateformofmitigationforallocations wheresignificantadverseeffectshavebeenidentifiedisavoidanceandthismayresultinchangesto SEPA thepreferredallocations,i.e.theremovalofallocationsatsignificantfloodrisk.Wheredevelopment Noted islikelytobeabletobeaccommodatedbutthescalehastobedeterminedthroughadetailedflood riskassessmentthenclearreferencetotheneedfortheFRAshouldbeincludedinthedevelopment requirements.Theneedtoconsiderappropriateallowancesforclimatechangeshouldalsobe identifiedaspartofthemitigationmeasures
10
CA
Comment Asaresultoftheassessmentanumberofconstraintshavebeenidentifiedfordevelopmentand specificreferencetothemeasuresrequiredtomitigatepotentialadverseeffectsshouldbeprovided withintheLDP,e.g.theneedforwastewatertreatmentinfrastructuretosupportdevelopment.
Actiontaken
WeanticipatethatmitigationmeasureswillbedeliveredthroughtheLDPpolicies,Supplementary Guidanceandactionsand/orassociatedguidanceinPlanningBriefsandMasterplans,aswellas MitigationhasbeenincorporatedintoLDP through specific mitigation measures at site level. It is important to ensure that any SEAs undertaken policies,supplementaryguidance,the SEPA aspartofthedevelopmentofPoliciesandSupplementaryGuidanceareabletoincorporatematters ScheduleofSitesandtheActionProgramme. whichflowfromtheMIRSEA,particularlywheresignificanteffectshavebeenidentified.Youmayalso wishtoconsiderhowmitigationmeasurescouldbeincorporatedintotheActionPlanthat accompaniestheLDPandplanningBriefs/Masterplans.Inordertoensurethatthemitigation measuresaretakenforwardandthepotentialenvironmentaleffectsareavoidedwewould recommendthatthemitigationmeasuresaswellasanyopportunitiesforenhancementareclearly detailedinthesitedevelopmentrequirements.Wewouldwelcomeafirmcommitmenttothe proposedmitigationmeasuresandtheconsiderationofaclearmechanismfortheirimplementation. AlthoughwewelcomethebrevityoftheERwefoundtheCollationofAssessmentResultssection Thissectionhasnotbeenincludedinthe andassociatedtable3.6ratherdifficulttofollowandwehavesetoutsomeofthereasonswhybelow. ProposedPlanEnvironmentalReport
SNH
11
CA
Comment
Actiontaken Theenvironmentalreportsforneighbouring authorities'ProposedLDPshavebeen considered.However,sinceassessment resultstendnottobequantified,itisnot possibletomakeajudgementon transboundaryeffects,otherthantosaythat thelikelyimpactsofdevelopmentare expectedtobesimilaracrosslocal authorities,sotheywillaccumulate. Mitigationmeasuresareproposedtoaddres theimpactsofeachLocalDevelopmentPlan, sotheseshouldreducethecumulative impact.
PerthandKinrossLDPandFifeCouncilLDPshouldbetakenintoaccountwhenassessingcross SNH boundaryeffectsandshouldbeincludedundertheLocalPPS/EnvironmentalProtectionObjectives page69ofERappendix2.
Para2insection3.1statesthatthe'interrelationshipbetweenthese(SEA)issueswerealso considered,asweresecondary,cumulativeandsynergisticimpacts,longandshorttermimpactsand SNH temporaryandpermanentimpacts.Itisnotclearhoweverwheretheseimpactshavebeenreported onintheER.Theseeffectswillbeeasiertoassessingreaterdetailattheproposedplanstageandwe wouldhopethattheresultsofthatassessmentwillbeclearlysetout.
Theseresultsaremoreclearlysetoutinthe ProposedPlanEnvironmentalReport
TheERappearstolimittheconsiderationofsoilimpactstovacantandderelictlandonly.Thislimited approachdoesnotproperlyconsiderthevalueofhighcarbonsoilforScotlandassetoutintheSG SNH ScottishSoilFramework.WethereforesuggestthatthefollowingcriteriaDoesthesiteinclude carbonrichsoil?isaddedtotheexistingobjectivesandcriterialistedintheER.
Carbonrichsoilshavebeenincludedin assesmentcriteriaforsitesandpolicy elementsoftheProposedPlan.Carbonrich soilsareincludedinthe"significantSoil Resources"policy
12
CA
Comment UnnotifiedGCRsitesnotincludedwithinSSSIsdonotappeartobeincludedinSEAcriteriaand assessments.WewouldsuggestthatarevisedERshouldconsidertheimpactoftheplanon geodiversity.AkeypartofthiswillbetofirstidentifythenotifiedandUnnotifiedGCRsitesinthe area.Theseareasfollows 2unnotifiedGCRsitesinClackmannanshire. GCR3102MineralogyofScotlandALVAMINE,ALVA
Actiontaken
SNH GCR2509OldRedSandstoneIgneousSHERIFFMUIRROADTO MENSTRIEBURN 1GCRsiteincludedwithinGeologicalSSSI(MillGlen) GCR2504OldRedSandstoneIgneousTILLICOULTRY 1GCRsiteincludedwithinmixedSSSI(DollarGlen) GCR1383CarboniferousPermianIgneousGLOOMHILL,DOLLAR WhenrevisingtheERfortheproposedplanstage,wesuggestthatanadditionalsectionbeinserted beforetable4.3brieflyexplainingassessmentmethodologyandalsoabriefintroductiontotable4.3.
ImpactsonGCRsiteshavebeenaddedtosite appraisals.Thisinformationhasbeen includedinthe"Clackmannanshire's Environment"sectionoftheEnvironmental Report.
SNH
Thistablehasnotbeenincludedinthe ProposedPlanEnvironmentalReport
ManyoftheSEAobjectivesarealsorelevantandapplicableatthesitelevel.Wesuggestyouconsider whichoftheSEAobjectivescouldalsohelpfullyformpartofthesiteappraisals.Itwouldalsobe SNH helpfulifyougaveabriefexplanationofhowthecriteriaintable3.3relatetotheSEAobjectives,or perhapsyoucouldconsidernestingthesiteappraisalcriteriaundereachSEAobjective. GiventheimportancetheMIRgivestotheCentralScotlandGreenNetworkapproach,wesuggest SNH thatanadditionalsuitablecriteriaforTable3.3wouldbeDoesthesiteimpactontheconnectivityof theCSGN?
SeeAppendix5.
Thiscriterionhasbeenaddedtosite assessments
13
CA
Comment
Actiontaken
Itisnotclearwhatthepurposeofthe4thcolumnofTable2.2(ImplicationsforClackmannanshire LDP)AheadingsuchasHowproblemsmightbeaddressedintheLDPmightmakeitspurposemore SNH obvious.IntermsofarevisedER,wesuggestthiscolumnshouldmakeclearhowtheLDPmight addresstheproblemssetoutinthetableandwhatthelimitationsoftheLDPare.Forexamplethe LDPwillhavelittleremitinimprovingthenaturalheritageoffarmedareas.
ThistableisnotincludedintheProposed PlanEnvironmentalReport
WenoteinthetablesinAppendix7and8thatthelistofcriteriaagainstwhichtheimpactsofthe policyoptionsareassessedincludeanumberofnonenvironmentalrelatedcriteria.Itisimportant thatanypositivescoresfromthesesocioeconomiccriteriaarenotoffsetagainstnegativefindings SNH fromenvironmentalimpacts.WhiletheSEAobjectivesarehighlightedingreen,itisimportantin assessingcumulativeimpactsthatitistheenvironmentalimpactsthatareassessedonly.SEAisabout assessingtheenvironmentalimpactsofaplanandnotthesocioeconomicones,howeverimportant thoseimpactsmightbeintermsoftheplanasawhole.
Positivescoresfromsocioeconomic objectiveswerenotusedtooffsetnegative findingsfromenvironmentalimpactson policyoptions;thesecriteriaweresolelyused toensurethepoliciesandsupplementary guidancecomplywiththeplanvision.Forthe avoidanceofconfusion,socioeconomic criteriahavebeenremovedfromthe matricesthatarepresentedintheProposed planEnvironmentalReport. ThistableisnotincludedintheProposed PlanEnvironmentalReport
SNH AclearerexplanationofthequartilestructurewouldbehelpfulinthenextiterationoftheER.
ItwouldbeusefultoincludeintheERalistoftheNaturalHeritagedesignationsinthePlanarea, includingthe10SSSIs,FirthofForthRamsarsite,FirthofForthSPA,LocalNatureReserveand SNH CountryPark(GartmornDam)detailedinformationonthesecanbefoundunderourSiteLinkpageon thefollowingpagehttp://www.snh.org.uk/snhi/ Site43:AWIlongestablishedplantationorigintoeasternandboundary.MitigationmeasureProtect andprovideadditionalbufferplantingtothisexistingwoodlandarea.
Thisinformationhasbeenincludedin the"Clackmannanshire'sEnvironment" sectionoftheEnvironmentalReport.
SNH
Noted
14
CA
Comment Site50GubberHill:AWIlongestablishedplantationorigintoeasternboundary.Mitigationmeasure Protectandprovideadditionalbufferplantingtothisexistingwoodlandarea.
Actiontaken
SNH
Noted
Site68:AWIlongestablishedplantationoriginwhichmayencroachinsidethesitetowestern SNH boundary.MitigationmeasureProtectandprovideadditionalappropriatebufferplantingtothis existingwoodlandarea. Site145isintheAGLV.DevelopmentBriefshouldberequiredthatensuresthatproposalsdonot damagethespecialqualitiesoftheAGLV. Site155:adjacentto25acrewoodMitigationmeasure;bufferplantingbetweenAWIsiteand proposedsite.
Noted
SNH
Noted
SNH
Noted
Site158BessieMine:noconstraintsarerecordedintheappraisal.Thesiteassessmentstatesthisis SNH nearlyallwoodlandandthatproposedusesshouldnotimpactonthis,butthiswillprobablybe difficulttoachieve.Recommendthissiteisreassessedintermsofitsecologicalvalue.
Noted
HS
TheConstraintsMapdoesnotidentifyanyculturalheritageassets,otherthanConservationAreas.We stillconsiderthatwithintheERitwouldbehelpfultoprovideseparatemapsshowingthebaseline Themaphasbeenupdatedtoincludelisted buildingsandscheduledmonuments dataforthehistoricenvironmentinrelationtothecurrentsituationandinrelationtotheproposed landallocations. Werecognisethattheculturalheritageobjectivehasbeenbrokendownfurtherthroughtheinclusion ofquestions,whichrelatetowhetheranydevelopmentwouldimpactonculturalheritageassets.You Bothdirectandindirectimpactsare maywanttoincludereferencetothepotentialfordirectandindirectimpactswithinthesequestions consideredthroughtheSEA fortheavoidanceofdoubt.
HS
15
CA
Comment Site22(AlloaParkB1) Referenceshouldbemadewithintheappraisaltabletoidentifytheproximityofthissitetothe scheduledmonumentknownasParkmill,crossslab,360mNof(Indexno.3016).Inrelationto mitigation,referencecouldbemadetoprotectionofthemonumentduringanyconstructionworks. Site25(CarsebridgeRoadNorthB4) Inadditiontothepotentialforimpactsonthesettingofthelistedbuildingswhichisreferredto,we wouldsuggestthatreferencealsobemadetotheneedforconsiderationofthepotentialfordirect impactsonthelistedbuildingswithinthedevelopmentsite(CarsebridgeHouseHBno.21022,and PillarHBno.21024).Adevelopmentbriefwouldbeausefultoolforthissite. WenotethattheproposalsformonitoringthelikelyimpactsoftheLDPwillbeproducedatthe ProposedPlanstage.PleaserefertoourcommentscontainedwithinourScopingresponsedated24 February2010. [Iwelcometheinclusionofthenumberoflistedbuildingsreusedorconvertedasanindicator.Inote youhaveproposedtousethenumberoflistedbuildings,scheduledmonuments,gardensand designedlandscapesandconservationareasasindicatorsofthehistoricenvironment.These statisticalindicatorscouldbeaffectedbymorethantheLocalPlan.Forexample,listinghistoric buildingsisanongoingprocess,whichmeansthatthenumbersoflistedbuildingscanchange. Similarly,ancientmonumentsmaybescheduledonanadhocbasis.Theotherindicatorwhichrelates to%ofplanningapplicationsonalistedbuilding,conservationareaorscheduledmonumentrefused orwithdrawnwouldbemoreappropriateformonitoring,however,youmaywishtoconsider includingthenumberofapplicationsapprovedwheresignificanteffectswerepredicted.Iwouldbe happytodiscussthesewithyoufurtherifthatwouldbehelpful.]
Actiontaken
HS
Noted
HS
Noted
HS
HistoricScotlandhavebeenconsultedonthe monitoringproposalsputforwardinthe ProposedPlanEnvironmentalReport.
16
CA
Comment Appendix2oftheERidentifiestheplans,programmesandstrategieswhichareofrelevanceforthe ClackmannanshireLDP.ReferencetoPassedtotheFutureandNPPG5shouldberemovedinlightof thefollowing: ScottishPlanningPolicy(2010)supersedestheoriginalindividualSPPdocuments,includingSPP23 (PlanningandtheHistoricEnvironment).NPPG5and18havealsobeensuperseded. ScottishHistoricEnvironmentPolicy(SHEP)outlinesScottishMinisterspoliciesontheHistoric EnvironmentandisproducedbyHistoricScotland.SHEPsupersedesthepolicyelementsofPassed totheFuture.
Actiontaken Noted.ScottishPlanningPolicyandScottish HistoricEnvironmentPolicyarealready includedinthereviewofplans,programmes andstaretgies.Appendix2willnotbe includedintheProposedPlanEnvironmental Report,sowillnotbeamended.
HS
17

October2013
Appendix3:Blankassessmentmatrix

ThefollowingmatrixwasusedtoassessthelikelyenvironmentalimpactsofthepolicyelementsoftheProposedLocalDevelopmentPlan. CriteriashadedingreenareSEAobjectives;thesehavebeenmappedagainsttheStrategicObjectivesoftheproposedplan.Criteriashadedinwhiterelate tothesocioeconomicobjectivesoftheproposedplan;althoughpolicieswereassessedagainstthesecriteriaatthesametimeasbeingassessedagainst SEAobjectives,thesocioeconomicimpactshavenotbeenincludedorconsideredinthisEnvironmentalReport. Ticksareenteredintothethreecentralcolumnstoindicatewhetherthepolicyislikelytocontributeto,conflictwith,orhavenoimpactontheSEA/Vision objective.Theseassessmentsaresupportedbyanexplanationinthe"Comments"column;andanyproposedmeasurestomitigateorenhancethepolicy's impactsaredescribedinthe"Mitigation/enhancement"column.
Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Mitigation / enhancement
Comments
1 1a
Setting a Clear Framework for Positive Change Regenerate Clackmannanshire's town centres New development offers opportunity to contribute to regeneration of existing neighbourhoods
1b
Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
Sustainable Economic Growth Promote economic regeneration, business growth, improved employment opportunities and economic diversification Support the development of tourism Environmental Sustainability Prevent any significant increase in Clackmannanshires greenhouse gas emissions Reduce greenhouse gas emissions
2a
2b 3
3a
3b
Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3c
Improve energy conservation and efficiency throughout Clackmannanshire Increase the proportion of energy generated from renewable sources Enable expansion of woodland cover Protect carbon-rich soils from disturbance or loss Improve Clackmannanshire's resilience to climate change Reduce overall flood risk in a sustainable way
3d
3e 3f
3g
3h
Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3i
Contribute to the mitigation of floods and droughts Keep air pollution below Local Air Quality Management thresholds Prevent deterioration and enhance the status of the water environment Achieve good ecological status Reduce water pollution Promote sustainable water use
3j
3k
3l 3m 3n
Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3o
Reduce contamination and safeguard soil quantity and quality Minimise waste generation Maximise recycling and composting Dispose of residual waste efficiently and sustainably New Homes and Supporting Population Growth Allocation of sites that are capable of contributing to Clackmannanshires housing needs in a sustainable way
3p 3q 3r 4
4a
Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
4b
Housing development achieves a maximum appropriate intensity of use and minimises unnecessary loss of agricultural and forestry land and open space Community Cohesion Our communities are more cohesive and inclusive Our communities are safer Health and Wellbeing Improve health and reduce health inequalities
5 5a 5b 6 6a
Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
Natural Environment Encourage promotion and connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network within and linking beyond Clackmannanshire Further the conservation of biodiversity Avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site Maintain and enhance the populations of European Protected Species, including protection of their resting places
7a
7b
7c
7d
Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7e
Protect and enhance SSSIs Protect and enhance priority species and habitats in Clackmannanshire Increase habitat connectivity and ecosystem function to assist local biodiversity in response to climate change Reduce the impact of invasive species Protect and enhance the distinctive character of the landscape and ensure new development does not exceed the capacity of the landscape to accommodate it
7f
7g
7h
7i
Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7j
Protect and enhance areas designated for their national or local landscape importance e.g. AGLVs Protect and enhance geodiversity, particularly in geological Sites of Special Scientific Interest Safeguard green belt from inappropriate development Safeguard open space from inappropriate development Built Environment
7k
7l
7m
Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8a
New neighbourhoods are well designed, peoplecentred and promote mixed uses and sustainable lifestyles Vacant and derelict land is given preference over greenfield sites for new development Priority is given to remediation of contaminated land Protect and, where appropriate, enhance the historic environment Sustainable Transport and Accessibility
8b
8c
8d
10
Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
9a
Reduce the environmental impact of travel
11
Thefollowingtableshowsthesymbolsusedintheassessment:
Contributes
Noimpact
?
Conflicts
ContributestotheSEAobjective StronglycontributestotheSEAobjective ConflictswiththeSEAobjective StronglyconflictswiththeSEAobjective HasnoimpactontheSEAobjective LikelyimpactontheSEAobjectiveisuncertainatthisstage
12

October2013
Appendix4:Policydevelopmentprocess

FollowingconsultationontheMainIssuesReport,aproformawascreatedtoguidethe developmentofpoliciesfortheProposedPlan,ensuringthatallrelevantinformation (includingstrategicenvironmentalassessment)wastakenintoaccount. Thisappendixcontainsacopyoftheproformaandtheguidancenotesthataccompaniedit, plusabriefingnotewrittenbytheSustainabilityofficerwhichsetsouthowtheSEAshould beintegratedintotheplanmakingprocess. PolicieselementsoftheProposedLocalDevelopmentPlanweresubjecttopeerreview duringtheirdevelopment:draftpolicieswereassessedagainsttheSEAobjectives,then discussedandchallengedbya"coordinators'group",whomaderecommendationsforhow theyshouldberevised;followingrevisiontothepolicy,itwasdiscussedagainandeither agreedorrevised(andassessedanddiscussed)again.Followingagreement,policieswere revisedbyan"editinggroup",whichaimedtoensurethatthepolicieswereconsistentin style,withoutchangingtheirmeaning.Oncepolicieswerefinalised,theywereassessed againagainsttheSEAobjectives.
TOPIC:Nameoftopic/policy BACKGROUNDCONSIDERATIONS(legislation,guidance,plans,monitoringstatement,etc.) Documentname/title,locationofrelevantinformationandlinkifavailable Summaryofrelevantinformation CONSULTEE EVIDENCE Name/positionofconsultee Information/outcome/recommendationand linkifavailable RELATIONSHIPTOSCCS AnyrelationshiptotheSCCSvisionandpriorities RELATIONSHIPTOSOA AnyrelationshiptotheSOApriorityoutcomesandactionareas CONTRIBUTIONTOTHELDPVISION HowthispolicycontributestotheLDPVision LINKSTOMIRREPRESENTATIONS Name/representationnumber Extractorlinkifavailable LINKSTOMIRSEAREPRESENTATIONS Name/representationnumber Extractorlinkifavailable FURTHERINFORMATIONREQUIRED Consulteetobecontacted Informationsought EXISTINGPOLICYANALYSIS PolicyNumber Analysis/critiqueofpolicystrengths/weaknesses ANALYSIS/SUMMARY Analysis/Summaryofthepertinentpointsfromtheinformationabove SUPPORTINGTEXTANDGRAPHICS Supportingtextandgraphics(whichmaybeincludedintheLDP) POLICY Policywording SPATIALELEMENT Maporlinktomapifrequired LIKELYTOPICFORFUTURESPG? RationaleforconsideringfurtherSPGforthistopic. 2
ACTIONPROGRAMME Actionsrequiredtosuccessfullyimplementthepolicy. RELATIONSHIPTOOTHERPOLICIES Namesofanyotherpolicieswhichmaybelinked/closelyrelated LIKELYENVIRONMENTALIMPACTS SummarisethelikelyenvironmentalimpactsidentifiedbytheSEAof(a)thedraftpolicyand (b)thefinalisedpolicy POLICYCHANGESFOLLOWINGSEA AnychangeswhichweremadetothePolicyfollowingSEA LIKELYIMPACTONSPA AnyimpactthePolicymayhaveontheSPAandevidencerequiredforHRA/AA MONITORINGINDICATORS Whatindicatorscouldbeusedtomonitorthispolicy COMPLETIONDATE Anticipateddatethepolicywillbecompleted
GUIDANCENOTESFORCOMPLETINGTHELDPPROPOSEDPLANPROFORMA
ThenotesbelowgiveguidanceoncompletingtherelevantsectionsoftheLDPproforma. BACKGROUNDCONSIDERATIONS The background considerations section should include references to any legislation, guidance, plans, etc. which need to be considered when formulating a policy on the particular topic. It should also include a summary of the environmental impacts and mitigation measures identified in the MIR SEA. It can include details from the monitoring statementandanyotherrelevantbackgroundpapers.Itdoesnotneedtobeexhaustive,but shouldhighlightthemainpointsandissueswhichshouldbeaddressed.Thedocumentname or title should be recorded along with a link to the relevant information, e.g. page and paragraph number. The information should then be summarised and, if possible, a link providedtothefulltext. CONSULTEE If you have consulted with anyone else who has offered information or opinion on the topic youshouldrecordtheirnameandpositionhere. EVIDENCE Any evidence, information, recommendations or opinions provided by the consultee should be provided here in summary, if possible a link should be provided to the full text or submission. RELATIONSHIPTOSCCS Insert any contribution to, or conflict with, the Sustainability and Climate Change Strategy visionsandprioritieswithabriefdescriptionoftherelationship. 3
RELATIONSHIPTOSOA Insertanycontributionto,orconflictwith,theSingleOutcomeAgreementpriorityoutcomes andactionareaswithabriefdescriptionoftherelationship. CONTRIBUTIONTOTHELDPVISION Briefly identify how the policy contributes to, or conflicts with, the LDP Vision. This assessmentwillbeundertakenaspartoftheSEAprocesstoensureconsistency. LINKSTOMIRREPRESENTATIONS Identify the name and representation number of any representations which you think are relevant to your consideration of this policy and include a brief summary or link if possible. This is to be a factual record of the relevant representation, or part of a representation received, and should not begin justifying why, how and where the representation was includedintheproposedpolicyornot. LINKSTOMIRSEAREPRESENTATIONS Identify the name and representation number of any representations which you think are relevant to your consideration of this policy and include a brief summary or link if possible. This is to be a factual record of the relevant representation, or part of a representation received, and should not begin justifying why, how and where the representation has influencedtheproposedpolicyformulationornot. FURTHERINFORMATIONREQUIRED If, having considered all of the evidence above, it is considered that further information is required, the most appropriate source for that information should be identified and recorded here. In order to keep the process short and simple, a description of the information which it is considered it is necessary to find, establish or clarify should also be recordedhere. EXISTINGPOLICYANALYSIS Identifythe existing policy orpolicieswhich theCouncilhasadoptedandanalyseandrecord theirstrengthsandweaknesses.Stateifthereisnoequivalentpolicy. ANALYSIS/SUMMARY Record what the main points you have identified are arising from the research above and therefore,whatthepolicywillneedtoaddressinordertoberelevant,uptodateanduseful. The initial stage of SEA will normally be undertaken at this stage (see SEA Briefing Note for furtherinformation). SUPPORTINGTEXTANDGRAPHICS Formulate text to support the policy, including any tables or diagrams, bearing in mind that this may be used as background text in the LDP and should therefore explain and justify the Policy wording. Note that graphics including tables, diagrams and photographs, should be used where this can help improve explanation and justification of policies while minimising theamountofsupportingtext. POLICY The wording of the Policy proposed for inclusion in the LDP, including any tables or diagrams. 4
SPATIALELEMENT Copies of, or links to, any maps, or a description of map based information, required to accompanythePolicy. LIKELYTOPICFORFUTURESPG? StatementofwhetherthistopicislikelytobeconsideredforfutureSPG,andadescriptionof whatthatSPGwouldbeexpectedtoinclude. ACTIONPROGRAMME State the actions that will be required to ensure this policy can be successfully implemented (includingmitigationmeasurestoaddressenvironmentalimpacts). RELATIONSHIPTOOTHERPOLICIES Identify the name(s), if known, or type of policy(ies) which may be linked or closely related to this policy and may therefore have to be referred to or highlighted for cross reference in thePlan. LIKELYENVIRONMENTALIMPACTS Summarise the likely environmental impacts identified by the SEA of (a) the draft policy and (b)thefinalisedpolicy(seeSEABriefingNoteforfurtherinformation).. POLICYCHANGESFOLLOWINGSEA Identify any changes which were made to this Policy as a result of the SEA process and the reasonsbehindthechanges(seeSEABriefingNoteforfurtherinformation). LIKELYIMPACTONSPA Identify whether this Policy is likely to have any impact on the SPA. If it is considered that there would or could, be an impact, consider and record what evidence may be required for thepreparationofanAppropriateAssessment. MONITORINGINDICATORS Listanyindicatorswhich couldassistwithmonitoringtheperformanceofthispolicyandthe environmental impacts of the policy. Ideally these should be indicators which are already collected and the source should be identified. If it is felt that new monitoring indicators may be required this should be highlighted along with any potential means of collecting the information. COMPLETIONDATE Identify the anticipated date by which the Policy will be completed. Refer to the Work Programme provided separately. Please advise the relevant Stream Coordinator as soon as possible if you envisage any reason that the draft or final Policy will not be completed to schedule.
Briefingnote:StrategicenvironmentalassessmentfortheLocalDevelopmentPlan TheSEAisanintegralpartoftheplanmakingprocess.Itensuresthattheenvironmental impactoftheplanisminimised,andthattheplan'spoliciesalignwiththevision. EachoptionintheMainIssuesReportwassubjecttoSEA,andthefindingswererecordedin theEnvironmentalReport(andsummarisedintheMIR).EachelementoftheProposedPlan thevision,spatialstrategy,policiesandsupplementaryguidanceaswellasany alternatives,willneedtobeassessed. TheSEAprocessusesamatrixtoassesstheimpactofeachpolicy 1 onanumberof environmentalandsustainabilityobjectives.Theseimpactsarethenwrittenupand summarised,andusedtoinformfurtheriterationsofthepolicy. Theassessmentprocess: Iwillworkwiththepersonwritingthepolicytoassessitsimpacts. Wewillneedtotimetablethesemeetingsinittakesabout30minutesto1hourper policy. Wewillgothroughthematrixandagreethelikelyimpactsofthepolicyoneach objective. Iwillsummarisethefindingsandprovideyouwithalistofthekeypointsfromthe assessment. Youcanthenusethesefindingstoamendthepolicytoreduceitsenvironmental impact. HowSEArelatestoeachstageofpolicydevelopment: Analysingthebackgroundtothepolicy TakeintoaccountthefindingsandrecommendationsoftheSEAattheMIRstage. TakeintoaccountthecommentsontheSEAfindingsattheMIRstage. Consideringthepolicyapproach Usethematrixtoassessthelikelyenvironmentalimpactsofdifferentpolicyapproaches. Recordhowthisassessmenthasinfluencedyourchoiceofpolicyapproach. Draftpolicy Usethematrixtoassessthelikelyenvironmentalimpactsofthedraftpolicy. Revisethepolicyinordertoavoidorreduceadverseenvironmentaleffects,andto enhanceanypositiveeffects;includemitigationmeasureswhereappropriate. Recordhowtheassessmenthasinfluencedthedevelopmentofthepolicy. Recordanyfurthermeasuresthatwillberequiredtomitigateanyadverseenvironmental impacts,andenhanceanypositiveimpacts. Finalpolicy Usethematrixtoassessthelikelyenvironmentalimpactsofthefinalisedpolicy. Ensurethatanyfurthermeasuresrequiredtomitigateadverseenvironmentalimpacts,or enhancepositiveimpacts,areincludedintheactionprogramme.
1
Or vision, spatial strategy or supplementary guidance

October2013
Appendix5:RelationshipbetweenSEA objectivesandsiteassessmentcriteria

Thetablebelowshowsthesiteassessmentcriteria,andtheSEAobjectivesthatwereusedto assessthepolicyelementsoftheplan,anddemonstrateshowtheyrelatetoeachotherand totheenvironmentaltopicsidentifiedintheEnvironmentalAssessment(Scotland)Act. Code SEAobjective CulturalHeritage Siteassessmentcriterion Woulddevelopmentwithinthesiteimpact ontheintegrityofsites,monuments, buildingsorareasdesignatedfortheir culturalheritagevalue? Woulddevelopmentwithinthesiteimpact onarchaeologicalremains? Woulddevelopmentwithinthesiteimpact ontheintegrityofsites,monuments, buildingsorareasdesignatedfortheir culturalheritagevalue? Doesthesiteincludeanyhazardareas?(oilor gaspipelines) Howdoesthesiterelatetoareaswithhigh SIMD? Isthesiteconnectedtothelocalcorepath network? Whatistherelationshipofthesitewith existingopenspaceresources?
8d
Protectand,whereappropriate,enhance thehistoricenvironment
1a
RegenerateClackmannanshire'stown centres
Populationandhumanhealth 5b 5a Ourcommunitiesaresafer Ourcommunitiesaremorecohesiveand inclusive Improvehealthandreducehealth inequalities
6a
7a
Encouragepromotionandconnectivityof Doesthesiteimpactontheconnectivityof theCentralScotlandGreenNetworkwithin theCentralScotlandGreenNetwork andlinkingbeyondClackmannanshire
Biodiversity,flora,fauna 7b Furthertheconservationofbiodiversity 7c 7d 7e 7f Avoidadverseeffectsontheintegrityof theFirthofForthSPAandRamsarsite Maintainandenhancethepopulationsof EuropeanProtectedSpecies,including protectionoftheirrestingplaces ProtectandenhanceSSSIs Protectandenhancepriorityspeciesand habitatsinClackmannanshire Increasehabitatconnectivityand ecosystemfunctiontoassistlocal biodiversityinresponsetoclimatechange Doesthesiteimpactondesignatedsites?
Doesthesiteimpactonpriorityhabitatsor species?
7g
7h Reducetheimpactofinvasivespecies Landscape Protectandenhancethedistinctive characterofthelandscapeandensurenew 7i developmentdoesnotexceedthecapacity ofthelandscapetoaccommodateit
Woulddevelopmentwithinthesiteimpact onsettlementsettingandidentity(drawing onissuesoflandscapecharacterandcapacity fordevelopment)? 1
Code
SEAobjective
Siteassessmentcriterion Woulddevelopmentwithinthesiteimpact onkeyviewstolandscapefeaturesorfrom keytransportroutes? Doesthesiteliewithinanareadesignatedfor itslandscapevalue? Doesthesitecontainanygeological conservationreview(GCR)sites?
7j
Protectandenhanceareasdesignatedfor theirnationalorlocallandscape importancee.g.AGLVs Protectandenhancegeodiversity, particularlyingeologicalSitesofSpecial ScientificInterest
7k Soil 30
Reducecontaminationandsafeguardsoil qualityandquantity Protectcarbonrichsoilsfromdisturbance orloss Preventdeteriorationandenhancethe statusofthewaterenvironment Achievegoodecologicalstatus Reducewaterpollution Promotesustainablewateruse Contributetothemitigationoffloodsand droughts
Doesthesiteincludeareasofvacantor derelictland? Isthesiteprimeagriculturalland? Doesthesiteincludecarbonrichsoil?
3f Water 3k 3l 3m 3n 3i Air
Arethereopportunitiestoimprovethestatus ofwatercourses? Aretherewatercourseswithinthesiteor whichwouldbeaffectedbyincreasedlevels ofpollution,orotherpressures,from developmentwithinthesite? Aretherewatercourseswithinthesiteor whichwouldbeaffectedbyincreasedlevels offloodingresultingfromdevelopmentof thesite? Doesthesiteliewithinanareawherelevels ofairpollutionareclosetocurrentlimit values?
3j
KeepairpollutionbelowLocalAirQuality Managementthresholds
Woulddevelopmentonthesitecontributeto highertrafficflowsalongtransportroutesor atkeyjunctions(potentiallyoutwiththelocal authorityarea)wherelevelsofairpollution areclosetocurrentlimitvalues? Isthesitelocatedclosetoexistingtransport, services,waterandenergyinfrastructure? Isthesitelocatedtomakebestuseof shelter,solargainandreducetheneedto travel? 2
Climaticfactors 3b 3c Reducegreenhousegasemissions Improveenergyconservationand efficiencythroughoutClackmannanshire
Code 3g 3h
SEAobjective ImproveClackmannanshire'sresilienceto climatechange Reduceoverallfloodriskinasustainable way
Siteassessmentcriterion Isthesiteatriskofincreasedfloodingor instabilityasaresultofclimatechange? Isthesiteatriskofflooding?
Isthesiteeasilyaccessiblebythelocalpath network,andprovideaccesstosettlements andservices? 9a Reducetheenvironmentalimpactoftravel Isthesiteeasilyaccessiblebypublic transport? Doesthelocationofthedevelopmentreduce theneedtotravel? Materialassets 3p 3q Other Woulddevelopmentonthesitereduce futurepotentialformineralextraction? Minimisewastegeneration Maximiserecyclingandcomposting Doesthesitereducewastegenerationand promotewasterecovery,recyclingand composting?

October2013
Appendix6:Completedfinalassessment matricesforthepolicyelementsofthe plan

Thisappendixcontainscompletedenvironmentalassessmentmatricesforthevisionandstrategicobjectives;spatialcontext;policies;andsupplementary guidanceintheProposedLocalDevelopmentPlan. Vision 28-6-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
Setting a Clear Framework for Positive Change

No direct mention of town centres, but the vision states that "New housing, employment, retail, leisure, education and training opportunities will have further transformed Clackmannanshire into a more successful and attractive area"
1a
Regenerate Clackmannanshire's town centres
Town centre regeneration is covered in the strategic objectives
Environmental Sustainability
Vision 28-6-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3b
Reduce greenhouse gas emissions
Vision states that the LDP will reduce carbon emissions, through building design, energy efficiency, reduced reliance on fossil fuels and reduced reliance on cars "Energy efficiency improves" This is part of the strategic objectives Not mentioned in the vision "The area will be more resilient to the social and environmental challenges of a changing climate"
3c
Improve energy conservation and efficiency throughout Clackmannanshire Protect carbon-rich soils from disturbance or loss
3f
3g
Improve Clackmannanshire's resilience to climate change
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3h
Reduce overall flood risk in a sustainable way
Reducing overall flood risk is part of the strategic objectives
Reducing overall flood risk is not specifically mentioned; however, the vision commits to "Understanding the effects of a changing climate on our natural systems and the way we can work with them to prevent and mitigate the negative effects of environmental change [...] a greater ability to cope with the predicted effects of climate change, including increased flood risk"
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3i
Contribute to the mitigation of floods and droughts
Droughts are not specifically mentioned; however, the vision commits to "Understanding the effects of a changing climate on our natural systems and the way we can work with them to prevent and mitigate the negative effects of environmental change [...] a greater ability to cope with the predicted effects of climate change, including increased flood risk"
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3j
Keep air pollution below Local Air Quality Management thresholds
Reducing pollution and improving air quality are part of the strategic objectives
The vision identifies a number of elements that would contribute to improved air quality: "cleaner renewable sources of energy", "reducing the dominance of motor vehicles" "Clackmannanshire's exceptional natural [...] environment will have been further protected and enhanced" "Clackmannanshire's exceptional natural [...] environment will have been further protected and enhanced"
3k
Prevent deterioration and enhance the status of the water environment
Improving water quality is part of the strategic objectives
3l
Achieve good ecological status
Improving water quality is part of the strategic objectives
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3m
Reduce water pollution
Reducing pollution is part of the strategic objectives
"Clackmannanshire's exceptional natural [...] environment will have been further protected and enhanced" Sustainable water use is not specifically mentioned, but the vision does require "ecologically sounds design"
3n
Promote sustainable water use
Water conservation and efficiency is part of the strategic objectives
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3o
Reduce contamination and safeguard soil quantity and quality
Safeguarding soil quantity and quality is part of the strategic objectives
Soils quantity and quality are not specifically mentioned in the vision; however, it does commit to "Clackmannanshire's exceptional natural [...] environment will have been further protected and enhanced. [...] The amount of vacant and derelict land will have decreased" "an emphasis on waste minimisation, composting and recycling will have helped us meet our zero waste targets"
3p
Minimise waste generation
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3q
Maximise recycling and composting
"an emphasis on waste minimisation, composting and recycling will have helped us meet our zero waste targets"
Community Cohesion
"social inclusion and cohesion will have increased" "Our communities will have become healthier, greener and safer places in which to live"
5a
Our communities are more cohesive and inclusive
5b
Our communities are safer
Health and Wellbeing
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
6a
Improve health and reduce health inequalities
"Health inequalities will have reduced, and health and wellbeing will have improved"
Natural Environment
"The Plan will have significantly contributed to the realisation of the principles of the Central Scotland Green Network" "Helping [...] wildlife adapt to environmental change [...] Strengthening our habitat networks to help enhance biodiversity
7a
Encourage promotion and connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network within and linking beyond Clackmannanshire
7b
Further the conservation of biodiversity
Furthering the conservation of biodiversity is part of the strategic objectives
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7c
Avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site
Protection and enhancement of designated sites and species is part of the strategic objectives
No specific mention of the Firth of Forth in the vision, but it does state that "Clackmannanshire's exceptional natural [...] environment will have been further protected and enhanced" No specific mention of EPS in the vision, but it does state that "Clackmannanshire's exceptional natural [...] environment will have been further protected and enhanced"
7d
Maintain and enhance the populations of European Protected Species, including protection of their resting places
Protection and enhancement of priority species is part of the strategic objectives
10
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7e
Protect and enhance SSSIs
Protection and enhancement of designated sites and species is part of the strategic objectives
"Clackmannanshire's exceptional natural [...] environment will have been further protected and enhanced" "Clackmannanshire's exceptional natural [...] environment will have been further protected and enhanced. [...] strengthening of habitat [...] networks" "helping [...] wildlife adapt to environmental change, for example [...] changes in habitat networks"
7f
Protect and enhance priority species and habitats in Clackmannanshire
Protection and enhancement of priority species is part of the strategic objectives
7g
Increase habitat connectivity and ecosystem function to assist local biodiversity in response to climate change
11
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7h
Reduce the impact of invasive species
Invasive species are not mentioned in the vision, but reducing their impact is considered to be implicit in the commitment to protect and enhance the natural environment. The vision does not mention landscape; however, it does stated that "we will have made the most of our "liveable" environment, with small towns and villages surrounded by attractive and easily accessible countryside"
7i
Protect and enhance the distinctive character of the landscape and ensure new development does not exceed the capacity of the landscape to accommodate it
Protecting and enhancing Clackmannanshire's distinctive landscape character is part of the strategic objectives
12
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7j
Protect and enhance areas designated for their national or local landscape importance e.g. AGLVs
Protecting and enhancing Clackmannanshire's distinctive landscape character, and protecting and enhancing designated sites are part of the strategic objectives Protecting and enhancing Clackmannanshire's distinctive landscape character, and protecting and enhancing designated sites are part of the strategic objectives
The vision does not mention areas designated for their landscape importance
7k
Protect and enhance geodiversity, particularly in geological Sites of Special Scientific Interest
Geodiversity is not mentioned in the vision.
Built Environment
13
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
Protect and, where appropriate, enhance the historic environment
"Clackmannanshire's exceptional [...] built environment will be protected and enhanced"
Sustainable Transport and Accessibility

"Reducing the need to commute long distances. [...] improved rail services and continued investment in a high-quality active travel network [...] reducing the dominance of motor vehicles and encouraging people to walk and cycle"
9a
14
Strategic Objectives 20-6-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
Setting a Clear Framework for Positive Change Regenerate Clackmannanshire's town centres Environmental Sustainability Reduce greenhouse gas emissions Improve energy conservation and efficiency throughout Clackmannanshire Protect carbon-rich soils from disturbance or loss Improve Clackmannanshire's resilience to climate change
Stated in the strategic objectives Stated in the strategic objectives Stated in the strategic objectives Stated in the strategic objectives
Stated in the strategic objectives
3c
3f
3g
15
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3h
Strategic objective of "reducing overall flood risk, and promoting sustainable flood management techniques" Aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and reduce overall flood risk Aims to manage and reduce pollution Aims to contribute to improving water quality Aims to contribute to improving water quality
3i
3j
Keep air pollution below Local Air Quality Management thresholds Prevent deterioration and enhance the status of the water environment Achieve good ecological status
3k
3l
16
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3m
Aims to manage and reduce pollution Stated in the strategic objectives Stated in the strategic objectives Stated in the strategic objectives Stated in the strategic objectives
3n
Promote sustainable water use Reduce contamination and safeguard soil quantity and quality Minimise waste generation
3o
3p
3q 5
Maximise recycling and composting Community Cohesion
5a
Aims to achieve social regeneration and a strong sense of local identity
17
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
5b
Aims to design new neighbourhoods to maximise personal safety and reduce the opportunity for crime
6 6a 7
Health and Wellbeing Improve health and reduce health inequalities Natural Environment Encourage promotion and connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network within and linking beyond Clackmannanshire Further the conservation of biodiversity
7a
Aims to support the objectives of the CSGN
7b
18
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7c
Avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site Maintain and enhance the populations of European Protected Species, including protection of their resting places Protect and enhance SSSIs Protect and enhance priority species and habitats in Clackmannanshire Increase habitat connectivity and ecosystem function to assist local biodiversity in response to climate change
Aims to protect and enhance designated sites
7d
Aims to protect and enhance priority species
7e
Aims to protect and enhance designated sites Stated in the strategic objectives Aims to strengthen habitat networks and support the strategic objectives of the CSGN Aims to further the conservation of biodiversity
7f
7g
7h
19
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
Aims to protect and enhance Clackmannanshire's distinctive landscape character Aims to protect and enhance Clackmannanshire's distinctive landscape character Aims to protect and enhance designated sites, and Clackmannanshire's distinctive landscape character
7j
7k
Built Environment
20
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
Protect and, where appropriate, enhance the historic environment Sustainable Transport and Accessibility
Aims to conserve and enhance built heritage
9a
Aims to encourage the provision of facilities and infrastructure to increase active travel and use of public transport
21
LDP Aims and Area Statement - Forth 24-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments

Aims to continue to improve the environment of Alloa Town Centre and further promote its economic vitality and viability
1a
22
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3b
The proposed developments are likely to increase the area's greenhouse gas emissions; however, encouraging brownfield and infill development, and walking and cycling, is likely to mitigate the impact by reducing greenhouse gas emission from transport
3c
3f
23
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3g
Reinforcing the green network and supporting the Inner Forth Landscape Initiative are likely to contribute to resilience to climate change Reinforcing the green network and supporting the Inner Forth Landscape Initiative could contribute to sustainable flood risk management Reinforcing the green network and supporting the Inner Forth Landscape Initiative could contribute to mitigating the impacts of floods and droughts
3h
3i
24
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3j
Although new development is likely to lead to increased air pollution, particularly from transport, the plan aims to ensure new development does not create potential pollution 'hot spots.' Encouraging brownfield develop and active travel are likely to contribute to reducing pollution associated with road transport Reinforcing the green network and supporting the Inner Forth Landscape Initiative could contribute to water status improvement
3k
25
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3l
Reinforcing the green network and supporting the Inner Forth Landscape Initiative could contribute to water status improvement Aims to ensure new development does not create potential pollution 'hot spots.'
3m
3n

Using brownfield and infill sites to their full potential is likely to reduce the impact of development on soils
3o
3p
26
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3q 5 5a
Maximise recycling and composting Community Cohesion Our communities are more cohesive and inclusive
Aims to address areas of social exclusion Addressing areas of social exclusion is likely to lead to improved community safety
5b

Addressing areas of social exclusion and encouraging walking and cycling are likely to lead to improved health
6a
27
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
Natural Environment Encourage promotion and connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network within and linking beyond Clackmannanshire
7a
Aims to reinforce the green network
7b
Aims to reinforce the green network and continue protection of designated sites, and investigate enhancement Aims to continue protection of designated sites, and investigate enhancement
7c
28
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7d
Aims to reinforce the green network and continue protection of designated sites, and investigate enhancement, which is likely to be beneficial for European Protected Species Aims to continue protection of designated sites, and investigate enhancement Aims to reinforce the green network and continue protection of designated sites, and investigate enhancement, which could be beneficial for priority species and habitats
7e
7f
29
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7g
Aims to reinforce the green network and continue protection of designated sites, and investigate enhancement
7h

Aims to encourage development on brownfield and infill sites, and to protect identity and landscape setting of individual settlements Directing development to the Forth area reduces pressure on areas more likely to impact on SLAs
7i
7j
30
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7k
Protect and enhance geodiversity, particularly in geological Sites of Special Scientific Interest Built Environment
8d
Aims to maintain and enhance the historic buildings and core of the towns, and take steps to enhance conservation areas

Aims to reinforce the green network; and ensure coordination of transport modes and encourage walking and cycling
9a
31
LDP Aims and Area Statement - West Ochils 24-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments

Focuses on regeneration and enhancement of the urban fabric; aims to enhance and promote the environment and vitality of village centres
1a
32
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3b
The proposed developments are likely to lead to increased greenhouse gas emissions; however, the impact of this is likely to be mitigated by directing development to brownfield sites and sites with existing settlement boundaries, and by efforts to promote cycling and walking, which are likely to contribute to reduced emissions from travel.
3c
3f
Aims to protect significant soil resources
33
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3g
Climate change adaptation is not covered in the LDP aims and area statements for West Ochils. Flooding is not covered in the LDP aims and area statement for West Ochils, other than to state that flood risk precludes development in some locations. Floods and droughts are not covered in the LDP aims and area statement for West Ochils, other than to state that flood risk precludes development in some locations.
3h
3i
34
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3j
None of the sites in West Ochils lie in areas where air pollution is close to current limit values Strives to improve water quality, including through the Ochils Landscape Partnership Strives to improve water quality, including through the Ochils Landscape Partnership Strives to improve water quality, including through the Ochils Landscape Partnership
3k
3l
3m
3n
35
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3o
Aims to protect significant soils resources and promote brownfield development
3p 3q 5
Minimise waste generation Maximise recycling and composting Community Cohesion

5a
Focuses on improved quality of space and community, including improving local services, which is likely to increase cohesion and inclusion.
36
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
5b
Improving community cohesion and inclusion is likely to lead to improved community safety

Improving community cohesion and inclusion, and improved active travel provision, are likely to lead to improved health
6a
7a
Aims to reinforce the green network
37
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7b
Reinforcing the green network, including development of habitat networks, is likely to be beneficial for biodiversity
7c
7d
Reinforcing the green network, including development of habitat networks, is likely to be beneficial for European Protected Species in the area SSSIs in west Ochils are on the escarpment, so are unlikely to be affected by development.
7e
38
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7f
Reinforcing the green network, including development of habitat networks, is likely to be beneficial for priority species in the area Reinforcing the green network, including development of habitat networks, is likely to be beneficial for European Protected Species in the area
7g
7h
Reduce the impact of invasive species Protect and enhance the distinctive character of the landscape and ensure new development does not exceed the capacity of the landscape to accommodate it
7i
Aims to protect landscape character and the setting and identity of settlements
39
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7j
Aims to protect landscape character and the setting and identity of settlements - this is assumed to include the Ochils SLA
7k
8d
Supports the Ochils Landscape Partnership, which aims to restore parts of the historic built landscape, and aims to take steps to enhance conservation areas
40
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
9a
Local road upgrades could increase traffic, but this could be counterbalanced by improved active travel links and reinforcement of the green network
41
LDP Aims and Area Statement - East Ochils 24-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments

Identifies scope for improvements to Dollar and Muckhart centres
1a
42
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3b
The proposed developments are likely to increase the area's greenhouse gas emissions; however, support for walking and cycling infrastructure and improved public transport, as well as the provision of neighbourhood shops to reduce the need to travel, is likely to mitigate the impact by reducing greenhouse gas emission from transport
3c
3f
Aims to protect significant soil resources
43
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3g
Climate change adaptation is not covered in the LDP aims and area statements for East Ochils. Flooding is not covered in the LDP aims and area statement for East Ochils. Floods and droughts are not covered in the LDP aims and area statement for East Ochils. None of the sites in East Ochils lie in areas where air pollution is close to current limit values
3h
3i
3j
44
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3k
Aims to improve river quality through the Ochils Landscape Partnership; however, many of the sites in Alloa East have the potential for adverse impacts on water courses Aims to improve river quality through the Ochils Landscape Partnership; however, Many of the sites in Alloa East have the potential for adverse impacts on water courses
3l
3m
3n
45
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3o
Aims to protect significant soil resources; however, most of the development sites in East Ochils are greenfield, so would result in a loss of soil resources
3p 3q 5 5a 5b 6
Minimise waste generation Maximise recycling and composting Community Cohesion Our communities are more cohesive and inclusive Our communities are safer Health and Wellbeing

Aims to improve local services
46
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
6a
Aims to provide and improve walking and cycling routes, and support facilities which encourage active travel, which is likely to lead to improved health
7a
7b
Consider at planning application stage
Aims to develop a habitat networks and secure the restoration of Meadowhill opencast site; however development on greenfield land could have detrimental impacts on biodiversity
47
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7c
7d
Development on greenfield and forestry sites mean that there is potential for detrimental impacts on European Protected Species There is potential for impacts on designated sites Development on greenfield and forestry sites mean that there is potential for detrimental impacts on priority species and habitats
7e
7f
48
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7g
Increase habitat connectivity and ecosystem function to assist local biodiversity in response to climate change Reduce the impact of invasive species Protect and enhance the distinctive character of the landscape and ensure new development does not exceed the capacity of the landscape to accommodate it
Aims to develop habitat networks
7h
7i
There is potential for development to impact on landscape character
7j
There is potential for development to impact on areas designated for their landscape importance
7k
49
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
Supports the Ochils Landscape Partnership, which aims to restore parts of the historic built landscape, and aims to take steps to enhance conservation areas

Aims to provide walking and cycling infrastructure, support development that promotes active travel, and improve public transport
9a
50
SC1 - Maintaining a Housing Land Supply 11-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
Setting a Clear Framework for Positive Change Regenerate Clackmannanshire's town centres Environmental Sustainability Reduce greenhouse gas emissions Improve energy conservation and efficiency throughout Clackmannanshire Protect carbon-rich soils from disturbance or loss Improve Clackmannanshire's resilience to climate change Reduce overall flood risk in a sustainable way
3c
3f
3g
3h
51
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3i
Contribute to the mitigation of floods and droughts Keep air pollution below Local Air Quality Management thresholds Prevent deterioration and enhance the status of the water environment Achieve good ecological status Reduce water pollution Promote sustainable water use Reduce contamination and safeguard soil quantity and quality Minimise waste generation
3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

3o
3p
52
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3q 5 5a 5b 6 6a 7
Maximise recycling and composting Community Cohesion Our communities are more cohesive and inclusive Our communities are safer Health and Wellbeing Improve health and reduce health inequalities Natural Environment Encourage promotion and connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network within and linking beyond Clackmannanshire Further the conservation of biodiversity

7a
7b
53
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7c
Avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site Maintain and enhance the populations of European Protected Species, including protection of their resting places Protect and enhance SSSIs Protect and enhance priority species and habitats in Clackmannanshire Increase habitat connectivity and ecosystem function to assist local biodiversity in response to climate change Reduce the impact of invasive species
7d
7e
7f
7g
7h
54
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
Protect and enhance the distinctive character of the landscape and ensure new development does not exceed the capacity of the landscape to accommodate it Protect and enhance areas designated for their national or local landscape importance e.g. AGLVs Protect and enhance geodiversity, particularly in geological Sites of Special Scientific Interest Built Environment Protect and, where appropriate, enhance the historic environment Sustainable Transport and Accessibility Reduce the environmental impact of travel
7j
7k
8d
9 9a
55
SC2 - Affordable Housing 10-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
3c
3f
3g
3h
56
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3i
3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

3o
3p
57
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3q 5
5a
Provision of affordable housing is likely to contribute to community cohesion and inclusion
5b 6
Our communities are safer Health and Wellbeing
6a
Good quality, affordable housing is likely to contribute to health improvement
Natural Environment
58
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7a
Encourage promotion and connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network within and linking beyond Clackmannanshire Further the conservation of biodiversity Avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site Maintain and enhance the populations of European Protected Species, including protection of their resting places Protect and enhance SSSIs Protect and enhance priority species and habitats in Clackmannanshire
7b
7c
7d
7e
7f
59
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7g
Increase habitat connectivity and ecosystem function to assist local biodiversity in response to climate change Reduce the impact of invasive species Protect and enhance the distinctive character of the landscape and ensure new development does not exceed the capacity of the landscape to accommodate it Protect and enhance areas designated for their national or local landscape importance e.g. AGLVs Protect and enhance geodiversity, particularly in geological Sites of Special Scientific Interest Built Environment
7h
7i
7j
7k
60
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
Protect and, where appropriate, enhance the historic environment Sustainable Transport and Accessibility Reduce the environmental impact of travel
9 9a
61
SG5 - Affordable Housing supplementary guidance 3-10-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
Setting a Clear Framework for Positive Change Regenerate Clackmannanshire's town centres
Reduce greenhouse gas emissions Improve energy conservation and efficiency throughout Clackmannanshire Protect carbon-rich soils from disturbance or loss Improve Clackmannanshire's resilience to climate change Reduce overall flood risk in a sustainable way
3c
3f
3g
3h
62
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3i
3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

3o
3p
63
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3q 5
5a
Provision of affordable housing is likely to contribute to community cohesion and inclusion
5b 6
6a
Good quality, affordable housing is likely to contribute to health improvement
Natural Environment
64
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7a
7b
7c
7d
7e
7f
65
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7g
7h
7i
7j
7k
66
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
9 9a
67
SC3 - Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Showpeople 10-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
3c
3f
3g
3h
68
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3i
3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

3o
3p
69
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3q 5 5a 5b 6 6a 7

7a
7b
70
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7c
7d
7e
7f
7g
7h
71
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
7j
7k
8d
9 9a
72
SC4 - Residential Care Facilities 10-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
3c
3f
3g
3h
73
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3i

Policy requires residential care facilities to be sited near active travel infrastructure and public transport services
3j
3k
Prevent deterioration and enhance the status of the water environment Achieve good ecological status Reduce water pollution Promote sustainable water use Reduce contamination and safeguard soil quantity and quality
3l 3m 3n

3o
74
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3p 3q 5

5a
Policy requires residential care facilities to be sited near community facilities Location near community facilities and active travel and public transport routes should contribute to a safe environment
5b
75
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
6a
Location near community facilities and active travel infrastructure should contribute to health improvement
7a
7b
7c
7d
76
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7e
Protect and enhance SSSIs Protect and enhance priority species and habitats in Clackmannanshire Increase habitat connectivity and ecosystem function to assist local biodiversity in response to climate change Reduce the impact of invasive species Protect and enhance the distinctive character of the landscape and ensure new development does not exceed the capacity of the landscape to accommodate it Protect and enhance areas designated for their national or local landscape importance e.g. AGLVs
7f
7g
7h
7i
7j
77
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7k
Protect and enhance geodiversity, particularly in geological Sites of Special Scientific Interest Built Environment Protect and, where appropriate, enhance the historic environment Sustainable Transport and Accessibility
8d
9a
Policy requires residential care facilities to be sited near active travel infrastructure and public transport services
78
SC5 - Layout and Design Principles 10-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments

New residential development is expected to contribute positively to the surrounding townscape
1a
New residential development is expected to reduce the need to travel by private car, minimise waste and promote energy efficiency Development density of new residential development is expected to promote energy efficiency
3b
3c
Improve energy conservation and efficiency throughout Clackmannanshire
79
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3f
Protect carbon-rich soils from disturbance or loss

Policy requires developments to manage flood risk in a sustainable way Policy requires developments to manage flood risk in a sustainable way Policy requires developments to manage flood risk in a sustainable way New residential developments are required to avoid adverse impact on air quality
3g
3h
3i
3j
80
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3k
New residential developments are required to avoid adverse impact on water quality New residential developments are required to avoid adverse impact on water quality New residential developments are required to avoid adverse impact on water quality New residential development will required to employ techniques that conserve water
3l
3m
3n
81
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3o
New residential developments are required to avoid adverse impact on soil quality New residential developments are required to be designed in accordance with policy on minimising waste New residential developments are required to provide adequate space and facilities of recycling and composting
3p
3q
5 5a
Community Cohesion Our communities are more cohesive and inclusive
82
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
5b
Policy requires that community safety considerations are taken into account

New residential development is expected to protect and enhance green networks, and integrate well with active travel, which should contribute to improved health
6a
Natural Environment
83
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7a
New residential developments are require to integrate well with, protect, and enhance green networks New residential developments are expected to protect and enhance green networks, contribute positively to ecology, and use appropriate native plant species
7b
7c
84
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7d
New residential developments are expected to contribute positively to ecology, and protect and enhance green networks, including through habitat provision and enhancement
7e

New residential developments are expected to contribute positively to ecology, and protect and enhance green networks, including through habitat provision and enhancement
7f
85
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7g
New residential developments are expected to contribute positively to ecology, and protect and enhance green networks, including through habitat provision and enhancement New residential developments are expected to use appropriate native species in landscaping and planting proposals New residential developments are expected to contribute positively to their setting and surrounding landscape
7h
7i
86
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7j
New residential developments are expected to contribute positively to their setting and surrounding landscape
7k
8d
New residential developments are expected to contribute positively to the surrounding townscape and the character of their setting, and to ensure that development density is appropriate
87
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
9a
New residential developments are expected to reduce the need to travel by private car, through appropriate development density, and integration with active travel and public transport networks
88
SC6 - Additional Design Information 10-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
3c
3f
3g
3h
89
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3i
3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

3o
3p
90
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3q 5 5a 5b 6 6a 7

7a
7b
91
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7c
7d
7e
7f
7g
7h
92
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
7j
Policy requires a design statement for developments in Special Landscape Areas
7k
93
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
Policy requires a design statement for developments in Conservation Areas, Historic Gardens, Designed Landscapes or affecting listed buildings or scheduled ancient monuments
9 9a
Sustainable Transport and Accessibility Reduce the environmental impact of travel
94
SG3 Placemaking Supplementary Guidance 1-10-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
Setting a Clear Framework for Positive Change Regenerate Clackmannanshire's town centres Environmental Sustainability
Promotes design and layout for energy efficiency, and reduced reliance on cars. Promotes design and layout for energy efficiency.
3b
3c
3f
95
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3g
SG states that developers should consider the adaptability of buildings and spaces to climate change Ensure flood risk is considered in climate change adaptation Ensure floods and droughts are considered in climate change adaptation SG does not explicitly address air quality, but design to reduce reliance on cars should reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
3h
3i
3j
96
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3k
Consider in conjunction with the Water SG
SG states that new developments should protect and where possible enhance the biodiversity and amenity of watercourses and waterbodies SG states that new developments should protect and where possible enhance the biodiversity and amenity of watercourses and waterbodies
3l
3m 3n
Reduce water pollution Promote sustainable water use

Consider in conjunction with the Water SG
97
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3o
Reduce contamination and safeguard soil quantity and quality Minimise waste generation Maximise recycling and composting Community Cohesion Our communities are more cohesive and inclusive
3p 3q 5 5a

98
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
5b
The SG aims to deliver places that are safe and pleasant, including lighting and passive surveillance, road design that prioritises the needs of pedestrians and cyclists, and landscaping that contributes to a sense of ownership and responsibility
6 6a 7
Health and Wellbeing Improve health and reduce health inequalities Natural Environment
SG aims to encourage walking and cycling
99
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7a
SG states that all new developments will be expected to enhance and support Green Network objectives The SG encourages the use of native species and the retention of mature trees and hedgerows, and states that sensitively designed places can improve habitat and biodiversity
7b
7c
Avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site Maintain and enhance the populations of European Protected Species, including protection of their resting places
7d
100
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7e
Protect and enhance SSSIs Protect and enhance priority species and habitats in Clackmannanshire
7f
7g
The SG encourages the use of native species and the retention of mature trees and hedgerows, and expects new developments to enhance and support Green Network objectives
7h
SG expects new developments to use native species
101
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
SG states that developments should seek to enhance, rather than detract from, important views and skylines, and that they should be of a design, scale and massing that respects and enhances their surroundings SG states that developments should seek to enhance, rather than detract from, important views and skylines
7j
7k
102
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
The design process requires developers to consider the historic environment

The SG requires new housing developments to be integrated with public transport and active travel networks, and promotes design that reduces dependence on cars
9a
103
SC7 - Energy Efficiency and Low Carbon Development 11-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
The policy seeks to encourage development proposals that achieve a higher level of carbon dioxide emissions reduction The policy seeks to encourage development proposals that achieve a higher level of carbon dioxide emissions reduction
3b
3c
104
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3f
Protect carbon-rich soils from disturbance or loss Improve Clackmannanshire's resilience to climate change Reduce overall flood risk in a sustainable way Contribute to the mitigation of floods and droughts Keep air pollution below Local Air Quality Management thresholds Prevent deterioration and enhance the status of the water environment Achieve good ecological status Reduce water pollution
3g
3h 3i

3j
3k
3l 3m

105
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3n
Promote sustainable water use Reduce contamination and safeguard soil quantity and quality Minimise waste generation Maximise recycling and composting Community Cohesion Our communities are more cohesive and inclusive Our communities are safer Health and Wellbeing Improve health and reduce health inequalities
3o
3p 3q 5 5a 5b 6 6a

106
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
Natural Environment Encourage promotion and connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network within and linking beyond Clackmannanshire Further the conservation of biodiversity Avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site Maintain and enhance the populations of European Protected Species, including protection of their resting places Protect and enhance SSSIs Protect and enhance priority species and habitats in Clackmannanshire
7a
7b
7c
7d
7e
7f
107
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7g
7h
7i
7j
7k
108
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
9 9a
109
SG7 Energy Efficiency and Low Carbon Development 7-10-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
Give more coverage to requirements rather than options for low and zero carbon technologies
3b
Provides information on renewable technologies
3c
Give more coverage to energy efficiency requirements
Provides information on energy efficiency and renewable technologies. Proposals need not comply with policy SC7 if they will exceed required CO2 savings in other ways.
110
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3f

The SG addresses cooling as well as heating requirements
3g
3h 3i

3j
3k
3l 3m

111
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3n
Promote sustainable water use Reduce contamination and safeguard soil quantity and quality Minimise waste generation Maximise recycling and composting Community Cohesion Our communities are more cohesive and inclusive Our communities are safer Health and Wellbeing Improve health and reduce health inequalities
3o
3p 3q 5 5a 5b 6 6a

112
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
Natural Environment Encourage promotion and connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network within and linking beyond Clackmannanshire Further the conservation of biodiversity Avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site Maintain and enhance the populations of European Protected Species, including protection of their resting places Protect and enhance SSSIs
The SG recommends the use of green infrastructure in providing cooling to new buildings
7a
7b
7c
7d
7e
113
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7f
Protect and enhance priority species and habitats in Clackmannanshire Increase habitat connectivity and ecosystem function to assist local biodiversity in response to climate change Reduce the impact of invasive species Protect and enhance the distinctive character of the landscape and ensure new development does not exceed the capacity of the landscape to accommodate it Protect and enhance areas designated for their national or local landscape importance e.g. AGLVs Protect and enhance geodiversity, particularly in geological Sites of Special Scientific Interest
7g
7h
7i
7j
7k
114
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
Built Environment Protect and, where appropriate, enhance the historic environment Sustainable Transport and Accessibility Reduce the environmental impact of travel
8d
9 9a
115
SC8 - Domestic Developments 11-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
Policy requires domestic developments to demonstrate high standards of energy efficiency Policy requires domestic developments to demonstrate high standards of energy efficiency
3b
3c
116
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3f

Address climate change adaptation potential of domestic developments in SG
3g
3h 3i
Reduce overall flood risk in a sustainable way Contribute to the mitigation of floods and droughts Keep air pollution below Local Air Quality Management thresholds Prevent deterioration and enhance the status of the water environment Achieve good ecological status

3j
3k
3l
117
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3m

Policy requires domestic developments to demonstrate high standards of water efficiency
3n
3o
3p 3q 5 5a

118
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
5b 6 6a 7
Our communities are safer Health and Wellbeing Improve health and reduce health inequalities Natural Environment Encourage promotion and connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network within and linking beyond Clackmannanshire Further the conservation of biodiversity Avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site
7a
7b
7c
119
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7d
Maintain and enhance the populations of European Protected Species, including protection of their resting places Protect and enhance SSSIs Protect and enhance priority species and habitats in Clackmannanshire Increase habitat connectivity and ecosystem function to assist local biodiversity in response to climate change Reduce the impact of invasive species
7e
7f
7g
7h
120
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
Policy supports domestic developments that do not result in overdevelopment, and that do not detrimentally affect the character of the surrounding area
7j
Protect and enhance areas designated for their national or local landscape importance e.g. AGLVs Protect and enhance geodiversity, particularly in geological Sites of Special Scientific Interest Built Environment Protect and, where appropriate, enhance the historic environment Sustainable Transport and Accessibility
7k
8d
121
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
9a
122
SC9 - Developer Contributions 16-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments

Town centre enhancement is identified as one of the things that the Council will expect contributions towards, but the nature of contributions will vary from site to site and development to development.
1a
3 3b
Environmental Sustainability Reduce greenhouse gas emissions Improve energy conservation and efficiency throughout Clackmannanshire
3c
123
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3f

Sustainable flood management is identified as one of the things that the Council will expect contributions towards, but the nature of contributions will vary from site to site and development to development. Sustainable flood management is identified as one of the things that the Council will expect contributions towards, but the nature of contributions will vary from site to site and development to development.
3g
3h
124
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3i
Sustainable flood management is identified as one of the things that the Council will expect contributions towards, but the nature of contributions will vary from site to site and development to development.
3j
125
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3k
The water environment is identified as one of the things that the Council will expect contributions towards, but the nature of contributions will vary from site to site and development to development. Sustainable flood management is identified as one of the things that the Council will expect contributions towards, but the nature of contributions will vary from site to site and development to development.
3l
3m
126
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3n
Promote sustainable water use Reduce contamination and safeguard soil quantity and quality Minimise waste generation Maximise recycling and composting Community Cohesion
3o
3p 3q 5

127
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
5a
Libraries, health centres, community halls and facilities are identified as things that the Council will expect contributions towards, but the nature of contributions will vary from site to site and development to development.
5b 6
128
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
6a
Health facilities; open space, recreation and play provision; and active travel networks are identified as things that the Council will expect contributions towards, but the nature of contributions will vary from site to site and development to development.
Natural Environment
129
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7a
The green network is identified as one of the things that the Council will expect contributions towards, but the nature of contributions will vary from site to site and development to development. Protection and enhancement of natural habitats are identified as things that the Council will expect contributions towards, but the nature of contributions will vary from site to site and development to development.
7b
130
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7c
7d
Protection and enhancement of natural habitats are identified as things that the Council will expect contributions towards, but the nature of contributions will vary from site to site and development to development.
7e
131
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7f
Protection and enhancement of natural habitats are identified as things that the Council will expect contributions towards, but the nature of contributions will vary from site to site and development to development. Protection and enhancement of green networks and natural habitats are identified as things that the Council will expect contributions towards, but the nature of contributions will vary from site to site and development to development.
7g
132
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7h
Reduce the impact of invasive species Protect and enhance the distinctive character of the landscape and ensure new development does not exceed the capacity of the landscape to accommodate it Protect and enhance areas designated for their national or local landscape importance e.g. AGLVs Protect and enhance geodiversity, particularly in geological Sites of Special Scientific Interest Built Environment Protect and, where appropriate, enhance the historic environment Sustainable Transport and Accessibility
7i
7j
7k
8d
133
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
9a
The green network, active travel networks and the core paths network are identified as things that the Council will expect contributions towards, but the nature of contributions will vary from site to site and development to development.
134
SG1 Developer Contributions Supplementary Guidance 29-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments

Town centre enhancement is identified as one of the things that the Council will expect contributions towards, so there is the potential for positive impacts, but contributions will be negotiated at the planning application stage.
1a
3 3b
Environmental Sustainability Reduce greenhouse gas emissions Improve energy conservation and efficiency throughout Clackmannanshire
3c
135
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3f

Sustainable flood management is identified as one of the things that the Council will expect contributions towards, so there is the potential for positive impacts, but contributions will be negotiated at the planning application stage.
3g
136
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3h
Sustainable flood management is identified as one of the things that the Council will expect contributions towards, so there is the potential for positive impacts, but contributions will be negotiated at the planning application stage. Sustainable flood management is identified as one of the things that the Council will expect contributions towards, so there is the potential for positive impacts, but contributions will be negotiated at the planning application stage.
3i
137
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3j
3k
The water environment is identified as one of the things that the Council will expect contributions towards, so there is the potential for positive impacts, but contributions will be negotiated at the planning application stage.
138
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3l
Sustainable flood management is identified as one of the things that the Council will expect contributions towards, so there is the potential for positive impacts, but contributions will be negotiated at the planning application stage.
3m 3n
Reduce water pollution Promote sustainable water use Reduce contamination and safeguard soil quantity and quality Minimise waste generation

3o
3p
139
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3q 5
5a
Libraries, health centres, community halls and facilities are identified as things that the Council will expect contributions towards, so there is the potential for positive impacts, but contributions will be negotiated at the planning application stage.
5b 6
140
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
6a
Health facilities; open space, recreation and play provision; and active travel networks, are identified as things that the Council will expect contributions towards, so there is the potential for positive impacts, but contributions will be negotiated at the planning application stage.
Natural Environment
141
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7a
The green network is identified as one of the things that the Council will expect contributions towards, so there is the potential for positive impacts, but contributions will be negotiated at the planning application stage. Biodiversity improvements are identified as things that the Council will expect contributions towards, so there is the potential for positive impacts, but contributions will be negotiated at the planning application stage.
7b
142
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7c
7d
Biodiversity improvements are identified as things that the Council will expect contributions towards, so there is the potential for positive impacts, but contributions will be negotiated at the planning application stage.
143
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7e
Biodiversity improvements involving designated sites are identified as things that the Council will expect contributions towards, so there is the potential for positive impacts, but contributions will be negotiated at the planning application stage. Biodiversity improvements are identified as things that the Council will expect contributions towards, so there is the potential for positive impacts, but contributions will be negotiated at the planning application stage.
7f
144
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7g
Protection and enhancement of green networks, and biodiversity improvements, are identified as things that the Council will expect contributions towards, so there is the potential for positive impacts, but contributions will be negotiated at the planning application stage.
7h
145
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
Landscape is identified as one of the things that the Council will expect contributions towards, so there is the potential for positive impacts, but contributions will be negotiated at the planning application stage. Landscape is identified as one of the things that the Council will expect contributions towards, so there is the potential for positive impacts, but contributions will be negotiated at the planning application stage.
7j
146
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7k
8d
147
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
9a
The green network, active travel networks and the core paths network are identified as things that the Council will expect contributions towards, so there is the potential for positive impacts, but contributions will be negotiated at the planning application stage.
148
SC10 - Education, Community Facilities and Open Space 11-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
3c
3f
3g
3h
149
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3i
3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

3o
3p
150
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3q 5
5a
Policy aims to retain and enhance provision of community facilities and open space Retention and enhancement of community facilities and open space is likely to lead to a greater sense of safety
5b
151
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
6a
Retention and enhancement of open space is likely to be beneficial for mental and physical health
7a
7b
7c
7d
152
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7e
7f
7g
7h
7i
7j
153
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7k
Protect and enhance geodiversity, particularly in geological Sites of Special Scientific Interest Built Environment Protect and, where appropriate, enhance the historic environment Sustainable Transport and Accessibility Reduce the environmental impact of travel
8d
9 9a
154
SC11 - Transport Networks 18-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
Improvement proposals should aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from road transport
3b
3c
Improve energy conservation and efficiency throughout Clackmannanshire Protect carbon-rich soils from disturbance or loss Improve Clackmannanshire's resilience to climate change
3f
3g
155
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3h 3i
Reduce overall flood risk in a sustainable way Contribute to the mitigation of floods and droughts Keep air pollution below Local Air Quality Management thresholds Prevent deterioration and enhance the status of the water environment Achieve good ecological status Reduce water pollution Promote sustainable water use Reduce contamination and safeguard soil quantity and quality

3j
Aims to improve air quality
3k
3l 3m 3n

3o
156
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3p 3q 5 5a 5b 6

Improvements to improve safety are identified
6a
Policy aims to safeguard, promote and enhance the core path network, which should bring health benefits for users
157
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
Natural Environment
Policy aims to safeguard, promote and enhance the core path network, in accordance with the green network SG Improvement proposals should aim to minimise adverse impacts of transport infrastructure on the natural heritage
7a
7b
7c
7d
158
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7e
Protect and enhance SSSIs Protect and enhance priority species and habitats in Clackmannanshire Increase habitat connectivity and ecosystem function to assist local biodiversity in response to climate change Reduce the impact of invasive species Protect and enhance the distinctive character of the landscape and ensure new development does not exceed the capacity of the landscape to accommodate it
7f
7g
7h

Improvement proposals should aim to minimise adverse impacts of transport infrastructure on the landscape
7i
159
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7j
Improvement proposals should aim to minimise adverse impacts of transport infrastructure on the landscape
7k
8d
160
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
9a
Policy aims to improve air quality and enhance the core path network, which should encourage reduced car use
SC12 - Development Proposals - Access and Transport Requirements 11-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a
161
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
Policy aims to reduce travel demand and encourage walking and cycling
3b
3c
Improve energy conservation and efficiency throughout Clackmannanshire Protect carbon-rich soils from disturbance or loss Improve Clackmannanshire's resilience to climate change Reduce overall flood risk in a sustainable way Contribute to the mitigation of floods and droughts
3f
3g
3h 3i

162
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3j
Policy aims to reduce travel demand and encourage walking and cycling
3k
Prevent deterioration and enhance the status of the water environment Achieve good ecological status Reduce water pollution Promote sustainable water use Reduce contamination and safeguard soil quantity and quality Minimise waste generation
3l 3m 3n

3o
3p
163
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3q 5
5a
Encouragement of walking, cycling and public transport is likely to contribute to community inclusiveness Policy aims to make new developments safer for walkers and cyclists
5b

Encouragement of walking and cycling is likely to have health benefits
6a
164
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
Natural Environment
Policy expects alternative provision where development could adversely affect a core path or right of way, but makes no provision for enhancement of existing routes, or connectivity to the CSGN.
7a
Consider how walking and cycling infrastructure relates to the CSGN at planning application stage
7b
Further the conservation of biodiversity Avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site Maintain and enhance the populations of European Protected Species, including protection of their resting places
7c
7d
165
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7e
7f
7g
7h
7i
7j
166
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7k
8d
9a
Policy aims to encourage walking and cycling, and requires a Transport Assessment and Travel Plan if there is likely to be any significant increase in trip generation
167
SC13 - Decentralised Energy 11-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
Policy encourages decentralised energy, including renewable and low carbon generation, and promotes the use of combined (cooling) heat and power and district heating schemes
3b
168
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3c
Policy encourages decentralised energy, including renewable and low carbon generation, and promotes the use of combined (cooling) heat and power and district heating schemes
3f
Protect carbon-rich soils from disturbance or loss Improve Clackmannanshire's resilience to climate change Reduce overall flood risk in a sustainable way Contribute to the mitigation of floods and droughts
3g
3h 3i

169
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3j
Consider in conjunction with Environmental Quality policy
Acceptable schemes could include biomass heating, which could increase air pollution
3k
Prevent deterioration and enhance the status of the water environment Achieve good ecological status Reduce water pollution Promote sustainable water use Reduce contamination and safeguard soil quantity and quality Minimise waste generation
3l 3m 3n

3o
3p
170
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3q 5 5a 5b 6
Maximise recycling and composting Community Cohesion Our communities are more cohesive and inclusive Our communities are safer Health and Wellbeing

6a
District heating and CHP could contribute to alleviating fuel poverty, which would be beneficial for health
Natural Environment
171
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7a
7b
7c
7d
7e
7f
172
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7g
7h
7i
7j
7k
173
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
9 9a
174
SC14 - Renewable Energy 11-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
Policy supports appropriate renewable energy generation development
3b
3c
175
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3f
Policy does not support developments that would have a significant adverse impact on the carbon stocks in carbon rich soils, and require developments accord with policy EA13, which protects carbon rich soils.
3g
Improve Clackmannanshire's resilience to climate change Reduce overall flood risk in a sustainable way Contribute to the mitigation of floods and droughts Keep air pollution below Local Air Quality Management thresholds
3h 3i

3j
176
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3k
Prevent deterioration and enhance the status of the water environment Achieve good ecological status Reduce water pollution Promote sustainable water use
3l 3m 3n

Policy requires that development accords with policy EA13, which protects prime agricultural land and carbon rich soils
3o
3p 3q
Minimise waste generation Maximise recycling and composting

177
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
5 5a 5b 6 6a 7
Community Cohesion Our communities are more cohesive and inclusive Our communities are safer Health and Wellbeing Improve health and reduce health inequalities Natural Environment Encourage promotion and connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network within and linking beyond Clackmannanshire
7a
178
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7b
Policy requires that developments should not have an adverse impact on the natural environment Policy requires that development must not impact on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA
7c
7d
7e
Policy requires that developments should not have a significant adverse impact on designated areas of nature conservation value
179
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7f
Protect and enhance priority species and habitats in Clackmannanshire Increase habitat connectivity and ecosystem function to assist local biodiversity in response to climate change Reduce the impact of invasive species
7g
7h

Policy requires that the development should not have a significant adverse impact on the quality and distinctive character of the local and wider landscape
7i
180
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7j
Policy requires that the development should not have a significant adverse impact on the quality and distinctive character of the local and wider landscape
7k
8d
Policy requires that the development should not have a significant adverse impact on listed buildings, Conservation Areas, historic gardens and designed landscapes, and sites of archaeological or historical importance
181
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
9 9a
SC15 Wind Energy Development 19-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
182
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3b
Policy SC14 supports appropriate renewable energy generation development. Policy SC15 supports appropriate wind energy development
3c
3f
Policy SC14 does not support developments that would have a significant adverse impact on the carbon stocks in carbon rich soils, and requires proposals to accord with policy EA13, which protects carbon rich soils.
183
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3g
3h 3i

3j
184
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3k
Developments must accord with the Wind Energy SG, which states that developers will be expected to demonstrate that development would not have any permanent adverse impacts on the water environment, and that any temporary impacts should be mitigated.
185
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3l
186
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3m
3n

Policy SC14 requires that development accords with policy EA13, which protects prime agricultural land and carbon rich soils
3o
187
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3p 3q 5 5a 5b 6

6a
Developments must accord with the Wind SPG, which aims to avoid adverse impacts such as noise and shadow flicker, which could affect the health of residents and occupiers
188
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7a
7b
Developments must accord with the Wind SPG, which states that developments should not result in an unacceptable adverse impact on biodiversity, and requires measures to enhance the biodiversity value of the site and its environs, where appropriate
189
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7c
Policy SC15 requires that development must not impact on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA Developments must accord with the Wind SPG, which states that developments should not result in an unacceptable adverse impact on biodiversity, and requires measures to enhance the biodiversity value of the site and its environs, where appropriate
7d
190
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7e
Developments must accord with the Wind SPG, which defines SSSIs as "areas requiring significant protection", in which wind development is unlikely to be considered favourably. Developments must accord with the Wind SPG, which states that developments should not result in an unacceptable adverse impact on biodiversity, and requires measures to enhance the biodiversity value of the site and its environs, where appropriate
7f
191
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7g
Developments must accord with the Wind SPG, which states that developments should not result in an unacceptable adverse impact on biodiversity, and requires measures to enhance the biodiversity value of the site and its environs, where appropriate
7h

Developments must accord with the Wind SPG, which identifies areas of landscape sensitivity
7i
192
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7j
Developments must accord with the Wind SPG, which defines Special Landscape Areas as "areas requiring significant protection", in which wind development is unlikely to be considered favourably.
7k
193
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
Developments must accord with the Wind SPG, which requires that development be accommodated without directly or indirectly harming the character, landscape setting and context of historic environment assets
9 9a
194
SG2 Onshore Wind Energy Supplementary Guidance 1-8-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
Wind energy generation is likely to reduce reliance on fossil fuels
3b
3c
195
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3f
Peatland is identified as an "area of potential constraint", and the SG requires measures to minimise disturbance to peat
3g
3h
The SG recognised the possibility of increased flood risk, and requires that there be no permanent adverse impacts, and that unavoidable temporary impacts be mitigated
196
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3i
The SG recognised the possibility of increased flood risk, and requires that there be no permanent adverse impacts, and that unavoidable temporary impacts be mitigated There could be negative impacts from constructionrelated traffic; developers are expected to reduce the impact where practicable and suitable
3j
197
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3k
The SG recognises the risks to the water environment and requires that there be no permanent adverse impacts, and that unavoidable temporary impacts be mitigated The SG recognises the risks to the water environment and requires that there be no permanent adverse impacts, and that unavoidable temporary impacts be mitigated
3l
198
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3m
The SG recognises the risks to the water environment and requires that there be no permanent adverse impacts, and that unavoidable temporary impacts be mitigated
3n
3o
3p 3q 5

199
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
5a 5b 6 6a 7
Our communities are more cohesive and inclusive Our communities are safer Health and Wellbeing Improve health and reduce health inequalities Natural Environment Encourage promotion and connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network within and linking beyond Clackmannanshire

7a
200
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7b
Renewable energy developments can help reduce the impacts of climate change on biodiversity; the SG states that there should be no adverse unacceptable impact on biodiversity, and requires mitigation where necessary, and measures to enhance the existing biodiversity where appropriate.
The Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site is defined as an "area requiring significant protection"
7c
201
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7d
The SSSIs are defined as "areas requiring significant protection"
7e
202
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7f
203
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7g
The SG states that there should be no adverse unacceptable impact on biodiversity, and requires mitigation where necessary, and measures to enhance the existing biodiversity where appropriate.
7h
7i
Aims to ensure that any impacts on local landscape character are acceptable
204
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7j
Aims to ensure that any impacts on Special Landscape Areas are acceptable
7k
8d
The SG requires developers to demonstrate that development will not directly or indirectly harm the character, landscape setting and context of historic environment assets.
205
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
9a
There could be negative impacts from constructionrelated traffic; developers are expected to reduce the impact where practicable and suitable
SC16 - Hydro-electricity Development 15-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a
206
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
Policy SC16 supports appropriate hydroelectricity generation
3b
3c
3f
3g
207
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3h
Policy SC16 requires that there is no significant adverse impact on flood risk Policy SC16 requires that there is no significant adverse impact on flood risk
3i
3j
3k
Policy SC16 requires that there is no significant adverse impact on the water environment
208
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3l
Policy SC16 requires there to be no significant adverse impact on ecological quality, and promotes the re-use of instream structures, which has the potential to improve fish passage
3m 3n

3o
3p
209
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3q 5 5a 5b 6 6a 7
Maximise recycling and composting Community Cohesion Our communities are more cohesive and inclusive Our communities are safer Health and Wellbeing Improve health and reduce health inequalities Natural Environment Encourage promotion and connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network within and linking beyond Clackmannanshire

7a
210
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7b
Where existing in-stream structures are re-used, ensure they remove barriers to fish passage
Policy SC14 requires that developments should not have an adverse impact on the natural environment. Policy SC16 requires that there is no significant adverse impact on ecological quality, fish passage and habitat; and encourages the re-use of in-stream structures, which has the potential to improve fish passage Policies SC14 and SC16 require that development must not impact on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA
7c
211
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7d
Policy SC16 requires that there is no significant adverse impact on protected species Policy SC14 requires that developments should not have a significant adverse impact on designated areas of nature conservation value
7e
7f
7g
Where existing in-stream structures are re-used, ensure they remove barriers to fish passage
7h
212
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
Policy SC14 requires that the development should not have a significant adverse impact on the quality and distinctive character of the local and wider landscape Policy SC14 requires that the development should not have a significant adverse impact on the quality and distinctive character of the local and wider landscape
7j
7k
213
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
Policy SC14 requires that the development should not have a significant adverse impact on listed buildings, Conservation Areas, historic gardens and designed landscapes, and sites of archaeological or historical importance
9 9a
214
SC17 - Biomass 11-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
Policy SC17 supports appropriate biomass generation that ensures efficient recovery and transmission of energy and heat
3b
3c
215
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3f
3g
Improve Clackmannanshire's resilience to climate change Reduce overall flood risk in a sustainable way Contribute to the mitigation of floods and droughts
3h 3i

216
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3j
Policy SC17 requires that biomass energy developments do not have a significant adverse impact on air quality
3k
3l 3m 3n

3o
217
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3p
Policy SC17 requires satisfactory procedures for waste minimisation
3q 5 5a 5b 6 6a 7
Maximise recycling and composting Community Cohesion Our communities are more cohesive and inclusive Our communities are safer Health and Wellbeing Improve health and reduce health inequalities Natural Environment

218
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7a
7b
Policy SC14 requires that developments should not have an adverse impact on the natural environment Policy SC14 requires that development must not impact on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA
7c
7d
219
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7e
Policy SC14 requires that developments should not have a significant adverse impact on designated areas of nature conservation value
7f
7g
7h
220
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
Policies SC14 and SC17 require that the development should not have a significant adverse impact on the quality and distinctive character of the local and wider landscape Policies SC14 and SC17 require that the development should not have a significant adverse impact on the quality and distinctive character of the local and wider landscape
7j
7k
221
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
9 9a
222
SC18 - Large Solar Arrays 11-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
Policy SC18 supports appropriately-sited large solar arrays
3b
3c
223
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3f
Policy SC14 does not support developments that would have a significant adverse impact on the carbon stocks in carbon rich soils, and requires that development accords with policy EA13, which protects carbon rich soils
3g
3h 3i

3j
224
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3k
3l 3m 3n

Policy SC18 requires foundations that facilitate the restoration of the site. Policy SC14 requires that development accords with policy EA13, which protects prime agricultural land and carbon rich soils
3o
3p
225
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3q 5 5a 5b 6 6a 7

7a
226
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7b
Policy SC18 requires that ground mounted solar arrays should have a neutral or positive impact on the ecological value of the site Policies SC14 and SC18 requires that development must not impact on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA
7c
7d
227
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7e
7f
7g
7h
228
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
Policies SC14 and SC18 require that the development should not have a significant adverse impact on the quality and distinctive character of the local and wider landscape Policies SC14 and SC18 require that the development should not have a significant adverse impact on the quality and distinctive character of the local and wider landscape
7j
7k
229
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
Vacant and derelict land is given preference over greenfield sites for new development
9 9a
230
SC19 - Deep Geothermal 11-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
Policy SC19 supports appropriate deep geothermal energy and heat proposals
3b
3c
231
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3f
Policy SC14 does not support developments that would have a significant adverse impact on the carbon stocks in carbon rich soils
3g
3h 3i

Policy SC19 requires that any impacts on air quality should be acceptable or could be satisfactorily mitigated
3j
232
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3k
Policy SC19 requires that development should not result in any significant adverse impact on the water environment
3l 3m 3n
Achieve good ecological status Reduce water pollution Promote sustainable water use

3o
3p
233
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3q 5 5a 5b 6 6a 7

7a
234
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7b
Policy SC14 requires that developments should not have an adverse impact on the natural environment Policies SC14 and SC19 require that development must not impact on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA Policy SC19 requires that there should be no significant adverse impact on protected species
7c
7d
235
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7e
7f
7g
7h
236
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
Policy SC14 requires that the development should not have a significant adverse impact on the quality and distinctive character of the local and wider landscape Policy SC14 requires that the development should not have a significant adverse impact on the quality and distinctive character of the local and wider landscape
7j
7k
237
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
9 9a
238
SC20 - Water and Drainage Infrastructure and Capacity 11-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
3c
3f
3g
239
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3h
Policy requires appropriate SUDS system for all new developments (except single dwellinghouses) Policy requires appropriate SUDS system for all new developments (except single dwellinghouses)
3i
3j
3k
Policy requires private water systems to have no detrimental effect on the natural environment
3l
240
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3m
Policy requires appropriate SUDS system for all new developments (except single dwellinghouses), and requires any private water systems to have no detrimental impact on the natural environment
3n
3o
3p 3q 5

241
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
5a 5b 6 6a 7
Our communities are more cohesive and inclusive Our communities are safer Health and Wellbeing Improve health and reduce health inequalities Natural Environment Encourage promotion and connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network within and linking beyond Clackmannanshire

7a
Policy requires SUDS features to be a key component of green infrastructure on site Consider habitat opportunities offered by SUDS at the planning application stage Policy requires SUDS features to be a key component of green infrastructure on site
7b
242
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7c
Avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site Maintain and enhance the populations of European Protected Species, including protection of their resting places Protect and enhance SSSIs Protect and enhance priority species and habitats in Clackmannanshire
7d
7e
7f
7g
Consider habitat connectivity opportunities offered by SUDS at the planning application stage
Policy requires SUDS features to be a key component of green infrastructure on site
7h
243
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
SUDS features should contribute to placemaking
7j
7k
8d
9 9a
244
SC21 - Pipeline and Hazard Consultation Zones 11-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
3c
3f
3g
3h
245
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3i
3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

3o
3p
246
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3q 5 5a

Development in Pipeline and Hazard Consultation Zones must avoid unnecessary increases in the number of people exposed to risk
5b
6 6a 7
247
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7a
7b
7c
7d
7e
7f
248
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7g
7h
7i
7j
7k
249
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
9 9a
250
SC22 - Hazardous Substances Consent 11-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
3c
3f
3g
3h
251
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3i
3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

3o
3p
252
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3q 5 5a

Location of development which will require Hazardous Substances Consent should avoid creating significant adverse levels of risk to people in the vicinity
5b
253
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
6a
Location of development which will require Hazardous Substances Consent should avoid creating significant adverse levels of risk to people in the vicinity
Natural Environment Encourage promotion and connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network within and linking beyond Clackmannanshire Further the conservation of biodiversity Avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site
7a
7b
7c
254
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7d
Developments requiring Hazardous Substances Consent should avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA
7e
Protect and enhance SSSIs Protect and enhance priority species and habitats in Clackmannanshire Increase habitat connectivity and ecosystem function to assist local biodiversity in response to climate change Reduce the impact of invasive species
7f
7g
7h
255
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
7j
7k
8d
9 9a
256
SC23 - Development in the Countryside - General Principles 11-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
Setting a Clear Framework for Positive Change Regenerate Clackmannanshire's town centres Sustainable Economic Growth
By directing development to towns and villages the policy should avoid increases in transport emissions which would arise from rural development
3b
3c
3f
257
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3g
Improve Clackmannanshire's resilience to climate change Reduce overall flood risk in a sustainable way Contribute to the mitigation of floods and droughts Keep air pollution below Local Air Quality Management thresholds Prevent deterioration and enhance the status of the water environment Achieve good ecological status Reduce water pollution Promote sustainable water use
3h 3i

3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

258
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3o
By directing development to towns and villages the policy should avoid damage to soils which could arise from rural development
3p 3q 5 5a 5b 6

259
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
6a 7
Improve health and reduce health inequalities Natural Environment Encourage promotion and connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network within and linking beyond Clackmannanshire
7a
Proposals will be expected to contribute to green network objectives By directing development to towns and villages the policy should avoid damage to biodiversity which could arise from rural development Proposals should no contribute to adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA
7b
7c
260
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7d
7e
7f
7g
7h
261
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
Policy directs development away from the countryside, and expects any development in the countryside to make a significant contribution to the enhancement of the quality and distinctive character of the landscape. Policy directs development away from the countryside, and expects any development in the countryside to make a significant contribution to the enhancement of the quality and distinctive character of the landscape.
7j
262
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7k
8d
Policy supports appropriate conversion of existing rural buildings of traditional character and architectural value

By directing development to towns and villages the policy should avoid increases in transport emissions which would arise from rural development
9a
263
SC24 - Residential Development in the Countryside 11-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
By directing development to towns and villages, policy SC23 should avoid increases in transport emissions which would arise from rural development
3b
3c
3f
264
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3g
3h 3i

3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

265
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3o
By directing development to towns and villages, policy SC23 should avoid damage to soils which could arise from rural development
3p 3q 5 5a 5b 6

266
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
6a 7
7a
Policy SC23 expects proposals to contribute to green network objectives By directing development to towns and villages, policy SC23 should avoid damage to biodiversity which could arise from rural development Policy SC23 expects proposals to not contribute to adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA
7b
7c
267
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7d
7e
7f
7g
7h
268
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
Policy SC23 directs development away from the countryside, and expects any development in the countryside to make a significant contribution to the enhancement of the quality and distinctive character of the landscape. Policy SC23 directs development away from the countryside, and expects any development in the countryside to make a significant contribution to the enhancement of the quality and distinctive character of the landscape.
7j
269
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7k
8d
Policy SC23 supports appropriate conversion of existing rural buildings of traditional character and architectural value

9a
270
SC25 - Business Development in the Countryside 11-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
3b
3c
3f
271
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3g
3h 3i

3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

272
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3o
3p 3q 5 5a 5b 6

273
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
6a 7
7a
7b
7c
274
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7d
7e
7f
7g
7h
275
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
7j
276
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7k
8d

9a
277
SC26 - Enabling Development in the Countryside 11-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
3b
3c
3f
278
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3g
3h 3i

3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

279
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3o
3p 3q 5 5a 5b 6

280
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
6a 7
7a
7b
7c
281
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7d
7e
7f
7g
7h
282
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
7j
283
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7k
8d

9a
284
EP1 - Strategic Land for Business 24-6-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
Planning proposals would need to demonstrate how new business / industrial development would address potential increase in emissions Potential to require energy efficient design New business and industry is likely to lead to increased greenhouse gas emissions, both from the new building and from commuting
3b
3c
3f
3g
285
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3h 3i
Reduce overall flood risk in a sustainable way Contribute to the mitigation of floods and droughts

New business and industry has the potential to lead to increased air pollution, both from the new industrial use and from commuting
3j
Assessment of risk and mitigation should be considered at planning application stage
3k
3l 3m 3n

286
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3o
Assess risk and mitigation at planning application stage
Industrial processes may leave a legacy of contamination. The sites in EP1 are mostly brownfield, so may provide the opportunity to address existing contamination.
3p 3q 5 5a 5b 6

287
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
6a 7
Improve health and reduce health inequalities Natural Environment Encourage promotion and connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network within and linking beyond Clackmannanshire Further the conservation of biodiversity Avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site Maintain and enhance the populations of European Protected Species, including protection of their resting places Protect and enhance SSSIs
7a
7b
7c
7d
7e
288
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7f
7g
7h
7i
7j
7k
289
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
9 9a
290
EP 2 - Existing Business Sites 24-6-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
3b
3c
3f
291
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3g
3h 3i

3j
3k
Prevent deterioration and enhance the status of the water environment Achieve good ecological status Reduce water pollution
3l 3m

292
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3n

Industrial processes may leave a legacy of contamination. The sites in the Schedule of Business and Industrial Sites are mostly brownfield, so may provide the opportunity to address existing contamination.
3o
Assess risk and mitigation at planning application stage
3p 3q 5 5a
Minimise waste generation Maximise recycling and composting Community Cohesion Our communities are more cohesive and inclusive

293
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
5b 6 6a 7
Our communities are safer Health and Wellbeing Improve health and reduce health inequalities Natural Environment Encourage promotion and connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network within and linking beyond Clackmannanshire Further the conservation of biodiversity
7a
7b
294
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7c
One of the criteria that must be met is "The use would not have an adverse effect on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA either alone or in combination with other proposals."
7d
Maintain and enhance the populations of European Protected Species, including protection of their resting places Protect and enhance SSSIs Protect and enhance priority species and habitats in Clackmannanshire
7e
7f
295
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7g
7h
7i
7j
7k
296
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
9 9a
297
EP3 - Business and Industrial Uses Outwith Existing or Allocated Business Sites 24-6-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
3b
3c
3f
298
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3g
3h 3i

3j
3k
Prevent deterioration and enhance the status of the water environment Achieve good ecological status Reduce water pollution
3l 3m

299
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3n

Policy directs developments to brownfield, vacant or derelict land
3o
3p 3q 5 5a 5b 6

300
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
6a 7
Improve health and reduce health inequalities Natural Environment Encourage promotion and connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network within and linking beyond Clackmannanshire Further the conservation of biodiversity
7a
7b

One of the criteria that must be met is "The proposed development would not result in adverse effects upon the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA either alone or in combination with other projects and plans"
7c
301
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7d
7e
7f
7g
7h
302
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
One of the criteria that must be met is "The layout and design of the proposed buildings would be appropriate to the character of the site and surrounding area"
7j
7k
8d
303
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
9a
EP4 - Non-Employment Generating Uses on Existing or Allocated Business Sites 26-6-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
Setting a Clear Framework for Positive Change Regenerate Clackmannanshire's town centres Environmental Sustainability Reduce greenhouse gas emissions
304
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3c
Improve energy conservation and efficiency throughout Clackmannanshire Protect carbon-rich soils from disturbance or loss Improve Clackmannanshire's resilience to climate change Reduce overall flood risk in a sustainable way Contribute to the mitigation of floods and droughts Keep air pollution below Local Air Quality Management thresholds Prevent deterioration and enhance the status of the water environment Achieve good ecological status
3f
3g
3h 3i

3j
3k
3l
305
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3m 3n
Reduce water pollution Promote sustainable water use Reduce contamination and safeguard soil quantity and quality Minimise waste generation Maximise recycling and composting Community Cohesion Our communities are more cohesive and inclusive Our communities are safer Health and Wellbeing

3o
3p 3q 5 5a 5b 6

306
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
6a 7
Improve health and reduce health inequalities Natural Environment
7a
Require design to contribute to the CSGN at planning application stage
Alternative developments may be required to provide environmental enhancements; this could include contribution to the CSGN
7b
Further the conservation of biodiversity Avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site Maintain and enhance the populations of European Protected Species, including protection of their resting places
7c
7d
307
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7e
Protect and enhance SSSIs Protect and enhance priority species and habitats in Clackmannanshire Increase habitat connectivity and ecosystem function to assist local biodiversity in response to climate change Reduce the impact of invasive species
7f
7g
7h

Alternative developments may be required to provide visual and/or environmental enhancement of the site and/or its surroundings
7i
Require design and landscaping to contribute to the landscape character at the planning application stage
7j
308
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7k
8d
9 9a
309
EP5 - Home Working 26-6-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
Home working can reduce the need to travel, and for new buildings to accommodate employment uses, and therefore is likely to contribute to reduced greenhouse gas emissions
3b
3c
310
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3f
3g
3h 3i

Home working can reduce the need to travel, and therefore is likely to contribute to reduced air pollution
3j
3k
Prevent deterioration and enhance the status of the water environment Achieve good ecological status
3l
311
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3m 3n

3o
3p 3q 5 5a 5b 6

312
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
6a 7
7a
7b
7c
7d
7e
313
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7f
7g
7h
7i
7j
7k
314
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
Home working can reduce the need to travel.
8d
9 9a
315
EP6 - Green Business 26-6-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments

This is one of the Council's sustainability objectives, as set out in the Sustainability and Climate Change Strategy (SCCS)
1a
One of the Council's sustainability objectives is to reduce Clackmannanshire's carbon footprint
3b
316
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3c
The policy's definition of "green business" includes low-carbon, resourceefficient practices
3f
Protect carbon-rich soils from disturbance or loss Improve Clackmannanshire's resilience to climate change
3g
3h
Policy encourages businesses that have a positive environmental outcome - reducing flood risk could be such an outcome
317
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3i
Policy encourages businesses that have a positive environmental outcome - mitigating floods and droughts could be such an outcome Policy encourages businesses that have a positive environmental outcome - reducing air pollution could be such an outcome One of the Council's sustainability objectives is to protect and improve water resources
3j
3k
318
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3l
One of the Council's sustainability objectives is to protect and improve water resources One of the Council's sustainability objectives is to protect and improve water resources One of the Council's sustainability objectives is to facilitate and encourage the sustainable design of new development
3m
3n
3o
Reduce contamination and safeguard soil quantity and quality Minimise waste generation
3p
This is one of the Council's sustainability objectives
319
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3q 5 5a 5b 6

6a
One of the Council's sustainability objectives is to reduce health inequalities
Natural Environment
320
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7a
Encourage promotion and connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network within and linking beyond Clackmannanshire Further the conservation of biodiversity Avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site
7b
7c
7d
Policy encourages businesses that have a positive environmental outcome - maintaining and enhancing populations of European Protected species could be such an outcome
321
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7e
Policy encourages businesses that have a positive environmental outcome - protecting and enhancing SSSIs could be such an outcome Policy encourages businesses that have a positive environmental outcome - protecting and enhancing priority species and habitats could be such an outcome Policy encourages businesses that have a positive environmental outcome - increasing habitat connectivity and ecosystem function could be such an outcome
7f
7g
322
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7h
Policy encourages businesses that have a positive environmental outcome - reducing the impact of invasive species could be such an outcome
7i
Protect and enhance the distinctive character of the landscape and ensure new development does not exceed the capacity of the landscape to accommodate it Protect and enhance areas designated for their national or local landscape importance e.g. AGLVs Protect and enhance geodiversity, particularly in geological Sites of Special Scientific Interest Built Environment
7j
7k
323
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
One of the Council's sustainability objectives is to conserve Clackmannanshire's build heritage
9 9a
Sustainable Transport and Accessibility Reduce the environmental impact of travel ?

324
EP7 - Telecommunications Development Criteria 26-6-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
3c
3f
3g
3h
325
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3i
3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

3o
3p
326
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3q 5 5a 5b 6 6a 7

7a
7b
327
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7c
Stated in the policy
7d
7e
Development should not have a significant adverse effect on sites of ecological interest Development should not have a significant adverse effect on sites of ecological interest
7f
7g
328
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7h

Siting and appearance should not unacceptably impact on the visual amenity, character and appearance of the surrounding area Development should not a significant adverse impact on special landscape areas
7i
7j
Protect and enhance areas designated for their national or local landscape importance e.g. AGLVs Protect and enhance geodiversity, particularly in geological Sites of Special Scientific Interest Built Environment
7k
329
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
Development should not have a significant adverse impact on archaeological sites, conservation areas, listed buildings or their setting
9 9a
330
EP8 - Telecommunication Development - Additional Information 26-6-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
3c
3f
3g
3h
331
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3i
3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

3o
3p
332
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3q 5 5a 5b 6 6a 7

7a
7b
333
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7c
7d
7e
7f
7g
7h
334
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
Proposals must be supported by information on visual impact, and landscaping and screen planting Proposals must be supported by information on visual impact, and landscaping and screen planting
7j
7k
Protect and enhance geodiversity, particularly in geological Sites of Special Scientific Interest Built Environment Protect and, where appropriate, enhance the historic environment
8d
335
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
9 9a
EP9 - Protection of Minerals Resources 26-6-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
336
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3b
Reduce greenhouse gas emissions Improve energy conservation and efficiency throughout Clackmannanshire Protect carbon-rich soils from disturbance or loss Improve Clackmannanshire's resilience to climate change Reduce overall flood risk in a sustainable way Contribute to the mitigation of floods and droughts Keep air pollution below Local Air Quality Management thresholds Prevent deterioration and enhance the status of the water environment
3c
3f
3g
3h 3i

3j
3k
337
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3l 3m 3n
Achieve good ecological status Reduce water pollution Promote sustainable water use Reduce contamination and safeguard soil quantity and quality Minimise waste generation Maximise recycling and composting Community Cohesion Our communities are more cohesive and inclusive Our communities are safer

3o
3p 3q 5 5a 5b

338
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
6 6a 7
Health and Wellbeing Improve health and reduce health inequalities Natural Environment Encourage promotion and connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network within and linking beyond Clackmannanshire Further the conservation of biodiversity Avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site Maintain and enhance the populations of European Protected Species, including protection of their resting places
7a
7b
7c
7d
339
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7e
7f
7g
7h
7i
7j
340
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7k
8d
9 9a
341
EP10 Minerals - General Principles 27-6-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
Mineral working is likely to increase greenhouse gas emissions
3b
3c
3f
3g
342
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3h 3i
Reduce overall flood risk in a sustainable way Contribute to the mitigation of floods and droughts Keep air pollution below Local Air Quality Management thresholds

Mineral extraction and transportation is likely to increase air pollution. Proposals that would result in a significant adverse impact on the water environment will not normally be supported Proposals that would result in a significant adverse impact on the water environment will not normally be supported
3j
3k
3l
343
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3m
Proposals that would result in a significant adverse impact on the water environment will not normally be supported
3n

Minerals working is likely to do significant local damage to soils. However, this can be mitigated by the policy's requirement for restoration
3o
3p 3q 5

344
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
5a
Policy expects proposals to provide direct community benefits; these could contribute to community cohesion. Policy expects proposals to not have a significant adverse impact on health and safety
5b
345
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
6a
Consider local community health profiles at the planning application stage
Policy expects proposals to not have a significant adverse impact on amenity, health and safety and air quality; however, any adverse impact on communities that already suffer from disproportionately poor health could be considered significant.
Natural Environment
Proposals have the potential to have a detrimental impact on the Central Scotland Green Network; however, restoration of the site could provide new green network features.
7a
346
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7b
Proposals have the potential to have a detrimental impact on biodiversity; however, restoration of the site could provide habitat improvements
7c
7d
Proposals have the potential to have a detrimental impact on European Protected Species; however, restoration of the site could provide habitat improvements
347
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7e
Policy does not support proposals that are likely to result in a significant adverse impact on designated areas of nature conservation value Proposals have the potential to have a detrimental impact on priority species and habitats; however, restoration of the site could provide habitat improvements
7f
348
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7g
Proposals have the potential to have a detrimental impact on habitat connectivity and ecosystem function; however, restoration of the site could provide habitat improvements.
7h

The policy does not support proposals that are likely to have a significant detrimental impact on the quality and distinctive character of the landscape
7i
349
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7j
The policy does not support proposals that are likely to have a significant detrimental impact on designated areas of special landscape Proposals have the potential to have detrimental impact on geodiversity: depends on location
7k
Built Environment
Policy does not support proposals that would have a significant adverse impact on the historic environment
8d
350
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
9 9a
EP11 Opencast Coal Extraction 27-6-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
351
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3b
3c
Improve energy conservation and efficiency throughout Clackmannanshire Protect carbon-rich soils from disturbance or loss Improve Clackmannanshire's resilience to climate change Reduce overall flood risk in a sustainable way Contribute to the mitigation of floods and droughts Keep air pollution below Local Air Quality Management thresholds
3f
3g
3h 3i

Mineral extraction and transportation is likely to increase air pollution.
3j
352
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3k
Proposals that would result in a significant adverse impact on the water environment will not normally be supported Proposals that would result in a significant adverse impact on the water environment will not normally be supported Proposals that would result in a significant adverse impact on the water environment will not normally be supported
3l
3m
3n
353
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3o
Opencast coal extraction is likely to do significant local damage to soils. However, this can be mitigated by the requirement for restoration.
3p 3q 5

5a
Policy expects proposals to provide direct community benefits; these could contribute to community cohesion.
354
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
5b
Policy expects proposals to not have a significant adverse impact on health and safety

6a
Natural Environment
355
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7a
Proposals have the potential to have a detrimental impact on the Central Scotland Green Network; however, restoration of the site could provide new green network features. Proposals have the potential to have a detrimental impact on biodiversity; however, restoration of the site could provide habitat improvements
7b
7c
356
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7d
Proposals have the potential to have a detrimental impact on European Protected Species; however, restoration of the site could provide habitat improvements Policy does not support proposals that are likely to result in a significant adverse impact on designated areas of nature conservation value
7e
357
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7f
Proposals have the potential to have a detrimental impact on priority species and habitats; however, restoration of the site could provide habitat improvements Proposals have the potential to have a detrimental impact on habitat connectivity and ecosystem function; however, restoration of the site could provide habitat improvements.
7g
7h
358
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
The policy does not support proposals that are likely to have a significant detrimental impact on the quality and distinctive character of the landscape The policy does not support proposals that are likely to have a significant detrimental impact on designated areas of special landscape Proposals have the potential to have detrimental impact on geodiversity: depends on location
7j
7k
Built Environment
359
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
9 9a
360
EP12 Aggregate Minerals 27-6-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
3b
3c
3f
3g
361
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3h 3i
Reduce overall flood risk in a sustainable way Contribute to the mitigation of floods and droughts Keep air pollution below Local Air Quality Management thresholds

Mineral extraction and transportation is likely to increase air pollution. Proposals that would result in a significant adverse impact on the water environment will not normally be supported Proposals that would result in a significant adverse impact on the water environment will not normally be supported
3j
3k
3l
362
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3m
Proposals that would result in a significant adverse impact on the water environment will not normally be supported
3n

Minerals working is likely to do significant local damage to soils. However, this can be mitigated by the requirement for restoration
3o
3p 3q 5

363
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
5a
5b
364
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
6a
Natural Environment
7a
365
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7b
7c
7d
366
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7e
7f
367
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7g
7h

7i
368
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7j
7k
Built Environment
8d
369
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
9 9a
EP13 Coal Bed Methane 27-6-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
370
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3a
Prevent any significant increase in Clackmannanshires greenhouse gas emissions
Mineral working is likely to increase greenhouse gas emissions Mineral working is likely to increase greenhouse gas emissions
3b
3c
3f
3g
3h 3i

371
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3j
Mineral extraction and transportation is likely to increase air pollution. Although the general principles policy states that proposals that would result in a significant adverse impact on the water environment will not normally be supported, coal bed methane extraction is likely to have detrimental impacts on the water environment
3k
372
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3l
Although the general principles policy states that proposals that would result in a significant adverse impact on the water environment will not normally be supported, coal bed methane extraction is likely to have detrimental impacts on the water environment
373
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3m
Although the general principles policy states that proposals that would result in a significant adverse impact on the water environment will not normally be supported, coal bed methane extraction is likely to have detrimental impacts on the water environment
3n

Minerals working is likely to do significant local damage to soils. However, this can be mitigated by the requirement for restoration
3o
374
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3p 3q 5

5a
5b
375
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
6a
Natural Environment
7a
376
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7b
7c
7d
377
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7e
7f
378
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7g
7h

7i
379
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7j
7k
Built Environment
8d
380
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
9 9a
EP14 - Retail Network Centre and Hierarchy 26-6-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments

Policy aims to protect and enhance the role and function of town centres
1a
381
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
Focussing retail development in town centres may reduce the need to people to travel by car for shopping
3b
3c
3f
3g
3h 3i

382
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3j
Keep air pollution below Local Air Quality Management thresholds Prevent deterioration and enhance the status of the water environment Achieve good ecological status Reduce water pollution Promote sustainable water use Reduce contamination and safeguard soil quantity and quality Minimise waste generation Maximise recycling and composting
3k
3l 3m 3n

3o
3p 3q

383
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
Community Cohesion
Supporting the role of town centres should be beneficial for community cohesiveness
5a
5b 6 6a 7
Our communities are safer Health and Wellbeing Improve health and reduce health inequalities Natural Environment Encourage promotion and connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network within and linking beyond Clackmannanshire
7a
384
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7b
Further the conservation of biodiversity Avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site Maintain and enhance the populations of European Protected Species, including protection of their resting places Protect and enhance SSSIs Protect and enhance priority species and habitats in Clackmannanshire Increase habitat connectivity and ecosystem function to assist local biodiversity in response to climate change Reduce the impact of invasive species
7c
7d
7e
7f
7g
7h
385
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
Protect and enhance the distinctive character of the landscape and ensure new development does not exceed the capacity of the landscape to accommodate it Protect and enhance areas designated for their national or local landscape importance e.g. AGLVs Protect and enhance geodiversity, particularly in geological Sites of Special Scientific Interest Built Environment Protect and, where appropriate, enhance the historic environment Sustainable Transport and Accessibility
7j
7k
8d
386
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
9a
Focussing retail development in town centres may reduce the need to people to travel by car for shopping
EP15 - Promoting Town Centre Regeneration 26-6-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a
Aim of the policy
387
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
Making town centres more attractive should reduce the need to travel elsewhere, so should reduce greenhouse gas emissions associated with travel. Developments are expected to provide safe and convenient access for pedestrians and cyclists Require energy efficiency measures when buildings are re-used
3b
3c
3f
3g
388
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3h 3i

3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

3o
389
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3p 3q 5

5a
Enhancing the vitality and viability of town centres is likely to benefit community inclusion and cohesion Developments are expected to provide safe and convenient access for pedestrians and cyclists
5b
6 6a
Health and Wellbeing Improve health and reduce health inequalities
390
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7a
7b
7c
7d
7e
7f
391
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7g
7h
7i
7j
7k
392
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
Developments are expected to safeguard and enhance the historic built environment

Making town centres more attractive should reduce the need to travel elsewhere, so should reduce greenhouse gas emissions associated with travel. Developments are expected to provide safe and convenient access for pedestrians and cyclists
9a
393
EP16 - New Retail and Commercial Leisure Development 26-6-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments

Policy directs development to town centres in the first instance
1a
Focussing retail development on town centres should reduce the need to travel. Proposals that do not accord with policy EP16 will be expected to be conveniently accessible on foot, bicycle and by public transport
3b
394
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3c
3f
3g
3h 3i

395
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

396
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3o
3p

Proposals will be expected to provide adequate waste management measures
3q
Community Cohesion
Supports the role of town centres, and development that meets neighbourhood needs
5a
5b 6
397
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
6a 7
7a
7b
7c
7d
7e
398
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7f
7g
7h
7i
7j
7k
399
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
Built Environment Protect and, where appropriate, enhance the historic environment Sustainable Transport and Accessibility
8d
9a
400
EP17 - Supermarket and Superstore Development 26-6-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
3c
3f
3g
3h
401
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3i
3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

3o
3p
402
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3q 5 5a 5b 6 6a 7

7a
7b
403
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7c
7d
7e
7f
7g
7h
404
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
7j
7k
8d
9 9a
405
EP18 - Food and Drink 26-6-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments

Policy directs food and drink proposals to town centres, and takes safety and environmental health issues into consideration
1a
3 3b
Environmental Sustainability Reduce greenhouse gas emissions Improve energy conservation and efficiency throughout Clackmannanshire Protect carbon-rich soils from disturbance or loss
3c
3f
406
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3g
3h 3i

3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

407
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3o
Reduce contamination and safeguard soil quantity and quality Minimise waste generation Maximise recycling and composting Community Cohesion Our communities are more cohesive and inclusive Our communities are safer Health and Wellbeing Improve health and reduce health inequalities Natural Environment
3p 3q 5 5a 5b 6 6a 7

408
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7a
7b
7c
7d
7e
7f
409
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7g
7h
7i
7j
7k
410
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
9 9a
411
EP19 - Siting of Mobile Snack Bars 26-6-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
3c
3f
3g
3h
412
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3i
3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

3o
3p
413
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3q
Mobile snack bars are required to provide adequate recycling arrangements
5 5a 5b 6
Community Cohesion Our communities are more cohesive and inclusive Our communities are safer Health and Wellbeing
Could encourage unhealthy eating. Could encourage people to walk to the snack bar rather than drive into town.

6a
Natural Environment
414
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7a
7b
7c
7d
7e
7f
415
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7g
7h
7i
7j
7k
416
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
9a
Could encourage people to walk to the snack bar rather than drive into town. Likely to rely on passing trade from drivers rather than customers making special journeys
417
EP20 - Motor Vehicle Sales and Service Areas 26-6-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
3c
3f
3g
3h
418
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3i
3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

3o
3p
419
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3q 5 5a 5b 6 6a 7

7a
7b
420
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7c
7d
7e
7f
7g
7h
421
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
7j
7k
8d
9 9a
422
EP21 - Local Shops 26-6-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
3c
3f
3g
3h
423
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3i

Provision of local shops should reduce the need to travel for everyday purchases
3j
3k
Prevent deterioration and enhance the status of the water environment Achieve good ecological status Reduce water pollution Promote sustainable water use Reduce contamination and safeguard soil quantity and quality
3l 3m 3n

3o
424
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3p 3q 5

5a
Retention of local shops can help support community cohesiveness Community cohesiveness can contribute to improved community safety
5b
6 6a 7
425
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7a
7b
7c
7d
7e
7f
426
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7g
7h
7i
7j
7k
427
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
9a
Provision of local shops should reduce the need to travel for everyday purchases
428
EP22 - Shop Front Design, Advertising and External Security Measures 26-6-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments

Policy seeks to ensure high standards of design for alterations to shops, signage etc, which will be contribute to regenerating town centres
1a
3 3b
3c
3f
429
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3g
3h 3i

3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

430
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3o
3p 3q 5 5a

Policy seeks to resist security measures which make the urban environment feel unsafe
5b
6 6a
Health and Wellbeing Improve health and reduce health inequalities
431
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7a
7b
7c
7d
7e
7f
432
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7g
7h
7i
7j
7k
433
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
All proposals affecting listed buildings or within conservation areas shall be required to protect and enhance the historical or special character of the building and/or conservation area
9 9a
434
EA1 - Clackmannanshire Green Network 15-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments

Policy has the potential to contribute to town centre regeneration through enhancement of the green network in town centre areas
1a
CSGN has a strong focus on promoting active travel, which should contribute to reduced greenhouse gas emissions.
3b
3c
435
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3f
Protect carbon-rich soils from disturbance or loss Improve Clackmannanshire's resilience to climate change

The green network has a strong emphasis on adapting to climate change Managing flood risk in a way which maximises biodiversity and amenity benefits is part of the green network objectives Managing flood risk in a way which maximises biodiversity and amenity benefits is part of the green network objectives
3g
3h
3i
436
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3j
CSGN has a strong focus on promoting active travel, which should contribute to improved air quality. The green network objectives include improvement to the condition of the water environment The green network objectives include improvement to the condition of the water environment
3k
3l
3m 3n

437
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3o
Reduce contamination and safeguard soil quantity and quality Minimise waste generation Maximise recycling and composting Community Cohesion
3p 3q 5

5a
One of the CSGN desired outcomes is that people feel that they live in communities, not in isolation One of the CSGN desired outcomes is that people feel safe
5b
438
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
6a
CSGN has a strong focus on promoting active travel and outdoor activity which should contribute to improved health.
7a
Aim of the policy
7b
Green network objectives include strengthening biodiversity
7c
439
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7d
Maintain and enhance the populations of European Protected Species, including protection of their resting places Protect and enhance SSSIs
Strengthening biodiversity is likely to include European Protected Species
7e

Strengthening biodiversity is likely to include European Protected Species The green network has a strong emphasis on habitat connectivity A focus on habitats, biodiversity and the water environment should help to reducing the impact of non-native invasive species
7f
7g
7h
440
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
CSGN desired outcomes include "characterful, high quality landscapes"
7j
CSGN desired outcomes include "characterful, high quality landscapes"
7k
8d
441
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
9a
CSGN has a strong focus on promoting active travel
SG6 Green Infrastructure Supplementary Guidance 30-9-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
442
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3b
Green infrastructure supports climate change mitigation through encouraging active travel, supplying locally sourced biofuels, and storing carbon in vegetation
3c
3f

Green infrastructure contributes to climate change adaptation, including flood alleviation and protection from extreme weather
3g
443
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3h
Green infrastructure contributes to climate change adaptation, including flood alleviation Green infrastructure contributes to climate change adaptation, including flood alleviation Green networks support active travel, which The SG requires developers to enhance assets, for example by deculverting and naturalising burns
3i
3j
3k
444
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3l
The SG requires developers to enhance assets, for example by deculverting and naturalising burns
3m 3n
Reduce water pollution Promote sustainable water use Reduce contamination and safeguard soil quantity and quality Minimise waste generation Maximise recycling and composting Community Cohesion

3o
3p 3q 5

445
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
5a
Green networks can improve community cohesion by providing opportunities to understand cultural and natural heritage; providing improved connections between places; and creating space for interaction and social events. Green networks will provide safe opportunities for walking and cycling, as well as contributing to more cohesive and inclusive communities
5b
446
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
6a
Green networks can contribute to lowering stress levels and providing the opportunity for physical exercise
7a
Aim of the SG
7b
The SG expands on the Habitat Networks and Biodiversity policy. The SG requires that development will not have an adverse impact on the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site
7c
447
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7d
The SG gives more detailed information about ecological appraisal, required where there is likely to be a significant effect on protected species The SG supports the Protection of Designated Sites and Protected Species policy Green networks should contribute to protection of priority habitats and species Green infrastructure should form part of wellconnected green networks
7e
7f
7g
448
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7h
The SG expects developments to use native trees and shrubs in landscaping
7i
Protect and enhance the distinctive character of the landscape and ensure new development does not exceed the capacity of the landscape to accommodate it Protect and enhance areas designated for their national or local landscape importance e.g. AGLVs Protect and enhance geodiversity, particularly in geological Sites of Special Scientific Interest Built Environment Protect and, where appropriate, enhance the historic environment
Green networks reinforce landscape character
7j
Green networks reinforce landscape character
7k
8d
449
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments

The SG supports the provision of paths, which should encourage active travel and reduce reliance on cars
9a
450
EA2 - Habitat Networks and Biodiversity 15-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
Setting a Clear Framework for Positive Change Regenerate Clackmannanshire's town centres Environmental Sustainability Reduce greenhouse gas emissions Improve energy conservation and efficiency throughout Clackmannanshire Protect carbon-rich soils from disturbance or loss
3c
3f

Habitat and biodiversity improvements have the potential to contribute to flood mitigation etc
3g
451
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3h 3i

3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

3o
452
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3p 3q 5 5a 5b 6 6a 7
Minimise waste generation Maximise recycling and composting Community Cohesion Our communities are more cohesive and inclusive Our communities are safer Health and Wellbeing Improve health and reduce health inequalities Natural Environment

453
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7a
Encourage promotion and connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network within and linking beyond Clackmannanshire Further the conservation of biodiversity
Development proposals must contribute to the ongoing improvement of the CSGN Aim of the policy Development will be expected to contribute positively to biodiversity conservation and enhancement, and protect and enhance existing habitat networks
7b
7c
454
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7d
Development will be expected to contribute positively to biodiversity conservation and enhancement, and protect and enhance existing habitat networks Development will be expected to contribute positively to biodiversity conservation and enhancement, and protect and enhance existing habitat networks
7e
455
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7f
Development will be expected to contribute positively to biodiversity conservation and enhancement, and protect and enhance existing habitat networks Policy focuses on protection and enhancement of habitat networks to allow the movement of flora and fauna
7g
456
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7h
Development proposals must contribute to the objectives of the Clackmannanshire Biodiversity Action plan, which includes actions to reduce the impact of nonnative invasive species Ensure and new habitats created are in keeping with the landscape character of the site Habitat creation and enhancement is likely to contribute to enhancing the landscape
7i
Protect and enhance the distinctive character of the landscape and ensure new development does not exceed the capacity of the landscape to accommodate it Protect and enhance areas designated for their national or local landscape importance e.g. AGLVs Protect and enhance geodiversity, particularly in geological Sites of Special Scientific Interest
7j
7k
457
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
9 9a
458
EA3 - Protection of Designated Sites and Protected Species 16-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
3c
3f
3g
3h
459
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3i
3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

3o
3p
460
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3q 5 5a 5b 6 6a 7

7a
461
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7b
Policy aims to protect protected species, and sites that have been designated for their biodiversity importance Policy only allows development that would affect Natura Sites if there are imperative reasons of overriding public importance, and in which case mitigation measures would be required
7c
7d
Policy aims to protect protected species
462
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7e
Policy aims to protect designated sites. Development will only be permitted where an Ecological Appraisal has demonstrated that it will not have a significant adverse impact on the integrity of the site or the qualities for which it has been designated. Policy aims to protect designated sites, which are likely to include priority habitats and species.
7f
7g
Designated sites form part of the habitat network
463
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7h
Reduce the impact of invasive species Protect and enhance the distinctive character of the landscape and ensure new development does not exceed the capacity of the landscape to accommodate it Protect and enhance areas designated for their national or local landscape importance e.g. AGLVs Protect and enhance geodiversity, particularly in geological Sites of Special Scientific Interest Built Environment Protect and, where appropriate, enhance the historic environment

Designated sites are likely to contribute to the distinctive character of the landscape Some designated sites are part of the SLA Policy protects SSSIs which have been designated for their geological value
7i
7j
7k
8d
464
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
9 9a
EA4 - Landscape Quality 15-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
465
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3b
Reduce greenhouse gas emissions Improve energy conservation and efficiency throughout Clackmannanshire Protect carbon-rich soils from disturbance or loss Improve Clackmannanshire's resilience to climate change Reduce overall flood risk in a sustainable way Contribute to the mitigation of floods and droughts Keep air pollution below Local Air Quality Management thresholds Prevent deterioration and enhance the status of the water environment
3c
3f
3g
3h 3i

3j
3k
466
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3l 3m 3n
Achieve good ecological status Reduce water pollution Promote sustainable water use Reduce contamination and safeguard soil quantity and quality Minimise waste generation Maximise recycling and composting Community Cohesion Our communities are more cohesive and inclusive Our communities are safer

3o
3p 3q 5 5a 5b

467
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
6 6a 7
Health and Wellbeing Improve health and reduce health inequalities Natural Environment Encourage promotion and connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network within and linking beyond Clackmannanshire Further the conservation of biodiversity Avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site Maintain and enhance the populations of European Protected Species, including protection of their resting places
7a
7b
7c
7d
468
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7e
7f
7g
7h
7i
Aim of the policy
7j
Aim of the policy
469
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7k
8d
9 9a
470
EA5 - Geological Conservation Review Sites 15-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
3c
3f
3g
3h
471
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3i
3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

3o
3p
472
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3q 5 5a 5b 6 6a 7

7a
7b
473
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7c
7d
7e
7f
7g
7h
474
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
7j
7k
Aim of the policy
8d
9 9a
475
EA6 - Woodlands and Forestry 15-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
Policy supports appropriate new woodland planting, which contributes to carbon sequestration
3b
3c
3f
3g
476
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3h 3i

3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

3o
477
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3p 3q 5 5a 5b 6 6a 7
Minimise waste generation Maximise recycling and composting Community Cohesion Our communities are more cohesive and inclusive Our communities are safer Health and Wellbeing Improve health and reduce health inequalities Natural Environment Encourage promotion and connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network within and linking beyond Clackmannanshire

7a
Policy supports woodland planting that is consistent with CSGN principles
478
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7b
Ensure new woodland planting considers biodiversity
New woodland planting is has the potential to be beneficial for biodiversity
7c
Avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site Maintain and enhance the populations of European Protected Species, including protection of their resting places Protect and enhance SSSIs
7d
Ensure EPS are considered in woodland proposals
Support for new woodland planting and resistance to woodland removal is likely to be beneficial for EPS
7e

Woodland is a priority habitat in the Clackmannanshire Biodiversity Action Plan
7f
479
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7g
Ensure new woodland planting considers biodiversity and habitat connectivity
New woodland planting is likely to contribute to habitat connectivity
7h
7i
7j
7k
480
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
9 9a
481
EA7 - Hedgerows, Trees and Tree Preservation Orders 15-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
Setting a Clear Framework for Positive Change Regenerate Clackmannanshire's town centres Environmental Sustainability Reduce greenhouse gas emissions Improve energy conservation and efficiency throughout Clackmannanshire Protect carbon-rich soils from disturbance or loss
3c
3f
482
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3g
Retention of trees, woodlands and hedgerows is likely to be beneficial for managing flood risk, and providing cooling in urban areas Retention of trees, woodlands and hedgerows is likely to be beneficial for managing flood risk.
3h
3i
Contribute to the mitigation of floods and droughts Keep air pollution below Local Air Quality Management thresholds Prevent deterioration and enhance the status of the water environment
3j
3k
483
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3l 3m 3n
Achieve good ecological status Reduce water pollution Promote sustainable water use Reduce contamination and safeguard soil quantity and quality Minimise waste generation Maximise recycling and composting Community Cohesion

3o
3p 3q 5

5a
Urban trees are likely to contribute positively to community identity
484
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
5b 6 6a 7
Our communities are safer Health and Wellbeing Improve health and reduce health inequalities Natural Environment
7a
CSGN aims to increase woodland cover; maintaining woodland and hedgerows contributes to habitat connectivity
485
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7b
Trees, woodlands and hedgerows can be important habitats. Policy favours replacement planting that uses native species or species of known biodiversity value
7c
Avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site Maintain and enhance the populations of European Protected Species, including protection of their resting places Protect and enhance SSSIs
7d
Trees, woodlands and hedgerows may be habitats or resting places for EPS
7e
486
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7f
Woodlands are priority habitats in the Clackmannanshire Biodiversity Action Plan Maintaining woodlands and hedgerows contributes to habitat connectivity Policy favours native species and species of known biodiversity value for any replacement planting Trees, woodlands and hedgerows can be an important element of landscape and townscape
7g
7h
7i
487
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7j
Protect and enhance areas designated for their national or local landscape importance e.g. AGLVs Protect and enhance geodiversity, particularly in geological Sites of Special Scientific Interest Built Environment Protect and, where appropriate, enhance the historic environment Sustainable Transport and Accessibility Reduce the environmental impact of travel
7k
8d
9 9a
488
EA8 - Green Belt 15-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments

The purpose of the green belt is to support regeneration
1a
3 3b
Environmental Sustainability Reduce greenhouse gas emissions Improve energy conservation and efficiency throughout Clackmannanshire Protect carbon-rich soils from disturbance or loss Improve Clackmannanshire's resilience to climate change
3c
3f
3g
489
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3h 3i

3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

Protecting the green belt protects its soils
3o
490
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3p 3q 5 5a 5b 6 6a 7

7a
491
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7b

Developments in the green belt must demonstrate that they will not have an adverse effect on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA
7c
7d
7e
7f
492
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7g
7h

Purpose of the green belt is to protect and enhance the landscape setting of settlements Purpose of the green belt is to protect and enhance the landscape setting of settlements
7i
7j
7k
493
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
Ensure any conversion or re-use is done in accordance with historic environment policies
Policy supports conversion or re-use of buildings of historic or architectural value
9 9a
494
EA9 - Managing Flood Risk 15-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
3c
3f

Managing flood risk contributes significantly to climate change resilience
3g
495
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3h
Aim of the policy Policy aims to manage the likelihood and impact of flooding
3i
3j
3k
Sustainable flood management measures are likely to enhance the status of the water environment Sustainable flood management measures are likely to enhance the ecological status of the water environment
3l
496
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3m
Reducing the risk of flooding from surface water and sewers is likely to reduce water pollution
3n
Promote sustainable water use Reduce contamination and safeguard soil quantity and quality Minimise waste generation Maximise recycling and composting Community Cohesion Our communities are more cohesive and inclusive
3o
3p 3q 5 5a

497
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
5b
Policy reduces the risk of flooding, making communities safer

Reduced risk of flooding is likely to have mental and physical health benefits
6a
7a
498
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7b
Sustainable flood management measures have the potential to contribute to biodiversity conservation Policy requires that development does not have an adverse effect on the Firth of Forth SPA Sustainable flood management measures have the potential to contribute to maintaining and enhancing habitat for EPS
7c
7d
7e
499
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7f
Sustainable flood management measures have the potential to contribute to habitat enhancement Sustainable flood management measures have the potential to contribute to habitat connectivity
7g
7h
7i
500
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7j
Protect and enhance areas designated for their national or local landscape importance e.g. AGLVs Protect and enhance geodiversity, particularly in geological Sites of Special Scientific Interest Built Environment Protect and, where appropriate, enhance the historic environment Sustainable Transport and Accessibility Reduce the environmental impact of travel
7k
8d
9 9a
501
EA10 - Coastal Planning 15-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
3c
3f
3g
502
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3h
Policy supports managed coastal realignment projects that are compatible with flood risk management plans Policy supports managed coastal realignment projects that are compatible with flood risk management plans
3i
3j
503
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3k
Policy presumes against most development in the coastal zone, which is likely to reduce the impact of development on that part of the water environment
3l

Policy presumes against most development in the coastal zone, which is likely to reduce the impact of pollution on that part of the water environment
3m
3n
Promote sustainable water use Reduce contamination and safeguard soil quantity and quality
3o
504
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3p 3q 5 5a 5b 6 6a 7

7a
Policy supports appropriate recreational access provision
505
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7b
Policy aims to protect designated habitats, and supports managed coastal realignment projects that are compatible with the Clackmannanshire Biodiversity Action Plan Policy requires developments to have no adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA Policy aims to protect designated habitats, and supports managed coastal realignment projects that are compatible with the Clackmannanshire Biodiversity Action Plan
7c
7d
506
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7e
Policy aims to protect designated habitats. Policy aims to protect designated habitats, and supports managed coastal realignment projects that are compatible with the Clackmannanshire Biodiversity Action Plan Policy aims to protect designated habitats, and supports managed coastal realignment projects that are compatible with the Clackmannanshire Biodiversity Action Plan
7f
7g
7h
507
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
Policy aims to protect the landscape of the coastal margin
7j
7k
8d
Policy aims to protect the cultural heritage of the coastal margin
508
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
9a
Policy supports appropriate recreational access provision
EA11 - Environmental Quality 16-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
509
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3b
Reduce greenhouse gas emissions Improve energy conservation and efficiency throughout Clackmannanshire Protect carbon-rich soils from disturbance or loss Improve Clackmannanshire's resilience to climate change Reduce overall flood risk in a sustainable way Contribute to the mitigation of floods and droughts Keep air pollution below Local Air Quality Management thresholds
3c
3f
3g
3h 3i

Policy requires minimisation and mitigation of air pollution
3j
510
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3k
Policy requires minimisation and mitigation of water pollution
3l

Policy requires minimisation and mitigation of water pollution
3m
3n

Policy requires minimisation and mitigation of soil pollution
3o
3p
511
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3q 5 5a 5b 6

6a
Reducing pollution is likely to contribute to improved health
7a
512
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7b
Reducing pollution is likely to be beneficial for biodiversity Policy requires minimisation and mitigation of water pollution
7c
7d
7e
7f
513
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7g
7h
7i
7j
7k
514
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
9 9a
515
EA12 - Water Environment 16-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
Setting a Clear Framework for Positive Change Regenerate Clackmannanshire's town centres Environmental Sustainability Reduce greenhouse gas emissions Improve energy conservation and efficiency throughout Clackmannanshire
3c
516
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3f
All developments shall conform to the principles set out in the Water SG, which sets out requirements to avoid and mitigate the effects of development that would affect peat land The Water SG aims to deliver development that addresses flood risk and droughts The Water SG aims to reduce and manage flood risk in a sustainable way
3g
3h
517
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3i
The Water SG aims to deliver development that addresses flood risk and droughts
3j
3k
The Water SG states that development proposals will generally not be supported where they are likely to have an adverse impact on any waterbody The Water SG expects developments to deliver enhancements to the water environment, where possible
3l
518
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3m
The Water SG states that development proposals will generally not be supported where they are likely to have an adverse impact, including pollution, on any waterbody The Water SG's guidance on SUDS features prioritises good housekeeping, including grey water systems and water butts Improved water quality is likely to be beneficial for soil quality
3n
3o
3p
519
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3q 5 5a

The Water SG aims to improve safety by managing and reducing flood risk
5b

Managing and reducing flood risk should be beneficial for mental and physical health
6a
Natural Environment
520
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7a
The Water SG is to be read in conjunction with the Design and Layout SG, which promotes the Central Scotland Green Network. The Water SG highlights the Council's preference for SUDS to contribute to habitat creation, biodiversity and green networks. The Water SG highlights the Council's preference for SUDS to contribute to habitat creation, biodiversity and green networks. Opportunities for measures to improve the biodiversity value of watercourses are identified.
7b
521
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7c
Development proposals will generally not be supported where they are likely to have an adverse impact on any waterbody Avoidance of damage to the water environment is likely to be beneficial to EPS that rely on the water environment for their habitat or resting places Development proposals will generally not be supported where they are likely to have an adverse impact on any waterbody. Drainage Assessments are required for proposed developments in areas within or upstream of SSSIs
7d
7e
522
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7f
Freshwater and wetland, and blanket bog, are identified as priority habitats in the Clackmannanshire Biodiversity Action Plan, and support a number of priority species The Water SG promotes a number of measures to improve ecosystem function
7g
523
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7h
Development proposals will generally not be supported where they are likely to have an adverse impact, including the introduction of non-native species, on any waterbody. The Water SG proposes measures to tackle non-native invasive species Many water environment features are part of the distinctive character of the landscape
7i
7j
7k
524
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
9 9a
525
SG4 Water Supplementary Guidance 16-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
Setting a Clear Framework for Positive Change Regenerate Clackmannanshire's town centres Environmental Sustainability Reduce greenhouse gas emissions Improve energy conservation and efficiency throughout Clackmannanshire
3c
3f
SG sets out requirements to avoid and mitigate the effects of development that would affect peat land
526
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3g
SG aims to deliver development that addresses flood risk and droughts SG aims to reduce and manage flood risk in a sustainable way SG aims to deliver development that addresses flood risk and droughts
3h
3i
3j
527
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3k
Development proposals will generally not be supported where they are likely to have an adverse impact on any waterbody SG expects developments to deliver enhancements to the water environment, where possible Development proposals will generally not be supported where they are likely to have an adverse impact, including pollution, n any waterbody
3l
3m
528
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3n
Guidance on SUDS features prioritises good housekeeping, including grey water systems and water butts Improved water quality is likely to be beneficial for soil quality
3o
3p 3q 5 5a

529
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
5b
SG aims to improve safety by managing and reducing flood risk

Managing and reducing flood risk should be beneficial for mental and physical health
6a
Natural Environment
530
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7a
The SG is to be read in conjunction with the Design and Layout SG, which promotes the Central Scotland Green Network. The SG highlights the Council's preference for SUDS to contribute to habitat creation, biodiversity and green networks. The SG highlights the Council's preference for SUDS to contribute to habitat creation, biodiversity and green networks. Opportunities for measures to improve the biodiversity value of watercourses are identified.
7b
531
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7c
Development proposals will generally not be supported where they are likely to have an adverse impact on any waterbody Avoidance of damage to the water environment is likely to be beneficial to EPS that rely on the water environment for their habitat or resting places Development proposals will generally not be supported where they are likely to have an adverse impact on any waterbody. Drainage Assessments are required for proposed developments in areas within or upstream of SSSIs
7d
7e
532
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7f
Freshwater and wetland, and blanket bog, are identified as priority habitats in the Clackmannanshire Biodiversity Action Plan, and support a number of priority species The SG promotes a number of measures to improve ecosystem function
7g
533
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7h
Development proposals will generally not be supported where they are likely to have an adverse impact, including the introduction of non-native species, on any waterbody. The SG proposes measures to tackle non-native invasive species Many water environment features are part of the distinctive character of the landscape
7i
7j
7k
534
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
9 9a
535
EA13 - Significant Soil Resources 16-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
Policy aims to protect carbon rich soils, in order to avoid releasing the peat stored in them. Where wind energy development is proposed that affects carbon rich soils, it must result in a net reduction in carbon emissions.
3b
3c
536
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3f
Aim of the policy
3g
3h 3i

3j
3k
Peat is part of the water environment
3l 3m

537
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3n

Aim of the policy is to safeguard soil quantity and quality for agricultural and carbon sequestration purposes
3o
3p 3q 5 5a 5b 6

538
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
6a 7
7a
7b
Peat is a priority habitat in the Clackmannanshire Biodiversity Action Plan
7c
7d
539
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7e

Peat is a priority habitat in the Clackmannanshire Biodiversity Action Plan
7f
7g
7h
7i
7j
540
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7k
8d
9 9a
541
EA14 - Supporting the Delivery of Community Growing Spaces 16-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
Growing food locally means that less carbon is used to transport food from elsewhere. Policy directs community growing spaces to locations that encourage active travel.
3b
3c
3f
542
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3g
Local food growing will contribute to improving resilience to global food shortages
3h 3i
Reduce overall flood risk in a sustainable way Contribute to the mitigation of floods and droughts Keep air pollution below Local Air Quality Management thresholds Prevent deterioration and enhance the status of the water environment Achieve good ecological status Reduce water pollution

3j
3k
3l 3m

543
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3n

Policy requires that any adverse impacts on soil be mitigated
3o
3p

Encouraging community growing is likely to encourage composting
3q
Community Cohesion
Community growing opportunities can contribute to cohesion and inclusion
5a
544
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
5b
Improve community cohesion is likely to lead to an improved sense of safety

Gardening can have mental and physical health benefits
6a
Significantly increasing community growing is one of the ambitions of the CSGN
7a
545
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7b
Encourage wildlifefriendly planting and growing
Policy requires that there be no significant detrimental impacts on habitat networks. Allotments and community growing spaces can provide habitats, depending on how they are managed Policy requires that there be no adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA Policy requires that there be no significant detrimental impacts on priority habitats and species.
7c
7d
546
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7e

Policy requires that there be no significant detrimental impacts on priority habitats and species. Policy requires that there be no significant detrimental impacts on habitat networks.
7f
7g
7h

Policy requires that there be no significant detrimental impacts on the quality and distinctive character of the landscape.
7i
547
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7j
7k
8d
9a
Policy directs community growing spaces to locations that encourage active travel
548
EA15 - Classification of Land that has been used for Community Growing 16-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
Setting a Clear Framework for Positive Change Regenerate Clackmannanshire's town centres Environmental Sustainability Reduce greenhouse gas emissions Improve energy conservation and efficiency throughout Clackmannanshire Protect carbon-rich soils from disturbance or loss Improve Clackmannanshire's resilience to climate change Reduce overall flood risk in a sustainable way Contribute to the mitigation of floods and droughts
3c
3f
3g
3h 3i

549
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3j
Keep air pollution below Local Air Quality Management thresholds Prevent deterioration and enhance the status of the water environment Achieve good ecological status Reduce water pollution Promote sustainable water use Reduce contamination and safeguard soil quantity and quality Minimise waste generation Maximise recycling and composting
3k
3l 3m 3n

3o
3p 3q

550
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
5 5a 5b 6 6a 7
Community Cohesion Our communities are more cohesive and inclusive Our communities are safer Health and Wellbeing Improve health and reduce health inequalities Natural Environment Encourage promotion and connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network within and linking beyond Clackmannanshire Further the conservation of biodiversity
7a
7b
551
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7c
7d
7e
7f
7g
7h
552
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
Policy protects land that has been used for community growing from inappropriate development
7j
7k
8d
9 9a
553
EA16 - Waste Management Facilities 16-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
Policy aims to treat waste as high up the waste hierarchy as possible
3b
3c
3f
3g
554
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3h 3i
Reduce overall flood risk in a sustainable way Contribute to the mitigation of floods and droughts

Impacts on air quality should be acceptable, or able to be satisfactorily mitigated
3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

555
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3o
Diverting waste from landfill helps to safeguard soils Aim of the policy is to treat waste as high up the waste hierarchy as possible Aim of the policy is to treat waste as high up the waste hierarchy as possible
3p
3q
5 5a 5b 6
556
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
6a 7
7a
7b

Policy requires proposals to have no adverse effect on the Firth of Forth SPA
7c
7d
7e
557
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7f
7g
7h

Policy requires that any impacts on landscape character should be acceptable or satisfactorily mitigated
7i
7j
7k
558
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
9 9a
559
EA17 - Energy from Waste Facilities 16-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
Energy from waste developments that maximise the recovery of energy and heat are likely to contribute to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from energy generation
3b
560
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3c
Policy supports appropriate proposals that recover heat and energy, which is more efficient than conventional electricity generation
3f
3g
3h 3i

Impacts on air quality should be acceptable, or able to be satisfactorily mitigated
3j
561
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3k
Prevent deterioration and enhance the status of the water environment Achieve good ecological status Reduce water pollution Promote sustainable water use Reduce contamination and safeguard soil quantity and quality Minimise waste generation Maximise recycling and composting Community Cohesion
3l 3m 3n

3o
3p 3q 5

562
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
5a
Where a proposal would be likely to treat waste from an area wider than Clackmannanshire, it should also deliver demonstrable benefits to the local community Proposals must demonstrate that potential adverse impacts on health and safety are acceptable
5b

Proposals must demonstrate that potential adverse impacts on health and safety are acceptable
6a
Natural Environment
563
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7a
7b
7c
7d
7e
7f
564
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7g
7h

Policy EA16 requires that any impacts on landscape character should be acceptable or satisfactorily mitigated
7i
7j
7k
565
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
9 9a
566
EA18 - Minimising Waste in New Development 16-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3
Minimising waste will contribute to reduced greenhouse gas emissions
3b
3c
3f
3g
567
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3h 3i

3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

3o
568
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3p
Aim of the policy is to minimise waste, and deal with any waste generated in accordance with the waste hierarchy Aim of the policy is to minimise waste, and deal with any waste generated in accordance with the waste hierarchy
3q
5 5a 5b 6
569
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
6a 7
7a
7b
7c
7d
7e
570
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7f
7g
7h
7i
7j
7k
571
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
9 9a
572
EA19 - Scheduled Monuments 16-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
3c
3f
3g
3h
573
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3i
3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

3o
3p
574
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3q 5 5a 5b 6 6a 7

7a
7b
575
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7c
7d
7e
7f
7g
7h
576
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
The setting of scheduled monuments etc is part of the landscape character
7j
7k
8d
Aim of the policy is to protect Scheduled Monuments and other identified nationally important archaeological resources
577
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
9a
EA20 - Other Archaeological Resources 16-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
578
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3c
3f
3g
3h 3i

3j
3k
3l
579
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3m 3n

3o
3p 3q 5 5a 5b 6

580
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
6a 7
7a
7b
7c
7d
7e
581
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7f
7g
7h

The setting of archaeological resources is part of the landscape character
7i
7j
7k
582
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
Aim of the policy is to protect other archaeological resources
8d
9 9a
583
EA21 - Historic Gardens and Designed Landscapes 16-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
3c
3f
3g
3h
584
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3i
3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

3o
3p
585
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3q 5 5a 5b 6 6a 7

7a
7b
586
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7c
7d
7e
7f
7g
7h
587
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
Protect and enhance the distinctive character of the landscape and ensure new development does not exceed the capacity of the landscape to accommodate it Protect and enhance areas designated for their national or local landscape importance e.g. AGLVs Protect and enhance geodiversity, particularly in geological Sites of Special Scientific Interest Built Environment
Historic gardens and designed landscapes are part of the landscape character
7j
7k
8d
Aim of the policy is to protect and enhance Historic Gardens and Designed Landscapes
588
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
9a
EA22 - Listed Buildings 16-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
589
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3c
3f
3g
3h 3i

3j
3k
3l
590
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3m 3n

3o
3p 3q 5 5a 5b 6

591
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
6a 7
7a
7b
7c
7d
7e
592
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7f
7g
7h
7i
The settings of listed buildings are part of the landscape character
7j
7k
593
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
Aim of the policy is to protect listed buildings and their settings
8d
9 9a
594
EA23 - Conservation Areas 19-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments

The policy protects the historic character of Conservation Areas, many of which are in town centres
1a
3 3b
3c
3f
595
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3g
3h 3i

3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

596
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3o
Reduce contamination and safeguard soil quantity and quality Minimise waste generation Maximise recycling and composting Community Cohesion Our communities are more cohesive and inclusive Our communities are safer Health and Wellbeing Improve health and reduce health inequalities Natural Environment
3p 3q 5 5a 5b 6 6a 7

597
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7a
7b
7c
7d
7e
7f
598
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7g
7h
7i
Conservation areas may be part of the landscape character
7j
7k
599
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
8d
Aim of the policy
9 9a
600
EA24 - Buildings at Risk and Non-Designated Heritage Assets 19-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
1 1a 3 3b
Buildings at risk may be in town centres
3c
3f
3g
601
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3h 3i

3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

3o
602
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3p 3q 5 5a 5b 6 6a 7

7a
603
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7b
Further the conservation of biodiversity Avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site Maintain and enhance the populations of European Protected Species, including protection of their resting places Protect and enhance SSSIs Protect and enhance priority species and habitats in Clackmannanshire Increase habitat connectivity and ecosystem function to assist local biodiversity in response to climate change Reduce the impact of invasive species
7c
7d
7e
7f
7g
7h
604
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
Policy aims to achieve a positive outcome for the landscape
7j
7k
8d
Aim of the policy
9 9a
605
EA25 - The Development of Brownfield and Contaminated Land 19-7-13 Contributes
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments

Policy supports the re-use of brownfield land and vacant and derelict buildings in urban areas
1a
3 3b
Environmental Sustainability Reduce greenhouse gas emissions Improve energy conservation and efficiency throughout Clackmannanshire Protect carbon-rich soils from disturbance or loss Improve Clackmannanshire's resilience to climate change
3c
3f
3g
606
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3h 3i
Reduce overall flood risk in a sustainable way Contribute to the mitigation of floods and droughts Keep air pollution below Local Air Quality Management thresholds Prevent deterioration and enhance the status of the water environment Achieve good ecological status Reduce water pollution Promote sustainable water use

3j
3k
3l 3m 3n

607
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
3o
Policy aims to encourage the re-use of brownfield land, which avoids development on greenfield sites, and requires the remediation of contaminated land Re-use of vacant and derelict buildings avoids some of the waste associated with demolition or new buildings
3p
3q 5 5a
608
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
5b
Remediation of contaminated land is likely to be beneficial for community safety

Remediation of contaminated land is likely to be beneficial for health
6a
Natural Environment Encourage promotion and connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network within and linking beyond Clackmannanshire Further the conservation of biodiversity
Bringing vacant and derelict land into beneficial use is one of the ambitions of the CSGN
7a
7b
609
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7c
7d
7e
7f
7g
7h
610
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
7i
Policy aims to encourage the re-use of brownfield land, which avoids development on greenfield sites and so should avoid adverse impacts on the landscape
7j
7k
8d
611
No impact
Conflicts
Criteria
Comments
9a
612

October2013
Appendix7:SEAsummariesforearlier iterationsofpolicies

ThefollowingtablegivesthetextofeachdraftofeachpolicyintheProposedPlan,andasummaryofthelikelyenvironmentalimpactsidentifiedbytheSEA. Assessmentmatricesfordraftpoliciesareavailableonrequest.
Policy Earlieriteration(s)ofpolicyandlikelyenvironmentalimpacts Sept2012 Policy SC1 aims to ensure the maintenance of a robust and deliverable housing land supply. TheCouncilwillworkwiththerelevantpublicandprivatesectoragenciestohelpsecure aminimumfiveyearhousinglandsupplyatalltimesinaccordwiththeVisionand SpatialStrategyoftheLocalDevelopmentPlan.TheCouncilwillreviewthehousingland supplypositionat5yearintervalsorless,andreviewthecalculationintheoverall housinglandrequirementasnecessary. FinalPolicy PolicySC1MaintainingaHousingLandSupply Thispolicyaimstoensurethemaintenanceofarobustand deliverablehousinglandsupply. TheCouncilwillworkwiththerelevantpublicandprivate sectoragenciestohelpsecureaminimumfiveyear housinglandsupplyatalltimesinaccordwiththeVision andSpatialStrategyoftheLocalDevelopmentPlan.The Councilwillreviewthehousinglandsupplypositionat5 yearintervalsorless,andreviewthecalculationinthe overallhousinglandrequirementasnecessary. PolicySC2AffordableHousing Thispolicyaimstosetoutcriteriaforthedeliveryof affordablehousingandidentifiesdifferentmechanismsfor deliveryandlevelsofprovision.Furtherguidanceis providedintheAffordableHousingSG. Housingproposalsfor20ormorehomes,orfor1hectare ormoreofland,willbeexpectedtoincludearangeand choiceofhousetypes,tenuresandsizesincluding affordablehousing.Allsuchproposalsshallcontributeto meetingthehousingneedinClackmannanshirebased upontheCouncil'scurrentHousingNeedsandDemand Assessment. (1) TheCouncilwillseekappropriateonsite provisionforaffordablehousingonhousingsites of20ormorehomesorover1hectare.The natureofaffordablehomesprovisiononsiteisto bedeterminedaccordingtoidentifiedneedand localcircumstances,butwithabenchmarkfigure of25%ofthetotalnumberofunitsasaffordable housing. (2) Developersofsiteswillbeexpectedtocontribute towardstheprovisionofaffordablehousing.The natureofthesecontributionswillvaryfromsite tositeandtheAffordableHousingSGprovides furtherguidance. (3) Anyaffordablehousingelementshallbefully completedandmadeavailableforoccupancy beforethefinal25%oftheopenmarketelement isreleasedforsale. (4) Whereadevelopercanclearlydemonstratethat itisnotfeasibletoprovideaffordablehousingon theirsite,andtheCouncilagreewiththeir findings,acommutedpaymenttowards affordablehousingdevelopmentlocated elsewheremaybeacceptable.Anycommuted summustbeagreedandsecuredthrougha formalplanningobligationbeforeany developmentcanstartonthesite.Further guidanceisprovidedintheAffordableHousing SG. (5) Developersofsmallersites,oflessthan20 homes,whereonsitedeliveryisnotpracticable, willbeobligedtoprovideacommutedsumtothe Councilforaffordablehomesonaproratabasis determinedaccordingtotheassessedneed, HNDA,andlocalcircumstances.Furtherguidance isprovidedintheAffordableHousingSG. Environmentalimpactsoffinal policy Mitigationmeasuresfor finalpolicy
SC1Maintaininga HousingLand Supply
Sept2012 Nosignificantenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy.
SC2Affordable Housing
18112 Developmenttoprovidequalityandchoiceinallcategoriesofhousingtomeetarange ofhousingneedsandtohelpcreatesustainablecommunities: TheCouncilwillfavourablyconsiderlargescalehousingproposals,30ormorehomes, thatprovidearangeandchoiceofhousetypes,tenuresandsizesincludingfor affordableandparticularneeds,throughtheplanningsystem.Allsuchproposalsshall addressthenatureofhousingneedinClackmannanshirebasedupontheCouncil's HousingNeedsandDemandAssessment. TheCouncilwilllooktosecureanappropriateonsiteprovisionforaffordable andparticularneedshousingonallsiteswithanoverallcapacityof30or morehomes.Thenatureofaffordablehomesprovisiononsitetobe determinedaccordingtotheidentifiedneedandthelocalcircumstances prevailing. Anyaffordablehousingelementshallnormallybefullycompletedandmade availableforoccupancybeforethefinal25%oftheopenmarketelementis releasedforsale. Inexceptionalcases,whereadevelopercanclearlydemonstratethatitisnot feasibletoprovideaffordablehousingontheirdevelopmentsite,a commutedpaymenttowardsaffordablehousingdevelopmentlocatedinthat particularsubareamaybeacceptable(ClackmannanshireNorth,South,or East),unlessagreedotherwiseinwritingbytheCouncil.Thecommutedsum tobeagreedandsecuredthroughformalplanningagreementbytheCouncil beforeanydevelopmentcanstartonthesite. Developersofsmallersites,lessthan30homesonsite,whereonsite deliveryisnotpracticablewillbeobligedtoprovideacommutedsumtothe Councilforaffordablehomesonaproratabasisdeterminedaccordingtothe assessedneed,HNDAbased,andprevailinglocalcircumstances.All commutedsumsmustbedeterminedaccordingtothemodelgivenin Appendix? Generally,andinordertocontributeappropriatelytotheidentifiedoverallneedfor affordablehomeshousingdevelopmentnotallocatedinthedevelopmentplan,must containatleast25%affordablehomesorasindicatedintheHNDA2011. WheresitesintheAreaStatementsandrelatedScheduleofSitesidentifiesa requirementforaffordablehomes,planningapprovalisunlikelytobegranted fordevelopmentthatdoesnotincorporateanappropriateelementfor affordableorparticularneedshousing. Onsiteprovisionforaffordableandparticularneedshomesshallbedesigned suchthattheexternalappearanceofthosehomesiscompatiblewiththerest ofthedevelopmenti.e.theyaresimilarindesignandappearancetothe otherhomesinthedevelopment.
18112 Nosignificantenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy.
Thispolicyislikelytocontributeto improvedhealth,andimproved communitycohesionandinclusion.
Policy
Earlieriteration(s)ofpolicyandlikelyenvironmentalimpacts
FinalPolicy PolicySC3Gypsies,TravellersandTravellingShowpeople Thispolicyidentifiestheconsiderationswhichwillbetaken intoaccountwhenconsideringproposalsforprivatesites forGypsies,TravellersandTravellingShowpeople. Gypsies,TravellersandTravellingShowpeoplewillbe encouragedtostayatauthorisedandrecommendedsites ofClackmannanshireandStirlingCouncilsbyagreement withtherelevantpartiesineachinstance.Proposalsfor smallsitesforGypsies,TravellersandTravelling Showpeoplewillonlybesupportedwherethefollowing criteriaaremet: (1) thesitecansatisfyallrelevantplanningpoliciesin thisPlanrelatingtotheprotectionand enhancementofthebuiltandnatural environmentandtheprotectionofpublicopen space (2) thedevelopmentiscarefullyandsensitively designedandlocatedsuchthatitdoesnotresult inanysignificantadverseeffectsonthe appearance,establishedamenity, landscape/townscapecharacterandecologyof thesurroundingarea. (3) thesiteaffordsanappropriatelevelofresidential amenityandhasadequateaccesstocommunity, educationandhealthfacilities (4) access,parkingandotherservicescanbe providedtothereasonablestandardrequiredby theCouncil. PolicySC4ResidentialCareFacilities Thispolicyaimstodirectresidentialcarefacilitiestothe mostappropriatesitesandensurethatthedesignis carefullyconsidered. Proposalsforresidentiallybasedcommunitycarefacilities, nursinghomesandcarevillagesmustdemonstratethat: (1) Thelocationprovidesagoodresidential environment; (2) Theyareincloseproximitytoeasilyaccessible communityfacilities,activetravelinfrastructure andpublictransportservicesthatmeettheneed oftheparticularclientgroup; (3) Sufficientgardenground,oramenityspace,can beprovidedfortheenjoymentofresidents;and (4) Theproposalscanhelpmeetthehousingneeds anddemandsindicatedintheCouncil'sHNDAand relatedaimsandobjectivesofthe ClackmannanshireHousingStrategy.
Environmentalimpactsoffinal policy
Mitigationmeasuresfor finalpolicy
SC3Gypsies, Travellersand Travelling Showpeople
18112 Gypsy/Travellers'sites Gypsy/travellerswillbeencouragedtostayattheauthorisedsite,managedbythe Council,atWesthaugh,Alvaasapreferredoption.Andmadeaware,attheearliest opportunity,ofourjointarrangementswithStirlingCouncilforpromotingappropriate accommodation. Thereisageneralpresumptionagainstproposalsforanysmallprivatelyownedsitesfor gypsy/travellersexceptwhereitcanbedemonstratedthatthefollowingcandeliver highqualitydevelopment 1. thesitecansatisfyallrelevantplanningpoliciesinthisPlanrelatingto(a)the protectionandenhancementofthebuiltandnaturalenvironmentand(b)the protectionofpublicopenspace. 2. thesitecanfitwellintothelandscapeasrequiredbyplanningpolicy,such thattherewillbenounacceptablyadverseeffectonthecharacter, appearanceandstandardofestablishedamenityofthevicinityor neighbourhood 3. thesiteaffordsanappropriatelevelofresidentialamenityi.e.itisa sustainableplacetolivewithadequateaccesstocommunity,educationand healthfacilities access,parkingandotherservicescanbeprovidedtothereasonablestandardrequired bytheCouncilandthesiteisnotatriskoffloodingandiscapableofcomplyingwiththe termsofotherrelevantplanningpolicies.
18112 Nosignificantenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy
SC4ResidentialCare Facilities
18112 ResidentialCareFacilities Proposalsforresidentiallybasedcommunitycarefacilitiesandnursinghomeswill generallybeconsideredfavourablyprovidedthat: (1)Thelocationprovidesagoodresidentialenvironment; (2)Thereisgoodaccesstocommunityfacilities,activetravelandpublictransport options; (3)Thedevelopmentisofascaleandcharacterappropriatetothesite;and (4)Sufficientgardenground,oramenityspace,canbeprovidedfortheenjoymentof residents.
18112
Nosignificantenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy.
Thispolicyislikelytocontributeto improvinghealthandimproving communityinclusion,cohesionand safety.Itisalsolikelytocontribute toreducingtheenvironmental impactoftravelassociatedwith suchfacilities.
Policy
FinalPolicy PolicySC5LayoutandDesignPrinciples Thispolicysetsoutcriteriathatshouldbefollowedinthe designofallnewresidentialdevelopmentstoensurethey aredesignedtohighstandardsandcontributepositivelyto theirlocalenvironmentandcommunity. Allnewresidentialdevelopments,regardlessoftenure,will beexpectedtodemonstratethequalitiesofsuccessful placesassetoutinDesigningStreetsandtheSGon'Layout andDesign'.TheCouncilwillexpectproposed developmentsto: (1) ontributepositivelytotheirsetting,surrounding landscape/townscape,character,appearanceand ecology. (2) ntegratewellwithexistingstreets, neighbourhoods,greennetworks,aswellas activetravelandpublictransportnetworks,and insodoing,reducetheneedforjourneystobe madebyprivatecar. (3) mploysustainabledesignandconstruction techniquestoconserveenergyandwater, includingthroughsitingandorientation;water recycling;andreuseofmaterials. (4) edesignedaroundprinciplesofplacemaking ratherthanvehiclemovementbycreatingnew streetsandpublicrealminaccordancewiththe principlesofDesigningStreetsandtheguidance setoutintheSG. (5) edesignedinaccordancewithPolicyEA18 'Minimisingwasteinnewdevelopment'. (6) nsureprotectionandenhancementofgreen networks,suchasthroughprovisionand enhancementofwoodlandandothervaluable habitats,inandadjacenttothesite,in accordancewithPolicyEA1. (7) anagefloodriskanddrainagesustainablyandina waythatenhancesthecharacterofthesiteand itssurroundings. (8) rovideadequatespaceandfacilitiesforrecycling, wastestorageandcollection,andcomposting. (9) rovidehighqualitylandscapingandplanting proposals,usingnativespeciesappropriatetothe siteanditssurroundings. (10) nsurethatcommunitysafetyconsiderationshave beentakenintoaccountindesignandlayout. (11) nsurethatdevelopmentdensityinnew developmentsreflectsthecharacterand townscapequalityofthesurroundingarea,andis consistentwithPlanobjectivestopromotequality oflife,promoteenergyefficiencyandreducethe needtotravelbyprivatecar. (12) voidadverseimpactonwater,airandsoilquality. TheLayoutandDesignSGsetsoutcriteriathatshould guidethedensityofnewdevelopments.
SC5Layoutand DesignPrinciples
10212 Policy1 Allnewresidentialdevelopmentsshallrequiretobedesignedtohighenvironmental standardsandcontributepositivelytotheirlocalenvironmentandcommunity.Indoing so,newresidentialdevelopmentsshall: a)bedesignedtotakeaccountoftheirsetting,surroundinglandscape/townscape, character,appearanceandecology. b)bedesignedtointegratewellwithpublictransportandactivetravelnetworks, includingfootpathsandcycleroutesandintegratewithexistingstreets,neighbourhoods andgreeninfrastructure. c)createnewstreetsandpublicrealmdesignedaroundplacemakingratherthanvehicle movementinaccordancewiththeprinciplesofDesigningStreetsandtheguidanceset outinSPGxbybeingdistinctive,easytogetto,welcoming,attractive,resourceefficient andsafe. e)ensureprotectionandenhancementofbiodiversityandthegreennetworkinand adjacenttothesiteinaccordancewiththeCentralScotlandGreenNetwork. f)ensurethatcommunitysafetyconsiderationshavebeentakenintoaccountindesign andlayout.
15212 Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificantbeneficialimpactsonthefollowingenvironmental objectives: Ourcommunitiesaremorecohesiveandinclusive Ourcommunitiesaresafer EncouragepromotionandconnectivityoftheCentralScotlandGreenNetwork withinanlinkingbeyondClackmannanshire Nosignificantnegativeimpactshavebeenidentified. TheimpactsofthepolicyonthefollowingSEAcriteriaareuncertain: Increasehabitatconnectivityandecosystemfunctiontoassistlocalbiodiversityin responsetoclimatechange(thereisthepotentialforimprovements,butitisnot clearwhatismeantby"newresidentialdevelopmentsshall[..]takeaccountof[...] ecology") Reducetheimpactofinvasivespecies(thereisthepotentialforimprovements,but itisnotclearwhatismeantby"newresidentialdevelopmentsshall[..]take accountof[...]ecology") Protectandenhancethedistinctivecharacterofthelandscapeandensurenew developmentdoesnotexceedthecapacityofthelandscapetoaccommodateit (thereisthepotentialforprotectionandenhancement,butitisnotclearwhatis meantby"newresidentialdevelopmentsshall[..]takeaccountof[...]surrounding landscape/townscape") Protectandenhanceareasdesignatefortheirnationalorlocallandscape importance(thereisthepotentialforprotectionandenhancement,butitisnot clearwhatismeantby"newresidentialdevelopmentsshall[..]takeaccountof[...] surroundinglandscape/townscape") Thefollowingopportunitiestoimprovethepolicyhavebeenidentified: Includearequirement/requestforwoodlandcreation Includeconsiderationofclimatechangeimpacts,particularlytheneedforwater conservation,andflooding Includereferencetosustainabledrainage Addresswaterpollutionthroughlandscaping Requireplantingappropriatetotheclimate,toavoidunnecessarywateruse Includecriteriarelatingtostorage/collectionofwater,andfacilitiesforcomposting Changethewordingincriterion(a)from"takeaccountof"to"complement" Requireplantsusedinlandscapingtobenativespecies
Thispolicyislikelytoreduce greenhousegasemissionsand improveenergyefficiency.Itis likelyhavesignificantpositive impactsonClackmannanshire's resiliencetoclimatechange, throughtherequirementfor developmentstomanagefloodrisk inasustainableway;airquality; thewaterenvironment;soil quality;wastegeneration; communitysafety;humanhealth; theCentralScotlandGreen Network;theconservationof biodiversity,includinghabitat provisionandenhancement; protectionandenhancementof landscapecharacter;andthe environmentalimpactsoftravel.
Policy
FinalPolicy PolicySC6AdditionalDesignInformation Thispolicysetsoutcircumstanceswherehigherquality designwillbeexpectedandthereforetheCouncilwill expectproposalstobesupportedbyadditionaldesign information. TheCouncilwillrequireplanningapplicationstoincludea DesignStatementwhereoneormoreofthefollowing circumstancesapply: (1) itisrequestedintheDevelopmentRequirements relatingtoanallocatedsite. (2) thedevelopmentconsistsof10dwellingsormore and/orhasagrossfloorareaof1,000mormore. (3) thesitelieswithinaConservationArea. (4) thesiteliesinthecurtilage,oraffectsthesetting, ofaListedBuildingorScheduledMonument. (5) thesitelieswithinaHistoricGardenorDesigned Landscape. (6) thesiteliesinGreenBeltoraSpecialLandscape Area(SLA). Wherenoneofthesecircumstancesapply,buttheCouncil decidesthat,aDesignStatementisrequireddueto particulardesignissuesraisedbyasiteordevelopment, thenthereasonsforthisshallbeexplainedasearlyas possibleintheplanningprocess,andtheCouncilwillseek toagreewiththeapplicantatimescaleforpreparationand submissionoftheDesignStatement.Theformandcontent ofdesignstatementsshallbeinaccordancewithPlanning AdviceNote(PAN)68. Forlargersites,suchasthoseclassifiedasmajoror nationaldevelopments,asdefinedbytheScottish Government,theCouncilmayconsideritappropriatethat amasterplanissubmittedbytheapplicantaspartofa planningapplication.Indeterminingtheneedfora masterplan,particularconsiderationshallbegivento creatingavisionforanareaandillustratinghowasiteor seriesofsitesshallbedesignedanddevelopedtoachieve suchavision.Inrespectoftheformandcontentof masterplans,theCouncilwillbeguidedbyPAN83.
SC6Additional DesignInformation
10212 Policy2 TheCouncilwillrequireplanningapplicationsforresidentialdevelopmentstoincludea DesignStatement[wherewillthecontentandpurposeoftheDesignStatementbe defined?Glossary?SPG?SupportingText?]whereoneormoreofthefollowing circumstancesapply: a)thedevelopmentisamajorornationaldevelopmentasdefinedbytheScottish Government b)thesitelieswithinaConservationArea c)thesiteliesinthecurtilageoraffectsthesetting,ofalistedbuildingorscheduled monument d)thesitelieswithinandHistoricGarden/DesignedLandscape e)thesiteliesinGreenBeltand/oraSpecialLandscapeArea(SLA)asdefinedbythisPlan Inallothercircumstances,theCouncilwilldeterminetheneedforaDesignStatementat thepreapplicationstageorassoonaspossiblefollowingreceiptofaplanning application.
15212 TheimpactsofthispolicyonalltheSEAobjectivesareuncertain:thisisbecausethecontent andpurposeofadesignstatementhasnotbeendefined.
Thispolicyislikelytoresultin positiveimpactsonprotectionof thehistoricenvironmentandareas designatedfortheirlandscape importance.
Policy
FinalPolicy PolicySC7EnergyEfficiencyandLowCarbon Development ThispolicysetsouttheCouncil'sexpectationswithregards totheenergyefficiencyofnewbuildings,andis underpinnedbySGthatsetsoutinmoredetailhowthe standardsshouldbemetthroughouttheplanperiod. Allnewbuildingsmustachieveaminimumof15%ofthe carbondioxideemissionsreductionstandards(assetby theScottishBuildingStandards)throughtheuseofLow andZeroCarbonGeneratingTechnologies(LZCGTs). Planningapplicationsforallnewbuildingsmustbe supportedbyastatementwhichdemonstrateshowthe levelofcarbondioxideemissionsreductionwillbe achievedthroughtheuseofLZCGTs.Oncebuilt,a sustainabilitylabelthatincludesthelevelofcarbondioxide emissionsreductionachievedshallbeaffixedtothe building. TheCouncilwillencouragedevelopmentproposalsthat seektoachieveahigherlevelofcarbondioxideemissions reductionthanthatrequiredbythispolicy.Achievementof ahigherlevelofcarbondioxideemissionsreductionwillbe treatedasamaterialconsiderationindeterminingany planningapplication. Furtherdetails,includinglimitationsorexemptions,are includedintheEnergyEfficiency&LowCarbon DevelopmentSG. PolicySC8DomesticDevelopments Thispolicysetsoutcriteriafortheassessmentofdomestic developments. Planningapplicationsfordomesticdevelopments,including alterations/extensionstohousesandflats,developments inthecurtilageofhousesandflats,meansofenclosureand domesticmicrogenerationwillnormallybeapproved, providedtheymeetthefollowingcriteria: (1)Thedevelopment,byvirtueofitssiting,design,scaleor massingdoesnotadverselyaffecttheresidentialamenity enjoyedbyoccupantsofsurroundingdomesticproperties, including,inthecaseofmicrogeneration,throughnoiseor shadowflicker. (2)Thedevelopment,byvirtueofitssiting,design,scaleor massingdoesnotdetrimentallyaffectthecharacteror appearanceofthebuilding,siteorsurroundingarea. (3)Thedevelopment,byvirtueofitssitingorscaledoes notresultintheoverdevelopmentoftheplotoralossof gardenground,parkingorbinstorage,thatwouldbe detrimentaltothelevelsofamenityenjoyedbyoccupants ofthepropertyorsurroundingdomesticproperties. (4)Thedevelopmentdemonstrateshighstandardsof energyefficiencyandwaterefficiency. Furtherguidanceondomesticdevelopmentsiscontained intheDomesticDevelopmentsSG.
SC7Energy EfficiencyandLow Carbon Development
10212 Policy4 Allnewhousesandflatsmustbedesignedandconstructedinsuchaway that (a)withregardtoadwelling,alevelofsustainabilityspecifiedbytheScottishMinisters inrespectofcarbondioxideemissions,resourceuse,buildingflexibility,adaptabilityand occupantwellbeingisachieved; (b)withregardtoanondomesticbuilding,alevelofsustainabilityspecifiedbythe ScottishMinistersinrespectofcarbondioxideemissionsisachieved;and (c)astatementofthelevelofsustainabilityachievedissubmittedtotheCouncilaspart ofanyplanningapplicationandoncebuiltisaffixedtothedwelling. ThespecificlevelofsustainabilityrequiredfornewdwellingsshallbebasedonSection7, DomesticSustainabilityoftheTechnicalHandbookoftheScottishBuildingRegulations. Initially,suchdevelopmentswillrequiretomeetorexceedBronzeActiveStandard,as setoutinSection7,andSupplementaryPlanningGuidancewillsetoutincreasing standardsthatwillrequiretobeachievedduringtheplanperiod,andinaccordancewith theStandardssetoutinSection7BronzeActivetoPlatinum.
22212 ThispolicyislikelytohavesignificantbeneficialimpactsonthefollowingSEAobjective: ImproveenergyconservationandefficiencythroughoutClackmannanshire TheimpactofthepolicyonthefollowingSEAobjectiveisuncertain: Protectandenhancethedistinctivecharacterofthelandscapeandensurenew developmentdoesnotexceedthecapacityofthelandscapetoaccommodateit (dependsonhowthepartofthepolicyrelatingtolowandzerocarbongenerating technologiesisimplemented)
Thispolicyislikelytoleadto reducedgreenhousegasemissions andimprovedenergyconservation andefficiency.
SC8Domestic Developments
PolicySC8DomesticDevelopments Thispolicysetsoutcriteriafortheassessmentofdomesticdevelopments. Planningapplicationsfordomesticdevelopments,includingalterations/extensionsto housesandflats,developmentsinthecurtilageofhousesandflats,meansofenclosure anddomesticmicrogenerationwillnormallybeapproved,providedtheymeetthe followingcriteria: (1)Thedevelopment,byvirtueofitssiting,design,scaleormassingdoesnotadversely affecttheresidentialamenityenjoyedbyoccupantsofsurroundingdomesticproperties, including,inthecaseofmicrogeneration,throughnoiseorshadowflicker. (2)Thedevelopment,byvirtueofitssiting,design,scaleormassingdoesnot detrimentallyaffectthecharacterorappearanceofthebuilding,siteorsurrounding area. (3)Thedevelopment,byvirtueofitssitingorscaledoesnotresultintheover developmentoftheplotoralossofgardenground,parkingorbinstorage,thatwould bedetrimentaltothelevelsofamenityenjoyedbyoccupantsofthepropertyor surroundingdomesticproperties. FurtherguidanceondomesticdevelopmentswillbecontainedinaDomestic DevelopmentsSG.
11/7/13 Nonegativeenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentified Thefollowingopportunitiestoimprovetheenvironmentalimpactsofthepolicyhavebeen identified: Addressenergyefficiency Addresswaterefficiency Addressclimatechangeadaptation
Thispolicyislikelytoleadto reducedgreenhousegasemissions from,andimprovedenergyand waterefficiencyin,existing developments.Itisalsolikelyto protectthedistinctivecharacterof thelandscape.
Addressclimatechange adaptationpotentialof domesticdevelopmentsin supplementaryguidance
Policy
FinalPolicy PolicySC9DeveloperContributions PolicySC9aimstoensurethat,whereanewdevelopment hasanimpactoninfrastructurecapacityorgivesrisetothe needforenvironmentalmitigationmeasures,developers mitigatetheimpactbycontributingneworimproved infrastructureorfacilities. Allresidentialdevelopmentswithanimpacton infrastructurecapacitywillbeexpectedtocontribute, eitherthroughfinancialcontributionsordirectprovision, towardsneworimprovedinfrastructureandthemitigation ofenvironmentalimpacts,commensuratewiththescaleof thedevelopment,toaddressdeficiencieswhicharea consequenceofthedevelopmenttakingplace. Inconsideringproposalsfornonresidentialandmixeduse developments,theCouncilwillassesstherequirementfor developercontributionsonanindividualbasis,in accordancewiththeprinciplessetoutabove,andthe provisionscontainedinCircular1/2010,Planning Agreements. Thetypesofinfrastructureandenvironmentalmitigation measureswhichtheCouncilwillexpectcontributions towardsinclude: (1) Educationprovision (2) Transportationinfrastructure(includingactive travelnetworks) (3) Openspace,recreationandplayprovision (includingsportsfacilities) (4) Protectionandenhancementofgreennetworks andnaturalhabitatsincludingthewater environmentandwoodlands (5) Publicartprovision (6) Sustainablefloodmanagement (7) Towncentreenhancement (8) Corepathsnetwork (9) Libraries,healthcentres,communityhallsand facilities Thenatureofcontributionsshallvaryfromsitetosite, dependingontheinfrastructureorfacilitiesrequirements withinthatparticulararea.Thescaleandnatureof contributionsrequiredshallrelatefairlyandreasonablyto eachdevelopment,takingaccountofthesizeandlocation ofthesite,thenumberofunits(ornewresidential floorspace)tobecreated,thetypeofhousingtobe provided,andconsiderationofclearevidenceofany abnormalcostsassociatedwiththedevelopment. Theassessmentofthenatureofcontributionsshallbein accordancewiththeLDPStrategy,Vision,subarea strategies,policiesanddevelopmentguidelines;theOpen SpaceStrategy;andrelevantSupplementaryGuidance. Theyshallalsobeinformedbyotherrelevantstrategies andplansoftheCouncilandotheragencies,aswellasany particularissuesraisedbyaplanningapplication,relating tothenatureofthesiteortheproposeddevelopment. Financialcontributionsordirectprovisionshallnormallybe deliveredthroughplanningconditionsand,where appropriate,legalagreementsnegotiatedbetweenthe developerandtheCouncil. Thedetailsofhowcontributionsarenegotiated,agreed anddeliveredaresetoutintheDeveloperContributions SG.
SC9Developer Contributions
2312 Developercontributions Inapprovingresidentialdevelopments,theCouncilwillrequirethedeveloperto contributefinanciallyorinkindtowardsnewandimprovedcommunityinfrastructure andthemitigationofenvironmentalimpacts,whichotherwisewouldnothavebeen necessarybutforthedevelopment. Inconsideringproposalsfornonresidentialandmixedusedevelopments,theCouncil willassesstherequirementfordevelopercontributionsonanindividualbasisin accordancewiththeprinciplessetoutinparagraphX,above,andinparticularthe provisionofCircular1/2010. ThescaleandnatureofanycontributionsshallbeassetoutinSPGXandinaccordance withtheLDPVision,AreaandSettlementStatementsandDevelopmentGuidelines. Allresidentialdevelopmentswillbeexpectedtocontribute,eitherthroughdirect provision,orinkind,totheprovisionofcommunityinfrastructureandenvironmental enhancement,commensuratewiththescaleofthedevelopmentandinordertoaddress deficienciesinsuchprovisionthatthedevelopmentwouldcreateorexacerbate. Thescaleofcontributionsrequiredshallbeappliedfairlyandreasonablytoeach development,takingaccountofsitesize,numberofunits(ornewresidentialfloorspace) tobecreated,thetypeofhousingtobeprovidedthelocationofthesite,and considerationofclearevidenceofabnormalcostsassociatedwithitsdevelopment.In particular,reducedrequirementsshallbeconsideredinthefollowingcircumstances: 1. Redevelopmentofvacant/derelictandcontaminatedland,wherethisisin accordancewiththedevelopmentplanstrategy. 2. Developmentsprovidingaffordableorparticularneedshousingthatmeets localhousingneedinaccordancewiththeLocalHousingStrategy. 3. Developmentsthatrequiresignificantinvestmentinabnormalonsite infrastructurecoststoovercomeparticularconstraints. Insuchcases,theCouncilmayrequiretheapplicanttopresentevidenceintheformof developmentappraisalinformation,thatdemonstratesajustificationforreduced developercontributions. Thenatureofcontributionsshallvaryfromsitetosite,dependingontheinfrastructure requirementswithinthatparticulararea.Theassessmentofthenatureofcontributions shallbeinaccordancewiththeStrategyoftheLDP,subareastrategies,policiesand developmentguidelines.Theyshallalsobeinformedbyotherrelevantstrategiesand plansoftheCouncil,consultationresponses,aswellasanyparticularissuesraisedbya planningapplication,duetothenatureofthesiteortheproposeddevelopment.The Councilwillexpectthecontributionstowardsthefollowingtypesofinfrastructure: 1. Educationprovision 2. Transportationinfrastructure(includingactivetravelnetworks) 3. Leisureandrecreation,(includingactivesportsfacilitiesandplayprovision) 4. TheGreenNetwork 5. Outdooraccess 6. Towncentreenhancement 7. PublicArt Theprovisionofinfrastructureorpaymentofinkindcommutedsumsshallnormallybe deliveredthroughplanningconditionsandwhereappropriate,legalagreements negotiatedbetweenthedeveloperandtheCouncil.Suchnegotiations,shalldealwith thescaleandnatureofcontributions,aswellasthetimingandifnecessaryphasingof anyworks/payments.TheCouncilshallbecommittedtoholdingandspendingdeveloper contributionpayments.
2312 Nosignificantenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy. ThisimpactsonthefollowingSEAobjectivesareuncertain. RegenerateClackmannanshire'stowncentres Ourcommunitiesaremorecohesiveandinclusive Ourcommunitiesaresafer Improvehealthandreducehealthinequalities EncouragepromotionandconnectivityoftheCentralScotlandGreenNetwork withinandlinkingbeyondClackmannanshire Reducetheenvironmentalimpactoftravel. Thereasonfortheuncertaintyisthattheeffectofthepolicyontheseobjectiveswilldepend onhowtheissuesattractingdevelopercontributionsareprioritisedintheSPG,thearea statementsandthedevelopmentguidelines. Thefollowingopportunitiestoimprovetheenvironmentalimpactsofthepolicyhavebeen identified: Includethefollowingasissuesthatcouldattractdevelopercontributions: watercourses,biodiversity,habitats
Thelikelyenvironmentalimpacts ofthispolicyareuncertain:ithas thepotentialtodeliverarangeof environmentalbenefits,depending onhowthepolicyisimplemented.
Policy
FinalPolicy PolicySC10Education,CommunityFacilitiesandOpen Spaces PolicySC10aimstoretainandenhancetheprovisionof educationfacilities,communityfacilitiesandopenspaces. TheCouncilwillsupportdevelopmentswhichwillprovide newand/orenhancedcommunityfacilitiesandopen spaces,wherethedevelopmentaccordswiththeLDP Vision,SpatialStrategy,StrategicObjectives,Planpolicies andtheOpenSpaceStrategy. Thereisapresumptionagainstdevelopmentthatwould resultinthelossorchangeofuseofland,buildingsand openspaces,includingprivatelyrunfacilities,whichare currently,orwerelastusedforeducationorcommunity purposes,unlessthefollowingcriteriacanbemet: 1. itwouldnotdetrimentallyaffectthevalueand functionofopenspaceandcommunityfacilitiesin thelocalcommunity,and 2. itaccordswiththeCouncil'sOpenSpaceStrategy; andeither: 3a. nosuitablealternativecommunityusescanbefound forthelandorbuildingsinquestion;or 3b. theproposalwouldresultintheprovisionof alternativefacilities,orfacilitiesofequivalentor enhancedvalueandfunctioninaccordancewiththe Council'sLeisureandSportsStrategy. PolicySC11TransportNetworks PolicySC11aimstoensurethattheimpactsof developmentonthewidertransportnetworkare considered,andthatopportunitiestoenhancethenetwork areidentifiedatanearlystage. Whereitisconsideredthatadevelopmentproposalis likelytocreateorexacerbatedeficienciesinthetransport networkandfacilities,includingactivetraveloptions, developerswillbeexpectedtoprovideinfrastructureor contributionstoovercomeormitigatedeficiencies. TheLDPidentifiessomeareaswherethereisaneedfor improvementintheroadnetwork,inordertoimprove safety,decreasecongestionandimproveairquality. Improvementproposalsshouldaimtoreducegreenhouse gasemissionsfromtransportandminimiseadverse impactsoftransportinfrastructureonthenaturalheritage, includinglandscape.Incertaincaseslandissafeguarded fortransportprojectswhichsupporttheobjectivesofthe LDPandLTSbutareunlikelytobecarriedoutwithinthe Planperiod. TheCouncilwillsupportproposalsfornewfreight operationsadjacenttotherailline,providedtheycomply withtheotherpoliciesintheLDP.
SC10Education, Community FacilitiesandOpen Spaces
19412 TheCouncilwillsupportdevelopmentswherethesewillprovidenewand/orenhanced communityfacilitieswhichaccordwiththePlanVision,SpatialStrategyandStrategic Objectives. Developmentinvolvingthelossorchangeofuseoflandorbuildingspresentlyusedor lastusedfor communitypurposeswillonlybepermittedwhere: (a)itwouldnotdetrimentallyaffecttheprovisionofcommunityfacilitiesinthelocal community;and (b)nosuitablealternativecommunityusescanbefoundforthelandorbuildingsin question;or (c)theproposalwouldresultintheprovisionofalternativeorfacilitiesofequivalentor enhancedcommunitybenefit. (d)theproposalsareinaccordancewiththeCouncil'sLeisureandSportsStrategy
23412 Nosignificantenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy.
Thispolicyislikelytohavepositive impactsonhealthandon communityinclusion,cohesionand safety.
SC11Transport Networks
23112 Strategictransportationnetworkandinfrastructure TheCouncil,throughtheplanningsystem,willseekto: 1.Supporttheenhancementofthestrategicroad,rail,publictransportandservices, andactivetravelnetworksforClackmannanshire.Notably,toenhancethetravel networkasindicatedintheLocalTransportStrategy,RoadTrafficreductionPlan,Road SafetyPlan,andrelatedActionPlans.Includingspecificfocustohelpsecureandsustain qualitylinksacrossouradministrativeboundaries 2.Safeguardthepotentialforincreasedrailfreightandpassengertransportto Clackmannanshireandforanyrelatedfacilitiesthatmightberequirede.g.anewhalting station,modalshiftonthefreightlinetoFife,safeguardingsiteswhererailfreightlines maybepossibleandprotectadjacentlandsuitableforarailfreightdepot.Further,the Councilwillprotectanyformerrailwaylinesthathavethepotentialtobereinstatedin thefuture,forrailorothermodese.g.cycling.Anyproposalstodevelopinthevicinity ofaformerrailwaylineshalldemonstrateappropriatemeasurestosafeguardaccessand futureprovisionoftheroute. 3.Supportandpromotethedevelopmentofstrategicwalkingandcyclinglinkagesin boththelocalnetworkandtothewidernetworks Wheredeficienciesinfacilitiesandamenities,thatmaybecreatedorexacerbateddueto anydevelopment,areclearlyidentifiedthentheprovisionofinfrastructureor contributionstoovercomesuchdeficienciesmaybesoughtfromthedevelopers.Any provisionmustbecommensuratewiththeproposeddevelopment.Section75 Agreementscanbedeployedalthoughitispreferablethatdevelopmentproposals clearlydemonstratehowsuchrequirementscanbedeliveredasanintegralpartoftheir developmentscheme.
23112 Nosignificantenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy. TheimpactsofthepolicyonthefollowingSEAobjectivesareuncertain: Reducegreenhousegasemissions(dependsonthebalancebetweencarandother modesoftransport) KeepairpollutionbelowLocalAirQualityManagementthresholds(dependsonthe balancebetweencarandothermodesoftransport) EncouragepromotionandconnectivityoftheCentralScotlandGreenNetwork withinandlinkingbeyondClackmannanshire(Thereisthepotentialtocontribute throughtheprovisionofwalkingandcyclinginfrastructure) Reducetheenvironmentalimpactoftravel(dependsonthebalancebetweencar andothermodesoftransport) Thefollowingopportunitieshavebeenidentifiedtoimprovetheenvironmentalimpactsofthe policy: Prioritiseactivetravelandpublictransport Requirewalkingandcyclingrouteprovisioninnewneighbourhoods
Thispolicyislikelytoreducethe environmentalimpactsoftravel, includinggreenhousegas emissions,airpollutionand impactsonbiodiversity.Itaimsto safeguard,promoteandenhance thecorepathnetwork,which contributestotheCentralScotland GreenNetwork,andshouldbring healthbenefitsforusers.Itisalso likelytocontributetocommunity safety.
Policy
Earlieriteration(s)ofpolicyandlikelyenvironmentalimpacts 23112 Integratedtransport TheCouncil,throughtheplanningsystem,willseekto: 1.reducetheneedtotravelbyrequiringdevelopmentsthatwillgeneratealarge numberoftripstolocateclosetoestablishedcentresofpopulations,themajorroad network,andrailconnections,andthatcanoffergoodaccesstopublictransport options. 2.Securedevelopmentthatimprovestransportchoiceandaccessibilitythrough promotingalternativestothecar:usingpublictransport,walking,andcyclingwhile seekinggenerallytoimproveroadandpersonalsafetyineveryinstance. 3.Securedevelopmentthatcansustainandenhanceestablishedcentresofpopulation throughcomprehensivetrafficmanagement,asindicatedintheLTS,includingclear parkingpoliciesandproposals. 4.Secureappropriatedeveloperresponsibilityandobligationsfortransport assessments,withrelevantmitigationmeasures,andthepreparationand implementationoftravelplansrelatedtothedevelopmentproposal.Alldevelopment proposalswillrequireatravelplantobepreparedbythedeveloperandapprovedby theCouncil,asplanningauthority. 5.Reduceanylikelyadverseimpactonthenaturalandbuiltenvironmentthrough effectivemonitoringandmanagementofairquality,noisepollution,andtraffic congestion
FinalPolicy TheCorePathnetworkwillbesafeguarded,promotedand enhanced,bytheprovisionofonsiteimprovementsand offsitelinkstotheexistingnetworkwhereappropriate. Developercontributionswillbesoughttoachievethese improvementswhereappropriateandproportionate. GuidanceonimprovementstotheCorePathnetworkwill becontainedintheGreenNetworksSG.TheLDPSchedule ofSitesdetailssomelocationswhereprioritywillbegiven totheimprovementoftheactivetravelnetwork.
23112 Nosignificantenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy. Theimpactsofthefollowingobjectiveisuncertain: EncouragepromotionandconnectivityoftheCSGNwithinandlinkingbeyond Clackmannanshire(dependshowtheactivetravelelementsofthepolicyare implemented)
SC12Development ProposalsAccess andTransport Requirements
23112 Developmentproposals 1.Alldevelopmentsshallclearlydemonstratehow"DesigningStreets"principleshave beenincludedandhowtheycanbedelivered. 2.Alldevelopmentproposalswillrequiretoprovidegoodqualitypedestrianroutes, whicharedirect,safeandaccessiblebyall.Thiswillincludetheintroductionofspeed reductionmeasures,20mphzonesandpedestrianpriorityschemesthroughinnovative layoutanddesign. 3.TheCouncilwillexaminethelocalroadnetworkwithaviewtoimprovingsafetyfor bothequestriansandpoweredtwowheelers. Alldevelopmentproposalsshallprovidefacilitiesformotorisedtwowheelers.Where appropriate,nonresidentialdevelopmentsshallprovidesecurelockersforaccessories, showerandchangingfacilities. 5.TheCouncilseekstopromoteClackmannanshireasanareaforequestriansforboth leisureandtourismandshall,therefore,seektosecureenhancedtravelinfrastructure andfacilitiestoservetheiractivity,whereappropriate.
23112 ThispolicyislikelytohavesignificantbeneficialimpactsonthefollowingSEAobjective: Ourcommunitiesaresafer Theimpactsofthispolicyonthefollowingobjectivesareuncertain KeepairpollutionbelowLocalAirQualityManagementstandards(dependson whetherthepolicyleadstoareductionincaruse) Reducetheenvironmentalimpactoftravel(dependsonwhetherthepolicyleads toareductionincaruse) Nosignificantnegativeimpactshavebeenidentified. Thefollowingopportunitytoimprovetheenvironmentalimpactsofthepolicyhasbeen identified: AmendthepolicytolinkittoCSGNobjectives
PolicySC12DevelopmentProposalsAccessand TransportRequirements PolicySC12aimstoensurethatsustainabletransport infrastructureisfullyintegratedintothedesignofnew developments. Proposalsfordevelopmentwillonlybesupportedwhere theyare: (1) Capableofbeingsafelyandconveniently accessedbyachoiceoftravelmodesincluding walking,cyclingandpublictransportaswellasby motorvehicles. (2) Locatedanddesignedtoreducetraveldemands (3) Designedinaccordancewith'DesigningStreets APolicyStatementforScotland','Designing Places'andtheCouncil'sLTStocreateaquality designthatprovidesexcellentaccessibilityand mobilityforallusers,includingwalkers,cyclists andthosewithspecialneeds,andissafeand attractive.Layoutpatternswillbeexpectedto favourandencouragewalkingandcycling,and minimiseconflictbetweenpedestrians,cyclists andmotorvehicles. (4) Ensuresuitablealternativeprovision,wherethe developmentmayadverselyaffectorresultinthe permanentlossofanexistingCorePathorRight ofWay. Forlargedevelopments,ordevelopmentslikelytoleadtoa significantincreaseintripgeneration,developerswillbe requiredtoprepareaTransportAssessmentand,if necessary,aTravelPlanforthedevelopment.Theneed for,andscopeof,suchanassessmentwillbeagreedwith theCouncilwithreferencetoTransportScotland's 'TransportAssessmentGuidance'.Anyimprovementsor mitigationmeasuresrequiredasaresultoftheAssessment orPlanwillbeagreedwiththeCouncilandmustbe implementedwithinagreedtimescales.
Thispolicyislikelytoreducethe environmentalimpactoftravel, includinggreenhousegas emissionsandairpollution.Itis likelytohavesignificantpositive impactsforhealth,andfor communitysafetyandinclusion.
Considerhowwalkingand cyclinginfrastructure relatestotheCSGNat planningapplicationstage.
Policy
FinalPolicy PolicySC13DecentralisedEnergy PolicySC13aimstoencouragetheprovisionof decentralisedenergyfromappropriatesourcesandwithin suitabledevelopments. Proposalsfordecentralisedenergygeneration,including renewableandlowcarbonenergygeneration,will normallybesupportedwheretheCouncilissatisifiedthat theapplicanthasdemonstratedthattheymeetallofthe followingcriteria: (1) theproposedtechnologywouldbeproportionate totheenergyneedsofthedevelopmentorarea tobeserved, (2) theproposalswouldaccordwiththerelevant requirementsrelatingtothespecifictechnology ortechnologiesproposed,setoutinPolicies SC1418below,includingintermsofanyimpacts onvisualamenity,theamenityofneighbours, landscapecharacter,thehistoricenvironment, designandairquality, (3) whereconsideredappropriatebytheCouncil,the scopeandviabilitytoincorporateCombined CoolingHeatandPower(CCHP)orCombined HeatandPower(CHP)and/ordistrictheatinghas beenconsideredbytheapplicant.Thisshould includeananalysisofthepotentialtoprovidean energyandheatsupplywhichwouldcomplement thepotentialenergyandheatdemands generatedwithinoradjacenttothesite,andthe potentialtotakeadvantageofanyexistingor proposedsourcesofwasteheatclosetothesite. TheCouncilwillrequiredeveloperstoprovide decentralisedenergygenerationaspartofthe development,whenconsideringproposalswhichmeetany ofthefollowingcriteria: (a) comprise50ormoredwellingsor,fornon residentialdevelopment,wouldcomprisea minimumof1,000sq.m.ofgrossfloorspace, (b) compriseause(s)ordevelopmentwhichwould havearelativelyhighallyearheatdemand,or wherethereisanexistingusenearbywhichhasa highallyearheatdemand,wherethisheat demandcouldbemetbyasuitablecombined heatandpowersystem, (c) comprise10ormoredwellingsor,fornon residentialdevelopment,wouldcomprisea minimumof1,000sq.m.ofgrossfloorspace,and wouldbeadjacenttoanexistingdecentralised energysourceordistrictheatingsystemwherea linkcouldbeprovided. Inordertoassistinidentifyingthesuitabilityoflocations fordecentralisedenergy,theCouncilencourages developerstoundertakeathermal masterplanning/mappingexercise.
SC13Decentralised Energy
18/06/12 Proposalsfordecentralisedenergygeneration,includingrenewableandlowcarbon energygeneration,willnormallybesupportedwheretheCouncilissatisifiedthat; (a)theproposedtechnologywouldbeproportionatetotheenergyneedsofthe developmentortheneedsoftheareatobeserved,and (b)thetechnologywouldnotresultinadverseimpactsonvisualamenity,theamenityof neighbours,landscapecharacter,designorairqualityand, (c)whereconsideredappropriatebytheCouncil,thescopeandviabilitytoincorporate CombinedCoolingHeatandPower(CCHP)orCombinedHeatandPower(CHP)and/or districtheatinghasbeenconsideredbytheapplicant,includingananalysisofthe potentialtoprovideanenergysupplywhichwouldcomplementthepotentialenergy andheatdemandsgeneratedwithinoradjacenttothesite,andthepotentialtotake advantageofanyexistingorproposedsourcesofwasteheatclosetothesite. TheCouncilwillrequiredeveloperstodemonstratehowconsiderationhasbeengivento theprovisionofdecentralisedenergyaspartofthedevelopment,whenconsidering proposalswhich; wouldcomprise50ormoredwellingsor,fornonresidentialdevelopment, wouldcompriseaminimumof1,000sqmofgrossfloorspaceand/or, compriseause(s)ordevelopmentwhichwouldhavearelativelyhighallyear heatdemand,orwherethereisanexistingusenearbywhichhasahighall yearheatdemand,wherethisheatdemandcouldbemetbyasuitable combinedheatandpowersystem,or, wouldcomprise10ormoredwellingsor,fornonresidentialdevelopment,would compriseaminimumof1,000sqmofgrossfloorspace,andwouldbeadjacenttoan existingdecentralisedenergysourceordistrictheatingsystemwherealinkcouldbe provided.
19/06/12 Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificantbeneficialimpactsonthefollowingenvironmental objectives: Reducegreenhousegasemissions ImproveenergyconservationandefficiencythroughoutClackmannanshire Theimpactsonthefollowingenvironmentalobjectiveareuncertain: Protectand,whereappropriate,enhancethehistoricenvironment Nonegativeenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentified Thefollowingopportunitytoimprovetheimpactsofthepolicyhasbeenidentified: Includeastrongerrequirementforrenewableheat/decentralisedenergyinnew developments Includecriteriarelatingtoprotectionandenhancementofthehistoric environment
Thispolicyislikelytoleadto reducedgreenhousegasemissions andimprovedenergyconservation andefficiency.Ithasthepotential tocontributetohealth improvementthroughthe alleviationoffuelpoverty;thereis alsothepotentialforareductionin airquality,butthiscanbe addressedthroughpolicyEA11.
Policy
FinalPolicy PolicySC14RenewableEnergy PolicySC14aimstoencouragetheincorporationanduseof renewableenergytechnology. Proposalsforallrenewableorlowcarbonenergy generationandassociatedtransmissioninfrastructure, includinganymitigationmeasuresproposed,willnormally besupported,wheretheymeetallofthefollowingcriteria: (1) Thedevelopmentwouldsatisfyrelevantnational planningpolicyguidance,includingSPPandonline SpecificAdviceSheets. (2) Thedevelopmentwouldbeappropriateinterms ofitsdesign,scaleandlayouttoitssurroundings. (3) Thedevelopmentwouldnothaveasignificant adverseimpactonthequalityanddistinctive characterofthelocalorwiderlandscape. (4) Thedevelopmentwouldnothaveasignificant adverseimpactonthenaturalandbuilt environment,includingdesignatedareasof natureconservationvalue,thewater environment,thecarbonstocksincarbonrich soils,listedbuildings,ConservationAreas,historic gardensanddesignedlandscapes,andsitesof archaeologicalorhistoricimportance. (5) Thedevelopmentwouldneedtodemonstrate thatitwouldnotadverselyaffecttheintegrityof theFirthofForthSPAorRiverTeithSACeither aloneorincombinationwithotherprojectsand plans. (6) Thedevelopmentwouldnotresultinanyadverse impactonaviation,defenceor telecommunicationsinterests. (7) Thedevelopmentwouldnothaveasignificant adverseimpactontheamenityorhealthand safetyofnearbysettlements,individualhousesor othersensitiveestablishments. (8) Therewouldbenosignificantadverseimpacton theoperationoftourismorrecreationinterests, includingtheamenityofusersofpublicoutdoor accessroutes. (9) Theywouldnotresultinanysignificantadverse amenity,landscapeorecologicalimpactsasa resultofthecumulativeimpactsassociatedwith existingsites,extensionsandundevelopedsites withplanningpermission.Thepotentialimpact fromotherproposalsatthesamestageofthe planningprocesswillbeamaterialconsideration. (10) TheCouncilissatisfiedwithmeasurestomanage impactsduringconstruction,operationand, whererelevant,decommissioningandtoensure thesatisfactoryrestorationofthesite,whenever thepermissionexpiresortheuseceasesto operateforaspecifiedperiod.TheCouncilwill normallyrequiretheappointmentofasuitable EcologicalClerkofWorksforthedurationof theseworksandmayrequireabondtoensure sufficientfinanceisavailabletorestorethesite. (11) Thedevelopmentwouldaccordwiththerelevant specificpolicyguidanceinPoliciesEA13andSC15 SC18.
SC14Renewable Energy
18/06/12 Proposalsforallrenewableorlowcarbonenergygeneration,includinganymitigation measuresproposed,willbeassessedagainstthefollowingcriteria,whererelevant,and shallbejudgedtoaccordwiththisPolicywheretheymeetalloftherelevantcriteria; thedevelopmentwouldnotresultinanysignificantadverseimpact,including adversecumulativeimpacts,asaresultoftheirlocation,siting,designand/or operation. Thedevelopmentwouldbeappropriateintermsofitsdesign,scaleand layouttoitssurroundings. Thedevelopmentwouldnothaveanunacceptableadverseimpactonthe landscapequalitiesandcharacterofthearea. Thedevelopmentwouldnothaveanunacceptableimpactonthenaturaland builtenvironment,includingdesignatedareasofnatureconservationvalue, thewaterenvironment,thecarbonstocksincarbonrichsoils,listedbuildings, ConservationAreas,historicanddesignedlandscapes,andsitesof archaeologicalorhistoricimportance. Thedevelopmentwouldnotresultinanyadverseimpactonaviation,defence ortelecommunicationsinterests. Thedevelopmentwouldnothaveanunacceptableadverseimpactonthe amenityorhealthandsafetyofnearbysettlements,individualhousesor othersensitiveestablishments. Therewouldbenounacceptableadverseimpactontheoperationoftourism orrecreationinterests,includingtheamenityofusersofpublicoutdoor accessroutes. Theywouldnotresultinanyunacceptableadverseamenity,landscapeor ecologicalimpactsonasaresultofcumulativeissuesassociatedwith extensions,existingsitesandsiteswithplanningpermission.Thepotential impactfromotherproposalsinearlierstagesoftheplanningprocesswillbea materialconsideration. thedevelopmentwouldsatisfyrelevantnationalplanningpolicyguidance, includingSPPandonlineSpecificAdviceSheets TheCouncilissatisfiedwiththemeasurestomanagetheimpactsduring constructionanddecommissioningandtosecurethesatisfactoryrestoration ofthesite,wheneverthepermissionexpiresortheprojectceasestooperate foraspecifiedperiod.TheCouncilwillnormallyrequiretheappointmentofa suitableEcologicalClerkofWorksforthedurationoftheseworksandmay requireabondtoensuresufficientfinanceisavailabletorestorethesite.
19/06/12 Nosignificantenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy. Thefollowingopportunitiestoimprovetheenvironmentalimpactsofthepolicyhavebeen identified: Makethepolicymoresupportiveofrenewableenergy
Thispolicyislikelytoleadto reducedgreenhousegas emissions.Itislikelytoavoid impactsoncarbonrichsoils,prime agriculturalland,designatedsites, landscapeandbuiltheritage.
thedevelopmentwouldaccordwiththerelevantspecificpolicyguidancebelow.
10
Policy
FinalPolicy PolicySC15WindEnergyDevelopment PolicySC15aimstoprovidedetailsofareaswherewind energydevelopmentproposalswillbelikelytobemost acceptable. Proposalsforwindenergydevelopment,including associatedinfrastructure,willnormallyonlybesupported wheretheproposal: (1) satisfiesthecriteriacontainedinPolicySC14 'RenewableEnergy' (2) accordswiththeguidancecontainedintheWind EnergySGandanyrelevantdevelopment guidelines;and (3) willnothaveadverseeffectsontheintegrityof theFirthofForthSPA,eitheraloneorin combinationwithotherprojectsandplans. Proposalswillbeassessedagainsttherelevantlocational guidancecontainedinthespatialframeworksforwind turbines,andonlandscapesensitivitycontainedinthe reporttitled'SensitivityoftheClackmannanshire LandscapetoWindTurbineDevelopment',June2012. ProposalswithinAreasofSearcharelikelytobesupported subjecttodetailedconsiderationagainstidentifiedcriteria intheWindEnergySG. ProposalswithinAreasofSignificantProtection(see FiguresSC1andSC2)areunlikelytobeconsidered favourably,particularlyformediumorlargescale developments,unlessitcanbedemonstratedthatthe proposalwouldnotadverselyaffecttheobjectivesor integrityofthequalifyinginterestsoftheArea;would meettherequirementsofSPP;andaccordswiththe objectivesoftheLDP. ProposalswithinAreasofPotentialConstraintwillbe judgedontheirindividualmeritsagainstthecriteriasetout intherelevantpoliciesandtheguidanceintheWind EnergySG.
SC15WindEnergy Development
18/06/12 Proposalsforwindenergydevelopment,includingitsassociatedinfrastructure,will normallyonlybesupportedwheretheproposal; satisfiesthecriteriacontainedinPolicyxx(RenewableEnergy);and accordswiththeguidancecontainedintheClackmannanshireSupplementary PlanningGuidance:WindEnergy,includingthespatialstrategyandrelevant developmentguidelines; Proposalswillbeassessedagainstthefollowing; proposalswithinAreasofSignificantConstraintareunlikelytobeconsidered favourably,particularlyformediumorlargescaledevelopments,unlessitcanbe demonstratedthattheproposal;wouldnotadverselyaffecttheobjectivesorintegrityof thequalifyinginterestsoftheArea;wouldmeettherequirementsofSPP;andaccords withtheobjectivesoftheProposedPlan. proposalswithinAreasofConstraintwillbejudgedontheirindividualmerits againstthecriteriasetoutintherelevantpoliciesandtheguidanceinthe SupplementaryGuidanceonWindEnergy. therelevantguidanceonlandscapesensitivitycontainedinthereporttitled SensitivityoftheClackmannanshireLandscapetoWindTurbineDevelopment,LUC,June 2012.
19/06/12 Nosignificantenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy.
Thispolicyislikelytoleadto reducedgreenhousegas emissions.Itislikelytoavoid impactsonthewater environment,carbonrichsoils, primeagriculturalland, biodiversity,designatedsites, healthandthehistoric environment.Itislikelytoprotect thedistinctivecharacterofthe landscape.
11
Policy
FinalPolicy PolicySC16HydroelectricityDevelopment PolicySC16aimstoidentifythecircumstancesunderwhich hydroelectricityschemesmaybesupported. Proposalsforhydroelectricitydevelopment,including alterationstoexistingschemes,willnormallyonlybe supportedwheretheCouncilissatisfiedthattheproposal meetsallofthefollowingcriteria; (1) ItwouldcomplywithPolicySC14'Renewable Energy' (2) Itwouldnotresultinanysignificantadverse directorcumulativeimpactonthewater environment,includingfloodrisk,riverflow standards,ecologicalquality,fishpassageand habitat,andprotectedspecies,orhaveadverse effectsontheintegrityoftheFirthofForthSPA eitheraloneorincombinationwithotherprojects andplans (3) Itwouldnotconflictwiththeobjectivesofthe ForthAreaManagementPlan (4) Itwouldnothaveasignificantadverseimpacton theinterestsofotherusersofthewater environment (5) Itwouldnotresultinanysignificantadverse impactonvisualamenity,thequalityand distinctivecharacterofthesurrounding landscape,ortherecreationaluseandenjoyment ofthearea Wheretheproposalwouldnotsatisfyalloftheabove criteria,anexceptionwillonlybesupportedwherethe Council,inconsultationwithSEPA,issatisfiedthatthereis nootherbetterenvironmentaloptionavailableandthe developmentwouldprovideothersignificant environmentalorsocialbenefitswhichwouldoutweighthe impactonthewaterenvironment. TheCouncilwillencourageappropriatehydroelectricity developmentproposalsthatseektoutiliseexistingin streamstructures(e.g.weirsanddams)thatarenolonger workingassets.Deliveryofenvironmentalimprovements throughtheuseofsuchstructureswillbetreatedasa materialconsiderationindetermininganyplanning application.
SC16Hydro electricity Development
18/06/12 Proposalsforhydroenergydevelopment,includingalterationstoexistingschemes,will normallyonlybesupportedwheretheCouncilissatisfiedthat; ItwouldcomplywithPolicyxxabove,and Itwouldnotresultinanydirectorcumulativeadverseimpactonthewater environment,includingitsecologicalquality,floodrisk,riverflowstandards,fishpassage andhabitat,andprotectedspecies,and ItwouldnotadverselyaffecttheobjectivesoftheScotlandRiverBasin ManagementPlan,and Itwouldnothaveasignificantadverseimpactontheinterestsofotherusersof thewaterenvironment,and Itwouldnotresultinanysignificantadverseimpactonvisualamenity,landscape characterortherecreationaluseandenjoymentofthearea,or Wheretheproposalwouldnotsatisfyalloftheabovecriteria,anexceptionwillonlybe supportedwheretheCouncil,inconsultationwithSEPA,issatisfiedthatthereisno otherbetterenvironmentaloptionavailableandthedevelopmentwouldprovideother significantenvironmentalorsocialbenefit(s)whichwouldoutweightheimpactonthe waterenvironment.
Thispolicyislikelytoleadto reducedgreenhousegas emissions.Itislikelytoavoid impactsoncarbonrichsoils,prime agriculturalland,designatedsites, landscapeandbuiltheritage.Ithas thepotentialtocontributetothe conservationofbiodiversity throughenvironmental enhancementsassociatedwiththe reuseofexistinginstream structures.
Whereexistinginstream structuresarereused, ensuretheyremove barrierstofishpassage
12
Policy
FinalPolicy PolicySC17Biomass PolicySC17aimstoidentifythecircumstancesunderwhich biomassproposalsmaybesupported. Proposalsforbiomassenergydevelopmentwillnormally besupportedwheretheCouncilissatisfiedthatthe proposalmeetsallofthefollowingcriteria: (1) ItwouldcomplywithPolicySC14'Renewable Energy'. (2) Theproposedscaleandlocationofthe developmentwouldensuretheefficientrecovery andtransmissionofenergyandheattothe intendedcustomers. (3) Theapplicationincludesaheatandpowerplan whichdemonstrateshowenergyrecoveredfrom thedevelopmentwouldbeusedtoprovidea renewablesourceofelectricityandheat, includingthescopetoefficientlydistributeheat tositeswhichwouldhavealongtermhighheat demand. (4) Theapplicanthasdemonstratedthatthe developmentwouldnotresultinanysignificant adverseimpactonresidentialamenity,visual amenity,thequalityanddistinctivecharacterof thesurroundinglandscape,airquality(including greenhousegasemissions),androadsafetyfrom thedevelopmentandthetransportationofthe fuelsourceorresiduesareacceptableorcouldbe satisfactorilymitigatedusingplanningconditions oraplanningagreement. (5) Theapplicanthasdemonstratedsatisfactory proceduresforwasteminimisationandthe disposalofanyresidualwaste. PolicySC18LargeSolarArrays PolicySC18aimstoidentifythecircumstancesunderwhich largesolararrayproposalsmaybesupported. Proposalsforlargephotovoltaic(PV)arrayswillnormally besupportedwheretheproposalmeetsallofthefollowing criteria: (1) TheproposalcomplieswithPolicySC14 'RenewableEnergy' (2) Thelocationandsitingofthearraysandany associatedworkswouldnothaveasignificant adverseimpactonvisualamenityorthequality anddistinctivecharacterofthesurrounding landscape. (3) Thelocationandsitingofthearraysandany associatedworkswillnotleadtoadverseeffects ontheintegrityofthequalifyingspeciesofthe FirthofForthSPAeitheraloneorincombination withotherprojectsandplans (4) TheCouncilissatisfiedthatglareandglintfrom thearrayswouldnotadverselyaffectresidential amenity,roadsafetyoraviationinterests (5) TheCouncilissatisfiedthatanygroundmounted arraywouldhaveaneutralorpositiveimpacton theecologicalvalueofthesite (6) Forgroundmountedarrays,theywouldbe installedusingpiledrivenorscrewfoundations ratherthantrenchfoundationstofacilitate restorationofthesite.
SC17Biomass
18/06/12 Proposalsforbiomassenergydevelopmentwillnormallybesupportedwherethe Councilissatisfiedthat; ItwouldcomplywithPolicyxxabove,and Theproposedscaleandlocationofthedevelopmentwouldmaximisetherecovery anduseofenergyandheatfromthedevelopment.Applicationsshallincludeaheatand powerplanwhichshalldemonstratehowenergyrecoveredfromthedevelopment wouldbeusedtoprovidearenewablesourceofelectricityandheat,includingthescope toefficientlydistributeheattositeswhichwouldhavealongtermhighheatdemand, and Inthecaseofwoodybiomass,therewouldbeasustainablesourceofwoodfuel available,and Theapplicanthasdemonstratedthattheimpactsonresidentialamenity,visual amenity,landscapecharacter,airquality,androadsafetyfromthedevelopmentandthe transportationofthefuelsourceorresiduesareacceptableorcouldbesatisfactorily mitigatedusingplanningconditionsoraplanningagreement.
19/06/12 Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificantbeneficialimpactsonthefollowingenvironmental objective: ImproveenergyconservationandefficiencythroughoutClackmannanshire Nosignificantnegativeimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy.
Thispolicyislikelytocontributeto reducedgreenhousegasemissions butthereisalsothepotentialfora reductioninairquality.However, thiscanbeaddressedthrough policyEA11.Itislikelytoavoid impactsoncarbonrichsoils,prime agriculturalland,airquality, designatedsites,landscapeand builtheritage.
Addressairqualityby consideringinconjunction withpolicyEA11.
SC18LargeSolar Arrays
18/06/12 Proposalsforlargephotovoltaic(PV)arrayswillnormallybesupportedwhere; ItwouldcomplywithPolicyxxabove,and Thelocationandsitingofthearraysandanyassociatedworkswouldnothavea significantadversevisualorlandscapeimpact,and TheCouncilissatisfiedthatglareandglintfromthearrayswouldnotadversely affectresidentialamenityoraviationinterests,and TheCouncilissatisfiedthatanygroundmountedarraywouldhaveaneutralor positiveimpactontheecologicalvalueofthesite,and Forgroundmountedarrays,theywouldbeinstalledusingpiledrivenorscrew foundationsratherthantrenchfoundationstofacilitaterestorationofthesite. Theyareinstalledonbuildingswithinindustrialorcommercialareas,andsatisfy thecriteriaabove.
Thispolicyislikelytoleadto reducedgreenhousegas emissions.Itislikelytoavoid impactsoncarbonrichsoils,prime agriculturalland,designatedsites, landscapeandbuiltheritage.
13
Policy
FinalPolicy PolicySC19DeepGeothermal PolicySC19aimstoidentifythecircumstancesunderwhich deepgeothermalproposalsmaybesupported. Proposalsfordeepgeothermalheatorenergy development,includingexploratoryworks,willnormallybe supportedwheretheCouncilissatisfiedthattheproposal meetsallofthefollowingcriteria: (1) TheproposalcomplieswithPolicySC14 'RenewableEnergy' (2) Theproposedscaleandlocationofthe developmentwouldmaximisetherecoveryand useofenergyandheatfromthedevelopment. Applicationsshallincludeaheatandpowerplan whichshalldemonstratehowenergyrecovered fromthedevelopmentwouldbeused,including thescopetoefficientlydistributeheattosites whichwouldhavealongtermhighheatdemand (3) Theapplicanthasdemonstratedthattheimpacts fromthedevelopmentwouldnotresultinany significantadverseimpactonresidentialamenity, visualamenity,thequalityanddistinctive characterofthesurroundinglandscape,air quality,thewaterenvironment,protectedspecies andrecreationaluseandenjoyment,andthat therearenosignificanteffectsontheintegrityof theFirthofForthSPAeitheraloneorin combinationwithotherprojectsandplans.
SC19Deep Geothermal
18/06/12 Proposalsfordeepgeothermalenergydevelopment,includingexploratoryworks,will normallybesupportedwheretheCouncilissatisfiedthat; ItwouldcomplywithPolicyxxabove,and Theproposedscaleandlocationofthedevelopmentwouldmaximisetherecovery anduseofenergyandheatfromthedevelopment.Applicationsshallincludeaheatand powerplanwhichshalldemonstratehowenergyrecoveredfromthedevelopment wouldbeusedtoprovidearenewablesourceofelectricityandheat,includingthescope toefficientlydistributeheattositeswhichwouldhavealongtermhighheatdemand, and Theapplicanthasdemonstratedthattheimpactsfromthedevelopmenton residentialamenity,visualamenity,landscapecharacter,airquality,thewater environment,protectedspeciesandrecreationaluseandenjoymentareacceptableor couldbesatisfactorilymitigatedusingplanningconditionsoraplanningagreement. Theenvironmentalimpactsthatcouldbeassociatedwiththetechnologyhave beenaddressedbythedeveloper,havingregardtotheprecautionaryprinciple.
19/06/12 Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificantbeneficialimpactsonthefollowingenvironmental objective: ImproveenergyconservationandefficiencythroughoutClackmannanshire Nosignificantnegativeimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy.
Thispolicyislikelytocontributeto reducedgreenhousegas emissions.Itislikelytoavoid impactsoncarbonrichsoils,prime agriculturalland,airquality,the waterenvironment,designated sites,protectedspecies,landscape andbuiltheritage.
14
Policy
V126911 WaterandDrainageInfrastructureandCapacity Althoughtherearenoknownwatersupplyissuesinthearea, developersareencouragedtocontactScottishWaterasearlyas possibleduringtheplanningprocesstodiscusstheneedsoftheir development. Developmentproposalsformorethanonehouseshallincludean appropriateSUDSsystemandsignificantdevelopmentproposals willrequiretobeaccompaniedbyaDrainageImpactAssessmentin accordancewithcurrentScottishGovernmentandSEPAguidance. Themostsustainableoptionisfornewdevelopmentstoconnectto thepublicseweragesystem,andthiswillbearequirementforall developmentswhichare: withinsettlementsidentifiedintheLDPwithapopulation equivalentofmorethan2000; singledevelopmentsofgreaterthan25residentialunits;or largescalebusinessandindustrialunits. Inallothercasesaconnectiontothepublicsewerwillberequired unlesstheapplicantcandemonstratethatthedevelopmentis unabletoconnecttothepublicsewerfortechnicaloreconomic reasons,andthattheproposalisnotlikelytoresultinoraddto significantenvironmentalhealthproblems.Alternative arrangementsforprovisionandmaintenancemustbeacceptableto ScottishWaterandSEPA. Inconstrainedareas,developercontributionsmayberequiredto facilitatenecessaryupgradesorimprovementstoservenew development.Thecostsofanyadditionalmodellingandnetwork reinforcementwouldbemetbythedeveloper,althoughScottish WaterwouldmakeReasonableCostContributionstowardsthese. SUDSwillberequiredforallnewdevelopmentsirrespectiveof whetherornotafinancialcontributiontoanestablishedschemeis beingmade. Design Whendesigningnewinfrastructureprovision,solutionsshouldtake accountofthefollowing: Therewillbeastrongpresumptionagainstthecanalisation, culvertingorengineeringactivitiesonwatercourses.Where theseactivitiesareunavoidableappropriatemitigationmeasures willberequired.Wheredevelopmentisproposedthatincludesa canalisedorculvertedwatercourse,theCouncilwillseekthe removaloftheculvertsandcanalisedsectionsandthere engineeringofthewatercoursetoamorenaturalisedcondition. Wheredevelopmentisproposedadjacenttoawatercourseoran areaofstillwater,includinganyareascreatedaspartofa development,managementandecologicalenhancementofthe adjacentareaswillbeexpectedalongwithabufferzoneofat least10mbetweenanyphysicaldevelopmentworksandany associatedvegetation.Ecologicalenhancementshallbedesigned withreferencetotheClackmannanshireLBAP. Accessformanagementshallbeincorporatedintothelandscape designforwatercoursesandfeatures. Waterconservationmeasuresfornewdevelopmentswillbe encouragedtoreducewaterabstractionandimpoundment impactsonwaterflowsandlevels,includinggrassswales, infiltrationdrains,privatesoakaways,greenroofs,etc.Water shouldbeconservedandusedefficientlyinnewdevelopments. Opportunitiesforpositiveimprovementstothewater environmentwillbeencouragedaspartofanynew development,particularlywheretheycanbeincorporatedwith minimalcostandinconveniencetothedeveloper.Thiscould includetheidentificationofexistingpressuresonwaterbodies andthemeasuresrequiredtoimprovethem. Proposalsfortheincorporationofwatercoursesintogarden groundwillnotbesupported. SUDSfeatureswillnotbeacceptedwheretheyliewithinanarea offloodrisk. ScottishWaterwillnotadoptsurfacewaterdrainagesystems thatrequiretheflowstobepumped. DesignsshouldfollowtheguidanceinSewersforScotland2. Dependingontheirdesignandlocation,SUDSmaybecountedas partoftheinformalopenspaceprovisionwithinadevelopment. Considerationofadditionalmeasureswhichwouldserveto improvethewateranddrainageperformanceofdevelopmentse.g. greenroofs,greywaterrecycling,etc.willbeencouragedandmay beconsideredinlieuofotherdeveloperrequirementsif appropriate.
FinalPolicy
SC20Waterand Drainage Infrastructureand Capacity
26September2011 Thepolicyislikelytohave significantbeneficial impactsonthefollowing objective: Preventdeterioration andenhancethestatus ofthewater environment Theimpactsonthe followingobjectiveis uncertain: Encouragepromotion andconnectivityofthe CentralScotlandGreen Networkwithinand linkingbeyond Clackmannanshire (potentialforecological enhancementsto contributetothis, dependingonthe location) Nonegative environmentalimpacts havebeenidentified.
V381111 WaterandDrainageInfrastructureandCapacity Althoughcurrentlytherearenoknownwatersupplyissuesinthearea, developersareencouragedtocontactScottishWaterasearlyaspossible duringtheplanningprocesstodiscusstheneedsoftheirdevelopment. AnappropriateSUDSsystemforsurfacewatermanagementwillberequired forallnewdevelopments,bothresidentialandnonresidential,theonly exceptionbeingproposalsforsingledwellinghouses.Therequirementfora DrainageImpactAssessmentwillbestatedinthedevelopmentdetailsfor sitesallocatedintheDevelopmentPlanandforallotherdevelopmentsthe CouncilwilldeterminewhetheraDrainageImpactAssessmentwillbe required.DrainageImpactAssessmentswillrequiretobecarriedoutin accordancewithcurrentguidance. Aconnectiontothepublicsewerwillberequiredforalldevelopmentwithinor closetourbanareas,unlesstheapplicantcandemonstratethatthe developmentisunabletoconnecttothepublicsewerfortechnicalor economicreasons,andthattheproposalisnotlikelytoresultinoraddto significantenvironmentalhealthproblems.Privatedrainageprovisionwould onlybeconsideredinanurbanareaasatemporarymeasuretoovercome existingseweragesystemconstraintpriortoconnectiontothepublic seweragesystemiftheimprovementofthesewersystemhasbeenidentified inthecurrentQualityandStandardsinvestmentperiodbyScottishWater.In suchcasessystemsmustbedesignedandbuilttoastandardtoallowadoption byScottishWaterandsothattheycanbeeasilyconnectedtothepublicsewer inthefuture. Inasmallsettlement(populationequivalentlessthan2000),wherethereis no,oralimited,collectionsystem,aprivatesystemmaybepermittedwhereit doesnotposeoraddtoariskofdetrimentaleffect,includingcumulative,to thenaturalandbuiltenvironment,surroundingusesortheamenityofthe area.Alternativearrangementsforprovisionandmaintenancemustbe acceptabletoScottishWaterandSEPA.Whereaprivatesystemisacceptable (withinsmallsettlementsorsmallscaledevelopmentinthecountryside)a dischargetolandcompatiblewiththeScottishBuildingStandardsAgency TechnicalHandbooksshouldbeexploredpriortoconsideringadischargeto surfacewaters. Inconstrainedareas,itwillbenecessarytofacilitatenecessaryinfrastructure upgradesorimprovementstoservenewdevelopment.Thecostsofany additionalmodellingandnetworkreinforcementwouldbemetbythe developer,althoughScottishWatermaymakeReasonableCostContributions towardsthese. Design Whendesigningnewdrainageinfrastructureprovision,solutionsshouldtake accountofthefollowing: Therewillbeastrongpresumptionagainstthecanalisationandculverting ofwatercoursesandotherunnecessaryengineeringactivitieswithinthe waterenvironment.Wheretheseactivitiesareunavoidableappropriate mitigationmeasureswillberequired.Wheredevelopmentisproposedthat includesacurrentlycanalisedorculvertedwatercourse,theCouncilwill seektheremovaloftheculvertsandcanalisedsectionsandthere engineeringofthewatercoursetoamorenaturalisedcondition. Wheredevelopmentisproposedadjacenttoawatercourseoranareaof stillwater,includinganyareascreatedaspartofadevelopment, managementandecologicalenhancementoftheadjacentareaswillbe expectedalongwithabufferzoneofatleast10mbetweenanyphysical developmentworksandanyassociatedvegetation.Proposalsforthe incorporationofwatercoursesintogardengroundwillnotbesupported. Ecologicalenhancementshallbedesignedwithreferencetothe ClackmannanshireLBAP.Thiscouldincludetheidentificationofexisting pressuresonwaterbodiesandthemeasuresrequiredtoimprovethem. Accessformaintenanceshallbeincorporatedintothelandscapedesignfor watercoursesandfeatures. Watershouldbeconservedandusedefficientlyinnewdevelopments. Waterconservationmeasuresfornewdevelopmentswillbeencouragedto reducewaterabstractionandimpoundmentimpactsonwaterflowsand levels,includinggrassswales,infiltrationdrains,privatesoakaways,green roofs,rainwaterharvesting,greywaterrecycling,etc. TherewillbeastrongpresumptionagainstSUDSfeatureswheretheylie withinanareaoffloodrisk. DesignsshouldfollowtheguidanceinSewersforScotland2. Dependingontheirnatureandlocation,SUDSmaybecountedaspartofthe informalopenspaceprovisionwithinadevelopment.
111111 Thispolicyislikelyto havesignificant beneficialimpactson thefollowing objectives: Improve Clackmannanshire's resiliencetoclimate change Reduceoverall floodriskina sustainableway Contributetothe mitigationoffloods anddroughts Prevent deteriorationand enhancethestatus ofthewater environment Achievegood ecologicalstatus Reducewater pollution Promote sustainablewater use Nonegativeor uncertain environmental impactswere identifiedforthis policy. Thefollowing opportunitiesto improvethepolicy wereidentified: Directdevelopment awayfromsitesthat cannotconnecttoa publicsewer
PolicySC20WaterandDrainageInfrastructureand Capacity PolicySC20aimstoensurethatdevelopmentsareserved bytherequiredstandardsofwateranddrainage infrastructure. AnappropriateSUDSsystemforsurfacewater managementwillberequiredforallnewdevelopments, bothresidentialandnonresidential,exceptinthecaseof singledwellinghouses.SUDSfeaturesshouldbedesigned asakeycomponentofgreeninfrastructureonsiteand contributetoplacemakingprinciplessetoutinPolicySC5 andtheLayoutandDesignSG. Thedevelopmentrequirementswillidentifywhethera DrainageAssessment(DA)isrequiredforsitesallocatedin theLDP;forallotherdevelopmentstheCouncilwill determinewhetheraDAwillberequired.DAsshouldbe carriedout,andnewdrainageinfrastructuredesigned,in accordancewiththeguidanceintheWaterSG. Aconnectiontothepublicsewerwillnormallyberequired foralldevelopmentwithinorclosetourbanareas.In countrysideareaswherethereisno,oralimited,collection system,aprivatesystemmaybepermittedwhereitcanbe demonstratedthattherewouldbenodetrimentaleffect onthenaturalandbuiltenvironment,surroundingusesor theamenityofthearea.Provisionandmaintenanceof wateranddrainageinfrastructuremustbeacceptableto ScottishWaterandSEPA.Furtherdetailscanbefoundin theWaterSG. Inareaswithlimitedcapacity,itwillbenecessaryto facilitateinfrastructureupgradesorimprovementstoserve newdevelopment.Thecostsofanyadditionalmodelling andnetworkreinforcementwillbemetbythedeveloper, althoughScottishWatermaymakeReasonableCost Contributionstowardsthese.
Thispolicyislikelytocontributeto theprotectionofthewater environment,andreductionof floodrisk.Itislikelytocontribute toprotectionandenhancementof thelandscape,andthe connectivityoftheCentral ScotlandGreenNetwork.Thereis thepotentialforSUDSfeaturesto contributetotheconservationof biodiversity,andtoecosystem connectivity:theopportunitiesfor habitatcreationorenhancement shouldbeconsideredatthe planningapplicationstage.
Considerhabitatand habitatconnectivity opportunitiesofferedby SUDSattheplanning applicationstage.
15
Policy
FinalPolicy PolicySC21PipelineandHazardConsultationZones PolicySC21aimstoensurethatproposeddevelopments withinConsultationZonesarecompatiblewiththeexisting operationaluses. ProposalsfordevelopmentswithinPipelineandHazard ConsultationZoneswillbesupportedwheretheymeetall ofthefollowingobjectives: (1) Avoidunnecessaryincreasesinthenumberof peoplewhomaybeexposedtotherisk,having regardtoHSEadvice. (2) Deliverlocalbenefitswhichcouldnotbe deliveredonanothersiteoutwiththe ConsultationZoneorbesecuredbyanyother means. (3) Ensurenosignificantadverseimpactsonthe continuedoperationoftheusearoundwhichthe ConsultationAreaisbased. PolicySC22HazardousSubstancesConsent PolicySC22aimstoensurethatdevelopmentsrequiring HazardousSubstancesConsentarelocatedonthemost appropriatesites. Applicationsfornewdevelopmentswhichwillrequire HazardousSubstancesConsentshouldbeinlocations wherethey: (1) Avoidcreatingsignificantadverselevelsofriskto peopleinthevicinityoftheproposed development,havingregardtoHSEadvice. (2) Willnotadverselyaffectorconstrainexistingor consenteddevelopments,ordevelopmentsites identifiedintheLDP. (3) Willbeunlikelytobeadverselyaffectedintheir operationsfromneighbouringestablishedor proposedlanduses. (4) WillnotadverselyaffecttheintegrityoftheFirth ofForthSPAeitheraloneorincombinationwith otherprojectsandplans.
SC21Pipelineand HazardConsultation Zones
SC22Hazardous SubstancesConsent
27811 ProposalsfordevelopmentwithinPipelineandHazard ConsultationZonesshouldmeetthefollowingobjectives: (1) Avoidingunnecessaryincreasesinthenumber ofpeoplewhomaybeexposedtoriskinthe area,havingregardtotheinformationfromthe HSE. (2) Thedevelopmentdeliverslocalbenefitswhich couldnotbedeliveredonanothersiteor securedbyanyothermeans. (3) Ensuringnosignificantadverseimpactsonthe continuedoperationoftheestablisheduse aroundwhichtheConsultationAreaisbased. Proposednewdevelopmentswhichwillinvolvetheuseor storageofpotentiallyhazardoussubstanceswill requiretobelocatedwheretheywillnotbe constrainedbyexistingorconsenteddevelopment.
23August2011 Thepolicyislikelytohave significantbeneficial impactsonthefollowing objective: Ourcommunitiesare safer Nonegative environmentalimpacts havebeenidentified
81111 ProposalsfordevelopmentswithinPipelineandHazardConsultation Zonesshouldmeetthefollowingobjectives: (1) Avoidsunnecessaryincreasesinthenumberofpeople whomaybeexposedtotherisk,havingregardtothe advicefromtheHSE. (2) Deliverslocalbenefitswhichcouldnotbedeliveredon anothersiteoutwiththeConsultationZoneorsecuredby anyothermeans. (3) Ensuresnosignificantadverseimpactsonthecontinued operationoftheusearoundwhichtheConsultationArea isbased. ApplicationsfornewdevelopmentswhichwillrequireHazardous SubstancesConsentshouldbeinlocationswherethey: (1) Avoidcreatingunacceptablelevelsofrisktopeoplein thevicinityoftheproposeddevelopment,havingregard totheadvicefromtheHSE. (2) Willnotadverselyaffectorconstrainexistingor consenteddevelopments,ordevelopmentsites identifiedintheLocalDevelopmentPlan. (3) Willbeunlikelytobeadverselyaffectedintheiroperationsfrom neighbouringestablishedorproposedlanduses.
111111 Thepolicyislikelyto havesignificant beneficialimpactson thefollowing objective: Ourcommunities aresafer Nonegative environmental impactshavebeen identified.
16
Policy
Earlieriteration(s)ofpolicyandlikelyenvironmentalimpacts 14312 DevelopmentintheCountryside The primary aim of the countryside policies is to support sustainable economic growth whileprotectingtheruralnatureofthecountryside. Proposals for development outwith settlement boundaries will only be considered favourablywheretheapplicanthassatisfactorilydemonstrated: Itrequiresarurallocation. Theproposedsiteisthemostappropriate. Itaccordswiththerelevantcriteriadetailedbelow. Development will be encouraged to locate on sites adjacent to existing settlements, or where existing buildings are reused, or as an addition to an existing group of buildings, in preference to isolated new development proposals in the countryside. Suitable proposalsforthereuseorconversionofanexistingbuildingwhichisconsideredworthy ofretention,andwhereithasbeendemonstratedthatitiscapableofconversion,willbe supportedwhereitwouldsignificantlyimprovetheamenityofthearea. Countryside proposals will require to demonstrate high quality standards which accord with the SPG and will protect or enhance the landscape character. Environmental enhancement will be encouraged as part of any new development and contributions to projects associated with the objectives of the CSGN including, promoting access to, interpretation, effective management or enhancement of the natural and built heritage mayberequired. EnablingDevelopment Enabling development which would allow exceptional developments to be undertaken which would not otherwise be likely to be achievable, and which meet the tests above, maybepermittedwhereithasbeendemonstrated: The economic, environmental and social benefits would justify the enabling development. The enabling development is the minimum required to enable the proposed development. Thereisaphysicallinkbetweentheenablingandproposeddevelopments. Therearenoalternativesourcesoffundingtoenablethedevelopment. BusinessDevelopment Business proposals in the countryside will also be required, where appropriate, to demonstrate: Theproposeddevelopmentwouldbesympatheticinscale,natureanddesigntoits surroundings or it can be exceptionally justified as being a type and design which would generally be perceived as of a high quality, unique and positive contribution tothearea. The viability of the proposals and their positive impact on the local economy are 21312 ThispolicyislikelytohavesignificantbeneficialimpactsonthefollowingSEAobjective: Protectandenhancethedistinctivecharacterofthelandscapeandensurenew developmentdoesnotexceedthecapacityofthelandscapetoaccommodateit ThispolicyislikelytohavesignificantnegativeimpactsonthefollowingSEAobjectives: Reducegreenhousegasemissions(developmentinthecountrysideislikelytolead toincreasedcardependency) KeepairpollutionbelowLocalAirQualityManagementthresholds Reducetheenvironmentalimpactoftravel TheimpactsofthispolicyonthefollowingSEAobjectivesareuncertain: Preventdeteriorationandenhancethestatusofthewaterenvironment(depends ontheimpactofmoreprivatewatersuppliesandprivatedrainage) Achievegoodecologicalstatus Reducewaterpollution Reducecontaminationandsafeguardsoilquantityandquality(developmentis likelytobeproposedongreenfieldsites,althoughpolicyencouragesreuseof existingbuildings) Furthertheconservationofbiodiversity(dependswhattypesofenvironmental enhancementareencouraged) AvoidadverseimpactsontheintegrityoftheFirthofForthSPAandRamsarsite (dependsontheproposedlocationofdevelopment) MaintainandenhancethepopulationsofEuropeanprotectedspecies,including protectionoftheirrestingplaces(policyencouragesreuseofbuildingscouldbe hometobats) ProtectandenhanceSSSIs(dependsontheproposedlocationofdevelopment) ProtectandenhancepriorityspeciesandhabitatsinClackmannanshire(depends ontheproposedlocationofdevelopment) Increasehabitatconnectivityandecosystemfunctiontoassistlocalbiodiversityin responsetoclimatechange(dependswhattypesofenvironmentalenhancement areencouraged) Thefollowingmeasurestoimprovetheenvironmentalimpactofthepolicyhavebeen identified: Encourageaccessibilitybypublicandactivetravel Requiretravelplanning Requirebusinessdevelopmenttobetoahighstandardofenergyefficiency Includewaterefficiencyinenergyefficiencyrequirements Require,ratherthan'encourage,'environmentenhancements Bespecificaboutthekindsofenvironmentalenhancementsthatwouldbe encouraged/required
FinalPolicy PolicySC23DevelopmentintheCountrysideGeneral Principles TheprimaryaimofPoliciesSC23SC26istosafeguardthe countrysidebysupportingdevelopmentswhichmeetthe criteriaoftherelevantpolicies. Proposalsfornewdevelopmentwillnormallybedirected toexistingtownsandvillages,toimprovetheirsocialand economicviability.Proposalsoutwithsettlementswillonly besupportedwheretheCouncilissatisfiedthatthe applicanthasdemonstratedthattheproposedsitemeets thecriteriabelow: (1) itcandemonstratetherequi (2) theproposalsareacceptableintheirscale, natureanddesignquality,andtheirrelationship toexistinglandusesandbuildings. (3) theproposalsreflectthedesignprinciplesset outintheLayoutandDesignSG. (4) theproposalsrespectthecharacterofthesite anditslocationand,whereverpossible,makea significantcontributiontotheenhancementof visualamenityandthequalityanddistinctive characterofthesurroundinglandscape,andwill beexpectedtocontributetothegreennetwork objectivessetoutintheGreenNetworkSG. (5) theavailabilityandadequacyofaccess arrangements,siteservicesandinfrastructure. (6) theproposalswillnotadverselyaffectthe integrityoftheFirthofForthSPAeitheralone orincombinationwithotherprojectsandplans. Proposalswillnormallybesupported: (1) onsuitablesitesadjacenttoexistinggroupsof buildingswherenewbuildcouldbe sympatheticallyintegratedwithinaclusterof existingbuildings;proposalsfornewbuildin locationsisolatedfromexistingdevelopment willnotnormallybesupported. (2) fortheconversionofanexistingbuildingof traditionalcharacterandarchitecturalvalue. (3) forthereuseorconversionofanexisting buildingwhichisconsideredworthyof retention,whereithasbeendemonstratedthat itiscapableofconversionandthatitwould significantlyimprovetheamenityofthearea.
SC23Development intheCountryside GeneralPrinciples
Thispolicyislikelytoprotectand enhancethedistinctivecharacter ofthelandscape,andcontributeto thepromotionandconnectivityof theCentralScotlandGreen Network.Itislikelytoavoid adverseimpactsonsoilqualityand biodiversity,andavoidincreasesin greenhousegasemissionsfrom transportassociatedwithrural development.
17
Policy
Earlieriteration(s)ofpolicyandlikelyenvironmentalimpacts demonstratedinasupportingbusinessplan. ResidentialDevelopment Residential accommodation which accords with the general criteria above will generally be acceptable where it is related to an appropriate rural business or commercial use, where a presence on site has been demonstrated to be required (permission may be granted for temporary accommodation in such cases until the business or activity it is associatedwithhasestablished).Housingunrelatedtoaruralactivitymaybeconsidered favourably where it involves the conversion or reuse of a building worthy of redevelopment,ornewbuildwhichcouldbesympatheticallyintegratedwithinacluster ofexistingbuildings. Wherearesidentialdevelopmentinthecountrysidecanbejustifieditwillrequiretobe constructedtoanenergyefficiencystandardabovethatspecifiedforbuildingsinthe urbanareaasdefinedintheLayoutandDesignPrinciples,EnergyEfficiency/LowCarbon DevelopmentPolicy(??).Exceptionsmaybemadeinthecaseoftheconversionor restorationofexistingbuildingswheretheinclusionofenergyefficiencymeasuresmay beunachievable.Countrysidelocationsmayalsoallowforinnovativeapproachestobe consideredfortheprovisionoflowandzerocarbongeneratingtechnologiesonsite.
FinalPolicy PolicySC24ResidentialDevelopmentintheCountryside InadditiontothecriteriaoftheGeneralPrinciplesPolicy SC23,residentialdevelopmentwillonlybesupported whereatleastoneofthefollowingcriteriaaremet: (1) itisdemonstratedtothesatisfactionofthe Councilthattheproposalisintegralto,andis necessaryfor,thefulltimemanagementofan existingandwellestablishedcountryside businessoractivitysuchasfarming,farm diversification,forestryandtourism developmentwhichhasnotpreviously incorporatedresidentialaccommodation (2) itcomprisesthereplacementofoneormore existinghouseswithanequalnumberofhouses ofenhanceddesign,settingandenergy efficiency (3) Whereaccommodationisrequiredin associationwithanewcountrysidebusiness, temporaryconsentmaybegrantedforthe sitingofamobilehomeorsimilar,untilsuch timesasthebusinessoractivityitisassociated withhasbecomeestablished. PolicySC25BusinessDevelopmentintheCountryside InadditiontothecriteriaoftheGeneralPrinciplesPolicy SC23,businessdevelopmentproposalsinthecountryside willonlytobesupportedwheretheproposalsare supportedbyanappropriatebusinessplanorfinancial appraisal,andwhereeitherofthefollowingcriteriaare met: (1) theneedforacountrysidelocationderivesfrom thecharacteristicsofthedevelopment (2) theproposalformsanextensiontoorthe diversificationofanexistingenterprise PolicySC26EnablingDevelopmentintheCountryside Theaimofthispolicyistoprovideaframeworkfor determiningplanningapplicationsforenabling developmentinthecountrysidewhichmayberequiredto financeanother,proposeddevelopment.Theproposed developmentrequiringfundingmustdemonstratethatit meetstherelevanttestsabove,priortoconsideration beinggiventoanyassociatedenablingdevelopment. Enablingdevelopmentmaybepermittedwherethe applicantdemonstratesallofthefollowing: (1) theeconomic,environmentalandsocial benefitsoftheproposeddevelopmentwould justifytheenablingdevelopment (2) theenablingdevelopmentistheminimum requiredtoenabletheproposeddevelopment (3) thereisaphysicallinkbetweentheenabling andproposeddevelopments (4) therearenoalternativesourcesoffundingto enabletheproposeddevelopment.
SC24Residential Developmentinthe Countryside
Nosignificantenvironmental impactshavebeenidentifiedfor thispolicy,beyondthoseidentified forpolicySC23.
SC25Business Developmentinthe Countryside
SC26Enabling Developmentinthe Countryside
18
Policy
Earlieriteration(s)ofpolicyandlikelyenvironmentalimpacts 13212 Theimpactsofthispolicyonthefollowingenvironmentalobjectivesareuncertain: Reducegreenhousegasemissions(dependsontheimpactofthenewbusinesson commutingwhetheritincreasescaruseorreducesoutcommuting) KeepairpollutionbelowLocalAirQualitymanagementthresholds(dependsonthe impactoncommutingpatternsandmodes) AvoidadverseeffectsontheintegrityoftheFirthofForthSPAandRamsarsite (sitespecificimpactswillbeassessedinthesettlementstatements) MaintainandenhancethepopulationsofEuropeanProtectsSpecies,including protectionoftheirrestingplaces(sitespecificimpactswillbeassessedinthe settlementstatements) ProtectandenhancepriorityspeciesandhabitatsinClackmannanshire(site specificimpactswillbeassessedinthesettlementstatements) Protectandenhancethedistinctivecharacterofthelandscapeandensurenew developmentdoesnotexceedthecapacityofthelandscapetoaccommodateit (sitespecificimpactswillbeassessedinthesettlementstatements) Protectandenhanceareasdesignatedfortheirnationalorlocallandscape importance(sitespecificimpactswillbeassessedinthesettlementstatements) Protectand,whereappropriate,enhancethehistoricenvironment(sitespecific impactswillbeassessedinthesettlementstatements) Reducetheenvironmentalimpactsoftravel(dependsontheimpactoncommuting patternsandmodes) Thefollowingopportunitiestoimprovetheimpactsofthepolicyhavebeenidentified: Requirebuildingstobeenergyefficient Requiremovementoffreightbyrail Requireaccessibilitybyactivetravelandpublictransport
FinalPolicy
EP1StrategicLand forBusiness
10212 ThefivestrategicsitessafeguardedthroughtheLDPare;Pavilions(Alloa),OrchardFarm (Alloa),Dumyat(Tullibody),CastlebridgeandKilbagie.Furtherdetailsonthesesitesand thetypesofuseswhichwillbepromotedineacharegivenintherelevantArea Statements.Developmentproposalsshouldconsiderandaddressanylocalamenity issues,andtheprovisionofactivetravelroutestothesitesallowingaccessbyanumber ofmeans. ProposalsforbusinessusesnotincludedintheidentifiedUseClassesforeachofthe sites(e.g.wastemanagement,commercialleisure,etc.)willonlybeconsideredwhere theyarecompatiblewith,andwouldnotprejudicetheidentifiedstrategicuseofthe site,andtheywouldcontributetoemploymentprovision.
PolicyEP1StrategicLandforBusiness Theaimofthispolicyistosupportbusinessandindustrial developmentsonstrategicsitesallocatedinthisPlan. TheCouncilwillsupportnewbusinessandindustrial developmentswhichareinaccordancewithDevelopment RequirementssetoutintheScheduleofSites,onthe followingsites: AlloaWestBusinessPark(Alloa) DumyatBusinessPark,Phases1and2 (Tullibody) BridgeBusinessPark Kilbagie Proposalsforbusinessusesnotfullyinaccordancewiththe DevelopmentRequirementswillonlybesupportedwhere theyarecompatiblewith,andwouldnotprejudice,the identifiedstrategicuseofthesite,andwouldbothincrease thenumber,andwidentherangeandqualityofjobsin Clackmannanshire.
Thispolicyislikelytoleadto increasedgreenhousegas emissions,andhasthepotentialto leadtoincreasedairpollutionand landcontamination(althoughmay alsoprovideopportunitiesto remediateexistingcontamination): theseissuesshouldbeconsidered andaddressedattheplanning applicationstage.
Requireplanningproposals todemonstratehownew business/industrial developmentwould addresspotentialincreases ingreenhousegas emissions. Potentialtorequireenergy efficientdevelopments. Considerrisktoairandsoil quality,andmitigation,at planningstage.
EP2Existing BusinessSites
15/06/12 Businessproposalswillbesupportedintheidentifiedbusinessandindustrialareasin accordancewiththeusesidentifiedassuitableforeachsiteintherelevantArea Statements.Developmentproposalsshouldconsiderandaddressanylocalamenity issues,andtheprovisionofactivetravelroutestothesitesallowingaccessbyanumber ofmeans. ProposalsforusesnotincludedinthesuitableUseClassesforeachofthesites(e.g. wastemanagement,commercialleisure,etc.)willonlybeconsideredwheretheyare compatiblewiththeprimarybusinessuseofthesiteandtheywouldcontributeto employmentprovision.Suchproposalsshouldnotnegativelyimpactontheamenityof thearea,ortheintendedusesonthebusinesssite. Businessproposalsoutwiththeidentifiedbusinessandindustrialareas,andinmixeduse areas,willbesupportedwhereitcanbedemonstratedthattherearenosuitablesites withinthelocallyidentifiedbusinessandindustrialareasandtherewillbenoadverse amenityimpactsincludingnoise,trafficmovements,dust,odours,etc.Proposalson brownfield,vacantandderelictsiteswillbefavouredovergreenfieldsites,andtherewill beapresumptionagainstdevelopmentonsitesallocatedforotherusesintheLDP. Thechangeofuseofbuildingsorlandfrombusinessandemploymentuseswillnotbe supportedunlessitcanbedemonstratedthatthelandhasbeenmarketedforbusiness usesunsuccessfully,ortheCouncilissatisfiedthatabusinessuseisnolonger
15/6/12 Nosignificantenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy. Theimpactsofthepolicyonthefollowingenvironmentalobjectivesareuncertain: Reducegreenhousegasemissions(dependsonthenatureofthebusinesscould providelocalemploymentthatreducescommutingoutofthearea) KeepairpollutionbelowLocalAirQualityManagementthresholds(dependsonthe natureofthedevelopment;policyconsiderslocalamenityissues) Reducewaterpollution(dependsonthenatureofthedevelopment) Promotesustainablewateruse(dependsonthenatureofthedevelopment) Reducecontaminationandsafeguardsoilquantityandquality(dependsonthe natureofthedevelopment:favoursdevelopmentonbrownfieldetcsites,but developmentcouldcausecontamination) Thefollowingopportunitytoimprovetheenvironmentalimpactsofthepolicyhasbeen identified: Makebusinessdevelopmentproposalssubjecttothesustainabledesignand constructionSPG
PolicyEP2ExistingBusinessSites Theaimofthispolicyistosupporttheretentionand promotionoftheexistingbusinessandindustrialsites identifiedinthisPlan. Businessandindustrialproposalswillbesupportedon,and directedto,theexistingbusinesssitesidentifiedonthe ProposalsMaps. Proposalsforanemploymentgeneratinguseonanexisting businesssitewillonlybeapprovedwhereallofthe followingcriteriaaremet: 1. Theusewouldcontributetoemployment provision; 2. Theusewouldbecompatiblewithsurrounding landuses; 3. Theusewouldnotnegativelyimpactonthe amenityofthearea; 4. Thetransportimpactsoftheproposedusecan beeffectivelymanaged. 5. Theusewouldnothaveanadverseeffecton theintegrityoftheFirthofForthSPAeither aloneorincombinationwithotherproposals.
Thispolicyislikelytoleadto increasedgreenhousegas emissions,andhasthepotentialto leadtoincreasedairpollutionand landcontamination(althoughmay alsoprovideopportunitiesto remediateexistingcontamination): theseissuesshouldbeconsidered andaddressedattheplanning applicationstage.Thepolicyavoids adverseimpactsontheFirthof ForthSPAandRamsarsite.
Requireplanningproposals todemonstratehownew business/industrial developmentwould addresspotentialincreases ingreenhousegas emissions. Potentialtorequireenergy efficientdevelopments. Considerrisktoairandsoil quality,andmitigation,at planningstage.
19
Policy appropriateonthesite.
FinalPolicy PolicyEP3BusinessandIndustrialUsesOutwithExisting orAllocatedBusinessSites Theaimofthispolicyistosetoutcriteriaforconsideration ofotheremploymentgeneratingusesoutwithexistingor allocatedbusinesssites. Businessandindustrialproposalsoutwiththebusinessand industrialsitesidentifiedinthePlan,includingexpansionof existingbusinesses,willonlybesupportedwhereallofthe followingcriteriaaremet: 1. Itisdemonstratedthatthereisnosuitablesite availableforthedevelopmentwithinsites identifiedforbusinessuseinthisPlan. 2. Thesiteisnotalreadyidentifiedforadifferent formofdevelopmentintheLDP 3. Theproposeddevelopmentwouldbecompatible withsurroundinglanduses; 4. Therewouldbenoadverseimpactonlocal,and inparticularresidential,amenityresultingfrom theproposeddevelopment; 5. Thetransportimpactsoftheproposed developmentcanbeeffectivelymanaged; 6. Thelayoutanddesignoftheproposedbuildings wouldbeappropriatetothecharacterofthesite andsurroundingarea; 7. Theproposeddevelopmentwouldnotresultin adverseeffectsupontheintegrityoftheFirthof ForthSPAeitheraloneorincombinationwith otherprojectsandplans. TheCouncilwillnormallyexpectsuchdevelopmentstobe locatedonbrownfield,vacantorderelictlandratherthan greenfieldsites. PolicyEP4NonEmploymentGeneratingUsesonExisting orAllocatedBusinessSites Theaimofthispolicyistosetoutcriteriaforconsideration ofnonemploymentgeneratingusesonexistingor allocatedbusinesssites. TheCouncilwillnotnormallysupportproposalstochange theuseofbuildingsorlandfromemploymentgenerating usesunlessoneormoreofthefollowingcriteriahavebeen met: 1. TheCouncilissatisfiedthatthereissufficient evidencetodemonstratethatthebuildingorland doesnothaveaneconomicallyviablefuturefor employmentgeneratinguse. 2. Theapplicant/ownerhavedemonstratedthat genuineattemptstosecureacontinued employmentgeneratingusehaveproved unsuccessful. 3. Theproposedalternativeusewouldbepreferable intermsoflocaland/orresidentialamenity. 4. Theproposedalternativeusewouldbe compatiblewithexistingorproposeduseswithin adjacentlandorbuildings. 5. Theproposedalternativeusewouldnothave significantnegativetransportimpacts. Shouldtheabovecriteriabemet,theCouncilwillnormally expecttheproposedalternativedevelopmenttoprovide visualand/orenvironmentalenhancementofthesite and/oritssurroundings.
EP3Businessand IndustrialUses OutwithExistingor AllocatedBusiness Sites
Thepolicyislikelytoleadto increasedgreenhousegas emissions,andhasthepotentialto leadtoincreasedairpollution: theseissuesshouldbeconsidered andaddressedattheplanning applicationstage.Thepolicyavoids adverseimpactsontheFirthof ForthSPAandRamsarsite.
Requireplanningproposals todemonstratehownew business/industrial developmentwould addresspotentialincreases ingreenhousegas emissions. Potentialtorequireenergy efficientdevelopments. Considerrisktoairquality, andmitigation,atplanning stage.
EP4Non Employment GeneratingUseson ExistingorAllocated BusinessSites
Thereisthepotentialforthis policytohavebeneficialimpacts onthelandscapeandtheCentral ScotlandGreenNetwork:this dependshowtherequirementfor visualand/orenvironmental enhancementsisimplementedat theplanningapplicationstage.
Requiredesignand landscapingtocontribute totheCentralScotland GreenNetworkandto landscapecharacteratthe planningapplicationstage.
20
Policy
FinalPolicy PolicyEP5HomeWorking Theaimofthispolicyistosupporttheprincipleofhome workingsubjecttodetailedcriteria. Therewillbeapresumptioninfavourofproposalsfor homeworking,whetherthroughconversionofanexisting residentialpropertyorprovisionofapurposebuilt live/workunit,providedthatthescaleandnatureofthe proposedbusinessdoesnotdetrimentallyaffectresidential amenityorcreateroadsafetyand/orparkingissueswithin apredominantlyresidentialarea. Whereconsentisgrantedforahomeworking development,planningconditionsmaybeimposedin ordertoensurethedevelopmentiscarriedoutina mannerthatdoesnotgiverisetoissuesofresidential amenity,roadsafetyorparking,suchasrestrictionson operatinghoursorthesizeofthedevelopment. PolicyEP6GreenBusiness Theaimofthispolicyistoprovidesupportand encouragementtoGreenBusiness. Highstandardsofsustainabilitywillbeamaterial considerationwhendeterminingbusinessandindustrial proposals.TheCouncilwillencourageGreenbusinesses, focussingontheadvancementoflowcarbon,resource efficientpracticeswhichhaveapositiveenvironmental outcomeorcontributetowardstheCouncil'ssustainability objectives.
EP5HomeWorking
15/06/12 Businessuses,includinghomeworking,maybeappropriatewithinoradjacenttoother landusessuchastowncentresorresidentialareas,subjecttoamenityconsiderations. Permissionsmaybesubjecttorestrictionsonthehoursofoperationorotherrestrictions requiredtoprotectthelocalamenityandmayalsobeinitiallygrantedtemporary consenttoallowtheCounciltomonitortheimpactsonthelocalarea.
15/06/12 Nosignificantenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy. Theimpactsofthepolicyonthefollowingenvironmentalobjectiveareuncertain: Reducegreenhousegasemissions(dependsonthenatureofthebusinessand whetheritprovidesemploymentlocally Thefollowingopportunitytoimprovetheenvironmentalimpactsofthepolicyhasbeen identified: Makemixeduseproposalssubjecttothesustainabledesignand constructionSPG
EP6GreenBusiness
Sept2012 TheaimofthispolicyistoprovidesupportandencouragementtoGreenBusiness. Highstandardsofsustainabilitywillbeamaterialconsiderationwhendetermining businessandindustrialproposals.TheCouncilwillencourageGreenbusinesses, focussingontheadvancementoflowcarbon,resourceefficientpracticeswhichhavea positiveenvironmentaloutcomeorcontributetowardstheCouncil'ssustainability objectives.
Sept2012 Nosignificantenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy.
Thispolicyhasthepotentialfora rangeofpositiveenvironmental impacts,dependingonthenature ofthegreenbusinessesthatthe policyattracts.
21
Policy
Earlieriteration(s)ofpolicyandlikelyenvironmentalimpacts 161111 Proposals for telecommunications development will be considered against the following criteria: ifproposinganewmast,itshouldbedemonstratedthattheapplicanthasexplored the possibility of erecting apparatus on existing buildings, masts or other structures.Suchevidenceshouldaccompanyanyapplicationforplanningconsent; the siting and appearance of the proposed apparatus and associated structures, including ground based equipment, should not unacceptably impact on the visual amenity,characterorappearanceofthesurroundingarea; visual impact can be addressed through various techniques including the concealing and disguising of masts, antennas, equipment housing and cable runs using design and camouflage techniques. Applicants should ensure there is sufficient land around ground based infrastructure to allow for any appropriate screeningorplanting; the proposed apparatus is the smallest size required to meet the operational requirements; if on a building, apparatus and associated structures should be sited and designed inordertoseektominimiseimpacttotheappearanceofthehostbuilding; the development should not have an unacceptable effect on areas of ecological interest,areasoflandscapeimportance,archaeologicalsites,conservationareasor listedbuildingsortheirsetting. Proposals for communications equipment should be accompanied by the following supportingmaterial: adescriptionofhowtheproposedequipmentfitsintothewidernetwork, a description of the siting and design options which satisfy the operational requirements, alternatives that were considered, and the reasons for the chosen solution, details of the design, including height, materials and all components of the proposal, detailsofanyproposedlandscapingandscreenplanting, a description of how the cumulative effects of the proposed and existing equipmentintheareawereconsidered, a declaration that the equipment and installation is designed to be in full compliancewiththeappropriateICNIRPguidelines,and informationonvisualimpact,ifrelevant. DeveloperswillberequiredtoconsidertheguidelinespublishedbytheDepartmentfor CommunitiesandLocalGovernment(2008),DataDuctingInfrastructureforNew Homes:GuidanceNoteanddemonstratehowthesehavebeenintegratedintotheir proposals.IftheCouncilfeelsthattheproposalswouldnotcontributetothe Government'svisionforgreaterdeploymentofnextgenerationbroadband,the developermaybeaskedtorevisetheirproposals.
FinalPolicy PolicyEP7TelecommunicationsDevelopmentCriteria Theaimofthispolicyistosetoutcriteriaforthe considerationofproposalsfortelecommunications developments. Proposalsfortelecommunicationsdevelopmentwill normallybeapproved,providedallofthefollowingcriteria aremet: 1. fproposinganewmast,theapplicanthas demonstratedthroughtheprovisionofclear evidencethatitisnotpossibletoerectapparatus onexistingbuildings,mastsorotherstructures; 2. hesitingandappearanceoftheproposed apparatusandassociatedstructures,including groundbasedequipment,wouldnot unacceptablyimpactonthevisualamenity, characterorappearanceofthesurroundingarea; 3. isualimpactcanbeaddressedthroughvarious techniquesincludingtheconcealingand disguisingofmasts,antennas,equipmenthousing andcablerunsusingdesignandcamouflage techniques.Applicantsshouldensurethereis sufficientlandaroundgroundbased infrastructuretoallowforanyappropriate screeningorplanting; 4. heproposedapparatusisthesmallestsize requiredtomeettheoperationalrequirements; 5. fonabuilding,apparatusandassociated structureswouldbesitedanddesignedinorder toseektominimiseadverseimpactonthe appearanceofthehostbuilding; 6. thedevelopmentwouldnothaveasignificant adverseeffectonareasofecologicalinterest, speciallandscapeareas,archaeologicalsites, conservationareasorlistedbuildingsortheir settingorhaveanadverseeffectontheintegrity oftheFirthofForthSPAeitheraloneorin combinationwithotherprojectsandplans.
EP7 Telecommunication sDevelopment Criteria
181111 Nosignificantenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy. Theimpactsonthefollowingenvironmentalobjectivesareuncertain: Protectcarbonrichsoilsfromdisturbanceorloss(dependsonthelocationof developmentorequipment) Protectandenhancegeodiversity,particularlyingeologicalSSSIs(dependson location) Thefollowingopportunitiestomitigateorenhanceenvironmentalimpactsofthepolicyhave beenidentified: Considerapplicationsinconjunctionwithcarbonrichsoilspolicy Considerapplicationsinconjunctionwithgeodiversitypolicy Promote,ratherthanjustenable,homeworkinginfrastructure(wouldcontribute toreducingtheenvironmentalimpactoftravel)
Thispolicyavoidsadverseimpacts ontheFirthofForthSPAand Ramsarsite.
22
Policy
FinalPolicy PolicyEP8TelecommunicationDevelopmentAdditional Information Theaimofthispolicyistosetoutthelevelofinformation requiredinordertoallowtheCounciltoconsider applicationsfortelecommunicationdevelopments. Proposalsforcommunicationsequipmentshouldbe accompaniedbyallofthefollowingsupportingmaterial: 1. adescriptionofhowtheproposedequipmentfits intothewidernetwork, 2. adescriptionofthesitinganddesignoptions whichsatisfytheoperationalrequirements, alternativesthatwereconsidered,andthe reasonsforthechosensolution, 3. detailsofthedesign,includingheight,materials andallcomponentsoftheproposal, 4. detailsofanyproposedlandscapingandscreen planting, 5. adescriptionofhowthecumulativeeffectsofthe proposedandexistingequipmentinthearea wereconsidered, 6. adeclarationthattheequipmentandinstallation isdesignedtobeinfullcompliancewiththe appropriateICNIRPguidelines,and 7. informationonvisualimpact. Developerswillberequiredtoconsidertheguidelines publishedbytheDepartmentforCommunitiesandLocal Government(2008),DataDuctingInfrastructureforNew Homes:GuidanceNoteanddemonstratehowthesehave beenintegratedintotheirproposals.IftheCouncilfeels thattheproposalswouldnotcontributetothe Government'svisionforgreaterdeploymentofnext generationbroadband,thedevelopermaybeaskedto revisetheirproposals.
EP8 Telecommunication Development Additional Information
EP9Protectionof MineralsResources
Protectionofmineralsresources Assessed41011 Permanentdevelopmentthatwouldresultinthesterilisationofvaluablemineral resourceswillnotnormallybepermitted.Whereaproposeddevelopmentisacceptable inallrespectsexceptfortheexistenceofmineraldeposits,itwillbeassessedagainstthe followingcriteria; 1. Therelativeimportanceoftheparticularmineralresource 2. Theavailabilityofsuitablealternativesitesforthedevelopment,inparticularwhere thedevelopmentisconsideredtoberequiredtocontributetothestrategichousingland requirement. 3. Thelikelihoodofthedepositbeingworked,includingwhetherinterestinitsextraction hasbeenexpressed. 4. Whetherpriorextractionofthedepositcouldtakeplaceinanenvironmentally acceptablemannerandwithinareasonabletimescale.
41011 Nosignificantbeneficialimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificantnegativeimpactsonthefollowingobjectives: Reducegreenhousegasemissions Protectcarbonrichsoilsfromdisturbanceorloss Theimpactsonthefollowingobjectivesareuncertain: Protectandenhancethedistinctivecharacterofthelandscapeandensurenew developmentdoesnotexceedthecapacityofthelandscapetoaccommodateit Protectandenhanceareasdesignatedfortheirnationalorlocallandscape importance Protectandenhancegeodiversity,particularlysitesofspecialscientificinterest (theseimpactsdependontheapplicationofthisandotherpolicies,andonhow "environmentallyacceptable"isdefined) Noopportunitiestoamendthepolicytomitigatenegativeenvironmentalimpactswere identified.
PolicyEP9ProtectionofMineralsResources Theaimofthispolicyistoprotectmineralresourcesfrom sterilisationbydevelopment. Developmentthatwouldresultinthesterilisationof provenmineralresourceswillnotnormallybesupported. Whereaproposeddevelopmentisacceptableinall respectsexceptfortheexistenceofmineraldeposits,itwill besupportediftheapplicantdemonstratestothe satisfactionoftheCouncilthatitmeetsallofthefollowing criteria: 1. Theeconomicimportanceofthemineral resourcesisoutweighedbytheeconomic importanceofthedevelopment 2. Thereisnoothersuitablesiteforthe development 3. Thereisnolikelihoodofthedepositbeingworked
23
Policy
V225/10/11 MineralsGeneralPrinciples Proposalsforneworextendedmineralworkingswillnormallybeacceptablewherethefollowing criteriacanbemet; 1.Itwouldnotresultinanunacceptableadverseimpactontheamenityorhealthandsafetyof nearbycommunitiesorsmallergroupsofhouses,orpropertiesalonganyagreedhaulagerouteto andfromthesite. 2.Itwouldnotresultinanunacceptableadverseimpactonthenaturalandbuiltenvironment, includingdesignatedareasofnatureconservationvalueandlocallyimportantsites,thecharacteror settingoflistedbuildingsorscheduledmonuments,historicgardensanddesignedlandscapesorsites ofarchaeologicalorhistoricimportance. 3.Itwouldnotresultinanunacceptableadverseimpactonthelandscapecharacter,appearanceor visualamenityoftheareasurroundingthesite,includingviewsfromsettlementsandmajortransport routes. 4.Itwouldnotresultinanadverseimpactonthewaterenvironment 5.Thesitewouldnotbeinanareaalreadysubjecttootheroperationalorconsenteddevelopments thatalsohavenegativeenvironmentaleffectsandthesimultaneousorsequentialworkingwillresult inanunacceptablecumulativeimpactonthelocalcommunityand/orenvironment. 6.Thetransportationofmineralswouldnotsolelybebyroadunless; (a)theapplicanthassatisfactorilydemonstratedwhytransportationbyrailorwaterisnotfeasible, and; (b)vehicleswouldnotpassdirectlythroughcommunitiesandtheapplicanthasdemonstratedhow theirroadsafety,environmentalandamenityimpactscouldbesatisfactorilymitigated. 7.TheproposalsforrestorationandaftercareaccordwithPolicy6below. 8.Theyprovidedirectcommunityandenvironmentalbenefitstothearea,suchaslocalemployment opportunitiesorimprovementstolocalamenityortheprovisionoffuturedevelopment opportunitieswhichaccordwiththeDevelopmentPlan. 9.Whererelevant,theproposalaccordswithPolicies3,4and5below. Applicationsformineralworkingswillbeexpectedtoincludethefollowinginformation; 1.Theneedforthemineral,havingregardtotheadviceinSPP. 2.Detailsofthereservesinsurroundingland,whereknown,andwhatinteresttheapplicanthasin anyfuturewinningofthesereserves. 3.Afullydetailedmethodstatementaddressing;thetimingandphasingofdevelopmentincluding progressiverestoration;thearrangementstominimisewasteintheextractionprocess;an EnvironmentalStatementidentifyingandassessingthekeyenvironmentaleffectsoftheproposal includinglandscape,visualimpact,floraandfauna,soilandairquality,waterandclimate,human beings,culturalheritage,publicfootpaths,corepathsandagriculturalinterests;andtheproposalsto mitigateanyimpacts. 4.Detailsofhowthearrangementsfortransportationofthemineralswithinorfromthesitewould contributetothereductioningreenhousegasemissions. 5.Thearrangementstoprovideregularenvironmentalmonitoringandauditingofsiteoperations andcommunityliaison. Applicationstoextendthedurationofaconsentedpermissionwillnotnormallybeapproved.
FinalPolicy PolicyEP10MineralsGeneralPrinciples Theaimofthispolicyistoensurethatmineralsextraction doesnothaveasignificantadverseimpacton Clackmannanshire'senvironmentandcommunities. Proposalsforneworextendedmineralworkingswill normallybesupportedwheretheapplicantdemonstrates tothesatisfactionoftheCouncilthattheproposalmeets allofthefollowingcriteria: 1.Theproposalwouldnotresultinasignificantadverse impactonanyofthefollowing: a) Theamenity,healthandsafetyorairqualityof nearbysettlements,individualhousesorgroupsof houses,orothersensitiveestablishments. b) Thenaturalandbuiltenvironment,including; i) Designatedareasofnatureconservationvalue andspeciallandscape ii) theintegrityoftheFirthofForthSPAeitheralone orincombinationwithotherprojectsandplans iii) Listedbuildingsandtheirsettings,conservation areas,scheduledmonuments,historicgardens, designedlandscapesorsitesofarchaeologicalor historicimportance. c) Thequalityanddistinctivecharacterofthesurrounding landscape,andthegeneralappearanceorvisual amenityoftheareasurroundingthesite,including viewsfromsettlementsandmajortransportroutes. d) Thewaterenvironment. 2.Theproposalwouldnotbeinanareaalreadyadversely affectedbyotheroperationalorconsentedmineral developments,wherethesimultaneousorsequential workingwouldresultinasignificantadversecumulative impactonthelocalcommunityand/orenvironment. 3.Whereverpossible,theopportunityistakentotransport mineralsbyrailorwater.Forshortdistancetransport conveyorsshouldbeused.Wherethisisnotfeasible proposalsshouldincludeinformationonhowany adverseimpactsonsettlementsasaresultofhaulage, includingroadsafety,environmentalandamenity impacts,willbemitigated.Thisshouldincludeprovision forroutinghaulagevehiclesawayfromsettlements whereverpossible. 4.Theproposalwouldprovidedirectcommunityand environmentalbenefitstothearea,suchaslocal employmentopportunities,improvementstolocal amenityortheprovisionoffuturedevelopment opportunitieswhichaccordwiththeLDP. 5.Properprovisionhasbeenmadefortheprogressive restorationandaftercareofthesitetothehighest possiblestandards,withdetailedrestorationand aftercareplans. 6.Theproposalwouldaccord,whererelevant,with PoliciesEP11,12and13. Furtherguidanceonmeetingtheabovecriteriawillbeset outintheMineralsSG. Developersmustprovideanappropriatebondtoensure thefullimplementationofthesiterestorationand aftercarescheme.Bondsshallbesubjecttolegal agreements,andtheirvalueshallbedeterminedbythe Councilinconsultationwithanindependentsurveyor. Applicationstoextendthedurationofaconsented permissionwillnotnormallybeapproved.
EP10Minerals GeneralPrinciples.
25/10/11 Nosignificantbeneficialimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificantadverseimpactsonthefollowingobjectives: Reducegreenhousegasemissions KeepairpollutionbelowLocalAirQualityManagementthresholds Reducecontaminationandsafeguardsoilquantityandquality EncouragepromotionandconnectivityoftheCentralScotlandGreenNetworkwithinand linkingbeyondClackmannanshire Furthertheconservationofbiodiversity AvoidadverseimpactsontheintegrityoftheFirthofForthSPAandRamsarsite MaintainandenhancethepopulationsofEuropeanProtectedSpecies,includingprotectionof theirrestingplaces ProtectandenhancepriorityspeciesandhabitatsinClackmannanshire Increasehabitatconnectivityandecosystemfunctiontoassistlocalbiodiversityinresponseto climatechange Protectandenhancethedistinctivecharacterofthelandscapeandensurenewdevelopment doesnotexceedthecapacityofthelandscapetoaccommodateit Thereareuncertaintiesaroundtheimpactsonthefollowingobjectives,whichmostlydependonthe definitionof"unacceptableimpact": Protectcarbonrichsoilsfromdisturbanceorloss Reduceoverallfloodriskinasustainableway Contributetothemitigationoffloodsanddroughts Improvehealthandreducehealthinequalities Protectandenhanceareasdesignatedfortheirnationalorlocallandscapevalue Protectandenhancegeodiversity,particularlyingeologicalSSSIs Protectand,whereappropriate,enhancethehistoricenvironment Thefollowingopportunitiestomitigatetheimpactofthepolicyhavebeenidentified: Restorationcouldincludemeasuretocontributetosustainablefloodmanagement,e.g. lagoons(Reduceoverallfloodriskinasustainableway,contributetothemitigationoffloods anddroughts) Controlemissionsfromplant(keepairpollutionbelowLocalAirQualityManagement thresholds) Regulatetheuseofwaterintheprocesses(promotesustainablewateruse) Managementandrestorationcouldprovideenhancementofthenaturalenvironmentand improvementstovisualamenity(Naturalenvironmentandlandscapeobjectives)
V1181111 RestorationandAftercareofSurfaceMineralWorkings Proposalsformineralextractionwillonlybepermittedwhereproperprovisionhasbeen madefortheprogressiverestorationandaftercareofthesitetothehighestpossible standards.TheCouncilwillrequiredeveloperstosubmitdetailedrestorationplans including; 1. Anassessmentoftheexistinglandscapeandecologicalfeatures/habitat networksandapracticableschemeshowinghowtherestoredsitewillbe assimilatedintothelandscape 2. Detailsofthephasing,filling,landforms,drainage,pollutionprevention measures,managementofsoils,landscapingandthearrangementsforpublic access. 3. Whereappropriate,measurestosecurelandscapeandhabitatenhancement, thepromotionofbiodiversityincludingtheimprovementinconnectivityof habitatnetworks,countrysideaccessandrecreation,havingregardto relevantgovernmentadviceongoodpractice. 4. Thearrangementsfora5yearaftercareschemeforthesiteandanylonger termlandmanagementmeasures 5. Theprovisionofappropriatefinancialguaranteesintheformofabondto ensurethefullimplementationofthesiterestorationandaftercarescheme. ThevalueofabondwillbedeterminedbytheCouncilinconsultationwithan independentsurveyor.Anybondwillbesubjecttoalegalagreement.
Thispolicyislikelytoincrease greenhousegasemissionsandair pollution,anddamagesoils (althoughthiscanbemitigatedby therequirementforrestoration). Thereisthepotentialforthepolicy tohavepositiveimpactson communitycohesionandinclusion, dependingonhowthe requirementforcommunity benefitsisimplemented.Thereis thepotentialforthepolicyto adverselyaffecthealthand exacerbateexistingconditions,so thehealthprofileofareasaffected bydevelopmentshouldbe consideredattheplanning applicationstage.Thereis potentialfornegativeimpactson geodiversity,biodiversity,species, habitatsandtheCentralScotland GreenNetwork,dependingonthe locationofproposals;theseissues, andthepotentialforhabitat improvementsandgreennetwork improvementsthroughsite restoration,shouldbeconsidered attheplanningapplicationstage.
Considerlocalcommunity healthprofilesatplanning applicationstage. Considerthepotentialfor impactson,or enhancementof,the CentralScotlandGreen Network,biodiversity conservation,European protectedspecies,priority species,andhabitat connectivityatplanning applicationstage. Considerpotentialfor adverseimpactson geodiversityatplanning applicationstage.
221111 Nosignificantenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy,althoughsite specificbeneficialimpactsarelikelyoverthelongterm. Thefollowingopportunitiestoimprovetheimpactsofthepolicyhavebeenidentified: Requestrestorationmeasuresthatcontributetoclimatechangeadaptation(e.g. mitigationfloodsanddroughts) Requestrestorationmeasuresthatcontributetowaterstatusimprovement objectives Specifythatonlynativespeciesaretobeusedinrestoration Requestthecreationofparticularhabitats
24
Policy
FinalPolicy PolicyEP11OpencastCoalExtraction Theaimofthispolicyistosetoutadditionalcriteriain relationtoopencastcoalextraction. Proposalsforopencastcoalminingwithinandsolely affectinganareaoflowconstraint(asdefinedinTable4 HierarchyofConstraintAreasforOpencastCoal Extraction)willbesupportedwheretheapplicant demonstratestothesatisfactionoftheCouncilthatthe proposalmeetsthecriteriacontainedinPolicyEP10, MineralsGeneralPrinciples;andeither: 1.Theproposalisenvironmentallyacceptable,orwill bemadesobyplanningconditionsand/or agreements,or 2.Theproposalprovideslocalorcommunitybenefits whichwouldsignificantlyoutweighthelikely impactsoftheextraction Proposalsforopencastcoalminingwithinoraffectingan areaofmediumconstraint,(asdefinedinTable4)willonly besupportedwheretheapplicantdemonstratestothe satisfactionoftheCouncilthattheproposalmeetsallof thefollowingcriteria: 1. Theproposalmeetsthecriteriacontainedin PolicyEP10MineralsGeneralPrinciples. 2. Thereareexceptionalcircumstances 3. Thenetbenefitsoftheproposalwouldoutweigh anyharmtotheenvironmentandsurrounding communities Proposalsforopencastcoalminingwillnotbesupported withinoraffectingareasofhighconstraint(asdefinedin Table4),unlesstheapplicantdemonstratestothe satisfactionoftheCouncilthat: 1. Theproposalmeetsthecriteriacontainedin PolicyEP10MineralsGeneralPrinciples;and 2. Thereareexceptionalcircumstancesand imperativereasonsofoverridingpublic,socialor economicinterest 3. Thenetbenefitsoftheproposalwouldoutweigh anyharmtotheenvironmentandsurrounding communities Proposalsforopencastcoalminingwillnotnormallybe supportedinthefollowingcircumstances: 1. Wherethesiteboundarylieswithin500metresof anysettlement 2. Wheretherewouldbeasignificantadverse impactonindividualorgroupsofhousesorother sensitiveestablishmentsandtheseeffectscannot besatisfactorilymitigated. 3. Wheretheschemewouldhaveanadverseeffect upontheintegrityoftheFirthofForthSPAeither aloneorincombinationwithotherprojectsand plans. Proposalsmustbecompletedandrestoredwithin10years.
EP11OpencastCoal Extraction
18/11/11 SurfaceCoalExtraction InadditiontothecriteriacontainedinPolicy2above,proposalsforopencastcoalmining willbeassessedasfollows; 1. WithinoraffectinganareaofhighconstraintasdefinedintheSPG, extractionwillnotbepermittedunlessthereareexceptionalcircumstances wheretheapplicantcanjustifyanddemonstratethatthereareimperative reasonsofoverridingpublic,socialoreconomicinterest 2. WithinoraffectinganareaofmediumconstraintasdefinedintheSPG, extractionwillnotbepermittedunlessthereareexceptionalcircumstances wheretheapplicantcanjustifyanddemonstratethatharmtotheconstraints canbeavoided,andthatthenetbenefitsoutweighthesignificanceofthe harm. 3. WithinalowconstraintareaasdefinedintheSPG,extractionwillbe supportedwhere; theproposalisenvironmentallyacceptable,orcanbemadesoby planningconditionsand/oragreements,or Theproposalprovideslocalorcommunitybenefitswhichwould significantlyoutweighthelikelyimpactsoftheextraction 4. Proposalswherethesiteboundarylieswithin500metresofanysettlement of10ormorehouseswillnotnormallybeacceptable.Whereanyoccupied buildingorsensitiveestablishmentoutwithsettlementscomeswithin200 metresoftheboundary,proposalswillnotnormallybeacceptableunlessit canbedemonstratedthatanyadverseimpactscanbesatisfactorily mitigated. Proposalswillbenormallyrequiretobecompletedandrestoredwithin10yearsin accordancewithPolicy6.
221111 Nosignificantbeneficialenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy. Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificantnegativeimpactsonthefollowingenvironmental objectives: Reducegreenhousegasemissions KeepairpollutionbelowLocalAirQualityManagementthresholds Reducecontaminationandsafeguardsoilquantityandquality Improvehealthandreducehealthinequalities EncouragepromotionandconnectivityoftheCSGNwithinandlinkingbeyond Clackmannanshire Furthertheconservationofbiodiversity AvoidadverseimpactsontheintegrityoftheFirthofForthSPAandRamsarsite MaintainandenhancethepopulationsofEuropeanProtectedSpecies,including protectionoftheirrestingplaces ProtectandenhanceSSSIs ProtectandenhancepriorityspeciesandhabitatsinClackmannanshire Increasehabitatconnectivityandecosystemfunctiontoassistlocalbiodiversityin responsetoclimatechange Protectandenhancethedistinctivecharacterofthelandscapeandensurenew developmentdoesnotexceedthecapacityofthelandscapetoaccommodateit Theimpactsofthispolicyonthefollowingobjectivesareuncertain: Protectcarbonrichsoilsfromdisturbanceorloss(Dependsonlocation) Reduceoverallfloodriskinasustainableway(Thereispotentialforminerals extractionstocauseschangestothewaterenvironment) Contributetothemitigationoffloodsanddroughts(Thereispotentialforminerals extractionstocauseschangestothewaterenvironment) Protectandenhanceareasdesignatedfortheirnationalorlocallandscape importance(dependsonlocation) Protectandenhancegeodiversity,particularlyingeologicalSSSIs(dependson location) Protectand,whereappropriate,enhancethehistoricenvironment(dependson how"unacceptableadverseimpact"isdefined) InadditiontothosesuggestedforMinerals:Generalprinciples,thefollowingopportunitiesto mitigatetheenvironmentalimpactsofthepolicyhavebeenidentified: Includecarbonrichsoilsincriteriaforidentifyinglevelofconstraint Directopencastworkstocontaminatedsitestoenabletheirrestoration Includepolicycriteriarelatingtoparticulates Implementmeasurestoreducedustandparticulates,suchasusingwater,keeping plantproperlymaintained,andminimisingexhaustemissions
25
Policy
Earlieriteration(s)ofpolicyandlikelyenvironmentalimpacts 25/10/11 Nosignificantbeneficialimpactshavebeenindentified forthispolicy Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificantadverseimpactson thefollowingobjectives: Reducegreenhousegasemissions KeepairpollutionbelowLocalAirQualityManagement thresholds Reducecontaminationandsafeguardsoilquantityand quality EncouragepromotionandconnectivityoftheCentral ScotlandGreenNetworkwithinandlinkingbeyond Clackmannanshire Furthertheconservationofbiodiversity AvoidadverseimpactsontheintegrityoftheFirthof ForthSPAandRamsarsite MaintainandenhancethepopulationsofEuropean ProtectedSpecies,includingprotectionoftheirresting places Protectandenhancepriorityspeciesandhabitatsin Clackmannanshire Increasehabitatconnectivityandecosystemfunction toassistlocalbiodiversityinresponsetoclimate change Protectandenhancethedistinctivecharacterofthe landscapeandensurenewdevelopmentdoesnot exceedthecapacityofthelandscapetoaccommodate it Thereareuncertaintiesaroundtheimpactsonthe followingobjectives,whichmostlydependonthe definitionof"unacceptableimpact": Protectcarbonrichsoilsfromdisturbanceorloss Reduceoverallfloodriskinasustainableway Contributetothemitigationoffloodsanddroughts Improvehealthandreducehealthinequalities Protectandenhanceareasdesignatedfortheir nationalorlocallandscapevalue Protectandenhancegeodiversity,particularlyin geologicalSSSIs Protectand,whereappropriate,enhancethehistoric environment Thefollowingopportunitiestomitigatetheimpactofthe policyhavebeenidentified: Restorationcouldincludemeasuretocontributeto sustainablefloodmanagement,e.g.lagoons(Reduce overallfloodriskinasustainableway,contributetothe mitigationoffloodsanddroughts) Controlemissionsfromplant(keepairpollutionbelow LocalAirQualityManagementthresholds) Regulatetheuseofwaterintheprocesses(promote sustainablewateruse) Managementandrestorationcouldprovide enhancementofthenaturalenvironmentand improvementstovisualamenity(Naturalenvironment andlandscapeobjectives) 221111 Nosignificantbeneficialenvironmental impactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy. Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificantnegative impactsonthefollowingenvironmental objectives: Reducegreenhousegasemissions KeepairpollutionbelowLocalAirQuality Managementthresholds Reducecontaminationandsafeguardsoil quantityandquality Encouragepromotionandconnectivityof theCSGNwithinandlinkingbeyond Clackmannanshire Furthertheconservationofbiodiversity Avoidadverseimpactsontheintegrityof theFirthofForthSPAandRamsarsite Maintainandenhancethepopulationsof EuropeanProtectedSpecies,including protectionoftheirrestingplaces ProtectandenhanceSSSIs Protectandenhancepriorityspeciesand habitatsinClackmannanshire Increasehabitatconnectivityandecosystem functiontoassistlocalbiodiversityin responsetoclimatechange Protectandenhancethedistinctive characterofthelandscapeandensurenew developmentdoesnotexceedthecapacity ofthelandscapetoaccommodateit Theimpactsofthispolicyonthefollowing objectivesareuncertain: Protectcarbonrichsoilsfromdisturbance orloss(Dependsonlocation) Reduceoverallfloodriskinasustainable way(Thereispotentialforminerals extractionstocauseschangestothewater environment) Contributetothemitigationoffloodsand droughts(Thereispotentialforminerals extractionstocauseschangestothewater environment) Improvehealthandreducehealth inequalities(dependsonthedefinitionof "unacceptableadverseimpact") Protectandenhanceareasdesignatedfor theirnationalorlocallandscapeimportance (dependsonlocation) Protectandenhancegeodiversity, particularlyingeologicalSSSIs(dependson location) Protectand,whereappropriate,enhance thehistoricenvironment(dependsonhow "unacceptableadverseimpact"isdefined) OtherthanthosesuggestedforMinerals: Generalprinciples,noopportunitiesto mitigatetheenvironmentalimpactsofthe policyhavebeenidentified.
FinalPolicy
EP12Aggregate Minerals
25/10/11V1 AggregateMinerals Inadditiontothecriteriacontainedin Policy2above,proposalsforaggregate mineralswillbeassessedasfollows; 1.Therewillbeapresumptionagainst proposalsforsandandgravelquarriesor anyextensiontoTillicoultryQuarry. 2.Applicationsshalldemonstratethe marketrequirementfortheproposed outputfromthesitehavingregardto; thecontributionitwouldmaketo maintainingalandbankofpermitted reservesasrequiredbySPP,thelikely availabilityofalternativesourcesof supply,andtheproximityprinciple.
V1181111 Aggregateminerals Inadditiontothecriteria containedinPolicy2above, proposalsforaggregate mineralswillbeassessedas follows; Therewillbea presumptionagainst proposalsforsandand gravelquarriesorany extensiontoTillicoultry Quarry. Applicationsshalldemonstrate themarketrequirementforthe proposedoutputfromthesite havingregardto;the contributionitwouldmaketo maintainingalandbankof permittedreservesasrequired bySPP,thelikelyavailabilityof alternativesourcesofsupply, andtheproximityprinciple.
PolicyEP12AggregateMinerals Theaimofthispolicyistosetoutadditionalcriteriain relationtoaggregateminerals. Proposalsforsandandgravelquarriesoranyextensionto CraigfootQuarry,Tillicoultry,willnotbesupported. Otherproposalsforaggregatemineralswillbesupported wheretheapplicantdemonstratestothesatisfactionof theCouncil: ThattheproposalmeetsthecriteriainPolicy EP10MineralsGeneralPrinciplespolicy;and Themarketrequirementfortheproposedoutput fromthesite,havingregardtothecontributionit wouldmaketomaintainingalandbankof permittedreservesasrequiredbySPP;thelikely availabilityofalternativesourcesofsupply;and theproximityprinciple.
26
Policy
Earlieriteration(s)ofpolicyandlikelyenvironmentalimpacts 221111 Nosignificantbeneficialenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy. Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificantnegativeimpactsonthefollowingenvironmental objectives: Reducegreenhousegasemissions KeepairpollutionbelowLocalAirQualityManagementthresholds Reducecontaminationandsafeguardsoilquantityandquality EncouragepromotionandconnectivityoftheCSGNwithinandlinkingbeyond Clackmannanshire Furthertheconservationofbiodiversity AvoidadverseimpactsontheintegrityoftheFirthofForthSPAandRamsarsite MaintainandenhancethepopulationsofEuropeanProtectedSpecies,including protectionoftheirrestingplaces ProtectandenhanceSSSIs ProtectandenhancepriorityspeciesandhabitatsinClackmannanshire Increasehabitatconnectivityandecosystemfunctiontoassistlocalbiodiversityin responsetoclimatechange Protectandenhancethedistinctivecharacterofthelandscapeandensurenew developmentdoesnotexceedthecapacityofthelandscapetoaccommodateit Theimpactsofthispolicyonthefollowingobjectivesareuncertain: Protectcarbonrichsoilsfromdisturbanceorloss(Dependsonlocation) Reduceoverallfloodriskinasustainableway(Thereispotentialforminerals extractionstocauseschangestothewaterenvironment) Contributetothemitigationoffloodsanddroughts(Thereispotentialforminerals extractionstocauseschangestothewaterenvironment) Promotesustainablewateruse(coalbedmethaneextractionprocesshasthe potentialtohavehighwaterconsumption) Ourcommunitiesaresafer(dependsontheextractionprocess) Improvehealthandreducehealthinequalities(dependsonthedefinitionof "unacceptableadverseimpact") Protectandenhanceareasdesignatedfortheirnationalorlocallandscape importance(dependsonlocation) Protectandenhancegeodiversity,particularlyingeologicalSSSIs(dependson location) Protectand,whereappropriate,enhancethehistoricenvironment(dependson how"unacceptableadverseimpact"isdefined) OtherthanthosesuggestedforMinerals:Generalprinciples,noopportunitiestomitigatethe environmentalimpactsofthepolicyhavebeenidentified.
FinalPolicy
EP13CoalBed Methane
V1181111 CoalBedMethane Applicationsfortheextractionofcoalbedmethanewillbesupportedunlesstheywould haveunacceptableadverseimpactsoncommunities,theenvironmentorthelocal economy.Inpracticethiswillrelatemainlytotheimpactofwellheadsandtransmission infrastructure. ProposalsmustdemonstratethattheycansatisfythecriteriainPolicy2andthatthe operationswill; 1. notresultinasignificantadverseimpactonresidentialamenityorbuiltand naturalheritage. 2. wherepracticable,transporttheendproductfromtheextractionpointvia pipeline,railorwatertransportratherthanbyroad. satisfactorilyremoveplant,equipmentandbuildingsandachievehighquality restorationandaftercareofthesitesoncompletionofexplorationandproduction.
PolicyEP13CoalBedMethane Theaimofthispolicyistosetoutadditionalcriteriain relationtocoalbedmethane. Proposalsfortheextractionofcoalbedmethanewillbe supportedwheretheapplicantdemonstratestothe satisfactionoftheCouncilthattheproposalmeetsallof thefollowingcriteria: 1. Theproposalwouldnothavesignificantadverse impactsoncommunities,theenvironmentorthe localeconomy. 2. TheproposalmeetsthecriteriainPolicyEP10 MineralsGeneralPrinciplespolicy. 3. Theproposalwouldnotresultinasignificant adverseimpactonresidentialamenityorthebuilt andnaturalenvironmentorhaveanadverse effectontheintegrityoftheFirthofForthSPA eitheraloneorincombinationwithotherprojects andplans. 4. Theendproductwouldbetransportedfromthe extractionpointviapipeline,railorwater transportratherthanbyroad,unlessthisisnot practicable. 5. Oncompletionofexplorationandproduction,all plant,equipmentandbuildingswouldbe removed,andhighqualityrestorationand aftercareofthesiteswouldbedelivered.
Thispolicyislikelytoincrease greenhousegasemissionsandair pollution,anddamagesoils (althoughthiscanbemitigatedby therequirementforrestoration). Thepolicyislikelytohavea negativeimpactonthewater environment.Thereisthe potentialforthepolicytohave positiveimpactsoncommunity cohesionandinclusion,depending onhowtherequirementfor communitybenefitsis implemented.Thereisthe potentialforthepolicyto adverselyaffecthealthand exacerbateexistingconditions,so thehealthprofileofareasaffected bydevelopmentshouldbe consideredattheplanning applicationstage.Thereis potentialfornegativeimpactson geodiversity,biodiversity,species, habitatsandtheCentralScotland GreenNetwork,dependingonthe locationofproposals;theseissues, andthepotentialforhabitat improvementsandgreennetwork improvementsthroughsite restoration,shouldbeconsidered attheplanningapplicationstage.
27
Policy
Earlieriteration(s)ofpolicyandlikelyenvironmentalimpacts 18/06/12 TheCouncilwillprotectandenhancetheroleandfunctionofthenetworkandhierarchy ofcentresassetoutinTablexx.Proposalsforretailorcommercialleisuredevelopment (includingtheexpansionorchangeofuseofexistingdevelopmentsofascalesufficient tochangetheirroleorfunction)ormajorcommunityuseswhicharenotconsideredto supporttheroleandfunctionofthehierarchyofcentresand/orisnotofascaleor charactercommensuratewithmaintainingthehierarchyofthecentreswillnotnormally beacceptable. TheboundariesofthecentresaredefinedontheProposalsMap. TableX Centre Role Levelin Hierarchy DistrictTown Alloa Principalshoppingcentrewhichprovidesthe Centre mainshopping,servicesandcommunityfacilities forresidentsinClackmannanshire. OtherTown Alva, Lowerlevelshoppingcentre(primarilylocal Centres Clackmannan, convenienceandservices)whichservestheneed Dollar,Sauchie, ofthelocalcommunity. Tillicoultry, Tullibody(Tron Court),Menstrie Commercial (a)SterlingMills Thesecentresaredistinctfromtowncentresas Centres (b)Sterling theyhaveadifferentand/orspecialisedrangeof Furniture uses,characterandphysicalstructure. (c)Clackmannan Adescriptionoftheroleofeachcentreis RoadRetailPark providedbelow. 18/06/12 Local/ Individualshops Smallgroupsorindividualshopswhichprovide Nosignificantenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy Neighbourhood outwiththe convenientfacilitiesforresidentsinvillagesor Shops networkof residentialareas.Theseprincipallyareusedfor centres topupshoppingandcanhelpreducethe dependenceonthecar. (a)SterlingMillsItsmainroleandfunctionisanOutletVillagesellingarangeof comparisongoods(primarilypersonalgoods).Distinctcharacterwhichattractsvisitors fromoutsidetheCouncilareaandsoalsoperformsatourismfunction.Permission grantedforanextensiontothecentre(ref06/00427/FULL).Legalagreementregulates theusestoaccordwithitsspecificroleandfunction.ElementoflinkedtripswithSterling Furniture. (b)SterlingFurnitureitsmainroleandfunctionisasaHouseholdShoppingCentre sellingarangeofcomparisongoods(primarilyhouseholdbulkygoods)whichattracts visitorsfromoutsidetheCouncilarea,therebyalsoperformingatourismfunction.Legal agreementandplanningconditionsregulateusestoaccordwithitsroleandfunction. ElementoflinkedtripswithSterlingMills. (c)ClackmannanRoadRetailParkitsmainroleandfunctionisdefinedasaHousehold ShoppingCentresellingcomparisongoodswithasuperstore.TheboundaryofthePark hasbeendefinedontheMapandincorporatesthebusinesslandtotheeasttoreflectits potentialtoaccommodatefurtherretaildevelopmentconsistentwithitsfunctionwithin thehierarchy.Theremaybeopportunitiesforcommercialleisureuseswherethese wouldenhancetheviabilityandvitalityoftheexistingcentreandwhichwouldnot adverselyimpactontheroleandfunctionoftheothertowncentres.Legalagreement andplanningconditionsregulateusestoaccordwithitsroleandfunction.
FinalPolicy
EP14RetailNetwork Centreand Hierarchy
PolicyEP14RetailNetworkCentreandHierarchy Thepurposeofthispolicyistoprotectandenhancethe roleandfunctionofthenetworkandhierarchyofretail centresinClackmannanshire. TheCouncilwillprotectandenhancetheroleandfunction ofthenetworkandhierarchyofcentresassetoutinTable 5HierarchyofRetailCentres. Proposalsforretailorcommercialleisure(includingthe expansionorchangeofuseofexistingdevelopmentsofa scalesufficienttochangetheirroleorfunction)ormajor communityusesthatwouldnotsupporttheroleand functionofthehierarchyofcentresand/orarenotofa scaleorcharactercommensuratewithmaintainingthe hierarchyofthecentreswillnotnormallybeacceptable. TheboundariesofthecentresaredefinedontheProposals Map.
28
Policy
FinalPolicy PolicyEP15PromotingTownCentreRegeneration Theaimofthispolicyistosupportdevelopmentsthatwill contributetotowncentreregeneration,inaccordance withtheLDPStrategy. TheCouncilwillactivelypursuetowncentreenhancement workswhichcontributetotheregenerationofthetown centresinClackmannanshirethroughpublicrealmand townscapeimprovements,includingthe'VillageandSmall TownCentreInitiative',withastrongemphasison placemakingandengenderinglocalpride.Innovativeways ofdeliveringregenerationwillbeencouraged:forexample, the'Placecheck'approach,andpartnershipswiththe ClackmannanshireBIDsteam,localretailerandtown centregroups,localcommunitiesandtheprivatesector willbeencouraged, TheCouncilwillsupportproposalswhichwouldcontribute totheregenerationoftowncentreswithin Clackmannanshireby: 1.Supportingavarietyofcommercial,community, leisure,culturalandbusinessuseswithintown centrestohelpmaximiseanddiversifytherange ofuses,wherethiswillenhancethevitalityor viabilityofthetowncentre. 2.Encouragingthereuseofvacantresidential propertiesintowncentres,butresisting proposalsforchangeofuseofgroundfloor commercialpremisestoresidentialorotheruses thatwouldcreatean"inactive"frontagetoa towncentrestreet. 3.Supportingproposalsfortheappropriatereuseof upperflooraccommodationinexistingbuildings forresidentialorothercomplementarytown centreuses. 4.Ensuringthat,byvirtueofappropriatedesignand layout,allnewdevelopmentscontributetothe creationofactiveandattractivepedestrian frontages;achievehighstandardsofdesignand finish;providesafeandconvenientaccessfor pedestriansandcyclists;and,whereappropriate, safeguardandenhancethehistoricbuilt environment. 5.Seekingtoensurethatnewdevelopmentscontribute totheimplementationoftowncentrestrategies and/ordevelopmentbriefspromotedbythe Councilandpartnershipbodies.
EP15Promoting TownCentre Regeneration
18/06/12 TheCouncilwillcontinuetosupportdevelopmentandopportunitieswhichwould contributetotheregenerationoftowncentreswithinClackmannanshire.Withintown centres, (a)thereisapresumptioninfavourofallowingavarietyofcommercial,community, leisure,culturalandbusinessuseswithintowncentrestohelpmaximiseanddiversify therangeofusestohelpsustaincorecommercialareas.Wheretheproposed developmentwouldnotinvolveuseasashop,theproposeduseshouldnotadversely affectthevitalityorviabilityofthecoreshoppingareas. (b)proposalsforchangeofusetoresidentialusewithintowncentreareaswillnot normallybepermittedonthegroundfloorofbuildings. (c)thedesignofcommercialdevelopmentswithintowncentresshall;createanactive andattractivefrontage;achieveahighstandardofdesignandfinish;andpromote pedestrianpermeabilityandsafety. (d)whereappropriate,theCouncilwillencouragetheprovisionofupperfloor accommodationortheuseofunderutilisedupperflooraccommodationinexisting buildingsforresidentialorothercomplementarytowncentreuses. (e)theextenttowhichdevelopmentwouldcontributetotherealisationofanytown centrestrategyorDevelopmentBriefpromotedby,orinpartnershipwith,theCouncil, willbeamaterialconsiderationinthedeterminationoftheapplication.
18/06/12 Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificantbeneficialimpactsonthefollowingenvironmental objectives: RegenerateClackmannanshire'stowncentres Ourcommunitiesaremorecohesiveandinclusive Ourcommunitiesaresafer Thefollowingopportunitytoimprovetheenvironmentalimpactsofthepolicyhasbeen identified: Includecriteriarelatingtoprotectingandenhancingthehistoricenvironment
Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveeffectsontown centreregeneration,protection andenhancementofbuiltheritage, andreducingtheenvironmental impactsoftravel.
29
Policy
FinalPolicy
PolicyEP16NewRetailandCommercialLeisureDevelopment Theaimofthispolicyistosetoutcriteriafortheassessmentof newretailandcommercialleisuredevelopments,inaccordance withtheLDPStrategy. TheCouncilwillsupportproposalsforretailandcommercialleisure developmentswithinanetworkcentresubjecttothefollowing criteria: 1. Theproposalisofascaleandcharacterwhichsupportsthe roleandfunctionofthatcentreasdefinedinthenetworkof centresandthehierarchysetoutinTable5. 2. Majornewretaildevelopmentinexcessof1,000square metresgrossfloorarea(sqmgfa)willnormallybedirectedto AlloaTownCentre. 3. Proposalsforretaildevelopmentinexcessof250sqmgfa andbelow1,000sqmgfawillnormallybedirectedtoAlloa TownCentreoroneoftheOtherTownCentres. 4. Proposalsofupto250sqmgfawhichwouldprimarilyservea neighbourhoodneedandcanbeconvenientlyaccessedon footfromthatneighbourhoodwillgenerallybeacceptable withinsettlements.Theassessmentofneighbourhoodneed willincludewhetherthereareanyexistingretailunitsinthe neighbourhood. 5. WithinexistingCommercialCentres,theproposedusewould complywiththerestrictionsimposedbyanyplanning agreementorplanningconditionsrelatingtotheCentre,in additiontotherequirementsofpoint1above. 6. Thedesignandlayoutwould: (a) enhancethecharacterandappearanceofthe area; (b) createanattractivepedestrianfrontage; (c) integratevisuallyandfunctionallywiththe existingcentre; (d) notresultinasignificantadverseimpacton residentialamenityorneighbouringuses; (e) provideadequateservicingandwaste managementmeasuresand; (f) accordwiththeCouncil'sparkingrequirements; (g)inthecaseoftowncentredevelopment,accordwith therequirementsofPolicyEP15. ProposalsthatdonotaccordwithPolicyEP16orwouldbelocated outwiththenetworkofcentreswillnotbepermittedunlessthe applicantsatisfactorilydemonstratesthattheproposalmeetsallof thefollowingcriteria: 1. Theproposalwouldsatisfythesequentialapproachasset outinSPP.Reasonsshouldbeprovidedastowhymore sequentiallypreferablesiteshavebeendiscountedas unsuitableorunavailableorcannotreasonablybemade available. 2. Itisofascalewhichiscommensuratewiththesizeofthe localcommunity 3. Theproposalwouldhelpmeetaquantitativeand/or qualitativedeficiencyinprovisioninthearea. 4. Itwouldnothaveasignificantadverseimpactonthevitality orviabilityofexistingcentres. 5. Itwouldbeconvenientlyaccessibleonfoot,bicycleandby publictransport. 6. Either a) Wherethesiteisgreenfield,thereisnosuitableor availablebrownfieldsiteor, b) Whereretailislocatedwithinabusinessorindustrialarea, theusewouldbedirectlyrelatedandancillaryto manufacturingoperationscarriedoutonthesite. 7.Theproposalwillnothaveanadverseeffectontheintegrityof theFirthofForthSPAeitheraloneorincombinationwith otherprojectsandplans. Aretailimpactassessmenttoaddresstheissuesreferredtoin1,2 and3abovewillberequiredwherethedevelopmentwouldexceed 2,500sqmetresgrossfloorarea.Anassessmentmayberequired forsmallerdevelopmentswheretheCouncilconsiderthatitmay haveasignificantimpactonviabilityandvitality. Planningapprovalmaybesubjecttoalegalagreementorplanning conditionswhichregulatetherangeofgoodsthatcanbesoldor theoverallamountandconfigurationoffloorspacewherethiscan addressconcernsabouttheimpactonthenetworkandhierarchyof centres.
EP16NewRetail andCommercial Leisure Development
18/06/12 TheCouncilwillsupportproposalsforretailandcommercialleisuredevelopmentswithin anetworkcentresubjecttothefollowing; (a)theproposalisofascaleandcharacterwhichsupportstheroleandfunctionofthe CentreinthenetworkofcentresandthehierarchysetoutinTableX. (b)majornewretaildevelopmentinexcessof1,000squaremetresgrossfloorarea(sqm gfa)willnormallyberequiredtolocateinAlloaTownCentre (c)proposalsforretaildevelopmentinexcessof250squaremetresgrossfloorareaand below1,000sqmgfawillnormallyberequiredtolocateinAlloaTownCentreorwithin oneoftheOtherTownCentres. (d)proposalsofupto250sqmgfawhichwouldprimarilyserveaneighbourhoodneed andcanbeconvenientlyaccessedonfootfromtheneighbourhoodwillgenerallybe acceptablewithinsettlements.Theassessmentofneighbourhoodneedwillinclude whetherthereareanyexistingretailunitsintheneighbourhood. (e)withinCommercialCentres,theproposedusewouldcomplywiththerestrictions imposedbyanyplanningagreementorplanningconditionsrelatingtotheCentre,in additiontotherequirementsofpoint(a)above. (f)thedesignandlayoutwould;achieveahighqualitystandardwhichwouldenhance thecharacterandappearanceofthearea;createanactivefrontageatstreetlevel; integratevisuallyandfunctionallywiththeexistingcentre;accordwiththeguidanceon securitymeasuresinSANNo3titledShuttersandGrillesand;notresultinan unacceptableimpactonresidentialamenityorneighbouringuses. ProposalswhicharedeemednottoaccordwithPolicy1orwouldbelocatedoutwiththe networkofcentreswillnotbepermittedunlessitcanbedemonstratedbytheapplicant that; (a)theproposalwouldsatisfythesequentialapproachtositeselection,including meetingalltherelevantrequirementssetoutinScottishPlanningPolicyrelatingtothe sequentialapproach.Reasonsshouldbeprovidedastowhymoresequentially preferablesiteshavebeendiscountedasunsuitableorunavailableorcannotreasonably bemadeavailableand, (b)itisofascalewhichiscommensuratewiththesizeofthelocalcommunityand, (c)itwouldnothaveasignificantadverseimpactonthevitalityorviabilityofexisting centres.Aretailimpactassessmenttoaddresstheseissueswillberequiredwherethe developmentwouldexceed2,500sqmetresgrossfloorarea.Anassessmentmaybe requiredforsmallerdevelopmentswheretheCouncilconsiderthatitmayhavea significantimpactonviabilityandvitality. (c)itwouldbeconvenientlyaccessibleonfoot,bicycleandbypublictransportand, (d)wherethesiteisgreenfield,thereisnosuitableoravailablebrownfieldsiteor, (e)whereretailislocatedwithinabusinessorindustrialarea,theusewouldbedirectly relatedandancillarytomanufacturingoperationscarriedoutonthesite. Developmentmaybesubjecttoalegalagreementorplanningconditionswhichregulate therangeofgoodsthatcanbesoldortheoverallamountorconfigurationoffloorspace wherethiscanaddressconcernsabouttheimpactonthenetworkandhierarchyof centres.
18/06/12 Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificantbeneficialimpactsonthefollowingenvironmental objective: RegenerateClackmannanshire'stowncentres Thefollowingopportunitytoimprovetheenvironmentalimpactsofthepolicyhasbeen identified: Includecriteriarelatingtowastemanagement Includecriteriarelatingtothehistoricenvironment
Thispolicyavoidsadverseeffects oftheFirthofForthSPAand Ramsarsite.
30
Policy
FinalPolicy PolicyEP17SupermarketandSuperstoreDevelopment Theaimofthispolicyistosetoutcriteriaforsupermarket andsuperstoreproposalsinaccordancewiththeLDP Strategy. TheCouncilwillonlysupportsupermarketandsuperstore developmentswherethesearerestrictedtoextensionsto existingstoreswhichdonotexceed10%oftheoriginal grossfloorarea.TheCouncilwillencouragenewfoodretail floorspaceinOtherTownCentreswherethisis commensuratewiththesizeofthelocalcommunity. ProposalswillhavetosatisfytherequirementsinPolicy EP16. PolicyEP18FoodandDrink Theaimofthispolicyistosetoutcriteriaforfoodand drinkproposalsinaccordancewiththeLDPStrategy,and takingparticularaccountofissuesofamenity. ProposalsforClass3uses,hotfoodtakeawaysand commerciallicensedpremises,willnormallyonlybe permittedintowncentresand,inallcases,theapplicant mustdemonstratethattheymeeteachofthefollowing criteria: 1. Therewouldbenosignificantadverseimpact, eitherindividuallyorcumulatively,onresidential amenityoradjoiningusesarisingfromtheuseof thesiteorthelevelsofactivitygeneratedinthe surroundingareaasaresultofthedevelopment; 2. Developmentwouldnotresultinasignificant adverseimpactonroadandpedestriansafety; 3. Therewouldbenosignificantadverselevelsof environmentalpollution,eitherindividuallyor cumulatively,suchasnoise,odourandlitter.The Councilwillrequireapplicantstosubmitareport byasuitablyqualifiedandexperiencedconsultant inrelationtonoise,odourorvibration,where applicable,todemonstratethattheproposeduse couldoperatewithoutcausingsignificantadverse levelsofnuisancetoneighbouringoccupantsor uses. Thispolicydoesnotapplytoproposalsformobilesnack bars(seePolicyEP19,below).
EP17Supermarket andSuperstore Development
18/06/12 Proposalsrelatingtonewsupermarketandsuperstoredevelopmentwillberestrictedto limitedextensionstoexistingstores.TheCouncilwillencouragenewfoodretail floorspaceinOtherTownCentreswhichiscommensuratewiththesizeofthelocal community.ProposalswillhavetosatisfytherequirementsinPolicy2.
18/06/12 Nosignificantenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy
EP18Foodand Drink
18/06/12 ProposalsforClass3uses,hotfoodtakeawaysandcommerciallicensedpremises,will normallyonlybepermittedintowncentres(unlesstheapplicantcandemonstratethat thereisnosuitableoravailableoption)provideditcanbedemonstratedthattheywould not; (a)haveanunacceptableadverseimpact,eitherindividuallyorcumulatively,on residentialamenityoradjoiningusesarisingfromtheuseofthesiteorthelevelsof activitygeneratedinthesurroundingarea, (b)resultinanunacceptableadverseimpactonroadandpedestriansafety, (c)createunacceptablelevelsofenvironmentalpollution,eitherindividuallyor cumulatively,suchasnoise,odourandlitter.Areportbyasuitablyqualifiedand experiencedconsultantwillberequiredtobesubmittedinrelationtonoise,odouror vibration,whereapplicable,todemonstratethatthethattheproposedusecould operatewithoutcausingunacceptablelevelsofnuisancetoneighbouringoccupantsor uses. Thispolicydoesnotapplytoproposalsformobilesnackbars.
31
Policy
FinalPolicy PolicyEP19SitingofMobileSnackBars Theaimofthispolicyistosetoutcriteriaforproposalsto sitemobilesnackvansinaccordancewiththeLDPStrategy, andtakingparticularaccountofissuesofamenityandroad safety. Proposalsforthesitingofmobilesnackbarswillnot normallybepermittedwhere: 1.Thesiteisoutwithasettlementboundary;or 2.Thesitewouldbeinatowncentreorresidential area;and 3.Thesitingofthesnackbarwouldresultina significantadverselossofamenitybyreasonof odour,noise,disturbanceorvisualimpact, particularlywhenviewedfrommaintransport routeswithinsettlements;and 4.Roadsafetyproblemsarelikelytobegeneratedby thesitingand/oroperationofthesnackbar Wherethelocationisconsideredtobeacceptable, planningpermissionmaybegrantedsubjecttothe followingrequirements; 1.Aconditionlimitingthedurationofpermissionfora temporaryperiodonly.Theinitialperiodmaybe restrictedto1yeartoallowtheCouncilto monitortheimpactsoftheoperation. 2.Satisfactoryexternalappearanceofthesnackbar. 3.Provisionofadequatelitterdisposalandrecycling arrangements. PolicyEP20MotorVehicleSalesandServiceAreas Motorvehiclesalesormotoristserviceareaswillbe directedtoindustrialparksorotherkeycommercialsites adjoiningmainroadswithinsettlementboundaries,and providedaccess,servicingandanyassociatedprocesses canbeaccommodatedwithoutresultinginanysignificant adverseimpactonroadsafety,residentialorvisual amenity.
EP19Sitingof MobileSnackBars
18/06/12 Proposalsforthesitingofmobilesnackbarswillnotnormallybepermittedwhere; (a)thesiteisoutwithasettlementboundaryorxxxsitedefinedontheProposalsMap. (b)thesitewouldbeinatowncentre. (c)thesitingofthesnackbarwouldresultinanunacceptablelossofamenitybyreason ofodour,noise,disturbanceorvisualimpact,particularlywhenviewedfrommain transportrouteswithinsettlements (d)roadsafetyproblemsarelikelytobegeneratedbythesitingand/oroperationofthe snackbar Wherethelocationisconsideredtobeacceptable,planningpermissionmaybegranted subjecttothefollowingrequirements; (a)aconditionlimitingthedurationofpermissionforatemporaryperiodonly.Theinitial periodmayberestrictedto1yeartoallowtheCounciltomonitortheoperation. (b)satisfactoryexternalappearanceofthesnackbar (c)provisionofadequatelitterdisposalandrecyclingarrangements.
18/06/12 Nosignificantenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy Theimpactsofthispolicyonthefollowingenvironmentalobjectiveisuncertain: Improvehealthandreducehealthinequalities(couldencourageunhealthydiets, butlikelytobewalkingdistancefromemploymentsitessocouldencouragepeople towalkratherthandriveforfood
Thispolicyhasthepotentialfor positiveandnegativeimpactson health,andontheenvironmental impactoftravel.
EP20MotorVehicle SalesandService Areas
18/06/12 MotorVehicleShowroomsormotoristserviceareaswillbedirectedtoindustrialparks orotherkeysitesadjoiningprincipalroadswithinsettlementboundarieswhereaccess, servicingandanyassociatedprocessescanbeaccommodatedwithoutresultinginany unacceptableimpactonroadsafety,residentialorvisualamenity.
32
Policy
FinalPolicy PolicyEP21LocalShops Theaimofthispolicyistoprotecttheroleoflocalshopsin accordancewiththeLDPStrategy,andsetoutcriteriafor assessmentofproposalstochangetheiruse. TheCouncilwillsupporttheprovision,retentionand improvementoflocalshopsinruralvillagesandresidential areas. 1.Inareaswithlimitedshoppingprovision,proposals forthechangeofuseofashopwillnotbe permittedexceptwheretheCouncilissatisfied thatareasonableattempthasbeenmadeto marketthepremisesasashop,usuallyforatleast a6monthperiod,andthereisevidencetoshow thatthereisnoreasonableprospectofretaining itinretailuse. 2.Theprovisionofneighbourhoodshops(proposalsfor upto250sqmetresofgrossfloorarea)toserve majornewresidentialdevelopments,orexisting areaswhichhavelimitedaccesstosuchfacilities, willbeencouragedbytheCouncilwherethese canbeprovidedwithoutresultinginany significantadverseimpactonresidentialamenity, roadorpedestriansafety. 3.TheCouncilwillconsiderthescopetoprovideor safeguardasuitablesiteforashopwhen consideringapplicationsformajorresidential developments.
EP21LocalShops
18/06/12 TheCouncilwillsupporttheprovision,retentionandimprovementoflocalshopsinrural villagesandresidentialareas. (a)Inareaswithlimitedshoppingprovision,proposalsforthechangeofuseofashop willnotbepermittedexceptwheretheCouncilissatisfiedthatareasonableattempthas beenmadetomarketthepremisesasashop,usuallyfora6monthperiod,andthereis evidencetoshowthatthereisnoreasonableprospectofretainingitinretailuse. (b)Theprovisionofneighbourhoodshops(proposalsforupto250sqmetresofgross floorarea)toservemajornewresidentialdevelopmentsorexistingareaswhichhave limitedaccesstosuchfacilitieswillbeencouragedbytheCouncilwherethesecanbe providedwithoutresultinginanyunacceptableimpactonresidentialamenity,roador pedestriansafetyandwhichwouldbeaccessibletothesurroundingcommunity.The Councilwillconsiderthescopetoprovideorsafeguardasuitablesiteforashopwhen consideringapplicationsformajorresidentialdevelopments.
33
Policy
FinalPolicy PolicyEP22ShopFrontDesign,AdvertisingandExternal SecurityMeasures Theaimofthispolicyistosetoutcriteriaforshopfront, advertisementandsecurityproposals,inaccordancewith theLDPStrategyandwithanemphasisontheimpacton thecharacterandvisualamenity. Proposalsforneworreplacementshopfronts,advertising andsecuritymeasuresshouldrespectand/orenhancethe designofthebuildingandthecharacterofthelocalityand shouldnotadverselyaffectroadorpedestriansafety.All proposalswillberequiredtoconformwiththeadvice containedinfutureguidanceonshopfrontdesign, advertisementandsecurityandtherelevantcriteriaset outbelow: ShopFrontDesign:Proposednewandaltered shopfrontswillonlybesupportedwherethey respectthecharacterandappearanceofthe buildingandsurroundingarea,intermsofdesign, proportions,materialsandexternalfinishes.In addition,disabledaccesstothebuildingmustbe consideredinthedesign. Advertisements:Proposalsfornewand replacementadvertisementsshallonlybe supportedwhere,throughappropriatelocation, size,design,materialsandcolour,theyenhance thecharacterandappearanceofthebuildingand areappropriatetothecharacterofthe surroundingarea.Advertisementswillnotbe approvedwheretheydetrimentallyaffectroador pedestriansafety,bycausingobstructiontodriver visibility,driverdistractionorwheretheywould impedepedestrianfloworcausehazardto pedestrians,cyclesorvehicles.Illuminationof advertisementswillnormallyonlybepermitted forpremiseswhichareregularlyopentothe publicduringtheeveningandwherethedesign andmethodofilluminationareappropriatetothe characterandappearanceofthebuilding. Internallyilluminatedsignsandadvertisements whichareunrelatedtothebusinessoroperation onwhichtheyaredisplayedshallnotnormallybe approved. ExternalSecurityMeasures:Proposalsfornew andreplacementexternalsecuritymeasureson shopsorbusinesspremiseswillnormallyonlybe supportedwheretheywouldhavenosignificant detrimentalimpactonthecharacterand appearanceofthebuildingandthesurrounding area.TheCouncilwillstronglyfavourinternally fittedopenmeshgrillesorshuttersoverthose mountedontheexteriorofthebuilding.External shutterswillnotnormallybeacceptable,unlessit isdemonstratedtothesatisfactionoftheCouncil, inconsultationwiththePolice,thatthereisa significantsecurityissuethatnootherviable meansofprotectingthepremisescanaddress. ListedBuildingsandConservationAreas:All proposalsaffectinglistedbuildingsorwithin conservationareasshallberequiredtoprotect andenhancethehistoricalorspecialcharacterof thebuildingand/orconservationarea.In particular,proposalsforexternalshuttersand grilleswillnotnormallybeapproved.
EP22ShopFront Design,Advertising andExternal SecurityMeasures
18/06/12 Proposalsforneworalteredshopfronts,securitymeasuresandadvertisingwillnormally besupportedwheretheyrespectand/orenhancethedesignofthebuildingandthe characterofthelocalityorwouldnotadverselyaffectroadorpedestriansafety,and theysatisfythecriteriasetoutbelow; ShopfrontDesign (a)theproposedneworalteredshopfrontwouldrespectthecharacterandappearance ofthebuildingandthesurroundingtownscapeasawhole,intermsofitsdesign, proportions,materialsandexternalfinishes.Considerationwillbegiventothescopeto restoreorrecreatetheoriginalshopfrontdesignwhentheproposalcomprisesa traditionalbuilding. (b)wherethebuildingislistedorinaconservationarea,thedesignwouldprotectand enhancethehistoricorspecialcharacterofthebuildingandtheareaasawhole. (c)theaccessibilityofthebuildinghasbeenconsideredinthedesign.Careful considerationwillberequiredwheretheproposalsrelatetoalistedbuildingorwouldbe withinaconservationareagiventherequirementsof(a)and(b)above. SecurityMeasures (a)thereisapresumptioninfavourofsecuritymeasuresthatcomprise; toughenedorlaminatedglass internallymountedopenmeshgrillesorrollershutterswhere;thebox housingisnotvisibleexternally;and/oranyhistoricfeaturesarenotaffected wherethebuildingislisted externallymounteddemountablegrilles(notrollershutters)whichare suitablydesignedandpainted. (b)wherethebuildingislistedoriswithinaconservationarea,theinstallationof externalshuttersandgrilleswillnotnormallybeapproved. (c)forpropertiesotherthan(b)above,theinstallationofexternalopenmeshroller shutterswillnotnormallybeacceptableexceptwheretheCouncilissatisfiedthat;there isasignificantsecurityproblem;thereisnoviablealternative;andthecharacterofthe buildingwouldnotbeadverselyaffected.Theshutterboxshouldberecessedwithinthe frontageandtheshutterpaintedanappropriatecolour. (d)forpropertiesotherthandescribedin(b)above,theinstallationofexternalsolid rollershutterswillnotnormallybeacceptableexceptwheretheCouncilissatisfiedthat; thereisasignificantsecurityrisk;thereisnoviablealternative;thebuildingisnotina towncentrelocation;andthedesign,colourandfittingwouldminimisethevisual impact. Advertisements (a)theproposalswouldrespectthedesignofthebuildingandanyshopfronttowhichit relates.Carefulconsiderationwillbegiventothesuitabilityofcanopiesorblindsused forthepurposeofadvertisement. (b)thedisplayofadvertisingonshopsorbusinessesdoesnotexceedonefasciasignand oneprojectingsign,exceptwherecommercialpremisesareonmorethanonefloor.In suchcases,furtheradvertisingwillnormallybepermittedifitisofahighstandardof design. (c)theproposalswouldnotadverselyaffectroadorpedestriansafety,including obstructiontodrivervisibility,causedriverdistractionorimpedepedestrianflow. (d)theuseofilluminationwillnormallyonlybepermittedforpremiseswhichare regularlyopentothepublicduringtheevening.Theuseofilluminatedboxsignswill normallybediscouragedbecauseoftheirgeneralbulkandappearance. (e)directionaloradvancesignswillnotnormallybepermitted,particularlyinthe countryside,unlesstheCouncilissatisfiedthattheyserveroadsafetyinterestsorform partofacomprehensive,recognisedschemetopromotetourism.
18/06/12 Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificantbeneficialimpactsonthefollowingenvironmental objective: RegenerateClackmannanshire'stowncentres Nosignificantnegativeimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy
34
Policy
FinalPolicy PolicyEA1ClackmannanshireGreenNetwork Theaimofthispolicyistosupporttheimplementationof theCentralScotlandGreenNetworkbyensuringthatnew developmentcontributestoitsobjectiveswherepossible. AllnewdevelopmentmustcontributetoGreenNetwork principlesandobjectivesassetoutinthisPlanandthe GreenNetworkSGanddemonstrablyenhancethe ClackmannanshireGreenNetwork.TheCouncilwillassess thepotentialimpactofallnewdevelopmentproposalson theGreenNetworktoensurethattheycomplywiththe principlessetoutintheGreenNetworkSG. Allnewdevelopmentwillbeexpectedtocontributetothe enhancementoftheconnectivity,qualityand/orextentof thenetwork,exceptwherethisimpractical.Proposalsfor newdevelopmentmustdemonstratehowthishasbeen incorporatedintotheproposeddesignofthe development,oralternativelyhowenhancementwillbe achievedthroughoffsiteprovision. Developmentresultinginanyreductionintheconnectivity, qualityorextentofthenetworkwillnotbepermitted unlessadequateproposalsformitigationcanbeagreed withtheCouncil.
EA1 Clackmannanshire GreenNetwork
Sept2012 TheaimofthispolicyistosupporttheimplementationoftheCentralScotlandGreen Networkbyensuringthatnewdevelopmentcontributestoitwherepossible. TheCouncilwillassessthepotentialimpactofallnewdevelopmentproposalsonthe greennetworktoensurethattheycomplywiththeprinciplessetoutintheGreen NetworksSPG. Applicationsfordevelopmentthathasthepotentialtoenhanceandsupportthegreen network,orthatwouldbelikelytoresultinincreaseddemandonthegreennetwork, willberequiredtoincludeproposalsforenhancingtheconnectivity,qualityand/or extentofthenetwork,andtodemonstratehowthishaseitherbeenincorporatedinto theproposeddesign,orhowitwillbeprovidedoffsite. Developmentresultinginanyreductionintheconnectivity,qualityorextentofthe networkwillnotbepermittedunlessadequateproposalsformitigationcanbeagreed withtheCouncil.
Sept2012 Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificantbeneficialimpactsonthefollowingobjectives: EncouragepromotionandconnectviityoftheCentralScotlandGreenNetwork withinandlinkingbeyondClackmannanshire Furthertheconservationofbiodiversity Increasehabitatconnectivityandecosystemfunctiontoassistlocalbiodiversityin responsetoclimatechange Nonegativeimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy
Thispolicyencouragespromotion andconnectionoftheCentral ScotlandGreenNetwork.This policyislikelytohavesignificant positiveimpactsonimproving Clackmannanshire'sresilienceto climatechange,includingthe abilityoflocalbiodiversitytoadapt toachangingclimate.Itislikelyto havesignificantbeneficialimpacts onairquality,thewater environment,biodiversityand landscape.Throughenabling accesstotheoutdoorsitislikelyto improvecommunitycohesionand safety,andimprovehealth;itis likelytoreducetheenvironmental impactsoftravel,and consequentlyreducegreenhouse gasemissions.
35
Policy
Earlieriteration(s)ofpolicyandlikelyenvironmentalimpacts 11/10/11 Thepolicyislikelytohavesignificantbeneficialimpactsonthefollowingobjectives: EncouragepromotionandconnectivityoftheCentralScotlandGreennetwork withinandlinkingbeyondClackmannanshire Furthertheconservationofbiodiversity AvoidadverseeffectsontheintegrityoftheFirthofForthSPAandRamsarsite MaintainandenhancethepopulationsofEuropeanProtectedSpecies,including protectionoftheirrestingplaces ProtectanenhanceSSSIs ProtectandenhancepriorityspeciesandhabitatsinClackmannanshire Increasehabitatconnectivityandecosystemfunctiontoassistlocalbiodiversityin responsetoclimatechange Protectandenhancethedistinctivecharacterofthelandscapeandensurenew developmentdoesnotexceedthecapacityofthelandscapetoaccommodateit Protectandenhanceareasdesignatedfortheirnationalorlocallandscape importance Protectandenhancegeodiversity,particularlyingeologicalSitesofSpecial ScientificInterest Thepolicyisunlikelytohaveanyadverseimpacts Impactsonthefollowingobjectivesareuncertain: Reduceoverallfloodriskinasustainableway(Couldbeachievedthroughthe deliveryofprojectsintheInnerForthFuturescape) Contributetothemitigationoffloodsanddroughts(Couldbeachievedthroughthe deliveryofprojectsintheInnerForthFuturescape) Improvehealthandreducehealthinequalities(Habitatcreationcanbe accompaniedbyimprovedaccess,facilitatinghealthierlifestyles) Thefollowingopportunitiestoimprovetheenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentified Ensuredevelopmentofnetworksofhabitats(improveClackmannanshire's resiliencetoclimatechange) Ensurehabitatcreationprojectsunderstandthepotentialtomanagefloodrisk (improveClackmannanshire'sresiliencetoclimatechange,contributetothe mitigationoffloodsanddroughts) Workinpartnershipwiththeriverbasinmanagementplanningprocess(prevent deteriorationandenhancethestatusofthewaterenvironment) Ensureprojectstoimprovehabitatconnectivityhaveregardforsoilquality(Reduce contaminationandsafeguardsoilquantityandquality) Ensurethatwecreatetherighthabitatsintherightlocation(protectandenhance thedistinctivecharacterofthelandscapeandensurenewdevelopmentdoesnot exceedthecapacityofthelandscapetoaccommodateit)
FinalPolicy PolicyEA2HabitatNetworksandBiodiversity Thispolicyaimstoencouragetheprotectionand enhancementofbiodiversityandhabitatnetworksby safeguardingtheintegrityoffeaturesofthelandscape whichareimportantbecauseoftheirlinearandcontinuous structureorfunctionasintermediatesitesforthe movementofbothfaunaandflora. Alldevelopmentproposalswillbeexpectedtofulfilallof thefollowingcriteria:
V111/10/11 HabitatNetworksandBiodiversityPolicy1:HabitatNetworks&Biodiversity Wewillencouragetheprotectionandenhancementofbiodiversityandhabitatnetworks bysafeguardingtheintegrityoffeaturesofthelandscapewhichareimportantbecause oftheirlinearandcontinuousstructureorfunctionashabitatsteppingstonesforthe movementofbothfaunaandflora. WhenconsideringdevelopmentproposalsthePlanningAuthoritywill:

EA2Habitat Networksand Biodiversity
maximisethepotentialoftheirdevelopmentto contributepositivelytobiodiversityconservation andenhancement(andseekmitigationforany adverseimpactsofdevelopment); protectandenhanceexistinghabitatnetworksin oradjacenttothedevelopmentsite; mitigateanynegativeimpactsonhabitats,species ornetworkconnectivityeitherresultingfromthe developmentorasaresultofthecumulative effectsofdevelopmentslocally; identifyopportunitiestostrengthentheexisting habitatnetworkbycreatingnewhabitatlinks.
considerthepotentialofalldevelopmentstocontributepositivelyto biodiversityconservationandenhancement(andseekmitigationforany adverseimpacts); considermeansofidentifying,protectingandenhancinghabitatnetworks and'steppingstones'(includingcreatinglinkingfeatures) consideranypotentialnegativeimpactsoneitherhabitats,speciesor networkconnectivity,eitheraloneorastheresultofcumulative developments
Applicationsfordevelopmentwillbeexpectedtodemonstratethattheycontributeto theobjectivesoftheClackmannanshireBiodiversityActionPlan,theongoing improvementoftheIntegratedHabitatNetworkandtheClackmannanshireGreen Network.Wherethereis,intheplanningauthority'sopinion,apotentialadverseeffect uponlocalbiodiversity,anecologicalappraisal(SeeGlossary)ofthedevelopmentwillbe requiredandconsideredbeforetheproposalisdetermined.Therewillbeapresumption againstdevelopmentthatwillhaveanegativeimpactonthefunctionofourhabitat networksunlessadequateprovisioncanbemadeonoroffsitetomaintainspecies populations,createorenhancecomparablehabitatsand/orimprovenetwork connectivityelsewheresuchthatoverallthereisanetincreaseinbiodiversity.Wewill onlyacceptharmtotheenvironmentwherethereisanoverridingpublicinterest.The CouncilmayapplyspecificconditionsoraSection75orotheragreementtosecurethe protectionofhabitatnetworks.
Developmentproposalsmustcontributetotheobjectives oftheClackmannanshireBiodiversityActionPlan;andthe ongoingimprovementoftheIntegratedHabitatNetwork andtheClackmannanshireGreenNetwork,inaccordance withtheGreenNetworkSG.Wherethereis,inthe Council'sopinion,apotentialadverseeffectuponlocal biodiversity,thedeveloperwillberequiredtosubmitan EcologicalAppraisalofthedevelopment,whichwillbe consideredbeforetheproposalisdetermined.Therewill beapresumptionagainstdevelopmentthatislikelyto haveadetrimentalimpactonthefunctionofourhabitat networksunlessadequateprovisioncanbemadeonoroff sitetomaintainspeciespopulations,createorenhance comparablehabitatsand/orimprovenetworkconnectivity elsewheresuchthatoverallthereisanexpectednet increaseinbiodiversity.FurtherinformationonEcological AppraisalissetoutintheGreenNetworkSG.
Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveimpactsfor biodiversity,includingpriority speciesandhabitats,and designatedsites.Itsfocuson habitatnetworksislikelytohelp biodiversityadapttoachanging climate;habitatcreationalsohas potentialtoenhancethe distinctivecharacterofthe landscape,andcontributeto sustainablefloodmanagement. Thispolicyislikelytocontributeto thepromotionandconnectivityof theCentralScotlandGreen Network.
36
Policy
V111/10/11HabitatNetworksandBiodiversityPolicy2:ProtectionofDesignatedSites Theprotection,conservationandenhancementofwildlife,wildlifehabitatsandothernatural featuresinareasdesignatedforthesepurposeswillbesupportedinlinewithstatutoryrequirements. Wewillapplytheprecautionaryprinciplewheretheimpactsofaproposeddevelopmenton nationallyorinternationallysignificantnaturalheritageresourcesareuncertainbutthereissound evidenceforbelievingthatsignificantirreversibledamagecouldoccur.Wheretheprecautionary principleisjustified,modificationstotheproposalwhichwouldeliminatetheriskofirreversible damageshouldbeconsidered. InternationalDesignations SitesclassifiedasSpecialProtectionAreas(SPA)undertheBirdsDirectiveanddesignatedasSpecial AreasofConservation(SAC)undertheHabitatsDirectiveformanEUwidenetworkofprotected areasknownasNatura2000.RamsarsitesarewetlandsdesignatedundertheRamsarConventionon WetlandsofInternationalImportance,especiallyaswaterfowlhabitat.AllRamsarsitesarealso Naturasitesand/orSitesofSpecialScientificInterestandareprotectedundertherelevantstatutory regimes.DevelopmentwhichcouldhaveasignificanteffectonaNaturasitewillonlybepermitted where:
FinalPolicy
PolicyEA3ProtectionofDesignatedSitesandProtectedSpecies Thispolicyaimstoprotectdesignatedsitesandprotectedspecies. Whereadevelopmentproposalcouldhaveadetrimentalimpacton aprotectedspeciesoralikelysignificanteffectondesignatedsites, anappraisalwillberequired,asdetailedbelow. InternationalDesignations(alsoknownasNaturaSites) Whereaproposalcouldhavealikelysignificanteffectonany Naturasite,theapplicantwillberequiredtoprovidesufficient informationtoallowanappropriateassessmenttobecarriedout. Developmentwillnotbepermittedunlesseither: a) tcanbedemonstratedthattheproposeddevelopment willnothaveanadverseeffectontheintegrityofthe site or,wherethiscannotbedemonstrated, b)therearenosatisfactoryalternativesolutions,andthere areimperativereasonsofoverridingpublicinterest, includingthoseofasocialoreconomicnature. ProtectedSpecies Whereaproposalcouldhaveadetrimentalimpactonany protectedspecies,theapplicantwillberequiredtocarryoutan EcologicalAppraisal.Developmentwillonlybepermittedwherethe applicanthasdemonstratedthateither: a) specieslicencewillnotberequiredfortheproposalto beimplemented or b) specieslicenceislikelytobegranted(withreference toanyrelevantlicensablepurposeorlicencetests) NationalDesignations(SSSIs) Whereaproposalcouldhaveadetrimentalimpactonanysite designatedforitsnationalbiodiversityorgeologicalimportance, theapplicantwillberequiredtocarryoutanEcologicalAppraisal. DevelopmentwillonlybepermittedwheretheEcologicalAppraisal hasdemonstratedthatitwillnothaveasignificantadverseaffect ontheintegrityofthesiteorthequalitiesforwhichithasbeen designated;unlessanysuchdetrimentalimpactsareclearly outweighedbysocial,environmentaloreconomicbenefitsof nationalimportance. LocalDesignations(LNRsandLNCSs) Whereaproposalcouldhaveadetrimentalimpactonanysite designatedforitslocalbiodiversityimportance,theapplicantwill berequiredtocarryoutanecologicalappraisal.Developmentwill onlybepermittedwheretheecologicalappraisalhasdemonstrated thatitwillnothaveasignificantadverseaffectontheintegrityof thesiteorthequalitiesforwhichithasbeendesignated;unlessany suchdetrimentalimpactsareclearlyoutweighedbysocial, environmentaloreconomicbenefitsofregionalorCountywide importance. PolicyRequirements AnEcologicalAppraisalmustbecompletedinaccordancewiththe InstituteofEcologyandEnvironmentalManagement's'Guidelines forPreliminaryEcologicalAppraisal.'Thelevelofdetailshouldbe proportionatetothelevelofdesignationandtheseverityofthe detrimentalimpactsthatarelikelytooccur.Whereappropriate, thisinformationcanbeincorporatedintoaHabitatsRegulations AppraisaloranEnvironmentalImpactAssessment. Inallcases,developmentswillonlybesupportedwhere appropriatemitigationandenhancementmeasuresareproposed toconserve,asfaraspossible,thesiteswildlifeorhabitatinterest
anappropriateassessmentunderHabitatsRegulationsAppraisalhasdemonstratedthat itwillnotadverselyaffecttheintegrityofthesite,or therearenoalternativesolutions,and thereareimperativereasonsofoverridingpublicinterest,includingthoseofasocialor economicnature. 11/10/11 Thepolicyislikelytohavesignificantbeneficialimpactsonthefollowingobjectives: Furthertheconservationofbiodiversity AvoidadverseeffectsontheintegrityoftheFirthofForthSPAandRamsarsite MaintainandenhancethepopulationsofEuropeanProtectedSpecies,includingprotectionof theirrestingplaces ProtectandenhanceSSSIs ProtectandenhancepriorityspeciesandhabitatsinClackmannanshire Nonegativeoruncertainimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy Thefollowingopportunitiestoimprovetheenvironmentalimpactsofthepolicyhavebeenidentified: Specificallymentionsitesdesignatedforgeodiversity(Protectandenhancegeodiversity, particularlyingeologicalSSSIs)
NationalDesignations ASiteofSpecialScientificInterest(SSSI)isnotifiedforthespecialinterestofitsflora,fauna,geology orgeomorphologicalfeatures.DevelopmentthataffectsaSSSIwillonlybepermittedwhere:

EA3Protectionof DesignatedSitesand ProtectedSpecies
itwillnotadverselyaffecttheintegrityoftheareaorthequalitiesforwhichithasbeen designated,or anysuchadverseeffectsareclearlyoutweighedbysocial,environmentaloreconomic benefitsofnationalimportance.
DevelopersareadvisedtoundertakepreapplicationconsultationswithSNHwheredevelopments mayhaveanimpactonNaturasitesandSSSIs. Local(StatutoryandNonstatutory) DevelopmentproposalsshouldnotadverselyaffectidentifiedLocalNatureReserves(Statutory)or LocalNatureConservationSites(Nonstatutory).Proposalsfordevelopmentwhichcouldaffectthese siteswillbeassessed:
Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificant positiveimpactsforbiodiversity, particularlydesignatedsitesand protectedspecies;geodiversity;and landscapecharacter.
toensurethatappropriatemeasuresareproposedtoconserve,asfaraspossible,the siteswildlifeorhabitatinterestandprovideforreplacementofhabitatsorfeatures wheredamageisunavoidable; todeterminetheireffectontheintegrityofthearea'shabitatnetworks;and
withaviewtocomplementingtheecologicalcoherenceoftheNatura2000network. Wheresignificantadverseimpactsarelikely,thePlanningAuthoritywillonlygrantplanning permissionifpersuadedthatanysuchadverseeffectsareclearlyoutweighedbysocial, environmentaloreconomicbenefitsofregionalorCountywideimportance.Insuchcircumstances thenatureconservationinterestshouldbemaintainedasfaraspossiblethroughplanningconditions, and/orbycompensatoryhabitatcreation. Considerationshouldbegiventoimpactsthatcouldarisefromdevelopmentswithin,directly adjacenttoorwithin500mofanysitewithoneofthedesignationslistedabove,exceptinthecaseof potentialimpactsonwaterqualityforwhichthewholewatercatchmentareashouldbeconsidered. Anassessmentofthesepotentialadverseaffectsshouldbesubmittedasanecologicalappraisal(see Glossary)whichwillbeexpectedtocontainalevelofdetailthatisproportionatetothedesignation ofthesiteandtheseverityoftheadverseimpactsthatarelikelytooccurasaresultoftheproposed development.Whereappropriate,thisinformationcanbeincorporatedintoaHabitatsRegulations AppraisaloranEnvironmentalImpactAssessment. V111/10/11HabitatNetworksandBiodiversityPolicy3:ProtectedSpecies CertainspeciesareprotectedunderEuropeanand/orUKlawandtheirpresenceonorneara developmentsitewillrequireconsiderationtoensurenooffenceundertherelevantlegislationis committedandmoregenerallythatnoadverseeffectonpopulation,includingcumulatively,arises. Ifthereisevidencetosuggestthataprotectedspeciesispresentonsiteormaybeaffectedbya proposeddevelopment,theirpresencemustbeestablished,therequirementsofthespeciesfactored intotheplanninganddesignofthedevelopmentandanylikelyimpactonthespeciesfullyconsidered
111011 Thepolicyislikelytohavesignificantbeneficialimpactsonthefollowingobjectives: Furthertheconservationofbiodiversity AvoidadverseeffectsontheintegrityoftheFirthofForthSPAandRamsarsite MaintainandenhancethepopulationsofEuropeanProtectedSpecies,includingprotectionof theirrestingplaces ProtectandenhanceSSSIs ProtectandenhancepriorityspeciesandhabitatsinClackmannanshire
37
Policy
priortothedeterminationoftheplanningapplication. Developmentthatislikelytohaveanadverseeffect,individuallyand/orcumulatively,onEuropean ProtectedSpeciesorspeciesprotectedundertheWildlifeandCountrysideAct1981willonlybe permittedwhere: Thereisnosatisfactoryalternative;and Thedevelopmentisrequiredforpreservingpublichealthorpublicsafetyorother imperativereasonsofoverridingpublicinterestincludingthoseofasocialoreconomic natureandbeneficialconsequencesofprimaryimportancefortheenvironment;and Thedevelopmentwillnotbedetrimentaltothemaintenanceofthepopulationofthe speciesconcernedatafavourableconservationstatusintheirnaturalrange. Nouncertainornegativeimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy. Noopportunitiestoenhancethebeneficialimpactsofthepolicyhavebeenidentified.
FinalPolicy
andprovideforreplacementofhabitatsorfeatureswheredamage isunavoidable.Thesemeasureswillbeagreedeitherthroughthe useofplanningconditionsoralegalagreement.
EA4Landscape Quality
131112 LPIAreasOfGreatLandscape InAreasofGreatLandscapeValue developmentwillonlybepermitted: +Whereitisanessentialrequirement offarming,renewableenergyinitiatives ,appropriaterecreationandtourism activities,orforestrywhichconforms withtheWoodlandsandForestry Strategy;and +Wherethereisspecificneedforthe developmentwhichcouldnotbemetin alesssensitivelocationandanyadverse impactsareclearlyoutweighedbysocial ,environmentaloreconomicbenefitsof localimportance;and +Wherethelandscapecharacterand scenicinterestwouldnotbeadversely affected: AnydevelopmentswiththeAreasof GreatLandscapeValueshallbedesigned topositivelycontributetothe immediatelandscapebyahighqualityof architecturalandlandscapedesign integratingwellwithitssurroundings. Theform,scale,layoutandmaterialsof developmentsshallreflectandenhance thecharacterofthesurroundarea
141211 Thepolicyislikelytohavesignificant beneficialimpactsonthefollowingSEA objectives: Protectandenhancethedistinctive characterofthelandscapeandensure newdevelopmentdoesnotexceedthe capacityofthelandscapeto accommodateit Protectandenhanceareasdesignated fortheirnationalorlocallandscape importancee.g.AGLVs Nonegativeenvironmentalimpactshave beenidentified Theeffectsofthepolicyonthefollowing SEAobjectiveareuncertain: Encouragepromotionandconnectivity oftheCentralScotlandGreenNetwork withinandlinkingbeyond Clackmannanshire
6112 LPISpecialLandscapeAreas InSpecialLandscapeAreasdevelopment willonlybepermitted: Whereitisanessential requirementoffarming, renewableenergyinitiatives, appropriaterecreationand tourismactivities,orforestry whichconformswiththe WoodlandsandForestry Strategy;and Wherethereisspecificneed forthedevelopmentwhich couldnotbemetinaless sensitivelocationandany adverseimpactsareclearly outweighedbysocial, environmentaloreconomic benefitsoflocalimportance; and Wherethelandscapecharacter andscenicinterestwouldnot beadverselyaffected: AnydevelopmentswithinSpecial LandscapeAreasshallbedesignedto positivelycontributetotheimmediate landscapebyahighqualityof architecturalandlandscapedesign integratingwellwithitssurroundings. Theform,scale,layoutandmaterialsof developmentsshallreflectandenhance thecharacterofthesurroundingarea.
6112 Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificantbeneficial impactsonthefollowingenvironmental objectives: Protectandenhancethedistinctive characterofthelandscapeandensurenew developmentdoesnotexceedthecapacity ofthelandscapetoaccommodateit. Protectandenhanceareasdesignatedfor theirnationalorlocallandscape importancee.g.AGLVs. Nonegativeoruncertainimpactshavebeen identified
PolicyEA4LandscapeQuality Thispolicysetsaframeworkfortheprotectionand enhancementofthequalityanddistinctivecharacterof Clackmannanshire'slandscapeandtoprotecttheSpecial LandscapeAreas Alldevelopmentproposalsshouldbeinformedby,andbe sympatheticto,thedistinctivelandscapecharacterof ClackmannanshireasdescribedintheLandscapeCharacter AssessmentforClackmannanshire.Developmentshouldbe designedandlocatedinsuchawaythatthelandscape qualityandvisualcharacteristicsofthesurroundingarea andtheoverallintegrityofthelocallandscapecharacteris maintainedand,whereverpossible,enhanced.Particular attentionshouldbegiventothedistinctivelocallandscape character,includingfeaturessuchaswatercourses,trees, traditionalconstructionmaterials,woodland,geological features,andkeyviewstoandfromthesite. InSpecialLandscapeAreasdevelopmentwillonlybe supportedwheretheapplicantdemonstratestothe satisfactionoftheCouncilthatthespeciallandscape characterandscenicinterestwouldnotbesignificantly adverselyaffected,andthateitherofthefollowingcriteria aremet: 1. Thedevelopmentisanessentialrequirementof agricultureorhorticulture;renewableenergy development;appropriaterecreationandtourism activities;orforestrywhichconformswiththe ForestryandWoodlandStrategy. 2. Thedevelopmentcouldnotbelocatedinaless sensitivelocation,andanyadverseimpactsare clearlyoutweighedbysocial,environmentalor economicbenefitsoflocalimportance.
Thispolicyislikelytohave significantbeneficialimpactsfor protectionandenhancementof thedistinctivecharacterofthe landscape,including,butnot limitedto,areasdesignatedfor theirlandscapeimportance.
EA5Geological Conservation ReviewSites
V17/11/11 GEO1Geology Developmentproposalslikelytoaffecta GeologicalConservationreviewsiteor othersiteidentifiedasoflocalgeological interest,byarecognisedauthority,and notintendedforthemanagementor interpretationofthesiteoritsusefor educationalpurposeswillnotbe supported.Proposalsonadjacentland shallensurethataccesstosuchsitesis notimpinged
71111 Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificant beneficialimpactsonthefollowing objectives: ProtectandenhanceSSSIs Protectandenhancethedistinctive characterofthelandscapeandensure newdevelopmentdoesnotexceedthe capacityofthelandscapeto accommodateit Protectandenhancegeodiversity, particularlyingeologicalSitesofSpecial ScientificInterest Nonegativeoruncertainimpactswere identified
6112 LP2GeologicalReviewSites Developmentproposalslikelytoaffecta GeologicalConservationReviewsiteand notintendedforthemanagementor interpretationofthesiteoritsusefor educationalpurposeswillnotbe supported.Proposalsonadjacentland shallensurethataccesstosuchsitesisnot prejudiced.
6112 Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificantbeneficial impactsonthefollowingenvironmental objective: Protectandenhancegeodiversity, particularlyingeologicalSitesofSpecial ScientificInterest. Nonegativeoruncertainimpactshavebeen identified.
PolicyEA5GeologicalConservationReviewSites ThispolicyaimstoprotectGeologicalConservationReview (GCR)sites. Developmentproposalsthatarelikelytoadverselyaffecta GCRsite,oraccesstoit,willnotbesupported.
Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveimpactsonthe protectionandenhancementof geodiversity.
38
Policy
Earlieriteration(s)ofpolicyandlikelyenvironmentalimpacts 6112 Nosignificantbeneficialenvironmentalimpacts havebeenidentifiedforthispolicy. Theimpactsofthispolicyonthefollowing environmentalobjectiveareuncertain: Reduceoverallfloodriskinasustainable way(dependsonthelocationofnew planting) Contributetothemitigationoffloodsand droughts(dependsonthelocationofnew planting) Preventdeteriorationandenhancethe statusofthewaterenvironment(depends onhowtreesareplantednearto watercoursestheeffectcouldbe acidificationduetodebrisinthewater,or theinterceptionofpollutants) Furthertheconservationofbiodiversity(it isnotclearhowtheSPGwillrelateto biodiversity) Maintainandenhancepopulationsof EuropeanProtectedSpecies,including protectionoftheirrestingplaces(Forestry couldcontributetohabitatsforred squirrels,butitisnotclearwhetherhabitat provisionwillbetakenintoaccount) Protectandenhancepriorityspeciesand habitatsinClackmannanshire(new woodlandhasthepotentialtoprovide habitatforpriorityspecies,butitisnot clearwhethertheSPGwilltakethisinto account) Protectandenhancethedistinctive characterofthelandscape(Itisnotclear howtheSPGwilltakelandscapeinto account) Protectandenhanceareasdesignatedfor theirnationalorlocallandscape importancee.g.AGLVs(Itisnotclearhow theSPGwilltakelandscapeintoaccount) Thefollowingopportunitiestoimprovethe environmentalimpactsofthepolicyhavebeen identified: 4. Takeintoaccountbiodiversityandthe ClackmannanshireBiodiversityActionPlan intheSPG. 5. TakelandscapeintoaccountintheSPG
FinalPolicy
EA6Woodlandsand Forestry
131211 LP3WoodlandsandForestry TheCouncilwillproduceaWoodlands andForestryStrategyandwillsupport ForestryCommission,CSGNandother partnerstodeliverthestrategy
141211 Theimpactsofthispolicyonthefollowing SEAobjectivesareuncertain: Reducegreenhousegasemissions ImproveClackmannanshire'sresilience toclimatechange Reduceoverallfloodriskina sustainableway Contributetothemitigationoffloods anddroughts Preventdeteriorationandenhancethe statusofthewaterenvironment Achievegoodecologicalstatus Reducewaterpollution Improvehealthandreducehealth inequalities Encouragepromotionandconnectivity oftheCentralScotlandGreenNetwork withinandlinkingbeyond Clackmannanshire Furthertheconservationofbiodiversity ProtectandenhanceSSSIs Protectandenhancepriorityspecies andhabitatsinClackmannanshire Increasehabitatconnectivityand ecosystemfunctiontoassistlocal biodiversityinresponsetoclimate change Protectandenhancethedistinctive characterofthelandscapeandensure newdevelopmentdoesnotexceedthe capacityofthelandscapeto accommodateit Protectandenhanceareasdesignated fortheirnationalorlocallandscape importancee.g.AGLVs Thisisbecausethepolicydoesnotindicate theaims/policydirectionoftheproposed WoodlandandForestryStrategy. Thefollowingopportunitytoimprovethe environmentalimpactsofthepolicyhas beenidentified: o Amendthepolicytomakethestrategy's aimsandpolicydirectionclearer
6112 LP3WoodlandsandForestry TheCouncilwillprepareaWoodlandsand ForestryStrategy*inpartnershipwith otherstakeholders.Intheinterimthe CouncilwillutilisetheexistingIndicative ForestryStrategytoguideitsdecisionson forestryproposalsandrelatedmatters. TheWoodlandandForestryStrategywill bedevelopedintoaSPGandtheCouncil responsewhenconsideringproposals involvingwoodlandandforestrywillbe guidedbytheSPGwhichwillinclude avisionfortheprotection,expansion andrestructuringofClackmannanshire's woodlandtomeetnationalandlocal objectives promotesustainablewoodland managementthatdeliversarangeof social,economicandenvironmental benefits,includingadaptationand mitigationofclimatechange localfactorsandcircumstanceswhich willbeconsideredintheassessmentof plantingandfellingproposals forestrysectorpotentialrolein sustainableeconomicgrowthlocallyby supportingemploymentbasedonwood andotherforestproducts. TheCouncilwillsupportForestry Commission,CSGNandotherpartnersto deliverthestrategy.
PolicyEA6WoodlandsandForestry ThispolicyaimstoprotectandexpandClackmannanshire's woodlandresources. Proposalsfornewwoodlandplantingwillbesupported wheretheyareconsistentwiththeCouncil'sWoodland andForestStrategy,andonWoodland&ForestrySG,and theprinciplesoftheCentralScotlandGreenNetwork. Proposalsfortheremovalofwoodlandwillonlybe supportedwheretheyareconsistentwiththeCouncil's WoodlandandForestStrategy,andtheForestry CommissionScotland'sControlofWoodlandRemoval policy.
Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveimpactson promotionandconnectivityofthe CentralScotlandGreenNetwork;it islikelytocontributetoa reductioningreenhousegas emissions,andislikelytobe beneficialforbiodiversitythrough anincreaseinwoodlandhabitat andimprovedhabitatconnectivity. Thereisthepotentialforfurther biodiversitybenefits:opportunities forhabitatcreationand protection,particularlyfor protectedspecies,shouldbe consideredattheplanning applicationstage.
Ensurenewwoodland plantingconsidersthe potentialtocontributeto habitatconnectivityand theconservationof biodiversity,including Europeanprotectedspecies
39
Policy
FinalPolicy PolicyEA7Hedgerows,TreesandTreePreservation Orders Thispolicyaimstoretaintrees,woodlandandhedgerows thatmakeapositivecontributiontolocalamenity. Wherenecessary,theCouncilwillprotectendangered treesandwoodlandsthroughthedesignationofTree PreservationOrders(TPOs).Developmentwillnotbe supportedwithinTPOareasunlesstheapplicant demonstratestothesatisfactionoftheCouncilthatthe proposalswillnotadverselyaffectthelongevity,stabilityor appearanceofthetrees. Wheredevelopmentispermittedwhichwillinvolvethe lossofexistingwoodland,treesorhedgerowstheCouncil willrequirethedevelopmentproposalstoinclude appropriatereplacementplantingintermsofnumber,size andspecies.TheCouncilwillfavourtheuseofnative speciesorspeciesofknownbiodiversityvalue. Allproposalswhichinvolveneworexistingwoodlandand treeswillbeexpectedtobeaccompaniedbya managementplan,includingprovisionsforfuture management.
EA7Hedgerows, TreesandTree PreservationOrders
131211 LP4TreePreservationOrders TheCouncilwillreviewtheexistingTPOs andwillpromotesuchorderswhen importanttrees,groupsoftreesor woodlandwhichcontributetolocal amenityareunderthreat.
141211 Nosignificantenvironmentalimpactshave beenidentifiedforthispolicy.
6112 LP4TreesandTreePreservationOrders (TPO) TheCouncilwillwhenconsidering developmentorotherproposalsseekto ensuretheprotectionandgood managementofamenitytrees,including thepromotionofTreePreservation Orderstoprotecttrees,orgroupsoftrees ,whichcontributetolocalamenityand areunderthreat. TheCouncilwillwhereappropriatesecure newtreeplantinginassociationwith developmentandotherproposals. TheCouncilwillreviewtheexistingTPOs withinthelifetimeoftheplantoassess theircontinuingappropriateness. *WoodlandandForestryStrategybeing preparedincooperationwithStirling CouncilandForestryCommissionScotland
6112 Nosignificantenvironmentalimpactshavebeen identifiedforthispolicy.
Thispolicyislikelytohavepositive impactsonbiodiversity,including priorityspeciesandhabitats,and adaptationtoclimatechange.Itis likelytocontributetosustainable floodmanagement,andtothe CentralScotlandGreenNetwork, aswellastocommunitycohesion andthedistinctivecharacterofthe landscape.
40
Policy
FinalPolicy PolicyEA8GreenBelt Thispolicyexplainsrestrictionsondevelopmentwithin areasdesignatedasGreenBelt,theexceptionstothese restrictionsandrequirementswheredevelopmentis permittedwithintheGreenBelt. Newdevelopmentwillnotnormallybepermittedwithin designatedGreenBeltareasexceptwhereitmeetsanyof thefollowingcriteria: 1) essentialdevelopmentassociatedwith agriculture,includingthereuseofhistoric agriculturalbuildings 2) essentialdevelopmentdirectlyrelatedto woodlandandforestry 3) horticulture,includingmarketgardeningand communitygrowing 4) recreationalusesthatarecompatiblewithan agriculturalornaturalsetting 5) essentialinfrastructureincludingelectronic communicationsinfrastructureandelectricity gridconnections 6) mineralextractionwhichcomplieswithrelevant mineralspoliciesinthisplanprovided significantenhancementtothecharacter, quality,andlandscapesettingofsettlements wouldresult 7) developmentproposedwithintheLDP, includingessentialtransportinfrastructure 8) Conversionorreuseofbuildingsofhistoricor architecturalvalue,andclearanceorre developmentofvacant,contaminatedor derelictlandorbuildingswhereproposals complywithCountrysidePolicySC22. 9) Developmentdirectlyrelatedtoexisting activitieswithinthedesignatedGreenBelt where: a)thedevelopmentisofasmallscaleand ancillarytotheexistinguse b)theintensityoftheactivity,intermsof theuseofthesiteandtrafficaccessingand egressingthesite,isnotsignificantly increased TheGreenBeltformsanAreaofSignificantProtectionfor windenergydevelopment.Proposalsforwindenergy developmentwillbedeterminedinaccordancewithPolicy SC14andtheguidancecontainedintheWindEnergySG. GreenBeltareasmayalsocontainareasofhabitatusedby qualifyingspeciesoftheFirthofForthSPA.Developments inareasusedbyqualifyingspecieswillberequiredto demonstratethattheywillnothaveanadverseeffect upontheintegrityoftheFirthofForthSPAeitheraloneor incombinationwithotherprojectsandplans. Whereverpossible,allnewdevelopmentwithintheGreen Beltwillberequiredtoenhancethequalityanddistinctive characterofthelocallandscapeandwillbeexpectedto contributetotheGreenNetworkobjectivessetoutinthe GreenNetworkSG.
EA8GreenBelt
V2110712 Greenbelt ThispolicyexplainsrestrictionsondevelopmentwithinareasdesignatedasGreenBelt, theexceptionstotheserestrictionsandrequirementswheredevelopmentispermitted withintheGreenBelt. NewdevelopmentwillnotnormallybepermittedwithindesignatedGreenBeltareas exceptwhereitmeetsanyofthefollowingcriteria: developmentassociated withagriculture,includingthereuseofhistoricagriculturalbuildings developmentdirectly relatedtowoodlandandforestry horticulture,including marketgardening recreationalusesthat arecompatiblewithanagriculturalornaturalsetting essentialinfrastructure includingelectroniccommunicationsinfrastructureandelectricitygrid connections mineralextractionwhich complieswithrelevantmineralspoliciesinthisplanprovidedsignificant enhancementtothecharacter,quality,andlandscapesettingofsettlements wouldresult; renewableenergy infrastructurewhichcomplieswithrelevantenergypoliciesinthisplan developmentproposed withinthisplan,includingessentialtransportinfrastructure DevelopmentdirectlyrelatedtoexistingactivitieswithinthedesignatedGreenBeltwill normallybepermittedwhere: thedevelopmentisofa smallscaleandancillarytotheexistinguse theintensityoftheactivity,intermsoftheuseofthesiteandtraffic accessingandegressingthesite,isnotsignificantlyincreased Conversionorreuseofbuildingsofhistoricalorarchitecturalvalue,andclearanceorre developmentofvacant,contaminatedorderelictlandorbuildingswithintheGreenBelt willnormallybepermittedwhereproposalscomplywiththeCountrysidePolicyXX. AllnewdevelopmentwithintheGreenBeltwillnormallyberequiredtomakea significantcontributiontotheimprovementofitslandscapecharacterandqualityand, whereappropriate,shouldcontributetotheobjectivesoftheCentralScotlandGreen Network,includingenhancementofaccesstothecountryside.
12July2012 Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificantbeneficialimpactsonthefollowingenvironmental objectives: EncouragepromotionandconnectivityoftheCentralScotlandGreenNetwork withinandlinkingbeyondClackmannanshire Protectandenhancethedistinctivecharacterofthelandscapeandensurenew developmentdoesnotexceedthecapacityofthelandscapetoaccommodateit Nonegativeimpactshavebeenidentifiedforthispolicy. Theimpactsofthepolicyonthefollowingobjectivesareuncertain: Furthertheconservationofbiodiversity(dependshowdeveloperschoosetomeet CSGNobjectives) Increasehabitatconnectivityandecosystemfunctiontoassistlocalbiodiversityin responsetoclimatechange(dependshowdeveloperschoosetometCSGN objectives) Thefollowingopportunitiestoimprovethepolicyhavebeenidentified: Specifywoodlandexpansionundertherequirementfordevelopmenttocontribute totheobjectivesoftheCSGN ChangewordingrecontributiontotheCSGNfrom"whereappropriate"to "whereverpossible"
Thispolicyislikelytoprotectand enhancethelandscape;itisalso likelytocontributetotowncentre regeneration.Ithasthepotential toenhancethehistoric environmentthroughsupporting thereuseofhistoricbuildings:this shouldbedoneinaccordancewith thehistoricenvironmentpolicies.
Ensureanyconversionor reuseofbuildingof historicorarchitectural valueisdoneinaccordance withhistoricenvironment policies
41
Policy
FinalPolicy
PolicyEA9ManagingFloodRisk Thispolicyaimstomanagetheriskoffloodingfromallsources: river,coastal,surfacewater,sewers,groundwater,reservoirsand otherinfrastructure. Alldevelopmentswillbeexpectedtoconformwiththerisk frameworkdetailedintheSPP.Therewillbeageneralpresumption againstproposalsforbuiltdevelopmentorlandraisingona functionalfloodplainandinareaswherethereisasignificant floodingprobabilityfromanysource,orwheretheproposalwould increasetheprobabilityoffloodingelsewhere ApplicationsfordevelopmentonlandwhichtheCouncilconsiders tobeatriskofflooding,orwhichtheCouncilconsidersarelikelyto increasetheriskoffloodingelsewhere,mustbeaccompaniedbya FloodRiskAssessmentcarriedoutinaccordancewiththeprinciples outlinedintheWaterSG.Allfloodriskassessmentswillbe consideredinrelationtotheriskframeworkdetailedintheSPP. Permissionwillnotnormallybegivenfordevelopmenton greenfieldsitesandundeveloped/sparselydevelopedlocalities whichareatriskofflooding,orwhichwouldincreasetheriskof floodingtoeitherexistingdevelopmentortoLDPsites.However,in exceptionalcircumstances,definedintheWaterSG,consentmay begrantedwithconditionscoveringpublicsafetyandresilience. Developmentproposalsonbrownfieldandpreviouslydeveloped sitesthatareatriskoffloodingwillbesupportedwherethe applicantdemonstratestothesatisfactionoftheCouncilthatthe proposalmeetsallofthefollowingcriteria: 1. Floodmitigationmeasurescanbeimplemented,for exampleraisedfloorlevels,orlandraisingsupportedby compensatorystorage. 2. Apolicyofmanagingthethreatoffloodingcanbe adopted. 3. Thesemeasureswouldnotcauseadetrimentalimpact ontheenvironmentincludingnoadverseeffectsonthe integrityoftheFirthofForthSPAorRiverTeithSAC eitheraloneorincombinationwithotherprojectsor plans. 4. Thesemeasureswouldnotincreasetheprobabilityof floodingelsewhereorhaveasignificantprobabilityof beingaffectedbyflooding 5. Anylandtobeusedforcompensatorystorageissecured forthispurposeinperpetuity. 6. Thefloodriskvulnerabilityofthelanduseisappropriate forthelocationanddegreeoffloodrisktothesite.For example,infloodriskareaslessvulnerablelanduses suchascommercialorindustrialshouldbefavouredover residentialuses. PriortothedevelopmentandapprovaloftheForthDistrictFlood RiskManagementPlan,proposalswillbesupportedwherethe applicantdemonstratestothesatisfactionoftheCouncilthatthey meetbothofthefollowingcriteria: 1. Featuresthathelptoattenuateorconveyfloodwater suchasfloodplains,wetlands,naturaldetentionbasins andothergreenspacesaresafeguarded. 2. Whereappropriate,developmentsincludefeaturesthat contributetosustainablefloodmanagement. Sustainablefloodmanagementmeasureswhicharepartofany approvednationalorlocalFloodRiskManagementPlanor measures,includingmanagedrealignmentonthecoast,willbe supported,providingthatthesewillhavenoadverseeffectsonthe integrityoftheFirthofForthSPAeitheraloneorincombination withotherprojectsorplans. TheWaterSGsetsouttheCouncil'sapproachtofloodrisk;advice onfloodriskassessmentanddrainageassessment;andguidance onrelateddrainageandwaterqualityissues.
EA9ManagingFlood Risk
V126911 FP1ManagingFloodRisk A)TheCouncilwillassessallplanningapplicationsforfloodrisk.Wheresitesare potentiallyatriskorcouldraisetheriskelsewhereinthecatchment,adetailedflood riskassessmentwillberequired.Whereagreenfieldsiteisdeterminedasbeingatrisk orincreasingtherisktoexistingdevelopmentorproposedlocaldevelopmentplansites ,permissionfornewdevelopmentwillnotbegiven.ProposalsforBrownfieldsites wherefloodmitigationmeasuressuchaslandraising(includingcompensatorystorage) canbeimplementedandapolicyofmanagingthethreatoffloodingcanbeadopted, withoutadetrimentalimpactontheenvironmentandnotincreasingtherisktoexisting developmentorproposedlocaldevelopmentplansitesthecouncilwillgive considerationtopermissionfornewdevelopment. F)Thecouncilwillsupportsustainablefloodmanagementmeasures,includingmanaged realignmentonthecoast,aspartofanyapprovednationalorlocalfloodrisk managementplanormeasuresandensurethatareasrequiredtoprovideflood alleviationareprotectedfromotherdevelopmentpressures
26911 Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificantbeneficialeffectsonthefollowingobjectives: Reduceoverallfloodriskinasustainableway Nonegativeenvironmentalimpactsoruncertainimpactshavebeenidentified.No opportunitiestoamendthepolicytoenhancebeneficialimpactshavebeenidentified.
Thispolicyislikelytosignificantly improveClackmannanshire's resiliencetoclimatechange,and reduceoverallfloodriskina sustainableway.Sustainableflood managementmeasuresarelikely toenhancethestatusofthewater environment,includingreducing pollution;theyalsohavethe potentialtocontributetothe conservationofbiodiversity throughhabitatenhancement. Reducingtheriskoffloodingis likelytoleadtoimproved communitysafety,andislikelyto havehealthbenefits.
42
Policy
FinalPolicy PolicyEA10CoastalPlanning Thispolicyaimstopromoteanintegratedapproachto developmentinthecoastalzone,supportingtheprovisions oftheForthAreaManagementPlan,andensuring protectionofdesignatedhabitatsitesandthelandscape, openspaceandculturalheritageofthecoastalmargin. Developmentproposalswillnormallybesupportedwithin theAlloasettlementboundary,providedtheydonot negativelyimpactontheprotectionofthelandscape, amenityandhabitatvalueofthecoastalzone,anddonot haveanadverseeffectontheintegrityoftheFirthofForth SPAandassociatedRamsarsiteorRiverTeithSACeither aloneorincombinationwithotherprojectsandplans. Whereproposalsmaybesubjecttosignificantfloodrisk,a FloodRiskAssessmentmayberequired. Therewillbeapresumptionagainstdevelopment elsewhereinthecoastalzone.However,proposalsforthe followingtypesofdevelopmentwillnormallybe supported: managedcoastalrealignmentprojectswhichare compatiblewiththeprovisionsofthefloodrisk managementplansfortheUpperForthandwith theClackmannanshireBiodiversityActionPlan recreationalaccessprovision,wherethisis compatiblewithamenityandnatureconservation policiesandwillnothaveanadverseeffectonthe integrityoftheFirthofForthSPAeitheraloneor incombinationwithotherprojectsandplans. PolicyEA11EnvironmentalQuality Thispolicyaimstoprotectthequalityoftheenvironment. Developmentsthathavethepotentialtonegativelyimpact thequalityoftheenvironment,eitherindividuallyorin combinationwithotherdevelopments,suchasthroughair, water,soil,noiseorlightpollution,willonlybeacceptable wherethedeveloperhasdemonstrated,tothesatisfaction oftheCouncil,thatallreasonablemeasurestominimise anysuchimpactshavebeentaken,andanyunavoidable impactswillbeappropriatelymitigated.
EA10Coastal Planning
V1190811 CP1CoastalPlanning TheCouncilwillpromoteanintegratedapproachtodevelopmentinthecoastalzone andwillsupporttheprovisionsoftheForthIntegratedManagementStrategyandthe ForthAreaManagementPlanandtakedueaccountoftheemergingstrategywork underthefloodriskmanagementandmarineplanningregimes.Therewillbegeneral supportfordevelopmentwithinthedevelopedcoastwheresuchdevelopmentshall ensuretheprotectionandenhancementofthecoastalresource,itsamenityandhabitat value Developmentinanycoastallocationthatmaydamagetheecologyofthecoast,or increasetheriskoffloodingelsewherewillnotnormallybesupported. Managedcoastalrealignmentprojectswhicharecompatiblewiththeprovisionsofthe floodriskmanagementplansfortheUpperForthandtheClackmannanshireLBAPwill besupported. Recreationalaccessprovisionwillbesupportedwherethesearecompatiblewith amenityandnatureconservationissueswillgenerallybesupported. Alldevelopmentproposalswithinthecoastalzonewillbeguidedbytheneedtoprotect theFirthofForthSPAandassociatedRAMSARsites
23August2011 Thepolicyislikelytohavesignificantbeneficialimpactsonthefollowingobjectives: AvoidadverseeffectsontheintegrityoftheFirthofForthSPAandRamsarsite Preventdeteriorationandenhancethestatusofthewaterenvironment Achievegoodecologicalstatus Reduceoverallfloodriskinasustainableway Theimpactsonthefollowingobjectivesareuncertain: Protectandenhancethedistinctivecharacterofthelandscapeandensurenew developmentdoesnotexceedthecapacityofthelandscapetoaccommodateit(managed realignmentcouldchangethelandscapehiscouldbeinterpretedaseitherapositiveor negativeimpact) Protectandenhancecarbonrichsoils(uncertainwhetherthereareanycarbonrichsoils alongthecoastlinewaitingforsoilmap) Thereareopportunitiestoamendthepolicytoenhanceimpactsonthefollowingobjectives: Reducetheimpactofinvasivespecies(opportunitytoconsiderinvasivespeciesinpolicy criteria) Reducecontaminationandsafeguardsoilquality(opportunitytoaddresscontaminationin policycriteria(NBuncertainwhetherthereisanycontaminatedlandalongthecoastline)) Nonegativeenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentified.
Thispolicyislikelytocontributeto sustainablefloodmanagementand toenhancementofwaterstatus.It islikelytohavesignificant beneficialimpactsforbiodiversity, includinghabitatconnectivity,and islikelytoprotectandenhancethe landscapeandculturalheritageof thecoastalmargin.Thispolicyis likelytocontributetothe objectivesoftheCentralScotland GreenNetwork,andislikelyto helptoreducetheenvironmental impactoftravel.
EA11Environmental Quality
V126911 PolicyAQ1AirQuality Anydevelopmentapplicationwhichthe Councilconsiderscouldhavea detrimentalimpactonairqualitywill requiretobeaccompaniedbyanAir QualityImpactAssessment.Applications whicharesubjecttoanEnvironmental ImpactAssessmentwillrequireair qualityimpactstobesubjectto assessmentinallcases
26911 Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificant beneficialeffectsonthefollowingobjective: KeepairpollutionbelowLocalAir QualityManagementthresholds Nonegativeenvironmentalimpactsor uncertainimpactshavebeenidentified.No opportunitiestoamendthepolicyto enhancebeneficialimpactshavebeen identified.
15713 EA11EnvironmentalQuality Thispolicyaimstoprotectthequalityof theenvironment. Developmentsthathavethepotentialto negativelyimpactthequalityofthe environment,eitherindividuallyorin combinationwithotherdevelopments, suchasthroughair,water,noiseorlight pollution,willonlybeacceptablewhere
15713 Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificantbeneficial impactsonthefollowingSEAobjectives: KeepairpollutionbelowLocalAir QualityManagementthresholds Preventdeteriorationandenhance thestatusofthewaterenvironment Reducewaterpollution. Thefollowingopportunitytoimprovethe
Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveimpactsforair, waterandsoilquality,andis consequentlylikelytocontribute toimprovedhealth,andbenefits forbiodiversity.
43
Policy 121211 1.Planningandenvironmental protection TheCouncilwilladoptthe precautionaryprincipleto pollutioncontrolanddevelopment indicatedinThisCommon Inheritance,1990andreiterated inPAN51(Planningand EnvironmentalProtection).Todo thistheCouncilwilladopteffective jointworkingprinciplesand practicesbetweentheplanning systemandotherenforcing agenciestoguideandcontrolthe natureandlocationofallrelevant formsofdevelopment.Developers willrequiretodemonstratethat anyenvironmentalprotection matterrelatingtothesiteorthe developmenthasbeenfully evaluatedandconsidered alongsideanyotherplanning mattersorissuesandtheresultant proposaldoesnotresultinany unacceptablyharmfulaffectonthe neighbourhood.Appropriate mitigationandcompensatory measureswillberequiredfrom developersifapotentialadverse impactonthecommunityorthe environmenthasbeenidentified.
Earlieriteration(s)ofpolicyandlikelyenvironmentalimpacts thedeveloperhasdemonstrated,tothe satisfactionoftheCouncil,thatall reasonablemeasurestominimiseany suchimpactshavebeentaken,andany unavoidableimpactswillbeappropriately mitigated. environmentalimpactsofthepolicyhasbeen identified: Includesoilasoneofthemediatobeprotected frompollution
FinalPolicy
141211 Nosignificantenvironmentalimpactshave beenidentifiedforthispolicy.
44
Policy
FinalPolicy PolicyEA12WaterEnvironment Thispolicyaimstoprotectandenhancethewater environment Allapplicationswillbedeterminedinaccordancewiththe WaterEnvironmentandWaterServices(Scotland)Act 2003,andtheactionsdetailedintheForthArea ManagementPlan. Alldevelopmentsshallconformtotheprinciplessetoutin theWaterSG. Developmentsshouldbedesignedtoleavethewater environmentinitsnaturalstate.Proposalsthatinvolve engineeringactivitiesofthetypesspecifiedintheWater SGwillgenerallynotbesupported. Developmentwillbesupportedwheretheapplicant demonstratesthatitwillprotectorenhancethewater environment,oritsupportsactionsintheForthArea ManagementPlantoenhancethestatusofthewater environment. Developmentthatdoesnotprotectorenhancethewater environmentwillonlybesupportedifthereisnoother suitablelocationforthedevelopment,andprotectionand enhancementofthewaterenvironmentisnottechnically feasible. Wheredevelopmentwouldrequireorimpactonaprivate watersupplyoritscatchment,theapplicantmust demonstratethatitwillnotincreasetheriskofpollutionto watercoursesorgroundwater,oradverselyaffectthe quantityorqualityoftheprivatewatersupplyto propertiesservedbythatsupply. SustainableDrainageSystems(SUDS)should,wherever possible,bedesignedtocreateorenhancehabitat. PolicyEA13SignificantSoilResources Thispolicyaimstoprotecttheareasofprimeagricultural landandcarbonrichsoils,identifiedontheConstraints Map,frominappropriatedevelopment. Developmenton,orwhichmayadverselyaffect,prime agriculturallandorcarbonrichsoilswillonlybesupported if: 1. hesiteisidentifiedfordevelopmentthroughthe LDP;or 2. heapplicantcandemonstrate,tothesatisfaction oftheCouncil,that: a. hereisaneedforthedevelopment, whichoutweighstheneedtoprotectthe soilresources;and b. hedevelopmentcannotbe accommodatedonasitethatdoesnot containprimeagriculturalland,carbon richsoilsorotherenvironmentalassets asidentifiedontheConstraintsMap. 3. nthecaseofproposedwindenergydevelopment affectingcarbonrichsoils,theapplicant
EA12Water Environment
V126911 PolicyWQ1WaterQuality TheCouncilinconsiderationofallapplicationswilltakedueaccountoftheEUWater FrameworkDirectiveenactedthroughtheWaterEnvironmentandWaterServices (Scotland)Act2003andtheactionsdetailedintheForthAreaManagementPlanwith specificregardtothefollowingissues Protectandwerepracticalenhancewaterbodiesandwatercourseswhichare directlyrelatedtoorimpactedbydevelopmentproposalsandsuchproposalssuch includedetailsofhowthedeveloperproposestodelivertheseaspects. SupportactionsintheForthAreaManagementPlantoenhancewaterbodiesand watercourses Developmentproposalswhichwouldincreasetheloadonlocalsewagetreatment worksandlikelyresultinfurtherdeteriorationofthewaterstatusoftheDevonand BlackDevonriversandtheirtributarieswillnotbeapproved. Developmentwithinthecatchmentareasforprivatewatersupplieswillrequireto demonstratethatthewillnotresultinapollutionrisktowatercoursesor groundwater Alldevelopmentsof2ormorehousesshallincorporateaSustainableUrbanDrainage Scheme(SUDS)andthepreferredapproachwillbesolutionsthatenablewetland habitatcreationorenhancement.ArrangementsforthefutureSUDSmanagement shouldbeincludedwiththeapplicationandagreementonthemanagementregime willberequiredbeforeanyconsentisgranted
26911 Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificantbeneficialeffectsonthefollowingobjectives: Preventdeteriorationandenhancethestatusofthewaterenvironment Achievegoodecologicalstatus Reducewaterpollution Nonegativeenvironmentalimpactsoruncertainimpactshavebeenidentified.No opportunitiestoamendthepolicytoenhancebeneficialimpactshavebeenidentified.
Thispolicyislikelytomakea significantcontributionto improvingClackmannanshire's resiliencetoclimatechange, throughaddressingtheriskof floodsanddrought;thisisalso likelytohavesignificantbeneficial impactsforcommunitysafetyand health.Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveimpactsonthe waterenvironment,ontheCentral ScotlandGreenNetwork,andon biodiversity,particularlyonpriority speciesandhabitatsrelatingtothe waterenvironment.Improvements tothewaterenvironmentare likelytoleadtopositiveimpactson soils,andcontributetoprotecting andenhancingthedistinctive characterofthelandscape.The policyislikelytoreducetheimpact ofnonnativeinvasivespecies.
EA13SignificantSoil Resources
DraftJune2011 Developmentwhich wouldresultinthe permanentlossof primeagricultural landwillonlybe permittedwhere suchlandis identifiedfor developmentinthe DevelopmentPlan, oritformspartofa nationalorhigher levelstrategyand nosuitable alternativesitesare available. Temporary permissionor permissionfortime limitedoperations or uses may be
DraftJune2011 Thereare uncertainties aroundtheimpacts ofthispolicyonthe historic environment, accesstoopen space,biodiversity, floraandfaunaand landscape. Potentialfor conflictsover temporary developmentof land. Needtoensure environmentaland social,aswellas economic,benefits aretakeninto account.
22August2011 Developmentwhich wouldresultinthe permanentlossof primeagricultural landwillonlybe permittedwhere suchlandis identifiedfor developmentinthe DevelopmentPlan, oritformspartofa nationalorhigher levelstrategyandit hasbeen demonstratedthat nosuitable alternativesitesare available. Temporary permissionor permission for time
23August2011 Thepolicyislikely tohave significant beneficial impactsonthe following objective: Reduce contaminatio nand safeguardsoil qualityand quantity Theimpacton thefollowing objectivesis uncertain Protectand, where appropriate,
V330811 Developmentwhich wouldresultinthe permanentlossof primeagriculturalland willgenerallyonlybe permittedwheresuch landisidentifiedfor developmentinthe DevelopmentPlan,or itformspartofa nationalorhigher levelstrategyandit hasbeen demonstratedthatno suitablealternative sitesareavailable. Onlyinexceptional cases,wherethereisa provenneedforthe development,andit has been rigorously
27September2011 Thepolicyislikely tohavesignificant beneficialimpacts onthefollowing objective: Reduce contamination andsafeguard soilquantityand quality Theimpactonthe followingobjectives areuncertain: Prevent deterioration andenhance thestatusofthe water environment (thereisthe
10212 Significantsoil resources Developmentwhich wouldresultinthe permanentlossof primeagricultural landorcarbonrich soilswillgenerally onlybepermitted wheresuchlandis identifiedfor developmentinthe DevelopmentPlan. Onlyinexceptional cases,wherethere isaprovenneedfor thedevelopment, andithasbeen rigorously demonstratedthat itcannotbe accommodatedona siteoutwithanarea ofprimequality agriculturalland,
13212 Thispolicyislikely tohavesignificant beneficialimpacts onthefollowing environmental objectives: Protectcarbon richsoilsfrom disturbanceor loss Reduce contamination andsafeguardsoil quantityand quality Protectand enhancepriority speciesand habitatsin Clackmannanshire Nonegativeor uncertainimpact havebeen identified.
Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveimpactsonthe protectionofcarbonrichsoils,and consequentlyislikelytocontribute toareductioningreenhousegas emissions.Itislikelytohave significantpositiveimpactson biodiversity,includingpriority speciesandhabitats.Thispolicyis likelytosafeguardsoilsqualityand quantity,whichislikelyto contributetotheprotectionofthe waterenvironment.
45
Policy subjecttosuitable restorationplans (includingthe securityoffinance fortherestoration) anda demonstrationthat theeconomic benefitofthe temporaryuse outweighsthe agriculturalvalueof thesite. arerequiredto safeguardsoils. Ensurethat restorationbrings sitebacktoprime agriculturalland status. Investigations shouldberequired toensurethatthere isnodetrimental impactto archaeology. Uncertaintiesover impactonhabitats, species,open space,landscape, greennetworks
Earlieriteration(s)ofpolicyandlikelyenvironmentalimpacts tosuitable restorationplans whichwouldreturn thelandto comparableor betterquality (includingthe securityoffinance fortherestoration), anda demonstrationthat theeconomic, environmentalor socialbenefitsof thetemporaryuse outweighthe agriculturalvalueof theland.Subjectto proposalsbeingin accordwith,or acceptableasa departurefromthe otherpoliciesofthe Plan. archaeologyif developmentis permitted require archaeological investigations) Encourage promotionand connectivityof theCentral ScotlandGreen Networkwithin andlinking beyond Clackmannanshi re(dependson locationand currentuseof anylandthatis developed considerin conjunction withCSGN policies) Furtherthe conservationof biodiversity (dependson currentuseof anylandthatis developed considerin conjunction withbiodiversity policies) Maintainand enhancethe populationsof European protected speciesand habitatsin Clackmannanshi re(dependson currentuseof anylandthatis developed considerin conjunction withbiodiversity policies) Protectand enhancepriority speciesand habitatsin Clackmannanshi re(dependson currentuseof anylandthatis developed considerin conjunction withbiodiversity policies) Increasehabitat primeagricultural land,may developmentbe considered.Insuch cases,development willbedirectedto siteswheretheimpact ontheamountof primeagriculturalland losttodevelopment canbeminimised. Temporarypermission orpermissionfortime limitedoperationsor usesmaybegranted e.g.mineral extraction,subjectto suitablerestoration planswhichwould returnthelandto comparableorbetter quality(includingthe securityoffinancefor therestoration),anda demonstrationthat theeconomic, environmentalor socialbenefitsofthe temporaryuse outweighthe agriculturalvalueof theland.Subjectto proposalsbeingin accordwith,or acceptableasa departurefromthe otherpoliciesofthe Plan. practices) Achievegood ecologicalstatus (asabove) Reducewater pollution(as above) Nonegative environmental impactshavebeen identified.
FinalPolicy
maydevelopment beconsidered.In suchcases, developmentwillbe directedtosites wheretheimpact ontheamountof landlostto developmentcanbe minimised. Temporary permissionor permissionfortime limitedoperations orusesmaybe grantede.g.mineral extraction,subject tosuitable restorationplans whichwouldreturn thelandto comparableor betterquality (includingthe securityoffinance fortherestoration), anda demonstrationthat theeconomic, environmentalor socialbenefitsof thetemporaryuse outweighthe agriculturalvalueof theland. Naturalcarbon sinks*willbe protectedfrom developmentand theCouncilwill supportproposals fortheir enhancement includingre wetting*. Renewableenergy development affectingpeat depositsmaybe exceptionally approvedwhere overall,itwould resultinanet carbonsaving,such developmentsshall avoidthedeepest areasofpeat.
demonstratesthatthedevelopmentwouldresult inanetreductionofcarbonemissions;and 4. nthecaseoftemporaryoperationsoruses,the applicantsubmits,andhashadapprovedby Council,restorationplanstoreturnthelandto comparableorbetterquality.Thiswillrequireto beaccompaniedbytheprovisionofappropriate financialguaranteesintheformofabondto ensurethefullimplementationofthesite restorationandaftercarescheme.Thevalueofa bondwillbedeterminedbytheCouncilin consultationwithanindependentsurveyor,and thebondwillbesubjecttoalegalagreement. Wheredevelopmenthasmettheabovetests,andis permittedonasitecontainingprimeagriculturallandor carbonrichsoils,theapplicantwillberequiredtomeetall ofthefollowingcriteria: 1. undertakeasoilorpeat surveytodemonstratethatthedevelopmentwill bedirectedtothepartofthesitewiththeleast impactonthesignificantsoilresourcei.e.the areasofhighestqualitysoilordeepestpeathave beenavoided. 2. submitasoilorpeat managementplanwhichdemonstratesthatany unnecessarydisturbance,degradationorerosion hasbeenminimised. 3. demonstrateprovisionof appropriatemitigationmeasuresagainstany significantlossofsoils,e.g.therestorationof degradedareasofpeat,orwherethisisnot possibleothercarbonsequesteringmethods shouldbeinvestigated.Whereprimeagricultural landislost,otherareasoffarmlandinthesame areawhichdonotmeet'prime'qualityshouldbe protectedandenhanced. TheCouncilwillsupportproposalsfortheenhancementor restorationofcarbonrichsoils.
46
Policy
Earlieriteration(s)ofpolicyandlikelyenvironmentalimpacts connectivityand ecosystem functionto assistlocal biodiversityin responseto climatechange (dependson locationand currentuseof anylandthatis developed considerin conjunction withbiodiversity policies) Protectand enhancethe distinctive characterofthe landscapeand ensurenew development doesnotexceed thecapacityof thelandscapeto accommodateit (dependson locationofany landthatis developed considerin conjunction withlandscape policies) Protectand enhanceareas designatedfor theirnationalor locallandscape importancee.g. AGLVs(depends onlocationof anylandthatis developed considerin conjunction withlandscape policies) Protectand enhance carbonrichsoils (dependson locationofany landthatis developed considerin conjunction withsoilpolicies uncertain whetherprime agriculturalland overlapsany areasofcarbon richsoil)
FinalPolicy
47
Policy
Earlieriteration(s)ofpolicyandlikelyenvironmentalimpacts Nonegative environmental impactshave beenidentified. V17/11/11 GEO2Carbonrichsoils Naturalcarbonsinks,undisturbeddepositsidentifiedontheJohn HuttonInstitutemaps,willbeprotectedfromdevelopmentandthe Councilwillsupportproposalsfortheirenhancementincludingre wetting.Renewableenergygeneratingproposalsinpeatdeposits maybeexceptionalapprovedwhereitcanbedemonstrated*that thereisanadvantagebalanceintermsofclimatechangemitigation lyingwiththeenergygeneratingproposal. *ScottishGovernmentCalculatingcarbonsavingsfromwindfarms onScottishpeatlandsorotherequivalentevidence 71111 Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificantbeneficialimpactsonthe followingobjectives: Protectcarbonrichsoilsfromdisturbanceorloss Reducecontaminationandsafeguardsoilsquantityand quality Protectandenhancepriorityspeciesandhabitatsin Clackmannanshire
FinalPolicy
48
Policy
Earlieriteration(s)ofpolicyandlikelyenvironmentalimpacts 11/10/11 Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificantbeneficialimpactsonthefollowingobjectives: ImproveClackmannanshire'sresiliencetoclimatechange Maximiserecyclingandcomposting Ourcommunitiesaremorecohesiveandinclusive Improvehealthandreducehealthinequalities EncouragepromotionandconnectivityoftheCentralScotlandGreenNetwork Impactsonthefollowingobjectivesareuncertain: Reduceoverallfloodriskinasustainableway(Dependsifproposedsitesareatriskofflooding) Contributetothemitigationoffloodanddroughts(Dependsofproposedsitesareatriskof flooding) Preventdeteriorationandenhancethestatusofthewaterenvironment(potentialimpactif gardensusepesticidesetc) Achievegoodecologicalstatus(potentialimpactifgardensusepesticidesetc) Reducewaterpollution(potentialimpactifgardensusepesticidesetc) Promotesustainablewateruse(sitescanbedesignedwithoutamainswatersupply) Furthertheconservationofbiodiversity(Dependsonthewaythesiteisgardened,andwhatits previoususewas) AvoidadverseeffectsontheFirthofForthSPAandRamsarsite(potentialforminorimpactson associatedwatercourses,butcouldbemanagedtomitigatethis) MaintainandenhancethepopulationsofEuropeanProtectedSpecies,includingprotectionof theirrestingplaces(unlikelyunlessanallotmentwasgrantedonasitethatwasusedfor resting/feedingbybirdsfromtheSPA) Protectandenhancethedistinctivecharacterofthelandscapeandensurenewdevelopment doesnotexceedthecapacityofthelandscapetoaccommodateit(sitescouldbeviewedasuntidy andlackingin'natural'character) Nonegativeenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentified. Thefollowingopportunitiesforimprovingtheenvironmentalimpactsofthepolicywereidentified Encouragecommunitygardensintowncentrelocations(regenerateClackmannanshire'stown centres) Encouragesitestobeaccessiblebyactivetravel(reducegreenhousegasemissions,reducethe environmentalimpactoftravel) Designsitesforfloodriskmanagement(Reduceoverallfloodriskinasustainableway,contribute tothemitigationoffloodanddroughts) Ensuresitesuseno/minimalchemicalfertilisers/pesticides(preventdeteriorationandenhance thestatusofthewaterenvironment,achievegoodecologicalstatus,reducewaterpollution, reducecontaminationandsafeguardsoilquantityandquality,avoidadverseeffectsonthe integrityoftheFirthofForthSPAandRamsarsite) Ensurethatwaterbuttsareused(promotesustainablewateruse) Ensurecompostingonsite(minimisewastegeneration,maximiserecyclingandcomposting) Encouragesitesthatenhancetheconnectivityofthegreennetwork(Encouragepromotionand connectivityoftheCSGNwithinandlinkingbeyondClackmannanshire) Ensurenewsitesaredesignedtobebiodiversityfriendlyandencouragebiodiversityfriendly gardening(furthertheconservationofbiodiversity,protectandenhancepriorityspeciesand habitatsinClackmannanshire,increasehabitatconnectivityandecosystemfunctiontoassistlocal biodiversityinresponsetoclimatechange) Takeintoaccountwhethersitesareusedforresting/feedingbybirdsfromtheSPA(maintainand enhancethepopulationsofEuropeanProtectedSpecies,includingprotectionoftheirresting places) Encourageplantingofnativetrees(increasehabitatconnectivityandecosystemfunctiontoassist localbiodiversityinresponsetoclimatechange) Ensuresensitivechoiceoflocationfornewsites(Protectandenhancethedistinctivecharacterof thelandscapeandensurenewdevelopmentdoesnotexceedthecapacityofthelandscapeto accommodateit) Ensureanylandscapedesignationsaretakenintoaccountwhenassessingthesuitabilityofasite (Protectandenhanceareasdesignatedfortheirnationalorlocallandscapeimportance)
FinalPolicy
EA14Supporting theDeliveryof Community GrowingSpaces
V111/10/11 CommunityGrowingPolicy1:Supportingthedeliveryofcommunity growingspaces Developmentsassociatedwithlocalfoodproductionsuchasallotments, communitygardensandorchardswillbesupported,ifthesuitabilityof thesiteforthispurposecanbedemonstrated.Specificreferenceshould bemadeto: accessibility amenity landscape requirementsforservicessuchaswater soilqualityandanyriskposedbycontaminatedland potentialadverseimpactsonorenhancementtopriority habitatsandspecies,andtheconnectivityofhabitat networks contributiontotheClacksgreennetwork/Central ScotlandGreenNetwork Communitygrowingspaceswillbeconsideredanacceptableusewithin thegreenbelt,subjecttothesuitabilityofthesitebeingdemonstrated. Approvalwillbegivenfortheconversionofopenspacetofood productionwherethecommunityconcernedsupportsthechange,where othergreennetworkandopenspaceobjectivesarenotcompromised, andwherethesuitabilityofthesitehasbeendemonstrated.
PolicyEA14SupportingtheDeliveryofCommunity GrowingSpaces Thispolicyaimstosupportthedeliveryofcommunity growingspaces,anddirectthemtolocationsthat encourageactivetravelandsustainabledevelopment. Applicationsforcommunitygrowingspacessuchas allotments,communitygardensandorchards,orthe conversionofunderusedopenspacesforsuchpurpose, willbesupportediftheapplicantdemonstratestothe satisfactionoftheCouncilthatthedevelopmentmeetsall ofthefollowingcriteria: 1. Thesiteiswithinoradjacenttoanexisting settlement;oriswithinwalkingdistance(c.750m) ofexistingsettlementboundaries; 2. mainswateranddrainagewillbesuppliedtothe siteor,wherethisisnotfeasible,appropriate alternativeprovisioncanbemadewhichis acceptabletoSEPA; 3. therewillbenosignificantdetrimentalimpacts onhabitatnetworksand/orpriorityhabitatsand speciesoradverseeffectsontheintegrityofthe FirthofForthSPAeitheraloneorincombination withotherprojectsandplans 4. anyimpactsonsoilquality,orrisksposedby contamination,canbemitigated 5. therewillbenosignificantdetrimentalimpacton thequalityanddistinctivecharacterofthe surroundinglandscapeandtheamenityof adjacentareas 6. thedevelopmentwillcontributetodeliveringthe objectivesoftheCentralScotlandGreenNetwork. Wherethedevelopmentrequirementsforasitehave identifiedtheneedforcommunitygrowingspace, contributionstooffsiteprovisionwillbeconsidered.
Thispolicyislikelytohave significantbenefitsforcommunity inclusionandcohesion,community safety,andhealth.Itislikelyto contributetoreducinggreenhouse gasemissions,resiliencetoclimate change,andincreasing composting.Itcontributesstrongly totheCentralScotlandGreen Network,andhasthepotentialfor beneficialimpactsonbiodiversity, ifwildlifefriendlygrowingand plantingareencouraged.
Encouragewildlifefriendly growingandplanting
49
Policy
Earlieriteration(s)ofpolicyandlikelyenvironmentalimpacts 11/10/11 Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificantbeneficialimpactsonthefollowingobjectives: Reducegreenhousegasemissions ImproveClackmannanshire'sresiliencetoclimatechange Impactsonthefollowingobjectivesareuncertain: Reducecontaminationandsafeguardsoilquantityandquality(dependingonthe useofchemicalfertilisersandpesticides) Furthertheconservationofbiodiversity(dependsonthesite) Increasehabitatconnectivityandecosystemfunctiontoassistlocalbiodiversityin responsetoclimatechange(Couldprovidealinkbetweenhabitatsifdesigned appropriatelyandonlandoflowbiodiversityvalue) Nonegativeenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentified. Thefollowingopportunitiesforimprovingtheenvironmentalimpactsofthepolicywere identified Ensuresitescanbeaccessedbyactivetravel(reducegreenhousegasemissions, reducetheenvironmentalimpactoftravel) Ensurenewsitesdon'tusechemicalpesticidesorfertilisers(prevent deteriorationandenhancethestatusofthewaterenvironment,reduce contaminationandsafeguardsoilsquantityandquality) Encouragetheuseofwaterbutts(promotesustainablewateruse) Designsitestobebiodiversityfriendly(furthertheconservationofbiodiversity, increasehabitatconnectivityandecosystemfunctiontoassistlocalbiodiversityin responsetoclimatechange)
FinalPolicy
V111/10/11 CommunityGrowingPolicy2:Communitygrowingwithinnewdevelopment Supportwillbegivenforformsofdevelopmentthatprovidespaceforallotments,other communalgrowingareasandorchards.Whereappropriate,developercontributions towardstheprovisionofcommunitygrowingspaceswillbesoughtatasubarealevelas partofawiderprogrammeofgreeninitiativesthatwillsupporttheimprovementof Clackmannanshire'sgreennetwork.
EA15Classification ofLandthathas beenusedfor Community Growing
V111/10/11 CommunityGrowingPolicy3:Classificationoflandthathasbeenusedforcommunity growing Atsuchatimeasagriculturallandthathasbeenusedforcommunitygrowingisdeemed tobenolongerrequiredforthisuse,itsclassificationwillreverttoagriculturallandand nottobrownfieldland.
PolicyEA15ClassificationofLandthathasbeenusedfor CommunityGrowing Thispolicyaimstoensureappropriateremediationforany landthatceasestobeusedforcommunitygrowing. Wherelandthathasbeenusedforcommunitygrowingis deemedtobenolongerrequiredforthisuse,its classificationwillreverttoitsprevioususe.Thelandowner willberequiredtoensurethatthesiteisremediatedtoits previousoranacceptableuse,asapprovedbytheCouncil, withintwelvemonthsofceasingtobeusedforcommunity growing. PolicyEA16WasteManagementFacilities Thispolicyaimstosupportthedevelopmentofsuitable wastemanagementfacilitieswhilesafeguardingthe environmentandamenity. Proposalsforwastemanagementfacilities,including energyfromwasteproposalsandsitesfortherecyclingof constructionordemolitionwastes,willnormallybe supportedwheretheapplicantdemonstratestothe satisfactionoftheCouncilthatallofthefollowingcriteria canbemet: 1. TheproposalconformswiththeNationalWaste ManagementPlanand,inparticular,would contributetoachievingthetargetsandmeasures containedinScotland'sZeroWastePlan. 2. Theproposalwouldenablethewastestreamsto betreatedashighuptheWasteHierarchyas practicablypossibleandbeconsistentwiththe requirementsoftheZeroWaste(Scotland) Regulations. 3. Theirlocationsatisfiesasequentialapproach favouring: a. suitableexistingwastemanagement sitesorsitesidentifiedbytheCouncil; then b. withinbuildingslocatedinIndustrial
EA16Waste Management Facilities
V125811 WasteManagement Facilities Proposalsforwaste managementfacilitieswill onlybepermittedwhere; 1.Theycontributetothe objectivesandtargets containedintheZeroWaste PlanScotland.Applications shouldbesupportedby informationwhich demonstrateshowthe developmentwould contributetothedeliveryof theseobjectivesandtargets. 2.Theywillcontributeto thetreatmentofwastesas highuptheWasteHierarchy aspracticablypossiblein ordertopreventunnecessary resourceuseandto maximisethevalueof resourcesthathavebeen used. 3.Theirlocationsatisfiesa sequentialapproach favouringlocationsallocated inthePlanforwaste managementusesorwithin
25August2011 Thepolicyislikelytohave significantbeneficialimpactson thefollowingobjectives: Reducegreenhousegas emissions Maximiserecyclingand composting Theimpactsonthefollowing objectivesareuncertain: Protectand,where appropriateenhancethe historicenvironment (dependsonlocation considerinconjunctionwith builtheritagepolicies) Avoidadverseeffectsonthe integrityoftheFirthofForth SPAandRamsarsite (dependsonlocation considerinconjunctionwith biodiversitypolicies) Maintainandenhance populationsofEuropean ProtectedSpecies,including protectionoftheirresting places(dependsonlocation considerinconjunctionwith
V220911 Policy1 WasteManagementFacilities Proposalsforwastemanagement facilities,includingenergyfrom wasteproposals,willnormallybe acceptablewherethefollowing criteriacanbemet; 1.Theyconformwiththe NationalWasteManagement Planandinparticular,theywould contributetoachievingthe targetsandmeasurescontained intheZeroWastePlanScotland. 2.Theywouldenablethewaste streamstobetreatedashighup theWasteHierarchyas practicablypossibleandbe consistentwiththerequirements oftheZeroWaste(Scotland) Regulations. 3.Theirlocationsatisfiesa sequentialapproachfavouring locations;allocatedinthePlanfor wastemanagementusesor suitableexistingwaste managementsites;thenwithin buildingslocatedinIndustrial Estatesidentifiedassuitablefor generalindustrialuse;then
27August2011 Thepolicyislikelytohave significantbeneficialimpactson thefollowingobjective: Maximiserecyclingand composting Theimpactonthefollowing objectiveisuncertain: Protectcarbonrichsoils fromlossordisturbance (proposeinclusionof carbonrichsoilsinpolicy criteria) Nonegativeenvironmental impactshavebeenidentified.
V3241011 WasteManagementFacilities Proposalsforwastemanagement facilities,includingenergyfrom wasteproposalsandsitesfor recyclingconstruction/ demolitionwastes,willnormally beacceptablewherethe followingcriteriacanbemet; 1. Thedeveloperhas demonstratedthatthe proposalconformswiththe NationalWasteManagement Planandinparticular,thatit wouldcontributetoachieving thetargetsandmeasures containedintheZeroWaste PlanScotland. 2. Thedeveloperhas demonstratedthatthe proposalwouldenablethe wastestreamstobetreatedas highuptheWasteHierarchyas practicablypossibleandbe consistentwiththe requirementsoftheZero Waste(Scotland)Regulations. 3. Theirlocationsatisfiesa sequentialapproachfavouring
251011 Thispolicyislikelytohave significantbeneficialimpactson thefollowingobjective: Maximiserecyclingand composting Thepolicyislikelytohave significantnegativeimpactson thefollowingobjective: Keepairpollutionbelowlocal airqualitymanagement thresholds Thereareuncertaintiesaround theimpactsonthefollowing objectives: Protectcarbonrichsoilsfrom disturbanceorloss(thereis nomentionofcarbonrich soilsinthepolicy.Depends onthelocationofthesite) Encouragepromotionand connectivityoftheCentral ScotlandGreennetwork withinandlinkingbeyond Clackmannanshire(depends
Thispolicyislikelytoreduce greenhousegasemissions, minimisewastegeneration,and maximiserecyclingand composting.Bydivertingwaste fromlandfill,itislikelytohave positiveimpactsonsoilqualityand quantity.Thispolicyislikelyto avoidadverseimpactsonair qualityorontheFirthofForthSPA.
50
Policy
oradjacenttoBusinessParks andIndustrialEstates identifiedassuitablefor generalindustrialuseor degradedorderelictland; beforesitesoutwith settlementboundariesof greenfieldsites. 4.Thetransportationof wastesandanyendproducts promotesustainable transportandminimise unnecessarytravel. 5.Theapplicanthas demonstratedthatthe impactsontheenvironment, sensitivelanduses,visual amenityandroadsafetyare acceptableorcouldbe satisfactorilyregulatedusing planningconditionsora planningagreement. 6.Inthecaseofanylarge scaleenergyfromwaste proposals,theproposed locationwouldmaximisethe potentiallocalbenefitsfrom thegenerationofenergyand heat.Anyapplicationshould includeaheatplan. 7.Theycomplywithother Planpolicies. biodiversitypolicies) ProtectandenhanceSSSIs (dependsonlocation considerinconjunctionwith biodiversitypolicies) Protectandenhancepriority speciesinClackmannanshire (dependsonlocation considerinconjunctionwith biodiversitypolicies) Increasehabitatconnectivity andecosystemfunctionto assistlocalbiodiversityin responsetoclimatechange (dependsonlocation considerinconjunctionwith biodiversitypolicies) Protectandenhanceareas designatedfortheirnational orlocallandscape importancee.g.AGLVs (dependsonlocation considerinconjunctionwith landscapepolicies) Preventdeteriorationand enhancethestatusofthe waterenvironment(depends onlocationandmanagement considerinconjunctionwith waterpolicies) Achievegoodecological status(dependsonlocation andmanagementconsider inconjunctionwithwater policies) Reducewaterpollution (dependsonlocationand managementconsiderin conjunctionwithwater policies) Protectandenhancecarbon richsoils(dependson locationconsiderin conjunctionwithcarbonrich soilspolicies) Nonegativeenvironmental impactshavebeenidentified.
degradedorderelictlandorother suitablebrownfieldsites;before greenfieldsites. 4.Thetransportationofwastes andanyendproductstoand fromthefacilitywouldcontribute tothereductionofgreenhouse gasemissions. 5.Theapplicanthas demonstratedthattheimpacts onthebuiltandnatural environment,thelocal community,sensitivelanduses, visualamenityandroadsafety fromthedevelopmentandthe transportationofthewasteand anyendproductsareacceptable orcouldbesatisfactorily mitigatedusingplanning conditionsoraplanning agreement.TheCouncilwill considertheneedtoapplya suitablebufferzonearound proposedfacilitiesinorderto safeguardsensitivereceptors havingregardtotheguidancein SPPandtothecharacteristicsof theproposalandtheindividual site. Whereaproposalwouldnot accordwithoneormoreofthe abovecriteria,applicantswillbe expectedtosubmitinformation tosatisfactorilydemonstratethat theproposalaccordswiththe sustainablewastemanagement objectivesofthePlanandthe NationalWasteManagement Plan. Applicationsshallbesupported bysufficientinformationwhich demonstrateshowthe developmentwouldmeetthe abovecriteria,includinginthe caseofCriteria1above,theneed forthefacilitytomeetthetargets andobjectivescontainedinthe ZeroWastePlan. Inappropriateneighbouring developmentstoexistingor consentedwastemanagement facilitiesthatmaycompromise theircurrentorfutureoperation willnotnormallybeapproved. Considerationoftheimpacton futureoperationwillincludeany adverseimpactonanyplanned expansionofthefacility consistentwithPlan. locations;allocatedinthePlan forwastemanagementusesor suitableexistingwaste managementsites;thenwithin buildingslocatedinIndustrial Estates/Areasdesignatedas suitableforgeneralindustrial use;thendegradedorderelict landorothersuitable brownfieldsites;before greenfieldsites.Exceptionsto thisapproachmaybeapproved forsmallscalefacilitiesoflocal importancewheretheyare compatiblewiththeamenity andcharacterofthearea. 4. Thecarbonemissionsresulting fromthetransportationof wastesandanyendproducts toandfromthefacilityhave beenminimized. 5. Theapplicanthas demonstratedthattheimpacts onthebuiltandnatural environment,thelocal community,sensitivelanduses, visualamenityandroadsafety fromthedevelopmentandthe transportationofthewaste andanyendproductsare acceptableorcouldbe satisfactorilymitigatedusing planningconditionsora planningagreement.The Councilwillconsidertheneed toapplyasuitablebufferzone aroundproposedfacilitiesin ordertosafeguardsensitive receptorshavingregardtothe guidanceinSPPandtothe characteristicsoftheproposal andtheindividualsite. Proposalsfordevelopmenton sitesneighbouringexistingor consentedwastemanagement facilitieswhicharelikelytobe incompatiblewiththefacilityand thereforecompromiseitscurrent orfutureoperationwillnot normallybeapproved. Considerationoftheimpacton futureoperationwillincludeany adverseimpactonanyplanned expansionofthefacility consistentwiththisPlan onthelocationofthesite) Furthertheconservationof biodiversity(dependsonthe locationofthesite)
FinalPolicy Estates/Areasdesignatedassuitablefor generalindustrialuse;then c. degradedorderelictlandorother suitablebrownfieldsites; d. thengreenfieldsites. Exceptionstothisapproachmaybesupportedfor smallscalefacilitiesoflocalimportance,where theyarecompatiblewiththeamenityand characterofthearea. Thegreenhousegasemissionsresultingfromthe processingandtransportationofwastes,andany endproducts,toandfromthefacility,havebeen minimised. Theimpactsonthebuiltandnatural environment,airquality,thelocalcommunity, sensitivelanduses,landscapecharacterand visualamenity,androadsafetyfromthe developmentandthetransportationofthewaste andanyendproductswouldbeacceptable,or couldbesatisfactorilymitigatedusingplanning conditionsoraplanningagreement. Theproposalwillnothaveanadverseeffecton theintegrityoftheFirthofForthSPAeitheralone orincombinationwithotherprojectsorplans.
Avoidadverseeffectsonthe
integrityoftheFirthofForth SPAandRamsarsite (dependsonthelocationof thesite)
Maintainandenhancethe
populationsofEuropean ProtectedSpecies,including protectionoftheirresting places(dependsonthe locationofthesite)
4.
ProtectandenhanceSSSIs
(dependsonthelocationof thesite)
5.
Protectandenhancepriority
speciesandhabitatsin Clackmannanshire(depends onthelocationofthesite)
Increasehabitatconnectivity
andecosystemfunctionto assistlocalbiodiversityin responsetoclimatechange (dependsonthelocationof thesite)
6.
Protectandenhancethe
distinctivecharacterofthe landscapeandensurenew developmentdoesnot exceedthecapacityofthe landscapetoaccommodateit (dependsonthelocationof thesite)
Protectandenhanceareas
designatedfortheirnational orlocallandscape importance(dependsonthe locationofthesite)
Wheresensitivereceptorsexistincloseproximitytoa proposedwastemanagementfacilitysite,theCouncilwill normallyapplyanappropriatebufferzonewithinwhich operationswillnotnormallybepermitted.Relevant guidanceintheSPP,thecharacteristicsoftheproposaland thecharacteristicsofthedevelopmentsitewillallbetaken intoaccountindeterminingthewidthofthebufferzone. Proposalsfordevelopmentonsitesneighbouringexisting orconsentedwastemanagementfacilitieswhicharelikely tobeincompatiblewiththefacilityandtherefore compromiseitscurrentorfutureoperationwillnot normallybesupported.
Protectandenhance
geodiversity,particularlyin geologicalSSSIs(dependson thelocationofthesite)
Protectand,where
appropriate,enhancethe historicenvironment (dependsonthelocationof thesite) Thefollowingopportunitiesto mitigatethepotential environmentalimpactsofthe policyhavebeenidentified:
Considerinrelationto
policiesprotecting:carbon richsoils,CSGN,biodiversity, naturalenvironment, landscape,geodiversity,built heritage
Locatewastemanagement
facilitiesinsitesthatareless sensitivetoincreasesinair pollution
LicensingofsitesbySEPA
51
Policy
Earlieriteration(s)ofpolicyandlikelyenvironmentalimpacts 251011 Nosignificantbeneficialimpactswereidentified. Thepolicyislikelytohavesignificantadverseimpactsonthefollowingobjectives: KeepairpollutionbelowLocalAirQualityManagementthresholds Maximiserecyclingandcomposting Protectandenhancethedistinctivecharacterofthelandscapeandensurenew developmentdoesnotexceedthecapacityofthelandscapetoaccommodateit Thereareuncertaintiesaroundtheimpactsonthefollowingobjectives,allofwhicharedue touncertaintyaboutwherethefacilitieswouldbelocated: RegenerateClackmannanshire'stowncentres Protectcarbonrichsoilsfromdisturbanceorloss Improvehealthandreducehealthinequalities EncouragepromotionandconnectivityoftheCentralScotlandGreennetwork withinandlinkingbeyondClackmannanshire Furthertheconservationofbiodiversity AvoidadverseeffectsontheintegrityoftheFirthofForthSPAandRamsarsite MaintainandenhancethepopulationsofEuropeanProtectedSpecies,including protectionoftheirrestingplaces ProtectandenhanceSSSIs ProtectandenhancepriorityspeciesandhabitatsinClackmannanshire Increasehabitatconnectivityandecosystemfunctiontoassistlocalbiodiversity inresponsetoclimatechange Protectandenhanceareasdesignatedfortheirnationalorlocallandscape importance Protectandenhancegeodiversity,particularlyingeologicalSSSIs Protectand,whereappropriate,enhancethehistoricenvironment Thefollowingopportunitiestomitigatethepotentialenvironmentalimpactsofthepolicy havebeenidentified: Considerinrelationtopoliciesprotectingcarbonrichsoils,CSGN,biodiversity, naturalenvironment,landscape,geodiversity,builtheritage Licensingandconditionstominimiseairpollutionandmitigateitsimpacts Regulationshouldonlypermittheburningofwastestreamswhichcannot practicablybereusedorrecycled Locateenergyfromwastefacilitiesinsuitableurbanareastominimisethe impactonthelandscape
FinalPolicy
EA17Energyfrom WasteFacilities
V324811 EnergyfromWasteFacilities Proposalswhichwouldinvolvetherecoveryofenergyfromwastewillnormallybe acceptablewherethefollowingcriteriacanbemet; 1.TheproposalmeetsthecriteriasetoutinPolicy1 2.TheproposalcomplieswiththerelevantThermalTreatmentofWasteGuidelines publishedbySEPA. 3.Theproposedlocationwouldmaximisetherecoveryanduseofenergyandheatfrom thedevelopment.Applicationsshallincludeaheatandpowerplanwhichshall demonstratehowenergyrecoveredfromthedevelopmentwouldbeusedtoprovidea renewablesourceofelectricityandheat,includingthescopetoefficientlydistributeheat tositeswhichwouldhavealongtermhighheatdemand. 4.Thepotentialadverseimpactsontheenvironmentandhealthandsafetyhavebeen adequatelyaddressed,includingthroughthesubmissionofanEnvironmentalImpact Assessment,whereappropriate,andhavebeenshowntobeacceptable. 5.Whereaproposalwouldbelikelytotreatwastefromanareawiderthan Clackmannanshire,itwouldalsodeliverdemonstrablelocalbenefitstothecommunity.
PolicyEA17EnergyfromWasteFacilities Thispolicysetscriteriaforproposalstogenerateenergy fromwaste. Proposalswhichwouldinvolvetherecoveryofenergyfrom wastewillnormallybesupportedwheretheapplicant demonstratestothesatisfactionoftheCouncilthatthe proposalmeetsallofthefollowingcriteria: 1. TheproposalmeetsthecriteriasetoutinPolicy EA16 2. TheproposalcomplieswiththerelevantThermal TreatmentofWasteGuidelinespublishedby SEPA. 3. Theproposedlocationwouldmaximisethe recoveryanduseofenergyandheatfromthe development.Applicationsmustincludeaheat andpowerplan,whichshalldemonstratehow energyrecoveredfromthedevelopmentwould beusedtoprovideelectricityandheat,including thescopetoefficientlydistributeheattosites whichhavealongtermhighheatdemand. 4. Thepotentialadverseimpactsonthe environmentandhealthandsafetyhavebeen adequatelyaddressed,includingthroughthe submissionofanEnvironmentalImpact Assessmentand/orHealthImpactAssessment, whereappropriate,andhavebeenshowntobe acceptable. 5. Whereaproposalwouldbelikelytotreatwaste fromanareawiderthanClackmannanshire,it wouldalsodeliverdemonstrablelocalbenefitsto thecommunity.
Thispolicyislikelytocontributeto improvingenergyconservationand efficiency,andreducing greenhousegasemissions.Ithas thepotentialforpositiveimpacts oncommunitycohesion.
52
Policy
Earlieriteration(s)ofpolicyandlikelyenvironmentalimpacts Minimisingwasteinnewdevelopment Assessed41011 Proposalsfordevelopmentmust demonstratethatthegenerationofwaste duringtheconstructionandoperational phaseshasbeenminimised;recycled constructionanddemolitionwastesare incorporatedintothedevelopmentasfaras practicablypossible;andanywaste generatedwillbeutilisedinasustainable manner.Whereappropriate,aSiteWaste ManagementPlanwillberequiredto demonstratehowthegenerationofwaste willbeminimisedduringtheconstruction andoperationalphasesofthedevelopment. Furtherguidanceonthedetailsthatwould needtobeincludedwillbeprovidedinthe SupplementaryPlanningGuidanceon ManagingWasteinNewDevelopment. Appropriatefacilitieswhichareaccessible andconvenienttouseforthepurposesof segregation,storage,collectionor compostingofwaste,consistentwiththe objectivesoftheZeroWastePlanScotland, willberequiredaspartofproposalsfornew buildingsoruseswhicharelikelyto generatewastewhenoperationalandthese shouldbeincludedaspartofanyplanning application.Thesiting,design,locationand levelsofprovisionoffacilitiesshallavoid anysignificantadverseimpactonamenity, designandroadsafety.Furtherdetailswill beprovidedintheaboveSupplementary PlanningGuidance
FinalPolicy PolicyEA18MinimisingWasteinNewDevelopment Thispolicyaimstominimisethewastegeneratedduring theconstructionanduseofnewdevelopments. Proposalsfordevelopmentmustdemonstratetothe satisfactionoftheCouncilthatallofthefollowingcriteria aremet: 1. thegenerationofwasteduringtheconstruction andoperationalphaseshasbeenminimised; 2. recycledconstructionanddemolitionwastesare incorporatedintothedevelopmentasfaras practicablypossible; 3. anywastegeneratedwillbedealtwithin accordancewiththewastehierarchy. Whereappropriate,theCouncilrequiretheapplicantto submitaSiteWasteManagementPlan,todemonstrate howthegenerationofwastewillbeminimisedduringthe constructionandoperationalphasesofthedevelopment. Proposalsfornewbuildingsorusesthatarelikelyto generatewastewhenoperationalwillbeexpectedto includeappropriatefacilitiesforthesegregation,storage, collectionorcompostingofwaste.Thesefacilitiesmustbe accessibleandconvenienttouse,andconsistentwiththe objectivesofScotland'sZeroWastePlan.Thesiting,design, locationandlevelsofprovisionoffacilitieswillbeexpected toavoidanysignificantadverseimpactonamenity,design androadsafety. Furtherguidanceonthedetailsthatwouldneedtobe includedinaSiteWasteManagementPlan,andon requirementsrelatingtotheprovisionofwastefacilities, willbeprovidedintheSupplementaryGuidanceon ManagingWasteinNewDevelopment.
EA18Minimising WasteinNew Development
.V125811 PreventionofWasteinNew Development Proposalsfornewdevelopmentmust demonstratethatthegenerationofwaste duringtheconstructionandoperational phaseshasbeenminimised;recycled constructionanddemolitionwastesare incorporatedintothedevelopmentasfar aspracticablypossibleandanyresidual wastehasbeenutilisedinasustainable manner. Appropriatefacilitiesfortheseparation, storageandcollectionofwastewillbe requiredinallnewdevelopment consistentwiththeobjectivesoftheZero WastePlanScotland.Thesiting,design, locationandlevelsofprovisionoffacilities shallavoidanysignificantadverseimpact onresidentialamenity,designandroad safety. Proposalsshallcomplywiththe requirementscontainedintherelated SupplementaryPlanningGuidanceon ManagingWasteinNewDevelopment.
25August2011 Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificant beneficialeffectsonthefollowing objectives: Reducegreenhousegasemissions Minimisewastegeneration Maximiserecyclingandcomposting Thereareopportunitiestoamendthepolicy toenhanceimpactsonthefollowing objectives: Reducewaterpollution(opportunityto bemoreexplicitaboutmanagementof liquidwaste) Nonegativeenvironmentalimpactsor uncertainimpactshavebeenidentified.
4October2011 Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificant beneficialimpactsonthefollowing objectives: Minimisewastegeneration Maximiserecyclingandcomposting Nonegativeenvironmentalimpactsor uncertainimpactshavebeenindentified. Noopportunitiestoamendthepolicyto enhancebeneficialimpactshavebeen identified.
Thispolicyislikelytominimise wastegenerationandmaximise recyclingandcomposting; consequently,itislikelyto contributetoareductionin greenhousegasemissions.
53
Policy Draft19August2011 PolicyHE1ScheduledAncient MonumentsandArchaeologicalSites AScheduledAncientMonumentsor otherimportantarchaeologicalsitesshall bepreservedinsituaswellastheirsetting .Developmentswhichhaveanadverse impactonthesiteoritssettingshallbe notbepermittedexceptinexceptional circumstances Significantpublicinteresttobe gainedfromtheproposed developmentthatoutweighs thearchaeologicalimportance ofthesite,wherethisinvolves ascheduledancientmonument thesignificancemustbeof nationalimportanceinorderto outweighthenational importanceofitspreservation Noappropriatealternative location Proposalsaredesignedand sitedtominimisedamageto thearchaeologicalresource BOtherarchaeologicalresourcesshallbe preservedinsituwhereverfeasible.The Councilwillweighthesignificanceofany impactsontheresourcesandsettings againsttheothermeritsofthe developmentproposalswhendetermining planningapplications CWhereanyproposalcouldimpactona knownsiteofarchaeologicalimportance, theapplicantswillrequiretoprovidean assessmentofthearchaeologicalvalueof thesiteandthelikelyimpactofthe proposalsonthearchaeologicalresources priortothedeterminationoftheplanning application. Ifthedevelopmentisconsideredtobe acceptableanditsisnotpossibleto preservethearchaeologicalresourcein situ,thedevelopermayberequiredto makearrangementsfortheafull archaeologicalinvestigation.Thiswould includedexcavationandrecordingpriorto thestartofdevelopment,followedby analysisandpublicationofthefielddata.
FinalPolicy
EA19Scheduled Monuments
23August2011 Thepolicyislikelytohavesignificant beneficialimpactsonthefollowing objective: Protectand,whereappropriate, enhancethehistoricenvironment Theimpactonthefollowingobjectiveis uncertain: RegenerateClackmannanshire'stown centres(policycouldconflictwith regenerationobjectivesdependson locationandtheinfluenceofother policies) Nonegativeenvironmentalimpactshave beenidentified.
V3181111 PolicyHE1ScheduledMonuments ScheduledMonumentsandother identifiednationallyimportant archaeologicalresourcesshallbepreserved insitu,andwithinanappropriatesetting. Developmentswhichhaveanadverseeffect onscheduledmonumentsortheintegrityof theirsettingshallnotbepermittedexceptin thefollowingcircumstances Significantpublicinteresttobegained fromtheproposeddevelopmentthat outweighsthearchaeological importanceofthesite.Wherethis involvesthesettingofaScheduled Monumentthesignificancemustbeof nationalimportanceinorderto outweighthenationalimportanceof itspreservationand; Noappropriatealternativelocationfor theproposeddevelopmentand; Proposalsaredesignedandsitedto minimisedamagetothescheduled monumentorarchaeologicalresource
181111 Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificant beneficialimpactsonthefollowing objectives: Protectandenhancethedistinctive characterofthelandscape Protectand,whereappropriate, enhancethehistoricenvironment Nonegativeenvironmentalimpactshave beenidentified Noopportunitiestomitigateorenhancethe environmentalimpactsofthepolicyhave beenidentified.
PolicyEA19ScheduledMonuments ThispolicyaimstoprotectScheduledMonumentsand otheridentifiednationallyimportantarchaeological resources. ScheduledMonumentsandotheridentifiednationally importantarchaeologicalresourcesshallbepreservedin situ,andwithinanappropriatesetting. Developmentswhichwouldhaveanadverseeffecton ScheduledMonumentsortheintegrityoftheirsettingwill onlybesupportedwheretheapplicantdemonstratesto thesatisfactionoftheCouncilthattheproposalmeetsall ofthefollowingcriteria: Thereissignificantpublicinteresttobegained fromtheproposeddevelopmentthatoutweighs thearchaeologicalimportanceofthesite. Thereisnoappropriatealternativelocationfor theproposeddevelopment Proposalsaredesignedandsitedtominimise damagetotheScheduledMonumentor archaeologicalresourceanditssetting Wheretheproposalinvolvesthesettingofa ScheduledMonumentthesignificancemustbeof nationalimportanceinordertooutweighthe nationalimportanceofitspreservation.
Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveimpactsonthe protectionandenhancementof thehistoricenvironment;itisalso likelytocontributetothe protectionandenhancementof landscapecharacter.
54
Policy
FinalPolicy PolicyEA20OtherArchaeologicalResources Thispolicyaimstoprotectotherarchaeologicalresources andpreservetheminsituwhereverpossible. Developmentproposalswhicharelikelytohaveadverse impactsonotherarchaeologicalresourcesortheirsettings willbesupportedwheretheapplicantdemonstratestothe satisfactionoftheCouncilthattheothermeritsofthe proposalsoutweighthesignificanceoftheimpacts. Developmentproposalswhicharelikelytohavesignificant adverseimpactsonotherarchaeologicalresourceswill onlybesupportedwheretheapplicantdemonstratesto thesatisfactionoftheCouncilthattheadverseimpactsare outweighedbysocial,environmentaloreconomicbenefits ofregionalorCountywideimportance.Insuch circumstancesthe,Councilmayuseplanningconditionsto ensurethatthearchaeologicalinterestisprotectedasfar aspossible. Developmentproposalswhichcouldhaveanimpactona knownorsuspectedsiteofarchaeologicalimportance mustbesupportedbyanassessmentofthearchaeological valueofthesiteandthelikelyimpactoftheproposalson thearchaeologicalresources.IftheCouncilconsidersthe proposaltobeacceptable,anditisnotpossibleto preservethearchaeologicalresourceinsitu,theCouncil willrequirethedevelopertomakearrangementsforafull investigationtobeundertakenbyaprofessional archaeologist.Thiswouldincludeexcavationandrecording priortothestartofdevelopment,followedbyanalysisand publicationofthefielddata. PolicyEA21HistoricGardensandDesignedLandscapes Thispolicyaimstoprotectandenhancehistoricgardens anddesignedlandscapes. Therewillbeapresumptionagainstdevelopmentwhich wouldadverselyaffectthecharacterorsettingofanysites includedinthe'InventoryofGardensandDesigned Landscapes,'andotherhistoricgardensorlandscapes recognisedashavingnational,regionalorlocal significance. Developmentproposalsaffectingorwithinthesesiteswill onlybesupportedwheretheymeetallofthefollowing criteria: 1. Theproposedworksseektoenhancethe resourceandincludeaproposedmanagement regimetomaintainthecharacterandsettingof thesite. 2. Theproposalisaccompaniedbyalandscape appraisalbyaqualifiedlandscapearchitect detailingthefullextentoftheproposedworks, theirimpactonthelandscape/garden,andtheir relationshiptothehistoricresource.
EA20Other Archaeological Resources
V3181111 PolicyHE2OtherArchaeologicalResources AOtherarchaeologicalresourcesshallbepreservedinsituwhereverappropriate.The Councilwillweighthesignificanceofanyimpactsontheresourcesandtheirsettings againsttheothermeritsofthedevelopmentproposalswhendeterminingplanning applications.Wheresignificantadverseimpactsarelikely,thePlanningAuthoritywillonly grantplanningpermissionifpersuadedthatanysuchadverseeffectsareclearly outweighedbysocial,environmentaloreconomicbenefitsofregionalorCountywide importance.Insuchcircumstancesthearchaeologicalinterestshouldbemaintainedasfar aspossiblethroughplanningconditions. BWhereanyproposalcouldimpactonaknownorsuspectedsiteofarchaeological importance,theapplicantswillprovideanassessmentofthearchaeologicalvalueofthe siteandthelikelyimpactoftheproposalsonthearchaeologicalresourcespriortothe determinationoftheplanningapplication. Ifthedevelopmentisconsideredtobeacceptableanditsisnotpossibletopreservethe archaeologicalresourceinsitu,thedevelopermayberequiredtomakearrangementsfor afullinvestigationtobeundertakenbyaprofessionalarchaeologist.Thiswillinclude excavationandrecordingpriortothestartofdevelopment,followedbyanalysisand publicationofthefielddata.
181111 Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificantbeneficialimpactsonthefollowingobjectives: Protectandenhancethedistinctivecharacterofthelandscape Protectand,whereappropriate,enhancethehistoricenvironment Nonegativeenvironmentalimpactshavebeenidentified. Noopportunitiestomitigateorenhancetheenvironmentalimpactsofthepolicyhavebeen identified.
Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveimpactsonthe protectionandenhancementof thehistoricenvironment
EA21Historic Gardensand Designed Landscapes
Draft19August2011 PolicyHE2HistoricGardensandDesigned Landscapes Therewillbeageneralpresumptionagainst developmentwhichwouldadverselyaffect thecharacterorsettingofanysitesincluded inthe'InventoryofGardensandDesigned Landscapes'andotherhistoricgardensor landscapesrecognisedashavingnational ,regionalorlocalsignificance. Anydevelopmentproposalforthesesites shouldbeaccompaniedbyalandscape appraisalbyaqualifiedlandscapearchitect detailingthefullextentoftheproposed worksandtheirimpactonthe landscape/gardenandtheirrelationshipto thehistoricresourcewhichshouldbe enhancedasaconsequenceaswellasthe proposedmanagementregimetoensure thesite'sfuture.
23August2011 Thepolicyislikelytohavesignificant beneficialimpactsonthefollowing objectives: Protectand,whereappropriate, enhancethehistoricenvironment Protectandenhancethedistinctive characterofthelandscapeandensure newdevelopmentdoesnotexceedthe capacityofthelandscapeto accommodateit Theimpactsonthefollowingobjectives areuncertain: Furthertheconservationof biodiversity(dependsontheplant speciesinvolved) Reducetheimpactofinvasivespecies (dependsontheplantspecies involved) Nonegativeenvironmentalimpactshave beenidentified.
V3181111 PolicyHE3HistoricGardensandDesigned Landscapes Therewillbeapresumptionagainst developmentwhichwouldadverselyaffect thecharacterorsettingofanysitesincluded inthe'InventoryofGardensandDesigned Landscapes'andotherhistoricgardensor landscapesrecognisedashavingnational ,regionalorlocalsignificance. Anydevelopmentproposalaffectingor withinthesesitesshouldbeaccompanied byalandscapeappraisalbyaqualified landscapearchitectdetailingthefullextent oftheproposedworksandtheirimpacton thelandscape/gardenandtheirrelationship tothehistoricresource.Theproposed worksshouldseektoenhancetheresource andincludeaproposedmanagement regimetoensurethesite'sfuture
181111 Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificant beneficialimpactsonthefollowing objectives: Protectandenhancethe distinctivecharacterofthe landscape Protectand,whereappropriate, enhancethehistoric environment Nonegativeenvironmentalimpactshave beenidentified. Noopportunitiestomitigateorenhancethe environmentalimpactsofthepolicyhave beenidentified.
55
Policy Draft19August2011 PolicyHE3ListedBuildings TheCouncilwhenconsideringapplications forlistedbuildingconsentorplanning applicationswhichaffectalistedbuildingor settingwillseektoensurethepreservation ofthebuilding,itssetting,oranyfeaturesof architecturalorhistoricinterest.Proposals foralterationsorextensionsshould complimenttheexistingarchitectureand buildingmaterialsofthelistedbuildingwith adesignstatementbeingrequiredwhere substantialchangeisproposed.TheCouncil willencouragetherestorationoftheoriginal integrityoflistedbuildings,wheresomeof thatintegrityhasbeenlostovertheyears. Approvalwillnormallybegrantedforuses thatsecureaviablefutureforalisted building,providedthatanyalterationsarein keepingwiththecharacterofthebuilding anditssetting. Proposalsforthetotalorsubstantial demolitionofalistedbuildingwillonlybe supportedwhentheycanbeclearlybe justifiedagainstthefollowingcriteria: thatthebuildinghasbeen activelymarketedataprice reflectingitslocation,condition andpossibleviableuseswithout findingabuyer thatthebuildingisincapableof physicalrepairandreuse demonstratedbyathorough structuralreport thereisanacceptable comprehensiveredevelopment proposal RCAHMSshallbeformallynotifiedofall proposalstodemolishlistedbuildingsto enablefeaturestoberecorded
Earlieriteration(s)ofpolicyandlikelyenvironmentalimpacts V3181111 PolicyHE4ListedBuildings TheCouncilwillsupportapplicationsfor listedbuildingconsentorplanning applicationswhichaffectalistedbuildingor settingwheretheproposalsseektoensure thepreservationofthebuilding,itssetting ,oranyfeaturesofarchitecturalorhistoric interest.Proposalsforalterationsor extensionsshouldcomplimenttheexisting architectureandbuildingmaterialsofthe listedbuilding.Adesignstatementwillbe requiredwheresubstantialchangeis proposed.TheCouncilwillencouragethe restorationoftheoriginalintegrityoflisted buildings,wheresomeofthatintegrityhas beenlostovertheyears. Approvalwillnormallybegrantedforuses thatsecureaviablefutureforalisted building,providedthatanyalterations complimentthecharacterofthebuilding anditssetting. Proposalsforthetotalorsubstantial demolitionofalistedbuildingwillonlybe supportedwhereitisdemonstratedthatthe followingkeytestscanbemet: thebuildingisnotofspecialinterest; or thebuildingisincapableofrepair;or thedemolitionofthebuildingis essentialtodeliversignificantbenefits toeconomicgrowthorthewider community;or therepairofthebuildingisnot economicallyviableandthatithas beenmarketedatapricetoreflectits locationandconditiontopotential restoringpurchasersforareasonable period RCAHMSshallbeformallynotifiedofall proposalstodemolishlistedbuildingsto enablefeaturestoberecorded
FinalPolicy PolicyEA22ListedBuildings Thispolicyaimstoprotectlistedbuildingsandtheir settings. TheCouncilwillonlysupportapplicationsforlisted buildingconsent,orplanningapplicationswhichaffecta listedbuildingoritssetting,wheretheyensurethe preservationofthebuilding,itssetting,anditsfeaturesof architecturalorhistoricinterest. Proposalsforalterationsorextensionswillbeexpectedto protectandenhancetheexistingarchitecturalandhistoric characterofthelistedbuilding.Wheresubstantialchange isproposed,theCouncilwillrequireadesignstatement, includinganacceptablejustificationfortheworks.The Councilwillexpecttherestorationofthebuilding'soriginal featureswherepossible. Proposalsthatsecureaviablefutureforalistedbuilding willbesupported,providedthatanyalterations complementthecharacterofthebuildinganditssetting. Therewillbeapresumptionagainstthedemolitionof listedbuildings.Proposalsforthetotalorsubstantial demolitionofalistedbuildingwillonlybesupported wheretheapplicantdemonstratestothesatisfactionof theCouncilandHistoricScotlandthatthebuildingshould nolongerbeconsideredtobeofspecialinterest,orthat bothofthefollowingcriteriaaremet: 1. thedemolitionofthebuildingisessentialto deliversignificantbenefitstoeconomicgrowthor tothewidercommunity 2. thebuildingcannotberepaired;ortherepairof thebuildingisnoteconomicallyviable,andithas beenmarketedtopotentialrestoringpurchasers, atapricetoreflectitslocationandcondition,for areasonableperiod. TheCouncilwillformallynotifyRCAHMSofallproposalsto demolishlistedbuildingstoenablefeaturestobe recorded.
EA22Listed Buildings
23August2011 Thepolicyislikelytohavesignificant beneficialimpactsonthefollowing objective: Protectand,whereappropriate, enhancethehistoricenvironment Nonegativeenvironmentalimpactshave beenidentified.
181111 Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificant beneficialimpactsonthefollowing objective: Protectand,whereappropriate,enhance thehistoricenvironment Nonegativeenvironmentalimpactshave beenidentified. Thefollowingopportunitytoenhancethe environmentalimpactsofthepolicyhas beenidentified: Ifabuildingisdemolished,requirethat thematerialsbereusedwherepossible (contributestominimisingwaste generation)
Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveimpactsonthe protectionandenhancementof thehistoricenvironment;itisalso likelytocontributetothe protectionandenhancementof landscapecharacter.
56
Policy
FinalPolicy PolicyEA23ConservationAreas Thispolicyaimstopreserveandenhancethecharacterof Clackmannanshire'sconservationareas. Developmentproposalsinconservationareas,including extensionsandalterationstoexistingbuildings,willbe supportedwheretheapplicantdemonstratestothe satisfactionoftheCouncilthateachofthefollowing criteriacanbemet: 1. theproposalcontributestothepreservationor enhancesthecharacterandvisualamenityofthe area,withparticularconsiderationbeinggivento setting,buildings,openspace,landscapingand trees,andboundaryfeatures. 2. Thedesignwillensurethepreservationand enhancementofthearea'scharacter. 3. Theproposalcontributetoidentified OpportunitiesforPreservationandEnhancement setoutintherelevantConservationArea Appraisalwhereappropriate. TheCouncilwillidentifyanyrequirementfordesign statementstoaccompanydevelopmentproposalswithin conservationareas. Alterationsandadditionstobuildingsortheircurtilage withinconservationareasmustpreserveorenhancethe characteroftheconservationareaintermsofdesignand materials. Proposalsforthedemolitionofbuildingswithin conservationareaswillonlybesupportediftheapplicant demonstratestothesatisfactionoftheCouncilthatthere isanacceptablecomprehensiveredevelopmentproposal, andthatitmeetsatleastoneofthefollowingcriteria: 1. anassessmentofthebuildinganditslocality concludesthatitmakesnomaterialcontribution tothecharacterandappearanceofthe conservationarea 2. thebuildinghasbeenactivelymarketedfora reasonableperiodatapricereflectingitslocation, conditionandpossibleviableuseswithoutfinding abuyer 3. athoroughstructuralreportdemonstratesthatit isnotphysicallypossibletorepairandreusethe building. Developmentproposalsadjacenttoaconservationarea willbesupportedwheretheapplicantdemonstratestothe satisfactionoftheCouncilthattheconservationarea's historiccharacterandsettingwillnotbeadversely affected.
EA23Conservation Areas
Draft19August2011 PolicyHE4ConservationAreas Developmentproposalsinconservation areas,includingextensionsandalterations toexistingbuildings,willonlybepermitted wheretheypreserveorenhancesthe characterandvisualamenityofthearea withparticularconsiderationbegivento setting,buildings,openspace,landscaping andtreesandboundaryfeatures Thedesignofnewdevelopmentsin conservationareasshallbeassessedin termsoftherequirementtoensurethe preservationandenhancementsofthe area'scharacter Developmentproposalsadjacenttoa conservationareashallensurethatits architecturalandhistoricalcharacterisnot adverselyaffected. Demolitionofbuildingswillnotbe permittedunlessitcanbejustifiedagainst thefollowingcriteria: anassessmentofthebuilding andit'slocalityconcludesthatit makesnomaterialcontribution tothecharacterandappearance ofthearea thatthebuildinghasbeen activelymarketedataprice reflectingitslocation,condition andpossibleviableuseswithout findingabuyer thatthebuildingisincapableof physicalrepairandreuse demonstratedbyathorough structuralreport thereisanacceptable comprehensiveredevelopment proposal Replacementwindows,doors,roofs ,rainwatergoods,boundarytreatmentsand otherfeaturesofunlistedpropertiesshould preserveorenhancethecharacterofthe conservationareaintermsofdesignand materials
23August2011 Thepolicyislikelytohavesignificant beneficialimpactsonthefollowing objective: Protectand,whereappropriate, enhancethehistoricenvironment Nonegativeenvironmentalimpactshave beenidentified.
V3181111 PolicyHE5ConservationAreas Developmentproposalsinconservation areas,includingextensionsandalterations toexistingbuildings,shallbesupported wheretheypreserveorenhancethe characterandvisualamenityofthearea withparticularconsiderationbegivento setting,buildings,openspace,landscaping andtreesandboundaryfeatures Thedesignofnewdevelopmentsin conservationareaswillbeassessedinterms oftherequirementtoensurethe preservationandenhancementsofthe area'scharacter.TheCouncilwillidentify whendesignstatementswillrequireto accompanydevelopmentproposalswithin ConservationAreas. Developmentproposalsadjacenttoa conservationareashallensurethatits historiccharacterandsettingisnot adverselyaffected. Demolitionofbuildingswillnotbe permittedunlessitcanbejustifiedagainst thefollowingcriteria: anassessmentofthebuildingandit's localityconcludesthatitmakesno materialcontributiontothecharacter andappearanceofthearea thatthebuildinghasbeenactively marketedatapricereflectingits location,conditionandpossibleviable useswithoutfindingabuyer thatthebuildingisincapableof physicalrepairandreuse demonstratedbyathoroughstructural report thereisanacceptablecomprehensive redevelopmentproposal Replacementwindows,doors,roofs ,rainwatergoods,boundarytreatmentsand otherfeaturesofunlistedpropertiesmust preserveorenhancethecharacterofthe conservationareaintermsofdesignand materials
181111 Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificant beneficialimpactsonthefollowing objective: Protectand,whereappropriate,enhance thehistoricenvironment Nonegativeenvironmentalimpactshave beenidentified. Thefollowingopportunitytoenhancethe environmentalimpactsofthepolicyhas beenidentified: Ifabuildingisdemolished,requirethat thematerialsbereusedwherepossible (contributestominimisingwaste generation;and,ifreusedinsitu,could contributetomaintainingthecharacterof theconservationarea)
Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveimpactsonthe protectionandenhancementof thehistoricenvironment;itisalso likelytocontributetothe protectionandenhancementof landscapecharacterandthe regenerationoftowncentres.
57
Policy
Earlieriteration(s)ofpolicyandlikelyenvironmentalimpacts 23August2011 Thepolicyislikelytohavesignificant beneficialimpactsonthefollowing objectives: Protectand,whereappropriate, enhancethehistoricenvironment RegenerateClackmannanshire'stown centres Protectandenhancethedistinctive characterofthelandscapeandensure newdevelopmentdoesnotexceedthe capacityofthelandscapeto accommodateit Theimpactsonthefollowingobjectives areuncertain: Protectandenhanceareasdesignated fortheirnationalorlocallandscape importancee.g.AGLVs(dependson thelocationofbuildings) Nonegativeenvironmentalimpactshave beenidentified.
FinalPolicy
EA24Buildingsat RiskandNon DesignatedHeritage Assets
Draft19August2011 PolicyHE5BuildingsatRiskandNon DesignatedHeritageAssets TheCouncilwillsupporttherenovationand reuseofbuildingsontheBuildingsatRisk registerandothernondesignatedheritage buildingswhicharevacantandof architecturalortownscapevalue..Such proposalsshallensurethatthecharacterof thebuildinganditssurroundingsare retainedandenhancedwithapositive outcomeforthetownscapeorlandscape withinwhichitissituated.
V3181111 PolicyHE6BuildingsatRiskandNon DesignatedHeritageAssets TheCouncilwillsupportappropriate renovationandreuseofbuildingsonthe BuildingsatRiskregisterandothernon designatedheritagebuildingswhichare vacantandofarchitecturalortownscape value.Suchproposalsshallensurethatthe characterofthebuildingandits surroundingsareretainedandenhanced withapositiveoutcomeforthetownscape orlandscapewithinwhichitissituated.
181111 Thispolicyislikelytohavesignificant beneficialimpactsonthefollowing objective: Protectand,whereappropriate, enhancethehistoric environment Nonegativeenvironmentalimpactshave beenidentified. Thefollowingopportunitytoenhancethe environmentalimpactsofthepolicyhas beenidentified: Requireenergyefficiency measurestobeinstalledwhen buildingsarereused (contributestoreducing greenhousegasemissions)
PolicyEA24BuildingsatRiskandNonDesignated HeritageAssets Thispolicyaimstosupporttherenovationandreuseof buildingsatrisk. Proposalsforrenovationandreuseofeitherbuildingson theBuildingsatRiskRegister,orothernondesignated heritagebuildingswhicharevacantandofarchitecturalor townscapevalue,willbesupportediftheapplicant demonstratestothesatisfactionoftheCouncilthatthe proposalswillensurethatthecharacterofthebuildingand itssurroundingsisretainedandenhanced,andthatthere willbeapositiveoutcomeforthetownscapeorlandscape withinwhichitissituated.
Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveimpactsonthe protectionandenhancementof thehistoricenvironmentandthe landscape;itisalsolikelyto contributetotheregenerationof towncentres.
EA25The Developmentof Brownfieldand ContaminatedLand
121211 2.Vacant,derelictandbrownfieldland TheCouncilwillmaintainanannualVacant andDerelictLandAuditasanintegralpartof theBuiltDirectoratemonitor.The contributionofsuchlandtotheoverall patternofdevelopmentwithinoururban areaswillbeassessedthroughouttheperiod ofthedevelopmentplan.TheCouncilwill prepare,andkeepupdated,anUrban PotentialAssessmenttoexaminethe amountofbrownfieldlandthatmaybe availableforredevelopmentaspartofthe5 yearlandsupply,atalltimes.
141211 Nosignificantenvironmentalimpactshave beenidentifiedforthispolicy
121211 3.Thedevelopmentofbrownfieldland TheCouncilwillplacepriorityonenabling vacant,brownfieldandderelictland,within existingurbanboundaries,thathasthe potentialtocontributesignificantlytothe efficientuseand/orreuseofresources includingenergy,materials,buildings,land orinfrastructuretobebroughtinto beneficialuseassoonaspracticablein accordwiththevision,spatialstrategyand programmingofsitesinthedevelopment plan. Wheretheexistingorprevious useoflandwasforbusinessthen redevelopmentforbusinessuse willbefavoured.Alternative formsofdevelopmentwillonly beconsideredfavourablyifitcan bedemonstratedthrough independentmarketing,that thereisalackofdemandfor businesstocontinueasthemain useonthesite. Whereabrownfieldsiteiscapableof providingaqualitylivingenvironmentthen anyproposalforthelandmustdemonstrate howqualityoutcomescanbeachievedin accordwiththeotherrelevantpoliciesin thedevelopmentplan.
141211 Thereareuncertaintiesastotheimpactsof thepolicyonthefollowingSEAobjectives: RegenerateClackmannanshire'stown centres(dependswhetherthe brownfieldsitesareintowncentres) Preventdeteriorationandenhancethe statusofthewaterenvironment Avoidadverseeffectsontheintegrity oftheFirthofForthSPAandRamsar site(dependsonthesiteandthe natureofthedevelopment) Thefollowingopportunitiestoimprovethe environmentalimpactsofthepolicyhave beenidentified: Amendpolicytorequire improvementstowatercourses onoraffectedbythesite
PolicyEA25TheDevelopmentofBrownfieldand ContaminatedLand Thispolicyaimstoencouragethereuseofbrownfieldand contaminatedland. TheCouncilwillsupportthereuseofbrownfieldland withinurbanareasincludingvacantandderelictbuildings, providedsuchproposalsaccordwiththevision,spatial strategyandprogrammingofsitesinthisPlan. Wherelandisknownorsuspectedtobecontaminated,the applicantmustdemonstratetothesatisfactionofthe Councilthatthelandis,orcanbemade,suitableforthe proposednewuse.TheCouncilwillnormallyrequireany identifiedremediationmeasurestobeundertakenpriorto thenewusecommencing.
Thispolicyislikelytohave significantpositiveimpactson soils,andcontributestronglyto theCentralScotlandGreen Network.Itislikelytocontribute totowncentreregeneration, minimisingwaste,protectingthe landscapeandimproving communitysafetyandhealth
58
Policy
FinalPolicy
121211 4.Contaminatedland TheCouncilwillonlypermitdevelopmenton,orinthevicinityoflandthatisknowntobe, ormaybe,unstable,contaminated,oraffectedbylandfillgaswheretheCouncilis satisfiedthattheactualorpotentialriskcanbeovercome.TheCouncilwillrequireall developmentproposalstobesupportedbyappropriatesurveyinformation,froma professionallyqualifiedsource,detailingtheextentandnatureofgroundinstabilityor contamination,theresultantimplicationsforsitedevelopmentandpossibleremedial action.WherenecessarytheCouncilwillnormallyrequireappropriateremedialmeasures tobeundertakentoovercome,removeorrenderharmlessanyidentifiedproblemsor contaminationbeforedevelopmentproceedsonsite.
141211 ThereareuncertaintiesastotheimpactsofthepolicyonthefollowingSEAobjectives: Achievegoodecologicalstatus(dependswhetherthelandinquestionaffectswater courses) Protectandenhancethedistinctivecharacterofthelandscapeandensurenew developmentdoesnotexceedthecapacityofthelandscapetoaccommodateit (dependswhetherremediationofcontaminatedlanddivertsdevelopmentawayfrom moresensitiveareas) Thefollowingopportunitiestoimprovetheenvironmentalimpactsofthepolicyhavebeen identified: Amendpolicytomoreproactivelyencourageremediationofcontaminatedland
59

October2013
Appendix8:AssessmentoftheProposed LocalDevelopmentPlanVision

ThetablebelowshowstheearlierdraftsoftheProposedLDPVision,andhowthechanges proposedbythestrategicenvironmentalassessementweretakenintoaccount. Visiondraft1 TheLocalDevelopmentPlanwillstrivetofacilitatesustainableeconomicgrowth,deliveran improvedqualityoflifeforallandenhanceClackmannanshiresenvironmentby2030by: AddressingClimateChange ConsiderablechangesinClackmannanshiresclimatearepredictedoverthePlanperiod.As oneofthemostimportantinfluencesonourabilitytoadaptsuccessfullytofutureclimate changeimpacts,theLDPwillensurethatby2030ourresiliencetokeyimpactssuchasrising sealevelsandfloodinghasimprovedsignificantly.Aprecautionaryapproachtothelocation ofnewdevelopmentwillbeadopted,ensuringthatlocationsinareaslesslikelytobe affectedbyextremeweathereventsarefavoured,andsustainablefloodmanagementwill becomethenorm.Whilesucheventswillposenewchallengeswewillliveincommunities thatarefarbetteradaptedtocopingwiththeseconditions,safeguardinghomes,businesses andinfrastructurefromthepotentialdamageofsuchevents. DuringthePlanperioditisanticipatedthatcarbonreductionwillbecomeincreasingly importantaswestrivetomeetstatutorygreenhousegasreductiontargetsandasthe availabilityoffossilfuelsdecreasesandthecostincreases.TheLDP,intandemwiththe BuildingStandards,willworktowardsensuringthatallnewdevelopmentmeetsrigorous emissionstandards,achievingasclosetozerocarbonemissionaspossible.Thelayoutof newdevelopmentswillallowmaximisationofsolargain,favourreductioninuseofprivate transportandpromotesustainablewateruse.Adoptionofrenewablegenerationand decentralisedenergyproductionwillplayanimportantpartinreducingcarbonemissions. Thus,by2030newhousingandbusinessaccommodationinClackmannanshirewillbehighly energyefficientandlowcosttorun,reducingthecostburdenonresidentsandbusinesses alike. CreatingSustainableCommunities TheLDPwillcreatetherightconditionstoensurethatClackmannanshirecanattractjobs andinvestmentintotheareaasthenationaleconomyrecovers,helpingsupportstronger communitiesandreducingtheneedtotravelbeyondClackmannanshiretofind employment.By2030Clackmannanshirewillhaveastrongandwelldiversifiedeconomy, buildingontheinvestmentinnewschoolsandfurthereducationmadeatthebeginningof thePlanperiod.Planningpolicywillhavemadeanimportantcontributiontoachieving substantialeconomicregenerationbynotonlyallocatinganappropriaterangeofbusiness sitesbutalsoensuringthattherightconditionstoattractandretainbusinessisachieved,in termsofprovisionofinfrastructure,environmentalenhancementandsupportingtheup skillingofClackmannanshireslabourforce. By2030,ourcommunitieswillbehealthier,greenerandsaferplacesinwhichtolive. Energyefficientnewhomeswillhelpreducefuelpovertyandcomprisepartofliving environmentsthatareconsiderablymoreattractiveandsustainablethanhasoftenbeenthe caseinthepast.Whileconvenientaccesstoactivetravelroutes,publictransportand essentialfacilitieswillbeimportant,therewillbeanemphasisonqualityonnew developmentbothintermsoflayout,designandmaterials,andintermsofaccesstohigh 1
qualityandbiodiversityrichgreenspace. Protectingourheritageandenhancingourenvironment By2030,Clackmannanshiresgreeninfrastructuresovitalforqualityoflifeand Clackmannanshiresappealasaplacetoliveandforbusinesstolocatewillhavebeen vastlyimproved.TheprinciplesoftheCentralScotlandGreenNetwork,anationalplanning priority,willhavebecomeaprimaryplanningconsideration,changingtheappearanceof Clackmannanshireforthebetter.Habitatnetworksandbiodiversitywillhavebeen strengthened,ourvaluablelandscapeprotected,woodlandcoverexpanded,vacantand derelictlandreducedandopportunitiesforhealthyexerciseinthecountrysideincreased.A moreattractiveandaccessibleenvironmentwillhaveprovidedtheopportunitiesnecessary toenableasignificantimprovementinthehealthofClackmannanshirespeopleandthe reductionofhealthinequalities.Ourbuiltheritagewillhavebeencarefullyconservedand conservationareaswillhaveseenaprogrammeofenhancementthatresidentscanbeproud of. Summaryofenvironmentalassessmentofdraft1 Thevisionislikelytohavesignificantbeneficialimpactsonthefollowingobjectives: Ourcommunitiesaresafer Improvehealthandreducehealthinequalities EncouragepromotionandconnectivityoftheCentralScotlandGreenNetwork withinandlinkingbeyondClackmannanshire Furthertheconservationofbiodiversity Protectandenhanceareasdesignatedfortheirnationalorlocallandscape importancee.g.AGLVs Reducegreenhousegasemissions ImproveenergyconservationandefficiencythroughoutClackmannanshire ImproveClackmannanshire'sresiliencetoclimatechange Reduceoverallfloodriskinasustainableway Reducetheenvironmentalimpactoftravel Thevisioncouldberewrittentoaddressthefollowingobjectives: Ourcommunitiesaremoreinclusiveandcohesive Objectivesrelatingtodesignated/protectedsitesandspecies Increasehabitatconnectivityandecosystemfunctiontoassistlocalbiodiversityin responsetoclimatechange Protectandenhancethedistinctivecharacterofthelandscapeandensurenew developmentdoesnotexceedthecapacityofthelandscapetoaccommodateit Reducesoilcontaminationandsafeguardsoilqualityandquantity Objectivesrelatingtothewaterenvironment KeepairpollutionbelowLocalAirQualityManagementthresholds Protectandenhancecarbonrichsoils Protectandenhancegeodiversity Contributetothemitigationoffloodsanddroughts(rewordtoincludedroughts) Minimisewastegeneration Maximiserecyclingandcomposting Nonegativeimpactswereidentified. 2
Visiondraft2 TheLocalDevelopmentPlanwillstrivetofacilitatesustainableeconomicgrowth,deliveran improvedqualityoflifeforallandprotectandenhanceClackmannanshiresenvironmentby 2030. AddressingClimateChange ClackmannanshiresclimateislikelytohaveseensignificantchangeoverthePlanperiod.As oneofthemostimportantinfluencesonourabilitytoadaptsuccessfullytofutureclimate changeimpacts,theLDPwillhaveensuredthatby2030ourresiliencetokeyimpactssuchas risingsealevel,floodinganddroughthasimprovedsignificantly.Theadoptionofamore precautionaryapproachtothelocationofnewdevelopmentwillhavehelpedsafeguardnew developmentfromtheworstimpactsofextremeweathereventsandpoliciespromoting sustainablefloodmanagementwillhavemarkedlyimprovedourresiliencetofloodevents. Whilesucheventswillposenewchallengeswewillliveincommunitiesthatarefarbetter adaptedtocopingwiththeseconditions,safeguardinghomes,businessesandinfrastructure fromthepotentialdamageofsuchevents. DuringthePlanperiodcarbonreductionwillhavebecomeincreasinglyimportantaswe strivetomeetstatutorygreenhousegasreductiontargetsandastheavailabilityoffossil fuelsdecreasesanditscostincreases.TheLDP,intandemwiththeBuildingStandards,will haveworkedprogressivelytowardseverstricteremissionstandardsinnewdevelopment, achievingasclosetozerocarbonemissionsaspossible.Policyonthelayoutanddesignof newdevelopmentswillhaveencouragedamarkedmovetowardsmoresustainabledesign whichenables,forexample,maximisationofsolargain,reductioninuseofprivatetransport andpromotionofsustainablewateruse.Increasedadoptionofrenewablegenerationand decentralisedenergyproductionwillplayanimportantpartinreducingcarbonemissions. Thus,by2030newhousingandbusinessaccommodationinClackmannanshirewillbehighly energyefficientandlowcosttorun,reducingthecostburdenonresidentsandbusinesses alike. CreatingSustainableCommunities TheLDPwillcreatetherightconditionstoensurethatClackmannanshirecanattractjobs andinvestmentintotheareaasthenationaleconomyrecovers,helpingsupportstronger communitiesandreducingtheneedforresidentstocommuteoutofClackmannanshireto findemployment.Planningpolicywillhavecreatedtheconditionsforsustainableeconomic growth,supportingawelldiversifiedeconomybyhelpingdeliveranappropriaterangeof businesssitesandpremises,provisionofhighqualityinfrastructure,andbyprotectingthe exceptionalenvironmentthatattractsinmigrationofemploymentandpopulation.Carewill havebeentakentoensurethattheareasincreasingprosperityhasbeensharedacrossthe community,enablingareductionininequalitiesandimprovementinqualityoflifeforall.By 2030ourcommunitieswillhavebecomemorecohesive,moreinclusive,andsaferplacesin whichtolive. BytheendofthePlanperiodourcommunitieswillbehealthier,greenerandsaferplacesin whichtolive.Astrongeremphasisonqualityinnewdevelopmentintermsofdesign, layoutandmaterialswillhavebeenestablished.Anemphasisonecologicallysounddesign willhaveresultedintheuseofmoresustainablematerialsandmoreenergyefficienthomes willhaveplayedanimportantpartineliminatingfuelpoverty.Ournewdevelopmentswill 3
havebeencarefullydesignedtoreducecrimeandengenderasenseofpride,encouraging involvementofresidentsintheirfuturecare. Theencouragementofanappropriatemixofusesinourtownsandvillageswillhaveadded vitalitytolivingenvironments,providedmoreconvenientaccesstoservicesandensured thatClackmannanshirehasmadethemostofnewtechnologywhilerespondingtoincreasing fuelcostsbyenablinghomeandworktobebroughttogether,furtherreducingtheneedto commute. Protectingourheritageandenhancingourenvironment By2030,Clackmannanshiresgreeninfrastructuresovitalforqualityoflifeand Clackmannanshiresappealasaplacetoliveandforbusinesstolocatewillhavebeen vastlyimproved.TheprinciplesoftheCentralScotlandGreenNetwork,anationalplanning priority,willhavebecomeaprimaryplanningconsideration,changingtheappearanceof Clackmannanshireforthebetter.PlanpolicieswillhavebeenalignedwiththeNetworks objectivesofprovidinganimprovedenvironmentforeconomicregeneration,improved opportunitiesforhealthyoutdoorrecreationandexperienceofnature,andculturalactivity. Woodlandcoverwillhaveexpandedverysignificantlyandaccesstohighqualityand biodiversityrichgreenspacewillbeimproved.Meanwhile,theamountofvacantand derelictlandwillhavebeensignificantlyreduced. Thedistinctivecharacterofourlandscapewillhavebeenprotectedandenhancedandnew developmentwillnothaveexceededthecapacityofthelandscapetoaccommodateit.The Planwillhaveplayedanimportantroleinreversingthedeclineinourbiodiversityand ecosystems,strengtheningthemforthefuture,whiledesignatedsitesandpriorityhabitats andspecieswillhavebeenakeyfocusforimprovement.Ourair,waterandsoilqualitywill alsohavebeenprotected.By2030,Clackmannanshirewillhavebuiltonitssuccessesin wasteminimisationandmaximisingrecyclingandcompostingasithasworkedtowardsa zerowastefuture. Amoreattractiveandaccessibleenvironmentwillhaveprovidedtheopportunities necessarytoenableasignificantimprovementinthehealthofClackmannanshirespeople andthereductionofhealthinequalities.Ourbuiltheritagewillhavebeencarefully conservedandconservationareaswillhaveseenaprogrammeofenhancementthat residentscanbeproudof. Summaryofenvironmentalassessmentofdraft2 Thevisionislikelytohavesignificantbeneficialimpactsonthefollowingobjectives: Ourcommunitiesaresafer Ourcommunitiesaremorecohesiveandinclusive Improvehealthandreducehealthinequalities EncouragepromotionandconnectivityoftheCentralScotlandGreenNetwork withinandlinkingbeyondClackmannanshire Protectandenhancethedistinctivecharacterofthelandscapeandensurenew developmentdoesnotexceedthecapacityofthelandscapetoaccommodateit Reducecontaminationandsafeguardsoilqualityandquantity Reducegreenhousegasemissions ImproveenergyconservationandefficiencythroughoutClackmannanshire ImproveClackmannanshire'sresiliencetoclimatechange Reduceoverallfloodriskinasustainableway 4
Contributetothemitigationoffloodsanddroughts Reducetheenvironmentalimpactoftravel Minimisewastegeneration Maximiserecyclingandcomposting
Thevisioncouldberewrittentoaddressthefollowingobjectives: Protectand,whereappropriate,enhancethehistoricenvironment(changewording toinclude"andprotected") RegenerateClackmannanshire'stowncentres(addinreferencetotowncentre regeneration) Furthertheconservationofbiodiversity(changewordingfrom"reversingthe decline"to"furtheringtheconservationof") Objectivesrelatingtodesignated/protectedsitesandspecies(rewordtomake moreexplicitreferencetositesandspecies) Objectivesrelatingtothewaterenvironment(rewordto"protectedand,where possible,enhanced") KeepairpollutionbelowLocalAirQualityManagementthresholds Protectandenhancecarbonrichsoils(addinreferencetocarbonrichsoilsin climatechangesection) Nonegativeimpactswereidentified. Vision(final) OurvisionforasustainableClackmannanshirein2035isof: Acommunitythathasexperiencedasuccessfultransitiontoavibrantlowcarbon economy,providingexcellenteducational,trainingandemploymentopportunities,job satisfactionandacontinuallyimprovingsenseofwellbeingforitspeopleinanareawhich deliversahighqualityoflife.Socialandeconomicinequalitieswillhavereduced dramaticallyandtheenvironmentandtheservicesprovidedbynaturewillhavebeen protectedandenhancedforthebenefitofcurrentandfuturegenerations. Tosuccessfullydelivertheseaspirationsitwillbeessentialtoworkcloselywithourpartners, localcommunitiesandbusinesses.Itwillalsodependonsecuringpolicysupportforour aspirationsinotherkeyplans,programmesandstrategiesaffectingClackmannanshire.The CouncilwillworkwithGovernment,statutoryagencies,communityplanningandother partnerstorealisetheVisionovertheperiodofthePlan. By2035,Clackmannanshirewillhaveachievedanacceleratedrateofeconomicgrowthwith economicperformanceabovetheScottishaverage.Businesseswillbethrivingand opportunitiesfornewandexpandingbusinesseswillhaveincreasedmarkedly.Business efficiencyandcompetitivenesswillhavecontinuedtoimproveaswemakethetransitionto alowcarboneconomy,reducingdependenceonexpensiveandpollutingfossilfuels, improvingenergyefficiencyandmovingtocleanerrenewablesourcesofenergy.Levelsof unemploymentwillhavefallenwhileconsiderablymoreofClackmannanshiresresidentswill beabletofindappropriateandfulfillingemploymentwithinthearea,reducingtheneedto commutelongdistances.Astechnologydevelops,increasingnumbersofpeoplewillbe workingatorclosetohome,ofteninpurposebuiltlive/workunits.
ClackmannanshirewillhavecapitalisedonitsstrategiclocationintheheartofCentral Scotlandandimprovementstoitstransportinfrastructurewillhavecontinued,with improvedrailservicesandcontinuedinvestmentinahighqualityactivetravelnetwork, attractingincreasedpopulationandinvestmentintothearea.Newhousing,employment, retail,leisure,educationandtrainingopportunities,willhavefurthertransformed Clackmannanshireintoamoresuccessfulandattractiveareainwhichtolive,workorvisit. ThePlansemphasisondeliveringarangeofbusinesssitesandpremisesfordifferenttypes ofusealongwithhighqualitysupportinginfrastructurewillhavesuccessfullycontributedto thedeliveryofsustainable,lowcarboneconomicgrowthandawelldiversifiedand flourishingbusinesscommunity. By2035,Clackmannanshire'senvironmentwillhavechangedsignificantly,bothasadirect resultofclimatechange,andbecauseofthemeasureswewillhavetakentoadapttoit.As faraspossible,thesechangeswillhavebeenanticipatedand,asaresult,theareawillbe moreresilienttothesocialandenvironmentalchallengesofachangingclimate. Understandingtheeffectsofachangingclimateonournaturalsystemsandthewaywecan workwiththemtopreventandmitigatethenegativeeffectsofenvironmentalchangewill havesafeguardedoureconomyandcommunitiesandhelpedprotectandimproveour qualityoflife.Partnershipworkingwillhavebecomeincreasinglyimportantinhelping communitiesandwildlifeadapttoenvironmentalchange,forexampleinaddressingthe increasedriskoffloodingandsealevelrise,changesinhabitatnetworks,anddisruptionto transportservices.Newdevelopmentwillhaveachievedincreasinglydemanding sustainabilitystandardsoverthelifetimeoftheLDPwithcontinuouslyimprovinglevelsof energyefficiencyandecologicallysounddesign,helpingreduceourcarbonemissionsand improvingourabilitytocopewiththepredictedeffectsofclimatechange,including increasedfloodrisk.Newdevelopmentwillalsoplayanimportantroleinstrengtheningour habitatnetworkstohelpenhancebiodiversity. Theareawillbewellknownforitssustainablecommunitiesandtheexcellentqualityoflife theyoffer.Wewillhavemadethemostofourliveableenvironment,withsmalltownsand villagessurroundedbyattractiveandeasilyaccessiblecountryside.Newdevelopmentswill fosterprideandprovideastrongsenseofplace,reducingthedominanceofmotorvehicles andencouragingpeopletowalkandcyclenotjustforrecreationbutaspartoftheir everydayjourneystoschool,workortoreachshopsandservices.Healthinequalitieswill havereducedandhealthandwellbeingwillhaveimproved.Newdevelopmentwillhave broughtclearbenefitsnotonlytonewresidentsbutalsotoestablishedcommunitiessuch asfurtherimprovededucationalandtrainingopportunities,bettercommunications,more opportunitiestoexperiencenatureclosetohome,andimprovedretail,serviceandsocial infrastructure.Carewillhavebeentakentoensurethattheareasgrowingprosperityhas beensharedbyallsectionsofthecommunity,contributingtoareductioninsocialinequality andanimprovementinqualityoflifeforall.Withnewfacilitiesandopportunities,social inclusionandcohesionwillhaveincreasedandmorelocalpeoplewillparticipatein communitylife.Communitieswillhavebeensupportedtoincreasetheircapacitytotackle localproblemsandtakepracticalactiontoimprovetheirlocalareaandcreatenew opportunitieslocally,suchasthroughanincreaseincommunitygrowingoffoodwithan expansioninthenumberofcommunitygardensandallotments,andbyimproved managementofvaluedopenspaces. Ourcommunitieswillhavebecomehealthier,greenerandsaferplacesinwhichtolive.A strongeremphasisonqualityinnewdevelopmentintermsofdesign,layoutandmaterials willhavedeliveredanewgenerationofattractivelydesignedandsoughtafter 6
neighbourhoodsthataresympathetictoandrelatecloselywithourhistoricandcultural identity.Theemphasisonenergyefficientnewhomeswillhavehelpedreducefuelpoverty andcarbonemissionswhilenewdevelopmentswillhavebeencarefullydesignedtoreduce crimeandengenderasenseofcommunitypride.Theencouragementofamixofusesin newdevelopmentwillhaveaddedvitalitytolivingenvironmentsandprovidedmore convenientaccesstoservices.Anemphasisonwasteminimisation,compostingand recyclingwillhavehelpedusmeetourzerowastetargets. Clackmannanshiresexceptionalnaturalandbuiltenvironmentwillhavebeenfurther protectedandenhanced.ThePlanwillhavesignificantlycontributedtotherealisationofthe principlesoftheCentralScotlandGreenNetwork,anationalplanningpriority,changingthe appearanceofClackmannanshireforthebetterwithmoreopportunitiesforhealthyoutdoor recreation,expansionofwoodlandcoverandstrengtheningofhabitatandoutdooraccess networks.Theamountofvacantandderelictlandwillhavedecreasedandanenhanced environmentwillhavecontributedtoincreasedlevelsofinvestmentintothearea. StrategicObjectives TheStrategicObjectivesprovidethelinkbetweentheVisionandtheSpatialStrategy, providingtheframeworkforthekeyissuesaddressedbytheSpatialStrategy.ThePlans policiesandproposalshavebeenassessedtoensurethattheyeachmakeameaningful contributiontotherealisationofthePlansStrategicObjectives.ThePlanwillberegularly monitoredtoensurethattheStrategicObjectivesarebeingsuccessfullydeliveredand, wherenecessary,considerationwillbegiventoamendingpoliciestoensurethatthey contributemoreeffectivelytotheirdelivery. StrategicObjective1 AClearFrameworkforPositiveChange TomeetthefutureneedsofClackmannanshirescommunitiesbyprovidingafocused frameworkforchangeandgrowththrough: focusingnewdevelopmentinareaswhereitcanfullysupportoureconomic, environmentalandsocialobjectives; continuingtheplannedregenerationofourtowncentresandexisting neighbourhoods,whereopportunityarises; ensuringthatnewneighbourhoodsaredesignedtodeliverhighenvironmental standardsandcontributetoenhancedqualityoflifeforresidents; protectingandenhancingourenvironmentalassetsandheritageforpresentand futuregenerations. StrategicObjective2 SustainableEconomicGrowth TocontinuetheeconomicregenerationofClackmannanshireandincreaseitseconomic potentialforthebenefitofitsresidents,bysupportingbusinessgrowthandimproved employmentopportunitiesthrough: providingarangeofappropriate,welldesignedplaces,whichcanattractbusiness investment,employmentandemployeestolocateinClackmannanshire,retain existingbusinesssupportnewenterpriselocally,andsupporteconomicdiversification; throughthepromotionofagrowthstrategy,increasethedemandforservicesinthe areaandgenerateemploymentopportunities,withparticularemphasisonpromoting higherwagegrowthsectorsandgreenbusinesses; supportingthedevelopmentoftourismandtourisminfrastructureinthearea. 7
StrategicObjective3 EnvironmentalSustainability Todeliverasustainablepatternofdevelopmentthatsupportscommunitycohesion,reduces greenhousegasemissions,supportswasteminimisationandensuresthatnewdevelopment consistentlycontributestoenvironmentalprotectionandenhancementby: ensuringthatnewdevelopmentdoesnotresultingrowthinClackmannanshiresnet greenhousegasemissions; minimisingreleaseofgreenhousegasemissionsfromnaturalsourcesincluding protectionofcarbonrichsoils,minimisingwasteandencouragingwoodland expansionwhereappropriate; deliveringastepchangetowardsimprovedenergyandwaterconservationand efficiency,andincreasingtheproductionofrenewableenergysuchthatallnew developmentiszerocarbonorclosetozerocarbonby2016; adaptingtotheimpactsofclimatechangebyensuringthatnewdevelopmentis appropriatelyclimateproofedtoremainresilienttopredictedfutureclimatic conditions,andtoprotectexistingdevelopmentfromtheadverseeffectsofclimate change; reducingoverallfloodriskandpromotingsustainablefloodmanagementtechniques; managingandreducingpollution,tocontributetotheimprovementofourairand waterquality; safeguardingsoilqualityandquantity; minimisingourwasteandmaximisingopportunitiesforrecycling,compostingand efficientandsustainabledisposalofresidualwaste. StrategicObjective4 MeetingtheNeedforNewHomes TomeetClackmannanshireshousingneedsbasedontheevidenceprovidedbythe ClackmannanshireHousingNeedandDemandAssessmentby: allocatingarangeofappropriatesitesanddwellingtypes; promotingarangeoftenures; makingprovisionforaffordable,particularneedsandsocialhousing; ensuringthatnewresidentialdevelopmentiswellservedbypublictransport;well connectedtotheactivetravelnetwork;andhasgoodqualityandaccessiblepublic openspace,educationalandsocialinfrastructure; ensuringthemostefficientuseoflandinmeetingdevelopmentneeds. StrategicObjective5 CommunityRegenerationandImprovingHealthandWellbeing Toworkwithpartnerstoachievesocialregeneration,revitalisethosepartsofthecounty whichcontinuetobeaffectedbydeprivationandlackofopportunities,enableresidentsto leadactiveandhealthylifestylesandaddresshealthinequalitiesby: targetingdevelopmentwhichwouldprovideemployment,trainingandeducation opportunities; undertakingenvironmentalimprovementsbothasintegralaspectsofnew developmentandmorewidelytosupportourenvironmentalregenerationobjectives; improvingaccesstothecountrysideandopenspace; providingsitesforcommunitygardensandallotments; seekingenhancementofthesocialandgreeninfrastructuretobenefitthewider communitywheremajornewdevelopmentisproposed; designingnewneighbourhoodstomaximisepersonalsafetyandreducethe 8
opportunityforcrime; ensuringthatlandisavailableforhealthinfrastructureasrequired.
StrategicObjective6 NaturalEnvironment ToprotectandenhanceClackmannanshire'snaturalheritage,regenerateournatural environmentandsupportthestrategicobjectivesoftheCentralScotlandGreenNetworkby: furtheringtheconservationofClackmannanshire'sbiodiversity,particularlythrough theprotectionandenhancementofdesignatedsitesandpriorityhabitatsandspecies; strengtheninghabitatnetworkswithinClackmannanshireandlinkingtoneighbouring areas; expandingwoodlandcoverwhereverpossible; protectingandenhancingClackmannanshire'sdistinctivelandscapecharacter; improvingrecreationalopportunityandaccesstobiodiversityrichopenspaces; safeguardingthegreenbelt. StrategicObjective7 BuiltEnvironment Tofacilitatethecreationofsensitivelyandwelldesignedplacesandenhancelocal distinctivenessandidentityby: designingplaceswhichhaveastrongsenseoflocalidentity,arepeoplecentred,safe, andpromotemixedusesandsustainablelifestyles; givingprioritytothereuseofvacantandderelictlandoverdevelopmentofgreenfield sites; encouragingappropriateremediationofcontaminatedland; conservingourbuiltheritage,includingdesignatedconservationareas,andtakinga proactiveroleinitsenhancement; recognisingandmaximisingthecontributionofourheritageassetsandwelldesigned newdevelopmenttothequalityofthebuiltenvironmentandoureconomy. StrategicObjective8 SustainableTransportandAccessibility Tofacilitateimprovedmovementandaccessibilitybetweenhomes,jobsandschoolsand reducerelianceonprivatecarsby: providingappropriatetransportinfrastructure; encouragingtheprovisionoffacilitiesandinfrastructuretoincreaseactivetravelanduse ofpublictransport. Summaryofenvironmentalassessmentoffinalvision ThevisionandspatialobjectivesarelikelytohavebeneficialimpactsonalloftheSEA objectives

October2013
Appendix9:Siteassesments

ThisappendixcontainsthesiteassessmentsthatwerecarriedoutfollowingtheMainIssues Report.
Clackmannanshire Council Local Development Plan

Proposed Plan site assessment
Prepared by LUC November 2012
Project Title: Clackmannanshire Council Local Development Plan Sites Assessment Client: Clackmannanshire Council
Version
Date
Version Details
Prepared by
Checked by
Approved by Principal Nick James
V1
23 11 2012
Draft report
Steven Orr
Nick James
H:\1 Projects\44\4429.0x Clacks PLDP sites\4429_Clacks LDP site appraisal_v1_20121126.docx 2

Proposed Plan site assessment
Prepared by LUC November 2012
Planning & EIA Design Landscape Planning Landscape Management Ecology Mapping & Visualisation
LUC GLASGOW 37 Otago Street Glasgow G12 8JJ Tel: 0141 334 9595 Fax: 0141 334 7789 glasgow@landuse.co.uk
Offices also in: London Bristol Edinburgh

FS 566056
Land Use Consultants Ltd Registered in England Registered number: 2549296 Registered Office: 43 Chalton Street London NW1 1JD LUC uses 100% recycled paper
EMS 566057
Contents
Introduction Study context Aims and objectives Methodology Assessment results Introduction Summary results Discussion Full assessment tables
2 2 2 3 4 4 5 6 9
Tables Table 2.1: summary of assessment results 5
Figures Figure 2.1: key to colour shading Figure 2.2: Dollar expansion site location map Figure 2.3: Glenochil Nursery site location map 4 7 8
Introduction
Study context
1.1 LUC was commissioned by Clackmannanshire Council to undertake this study to assess the development potential, and likely environmental constraints, of two additional sites for inclusion in the proposed Clackmannanshire Local Development Plan (LDP). This study builds on work undertaken by LUC at Main Issues Report stage in 2010, and for the Local Plan 1 st alteration in 2008, and draws on the same method and approach.
Aims and objectives

1.2 The aims and objectives of the study are defined as follows: to provide a comprehensive and detailed report supported by plans, drawings, data and photographs as appropriate to explain any potential for development and all constraints to development for the sites listed. The report will be based on criteria set out in the study brief and consistent with the methodology for the previous assessments; to assess whether these sites are suitable for development in terms of a balanced view in location and accessibility by sustainable modes of travel; this assessment will provide part of the evidence base in the initial discounting of any land to be considered for allocation, or otherwise, in the Local Development Plan and should be consistent with, and comparable to, the previous study undertaken for the Local Plan 1st Alteration and its SEA.
1.3
The detailed objectives are defined as follows: to determine the nature of each site and identify all known site constraints. This to include land ownerships [where information is available from the council], existing land uses, ecology, landscape, built heritage and townscape, flooding and water management, access requirements, open spaces, and land and soil considerations; to capture assessment on the relevant sustainability issues as they relate to the criteria given in the Environmental Assessment (Scotland) Act Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Tool Kit, particularly pages 12-15 for the sites. Notably in this instance we are considering biodiversity, flora, fauna particularly for protected species and priority species; population and human health; soil; water and the Water Framework Directive; air quality as appropriate; climatic factors including for adaptations and mitigation and where relevant sea level issues; material assets; cultural heritage; and landscape considerations; to measure and identify the accessibility of each site by road, rail and for walking, including any relationship to the local Core Path Network and rights of way, cycling, public transport, and horse riding provision. All in general accord with the Local Transport Strategy, and to indicate any potential and likely preferences for access to the site assuming if it were to be developed; and, to identify those sites most and least appropriate for development in terms of this brief. That means providing a balanced synthesis and justification for development.
1.4
As indicated in the brief, we have replicated the methodology used in previous phases of site appraisal work. In addition to ensuring consistency, this also facilitates direct comparison with these sites and enables judgements to be made on their relative merits. The sites assessed in this document are: former Glenochil Nursery, between Menstrie and Alva; and 2
1.5
urban expansion of Dollar, proposed by the Community Council.
Methodology
1.6 For a detailed account of the methodology employed in assessing the sites, readers should consult the Main Issues Report site assessment document and appendices prepared by LUC (October 2010).
Assessment results
Introduction
1.1 This section of the report sets out the results of the assessment process. The assessment results have been grouped according to the number of positive and number of negative impacts identified to allow identification of the sites which have the least negative effect in relation to the assessment criteria. This approach facilitates direct comparison with the sites previously assessed for the Main Issues report. Key to colour shading for scores:
Higher number of positive scores Lower number of negative scores
Lower number of positive scores
A1
A2
A3
A4
B1
B2
B3
B4
C1
C2
C3
C4
Higher number of negative scores
D1
D2
D3
D4
Figure 2.1: key to colour shading Sites with constraints which could potentially override any potential for development are shaded in grey. 2.1 Additional information used in the assessment includes: Where the site sits within the locational framework to allow comparison of sites in similar geographical locations; Identification of any overriding constraints; Identification of major, moderate and minor physical and environmental constraints; A summary of the remaining site area following allowance for the identified constraints.
Summary results
Table 2.1: summary of assessment results
Site information
Site ID PP1 PP2 Location Name and Site area (ha) score Summary
Site constraints
Mitigation
Appro Overriding constraints x Major Moderate Minor area remai ning Small-scale flood defence; Possible mitigation options
Dollar urban expansion
5.8
C4
Development on playing fields
Flood risk along western boundary
Restricted vehicular access
provision of compensatory 5ha open space / sports pitches; road enahncements
Development within proposed green belt would require alteration of boundary; Glenochil Nursery 2.7 B2 Mature woodland in western portion of the site should be retained Creating new settlement between Alva and Menstrie Need for junction upgrade / speed restrictions 1ha Retention of woodland through development brief; junction upgrades
NB: summary score bands are in relation to sites previously assessed, and are in relation to the sites in isolation
Discussion
Dollar southern expansion 2.2 In comparison to the existing group of sites assessed for the Main Issues Report, this site is assessed as having potential for development but is subject to significant constraints that would require appropriate mitigation. In principle, development of the site is contrary to Scottish Planning Policy which precludes development of playing fields. In practice, the development of an appropriate playing fields strategy could indicate that the pitches are surplus to local requirements. However, if this indicates that the pitches are well-used and necessary for local use, this should be taken to be an overriding constraint to development. The site also has the potential for flooding along its western edge although the at-risk area could readily be avoided through careful design and the implementation of a SuDS scheme to prevent downstream impacts for increased runoff. Given the size of the proposed area, it is likely that significant upgrading to the drainage and sewerage infrastructure will be required to accommodate additional housing. Equally, well planned and designed open space within the development could provide an opportunity to address upstream flooding issues. The local road network is also relatively fragile, with residents parking and potentially problematic junctions onto Bridge Street that may require mitigation if development were to significantly increase traffic flows. Recommendation: while this site may offer significant potential for expansion, when viewed in isolation, it scores less highly than other sites assessed in and around Dollar (e.g. Kellybank MIR141), which do not conflict with national policy and may represent more proportionate and sustainable settlement expansion. Assessment as part of the wider Dollar Community Plan 2.5 When viewed as part of the wider masterplan proposed for the growth of Dollar, proposed by Dollar Community Council (The Paul Hogarth Company, July 2012), the site performs more favourably. It should be noted that the masterplan as a whole has not be subject to SEA, and therefore any conclusions drawn are contingent on confirmation by more detailed appraisal. While an assessment in fulfilment of SPP requirements regarding development of playing fields would still be required, the phasing of the masterplan would deliver significant new sports facilities in advance of development of the majority of the site. The existing primary school and community centre will be relocated at the same time as the majority of the site is developed, and improved vehicular access will be provided in parallel with streetscape enhancements. It remains likely that some form of flood defence will be required to eliminate risk to new properties, particularly in the northwest corner of the site. However, if delivered through the masterplan a suitable naturalistic retention/attenuation scheme could be provided as part of the new public park to the south reducing the effect of new development on downstream flows to the River Devon. (It is understood that the catchment response times for the Dollar Burn are relatively short due to the topography of the southern Ochils any scheme delivered could therefore contribute to wider sustainable flood management in the Devon catchment. The western portion of Dollar lies within a Potentially Vulnerable Area classified by the National Flood Risk Assessment.) Recommendation: with appropriate mitigation in place, this site would record an A2 overall score (with only 7 sites out of the 52 assessed performing better). However, a positive outcome would be dependent on delivery of the proposed masterplan to the quality standards and phasing set out in the Community Plan document. Ideally, the Council should insist on the provision of detailed flood risk mitigation / sustainable water management proposals before the site should be considered for development.
2.3
2.4
2.6
2.7
Figure 2.2: Dollar expansion site location map
Glenochil Nursery 2.8 In comparison with the sites already assessed, the former Glenochil Nursery site records relatively positive scores against the environmental assessment criteria scoring just below the third quartile (i.e. in the second-best category). The site is well connected to the road, path and public transport network but, sitting beyond the recognised settlement boundary of Menstrie, it would potentially set an unhelpful precedent for ribbon development along main transport corridors. Housing development on the site would create the perception of a small settlement between Menstrie and Alva, interrupting the largely rural break between the existing settlements. Consequently, the site lies within an area proposed as green belt in the recent designation review. To enable development, the agreed green belt boundary would need alteration to excise the proposed site. The western portion of the site is currently woodland, which should be retained in any development brief to avoid significant environmental impacts and further local and national policy conflicts. Development may also have unfavourable effects on undeveloped views of the Ochils from the A91, changing the perceived size of settlements and potentially affecting the scale of the hills in views from the road. The site is location on a 60mph section of the A91 and the main entrance is currently a standard bellmouth junction that does not offer suitable visibility for the levels of use likely to occur if the site were developed for housing. In particular, traffic turning right into the site would represent a frequent hazard. It is therefore likely that some form of mitigation will be required, either: Upgrading of junction to provide deceleration and turning lanes; and/or Extending the 40mph speed restriction from the eastern edge of Menstrie to include the whole site.
2.9
2.10
2.11
Recommendation: the site performs relatively well against the assessment criteria, with only two sites in the environs of Alva scoring more highly. The lack of flood risk is a particularly attractive asset. However, alteration of the green belt boundary should only be considered if the neighbouring urban areas lack the capacity to cater to projected housing need. The trees on site should be retained as a precondition to any proposal.
8 Figure 2.3: Glenochil Nursery site location map
Full assessment tables
Site reference and location: Size (ha) Size (group) Summary description including site access and public transport connections Overriding constraints to development Site specific investigations Constraints to development Summary of area remaining following mitigation Environmental features Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use
Dollar southern expansion

5.8 Area of playing fields on southern edge of Dollar largely enclosed on three sides by existing development. The centre of the site is around 150m from Bridge Street (A91), and is therefore within comfortable walking distance of public transport links. Road access is via small-scale local streets with resident parking (Lovers Loan is particularly narrow and unsuited to significant increases in traffic).
A playing fields strategy, developed in consultation with sportscotland, should be prepared to demonstrate whether the pitches are surplus to local requirements. Development of playing fields is contrary to Scottish Planning Policy (para.156); Western edge of the site at risk from fluvial flooding from the canalised Dollar Burn; trees lining Dollar Burn and Lovers Loan; adjacent to primary school; site is identified in the Clackmannanshire Open Space Framework -
Mature trees on west and east site boundaries
Other - housing Playing fields Housing; Green Belt; primary school and community centre
SEA /site assessment topic Biodiversity, flora and fauna
Site appraisal criteria
Site issues and discussion
Summary of Effect of development

(++/+/0/-/--)
Enhancement and mitigation options
Potential effect following mitigation
Does the site impact on designated sites? Does the site impact on priority habitats or species?
0 0
0 0
Population and human health
Is the site connected to the local core path network?
On the Devon Way
++
++
How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD? What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources?
No Development of the site would result in significant loss of open space
0 -Any proposed development should include high quality open space Implementation of masterplan would provide this in advance of development
0 +
Water
Is the site at risk of flooding?
Yes western edge of the site at risk of fluvial flooding
Would require some level of flood protection Not explicitly dealt with in Masterplan but new open spaces could provide SuDS options (a more naturalistic course for the Kelly Burn through the new public park is indicated in Phase 4 of the masterplan, therefore delivery of a scheme for the Dollar Burn at this stage would be necessary, as this would be in parallel with the development of the site)
Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site?
Yes pollution unlikely to be a significant issue beyond the construction period
0/-
Development should incorporate an appropriate SuDS scheme to retain and treat surface water
0/-
Yes development would significantly reduce the infiltration and retention capacity, speeding runoff rates and potentially contributing to downstream flooding
Incorporation of significant open space and SuDS scheme.
0/-
Soil
Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land?
No No
0 0
0 0
10
SEA /site assessment topic Air Quality and Transport

(++/+/0/-/--)
Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
Yes well-served by the Core and Local Path network; adjacent to the National Cycle Network
++
++
Yes public transport services easily accessible in Dollar town centre
No
Yes the development area is significant in size and if developed for housing could result in increased traffic levels, putting pressure on noncontrolled junctions onto Bridge Street
Depending on predicted traffic levels, light-controlled junctions may be required to mitigate potential congestion, particularly at peak times. Access enhancements are planned as part of the proposed masterplan
Climatic Factors
Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel?
No
0/-
0/-
Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change?
Yes climate change impacts are likely to increase the frequency and severity of flooding on the western edge of the site
Some level of flood defence will be required, and will continue to have downstream impacts Impacts can be readily mitigated without affecting downstream flows to the Devon through incorporation of flood retention in new open spaces proposed in the masterplan
Material Assets
Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure?
Yes although the size of the proposed development area would likely require upgrading to infrastructure, particularly in relation to drainage and sewerage
0/-
Infrastructure upgrades will be required Would be delivered through the proposed masterplan
Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Cultural Heritage Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains?
The site is largely flat and open although the western edge is lined with mature trees; as the site is open to the south and new development could be orientated to benefit from solar gain No No No
0/+
0/+
0 0 0
0 0 0
It is unlikely, as the site has been levelled, potentially destroying any shallow-buried archaeological remains 11
SEA /site assessment topic Landscape

(++/+/0/-/--)
Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
No
The site would represent a significant extension of Dollars urban area. It lies adjacent to the Dollar Conservation Area, however development is unlikely to have significant impacts on its setting
Development of the site would compromise views across Dollar to the Ochils from the National Cycle Network/Core Path, moving the line of settlement up to the edge of the Devon Way
0/-
Wider enhancements to the transport and access network delivered through the masterplan should offset likely effects.
12
Glenochil Nursery
2.7
Former plant nursery site on the A91 between Menstrie and Alva. The site lies 0.6km to the east of Menstrie within the green belt
Site lies within the recently reviewed green belt, and would require re-drawing of the boundary
Area of high quality mature trees at the east end of the site, and the garden surrounding Glenochil Bungalow; further smaller trees around site boundary
Other - housing Disused plant nursery: glasshouses / polytunnels, sheds and ancillary infrastructure on site Social housing; agricultural land
13

(++/+/0/-/--)
No Eastern end of the site lies within mature woodland which should be retained
0 0 Retention of woodland
Yes
++
Not close to areas with particularly high levels of deprivation Site lies outside the settlement boundary of Menstrie, and is therefore at a distance of c. 800m from the closest formal open space. However, it is wellserved by the Core Paths Network, and a range of natural green space (i.e. the Ochils and Menstrie Glen) can be readily accessed from the site. No
0 +
Water
No
No
Soil
No No Yes the site is well-served by the Core Path network, but local amenities in Menstrie are around1km away (and are relatively limited in nature); Alva is considerably further away. It is therefore likely that the majority of journeys will be by private car The site is served by regular bus services, providing links to Alloa, Stirling and key services (e.g. Forth Valley Royal Hospital in Larbert) No
0 0 0/+
Air Quality and Transport
Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially
Housing development on the site is likely to generate relatively minor increases in overall traffic levels with which the A91 should be readily able to cope. However, the current main entrance to the site is via a bellmouth 14
0/-
The transition from 40-60mph is adjacent to the sites western boundary and could be extended past the site to slow traffic.
SEA /site assessment topic

(++/+/0/-/--)
outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
junction directly on to a 60mph section of the A91.
Alternatively, new junction arrangements such as a deceleration / turning lanes may have to be considered to secure road safety 0/-
Climatic Factors
Not to any meaningful extent employment and amenity locations will require additional trips
Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Material Assets Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain?
No
Yes the site has access to key service infrastructure, but may require reinforcements to drainage/sewerage systems depending on the number of units planned The site is located on ground rising gently from south to north, creating good opportunities for passive solar design (as the site was formerly a plant nursery, access to good light is clearly a requirement); some plantings around the western site boundary may provide some shelter, but it is largely open to the prevailing wind No No No
0/+
Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Cultural Heritage Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Landscape Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
0 0 0
It is very unlikely that any archaeological remains are extant within the site footprint, given the planning history Lies within Green Belt
0 Development would require redrawing of green belt boundary 0
Potentially the presence of housing development on the site would create the impression of a larger settlement between Menstrie and Alva (when viewed together with Victoria Terrace. This could be considered unfavourable ribbon development
0/-
The low-rise buildings (glasshouses / polytunnels) on much of the site currently allow views across the area to the Ochils from the A91 housing development would compromise this
0/-
15

Proposed Plan Site Assessment
Prepared by LUC February 2013
Project Title: Clackmannanshire Council Local Development Plan Sites Assessment Client: Clackmannanshire Council
Version
Date
Version Details
Prepared by
Checked by
Approved by Principal Nick James
V1
22/02/2013
Draft report
Melissa Mc Ginley
Nick James
H:\1 Projects\44\4429.0x Clacks PLDP sites\Reports\4429.0_ClacksLDP_site_assessment_v1_20130222.docx

Prepared by LUC February 2013
LUC EDINBURGH 28 Stafford Street Edinburgh EH3 7BD Tel: 0131 202 1616 edinburgh@landuse.co.uk
Offices also in: London Bristol Glasgow

FS 566056 EMS 566057
Contents
1 1 1 2 3 3 4 6 12 33 33 34 35 37 39
Appendix 1 Photographs from site visit Land at Fishcross/ Devonside Land at Ditch Farm Land to the south of Sunnyside Court Patons Bowling Club
Tables Table 2.1 Summary of assessment results 4
Figures Figure 2.1 Key to colour shading Figure 2.2 Fishcross/ Devonside location & constraints Figure 2.3 Ditch Farm location & constraints Figure 2.4 Sunnyside Court location & constraints Figure 2.5 Patons Bowling Club location & constraints 3 6 7 8 10
Introduction
Study context
1.1 LUC was commissioned by Clackmannanshire Council to undertake this study to assess the development potential, and likely environmental constraints, of four additional sites for inclusion in the proposed Clackmannanshire Local Development Plan (LDP). This study builds on work undertaken by LUC at the Main Issues Report stage in 2010, and for the Local Plan 1 st alteration in 2008, and draws on the same method and approach.
Aims and objectives

1.1 The aims and objectives of the study are defined as follows: to provide a comprehensive and detailed report supported by plans, drawings, data and photographs as appropriate to explain any potential for development and all constraints to development for the sites listed. The report will be based on criteria set out in the study brief and consistent with the methodology used for the previous assessments; and to assess whether these sites are suitable for development in terms of a balanced view in relation to location and accessibility by sustainable modes of travel.
1.2
This assessment will also provide part of the evidence base in the initial discounting of any land to be considered for allocation, or otherwise, in the Local Development Plan and should be consistent with, and comparable to, the previous study undertaken for the Local Plan 1st Alteration and its SEA. The detailed objectives are defined as follows: to determine the nature of each site and identify all known site constraints, including land ownerships [where information is available from the council], existing land uses, ecology, landscape, built heritage and townscape, flooding and water management, access requirements, open spaces, and land & soil considerations; to capture assessment on the relevant sustainability issues as they relate to the criteria given in the Environmental Assessment (Scotland) Act Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Tool Kit, particularly pages 12-15 for the sites. Notably in this instance we are considering biodiversity, flora, and fauna particularly for protected species and priority species; population and human health; soil; water and the Water Framework Directive; air quality as appropriate; climatic factors including for adaptations and mitigation and where relevant sea level issues; material assets; cultural heritage; and landscape considerations; to measure and identify the accessibility of each site by road, rail and for walking, including any relationship to the local Core Path Network and rights of way, cycling, public transport, and horse riding provision. All in general accord with the Local Transport Strategy, and to indicate any potential and likely preferences for access to the site assuming if it were to be developed; and, to identify those sites most and least appropriate for development in terms of this brief.
1.3
1.4
As indicated in the brief, we have replicated the methodology used in previous phases of site appraisal work. In addition to ensuring consistency, this also facilitates direct comparison with these sites and enables judgements to be made on their relative merits. The sites assessed in this document are: Land at Fishcross / Devonside, between Tilicoultry and Sauchie;
1.5
25 February 2013
Land at Ditch Farm, north of Tullibody; Land to the south of Sunnyside Court, Alloa; and Patons Bowling Club, Alloa.
Methodology
1.6 For a detailed account of the methodology employed in assessing the sites, readers should consult the Main Issues Report site assessment document and appendices prepared by LUC (October 2010).
25 February 2013
Assessment results
Introduction
1.1 This section of the report sets out the results of the assessment process. The assessment results have been grouped according to the number of positive and negative impacts identified to allow identification of the sites which have the least negative effect in relation to the assessment criteria. This approach facilitates direct comparison with the sites previously assessed for the Main Issues Report. Key to colour shading for scores:
A1
A2
A3
A4
B1
B2
B3
B4
C1
C2
C3
C4
D1
D2
D3
D4
Figure 2.1 Key to colour shading Sites with constraints which could potentially override any potential for development are shaded in grey. 2.1 Additional information used in the assessment includes: Where the site sits within the locational framework to allow comparison of sites in similar geographical locations; Identification of any overriding constraints; Identification of major, moderate and minor physical and environmental constraints; A summary of the remaining site area following allowance for the identified constraints.
25 February 2013
Summary results
Table 2.1 Summary of assessment results
Site information
Site ID Farm Location Land at Fishcross/ Devonside 0.7 5.5 None south of Sunnyside Court Name and Site area (ha) score Summary
Site constraints
Mitigation
Overriding constraints
Approx Major Moderate Minor area remaining Possible mitigation options
Impact on key views of the Ochil Hills from the A908; Creating new settlement None between Sauchie and Tilicoultry; Close proximity to the River Devon flood risk zone. Site within green belt development would require Land at Ditch 1.07 5.0 None alteration boundary; Presence of electricity pylons in adjacent fields. Directly adjacent to a flood Land to the 0.63 4.0 None Impact on cultural heritage features. zone; Road access will require upgrading. 0.58 Sensitive development in relation to cultural heritage features; Riparian planting, use of SuDS and permeable surface water treatments; Access to the site and roundabout exit will require upgrading. 1.02 Road and roundabout exit upgrade. 0.65 Use of SuDS and permeable surface water treatments;
25 February 2013
Site information
Site ID Club Location Name and Site area (ha) score Summary
Site constraints
Mitigation
Approx Major Moderate Minor area remaining Possible mitigation options
Road upgrade. Proposals should include recreational Loss of open space; Patons Bowling Impact on cultural heritage 1.57 -2.5 None features; Impact on settlement setting and identity. 0.8 areas, as well as connections to existing sites as part of the wider green infrastructure network; Sensitive development in relation to cultural heritage features; Retention of the Sports Pavilion should be a precondition to any proposal.
25 February 2013
Discussion
Land at Fishcross/ Devonside
Figure 2.2 Fishcross/ Devonside location & constraints 2.2 2.3 In comparison with sites previously assessed, the land at Fishcross /Devonside attains particularly positive scores against the environmental assessment criteria scoring within the fourth quartile. The site is well connected to the road and public transport network as it is located alongside the A908. As a section of the core path network runs adjacent to the site along its northern boundary, it is also well connected to the wider core path network. Currently, development along the A908 between Sauchie and Tilicoultry is limited to the small residential development of Benview Terrace, located opposite the site. Housing development on the site may set an unhelpful precedent for ribbon development along a main transport corridor, whilst also interrupting the largely rural area between existing settlements. Development on the site will also increase the sense of enclosure along the A908 and will inhibit the undeveloped views of the Ochil Hills from the road. Development on a small section to the east of the site will be constrained by the hollow of land at the entrance to the culvert. As the site overlooks the core path network, any development should incorporate the retention of the existing tress along the northern boundary and should incorporate landscaping within the small area of potential (2km dispersal) integrated habitat network. Although there are no water courses within or directly adjacent to the site, the site is approximately 185m from the River Devon flood zone and may be at risk of flooding from increasingly frequent severe weather events. Any development on the site should take the precautionary measure to include the use of SuDS and permeable surface water treatments.
2.4
2.5 2.6 2.7
2.8
25 February 2013
2.9
The site entrance is close to the entrance for Benview Terrace which may represent a hazard in particularly at peak times. Although the site is located within a 40mph speed limit zone, the speed of traffic passing the site is significantly higher than 40mph. A mitigation measure to apply prior to development would be to erect a radar speed sign close to the site. Recommendation: The site scores favourably against the environmental assessment criteria, with its close proximity to the core path & road network, lack of designated sites or cultural heritage features within the site, and the designation of the site as vacant and derelict land, as some of its best attributes. However, the sense of enclosure a developed site would have on the A908 and its impact on key views of the Ochil Hills should be carefully considered. Retaining the tress on site and landscaping the small area to the west of the site should be a precondition to any proposal. Land at Ditch Farm
Figure 2.3 Ditch Farm location & constraints 2.10 2.11 Assessment of the land at Ditch Farm reveals that it has good potential for development, scoring within the fourth quartile. The site benefits from its location adjacent to the A907/B9140 roads, in terms of possessing excellent transport links to the surrounding towns and settlements. The site is also easily accessible via the local path network approximately 200m from the site. There is also a large area across the B9140 road, approximately 100m from the site, designated for community and recreational development. The site also possesses excellent views of the Ochil Hills, and distant views of Stirling Castle and Wallace Monument. The site is entirely contained within the Alva-Tilicoultry Green Belt. To enable development of the site, the green belt boundary would need alteration to excise the proposed site. Access to the site currently consists of a relatively narrow track with an inconspicuous exit to the roundabout. Development of the site may increase the risk of collisions on the roundabout at peak
2.12 2.13
25 February 2013
times. A new access road and upgraded roundabout exit should be designed and managed to ensure smooth traffic flows and public safety. 2.14 Any development of the site should take into consideration the close proximity of the electricity pylons in the adjacent fields, particularly during construction of any development on the site.
Recommendation: The site scores highly against the environmental assessment criteria, particularly due to its excellent transport links. Alteration of the green belt boundary should only be considered if the neighbouring urban areas lack the capacity to cater to the projected housing need. The presence of electricity pylons in close proximity to the site may prejudice the development of the site for housing. Land to the south of Sunnyside Court
Figure 2.4 Sunnyside Court location & constraints 2.15 2.16 The land to the south of Sunnyside Court records relatively positive scores against the environmental assessment criteria scoring highly within the third quartile. The site is centrally located within Alloa town centre, and has excellent access to sustainable transport networks: 2.17 The adjacent core path links the site to the town and other nearby settlements; Alloa train station is situated approximately 250m away; and The area is well served by the bus network.
Any development on the site would impact on the stretch of local paths which intersect the centre of the site. Proposals for development should reposition the local paths to sustain connectivity to the core path network.
25 February 2013
2.18
Although the site is not at risk of flooding (according to SEPA data), it is directly adjacent to an area identified at risk. It remains likely that some form of flood mitigation will be required to eliminate risk to new properties, particularly in the south eastern section of the site. Landscaping on the site should incorporate riparian planting and include the use of SuDS and permeable surface water treatments. Given the size of the proposed area, it is likely that an upgrade to the drainage and sewerage infrastructure will be required to accommodate additional housing. The site and its immediate surroundings have a number of important cultural heritage & archaeological features, including: One archaeological feature within the site (Alloa North railway Station) and another adjacent to the site (Wagonway Bridge); Four listed buildings within 250m (one Category A and three Category B listed buildings); and The boundary to the Old Alloa Conservation Area within 50m of the site.
2.19
2.20
Development of the site would need to be sensitive to the characteristics of the conservation area and other cultural heritage & archaeological features. However, the site in its current condition may be regarded as a blight on the quality and integrity of the conservation area and appropriate development could result in significant improvement. Due to the presence of an archaeological feature within the site, archaeological investigations may be necessary prior to development to ensure remains are dealt with in accordance with relevant legislation and guidance. Development of the site is likely to cause an increase in traffic along Sunnyside Road and along the presently fragile Erskine Road, particularly at peak times. It is therefore likely that some form of mitigation will be required such as an upgrade of the Erskine Road to accommodate the increased traffic. Recommendation: The site preforms relatively well against the assessment criteria, particularly due to its excellent transport links and its close proximity to the core path network. Links to the core path network should be established. To reduce the risk of flooding to new properties, flood mitigation measures should be incorporated into the development. Development should be sensitive to the existing archaeological feature on site and other cultural heritage features within close proximity of the site. An archaeological investigation should be undertaken prior to development.
2.21
2.22
25 February 2013
Patons Bowling Club
Figure 2.5 Patons Bowling Club location & constraints 2.23 2.24 Of the four sites assessed, Patons Bowling Club scored the lowest against the environmental assessment criteria scoring lowly within the second quartile. The site benefits from its location adjacent to Tullibody Road, in terms of possessing excellent transport links to Alloa town centre and nearby settlements. The lack of flood risk is a particularly attractive asset of the site. The site is classified as an area of safeguarded recreational open space and development on the site is likely to result in a net loss of publicly accessible open space. Any development on the site should include recreational areas, as well as connections to existing sites as part of the wider green infrastructure network. Development of the site would have a significant impact on the character of the area. The site is used by the surrounding residential estates as an area of formal (the bowling green) and informal (the area which previously occupied the tennis courts) open space. Development retaining the Sports Pavilion and incorporating large areas of open space could make a positive contribution to the quality and character of the local area. Development of the site would need to be sensitive to the setting of the listed building and to other cultural heritage features within close proximity (two Category B listed buildings within 200m, one feature of archaeological interest within 10m, and the Old Alloa Conservation Area within 350m). Proposals should include the retention of the existing trees along the western boundary and incorporate screening along the north western section of the site to prevent the site from being overlooked by adjacent neighbouring properties. Recommendation: Proposals to develop the site should include the retention of the existing Sports Pavilion and trees along the western boundary of the site. Any development should incorporate large areas of open space into the design to contribute to the quality and character of the local area. Proposals should
Clackmannanshire Council Local Development Plan 10 25 February 2013
2.25
2.26
2.27
2.28
be sensitive to the setting of the listed building on site and to other cultural heritage features within close proximity.
11
25 February 2013
12
25 February 2013
Site reference and location: Size (ha) Size (group) Summary description including site access and public transport connections
Land at Fishcross / Devonside

0.7 The site is located on the outskirts of the town of Fishcross, between Tillicoultry and Sauchie. The site consists of a linear strip of land along the A908. The site contains mostly scrub and is bounded to the north and south by trees, to the east by a bridge, and to the west by flat, marshy land. The entire site consists of vacant and derelict land owing to it being a closed landfill site. The northern boundary of the site is adjacent to a core path which links it to the town and the wider core path network. There are no designated or cultural heritage sites within the boundary or within 500m of the site. None
Overriding constraints to development Site specific investigations Constraints to development
None Impact on key views of the Ochil Hills from the A908; Creating new settlement between Sauchie and Tilicoultry; Close proximity to the River Devon flood risk zone
Summary of area remaining following mitigation Environmental features Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use Preferred - housing Open space Residential; Farming; Open Space Hollow of land at the entrance of the culvert (east of the site)
13
25 February 2013
Summary of Effect of development 0 0/-
(++/+/0/-/--)
There are no designations within the site. An integrated habitat network area lies within 100m to the west of the site. The site includes a small area of integrated habitat network (within 2km dispersal) which could be affected by development.
Avoid development of the small area of integrated habitat network. Potential to incorporate into landscaping for the site.
0/+
There are no core paths within the site area. However, a section of the local core path network runs adjacent to the site along its northern boundary which links it to the town of Sauchie and the wider core path network. The development of the site would not have an effect on this network provided construction did not involve temporary or permanent obstruction. The developed site could be linked to this network. According to the 2009 SIMD, the site lies within an area ranked at 2628 (out of 6,505 1 being the most deprived) with a score of 20.94. It lies within 500m of more deprived areas with one area ranked at 1232 with a score of 34.9. Development of the site could have a positive effect on deprivation through regeneration. The site is surrounded by areas of open space and areas of woodland. The Alva-Tillicoultry Greenbelt is within 500m of the site. The development of the site could have a positive effect on health if links were made with the adjacent core path and the wider path network.
0/+
Connectivity could be enhanced by including links from the site to the core path network
How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD?
Development of the site could be further enhanced by promoting links to core paths, recreational resources and centres of employment. Development of the site could be further enhanced by promoting links to core paths, recreational resources and centres of employment.
No mitigation will be required as the effect of development on population and human health will be positive. No mitigation will be required as the effect of development on population and human health will be positive.
What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources?
Water
Development of the site is not expected to increase the risk of flooding as the site is not within an area identified by SEPA at fluvial or coastal flood risk. The site is approximately 185m from the River Devon flood zone. There are no water courses within or directly adjacent to the site. The River Devon is approximately 430m from the site and development on the site may affect pollution levels.
Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development
0/-
Development of the site, including construction and operation, should ensure that any potential risk of
0/+
14
25 February 2013
(++/+/0/-/--)
within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? There are no water courses within or directly adjacent to the site. The River Devon is approximately 430m from the site which could be affected by increased run-off from the development of the site 0/-
pollution of the River Devon is avoided. Any increases in runoff should be mitigated wherever possible through the use of SuDS and permeable surface treatment 0/+
Soil
Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land?
The entire site is designated as prioritised vacant and derelict land due to it being a closed landfill site. Well planned development within this site would make effective use of space and could result in significantly improved environmental quality. No The site is well positioned to take advantage of the adjacent local path network which links it to the town of Sauchie and the wider core path network. As the site is located adjacent to the A908 road, it is well connected to the surrounding settlements of Tilicoultry and Sauchie. It is also located within a 40mph speed limit zone. The site is located on a bus route, serving the housing developments located opposite the site. Two bus stops are situated along the southern boundary of the site, with another at the entrance of the housing development. No data
Is the site prime agricultural land? Air Quality and Transport Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services?
0 + Development should ensure that connections are enhanced +
Is the site easily accessible by public transport?
Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need
Although the A908 road accommodates a high volume of traffic, it is expected that the development of the site would not have a significant impact on traffic volume.
0/-
The site is well placed to allow residents to take advantage of sustainable transport networks.
15
25 February 2013
(++/+/0/-/--)
to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Material Assets Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? No 0
As the site is located on the fringe of Sauchie town, it is likely to have access to necessary services
Presently the site is quite sheltered due to trees located along the northern and (to a lesser extent) southern boundary edges. It should however be possible to orientate buildings to maximise benefits of passive solar gain. No site unsuitable for mineral extraction
Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Cultural Heritage Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value?
There are no designated hazard areas within or near the site. There are no designated features of cultural heritage value within the site. However, there is one scheduled monument/ Category B listed building (Sauchie Tower) within 600m of the site. Development of the site is not expected to have an effect on cultural heritage given the separation distances between the site and the nearest cultural heritage feature. It is unlikely that development at this site will impact on archaeological remains. No
Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Landscape Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)?
Development of the site may have an effect on the setting and identity of the surrounding area as it is mostly agricultural land and, with the exception of the housing development opposite, the area is not built up. However, the site is currently derelict, disused land so may benefit from a structured development.
0/-
16
25 February 2013
Summary of Effect of development 0/-
(++/+/0/-/--)
Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
Development on the site will increase the sense of enclosure along the A908 and, coupled with the residential development opposite will create a suburban feel to an otherwise rural stretch of road.
17
25 February 2013
Land at Ditch Farm

1.07 The site is located north of Tullibody town, adjacent to the B9140 road. The site consists largely of agricultural buildings, a house and a yard. The site is entirely contained within the Alva-Tilicoultry Green Belt. There is also a large area across the B9140 road, approximately 100m from the site, designated for community and recreational development. Although there are no core paths within the site area, the site is easily accessible via the local path network approximately 200m from the site. Access to the site is off the A907/B9140 roundabout, with a track leading down to the farm. As the site is located adjacent to the A907/B9140 roads, it is well connected to the surrounding settlements of Tullibody and Cambus. None
Overriding constraints to development Site specific investigations Constraints to development Summary of area remaining following mitigation Environmental features Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use
Located within the greenbelt; close proximity to electricity pylons; access to the site and roundabout exit will require upgrading
Surrounding area consists mostly of flat agricultural land
Option - housing Agricultural buildings; agricultural land Farming
18
25 February 2013
Summary of Effect of development 0
(++/+/0/-/--)
Does the site impact on designated sites?
There are no designated sites within the site. The Ochil Hills Area of Great Landscape Value is located 1.6km from the site. The Firth of Forth SPA/RAMSAR/SSSI is located approximately 1.8km from the site. The site is currently of relatively low biodiversity value, consisting largely of agricultural buildings, a house and a yard. An integrated habitat network lies within 500m of the site (across the A907 road).
Does the site impact on priority habitats or species?
There are no core paths within the site area. There are core paths within 200m of the site which links to the town of Cambus and the wider core path network. Furthermore, during the site visit I observed locals using the disused railway line running adjacent to the farm as a link to the wider core path network. According to the 2009 SIMD, the site lies within an area ranked at 663 (out of 6,505 1 being the most deprived) with a score of 45.35, indicating that the site is located in an area of social deprivation. It lies within 500m of more deprived areas with one area ranked at 514 with a score of 49.51. Development of the site could have a positive effect on deprivation through regeneration. The site is entirely contained within the Alva-Tilicoultry Green Belt. There is also a large area across the B9140 road, approximately 100m from the site, designated for community and recreational development. Development of the site is not expected to increase the risk of flooding as the site is not within an area identified by SEPA at fluvial or coastal flood risk. The site is approximately 330m from the River Devon flood zone. There are no water courses within or directly adjacent to the site. The River Devon is approximately 360m from the site and development on the site may affect pollution levels.
0/+
Development proposals could include new links to the core path network
0/+
Development of the site could be further enhanced by promoting links to core paths, recreational resources and centres of employment.
No mitigation will be required as the effect of development on population and human health will be positive.
What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? Water Is the site at risk of flooding?
++
Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site?
0/-
Development of the site, including construction and operation, should ensure that any potential risk of pollution of the River Devon is avoided.
0/+
19
25 February 2013
Summary of Effect of development 0/-
(++/+/0/-/--)
Potential effect following mitigation 0/+
Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site?
There are no water courses within or directly adjacent to the site. The River Devon is approximately 360m from the site which could be affected by increased run-off from the development of the site
Any increases in runoff should be mitigated wherever possible through the use of SuDS and permeable surface treatment
Soil
No although the disused railway line approximately 100m from the site is classed as prioritised vacant and derelict land No prime agricultural land is present approximately 700m from the site Although there are no core paths within the site area, the site is easily accessible via the local path network. Access to the site is off the A907/B9140 roundabout, with a track leading down to the farm. As the site is located adjacent to the A907/B9140 roads, it is well connected to the surrounding settlements of Tullibody and Cambus. There are no bus stops within the immediate area although there are bus stops at the edge of Tullibody town, along the B9096, approximately 200m from the site. No data
Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services?
0/-
Redevelopment should ensure that connections are enhanced
Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
Although the A907/B9140 roads accommodate a high volume of traffic, it is expected that the development of the site due to its size would not have a significant impact on traffic volume. However, there may be issues with improving road access from the roundabout into the site as it currently consists of a relatively narrow track with an inconspicuous exit onto the roundabout. This could increase the risk of collisions on the roundabout at peak times. The site is well placed to allow residents to take advantage of sustainable transport networks (bus stops
A new access road and roundabout exit would have to be carefully designed and managed to ensure smooth traffic flows and public safety
Climatic
Does the location of the development reduce the need
20
25 February 2013
SEA /site assessment topic Factors
(++/+/0/-/--)
to travel?
& core paths are located within 200m from the site).
Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Material Assets Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure?
The site is not currently at risk of flooding and it is unlikely to be at significantly greater risk if changes occur as a result of climate change. The site is likely to be well provided with necessary services given its current use. Furthermore, as the site is located on the fringe of Tullibody town, it is likely to have access to necessary services. In the adjacent fields there are a number of electricity pylons. There are also 33kv electricity masts along the B9140 road. As the site is surrounded by vast amounts of high quality agricultural land and it not overlooked in any way, it is well-placed to ensure development can be located to maximise passive solar gain. No
+/-
Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Cultural Heritage Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value?
There are no designated hazard areas within or near the site. There are no designated features of cultural heritage value within the site. However, there is one scheduled monument/Category A listed building (Tullibody Old Bridge) within 400m of the site (located across the A907 road). Whilst on site, views of Stirling Castle and Wallace Monument were visible (although the site is 6.1km and 4.1km away from these cultural heritage features respectively). Development of the site is not expected to have an effect on cultural heritage given the separation distances between the site and the nearest cultural heritage feature. It is unlikely that development at this site will impact on archaeological remains. No. The Ochil Hills Area of Great Landscape Value is located 1.6km from the site.
Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Landscape Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value?
21
25 February 2013
(++/+/0/-/--)
Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
The surrounding area consists mostly of flat agricultural land. However, as there are agricultural buildings and a residential building on the site at present and given the relatively small size of the site, redevelopment of the site is not likely to impact on the setting and identity of the area. No
22
25 February 2013
Land to the south of Sunnyside Court

0.63 The site is located within Alloa town centre, adjacent to the railway line and the old Alloa North Railway Station. The site consists largely of two local paths and mown grassland. The southern boundary of the site is adjacent to a core path which links it to the town and the wider core path network. The entire site consists of vacant and derelict land reflecting its previous use as an area for dismantling and repairing of railway stock. The south-eastern boundary of the site is adjacent to an area identified for flood risk. The site is within 50m of the Old Alloa Conservation Area and one archaeological feature is present on the site, the Alloa North Railway Station. None
Archaeological investigation
Directly adjacent to a flood zone; impact on cultural heritage features
Adjacent to railway line; north of the site is below road level (Sunnyside Road) with the site sloping upwards to the east and south east
Preferred - housing Open space Residential; Retail
23
25 February 2013
Summary of Effect of development 0 0/-
(++/+/0/-/--)
There are no designated sites within the site. The closest designated site is over 1.8km away. The site is currently of relatively low biodiversity value, consisting largely of local paths and mown grassland. There are two integrated habitat networks within 500m of the site. There is an area of ancient woodland at Hawk Hill which is 400m from the site and a small area of broadleaves within 150m of the site. There is a core path running adjacent to the southern boundary of the site. There are also two local paths within the site which are used frequently by locals as a short cut to Sunnyside Court, Keilarsbrae, Alloa town centre, and the large retail supermarkets to the east of the site (ASDA, Iceland, Aldi, etc.). Development on the site would impact on the stretch of local paths which intersect the centre of the site which may need to be removed /repositioned for the site to be utilised to its full potential. According to the 2009 SIMD, the site lies within an area ranked at 2625 (out of 6,505 1 being the most deprived) with a score of 20.64. It lies adjacent to more deprived areas with one area ranked at 488 and another at 577 with scores of 50.68 and 47.50 respectively. Development of the site could have a positive effect on deprivation through regeneration. The site lies within 70m of two areas of safeguarded recreational open space, with one very large area (West End park) within 400m of the site. The site is currently connected with one of these areas through the core path network. Development of the site could have a positive effect on health if links were made to the other open spaces and the core path network. According to the SEPA fluvial and coastal flood risk dataset, the south-eastern boundary of the site is adjacent to an area identified for flood risk. Furthermore, local people whom I spoke to whilst on site stated that the area is subject to flooding and at times can be impassable. There are no water courses within or directly adjacent to
Development should incorporate native planting and foster links with wider habitat networks.
+/-
Local paths should be repositioned to increase connectivity to the core path network
Development of the site could be further enhanced by promoting links to core paths, recreational resources and centres of employment. Development of the site could be further enhanced by promoting links to core paths, recreational resources and centres of employment.
Water
Are there water courses within
0/-
Development of the site,
0/+
24
25 February 2013
(++/+/0/-/--)
the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site?
the site. The Brothie Burn is approximately 230m from the site and development on the site may affect pollution levels.
including construction and operation, should ensure that any potential risk of pollution of the Brothie Burn is avoided. 0/Any increases in runoff should be mitigated wherever possible through the use of SuDS and permeable surface treatment 0/+
Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Soil Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land?
There are no water courses within or directly adjacent to the site. The Brothie Burn is approximately 230m from the site and development on the site may affect pollution levels.
The entire site is designated as prioritised vacant and derelict land reflecting its previous use as an area for dismantling and repairing of railway stock. Well planned development within this site would make effective use of space and could result in significantly improved environmental quality. No The site is well positioned to take advantage of the adjacent core path network which links it to the town, other settlements, and the wider core path network The site is located approximately 250m from Alloa train station and the area is well served by buses, with the closest stop on King Street. No data
Is the site prime agricultural land? Air Quality and Transport Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
++
Development of the site is likely to cause an increase in traffic along the Sunnyside Road, particularly at peak times
25
25 February 2013
SEA /site assessment topic Climatic Factors
Summary of Effect of development ++
(++/+/0/-/--)
Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change?
The site is well placed to allow residents to take advantage of sustainable transport networks. Although the site is not at risk of flooding (according to SEPA data) it is directly adjacent to an area identified at risk. The site is at additional risk from increasingly frequent severe weather events as a result of climate change.
Landscaping on the site should include riparian planting to mitigate any increase in water. Any increases in water should also be mitigated wherever possible through the use of SuDS and permeable surface treatment
0/+
Material Assets
Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain?
As the site is located within Alloa town, it is likely to have access to necessary services.
The north of the site is quite sheltered due to its location below road level (Sunnyside Road). The site slopes upwards to the east and south east and is well-placed to ensure development can be located to maximise passive solar gain. No - As it is an urban site it is unsuitable for mineral extraction There are no designated hazard areas within or near the site. There is one feature of archaeological interest on the site, the Alloa North Railway Station, and another adjacent to the site, the Wagonway Bridge. The site is less than 50m from the Old Alloa Conservation Area. Directly opposite the site boundary is an area classed as a conservation environment area (CE1 Ring Road). Also, there is one scheduled monument within 450m of the site (Hawk Hill cairn). There is one Category A listed building and three Category B listed buildings within 250m of the site.
Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Cultural Heritage Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value?
Development of the site would need to be sensitive to the characteristics of the conservation area and other cultural heritage & archaeological features. However, the site in its current condition may be regarded as a blight on the quality and integrity of the conservation area
0/+
26
25 February 2013
(++/+/0/-/--)
and appropriate development could result in significant improvement. Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? There may be archaeological remains on the site due to the existing archaeological feature present on the site. Archaeological investigations may be necessary prior to development to ensure remains are dealt with in accordance with relevant legislation and guidance. 0/+
Landscape
No
Although the site does not lie within the Old Alloa Conservation Area it is in such close proximity that development should take into account the townscape character of the area. However as the site is currently degraded, development is likely to constitute enhancement. No
0/+
Development should be sensitive to the townscape character of the area.
27
25 February 2013
Patons Bowling Club

1.57 The site is located off the Tullibody Road, in Alloa. The site comprises a Category B listed building, a club house, a well maintained bowling green, large car park and an area of informal open space (previously the tennis courts). There are no core paths within or directly adjacent to the site. The site is classified as an area of safeguarded recreational open space and any development on the site will result in a net loss of open space. None
Loss of open space; Impact on cultural heritage features; impact on settlement setting and identity
Option - housing Recreational ground Residential
28
25 February 2013
(++/+/0/-/--)
There are no designated sites within or adjacent to the site. The Firth of Forth SPA/SSSI/RAMSAR is located 1.1km from the site. The site is of relatively low biodiversity value, consisting principally of a bowling green, two large buildings, and a paved car park. However, the western boundary of the site is screened by established trees and there is an area of informal open space (previously the tennis courts) to the west of the site. An integrated habitat network lies within 250m of the site. There are no core paths within or directly adjacent to the site. There closest core paths are 400m from the site.
0/-
Development should incorporate native planting and foster links with wider habitat networks.
Development proposals could include new links to the core path network Development of the site could be further enhanced by promoting links to core paths, recreational resources and centres of employment. Development of the site could include recreational areas on site, as well as connections to existing sites as part of the wider green infrastructure network
According to the 2009 SIMD, the site lies within an area ranked at 907 (out of 6,505 1 being the most deprived) with a score of 40.23. It lies within one of the more deprived areas as the adjacent areas are ranked at 4141 and 4533 with scores of 12.6 and 10.83 respectively. Development of the site could have a positive effect on deprivation through regeneration. The site is classified as an area of safeguarded recreational open space and is within 350m of two large areas of safeguarded recreational open space. The Alloa Tullibody Green Belt is approximately 350m from the site. However, development on the site itself is likely to result in net loss of publicly accessible open space.
No mitigation will be required as the effect of development on population and human health will be positive. +
Water
Development of the site is not expected to increase the risk of flooding as the site is not within an area or adjacent to an area identified by SEPA at fluvial or coastal flood risk. There are no water courses within or adjacent to the site. The nearest flood zone is 845m from the site.
29
25 February 2013
(++/+/0/-/--)
Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Soil Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Air Quality and Transport Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services?
There are no water courses within or adjacent to the site. The nearest flood zone is 845m from the site.
No No Although the site is not connected to the core path network it is within close proximity (within 400m) of the local path network. As the site is within a residential area off the Claremont Road and Tullibody road, it is well connected to the surrounding settlements and Alloa town centre. The site is well served by buses, with the closest stop located on Tullibody Road adjacent to the eastern boundary of the site. No data
0 0 +
Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
Development of the site is likely to cause an increase in traffic along the Tullibody Road, particularly at peak times. There may also be issues with forming wider access to the site as presently the site is accessed off Dawson Avenue (a high density residential area). A new junction could contribute to congestion/risk of collisions at peak times.
New access junction would have to be carefully managed to ensure smooth traffic flows and public safety
Climatic Factors
The site is well placed to allow residents to take advantage of sustainable transport networks. No
Material
Is the site located close to existing transport, services,
The site is likely to be well provided with necessary services given its current use. Furthermore as the site is
30
25 February 2013
SEA /site assessment topic Assets
(++/+/0/-/--)
water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
located on the fringe of Alloa town, it is likely to have access to necessary services. The size of the site would facilitate orientation of new buildings to maximise the benefits of passive solar gain. No - As it is an urban site it is unsuitable for mineral extraction There are no designated hazard areas within or near the site. Within the site, the sports pavilion is designated as a Category B listed building. There are also two other Category B listed buildings within 200m of the site. There is one feature of archaeological interest within 10m of the site, the Fairy Burn. Furthermore, the site is located within 350m of the Old Alloa Conservation Area. + 0
Cultural Heritage
Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value?
--
Development of the site would need to be sensitive to the setting of listed buildings, features of archaeological interest and the conservation area. Retention of the Sports Pavilion building would safeguard the character of the area. Archaeological investigations may be necessary prior to development to ensure remains are dealt with in accordance with relevant legislation and guidance.
0/-
Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains?
There may be archaeological remains on the site due to the close proximity of the existing archaeological feature.
0/+
Landscape
Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)?
No
Development of the site would have a significant impact on the character of the area. The site is used by the surrounding residential estates as an area of formal (the bowling green) and informal (the area which previously occupied the tennis courts) open space.
--
Development retaining the Sports Pavilion and incorporating large areas of open space could make a contribution to the quality and character of the local area
++
31
25 February 2013
(++/+/0/-/--)
No
32
25 February 2013
Appendix 1 Photographs from site visit
33
25 February 2013
Land at Fishcross/ Devonside

View through the site View of adjacent core path
View from the site
34
25 February 2013
Land at Ditch Farm

View of access track View of adjacent pylon
View from west of site
View from east of site
35
25 February 2013
View of existing dwelling house
View of agricultural buildings
36
25 February 2013
Land to the south of Sunnyside Court

View through the site to the west View of southern boundary
View through the site to the east
View of the bridge and local path
37
25 February 2013
View to the north
View of the local path network
38
25 February 2013
Patons Bowling Club

View of the bowling green View of the car park and informal open space area
View of the adjacent development (at the n/w of the site)
View from the north of the site
39
25 February 2013
View of the Sports Pavilion and club house
40
25 February 2013

Final Report Prepared by LUC June 2013
Project Title: Clackmannanshire Council Local Development Plan Site Assessment Client: Clackmannanshire Council
Version
Date
Version Details
Prepared by
Checked by
Approved by Principal
V0.1
13/06/13
Draft report
Melissa Mc Ginley Melissa Mc Ginley Melissa Mc Ginley
Steven Orr
V1
18/06/13
Final report
Steven Orr
Nick James
V2
20/06/13
Final report with revisions
Steven Orr
Nick James
H:\1 Projects\44\4429.0x Clacks PLDP sites\Reports\4429_07_ClacksLDP_site_assessment_v2_20130620.docx

Final Report Prepared by LUC June 2013
LUC EDINBURGH 28 Stafford Street Edinburgh EH3 7BD Tel: 0131 202 1616 edinburgh@landuse.co.uk
Offices also in: London Bristol Glasgow

FS 566056 EMS 566057
Contents
1 1 1 2 3 3 4 5 7 15 15
Appendix 1 Photographs from site visit to Midtown Farm
Tables Table 2.1 Summary of assessment results Table 3.1 Assessment table - Land at Midtown Farm 4 8
Figures Figure 2.1 Key to colour shading Figure 2.2 Midtown Farm location and constraints 3 5
Introduction
Study context
1.1 LUC was commissioned by Clackmannanshire Council to undertake this study to assess the development potential, and likely environmental constraints, of one additional site for inclusion in the proposed Clackmannanshire Local Development Plan (LDP). This study builds on previous work undertaken by LUC1 and draws on the same method and approach.
Aims and objectives

1.1 The aims and objectives of the study are defined as follows: to provide a comprehensive and detailed report supported by plans, drawings, data and photographs as appropriate to explain any potential for development and all constraints to development for the site listed. The report will be based on criteria set out in the study brief and consistent with the methodology used for the previous assessments; and to assess whether the site is suitable for development in terms of a balanced view in relation to location and accessibility by sustainable modes of travel.
1.2
This assessment will also provide part of the evidence base in the initial discounting of any land to be considered for allocation, or otherwise, in the Local Development Plan and should be consistent with, and comparable to, the previous study undertaken for the Local Plan 1st Alteration and its SEA. The detailed objectives are defined as follows: to determine the nature of the site and identify all known site constraints, including land ownerships [where information is available from the council], existing land uses, ecology, landscape, built heritage and townscape, flooding and water management, access requirements, open spaces, and land & soil considerations; to capture assessment on the relevant sustainability issues as they relate to the criteria given in the Environmental Assessment (Scotland) Act Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Tool Kit, particularly pages 12-15 for the site. Notably in this instance we are considering biodiversity, flora, and fauna particularly for protected species and priority species; population and human health; soil; water and the Water Framework Directive; air quality as appropriate; climatic factors including for adaptations and mitigation and where relevant sea level issues; material assets; cultural heritage; and landscape considerations; to measure and identify the accessibility of the site by road, rail and for walking, including any relationship to the local Core Path Network and rights of way, cycling, public transport, and horse riding provision. All in general accord with the Local Transport Strategy, and to indicate any potential and likely preferences for access to the site assuming if it were to be developed; and, to identify whether the site is appropriate for development in terms of this brief.
1.3
1.4
As indicated in the brief, we have replicated the methodology used in previous phases of site appraisal work. In addition to ensuring consistency, this also facilitates direct comparison with this site and enables judgements to be made on their relative merits. The site assessed in this document is:
1.5
1
Previous work was undertaken at the Main Issues Report stage in 2010, for additional site assessments in 2012 and early 2013, and for the Local Plan 1st alteration in 2008. Clackmannanshire Council Local Development Plan 1 21 June 2013
Land at Midtown Farm, Blackgrange Road, Cambus.
Methodology
1.6 For a detailed account of the methodology employed in assessing the site, readers should consult the Main Issues Report site assessment document and appendices prepared by LUC (October 2010).
21 June 2013
Assessment results
Introduction
1.1 This section of the report sets out the results of the assessment process. The assessment results have been grouped according to the number of positive and negative impacts identified to allow identification of the sites which have the least negative effect in relation to the assessment criteria. This approach facilitates direct comparison with the sites previously assessed for the Main Issues Report. Key to colour shading for scores:
A1
A2
A3
A4
B1
B2
B3
B4
C1
C2
C3
C4
D1
D2
D3
D4
Figure 2.1 Key to colour shading Sites with constraints which could potentially override any potential for development are shaded in grey. 2.1 Additional information used in the assessment includes: Where the site sits within the locational framework to allow comparison of sites in similar geographical locations; Identification of any overriding constraints; Identification of major, moderate and minor physical and environmental constraints; A summary of the remaining site area following allowance for the identified constraints.
21 June 2013
Summary results
Table 2.1 Summary of assessment results
Site information
Site ID Farm Location Name and Site area (ha) score Summary
Site constraints
Mitigation
Approximate Major Moderate Minor area remaining Possible mitigation options
Habitats Regulations Appraisal screening / Appropriate Assessment if required; Flooding; Consultation with the HSE if required; Presence of pylons within the site; Land at Midtown 16.08 -2.5 C4 None Adjacent to a major hazard site and within the HSE outer consultation zone; Potential impact on biodiversity. Exclusion zones for pylons; Upgrading access road and junction. Access roads and junction are inadequate for heavy traffic. 13.5 Use of SuDS and permeable surface water treatments; avoidance of flood zone; Planting to conserve and enhance habitat connectivity;
21 June 2013
Discussion
Land at Midtown Farm
Figure 2.2 Midtown Farm location and constraints 2.2 2.3 Assessment of the land at Midtown Farm reveals that it has limited potential for development. Access to the site is gained via the Blackgrange Road off the A907 Alloa Road, with a minor road leading towards the site. Development of the site is likely to cause an increase in traffic along Blackgrange Road and along the presently fragile minor road, particularly at peak times. It is therefore likely that an upgrade of the minor road and junction will be required to accommodate the increased traffic. Sustainable transport connections are limited within the area with the closest bus stop approximately 1km away and Alloa train station 3km from the site. Development of the site should ensure that connections are improved so the site is better connected to the surrounding settlements of Cambus, Tullibody & Alloa. The site is well positioned to take advantage of the adjacent core path network which links it to Tullibody town, other settlements, and the wider core path network. Although there are no water courses within the site, the Upper Forth Estuary is approximately 50m from the southern boundary of the site and according to the SEPA coastal flood risk dataset, the southern and eastern boundaries of the site are identified as areas at risk of flooding. A small section within the site is also identified as an area at risk of marine flooding. Overall approximately 2.7 hectares are within the flood risk zone and may be at risk of flooding from increasingly frequent severe weather, particularly as a result of storm-surge events. A small area of the site, in the north east quadrant, appears to be prone to waterlogging and will need to be carefully managed to reduce the effects of surface water flooding, as the anticipated use of the site will substantially reduce the infiltration and storage capacity of the area. To reduce the risk of flooding, water management measures should be incorporated into the development such as including tree planting within the landscaping of the site and including the use of SuDS and permeable surface treatments.
2.4
21 June 2013
2.5
Development of the site will require Habitats Regulation Appraisal screening owing to the potential impact on qualifying species from the nearby designated Firth of Forth SPA. As the site is currently open agricultural land and in close proximity to the SPA, it is likely to be frequently used by overwintering geese and waders for foraging activity. The site is also adjacent to the Cambus Pools Nature Reserve, managed by the Scottish Wildlife Trust. Effects on key interests would need to be examined in any assessments conducted in supporting a planning application. Development should retain existing field boundary trees and incorporate additional planting along the north-eastern boundary of the site to conserve and enhance habitat connectivity Two electricity pylons are present within the site (one adjacent to the southern boundary, and another located approximately 60m for the northern-eastern edge of the site) with overhead power lines dissecting the site. Development of the site, including construction and operation, would be required to leave a suitable exclusion zone for the pylons and power lines is present to safeguard this area from development. As the site is adjacent to bonded warehouses used for whiskey maturation (classed as a major hazard site), the northern and north-eastern sections of the site are within the HSE outer consultation zone. Development of the site will require consultation with the HSE. There are a number of recorded features of archaeological interest adjacent to the site, suggesting that the area may have some archaeological potential which would need to be appropriately understood in advance of development. Recommendation: Proposals to develop the site should include flood mitigation measures to reduce the risk of flooding. Development of the site should ensure that an exclusion zone for the pylons and power lines is present to safeguard this area from development. Development of the site will require consultation with the HSE. Habitats Regulations Appraisal (HRA) screening should be undertaken prior to development. The archaeological potential of the site should be understood in advance of development ideally in the pre-application stages to improve certainty for the developer and the planning authority. Links to the core path network should be established. Development of the site should ensure that sustainable transport connections are improved so the site is better connected to the surrounding settlements. Upgrading the minor road and junction will be required (although it is likely that this would need to be undertaken to facilitate construction and operation of the site in any case).
2.6
2.7
2.8
21 June 2013
21 June 2013
Table 3.1 Assessment table - Land at Midtown Farm

Land at Midtown Farm, Blackgrange Road, Cambus

16.08 The site is located to the south of Tullibody town, to the west of Cambus village and is adjacent to the Upper Forth Estuary. The site is entirely enclosed by a hedge & fence and consists primarily of good quality agricultural land, with a farmhouse and yard situated at the north of the site. Two electricity pylons are present within the site (one adjacent to the southern boundary, and another located approximately 60m for the northern-eastern edge of the site) with overhead power lines dissecting the site. The site is bounded by poultry houses to the west and agricultural land to the south and east. The northern part of the site is adjacent to bonded warehouses used for whiskey maturation (classed as a major hazard site). On account of the hazardous materials stored within the adjacent site, the land at Midtown is within the HSE outer consultation zone. Owing to its close proximity to the Upper Forth Estuary, the southern and eastern sections of the site are identified as areas at risk of flooding. Although there are no core paths within the site area, the north-eastern boundary of the site is adjacent to a core path which links it to Cambus, Tullibody and the wider core path network. Access to the site is gained via the Blackgrange Road off the A907 Alloa Road, with a minor road leading towards the site. None
Overriding constraints to development Site specific investigations
HRA screening will be required to understand the potential for likely significant effects on the Firth of Forth Special Protection Area. Flood risk assessment will be required. An appropriately-scoped scheme of archaeological investigations should be agreed with the local authority archaeologist.
Constraints to development
Possibility of flooding; presence of two electricity pylons and overhead power lines; adjacent to a major hazard site and within the HSE outer consultation zone; access to the site will require upgrading; potential impact on biodiversity notably the Firth of Forth SPA. Due to the potential for flooding within the site, avoidance of the portion of the site at most risk may be a prudent approach. The anticipated nature of the development is likely to significantly increase runoff, which will require mitigation through the use of SuDS and permeable surface treatment where appropriate. Development of the site, including construction and operation, should also ensure that an exclusion zone for the pylons and overhead power lines is present ensuring that development takes place outwith this area. A new access road and junction would have to be carefully designed and managed to ensure smooth traffic flows and public safety. Adjacent to the Upper Forth Estuary and the Cambus Pools SWT Reserve Option industrial Agricultural land Agricultural land; industrial units
Summary of area remaining following mitigation
Environmental features Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use
21 June 2013
21 June 2013
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) -
Potential effect following mitigation -
Biodiversity, flora and fauna
There are no designated sites within the site. The closest designated site is the Firth of Forth SPA/RAMSAR/SSSI which is located approximately 575m from the site. As the site is located in close proximity to the SPA and is currently arable land it is likely to be used by qualifying species from the SPA for foraging. An area of established trees located adjacent to the north eastern boundary of the site provides some level of habitat connectivity, which should be conserved and enhanced.
Site will require HRA screening at minimum, if taken forward for development
0/-
Avoid development of the existing woodland habitat. Potential to incorporate into landscaping for the site.
0/+
There are no core paths within the site area. However, the core path network runs adjacent to the north-eastern edge of the site which links it to Cambus, Tullibody and the wider core path network. According to the 2012 SIMD, the site lies within an area ranked at 3,198 out of 6,505 (with 1 being the most deprived). It lies adjacent to less deprived, more affluent areas with one area ranked at 5,053 and another at 4,734. Development of the site could have a positive effect by raising the SIMD figures for the area in line with SIMD figures for adjacent areas. The site is surrounded by areas of green space and areas of woodland. Adjacent to the north-eastern boundary is an area identified within the National Forest Inventory. The Alva-Tillicoultry Greenbelt is within 1.2km of the site. The development of the site could have a positive effect on health if links were made with the adjacent core path and wider path network.
0/+
Connectivity could be enhanced by including links from the site to the core path network. Development of the site could be further enhanced by promoting links to core paths and recreational resources.
Development of the site could be further enhanced by promoting links to core paths and recreational resources.
Water
The site is located within the Forth catchment area. According to the SEPA coastal flood risk dataset, the southern and eastern boundaries of the site are identified as areas at risk of flooding from the Upper Forth Estuary. A small section within the site is also
10
Development of the site should avoid those areas identified as at risk of flooding.
0/+
21 June 2013
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--)
identified as an area prone to flooding. Are there water courses within the site or adjacent to the site which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or adjacent to the site which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Soil Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? There are no watercourses within the site. However, the Upper Forth Estuary is approximately 50m from the southern boundary of the site which could be affected by increased levels of pollution from the development of the site. Development of the site, including construction and operation, should ensure that any potential risk of pollution of the Upper Forth Estuary is avoided. Any increases in runoff should be mitigated wherever possible through the use of SuDS and permeable surface treatment. 0/+
There are no watercourses within the site. As the Upper Forth Estuary is adjacent to the site it is possible that it could be affected by increased run-off from the development of the site.
0/+
The site does not include areas of vacant or derelict land. Directly adjacent to the north-eastern boundary of the site is an area identified as prioritised vacant and derelict land owing to its previous use as a landfill site. Furthermore, neighbouring the southern boundary of the site is an area previously used as a pit/quarry. According to the Land Capability for Agriculture dataset, the site is designated as 3.2 and thus is not classed as prime agricultural land. The site is well positioned to take advantage of the adjacent core path network which links it to Tullibody town, other settlements, and the wider core path network. Access to the site is gained via the Blackgrange Road off the A907 Alloa Road, with a minor road leading toward the site. Development of the site should ensure that connections are improved so the site is better connected to the surrounding settlements of Cambus, Tullibody & Alloa. There are no bus stops within the immediate area although there are bus stops along the A907 road approximately 1km from the site. The site is also located approximately 3km from Alloa train station.
0/-
Is the site prime agricultural land?
0/+
Development should ensure that connections are enhanced.
0/+
Development should ensure that connections are improved.
11
21 June 2013
Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel?
No data
Development of the site is likely to cause an increase in traffic along the Blackgrange Road, particularly at peak times. There may also be issues with access into the site as presently the site is accessed off a narrow, minor road. The junction connecting the minor road to the Blackgrange Road could contribute to congestion/risk of collisions at peak times. Although the site is well placed to allow people to take advantage of the adjacent core paths, it is over 1km from the nearest bus stop (located along Alloa Road) and 3km from Alloa train station. According to SEPA coastal flood zone data, sections along the southern and eastern boundaries of the site are identified as at risk of flooding. The site is therefore at additional risk from increasingly frequent severe weather events as a result of climate change.
Upgrading of the minor road and junction will be required to accommodate increased traffic.
0/+
Development should ensure that connections are enhanced.
Landscaping on the site should include riparian planting to mitigate any increase in water. Any increases in water should also be mitigated wherever possible through the use of SuDS and permeable surface treatment. Development of the site, including construction and operation, should ensure that an exclusion zone for the pylons and overhead power lines is present ensuring that development takes place outwith this area.
0/+
Material Assets
As the site is located on the fringe of Cambus village and Tullibody town, it is likely to have access to necessary services. Two electricity pylons are present within the site (one adjacent to the southern boundary, and another located approximately 60m for the northern-eastern edge of the site) with overhead power lines dissecting the site.
0/+
Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain?
The size of the site would facilitate orientation of new buildings to maximise the benefits of passive solar gain. (However, this is unlikely to be a consideration for the anticipated use of the site)
++
12
21 June 2013
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) 0
Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
No
As the site is adjacent to bonded warehouses used for whiskey maturation (classed as a major hazard site), the northern and north-eastern sections of the site are within the HSE outer consultation zone.
Clackmannanshire Council will be required to consult with the HSE on the development of the site (if taken forward) as it lies within the consultation distance of a major hazard site. Development would need to be sensitive to the setting of the archaeological sites located approximately 15m to the south of the site.
Cultural Heritage
There are no designated features of cultural heritage value within the site. However, there is one Scheduled Monument / Category A listed building (iron bridge over River Devon) within 870m of the site. Located to the south of the site, Haugh Cottage and the Brick & Tiles Works are identified as archaeological sites. Whilst on site, views of Stirling Castle were visible (although the site is 5.1km away from the castle). There may be archaeological remains on the site due to the close proximity of the existing archaeological features.
0/-
0/-
0/-
Archaeological investigations may be necessary prior to development to ensure remains are dealt with in accordance with relevant legislation and guidance.
0/-
Landscape
Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to
No The closest AGLV is 3km from the site.
Development on the site is unlikely to have an effect on the setting and identity of the surrounding areas as the area is presently occupied by large bonded warehouses and poultry houses.
No
13
21 June 2013
landscape features or from key transport routes?
14
21 June 2013
Appendix 1 Photographs from site visit to Midtown Farm
15
21 June 2013
View of Midtown Farm
View of access track & poultry houses west of site
View from western boundary to the east
View of Upper Forth Estuary south-west of site
16
21 June 2013
View from southern boundary to the east
View of site to the north (Midtown Farm & warehouses)
View of site to the north
View of eastern boundary of site
17
21 June 2013
View of north eastern boundary of site
View of site to the south
View of site to the west
View of pylons within site
18
21 June 2013
LDP H11 - ST JOHN'S PRIMARY SCHOOL

0.48 Site of St John's Primary School and associated playground. Lies within a residential area, well served by the local road network with bus routes along Grange Road adjacent to the site. West End Park to the east, on the opposite side of Grange Road. None
Original school building is B Listed.
Local authority Option site, housing Community use Residential; open space
Potential effect following mitigation 0
Does the site impact on designated sites? Biodiversity, flora and fauna
There are no designated areas within the site. The only areas of higher habitat value within 400m of the site are several areas of forest habitat network, and an area of semi-natural ancient woodland. It is unlikely that development of this site will affect their function or integrity. There are core paths through West End Park, adjacent to the site. Alloa and Sauchie include some of the most deprived areas in Clackmannanshire. The site lies within 1km of some of the most deprived areas in Clackmannanshire. Development of the site for housing could have a positive effect on this through regeneration. The site is very well located in relation to existing open space. It is adjacent to West End Park, an area of safeguarded recreational open space. The site is some distance (approximately 450 metres) from areas identified by SEPA as at risk from flooding. The site footprint is currently covered in tarmac redevelopment may result in a net increase in permeable area, potentially reducing runoff.
Is the site connected to the local core path network? Population and human health How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD?
0/+
0/+
0/+
0/+
Water
Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from
No.
No
Soil
development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport?
No No. The site is currently enclosed by a boundary wall, with access from Grange Road and Dirleton Lane. It is well located to make use of the local path network. Yes frequent bus services use Grange Road and there is a bus stop 80 metres from the site on Smithfield Loan. No data
0 0
0 0
0/+
0/+
Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure?
If developed for housing, there is the potential for minor increases in traffic volume, but as the site is relatively small and is situated close to robust local roads this is unlikely to be significant
Not to any significant level No Yes the site is in a residential area and, as there is development in use already on site, connections to the energy, water and sewerage infrastructure already exist although these may not be fit for intended purpose. The site is relatively sheltered and is orientated N-S, therefore new buildings could be orientated to maximise
0 0
0 0
Climatic Factors
Material Assets
0/+
0/+
Is the site located to make best
0/+
0/+
use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
solar gain. No site is in an urban location and therefore unsuitable for minerals development. No The site includes the original school which is a B listed building. Redevelopment provides the opportunity to improve the condition of the building and remove the later extension, enhancing the setting of the listed building. 0 0
0 0 Development of the site will provide an opportunity to enhance the quality of the listed building.
Cultural Heritage
Impacts unlikely.
No If the school extension was demolished, and any new development designed and positioned sympathetically to the prominent listed building, its setting and identity would be enhanced.
0 Retention and sensitive, high quality conversion of school building would conserve and enhance character of the area.
Landscape
No
LDP H13 - CLAREMONT PRIMARY SCHOOL

1.58
Site of Claremont Primary School and associated open space. Located on the western fringe of Alloa, the site is well served by the local road network with bus routes accessible at a nearby junction.
Loss of green/open space.
Periphery of forest habitat network. Local authority Preferred, housing School and associated open space Residential; Recreational Open Space
No
No
A section of the local core path network runs adjacent to the site, along the southern edge. The development of the site would not have effect on this network provided construction did not involve temporary or permanent obstruction. The developed site could be linked to this network. Alloa and Sauchie include some of the most deprived areas in Clackmannanshire. The site lies within two of the least deprived areas in Alloa and Clackmannanshire, ranked at 4310 and 4533 (out of 6,505 1 being the most deprived). It lies adjacent to more deprived areas and within 1km of some of the most deprived areas in Clackmannanshire. Development of the site for housing could have a positive effect on this through regeneration.
Connectivity could be enhanced by including links from the site to the core path network.
The site is adjacent to a large area of safeguarded open space to the south and the core path network. However, development of the site would, in itself, result in the loss of a small area of open space.
0/-
Development of the site could be further enhanced by promoting links to core paths, recreational resources and centres of employment. Compensator y provision of open space should be considered
Is the site at risk of flooding? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where
The site is not at risk of flooding, it is not within or adjacent to an area identified by SEPA as at risk of fluvial or coastal flooding.
Water
No
No
No No The site lies adjacent to the core path network, with routes following the southern boundary. It is also well served by the local path network. Bus routes are accessible at the nearby junction of Gean Road and Claremont.
0 0
0 0
Soil
0/+
0/+
No data.
It is possible that development could result in an increase in traffic volumes, particularly at peak times on smaller local routes.
0/-
Encouraging the use of sustainable and public transport may mitigate an increase in private car use
0/+
levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? It is possible that the proximity of the core path network and relatively easy access thereon to the town centre and rail station could reduce need for private car journeys. No + +
Climatic Factors
The site is likely to have easy access to necessary services The site stands on a small hill which is relatively open to the southwest (although trees provide some screening). The site of a sufficient size and conducive shape to allow properties to be orientated to maximise passive solar gain. Urban edge site unsuitable for minerals development.
0/+
0/+
Material Assets
No
No
Cultural Heritage
The site of the school buildings is likely to be heavily disturbed and of low archaeological potential. The associated open space may have a greater potential for remains although these are likely to have been subjected to considerable groundworks for levelling and drainage. It is therefore likely that development will have no
Appropriate archaeological research and supervision of ground preparation works.
significant impact on archaeological remains. Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes? No Development of the site would fill in the edge profile of the settlement, changing the character of the area particularly when viewed from the golf course and Core Path network. Development on the adjacent site will reduce the impact which there would have been had it remained undeveloped. To the north, the Ochils are a strong visual influence on the site. These views should be preserved wherever possible. 0 Well planned and designed development should limit impacts on surrounding area and preserve any key visual relationships Design of development could readily preserve visual relationships
Landscape
0/-
0/-
0/+
LDP H19 - SAUCHIE NURSERY, MAIN STREET, SAUCHIE

0.26
This site is located within a residential area of New Sauchie adjacent to the A908 with good potential to take advantage of local public transport networks. There are potential issues with land stability relating to the areas history of coal mining.
Geotechnical survey Land stability
Trees and scrub vegetation Local Authority Preferred site: Housing Nursery school Residential; vacant land
10
No The site is potentially a useful habitat resource within the urban area, given the level of tree and vegetation cover. (The presence of priority species could not be confirmed)
0/-
Any development should make provision for retaining woodland boundary features Connectivity could be improved if the proposed development included a link to the core path network. Development of the site could be further enhanced by promoting links to core paths, recreational resources and centres of employment.
The site is not directly connected to the core path network, but there are sections in close proximity. The closest is approximately 70m away. Alloa and Sauchie include some of the most deprived areas in Clackmannanshire. The site lies within one of the more deprived areas (ranked 842 out of 6, 505 1 being the most deprived). The datazone the site is within has been allocated a score of 41.5. Other areas in the town centre to the south are more deprived. Development of the site could have a positive effect on deprivation through regeneration. An area of open space lies across the road from the site to the west. There are other safeguarded recreational sites within 200m (to the south of the site, and a football field to the north east) and an area to Greenbelt to the north west. The site is approximately 120m from a large expanse of open space which is easily accessible via existing transport routes. The site lies outside the areas identified by SEPA as at risk from flooding. The nearest at risk areas are approximately 500 metres to the south of the site. There do not appear to be any watercourses within or
0/+
Water
Are there water courses within the site or which would be
0/-
Geotechnical and hydrological investigations
11
Enhancement and mitigation options should be conducted to identify reasons for the sites damp conditions
affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site?
adjacent to the site. However, site inspection indicated that the area is relatively wet with open ground habitat dominated by rushes on the site adjacent to the north. Although the source of this water is unknown it should be investigated to eliminate the potential for diffuse pollution of groundwater etc / or upwellings from former mine workings. There do not appear to be any watercourses within or adjacent to the site.
Soil
Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport?
No. No. The site is easily accessible via the local path network and is close the services within Alloa. The site is well positioned to make use of public transport services within Alloa. No data
0 0 +
0 0 +
It is unlikely that development here will impact significantly on traffic flows.
12
Climatic Factors
Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
The site is located within Alloa/Sauchie and is within easy reach of local services and transport links. It is not likely that development here would increase the need to travel significantly. The site is not currently at risk of flooding and is unlikely to be at significantly greater risk if changes occur as a result of climate change. The site is well positioned to take advantage of the existing services and infrastructure of Sauchie. A good degree of sunlight is likely to reach the site during daytime hours and it would be well sheltered by the houses around it. Urban location precludes mineral extraction resources are likely to have been worked out in any case, given the areas history of mining.
0/+
0/+
Material Assets
The site does not lie within any hazard areas.
Cultural Heritage
The site does not contain and is not adjacent to areas or features designated for their cultural heritage value.
It is unlikely that development here would impact on archaeological remains.
13
Landscape
No
No
No
14
LDP H20 - SAUCHIE SCOUT HALL, SAUCHIE

0.08
Road access to site
Local Authority Preferred site: Housing Vacant ground Residential
15
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) 0 0
Potential effect following mitigation 0 0
No No
The site is not directly connected to the core path network, but there are sections in close proximity. The closest is approximately 60m away. Alloa and Sauchie include some of the most deprived areas in Clackmannanshire. The site lies within one of the more deprived areas (ranked 842 out of 6, 505 1 being the most deprived). The datazone the site is within has been allocated a score of 41.5. Other areas in the town centre to the south are more deprived. Development of the site could have a positive effect on deprivation through regeneration. An area of open space lies on the opposite side of the A908 to the south. There are other safeguarded recreational sites within 200m (to the south of the site, and a football field to the north east) and an area to Greenbelt to the north west. The site is approximately 120m from a large expanse of open space which is easily accessible via existing transport routes. The site lies outside the areas identified by SEPA as at risk from flooding. The nearest at risk areas are approximately 500 metres to the south of the site.
Connectivity could be improved if the proposed development included a link to the core path network. Development of the site could be further enhanced by promoting links to core paths, recreational resources and centres of employment.
0/+
Water
Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development
There do not appear to be any watercourses within or adjacent to the site.
0/-
Geotechnical and hydrological investigations should be conducted to identify reasons for the
16
Enhancement and mitigation options sites damp conditions
within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Air Quality and Transport Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result There do not appear to be any watercourses within or adjacent to the site. The site is currently vacant following the demolition of the former Scout Hall which stood on the site previously. No. The site is easily accessible via the local path network and is close the services within Sauchie. The site is well positioned to make use of public transport services. No data
Soil
+ 0 +
+ 0 +
It is unlikely that development here will impact significantly on traffic flows. However, there may be issues with parking associated with this small site. The site is located within Sauchie and is within easy reach of local services and transport links. It is not likely that development here would increase the need to travel significantly. The site is not currently at risk of flooding and is unlikely to be at significantly greater risk if changes occur as a result of
Climatic Factors
17
of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
climate change. The site is well positioned to take advantage of the existing services and infrastructure of Sauchie. A good degree of sunlight is likely to reach the site during daytime hours and it would be well sheltered by the houses around it. Urban location precludes mineral extraction. + +
0/+
0/+
Material Assets
Cultural Heritage
The site does not contain and is not adjacent to areas or features designated for their cultural heritage value.
It is unlikely that development here would impact on archaeological remains. No
No
18
No
19
Following consultation on the Main Issues Report, the consultation authorities recommended that site assessments should better consider the water environment, carbon rich soils, the Central Scotland Green Network and geodiversity. To address this, all the sites that had been assessed at the MIR stage, and any assessed subsequently, were assessed by Council officers to consider these impacts using the following additional criteria: Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? The results of this assessment are in the tables below.
MIR 2 ELM GROVE

Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion No No No No Enhancement and mitigation options
MIR 3 CLAREMONT
Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion Yes, adjoins core path No No No Enhancement and mitigation options Boundary treatment to enhance path amenity
MIR 5 FORMER COLLEGE

MIR 6 THE SHORE

MIR 10 ALLOA CO-OP

MIR 11 HEALTH CENTRE

MIR 12 ASHLEY TERRACE

Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion No Enhancement and mitigation options
No No No
MIR 13 CENTRAL PARKLAND

Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion ? No No No Enhancement and mitigation options
MIR 14 MAIN STREET, SAUCHIE

MIR 18 CARSEBRIDGE ROW

MIR 22 ALLOA PARK

MIR 23 KELLIEBANK / BOWHOUSE

MIR 24 FORTHBANK
MIR 25 CARSEBRIDGE ROAD NORTH

Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion ? No No No Enhancement and mitigation options
MIR 26 NORTH CASTLE STREET

MIR 20 FAIRFIELD SCHOOL

MIR 42 SUNNYSIDE ROAD

Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion Adjacent to Devon Way No No No Enhancement and mitigation options Enhance active travel route
MIR 43 CARSEBRIDGE
Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion Adjoins access to Gartmorn Dam Yes. Culverted burn through site No No Enhancement and mitigation options Provide access through site to Gartmorn Dam access De-culvert burn and re-engineer to naturalise design
MIR 45 CHURCH GROVE

MIR 57 NORTH STREET / MAIN STREET

MIR 80 DUMYAT BUSINESS PARK PHASE 2

Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion Active travel routes on northern and eastern boundary Yes No No Enhancement and mitigation options Border landscaping enhance
MIR 81 STATION ROAD (WEST SIDE)

MIR 77 THE ORCHARD, TULLIBODY

MIR 89 ABERCROMBY PLACE

MIR 99 BEAUCLERC STREET

Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion Yes. Access to Alva Glen No No No Enhancement and mitigation options Enhance access to Alva Glen
MIR 100 PARK STREET

MIR 101 BROOK STREET / BACK ROAD

Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion No Yes No No Re-naturalise bankside? Enhancement and mitigation options
MIR 103 FORMER ALVA GLEN HOTEL

MIR 106 GLENTANA

Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion No Yes. Canalised burn on boundary No No Enhancement and mitigation options
MIR 108 ALVA CEMETERY

Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion No Yes No No Wetland creation? Enhancement and mitigation options
MIR 115 DEVONPARK MILLS

MIR 118 COALSNAUGHTON NORTH

Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion Yes. Path route through woodland edge No No No Enhancement and mitigation options Improve path

Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion No Yes. Riverbank subject to past tipping of soils etc No No Enhancement / re-grading of riverside? Enhancement and mitigation options
MIR 126 STERLING MILLS OUTLET VILLAGE

Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion Yes. Greenspace adjacent to active travel routes Yes. Banking subject to erosion No No Enhancement and mitigation options Habitat creation opportunity Will walling and habitat creation. Stabilise banking
MIR 132 COMMUNITY CENTRE SITE

MIR 131 UPPER MILL STREET

Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion Yes. Adjoins core path Yes. Canalised burn boundary No No Enhancement and mitigation options Improve amenity of core path - possible linkage to Upper Mill Street Re-naturalise burn. Possible flood alleviation measures
MIR 138 DOLLAR GOLF CLUB (this site has planning permission, so has not been subject to additional assessment) MIR 141 KELLYBANK
Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion No Yes. Kellyburn on site. Drain on northern boundary No No Drain could be naturalised Enhancement and mitigation options
MIR 145 MUCKHART CEMETERY EXTENSION

Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion Yes. Path through site gives access to Seamab and Geordies Wood Yes. Burn on site Possible on western edge No Enhancement and mitigation options Path route diverted to avoid traversing cemetery Re-naturalise burn and margins Incorporate into landscaping
MIR 97 GLENOCHIL YEAST

Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution, or other pressures, from development within the site? 1 Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Culverted burn on site Yes. Culverted burn No No Map burn route - development to avoid burn Potential to de-culvert Site issues and discussion Enhancement and mitigation options
The phrase "and other pressures" was added to this criterion, and the site assessments were all reviewed in light of this amendment; where the findings were altered, they have been included in these tables.
MIR 151 GARVEL FARM

MIR 153 MANOR POWIS

Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion Yes. Scrubland with pioneer plans. Local biodiversity resource Yes. Watercourse through site No No Enhancement possibility Enhancement and mitigation options
MIR 154 TILLICOULTRY QUARRY

Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion No No No Adjacent to GCR: Mill Glen SSSI Enhancement and mitigation options
MIR 156 FORMER DEVON EQUESTRIAN CENTRE

Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion Yes. Core path through site No No No Enhancement and mitigation options
MIR 50 SAUCHIE WEST / TULLYGARTH

Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion Yes. Core path on site - tree belts on boundaries No No No Enhancement and mitigation options Enhance path route. Tree planting on north to join up woodland areas
MIR 155 SAUCHIE TOWER

Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion Yes. Core path adjacent Yes. Small burn on site No No Enhancement and mitigation options Enhance amenity of path Enhance burnside's biodiversity
MIR 158 BESSIE MINE

Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion Yes. Core paths on site No No No Enhancement and mitigation options Enhance amenity of path routes
MIR 49 ALLOA WEST (ORCHARD FARM)

Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion Yes. Core paths on site and boundaries Yes. Bank erosion? No No Potential to stabilise riverbank / managed retreat Enhancement and mitigation options
MIR 68 TULLYGARTH BRICKWORKS

Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion Adjoins active travel route No No No Enhancement and mitigation options Enhance amenity of active travel route
MIR 47 BRAEHEAD GOLF CLUB

DOLLAR SOUTHERN EXPANSION

Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Site issues and discussion
Adjacent to Core Path

Development should incorporate proposals to enhance the amenity/biodiversity of the Core Path Dollar Burn is a good status and development should include buffer strip to ensure status is maintain and biodiversity enhanced. Development proposals should include proposals to re-naturalise the burn line on site and enhance its biodiversity value with riparian planting
Yes - Canalised section of Kelly Burn along site boundary . Dollar Burn's good status requires to be retained
Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses?
Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites?
No No
GLENOCHIL NURSERY
Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion
Site within the Green Belt/ Green Network with small are of woodland Yes - drainage ditches are canalised No No

Development offers opportunity to manage woodland and extend it to incorporate development into the landscape. Development offers potential to re-design ditches to be more naturalised
LAND AT FISHCROSS / DEVONSIDE

Site adjacent to NCN which is important active travel route and part of the Green Network .
Development of the site should include provision to link to and enhance the 'green' corridor in this locality
No No No
LAND AT DITCH FARM

Site within the green belt and locally defined green network
Development of the site should include provision to enhance local biodiversity such as SUDS and tree planting
No No No
LAND TO THE SOUTH OF SUNNNYSIDE COURT

Situated at southern end of Devon Way , NCN route to Hillfoots . Development of site potential to lose link to Leisure Centre
Development design should retain link through to Leisure Centre and include landscaping to amenity of Devon Way
No No No
PATONS BOWLING CLUB

No
no No No
LAND AT MIDTOWN FARM, BLACKGRANGE ROAD, CAMBUS

Site appraisal criteria Site issues and discussion
Site is within the green network defined in the LDP as well as adjacent to a Core Path and Cambus Pools
Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network?
Development of the site should include proposals to increase the amenity and biodiversity of the locality within the flood risk area
Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites?
No No No
ST JOHN'S PRIMARY SCHOOL, ALLOA

Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion Yes, in very close proximity to core path.
No No No
CLAREMONT PRIMARY SCHOOL ALLOA

Site appraisal criteria Does the site impact on the connectivity of the Central Scotland Green Network? Are there opportunities to improve the status of water courses? Does the site include carbon rich soil? Does the site include any geological conservation review (GCR) sites? Site issues and discussion Yes, in very close proximity to core path.
No No No
SAUCHIE NURSERY, SAUCHIE

No
No No No
FORMER SCOUT HALL, HOLTON SQUARE, SAUCHIE

No
No No No

October2013
Appendix10:ListofsitesintheProposed LocalDevelopmentPlan

ThefollowingtableliststhesitesthathavebeenallocatedfordevelopmentintheProposed LocalDevelopmentPlanandprovidesalinktothesiteassessmentforeachsite. Area Housing Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa H01 H02 H03 H04 H05 H06 H07 H08 H09 H10 H11 H12 H13 Sunnyside,Alloa AshleyTerrace,Alloa CarsebridgeRoadNorth,Alloa Carsebridge,Alloa SouthEarlsfield2,Alloa AlloaParkPhase4,Alloa Earlsfield1,Alloa EarlsfieldWest,Alloa ElmGrove2,Alloa CentralParkland,Alloa StJohn'sPrimarySchool,Alloa Claremont,Alloa ClaremontPrimarySchool,Alloa Paton'sBowlingClub,Tullibody Road FormerFVCollege,Sauchie SauchieWest,Sauchie FairfieldSchool,Sauchie MainStreet,Sauchie SauchieNursery,Sauchie FormerScoutHall,Holton Square,Sauchie Todd'sYard,Sauchie PrestonTerrace,Sauchie Oct2010 Oct2010 Oct2010 MIR42 MIR12 MIR25 Settlement Ref. Proposal Date assessed Reference 1
Oct2010 MIR43 Notassessed:under construction Notassessed:under construction Dec2008 LP3 Dec2008 Oct2010 Oct2010 July2013 Oct2010 July2013 LP2 MIR2 MIR13 StJohn's Primary School MIR3 Claremont Primary School Patons Bowling Club MIR5 LP32 MIR20
Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth
Alloa Sauchie Sauchie Sauchie Sauchie Sauchie Sauchie Sauchie Sauchie
H14 H15 H16 H17 H18 H19 H20 H21 H22
Feb2013 Oct2010 Dec2008 Oct2010 Oct2010
MIR14 Sauchie July2013 Nursery Sauchie July2013 ScoutHall Notassessed:under construction Notassessed:under construction
Siteswithareferencebeginning"LP"wereassessedfortheLocalplanAlteration;siteswitha referencebeginning"MIR"wereassessedfortheLocalDevelopmentPlanMainIssuesReport.These siteassessmentscanbefoundinAnnex1.AllothersiteassessmentscanbefoundinAppendix9.
Area Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth
Settlement Sauchie Tullibody Tullibody Tullibody Clackmannan Clackmannan DevonVillage DevonVillage ForthRural ForthRural
Ref. H23 H24 H25 H26 H27 H28 H29 H30 H31 H32 H33 H34 H35 H36 H37 H38 H39 H40 H41 H42 H43 H44 H45
Proposal TheManse,MainStreet,Sauchie TullibodyBypass,Tullibody BaingleBrae,Tullibody Muirside,LethenView,Tullibody MainStreet/NorthStreet, Clackmannan Helensfield,Clackmannan Blackfaulds,DevonVillage BlackfauldsSteading,Devon Village LornshillSteading,Alloa DitchFarm,Tullibody Middletonkerse,Menstrie OchilRoad,Menstrie MainsFarmSteading,Menstrie BrookStreet/BeauclercStreet, Alva BrookStreet/BackRoad,Alva Berryfield,Alva FormerAlvaGlenHotel,Alva QueenStreet,Alva AlvaWest,Alva LowerMillStreet,Tillicoultry MiddletonMill/UpperMill Street,Tillicoultry CoalsnaughtonNorth, Coalsnaughton CoalsnaughtonNorth(TheGlen), Coalsnaughton
Date Reference 1 assessed Notassessed:has planningpermission Notassessed:under construction Notassessed:has planningpermission Notassessed:has planningpermission Oct2010 MIR57
WestOchils Menstrie WestOchils Menstrie WestOchils Menstrie WestOchils Alva WestOchils Alva WestOchils Alva WestOchils Alva WestOchils Alva WestOchils Alva Tillicoultry& WestOchils Coalsnaughton Tillicoultry& WestOchils Coalsnaughton Tillicoultry& WestOchils Coalsnaughton Tillicoultry& WestOchils Coalsnaughton
Dec2008 LP12 Notassessed:under construction Notassessed:has planningpermission Dec2008 LP36 LandAt Feb2013 DitchFarm Dec2008 LP27 Notassessed:has planningpermission Notassessed: conversionofan existingbuilding Oct2010 MIR99
Oct2010 MIR101 Notassessed:has planningpermission Oct2010 MIR103 Oct2010 MIR100 Dec2008 LP8b Notassessed:has planningpermission Oct2010 Oct2010 MIR131 MIR118
EastOchils
Dollar
H46
DollarVillageExpansion
Notassessed:under construction LP19,LP Dec 23a,LP23b, 2008,Oct MIR141, Dollar 2010, Nov2012 Southern Expansion 4
Area EastOchils EastOchils EastOchils
Settlement Dollar Muckhart
Ref. H47 H48 H49 H50
Proposal DollarGolfClub,Dollar SouthandEastofPoolof Muckhart Forestmill Solsgirth
Date assessed Oct2010 Dec2008 Dec2008
Reference 1 MIR138 LP31 LP24A
EastOchils Rural EastOchils EastOchils Rural MixedUseSites Forth Forth Forth Forth Alloa Alloa Alloa Tullibody
Notassessed:has planningpermission Oct2010 MIR10
M01 M02 M03 M04
AlloaCoopSite,Alloa TheShore,Alloa Greenfield,Alloa AlloaRoad,Tullibody ParkStreet,Alva FormerTillicoultryCommunity Centre,Tillicoultry Forthbank AlloaWestBusinessPark CarsebridgeSouth NorthCastleStreet TheOval,Alloa HiltonRoad/ClackmannanRoad, Alloa ClackmannanRoadRetailPark DumyatBusinessPark(Phase1) StationRoad,Cambus DevonVillage Kilbagie GarvelFarm,Blackgrange Midtown Kennetpans Meadowend GlenochilYeast
WestOchils Alva M05 Tillicoultry& WestOchils M06 Coalsnaughton BusinessandEmployment Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Tullibody Tullibody DevonVillage ForthRural ForthRural ForthRural ForthRural ForthRural B01 B02 B03 B04 B05 B06 B07 B08 B09 B10 B11 B12 B13 B14 B15 B16
Oct2010 MIR6 Notassessed:identified asanopportunityonly Notassessed:has planningpermission Oct2010 MIR100 Oct2010 MIR132
Oct2010 MIR24 Dec 2008,Oct LP6,MIR49 2010 Dec2008 LP4 Oct2010 MIR26 Notassessed:partof existingbusinesssite Notassessed:has planningpermission Oct2010 MIR22 Notassessed:partof existingbusinesspark Oct2010 MIR81 LandAt Feb2013 Fishcrosss/ Devonside Notassessed:has planningpermission Oct2010 MIR151 LandAt June Midtown 2013 Farm Dec2008 LP11 Dec2008 Oct2010 LP13 MIR97 5
WestOchils Menstrie
Area
Settlement
Ref. B17 B18 B19 B20 B21 B22 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 S06 S07 S08
Proposal Glentana FormerGlenochilNursery DevonRoad DollarExpansionEmployment BridgeBusinessPark Solsgirth Redwellnewprimaryschool Carsebridgesafeguardingof landfornewschool SunnysidePrimarySchool PineGroveAlloa SauchieWestnewprimary school TullibodyCivicCentre AlvaCemeteryExtension WoodlandBurialSite
WestOchils Alva WestOchils WestOchils Rural EastOchils EastOchils EastOchils Dollar Dollar
EastOchils Rural EastOchils EastOchils Rural Socialinfrastructure Forth Alloa Forth Forth Forth Forth Forth Alloa Alloa Alloa Sauchie Tullibody
MIR106 Glenochil Nov2012 Nursery Notassessed:has planningpermission AssessedaspartofH46 DollarVillageExpansion Notassessed:has planningpermission Notassessed:has planningpermission Dec2008 LP37 Notassessed:identified asanopportunityonly Notassessed:identified asanopportunityonly Notassessed:identified asanopportunityonly AssessedaspartofH16 SauchieWest Notassessed:identified asanopportunityonly Oct2010 MIR108 Notassessed:has planningpermission Notassessed: safeguardinglandfor recreationratherthan development AssessedaspartofH46 DollarVillageExpansion Notassessed:has planningpermission Notassessed:has planningpermission AssessedaspartofH46 DollarVillageExpansion AssessedaspartofH46 DollarVillageExpansion LP24a& Dec2008 24b Dec2008 LP24b
Date assessed Oct2010
Reference 1
WestOchils Alva WestOchils Alva
WestOchils
Tillicoultry& S09 Coalsnaughton Dollar Dollar Dollar Dollar Dollar EastOchils Rural EastOchils Rural S10 S11 S12 S13 S14 S15 S16
PlayingFieldsExtension
EastOchils EastOchils EastOchils EastOchils EastOchils EastOchils EastOchils
StrathdevonPrimarySchool Lover'sLoanplayingfield NewClubhouse DollarVillageExpansion CommunitySportsFacility NewDollarCemetery Forestmillnewprimaryschool Forestmillgolfcourseandhotel

October2013
Annex1:LocalPlanAlterationandLocal DevelopmentPlanMainIssuesReport SiteAppraisals

ThisAnnexcontainsthesiteassessmentsfromtheLocalPlanAlterationandtheLocal DevelopmentPlanMainIssuesReport:bothofthesehavebeenusedtoinformtheProposed LocalDevelopmentPlan.
CLACKMANNANSHIRE LOCAL PLAN SITE APPRAISAL Draft Report
Prepared for Clackmannanshire Council by Land Use Consultants
December 2008
37 Otago Street Glasgow G12 8JJ Tel: 0141 334 9595 Fax: 0141 334 7789 glasgow@landuse.co.uk
CONTENTS
1. Introduction ......................................................................................... 1
Study context...............................................................................................................................................1 Project aims and objectives ......................................................................................................................1 Report Structure.........................................................................................................................................5
2. Method.................................................................................................. 7
Review of Plans, Policies and Strategies.................................................................................................9 Baseline Data Collection ...........................................................................................................................9 Baseline Scenario for Each Site ..............................................................................................................13 Site Assessment.........................................................................................................................................13 Consultation...............................................................................................................................................14 Field survey.................................................................................................................................................14 Collation of assessment results .............................................................................................................14 Weighting....................................................................................................................................................15 Planning and Policy Considerations.......................................................................................................15 Eastern Growth Area...............................................................................................................................16
3. Summary Assessment results .......................................................... 17

Introduction................................................................................................................................................17
4. Planning and policy considerations and selection of preferred Option................................................................................................. 23

Introduction................................................................................................................................................23
5. Conclusions ........................................................................................ 27
TABLES
Table 2.1 Data sources..9 Table 2.2 SEA and site assessment criteria...11 Table 2.3 Assumptions of Site Development Impacts...13 Table 3.1 Results of Environmental Appraisal and key constraints........19 Table 4.1: Planning and policy considerations..23 Table 5.1 Summary of Site Constraints and development potential.27
FIGURES
Figure 1.1 Site location map Menstrie, Alva, Alloa and Cambus Figure 1.2 Site location map Clackmannan, Kennetpans and eastern expansion area Figure 1.3 Site location map Tillicoultry, Coalsnaughton, Dollar and Pool of Muckhart
APPENDICES (SEPARATE DOCUMENT)

Appendix 1 List of the documents included in the policy review Appendix 2 General development policies which apply to all development sites Appendix 3 Site assessment matrices Appendix 4 Criteria to which the weighting was applied
1.
1.1.
INTRODUCTION
Study context
Land Use Consultants was commissioned by Clackmannanshire Council to undertake the Local Plan Site Appraisal to assess the development potential of 41 sites within Clackmannanshire to inform the identification of a preferred option to take forward as part of the Local Plan Housing Alteration, to accommodate the strategy for growth set out in the Stirling and Clackmannanshire Structure Plan 3rd Alteration, 2008. The Stirling and Clackmannanshire Structure Plan 3rd Alteration 2008 sets out the locational strategy for accommodating the new housing land requirement for approximately 2250 housing units throughout the Clackmannanshire area to 2025. The locational strategy secures the availability of land for housing throughout the Clackmannanshire area to 2025. The strategy for the following areas is outlined below: Within the Hillfoots corridor: Potential for a modest amount of remaining land to be brought forward as part of phased development areas and through urban capacity sites. Tullibody-Alloa corridor. Principally phased development sites and urban capacity study sites. Dollar, Muckhart: No development outwith currently established settlement boundaries due to strategic constraints, unless exceptionally in Dollar to enable community development where there is an identified need and development is limited to the minimum required, or it is in accordance with rural policies. East Clackmannanshire: Area of search for major growth circa 1200 houses.
1.2.
1.3.
1.4.
Project aims and objectives

Within the above policy framework, the purpose of the project is: 1.5. To carry out a comprehensive review of constraints to development for the 41 identified sites; To assess whether the sites are suitable for development in terms of location and accessibility by sustainable modes of travel; To complete SEA in accord with the Environmental Assessment (Scotland) Act 2005 To inform the Local Plan alteration, which will identify changes to housing land.
The objectives of the study are as follows: To determine the nature of each site and identify all known sites constraints including relevant sustainability issues of biodiversity, flora, fauna (particularly for
protected species, and priority species); population and human health; access and sustainable transport, soil, water, air quality, climatic factors (including for adaptations and mitigation), material assets; cultural heritage, and landscape considerations, and to indicate any potential and likely preferences for access to the site assuming it were to be developed. To identify those sites most and least appropriate for development in terms of the above criteria, and providing a balanced synthesis and justification for development within the timeframe of the current structure plan. In particular this will identify the issues related to costs and benefits of development of each site. In addition to identify sites which may be appropriate for development beyond the current Structure Plan period to 2030.
1.6.
The SEA process also includes a number of brownfield sites which form part of the local plan alteration. These sites were not included as individual sites within in the local plan site appraisal as their impacts are assessed on a settlement by settlement basis as part of the cumulative assessment process. The following sites are included in the local plan site appraisal assessment:
Reference 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8a 8b 8c 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Site name Lornshill Farm West Earlsfield South Earlsfield Alloa East (1) Alloa East (2) Alloa West expansion area Jellyholm, Sauchie Land south of Brook Street Alva west Land east of B908 Birkhill Ladywood Kennetpans Helensfield Meadowend Farm Kilbagie (north) Clackmannan (east) Clackmannan (south) Location Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa (north east) Alva Alva Alva Castlebridge Clackmannan Clackmannan Clackmannan Clackmannan Clackmannan Clackmannan Clackmannan Locational Framework Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Hillfoots corridor Hillfoots corridor Hillfoots corridor East Clackmannanshire area of search Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Core Area Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages/Tullibody Alloa Clackmannan Corridor
1.7.
Hillfoots Corridor Hillfoots Corridor Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages East Clackmannanshire area of search 24a Forestmill Forestmill East Clackmannanshire area of search 24b Forestmill Forestmill Gartknowie, former East Clackmannanshire area opencast site of search 25* Forestmill East Clackmannanshire area of search 26 Aitkenhead Forestmill (North) Hillfoots corridor 27 Middletonkerse Menstrie Hillfoots corridor 28 Menstrie East Menstrie Rural Villages 29 Land at Devonpark Muckhart Rural Villages 30 North side of A91 Pool of Muckhart Rural Villages 31 West of A823 Pool of Muckhart Alloa North West, Tullibody AlloaBranshill Clackmannan corridor 32 Sauchie Hillfoots corridor 33 Oak Mills Tillicoultry Hillfoots corridor 34 Land south of Dollar Road Tillicoultry Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor 35 Cambus East Tullibody Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor 36 Lornshill farm steading Alloa Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor 37 Redwell, Stirling road Alloa *Site 25 is considered in association with site 24a in order to identify the benefits associated with the restoration of the former open cast site. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23a 23b Land south of James Place Devonside East Lover's Loan Dollarfield farm Dollarfield Upper Hillfoot Road Dollar (South) Dollar (South) Coalsnaughton Coalsnuaghton Dollar Dollar Dollar Dollar Dollar Dollar
1.8.
Figures 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 illustrate the location of the sites included in the assessment process.
Report Structure
1.9. The remainder of the report is set out as follows: Section 2: Methodology Section 3: Summary of assessment results Section 4: Planning and policy considerations.
2.
2.1.
METHOD
This section of the report describes the method and approach to the main study stages. The stages are set out in the diagram overleaf and described in more detail in the following paragraphs.
Figure 1: Overview of project stages, illustrating compatibility between SEA and site appraisal tasks Site appraisal SEA
Project Plan
Policy review
Scoping
Review of relevant plans, programmes and strategies Baseline data collection Collation of baseline data
Establishment of site appraisal criteria
Establishment of environmental assessment methods
Identification of site scenarios
Preparation of Scoping Report and submission to the SEA Gateway
Detailed baseline assessment in relation to each site and completion of detailed site matrix Consultation with key stakeholders
Assessment of individual sites
Field survey Clackmannanshire Council select sites for inclusion in local plan alteration
Draft Site Appraisal Report
Assessment of site combinations
Final Draft Site Appraisal Report

8
Draft Environmental Report and submission to SEA Gateway
Review of Plans, Policies and Strategies

2.2. Plans, policies and strategies were reviewed as part of the SEA process to inform the selection of detailed SEA sub criteria and site selection criteria. A list of the documents included in the review is set out in Appendix 1. A detailed planning policy review was also undertaken to provide the detailed policy context for each site, and this information is included in the site assessment matrices. In addition general development policies which apply to all development sites are set out in Appendix 2. These provide the policy context for each site.
Baseline Data Collection

2.3. Baseline environmental data was collected as part of the SEA process and the site assessment. Data sources used in the assessment are listed in Table 2.1 below. Table 2.1 Data sources
Topic Biodiversity, flora and fauna Population and human health Data National and local designations Phase 1 habitat survey data Population change and migration Socio economic issues Health trends Recreation area/open space resources Core paths Town centres Water Local flood data Water and waste infrastructure capacity SEPA flood map Soil Air Quality and Transport Derelict and contaminated land Air quality monitoring data Data format Shapefile
Shapefile Reports/statistics
SIMD and ROA areas Reports/statistics Electronic sourced from Open Space Audit Shapefile Shapefile Clackmannanshire Council Biennial Flood Report (2007) Information from Scottish Water Shapefile Shapefile Clackmannanshire Council LAQM Progress Report 2008 Shapefile Clackmannanshire council also collect traffic data at 16 permanent monitoring sites Electronic
Road network Road traffic data
Climate
UKCIP 02 climate change
Topic
Data scenarios and SNIFFER (2006) A Handbook of Climate Trends Across Scotland
Data format
Material Assets Cultural heritage
Mineral resources Gas pipeline hazard zones Historic Gardens and Designed Landscapes Scheduled Ancient Monuments Listed buildings Conservation areas Historic Landuse Assessment
Shapefile Shapefile Shapefile Shapefile Shapefile Shapefile Shapefile Shapefile Shapefile Raster data Raster data Raster data Shapefile Electronic/paper copies
Landscape
Local landscape designations Clackmannanshire Landscape Character Assessment
Generic data sources
Aerial photography 1:10 000 map base 1:25, 000 map base Local plan development sites Information which has been previously submitted in relation to any of the sites for previous development enquiries. Copy of Clackmannanshire Local Plan Environmental Appraisal of Potential Development Sites 2000
Hard copy
2.4.
The SEA and site assessment criteria were informed by the project brief, the policy review and the requirements of SEA. Comments from the consultation authorities on the SEA Scoping Report informed the refinement of the SEA and site assessment criteria. The SEA and site assessment criteria are set out in Table 2.2 below:
2.5.
10
Table 2.2 SEA and site assessment criteria

Biodiversity, flora and fauna Does the site impact on designated sites? Does the site impact on priority habitats or species? Does the development of the site avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site? Does the development of the site maintain and enhance populations of European Protected Species including protection of their resting places? Does the site facilitate the restoration and enhancement of biodiversity in all our urban and rural environments through better planning, design and practice? Population and human health Is the site connected to the local core path network? How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD? What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? Water Is the site at risk of flooding? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Soil Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Air Quality and Transport Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter, solar gain and reduce the need to travel? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction?
Material Assets
11
Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
Does the site reduce waste generation and promote waste recovery, recycling and composting? Cultural Heritage Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Landscape Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
12
2.6.
In relation to each of the site appraisal criteria, each site is assessed as having a strongly positive effect (++) positive effect (+) a neutral effect (0), a negative effect (-), or a strongly negative effect (--). Options for mitigation and enhancement are outlined in the assessment table and the overall outcome following the application of mitigation and enhancement options is identified.
Baseline Scenario for Each Site

2.7. Baseline scenarios were generated on which to base the SEA and site appraisal. This provides the basis on which to carry out the individual site assessments taking the site specific issues into account, but ensuring a consistent approach to the potential impacts of a site coming forward for development. Table 2.3 Assumptions of Site Development Impacts
Assumption Housing density of 20 houses/ha Potential associated impact Loss and severance of habitats Increased recreational pressure Increased disturbance to wildlife, pressures from domestic pets Introduction of built features into the landscape impact on local landscape character and setting. Impacts on water and drainage including increase run off, diffuse pollution Soil sealing Increased requirement for waste disposal An increase in traffic volume (related to number of households per site) Increased congestion Increased air pollution Reduction in perceived safety for pedestrians, cyclists and recreational users Negative impacts on human health and quality of life
SITE ASSESSMENT
2.8. The baseline data forms the basis for the site assessment and the SEA. Following the establishment and review of the baseline data, the key environmental problems within Clackmannanshire were identified and set out in the Scoping Report. The data relevant to each site is set out in the assessment matrices in Appendix 3, and individual site maps illustrating the site features and constraints are associated with each assessment matrix. In addition to the site assessment criteria, additional background information on each site is summarised in the assessment matrix. This includes:
2.9.
13
Site reference and location Size (ha) Summary description including site access and public transport connections Overriding constraints to development Site specific investigations Constraints to development Summary of area remaining following mitigation Environmental features Site ownership Site type Current land use Surrounding land use Planning policy framework Planning History
Consultation
2.10. In order to supplement the desk based information and results of the field survey targeted consultation with key stakeholders was carried out to gather additional information on key sensitivities and issues associated with each site. This included discussions with Clackmannanshire biodiversity, transport and sustainability officers, written consultation with SEPA, SNH and Historic Scotland. Information gathered through the consultation was fed into the assessment process through the individual site matrices.
2.11.
Field survey
2.12. The field survey involved site visits and walk over to identify site features and supplement the desk based review. Additional information gathered from the field survey is incorporated within the assessment matrix for each site.
COLLATION OF ASSESSMENT RESULTS

2.13. The site assessment results are a combination of positive and negative scores. Some sites performed positively and others had a greater number of negative impacts. Using a total scoring process would have masked the variations between positive and negative scores. In order to illustrate the balance between positive and negative scores the following approach was adopted.
14
2.14.
The results of the evaluation scores for each of the sites is grouped by the number of positive and the number of negative scores. The positive and negative scores were converted to numbers based on their face value whereby ++ or -- = 2, + or - =1 and 0/+ or 0/- =0.5. These scores were then summed to provide an overall score reflecting the number of positive effects of the site and an overall score reflecting the number of negative effects of the site. These scores were then grouped into four categories from high to low, based on the quartiles of the scores. The sites were then assigned a category based on the relative proportion of positive scores to negative scores, as illustrated below.
Higher number of positive scores A1 B1 C1 D1 Lower number of positive scores A4 B4 C4 D4
Lower number of negative scores Higher number of negative scores
A2 B2 C2 D2
A3 B3 C3 D3
2.15.
The results of this grouping facilitates a comparison between the sites in terms of their overall effect. This information is set out in Table 3.1 in Section 3 of this report.
Weighting
2.16. Weighting (x2) was also applied to the scores to identify how different sites perform under the following three different themes: 2.17. Environment Community Accessibility
This allows the exploration of the relative merit of different sites under these three alternative scenarios. The criteria to which the weighting was applied under each of the headings is listed in Appendix 4.
PLANNING AND POLICY CONSIDERATIONS

2.18. Following the environmental assessment, process a number of additional planning and policy considerations informed the selection of the sites. These included infrastructure requirements and enabling development. In addition the eastern expansion area is required to fulfil a number of additional criteria explained in the following paragraphs.
15
Eastern Growth Area

2.19. The Clackmannanshire Structure Plan (3rd Alteration) 2008 and the Clackmannanshire Local Plan set out the requirement for a new eastern growth area within Clackmannanshire. The principles which will guide the selection of the eastern growth area site as defined in the Clackmannanshire Structure Plan (3rd Alteration) 2008 are set out below: 2.20. Avoids greenbelt and sensitive landscape area around the Hillfoots Corridor/Ochils Prevents coalescence of settlements Utilises potential access/transport improvements from Upper Forth Crossing. Assists regeneration of the Clackmannanshire area to redress declining population.
Criteria identified from paragraph 3.9 of the Clackmannanshire Local Plan require a development site which is of sufficient scale to: Deliver a mixed use village Deliver employment opportunities Deliver leisure development, recreational access and sports use
2.21.
In addition Clackmannanshire Council identified the requirement for the site to support the restoration of the Meadowhill open cast coal site, close to the area of search. Sites 9, 24a, 24b, and 26 lie within the eastern expansion area of search.
16
3.
SUMMARY ASSESSMENT RESULTS

INTRODUCTION
3.1.
This chapter of the report sets out a summary table illustrating the results of the environmental assessment process (Table 3.1). The assessment results have been grouped according to the number of positive and number of negative impacts identified to allow identification of the sites which have the least negative effect in relation to the assessment criteria. Weighting (x2) was also applied to selected criteria under the themes of environment, community and accessibility. This allows illustration of the sites which have the greatest positive and least negative impact under each of these themes. Table 3.1 also includes information on key constraints to development associated with the sites. Key to colour shading for scores:
Higher number of positive scores A1 B1 C1 D1 Lower number of positive scores A4 B4 C4 D4
Lower number of negative scores Higher number of negative scores
A2 B2 C2 D2
A3 B3 C3 D3
3.2.
Table 3.1 summarises the results of the environmental appraisal and also collates key information on the sites. This includes: Where the site sits within the locational framework to allow comparison of sites in similar geographical locations; Identification of any overriding constraints; Identification of major, moderate and minor physical and environmental constraints; A summary of the remaining site area following allowance for the identified constraints; A summary of mitigation options for the significant negative impacts identified;
3.3. 3.4.
The sites are grouped according to the locational strategy so that sites can be compared within this framework. Table 4.1 in Section 4 of this report sets out: Planning and policy constraints which apply to each of the sites;
17
Additional criteria applied to the eastern growth area sites; Sites selected for the local plan alteration, and; Sites with future development potential beyond the current policy framework.
18
Table 3.1 Results of Environmental Appraisal and key constraints

Site constraints Site ID 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8a 8b 8c 9 10 11 12 13 14 Name and Location Lornshill Farm West Earlsfield South Earlsfield Alloa East (1) Alloa East (2) Alloa West expansion area Jellyholm, Sauchie Alva west Land east of B908 Land south of Brook Street Birkhill Ladywood Kennetpans Helensfield Meadowend Farm Kilbagie (north) Locational Framework Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor (Menstrie-Alva-Tillicoultry) Hillfoots corridor (Menstrie-Alva-Tillicoultry) Hillfoots corridor (Menstrie-Alva-Tillicoultry) Hillfoots corridor East Clackmannanshire area of search Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Core Area Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Rural Villages Rural Villages Site area (ha) 9.62 1.02 3.86 7.93 6.42 18.86 61.5 67.2 12.6 41.9 109.81 2.33 5.95 6.13 9.02 14.4 All scores (no weighting) Environment weighting Community weighting Accessibilty weighting Overriding constraints Major Moderate Surface water drainage. Ground stability Surface water drainage Surface water drainage Potential inundation risk associated with Gartmorn Dam Potential inundation risk associated with Gartmorn Dam Pipeline hazard zone over approximately one third of site area Flood risk. Surface water drainage Flood risk surface water drainage Reduction in the area allocated for development and a recreation and access management plan would reduce additional disturbance to the adjacent Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar. Instability. Prime agricultural land. TPO adjacent to southern site boundary Approximately one third of the area of the site is estimated to lie outwith the area of potential inundation risk Approximately one third of the area of the site lies outwith the area of identified potential flood risk in the SEPA indicative river and coastal flood map. Approximately two thirds of the area Minor Tree preservation orders cover the woodland belts to the southern boundary of the site Approx area remaining Mitigation
c3 b3 b3 b1 b1
c3 b3 c3 b2 b2
c3 a3 b2 a1 a1
b2 a3 a2 a1 a1
d1
d2
d1
d1
Flood risk. Potential impact on River Forth SPA and Ramsar.
c1
c2
c1
b1
Inundation risk from Gartmorn Dam.
d3 c3 d4
d3 d3 c4
d3 c3 c3
d2 c2 d3
Flood risk
Major Flood risk Flood risk resulting from overland flow to the north TPO covers trees to the north of the site
Focusing development on the area immediately adjacent to the existing built edge of Alva would reduce flood risk associated with this site.
d4 c3 d4 c3 c4 d4
d4 c3 d4 d3 c4 d4
d4 c3 d4 c2 c4 c4
d3 c2 d4 c1 c3 d4
Oil and gas pipeline hazard zone covers all of site
AGLV.
Road access. Nature conservation. Prime quality agricultural land
Surface water drainage Flood risk
The provision of local facilities and services would reduce the need to travel associated with the development of this site. Retaining the boundary woodland planting would reduce the landscape impacts of developing the site, however comparative elevation of the area constrains the opportunities for mitigation Limited opportunities for mitigating flood risk. No opportunities to mitigate accessibility issues. Limited options for mitigating impact of loss of views to Clackmannan Tower.
Flood risk. Potential impact on Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar. Impact on views to Clackmannan Tower
Accessibility Road access Road access. Prime quality agricultural land Prime quality agricultural land
19
Site constraints Site ID 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23a 23b 24a 24b 26 Name and Location Clackmannan (east) Clackmannan (south) Land south of James Place Devonside East Lover's Loan Dollarfield farm Dollarfield Upper Hillfoot Road Dollar (South) Dollar (South) Forestmill Forestmill Aitkenhead Locational Framework Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages East Clackmannanshire area of search East Clackmannanshire area of search East Clackmannanshire 312 Site area (ha) 171.23 89.44 24.23 7.78 13.91 1.98 2.89 8.69 8.5 9.2 199.42 All scores (no weighting) Environment weighting Community weighting Accessibilty weighting Overriding constraints Major Oil and gas pipeline hazard zone. Landscape impact (proximity to AGLV and views to Ochil Hills, most notably Shiel Hill) Moderate Flood risk. Prime quality agricultural land. Minor Approx area remaining Approximately one quarter of the area of site remains after exclusion of the constraints to development identified above. Approximately one quarter of the site is affected by the oil and gas pipeline hazard zone, and additionally excluding the part of the site with high landscape impact reduces the total available area of site to approximately a quarter of the total area. Mitigation No mitigation of landscape impact. Oil and gas pipeline hazard zone can be armoured or re routed.
d3
d3
d3
d3
c4 a2 a3 c4 c4
c4 a3 b3 c4 c4
b3 a2 a3 c3 c4
b3 a1 a3 c3 b4
Oil and gas pipeline hazard zone.
Prime quality agricultural land. Landscape impacts in relation to eastern area of site Ground stability Surface water drainage and overland flow. Road access. Topography Surface water drainage and flood risk Impact on settlement character
Woodlands to the west of the site are covered by TPO
Scheduled Monument Flood risk. Issues with private site access.
d4 d4
d4 d4
d4 d4
c3 d3
Flood risk AGLV. Impact on setting of Castle Campbell and settlement character
d3
d3
d3
c2
d3
d3
c3
c3
Site access Bedrock. Surface water drainage. Site access. Landscape. Landscape impacts and impact on settlement form. Impact on road infrastructure. Landscape impacts and impact on settlement form. Impact on road infrastructure.
The whole of the site lies within the area identified as at risk of flooding by the River Devon on the SEPA indicative flood map. No mitigation for landscape, site access and physical constraints. Junction modification could address issues associated with increased road traffic. Limited opportunity to mitigate landscape impacts. Junction modification could address issues associated with increased road traffic. Limited opportunity to mitigate landscape impacts. Additional public transport provision and access routes would enhance the accessibility of the site. Appropriate implementation of SUDS would reduce impacts on the water environment. The development of the site would have positive impacts on landscape through the restoration of Meadowhill, although development would have some negative impact on the landscape character of the area. Maintaining the wooded character of the landscape would reduce the landscape impact associated with development of this site. Appropriate implementation of SUDS would reduce impacts on the water environment. Habitat enhancement as part of the development of the site could improve the existing habitat value. Additional public transport provision and access routes would enhance the accessibility of the site. Maintaining woodland character
Flood risk associated with Dollar Burn
d4
d4
d4
d4
Landscape. Sustainable transport. Scheduled Monument
d4 d4
d4 d4
d4 d4
d4 d3
AGLV AGLV. Scheduled Monument
Oil and gas pipeline Ground stability. Nature
20
Site constraints Site ID 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 Name and Location Middletonkerse Menstrie East Land at Devonpark North side of A91 West of A823 Alloa North West, Branshill Oak Mills Land south of Dollar Road Cambus East Lornshill farm steading Redwell, Stirling road Locational Framework area of search (Menstrie-Alva-Tillicoultry) Hillfoots corridor (Menstrie-Alva-Tillicoultry) Hillfoots corridor Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor (Menstrie-Alva-Tillicoultry) Hillfoots corridor (Menstrie-Alva-Tillicoultry) Hillfoots corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Site area (ha) 9 9.26 5.66 1.44 17.51 70.92 6.13 4 9.81 0.8 6.47 All scores (no weighting) Environment weighting Community weighting Accessibilty weighting Overriding constraints Major Moderate conservation Minor Approx area remaining Mitigation would reduce landscape and biodiversity impacts. Additional public transport provision and access routes would enhance the accessibility of the site. Appropriate implementation of SUDS would reduce impacts on the water environment. Site access Amenity associated with proximity to yeast factory. Flood risk Surface water drainage. Impact on settlement character. Flood risk. Tree protection order
c4 c4 c4
d4 c4 c4
c3 b4 c4
c3 b3 c4
c4
d4
d4
c4
AGLV. Impact on settlement character. Road access.
c4 c3
d4 c3
c4 b2
c3 b1
Impact on settlement character. Surface water drainage
Approximately two thirds of the site lie outwith the area identified as at risk of flooding in the SEPA indicative flood map.
Appropriate implementation of SUDS would reduce impacts on the water environment. The development sites are of insufficient size to generate additional public transport services to address accessibility issues. Appropriate implementation of SUDS would reduce impacts on the water environment. The development sites are of insufficient size to generate additional public transport services to address accessibility issues. Minimising the extent of the area developed would reduce landscape impacts. Limited opportunities to mitigate flood risk due to low lying nature of the site. Limited opportunities to mitigate landscape impact.
d2
d2
d1
c1
Flood risk The whole of the site lies within an area identified as at potential risk of flooding on the SEPA indicative flood map. Flood risk. Traffic management. Potential impact on River Forth SPA and Ramsar. Development of the site would result in loss of public open space.
c2 d3 b1 b1
c3 d3 b2 b2
c2 d3 a1 b1
b1 c2 a1 b1
Flood risk Access constraints associated with level crossing.
21
4.
PLANNING AND POLICY CONSIDERATIONS AND SELECTION OF PREFERRED OPTION

INTRODUCTION
4.1.
This chapter sets out the relevant planning and policy considerations which apply to each of the sites. This is an additional layer of information which has been applied by Clackmannanshire Council to inform the identification of a preferred option based on a combination of sites. Sites agreed by Clackmannanshire Council as forming part of the local plan alteration are identified in Table 4.1 below. In addition the final column in Table 4.1 identifies the future potential of the sites beyond the current policy framework. For example, future review of policy may revise safeguarded areas of open space, Green Belt and locational strategy which would potentially remove existing policy constraints for some of the sites.
Table 4.1: Planning and policy considerations

Additional planning requirements for new settlement (Sites 9, 24a, 24b, 26) Potential to deliver leisure development, recreational access and sports use Site agreed by Clackmannanshire Council to be taken forward as part of local plan alteration Site potentially suitable for consideration for future housing land release beyond current policy framework
Site ID
Locational Framework Relevant planning policies Current policy constraints Green Belt
Infrastructure to be enabled through the development
Infrastructure requirements
Enabling development required
Optimal development use is residential Yes Yes Yes
Potential to deliver a mixed use village
Potential to deliver employment opportunities
Potential to contribute to the restoration of Meadowhill
1 2 3 4 5
Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor
6 7 8a 8b 8c
Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor (Menstrie-AlvaTillicoultry) Hillfoots corridor (Menstrie-AlvaTillicoultry) Hillfoots corridor (Menstrie-AlvaTillicoultry) Hillfoots corridor East Clackmannanshire area of search Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Core Area
9 10 11
SP ENV3, ED4, H6, ENV4, LP EN18, EN19. Generic development policies only Generic development policies only Local Plan Schedule of Sites H1 (2), Policy RES5 LP Schedule of Sites H1 (2), RES5. SP ENV9, LP ENV4 SP ENV1, ENV9, ENV3, ED4, H6. Local Plan Schedule of Sites J16, LP EN5, EN4, RES2, INF3, EN18 SP ENV3, ED4, H6, ENV7, LP EN18, EN2, INF3. SP ENV3, ED4, H6, ENV4, ENV9, LP EN18, EN19, EN4, EN12. SP ENV3, ED4, H6, ENV4, LP EN18, EN19, EN12. SP ENV3, ED4, H6, ENV4, LP EN18, EN19, EN12. SP ENV3, ED4, H6, ENV2, ENV10, LP EN18, EN2, EN12, EN24. SP ENV7, ENV3, ED4, H6, ENV9, ENV7, LP EN18, EN4 SP ENV3, ED4, H6,

-
Yes
Yes
Mixed

Insufficient land available within site constraints Insufficient land available within site constraints Insufficient land available within site constraints
(part see Appendix 3) (part see Appendix 3) (part see Appendix 3)
Yes
Green Belt
Yes
Green Belt
Yes

Green Belt
Yes
Yes
Unknown

Yes Contrary to Protection and No
23
Site ID
Locational Framework Relevant planning policies
ENV1, ENV9, LP EN4, EN5 EN7, EN8, EN12, EN18. 12 13 14 Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Rural Villages Rural Villages LP EN12M INF3. SP ENV3, ED4, H6, ENV7, LP EN18 SP ENV3, ED4, H6, ENV7, LP EN18 SP ENV3, ED4, H6, ENV7, ENV9, ENV10, LP EN18, RES2, INF3, EN4, EN24, EN12. SP ENV3, ED4, H6, ENV6, ENV7, LP EN18, INF3, EN2, EN12.
Current policy constraints locational strategy
Enabling development required enhancement of Kennetpans Scheduled Monument
Optimal development use is residential
Yes Contrary to locational strategy Contrary to locational strategy Contrary to locational strategy Contrary to locational strategy Safeguarding route of Tullibody bypass Contrary to locational strategy Contrary to locational strategy Contrary to locational strategy Part of site identified as community and recreational development area Contrary to locational strategy Contrary to locational strategy Contrary to locational strategy Contrary to locational strategy Contrary to locational strategy No Yes

15 16
Rural Villages Rural Villages
Yes

(part)
Yes
17 18
SP ENV3, ED4, H6, LP EN18, INF3. SP ENV3, ED4, H6, LP EN18
Fishcross and Coalsnaughton bypass
School provision required School provision required
Yes Yes

19 20 21 22 23a 23b
Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages East Clackmannanshire area of search East Clackmannanshire
SP ENV3, ED4, H6, LP EN18, EN7, EN8, Schedule of sites CR32. SP ENV3, ED4, H6, ENV9, LP EN18, EN4 SP ENV3, ED4, H6, ENV9, LP EN18, EN4, INF3. SP ENV3, ED4, H6, ENV9, ENV2, LP EN18, EN2, EN4. SP ENV3, ED4, H6, LP EN18. SP ENV3, ED4, H6, ENV9, LP EN18, EN4, INF3. SP ENV3, ED4, H6, ENV1, ENV2, ENV9, LP EN1, EN2, EN4, EN7, EN8, EN12, EN18. SP ENV3, ED4, H6,
Yes Yes

No
Yes Yes
Yes Land identified in 24b to deliver leisure development, recreational access and sports use Land identified as part of 24a to deliver
24a 24b
Yes No
Sufficient land available Insufficient land available within
Sufficient land available Insufficient land available within
Yes Unknown

24
Additional planning requirements for new settlement (Sites 9, 24a, 24b, 26) Potential to deliver leisure development, recreational access and sports use leisure development, recreational access and sports use Site agreed by Clackmannanshire Council to be taken forward as part of local plan alteration Site potentially suitable for consideration for future housing land release beyond current policy framework
Site ID
Locational Framework Relevant planning policies Current policy constraints
Potential to deliver a mixed use village landscape constraints
Potential to deliver employment opportunities landscape constraints
area of search
26 27 28 29 30 31
East Clackmannanshire area of search East Clackmannanshire area of search (Menstrie-AlvaTillicoultry) Hillfoots corridor Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages
ENV1, ENV2, ENV9, LP EN1, EN2, EN4, EN7, EN8, EN12, EN18. SP ENV1, ENV2, ENV3, ENV9, ENV10, H6, ED4, LP EN1, EN2, EN4, EN7, EN8, EN12, EN24, INF3. SP ENV9, LP INF3, EN2, EN4, EN12 SP ENV3, ED4, H6, ENV4, LP EN12, EN18, EN19, INF3. SP ENV3, ED4, H6, ENV6, LP EN12, EN18, INF3. SP ENV3, ED4, H6, ENV2, ENV6, LP EN2, EN12, EN18. SP ENV3, ED4, H6, ENV6, LP EN12, EN18, INF3.
Yes Yes
Insufficient land available within site constraints
Not in short term. Unknown in longer term

Green Belt Contrary to locational strategy Contrary to locational strategy Contrary to locational strategy Green Belt (partly) Part of site identified as community and recreational development area Green Belt Site identified as community and recreational development area New community facilities required New community facilities required New community facilities required
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
32
Rural Villages
SP ENV4, LP EN19, INF3, Schedule of sites H7 and CR5. SP ENV3, ED4, H6, ENV9, ENV4, LP EN4, EN12, EN19, Schedule of sites CR31. SP ENV3, ED4, H6, ENV9, ENV4, LP EN4, EN12, EN18, EN19, Schedule of sites H96. SP ENV3, ED4, H6, ENV1, ENV9, LP EN1, EN4, EN5, EN18, INF3
Yes
33
Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor (Menstrie-AlvaTillicoultry) Hillfoots corridor (Menstrie-AlvaTillicoultry) Hillfoots corridor
New community facilities required
Yes
34 35
Yes New station at Cambus Green Belt, however development would only involved previously developed land Safeguarded open space, however development of only part of the site would

Yes
36
Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor
SP ENV3, ED4, H6, ENV4, LP EN6, EN18, EN19
Medium - to resolve inconsistent uses Medium - to enable improvement of sports pitches
Yes
37
Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor
SP SR1, LP INF14
No
25
Site ID
Locational Framework Relevant planning policies Current policy constraints maintain open space role
26
5.
5.1.
CONCLUSIONS
The project brief required the information provided as a result of the site assessment to inform the selection of sites to take forward as part of the Local Plan Alteration, and also to examine potential longer term land releases to 2030. This section of the report provides a summary of the environmental and planning constraints associated with each site and future development potential, and identifies those sites identified by Clackmannanshire Council to take forward as part of the Local Plan Alteration. The sites are grouped according to the locational framework as set out in the Clackmannanshire Structure Plan 3rd Alteration. This allows comparison of sites within similar geographical locations, and in particular allows the comparison of the larger scale eastern expansion area sites. The scale of impact associated with the potential development of the larger sites is typically greater than the impacts associated with smaller sites within more urban locations and therefore grouping the sites by the strategic framework allows comparison of like with like.
5.2.
Table 5.1 Summary of Site Constraints and development potential
Site ID 8a
Locational Framework (Menstrie-Alva-Tillicoultry) Hillfoots corridor (Menstrie-Alva-Tillicoultry) Hillfoots corridor (Menstrie-Alva-Tillicoultry) Hillfoots corridor (Menstrie-Alva-Tillicoultry) Hillfoots corridor (Menstrie-Alva-Tillicoultry) Hillfoots corridor (Menstrie-Alva-Tillicoultry) Hillfoots corridor (Menstrie-Alva-Tillicoultry) Hillfoots corridor
8b 8c 27 28
33 34
11
Core Area
East Clackmannanshire area of search
24a 24b
East Clackmannanshire area of search East Clackmannanshire area of search
Commentary Principal constraint on this site relates to location within the Green Belt. Environmental constraints include flood risk associated with the River Devon and future flood risk associated with climate change. Landscape impacts can be reduced through development of only part of this site. Principal constraint on this site relates to location within the Green Belt. Environmental constraints include and flood risk associated with overland flow and increased future flood risk associated with climate change, and future development potential should be considered within the context of future climate change impacts and mitigation options explored. This site lies within the Green Belt and has a high flood risk associated with the River Devon. The high level of flood risk reduces future potential for development. The site is located close to areas of identified flood risk and future flood risk associated with climate change may limit the future development potential of this site and mitigation options should be explored should this site be progressed. The site is located within the Green Belt. The site is partly constrained by flood risk issues and landscape impacts on settlement identity. The amenity issues associated with the proximity to the yeast factory may limit suitability for residential development. The site lies within Green Belt and is identified as a community and recreational development area. The potential flood risk associated with the site may constrain future development potential. Increased future flood risk associated with climate change presents a greater limitation to future development potential. There is a high level of flood risk identified across this site which constrains future development potential. This site is contrary to the Clackmannanshire Structure Plan 3rd Alteration locational strategy. Environmental site constraints relate principally to the proximity to the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar and flood risk. Impacts on the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar can be mitigated through managing recreation and access in proximity to the Firth of Forth. Increased future flood risk associated with climate change presents a greater limitation to future development. Principal constraints relate to the landscape value of this site due to its location within AGLV. Additional constraints include the nature conservation value of the site and issues with road access for development of the site. Mitigation of landscape and nature conservation impacts through retaining woodland areas would limit the site area and insufficient area would remain to provide the required components of a settlement expansion area. The development of the site will have some negative landscape and nature conservation impacts. Development within a rural area with limited services and public transport does not support sustainability principles. Although services will be provided as part of the new settlement, the development of the site will generate additional journeys to nearby towns. The associated restoration of Meadowhill will bring landscape enhancement benefits. Principal constraints relate to the landscape value of this site due to its location within AGLV. Additional constraints include the nature conservation value of the site. Mitigation of landscape and nature conservation impacts through retaining woodland areas would limit the site area and insufficient
Site taken forward as part of local plan alteration
Site suitable for consideration for future land release beyond current policy framework (part see matrix)

27
Site ID
Locational Framework
Commentary area would remain to provide the required components of a settlement expansion area. The site is constrained by its location within The Forest AGLV and nature conservation value. Mitigation of identified landscape and nature conservation impacts would reduce the effective area available for development resulting in insufficient available land to deliver the requirements for a new settlement. This site is contrary to the Clackmannanshire Structure Plan 3rd Alteration locational strategy. Development of the site would result in loss of prime quality agricultural land. Options to create road access to this site may present a minor constraint. Site is identified as having future potential for non residential use. This site is contrary to the Clackmannanshire Structure Plan 3rd Alteration locational strategy. The site is constrained by the location of the oil and gas pipeline hazard zone. This site is contrary to the Clackmannanshire Structure Plan 3rd Alteration locational strategy. The site is partially constrained by the location of the oil and gas pipeline hazard zone, the landscape impact associated with development of the site, flood risk and loss of prime quality agricultural land. In combination these constraints reduce the effective area of the site and limit future development potential. This site is contrary to the Clackmannanshire Structure Plan 3rd Alteration locational strategy. The full extent of this site is influenced by the oil and gas pipeline hazard zone, landscape impacts and prime quality agricultural land. The western part of the site is prime quality agricultural land, but not affected by the additional constraints and has some potential for development. This site is contrary to the Clackmannanshire Structure Plan 3rd Alteration locational strategy. The site has limited environmental constraints to future development potential, however lies within an area identified for the construction of a bypass which would require to form part of the development of the site. This site is contrary to the Clackmannanshire Structure Plan 3rd Alteration locational strategy. The site has some physical and access constraints, however should these be adequately addressed the site has future development potential. This site is contrary to the Clackmannanshire Structure Plan 3rd Alteration locational strategy Part of site identified as community and recreational development area. Development within a rural village with limited services and public transport does not support sustainability principles. The site layout and design would be required to protect and enhance the Scheduled Monument within the site, however the remaining area of land has future development potential. This site is contrary to the Clackmannanshire Structure Plan 3rd Alteration locational strategy. Development within a rural village with limited services and public transport does not support sustainability principles. The site is constrained by the identified flood risk associated with the Dollar Burn, and future flood risk associated with climate change limits the future development potential of this site. This site is contrary to the Clackmannanshire Structure Plan 3rd Alteration locational strategy. Development within a rural village with limited services and public transport does not support sustainability principles. This site is identified as having a high flood risk which constrains future development potential. This site is contrary to the Clackmannanshire Structure Plan 3rd Alteration locational strategy. Development within a rural village with limited services and public transport does not support sustainability principles. The landscape impacts of developing this site combined with physical site constraints including access limit future development potential. This site is contrary to the Clackmannanshire Structure Plan 3rd Alteration locational strategy. Development of this site would impact on the landscape setting of Dollar and the Ochil Hills AGLV. Road infrastructure presents further constraints. Development within a rural village with limited services and public transport does not support sustainability principles. Restricting the area of the site taken forward for development would limit the extent of these impacts. This site is contrary to the Clackmannanshire Structure Plan 3rd Alteration locational strategy. Development of this site would impact on the landscape setting of Dollar and the Ochil Hills AGLV. Road infrastructure presents further constraints. Development within a rural village with limited
Site suitable for consideration for future land release beyond current policy framework
26
East Clackmannanshire area of search
13 14

15
Rural Villages
16
Rural Villages
(part)
17 18

19
Rural Villages
20
Rural Villages
21
Rural Villages
22
Rural Villages
(part)
23a 23b
(part)
28
Site ID
Locational Framework
29
Rural Villages
30
Rural Villages
31
Rural Villages
1 2 3 4 5
Tullibody Alloa-Clackmannan corridor Tullibody Alloa-Clackmannan corridor Tullibody Alloa-Clackmannan corridor Tullibody Alloa-Clackmannan corridor Tullibody Alloa-Clackmannan corridor
6 7 10 12 32
Tullibody Alloa-Clackmannan corridor Tullibody Alloa-Clackmannan corridor Tullibody Alloa-Clackmannan corridor Tullibody Alloa-Clackmannan corridor Tullibody Alloa-Clackmannan corridor
35 36 37
Tullibody Alloa-Clackmannan corridor Tullibody Alloa-Clackmannan corridor Tullibody Alloa-Clackmannan corridor
Commentary services and public transport does not support sustainability principles. Restricting the area of the site taken forward for development would limit the extent of these impacts. This site is contrary to the Clackmannanshire Structure Plan 3rd Alteration locational strategy. Development within a rural village with limited services and public transport does not support sustainability principles. The site also has identified surface water drainage constraints and landscape impacts on settlement character but is not significantly constrained for potential future development. This site is contrary to the Clackmannanshire Structure Plan 3rd Alteration locational strategy. Development within a rural village with limited services and public transport does not support sustainability principles. The site lies within the Ochil Hills AGLV, but is not significantly constrained for potential future development. This site is contrary to the Clackmannanshire Structure Plan 3rd Alteration locational strategy. Development within a rural village with limited services and public transport does not support sustainability principles. The site also has identified flood risk constraints and landscape impacts on settlement character which limit the area of land with development potential. Principal constraint on this site relates to location within the Green Belt and role in providing separation between Alloa and Tullibody. The minor environmental constraints for residential development are potentially mitigated through site layout and design, resulting in future development potential of the site. Potential issues with surface water drainage require to be addressed. Site specific investigations for European protected species should be undertaken. Potential issues with surface water drainage require to be addressed. Location of oil and gas pipeline hazard zone restricts site area available for development. Site specific investigations for European protected species should be undertaken. Potential inundation risk associated with Gartmorn Dam requires to be established. Site specific investigations should identify flood risk. Potential inundation risk associated with Gartmorn Dam requires to be established. Site specific investigations should identify flood risk. Principal constraints on this site relates to the proximity to the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar, and future flood risk associated with climate change. Impacts on the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar can be mitigated through limiting the area developed and managing recreation and access in proximity to the Firth of Forth. Potential inundation risk associated with Gartmorn Dam requires to be established. The northern part of this site lies outwith the main hazard area associated with this risk. Policy constraints include the prime quality agricultural land status and environmental constraints include the minor flood risk associated with the northern part of the site. The site has future development potential. No policy constraints, however options to mitigate impact of loss of views to Clackmannan Tower relate to site layout and design. The western field lies within Green Belt and is also identified as a community and recreational development area. There are no significant environmental constraints associated with the development of the site. The site is constrained by the traffic impacts associated with the location of the level crossing and the junction with the A907. Should options be identified to address the access constraint issues associated with the site, environmental constraints associated with the potential impact on the River Forth SPA and Ramsar and flood risk limit future development potential of this site. The site is located within the Green Belt, however development would only involve previously developed land. There are no known significant environmental constraints to developing the site. The site is designated as safeguarded open space, however development of only part of the site would maintain open space role. There are no known significant environmental constraints to developing the site.
Site suitable for consideration for future land release beyond current policy framework

-

(remaining land) (part see matrix)
-

(part)
29
5.3.
Sites identified by Clackmannanshire Council for inclusion in the Clackmannanshire Local Plan Alteration include:
Reference 2 3 4 5 24a 32 36 Site name West Earlsfield South Earlsfield Alloa East (1) Alloa East (2) Forestmill Alloa North West, Branshill Lornshill farm steading Location Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Forestmill Sauchie Alloa Locational Framework Tullibody Alloa-Clackmannan corridor Tullibody Alloa-Clackmannan corridor Tullibody Alloa-Clackmannan corridor Tullibody Alloa-Clackmannan corridor East Clackmannanshire area of search Tullibody Alloa-Clackmannan corridor Tullibody Alloa-Clackmannan corridor Extent of site included in alteration All All All All All Part (approximately half of the site area) All
5.4.
A site immediately adjacent to Site 6 is identified for inclusion within the Local Plan Alteration. The proposed area lies within the settlement boundary and includes an area of vacant and derelict land.
NEXT STEPS
5.5. Table 5.1 summarises the constraints to development associated with each site and identifies physical, environmental and policy constraints. Issues associated with the requirement for enabling development are identified within Table 4.1. Based on the information in these tables, the results of the assessment provide a basis for future site identification, and highlight the opportunities for future policy review and opportunities to facilitate future development
30
31
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Site Appraisal Draft Report APPENDICES
A Report to Clackmannanshire Council by Land Use Consultants
December 2008
CONTENTS
Appendix 1 Policy documents included in the policy review............................................................3 Policy documents included in the policy review: .................................................................................4 Appendix 2 General development policies which apply to all development sites .......................5 APPENDIX 3 Site Assessment Matrices .................................................................................15 Site 1 Lornshill Farm, Alloa.....................................................................................................................16 Site 2 West Earlsfield, Alloa....................................................................................................................22 Site 3 Earlsfield, South Earlsfield, Alloa ................................................................................................28 Site 4 Alloa East (1), Carsebridge, Alloa ..............................................................................................34 Site 5 Alloa East (2), Carsebridge, Alloa ..............................................................................................39 Site 6 Alloa west expansion area, Alloa ...............................................................................................44 Site 7 Jellyholm, Sauchie, Alloa (north east)........................................................................................50 Site 8A: Land south of Brook Street, West of B908 Alva ...............................................................56 Site 8 B: West Alva, to line with settlement edge Land south of Brook Street, Alva...............62 Site 8 C: East of B908, Alva ....................................................................................................................68 Site 9 Birkhill Castlebridge......................................................................................................................73 Site 10 Ladywood, east of Clackmannan .............................................................................................79 Site 11 Kennetpans, Clackmannan ........................................................................................................85 Site 12 Helensfield, Clackmannan..........................................................................................................91 Site 13 Meadowend Farm Clackmannan..............................................................................................96 Site 14 Kilbagie (north)......................................................................................................................... 101 Site 15 Clackmannan (east) Tullygarth, Clackmannan ................................................................... 106 Site 16 Clackmannan south, Clackmannan....................................................................................... 112 Site 17 Land South of James Place, Coalsnaughton ........................................................................ 118 Site 18 Devonside East ......................................................................................................................... 122 Site 19 Lovers Loan .............................................................................................................................. 126 Site 20 Dollarfield Farm........................................................................................................................ 131 Site 21 Dollarfield................................................................................................................................... 136 Site 22 Upper Hillfoot Road, Hillfoot Road, Dollar ....................................................................... 141 Site 23a Dollar (South), West of Devon Road................................................................................ 147 Site 23B Dollar (South), east of Devon Road.................................................................................. 151 Site 24a Forestmill (includes assessment of restoration of Meadowhill) ................................. 155 Site 24b Forestmill (includes assessment of restoration of Meadowhill) .................................. 162 Site 26 Aitkenhead Forestmill (north)............................................................................................... 169 Site 27 Middletonkerse, Menstrie....................................................................................................... 175 Site 28, Menstrie East, Glenochil, Menstrie...................................................................................... 181 Site 29 Land at Devonpark, Muckhart............................................................................................... 187 Site 30 North Side of A91, west side of Pool of Muckhart......................................................... 193 Site 31 Land East of Pool of Muckhart .............................................................................................. 198 Site 32, Alloa North West, Branshill, Sauchie ................................................................................. 204 Site 33 Oak Mills, Lower Mill Street, Tillicoultry............................................................................ 210
Site 34 Land south of Dollar Road Tillicoultry................................................................................ 216 Site 35 Cambus East, Cambus, Tullibody.......................................................................................... 222 Site 36 Lornshill Farm STeading.......................................................................................................... 228 Site 37 Redwell, Alloa ........................................................................................................................... 233 APPENDIX 4 Criteria to which weighting was applied................................................................. 239 APPENDIX 5 Summary Results of Assessment of Alternatives.................................................. 247
APPENDIX 1 POLICY DOCUMENTS INCLUDED IN THE POLICY REVIEW
Policy documents included in the policy review:

Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan; Clackmannanshire Local Plan; Contaminated land strategy; Clackmannanshire Local Biodiversity Action Plan; Supplementary Advice Note 1: Recreational Open Space; Supplementary advice note 9: Planning and flooding; Clackmannanshire Community Plan 2006-2009; Outdoor Access Strategy and Core Paths Plan; Clackmannanshire Council Biennial Report (November 2007) As required by The Flood Prevention and Land Drainage (Scotland) Act 1997; Transport and the Environment 2006 - 2009 Road Traffic Reduction Plan 2006 - 2009 Road Safety Plan 2006 - 2009 Local Transport Strategy 2006 - 2009 Tourism in Clackmannanshire A Strategy for Growth Final Report (2006); Clackmannanshire Landscape Character Assessment. Clackmannanshire Sustainability and Climate Change Strategy Open Space Strategy SSP1 The Planning System; SPP3 Planning for Housing; SPP7 Planning and Flooding; SPP11 Open Space and Physical Activity; NPPG14 Natural Heritage; SPP17 Planning for Transport; NPPG18 Planning and the Historic Environment; Scottish Historic Environment Policy 1 Scotlands Historic Environment. PAN33 Development of Contaminated Land (2000) NPPG5 Archaeology and Planning (1998) NPPG13 Coastal Planning (1997) SPP21 Green Belts (2006) SNH Natural Heritage Futures (2002) SPP2 Economic Development (2002) Historic Scotland, Passed to the Future: Historic Scotlands Policy for the Sustainable Management of the Historic Environment, (2002)
APPENDIX 2 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT POLICIES WHICH APPLY TO ALL DEVELOPMENT SITES
Policy Document Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan
Policy/Plan reference Policy SD1 Key Principles
Summary In assessing development proposals, consideration will be taken of the contribution the development will make towards the Structure Plans overarching goal of Working Towards Sustainable Development and give consideration to environmental, social and economic factors. The policy aims to promote the protection of wildlife, habitats and other natural features. It states that development which will potentially negatively impact upon internationally or nationally designated sites will not be permitted unless it can be demonstrated that their will be no adverse effect from the proposal, or no viable alternative solution. Similarly, proposals which may affect a site of local importance will only be allowed where it can be demonstrated that there will be no significant negative impact on the conservation value of the site. The policy states that development will only be permitted in Areas of Great Landscape Value where it satisfies the criteria of Policy ENV3 (below) and can be accommodated without adversely affecting the overall quality of the area. The policy states that development in the Countryside (as defined in Local Plans i.e. areas not within settlement boundaries) be suitable for its location in function and design and should accord with Policy ED4 Rural Development (discussed below). In green belt areas there will be a strong presumption against development any developments which are permitted will have to demonstrate appropriate environmental enhancement. Policy ENV5 highlights the priority given by the council to environmental enhancement measures, in particular the remediation of contaminated land, through new development. Policy ENV6 aims to protect and enhance cultural heritage features, as well as ensure that new developments are in keeping with the character and quality of the area. Development which would result in the permanent loss of prime agricultural land will only be permitted where such land is identified for development in Local Plans and lower quality land
Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan
Policy ENV1 Nature Conservation
Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan
Policy ENV2 Protected Landscapes Policy ENV3 Development in the Countryside Policy ENV4 Green Belts
Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan
Policy ENV5 Environmental Enhancement Policy ENV6 The Historic and Built Environment Policy ENV7 Agricultural Land
Policy/Plan reference Policy ENV9 Water Resources Management
Summary
Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan
Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan
cannot reasonably be used. The policy states that development will not normally be permitted in undeveloped flood plain areas, in areas of known significant flood risk, or if it will adversely affect the forth estuary. Exceptions will be made only when it can be demonstrated that no alternative locations can be found, or that suitable mitigation measures can be implemented. Policy ENV10 Economically important mineral resources will be Minerals protected from sterilisation by permanent General development. Alternatively, working of minerals in Principles advance of development will be encouraged Policy ENV14 The policy states that development proposals must Renewable demonstrate that energy conservation and Energy and efficiency are integral to the design, and to the Energy-Efficient layout of new buildings. Development Policy ED4 The policy states that economic and social Rural development in rural areas will be supported within Development the following criteria: Focussing development within existing towns and villages Restricting development within greenbelt and countryside. Policy H1 The policy states that the councils will work to Maintaining a 5 ensure sufficient provision is made for a minimum year land effective five year land supply for housing supply Policy H2 The policy states that the council will allocate Brownfield appropriate brownfield opportunity sites and Sites facilitate development on brownfield sites. Policy H3 Policy H3 states that the provision of a range and Housing to choice of house types should be supported. In meet a range particular, sites suitable for affordable and special of needs needs housing should be identified. Policy H5 Policy H5 supports rural development in the Housing in the Upland Area within the settlement boundaries Upland Area defined in the Local Plan. Policy H6 The policy states that new housing developments in Housing in the the Countryside will only be approved where the Countryside development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 above. Policy TR1 The policy aims to reduce the need to travel by Integrated promoting development within areas of good Transport transport access.
Policy/Plan reference Policy TR2 Transport
Summary The policy aims to promote a wide range of transport choices by requiring developers to consider a range of transport options as part of new development proposals. This will ensure that new development integrates with and enhances the wider transport network. The policy states that any application for development will be guided by the Local Biodiversity Action Plan. It also states that any development proposals should consider the importance of non-designated sites of local nature conservation or biodiversity importance and should minimise negative impacts on the natural heritage resource. The policy includes conditions which must be met if a development is to be permitted in an AGLV. The policy also states that appropriate consideration must be given to woodland, habitats, natural and landscape features when making a planning application. The policy states that where a development area is determined as being at risk of flooding, planning permission will not be granted except where it can be proved that there are no viable alternative sites. The policy states that the undeveloped coast will be protected from further development except where it can be proved that there are no viable alternatives sites. The policy states that development will not be permitted where it can adversely affect a SAM or other important archaeological or historical site unless it can be demonstrated that there is no alternative viable site or the development is of national public importance. Where a development could affect a site of archaeological importance, an assessment of the historical value must be undertaken prior to permission being granted. The policy states that new developments must contribute to the protection of conservation areas and that proposals will be assessed in terms of the need to ensure the preservation and enhancement of the areas character. The policy states that new development will be expected to positively contribute to its immediate
Clackmannanshire Local Plan
Policy EN1 Sites of Local Ecological Importance
Policy EN2 Landscape and Ecology
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Clackmannanshire Local Plan Clackmannanshire Local Plan
Policy EN4 Water Resources Policy EN5 The Coast Policy EN7 Archaeological or Historic Sites Policy EN8 Site assessment, evaluation and recording Policy EN10 Conservation Areas Policy EN11 Enhancing
Policy Document
Policy/Plan reference Environmental Quality Policy EN12 Area Environmental Enhancement
Summary environment through sensitive design and consideration of landscape, ecological and amenity issues. The Local Plan identifies three key Environmental Enhancement Areas where an improvement in environmental quality is desired: the rivers the A91 corridor the Conservation Areas Policy EN12 states that proposals which would detract from the setting or aesthetics of these areas will not normally be permitted, and that developers must demonstrate how proposals can be integrated with proposed enhancement measures. The council will only permit development on or around areas of contaminated land where remediation is possible and potential risk can be overcome. The policy sets criteria which must be met if planning permission is to be granted to a proposed development which is outwith the settlement boundaries in the Local Plan Countryside map. The policy states that development will only be permitted in green belt where no alternative location can be found or the development would provide an opportunity to enhance the green belt. The policy states that permanent development which would result in the sterilisation of viable mineral resources will not be permitted except where this would prevent residential development which contributes to the strategic housing land requirement and no other sites area available to meet this requirement. The policy states that at all times at least 5 years supply of effective housing land will be available, taking into account the need to provide choice in terms of location, type and different market segments. The policy prioritises development which will take place on brownfield sites which will utilise vacant, derelict, contaminated and underused land and property within settlement boundaries. The policy aims to secure a proportion of affordable/particular needs housing on all developments over 30 houses.
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Clackmannanshire Local Plan Clackmannanshire Local Plan Clackmannanshire Local Plan
Policy EN 15 Contaminated Land Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside Policy EN19 Green belt Policy EN24 Protection of Minerals
Policy RES1 Housing Land Supply Policy RES2 Brownfield Development Policy RES5 Affordable and particular
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Clackmannanshire Local Plan
10
Policy Document Clackmannanshire Local Plan Clackmannanshire Local Plan Clackmannanshire Local Plan Clackmannanshire Local Plan
Policy/Plan reference needs housing Policy RES7 The layout and form of development Policy RES8 Amenity Standards Policy RES9 Open Space Principles Policy RES11 Development principles for large housing developments Policy INF2 Integration of Transport and Development Proposals Policy INF3 Local Access
Summary The policy states that new development must be consistent with the form and character of surrounding development and should reflect surrounding densities. The policy sets standards for amenity which must be adhered to in all development proposals. The policy states that recreational and amenity open space must be provided as part of any new housing development. For developments of all housing sites (particularly those of 30 or more units), a high quality of design and landscaping should be aspired to. The policy states that new developments should be located where they are capable of being conveniently and safely accessed by public transport, foot or cycle as well as by private vehicle. The policy states that development will not be permitted where it will result in the loss of an asserted right of way, footpath or a path forming part of the Clackmannanshire path network unless the provision of an alternative path can be assured. The policy states that existing amenity resources will be protected from unrelated development which would negatively affect their recreational or amenity value.
Clackmannanshire Biodiversity Action Plan (July 2003)
Policy INF14 Existing Public Parks, Amenity Open Spaces, Allotment Gardens, Playing Fields and Sports Pitches n/a
Clackmannanshire Community Plan
Regeneration
The Clackmannanshire LBAP aims to implement the UK wide BAP through the identification of biodiversity resources and priorities in the local area. Habitat Action Plans have been devised for virtually all of the habitats recorded in the Clackmannanshire area. Species Action Plans have been developed for numerous mammals, birds, fish, invertebrates and plants in the Clackmannanshire area. The Clackmannanshire Community Plan (published by the Clackmannanshire Alliance) aims to promote
11
Policy Document 2006-2009
Policy/Plan reference
Summary the regeneration and development of Clackmannanshire by focussing on four key aims: Economic Development; Health improvement; Community safety; and Environment. Of particular relevance to the site appraisal is the section relating to regeneration the Community Planning Partnership has received 1 million annually between 2005 and 2008 to invest in Alloa South and East, Tullibody, Sauchie, Coalsnaughton and Devonside (these areas were identified as being in need of targeted economic support using the SIMD). The policy states that any development proposal will need to provide quality pedestrian routes which are direct, safe and accessible by all (this will include the introduction of speed reduction measures, 20mph zones and priority schemes through innovative layout and design). The policy states that developments will not be supported where an existing footpath or cycle route will be lost unless a suitable replacement can be agreed upon. The policy states that new residential developments will be required to provide appropriate facilities for cyclists (including secure parking and links to cycle routes). The policy states that any proposals to develop in the vicinity of a former railway line shall demonstrate appropriate measures to safeguard access and future provision of the route for reinstatement or other modes of transport e.g. cycling. The policy states that new housing will only be supported where there are existing links to public transport or where the development can support new services or remove the need for subsidy to existing services. The policy states that developers of new residential areas will be expected to provide safer routes to the nearest primary and secondary schools in the catchment area. New residential developments will require to give due consideration to the incorporation of natural
Clackmannanshire Local Transport Strategy 20062009 Clackmannanshire Local Transport Strategy 20062009 Clackmannanshire Local Transport Strategy 20062009 Clackmannanshire Local Transport Strategy 20062009 Clackmannanshire Local Transport Strategy 20062009 Clackmannanshire Local Transport Strategy 20062009 Clackmannanshire Local Transport
Policy W2
Policy W3
Policy C4
Policy PT4
Policy PT6
Policy ST4
Policy TM1
12
Policy Document Strategy 20062009 Clackmannanshire Local Transport Strategy 20062009
Policy/Plan reference
Summary traffic calming features into the site master plan to give pedestrians equal priority with vehicles and to reduce speeds. The policy states that in new residential areas, developers will be required to provide adequate residential and visitor parking spaces.
Policy P2
13
14
APPENDIX 3
SITE ASSESSMENT MATRICES
15
SITE 1 LORNSHILL FARM, ALLOA

9.62 Medium The site comprises an unmanaged field adjacent to the B9096 between Alloa and Tullibody, on the south east facing slopes of Lornshill. Enclosed by woodland belts on three sides and open to the road. The site is located outwith the settlement boundary. Transport issues to consider include the impact of a new access junction in relation to school traffic at the nearby Lornshill Academy. Access could be taken directly onto the B9096. There is an opportunity to improve the access around the school and development of the site could support a long term plan to develop an Alloa Tullibody cycle route. A signed Right of Way runs along the southern boundary of the site and provides access to the nearby housing area, and informal paths run through the woodland belts and connect to Tullibody.
None Ground stability Presence of bats within boundary woodlands.
Constraints to development Summary of area remaining following mitigation Environmental features
Moderate - Surface water drainage. Ground stability Implementation of SUDS to mitigate surface water drainage issue Vegetation: Rough grass with rushes bounded by mature woodland to the north, south-east and south. The mature mixed deciduous woodland contributes landscape setting to the site and are intact. An area of scrub woodland with extensive willow growth is located in the south east corner of the site, and Area A consists of overgrown herbaceous vegetation. Field boundaries: The field is unmanaged and boundaries comprise a post and wire fence, outgrown hedgerow trees and a broken down stone wall on the southern boundary. Water: A drain runs through the woodland to the south of the site, and water collects in the south east corner of the site, contributing to surface flow into the road in wet weather. Other features: The site plays a role in providing setting for the listed building at Lornshill.
Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use Settlement expansion Unmanaged pasture Residential, educational (Lornshill Academy), woodland and farmland
16
Planning policy framework:
Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV3 Development in the Countryside: The policy states that development in the Countryside (as defined in Local Plans i.e. areas not within settlement boundaries) be suitable for its location in function and design and should accord with Policy ED4 Rural Development (see below). Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ED4 Rural Development: The policy states that economic and social development in rural areas will be supported within the following criteria: Focusing development within existing towns and villages Restricting development within Green Belt and countryside.
Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. This site also lies within the Green Belt and therefore the following planning policies apply: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV4 Green Belts: In Green Belt areas there will be a strong presumption against development any developments which are permitted will have to demonstrate appropriate environmental enhancement. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN19 Green Belt: The policy states that development will only be permitted in Green Belt where no alternative location can be found or the development would provide an opportunity to enhance the Green Belt.
Planning History
The site was subject to a previous planning application which went to appeal. The council lost the appeal.
Site issues
Tree preservation orders cover the woodland belts to the southern boundary of the site. Development of the site would not impact directly on the adjacent tree preservation orders, provided development of the site protected the tree canopy, root and nutrient zones. However the site may provide a role in providing habitat for a number of bird and mammal species due to the provision of open ground with a woodland boundary habitat.
Ensure protection of tree root and nutrient zones should development of the site take place.
No adverse impacts on designated sites.
The site is identified in the Phase 1 Habitat Survey as arable and pasture. The development of the site would result in the loss of the habitat provided by the site which may be important for species such as bats.
0/-
There are limited opportunities to enhance the biodiversity value of the surrounding area.
The loss of the site would result in a reduction in the area of foraging habitat, however the creation of SUDS pond would create new habitat.
Does the development of the site avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site? Does the development of the site maintain and enhance populations of European Protected Species including protection of their resting places?
The site is over 1km from the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site and development of the site should not impact on the integrity of the site. The woodland, wetland and perimeter woodlands may provide habitat for some protected species. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified.
0/-
Following site specific survey, appropriate mitigation should be identified and implemented.
17
Site issues
Does the site facilitate the restoration and enhancement of biodiversity in all our urban and rural environments through better planning, design and practice?
The woodland belts at the perimeter of the site form part of the woodland generalist 1km dispersal network, and the area of wet woodland at the south eastern corner of the site provide habitat value. Development of the site could potentially result in the loss of these resources. The site is connected to the core path network providing links to the housing to the south, along the B9096 and through the woodland to the north west.
The areas of woodland and wetland should be protected and enhanced.
Minor negative
++
Connectivity could be enhanced through providing access onto the core path network across the southern boundary of the site to provide direct access to the network. Enhancement of the informal path network within the woodland belts to the west would enhance the local access network. n/a
Enhancement of the access opportunities would have a positive effect on connectivity to the local core path network.
Tullibody ROA agreement area lies to the north and west of this site, within 500m. The area within which the site is located does not have a high SIMD. The site will not directly or significantly facilitate regeneration. However the location of the site in closer proximity to Tullibody town centre, than Alloa town centre may assist in support for local services within Tullibody. The site is within 500m of Braehead Golf Club. Also within 500m are the grounds surrounding Gean house and also the par surrounding Inglewood House. The grounds of Lornshill Academy are identified for community recreation development in the local plan and provide a recreation resource. The surrounding area to the north and east (Gubber Hill and Blackmuir Wood) includes a network of paths and provides an open space resource. The site is well connected to existing access routes and areas of open space.
No effect
n/a
No effect
Water
The site is located on a gentle slope and does not lie within the flood risk areas identified in the SEPA flood risk mapping. However surface water drainage is an issue for this site which comprises rushy pasture and the area of willow scrub in the south eastern corner. Surface water flows from this corner over the pavement and road during wet weather. Flooding is unlikely to be a significant issue for this site, however surface water drainage would require management. Development of the site would increase the rate of run off and would require the implementation of a SUDS scheme in the south eastern corner of the site. A drain runs through the woodland to the immediate south of the site and this is then culverted. Run off from development of the site could potentially enter this watercourse. There is potentially a minor risk of increased pollution to the minor water course from site run off. Development of this site would increase the rate of run off from the site. There are no recorded flooding incidents in relation to this site (2007). The site is small in extent and therefore the quantity of
The implementation of a SUDS scheme would positively contribute to the management of surface water drainage issues on this site.
The implementation of SUDS would reduce the impact of pollution resulting from run off associated with this site.
The lower part of this site could potentially accommodate a SUDS scheme.
No effect
18
Site issues
increased run off is likely to be minimal Soil Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? The site is not vacant or derelict. 0 n/a n/a
The site is not an area of prime quality agricultural land.
n/a
n/a
The site is located a short distance from the centre of Tullibody and Alloa but is well connected by the core path network providing easy access to these centres. The site is located adjacent to the B9096 which provides bus services to Tullibody and Alloa. The closest air quality monitoring stations for nitrogen dioxide indicate no significant trend in levels between 2002 and 2007. Development of the site will potentially contribute to a minor increase in traffic levels on the A907 and in Alloa town centre. However cumulative effects require to be assessed in Stage 2.
Development of the site could support the development of a cycleway between Alloa and Tullibody. n/a n/a
n/a
+ 0
n/a n/a
n/a
n/a
Climatic Factors
The centres of Tullibody and Alloa are accessible on foot, cycle and by public transport from the site. Schools and services are accessible within close proximity to the site, however the size of the site would not be sufficient to support new facilities. Local services can be accessed without the use of the private car. The site is located on a low rise and within an area of undulating landform. The site characteristics and surrounding landform do not suggest a significant increased risk of flooding or instability as a result of climate change There is an identified issue with surface water drainage which would require to be addressed should the site be developed. The site lies close to other residential areas and therefore anticipated to be provided from existing infrastructure. The site is located on a south east facing slope and partially enclosed by woodland belts. The site lies within 1.5km of Tullibody town centre, and 2km of Alloa town centre facilitating accessibility and would form an extension to existing settlement. The site characteristics are favourable for accessibility, aspect, and shelter. The site is located close to a residential area and would not be developed for mineral extraction due to a lack of opportunity for sufficient separation distances from settlement.
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Material Assets
Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter, solar gain and reduce the need to travel?
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction?
n/a
n/a
19
Site issues
No hazard areas.
n/a
n/a
Does the site reduce waste generation and promote waste recovery, recycling and composting? Cultural Heritage Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Landscape Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value?
The site does not have a significant impact on waste generation, however as it is located within the urban area it will not generate significant additional waste related journeys. Lornshill farmhouse is located immediately outwith the site boundary on the hill and is a B listed building. Development of the site would have some impact on the setting of the farmhouse which overlooks the slopes. There are no known archaeological remains within the site boundary. The site is identified in the HLA as 18th 19th century fields and farming. The site lies within an area of land currently designated as Greenbelt. The site lies within the Carse of Forth landscape character area. This landscape is characterised by its open character and flatness of landform which contrasts with the steeply rising Ochil Hills to the north. Development of this site would result in loss of Greenbelt, however this would not breach the Greenbelt which separates Tullibody and Alloa, but it would reduce it to the width of a single field bounded by woodland belts. The existing settlement form of the housing at Alloa consists of housing development extending along the B9096 on both sides of the road and partially contained by policy woodland. The settlement edge of Tullibody is contained by the policy woodland. Development already extends to the north of the B9096, and within open areas between policy woodland. However development of this area would reduce the actual and perceived separation between the two settlements. Lornshill Academy already compromises the separation between Tullibody and Alloa. The site lies immediately adjacent to the B9096, with no visual barrier at the road boundary making this site highly visible. The wider landscape has an undulating topography. Development within the site would be highly visible from the B9096, but would not be more widely significant.
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Guidelines for this area include protection of the open agricultural character, but also highlighting roads through roadside planting and the River Forth. Enhancement and mitigation would not reduce the impact of the loss of separation between Alloa and Tullibody. The sloping character of the site reduces opportunity for enhancement or mitigation.
Development of the site would result in loss of separation between Alloa and Tullibody.
Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)?
Development of the site would result in loss of separation between Alloa and Tullibody.
0/-
As above.
20
View north west towards Lornshill farm
View west along southern tree belt and illustrating woodland growing within poorly drained area on site
21
Site reference and location:
SITE 2 WEST EARLSFIELD, ALLOA

1.02 Small Located on the south eastern outskirts of Alloa. Adjacent to Earlsfield Rugby Football Ground and surrounded by residential properties to the north, south and west. The site lies within the settlement boundary. Access to the site would be taken onto Forth Crescent.
Size (ha) Size (group) Summary description including site access and public transport connections
Surface water drainage Drainage Ground stability
Major surface water drainage Topography and water table may limit opportunity for SUDS and therefore the scope for mitigation.
Vegetation: Mown grass at the road edge, and rough grass and trees to the east of the site. The rest of the site is bordered by road and residential properties. Field boundaries: There are a few field trees along the eastern boundary with the rugby club. Water: There are no surface water features within 200m of the site, however the flat and low lying nature of the site results in issues associated with surface water drainage. Additionally the Brothie Burn has been culverted through the site and the location and depth of this need to be established. Role as part of FHN: The site forms part of the woodland generalist 1km dispersal network and is associated with the adjacent areas of open space which are also part of the network. Other features: No other features of note.
Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use Planning policy framework Settlement expansion Unmanaged and used for informal recreation Residential, educational (St Mungos Primary School), recreational (Earlsfield rugby ground) There are no specific planning designations relating to the site however the following policy may be of relevance as the site lies within an area of multiple deprivation: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H3 Housing to meet a range of needs states that the provision of a range and choice of house types should be supported. In particular, sites suitable for affordable and special needs housing should be identified. This site forms part of a larger development proposal for the area and has been subject to a detailed planning application for a nursing home. The Clackmannanshire Community Plan 2006-2009 aims to promote the regeneration of Clackmannanshire and this designates Alloa South and East as an area eligible for regeneration funding under the Regeneration Outcome Agreement. The designation of this area as a focus for regeneration should be considered when further development is proposed.
Planning History Other policy considerations
22
The site lies within 500m of ancient woodland (Pond Wood) and within 2km of the Forth Estuary SPA, Ramsar and SSSI. It is unlikely that development of West Earlsfield would have any impact on the ancient woodland or on Forth Estuary as the site lies on the outskirts of Alloa and as such is surrounded by existing developed areas. However cumulative impacts resulting in the loss of habitat adjacent to the Forth Estuary should be considered.
Mitigation unlikely to be required.
No adverse effect on designated sites.
There are numerous Phase 1 habitat survey Target Note sites within 500 metres of the site. Pond Wood is also within 500m of the site where Clackmannanshire Council keeps records of Phase 1 and Phase 2 surveys. The site is identified in the Phase 1 Habitat Survey as amenity grassland. It is unlikely that development at West Earlsfield would have an impact on priority habitats or species because, as discussed above, the site is surrounded by existing development to the north, south and west. As such, any development could be viewed as an extension to the existing sites.
Mitigation is unlikely to be required.
Does the development of the site avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site? Does the development of the site maintain and enhance populations of European Protected Species including protection of their resting places? Does the site facilitate the restoration and enhancement of biodiversity in all our urban and rural environments through better planning, design and practice? Population and human health Is the site connected to the local core path network?
The site does not impact directly on the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site as the site lies on the outskirts of Alloa and as such is surrounded by existing developed areas. The mature boundary trees may provide bat roosts. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified. The site forms part of the woodland generalist 1km dispersal network and is associated with the adjacent areas of open space which are also part of the network. The development of the site could potentially result in loss of trees and open space which provide local biodiversity value. Whilst no Core Paths are directly within the site, West Earlsfield is relatively well connected to the Core Path Network and is within 100m of paths which provide links to The Black Devon in the south and areas of woodland (Black Wood and Mary Wood) and Clackmannan in the east. West Earlsfield has a high SIMD rating and lies within an area classed as one of the most deprived in Scotland. It is also within the Alloa ROA area. As such, development of the site will have a significant positive effect on regeneration.
0/-
Following site specific survey, appropriate mitigation should be identified and implemented. The woodland belt to the eastern site boundary should be protected and enhanced. Connectivity could be enhanced through designation of Riverside View as part of the Core Path Network as this links directly onto existing routes. Development of the site could be further enhanced by promoting links to core paths, recreational resources and centres of employment. Minor negative effect.
No effect
+/++
No mitigation will be required as the effect of development on population and human health will be positive. No mitigation will be required.
The site is located adjacent to Earlsfield Rugby ground is within 300m of both Alloa Park and the nearby school playing field. In addition the site is well connected to the Core Path network and provides links to open space and nearby woodland in the east. The site is currently used as informal open space The site does not lie within the flood risk areas identified in the SEPA flood risk map. However, the Black Devon and culverted area of the Bothie Burn which runs through the town of Alloa are identified as at risk of flooding in the SEPA flood risk map and the Clackmannanshire Council Biennial flooding report (2007).
+/++
Water
The use of SUDS in the development of the site may be used to mitigate the impacts of flooding, however there may be limitations on the
23
Flooding from the Forth Estuary is also identified as a risk. Therefore whilst the site itself is not identified as being at risk of flooding, the cumulative effect arising from the potential flood risk of the surrounding areas increases the likelihood of a flood event. Furthermore the site is flat and low lying and there may be issues associated with surface water drainage. Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? There are no open water courses directly within or adjacent to the site. There is a drain approximately 500m south east of the site which links to the Black Devon and the Firth of Forth to the south. There are unlikely to be any adverse effects on watercourses as a result of development of the site. Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? There are no recorded flooding incidents in relation to this site although surrounding areas are considered to be at risk from flooding as discussed above and could be affected by increased run off as a result of development of the area. The site is relatively small in extent and therefore the quantity of increased run off is likely to be minimal. Soil Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? The site is not vacant or derelict land. 0 0/0
scope and effectiveness due to the flat and low lying nature of the site.
The implementation of SUDS.
No effect
Implementation of SUDS could help to alleviate any increased risk of flooding should the site be developed.
There is unlikely to be any residual effect following mitigation.
The site is located on the outer fringes of Alloa and is also well linked with Clackmannan via the Core Path Network. Development could therefore have a positive effect on local air quality and could increase the use of sustainable forms of travel. The site is located about 1km away from the centre of Alloa and the new Alloa train station. The site has reasonable accessibility to public transport and development could therefore have a positive effect on air quality by encouraging those who live there to use public transport instead of private vehicle.
Promotion of the Core Path Network could help facilitate access between the site and Clackmannan.
Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
The site would be accessible by foot, cycle, bus and rail and has reasonable accessibility without private car use. As a result of the high level of accessibility by sustainable transport modes, the development of the site would be unlikely to have a significant impact on air quality. Available air quality data indicates that there are no exceedences of Nitrogen Dioxide or Particulates within the council area. There are no AQMAs within Clackmannanshire however air quality monitoring is ongoing. Traffic monitoring is also carried out at 16 permanent sites in the council area (none of which are located near West Earlsfield. There are no significant air quality issues associated with the site or the immediate surrounding area. The site is relatively small in scale and as such, development of
Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
No mitigation required however promotion of cycling/walking through the development of pathways and good access to town centres could help reduce the number of journeys made by private vehicle and have a knock on positive effect on emission
24
the area would be unlikely to result in significantly increased levels of air pollution or traffic. Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Development of the site would result in increased levels of traffic on local roads during construction but this is likely to be reduced once the development is complete. However cumulative effects require to be assessed in Stage 2. As the site is relatively small there is unlikely to be any significant change in the amount of traffic generated locally if development were to take place. Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Although the site itself is not identified as being at risk of flooding, it is surrounded by three areas which are (as discussed above). Extreme weather conditions and flooding as a result of climate change could potentially result in flooding of the site due to the proximity of other flood risk areas. Material Assets Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) The site lies close to other residential areas and therefore anticipated to be provided from existing infrastructure. The site is flat and in a sheltered location and is favourably located to make best use of shelter and solar gain. The site is located close to the urban edge of Alloa and although an area of search for open cast coal is identified to the east of the site, this is a restricted area. There is a pipeline hazard area approximately 50m south east of the site, but not within the site boundary. The site does not have a significant impact on waste generation, however as it is located within the urban area it will not generate significant additional waste related journeys. The site is approximately 150m away from the Old Alloa Conservation Area and several listed buildings in the town. This includes Alloa Tower which is located within 500m of the site, and there are also distant views across the parkland to Clackmannan Tower. Development of the site would have no effect on the cultural heritage value of the area as it is surrounded by existing residential developments to the north, south and west. Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Landscape Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? There are no known archaeological remains within the site boundary. The site is identified in the HLA as a 19th century recreation area. The site lies within the settlement boundary and there are no areas nearby designated for their landscape value. However the site forms part of the wider parkland setting for distant views to Clackmannan Tower. The site is surrounded to the north, south and west by existing developments. As such, development of the site would have no effect on settlement setting and identity. 0 0 0 -
levels. No mitigation is required.
0/+ 0 0
Does the site reduce waste generation and promote waste recovery, recycling and composting? Cultural Heritage Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value?
No mitigation would be required.
No effect.
No mitigation required.
25
The site lies on local roads and is surrounded by existing residential areas. The site forms part of the wider parkland landscape which provides distant views to Clackmannan Tower and development of the site may reduce appreciation of these views.
26
Mown grass area to east of site
Unmanaged vegetation to west of site
27
SITE 3 EARLSFIELD, SOUTH EARLSFIELD, ALLOA

3.86 Small Located on the south eastern outskirts of Alloa. South of Earlsfield Rugby Football Ground with existing residential development to the west and Pond Wood to the east. The remainder of the site is surrounded by enclosed by residential properties to the north, south and west. The site lies within the settlement boundary. Access to the site could potentially be linked to the new access road proposed as part of the masterplan for the surrounding area. None Ground stability Drainage
Size (ha) Size (group) Summary description including site access and public transport connections Overriding constraints to development Site specific investigations
Major surface water drainage Moderate pipeline hazard zone over approximately one third of site area Topography and water table may limit opportunity for SUDS.
Vegetation: Rough grass and trees within the site, woodland to the east including an attractive stand of mature oak trees. Field boundaries: A broken down post and wire fence adjoins the rugby pitch, and a stone wall extends along the southern boundary. Water: There is a drain approximately 50m south east of the site. Surface water drainage is an issue for this site. Role as part of FHN: The site includes part of woodland generalist 1km dispersal networks and an area of broadleaved species 500m dispersal network. The site is also important for its proximity to Pond Wood* Other features: Views to Clackmannan Tower.
Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use Planning policy framework: Other policy considerations Settlement expansion Unmanaged, used for informal recreation Residential, educational (St Mungos Primary School), recreational (Earlsfield rugby ground), open space. There are no specific planning designations related to the site, although generic development policies will apply The Clackmannanshire Community Plan 2006-2009 aims to promote the regeneration of Clackmannanshire and this designates Alloa South and East as an area eligible for regeneration funding under the Regeneration Outcome Agreement. The site is lies adjacent to this designated area and this should be considered when further development is proposed.
SEA /site assessment topic Biodiversity, flora and
The eastern boundary of the site is adjacent to ancient woodland on (Pond Wood) and is within approximately 1km of the Forth Estuary SPA, Ramsar and SSSI. As
Mitigation unlikely to be required.
No adverse effect on
28
SEA /site assessment topic fauna
the site is relatively small, it is unlikely that there would be any negative effect on designated areas as a result of development. Does the site impact on priority habitats or species? There are numerous Phase 1 habitat survey Target Note sites within 500m of the site; there are several within Pond Wood in particular. This is also an area where Clackmannanshire Council keeps records of Phase 1 and Phase 2 surveys. The site is identified in the Phase 1 Habitat Survey as arable and pasture. The woodland to the east of the site provides habitat connectivity to Pond Wood The site is presently an area of open space but is not safeguarded or designated as a countrypark or local nature reserve. Development of the Earlsfield site is unlikely to have a significant effect on local wildlife conservation, however it is likely to provide an area of habitat for species foraging. Does the development of the site avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site? Does the development of the site maintain and enhance populations of European Protected Species including protection of their resting places? Does the site facilitate the restoration and enhancement of biodiversity in all our urban and rural environments through better planning, design and practice? The site does not impact directly on the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site as the site lies on the outskirts of Alloa and as such is surrounded by existing developed areas The mature boundary trees may provide bat roosts. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified. The site includes part of woodland generalist 1km dispersal networks and an area of broadleaved species 500m dispersal network. The site is also important for its proximity to Pond Wood. Development of the site would result in the loss of the open space and woodland habitat. The site is directly connected to the Core Path Network providing links to The Black Devon, areas of woodland (Black Wood and Mary Wood) and Clackmannan in the east. Development at the Earlsfield site could help to strengthen these connections. How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD? West Earlsfield has a relatively high SIMD rating but is outwith the Alloa ROA agreement area. Development of the site will have a positive effect on regeneration. + 0 0 Mitigation is unlikely to be required.
designated sites.
0/-
Following site specific survey, appropriate mitigation should be identified and implemented. The woodland to the eastern site boundary should be protected and enhanced. Connectivity could be enhanced through designation of Riverside View as part of the Core Path Network as this links directly onto existing routes. Development of the site could be further enhanced by promoting links to core paths, recreational resources and centres of employment. No mitigation will be required as the effect of development on population and human health will be positive. Minor negative effect.
The site is located directly south of Earlsfield Rugby ground and is within 400m of both Alloa Park and the nearby St Mungos school playing field. In addition the site is well connected to the Core Path network and provides links to nearby woodland in the east. The area of woodland is also identified as an area with potential for recreational development as part of the proposed housing development to the north of the site. The site currently plays a role in providing an area of informal open space and development of the site would result in a loss of this function. However this role is not considered significant due to the poor drainage and tussocky vegetation which limits access. Earlsfield is therefore well positioned with respect to open space and development
++
Access links to these resources should be implemented should these sites be developed.
29
of the site could further enhance this resource. Water Is the site at risk of flooding? The site does not lie within the flood risk areas identified in the SEPA flood risk mapping. However, the Black Devon and culverted area of the Bothie Burn which runs through the town of Alloa are identified as at risk of flooding in the SEPA flood risk map and the Clackmannanshire Council Biennial flooding report (2007). Flooding from the Forth Estuary is also identified as a risk, and the Black Devon to the east of the site is also tidal at this point. The cumulative effect arising from the risk of all areas flooding could result in flooding at the site. In addition the flat and low lying nature of the site results in surface water drainage issues which would have to be addressed through development, and limits opportunities for mitigation of the effects of flooding. Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? There are no water courses directly within the site. There is a drain approximately 50m south east of the site which links to the Black Devon (approximately 200m from the site boundary) and the Firth of Forth to the south. Whilst there are unlikely to be any adverse effects on watercourses as a result of development of the site, the risk of pollution always remains. Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? There are no recorded flooding incidents in relation to this site although surrounding areas are considered to be at risk from flooding as discussed above and could be affected by increased run off as a result of development of the area. In particular, there could be an increase in water flowing to the Black Devon from the drain located approximately 50m from the site boundary. However, the site is relatively small in extent and therefore the quantity of increased run off is likely to be minimal. The site is not vacant or derelict land. 0 -/0 The implementation of SUDS and good environmental management practices should prevent any pollution of water course as a result of development at the site. Implementation of SUDS could help to alleviate any increased risk of flooding should the site be developed. No effect A detailed assessment of the flood risk associated with the site should be undertaken and SUDS should be implemented on site. Further investigation required.
Further investigation required.
Soil
Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport?
The site is located on the outer fringes of Alloa and is well linked with Clackmannan via the Core Path Network. The site is located about 1km away from the centre of Alloa and the new Alloa train station and has reasonable accessibility to public transport Development of the site could therefore have a positive effect on the number of people in the council area choosing to opt for public transport instead of using private cars to commute to work and access local services. Available air quality data indicates that there are no exceedences of Nitrogen Dioxide or Particulates within the council area. There are no AQMAs within Clackmannanshire however air quality and traffic monitoring is ongoing. The site itself is not identified as being problematic in terms of air pollution levels and as such, development of the site is unlikely to have any significant effect on this criterion. As the site is relatively small there is unlikely to be any significant change in the
Promotion of the Core Path Network could help facilitate access between the site and Clackmannan.
Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially
No mitigation required however promotion of cycling/walking through
30
outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
amount of traffic generated locally if development were to take place. Cumulative effects require to be assessed in Stage 2.
the development of pathways and good access to town centres could help reduce the number of journeys made by private vehicle and have a knock on positive effect on emission levels. + n/a
Climatic Factors
Alloa and Clackmannan are both readily accessible from the site and schools and services are accessible within close proximity to the site. Development of this site would therefore reduce the need to travel for those who lived there. Extreme weather conditions and flooding as a result of climate change could potentially result in flooding of the site due to the proximity of other flood risk areas as discussed above. The site lies close to other residential areas and therefore anticipated to be provided from existing infrastructure. The site is flat and in a sheltered location and is favourably located to make best use of shelter and solar gain. The site is located close to the urban edge of Alloa and although an area of search for open cast coal is identified to the east of the site, this is a restricted area. There is a hazard area which partly overlaps the west of the site, occupying approximately one third of the available land area.
Development of this site and the surrounding area should take future flood risk into account in the design and layout of the development.
Further investigation required.
Material Assets
Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
0/+ 0 The hazard area could potentially form an area of open space within the development, or to accommodate SUDS however the role of this area for the provision of SUDS may be affected by the scope to excavate in the hazard zone. Further investigation required.
The site will generate additional waste arisings, however as it is located within the urban area it will not generate significant additional waste related journeys. The site is approximately 250m away from the Old Alloa Conservation Area and several listed buildings in the town. This includes Alloa Tower which is located within 500m of the site, and there are also distant views across the parkland to Clackmannan Tower. However there are no designated sites of monuments within the site boundary itself. As such, development of the site would be unlikely to have an effect on the cultural heritage value of the area.
0 No mitigation would be required.
There are no known archaeological remains within the site boundary. The site is identified in the HLA as a relict designed landscape from the 17th-19th century. The site lies within the settlement boundary and there are no areas nearby designated for their landscape value. However the site forms part of the wider parkland setting for distant views to Clackmannan Tower. There is an existing settlement directly to the west of the site boundary however it is unlikely that development of Earlsfield would have any effect on the setting
0 0
No mitigation would be required.
No effect.
No mitigation required.
31
and identity of this area. Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes? The site would potentially be viewed from local roads to and around it however the development would primarily be seen as a small extension to an existing area of urban development with surrounding areas of open space. The wider landscape of which this site is part has a strong policy character, although this is of degraded quality. The oak trees at the eastern end are an important local landscape feature which should be retained, however in association with the area of land identified as a hazard zone, this would result in a reduction in the viable available area of land for development on this site. Enhancement and retention of the oak trees at the eastern end of the site, in association with enhancement of the wider former policy landscape.
32
Mature trees to east of site and unmanaged vegetation
33
Site reference and location: Size (ha) Size (group) Summary description including site access and public transport connections Overriding constraints to development Site specific investigations
SITE 4 ALLOA EAST (1), CARSEBRIDGE, ALLOA

7.93 Medium Lying between the B909 and the Alloa Dunfermline railway line and to the east of Alloa town centre. Within 1 km of Alloa train station and closely accessibly to the A907 and A908 main roads and bus links. The site lies within the settlement boundary and is allocated for housing development in the local plan. The main access to this site would be directly onto the B909 is on embankment through the area and this would present issues for access onto this road. However there is existing access to the warehouse. None Drainage Ground stability
Major inundation risk associated with Gartmorn Dam Moderate surface water drainage, flood risk
Summary of area remaining following mitigation Environmental features
Implementation of SUDS Management of risk associated with Gartmorn Dam The site was recently modified by the construction of the B909 and the construction works associated with the new railway. Trees and vegetation A small woodland belt is located in the south eastern corner of the site, the site comprises unmanaged rushy pasture. Field boundaries: Post and wire adjacent to B909, industrial style fencing adjacent to bonded warehouse with poplars along boundary. Water (ponds, rivers and streams): There are no water courses located within the site. Surface water forms a shallow pond which is developing over a large part of this site. Role as part of FHN: The site includes parts of the woodland generalist 1km dispersal network which provides connectivity to the wider FHN to the east.
Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use Planning policy framework: Settlement expansion Unmanaged agricultural field. The railway line and fire station are located to the south, residential housing lies to the west and there are fields and warehouses to the north. To the east is open farmland. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Schedule of Sites H1 (2) Hilton Sites 1 & 2 Development Guidelines: Existing Uses: Business/Vacant/Grazing Subject to Masterplan for entire expansion area, (Residential and Businesses uses see Business Site 11). Subject to Development Brief for each site. Provision of active/passive open space. Developer contributions required for provision of Eastern Relief Road/ associated traffic management measures. Part redevelopment of bonded warehouses required. Access from Hilton Road for Site 1. Access from new Relief Road for Site 2. Structural planting/landscaping to boundaries. Enhance and retain existing burn and woodland on site. Ground conditions will require investigation (White land for future allocation development). Also Policy RES5 - Affordable and Particular Needs Housing: The policy aims to secure a proportion of affordable/particular needs housing on all developments over 30 houses.
34
There are no designated sites within the site boundary or within the identified buffers.
The site is identified as improved grassland in the Phase 1 Habitat Survey.
Does the development of the site avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site? Does the development of the site maintain and enhance populations of European Protected Species including protection of their resting places? Does the site facilitate the restoration and enhancement of biodiversity in all our urban and rural environments through better planning, design and practice? Population and human health Is the site connected to the local core path network? How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD?
The site does not impact directly on the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site as the site lies on the outskirts of Alloa and is over 1km from the site. The woodland may provide bat roosts and the wetland may provide habitat for species such as great crested newt. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified. The development of the site would potentially result in loss of wetland and woodland. The site includes parts of the woodland generalist 1km dispersal network which provides connectivity to the wider FHN to the east. A core path connection provides recreational access from the north east of the site, however there is no other access by core paths from the site. However there is access on local roads and pavements to Alloa town centre. The site lies adjacent to areas within the top 15% ranking of the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 2006, and the Alloa Regeneration area. Development within this area may contribute to the regeneration of the area through providing new development and investment.
0/-
Following site specific survey, appropriate mitigation should be identified and implemented. The existing woodland and wetland should be protected and enhanced. Minor negative effect.
There is a playing field located at the western end of the site and the football ground is within 200m of the site. The site is well connected and provided with access to recreational open space due to the playing field to the west of the site.
++
Water
Parts of the site are identified on the SEPA flood map as being at risk of flooding from rivers, which is likely to be from the Brothie Burn. The site contains an area of developing standing water and rushy pasture which identifies issues with surface water drainage.
The presence of standing water may reduce the opportunity for the development of SUDS.
The flood risk of the site should be investigated further. This is a low lying site in close proximity to a watercourse with evidence of surface water drainage issues.
The Brothie Burn is culverted, and this reduces the opportunity for pollution from development within the site. There is some potential for diffuse pollution caused by run off from the development of the site. The development of the site would potentially increase run off to the Brothie Burn.
0/-
The implementation of SUDS on the site could reduce the impacts of contamination from run off. The size of the site may reduce opportunities to accommodate SUDS. Further detailed investigation of site drainage constraints should be carried out.
35
There are known flooding issues associated with the Brothie Burn.
Soil
The site is not vacant or derelict land.
The site is not prime agricultural land.
The site lies within 1.5km of Alloa town centre and this can be accessed along roads and pavements. There are core path connections which provide recreational access to the north east of the site. The site is well connected to the services and transport nodes within Alloa town centre.
++
The site lies within 1km of Alloa railway station and the A907 and A908 which provide access to regular bus services. The site lies within close proximity to Alloa town centre and public transport connections.
++
The closest air quality monitoring stations for nitrogen dioxide indicate no significant trend in levels between 2002 and 2007. Development of the site is unlikely to have a significant impact on local air quality. However, should several sites within the local area be developed, the cumulative effect on air quality should be considered.
The site will potentially have a minor effect on traffic levels on the A907 and A908, however the site is small in extent and therefore this effect is not likely to be significant. Development of the site is unlikely to have a significant impact on local traffic flows. However, should several sites within the local area be developed, the cumulative effect should be considered The site is located within Alloa and with close access to public transport and services. The site is identified as having some potential flood risk, which may be exacerbated by climate change. The site is located within the built up area of Alloa and therefore close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure. The site is located on a flat to gently sloping area partially screened from the south by the existing woodland belt adjacent to the railway. This is a sheltered location, although some of the woodland would reduce solar gain. The development of the site would not further reduce future potential for mineral
Climatic Factors
++ ++ The implementation of SUDS may reduce the impacts of this.
Material Assets
Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future
36
potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
extraction. The site does not lie within any oil or gas pipeline hazard areas. 0
Development of the site would generate additional waste arisings, however the site is small in extent and lies adjacent to an existing urban areas for which recycling facilities will be provided. There are no known historic environment features within the site or in the identified buffer of the site. The site is identified in the HLA as 18th -19th century fields and farming.
There are no known archaeological remains within the site boundary. The site is not designated AGLV or Greenbelt. The landscape lies within the Lower Devon Carselands landscape character area which is characterised by the twisting course of the Devon contrasting with the channelled drainage ditches and large scale rectilinear fields. The Ochil hills are a dominant feature and the hillfoot villages nestle at their base.
0 0 The guidelines for this character area support the definition of settlement boundaries which should be defined through woodland planting to reflect existing field patterns and woodland planting.
The development of the site would not impact negatively on settlement setting and identity. The site does not strongly visually relate to the existing settlement and development could be accommodated within this area. The site is highly visible from the B909, however the local area is already influenced by the developed character contributed by the warehouses and although locally prominent, is not widely visible.
37
Area of standing water and rushes within site
Woodland to south of site boundary
38
SITE 5 ALLOA EAST (2), CARSEBRIDGE, ALLOA

6.42 Medium Lying north of the B909 and to the east of Alloa town centre. Within 1 km of Alloa train station and accessibly to the A907 and A908 main roads and bus links. The site lies within the settlement boundary. Site access would have to be taken from the B909. If site 4 was also developed a roundabout on the B909 could serve to provide access to both sites. None Drainage Ground stability
Major inundation risk associated with Gartmorn Dam Moderate Flood risk Minor surface water drainage
The whole of the site is assumed at potential inundation risk associated with Gartmorn Dam The site was recently modified by the construction of the B909 as a result of the railway reinstatement. Trees and vegetation A small woodland belt is located to the east of the site. The site comprises unmanaged pasture. Field boundaries: The boundary with the road is post and wire fence and there is security fencing with poplars along the boundary with the bonded warehouse. Hedgerow trees extend along the boundary with the footpath to the east of the site. Water (ponds, rivers and streams):The culverted Brothie Burn runs through the site.
Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use Settlement expansion Unmanaged agricultural land There are warehouses to the immediate north of the site. To the east is open farmland, located beyond a shelterbelt.
39
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Schedule of Sites H1 (2) Hilton Sites 1 & 2 Development Guidelines: Existing Uses: Business/Vacant/Grazing Subject to Masterplan for entire expansion area, (Residential and Businesses uses see Business Site 11). Subject to Development Brief for each site. Provision of active/passive open space. Developer contributions required for provision of Eastern Relief Road/ associated traffic management measures. Part redevelopment of bonded warehouses required. Access from Hilton Road for Site 1. Access from new Relief Road for Site 2. Structural planting/landscaping to boundaries. Enhance and retain existing burn and woodland on site. Ground conditions will require investigation (White land for future allocation development). Also: Policy RES5 - Affordable and Particular Needs Housing: The policy aims to secure a proportion of affordable/particular needs housing on all developments over 30 houses. Due to the risk of flooding the following should also be taken into account: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV9 Water Resource Management: The policy states that development will not normally be permitted in undeveloped flood plain areas, in areas of known significant flood risk, or if it will adversely affect the Forth Estuary. Exceptions will be made only when it can be demonstrated that no alternative locations can be found, or that suitable mitigation measures can be implemented. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN4 Water Resources: The policy states that where a development area is determined as being at risk of flooding, planning permission will not be granted except where it can be proven that there are no viable alternative sites.
There are no designated sites within the site boundary or within the identified buffers.
The site is identified in the Phase 1 Habitat Survey as arable and pasture
The site does not impact directly on the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site as the site lies on the outskirts of Alloa over 1km from the site and is surrounded by existing developed areas. The mature boundary trees may provide bat roosts. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified. The woodland along the eastern site boundary is part of the woodland generalist 1km dispersal network. The development of the site could potentially result in loss of trees and open space which provide local biodiversity value. A core path connection provides recreational access through the shelterbelt to the east of the site where access can be gained north and east to Gartmorn Dam. However there is access on local roads and pavements to Alloa town centre.
0/-
Following site specific survey, appropriate mitigation should be identified and implemented. The woodland belt to the eastern site boundary should be protected and enhanced. Minor negative effect.
The site lies adjacent to areas within the top 15% ranking of the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 2006, and the Alloa Regeneration area. Development within this area may contribute to the regeneration of the area through providing new development and investment.
40
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) ++
What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? Notes connections to key recreational area or designation as a safeguarded open space or country park Water Is the site at risk of flooding?
There is a playing field located in close proximity to the site and the football ground is within 500m of the site. The site is well connected and provided with access to recreational open space due to the proximity of the playing field to the west of the site. Parts of the site are identified on the SEPA flood map as potentially being at risk of flooding from rivers, which is likely to be from the Brothie Burn.
The flood risk of the site should be investigated further. This is a low lying site in close proximity to a watercourse. The implementation of SUDS on the site could reduce the impacts of contamination from run off. The size of the site may reduce opportunities to accommodate SUDS.
The Brothie Burn is culverted, and this would reduce the opportunity for pollution from development within the site. There is some potential for diffuse pollution caused by run off from the development of the site. The development of the site would potentially increase run off to the Brothie Burn. There are known flooding issues associated with the Brothie Burn. (confirm that these are downstream)
0/-
Soil
The site lies within 2km of Alloa town centre and this can be accessed along roads and pavements. There are core path connections which provide recreational access to the north east of the site. The site is well connected to the services and transport nodes within Alloa town centre.
++
The site lies within 1km of Alloa railway station and the A907 and A908 which provide access to regular bus services. The site lies within close proximity to Alloa town centre and public transport connections.
++
The closest air quality monitoring stations for nitrogen dioxide indicate no significant trend in levels between 2002 and 2007. The site will potentially have a minor effect on traffic levels on the A907 and A908, however the site is small in extent and therefore this effect is not likely to be significant.
41
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) ++ ++
Climatic Factors
The site is located within Alloa and with close access to public transport and services. The site is identified as having some potential flood risk, which may be exacerbated by climate change. The site is located within the built up area of Alloa and therefore close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure. The site is located on a flat to gently sloping area in a sheltered location. The development of the site would not further reduce future potential for mineral extraction. The site does not lie within any oil or gas pipeline hazard areas.
The implementation of SUDS may mitigate these impacts
Material Assets
+ 0 0
The site does not have a significant impact on waste generation, however as it is located within the urban area it will not generate significant additional waste related journeys. There are no known historic environment features within the site or in the identified buffer of the site. The site is identified in the HLA as 18th -19th century fields and farming.
Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Landscape Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
There are no known archaeological remains within the site boundary. The site is not designated AGLV or Greenbelt. The landscape lies within the Lower Devon Carselands landscape character area. The development of the site would not impact negatively on settlement setting and identity. The site does not strongly visually relate to the existing settlement and development could be accommodated within this area. The site is highly visible from the B909, however the local area is already influenced by the developed character contributed by the warehouses and although locally prominent, is not widely visible.
0 0 0
42
Poplars adjacent to bonded warehouses
Woodland to north east of site boundary
43
SITE 6 ALLOA WEST EXPANSION AREA, ALLOA

18.86 Medium The site lies in close proximity to the River Forth on the south western edge of Alloa. The site comprises a flat area of farmland adjacent to industrial and residential development at the riverside. The majority of the site lies within the settlement boundary, part of the western edge lies outwith the boundary. Access should be taken onto Smithfield Loan to the existing roundabout on the A907. None Drainage Ground stability
Major flood risk. Potential impact on Firth of Forth SPA Implementation of SUDS may be limited due to low lying nature of the site. The site comprises very flat arable farmland with natural regeneration woodland on the disused sidings to the north of the site. The route of a disused railway passes through the southern part of the site. Trees and vegetation An area of woodland extends along the northern boundary of the site on the location of former railway sidings. Field boundaries: The majority of the site is not enclosed by field boundaries, with post and wire fences at the southern boundary of the site. The northern site boundary includes outgrown hedgerow trees and the western site boundary includes deciduous pioneer woodland Water (ponds, rivers and streams): There are no water resources on the site, however a pond lies within 50m of the site boundary at Longcarse and the Firth of Forth is within 200m of the site boundary.
Site ownership: Site type: Settlement expansion
Current land use Surrounding land use
Predominantly arable agriculture with some pasture to the south of the dismantled railway. To the north and east is the residential and industrial area of Alloa, to the east is housing, industrial, business and warehouse use. There is farmland to the south and west of the area.
44
The site includes an area designated for Jobs in the Local Plan: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Schedule of Sites - J16 New Alloa Business Park: Development Guidelines: Access from Arnsbrae Roundabout/Smithfield Loan. High quality business park geared to appropriate Class 4 uses with potential for Classes 5 and 6 to south east part of site, subject to protection of amenity for neighbouring uses. Incorporates Pavilions Business Park and Alloa Smart Village. The site lies partly within the areas designated as Developed and Undeveloped Coast in the Local Plan: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN5 The Coast:: The policy states that the Undeveloped Coast will be protected from further development except where it can be proven that there are no viable alternative sites. The site is in proximity to the Firth of Forth SPA, RAMSAR and SSSI and therefore the following Structure Plan policy should be taken into account: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV1 Nature Conservation: The policy aims to promote the protection of wildlife, habitats and other natural features. It states that development which will potentially negatively impact upon internationally or nationally designated sites will not be permitted unless it can be demonstrated that their will be no adverse effect from the proposal, or no viable alternative solution. Due to the limited opportunities for managing flood risk on the site, the following policies are of relevance: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV9 Water Resource Management: The policy states that development will not normally be permitted in undeveloped flood plain areas, in areas of known significant flood risk, or if it will adversely affect the Forth Estuary. Exceptions will be made only when it can be demonstrated that no alternative locations can be found, or that suitable mitigation measures can be implemented. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN4 Water Resources: The policy states that where a development area is determined as being at risk of flooding, planning permission will not be granted except where it can be proven that there are no viable alternative sites. As the site comprises vacant or derelict land the following policy is of relevance: Clackmannanshire Local Plan - Policy RES2 Brownfield Development: The policy prioritises development which will take place on brownfield sites which will utilise vacant, derelict, contaminated and underused land and property within settlement boundaries. As the site includes two core paths the following should be considered: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy INF3 Local Access: The policy states that development will not be permitted where it will result in the loss of an asserted right of way, footpath or a path forming part of the Clackmannanshire path network unless the provision of an alternative path can be assured. NB. For the part of the site outwith the settlement boundary the following apply: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV3 Development in the Countryside: The policy states that development in the Countryside (as defined in Local Plans i.e. areas not within settlement boundaries) be suitable for its location in function and design and should accord with Policy ED4 Rural Development (see below). Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ED4 Rural Development: The policy states that economic and social development in rural areas will be supported within the following criteria: Focusing development within existing towns and villages Restricting development within Green Belt and countryside.
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Sets out the criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area.
Planning History
An outline planning application for housing and business uses adjacent to and south of the distributor road has been given consent.
45
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) --
There are no designated sites within the site boundary, however the Forth SPA, Ramsar, SSSI lies within 200m of the site boundary. The SPA citation statement seeks to avoid significant disturbance to the qualifying species and ensuring that the integrity of the site is maintained. Development close to the SPA may result in disturbance to the species for which the SPA is designated. Alloa New Marshalling Yards are identified as a wildlife site in the north western corner of the site. The disused sidings to the north of the site have been subject to Phase 2 habitat survey and there are 5 Phase 1 Habitat Survey target note sites within this area. Development of the site would potentially result in disturbance to the bird species noted in the SPA citation. The site is identified in the Phase 1 Habitat Survey as arable and pasture, with unimproved neutral pasture along the route of the disused railway.
Development of this site has a potential cumulative impact in association with loss of other undisturbed areas within the Forth Valley. A recreation and access management plan would reduce additional disturbance to the adjacent Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar.
Does the development of the site avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site?
The development of the site may result in increased disturbance to the species for which the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar is designated.
--
Reduction in the area of the site proposed for development may reduce the potential impact of the development of the site. Site specific survey should be undertaken to ascertain the extent of any likely disturbance resulting from development of the site. Following site specific survey, appropriate mitigation should be identified and implemented. The role of the perimeter woodland as part of the habitat network should be protected and enhanced. There is opportunity to improve the access along the former railway.
Does the development of the site maintain and enhance populations of European Protected Species including protection of their resting places? Does the site facilitate the restoration and enhancement of biodiversity in all our urban and rural environments through better planning, design and practice? Population and human health Is the site connected to the local core path network? How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD?
The mature boundary trees may provide bat roosts. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified. The woodland to the north of the site forms part of the woodland generalist 1km dispersal network. Development of the site may result in loss of boundary woodland which provides local biodiversity value. The site is includes two core paths and is well connected to the wider core path network providing access into the urban area and to the west for recreation. The disused railway is an important access route and the area is popular for recreation. The site does not lie close to or within the top 15% ranking of the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 2006.
0/-
++
There are no open space resources per se, however the riverside and access networks provide an open space resource.
The access routes should be maintained should the development of the site take place. The low lying nature of the site and proximity to the River Forth reduces the options for flood mitigation.
Water
The site lies immediately adjacent to the Firth of Forth and lies adjacent to areas identified on the SEPA flood map as potentially being at risk of flooding from the sea. This is a flat site and therefore there may be limited opportunity to manage flood risk on the site. The pumping station located to the east of the site boundary has previously resulted
--
46
in flooding of the area when breakdown occurs.
There is a pond at Longcarse and the Firth of Forth may be affected by run off from the site.
The implementation of SUDS will reduce the impact of run off from the site.
There are no watercourses within the site, however the site may play a current role in holding surface water and contribute to reducing the rate of run off to the Firth of Forth.
Soil
The majority of the site comprises an area of vacant or derelict land. The site is not prime quality agricultural land.
++ 0
The site is well connected by the core path network and although located on the periphery of Alloa lies within 2km of the central area of the town. The site is located a short distance from the A907 and local bus routes. Alloa station is within 2km of the site.
++ +
Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Material Assets Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain?
The nearest air quality monitoring locations for NO2 are at Norwood Avenue and Glasshouse Loan and these do not show any clear trends in NO2 concentrations between 2002 and 2007. Development on the site would increase traffic flows on the A907.
The development is located close to Alloa town centre and therefore potentially reduces the need to travel to access local services and facilities. The site is flat and low lying and therefore is at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change. The site is located adjacent to the existing built up area of Alloa and therefore close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure. The site is located on the flat low lying ground at the edge of the River Forth and is moderately well located to make best use of solar gain. Additional shelter could be provided through landscape planting.
++ -Mitigation options to reduce the increased flood risk associated with climate change are limited.
47
The site is located adjacent to residential areas and would not be appropriate for mineral extraction. There are no hazard areas on site.
The site does not have a significant impact on waste generation, however as it is located within the urban area it will not generate significant additional waste related journeys. There are no designated features or buildings on the site or close to the site.
There are no known archaeological remains within the site boundary. The HLA identifies the site as 19th century to present fields and farming. The site lies within the Carse of Forth landscape character area. The landscape is characterised by its broad width and flatness, and openness emphasised by a lack of woodland and field boundaries. Human settlement is a prominent feature within the landscape. The site lies partly in an area of undeveloped coast and partly in an area of developed coast however the majority of the site is unclassified. The site lies at the periphery of Alloa and is not highly visible from the surrounding area. It is not a prominent location when approaching Alloa on the A907 due to the screening provided by the scrub and woodland to the north of the site. Development of the site would not conflict with the current settlement pattern.
0 0 Guidelines for this area include protection of the open agricultural character, but also highlighting roads through roadside planting and the River Forth.
Development of this site would increase the extent of built development on the riverside, reducing the open expansive landscape character of the carse of Forth.
No mitigation suitable to reduce loss of open character.
48
View north to new business development
Woodland to east of site boundary along disused railway
49
SITE 7 JELLYHOLM, SAUCHIE, ALLOA (NORTH EAST)

61.50 Large The site lies adjacent to the urban edge of Sauchie and Alloa and comprises gently undulating farmland with the low Post Hill at the western end. There are some mature trees at the boundary and demarking field boundaries. The site includes Jellyholm and some residential properties. A disused shaft is also marked on the OS map, to the east of the site. The site lies outwith the settlement boundary. All of the site is within 1.4km of the A908 where bus routes are accessible. Development within a site of this size would potentially require two access points. Site access could be taken onto Gartmorn Road which provides the main access to Sauchie and Gartmorn Dam. However this route already serves a large number of houses within the Sauchie area, and although the junction with the A908 could be upgraded to include a roundabout, an alternative option would be to use Jellyholm Road as the main site access, however this is a private road along the majority of its length and there may be issues in securing access to this site. This connects to Carsebridge Road which joins the A908 at the existing roundabout. There are known capacity issues associated with the roundabout with the B909.
Size (ha) Size (group) Summary description including site access and public transport connections
Inundation risk from Gartmorn Dam. Ground stability Major - Inundation risk from Gartmorn Dam. Moderate Instability. Prime agricultural land. The site also has odour amenity issues associated with the proximity to the bonded warehouses. Minor The woodland to the southern site boundary is covered by TPO.
Approximately one third of the area of the site is estimated to lie outwith the area of potential inundation risk. The site comprises gently undulating farmland with the low Post Hill at the western end. Trees and vegetation Two small woodland belts adjoin the site boundary in places, and trees run alongside Gartmorn Road. The route of the Brothie Burn is wooded. The land is under both arable and pasture cultivation Field boundaries: There are some field trees and a number of hedgerows and also outgrown hedgerow trees. Water (ponds, rivers and streams): The Brothie Burn runs to the south of the site and a disused mill lade runs along the site boundary at Keilarsbrae.
Site ownership: Site type: New settlement
Arable and pasture agriculture To the north is the residential area of Sauchie, to the east is industrial, business and warehouse use. There is farmland to the south and west of the area.
50
Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV3 Development in the Countryside: The policy states that development in the Countryside (as defined in Local Plans i.e. areas not within settlement boundaries) be suitable for its location in function and design and should accord with Policy ED4 Rural Development (see below). Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ED4 Rural Development:: The policy states that economic and social development in rural areas will be supported within the following criteria: Focusing development within existing towns and villages Restricting development within Green Belt and countryside.
Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. As the site includes areas of prime agricultural land the following is of relevance: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV7 Agricultural Land: Development which would result in the permanent loss of prime agricultural land will only be permitted where such land is identified for development in Local Plans and lower quality land cannot reasonably be used. As there are areas of woodland within the site the following should be considered: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN2 Landscape and Ecology: The policy states that appropriate consideration must be given to existing woodland, habitats, natural and landscape features when making a planning application. As there is a core path connection through the site the following applies: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy INF3 Local Access: The policy states that development will not be permitted where it will result in the loss of an asserted right of way, footpath or a path forming part of the Clackmannanshire path network unless the provision of an alternative path can be assured.
,
SEA /site assessment topic Biodiversity, flora and fauna Site appraisal criteria Site issues and discussion Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) 0 Enhancement and mitigation options Potential effect following mitigation
Gartmorn Dam SSSI lies to the east of the site, and is upstream of the site, but connected by the Brothie Burn. There are tree preservation orders covering the woodland to the south at Keilarsbrae, which includes stands of woodland within the site boundary. The site is not designated as of local wildlife importance. The site is identified in the Phase 1 Habitat Survey as arable and pasture and includes small areas of broadleaved semi natural woodland at Keilarsbrae and along the route of the Brothie Burn. There are two Phase 1 habitat survey target note sites outwith the area and in the woodland connected to the site. An area to the north east of the site has been subject to Phase 1 and Phase 2 habitat survey. The site provides an open farmland habitat with hedgerows and boundary trees.
The site is remote from the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site and development of the site should not impact on the integrity of the site. The mature boundary trees may provide bat roosts, proximity to the Brothie Burn may support otter and hedgerows may provide habitat for other protected species. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation
0/-
51
implemented if these species are identified. Does the site facilitate the restoration and enhancement of biodiversity in all our urban and rural environments through better planning, design and practice? The southern and northern boundary of the site provide part of the woodland generalist 1km dispersal network, along with the woodland at the base of Post Hill and west of Jellyholm. Further connections could be created through the northern edge of the site and from north to south across the site. The development of the site could potentially result in loss of trees, hedgerows and open space which provide local biodiversity value. A core path connection provides recreational access through site along Jellyholm road from where access can be gained east to Gartmorn Dam. The core paths also connect to other routes and networks to the north, south and west. The site lies close to areas within the top 15% ranking of the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 2006, and the Sauchie Regeneration area. Development within this area may contribute to the regeneration of the area through providing new development and investment. What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? The site lies within 1km of the Gartmorn Dam Country Park which is a significant and important open space resource. Other open space resources of note within 1km include Sauchie Football ground and Alloa Golf club. Parts of the site immediately adjacent to the Brothie Burn are identified on the SEPA flood map as potentially being at risk of flooding from rivers. Inundation risk associated with the Gartmorn Dam would be high within the area. Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? The site slopes from east to west, with the majority of the site draining towards the Brothie Burn. There is some potential for diffuse pollution caused by run off from the development of the site entering the Brothie Burn. The development of the site would potentially increase run off to the Brothie Burn. There are known flooding issues associated with the Brothie Burn downstream from this site. ++ The areas of woodland, hedgerows and riparian habitat should be protected and enhanced. Minor negative effect.
Is the site connected to the local core path network? How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD?
++
Water
--
This is a gently sloping site and therefore there may be opportunity to manage flooding risk on the site through careful layout and design. The implementation of SUDS on the site could reduce the impacts of contamination from run off. The implementation of SUDS on the site could reduce the quantity of run off resulting from development of the site.
Soil
The site is not vacant and derelict land.
A third of the site area is prime quality agricultural land.
The site lies within 1km of Sauchie Main Street and 2km of Alloa town centre. Alloa town centre can be accessed along roads and pavements and also off road core paths. There are core path connections which provide recreational access to the north east of the site.
++
52
The site lies within 2km of Alloa railway station and the A907 and A908 which provide access to regular bus services.
Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Material Assets Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
The closest air quality monitoring stations for nitrogen dioxide indicate no significant trend in levels between 2002 and 2007. The site will potentially increase traffic levels on the A908.
The site is located within Alloa and with close access to public transport and services. The site is identified as having some potential flood risk, which may be exacerbated by climate change. The site is located within the built up area of Alloa and therefore close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure. The site is located on a gently sloping predominantly south facing area in a sheltered location. The site is identified as lying within the New Sauchie restricted area of search for open cast coal, however the site lies within 500m of settlement and would not be suitable for development. The site does not lie within any oil or gas pipeline hazard areas.
++ ++
+ 0
Development of the site would generate additional waste arisings.
Local recycling and composting facilities should be provided as part of the site masterplan.
No effect.
There are no known historic environment features within the site. The listed buildings of Carsewood and Keilarsbrae lie within close proximity to the site boundary. Both listed buildings are located within a wooded setting and intervisibilty with development on the site would be limited. The site is identified in the HLA as 18th-19th century fields and farming. There are no known archaeological remains within the site boundary. The site is not designated AGLV or Greenbelt, however the eastern site boundary adjoins the Forest AGLV and development within the site would affect the rural character of this area. The site lies within the Devon/Forth landscape character area
0 This landscape character area is noted for its diversity of landscape features and high landscape value. In particular
53
with varied farmland characterised by undulating landform and coniferous blocks of forestry. Key attributes of the landscape character area are the diversity of features and dramatic outlook to the Ochils. The corridor of the Black Devon is identified as important. Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes? The landscape has a strong rural character with limited visual association with the urban area. Development within this area would be in close proximity to an area of industrial development and this would isolate the development from the settlement. The site itself is not highly visible within the wider landscape, however development within this area would destroy the integrity of this rural landscape. -
guidelines for development include new woodland planting and restructuring of existing coniferous plantations.
54
View east illustrating strong rural character of the landscape
South east to woodland along route of Brothie Burn
55
Site reference and location: Size (ha) Size (group) Summary description including site access and public transport connections Overriding constraints to development Site specific investigations Constraints to development Summary of area remaining following mitigation Environmental features 67.2ha Large
SITE 8A: LAND SOUTH OF BROOK STREET, WEST OF B908 ALVA
The site is extensive and wraps around the southern periphery of Alva to the River Devon. The site is largely flat and low lying agricultural land. The B908 is the major transport route to the east of the site. The site lies outwith the settlement boundary.
Flood risk Major Flood risk Approximately one third of the area of the site lies outwith the area of identified potential flood risk in the SEPA indicative river and coastal flood map. Trees and vegetation: The fields are large and predominantly under arable cultivation. There are few field trees. There are some areas of scrub adjacent to the River Devon. Field boundaries This is a large scale agricultural landscape and there are few field boundaries, mostly comprising remnant hedgerows and outgrown hedgerow trees Water (ponds, rivers and streams): The River Devon flows at the southern extent of the site. The Alva Burn flows from north to south across the site, as does the Spring Burn and minor drains. There is an area of wetland and two small ponds adjacent to the River Devon and a small pond to the south east of Greenhead.
Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use Settlement expansion Agriculture. A sewage works is also located in the west of the site. The site adjoins the built edge of Alva and the surrounding land is used for agriculture.
56
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Sets out the criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area. The site also lies within the Green Belt and therefore the following policies apply: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV4 Green Belts: In Green Belt areas there will be a strong presumption against development any developments which are permitted will have to demonstrate appropriate environmental enhancement. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN19 Green Belt:: The policy states that development will only be permitted in Green Belt where no alternative location can be found or the development would provide an opportunity to enhance the Green Belt. As the site has been identified as being at risk of flooding the following policies apply: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV9 Water Resources: The policy states that development will not normally be permitted in undeveloped flood plain areas, in areas of known significant flood risk, or if it will adversely affect the Forth Estuary. Exceptions will be made only when it can be demonstrated that no alternative locations can be found, or that suitable mitigation measures can be implemented. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN4 Water Resources: The policy states that where a development area is determined as being at risk of flooding, planning permission will not be granted except where it can be proven that there are no viable alternative sites. As the site is close to the River Devon and the A91Corridor the following policy applies: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN12 Area Environmental Enhancement states that proposals which would detract from the setting or aesthetics of areas adjacent to Conservation Areas or in proximity to rivers or the A91 corridor will not normally be permitted. Developers must also demonstrate how proposals can be integrated with proposed enhancement measures. SEA /site assessment topic Biodiversity, flora and fauna Site appraisal criteria Site issues and discussion Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) 0 Enhancement and mitigation options Potential effect following mitigation
There are no sites designated for their wildlife value within the site boundaries or buffer zone. The Craigleith and Myreton Hill SSSI lies to the north of the site on the steep slopes of the Ochils, part of which is within 200m of the northern site boundary. The site is designated for its woodland, bog and flush grassland and basic rock outcrop. Development of the site would not impact on SSSI as it is upstream from the development site and is steep and not easily accessible.
Two areas adjacent to the River Devon have been subject to Phase 1 and Phase 2 habitat surveys, and include two target species note sites. The site is identified in the Phase 1 Habitat Survey as predominantly arable and pasture, with some areas of semi improved neutral grassland, swamp and a pond and an area of tall ruderal herbs adjacent to the River Devon,
The site is remote from the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site and development of the site should not impact on the integrity of the site.
57
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) 0/-
Does the development of the site maintain and enhance populations of European Protected Species including protection of their resting places? Does the site facilitate the restoration and enhancement of biodiversity in all our urban and rural environments through better planning, design and practice?
The mature trees adjacent to the River Devon may provide bat roosts, the river may support otter and the ponds and remnant hedgerows may provide habitat for other protected species. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified. The route of the River Devon and Alva Burn includes some areas of woodland generalist 1km dispersal network, and there are some isolated areas along field boundaries to the east of the site. Overall the sites does not make a strong contribution to the network. There are key opportunities to enhance the FHN along the route of the River Devon and to connect the currently isolated areas of FHN. The development of the site could potentially result in loss of trees, hedgerows and open space which provide local biodiversity value. The site is generally well connected to the core path network with links along the riverside to Alva, the route along the southern settlement edge, routes through the site and also the on road core path routes along the B908. The site is not within or close to areas in the top 15% SIMD.
The trees, remnant hedgerows, ponds and wetland vegetation should be protected and enhanced.
Minor negative effect.
++
Access along the riverside provides a recreational resource. There are the safeguarded recreational open space resources of Cochrane Park, Johnstone Park and playing fields at Greenhead. These can be accessed on local roads and pavements from the site. The SEPA indicative river and coastal flood map suggests areas adjacent to the River Devon have potential flood risk. The site drains into ditches and burns which enter the River Devon, and adjoins the River Devon itself and therefore diffuse pollution resulting from development of the site could potentially enter the River Devon.
New open space provision would need to be integral to the development of this site. Development should be focused on the area immediately adjacent to the existing built edge of Alva. The use of SUDS could mitigate the impacts of increased diffuse pollution resulting from development of the site, however the low lying nature of the site and proximity to the River Devon may limit opportunities for implementing SUDS. The impacts of developing the site could be mitigated through developing only part of the site, and including SUDS in the site design, however the low lying nature of the site and proximity to the River Devon may limit opportunities for implementing SUDS.
Water
--
The development of the site will increase the rate of run off from the site contributing to increased water levels in the tributary burns and the River Devon.
Soil
The site is not prime quality agricultural land.
58
Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
The development of the site would result in growth around the periphery of Alva and all areas of the site would be within 1km of the town centre by foot or cycle. Alva town centre provides regular bus services to the surrounding settlements. Air quality is not monitored within Alva. The development of the site would increase the quantity of local traffic and contribute to an overall decrease in air quality.
+ + New bus service provision would be required to service this site. The creation of new pedestrian and cycle routes would decrease the dependence on the private car, however the development of the site will generate journeys to surrounding settlements to access services and employment. The creation of new pedestrian and cycle routes would decrease the dependence on the private car, however the development of the site will generate journeys to surrounding settlements to access services and employment.
Traffic flows are measured to the east of Alva and to the west of Alva on the A91, and both of these routes have shown a minor decrease in traffic levels between 2006 and 2007. Development of this site would potentially increase traffic levels on the A91 and the B908.
Climatic Factors
The site is located close to the centre of Alva and therefore reduces the need to travel to access local services. However, travel to larger centres such as Alloa and Stirling is likely to be generated. The site has a potential flood risk and therefore an increase in future storm events and rainfall intensity will further increase the vulnerability of this site.
0/-
--
The flood risk results from the proximity to watercourses which rapidly drain the Ochils for which there is no mitigation option.
Material Assets
The site forms an extension to Alva and can make use of existing infrastructure.
The site is low lying and south of the Ochils and is well located to make use of solar gain and shelter. The site does not lie in an area identified as having open cast coal potential. The site does not include any hazard areas.
+ 0 0
Does the site reduce waste generation and promote waste recovery, recycling and composting? Cultural Heritage Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage
Development of the site would generate additional waste arisings.
There are no sites designated for their cultural heritage value within the site boundary or buffer. The HLA identifies that the majority of the site is 18th -19th century fields and farming.
59
value?
The only known archaeological feature is a track mark recorded in the NMRS to the south west of the sewage treatment work. The site does not lie within an area designated as AGLV, however the Ochil Hills AGLV extends to the north of Alva over the steeply rising slopes to the north of the site. The site lies within the Lower Devon Carselands landscape character area which is characterised by the twisting course of the Devon contrasting with the channelled drainage ditches and large scale rectilinear fields. The Ochil hills are a dominant feature and the hillfoot villages nestle at their base. Development of this site would impact on the setting and views to the Ochils from the flat carselands.
0 The restriction of the development area to the area outwith the identified potential flood risk area would limit the extent of the landscape impact of development on the carselands. Minor negative effect.
The proposed development site would form a large scale extension to Alva. Development of the site would increase the size of Alva, reducing the extent of the flat carseland landscape to the south of the town although partly reflecting the traditional hillfoot settlement pattern
Development should reflect the existing settlement pattern and form of the hillfoot villages.
Development of the site would have high visibility from the B908. Development extending across the flat carselands would impact on the appreciation of the Ochil Hills from the south through reducing the flat agricultural foreground landscape which extends in front of the hillfoot settlement.
The implementation of structural planting to integrate the new development into the landscape would reduce the landscape impact. Focusing development on the area without identified potential flood risk will limit the extent of the landscape impact of developing the site.
60
View west illustrating contrast between flat carselands and Ochils
Mature trees and reeds at River Devon
61
SITE 8 B: WEST ALVA, TO LINE WITH SETTLEMENT EDGE LAND SOUTH OF BROOK STREET, ALVA
12.6 Medium The site lies to the western periphery of Alva. The site is flat and low lying agricultural land. The A91 is the major transport route through the site. The site lies outwith the settlement boundary. Access onto the A91 could require extension of the 30mph speed limit to the west, however there are issues with capacity of the A91. None Flood risk Moderate - Flood risk resulting from overland flow to the north Minor TPO covers trees to the north of the site
Size (ha) Size (group) Summary description including site access and public transport connections Overriding constraints to development Site specific investigations Constraints to development
n/a Trees and vegetation: The fields are large and predominantly under arable cultivation. Field boundaries: Hedgerow adjacent to the A91and to the west and hedgerow and field trees along the southern boundary. Garden boundaries to the east. Water (ponds, rivers and streams): There are no watercourses within the site. The River Devon flows to the south west of the site.
Agriculture. The site adjoins the built edge of Alva and the surrounding land is used for agriculture, with an industrial building and storage yard surrounded by woodland to the west.
62
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Sets out the criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area. The site also lies within the Green Belt and therefore the following policies apply: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV4 Green Belts: In Green Belt areas there will be a strong presumption against development any developments which are permitted will have to demonstrate appropriate environmental enhancement. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN19 Green Belt: The policy states that development will only be permitted in Green Belt where no alternative location can be found or the development would provide an opportunity to enhance the Green Belt. As the site is close to the River Devon and the A91Corridor the following policy applies: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN12 Area Environmental Enhancement states that proposals which would detract from the setting or aesthetics of areas adjacent to Conservation Areas or in proximity to rivers or the A91 corridor will not normally be permitted. Developers must also demonstrate how proposals can be integrated with proposed enhancement measures.
There are no sites designated for their wildlife value within the site boundary. A tree preservation order extends over the Back Road area which adjoins the north western extent of the site. The Craigleith and Myreton Hill SSSI lies to the north of the site on the steep slopes of the Ochils, part of which is within 200m of the northern site boundary. The site is designated for its woodland, bog and flush grassland and basic rock outcrop. Development of the site would not impact on SSSI as it is upstream from the development site and is steep and not easily accessible.
The site is identified in the Phase 1 Habitat Survey as predominantly arable and pasture.
The site is remote from the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site and development of the site should not impact on the integrity of the site. The hedgerows may provide habitat for some protected species. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified.
0/-
63
Does the site facilitate the restoration and enhancement of biodiversity in all our urban and rural environments through better planning, design and practice? Population and human health Is the site connected to the local core path network? How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD?
There are no elements of the FHN within the site. The site is bounded by hedgerows which provide some habitat value, and development of the site could potentially result in loss of these resources.
The hedgerows should be protected and enhanced through the development of the site. Additional woodland habitat should be created along the southern site boundary.
Minor negative
The site is generally well connected to the core path network with links around the perimeter of the site. The site is not within or close to areas in the top 15% SIMD.
++ 0
The path links from the site provide access to the Riverside and also Alva Glen. There are the safeguarded recreational open space resources of Cochrane Park, Johnstone Park and playing fields at Greenhead. These can be accessed on local roads and pavements from the site. The SEPA indicative river and coastal flood map does not identify the site as at risk of flooding, however there may be issues associated with overland flow and surface water drainage. There are no water courses within the site boundary however development of the site would result in diffuse pollution entering neighbouring water courses.
New open space provision would need to be integral to the development of this site.
Water
0/-
The use of SUDS could mitigate the impacts of increased diffuse pollution resulting from development of the site, however the low lying nature of the site and proximity to the River Devon may limit opportunities for implementing SUDS. The impacts of developing the site could be mitigated through including SUDS in the site design, however the low lying nature of the site and proximity to the River Devon may limit opportunities for implementing SUDS.
Soil
Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of
The development of the site would result in growth around the western periphery of Alva and all areas of the site would be within 1km of the town centre by foot or cycle. Alva town centre provides regular bus services to the surrounding settlements. Air quality is not monitored within Alva.
+ -
New bus service provision would be required to service this site. The creation of new pedestrian and cycle routes would decrease the
64
air pollution are close to current limit values?
The development of the site would increase the quantity of local traffic and contribute to an overall decrease in air quality.
dependence on the private car, however the development of the site will generate journeys to surrounding settlements to access services and employment. The creation of new pedestrian and cycle routes would decrease the dependence on the private car, however the development of the site will generate journeys to surrounding settlements to access services and employment.
Traffic flows are measured to the east of Alva and to the west of Alva on the A91, and both of these routes have shown a minor decrease in traffic levels between 2006 and 2007. Development of this site would potentially increase traffic levels on the A91 and the B908.
Climatic Factors
The site is located close to the centre of Alva and therefore reduces the need to travel to access local services. However, travel to larger centres such as Alloa and Stirling is likely to be generated. The site has a potential flood risk and therefore an increase in future storm events and rainfall intensity will further increase the vulnerability of this site. The site forms an extension to Alva and can make use of existing infrastructure.
0/-
The flood risk results from overland flow from the Ochils for which there is no mitigation option.
Material Assets
Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Does the site reduce waste generation and promote waste recovery, recycling and composting?
The site is low lying and south of the Ochils and is well located to make use of solar gain and shelter. The site does not lie in an area identified as having open cast coal potential. The site does not include any hazard areas. Development of the site would generate additional waste arisings, however the site is small in extent and lies adjacent to an existing urban areas for which recycling facilities will be provided. There are no sites designated for their cultural heritage value within the site boundary or surrounding area. The HLA identifies that the majority of the site is 18th -19th century fields and farming. There are no known archaeological remains within the site boundary. The site does not lie within an area designated as AGLV, however the Ochil Hills AGLV extends from Back Road over the steeply rising slopes to the immediate north of the site. The site lies immediately adjacent to the existing settlement edge and would have a minor impact on the landscape setting of the Ochil hills through reducing the appreciation of the flat farmland and contrasting rising slopes behind. The site lies within the Lower Devon Carselands landscape character area which is characterised by the twisting course of the Devon contrasting with the channelled drainage ditches and large scale rectilinear fields. The Ochil hills are a dominant
+ 0 0 -
Cultural Heritage
Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains?
0 -
Landscape
Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value?
65
feature and the hillfoot villages nestle at their base.
The proposed development site would form a western extension to Alva and the development site would mirror of the existing settlement pattern, however this would effectively reduce the perceived separation with Menstrie to the west.
Development should reflect the existing settlement pattern and form of the hillfoot villages.
Development of the site would have high visibility from the A91. Development extending across the flat carselands would impact on the appreciation of the Ochil Hills and reduce the distinction between the hillfoot settlements.
The implementation of structural planting to integrate the new development into the landscape would reduce the landscape impact.
66
View south east from Back Road towards settlement edge
Flat farmland and hedgerow
67
Site reference and location: Size (ha) Size (group) Summary description including site access and public transport connections Overriding constraints to development Site specific investigations Constraints to development Summary of area remaining following mitigation Environmental features 41.9 Medium
SITE 8 C: EAST OF B908, ALVA
The site lies at the south eastern edge of Alva. The site is gently undulating agricultural land. The B908 is the major transport route adjacent to the site. The site lies outwith the settlement boundary.
Flood risk n/a See overriding constraints above. The whole of the site lies within an area identified as at risk of flooding on the SEPA indicative river and coastal flood map. Trees and vegetation: The site comprises a large arable field. Field boundaries: The site is bounded by hedgerows, garden boundaries and the woodland of the adjacent land to the west. Water (ponds, rivers and streams): There is a small area of marshy ground within the eastern area of the site.
Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use Planning policy framework: Settlement expansion Agriculture. The site adjoins the built edge of Alva to the north and the surrounding land is used for agriculture. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV3 Development in the Countryside: The policy states that development in the Countryside (as defined in Local Plans i.e. areas not within settlement boundaries) be suitable for its location in function and design and should accord with Policy ED4 Rural Development (see below). Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ED4 Rural Development:: The policy states that economic and social development in rural areas will be supported within the following criteria: Focusing development within existing towns and villages Restricting development within Green Belt and countryside.
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Sets out the criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area. The site also lies within the Green Belt and therefore the following policies apply: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV4 Green Belts: In Green Belt areas there will be a strong presumption against development any developments which are permitted will have to demonstrate appropriate environmental enhancement. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN19 Green Belt:: The policy states that development will only be permitted in Green Belt where no alternative location can be found or the development would provide an opportunity to enhance the Green Belt. As the site is on the A91 Corridor the following policy applies: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN12 Area Environmental Enhancement states that proposals which would detract from the setting or aesthetics of areas adjacent to Conservation Areas or in proximity to rivers or the A91 corridor will not normally be permitted. Developers must also demonstrate how proposals can be integrated with proposed enhancement measures.
68
There are no sites designated for their wildlife value within the site boundaries or buffer zone. A tree preservation order extends over the Back Road area which adjoins the north western extent of the site. The Craigleith and Myreton Hill SSSI lies to the north of the site on the steep slopes of the Ochils, part of which is within 200m of the northern site boundary. The site is designated for its woodland, bog and flush grassland and basic rock outcrop. Development of the site would not impact on SSSI as it is upstream from the development site and is steep and not easily accessible.
Does the site impact on priority habitats or species? Does the development of the site avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site? Does the development of the site maintain and enhance populations of European Protected Species including protection of their resting places? Does the site facilitate the restoration and enhancement of biodiversity in all our urban and rural environments through better planning, design and practice? Population and human health Is the site connected to the local core path network? How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD?
The site is identified in the Phase 1 Habitat Survey as predominantly arable and pasture. The site is remote from the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site and development of the site should not impact on the integrity of the site. The hedgerows and field trees may provide habitat for some protected species. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified. There are no elements of the FHN within the site. The site is bounded by hedgerows and includes some field trees which provide some habitat value, and development of the site could potentially result in loss of these resources. The site is connected to the core path network with on road links to the west of the site. The site is not within or close to areas in the top 15% SIMD.
0 0
The hedgerows should be protected and enhanced.
0/-
The hedgerows should be protected.
No effect
+ 0
The path links from the site provide access to the Riverside and also Alva Glen to the north. There are the safeguarded recreational open space resources of Cochrane Park, Johnstone Park and playing fields at Greenhead. These can be accessed on local roads and pavements from the site. The SEPA indicative river and coastal flood map identifies that the whole of the site is at risk of flooding. There are two burns and a pond within the site boundary which may be influenced by diffuse pollution resulting from development of the site.
Water
Is the site at risk of flooding? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site?
-The use of SUDS could mitigate the impacts of increased diffuse pollution resulting from development of the site, however the low lying nature of the site and proximity to the River Devon may limit opportunities for implementing SUDS. The impacts of developing the site could be mitigated through developing only part of the site, and including SUDS in the site design, however the low lying
69
nature of the site and proximity to the River Devon may limit opportunities for implementing SUDS. Soil Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? The site is not vacant or derelict land. 0
The development of the site would result in growth to the south east of Alva and all areas of the site would be within 1km of the town centre by foot or cycle. Alva town centre provides regular bus services to the surrounding settlements. Air quality is not monitored within Alva. The development of the site would increase the quantity of local traffic and contribute to an overall decrease in air quality.
+ + The creation of new pedestrian and cycle routes would decrease the dependence on the private car, however the development of the site will generate journeys to surrounding settlements to access services and employment. The creation of new pedestrian and cycle routes would decrease the dependence on the private car, however the development of the site will generate journeys to surrounding settlements to access services and employment.
Traffic flows are measured to the east of Alva and to the west of Alva on the A91, and both of these routes have shown a minor decrease in traffic levels between 2006 and 2007. Development of this site would potentially increase traffic levels on the A91.
Climatic Factors
The site is located close to the centre of Alva and therefore reduces the need to travel to access local services. However, travel to larger centres such as Alloa and Stirling is likely to be generated. The site has a high flood risk and therefore an increase in future storm events and rainfall intensity will further increase the vulnerability of this site.
0/-
--
The site is low lying and has an identified flood risk and therefore options to mitigate flood risk may be limited.
Material Assets
The site forms an extension to Alva and can make use of existing infrastructure.
The site is low lying and south of the Ochils and is well located to make use of solar gain and shelter. The site does not lie in an area identified as having open cast coal potential. The site does not include any hazard areas.
+ 0 0
70
Development of the site would generate additional waste arisings, however the site is small in extent and lies adjacent to an existing urban areas for which recycling facilities will be provided. There are no sites designated for their cultural heritage value within the site boundary or buffer. The HLA identifies that the site is 18th -19th century fields and farming.
There are no known archaeological features within the site boundary. The site does not lie within an area designated as AGLV, however the Ochil Hills AGLV from the northern edge of Alva. Development of the site would result in extension of the settlement to the south, reducing the contrast between the flat carselands and the steeply rising slopes of the Ochils. The proposed development site would form a southern extension to Alva which would be contrary to the existing settlement pattern.
0 Minor negative effect.
Development should reflect the existing settlement pattern and form of the hillfoot villages. The implementation of structural planting to integrate the new development into the landscape would reduce the landscape impact.
Development of the site would have high visibility from the B908. Development extending across the flat carselands would impact on the appreciation of the Ochil Hills from the south through reducing the flat agricultural foreground landscape which extends in front of the steeply rising slopes.
71
View south west illustrating flat farmland and areas of standing water
Wetland vegetation south of business park
72
SITE 9 BIRKHILL CASTLEBRIDGE

109.81 Very large Centred around Birk Hill which rises to 65m AOD and includes the mixed forestry of the Gartlove Plantation which extends over around half of the site area. The site lies outwith the settlement boundary. The site could potentially be accessed from the A977, however junction treatment would be required.
Drainage Stability
Major- AGLV. Moderate Road access. Nature conservation. Minor surface water drainage
Retaining the woodland area results in loss of approximately half of the site area. Trees and vegetation: The site comprises agricultural fields with an extensive area of woodland to the east of the site. Woodland is also found along the course of the unnamed burn in the southern part of the site. Field boundaries: Stone walls to north, post and wire, outgrown hedgerows along disused railway. Water (ponds, rivers and streams): An unnamed burn flows from the Gartlove Plantation south and east along the southern extent of the site, where it joins the River Black Devon.
Site ownership: Site type: Settlement expansion/new settlement
The site is currently used for agriculture and forestry. The site is surrounded by agriculture and forestry, the B910 and the A977 and adjoins Castlebridge Business Park.
73
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Sets out the criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area. As the site is located within an AGLV the following policies apply: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV2 Protected Landscapes: The policy states that development will only be permitted in Areas of Great Landscape Value where it satisfies the criteria of Policy ENV3 (below) and can be accommodated without adversely affecting the overall quality of the area. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN2 Landscape and Ecology: The policy includes conditions which must be met if a development is to be permitted in an AGLV. The policy also states that appropriate consideration must be given to woodland, habitats, natural and landscape features when making a planning application. Due to the proximity to the River Devon the following policy applies: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN12 Area Environmental Enhancement states that proposals which would detract from the setting or aesthetics of Conservation Areas, rivers or the A91 corridor will not normally be permitted, and that developers must demonstrate how proposals can be integrated with proposed enhancement measures. As the site lies in an area of search identified as having a potentially workable opencast resource the following should be considered: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV10 Minerals General Principles states that economically important mineral resources will be protected from sterilisation by permanent development. Alternatively, working of minerals in advance of development will be encouraged. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN24 Protection of Minerals: The policy states that permanent development which would result in the sterilisation of viable mineral resources will not be permitted except where this would prevent residential development which contributes to the strategic housing land requirement and no other sites are available to meet this requirement.
There are no sites designated for their nature conservation value within the site boundary. Linn Mill SSSI adjoins the northern boundary of the site and is designated for its woodland mire. The SSSI is upstream of the site and therefore impacts will be limited. The site is identified in the Phase 1 Habitat Survey as predominantly arable and pasture and coniferous plantation. There is a small area of swamp surrounded by unimproved neutral grassland to the south of the site and small areas of broadleaved semi natural woodland associated with the minor burn which drains into the Black Devon. Red squirrels are known within the woodland, development which resulted in loss of woodland would have an adverse impact on these species. The site is remote from the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site and development of the site should not impact on the integrity of the site. The woodlands and burn, area of swamp and unimproved neutral grassland may provide habitat for some protected species. Site specific survey should be undertaken
Protection of the woodland resource within the site masterplan.
No impact
Does the development of the site avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site? Does the development of the site maintain and enhance populations of European Protected
0/-
Following site specific survey, appropriate mitigation should be
74
Species including protection of their resting places? Does the site facilitate the restoration and enhancement of biodiversity in all our urban and rural environments through better planning, design and practice? Population and human health Is the site connected to the local core path network? How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD?
prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified. The site includes extensive areas of FHN woodland generalist 1km dispersal networks along the southern and western boundaries and in the eastern extent of the area, and areas of riparian habitat. Development of the site could potentially result in the loss of these resources. National Cycle Route 76 on the route of a disused railway runs to the immediate south of the site. The site is not in an area with high SIMD. -
identified and implemented. The hedgerows and woodland and habitat associated with the burn and swamp should be protected and enhanced. Minor negative
+ 0
There are no open space resources close to the site, however the size of the site would require the provision of open space facilities within the site. Gartmorn Country Park provides a large open space resource within 2km of the site.
The River Black Devon runs to the west of the site and has an identified potential flood risk, however the river is in a valley at this location and flooding events would not affect the site. The site is drained by a number of small watercourses which join on to the unnamed burn which flows into the River Devon and would potentially be affected by diffuse pollution resulting from development of the site. The development of the site would potentially increase the rate of run off and contribute to increased levels of flow within the unnamed burn and the River Black Devon.
The implementation of SUDS would reduce the impact of diffuse pollution on watercourses. The implementation of SUDS would reduce the rate of run off.
Soil
The site does not include areas of vacant or derelict land, however the site lies adjacent to the site of the former Castlebridge colliery which is now used as a business park. The main pithead remains and is a tall and prominent landscape structure. The site is not prime quality agricultural land.
The site is linked by both on and off road core paths to Clackmannan and Alloa. As a new settlement, public transport would be required to service the site.
+ A new bus service would be required to service the site, however frequency of service may be limited. 0
Does the site lie within an area where levels of
The site does not lie within an area currently monitored for air pollution. However it
75
air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel?
lies in a rural location and unlikely to have any key air pollution issues. Access would be taken onto the A977 which would generate increased traffic flows on the A977 and at Gartarry roundabout. There are limited opportunities for mitigation of transport impacts.
The development site is of sufficient size to include provision of local facilities, however access to education, employment and other services will generate trips.
The additional services provided as a result of development of other sites in the eastern expansion area may reduce the need to travel.
Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Material Assets Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
The site extends over a low hill and does not have an identified potential flooding risk, therefore it is unlikely to be at increased risk of flooding or instability as a result of climate change. The site is located a short distance from Clackmannan, however additional service provision is likely to be required to service the site. The site is located over a low hill with a predominantly southerly aspect and is well located to make good use of shelter and solar gain. The site lies in an area of search identified as having a potentially workable opencast resource, however there are also known constraints to working this site. The site does not include any oil or gas pipeline hazard areas.
+ 0
Development of the site would generate additional waste arisings associated with a large development area. There are no sites designated for their cultural heritage value within the site boundary. Linn Mill and the old Bridge over the River Black Devon are listed structures, but lie outwith the site boundary. The HLA identifies that the site comprises 20th century coniferous plantation, and 18th-19th century and 19th century fields and farming.
There are no known archaeological remains within the site boundary. The site lies within The Forest AGLV. The site is not within the area designated as Greenbelt. The site lies within the Devon/Forth landscape character area with varied farmland characterised by undulating landform and coniferous blocks of forestry.
0 -This landscape character area is noted for its diversity of landscape features and high landscape value. In particular guidelines for development include new woodland planting and restructuring of existing coniferous plantations.
76
The site would create a new settlement distinct from the existing urban areas. The site is not highly visible and would form a new settlement. However, the site has an intrinsically rural character and development would be out of character with the rural landscape within the AGLV.
There are limited views to this landscape area due to undulating topography. This further serves to reduce intervisibility with existing settlement. The conifer plantation adjacent to the A977 limits visibility to the east. The site lies in an area of undulating topography, however development on the hill summit should be avoided as this would have a negative impact on the prominence of the site. The sloping character of the site would also increase visibility.
Retaining the boundary woodland planting would reduce visibility of the site, however comparative elevation of the area constrains the opportunities for mitigation.
77
View north illustrating undulating topography and views to Ochils
View east to Castlebridge business park
78
SITE 10 LADYWOOD, EAST OF CLACKMANNAN

2.33 Small A small site comprising a field located on the periphery of Clackmannan. This is a gently sloping site which rises to the south from the Goudnie Burn to Alloa Road. The site lies outwith the settlement boundary. Access to the site would be taken from Alloa Road and there is access to existing public transport provision within Clackmannan. Junction treatment would be required for the access onto Alloa Road. None Drainage Ground stability
Moderate Prime quality agricultural land Minor- Flood risk
n/a
Trees and vegetation: There is some scrub alongside the course of the Goudnie Burn. The field is pasture. Field boundaries: Stone wall adjacent to Alloa Road, garden boundaries and post and wire fencing. Water (ponds, rivers and streams): The northern boundary of the site immediately adjoins the Goudnie Burn. Role as part of FHN: The site does not currently play a role as part of the FHN. Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use Settlement expansion. The field is currently under pasture and used for grazing. A residential area of Clackmannan adjoins the western boundary of the site. To the north is the Goudnie Burn, a narrow field and the Alloa Dunfermline railway line. To the east is a field and to the south is Alloa Road bounded by thick woodland belts.
79
Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV7 Agricultural Land: Development which would result in the permanent loss of prime agricultural land will only be permitted where such land is identified for development in Local Plans and lower quality land cannot reasonably be used. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV3 Development in the Countryside: The policy states that development in the Countryside (as defined in Local Plans i.e. areas not within settlement boundaries) be suitable for its location in function and design and should accord with Policy ED4 Rural Development (see below). Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ED4 Rural Development:: The policy states that economic and social development in rural areas will be supported within the following criteria: Focusing development within existing towns and villages Restricting development within Green Belt and countryside.
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Sets out the criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area. As part of the site has been identified as of potential risk of flooding the following policies apply: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV9 Water Resource Management: The policy states that development will not normally be permitted in undeveloped flood plain areas, in areas of known significant flood risk, or if it will adversely affect the Forth Estuary. Exceptions will be made only when it can be demonstrated that no alternative locations can be found, or that suitable mitigation measures can be implemented. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN4 Water Resources: The policy states that where a development area is determined as being at risk of flooding, planning permission will not be granted except where it can be proven that there are no viable alternative sites. As the site has been identified as an area of prime agricultural land the following applies: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV7 Agricultural Land: Development which would result in the permanent loss of prime agricultural land will only be permitted where such land is identified for development in Local Plans and lower quality land cannot reasonably be used.
The site does not impact on any sites designated for their nature conservation value.
The woodland belts to the south of the site have been subject to Phase 2 Habitat survey. The site comprises pasture and may play some role in providing foraging habitat for species such as bats which may roost in the adjacent woodland.
Does the development of the site avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site? Does the development of the site maintain and enhance populations of European Protected Species including protection of their resting places? Does the site facilitate the restoration and enhancement of biodiversity in all our urban and
The site is remote from the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site and development of the site should not impact on the integrity of the site. The site includes an area of marshy ground, and is unlikely to provide habitat for protected species. However, site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified. The site does not currently play a role as part of the FHN, however development of the site would result in the loss of an area of open ground which may provide foraging
80
0/-
Following site specific survey, appropriate mitigation should be identified and implemented. Habitat creation would reduce the
0/-
rural environments through better planning, design and practice? Population and human health Is the site connected to the local core path network?
habitat. There is access on local roads and pavements into Clackmannan and the pavement route to Kennet is a core path. There are also core paths within the woodland belts which provide recreational access within the woodland and farmland adjacent to the site. The site does not lie in an area within the top 15% SIMD, nor is it close to areas with high levels of deprivation. +
impact of loss of open ground.
There are safeguarded areas of recreational open space within Clackmannan within 1km of the site. The access network within the woodland belts and surrounding farmland provides an open space resource.
Part of the site at the northern edge is identified on the SEPA flood map as of potential risk of flooding by rivers. Flooding events have also been recorded in the urban area to the west at Duke Street and Brucefield Crescent, although none have been recorded since 2005. A drain carries a small burn under the site, which flows from the woodland to the south of the site. The Goudnie Burn is a tributary of the River Black Devon.
Location of the proposed development to avoid the areas of land with identified flood risk would mitigate this impact.
No effect
The Goudnie Burn which runs at the northern boundary of the site would potentially be affected by run off from the site should it be developed. The development of the site would increase the rate of run off to the Goudnie Burn which may potentially increase the risk of flooding downstream from the site. Although the site is small in extent the cumulative effect of development within the wider area should be considered.
The implementation of SUDS would potentially mitigate this impact. The implementation of SUDS would potentially mitigate this impact.
Soil
The site is identified as prime quality agricultural land. The site is small in extent and therefore the loss would not be significant within Clackmannanshire as a whole. However the cumulative impact of the loss of this quality of farmland should be considered in light of the results of the full site assessment. The centre of Clackmannan lies within approximately 1km of the site, and the centre of Alloa is approximately 4km away. The centre of Clackmannan can be accessed by pavements and local roads. There is off road access via core paths to Alloa town centre, however the distance does not make a practical option for pedestrian access from the site. National Cycle Route 76 links Clackmannan and Alloa.
No mitigation.
81
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) + 0
Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Material Assets Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
The site is located close to bus stops within Clackmannan which would provide access. The site does not lie in an area where air quality is monitored.
The nearest site where air quality is monitored is Clackmannan Road in Alloa which has the highest levels of NO2 recorded from the ten monitoring sites. Trends across all monitoring sites have varied between 2002 and 2007, however Clackmannan Road is one of only three sites to show an increase in NO2 concentrations between 2005 and 2007. The site is located close to a local centre which will provide local services, however access to employment will require travel outwith the local area. The site is located on a gentle slope above the Goudnie Burn which may experience an increased risk of flooding as a result of climate change. The site forms an extension to Clackmannan and is therefore close to existing transport, water and energy infrastructure. The site is located on a very gently sloping north east facing field with a thick woodland belt to the south. The woodland will provide shelter from prevailing winds but may also create some shading for housing at the southern edge of the site. The site lies close to the Tullygarth area identified as having potential for development, however the site is constrained by existing settlement and transport links and is unlikely to be considered for extraction. The site does not include any hazard areas.
The site is small in extent and would not make a significant contribution to traffic flows.
++ 0 Site layout and design can avoid the areas of the site with greatest flood risk.
Development of the site would generate additional waste arisings, however the site is small in extent and lies adjacent to an existing urban areas for which recycling facilities will be provided. Kennet Lodge is a B listed building and located within 200m of the site boundary. There is some screening provided by the woodland and the setting of the lodge is already influenced by the proximity of the urban edge of Clackmannan. The HLA identifies that the site is 18th -19th century fields and farming. There are no known archaeological remains within the site boundary. The site does not lie within an area designated for its landscape value. The site lies within the Devon/Forth landscape character area with varied farmland characterised by undulating landform and coniferous blocks of forestry. Key attributes of the landscape character area are the diversity of features and dramatic outlook to the Ochils. The corridor of the Black Devon is identified as important. Development of this site would form an extension to Clackmannan, and reduce the perceptual separation between Clackmannan and Kennet. However development of
0 0 This landscape character area is noted for its diversity of landscape features and high landscape value. In particular guidelines for development include new woodland planting and restructuring of existing coniferous plantations. Provision of a firm and defensible
Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues
82
of landscape character and capacity for development)?
the site would also provide an opportunity to improve the landscaping of the existing settlement edge.
settlement edge to Clackmannan.
The site would be visible from the A907 however this would appear as part of Clackmannan and would not have a significant negative impact on views.
83
View north illustrating surface water drainage issues
View west to existing settlement edge
84
Site reference and location: Size (ha) Size (group) Summary description including site access and public transport connections Overriding constraints to development Site specific investigations Constraints to development Summary of area remaining following mitigation Environmental features
SITE 11 KENNETPANS, CLACKMANNAN

5.95 Small - medium The site is located at the edge of the River Forth at Kennetpans and comprises an area of land with perimeter woodland trees and a former market garden. The land is flat, rising gently to the north and adjoins the cluster of residential buildings at Kennet Pans. The site is accessed from a minor road from Clackmannan and the track from this road to Kennetpans is single track with passing places. The site is approximately 3km from the centre of Clackmannan to the north west, and approximately 3km from Kincardine to the south east. The new Clackmannanshire Bridge passes a short distance to the east of the site
Coastal flood risk affecting access to the site.
Flood risk Major flood risk. Potential impact on Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar Moderate - access The whole of the site is at risk from coastal flooding.
Trees and vegetation: The site comprises areas of open grassland, the enclosed former orchard and a large area of scrub woodland. The site adjoins the wooded surrounds of the Kennetpans distillery. Field boundaries: There are perimeter trees and outgrown hedgerow trees. The site is partly bounded by stone wall and the existing buildings to the east. Water (ponds, rivers and streams): There are no watercourses within the site boundary, however it adjoins the shore of the Forth Estuary.
Site ownership: Site type: Development in the countryside
Derelict nursery. Firth of Forth, agriculture and site of former Kennetpans Distillery. Residential
85
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Sets out the criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area As the site is adjacent to the Firth of Forth SPA, RAMSAR and SSSI the following policies are of relevance: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV1 Nature Conservation: The policy aims to promote the protection of wildlife, habitats and other natural features. It states that development which will have a potential negative impact upon internationally or nationally designated sites will not be permitted unless it can be demonstrated that their will be no adverse effect from the proposal, or no viable alternative solution. Similarly, proposals which may affect a site of local importance will only be allowed where it can be demonstrated that there will be no significant negative impact on the conservation value of the site. As the site lies within the area of Undeveloped Coast in the Local Plan the following policy applies: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN5 The Coast:: The policy states that the undeveloped coast will be protected from further development except where it can be proven that there are no viable alternative sites. Due to the risk of flooding the following policies are of relevance: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV9 Water Resource Management: The policy states that development will not normally be permitted in undeveloped flood plain areas, in areas of known significant flood risk, or if it will adversely affect the Forth Estuary. Exceptions will be made only when it can be demonstrated that no alternative locations can be found, or that suitable mitigation measures can be implemented. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN4 Water Resources: The policy states that where a development area is determined as being at risk of flooding, planning permission will not be granted except where it can be proven that there are no viable alternative sites. Due to the proximity of the Kennetpans Distillery SAM the following policies apply:: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN7 Archaeological or Historic Sites: The policy states that development will not be permitted where it can adversely affect a SAM or other important archaeological or historical site unless it can be demonstrated that there is no alternative viable site or the development is of national public importance. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN8 Site assessment, evaluation and recording: Where a development could affect a site of archaeological importance, an assessment of the historical value must be undertaken prior to permission being granted. As the site is adjacent to the Firth of Forth the following policy relating to environmental enhancement applies: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN12 Area Environmental Enhancement states that proposals which would detract from the setting or aesthetics of Conservation Areas, the A91 corridor or rivers will not normally be permitted, and that developers must demonstrate how proposals can be integrated with proposed enhancement measures.
The site adjoins an area of mudflat designated as the Firth of Forth SPA, Ramsar and SSSI. Development of the site would increase the level of disturbance to the SPA.
No mitigation
86
The site is identified in the Phase 1 Habitat Survey as amenity grassland with an area of unimproved neutral grassland at the coastal edge. There is a Phase 1 Habitat Survey target note site at the coastal edge within the site.
The site is located immediately adjacent to the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site and development of the site would result in increased disturbance to this site. The trees and buildings may provide habitat for some protected species. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified. The site and its immediate surrounds comprises part of the woodland generalist 1km dispersal network, and are one of the larger coastal areas of FHN within Clackmannanshire. Development of the site could potentially result in loss of these resources. The site is connected to the core path network and NCN 76 runs along the minor road to the north of the site. However the site is approximately 3km from Clackmannan and not closely accessible. The area does not lie within an area in the top 15% of the SIMD and therefore the development of the site will not contribute significantly to regeneration.
--
No mitigation
0/-
Following site specific survey, appropriate mitigation should be identified and implemented. The trees should be protected and enhanced through development of the site.
The site is isolated from settlement and does not have access to existing open space resources.
On site open space provision should be provided.
The site is low lying and adjacent to the River Forth. The SEPA indicative flood map shows the site itself as potentially not at risk of flooding from the sea, but the surrounding area is identified as being at risk of flooding. The flood map is indicative and the close proximity of areas identified at risk of flooding suggests risk to the site itself. In addition the minor road from Clackmannan and the access road to the site are identified as at risk of flooding from the sea which could result in the site becoming cut off during flooding events. The site immediately adjoins the River Forth and run off from the site would potentially directly enter the River Forth contributing to diffuse pollution. The site will drain into the River Forth and would have a minor impact on increasing levels of run off. This impact is likely to be negligible in light of the scale of the site, however cumulative effects resulting from numerous developments at the river edge should be considered.
--
The implementation of SUDS on site could be used to reduce any impacts of diffuse pollution. Consider cumulative impacts of riverside development.
No effect.
Potential cumulative impact.
87
SEA /site assessment topic Soil
The site is approximately 3km from Clackmannan and approximately 3km from Kincardine, both settlements can be reached using minor roads which are identified as core paths and form part of the national cycle network. Although walking and cycling access is possible, the distances involved mean that it is not a quick alternative to driving. The site is not easily accessible by public transport because public transport can only be accessed from Clackmannan or Kincardine which are a journey of 3km from the site. The site does not lie in an area with identified air quality issues, however the route of the A876 Clackmannanshire Bridge lies within 1km of the site, and the new road will reduce congestion and pollution within Kincardine. Travel from the site will be through Kincardine or Clackmannan, and contribute to increased levels of local traffic within these settlements and on the minor roads which provide access to the site which have a rural character and low traffic flows.
Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel?
No mitigation.
The site is located in a rural area, and although accessible to the nearest settlements by foot and cycle, from which public transport connections can be accessed, the development of the site is likely to generate journeys by private car to access services and employment. The site is located within an area with an identified potential flooding risk. An increase in future severity of flooding events resulting from climate change, or sea level rise would result in an increased risk to this site. The site is accessed from a minor road and there are houses immediately adjacent to the site, and therefore services are provided.
--
No mitigation.
Development of the site will increase the need to travel.
--
Policy of managed retreat would mean that this area would not be defended from flooding.
Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction?
The existing perimeter trees provide shelter to the site which is more open in aspect to the south, and reasonably well located to make good use of shelter and solar gain. The site lies close to the Broadcarse Controlled Area of search for open cast coal. The area is identified as controlled however there may be practical constraints to working the site due to flooding and uncertainty over the extent and quality of the coal reserves. The site is not located within any hazard areas.
+ 0
Does the site reduce waste generation and
Development of the site would generate additional waste arisings, however the site is
88
promote waste recovery, recycling and composting? Cultural Heritage Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value?
small in extent and lies adjacent to existing residential properties for which recycling collection services will be provided. The site lies immediately adjacent to the Scheduled Ancient Monument which comprises the roofless remains of the Kennetpans Distillery dating from the 1770s. This includes the main distillery building and associated maltings and bonded stores. A wooden pier was used for shipping spirit and later coal. The cottages on the access road are C listed buildings. Development of the site will impact on the immediate setting of the Kennetpans Distillery and also the listed cottages. The listed building is in a poor state of repair with significant damage caused by vegetation growth. There are no known archaeological remains within the site boundary. The HLA identifies that the site is late 20th century to present industrial scale farming. The site is not designated for its landscape value and lies within the Carse of Forth Landscape Character Area. This character area is dominated by the width of the valley and flatness of the landform, combined with the openness of the landscape. Built features are also a key characteristic of this landscape character area, and the site is enclosed by a stone boundary wall and perimeter woodland which reduces the open character of this area. The site lies in an area of undeveloped coast and therefore development would conflict with this character. -
0 0 Guidelines for this area include protection of the open agricultural character, but also highlighting roads through roadside planting and the River Forth. Development of the site would not have a significant adverse impact on the landscape character of the area, however it would conflict with the character of undeveloped coast.
The site is remote from larger settlement, although it would relate to the existing buildings and cottages adjacent to the site. The site lies within an area bounded by trees and therefore development would not be as visually prominent, as without this existing screen. Development could be accommodated in landscape terms. The site is located close to the route of the new Clackmannanshire Bridge. It is anticipated that the elevation of the road would result in visibility of this site from this route. However this would be in the context of views into the site of the former Kincardine Power station.
89
View south along narrow access road
Kennetpans Distillery Scheduled Monument
90
Site reference and location: Size (ha) Size (group) Summary description including site access and public transport connections Overriding constraints to development Site specific investigations Constraints to development
SITE 12 HELENSFIELD, CLACKMANNAN

6.13 Small - medium A gently sloping south facing site located to the north of Clackmannan, north of the Black Devon. The site lies between the A907 and the Alloa Dunfermline railway. The site lies within the settlement boundary, however does not relate closely to the existing settlement of Clackmannan. Site access would require to be taken from the A907 and a new roundabout would be required. None Ground stability Major Impact on views to Clackmannan Tower. Ground stability. Moderate - Road access requirements.
Ground stability may be a greater issue on the area of disturbed ground which occupies less than a sixth of the site. Trees and vegetation: There are some trees and scrub in the eastern part of the site and the course of the river is wooded. Field boundaries: Post and wire with occasional field trees along the eastern road boundary. Water (ponds, rivers and streams): The site adjoins the Black Devon and a minor tributary enters the river to the east of the site. Role as part of FHN: The course of the Black Devon forms part of the 1km woodland generalist dispersal network.
Current land use Surrounding land use Planning policy framework:
Agriculture The site is bounded by the railway line and A907. The land to the north of the site is managed for agriculture. To the south is the Black Devon and residential development, to the west is residential development surrounded by open space. Due to the proximity of the River Black Devon the following policy is of relevance: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN12 Area Environmental Enhancement states that proposals which would detract from the setting or aesthetics of Conservation Areas, the A91 corridor or rivers will not normally be permitted, and that developers must demonstrate how proposals can be integrated with proposed enhancement measures. Due to the presence of a core path link the following policy applies:
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy INF3 Local Access: The policy states that development will not be permitted where it will result in the loss of an asserted right of way, footpath or a path forming part of the
Clackmannanshire path network unless the provision of an alternative path can be assured.
91
There are no designated sites within the site boundary or within the buffer of the site.
The Phase 1 habitat survey identifies the site is predominantly arable and pasture with a small area of unimproved neutral grassland in the eastern part of the site. There is one target note species in the eastern part of the site.
The site is remote from the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site and development of the site should not impact on the integrity of the site. The trees and scrub and proximity to the River Black Devon may provide habitat for some protected species. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified. The course of the Black Devon forms part of the 1km woodland generalist dispersal network. Development of the site is unlikely to impact directly on this habitat, however the development of the site will result in the loss of open habitat which may provide foraging areas. A core path link passes through the centre of the site and provides access alongside the A907. This also provides links to other paths to the north and west of the site for recreational access. The site does not lie in within an area in the top 15% SIMD.
0/-
0/-
The recreation ground off the B910 is the closest safeguarded open space. In addition the woodland areas and path network at Back Wood and Mary Wood provide a recreational resource.
The land immediately adjacent to the River Black Devon is identified as at potential risk of river flooding on the SEPA indicative river and coastal flood map, however the river is in a steeply incised valley. There may be issues with surface water drainage in parts of the site which are very flat. The River Black Devon would potentially be affected by diffuse pollution resulting from run off from development of the site. The River Black Devon has a potential risk of flooding along its length downstream of the site identified in the SEPA indicative river and coastal flood map. Development of the site would contribute to increased rate of run off to the River Black Devon.
Implementation of SUDS and adequate site drainage can address issues with surface water drainage. The implementation of SUDS would mitigate the impact of diffuse pollution. The implementation of SUDS would mitigate the impact of increase flood risk.
No effect
No effect No effect
Soil
The site does not include any identified areas of vacant and derelict land, however the HLA identifies that part of the eastern area of the site is a former mining area.
92
The site is connected to the core path network and is within 1km of from Clackmannan town centre. Alloa town centre is accessible using off road access routes and is within 3km. Bus access is provided from Clackmannan village, however a short walk is required to reach the nearest bus stop. Air quality is monitored on Clackmannan Road in Alloa which would be the main route for traffic entering Alloa. Although recent trends have varied, there has been an increase in NO2 concentrations between 2005 and 2007 at this location.
0 The site is comparatively small in extent and therefore the net increase in traffic flows would not have a significant impact on air pollution, however cumulative impacts in combination with other sites should be noted.
Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change?
Development of the site would contribute to increased traffic flows on the A907, however the size of the site would not make a significant contribution to traffic levels.
The development would provide easy access to Clackmannan town centre, and Alloa town centre is easily accessible by public transport. Parts of the site adjacent to the River Black Devon have an identified potential flood risk which may be increased as a result of climate change. The development of this site will contribute to increased run off to the River Black Devon. The site is located adjacent to Clackmannan with access to transport services, water and energy infrastructure. The site is located on a gently south facing slope and is well located to make use of shelter and solar gain. The site does not lie within an area identified as having open cast potential. The site does not lie within any hazard areas. Development of the site would generate additional waste arisings, however the site is small in extent and lies adjacent to an existing urban areas for which recycling facilities will be provided. There are no sites or features designated for their cultural heritage value within the site boundary. To the immediate south of the site the bridge over the Black Devon is a category C listed structure. Development of the site would not impact directly on the integrity of the monument. The development of the site would impact on views
+ The implementation of SUDS will mitigate the impacts of increased run off resulting from development of the site. No effect, however cumulative impacts in association with the development of other sites should be noted.
Material Assets
Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Does the site reduce waste generation and promote waste recovery, recycling and composting?
++
++ 0 0 -
Cultural Heritage
--
Alterations to site layout would not mitigate the screening effect of development on the views to Clackmannan Tower.
No change.
93
to Clackmannan Tower from the A907. Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Landscape Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? There are no known archaeological remains within the site boundary. The HLA identifies that the majority of the site is 18th-19th century fields and farming and part of the site adjacent to the River Black Devon is a relict 19th-20th century mining area. The site does not lie within an area designated for its landscape value. The site lies within the Devon/Forth landscape character area noted for its varied farmland characterised by undulating landform and coniferous blocks of forestry. Key attributes of the landscape character area are the diversity of features and dramatic outlook to the Ochils. The corridor of the Black Devon is identified as important. This landscape character area is noted for its diversity of landscape features and high landscape value. In particular guidelines for development include new woodland planting. The development of the site would create an extension to Clackmannan which would be visible from the A907. Clackmannan Tower and the church are landscape features which contribute to the identity of Clackmannan and development of this site would affect views to these features. 0
The development of the site will impact on views to the tower and church.
The development of the site would screen views from the A907 to Clackmannan Tower and the church and would have a negative impact on these views.
--
The presence of built structures will impact on views.
94
View to Clackmannan Tower
View east along A907 illustrating existing boundary trees
95
SITE 13 MEADOWEND FARM CLACKMANNAN

9.02 Medium Located adjacent to the Gartarry roundabout between the A977 and Alloa Road, and the A876 trunk road and the Alloa Dunfermline railway. The site comprises a gently sloping field and is well connected to the road network. The site lies outwith the settlement boundary. Access could be taken onto the new roundabout on the A977 south of Gartarry.
Access onto trunk road Moderate Road access. Prime quality agricultural land None Trees and vegetation: Arable field with small number of deciduous trees at Gartarry roundabout. Field boundaries: Hedgerow adjacent to Alloa Road, and post and wire fencing on other boundaries Water (ponds, rivers and streams): A drain runs along the eastern boundary of the site.
Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use Planning policy framework: Development in the countryside Agriculture Transport network and agriculture Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV3 Development in the Countryside: The policy states that development in the Countryside (as defined in Local Plans i.e. areas not within settlement boundaries) be suitable for its location in function and design and should accord with Policy ED4 Rural Development (see below). Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ED4 Rural Development: The policy states that economic and social development in rural areas will be supported within the following criteria: Focusing development within existing towns and villages Restricting development within Green Belt and countryside.
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Sets out the criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area. As the site lies within an area of prime agricultural land the following policy applies: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV7 Agricultural Land: Development which would result in the permanent loss of prime agricultural land will only be permitted where such land is identified for development in Local Plans and lower quality land cannot reasonably be used. SEA /site assessment topic Site appraisal criteria Site issues and discussion Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) Enhancement and mitigation options Potential effect following mitigation
96
The site does not include any sites designated for their nature conservation value.
The site does not impact on priority habitats or species. The Phase 1 habitat survey identifies this site as arable and pasture.
The site is remote from the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site and development of the site should not impact on the integrity of the site. The hedgerows may provide habitat for some protected species. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified. There are no elements of the FHN within the site. The site is bounded by hedgerows which provide some habitat value, and development of the site could potentially result in loss of these resources.
0/-
Following site specific survey, appropriate mitigation should be identified and implemented. The hedgerows should be protected and enhanced through the development of the site. Additional woodland habitat should be created along the southern site boundary. Minor negative
The site is not directly connected to the core path network, however a core path extends through the nearby woodland belt to the west of the site. The national cycle network is routed over the new Clackmannanshire Bridge.
The site is not located within or close to any areas within the top 15% SIMD.
What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? Notes connections to key recreational area or designation as a safeguarded open space or country park Water Is the site at risk of flooding? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site?
There are no open space resources close to the site, however the network of paths in the adjacent woodland and farmland to the west provides a recreation resource.
Formal open space provision.
The site is not identified as at risk of flooding on the SEPA indicative river and coastal flooding map. The site is low lying in relation to the surrounding topography. There is a drain at the eastern boundary of the site which may be affected by diffuse pollution resulting from development of the site. Development of the site may result in increased rate of run off, however the site has a comparatively small area. There is a drain at the eastern boundary of the site.
0 -
97
The site is prime quality agricultural land.
The site is over 2km from the centre of Clackmannan and 3.5km from the centre of Kincardine. A core path through the woodland belt at Kennet provides off road access to Clackmannan. There is no pavement access along Alloa Road from Gartarry roundabout to Kennet.
Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Material Assets Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
The site is not currently serviced by public transport, with the nearest bus stops in Kennet, however provision could be made. Air quality is not monitored within close proximity of the site, however the site lies at the junction of five major roads which will have a local impact on amenity. The development of the site would contribute to traffic flows on the A907 to Alloa and Alloa Road into Clackmannan.
0 -
The site is not located close to existing settlement and services and therefore would increase the need to travel. The site is not identified as at high risk of flooding or instability as a result of climate change, however the site is essentially low lying in nature and potentially vulnerable to flood events. The site is located close to existing transport, water and energy infrastructure.
The site is gently sloping and suitably located to make use of solar gain. The site is not identified as a potential site for mineral extraction. The site is not within any oil or gas pipeline hazard areas.
+ 0 0
Does the site reduce waste generation and promote waste recovery, recycling and composting? Cultural Heritage Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or
Development of the site would generate additional waste arisings, however the site is small in extent and lies adjacent to an existing urban areas for which recycling facilities will be provided. The Kennet Conservation Area lies to the west of the site beyond the railway. Development of this site would introduce additional built development to the east of
98
areas designated for their cultural heritage value?
Kennet, however this would remain separated from the village by the railway line and would not impact on the immediate setting or form of the conservation area.
There are no known archaeological remains within the site boundary. The HLA identifies that the site is 19th century to present fields and farming. The site does not lie in an area of AGLV or Greenbelt. It lies within the Devon/Forth landscape character area with varied farmland characterised by undulating landform and coniferous blocks of forestry. Key attributes of the landscape character area are the diversity of features and dramatic outlook to the Ochils. The corridor of the Black Devon is identified as important. The development of the site would introduce a new area of development into an area of otherwise intact rural landscape. The development of the site would not impact directly on existing settlement and identity, however it would introduce development alongside the A977. The site has a high level of intervisibility with site 16 which should also be considered. The site is highly visible from the A876 trunk road, the A977 and Alloa Road and development would detract from the intrinsically rural character of the area.
0 0 This landscape character area is noted for its diversity of landscape features and high landscape value.
0/-
Views from the new Clackmannanshire Bridge and A977 from the south are elevated and therefore landscaping would have limited role in screening views. As above
99
View north east to Gartarry roundabout
View east to A977
100
SITE 14 KILBAGIE (NORTH)

14.40 Medium Lying to the east of the A876 Trunk road, west of the A977 and straddling the Alloa Dunfermline railway line this site is strongly influenced by the surrounding transport infrastructure. The site rises gently to the west and comprises two large fields with the wooded route of the railway line running through the centre of the site. Oil and gas pipeline hazard zone n/a See overriding constraint above. Moderate Prime quality agricultural land
Summary of area remaining following mitigation Environmental constraints
The whole of the site is affected by the overriding constraint to development of the oil and gas pipeline hazard zone. Trees and vegetation: Agriculture with occasional shrubs and trees on boundaries. Field boundaries: Post and wire. Water (ponds, rivers and streams): A drain runs through the eastern part of the site and along the southern boundary of the site Role as part of FHN: No role
Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use Planning policy framework:
This information will be gathered from the desk based review and consultation Development in the countryside Agriculture and railway. The site is bounded by the A876 and A977 with agricultural land to the west, north and east. To the south is the complex of buildings and grounds of the Kilbagie paper mill. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV3 Development in the Countryside: The policy states that development in the Countryside (as defined in Local Plans i.e. areas not within settlement boundaries) be suitable for its location in function and design and should accord with Policy ED4 Rural Development (see below). Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ED4 Rural Development:: The policy states that economic and social development in rural areas will be supported within the following criteria: Focusing development within existing towns and villages Restricting development within Green Belt and countryside.
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Sets out the criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area. As the site lies within an area of prime agricultural land the following policy applies: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV7 Agricultural Land: Development which would result in the permanent loss of prime agricultural land will only be permitted where such land is identified for development in Local Plans and lower quality land cannot reasonably be used. NB. The site is also identified as being within a Gas and Oil Pipeline Hazard Area on the Local Plan Countryside Wide Map.
101
There are no designated sites within the site boundary or site buffer.
A small area of woodland to the west of the site (which formed part of the boundary woodlands to site 16) was subject to Phase 2 Habitat survey. The site is identified as arable and pasture in the Phase 1 habitat survey.
The site is remote from the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site and development of the site should not impact on the integrity of the site. The hedgerows may provide habitat for some protected species. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified. There are no elements of the FHN within the site. The site is bounded by hedgerows which provide some habitat value, and development of the site could potentially result in loss of these resources.
0/-
Following site specific survey, appropriate mitigation should be identified and implemented. The hedgerows should be protected and enhanced through the development of the site. Additional woodland habitat should be created along the southern site boundary. Minor negative
The site is not connected to the core path network and pedestrian or cycle access from the site would be adjacent to main roads. The site does not lie within an area within the top 15% SIMD.
-0
The site does not lie close to any existing open space resources. The site is not identified as having any risk of flooding on the SEPA indicative river and coastal flood map. The north eastern part of the site is low lying compared to the surrounding landform. There are minor drains at the perimeter of the site which may be affected by diffuse pollution resulting from the development of the site. Development of the site may result in increased rate of run off, however the site has a comparatively small area and drains towards the Kilbagie site which is not recorded as having flooding issues.
-0
The site is of insufficient size to support open space resources.
0 Potential flooding risk can be mitigated through the provision of SUDS within the site.
Soil
The site is identified as prime quality agricultural land.
102
The site is over 3km from the centre of Clackmannan and over 2.5km from the centre of Kincardine. There are no core paths which connect the site to either Clackmannan or Kincardine. The site is close to the NCN which is routed across the Clackmannanshire Bridge.
--
Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel?
There are bus services from Kennet and on the A977. Air quality is not monitored within close proximity of the site, however the site is comparatively small in size and development would not make a significant impact on air quality. The development of the site would contribute to increased traffic levels at the roundabout between the A876 trunk road and the A977 and Gartarry roundabout.
The site is located outwith convenient walking distance to the nearest settlement and therefore does not reduce the need to travel.
--
No mitigation.
The site is not identified as being of significant risk of flooding or instability as a result of climate change due to the current site characteristics which include a gently slope and no major watercourses.
The site is located on a gently sloping south east facing site and therefore is well located to make use of shelter and solar gain. The site is constrained by the oil and gas pipeline hazard zone and is not identified as a potential site for mineral extraction. All of the site lies within the oil and gas pipeline hazard zone.
+ 0 -No mitigation.
Development of the site would generate additional waste arisings, and the site is remote from existing settlement and would require additional collection services. There are no features designated for their cultural heritage value within the site boundary. The B listed Kilbagie House and Garden Walls lies within 50m of the site boundary and Kilbagie Mill House (C) lies within 200m. However these features are located downslope from the site and intervisibility is limited.
There are no known archaeological remains within the site boundary. The HLA identifies that to the east of the railway line is 19th century to present fields and farming, and to the west of the railway line is also 19th century to present fields and
103
farming with the relict category of settlement and agriculture. Landscape Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? The site is not Greenbelt and does not lie within an AGLV. The site lies within the Devon/Forth landscape character area with varied farmland characterised by undulating landform and coniferous blocks of forestry. Key attributes of the landscape character area are the diversity of features and dramatic outlook to the Ochils. This landscape character area is noted for its diversity of landscape features and high landscape value. The site does not relate to existing areas of settlement and would create an isolated area of development with no physical or perceptual links to settlement. Although the developed site of Kilbagie lies to the south of this site, this does not have a strong visual relationship with the site. The site would be visible from the A977 and the A876 trunk road. 0
0/-
104
105
SITE 15 CLACKMANNAN (EAST) TULLYGARTH, CLACKMANNAN

171.23 Very large The development of this site would provide a new settlement to the east of Clackmannan. The site is gently sloping with a low ridge and the more pronounced Shiel Hill to the north east of the site. The River Black Devon flows through the north western corner of the site. The site is bounded on two sides by the A977 and the A907. None (however note combination of impacts outlined below) Ground stability Flood risk Protected species
Major - Oil and gas pipeline hazard zone. Landscape impact (proximity to AGLV and views to Ochil Hills, most notably Shiel Hill) Moderate - Flood risk. Prime quality agricultural land.
Approximately one quarter of the area of site remains after exclusion of the constraints to development identified above. Trees and vegetation: There is woodland associated with the course of the River Black Devon and over the site of the disused tip and works. Other woodland is limited to trees alongside the disused railway and A907 and occasional outgrown hedgerow trees. The majority of the site is arable farmland. Field boundaries: The fields are large and bounded by post and wire fences with occasional hedgerow trees. Water (ponds, rivers and streams): The River Black Devon flows through the north western corner of the site. Field drains flow along the field boundaries in the south east of the site.
Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use New settlement The site is currently used for agriculture and includes Tullygarth farm, and at the northern boundary with the former railway is a works and disused tip with scrub woodland. Clackmannan lies to the south west of the site and the remainder of the surrounding land use is agriculture with some small areas of forestry.
106
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Sets out the criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area. As part of the site lies within an area of prime agricultural land the following policy applies: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV7 Agricultural Land: Development which would result in the permanent loss of prime agricultural land will only be permitted where such land is identified for development in Local Plans and lower quality land cannot reasonably be used. As part of the site is vacant or derelict land the following policy applies: Clackmannanshire Local Plan - Policy RES2 Brownfield Development: The policy prioritises development which will take place on brownfield sites which will utilise vacant, derelict, contaminated and underused land and property within settlement boundaries. Due to the presence of a core path link the following policy applies:
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy INF3 Local Access: The policy states that development will not be permitted where it will result in the loss of an asserted right of way, footpath or a path forming part of the Clackmannanshire path network unless the provision of an alternative path can be assured.
As there is some potential for flooding the following policies should be taken into account: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV9 Water Resource Management: The policy states that development will not normally be permitted in undeveloped flood plain areas, in areas of known significant flood risk, or if it will adversely affect the Forth Estuary. Exceptions will be made only when it can be demonstrated that no alternative locations can be found, or that suitable mitigation measures can be implemented. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN4 Water Resources: The policy states that where a development area is determined as being at risk of flooding, planning permission will not be granted except where it can be proven that there are no viable alternative sites. As the site has an identified potential for open cast coal extraction (within a Constraint Area) the following apply: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV10 Minerals General Principles: states that economically important mineral resources will be protected from sterilisation by permanent development. Alternatively, working of minerals in advance of development will be encouraged. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy Policy EN24 Protection of Minerals: The policy states that permanent development which would result in the sterilisation of viable mineral resources will not be permitted except where this would prevent residential development which contributes to the strategic housing land requirement and no other sites area available to meet this requirement. As the River Black Devon flows through part of the site the following policy applies: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN12 Area Environmental Enhancement states that proposals which would detract from the setting or aesthetics of Conservation Areas, the A91 corridor or rivers will not normally be permitted, and that developers must demonstrate how proposals can be integrated with proposed enhancement measures. NB. The site is also identified as being within a Gas and Oil Pipeline Hazard Area on the Local Plan Countryside Wide Map.
107
Tulligarth Brickworks and Garrison Dam are identified as a local wildlife site, there are no other designated sites within the site boundary .
The disused tip has been subject to Phase 1 and 2 habitat survey and includes a Phase 1 habitat survey target note site. The site is identified in the Phase 1 Habitat Survey as predominantly arable and pasture with small areas of unimproved neutral grassland and broadleaved semi natural woodland associated with the northern part of the site and Black Devon.
The site is remote from the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site and development of the site should not impact on the integrity of the site. The woodland and burn and disused brickwork buildings may provide habitat for some protected species. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified. The course of the River Black Devon, the disused tip and the disused railway line form components of the woodland generalist 1km dispersal network. There are two isolated areas associated with hedgerow trees and the site adjoins Gartarry Wood. Development of the site could potentially result in the loss of these resources. The route of the disused railway at the north of the site is a core path and a route also passes alongside the River Black Devon. The B910 is also an on road route. The site does not lie in within an area in the top 15% SIMD.
0/-
Following site specific survey, appropriate mitigation should be identified and implemented. The habitat associated with the woodland and burn should be protected and enhanced.
+ 0
The site is of sufficient scale to incorporate open space provision within the site masterplan. The SEPA indicative river and coastal flood map identifies a potential risk of flooding along the route of the River Black Devon, which is largely contained by the topography. There is also a potential risk of flooding associated with the Goudnie Burn which is on the flat land to the south of the site. The River Black Devon drains part of the site and the Goudnie Burn, a tributary of the River Black Devon drains the majority of the remainder of the site. These watercourses would potentially be affected by diffuse pollution resulting from development of the site. Development of the site would increase the rate of run off to the River Black Devon and the Goudnie Burn, which have a history of flooding and identified potential flood risk.
0 The areas of potential flood risk are comparatively small in extent and the site masterplan could avoid development in flood risk locations. The implementation of SUDS would mitigate the impacts of diffuse pollution. No effect
--
The implementation of SUDS would mitigate the impacts of increased run off resulting from development of the site.
Minor effect.
Soil
Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict
The area of former workings and tip at the north of the site is vacant and derelict land. Development of the site would potentially restore this area. However the site
108
land?
provides some habitat value in its current form and this should be investigated further. The low lying areas of land within the site are prime quality agricultural land. No mitigation.
The site is accessible via the local path network which provides connections into Clackmannan, and toward Alloa, however the route to Clackmannan is not direct.
New links would require to be developed from the more easterly parts of the site, including the provision of safe crossing points over the A907. Public transport provision.
The site is located adjacent to the A907, however the development of the site would require the provision of public transport.
The site does not lie in an area where air quality is monitored.
The development of the site would make a significant contribution to traffic levels on either the A907 or the A977. Traffic leaving the site would travel to Alloa on the A907 to make use of the services within the town. This would generate higher traffic levels within Alloa town centre and the nearest monitoring location on Clackmannan Road had the highest level of NO2 of the ten monitoring locations. The development would comprise a new settlement, which would be provided with local services. The location of the development will not reduce the need to travel.
--
Climatic Factors
The masterplanning of the site can ensure the best use of the site so that car use is minimised and walking and cycling are facilitated. These areas can be avoided through site masterplanning and the implementation of SUDS.
Parts of the site have an identified potential flood risk which is likely to increase as a result of predicted climate change. The site is located to the north of Clackmannan and is therefore close to existing transport, water and energy infrastructure. The site occupies a predominantly south facing gently sloping site and is well located to make best use of shelter and solar gain. The site has an identified potential for open cast coal extraction. However a number of technical constraints may exist to extraction. There is a gas and oil pipeline hazard safeguarding zone running south west to north east through the site.
No effect.
+ No mitigation Exclusion of this area from development reduces the overall potential area of land for development Local recycling and composting facilities should be provided as part of the site
Does the site reduce waste generation and promote waste recovery, recycling and
Development of the site would generate additional waste arisings associated with a large development area.
109
composting? Cultural Heritage Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? There are no designated archaeological features within the site boundary or the immediate buffer. The HLA identifies that the majority of the site is 18th-19th century and 19th century to present fields and farming. 0
masterplan.
Brucefield Colliery and brickworks are recorded in the National Monuments Record of Scotland, as is Cherryford Brickworks. The site lies adjacent to The Forest AGLV. The site constitutes a new settlement and would impact on the character and identity of Clackmannan through creating a lack of physical and perceptual distinction between the two settlements.
The layout of the site could provide separation between Clackmannan and the new settlement, however this would not fully mitigate the visual impacts of the close proximity of the settlements. No mitigation. Outstanding impact.
The development of the site would be highly visible from the A907 and the A977 and be highly visible as a developed foreground to the Ochils when viewed from Gartarry roundabout. This view is one of the most important views when travelling through Clackmannan and the landscape character should be protected.
--
110
View east to Shiel Hill
View west to Clackmannan
111
SITE 16 CLACKMANNAN SOUTH, CLACKMANNAN

89.44 Large A large area of farmland to the south east of Clackmannan enclosed by thick woodland belts located on a low hill which rises to 62m. A small covered reservoir and transmission masts are located on the hill summit. Site access could potentially be taken either onto Lookaboutye Brae or Alloa Road. The large extent of the site would require the provision of local bus services to provide public transport connections. The site lies outwith the settlement boundary. Due to the size of the site, access to the road network could be taken at several locations. Access onto Alloa Road, east of Kennet would provide direct access to the trunk road system however vehicular access into Clackmannan could be taken onto Lookaboutye Brae and Alloa Road. None (see constraints below) Ground stability Surface water drainage
Major Oil and gas pipeline hazard zone. Moderate Prime quality agricultural land. Landscape impacts in relation to eastern area of site Minor Woodlands to the west of the site are covered by TPO
Approximately one quarter of the site is affected by the oil and gas pipeline hazard zone, and additionally excluding the part of the site with high landscape impact reduces the total available area of site to approximately a quarter of the total area. Trees and vegetation: A thick mixed woodland belt extends around the perimeter of the site Field boundaries: Some post and wire at perimeter with woodland and degraded stone wall alongside access track to Kennet Gardens Water (ponds, rivers and streams): There is a covered reservoir on the hill summit, and drains issue from the fields into the surrounding woodland north east towards the Goudnie Burn and south west into minor streams and drains toward the River Forth. Role as part of FHN: The perimeter woodlands provide a continuous length of woodland generalist 1km dispersal networks.
Site ownership: Site type: settlement expansion/new settlement
Agriculture and water storage (small covered reservoir) Woodland belts, agricultural land, settlements of Clackmannan and Kennet and the route of the A876 trunk road.
112
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Sets out the criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area. As the site lies within an area of prime agricultural land the following policy applies: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV7 Agricultural Land: Development which would result in the permanent loss of prime agricultural land will only be permitted where such land is identified for development in Local Plans and lower quality land cannot reasonably be used. As there are two core paths which cross the site the following applies: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy INF3 Local Access: The policy states that development will not be permitted where it will result in the loss of an asserted right of way, footpath or a path forming part of the Clackmannanshire path network unless the provision of an alternative path can be assured. As the site is adjacent to a Conservation Area the following should be considered: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV6 The Historic and Built Environment: aims to protect and enhance cultural heritage features, as well as ensure that new developments are in keeping with the character and quality of the area. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN12 Area Environmental Enhancement: states that proposals which would detract from the setting or aesthetics of Conservation Areas, the A91 corridor or rivers will not normally be permitted, and that developers must demonstrate how proposals can be integrated with proposed enhancement measures. As the site is surrounded by woodland the following policy should be taken into account: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN2 Landscape and Ecology: The policy also states that appropriate consideration must be given to existing woodland, habitats, natural and landscape features when making a planning application. NB. The site includes two gas and oil pipeline hazard areas as noted on the Local Plan Countryside Wide Map.
The site does not impact directly or indirectly on sites designated for their biodiversity value. The woodland belt which adjoins the built edge of Clackmannan is designated as a tree preservation order area.
The protection and enhancement of the area of woodland subject to the tree preservation order should be incorporated within the development of the site.
The woodland belts have been subject to Phase 2 Habitat survey and include Phase 1 target note sites. The site is identified in the Phase 1 Habitat Survey as arable and pasture with a small area of semi improved neutral grassland at the extreme west of the site and mixed plantation surrounding the site, as identified in the Phase I habitat survey.
Does the development of the site avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA
The site is remote from the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site and development of the site should not impact on the integrity of the site.
113
and Ramsar site? Does the development of the site maintain and enhance populations of European Protected Species including protection of their resting places? Does the site facilitate the restoration and enhancement of biodiversity in all our urban and rural environments through better planning, design and practice? Population and human health Is the site connected to the local core path network? How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD? The site includes extensive perimeter woodlands and arable farmland. The woodlands may provide habitat for protected species. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified The perimeter woodlands provide a continuous length of woodland generalist 1km dispersal networks. Development of the site could result in loss of an area of open ground which may provide foraging habitat. Two core paths cross the site and other connections extend through the perimeter woodlands. The site is well connected to the core path network. The site is not within an area in the top 15% in the SIMD, and is not in close proximity to deprived areas. 0/Following site specific survey, appropriate mitigation should be identified and implemented.
0/-
Habitat creation would reduce the impact of loss of open ground.
+ 0
What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? Notes connections to key recreational area or designation as a safeguarded open space or country park Water Is the site at risk of flooding? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site?
The perimeter woodland belts with their network of paths provide an open space resource. King Georges Field lies within 200m of the site boundary at the north western edge and is a safeguarded open space. The size of the site would provide opportunity for open space provision within the site boundaries.
The pipeline hazard zones provide opportunity to create an open space resource within the site.
The site is located on a hill and is not identified as at risk of flooding in the SEPA indicative flood map. Several minor watercourses drain the site and would potentially be affected by pollution resulting from run off from development of the site.
++ The implementation of SUDS would mitigate impacts associated with pollution resulting from development of the site. The implementation of SUDS would mitigate flooding impacts associated with development of the site.
The development of the site would increase the rate of run off and this would potentially increase the quantity of water entering the Goudnie Burn to the north east of the site. The Goudnie Burn has previously been subject to flooding and development of this site could contribute to future flooding incidence.
Soil
The site is not vacant, derelict or contaminated.
The whole of the site is prime quality agricultural land.
--
The area of land remaining following exclusion of areas with oil and gas pipeline hazard zones and significant landscape impact is comparatively small in extent. Should only the smaller western part of the site be taken forward for development the overall impact on prime quality agricultural land
Minor negative
114
is reduced. Air Quality and Transport Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? The site is well connected to the local path network which provides links into Clackmannan. The size of the site will allow the provision of some local services within the development. The site is of sufficient size to require provision of additional bus services. However should only the western part of the site be taken forward for development, this would have access to existing bus services within Clackmannan. There is no air quality monitoring information for this area. + Access links within the site should be provided to ensure links to the existing core path network and within the site itself. Additional bus services should be provided to the site should it be developed.
Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Material Assets Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain?
0/-
Development of the site would potentially increase traffic flows within the centre of Clackmannan and Alloa as people travel to access services and employment.
No mitigation
The site is located close to the centre of Clackmannan, however local services will be accessed within Alloa and access to employment will generate additional journeys. The site is located on a low hill and is unlikely to be at increased risk of flooding or instability as a result of climate change. The site is adjacent to Clackmannan and Kennet and therefore is located close to existing transport, water and energy infrastructure. The site extends over a low hill at the edge of the Forth valley. Although surrounded by perimeter woodlands, parts of the site are elevated and exposed to the prevailing wind. The topography of the site provides a variety of aspects which can be accommodated in the design and layout of development on site.
0 +
No mitigation
Development on the more elevated and exposed slopes to the immediate south west of the reservoir should be avoided, as should the north facing slopes. Avoidance of the highest ground will assist in reducing the landscape impact of the site, however in combination with the oil and gas pipeline hazard zones, which effectively reduce the area of site suitable for built development, the opportunity to make best use of aspect may be limited.
The site does not lie in an area identified as having potential for open cast coal extraction The site includes two oil and gas pipeline hazard zones. The first runs across the site to the west of the reservoir from south west to north east. The second lies immediately adjacent to the route of the Clackmannanshire Bridge link road at the south east of the site. Development of the site would generate additional waste arisings, however the site lies adjacent to an existing urban areas for which recycling facilities will be provided.
0 No mitigation
Does the site reduce waste generation and promote waste recovery, recycling and composting?
115
SEA /site assessment topic Cultural Heritage
There are no features designated for their cultural heritage value within the site boundary. The site adjoins Kennet Village conservation area, however a belt of woodland separates the conservation area from the development site which reduces intervisibilty. Cumulative impacts resulting from development of this site and the sites identified to the east should be considered in their impact on Kennet Village conservation area.
The National Monuments Record of Scotland identifies two enclosures in the vicinity of the reservoir, of which there are no visible remains. The area to the south west of the reservoir was the site of Kennet House and Stables (now demolished). The HLA identifies that the farmland to the west is a relict designed landscape, as illustrated by the woodland belts. The farmland to the east is relict agriculture and settlement.
Landscape
The site does not lie in an area designated for its landscape value or as Greenbelt. The site lies within the Devon/Forth landscape character area with varied farmland characterised by undulating landform and coniferous blocks of forestry. Key attributes of the landscape character area are the diversity of features and dramatic outlook to the Ochils. The corridor of the Black Devon is identified as important. The perimeter woodland belts provide a high degree of screening for the site and this would reduce the impact on settlement setting and identity. However this would also serve to identify the development within the site as a separate settlement without strong visual or physical association with existing settlement. Development in the western part of the site would have some visual association with the existing settlement, but would be largely screened by the woodland belts. The eastern slopes of the site are particularly open when viewed from the east and the route of new Clackmannanshire Bridge further increases the visibility of this area. Similar to above, the perimeter woodland belts limit views into the site but the new A876 trunk road provides open views to the eastern part of the site. In addition the development of the slopes would potentially be visible in distant views when approaching the new Clackmannanshire Bridge from the south.
This landscape character area is noted for its diversity of landscape features and high landscape value. In particular guidelines for development include new woodland planting and restructuring of existing coniferous plantations. No mitigation
0/-
Avoid locating development on these slopes.
116
Path through woodlands to west
View south to hill with masts and covered reservoir
117
SITE 17 LAND SOUTH OF JAMES PLACE, COALSNAUGHTON

24.23 Medium The site is located south of the village of Coalsnaughton in an area of agricultural land. The site lies outwith the settlement boundary. Access to the western part of the site would be onto James Place, with potential junction improvements with Ramsay Street. Access from the eastern part of the site could be taken onto James Place or the main road. None Ground stability Moderate ground stability n/a
Trees and vegetation: there are small areas of mixed woodland to the west and north west of the site. The site is predominantly pasture. Field boundaries: the north site boundary adjoins with the existing residential developments at Coalsnaughton. The remaining boundaries include some hedgerows and some post and wire fences. Water: there is a drain in the north eastern corner of the site. Other features: n/a Settlement expansion Agricultural The north of the site adjoins the existing settlement of Coalsnaughton. The south of the site borders with agricultural and farm land. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV3 Development in the Countryside: The policy states that development in the Countryside (as defined in Local Plans i.e. areas not within settlement boundaries) be suitable for its location in function and design and should accord with Policy ED4 Rural Development (see below). Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ED4 Rural Development: The policy states that economic and social development in rural areas will be supported within the following criteria: Focusing development within existing towns and villages Restricting development within Green Belt and countryside.
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Sets out the criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area. As there are core path routes which pass through the site the following should be taken into account: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy INF3 Local Access: The policy states that development will not be permitted where it will result in the loss of an asserted right of way, footpath or a path forming part of the Clackmannanshire path network unless the provision of an alternative path can be assured.
Gartmorn Dam Local Nature Reserve is approximately 750m south of the site. It is unlikely that development of the site will affect the nature reserve.
118
There are Phase 1 and Phase 2 habitat survey records for several areas close to the site including Devonknowes Bing, Glenfoot Devon Wetlands, Brandyhill Wood and Cowpark wood. The site is identified in the Phase 1 Habitat Survey as arable and pasture. The site is remote from the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site and development of the site should not impact on the integrity of the site. The site includes areas of hedgerow which may provide habitat for protected species. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified. Small areas of mixed woodland to the south west and north east of the site play a role as part of the woodland generalist 1km dispersal network. The site includes hedgerows and development of the site could potentially result in the loss of these resources. The site is well connected with the Core Path Network (several routes pass through and adjacent to the site) and is within easy access of Coalsnaughton and Tillicoultry where there are numerous paths leading to Alva in the west, Dollar in the east, Sauchie in the south west and the wider countryside of Clackmannanshire. Development of the site may result in more people utilising the Core Path Network which could have a knock on positive effect on the health of the local population. The site lies just south of an area identified as having a high SIMD. The same area is also an ROA area. Development of the site is likely to have a positive effect on levels of deprivation in the surrounding area. In addition to being well located in relation to the Core Path Network, the site is within easy access of several areas of safe recreational open space as identified by Clackmannanshire Council. There two areas identified of safeguarded open recreational open space within Coalsnaughton and two community recreation sites north west of the site. Development at the site may result in a greater number of people using the available recreational resources and could have a positive effect on population and human health. The site is not identified as being at risk of flooding. There is a drain at the north eastern boundary of the site however it is unlikely that any significant effect would arise if a pollution event were to occur on site as a result of the development. There are no watercourses which are likely to be affected by increased flood risk as a result of development on the site.
0 0/Following site specific survey, appropriate mitigation should be identified and implemented. The hedgerows and woodland habitat should be protected and enhanced. There are opportunities to improve the informal paths to the west of the site.
++
++
Water
Is the site at risk of flooding? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site?
0 0 0
Soil
The site is not identified as an area of vacant or derelict land. The site is not prime quality agricultural land. The site is easily accessible by the Core Path Network and is well positioned to access services in Coalsnaughton and Tillicoultry. However the site is located up a steep hill from Tillicoultry which limits the potential for pedestrian access to and from the site.
0 0 0
119
Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
The site is approximately a 5 minute walk of Tillicoultry and is well positioned to make use of the existing public transport network. The closest air quality monitoring site is at Tillicoultry bus station however near the site however available air quality data indicates that there are no exceedences of Nitrogen Dioxide or Particulates within the council area. There is no indication that air quality is an issue at the site and it is unlikely that development of the site will have an adverse effect. Whilst development of the site is likely to result in increased levels of traffic on local roads it is unlikely that this will have a significant adverse effect on air quality or pollution levels as no potential issues have been identified in this area. The main road access to Tillicoultry is limited in its capacity to accommodate increased traffic levels which limits the accessibility of the site. Cumulative effects require to be assessed in Stage 2. The site is very well linked with Tillicoultry and will benefit from the existing transport infrastructure available here. People will therefore not need to travel far to access services and facilities. The site is gently undulating and is not identified as having a high risk of flooding or instability as a result of climate change. The settlement is well positioned to make use of the existing infrastructure present in Tillicoultry. The site is well positioned to make use of both solar gain and shelter. The Gartmornhill area is identified as a restricted area of search for coal mining. It is identified as the only area of remaining shallow coal resources in the neighbourhood, however the site would not be suitable for development due to its proximity to settlement and other restrictions. There are no hazard areas within or near the site. Development of the site would generate additional waste arisings associated with a large development area. There are no features of archaeological interest within the site.
Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Does the site reduce waste generation and promote waste recovery, recycling and composting? Cultural Heritage Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
+ 0 + + 0
Material Assets
0 Local recycling and composting facilities should be provided as part of the site masterplan.
Development of the site would not impact on any archaeological remains. The Ochil Hills AGLV is over 1km north of the site boundary. Development of the site will have no effect on this designated area as it is buffered by the existing settlement of Tillicoultry to the north. The Forest AGLV lies within 250m of the southern boundary of the site and the boundary is created by the woodland edge. Development of the site would affect the existing setting and identity of Coalsnaughton which has a traditional linear character, however it would also form a logical extension to the existing settlement area which has already expanded to the north. Development of the site would be unlikely to impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes, particularly as it would be viewed as an extension to the existing settlement of Coalsnaughton. Development would be visible in glimpse views from the B9140.
0 0
Landscape
120
View north east to settlement edge and Ochils
View west from B9140
121
SITE 18 DEVONSIDE EAST

7.78 Medium The site is located on the southern fringes of the settlement of Tillicoultry to the north of the village of Coalsnaughton. The site lies outwith the settlement boundary. Access would be taken onto The Glen. Junction improvements may be required with Alexandra Street. None (see constraints below) Surface water drainage Moderate Surface water drainage and overland flow Road access. Topography n/a
Trees and vegetation: there are small areas of mixed woodland within and north of the site. Field boundaries: The north and south site boundaries adjoin with existing residential developments. The east of the site is open to fields and open space. The western boundary of the site corresponds with The Glen road. Boundaries are predominantly hedgerows and woodland belts. Water: A sink runs through the north eastern portion of the site. Role as part of FHN: small areas of woodland to the north east of the site form part of the woodland generalist 1km dispersal network, however these areas are not well connected to the surrounding areas of FHN. Other features: A deep gorge lies to the east of the site. This information will be gathered from the desk based review and consultation Settlement expansion Pasture The north, west and south of the site are a mixture of residential and commercial developments including Sterling Mills shopping outlet to the north. Undeveloped open space and agricultural land extend from the eastern boundary of the site. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV3 Development in the Countryside: The policy states that development in the Countryside (as defined in Local Plans i.e. areas not within settlement boundaries) be suitable for its location in function and design and should accord with Policy ED4 Rural Development (see below). Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ED4 Rural Development: The policy states that economic and social development in rural areas will be supported within the following criteria: Focusing development within existing towns and villages Restricting development within Green Belt and countryside.
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Sets out the criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area. As part of the Local Plan Schedule of sites the woodland area to the west of the site is designated as follows: Plan Ref: CE8 The Glen: Environmental enhancement as integral part of adjoining housing development (related to Local Plan Residential Sites 101 and 102).
122
Does the site impact on designated sites? Does the site impact on priority habitats or species? Does the development of the site avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site? Does the development of the site maintain and enhance populations of European Protected Species including protection of their resting places? Does the site facilitate the restoration and enhancement of biodiversity in all our urban and rural environments through better planning, design and practice?
There are no designated sites within 500m of Devonside East. The site is identified in the Phase 1 Habitat Survey as arable and pasture with area of broad leaved semi natural woodland and broadleaved plantation in the northern part of the site. The site is remote from the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site and development of the site should not impact on the integrity of the site. The woodland, burn and hedgerows may provide habitat for some protected species. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified. Small areas of woodland to the north east of the site form part of the woodland generalist 1km dispersal network, however these areas are not well connected to the surrounding areas of FHN. Development of the site could potentially result in the loss of these resources. Whilst there are no core paths leading directly to the site, the site is within easy access of Coalsnaughton and Tillicoultry where there are numerous paths leading to Alva in the west, Dollar in the east, Sauchie in the south west and the wider countryside of Clackmannanshire. Development of the site may result in more people utilising the Core Path Network which could have a knock on positive effect on the health of the local population. The site is adjacent to an area identified as having a high SIMD. The same area is also an ROA area. Development of the site is likely to have a positive effect on levels of deprivation in the surrounding area. In addition to being well located in relation to the Core Path Network, the site is within easy access of several areas of safe recreational open space as identified by Clackmannanshire Council. There are several playing fields and gardens on the outskirts of Tillicoultry as well as an area directly adjoined to the south west of the site. Several sites with potential for recreational development have also been identified to the west of the site. Development at the site may result in a greater number of people using the available recreational resources and could have a positive effect on population and human health. The site is within 100m of the River Devon which is identified by SEPA as being at risk of flooding however the flood risk map indicates that this would not affect the site. However there is a potential risk associated with surface water and overland flow affecting the site. There are sinks and issues within the site which could be affected by diffuse pollution resulting from development on the site. Development of the site may result in increased levels of run off to the River Devon which has an identified flood risk.
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) 0 0 0 0/-
Following site specific survey, appropriate mitigation should be identified and implemented. The hedgerows and areas of woodland should be protected and enhanced. Minor negative
++
Water
0/-
0/-
0/-
The implementation of SUDS will reduce the impact of diffuse pollution resulting from development of the site. The implementation of SUDS will reduce the impact of increased flood risk resulting from development of the site.
Soil
123
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) 0 + +
Is the site prime agricultural land? Air Quality and Transport Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport?
The site is not prime quality agricultural land. The site is easily accessible by the Core Path Network and is well positioned to access services in Coalsnaughton and Tillicoultry. The site is accessible to the bus service in Coalsnaughton and is approximately a 5 minute walk of Tillicoultry and is well positioned to make use of the existing public transport network. The closest air quality monitoring site is at Tillicoultry bus station however near the site however available air quality data indicates that there are no exceedences of nitrogen dioxide or particulates within the council area. There is no indication that air quality is an issue at the site and it is unlikely that development of the site will have an adverse effect. Whilst development of the site is likely to result in increased levels of traffic on local roads both during construction and post-development it is unlikely that this will have any significant adverse effect on air quality or pollution levels as no potential issues have been identified in this area. However the local road providing the main access to the site is identified as having low capacity to accommodate additional traffic flows. Cumulative effects require to be assessed in Stage 2. The site is very well linked with Tillicoultry and will benefit from the existing transport infrastructure available here. People will therefore not need to travel far to access services and facilities. The site is located on a steep north facing slope, which in combination with overland flow may result in issues of instability The settlement is well positioned to make use of the existing infrastructure present in Tillicoultry. The site is located on a steep north facing slope and does not make best us of shelter and solar gain. The site would not impact on future potential for mineral extraction. The Balhearty area has been worked and coaling is finished. There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site. Development of the site would generate additional waste arisings however the site is small in extent and lies adjacent to an existing urban areas for which recycling facilities and waste collection will already be provided. There are no features of archaeological interest within the site.
Climatic Factors
Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Does the site reduce waste generation and promote waste recovery, recycling and composting?
+ 0/+ 0 0
Material Assets
Cultural Heritage
Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
Landscape
Development of the site would not impact on any known archaeological remains. The HLA identifies that the site comprises 18th 19th century fields and farming. The Ochil Hills AGLV is approximately 1km north of the site boundary. Development of the site will have no effect on this designated area as it is buffered by the existing settlement of Tillicoultry to the north. Development of the site would result in coalescence between Coalsnaughton and Devonside, however the separation between these two settlements is already compromised by the development to the west of this site. Development of the site would be unlikely to impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes, as it is screened by woodland belts and areas of housing development.
0 0 0
124
View north east from Coalsnaughton settlement edge
125
SITE 19 LOVERS LOAN

13.91 Medium Located south east of the settlement of Dollar, small areas of mixed woodland to the north and east of the site, open space to the south. The site is traversed by several paths and tracks and links to the wider countryside of Clackmannanshire in the east. The site lies outwith the settlement boundary. Access would be taken onto the A91, however junction treatment would be required.
None Ground stability Surface water drainage and flood risk
Major Scheduled Monument Moderate - Surface water drainage and flood risk n/a
Vegetation: Woodland along the northern, western and eastern boundaries of the site which comprises rough grass. Field boundaries: Woodland and post and wire fencing Water: There are several drains and issues north, south and west of the site Other features: Scheduled Monument
Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use Settlement expansion Informal open space Open space, mixed woodland and farmland to the east. Residential, recreational and educational to the west.
126
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Sets out the criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area. As there is a Scheduled Monument on the site the following applies: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN7 Archaeological or Historic Sites: The policy states that development will not be permitted where it can adversely affect a SAM or other important archaeological or historical site unless it can be demonstrated that there is no alternative viable site or the development is of national public importance; and Policy EN8 Site assessment, evaluation and recording Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN8 Site assessment, evaluation and recording: Where a development could affect a site of archaeological importance, an assessment of the historical value must be undertaken prior to permission being granted. A section of the west part of the site is designated as a Community and Recreation Development Area in the Local Plan(CR32 Kellyburn, Dollar), this includes the following development guidelines: Provision of playing field, accessed from Lovers. Protect and enhance burn and introduce new structural planting.
Planning history SEA /site assessment topic Biodiversity, flora and fauna
Part of site committed for a cemetery, playing field and enabling housing. Site issues and discussion Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) 0 Enhancement and mitigation options Potential effect following mitigation
Damhead wood is approximately 600m south of the site but this is separated from the site River Devon and the dismantled railway line. Dollar Glen is approximately 750m north of Lovers Loan but is separated from the site by the existing settlement of Dollar. There is an area of ancient woodland approximately 400m north of Lovers Loan but again, this is separated from the site by existing development and farmland. There are small areas of mixed woodland surrounding the northern half of the Lovers Loan site. The site is identified in the Phase 1 Habitat Survey as arable and pasture. The site is not in proximity to the Firth of Forth SPA and RAMSAR site. Although there are no significant habitat features on site a site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified. An area of woodland generalist 1km dispersal network lies at the north east of the site. This is an isolated area of FHN with no other areas of FHN in close proximity. Development of the site would result in a loss of open ground. The site is well connected to the Core Path Network and is in the centre of a loop of paths. A number of informal paths cross the site. Links to the wider countryside and north into Perth and Kinross are easily accessible. Development
127
Does the development of the site avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site? Does the development of the site maintain and enhance populations of European Protected Species including protection of their resting places? Does the site facilitate the restoration and enhancement of biodiversity in all our urban and rural environments through better planning, design and practice? Population and human Is the site connected to the local core path network?
0 0/Following site specific survey, appropriate mitigation should be identified and implemented.
0/-
++
SEA /site assessment topic health
at the site could lead to a greater number of people using the paths which could have knock on benefits on health.
The site is not part of an ROA area or located in an area which has a high SIMD. Development of the site will therefore have no impact on this criterion.
The site has good access to the Core Path Network, and the safeguarded open space of the school playing fields to the west of the site.
Water
The site does not lie in an area of flood risk identified on the SEPA flood map. However the site has some issues with localised flooding from the Kelly Burn and surface water drainage issues. The Kelly Burn flows from the Ochils and may cause flooding risk during periods of intense rainfall or rapid snowmelt. There are several drains and issues around the site boundary. Development on the site could therefore result in increased levels of pollution entering these drains and flowing on to surrounding water courses. Development at the site would increase the rate of run off to the River Devon. The cumulative impacts of development along the water course should be considered.
Site layout to avoid locating development close to the areas of flood risk would mitigate this risk. The implementation of SUDS would mitigate this impact. The implementation of SUDS would mitigate this impact, however some impact would remain.
No effect
No effect.
Soil
The site is well linked with the Core Path Network and close to the centre of Dollar. The site is located a short distance from the centre of Dollar. Air quality is not monitored near the site however available air quality data indicates that there are no exceedences of nitrogen dioxide or particulates within the council area. Development of the site is unlikely to contribute significantly to air pollution. Development of the site would result in increased levels of traffic on the A91 and contribute to increased traffic levels in the centre of Dollar. Cumulative effects require to be assessed in Stage 2. Development of the site will not reduce the need to travel. Although local
0/+
+ 0
Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Does the location of the development reduce the need to
No mitigation
Improved public transport
128
travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change?
services are provided in Dollar people will travel outwith the local area to access employment and a wider range of retail services Extreme weather conditions and flooding as a result of climate change could potentially result in flooding of the site. The site is located within Dollar, and therefore close to existing infrastructure. Site layout can reduce the potential impacts of flood risk associated with the site.
Material Assets
The site is well positioned to make use of both solar gain and shelter being located on a south facing slope. The site is within close proximity to Dollar and is identified as a restricted area for open cast. There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site.
+ 0 0
The site is medium in size and will have some household waste arisings following development. The site is outwith the Dollar conservation area and would not impact on the integrity of this designation.
Provision of on site waste recovery, recycling and composting should be considered if feasible.
There is a Scheduled Monument located in the western section of the site, which is the remains of a pallisaded enclosure.
Site masterplanning could ensure the accommodation of the scheduled monument within open space provision within the site.
Landscape
The Ochil Hills AGLV is located within approximately 1km to the north west of the site, however development within this site will not impact on views to this area. This site does not relate strongly to the existing settlement due to the separation created by the woodland belts. Views to the site are limited by the woodland belts alongside the A91. Development on the site would be viewed from the A91, but is not widely visible.
-/0
0/-
129
View south from A91
View north illustrating woodland belt adjacent to A91 and settlement edge
130
SITE 20 DOLLARFIELD FARM

1.98 Small Located approximately 300m south of the settlement of Dollar on the south side of the dismantled railway line. The surrounding land is mostly agricultural and the River Devon is approximately 200m south of the site. The site is located outwith the settlement boundary. Access would be taken onto the B913 however access would require to be taken along a private road. Flood risk Flood risk Major - Flood risk. Issues with private site access. Moderate - Impact on settlement character The eastern area of the site is at risk of flooding from the Dollar Burn.
Size (ha) Size (group) Summary description including site access and public transport connections Overriding constraints to development Site specific investigations Constraints to development Summary of area remaining following mitigation Environmental features
Trees and Vegetation: Small areas of mixed woodland to the east and west of the site and unmanaged grassland. Field boundaries: The east of the site is bordered by a small area of mixed woodland. The south west boundary of the site adjoins Dollarfield Farm buildings. Water: the Dollar Burn runs along the eastern boundary of the site and leads into the River Devon approximately 200m south of the site.
Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use Development in the countryside Unmanaged agricultural Open space, small areas of mixed woodland and farm land to the east and west.
131
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Sets out the criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area. Due to the risk of flooding the following apply: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV9 Water Resource Management: The policy states that development will not normally be permitted in undeveloped flood plain areas, in areas of known significant flood risk, or if it will adversely affect the Forth Estuary. Exceptions will be made only when it can be demonstrated that no alternative locations can be found, or that suitable mitigation measures can be implemented. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN4 Water Resources: The policy states that where a development area is determined as being at risk of flooding, planning permission will not be granted except where it can be proven that there are no viable alternative sites. SEA /site assessment topic Biodiversity, flora and fauna Site appraisal criteria Site issues and discussion Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) 0 Enhancement and mitigation options Potential effect following mitigation
Damhead wood SSSI is approximately 200m south of the site but is separated from it by the River Devon. Dollar Glen SSSI is approximately 1.5km north of the site on the other side of the existing settlement of Dollar. It is unlikely that development of the site would have any impact on the designated sites mentioned due to their distance from Dollarfield Farm. There are no designated Local Nature Reserves near the site however the Damhead Wood SSSI and includes locally rare woodland species and rare woodland habitat. The site is identified in the Phase 1 Habitat Survey as arable and pasture. There are small areas of mixed woodland around the north and west of the Dollarfield Farm site as well as the SSSI 200m to the south which is designated for its rare woodland habitat. The site is not in proximity to the Firth of Forth SPA and RAMSAR site. As the site comprises some woodland and a watercourse along the eastern boundary site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified. Although the site is not identified as part of the Forest Habitat Network the site could be important for habitat connectivity in terms of linking the Dollar Burn to the River Devon. In addition, the small areas of woodland east of the site connect to Damhead Wood SSSI south of the site. The site is not directly linked to the Core Path Network but is within easy access of a route along the B913. However this is not a pleasant or safe route and the informal route along Dollar Burn provides an off road alternative to access the town. The site is not part of an ROA area or located in an area which has a high SIMD.
132
Does the development of the site avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site? Does the development of the site maintain and enhance populations of European Protected Species including protection of their resting places? Does the site facilitate the restoration and enhancement of biodiversity in all our urban and rural environments through better planning, design and practice?
0 0/Following site specific survey, appropriate mitigation should be identified and implemented. The potential for habitat networks following the natural habitat features of the site should be considered at the development planning stage.
0/-
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) +
Water
The site is within easy access of the Core Path Network which provides links to the wider countryside and areas of open space. The site is approximately 250m from the playing fields on the outskirts of the settlement of Dollar. Development at the site may result in a greater number of people using this resource thus having a positive effect on population and human health. The Dollar Burn runs along the eastern boundary of the site which is identified by SEPA as being at risk from flooding. The River Devon approximately 200m south of the site is also identified as being at risk of flooding. If development were to take place on this site it would be at significant risk of flooding. The Dollar Burn which flows past the eastern boundary of the site could be affected by increased levels of pollution as a result of development. Whilst the site is relatively small and run off levels are likely to be low, the risk to the water environment remains. The Dollar Burn could be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site at Dollarfield Farm. However, it is likely that the effect will be relatively small owing to the small size of the site.
--
The proximity to watercourses
The implementation of SUDS would reduce the impact of diffuse pollution resulting from development of the site.
0/-
Soil
The site is not vacant or derelict land. The site is not an area of prime quality agricultural land. The site is not directly linked to the Core Path Network but is within easy access of it. The paths provide links to Dollar, Tillicoultry and the wider countryside. Development of the site will have a positive effect on local access and could encourage more people to utilise the available routes, resulting in positive knock on effects on private car use and air quality as a consequence. The site will benefit from use of the public transport facilities available in Dollar and development of the site may help to improve the public transport network in the area. Air quality is not monitored near the site however available air quality data indicates that there are no exceedences of nitrogen dioxide or particulates within the council area. Development of the site is unlikely to result in local problems of air pollution. Presently there is only one road which would provide access to the site (the B913) therefore development would be likely to result in increased levels of traffic on this route both during construction and post-development. However, as there are no identified issues of air pollution currently, this is unlikely to have a significant effect on air quality. There are known capacity issues associated with the junction of the B913 and the A91. Cumulative effects require to be assessed in Stage 2. Whilst the site is close to, and well linked with, the settlements of Dollar and Tillicoultry via the Core Path Network, it is unlikely that development of the site will reduce the need to travel. The road network to the site is limited and as such, public transport may not be sufficient for people who need to commute for work or access to services. Extreme weather conditions and flooding as a result of climate change could potentially result in flooding of the site. The site would be expected to utilise the existing infrastructure present in the settlement of Dollar.
0 0 +
--
0 -
Climatic Factors
Material Assets
Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure?
133
Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Does the site reduce waste generation and promote waste recovery, recycling and composting? Cultural Heritage Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
The site is well positioned to make use of both solar gain and shelter. The development of the site would not impact on areas identified for future open cast. There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site. Although the site is small in site, household development will result in some household waste arisings. There are no sites monuments or buildings designated for their cultural heritage value within the site boundary. Dollar conservation area, and numerous listed buildings within the settlement, are located approximately 500m north of the site. Development of the site would not impact on any known archaeological remains. The HLA identifies that the site is a relict designed landscape. The Ochil Hills AGLV is over 1km away Dollarfield Farm site boundary. Development of the site is therefore unlikely to have an effect on this designated area as it is buffered by the existing settlement of Dollar. Development of Dollarfield Farm may impact on the rural setting and identity of the landscape surrounding it however this will be fairly limited as some farm buildings and residential properties are already present within and nearby the site. The development of this site would also effectively extend the built development of Dollar south along the B913. The development of the site would not be highly visible from transport routes, however it would be partially visible in views from the Ochils where it would appear as an extension to Dollar.
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) + 0 0 0
Consideration of some on-site small scale recycling facilities.
0 0 -/0
Landscape
134
View west from Dollar Burn to Dollarfield Steading
135
SITE 21 DOLLARFIELD
2.89 Medium The site is located approximately 500m south of the settlement of Dollar on the south side of the dismantled railway line. Riverside Caravan Park and the River Devon are directly south of the site. The site is located outwith the settlement boundary and access would be taken onto the B913. The access road is a private road which may limit opportunities for further development of the site. Flood risk
Moderate - Site access The whole of the site lies within the area identified as at risk of flooding by the River Devon on the SEPA indicative flood map.
Trees and vegetation: Small areas of mixed woodland north of the site. Field boundaries: existing farm/residential buildings border the north of the site, the east and north of the site is bordered by private grounds. Riverside Caravan Park borders the south of the site and the west of the site is adjacent to the B913. Water: the Dollar Burn is 30m from the east of the site at its closest point. The River Devon is approximately 30m south of the site at its closes point. Role as part of FHN: The site does not form part of the FHN. Development in the countryside Agriculture Caravan site, scattered residential properties, B913 road to the west.
Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use
136
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Sets out the criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area. Due to the risk of flooding the following apply: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV9 Water Resource Management: The policy states that development will not normally be permitted in undeveloped flood plain areas, in areas of known significant flood risk, or if it will adversely affect the Forth Estuary. Exceptions will be made only when it can be demonstrated that no alternative locations can be found, or that suitable mitigation measures can be implemented. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN4 Water Resources: The policy states that where a development area is determined as being at risk of flooding, planning permission will not be granted except where it can be proven that there are no viable alternative sites. Due to the presence of a core path along one of the site boundaries the following applies: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy INF3 Local Access: The policy states that development will not be permitted where it will result in the loss of an asserted right of way, footpath or a path forming part of the Clackmannanshire path network unless the provision of an alternative path can be assured.
Does the site impact on designated sites? Does the site impact on priority habitats or species? Does the development of the site avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site? Does the development of the site maintain and enhance populations of European Protected Species including protection of their resting places? Does the site facilitate the restoration and enhancement of biodiversity in all our urban and rural environments through better planning, design and practice?
Damhead Wood SSSI is approximately 50m south of the site but is separated from it by the River Devon. Damhead Wood SSSI is a rare woodland habitat and important for local wildlife conservation. The site is identified in the Phase 1 Habitat Survey as arable and pasture. The site is not in proximity to the Firth of Forth SPA and RAMSAR site. Although there are no outstanding habitat features within the site, site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified. The site does not form part of the Forest Habitat Network and there are limited opportunities for habitat connectivity on site. Development of the site would result in a loss of open habitat. The western boundary of the site corresponds with a designated Core Path on the B913 road. This links to the wider countryside in the south and the settlement of Dollar and Tillicoultry in the north and east respectively. Development of the site may result in more people using the Core Path Network and have knock on positive effects on human health. The site is not part of an ROA area or located in an area which has a high SIMD. The site is very well linked with the Core Path Network which provides access to the wider countryside east of Dollar. The site is also within 400m of the playing fields on the outskirts of the settlement of Dollar.
137
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) 0 0 0 0/-
0/-
0 +
Water
Development at the site may result in a greater number of people using the available recreational resources and could have a positive effect on population and human health. The site is located less than 50m north of the River Devon and west of the Dollar Burn and is identified as being at risk flooding in the SEPA flood risk map. In addition, the caravan site at Rackmill (which adjoins the southern boundary of the site) has experienced minor flooding in the past (Biennial report, November 2007). The Dollar Burn and the River Devon could both be affected by pollution caused by development on the site due to their close proximity to Dollarfield. Both the Dollar Burn and the River Devon could be affected by increased levels of flooding as a result of development on the Dollarfield site.
--
No mitigation
The implementation of SUDS would reduce the impact of diffuse pollution resulting from development of the site. The implementation of SUDS would reduce the impact of increased run off resulting from development of the site
Soil
The site is not vacant or derelict land. The site is not an area of prime quality agricultural land. The site is directly linked to the Core Path Network on at its western boundary. This provides further links into Dollar itself as well as to the wider countryside and east to Tillicoultry. Development of the site will have a positive effect on local access and could encourage more people to utilise the available routes, resulting in positive knock on effects on levels of private car use and air quality as a consequence. The site is located approximately 1km from the centre of Dollar, however access to public transport services would be limited by the poor access from the site to the centre of Dollar. Air quality is not monitored near the site however available air quality data indicates that there are no exceedences of nitrogen dioxide or particulates within the council area. Development of the site is unlikely to result in local problems of air pollution due to the existing levels and size of the site. Presently there is only one road which would provide access to the site (the B913) therefore development would be likely to result in increased levels of traffic on this route. However, as there are no identified issues of air pollution currently, this is unlikely to have a significant effect on air quality. Cumulative effects require to be assessed in Stage 2. Whilst the site is close to and well linked with the settlements of Dollar and Tillicoultry via the Core Path Network, it is unlikely that development of the site will reduce the need to travel. The road network to the site is limited and as such, public transport may not be sufficient for people who need to access services or commute to work. Extreme weather conditions and flooding as a result of climate change could potentially result in flooding of the site. The site would be expected to utilise the existing infrastructure present in the settlement of Dollar. The site is well positioned to make use of both solar gain and shelter. The development of the site would not impact on areas identified for future open
0 0 +
Improved path access from this site to the centre of Dollar would enhance the accessibility of the site.
Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel?
No mitigation
Material Assets
Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for
-+ + 0
No mitigation
138
mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Does the site reduce waste generation and promote waste recovery, recycling and composting? Cultural Heritage Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
cast. There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site. The site is medium in size and household development will result in some household waste arisings. There are no sites monuments or buildings designated for their cultural heritage value within the site boundary. Dollar conservation area, and numerous listed buildings within the settlement, are located approximately 750m north of the site. Development of the site would not impact on any known archaeological remains. The HLA identifies that the site is 19th century to present fields and farming. The Ochil Hills AGLV is over 1km away from Dollarfield site boundary. Development of the site is therefore unlikely to have an effect on this designated area as it is buffered by the existing settlement of Dollar. Development of Dollarfield may impact on the rural setting and identity of the landscape surrounding it however this will be fairly limited as some farm buildings and residential properties are already present within and nearby the site. The site would be visible when travelling along the B913, contributing to the perception of the development as an extension of Dollar. The site would also be viewed as an extension from Dollar when viewed from the elevation of the Ochils.
Consideration of some on-site small scale recycling facilities if feasible.
0 0 0/-
Landscape
Mature trees line the B913, however opportunities for screening would be limited.
139
View east illustrating site topography and proximity to woodland
140
SITE 22 UPPER HILLFOOT ROAD, HILLFOOT ROAD, DOLLAR

8.69 Medium The site lies at the northern edge of Dollar surrounded by woodland. The site lies outwith the settlement boundary. The main site access is from Upper Hillfoot Road and through the settlement.
(see combined constraints below)
Major AGLV.
Impact on setting of Castle Campbell and settlement character
Medium Bedrock. Surface water drainage. Site access. Landscape. Summary of area remaining following mitigation Environmental features The whole of the site is affected by the landscape impact constraints and the access limitations. The site is located on a steeply sloping south east facing slope. Trees and vegetation: The site is pasture surrounded on woodland on three sides, which includes coniferous forestry to the north and west and semi natural ancient woodland to the east. There are some individual mature trees within the site associated with the houses. Field boundaries: Mostly post and wire with some degraded stone walls Water (ponds, rivers and streams): Two minor water courses cross the site draining from the hillside above and enter the Kelly Burn. Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use Settlement expansion The site currently forms the grounds of four properties and is grassland with some mature trees and includes a covered reservoir. The site is surrounded by coniferous and deciduous woodland and the urban edge of Dollar adjoins part of the southern site boundary.
141
Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV3 Development in the Countryside: The policy states that development in the Countryside (as defined in Local Plans i.e. areas not within settlement boundaries) be suitable for its location in function and design and should accord with Policy ED4 Rural Development (see below). Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ED4 Rural Development: The policy states that economic and social development in rural areas will be supported within the following criteria: Focussing development within existing towns and villages Restricting development within Green Belt and countryside.
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Sets out the criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area. As there is a risk of flooding the following apply: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV9 Water Resource Management: The policy states that development will not normally be permitted in undeveloped flood plain areas, in areas of known significant flood risk, or if it will adversely affect the Forth Estuary. Exceptions will be made only when it can be demonstrated that no alternative locations can be found, or that suitable mitigation measures can be implemented. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN4 Water Resources: The policy states that where a development area is determined as being at risk of flooding, planning permission will not be granted except where it can be proven that there are no viable alternative sites. As the site lies within the Ochil Hills AGLV the following policies are of relevance: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV2 Protected Landscapes: The policy states that development will only be permitted in Areas of Great Landscape Value where it satisfies the criteria of Policy ENV3 (see above) and can be accommodated without adversely affecting the overall quality of the area. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN2 Landscape and Ecology: The policy includes conditions which must be met if a development is to be permitted in an AGLV. The policy also states that appropriate consideration must be given to woodland, habitats, natural and landscape features when making a planning application.
There are no designated sites within the site boundary. Dollar Glen SSSI lies within 500m of the site boundary to the south west.
The site is identified in the Phase 1 Habitat Survey as predominantly arable and pasture with a small area of semi improved acid grassland to the north of the houses. There is an area identified as amenity grassland and coniferous plantation to the north of the site.
The site is not in proximity to the Firth of Forth SPA and RAMSAR site.
142
Does the development of the site maintain and enhance populations of European Protected Species including protection of their resting places?
There are some habitat features on the site including watercourses and mature trees and therefore site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified.
The woodland surrounding the site forms part of the woodland generalist 1km dispersal network and is therefore an important habitat connection
0/-
Development should take into account the potential for habitat linkages across the site linking parts of the FHN.
Core paths surround the perimeter of the site and there is a network of paths in Dollar Glen and the woodland to the east of the site. The site does not lie within an area within the top 15% SIMD
+ 0
Dollar Glen provides an important open space resource and lies within 500m of the site. Access can be gained to the Ochil Hills close to Castle Campbell and there are access networks in Lawhill Community Woodland to the south east of the site.
The site is located on a steeply sloping hillside and may experience high levels of surface run off due to its proximity to the Ochil Hills.
The steepness of the site and proximity to the Ochils may reduce mitigation options to reduce the impact of surface water run off. The steepness of the site may reduce mitigation options to reduce the impact of diffuse pollution resulting from development of the site.
There are two minor watercourses which drain across the site
Development of the site would potentially increase the rate of run off from the site into the Kelly Burn which is a tributary of the River Devon. However the scale of the site would mean that this would not be significant, however the cumulative effect of developments which drain into the River Devon should be considered.
0/-
Soil
Air Quality
Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and
The site is located to the north of Dollar and within 1.5km of the centre on roads and
143
SEA /site assessment topic and Transport
services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
pavements. There is public transport provision in the centre of Dollar, however the site is located up a steep hill on the periphery of the settlement and is not easily accessible. Air pollution is not monitored within Dollar, however the site is located at the northern periphery of Dollar and away from main roads and therefore air quality is unlikely to be an issue in this area. Development of the site would result in higher levels of traffic flow on the A91and at the road junctions joining the A91 within Dollar. 0
Climatic Factors
The site is located close to the centre of Dollar which may reduce the need to travel to access local services. However the majority of travel for employment will be outwith the local area which will generate a need to travel to the surrounding area. The site is located on a steep slope beneath the steep wooded slopes of Hillfoot Hill. Climate change may cause increased risk of flooding and instability on this site. The site is located on the northern perimeter of Dollar and is therefore close to existing transport, water and energy infrastructure. The site is located on a steeply sloping south east facing area with woodland at the north, east and western boundaries. The site is elevated lying between 130m and 195m AOD which will increase exposure.
No mitigation
Changes in land management on the surrounding slopes may impact on site stability.
Material Assets
Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain?
Although south facing the comparative elevation of the site increases exposure to prevailing winds, reducing the positive effect of orientation. However the design and layout of the development on site should make best use of the elevation and orientation for solar heating.
The site is not in an area identified as having open cast coal mining potential. The site does not include any oil or gas hazard areas.
0 0
The site is medium in size and development will result in household waste arisings.
Consideration of small scale waste recycling facilities on site if feasible.
Castle Campbell and Dollar Glen comprise the Castle Campbell Historic Garden and Designed Landscape. The castle and grounds are a scheduled monument and the castle is a category A listed building. Castle Campbell lies within 500m of the site boundary, but the topography of the area limits visual relationship between the two areas. However in views from the south, the site is of a similar elevation to Castle Campbell and would have some minor
144
negative impact on setting. Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? There are no known archaeological remains within the site boundary. The HLA identifies that the northern part of the site is a relict designed landscape, and the southern parts of the site are 18th to 19th century and 19th century to present fields and farming with the relict land use of settlement and agriculture. The site lies within the Ochil Hills AGLV. The site lies partly within the Ochil hills landscape character area and partly within the middle Devon Water landscape character area. The middle Devon Water landscape character area is characterised by a detailed scale of topography and proportion of woodland cover. Development of the site would introduce built development into an essentially undeveloped area. The site lies outwith the Dollar Conservation area, however it would form a northerly extension to the settlement onto elevated slopes with little built development. This would be contrary to the existing settlement character. -0
Landscape
As noted above, development of the site would compromise the landscape setting of Castle Campbell and impact on the Ochil Hills AGLV.
--
145
View east illustrating site watercourses and slope
View north from Dollar illustrating site context within Ochil Hills AGLV (site is located south of felled woodland)
146
Site reference and location: Size (ha) Size (group) Summary description including site access and public transport connections Overriding constraints to development Site specific investigations Constraints to development Summary of area remaining following mitigation Environmental features 8.5 ha Medium
SITE 23A DOLLAR (SOUTH), WEST OF DEVON ROAD
The site is located approximately 500m south of the settlement of Dollar and west of the B913. The site lies outwith the settlement boundary and access would be taken from the B913.
None n/a Moderate Landscape impacts and impact on settlement form. n/a
Trees and vegetation: Arable farmland with hedgerows. Field boundaries: the northern boundary of the site is adjacent to the existing settlement of Dollar and Lower Mains to the west, the boundaries include garden boundaries and trees and hedgerows. Water: The River Devon is approximately 300m south of the site at its closes point. Settlement expansion Agriculture Small cluster of residential properties at the western site boundary, the B913 and Dollar to the north. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV3 Development in the Countryside: The policy states that development in the Countryside (as defined in Local Plans i.e. areas not within settlement boundaries) be suitable for its location in function and design and should accord with Policy ED4 Rural Development (see below). Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ED4 Rural Development: The policy states that economic and social development in rural areas will be supported within the following criteria: Focusing development within existing towns and villages Restricting development within Green Belt and countryside.
Does the site impact on designated sites? Does the site impact on priority habitats or species? Does the development of the site avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site?
The site does not impact on designated sites. The site is identified in the Phase 1 Habitat Survey as arable and pasture. The site is not in proximity to the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site.
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) 0 0 0
147
Does the development of the site maintain and enhance populations of European Protected Species including protection of their resting places? Does the site facilitate the restoration and enhancement of biodiversity in all our urban and rural environments through better planning, design and practice? Population and human health Is the site connected to the local core path network?
The site includes some mature boundary trees which may provide habitat for protected species. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified. The site is not identified as part of the FHN, however the mature trees associated with the disused railway to the north of the site provide some local habitat value. Development of the site would result in the loss of open ground. A route alongside the B913 which is part of the Core Path network dissects the site leading to the settlement of Dollar in the north and the River Devon, Damhead Wood and the wider countryside in the south. Development of the site may result in more people utilising the Core Path Network which could have a knock on positive effect on the health of the local population. The site is not part of an ROA area or located in an area which has a high SIMD. The site is well linked with the Core Path Network. The Core Path which runs alongside the dismantled railway track on the northern boundary of the site also provides links to the playing fields on the outskirts of the town. The site is not identified in the SEPA indicative flood map as being at risk of flooding. There are no identified watercourses which would be affected by pollution resulting from development of the site. The River Devon could be affected by increased levels of flooding as a result of development on the site.
Enhancement and mitigation options Following site specific survey, appropriate mitigation should be identified and implemented.
0/-
How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD? What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? Water Is the site at risk of flooding? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site?
0 +
0 0 The implementation of SUDS may mitigate some of the impacts of development of the site increasing the rate of run off to the River Devon.
Soil
The site is not derelict or vacant land. The site is not an area of prime quality agricultural land. Core paths link along part of the sites northern boundary. As such, these routes provide access to services and facilities within the settlement of Dollar and further west to Tillicoultry. The site will benefit from use of the public transport facilities available in Dollar and development of the site may help to improve the public transport network in the area. Air quality is not monitored near the site however available air quality data indicates that there are no exceedences of nitrogen dioxide or particulates within the council area. Development of the site is unlikely to result in local problems of air pollution. The site will be accessed from the B913 which passes to the east of the site. Devon Road makes up the western boundary of the site. It is likely that development of the site would result in increased levels of traffic on these roads. However, as there are no identified issues of air pollution currently, this is unlikely to have a significant effect on air quality. However the development of the site would require treatment of the junction between the B913 and the A91.
0 0 + +
--
No mitigation
148
Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Does the site reduce waste generation and promote waste recovery, recycling and composting?
Cumulative effects require to be assessed in Stage 2. Whilst the site is close to and well linked with the settlements of Dollar and Tillicoultry via the Core Path Network, it is unlikely that development of the site will reduce the need to travel. Extreme weather conditions and flooding as a result of climate change could potentially result in flooding of the site. The site would be expected to utilise the existing infrastructure present in the settlement of Dollar. The site is well positioned to make use of both solar gain and shelter. The site is not in an area identified as having open cast coal mining potential. There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site. The site will have a minor impact on waste generation, however as it is located within the urban area it will not generate significant additional waste related journeys. There are no sites monuments or buildings designated for their cultural heritage value within the site boundary. Ochilton, which is a category B listed building, is beside the northern boundary of the site. In addition, Dollar conservation area, which contains numerous listed buildings, is located approximately 100m north of the site on the other side of the dismantled railway line. It is unlikely that development of the site would have any adverse effect on the cultural heritage features mentioned above as there is a significant area of residential property between the site and the conservation area. Development of the site would not impact on any known archaeological remains. The HLA identifies the site as 19th century to present fields and farming The Ochil Hills AGLV is approximately 550m north west of the site boundary. Development of the site will not impact directly on the AGLV, however it reduces the extent of the undeveloped valley floor which provides a foreground in views to the Ochils. Development of the valley floor will reduce the contrast provided by the undeveloped flat valley foreground. Development of the site would impact on the existing settlement character of Dollar, through a southern extension to the traditionally linear hillfoot settlements. Development of the site would impact on views to the Ochils, particularly when travelling along the B913. The introduction of built development would detract from the open views across the flat valley floor to the steeply rising slopes.
+ + 0 0 -
Material Assets
Cultural Heritage
Landscape
Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value?
0 No mitigation
No mitigation
No mitigation
149
View west illustrating settlement edge at Lower Mains
View north to Ochil Hills
150
Site reference and location: Size (ha) Size (group) Summary description including site access and public transport connections Overriding constraints to development Site specific investigations Constraints to development Summary of area remaining following mitigation Environmental features 9.2 ha Medium
SITE 23B DOLLAR (SOUTH), EAST OF DEVON ROAD
The site is located approximately 500m south of the settlement of Dollar on the south side of the dismantled railway line. Riverside Caravan Park and the River Devon are to the south of the site. The site lies outwith the settlement boundary and would be accessed from the B913. None Flood risk associated with Dollar Burn Moderate - Landscape impacts and impact on settlement form Minor - Flood risk associated with Dollar Burn The area potentially affected by flood risk associated with the Dollar Burn is limited to the eastern boundary of the site which does not impact significantly on the available area of site.
Vegetation: Arable farmland with mature deciduous trees along boundary with Dollar, Dollar Burn and the boundary with Dollarfield Farm. Field boundaries: the northern boundary of the site is adjacent to the existing settlement of Dollar and comprises trees. The Dollar Burn flows along the eastern boundary of the site and includes some mature trees and outgrown hedgerow trees. Part of the southern boundary adjoins on to Dollarfield farm and other properties and includes mature trees and post and wire fencing. A hedgerow adjoins the B913. Water: the Dollar Burn corresponds with the eastern boundary of the site; the River Devon is approximately 300m south of the site at its closes point. Settlement expansion Agriculture Agriculture, settlement and road. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV3 Development in the Countryside: The policy states that development in the Countryside (as defined in Local Plans i.e. areas not within settlement boundaries) be suitable for its location in function and design and should accord with Policy ED4 Rural Development (see below). Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ED4 Rural Development: The policy states that economic and social development in rural areas will be supported within the following criteria: Focusing development within existing towns and villages Restricting development within Green Belt and countryside.
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Sets out the criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area. As there is a risk of flooding the following apply: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV9 Water Resource Management: The policy states that development will not normally be permitted in undeveloped flood plain areas, in areas of known significant flood risk, or if it will adversely affect the Forth Estuary. Exceptions will be made only when it can be demonstrated that no alternative locations can be found, or that suitable mitigation measures can be implemented. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN4 Water Resources: The policy states that where a development area is determined as being at risk of flooding, planning permission will not be granted except where it can be proven that there are no viable alternative sites. Due to the presence of a core path route the following applies: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy INF3 Local Access: The policy states that development will not be permitted where it will result in the loss of an asserted right of way, footpath or a path forming part of the Clackmannanshire path network unless the provision of an alternative path can be assured.
151
Damhead wood SSSI is approximately 300m south of the site but is separated from it by the River Devon and the existing properties at Dollarfield Farm. It is unlikely that development of the site will have any effect on the SSSI. The site is identified in the Phase 1 Habitat Survey as arable and pasture. The site is not in proximity to the Firth of Forth SPA and RAMSAR site. The Dollar Burn and associated woodland may provide habitat for protected species. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified. The site does not play a role as part of FHN, however the habitat associated with the Dollar burn may provide an important corridor. Development of the site would affect the habitat value associated with the corridor of the Dollar Burn. An on-road route which is part of the Core Path network runs along the western boundary of the site leading to the settlement of Dollar in the north and the River Devon, Damhead Wood and the wider countryside in the south. An informal path runs alongside the route of the Dollar Burn providing a link to Dollar. The site is not part of an ROA area or located in an area which has a high SIMD. The site is well linked with the Core Path Network which provides access to the wider countryside east of Dollar. The Core Path which runs alongside the dismantled railway track on the northern boundary of the site also provides links to the playing fields on the outskirts of the town. The site could be at risk from flooding from the Dollar Burn to the east. The Dollar Burn could potentially be affected by pollution caused by development on the site. Both the Dollar Burn and the River Devon could be affected by increased levels of flooding as a result of development on the Dollarfield site.
Does the site impact on priority habitats or species? Does the development of the site avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site? Does the development of the site maintain and enhance populations of European Protected Species including protection of their resting places? Does the site facilitate the restoration and enhancement of biodiversity in all our urban and rural environments through better planning, design and practice? Population and human health Is the site connected to the local core path network?
0 0 0/Following site specific survey, appropriate mitigation should be identified and implemented. The woodland and corridor of the Dollar Burn should be protected and enhanced.
0/-
0 +
Water
Site layout and design to avoid development within close proximity of Dollar Burn. The implementation of SUDS would reduce the impacts of pollution resulting from development of the site. The implementation of SUDS would reduce the impacts of increased flood risk resulting from development of the site.
Soil
The site is not derelict or vacant land. The site is not an area of prime quality agricultural land. Core paths run along the western and make up part of its northern boundary. As such, these routes provide access to services and facilities within the settlement of Dollar and further west to Tillicoultry. Development of the site could encourage more people to utilise the available routes, resulting in positive knock on effects on levels of private car use and air quality as a consequence.
0 0 +
152
Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Does the site reduce waste generation and promote waste recovery, recycling and composting? Cultural Heritage Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value?
Bus services are available in Dollar and development of the site may help to support improvement of the public transport network in the area. Air quality is not monitored near the site however available air quality data indicates that there are no exceedences of nitrogen dioxide or particulates within the council area. Development of the site is unlikely to result in local problems of air pollution. The site will be accessed from the B913 which passes to the west of the site. It is likely that development of the site would result in increased levels of traffic with particular impacts on the junction with the A91. Cumulative effects require to be assessed in Stage 2. Whilst the site is close to and well linked with the settlements of Dollar and Tillicoultry via the Core Path Network, it is unlikely that development of the site will reduce the need to travel to larger service centres. Extreme weather conditions and flooding as a result of climate change could potentially result in flooding of the site. The site would be expected to utilise the existing infrastructure present in the settlement of Dollar. The site is well positioned to make use of both solar gain and shelter. The site is not in an area identified as having open cast coal mining potential. There are no hazard areas within or close to the site. The site will generate additional waste arisings, however as it is located within the urban area it will not generate significant additional waste related journeys. There are no sites monuments or buildings designated for their cultural heritage value within the site boundary. Ochilton, which is a category B listed building, is to the north west of the site. In addition, Dollar conservation area, which contains numerous listed buildings, is located approximately 100m north of the site on the other side of the dismantled railway line. It is unlikely that development of the site would have any adverse effect on the cultural heritage features mentioned above as there is a significant area of residential property between the site and the conservation area. Development of the site would not impact on any known archaeological remains. The HLA identifies the site as 19th century to present fields and farming The Ochil Hills AGLV is approximately 550m north west of the site boundary. Development of the site will not impact directly on the AGLV, however it reduces the extent of the undeveloped valley floor which provides a foreground in views to the Ochils. Development of the valley floor will reduce the contrast provided by the undeveloped flat valley foreground. Development of the site would impact on the existing settlement character of Dollar, though a southern extension to the traditionally linear hillfoot settlements. However the traditional settlement form is already compromised by the north eastern expansion of the town on the slopes of Gloom Hill. Development of the site would impact on views to the Ochils, particularly when travelling along the B913. The introduction of built development would detract from the open views across the flat valley floor to the steeply rising slopes.
Enhancement and mitigation options Off road access should be provided to facilitate safe access to the centre of Dollar.
--
Junction improvement may be required, however increased traffic levels will remain. No mitigation No mitigation
+ + 0 0 0
Material Assets
No mitigation
Landscape
0 No mitigation
Restriction of the area of site developed to the immediate south of the town would reduce the impact on settlement form. Restriction of the area of site developed to the immediate south of the town would reduce the impact on settlement form.
153
View north east to Dollar settlement edge
View west along boundary with Site 20
154
SITE 24A FORESTMILL (INCLUDES ASSESSMENT OF RESTORATION OF MEADOWHILL)

127.6 Very large The site is focused around the settlement of Forestmill, which lies approximately 6km from Clackmannan. The site extends to the east towards Meadowhill over the gently sloping land towards the flat bottomed valley of the River Black Devon. The site adjoins the A977, however access could also be taken onto the minor road which enters Forestmill from the south, before joining the A977. A planning application for a housing development proposal has been submitted for this site. None EIA has been carried out for the proposed development on this site Moderate Landscape. Oil and gas pipeline hazard zone. Scheduled Monument. Minor Flood risk associated with the Dollar Burn
Summary of area remaining following mitigation
Trees and vegetation: South plantation is a coniferous forestry plantation and there are small pockets of broadleaved semi natural woodland within this area. To the east there are small areas of broadleaved semi natural woodland Field boundaries: There is a mixture of occasional outgrown hedgerows, degraded stone walls and post and wire fences. Water (ponds, rivers and streams): The site includes a number of minor drains and the River Black Devon which meanders along part of the northern boundary and through the site.
Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use New settlement A mixture of arable and pasture farmland. Meadowhill open cast coal site lies to the immediate north of the eastern site, with areas of forestry to the south and farmland to the east.
155
Planning policy framework
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Sets out the criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area. Due to the proximity of designated sites the following should be taken into account: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV1 Nature Conservation: The policy aims to promote the protection of wildlife, habitats and other natural features. It states that development which will have a potential negative impact upon internationally or nationally designated sites will not be permitted unless it can be demonstrated that their will be no adverse effect from the proposal, or no viable alternative solution. Similarly, proposals which may affect a site of local importance will only be allowed where it can be demonstrated that there will be no significant negative impact on the conservation value of the site. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN1 Sites of Local Ecological Importance: The policy states that any application for development will be guided by the Local Biodiversity Action Plan. It also states that any development proposals should consider the importance of non-designated sites of local nature conservation or biodiversity importance and should minimise negative impacts on the natural heritage resource. As part of the site is within The Forest AGLV, the following policies apply: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV2 Protected Landscapes: The policy states that development will only be permitted in Areas of Great Landscape Value where it satisfies the criteria of Policy ENV3 (above) and can be accommodated without adversely affecting the overall quality of the area. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN2 Landscape and Ecology: The policy includes conditions which must be met if a development is to be permitted in an AGLV. The policy also states that appropriate consideration must be given to existing woodland, habitats, natural and landscape features when making a planning application. As the site includes part of the River Black Devon the following should be considered: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN12 Area Environmental Enhancement states that proposals which would detract from the setting or aesthetics of Conservation Areas, the A91 corridor or rivers will not normally be permitted, and that developers must demonstrate how proposals can be integrated with proposed enhancement measures. As there is a Scheduled Ancient Monument the following should be taken into account: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN7 Archaeological or Historic Sites: The policy states that development will not be permitted where it can adversely affect a SAM or other important archaeological or historical site unless it can be demonstrated that there is no alternative viable site or the development is of national public importance. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN8 Site assessment, evaluation and recording: Where a development could affect a site of archaeological importance, an assessment of the historical value must be undertaken prior to permission being granted. As there is a potential flood risk the following policies are of relevance: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV9 Water Resource Management: The policy states that development will not normally be permitted in undeveloped flood plain areas, in areas of known significant flood risk, or if it will adversely affect the Forth Estuary. Exceptions will be made only when it can be demonstrated that no alternative locations can be found, or that suitable mitigation measures can be implemented. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN4 Water Resources: The policy states that where a development area is determined as being at risk of flooding, planning permission will not be granted except where it can be proven that there are no viable alternative sites. NB. The site is also identified as being within a Gas and Oil Pipeline Hazard Area on the Local Plan Countryside Planning History The site is subject to an outline planning application for the development of a new village settlement and the reinstatement of Meadowhill Quarry cross funded by the proposed development.
156
There are no designated sites within the site boundary, however Craigmad Wood SSSI immediately adjoins part of the southern boundary of the eastern extent of the site. Parklands Muir Wildlife Site was created as part of the restoration of Meadowhill open cast site. The restoration of Meadowhill will not impact on any designated sites. The site includes a greater mosaic of habitat types with areas of arable and pasture farmland, some areas of marsh/marshy grassland and small areas of Blanket Sphagnum bog associated with the River Black Devon. There are two small areas of broad leaved semi natural woodland. The woodland adjacent to the site is known to provide habitat for red squirrel and development of the site will result in disturbance and potential habitat loss. The restoration of Meadowhill will create new areas of grazing land with some small areas of new woodland planting. The site is not in proximity to the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site.
The land immediately adjacent to the SSSI should remain undeveloped to maintain the integrity of the site.
Impact of restoration of Site 25 Does the site impact on priority habitats or species?
0 0/-
Impact of restoration of Site 25 Does the development of the site avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site? Does the development of the site maintain and enhance populations of European Protected Species including protection of their resting places? Does the site facilitate the restoration and enhancement of biodiversity in all our urban and rural environments through better planning, design and practice? Population and human health Is the site connected to the local core path network? Impact of restoration of Site 25 How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD?
0 0
Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified. The woodland along the southern boundary of the site comprises the woodland generalist 1km dispersal network. Development of the site will result in increased disturbance to the existing woodland areas and loss of open habitat. There are no existing core paths within the site boundaries, however there are connections from Forestmill which link to Gartmorn, and a connection to the NCN 76 on the disused railway line to the south. The restoration of Meadowhill will provide recreational access opportunities but will not provide functional access links. The site does not lie in an area with high SIMD, nor are there any areas with high SIMD close to the site.
Following site specific survey, appropriate mitigation should be identified and implemented. Habitat enhancement as part of the development of the site could improve the existing habitat value. Connections to these existing links should be developed within the site. Minor negative
Positive effect.
0 0
Impact of restoration of Site 25 What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources?
No impact Gartmorn Dam country park lies approximately 3km to the west of the site. Devilla Forest to the south includes a network of paths and recreational opportunities. These are large scale recreational resources, however they are not closely accessible from the site. The restoration of Meadowhill will provide a local open space resource accessible from the new development at Forestmill. The low lying land associated with the River Black Devon is identified on the SEPA indicative river and coastal flood map as at potential risk of flooding. The remainder
0 The restoration of Meadowhill with the creation of a path network will create an accessible open space resource. Positive effect
Impact of restoration of Site 25 Water Is the site at risk of flooding?
+ Avoiding development within the area identified as at risk of flooding will No impact.
157
of the site is elevated and gently sloping and is not identified as at risk of flooding. Impact of restoration of Site 25 Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Impact of restoration of Site 25 No impact The watercourses drain into the River Black Devon which would potentially be affected by increased levels from diffuse pollution resulting from development of the site. The Hydrology and Hydrogeology report (2007) for the restoration of Meadowhill identifies that during flood events it is possible that there may be impacts on water quality in the River Black Devon. Development of the site would potentially increase the rate of run off to the River Black Devon, increasing the risk of flooding downsteam. -
remove this risk.
The impact of increased diffuse pollution resulting from development of the site can be mitigated through the implementation of SUDS.
0/-
The impact of increased run off resulting from development of the site can be mitigated through the implementation of SUDS.
Impact of restoration of Site 25 Soil Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land?
The void is largely fed by rainwater and if flows between the void and the River Black Devon occur this could impact on flooding in the River Black Devon. The site does not include any areas of vacant and derelict land, however it lies immediately adjacent to the Meadowhill open cast coal site which is to be restored. ++
Impact of restoration of Site 25 Is the site prime agricultural land?
The restoration of Meadowhill will improve the quality of an existing area of vacant and derelict land The site is not prime quality agricultural land.
++ 0
Impact of restoration of Site 25 Air Quality and Transport Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services?
The restoration will create areas of grazing land. The development of the site would constitute a new settlement. Local services would be provided, however access to other settlements would not be easy without the use of transport.
0 -The development of the site within a rural location remote from service centres and employment limits opportunities for sustainable access to settlements and services. Negative effect
Impact of restoration of Site 25 Is the site easily accessible by public transport?
No impact The development of the site would require the provision of additional bus services to serve the site. There is no public bus service to Forestmill. -Development of the site would require the provision of additional public transport services in order to support options for sustainable travel. Depending on the level of service provision this would result in a positive effect.
Impact of restoration of Site 25 Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
No impact Air quality is not currently monitored within the immediate vicinity of the site. 0
158
Impact of restoration of Site 25 Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Impact of restoration of Site 25 Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel?
No impact The development of the site would contribute to higher traffic flows at Gartarry roundabout and into Alloa and Kincardine. Development of the site would require the provision of additional public transport services in order to support options for sustainable travel.
No impact The creation of a new settlement within a rural location would generate journeys because there is no access to services within close proximity of the site. -Development of the site would require the provision of additional public transport services in order to support options for sustainable travel.
Impact of restoration of Site 25 Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Impact of restoration of Site 25 Material Assets Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Impact of restoration of Site 25 Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Impact of restoration of Site 25 Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Impact of restoration of Site 25 Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
No impact The flood risk associated with the River Black Devon may become greater as a result of changes in rainfall patterns associated with climate change. There is a risk of flooding associated with the movement of water from the void into the River Black Devon. The site will make use of existing infrastructure at Forestmill and provide a new sewage treatment works. No impact The site has a predominantly north facing aspect with the land rising to the south, however the slope is gentle and the reduction in insolation would not be significant. The land around Fearns Farm is south facing. No impact The area to the south of the site is identified as a restricted site for open cast coal therefore development would not take place within this area. No impact The gas pipeline hazard zone extends through the centre of the eastern part of the site north of Gartgreenie. 0 The pipeline will either be armoured or diverted. 0 0 Avoiding development within the area identified as at risk of flooding will remove this risk.
Impact of restoration of Site 25 Does the site reduce waste generation and promote waste recovery, recycling and composting? Cultural Heritage Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage
No impact The site will generate additional waste arisings and generate additional waste collection journeys. Due to the size of the site local composting and recycling facilities could be provided as part of the site masterplan, The Gartmorn Lade lies within the potential flood risk area identified in the SEPA indicative river and coastal flood
Gartmorn Lade extends alongside the northern edge of the River Black Devon and is a Scheduled Ancient Monument. Other features recorded in the NMRS include the
0/-
159
value?
weir at Forestmill.
map. Development, infrastructure or other works should maintain the setting and character of the SAM.
Impact of restoration of Site 25 Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Impact of restoration of Site 25 Landscape Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value?
No impact The development of the site would potentially impact on the integrity of the remains listed above. No impact The site lies immediately adjacent to the Forest AGLV which extends to the east of the site. Development of the site will not have a significant impact on the setting of the AGLV however it will introduce an area of built development within an intrinsically rural landscape. The restoration of Meadowhill will have a positive impact on the local landscape. The site lies within the Devon/Forth landscape character area with varied farmland characterised by undulating landform and coniferous blocks of forestry. Key attributes of the landscape character area are the diversity of features and dramatic outlook to the Ochils. The corridor of the Black Devon is identified as important. The development of the site would have a significant impact on the character and setting of Forestmill which is a small settlement focused alongside the Black Devon. 0/0 These resources are limited in extent and direct impacts could be avoided through awareness and mitigation.
Impact of restoration of Site 25 Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)?
+ This landscape character area is noted for its diversity of landscape features and high landscape value. In particular guidelines for development include new woodland planting and restructuring of existing coniferous plantations. The development will use the existing landscape structure provided by the existing woodland blocks, however the new development will result in significant change to the character of Forestmill.
Impact of restoration of Site 25 Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
The restoration of Meadowhill will have a positive impact on the local landscape. The development of the site would be visible from the A977 which is a major transport route, and it would affect the landscape character of the wider area.
+ Maintaining the wooded edge to the A977 reduces the impact of development within the AGLV, however the visual impact of the new development in views from the A977 will remain. Minor negative effect.
Impact of restoration of Site 25
Meadowhill is visible from the A977 and restoration will have a positive impact on the local landscape.
160
View to Meadowhill open cast workings
View south to Gartgreenie, with Gartgreenie Wood behind
161
SITE 24B FORESTMILL (INCLUDES ASSESSMENT OF RESTORATION OF MEADOWHILL)

73.3 Large The site lies to the south west of the settlement of Forestmill, which lies approximately 6km from Clackmannan. The site includes South Plantation lying to the south of the A977. The site is proposed to form an area of leisure development in association with the planning application submitted for the proposed housing development proposal in area 24a at Forestmill. None EIA has been carried out for the proposed development on this site Major Landscape. Moderate oil and gas pipeline hazard zone
Summary of area remaining following mitigation Trees and vegetation: South plantation is a coniferous forestry plantation and there are small pockets of broadleaved semi natural woodland within this area. To the east there are small areas of broadleaved semi natural woodland Field boundaries: The site includes an area of coniferous forestry plantation bounded by fencing. Water (ponds, rivers and streams): There are two minor watercourses within the western part of the site. The eastern part of the site includes a number of minor drains and the River Black Devon which meanders along part of the northern boundary and through the site. Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use New settlement The site is currently under coniferous forestry The western area is bounded by forestry plantations and open farmland to the south.
162
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Sets out the criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area. Due to the proximity of designated sites the following should be taken into account: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV1 Nature Conservation: The policy aims to promote the protection of wildlife, habitats and other natural features. It states that development which will have a potential negative impact upon internationally or nationally designated sites will not be permitted unless it can be demonstrated that their will be no adverse effect from the proposal, or no viable alternative solution. Similarly, proposals which may affect a site of local importance will only be allowed where it can be demonstrated that there will be no significant negative impact on the conservation value of the site. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN1 Sites of Local Ecological Importance: The policy states that any application for development will be guided by the Local Biodiversity Action Plan. It also states that any development proposals should consider the importance of non-designated sites of local nature conservation or biodiversity importance and should minimise negative impacts on the natural heritage resource. As part of the site is within The Forest AGLV, the following policies apply: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV2 Protected Landscapes: The policy states that development will only be permitted in Areas of Great Landscape Value where it satisfies the criteria of Policy ENV3 (above) and can be accommodated without adversely affecting the overall quality of the area. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN2 Landscape and Ecology: The policy includes conditions which must be met if a development is to be permitted in an AGLV. The policy also states that appropriate consideration must be given to existing woodland, habitats, natural and landscape features when making a planning application. As the site includes part of the River Black Devon the following should be considered: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN12 Area Environmental Enhancement states that proposals which would detract from the setting or aesthetics of Conservation Areas, the A91 corridor or rivers will not normally be permitted, and that developers must demonstrate how proposals can be integrated with proposed enhancement measures. As there is a Scheduled Ancient Monument the following should be taken into account: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN7 Archaeological or Historic Sites: The policy states that development will not be permitted where it can adversely affect a SAM or other important archaeological or historical site unless it can be demonstrated that there is no alternative viable site or the development is of national public importance. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN8 Site assessment, evaluation and recording: Where a development could affect a site of archaeological importance, an assessment of the historical value must be undertaken prior to permission being granted. As there is a potential flood risk the following policies are of relevance: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV9 Water Resource Management: The policy states that development will not normally be permitted in undeveloped flood plain areas, in areas of known significant flood risk, or if it will adversely affect the Forth Estuary. Exceptions will be made only when it can be demonstrated that no alternative locations can be found, or that suitable mitigation measures can be implemented. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN4 Water Resources: The policy states that where a development area is determined as being at risk of flooding, planning permission will not be granted except where it can be proven that there are no viable alternative sites. NB. The site is also identified as being within a Gas and Oil Pipeline Hazard Area on the Local Plan Countryside Planning History The site is subject to an outline planning application for the development of a new village settlement and the reinstatement of Meadowhill Quarry cross funded by the proposed development.
163
There are no designated sites within the site boundary.
The land immediately adjacent to the SSSI should remain undeveloped to maintain the integrity of the site.
Impact of restoration of Site 25 Does the site impact on priority habitats or species?
The restoration of Meadowhill will not impact on any designated sites. The majority of the site is coniferous plantation with some smaller areas of broadleaved semi nature woodland in the southerly extent of the site. The woodland is known to provide habitat for red squirrel and development of the site will result in disturbance and habitat loss.
0 Restructuring of the woodland to create a greater diversity of habitats and species and grey squirrel control would reduce the impact of developing the site.
Impact of restoration of Site 25 Does the development of the site avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site? Does the development of the site maintain and enhance populations of European Protected Species including protection of their resting places? Does the site facilitate the restoration and enhancement of biodiversity in all our urban and rural environments through better planning, design and practice?
The restoration of Meadowhill will create new areas of grazing land with some small areas of new woodland planting. The site is not in proximity to the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site.
0 0
Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified. The whole of the western part of the site comprises the woodland generalist 1km dispersal network, and woodland extends alongside the south western boundary of the eastern part of the site. This element of the FHN forms part of a substantial swathe of FHN which extends from Fishcross to the Bath Moor Plantation and Devilla Forest in Fife. Development of the site would result in a loss of habitat and reduce the habitat value of the site. There are no existing core paths within the site boundaries, however there are connections from Forestmill which link to Gartmorn. The restoration of Meadowhill will provide recreational access opportunities but will not provide functional access links. The site does not lie in an area with high SIMD, nor are there any areas with high SIMD close to the site. No impact Gartmorn Dam country park lies approximately 3km to the west of the site. Devilla Forest to the south includes a network of paths and recreational opportunities. These are large scale recreational resources, however they are not closely accessible from the site. The restoration of Meadowhill will provide a local open space resource accessible from the new development at Forestmill. The site is elevated and gently sloping and is not identified as at risk of flooding. No impact
Following site specific survey, appropriate mitigation should be identified and implemented. Habitat enhancement as part of the development of the site could improve the existing habitat value. Minor negative
Is the site connected to the local core path network? Impact of restoration of Site 25 How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD? Impact of restoration of Site 25 What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources?
0 0 0 -
Connections to these existing links should be developed within the site.
Positive effect.
The restoration of Meadowhill with the creation of a path network will create an accessible open space resource.
Positive effect
Impact of restoration of Site 25 Water Is the site at risk of flooding? Impact of restoration of Site 25
+ 0
164
Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Impact of restoration of Site 25
The watercourses drain into the River Black Devon which would potentially be affected by increased levels from diffuse pollution resulting from development of the site. The Hydrology and Hydrogeology report (2007) for the restoration of Meadowhill identifies that during flood events it is possible that there may be impacts on water quality in the River Black Devon. Development of the site would potentially increase the rate of run off to the River Black Devon, increasing the risk of flooding downsteam.
The impact of increased diffuse pollution resulting from development of the site can be mitigated through the implementation of SUDS.
0/-
The impact of increased run off resulting from development of the site can be mitigated through the implementation of SUDS.
Impact of restoration of Site 25 Soil Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land?
The void is largely fed by rainwater and if flows between the void and the River Black Devon occur this could impact on flooding in the River Black Devon. The site does not include any areas of vacant and derelict land, however it lies immediately adjacent to the Meadowhill open cast coal site which is to be restored. ++
Impact of restoration of Site 25 Is the site prime agricultural land?
The restoration of Meadowhill will improve the quality of an existing area of vacant and derelict land The site is not prime quality agricultural land.
++ 0
Impact of restoration of Site 25 Air Quality and Transport Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services?
The restoration will create areas of grazing land. The development of the site would constitute a new settlement. Local services would be provided, however access to other settlements would not be easy without the use of transport.
0 -The development of the site within a rural location remote from service centres and employment limits opportunities for sustainable access to settlements and services. Negative effect
Impact of restoration of Site 25 Is the site easily accessible by public transport?
No impact The development of the site would require the provision of additional bus services to serve the site. There is no public bus service to Forestmill. -Development of the site would require the provision of additional public transport services in order to support options for sustainable travel. Depending on the level of service provision this would result in a positive effect.
Impact of restoration of Site 25 Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Impact of restoration of Site 25 Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at
No impact Air quality is not currently monitored within the immediate vicinity of the site. 0
No impact The development of the site would contribute to higher traffic flows at Gartarry Development of the site would require the provision of additional public
165
key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Impact of restoration of Site 25 Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel?
roundabout and into Alloa and Kincardine.
transport services in order to support options for sustainable travel.
No impact The creation of a new settlement within a rural location would generate journeys because there is no access to services within close proximity of the site. -Development of the site would require the provision of additional public transport services in order to support options for sustainable travel.
Impact of restoration of Site 25 Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Impact of restoration of Site 25 Material Assets Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Impact of restoration of Site 25 Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Impact of restoration of Site 25 Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Impact of restoration of Site 25 Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
No impact The site is not identified as at significant risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change. There is a risk of flooding associated with the movement of water from the void into the River Black Devon. The site will make use of existing infrastructure at Forestmill and provide a new sewage treatment works. No impact The western extent of the site is partly north facing and partly south facing however it is also comparatively elevated. No impact The area to the south of the site is identified as a restricted site for open cast coal therefore extraction would not take place within this area. No impact The gas pipeline hazard zone extends through a small area at the south eastern corner of this site. 0 The pipeline will either be armoured or diverted. 0 0 0 0
Impact of restoration of Site 25 Does the site reduce waste generation and promote waste recovery, recycling and composting? Cultural Heritage Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Impact of restoration of Site 25 Would development within the site impact on
No impact The site will generate additional waste arisings and generate additional waste collection journeys. Due to the size of the site local composting and recycling facilities could be provided as part of the site masterplan,
There are no designated features within the site boundary.
No impact The remains of a possible limekiln are located within Starton Wood. Development of 0/Protection and enhancement of the archaeological feature and its setting, No impact
166
archaeological remains? Impact of restoration of Site 25 Landscape Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value?
the site would potentially have a minor impact on this feature. No impact The site lies completely within The Forest AGLV. The AGLV is designated for its forested character. --
would result in no adverse impact as a result of development.
The proposed development seeks to integrate the golf course and hotel and leisure club into the existing forest structure. The development within the AGLV will result in a change in character, however this will not be widely visible due to the retention of the perimeter woodland. The eastern part of the site is not within the AGLV designation.
Impact of restoration of Site 25 Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)?
The restoration of Meadowhill will have a positive impact on the local landscape. The site lies within the Devon/Forth landscape character area with varied farmland characterised by undulating landform and coniferous blocks of forestry. Key attributes of the landscape character area are the diversity of features and dramatic outlook to the Ochils. The corridor of the Black Devon is identified as important. The development of the site would have a significant impact on the character and setting of Forestmill which is a small settlement focused alongside the Black Devon.
+ This landscape character area is noted for its diversity of landscape features and high landscape value. In particular guidelines for development include new woodland planting and restructuring of existing coniferous plantations. The development will use the existing landscape structure provided by the existing woodland blocks, however the new development will restul in a significant change to the character of Forestmill.
Impact of restoration of Site 25 Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
The restoration of Meadowhill will have a positive impact on the local landscape. The development of the site would be visible from the A977 which is a major transport route, and it would affect the landscape character of the wider area.
+ Maintaining the wooded edge to the A977 reduces the impact of development within the AGLV, however the visual impact of the new development in views from the A977 will remain. Minor negative effect.
Impact of restoration of Site 25
Meadowhill is visible from the A977 and restoration will have a positive impact on the local landscape.
167
168
SITE 26 AITKENHEAD FORESTMILL (NORTH)

312.00 Very large This is a large undulating site which includes the incised valley of the River Black Devon. The rounded hill of Birkhill Plantation (85m AOD) and the ridge of Fiddle Wood (95m AOD) are the highest points of the site The site includes several areas of forestry plantation including the extensive Birkhill plantation and North Plantation to the south of the Black Devon. The site is located to the north and west of Forestmill in a predominantly rural area. The main access road is the A977, however there are also minor roads extending along the northern and eastern perimeter of the site. Pedestrian and cycle links could be developed along the B910 to facilitate access to Clackmannan
Ground stability Major Landscape, AGLV. Scheduled Monument. Medium Ground stability
Summary of area remaining following mitigation Environmental features Trees and vegetation: The site includes the extensive Birkhill plantation and North Plantation to the south of the Black Devon and several smaller areas of woodland including semi natural ancient woodland extending along the course of the Black Devon. The site is enclosed by woodland on all sides, apart from the east. Field boundaries: Hedgerows and post and wire fences. Water (ponds, rivers and streams): The site is drained primarily by the River Black Devon and the Gartreilly Burn, a tributary of the Black Devon. The Black Devon follows a sinuous course through the centre of the site. Site ownership: Site type: New settlement
The site is currently under agriculture and forestry. There are forestry plantations to the south of the site and the surrounding landscape is agriculture and forestry.
169
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Sets out the criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area. Due to the proximity of designated sites the following should be taken into account: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV1 Nature Conservation: The policy aims to promote the protection of wildlife, habitats and other natural features. It states that development which will have a potential negative impact upon internationally or nationally designated sites will not be permitted unless it can be demonstrated that their will be no adverse effect from the proposal, or no viable alternative solution. Similarly, proposals which may affect a site of local importance will only be allowed where it can be demonstrated that there will be no significant negative impact on the conservation value of the site. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN1 Sites of Local Ecological Importance: The policy states that any application for development will be guided by the Local Biodiversity Action Plan. It also states that any development proposals should consider the importance of non-designated sites of local nature conservation or biodiversity importance and should minimise negative impacts on the natural heritage resource. As part of the site is within The Forest AGLV, the following policies apply: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV2 Protected Landscapes: The policy states that development will only be permitted in Areas of Great Landscape Value where it satisfies the criteria of Policy ENV3 (above) and can be accommodated without adversely affecting the overall quality of the area. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN2 Landscape and Ecology: The policy includes conditions which must be met if a development is to be permitted in an AGLV. The policy also states that appropriate consideration must be given to existing woodland, habitats, natural and landscape features when making a planning application. As the site contains the River Black Devon the following should be taken into account: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN12 Area Environmental Enhancement states that proposals which would detract from the setting or aesthetics of Conservation Areas, the A91 corridor or rivers will not normally be permitted, and that developers must demonstrate how proposals can be integrated with proposed enhancement measures. As the Aitkenhead area is within a restricted zone for open cast coal, the following policies apply: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV10 Minerals General Principles states that economically important mineral resources will be protected from sterilisation by permanent development. Alternatively, working of minerals in advance of development will be encouraged. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN24 Protection of Minerals: The policy states that permanent development which would result in the sterilisation of viable mineral resources will not be permitted except where this would prevent residential development which contributes to the strategic housing land requirement and no other sites are available to meet this requirement. As there are cultural heritage features the following should be taken into account: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN7 Archaeological or Historic Sites: The policy states that development will not be permitted where it can adversely affect a SAM or other important archaeological or historical site unless it can be demonstrated that there is no alternative viable site or the development is of national public importance. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN8 Site assessment, evaluation and recording: Where a development could affect a site of archaeological importance, an assessment of the historical value must be undertaken prior to permission being granted. As there are core path connections within the site the following applies: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy INF3 Local Access: The policy states that development will not be permitted where it will result in the loss of an asserted right of way, footpath or a path forming part of the Clackmannanshire path network unless the provision of an alternative path can be assured. As the River Black Devon has been identified as having flood risk the following may be taken into account: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV9 Water Resource Management: The policy states that development will not normally be permitted in undeveloped flood plain areas, in areas of known significant flood risk, or if it will adversely affect the Forth Estuary. Exceptions will be made only when it can be demonstrated that no alternative locations can be found, or that suitable mitigation measures can be implemented. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN4 Water Resources: The policy states that where a development area is determined as being at risk of flooding, planning permission will not be granted except where it can be proven that there are no viable alternative sites.
170
The route of the River Black Devon in the west of the site is part of the Linn Mill SSSI. This site is designated for its woodland mire and includes relatively undisturbed mixed valley woodland and long established acid oakwood which are uncommon habitats in Clackmannan District. The site includes the River Black Devon (Helensfield to Piperpool Moss) wildlife site. The site includes a mosaic of habitats recorded in the Phase 1 habitat survey. This includes the areas of coniferous plantation to the south of the River Black Devon, areas of broad leaved semi natural woodland alongside the Black Devon and in the policy woodlands to the north of the site. The remainder of the site comprises arable and pasture, including some areas of semi improved neutral grassland. The areas of forestry are important for supporting red squirrels. The site is not in proximity to the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site.
Site layout and design could avoid development close to this location and provide additional habitat to create a buffer around this area. The retention and restructuring of areas of forestry could provide habitat enhancement, however overall habitat loss and disturbance would have a negative impact on the biodiversity value of the area.
No significant effect.
Minor negative impact
The site includes extensive areas of woodland, hedgerows and a watercourse and may provide habitat for protected species. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified.
0/-
The site includes extensive areas of woodland generalist 1km dispersal networks and the woodland associated with the course of the Black Devon includes 500m broadleaved dispersal network. The woodland provides important connections to the woodland at Gartmorn Dam and Forestmill. Development of the site may result in loss of these woodlands and disturbance to the riparian habitat. Core path connections extend through the site from Forestmill, along the route of the Black Devon and connect to Gartmorn Dam. Connections also extend to the north to provide links to the more rural core path network. There are no existing paths within the site to the south of the Black Devon. The site does not lie in an area of high SIMD.
The site masterplan should protect the riparian corridor and woodland resource and create areas of new habitat.
Minor negative
The development of the site should support the creation of additional path networks within the area.
Strong positive
The western boundary of the site adjoins Gartmorn Dam country park which provides a local access resource and recreation area. Core paths link the site to Gartmorn.
The scale of the site would require the provision of open space resources within the site. These should complement the landscape features provided by the Black Devon and existing woodland.
The route of the River Black Devon is identified as at potential risk of flooding on the SEPA indicative river and coastal flood map. However the course of the river is contained within a narrow valley and does not affect wider areas of the site. The site is drained by the River Black Devon and the Gartreilly Burn and these watercourses would potentially be affected by increased levels of diffuse pollution as a result of run off from the development of the site.
The implementation of SUDS as part of the development of the site would reduce the impacts of diffuse pollution
171
resulting from run off. Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? The River Black Devon follows an incised course and flows through Clackmannan, before flowing south of Alloa and meandering across the low farmland before joining the River Forth. Flood risk associated with the Black Devon does not directly affect built up areas and an increased flood risk on the river resulting from development of the site would not have a significant impact on flood risk down stream of the site. The site does not include areas of vacant or derelict land. 0
Soil
The site to the north of the Black Devon includes a network of core paths. There are no core paths in the southern part of the site. The nearest settlement to the site is Forestmill, which provides no local services. Clackmannan is the next closest settlement and lies about 3km distant (depending on the location of chosen site access). The scale of the site would require the provision of on site local services. There is limited public transport to the site, and additional public transport services would have to be provided should the site be developed. Air quality is not monitored close to the site, however it lies in a rural area and is unlikely to have air quality issues. Development of the site would contribute to an increase in traffic flows on the A977 and at the Gartarry roundabout.
The provision of local education and retail facilities would be required, however access to employment and education services will generate longer distance journeys. The provision of additional bus services to the site would provide public transport.
Minor negative
--
The overall impact would depend on the level of public transport provided.
Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Material Assets Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction?
++
No mitigation
The site is located remote from existing settlement and therefore generates need to travel. The flood risk associated with the site is limited to the course of the Black Devon and would not significantly affect the site as a result of increased risk from climate change. The site is located within a largely rural area and as a new settlement would require new infrastructure provision The site is undulating with varying aspects. The surrounding woodland and landform provides some shelter, however the site masterplan should seek to ensure best use of the landform. Aitkenhead is identified as a constraint site for open cast coal and development of the site would remove future potential for extraction.
-0 -
No mitigation
No mitigation
No mitigation
172
The site does not include any oil or gas pipeline hazard areas.
The site will generate additional waste arisings and generate additional waste collection journeys.
Due to the size of the site local composting and recycling facilities could be provided as part of the site masterplan, Development should avoid the Black Devon valley to maintain the setting and integrity of the listed features
Gartmorn Lade and adjoining sluices runs alongside the River Black Devon for its full length through the site. The Lade is a category B listed structure. Aberdona House is a grade C listed building dating from the early 18th century. The house is located in policy woodlands to the north of the Gartreilly Burn to the north of the site, and as such development of the site would have minimal impact on the setting of the property.
The NMRS identifies that the remains of a waterwheel and associated conducts are located on the south bank of the Black Devon, a short distance NW of Shawbernaig Bridge. The area to the south of the Black Devon lies within The Forest AGLV. This area has an undulating landform emphasised by the extensive woodland cover. Development within the AGLV would affect the rural character of the area. Development to the north of the Black Devon would impact on the character of the adjacent AGLV.
The preservation and interpretation of these remains could be implemented through the development of this site. Site layout and design which sympathetically reflect the pattern of landform and landcover would reduce the negative impact on the AGLV, however a minor negative impact would remain. The implementation of a high quality design and architecture could create a new identity to the settlement, however this would not mitigate the impact on the existing character of Forestmill. Layout and design which reflects the landform and pattern of woodland cover would reduce the visual impact of the development of this site. Minor negative effect.
Development of the site would impact on the setting and identity of Forestmill, which is a small settlement comprising properties along the A977 and minor road to the south. Forestmill does not have a highly distinctive identity and contains a contrasting range of building ages and styles and therefore development of the surrounding area may provide an opportunity to create a stronger sense of local character and identity. The development of the site would impact on the integrity of the Forest AGLV and would be visible in views from the A977. This would introduce built development into a strongly rural landscape.
--
173
View north to Lower Saline Wood
View north to Ochils from Gartlove
174
SITE 27 MIDDLETONKERSE, MENSTRIE

9.0 Medium The site comprises farmed fields lying to the immediate south of Menstrie. The site is bounded to the west by a disused railway line and to the east by a local road. A drain separates the two fields and is marked by a line of trees. There are also two roundels within the field to the east. The site lies within the settlement boundary. The site could be accessed through the existing housing estate or directly onto the road to the east of the site. The bridge over the former railway is a potential constraint to development which may require treatment.
None Flood risk Moderate site access Minor - Flood risk. Tree protection order on roundels and trees within site boundary
Unknown, dependent on site specific investigation Trees and vegetation: Trees extend along the line of the burn and there are two woodland roundels. Field boundaries: The field to the east is bounded by mature trees and hedgerows. Water (ponds, rivers and streams): A drain flows along the line of the field boundary between the two fields.
The site is currently used for agriculture, Residential housing lies to the north and farmland surrounds the site to the west, south and east.
175
As there is a core path connection to the east of the site the following may apply: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy INF3 Local Access: The policy states that development will not be permitted where it will result in the loss of an asserted right of way, footpath or a path forming part of the Clackmannanshire path network unless the provision of an alternative path can be assured. As there is a potential flood risk the following policies are of relevance: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV9 Water Resource Management: The policy states that development will not normally be permitted in undeveloped flood plain areas, in areas of known significant flood risk, or if it will adversely affect the Forth Estuary. Exceptions will be made only when it can be demonstrated that no alternative locations can be found, or that suitable mitigation measures can be implemented. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN4 Water Resources: The policy states that where a development area is determined as being at risk of flooding, planning permission will not be granted except where it can be proven that there are no viable alternative sites. As the site includes areas of woodland the following should be taken into account: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN2 Landscape and Ecology: The policy states that appropriate consideration must be given to existing woodland, habitats, natural and landscape features when making a planning application. As the site is in proximity to the River Devon the following should be considered: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN12 Area Environmental Enhancement states that proposals which would detract from the setting or aesthetics of Conservation Areas, the A91 corridor or rivers will not normally be permitted, and that developers must demonstrate how proposals can be integrated with proposed enhancement measures.
The areas of woodland within the site are protected by tree preservation orders. Loss of these woodland areas would have a negative effect.
The protection of the areas of protected woodland and the associated root zones should be part of the site layout and design.
No effect.
There are no Phase 2 habitat survey sites or target notes within the site boundary or buffer. The site is identified in the Phase 1 habitat survey as arable and pasture.
The site is not in proximity to the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site.
The site includes mature boundary trees and is in close proximity to the River Devon and may provide habitat for protected species. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified.
0/-
176
The field boundaries and roundels form part of the woodland generalist 1km dispersal network and provide connections to the River Devon. Development of the site may result in loss or damage to these resources.
The site layout and design should incorporate the existing woodland resources and create additional habitat through planting.
There is an on road core path connection to the east of the site. The site does not lie in an area within the top 15% SIMD, however it is located close to areas with deprivation issues and development of the site could support community regeneration. There are areas of safeguarded open space to the north of the site in the centre of Menstrie and core paths provide access to the Ochil Hills.
+ 0/+
There is potential to upgrade the disused railway to a formal access route.
Positive effect.
Open space provision should be made as part of the site layout and design.
The SEPA indicative river and coastal flood map identifies potential flood risk from the River Devon to the immediate south of the site. Therefore there is a potential risk of flooding in the southern extent of the site. There is a drain across the middle of the site and the site drains into the River Devon. There is a potential risk of diffuse pollution entering these watercourses as a result of development of the site. The development of the site would increase the rate of run off to the River Devon. The site is not large in extent, however the cumulative impact of new development sites along the River Devon should be considered. The scale of the site limits opportunities for utilising SUDS to mitigate flood risk.
The low lying nature of the site limits opportunities to mitigate flood risk. The low lying nature of the site limits opportunities to implement SUDS. The low lying nature of the site limits opportunities to implement SUDS.
Soil
Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at
An on road core path link provides connection to the east of the site and there is on road access to the town centre within 1km. Public transport can be accessed from the town centre. Air quality is not monitored within Menstrie, however the site is located in a residential area and air quality is unlikely to be an issue for this site. The development of the site would potentially lead to increased levels of traffic on the A91 and the B9140. Increases in traffic counts between 2006 and 2007 at
177
+ + 0
No mitigation
key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Material Assets Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
Muirside and the Tullibody bypass have been 12.3% and 12.2% respectively.
Local services can be accessed within Menstrie by walking and cycling, however access to larger service centres and employment requires travel outwith the local area. The site lies immediately adjacent to an area with an identified potential risk of flooding and therefore is likely to be at risk of future flooding as a result of climate change. The site is located adjacent to the developed edge of Menstrie and is therefore close to existing transport, water and energy infrastructure. The site is located on a gently sloping site to the south of Menstrie and makes reasonable use of shelter and solar gain. The site does not lie in an area with identified open cast coal potential. The site does not include any oil or gas pipeline hazard zones.
-No mitigation
+ 0 0
The site will generate additional waste arisings, however as it is located within the urban area it will not generate significant additional waste related journeys. There are no designated features within the site boundary.
There are no known archaeological remains within the site boundary. The HLA identifies that the site is 18th 19th century and 19th century fields and farming. The site does not lie in an area designated for its landscape value. The site lies within the Lower Devon Carselands landscape character area. This landscape is characterised by the open floodplain, the hillfoot settlements and the large scale grid of rectilinear arable fields beneath the towering bulk of the Ochils. The juxtaposition of the carselands and Ochils escarpment is a key feature which makes the area sensitive to change. Settlement boundaries need to be defined with woodland planting and the pattern of field boundaries needs to be reinforced.
0 0
The development of the site would create further extension of the settlement to the south, which is contrary to the east - west linear nature of the hill foot settlements, however this is already compromised by development to the west.
178
The site would be visible from the B9140, however new development extends to the west of the site and this area is also highly visible, therefore the development of the site would be within the context of a wider developed area.
Views from the south are elevated and therefore planting to reduce the visual impact of the new development would have limited visual effect. Riparian planting adjacent to the river would enhance this as a landscape feature.
179
View north to urban edge of Menstrie
Woodland roundel
180
SITE 28, MENSTRIE EAST, GLENOCHIL, MENSTRIE

9.26 Medium The site comprises two agricultural fields separated by the Dam Burn. The A91 runs to the north of the site and local roads pass to the east and west of the site boundary. The site lies outwith the settlement boundary. The preferred access for the site would be to implement junction improvements on the A91 to allow access to the site None Flood risk Moderate Amenity associated with proximity to yeast factory. Flood risk The flood risk is associated with the Dams Burn which extends through the centre of the site. Trees and vegetation: The fields are under pasture and arable cultivation. There are no trees within the site other than the hedgerow trees along the burn and along the southern site boundary. Field boundaries: There is a hedgerow across the centre of the site, the northern edge and along part of the southern site boundary. Water (ponds, rivers and streams):The Dams Burn flows across the centre of the site along a field boundary.
Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use Settlement expansion The two fields are under agriculture. To the south of the site is an open space and a factory, bonded warehouses are located to the east.
181
As the site lies within the Green Belt designation the following applies:
Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV4 Green Belts: In Green Belt areas there will be a strong presumption against development any developments which are permitted will have to demonstrate appropriate environmental enhancement. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN19 Green Belt: The policy states that development will only be permitted in the Green Belt where no alternative location can be found or the development would provide an opportunity to enhance the Green Belt. As there are core paths around the perimeter of the site the following should be considered: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy INF3 Local Access: The policy states that development will not be permitted where it will result in the loss of an asserted right of way, footpath or a path forming part of the Clackmannanshire path network unless the provision of an alternative path can be assured. As the site is on the A91corridor the following policy must be considered: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN12 Area Environmental Enhancement: states that proposals which would detract from the setting or aesthetics of Conservation Areas, the A91 corridor or rivers will not normally be permitted, and that developers must demonstrate how proposals can be integrated with proposed enhancement measures.
There are no sites designated for nature conservation within the site boundary. The Craigleith and Myreton Hill SSSI lies on the steep slopes of the Ochils to the north of the site, within 500m of the site boundary. The site is identified in the Phase 1 habitat survey as arable and pasture.
182
The site includes the route of the Dams Burn and may provide habitat for protected species. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified.
The site does not play a role as part of the FHN. The nearest resources are beyond 200m of the site boundary. The Dams Burn may play a role in providing habitat connectivity.
0/-
The development of the site should maintain and enhance the corridor of the Dams Burn and associated hedgerow.
Core path links include on road and off road routes around the perimeter of the site. The site lies in an area of low SIMD ranking and development of the site may support the regeneration of the local area through providing greater demand for local services. An open space lies to the south of the site, separated by the disused railway. There are two areas of safeguarded open space within 500m of the site boundary. These provide open space resources close to the site. The SEPA indicative river and coastal flood map does not identify potential flood risk on the site. The site is low lying and crossed by a small burn, which drains from the Ochils. Due to the high rate of run off from the Ochils, there is a flood risk associated with the burn. The site is over 700m from the River Devon and therefore unlikely to be affected by flooding from the River Devon.
+ +
The site is fairly flat and this may limit opportunities for mitigation of the flood risk associated with the Dams Burn.
The site is crossed by the Dams Burn which would potentially be affected by increased levels of diffuse pollution resulting from development of the site. Development of the site would potentially have a minor impact on the rate of run off to the Dams Burn, however the Dams Burn flows from the Ochil Hills and the impact of increased run off is unlikely to be significant except in combination with the development of additional sites. The Dams Burn is a tributary of the River Devon which has an identified flooding risk and development of the site would have a minor impact on increasing rates of run off to the River Devon.
The implementation of SUDS would reduce the impact of diffuse pollution resulting from development of the site.
0/-
Soil
183
SEA /site assessment topic Air Quality and Transport
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) ++ + 0
Core paths pass around the perimeter of the site which provides off road access to Alva to the east and Tullibody to the south. The site is located adjacent to the A91 and within 1km of the town centre. Air quality is not monitored within Menstrie however the site lies adjacent to the A91 which carries heavy traffic flows and would impact on the amenity of the site. Traffic flows are measured west and east of Menstrie on the A91 and changes in traffic flow between 2006 and 2007 show only minor increases (0.7% and 0.1% respectively). The development of the site would contribute to increased traffic flows on the A91, however this would not be significant, however cumulative effects in combination with other sites which may be developed should be considered. Access into the centre of Menstrie is within 1km of the site and the centre of Alva is within 3km. However access for employment is likely to generate travel outwith the immediate local area. The site is comparatively low lying and may be subject to increased risk of flooding associated with the Dams Burn. The site is located on the periphery of Menstrie and is therefore served with transport water and energy infrastructure. The site lies at the foot of the Ochils on a low lying area of land which makes some use of shelter and solar gain. The site does not lie in an area with identified open cast coal potential. The site does not include any oil or gas pipeline hazard zones.
No mitigation
Climatic Factors
0/++
Material Assets
+ 0 0
The site will generate additional waste arisings, however as it is located within the urban area it will not generate significant additional waste related journeys. There are no designated features within the site boundary.
There are no known archaeological remains within the site boundary. The HLA identifies that the site is 18th -19th century fields and farming. The site is currently designated as Greenbelt. The site lies within the Lower Devon Carselands landscape character area. This landscape is characterised by the open floodplain, the hillfoot settlements and the large scale grid of rectilinear arable fields beneath the towering bulk of the Ochils.
0 Development of the site would result in an eastern linear expansion of the settlement which would further reduce the existing character of open fields and no mitigation would reduce this impact
184
The juxtaposition of the carselands and Ochils escarpment is a key feature which makes the area sensitive to change. Settlement boundaries need to be defined with woodland planting and the patter of field boundaries needs to be reinforced. Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes? The development of the site would further reduce the perception of separation between Menstrie and Alva, however this is already partly compromised by the bonded warehouses which extend to the east of the settlement. -
due to the restricted size of the site.
No mitigation
Development of the site would be highly visible from the A91 and contribute to the perception of a developed corridor along the hillfoot settlements. This would not impact directly on the appreciation of views to the Ochils, however it would reduce the open farmland character of the carselands which provides a contrast to the steep rising slopes.
There are limited options for landscape mitigation due to the site layout, however structural planting along the A91 would reduce visibility.
185
View west to urban edge of Menstrie and Ochil Hills
View east along Ochil scarp
186
SITE 29 LAND AT DEVONPARK, MUCKHART

5.66 Medium Located north east of the village of Pool of Muckhart close to the A823 and the A91. The area is rural in nature with a scattering of farms and residential properties nearby. The site lies outwith the settlement boundary. Access would be taken onto the A823, or if Site 31 was also developed access could be taken onto the A91.
Size (ha) Size (group) Summary description including site access and public transport connections Overriding constraints to development Site specific investigations Constraints to development Summary of area remaining following mitigation Environmental features
Surface water drainage Moderate surface water drainage. Impact on settlement character
Trees and vegetation: Woodland to the north and south of the site, pasture to the east and west. Occasional field trees Field boundaries: Remnant hedgerow and occasional field tress with post and wire fences. Water: There are several drains and issues north, south and west of the site.
Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use Settlement expansion Pasture Open space and woodland, some isolated farms and residences.
187
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Sets out the criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area. Due to the proximity of the Muckhart Village Conservation Area and the A91 corridor the following should be considered: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV6 The Historic and Built Environment: aims to protect and enhance cultural heritage features, as well as ensure that new developments are in keeping with the character and quality of the area. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN12 Area Environmental Enhancement: states that proposals which would detract from the setting or aesthetics of Conservation Areas, the A91 corridor or rivers will not normally be permitted, and that developers must demonstrate how proposals can be integrated with proposed enhancement measures. Due to the proximity of core path network connections the following should be taken into account: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy INF3 Local Access: The policy states that development will not be permitted where it will result in the loss of an asserted right of way, footpath or a path forming part of the Clackmannanshire path network unless the provision of an alternative path can be assured. .
There are no designated sites either within or close to the site at Devonpark.
There are extensive areas of woodland both north and south of the site however these have not been identified as being of importance for priority habitats or species. The site is identified in the Phase 1 habitat survey as arable and pasture. The site is not in proximity to the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site. The field trees and areas of wetland within the site may provide habitat for protected species. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified. There is an area of woodland generalist 1km dispersal network to the north of the site. The community woodland to the south will also provide a habitat network resource., however the site is not identified as part of the FHN. Development of the site would result in the loss of an area of marshy ground which may provide foraging habitat.
0 0/Following site specific survey, appropriate mitigation should be identified and implemented. Development of the site could provide habitat enhancement however there would still be net loss of undeveloped ground.
188
SEA /site assessment topic Population and human health
The site is well connected to the Core Path Network and is in the centre of a loop of paths. Links to the wider countryside are easily accessible. The site is not part of an ROA area or located in an area which has a high SIMD. Development of the site will therefore have no impact on this criterion. The site has good access to the Core Path Network and is adjacent to Drumburn Farm community woodland and is close to Muckhart Golf Course.
Water
The site does not lie within a flood risk area as identified on the SEPA flood map. However, the watercourses in the area include the Black Burn (approximately 500m south of the site) and the River Devon (just under 1km north east of the site) are both identified as being at risk of flooding. In addition, some areas within Muckhart have been identified as having experienced flooding in the past (Biennial Report, 2007). There are several drains and issues around the site boundary. Development on the site could therefore result in increased levels of pollution entering these drains and flowing on to surrounding water courses. Development at the site could put pressure on the existing drain and issue network, potentially causing an increased chance of flooding of the Black Burn south of the site.
Overland flow and surface water drainage may be mitigated through the implementation of SUDS
The implementation of SUDS would mitigate the impacts of diffuse pollution. The implementation of SUDS would mitigate the impacts of increased surface run off.
Soil
The site is well linked with the Core Path Network however the majority of the surrounding area is rural in nature and limited services are provided within Pool of Muckhart. There are links with Dollar which, as the nearest service centre, is approximately 4km away. The site is located between the A91and the A823 but Pool of Muckhart is infrequently served by public transport. Whilst development of the site may result in an improved public transport service in the area, it is unlikely to discourage people from using their cars. Traffic is monitored close to the site at Muckhart to determine Annual Average Daily Traffic levels the results indicate that traffic numbers are not a cause for concern at present. As such, if development were to proceed on this site, it is unlikely that there would be any adverse effect air quality in the area.
Pool of Muckhart is a rural settlement, and the development will generate trips to access services, employment and secondary education. Pool of Muckhart is a rural settlement, and the development will generate trips to access services, employment and secondary education.
189
Development of the site would result in increased levels of traffic on the A91and A823. As the site is relatively small in extent, there is unlikely to be any significant change in the amount of traffic generated locally if development were to take place. Cumulative effects require to be assessed in Stage 2.
Climatic Factors
Development of the site will not reduce the need to travel. The site is relatively remote and isolated from service centres and as such, private cars will be needed to access employment and services in surrounding areas of Clackmannanshire and beyond. Extreme weather conditions and flooding as a result of climate change could potentially result in flooding of the site. The site is located close to the existing village at Pool of Muckhart therefore is likely to utilise much of the infrastructure available there. The site is well positioned to make use of both solar gain and shelter. The site is located in close proximity to settlement and would not impact on future potential for mineral extraction. There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site.
Surface water run off is a known issue for the area.
+ 0 0
The site will generate additional waste arisings, however as it is located within the urban area it will not generate significant additional waste related journeys. The site is approximately 200m east of Muckhart Village which is identified in the Clackmannanshire Local Plan as a Conservation Area. There are several listed buildings and monuments identified on the National Monuments Records of Scotland within Muckhart Village but there are no designated sites or monuments within the site boundary itself. As such, development of the area is unlikely to have a significant effect on the cultural heritage value of the area. There are no known archaeological remains within the site boundary. The HLA identifies that the site is 18th-19th century fields and farming. The Ochil Hills AGLV is located approximately 150m west of the site therefore development could have a negative effect on the landscape resource. The proximity of the site to the existing village of Muckhart is likely to reduce this effect. If development were to take place on the site, it would need to be in keeping with Muckhart Village conservation area to ensure no negative impact on the settlement setting and identity. The location of the site would potentially contribute to perceptual coalescence with Yetts o Muckhart. Development on the site would be viewed from the A823.
0 Ensure that development is in keeping with style of Muckhart Village conservation area.
0 0/-
Structure planting would integrate the development site into the landscape which would mitigate the
190
visual impact.
191
View north to Devonpark
192
SITE 30 NORTH SIDE OF A91, WEST SIDE OF POOL OF MUCKHART

1.44 Small Located west of the village of Pool of Muckhart beside the A91. The site lies outwtih the settlement boundary and access would be taken directly onto the A91.
Landscape Surface water drainage Moderate AGLV. Impact on settlement character. Road access.
Trees and Vegetation: Pasture Field boundaries: Garden boundaries, decayed stone wall and post and wire fencing. Water: there is an issue running through the site and along the southern boundary of the side adjacent to the A91 Other features: Adjacent to community playing field
Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use Settlement expansion Pasture Village residences south and east of the site, open space to the north and west.
193
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Sets out the criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area. As the site lies within the Ochil Hills AGLV the following apply: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV2 Protected Landscapes: The policy states that development will only be permitted in Areas of Great Landscape Value where it satisfies the criteria of Policy ENV3 (above) and can be accommodated without adversely affecting the overall quality of the area. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN2 Landscape and Ecology: The policy includes conditions which must be met if a development is to be permitted in an AGLV. The policy also states that appropriate consideration must be given to existing woodland, habitats, natural and landscape features when making a planning application. Due to the proximity of the Muckhart Village Conservation Area and the A91 corridor the following should be considered: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV6 The Historic and Built Environment: aims to protect and enhance cultural heritage features, as well as ensure that new developments are in keeping with the character and quality of the area. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN12 Area Environmental Enhancement: states that proposals which would detract from the setting or aesthetics of Conservation Areas, the A91 corridor or rivers will not normally be permitted, and that developers must demonstrate how proposals can be integrated with proposed enhancement measures.
There are no designated sites either within or close to the site at the North Side of the A91.
There are no areas identified as important for priority habitats or species within 500m of the site. The site is identified in the Phase 1 habitat survey as arable and pasture. The site is not in proximity to the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site. The site includes open fields and a broken down stone wall. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified. The site does not play a role as part of FHN, however development of the site will result in the loss of open ground.
0 0/Following site specific survey, appropriate mitigation should be identified and implemented. Habitat enhancement would potentially increase the biodiversity value of the site.
0/-
194
The site is relatively well connected to the Core Path Network. Links to the wider countryside are easily accessible.
The site has relatively good access to the Core Path Network and is close to Muckhart Golf Course. There are also several recreational development areas identified by Clackmannanshire Council nearby. Development of the site could have a positive effect on the recreational resource through increased users and investment in the area as a whole. The site does not lie within a flood risk area as identified on the SEPA flood map. However, some areas within Muckhart have been identified as having experienced flooding in the past (Biennial Report, 2007). An issue runs through the area and along the southern boundary of the site however there are no water courses within the site which are likely to be affected by increased levels of pollution as a result of development. Development at the site could put pressure on the existing drain and issue network, potentially resulting in flooding.
Water
Good environmental management plan to prevent pollution
-/0
Soil
The site is relatively well linked with the Core Path Network however the majority of the surrounding area is rural in nature and as such, there are few links to nearby settlement and services areas. The site is located on the A91 but Pool of Muckhart has infrequent services and therefore not easily accessible by public transport. Whilst development of the site may result in an improved public transport service in the area, it is unlikely to discourage people from using their cars. Traffic is monitored close to the site at Muckhart to determine Annual Average Daily Traffic levels however no air pollution problems have been identified. Due to the relatively small size of the site, a significant increase in traffic/air pollution would also be unlikely post development. Development of the site will result in increased levels of traffic however as the site is relatively small, this is unlikely to be significant.
0/+
No mitigation
Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air
195
pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel?
Cumulative effects require to be assessed in Stage 2. Development of the site will not reduce the need to travel. The site is relatively remote and isolated from service centres and as such, private cars will be needed to access employment and services in surrounding areas of Clackmannanshire and beyond. Extreme weather conditions and flooding as a result of climate change could potentially result in flooding of the site associated with overland flow. The site is located adjacent to Pool of Muckhart therefore is likely to utilise much of the infrastructure available in the village. The site is well positioned to make use of both solar gain and shelter. Development of the site would not reduce future potential for mineral extraction. There are no hazard areas within or close to the site. Improved public transport
+ 0 0
The site will generate additional waste arisings, however as it is located within the urban area it will not generate significant additional waste related journeys. The site is adjacent to Muckhart Village which is identified in the Clackmannanshire Local Plan as a Conservation Area. There are several listed buildings and monuments identified on the National Monuments Records of Scotland within Muckhart Village but there are no designated sites or monuments within the site boundary itself. As such, development of the area is unlikely to have a significant effect on the cultural heritage value of the area. There are no known archaeological remains within the site boundary. The HLA identifies that the site is 18th-19th century fields and farming. The site is within the Ochil Hills AGLV therefore development could have a negative effect on the landscape resource. However, the proximity of the site to the existing village of Muckhart could help to reduce any negative impact.
0 Ensure that development is in keeping with style of Muckhart Village conservation area. Ensure development guidance on archaeology is followed during construction. 0 Ensure development guidance on archaeology is followed during construction.
--
If development were to take place on the site, it would need to be in keeping with Muckhart Village conservation area , however the site is located on a steep slope and development would be prominent, resulting in further negative impact on the settlement character. Development on the site would be visible from the A91 and impact on views to the Ochil Hills AGLV.
--
No mitigation. The size of the site and topography limit opportunities to mitigate the landscape impact.
196
View north to Ochils
197
SITE 31 LAND EAST OF POOL OF MUCKHART

17.51 Medium Located east of the village of Pool of Muckhart beside the A91. This site is outwith the settlement boundary. Access would be taken onto the A91.
n/a Surface water drainage Moderate Impact on settlement character. Surface water drainage n/a
Trees and vegetation: Mixed woodland lie to the south eastern boundary and mature trees bound the A91 and settlement edge. Field boundaries: Hedgerows and post and wire fences. Water: there are several drains and issues within and surrounding the site and standing surface water in the form of shallow pools and rushy areas of pasture.
Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use Settlement expansion Pasture Village residences north and west of the site, community woodland and pasture to the east and south.
198
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Sets out the criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area. Due to the proximity of the Muckhart Village Conservation Area and the A91 corridor the following should be considered: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV6 The Historic and Built Environment: aims to protect and enhance cultural heritage features, as well as ensure that new developments are in keeping with the character and quality of the area. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN12 Area Environmental Enhancement: states that proposals which would detract from the setting or aesthetics of Conservation Areas, the A91 corridor or rivers will not normally be permitted, and that developers must demonstrate how proposals can be integrated with proposed enhancement measures. Due to the proximity of core path network connections the following should be taken into account: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy INF3 Local Access: The policy states that development will not be permitted where it will result in the loss of an asserted right of way, footpath or a path forming part of the Clackmannanshire path network unless the provision of an alternative path can be assured. SEA /site assessment topic Biodiversity, flora and fauna Site appraisal criteria Site issues and discussion Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) 0 Enhancement and mitigation options Potential effect following mitigation
There are no designated sites either within or close to the site. The nearest designated site is Black Burn Wood and Meadows SSSI which is approximately 650m south of the site. Muckhart golf course lies between the site and the SSSI so development will have no adverse effect. There are no areas identified as important for priority habitats or species within 500m of the site although there are a number of Phase 1 Habitat Survey Target Note Sites relatively close to the site. The site is identified in the Phase 1 Habitat Survey as arable and woodland, built up and there is a small area of broad leaved plantation. The site is not in proximity to the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site. The site includes areas of marshy ground and boundary woodland and may provide habitat for protected species. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified. There are areas of woodland generalist 1km dispersal network to the north east and south west of the site. The development of the site would potentially result in loss of marshy and grassland habitat.
0 0/Following site specific survey, appropriate mitigation should be identified and implemented. Development of the site could implement habitat enhancement measures however the development of the site would result in overall loss of habitat.
Population and human
The site is very well connected to the Core Path Network; there are several paths through and around the boundary of the site. Links to the wider countryside are
++
199
SEA /site assessment topic health
easily accessible.
The site has good access to the Core Path Network and is adjacent to Drumburn Farm community woodland and is close to Muckhart Golf Course.
Water
The site does not lie within a flood risk area as identified on the SEPA flood map but is only 250m from the Black Burn which has been identified as being an area of risk. The site has identified surface water drainage issues. Several issues run through the area and along the boundaries of the site however there are no water courses within the site which are likely to be affected by increased levels of pollution as a result of development. Development at the site could put pressure on the existing drain and issue network, potentially resulting in flooding.
The surface water drainage issues may limit opportunities for the implementation of SUDS. The implementation of SUDS would mitigate the impacts of diffuse pollution. The implementation of SUDS would reduce the impact of increased rate of run off resulting from development of the site. However opportunities for SUDS may be limited due to the topography and surface water drainage issues in the area. No significant effect.
Soil
The site is well linked with the Core Path Network however the majority of the surrounding area is rural in nature and limited services are provided within Pool of Muckhart. There are links with Dollar which, as the nearest service centre, is approximately 4km away. The site is located directly adjacent to the A91 but Pool of Muckhart is infrequently served by public transport. Whilst development of the site may result in an improved public transport service in the area, it is unlikely to discourage people from using their cars. Traffic is monitored close to the site at Muckhart to determine Annual Average Daily Traffic levels the results indicate that traffic numbers are not a cause for concern at present. As such, if development were to proceed on this site, it is unlikely that there would be any adverse effect air quality in the area.
Pool of Muckhart is a rural settlement, and the development will generate trips to access services, employment and secondary education. Pool of Muckhart is a rural settlement, and the development will generate trips to access services, employment and secondary education.
200
Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel?
Development of the site would result in increased levels of traffic on the A91. Cumulative effects require to be assessed in Stage 2.
Development of the land east of the Pool of Muckhart will not reduce the need to travel. The site is relatively remote and isolated from service centres and as such, private cars will be needed to access employment and services in surrounding areas of Clackmannanshire and beyond. Although the site is not identified by SEPA as being at risk of flooding, extreme weather conditions and flooding as a result of climate change could potentially result in flooding of the site. The site is located adjacent to Pool of Muckhart therefore is likely to utilise much of the infrastructure available in the village. As the site is relatively large in comparison to the existing settlement, there is capacity for additional infrastructure to be accommodated in addition to housing developments. The site is well positioned to make use of both solar gain and shelter. The site is located in close proximity to settlement and would not impact on future potential for mineral extraction. There are no hazard areas within or close to the site.
Surface water run off is a known issue for the area.
Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
+ 0 0
The site will generate additional waste arisings, however as it is located within the urban area it will not generate significant additional waste related journeys. The site is adjacent to Muckhart Village which is identified in the Clackmannanshire Local Plan as a Conservation Area. There are several listed buildings and monuments identified on the National Monuments Records of Scotland within Muckhart Village but there are no designated sites or monuments within the site boundary itself. As such, development of the area is unlikely to have a significant effect on the cultural heritage value of the area. There are no known archaeological remains within the site boundary. The HLA identifies that the site is 19th century to present fields and farming. The site is separated from the Ochil Hills AGLV by the A91 in the north of the site and the village of Pool of Muckhart in the south. Whilst development could have a negative effect on the landscape resource, the proximity of the site to the existing village of Muckhart could help to reduce this.
0 Ensure that development is in keeping with style of Muckhart Village conservation area.
0 -
The development of the site would extend the settlement to the south and contrast with the existing linear settlement pattern.
If development were to take place on the site, it would need to be in keeping with Muckhart Village conservation area to ensure no negative impact on the settlement setting and identity.
201
Development on the site would be visible from the A91 and the A823, however these would be interrupted views as a result of hedgerows and built features.
202
View west to settlement edge
View east towards Site 29
203
SITE 32, ALLOA NORTH WEST, BRANSHILL, SAUCHIE

70.92 Large This is an undulating site lying to the north of Alloa and west of Sauchie. It is a comparatively elevated site located within policy woodlands with a predominantly east to south easterly aspect. The site adjoins existing residential areas and the closest main access road is the B908. The majority of the site lies within the settlement boundary, with the exception of the western most field. None
Trees and vegetation: The thick shelterbelts at the site boundary are a key characteristic of this landscape and an important landscape feature within this part of Clackmannanshire. A small area of woodland lies in a dip on the hill crest to the south of the site. Field boundaries: The majority of the field boundaries are formed by the shelterbelts and also include remnant stone walls and post and wire fences. Water (ponds, rivers and streams) There are several small drains within the site and in the woodland belts at the periphery.
Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use Settlement expansion Agriculture The site is bounded to the north and south by thick woodland belts and adjoins the residential area of Fairfield to the east. To the west of the site the area adjoins Lornshill Academy, and residential areas extend to the south beyond the woodland belts. To the north farmed fields extend beyond the woodland belts.
204
Part of the site is zoned for housing in the Local Plan as follows: Plan Ref: H7 Alloa North West Phase 1 - Existing Use: Agriculture First phase within the urban expansion area of North West Alloa. Subject to Masterplan for the entire expansion area. Enhancement to Green Belt setting required with enhancement of established adjacent woodlands. Enhancement of local footpath/leisure routes required to link with Sauchie, Lornshill and Inglewood. Structural planting and new woodland planting to south. Active and passive open space required within development. Potential for part provision to be off site. Roundabout required at B9140/B908 junction with road alignment of B908. Improvements to B9140 including potential for contribution to Tullibody By-Pass. Sterilisation of any coal reserves requires to be considered (Refer to Policy EN21). Part of the site is zoned for Community Recreational Development in the Local Plan, as follows: Plan Ref: CR5 Alloa North West Provision of and suitable arrangements for long term management of recreational land (See Local Plan Residential Sites 12-16). As there are core paths the following applies: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy INF3 Local Access: The policy states that development will not be permitted where it will result in the loss of an asserted right of way, footpath or a path forming part of the Clackmannanshire path network unless the provision of an alternative path can be assured. As the site includes areas of Green Belt the following policies are of relevance: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV4 Green Belts: In Green Belt areas there will be a strong presumption against development any developments which are permitted will have to demonstrate appropriate environmental enhancement. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN19 Green Belt: The policy states that development will only be permitted in the Green Belt where no alternative location can be found or the development would provide an opportunity to enhance the Green Belt.
There are no designated sites within the site boundary, there are tree preservation orders covering the woodland to the immediate south west of the site at Inglewood House. The woodland to the south of the site, and extending across part of the site in a shelterbelt has been subject to Phase 1 and Phase 2 habitat survey. There are Phase 1 Habitat survey Target Note sites within the woodland to the south of the site. The Phase 1 Habitat Survey identifies the site as predominantly arable and pasture with areas of broadleaved semi natural woodland through the site and at the periphery.
Ensure protection of tree root and nutrient zones should development of the site take place.
The site includes extensive perimeter woodlands, and a small burn. The site may provide habitat for protected species. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified. The woodland belts are an important part of the FHN with the woodland to the south providing one of the larger areas of broadleaved specialist 500m dispersal networks within Clackmannanshire. It is important that connectivity with this area of woodland is maintained and enhanced. The woodland generalist 1km dispersal network extends through the site along the shelterbelt and connects with the area of woodland to the north.
0/-
Following site specific survey, appropriate mitigation should be identified and implemented. The creation of additional woodland habitat connections through the site would enhance the habitat value of the site.
0/-
205
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) ++
A core path passes through the centre of the site and a network of core paths extend through the surrounding woodland belts. The site is well connected to the core path network. The site is not within the top 15% of the SIMD and does not adjoin any areas within this category.
The north western portion of the site and southern part of the site are identified in the local plan for community recreational development. In addition part of the woodland belt to the immediate south west of the site surrounding Inglewood House is safeguarded recreational open space. Other open space resources within the vicinity include Lornshill Academy school grounds, the grounds of Inglewood House and Fairfield recreation ground. There is no risk of flooding identified on the SEPA flood map and the site is elevated and sloping and therefore the site itself does not have an identified flood risk. However development within close proximity to the central stream should be avoided and the stream has a history of flooding at the culvert adjoining the urban area. There is a drain to the south west of the site close to Inglewood House and also a small burn which drains the site toward Branshill. To the north a minor watercourse runs through the woodland belt draining to the north west. These could potentially be affected by diffuse pollution caused by run off from the development of the site. The burn to the north of Inglewood House is identified as having caused previous flooding issues at Forrester Drive (2007 Biennial report), and remedial action has been taken by Clackmannanshire Council to direct the flow into Inglewood Pond. The stream which drains the main area of the site flows toward the Fairfield area and appears to enter a culvert. Increased rates of run off from the site resulting from development could contribute a local flooding problem at Fairfield.
++
The implementation of a SUDS scheme would positively contribute to the management of issues associated with diffuse pollution resulting from development of the site. Potential impacts on the levels of flow within the watercourse at Inglewood House should be considered and location of development within the site should seek to avoid increasing the rate of run off to this watercourse, and also to the watercourse draining toward Fairfield. These potential impacts could be alleviated through the implementation of SUDS on site.
Soil
Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of
The site is easily accessible by the core path network providing links to the settlement to the east, west and south. The site is close to residential areas served by public transport, however additional provision should be made to serve the site. The nearest monitoring location for NO2 on Shaftesbury Avenue does not show high
+ + 0
206
air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Material Assets Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain?
levels of NO2, nor is there a clear trend in levels between 2002-2007. The development of the site will primarily increase traffic levels on the A908 and B908 with travel into Alloa town centre. There are no current air quality issues identified on these routes. Improved public transport and maintenance and enhancement of the access routes will reduce the requirement for travel by private vehicle. No significant effect.
The site is located at the northern edge of Alloa and accessible by foot and cycle and public transport. The site may experience minor flooding problems associated with the burn at Branshill as a result of climate change, however this can be mitigated within the site layout and design and use of SUDS. The site is located within a developed area and is located close to existing transport services, water and energy infrastructure. The site is undulating and is orientated to the east and enclosed by woodland shelterbelts to the west and south. These will contribute to providing shelter to the site. Some parts of the site are north easterly in aspect and are unable to take full advantage of solar gain. The site lies in the North West Alloa restricted area of search for opencast coal, however proximity to existing urban areas would also limit opportunities for extraction. The site does not include any hazard areas.
+ The implementation of a SUDS scheme would positively contribute to the management of flood issues on this site. No significant effect.
No impact
The site will generate significant additional waste arisings, however as it is located within the urban area it will not generate significant additional waste related journeys. There are no sites designated for their cultural heritage value within the site.
The site masterplan should provide for local composting and recycling facilities.
Minor negative
There are no known archaeological remains within the site boundary or buffer. The HLA identifies 18th -20th century managed woodland and 18th -19th century and 19th century to present fields and farming. About half of the site lies within the area of Greenbelt identified within the local plan. The current area of greenbelt provides physical and perceptual separation between Alloa and Fairfield. The site lies within the Carse of Forth landscape character area which is characterised by its flatness and open character which contrasts with the steeply rising Ochil Hills to the north. This part of the landscape character area has an undulating character
Development of the site would result in the loss of the Greenbelt function provided by this landscape.
207
and has a strong rural character, however the landform also relates to the surrounding area of settlement. Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Development within this area would form an effective extension to Fairfield and increase the extent of Alloa to the north. Development would be partially visually contained by the landform of the low hill and shelterbelt to the south of the B9140, which forms a defensible boundary. The thick shelterbelts to the south and west of the site further contain the landscape. The growth of Alloa and Tullibody has extended into the structured landscape of low hills and fields enclosed by thick woodland belts, which are an attractive and distinctive landscape feature that provides identity to the local area. 0 The creation of new woodland belts within the site layout and design would reflect the character of the surrounding landscape and help to integrate the development into the landscape.
The site is visible in views from the B908 and the surrounding residential area, however visibility is limited due to landform and woodland.
0/-
The implementation of structure planting through site layout and retention of the most prominent ridges as open space would reduce the visual impacts of development of the site.
208
View west along path
View west towards settlement edge
209
SITE 33 OAK MILLS, LOWER MILL STREET, TILLICOULTRY

6.13 Medium The site lies to the west of Tillicoultry and comprises part of an arable field and an area of land adjacent to a works. The site lies outwith the settlement boundary. Access could be taken onto Lower Mill Street or onto the A91. Flood risk Flood risk Major flood risk. Approximately two thirds of the site lie outwith the area identified as at risk of flooding in the SEPA indicative flood map. Approximately two thirds of the site lie outwith the area identified as at risk of flooding in the SEPA indicative flood map. Trees and vegetation: The northern section of the site adjoins the recreation ground to the east and the boundary is defined by a number of mature trees. The southern section of the site includes some scrub woodland and young alder. To the west of the site is an extensive area of scrub woodland. Field boundaries: There is a hedge adjacent to the A91 and a wire fence adjacent to the minor road to Glenfoot. There is no boundary to the west of the site. Water (ponds, rivers and streams): The Tillicoultry Burn flows alongside Lower Mill Street, which is adjacent to the southern part of the site. The River Devon flows to the south of the site and an area of marshy woodland lies to the west.
Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use Settlement expansion Unmanaged grassland with natural regeneration of scrub woodland and two small paddocks close to the works. The site adjoins the western edge of Tillicoultry, lying south of the golf course. The land to the west is arable farmland and the area of scrub woodland and the River Devon is a short distance to the south.
210
The majority of the site is designated as a Community Recreation Development site in the Local Plan, as follows: Plan Ref: CR31 - Tillicoultry West: Development Guidelines: Provision of playing field(s). As the site is outwith the settlement boundary the following applies: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV3 Development in the Countryside: The policy states that development in the Countryside (as defined in Local Plans i.e. areas not within settlement boundaries) be suitable for its location in function and design and should accord with Policy ED4 Rural Development (see below). Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ED4 Rural Development: The policy states that economic and social development in rural areas will be supported within the following criteria: Focusing development within existing towns and villages Restricting development within Green Belt and countryside.
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Sets out the criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area. As the site is on the A91 corridor the following policy must be considered: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN12 Area Environmental Enhancement: states that proposals which would detract from the setting or aesthetics of Conservation Areas, the A91 corridor or rivers will not normally be permitted, and that developers must demonstrate how proposals can be integrated with proposed enhancement measures. As there is a potential flood risk the following policies are of relevance: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV9 Water Resource Management: The policy states that development will not normally be permitted in undeveloped flood plain areas, in areas of known significant flood risk, or if it will adversely affect the Forth Estuary. Exceptions will be made only when it can be demonstrated that no alternative locations can be found, or that suitable mitigation measures can be implemented. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN4 Water Resources: The policy states that where a development area is determined as being at risk of flooding, planning permission will not be granted except where it can be proven that there are no viable alternative sites. As the site is within Green Belt the following policies are of relevance: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV4 Green Belts: In Green Belt areas there will be a strong presumption against development any developments which are permitted will have to demonstrate appropriate environmental enhancement. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN19 Green Belt: The policy states that development will only be permitted in the Green Belt where no alternative location can be found or the development would provide an opportunity to enhance the Green Belt.
There are no designated sites within the site boundary.
An area to the immediate west of the site and alongside the River Devon has been subject to Phase 2 habitat survey. The Phase 1 Habitat Survey identifies the site as arable and pasture.
211
The site lies in close proximity to an area of wet woodland and scrub and may provide habitat for protected species. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified.
0/-
The site plays no role in the FHN and there are no areas of FHN within 200m of the site. The site has habitat value as an area of unmanaged grassland and young trees. Development of the site would result in the loss of this role.
The development of the site would result in the loss of this resource.
On road core paths are located along the A91 and Lower Mill Street. Access routes provide links to the Ochils to the north and over the River Devon to the south. The site adjoins an area with the highest SIMD in Tillicoultry, however there are no regeneration outcome agreement areas in Tillicoultry. Development of this area could contribute towards supporting neighbourhood renewal. The site lies immediately adjacent to a recreation ground and the site itself is identified as a community recreation development site in the local plan. In addition the Ochil Hills are accessible within 1km of the site boundary including Mill Glen and the Woodland Trust Ochil Hills Woodland Park.
+ +
++
The SEPA indicative river and coastal flood map suggests that the site is at potential risk of flooding associated with the Tillicoultry Burn and the River Devon. The site is low lying and gently sloping and an area of marshy land lies within 500m of the site boundary associated with the River Devon. The site is closely associated with the Tillicoultry Burn and also the River Devon which would potentially be affected by increased levels of run off from the development of the site.
--
The low lying nature of the site reduces the potential for the implementation of SUDS to mitigate flooding issues. The use of SUDS would reduce the impact of diffuse pollution resulting from the development of the site, however opportunities for the implementation of SUDS may be limited by the low lying nature of the site. The low lying nature of the site reduces the potential for the implementation of SUDS to mitigate flooding issues.
Negative effect
Minor negative effect
The development of the site would increase the rate of run off to the River Devon, however the greatest flooding risk associated with the River Devon is related to the high rates of flow from the Ochil Hills and therefore the additional impact resulting from the development of this site would be minor.
Minor negative effect
Soil
Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict
212
land?
The site lies within 1km of the centre of Tillicoultry, with access on roads and pavements. The site lies close to the A91 and is accessible by public transport Air quality is not monitored within Tillicoultry, however the site lies close to the A91 which is a main trunk road. Development of the site would contribute to higher traffic flows on the A91.
+ + 0 Development should be set back from the A91 to reduce impacts of air pollution. Development of the site could support the development of an access route between Tillicoultry and Alva.
Climatic Factors
The site is well located to provide easy access to local services within Tillicoultry. However access to employment will generate travel outwith the local area. The site has an identified potential flood risk, and climate change predictions indicate increased annual precipitation, greater rainfall intensity, and an increase in the number of days of heavy rain. This is likely to result in an increased risk of future flooding. The site is located at the periphery of Tillicoultry and therefore accessible to existing transport services, water and energy infrastructure. The site is flat and low lying and south of the Ochil Hills and is therefore well placed to make best use of shelter and solar gain. The land to the west of Tillicoultry is not identified as having potential for open cast coal. The site does not lie within any oil or gas pipeline hazard areas.
+ -No mitigation
Material Assets
++
+ 0 0
The site would generate additional waste arisings, however as it is located within the urban area it will not generate significant additional waste related journeys and local recycling facilities would be accessible to residents. There are no features designated for their cultural heritage value within close proximity of the site. The HLA identifies that the site is 19th century to present fields and farming.
213
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) 0 -
There are no known archaeological remains within the site boundary. Oak Mill located to the east of the site is recorded in the NMRS. The Ochil Hills AGLV to the north lies within 500m of the site boundary. The site lies within the Lower Devon Carselands landscape character area, noted for the sinuous route of the River Devon and rectilinear arable fields and scarcity of woodland. The hillfoot settlements are a key characteristic of this landscape character area. Development of the site would result in an extension of Tillicoultry to the west, and loss of part of an agricultural field. This would have a minor impact on the landscape of the area.
The guidelines for this character area support the definition of settlement boundaries with woodland planting. Development of the site would result in loss of the Green Belt function provided by the landscape.
Development of the site would result in an extension of Tillicoultry to the west which would reflect the existing settlement pattern centred along the A91. However it would further contribute to an elongation of the settlement form reducing accessibility to the centre of the settlement. The existing recreation ground and line of mature trees provides a robust settlement edge. Development to the east of this edge would not relate well to the existing settlement.
No mitigation to reduce the impact on settlement form.
Development of the site would be highly visible from the A91, and extend the settlement to the west. The Ochil Hills AGLV lies to the north of the site on the steeper slopes and the development of the valley floor would reduce the contrast provided by the flat valley floor and the steep rising slopes.
No mitigation.
214
Scrub and marsh to west of site
View east towards settlement edge
215
SITE 34 LAND SOUTH OF DOLLAR ROAD TILLICOULTRY

4.00 Small The site lies to the east of Tillicoultry to the south of the A91 and is flat and low lying. The western part of the site is currently used as a golf driving range and the eastern part of the site is agricultural. The northern part of the site lies within the settlement boundary. The only option for site access is from the A91. Flood risk Flood risk Major Flood risk. The whole of the site lies within an area identified as at potential risk of flooding on the SEPA indicative flood map. The whole of the site lies within an area identified as at potential risk of flooding on the SEPA indicative flood map. Trees and vegetation The majority of the site comprises the mown grass of the golf driving range and the pasture to the east. There is woodland adjacent to the southern part of the western boundary and mature trees stand along the eastern field boundary. Field boundaries: There are field trees and hedgerow at the site boundary. A small levee runs along the western boundary Water (ponds, rivers and streams): The Kirk Burn flows along the western boundary of the site and a drain flows along the field boundary between the golf driving range and field. The River Devon lies within 50m of the southern site boundary.
Golf driving range and agricultural field. To the west of the site is an area of woodland and beyond that a cemetery. To the south is the River Devon and the Devon Way access route and to the east is an agricultural field. Housing lies to the north.
216
Part of the site is designated for housing in the Local Plan as follows: Plan Ref: H96 Dollar Road: Development Guidelines: Existing Use: Garden Centre/Golf Driving Range Subject to Development Brief. Single access from A91. Maximum 1 storeys to front A91. Wide landscaping strip to road frontage. Traditional cottage style development. Structural planting to south and west boundaries. Protection and enhancement of existing burn. Flood appraisal may be required. The following apply to the area of the site outwith the settlement boundary: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV3 Development in the Countryside: The policy states that development in the Countryside (as defined in Local Plans i.e. areas not within settlement boundaries) be suitable for its location in function and design and should accord with Policy ED4 Rural Development (see below). Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ED4 Rural Development: The policy states that economic and social development in rural areas will be supported within the following criteria: Focusing development within existing towns and villages Restricting development within Green Belt and countryside.
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Sets out the criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area. As the site is in close proximity to the River Devon and on the A91 corridor the following policy must be considered: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN12 Area Environmental Enhancement: states that proposals which would detract from the setting or aesthetics of Conservation Areas, the A91 corridor or rivers will not normally be permitted, and that developers must demonstrate how proposals can be integrated with proposed enhancement measures. As there is a potential flood risk the following policies are of relevance: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV9 Water Resource Management: The policy states that development will not normally be permitted in undeveloped flood plain areas, in areas of known significant flood risk, or if it will adversely affect the Forth Estuary. Exceptions will be made only when it can be demonstrated that no alternative locations can be found, or that suitable mitigation measures can be implemented. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN4 Water Resources: The policy states that where a development area is determined as being at risk of flooding, planning permission will not be granted except where it can be proven that there are no viable alternative sites. As the site lies within the Green Belt, the following apply: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV4 Green Belts: In Green Belt areas there will be a strong presumption against development any developments which are permitted will have to demonstrate appropriate environmental enhancement. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN19 Green Belt: The policy states that development will only be permitted in the Green Belt where no alternative location can be found or the development would provide an opportunity to enhance the Green Belt.
The site does not impact on any designated sites.
217
The site does not impact on priority habitats and species. The Phase 1 Habitat Survey identifies the site as amenity grassland to the west and arable and pasture to the east.
The site includes two water courses and may provide habitat for protected species. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified.
0/-
The site does not form part of the FHN however an area of woodland generalist 1km dispersal network lies to the immediate north of the site. The habitat associated with the watercourses should be protected and enhanced. Development of the site would result in loss of habitat associated with the watercourses.
Development of the site would result in loss of open ground and impact on the habitat associated with the watercourses.
The Devon Way core path runs to the south of the site and there is an on road core path along the A91 to the north of the site The site does not lie in an area with a high SIMD
+ 0
There are safeguarded recreational open spaces to the immediate north of the site and the large cemetery to the east of the site.
The site is identified as at potential risk of flooding by rivers on the SEPA indicative river and coastal flood map. This reflects the low lying nature of the site and proximity to the River Devon. Development of the site would result in increased levels of diffuse pollution entering the River Devon. The River Devon has an identified flood risk, largely attributable to the high levels of run off from the Ochil Hills. Development of the site would increase the rate of run off and reduce any current holding capacity provided by the site.
--
The extent and proximity of watercourses and low lying nature of the site limits opportunities for the use of SUDS. See above See above
Significant negative effect
Minor negative effect Minor negative effect
218
The Devon Way provides off road access to the centre of Tillcoultry and there is also pavement access along the A91. The site lies on the eastern edge of Tillicoultry, close to the A91 and has access to local bus services. Air quality is not monitored in Tillicoultry, however the A91 is a major trunk road through the area. The A91 is a major trunk road through the area and development of the site would contribute an increase in traffic levels on this road. The site is small in extent and therefore the quantity of traffic generated would not be significant. However cumulative impacts of developments contributing to traffic levels on this route should be considered. The site lies within 2km of the centre of Tillicoultry which reduces the need to travel to access local services and public transport. However travel for employment will generate trips outwith the local area. The site has an identified potential flood risk and climate change predictions indicate an increased future risk resulting from higher levels of rainfall and greater intensity of rainfall. The site is located on the periphery of Tillicoultry and is close to existing transport, water and energy infrastructure. The site is located in a low lying area and is reasonably well located to make best use of shelter and solar gain. The area to the north east of the site has an identified coal resource, however development of the site would be unlikely to influence future mining activities. The site does not include any oil or gas pipeline hazard zones.
++ + 0 Potential air quality impacts can be mitigated through setting development back from the A91.
0/-
Climatic Factors
--
The low lying nature of the site and close proximity to watercourses limits opportunities for mitigation.
Significant negative effect.
Material Assets
++
+ 0 0
Does the site reduce waste generation and promote waste recovery, recycling and composting? Cultural Heritage Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage
The site will generate additional waste arisings, however as it is located within the urban area it will not generate significant additional waste related journeys and residents can make use of local recycling facilities. The site does not include any features designated for their cultural heritage value and the site is identified in the HLA as a 19th century recreation area, 18th and 19th century and 19th century fields and farming. The site provides a foreground in views to the gatehouse from the disused railway access route and would reduce the appreciation
219
value?
of the parkland setting.
There are no known archaeological remains within the site boundary. The Ochil Hills AGLV lies to the immediate north east of the site. The site lies within an area of Greenbelt and lies within the Lower Devon Carselands landscape character area, noted for the sinuous route of the River Devon and rectilinear arable fields and scarcity of woodland. The hillfoot settlements are a key characteristic of this landscape character area. Development of this site would extend the settlement to the east.
0 The guidelines for this character area support the definition of settlement boundaries which should be defined through woodland planting to reflect existing field patterns and woodland planting. The existing trees on the eastern edge provide definition to the site boundary.
Tillicoultry is centred along the A91 and the development of this site would form an extension to the settlement along the A91, reflecting the existing character. However development in the field to the east would impact on the rural parkland character of the landscape to the east of Tillicoultry. Development of the site would be partly visible from the A91. The golf driving range and nursery buildings already contribute a built feature on the eastern edge of the settlement and the impact of development would not be significant on views from the A91.
220
View north to golf driving range and settlement edge
View north towards West Lodge and Ochils
221
SITE 35 CAMBUS EAST, CAMBUS, TULLIBODY

9.81 Medium A flat and low lying site to the immediate east of Cambus, where new housing development has recently been built. The site lies to the south of the Stirling Alloa railway and is visually screened from the railway by a belt of trees. The majority of the site lies outwith the settlement boundary, however the western extent of the site lies within the boundary. Site access would be onto Station Road and joining the A907. The level crossing over the railway may represent a constraint to development through the potential for traffic queuing back from the traffic lights on the A907 resulting from increased traffic levels. Access constraints associated with level crossing. Traffic management options for level crossing Flood risk
Major Flood risk. Traffic management. Impact on Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar An area of established standing water is located adjacent to the path through the site, however this does not significantly affect the available area of land for development. Trees and vegetation: A belt of scrub woodland lies to the north of the site along the route of the railway, and there are occasional field trees along the eastern field boundary. Field boundaries: These include some field trees and outgrown hedgerow trees and post and wire fences. Water (ponds, rivers and streams): A ditch runs along the field boundary at the south eastern corner of the site. There is standing water adjacent to the access route.
Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use Settlement expansion Agriculture The residential area of Cambus lies to the immediate west and north beyond the Stirling - Alloa railway. The surrounding landscape is a mixture of arable and pasture farmland.
222
The following apply to the area of the site outwith the settlement boundary: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV3 Development in the Countryside: The policy states that development in the Countryside (as defined in Local Plans i.e. areas not within settlement boundaries) be suitable for its location in function and design and should accord with Policy ED4 Rural Development (see below). Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ED4 Rural Development: The policy states that economic and social development in rural areas will be supported within the following criteria: Focusing development within existing towns and villages Restricting development within Green Belt and countryside.
Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN18 Development in the Countryside: Sets out the criteria for the granting of planning permission to a proposed development in the countryside. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy H6 Housing in the Countryside: The policy states that new housing developments in the Countryside will only be approved where the development is essential, involves the conversion of an existing building, or is consistent with Policy H5 Housing in the Upland Area. As the site lies within the area of undeveloped coast as identified on the Local Plan Clackmannanshire wide Countryside map the following policy applies: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN5 The Coast: The policy states that the undeveloped coast will be protected from further development except where it can be proved that there are no viable alternative sites. Due to the proximity of designated sites the following should be taken into account: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV1 Nature Conservation: The policy aims to promote the protection of wildlife, habitats and other natural features. It states that development which will have a potential negative impact upon internationally or nationally designated sites will not be permitted unless it can be demonstrated that their will be no adverse effect from the proposal, or no viable alternative solution. Similarly, proposals which may affect a site of local importance will only be allowed where it can be demonstrated that there will be no significant negative impact on the conservation value of the site. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN1 Sites of Local Ecological Importance: The policy states that any application for development will be guided by the Local Biodiversity Action Plan. It also states that any development proposals should consider the importance of non-designated sites of local nature conservation or biodiversity importance and should minimise negative impacts on the natural heritage resource. Due to the presence of a core path route the following applies: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy INF3 Local Access: The policy states that development will not be permitted where it will result in the loss of an asserted right of way, footpath or a path forming part of the Clackmannanshire path network unless the provision of an alternative path can be assured. As there is a potential flood risk the following policies are of relevance: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV9 Water Resource Management: The policy states that development will not normally be permitted in undeveloped flood plain areas, in areas of known significant flood risk, or if it will adversely affect the Forth Estuary. Exceptions will be made only when it can be demonstrated that no alternative locations can be found, or that suitable mitigation measures can be implemented. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN4 Water Resources: The policy states that where a development area is determined as being at risk of flooding, planning permission will not be granted except where it can be proven that there are no viable alternative sites.
The site lies within 500m of the Firth of Forth SPA, Ramsar and SSSI. Development of the site would increase the level of disturbance to the SPA.
Management of access and recreation would reduce negative impacts on the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar.
223
The Phase 1 Habitat Survey identifies the site as arable and pasture with an area of unimproved neutral grassland along the route of the disused railway.
The site is in close proximity to the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site. Development of the site would potentially result in increased levels of disturbance to the SPA and Ramsar.
--
Management of access and recreation would reduce negative impacts on the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar.
The site includes standing water, a ditch and mature boundary trees and may provide habitat for protected species. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified.
0/-
There are elements of the woodland generalist 1km dispersal network to the north and east of the site. Development of the site would result in loss of the open water and loss of open ground.
Habitat creation would reduce the impact of the loss of the standing water habitat.
A core path passes through the centre of the site providing off road recreational links toward Alloa, there are also routes providing links to the west and north The site does not lie in an area within the top 15% in the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation. The nearest Regeneration Outcome Agreement areas are in Tullibody to the north. There is a playground adjacent to the site which is safeguarded for community recreation development. There is also a bowling green within Cambus which is a safeguarded recreational open space. Within Tullibody to the north is Braehead golf club and playing field facilities.
++ 0
The site lies immediately adjacent to an area identified on the SEPA flood map as at risk of flooding by the sea, and therefore there is a potential risk of flooding on the site which lies between the Black Devon and the River Forth. In addition the evidence of minor flooding adjacent to the access route further suggests investigation of flood risk on this site. The site lies within 500m of the Firth of Forth and therefore run off from the site could potentially increase levels of diffuse pollution in the River Forth. There is a minor ditch within the field boundary to the south east of the site which may incur increased water levels resulting from development of the site through increasing the rate of run off. The Clackmannanshire biennial flood report (2007) identifies that Forth Street in
The proximity to the two watercourses may limit opportunities to mitigate the flood risk associated with the site.
The implementation of SUDS will reduce the impact of diffuse pollution resulting from development of the site. The implementation of SUDS will reduce the impact of increased run off resulting from development of the site.
224
Cambus has been recorded as a previous flood prone site but no flooding has been recorded since 2005.
Soil
The site is well connected to the local path network for recreation. It lies within 1km of the centre of Tullibody, however pedestrian access to Tullibody requires the use of on road access. The main A907 a short walk from the site and provides regular bus services.
Creation of a new access route to facilitate safe off road pedestrian access to Tullibody. Provide pedestrian access from the north of the site over the railway to increase accessibility to the A907 for public transport connections. Future development of a station at Cambus would increase the accessibility of the site.
0/-
The nearest air quality monitoring location is in the centre of Tullibody on Stirling Road and there are no clear trends in NO2 concentrations between 2002-2007. Traffic counts to the west of Cambus indicate a minor increase in traffic levels between 2006 and 2007 of 1.4%. Traffic resulting from development of the site would travel principally on the A907 into Alloa and west to Stirling. There are no declared AQMA in Stirling.
Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change?
Development of a new station at Cambus would reduce the reliance on the private car.
The site is located at the edge of the urban areas of Tullibody and accessible to Alloa town centre by bus and pedestrian and cycle access. The site is low lying and in close proximity to the River Devon and the River Forth. It is immediately adjacent to an area identified by the SEPA flood map as being at risk of flooding by the sea, and therefore future risk to this site as a result of climate change should be considered. The site is located close to an existing urban area and therefore close to existing transport services, water and energy infrastructure.
+ -The proximity to the two watercourses may limit opportunities to mitigate the flood risk associated with the site.
Material Assets
Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction?
The site is flat and low lying, however it would be reasonably well placed to make use of solar gain due to the open aspect. The site does not lie in an area identified for its open cast extraction potential.
+ 0
225
There are no hazard areas within the site boundary.
The site would generate additional waste arisings however as it is located within the urban area it will not generate significant additional waste collection journeys. There are no known features designated for their heritage value within the site boundary, and development of the site would not impact on the setting or integrity of any features designated for their cultural heritage value.
The development of the site will not result in impacts on known archaeological remains. The HLA identifies that the site is 18th -19th century fields and farming. The site does not lie in an area designated for its landscape value. The site lies within the Carse of Forth landscape character area. The landscape is characterised by its width, flatness, and openness emphasised by a lack of woodland and field boundaries. Human settlement is a prominent feature within the landscape. Development of the site would result in a significant expansion of Cambus, almost doubling the area of the settlement. The core of the settlement is linear in form and new development across the site will detract from this character.
0 0
Guidelines for this landscape character area include protection of the open agricultural character, but also highlighting roads through roadside planting and the River Forth.
The site is not visible from the A907 due to the screening effect of woodland at the northern edge, and this also serves to limit views from the Stirling Alloa railway.
226
View west to settlement edge illustrating standing water adjacent to access route
View east field boundary and woodland associated with railway
227
SITE 36 LORNSHILL FARM STEADING

0.8 Small This site comprises the cluster of buildings at Lornshill Farm Steading located on a low rise, which lies between Tullibody and Alloa. The site is located close to the existing public transport provision in Tullibody and Alloa. The site has an existing access road which could be improved to serve the site. None Investigation of bats within steading buildings. None n/a Trees and vegetation: There are areas of scrub and a partial avenue of mature deciduous trees along the access road. Field boundaries: The boundary comprises scrub, post and wire fences and garden boundary. Water (ponds, rivers and streams): There are no watercourses within the site boundary.
Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use Planning policy framework: Brownfield Plant hire storage and residential. Woodland and agricultural fields. Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV3 Development in the Countryside: The policy states that development in the Countryside (as defined in Local Plans i.e. areas not within settlement boundaries) be suitable for its location in function and design and should accord with Policy ED4 Rural Development (see below). Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ED4 Rural Development: The policy states that economic and social development in rural areas will be supported within the following criteria: Focusing development within existing towns and villages Restricting development within Green Belt and countryside.
As the site lies within the Green Belt designation the following applies:
Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy ENV4 Green Belts: In Green Belt areas there will be a strong presumption against development any developments which are permitted will have to demonstrate appropriate environmental enhancement. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN19 Green Belt: The policy states that development will only be permitted in the Green Belt where no alternative location can be found or the development would provide an opportunity to enhance the Green Belt. Due to the presence of a Listed Building the following policy applies: Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy EN6 - Listed Buildings: When determining applications for listed building consent or planning applications that affect a listed building or its setting, the Council will seek to ensure preservation of the building, its setting, or any features of architectural or historic interest. Approval will normally be granted for uses that would secure a viable future for a listed building, provided that any alterations are sympathetic to the character of the building and its setting.
228
Planning History SEA /site assessment topic Biodiversity, flora and fauna Site appraisal criteria Site issues and discussion Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) 0 Enhancement and mitigation options Potential effect following mitigation
The site does not impact on any sites designated for their nature conservation value.
The site is identified in the Phase 1 habitat survey as arable and pasture and built up.
The site is not in close proximity to the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site.
The derelict buildings and mature trees may provide habitat for protected species. Site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified.
0/-
The areas to the south and north of the site form part of the woodland generalist 1km dispersal network. Development of the site would not impact directly on the FHN.
Additional avenue planting would enhance the habitat value of the entrance road.
Core paths run through the woodland to the north and west of the site and on road routes provide links to Alloa and Tullibody. Tullibody ROA agreement area lies to the north and west of this site, within 500m. The area within which the site is located does not have a high SIMD. The site will not directly or significantly facilitate regeneration. However the location of the site in closer proximity to Tullibody town centre, than Alloa town centre may assist in support for local services within Tullibody. The site is within 500m of Braehead Golf Club. Also within 500m are the grounds surrounding Gean house and also the par surrounding Inglewood House. The grounds of Lornshill Academy are identified for community recreation development in the local plan and provide a recreation resource. The surrounding area to the north and east (Gubber Hill and Blackmuir Wood) includes a network of paths and provides an open space resource. The site is well connected to existing access routes and areas of open space. The site is located on the crest of a ridge and is not identified as being at risk of flooding.
++ 0
What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? Notes connections to key recreational area or designation as a safeguarded open space or country park
Water
229
There are no identified water courses within the site boundary, however a drain runs to the south of the site. The site comprises buildings and therefore development of the site would not contribute significantly to increased levels of run off resulting from development of the site.
Soil
The site does not include areas of vacant or derelict land.
The site is well connected by the local path network providing access to local settlements and services. The site is located adjacent to the B9096 which provides bus services to Tullibody and Alloa. The closest air quality monitoring stations for nitrogen dioxide indicate no significant trend in levels between 2002 and 2007. Development of the site will potentially contribute to a minor increase in traffic levels on the A907 and in Alloa town centre. However cumulative effects require to be assessed in Stage 2.
++ ++ 0
0/-
Climatic Factors
The centres of Tullibody and Alloa are accessible on foot, cycle and by public transport from the site. Schools and services are accessible within close proximity to the site, however the size of the site would not be sufficient to support new facilities. Local services can be accessed without the use of the private car. The site is located on a low rise and within an area of undulating landform. The site characteristics and surrounding landform do not suggest a significant increased risk of flooding or instability as a result of climate change. The site lies close to other residential areas and therefore anticipated to be provided from existing infrastructure. The site is located on a low rise. The site lies within 1.5km of Tullibody town centre, and 2km of Alloa town centre facilitating accessibility. The site characteristics are favourable for accessibility, aspect, and shelter. The site is located within close proximity to a residential area and would not be developed for mineral extraction due to a lack of opportunity for sufficient separation
Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Material Assets Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction?
230
distances from settlement. Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) No hazard areas. 0
The site will generate additional waste arisings, however as it is located within the urban area and already comprises residential development it will not generate significant additional waste related journeys. The site includes Lornshill farmhouse which is a B listed building, however it is surrounded by derelict steading buildings and heavy plant storage and therefore development of the site will provide an opportunity to enhance the quality of the immediate setting of the building.
0/-
The design and layout of the site should respect the character and setting of the listed building.
The development of the site would not impact on any known archaeological remains. The site lies within an area of land currently designated as Greenbelt. The site already has a developed character and therefore the redevelopment of the site would not significantly alter the character of this part of the Greenbelt. The site already has a developed character and therefore the redevelopment of the site would not significantly affect the character of the surrounding settlement.
0 The design and layout of the site should respect the character and setting of the existing buildings.
The site is visible from the B9096, however it already has a developed character and therefore the impact of developing this site would not result in significant change provided the site layout and design reflects the character of the existing buildings.
231
Lornshill farmhouse
232
SITE 37 REDWELL, ALLOA

6.4ha Medium The site lies to the west of Alloa between the A907 and the railway. The site lies within 1km of Alloa town centre, and is served by bus stops on the A907. Site access would require to be taken to the east of the site where gradient would facilitate the creation of an access link. None Surface water drainage Medium development of the site would result in loss of public open space. n/a Trees and vegetation: The site comprises a large mown playing field with deciduous mixed trees to the western boundary. Field boundaries: A metal fence adjoins the railway and metal railings extend alongside the A907. Water: There are no water features within the site, however issues with surface water drainage are noted.
Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use Planning policy framework: Settlement expansion Open space sports pitches. The steep wooded slope to the north of the site is an open space, with residential development to the north and south. As the site is currently used as open space and designated as an area of Safeguarded Recreational Open Space in the Local Plan, the following policies apply: Clackmannanshire and Stirling Structure Plan Policy SR1 - Sport, Recreation and Strategic Open Space states that Local Plans will identify existing sport and physical recreation facilities together with strategic areas of open space which are to be protected from development. There will be a presumption against development of such sites unless the facility/open space is surplus to requirements or alternative facilities can be provided in the locality. Clackmannanshire Local Plan Policy INF14 - Existing Public Parks, Amenity Open Spaces, Allotment Gardens, Playing Fields and Sports Pitches states that these resources will be protected from unrelated development which would diminish their recreational or amenity value except where it can be demonstrated that exceptional circumstances apply, including a long term surplus of playing fields in the vicinity.
233
The site does not impact on any designated sites and is located within an existing built up area. The site is identified in the Phase 1 habitat survey as amenity grassland.
The site is not in close proximity to the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site.
The site does not include features likely to support protected species as it comprises short mown grass, however site specific survey should be undertaken prior to development of the site to ascertain the presence of European Protected Species and appropriate mitigation implemented if these species are identified.
0/-
The site does not play a role as part of the FHN. Development of the site would result in a loss of urban open space.
0/-
Habitat enhancement could be incorporated as part of the development of the site which would increase the habitat value of the site.
No effect
Core paths extend through the public park to the north, which provides links to the wider network. The site does not lie within an area with a high SIMD rating and lies outwtih the Alloa ROA area.
++ 0
The site comprises a public open space and loss of this resource would have a negative impact for the local community. However there is a public park to the north of the site and Braehead golf course beyond. The site is not identified as having a risk of flooding in the SEPA indicative flood map. However surface water drainage may be an issue for this site which is low lying and located between the embanked railway, A907 and Smithfield Loan. There are no water courses within the site boundary. There are no water courses within the site boundary.
Water
0 0
234
The site is not vacant or derelict land. The site is not prime agricultural land.
The site is located close to Alloa town centre and provides easy access to services. The site is located close to Alloa town centre and is therefore easily accessible by public transport both by bus and through access to the railway station. The nearest air quality monitoring locations for NO2 are at Norwood Avenue and Glasshouse Loan and these do not show any clear trends in NO2 concentrations between 2002 and 2007. Development on the site would increase traffic flows on the A907.
++ ++ 0
Climatic Factors
The development is located close to Alloa town centre and therefore potentially reduces the need to travel to access local services and facilities. Although the site does not have an identified flooding risk, the potential issues with surface water drainage may increase as a result of future climate change. The site is located adjacent to the existing built up area of Alloa and therefore close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure. The site is located in a slight dip, however it is not poorly located in relation to shelter and solar gain. The site is located adjacent within a residential area and would not be appropriate for mineral extraction. There are no hazard areas on site.
+ +
Material Assets
+ 0 0
The site would generate additional waste arisings however as it is located within the urban area it will not generate significant additional waste collection journeys. There are no designated features or buildings on the site or close to the site.
235
There are no known archaeological remains within the site boundary. The HLA identifies the site as 19th century to present recreation area. The site does not lie in an area designated for its landscape value, however it is an area of safeguarded open space and performs some landscape role as an open space within settlement. Development of the site would result in loss of an established area of open space within Alloa, however this would not have a strong negative impact on wider settlement setting and identity. The site is a key feature in views from the A907 and particularly important as part of the approach to Alloa from the west, providing part of a green corridor on the approach to the town centre.
236
View east to settlement edge
View south to business units and railway
237
238
APPENDIX 4 CRITERIA TO WHICH WEIGHTING WAS APPLIED
239
Criteria to which weighting was applied Environment criteria

Biodiversity, flora and fauna Does the site impact on designated sites? Does the site impact on priority habitats or species? (see buffers in methodology) Does the development of the site avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site? Does the development of the site maintain and enhance populations of European Protected Species including protection of their resting places? Does the site facilitate the restoration and enhancement of biodiversity in all our urban and rural environments through better planning, design and practice? Is the site connected to the local core path network? How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD? What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? Water Is the site at risk of flooding? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Air Quality and Transport Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter, solar gain and reduce the need to travel? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Does the site reduce waste generation and promote waste recovery, recycling and composting? Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value?
Soil
Climatic Factors Material Assets
Cultural Heritage
241
242
Community criteria
Biodiversity, flora and fauna Does the site impact on designated sites? Does the site impact on priority habitats or species? (see buffers in methodology) Does the development of the site avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site? Does the development of the site maintain and enhance populations of European Protected Species including protection of their resting places? Does the site facilitate the restoration and enhancement of biodiversity in all our urban and rural environments through better planning, design and practice? Is the site connected to the local core path network? How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD? What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? Water Is the site at risk of flooding? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Air Quality and Transport Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter, solar gain and reduce the need to travel? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Does the site reduce waste generation and promote waste recovery, recycling and composting? Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains?
Soil
Climatic Factors Material Assets
Cultural Heritage
243
Landscape
244
Access criteria
Biodiversity, flora and fauna Does the site impact on designated sites? Does the site impact on priority habitats or species? (see buffers in methodology) Does the development of the site avoid adverse effects on the integrity of the Firth of Forth SPA and Ramsar site? Does the development of the site maintain and enhance populations of European Protected Species including protection of their resting places? Does the site facilitate the restoration and enhancement of biodiversity in all our urban and rural environments through better planning, design and practice? Is the site connected to the local core path network? How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD? What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? Water Is the site at risk of flooding? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Air Quality and Transport Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services?
Soil
Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Material Assets Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter, solar gain and reduce the need to travel? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Does the site reduce waste generation and promote waste recovery, recycling and composting? Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains?
Climatic Factors
Cultural Heritage
245
Landscape
246
APPENDIX 5 SUMMARY RESULTS OF ASSESSMENT OF ALTERNATIVES
247
Table A5 Summary Results of Assessment of Alternatives from the Site Appraisal Process (based on results of individual site assessment)
Environment ranking
Site ID 17 4 5 36 37 2 18 Name and Location Land south of James Place Alloa East (1) Alloa East (2) Lornshill farm steading Redwell, Stirling road West Earlsfield Devonside East Locational Framework Rural Villages Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Rural Villages Site area (ha) 24.23 7.93 6.42 0.8 6.47 1.02 7.78 Environmen t weighting a3 b2 b2 b2 b2 b3 b3
Community ranking
Site ID 4 5 36 17 2 18 37 Name and Location Alloa East (1) Alloa East (2) Lornshill farm steading Land south of James Place West Earlsfield Devonside East Redwell, Stirling road Locational Framework Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Rural Villages Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Rural Villages Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Site area (ha) 7.93 6.42 0.8 24.23 1.02 7.78 6.47 Community weighting a1 a1 a1 a2 a3 a3 b1
Accessibility ranking
Site ID 17 4 5 36 3 2 18 Name and Location Land south of James Place Alloa East (1) Alloa East (2) Lornshill farm steading South Earlsfield West Earlsfield Devonside East Locational Framework Rural Villages Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Rural Villages Site area (ha) 24.23 7.93 6.42 0.8 3.86 1.02 7.78 Accessibilty weighting a1 a1 a1 a1 a2 a3 a3
248
Environment ranking
Site ID 7 1 3 10 32 34 8c Name and Location Jellyholm, Sauchie Lornshill Farm South Earlsfield Ladywood Alloa North West, Branshill Land south of Dollar Road Land south of Brook Street Locational Framework Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Hillfoots corridor Hillfoots corridor Site area (ha) 61.5 9.62 3.86 2.33 70.92 4 Environmen t weighting c2 c3 c3 c3 c3 c3 c4
Community ranking
Site ID 3 32 16 28 7 34 12 Name and Location South Earlsfield Alloa North West, Branshill Clackmannan (south) Menstrie East Jellyholm, Sauchie Land south of Dollar Road Helensfield Locational Framework Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Rural Villages Hillfoots corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Hillfoots corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Site area (ha) 3.86 70.92 89.44 9.26 61.5 4 6.13 Community weighting b2 b2 b3 b4 c1 c2 c2
Site ID 37 7 32 34 1 16 28 Name and Location Redwell, Stirling road Jellyholm, Sauchie Alloa North West, Branshill Land south of Dollar Road Lornshill Farm Clackmannan (south) Menstrie East Locational Framework Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Hillfoots corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Rural Villages Hillfoots corridor Site area (ha) 6.47 61.5 70.92 4 9.62 89.44 9.26 Accessibilty weighting b1 b1 b1 b1 b2 b3 b3
249
Environment ranking
Site ID 13 16 19 20 28 29 6 Name and Location Meadowend Farm Clackmanna n (south) Lover's Loan Dollarfield farm Menstrie East Land at Devonpark Alloa West expansion area Locational Framework Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages Hillfoots corridor Rural Villages Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Site area (ha) 9.02 89.44 13.91 1.98 9.26 5.66 18.86 Environmen t weighting c4 c4 c4 c4 c4 c4 d2
Community ranking
Site ID 1 10 8c 19 8b 23b 27 Name and Location Lornshill Farm Ladywood Land south of Brook Street Lover's Loan Land east of B908 Dollar (South) Middletonkerse Locational Framework Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Hillfoots corridor Rural Villages Hillfoots corridor Rural Villages 9.2 Hillfoots corridor Site area (ha) 9.62 2.33 13.91 9 Community weighting c3 c3 c3 c3 c3 c3 c3
Site ID 20 33 12 10 8b 23a 35 Name and Location Dollarfield farm Oak Mills Helensfield Ladywood Land east of B908 Dollar (South) Cambus East Locational Framework Rural Villages Hillfoots corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Hillfoots corridor Rural Villages 8.5 Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Site area (ha) 1.98 6.13 6.13 2.33 9.81 Accessibilty weighting b4 c1 c1 c2 c2 c2 c2
250
Environment ranking
Site ID 33 8a 8b 12 15 23a 23b Name and Location Oak Mills Alva west Land east of B908 Helensfield Clackmanna n (east) Dollar (South) Dollar (South) Locational Framework Hillfoots corridor Hillfoots corridor Hillfoots corridor Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages Site area (ha) 6.13 6.13 171.23 8.5 9.2 Environmen t weighting d2 d3 d3 d3 d3 d3 d3
Community ranking
Site ID 13 20 29 14 31 6 33 Name and Location Meadowend Farm Dollarfield farm Land at Devonpark Kilbagie (north) West of A823 Alloa West expansion area Oak Mills Locational Framework Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Hillfoots corridor Site area (ha) 9.02 1.98 5.66 14.4 17.51 18.86 6.13 Community weighting c4 c4 c4 c4 c4 d1 d1
Site ID 13 19 23b 21 27 31 29 Name and Location Meadowend Farm Lover's Loan Dollar (South) Dollarfield Middletonkers e West of A823 Land at Devonpark Locational Framework Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages Hillfoots corridor Rural Villages Rural Villages Site area (ha) 9.02 13.91 9.2 2.89 9 17.51 5.66 Accessibilty weighting c3 c3 c3 c3 c3 c3 c4
251
Environment ranking
Site ID 35 9 11 14 21 22 24a Name and Location Cambus East Birkhill Kennetpans Kilbagie (north) Dollarfield Upper Hillfoot Road Forestmill Locational Framework Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor East Clackmannanshire area of search Core Area Rural Villages Rural Villages Rural Villages East Clackmannanshire area of search Site area (ha) 9.81 109.81 5.95 14.4 2.89 8.69 199.42 Environmen t weighting d3 d4 d4 d4 d4 d4 d4
Community ranking
Site ID 8a 15 23a 35 9 11 21 Name and Location Alva west Clackmannan (east) Dollar (South) Cambus East Birkhill Kennetpans Dollarfield Locational Framework Hillfoots corridor Rural Villages Rural Villages Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor East Clackmannansh ire area of search Core Area Rural Villages Site area (ha) 171.23 8.5 9.81 109.81 5.95 2.89 Community weighting d3 d3 d3 d3 d4 d4 d4
Site ID 30 6 8a 8c 15 9 22 Name and Location North side of A91 Alloa West expansion area Alva west Land south of Brook Street Clackmannan (east) Birkhill Upper Hillfoot Road Locational Framework Rural Villages Tullibody AlloaClackmannan corridor Hillfoots corridor Hillfoots corridor Rural Villages East Clackmannanshire area of search Rural Villages Site area (ha) 1.44 18.86 171.23 109.81 8.69 Accessibilty weighting c4 d1 d2 d3 d3 d3 d3
252
Environment ranking
Site ID 24b 26 27 30 31 Name and Location Forestmill Aitkenhead Middletonke rse North side of A91 West of A823 Locational Framework East Clackmannanshire area of search East Clackmannanshire area of search Hillfoots corridor Rural Villages Rural Villages Site area (ha) 312 9 1.44 17.51 Environmen t weighting d4 d4 d4 d4 d4
Community ranking
Site ID 22 24a 24b 26 30 Name and Location Upper Hillfoot Road Forestmill Forestmill Aitkenhead North side of A91 Locational Framework Rural Villages East Clackmannansh ire area of search East Clackmannansh ire area of search East Clackmannansh ire area of search Rural Villages Site area (ha) 8.69 199.42 312 1.44 Community weighting d4 d4 d4 d4 d4
Site ID 26 11 14 24a 24b Name and Location Aitkenhead Kennetpans Kilbagie (north) Forestmill Forestmill Locational Framework East Clackmannanshire area of search Core Area Rural Villages East Clackmannanshire area of search East Clackmannanshire area of search Site area (ha) 312 5.95 14.4 199.42 Accessibilty weighting d3 d4 d4 d4 d4
253
255
257
CLACKMANNANSHIRE MAIN ISSUES REPORT Site Appraisal

Prepared for Clackmannanshire Council by Land Use Consultants
October 2010
www.landuse.co.uk
LUC SERVICES
Environmental Planning Landscape Design Landscape Management Masterplanning Landscape Planning Ecology Environmental Assessment Rural Futures Digital Design Urban Regeneration Urban Design
43 Chalton Street London NW1 1JD Tel: 020 7383 5784 Fax: 020 7383 4798 london@landuse.co.uk 14 Great George Street Bristol BS1 5RH Tel: 0117 929 1997 Fax: 0117 929 1998 bristol@landuse.co.uk
37 Otago Street Glasgow G12 8JJ Tel: 0141 334 9595 Fax: 0141 334 7789 glasgow@landuse.co.uk 28 Stafford Street Edinburgh EH3 7BD Tel: 0131 202 1616 edinburgh@landuse.co.uk
CONTENTS
1 2 INTRODUCTION METHOD 3 9
Baseline Data Collection ..................................................................................................... 10 Baseline Scenario for Each Site ............................................................................................ 12 Site Assessment.................................................................................................................. 13 Field survey ........................................................................................................................ 13 Collation of Assessment Results .......................................................................................... 13
SUMMARY ASSESSMENT RESULTS
15
Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 15 Potential Effects of mitigation .............................................................................................. 19
COMPARISON WITH PREVIOUS APPRAISAL SITES
22
Equivalence with MIR sites .................................................................................................. 22 Relative scores ................................................................................................................... 23
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
29
Sites with potential for development .................................................................................... 29 High scores, low constraints ............................................................................................... 29 High scores, moderate constraints....................................................................................... 30 Lower scores, less significant constraints.............................................................................. 31 Moderate scores, minor-moderate constraints ..................................................................... 32 High scores, major constraints ............................................................................................ 33 Moderate scores, major constraints ..................................................................................... 33 Low scoring sites ................................................................................................................ 34 Sites currently unsuitable for development ........................................................................... 35
TABLES
Table 1.1: List of sites assessed...................................................................................................4 Table 2.1: Data sources............................................................................................................. 10 Table 2.2: SEA criteria ............................................................................................................... 11 Table 2.3: Assumptions of Site Development Impacts ....................................................... 12 Table 2.4: Additional assessment criteria .............................................................................. 13 Table 2.5: Site scoring categories............................................................................................ 14 Table 3.1: Results of environmental appraisal and key constraints ................................. 16 Table 3.2: Comparison of pre- and post-mitigation scores............................................... 20 Table 4.1: Sites from previous assessment with MIR equivalents .................................... 22 Table 4.2: MIR and Local Plan Alteration sites, ranked by score..................................... 23 Table 5.1: Sites with clear potential for proposed development ..................................... 29 Table 5.2: Sites with good potential for proposed development and requiring lowlevel mitigation .................................................................................................................... 30 Table 5.3: Lower scoring sites with development potential ............................................. 31
Table 5.4: Sites with potential for development where mitigation can be guaranteed32 Table 5.5: Sites with good potential for development, but requiring significant mitigation.............................................................................................................................. 33 Table 5.6: Sites with some development potential, but requiring extensive mitigation33 Table 5.7: Sites where significant mitigation could release limited development potential................................................................................................................................ 34 Table 5.8: sites unsuitable for development ......................................................................... 35
FIGURES
Figure 1.1: Alloa and environs.....................................................................................................6 Figure 1.2: Clackmannan and environs......................................................................................6 Figure 1.3: Tullibody, Cambus and environs............................................................................7 Figure 1.4: Alva, Mentrie and environs......................................................................................7 Figure 1.6: Tillicoultry, Coalsnaughton and environs.............................................................8 Figure 1.7: Dollar and Pool of Muckhart ..................................................................................8 Figure 2.1: Project flow diagram.................................................................................................1 Figure 4.1: Correlation of MIR and previously assessed sites........................................... 26 Figure 4.2: Comparison of MIR and previous assessment site scores ............................ 27
ii
Introduction
Study context
1.1
Land Use Consultants (LUC) was commissioned by Clackmannanshire Council to undertake this study to assess the development potential of 50 sites within Clackmannanshire to inform the preparation of the Local Development Plan Main Issues Report, reflecting the strategy for growth set out in the Stirling and Clackmannanshire Structure Plan 3rd Alteration, 2008. The Stirling and Clackmannanshire Structure Plan 3rd Alteration 2008 sets out the locational strategy for accommodating the new housing land requirement for approximately 2250 housing units throughout the Clackmannanshire area to 2025. The locational strategy secures the availability of land for housing throughout the Clackmannanshire area to 2025. The strategy for the following areas is outlined below:
1.2
1.3
Within the Hillfoots corridor: Potential for a modest amount of remaining land to be brought forward as part of phased development areas and through urban capacity sites. Tullibody-Alloa corridor. Principally phased development sites and urban capacity study sites. Dollar, Muckhart: No development outwith currently established settlement boundaries due to strategic constraints, unless exceptionally in Dollar to enable community development where there is an identified need and development is limited to the minimum required, or it is in accordance with rural policies. East Clackmannanshire: Area of search for major growth circa 1200 houses.
1.4
This work builds on LUCs earlier site appraisal studies to inform the most recent Local Plan alteration. Project aims and objectives
1.5
The aims and objectives of the study are defined as follows:
to provide a comprehensive and detailed report supported by plans, drawings, data and photographs as appropriate to explain any potential for development and all constraints to development for the sites listed. The report will be based on criteria set out in the study brief and consistent with the methodology for the previous assessments; to assess whether these sites are suitable for development in terms of a balanced view in location and accessibility by sustainable modes of travel; this assessment will provide part of the evidence base in the initial discounting of any land to be considered for allocation, or otherwise, in the Local Development Plan and should be consistent with, and
Land Use Consultants
comparable to, the previous study undertaken for the Local Plan 1st Alteration and its SEA. 1.6 The detailed objectives are defined as follows:
to determine the nature of each site and identify all known site constraints. This to include land ownerships [where information is available from the council], existing land uses, ecology, landscape, built heritage and townscape, flooding and water management, access requirements, open spaces, and land and soil considerations; to capture assessment on the relevant sustainability issues as they relate to the criteria given in the Environmental Assessment (Scotland) Act Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Tool Kit, particularly pages 1215 for the sites. Notably in this instance we are considering biodiversity, flora, fauna particularly for protected species and priority species; population and human health; soil; water and the Water Framework Directive; air quality as appropriate; climatic factors including for adaptations and mitigation and where relevant sea level issues; material assets; cultural heritage; and landscape considerations; to measure and identify the accessibility of each site by road, rail and for walking, including any relationship to the local Core Path Network and rights of way, cycling, public transport, and horse riding provision. All in general accord with the Local Transport Strategy, and to indicate any potential and likely preferences for access to the site assuming if it were to be developed; and, to identify those sites most and least appropriate for development in terms of this brief. That means providing a balanced synthesis and justification for development.
1.7
As indicated in the brief, we have replicated the methodology used in previous phases of site appraisal work. In addition to ensuring consistency, this also facilitates direct comparison with these sites and enables judgements to be made on their relative merits this is set out in Section 0 of this report. The following sites are included in the MIR site appraisal: Table 1.1: List of sites assessed
Reference 2 3 5 6 10 11 12 13 14 18 20 22 23 Site name Elm Grove Claremont Former College The Shore Alloa Co-op Health Centre Ashley Terrace Cnetral Parkland Main Street, Sauchie Carsebridge Row Fairfield School Alloa Park Kelliebank/Bowhouse Location Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa
1.7.
24 25 26 42 43 45 47 49 50 57 68 77 80 81 89 97 99 100 101 103 106 108 115 118 120 126 131 132 138 141 145 151 153 154 155 156 158
Forthbank Carsebridge Road North North Castle Street Sunnyside Road Carsebridge Church Grove Braehead Golf Course Alloa West (Orchard Farm) Sauchie West/Tullygarth North Street/Main Street Tullygarth brickworks The Orchard, Tullibody Dumyat Business Park Phase 2 Station Road (west side) Abercromby Place Glenochil Yeast Beauclerc Street Park Street Brook Street/Back Road Former Alva Glen Glentana Alva cemetery Devonpark Mills Coalsnaughton North Devonpark Mills Sterling Mills Outlet Village Upper Mill Street Community Centre Site Dollar Golf Club Kellybank Muckhart cemetery extension Garvel farm Manor Powis Tillicoultry Quarry Sauchie Tower Former Devon Equestrian Centre Bessie Mine
Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Alloa Clackmannan Rural (Aloa) Tullibody Tullibody Tullibody/Cambus Tullibody Rural (Menstrie) Alva Alva Alva Alva Alva Alva Coalsnaughton Coalsnaughton Coalsnaughton Coalsnaughton Tillicoultry Tillicoultry Dollar Dollar Muckhart Rural (Tullibody) Rural (Tullibody) Rural (Tillicoultry) Rural (Alva) Rural (Alva) Rural (Tillicoultry)
1.8 1.9
Figures 1.1 to 1.6 illustrate the location of the above sites. The remainder of the report is set out as follows:

Section 2: Methodology Section 3: Summary of assessment results. Section 4: Comparison with previous appraisal sites
Figure 1.1: Alloa and environs
Figure 1.2: Clackmannan and environs
Figure 1.3: Tullibody, Cambus and environs
Figure 1.4: Alva, Mentrie and environs
Figure 1.5: Tillicoultry, Coalsnaughton and environs
Figure 1.6: Dollar and Pool of Muckhart
2
2.1
Method
This section of the report describes the method and approach to the main study stages. The stages are set out in the diagram below and described in more detail in the following paragraphs. The present study has focused on the process highlighted in red.
Figure 2.1: Project flow diagram
Baseline Data Collection

2.2 Baseline environmental data was collected as part of the SEA process and the site assessment. Data sources used in the assessment are listed in Table 2.1 below. Table 2.1: Data sources
Topic Biodiversity, flora and fauna Data National and local designations Population change and migration Socio economic issues Population and human health Health trends Core paths Town centres Local flood area Water Water and waste infrastructure capacity SEPA flood map Soil Derelict and contaminated land Air quality monitoring data Data unavailable Air Quality and Transport Road network Road traffic data Data unavailable UKCIP 02 climate change scenarios and SNIFFER (2006) A Handbook of Climate Trends Across Scotland Mineral resources Gas pipeline hazard zones Historic Gardens and Designed Landscapes Cultural heritage Scheduled Ancient Monuments Listed Buildings Conservation areas Historic Landuse Assessment Data format Shapefile SIMD and ROA areas Reports/statistics Electronic sourced from Open Space Audit Shapefile Shapefile Clackmannanshire Council Biennial Flood Report (2007) Information from Scottish Water Shapefile Shapefile Clackmannanshire Council LAQM Progress Report 2008 Shapefile Clackmannanshire council also collect traffic data at 16 permanent monitoring sites
Climate
Electronic
Material Assets
Shapefile Shapefile Shapefile Shapefile Shapefile Shapefile Shapefile
10
Topic Landscape
Data Local landscape designations Clackmannanshire Landscape Character Assessment Aerial photography 1:10 000 map base 1:25 000 map base Local plan development sites Information which has been previously submitted in relation to any of the sites for previous development enquiries.
Data format Shapefile Shapefile Raster data Raster data Raster data Shapefile
Generic data sources
Electronic/paper copies
2.3 2.4
The SEA and site assessment criteria were informed by the project brief, previous phases of work on the foregoing Local Plan Alteration. The SEA and site assessment criteria are set out in Table 2.2 below: Table 2.2: SEA criteria
Biodiversity, flora and fauna Does the site impact on designated sites? Does the site impact on priority habitats or species? Population and human health Is the site connected to the local core path network? How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD? What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? Water Is the site at risk of flooding? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Soil Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Air Quality and Transport Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Material Assets Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter, solar gain and reduce the need to travel? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
11
Does the site reduce waste generation and promote waste recovery, recycling and composting? Cultural Heritage Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Landscape Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
2.5
In relation to each of the site appraisal criteria, each site is assessed as having a strongly positive effect (++) positive effect (+) a neutral effect (0), a negative effect (-), or a strongly negative effect (--). Options for mitigation and enhancement are outlined in the assessment table and the overall outcome following the application of mitigation and enhancement options is identified. These mitigated scores for each site must be taken as indicative, as they are predicated on the successful application of the proposed solutions. Given the scale of the assessment exercise and the strategic level at which it has been conducted no detailed analysis of the feasibility of these solutions has been undertaken.
2.6
Baseline Scenario for Each Site Baseline scenarios were generated on which to base the site appraisal. This provides the basis on which to carry out the individual site assessments taking the site specific issues into account, but ensuring a consistent approach to the potential impacts of a site coming forward for development.
Table 2.3: Assumptions of Site Development Impacts
Assumption Potential associated impact Loss and severance of habitats Increased recreational pressure Increased disturbance to wildlife, pressures from domestic pets Housing density of 20 houses/ha Introduction of built features into the landscape impact on local landscape character and setting. Impacts on water and drainage including increase run off, diffuse pollution Soil sealing Increased requirement for waste disposal An increase in traffic volume (related to number of households per site) Increased congestion Increased air pollution Reduction in perceived safety for pedestrians, cyclists and recreational users Negative impacts on human health and quality of life
12
SITE ASSESSMENT
2.7 The baseline data forms the basis for the site assessment and the SEA. Following the establishment and review of the baseline data, the key environmental problems within Clackmannanshire were identified and set out in the Scoping Report. The data relevant to each site is set out in the assessment matrices in Appendix 1, and individual site maps illustrating the site features and constraints are associated with each assessment matrix. In addition to the site assessment criteria, additional background information on each site is summarised in the assessment matrix. This includes: Table 2.4: Additional assessment criteria
Site reference and location Size (ha) Summary description Overriding constraints to development Site-specific investigations Constraints to development Summary of area remaining following mitigation Environmental features Site ownership Site type Current land use Surrounding land use
2.8
2.9
Field survey The field survey involved site visits and, where possible, walk-over inspections to identify site features and supplement the desk based review. Additional information gathered from the field survey is incorporated within the assessment matrix for each site, and site photographs are provided in Appendix 1. Collation of Assessment Results The site assessment generates a combination of positive and negative scores against each SEA objective reflecting the predicted environmental impact of developing the site. Using a numerical scoring process (i.e. assigning scores based on linear scale for instance, between 1 and 5) would have masked the variations between positive and negative scores. In order to illustrate the balance between positive and negative scores and to maintain compatibility with accepted SEA assessment practice the following approach was adopted:
2.10
The positive and negative scores were converted to numbers based on their face value whereby ++ or -- = 2; + or - = 1; and 0/+ or 0/- = 0.5.
13
These scores were then totalled to provide an overall score reflecting the number of positive effects of the site and an overall score reflecting the number of negative effects of the site. The difference between these scores is then used to provide an index score for the site. These index scores were then grouped into four categories from high (A) to low (D), based on the quartile banding of the scores as illustrated in Table 2.5 below. The sites were then assigned a category based on the relative proportion of positive scores to negative scores, as illustrated below. NB Quartile bands provides a useful visual key to the relative merits of the sites within the assessment group. However, they must not be used to directly compare the qualities of this group of sites with those assessed previously since the bandings only have internal logic. Section 4 of this report sets out a relative assessment of all sites with re-calculated score bands.
Table 2.5: Site scoring categories

Higher number of positive scores Lower number of negative scores A1 A2 A3 Lower number of positive scores A4 Explanation
Scores greater than 3rd quartile Scores between median value (2nd quartile) and 3rd quartile Scores between 1st quartile and median Scores less than 1st quartile value
B1
B2
B3
B4
C1 Higher number of negative scores
C2
C3
C4
D1
D2
D3
D4
2.11
The results of this grouping facilitate a comparison between the sites in terms of their overall effect. This information is set out in Table 3.1 in Section 3 of this report.
14
Summary assessment results

INTRODUCTION
3.1
This chapter of the report sets out a summary table illustrating the results of the environmental assessment process (Table 3.1). The assessment results have been grouped according to the number of positive and number of negative impacts identified to allow identification of the sites which have the least negative effect in relation to the assessment criteria. Table 3.1 also includes information on key constraints to development associated with the sites. Key to colour shading for scores:
Higher number of positive scores Lower number of negative scores A1 A2 A3
Lower number of positive scores A4
B1
B2
B3
B4
C1 Higher number of negative scores
C2
C3
C4
D1
D2
D3
D4
Sites with constraints which could potentially override any potential for development are shaded in grey. 3.2 Additional information used in the assessment includes:
Where the site sits within the locational framework to allow comparison of sites in similar geographical locations; Identification of any overriding constraints; Identification of major, moderate and minor physical and environmental constraints; A summary of the remaining site area following allowance for the identified constraints; A summary of mitigation options for the significant negative impacts identified potential scores with mitigation measures are set out in Table 3.2
15
Table 3.1: Results of environmental appraisal and key constraints

Site information
Site ID Name and Location Site area (ha) Summary score
Site constraints
Mitigation
Major
Moderate
Minor
Approx area remaining
Possible mitigation options
ALLOA 2 3 5 6 10 11 12 13 14 18 22 23 Elm Grove Claremont Former College The Shore Alloa Co-op Health Centre Ashley Terrace Central Parkland Main Street, Sauchie Carsebridge Row Alloa Park Kelliebank/Bowhouse
1.3 4.5 5.5 4.9 0.46 1.1 0.6 1.01 0.3 0.7 1.6 31.9 B1 C1 B2 D2 A2 A1 B2 D2 B4 C1 A2 C4 Flood risk Firth of Forth SPA; Scheduled monument High voltage overhead lines; Proximity to sewage works; Adjacent to Oil and Gas pipeline safeguarding zone Future flood risk; Tree Preservation Order; potential for impacts on setting of Listed Building Future flood risk School building on site; Character of area Future flood risk Flood risk Loss of greenspace; topography Conservation Area; historic building on site Flood risk Scheduled Monument; 0.7 Adjacent to Conservation Area Flood risk assessment; reinforcing coastal defence; Appropriate Assessment (depending on change in use) Mitigation of flood risk dependent on off-site coastal defences Flood risk assessment; SuDS; development brief Off-site marine flood defences Development brief Flood risk assessment; SuDS Flood risk assessment; SuDS; landscape design Partial development of site Potential land stability issues Conservation area; Listed buildings on site; potential for presence of bats Historic building on site; character of area Loss of open space; possible relict designed landscape features Road access to site Ground stability; Potential future flood risk Flood risk (risk assessment and proposals in place) Proximity to sewage works Adjacent to Conservation Area Landraising; freeboard allowance on development Significant loss of greenspace
Development brief for retention of extant buildings Proximity to Conservation Area Geotechnical survey; SuDS; flood risk assessment;
24
Forthbank
1.07
D2
Flood risk
25 26 20 42 43 45
Carsebridge Road North North Castle Street Fairfield School Sunnyside Road Carsebridge Church Grove
4 0.45 0.39 5.25 17.6 1.6
C3 A1 C3 A2 A3 C2
CLACKMANNAN AND KENNET 57 80 North Street/Main Street Dumyat Business Park Phase 2
0.1 A3 Development brief
TULLIBODY, GLENOCHIL AND CAMBUS

10.8 D4 Appropriate Assessment may be
16
Site information
Site constraints
Mitigation
Major
Moderate
Minor
potential for impacts on protected species HSE risk zone associated with adjacent bonded warehouses Partially within safeguarded open space although compatible with proposed use Flood risk Listed Building on site Proximity to Ochil Hills AGLV Flood risk Flood risk (common to much of central Alva) Existing hotel building on site Listed Building on site; potential for bats in building Flood risk; topography Proximity to Ochil Hills AGLV Potential for archaeological remains
required development could result in loss of winter grazing for pink-footed goose (SPA interest) or pollution; Flood risk assessment; SuDS Low sensitivity development (e.g. industry) likely to be acceptable to HSE
81 77 89 ALVA 99 100 101 103 106 108
Station Road (west side) The Orchard, Tullibody Abercromby Place
0.5 0.37 0.56
A4 B2 B1
Beauclerc Street Park Street Brook Street/Back Road Former Alva Glen Hotel Glentana Alva Cemetery
1.13 1.9 0.3 0.1 1.3 1.3
D2 A3 C4 B3 A2 C4
Flood risk assessment; development bried
Flood risk assessment Appropriate use and design solution; offsite flood attenuation Bat survey; development brief Flood risk assessment / hydrological survey; landraising; archaeological assessment Flood risk assessment (impacts likely to be mitigated by site topography and appropriate siting of buildings) Local character; loss of views to Ochil Hills; potential for impacts on archaeological remains; loss of prime agricultural land Archaeological desk-based assessment / watching brief Flood risk assessment; on-site water management; development brief Flood defences transferring impacts up/downstream Flood risk assessment; avoidance of atrisk area; development brief to ensure preservation of historic character and appropriate water management Flood risk assessment (on-site mitigation through defence unlikely to be feasible) Expansion of Dollar settlement boundary; Undeveloped site therefore some archaeological SuDS; archaeological desk-based assessment and watching brief
TILLICOULTRY AND COALSNAUGHTON 115 Devonpark Mills

0.23 B2 Future flood risk
118
Coalsnaughton North
12
D2
120 126 132 131
Devonpark Mills Sterling Mills Outlet Village Community Centre site Upper Mill Street
0.8 1.9 0.75 1.09
C2 D3 B3 C1 Flood risk
Flood risk
Existing mill buildings on site
Flood risk
Remains of mill buildings on site
DOLLAR 138 141 Dollar Golf Club Kellybank

0.08 2.2 D2 Flood risk Dollar Conservation Area Potential for future flood risk
C1
17
Site information
Site constraints
Mitigation
Major
Moderate
Minor
potential
MUCKHART AREA 145 97 Muckhart cemetery extension Glenochil Yeast

2.2 C4 Adjacent watercourses Ochil Hills AGLV; Muckhart Conservation Area Potential additional run-off Future flood risk; Access via level crossing; potential for impacts on priority species SEPA 50m watercourse buffer
RURAL AREA
5.5 B2 SuDS Part development of site Appropriate assessment may be required depending on whether site is used by SPA species and proposed use; Confine development to eastern part of site; SuDS Access improvement Part development of site Appropriate Assessment may be necessary although unlikely; On-site water management; Improved access Upgrading road access Potential impact on setting of Scheduled monument (unlikely) Undeveloped site potential for unrecorded archaeology Future flood risk Flood risk Future flood risk; Firth of Forth SPA/Ramsar/SSSI (potential loss of goose grazing habitat / direct impacts on water quality) Future flood risk Green Belt; Veteran trees in good condition Potential for presence of protected species; severance of Core Path network; impacts on character of area Greenfield site potential for impacts on unrecorded archaeology
151
Garvel Farm
20.2
D4
Flood risk (part of site)
17.7ha
153
Manor Powis
2.71
D3
Future flood risk; Access via level crossing Road access currently very poor also potential for disturbance of community Ochil Hills AGLV; adjacent to Mill Glen SSSI (although impacts unlikely)
c.1ha
154 156 50 155 158
Tillicoultry Quarry Former Devon Equestrian Centre Sauchie West/Tullygarth Sauchie Tower Bessie mine
10.8 24.5 22.5 2.2 8.3
C1
B1 A2 C1 Scheduled Monument (although conservation use) Green Belt (although use likely to be compatible)
Archaeological desk-based assessment Conservation Management Plan for site and environs (should be produced by developer) Make space for natural floodplain processes compatible with conservation use Appropriate Assessment may be required; flood risk assessment; avoidance of risk areas; SuDS; Archaeological desk-based assessment and watching brief Allow space for preservation of natural floodplain processes (compatible with conservation use) Development would inevitably result in loss of veteran trees;
A3
49
Alloa West (Orchard Farm)
39.5
D3
68
Tullygarth brickworks
9.9
A4
47
Braehead Golf Course
1.4
C3
18
Key to site information Site status Preferred Option Other
Proposed land use Business Business and housing Community and leisure Conservation Housing
POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF MITIGATION

3.3 As noted above, comparison of quartile bandings for pre- and post-mitigation scores are not instructive since the method always generates four bands containing approximately equal numbers of sites. It is therefore possible for a sites score to improve significantly, but remain in the same quartile band or even drop into a lower band due to changes to the other scores in the dataset. However, these rating are provided to maintain consistency and to provide an at-a-glance reference for the relative merits of each site. Instead, Table 3.2 below summarises the effects of idealised mitigation scenarios on the qualitative scores for each site and the relative improvement in overall scores (shown in the change column). Each sites rank within the dataset is also provided to illustrate the wider effects of applying mitigation to lower scoring sites. It is worth noting the effect which this has on sites where mitigation measures are not an option and where no change in score occurs without exception they drop at least one quartile band. (Sites with no change in score are indicated in grey in Table 3.2) As expected, applying the relevant mitigation measures results in a significant overall improvement in site scores with an average increase of 3.37 positive scores per site as the principal environmental issues are addressed. However, these scores should be taken only as an illustration of the potential success of generic solutions, as they are not based on detailed analysis of individual requirements or site-specific conditions.
3.4
3.5
19
Table 3.2: Comparison of pre- and post-mitigation scores

Ref 2 3 5 6 10 11 12 13 14 18 22 23 24 25 26 20 42 43 45 57 80 81 77 89 Name Elm Grove Claremont Former College The Shore Alloa Co-op Health Centre Ashley Terrace Central Parkland Main Street, Sauchie Carsebridge Row Alloa Park Kelliebank/Bowhouse Forthbank Carsebridge Road North North Castle Street Fairfield School Sunnyside Road Carsebridge Church Grove North Street/Main Street Dumyat Business Park Phase 2 Station Road (west side) The Orchard, Tullibody Abercromby Place Pre-mitigation score Pre-mitigation rank Pre-mitigation band Post-mitigation score Post-mitigation rank Change Post-mitigation band
5.5 3.5 5 0.5 7.5 10 5 -0.5 4 3.5 9 2 0 2.5 9.5 2.5 7.5 6.5 3 6.5 -5.5 6 5 5.5
14 26 17 40 5 1 17 45 24 26 3 36 43 33 2 33 5 10 31 10 49 12 17 14
b1 c1 b2 d2 a2 a1 b2 d3 b4 c1 a2 c4 d2 c3 a1 c3 a2 a3 c2 a3 d4 a4 b2 b1
8.5 8.5 9.5 6 9 12 10 7 5.5 9 9 8 6 9 10 7 11.5 11.5 3.5 6.5 3 6 5 5.5
15 15 8 28 11 1 5 21 32 11 11 18 28 11 5 21 2 2 44 24 45 28 35 32
3 5 4.5 5.5 1.5 2 5 7.5 1.5 5.5 0 6 6 6.5 0.5 4.5 4 5 0.5 0 8.5 0 0 0
b2 b2 a4 c1 b1 a1 a2 b3 c2 b1 b1 b2 c1 b1 a2 b3 a2 a2 d1 b4 d2 c1 c2 c2
20
99 100 101 103 106 108 115 118 120 126 132 131 138 141 145 97 151 153 154 156 50 155 158 49 68 47
Beauclerc Street Park Street Brook Street/Back Road Former Alva Glen Glentana Alva Cemetery Devonpark Mills Coalsnaughton North Devonpark Mills Sterling Mills Outlet Village Community Centre site Upper Mill Street Dollar Golf Club Kellybank Muckhart cemetery extension Glenochil Yeast Garvel farm Manor Powis Tillicoultry Quarry Former Devon Equestrian Centre Sauchie West/Tullygarth Sauchie Tower Bessie mine Alloa West (Orchard Farm) Tullygarth brickworks Braehead Golf Course
0.5 7 1 4.5 7.5 2 5 0.5 3 -4 4.5 3.5 0 3.5 2 5 -13.5 -5 4 3.5 9 3.5 7 -5 6 2.5
40 8 39 22 5 36 17 40 31 46 22 26 43 26 36 17 50 47 24 26 3 26 8 47 12 33
d2 a3 d1 b3 a2 c4 b2 d2 c2 d3 b3 c1 d2 c1 c4 b2 d4 d3 b4 c1 a2 c1 a3 d3 a4 c3
8.5 8 4.5 4.5 9.5 6 5.5 1 5 -1.5 4.5 4.5 1 6.5 4 8 -1 4.5 6.5 4.5 9.5 4.5 11.5 6.5 10 3.5
15 18 37 37 8 28 32 47 35 50 37 37 47 24 43 18 49 37 24 37 8 37 2 24 5 46
8 1 3.5 0 2 4 0.5 0.5 2 2.5 0 1 1 3 2 3 12.5 9.5 2.5 1 0.5 1 4.5 11.5 4 1
b2 b2 c3 c3 a4 c1 c2 d3 c2 d4 c3 c3 d3 b4 d1 b2 d4 c3 b4 c3 a4 c3 a2 b4 a2 d2
21
4
4.1 4.2
Comparison with previous appraisal sites

As the same methodology was deployed for successive phases of assessment, direct comparison between groups of sites is possible. The index scores (i.e. the balance of positive and negative scores) for all sites were combined and analysed using the method outlined in paragraph 2.10.
4.3
Equivalence with MIR sites Although several of the sites assessed during the previous phase of work are broadly similar to those in the wider MIR site group (those sites not assessed as part of this project), scores have not been transferred as boundary changes could introduce or remove key environmental constraints, thereby altering the scores against SEA objectives.
Table 4.1: Sites from previous assessment with MIR equivalents
Previous site ID ref. 2 3 11 27 33 22 29 30 31 17 32 4 12 13 14 1 18 28 25 36 37 23a 8c 8a Address_1 West Earlsfield Earlsfield Kennetpans Middletonkerse Oak Mills Upper Hillfoot Road Land at North side of A91 Land east of Land south of Alloa North West Alloa East (1) Helensfield Meadowend Farm Kilbagie (north) Lornshill Farm Devonside East Menstrie East Gartknowie, former opencast site Lornshill farm steading Redwell Dollar (South) Land south of Brook Street Land south of Brook Street The Glen Glenochil James Place Branshill Carsebridge Middletonkerse Lower Mill Street Hillfoot Road Devonpark West side of Address_2 Earlsfield South Earlsfield 1 Address_3 Alloa Alloa Clackmannan Menstrie Tillicoultry Dollar Muckhart Pool of Muckhart Pool of muckhart Coalsnaughton Sauchie Alloa Clackmannan Clackmannan Clackmannan Alloa Coalsnuaghton Menstrie Forestmill Lornshill Stirling road Devon Road Brook Street Brook Street Alloa Alloa Dollar Alva Alva MIR equivalent site 41 40 157 92 127 140 146 144 146 128 15 8 59 72 71 46 129 98 150 9 44 143 114 113
22
Previous site ID ref. 24a 24b 8b 8b
Address_1 Forestmill Forestmill Alva west 1(north of A91) Alva west 1(north of A91)
Address_2
Address_3 Forestmill Forestmill
MIR equivalent site 147 149 110 111
Balquharn Balquharn
Alva Alva
4.4
Relative scores Table 4.2 below sets out the index scores and highlights the level of constraint for the MIR and previous Local Plan Alteration sites. It clearly illustrates that the majority of sites that could be classed as acceptable for development without significant mitigation are derived from the MIR group. Of the sites rated A1-B4 (those scoring greater than the median), the MIR group represented 38 of 45 possible sites.
This is as generally expected, as the MIR group largely brownfield, urban sites performed better than those assessed for the LP Alteration, which were often far larger and in greenfield locations. However, it should be noted that no additional assessment work of the LP Alteration sites was undertaken as part of this commission. Judgements are therefore based on environmental information available at the time and there is the potential for changes to have occurred in the interim. Table 4.2: MIR and Local Plan Alteration sites, ranked by score
Site ID SCORE Rank Score band a1 a1 a1 a1 a2 a2 a2 a2 a2 a2 a2 a2 a3 a3 a3 a3 a3 Overriding constraints Major constraints Moderate Minor constraints constraints
4.5
Local Plan Alteration sites indicated in bold
MIR 11 MIR 26 MIR 22 MIR 50 MIR 10 MIR 42 MIR 106 MIR 100 MIR 158 4 5 36 MIR 43 MIR 57 MIR 81 MIR 68 37
10 9.5 9 9 7.5 7.5 7.5 7 7 7 7 7 6.5 6.5 6 6 6
1 2 3 3 5 5 5 8 8 8 8 8 13 13 15 15 15
23
Site ID
SCORE Rank
Score band a4 a4 a4 a4 b1 b1 b1 b1 b1 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b3 b3 b3 b3 b3 b3 b4 b4 b4 b4 b4 c1 c1 c1 c1 c1 c2 c2 c2 c2 c2 c2
Major constraints
Moderate Minor constraints constraints
MIR 2 MIR 89 MIR 156 17 MIR 5 MIR 12 MIR 77 MIR 115 MIR 97 MIR 103 MIR 132 MIR 14 MIR 154 MIR 3 MIR 18 MIR 131 MIR 141 MIR 155 MIR 45 MIR 120 MIR 25 MIR 20 MIR 47 7 MIR 23 MIR 108 MIR 145 MIR 101 18 MIR 6 MIR 99 MIR 118 2 3 MIR 24 MIR 138 MIR 13 32 34 6
5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5 5 5 5 5 4.5 4.5 4 4 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3 3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2 2 2 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0 0 -0.5 -1 -2 -2.5
18 18 18 18 22 22 22 22 22 27 27 29 29 31 31 31 31 31 36 36 38 38 38 38 42 42 42 45 45 47 47 47 47 47 52 52 54 55 56 57
24
Site ID
SCORE Rank
Score band c2 c3 c3 c3 c3 c3 c4 c4 c4 c4 d1 d1 d1 d2 d2 d2 d2 d2 d2 d2 d2 d2 d2 d3 d3 d3 d3 d4 d4 d4 d4 d4 d4
Major constraints
Moderate Minor constraints constraints
33 12 1 MIR 126 10 16 19 28 MIR 153 MIR 49 MIR 80 8b 20 23a 23b 27 35 29 13 31 8a 21 30 8c 9 22 15 MIR 151 11 26 14 24b 24a
-2.5 -3 -3.5 -4 -4 -4 -4.5 -4.5 -5 -5 -5.5 -5.5 -5.5 -6 -6 -6 -6 -6.5 -7 -7 -8 -8 -8 -9 -9.5 -10.5 -12.5 -13.5 -14.5 -15.5 -17 -17.5 -18.5
57 59 60 61 61 61 64 64 66 66 68 68 68 71 71 71 71 75 76 76 78 78 78 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
4.6
Figure 4.1 below illustrates the spatial correlation of the above sites and those without an equivalent MIR site.
25
Figure 4.1: Correlation of MIR and previously assessed sites
26
Figure 4.2: Comparison of MIR and previous assessment site scores
27
5
5.1
Conclusions and recommendations

The project brief required the selection of sites most, and least, suitable for development. This section of the report sets out LUCs conclusions in this regard and makes recommendations with regard to securing mitigation on sites which are currently severely constrained. This section deals only with the MIR assessment group of sites.
5.2
SITES WITH POTENTIAL FOR DEVELOPMENT

5.3 The assessed sites are grouped by performance against SEA objective and level of addition constraint. Where overriding' constraints have been identified, sites have been rejected due to the likely difficulties in satisfactorily mitigating impacts. Any exceptions to this rule are highlighted.
5.4
High scores, low constraints The following sites have clear potential for development, as they perform well against the SEA objectives, generating high numbers of positive scores with few obvious environmental impacts, and are not subject to significant additional constraints. This group should represent the first choice
Table 5.1: Sites with clear potential for proposed development
MIR ID SCORE Rank
Score band a1 a2 a2
Overriding
Major
Moderate
Minor
Commentary
Future flood risk must be addressed to safeguard much of waterfront Alloa site will therefore benefit
26 22
9.5 9 9
2 3 3
50
( )
10
7.5 7.5 7 5.5 5 5 5 4.5
5 5 8 14 17 17 17 22
a2 a2 a3 b1 b2 b2 b2 b3
42 100 2 5 77 97 132
Site is in the Green Belt, however likely use of site for playing fields etc. associated with Lornshill Academy will be generally compatible Development likely to enhance adjacent Conservation area, particularly in relation to current building on site Future flood risk easily addressed through design of development safeguarding likely risk area in open space
Minor impacts from additional runoff easily addressed through requirement for SuDS system
29
5.5
(Where constraints are indicated by ( ) it is unlikely they will present a significant issue, but have been highlighted for consistency).
5.6
High scores, moderate constraints The following group of sites return similarly positive scores against the SEA objectives but are subject to additional constraints. Relatively low level mitigation measures will be required to ensure proposed developments convey positive environmental effects.
Table 5.2: Sites with good potential for proposed development and requiring low-level mitigation
Score Overriding band
MIR ID SCORE Rank
Major
Moderate
Minor
Commentary
11
10
a1
106
7.5
a2
158
a3
( )
81
12
a4
68
12
a4
( )
89 156
5.5 5.5 5 5
14 14 17 17
b1 b1 b2 b2
12
115
103
4.5
22
b3
Preparation of Development Brief for site should ensure proposals retain Listed Building and design enhances Conservation Area Development Brief required to ensure appropriate protection and enhancement of Listed school building Conservation use of site should be compatible with making space for natural flooding processes without compromising environmental quality or likely enhancements Influence of HSE risk zone (inner) on range of developments possible on site however, industrial use likely to be acceptable Conservation use of site likely to be compatible with sustainable flood management on site. Making space for natural floodplain processes should be a priority for enhancement. Safeguarded open space on site likely to be compatible with proposed use Development of site as animal rescue centre unlikely to have a detrimental effect on the setting of SM Preparation of development brief prioritising retention of historic hospital building Future flood risk can be mitigated through appropriate design of residential development locating on higher ground Although at risk of flooding, the site is currently developed and lies in central Alva. Any mitigation solution would have to be town-wide and could not be implemented at single site level.
5.7
In general terms, development of these sites would have a positive effect on the environment of Clackmannanshire. The additional constraints identified through the assessment process should be relatively easy to mitigate through
30
the design and planning process, rather than requiring extensive retro-fitted solutions. Positive planning measures, such as the production of Development Briefs for sensitive sites, will provide a measure of certainty and clear guidance on expected standards for prospective developers. 5.8 Site 103, the former Alva Glen Hotel, lies within southeast Alva and is, like much of this area of the town, at significant risk from flooding. Mitigation cannot be applied at the site-specific level and could not reasonably be secured through redevelopment of the site. However, proposals for reuse or redevelopment of the site will have to take this risk into account and make use of creative design solutions to reduce the potential impact of flooding on residents or users of the development. The views of SEPA will be critical in ensuring any proposal is appropriate and is not at undue risk.
5.9
Lower scores, less significant constraints While the sites listed below do not return particularly high scores against the SEA objectives, they are not subject to significant constraints and could make a positive contribution to land supply and the environment with limited mitigation.
Table 5.3: Lower scoring sites with development potential
MIR ID SCORE Rank
Score band c1
Overriding
Major
Moderate
Minor
Commentary
Sensitive design of proposed development should effectively mitigate likely effects through the preservation of key views and provision of well-designed open space Adverse effects largely related to greenfield location.
3.5
26
141
3.5
26
c1
( )
155
3.5
26
c1
( )
45
31
c2
Proposals must take into account potential for future flood risk and incorporate sensitive planting and landscape design to ensure development is rooted in the landscape. While presence of SM is, strictly, a major constraint the continued Conservation use of the site is unlikely to have a significant impact any physical works will require SM Consent from the Scottish Ministers. Developing only part of the site could obviate the majority of negative scores
5.10
Site 155 is an obvious anomaly, as it is subject to a major constraint the presence of a Scheduled Monument on site. However, as the proposed use is continued conservation of the monument (Sauchie Tower) in practice impacts are unlikely. Any proposed works to the Tower will require Scheduled Monument Consent from Scottish Ministers, which will ensure that the character and significance of the monument are preserved. Sites requiring more extensive mitgation The following sites have some potential for development however, because of their lower assessment scores and/or additional constraints, they may require
5.11
31
more extensive mitigation measures to ensure positive environmental outcomes.
5.12
Moderate scores, minor-moderate constraints While development of these sites could convey a broadly positive overall effect, some
Table 5.4: Sites with potential for development where mitigation can be guaranteed
MIR ID SCORE Rank
Score band c1
Overriding
Major
Moderate
Minor
Commentary
Geotechnical investigations and avoidance of areas likely to be affected by future flood risk should enable residential development on the site Detailed flood risk assessment is necessary to determine the actual risk to the site as is elevated and may be partially protected by stone revetment and made ground on which the former mills were built. Preparation of a development brief could ensure that proposals retain surviving elements of historic fabric. Preparation of a development brief could secure appropriate schemes which conserve and enhance historic interest; Appropriate on-site water management could avoid future flooding impacts from adjacent watercourses Retention of school building should be prioritised if possible; would avoid cultural heritage impacts and preserve character of area Subject to significant flood risk, has a SM on site and is adjacent to Firth of Forth SPA. However, redevelopment is unlikely to result in additional impacts on SM or SPA, and flood risk is likely to be addressed to safeguard existing industry Application of SEPA standards for cemetery development should avoid any potential pollution issues (NB. assessment does not include potential impacts of proposed land-raising to mitigate possible flooding issues insufficient detail available) Application of SEPA standards for cemetery development should avoid potential pollution issues (and also deal with potential flood risk) although a relatively small area will remain for cemetery expansion.
18
3.5
26
131
3.5
26
c1
25
2.5
33
c3
20
2.5
33
c3
23
36
c4
( )
108
36
c4
145
36
c4
5.13
The mitigation measures proposed to enable development on these sites should not prove an unnecessary burden on prospective developers and
32
would convey significant environmental benefits. The two cemetery expansion sites (108 and 145) will be subject to necessary assessments to satisfy SEPA of acceptability in relation to impacts on surface and groundwater. Should these assessments indicate that impacts are unlikely, the sites should be considered to be acceptable. Exceptions Site 23, although identified as being subject to overriding flood risk, is currently in industrial use and is likely to benefit from enhanced flood protection measures as the area is an important economic asset. Similarly, as the site is already wholly in industrial use, any redevelopment is unlikely to generate additional impacts on the designated interests of the Firth of Forth SPA or the Alloa Glassworks Cone Scheduled Monument. However, operational impacts will be largely dependent on the proposed use and could be less significant than historical levels, but could equally be the same or more severe than at present. The possibility of short-term, but potentially significant, impacts during the construction phase may be of particular importance. Appropriate Assessment may be required for developments that would represent a major change in scale or type of use of the site.
5.14
5.15
High scores, major constraints Although this site performs well against the SEA objectives, significant additional constraints must be overcome before its development potential can be released.
Table 5.5: Sites with good potential for development, but requiring significant mitigation
MIR ID SCORE Rank
Score band
Overriding
Major
Moderate
Minor
Commentary
Redevelopment of site would convey significant benefits to Conservation Area however, development brief required to ensure appropriate protection and enhancement of historic building on site.
57
6.5
10
a3
5.16
The extant Co-operative Building, while not Listed, is an important aspect of local character and should be retained if possible. This potentially limits the range of development that would be suitable on the site.
5.17
Moderate scores, major constraints The sites listed below have some development potential, but are likely to require extensive mitigation to realise this potential.
Table 5.6: Sites with some development potential, but requiring extensive mitigation
MIR ID SCORE Rank
Score band
Overriding
Major
Moderate
Minor
Commentary
33
14 154 120
4 4 3
24 23 29
b4 b4 c2
Potential land stability issues related to minerals extraction in the area Potential business/industrial use strongly constrained by fragile road access and nature of site Site partially at risk of flooding
5.18
For the purposes of the assessment, it is assumed that Site 154 Tillicoultry Quarry will not be subject to continued mineral extraction but will be put to another industrial/business use. Potential uses are strongly constrained by the very poor road access through Tillicoultry which, if heavy use is required, could result in significant adverse impacts on the community and would also necessitate major upgrading of the local road network. Similarly, the nature of the site is likely to limit the range of uses that would be appropriate as the floor of the quarry is likely to be in deep shade throughout much of the day. Should the Council have particular aspirations for the site, the preparation of a development brief or masterplan could stimulate /steer appropriate and innovative solutions.
5.19
Low scoring sites The following sites have some potential to be developed in a sustainable manner, but currently require proactive measures to be put in place to avert the potential for adverse environmental effects.
Table 5.7: Sites where significant mitigation could release limited development potential
MIR ID SCORE Rank
Score band
Overriding
Major
Moderate
Minor
Commentary
While part of the site is currently at risk from flooding a risk that will increase with climate change the majority of the site could safely be developed.
99
0.5
40
d2
118
0.5
40
d2
0.5
40
d2
( )
153
-5
47
d3
The preparation of a development brief for the site, highlighting the preservation and enhancement of the Listed Building, safeguarding of the Alva Glen access facilities and avoiding flood risk could enable positive development Site returns a low score because it is in a greenfield location and is intrinsically less sustainable than brownfield development closer to major centres of population Site within both fluvial and marine flood risk zone (NB assessment does not include proposed land-raising) The site suffers from poor accessibility and development could result in release of pollutants from colliery spoil into the River Forth. Risk could be largely avoided by only developing eastern portion of site. Any significant development would require enhancement of railway crossing
34
5.20
While returning a low overall score, Site 118 has considerable potential for development. However, as a greenfield site on prime agricultural land, it is significantly less sustainable than the majority of brownfield sites examined in the course of the assessment hence its low rank. The potential exists to avoid flooding impacts on the other sites by excluding at-risk areas from development and ensuring that proposals convey wider benefits which could offset any risk. Site 99 could be developed where suitable provision is made to secure a sustainable future for the Listed building on site and where flood risk can be appropriately mitigated. It is our understanding that Site 6 has been subject to detailed flood risk assessment and active development proposals incorporate sufficient mitigation to satisfy SEPA. No information is available as to whether other identified impacts can be satisfactorily addressed.
5.21
5.22
SITES CURRENTLY UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT

5.23 The following sites are either subject to constraints that cannot be mitigated without major interventions, or do not convey sufficient positive benefits to the area or sometimes a combination of the two. The sites listed below are currently unsuitable for development and would either require major mitigation measures which could have significant environmental impacts in their own right or would result in unjustifiable impacts. Table 5.8: sites unsuitable for development
MIR ID SCORE Rank Score band a3
5.24
Commentary
Site almost entirely within flood risk zone defence would increase downstream risk Development of site would inevitably lead to loss of veteran trees potential for presence of bats. Would result in expansion of settlement into Green Belt. Small site almost entirely within flood risk zone (where SEPA data corrected to stream corridor) defence would increase downstream risk Detailed flood risk assessment could unlock development potential Site lies within flood risk zone, is adjacent to the Oil and Gas Pipeline safeguarding zone and is situated next to a large sewage works. It is also spanned by high voltage power lines. These factors significantly constrain development potential Site is largely within the flood risk zone although use as Golf Clubhouse potentially at less risk than residential development
43
6.5
10
47
2.5
33
c3
101
39
d1
24
43
d2
138
43
d2
35
13 126
-0.5 -4
45 46
d3 d3
49
-5
47
d3
80
-5.5
49
d4
151
-13.5
50
d4
Development would result in loss of open space resource and possible historic designed landscape features Site is almost entirely within fluvial flood risk zone defence would significantly increase downstream risk The site is likely to be at considerable risk of flooding as a result of climate change. Development could also result in a loss of grazing habitat for overwintering wildfowl (notified interest of the adjacent SPA) Site is largely within the fluvial flood risk zone. Development could result in loss of grazing habitat for overwintering wildfowl and could potentially generate pollution At least 30% of site within flood risk zone. Development could result in loss of habitat for overwintering wildfowl; Site is currently only accessible via small-scale level crossing, therefore any significant commercial development would have to be accompanied with provision of bridge
5.25
Impacts on Natura 2000 sites A number of sites (49, 80 and 151) above have incurred negative scores for potential impacts on the Firth of Forth SPA/Ramsar/SSSI. Appropriate Assessment may reveal that impacts are unlikely however a precautionary approach has been applied for the purposes of this assessment. Flood risk Sites 24, 49 and 151 above (in addition to Site 23, 6 and 153) are subject to significant risk of marine flooding either now or as a result of climate change and cannot readily be developed without addressing this issue. Although there are likely to be improvements in Alloas marine defences potentially protecting 6 and 23 any wider development of hard defence is likely to place unsustainable pressure on sensitive intertidal habitats, such as salt marsh, through the effects of coastal squeeze. There may be opportunities to set the limited development of these sites in the context of a broader strategy for the Firth of Forth which includes making space for managed realignment to allow internationally significant habitats to move inland as sea levels rise. Sites 43, 101, 138, 126 and 80 are at significant risk of fluvial flooding, which creates rather different issues relating to reductions in the buffering capacity of floodplains to accommodate floodwaters and attenuate the destructive effects of severe weather events. Development in these locations could necessitate the construction of additional hard defences which, in turn, transfers impacts to downstream assets and communities. Given the availability of good quality, sustainable sites available for development across Clackmannanshire, it is recommended that this group of sites be rejected.
5.26
5.27
5.28
36
37
39
Clackmannanshire Main Issues Report

Site Assessments APPENDIX 1 Prepared for Clackmannanshire Council by Land Use Consultants
August 2010
www.landuse.co.uk
LUC SERVICES
Environmental Planning Landscape Design Landscape management Masterplanning Landscape Planning Ecology Environmental Assessment Rural Futures Digital design Urban Regeneration Urban Design
43 Chalton Street London NW1 1JD Tel: 020 7383 5784 Fax: 020 7383 4798 london@landuse.co.uk
14 Great George Street Bristol BS1 5RH Tel: 0117 929 1997 Fax: 0117 929 1998 bristol@landuse.co.uk
28 Stafford Street Edinburgh EH3 7BD Tel: 0131 202 1616 edinburgh@landuse.co.uk
CONTENTS
MIR 2 ELM GROVE ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 MIR 3 CLAREMONT ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 MIR 5 FORMER COLLEGE ........................................................................................................................................................................... 12 MIR 6 THE SHORE ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 MIR 10 ALLOA CO-OP ............................................................................................................................................................................... 21 MIR 11 HEALTH CENTRE ........................................................................................................................................................................... 25 MIR 12 ASHLEY TERRACE........................................................................................................................................................................... 29 MIR 13 CENTRAL PARKLAND .................................................................................................................................................................... 33 MIR 14 MAIN STREET, SAUCHIE ................................................................................................................................................................. 37 MIR 18 CARSEBRIDGE ROW ...................................................................................................................................................................... 41 MIR 22 ALLOA PARK .................................................................................................................................................................................. 45 MIR 23 KELLIEBANK/BOWHOUSE .............................................................................................................................................................. 49 MIR 24 FORTHBANK .................................................................................................................................................................................. 53 MIR 25 CARSEBRIDGE ROAD NORTH........................................................................................................................................................ 57 MIR 26 NORTH CASTLE STREET ................................................................................................................................................................ 62 MIR 42 SUNNYSIDE ROAD ......................................................................................................................................................................... 70 MIR 43 CARSEBRIDGE ................................................................................................................................................................................ 75 MIR 45 CHURCH GROVE ........................................................................................................................................................................... 80 MIR 57 NORTH STREET/MAIN STREET ....................................................................................................................................................... 84 MIR 80 DUMYAT BUSINESS PARK PHASE 2 ................................................................................................................................................. 88 MIR 81 STATION ROAD (WEST SIDE) ........................................................................................................................................................ 93 MIR 77 THE ORCHARD, TULLIBODY ......................................................................................................................................................... 97 89 ABERCROMBY PLACE ....................................................................................................................................................................... 101 99 BEAUCLERC STREET ......................................................................................................................................................................... 105 100 PARK STREET.................................................................................................................................................................................. 109 101 BROOK STREET/BACK ROAD ......................................................................................................................................................... 113 103 FORMER ALVA GLEN HOTEL .......................................................................................................................................................... 117 106 GLENTANA .................................................................................................................................................................................... 121 108 ALVA CEMETERY ............................................................................................................................................................................ 125 MIR 115 DEVONPARK MILLS .................................................................................................................................................................... 130 MIR 118 COALSNAUGHTON NORTH...................................................................................................................................................... 135 MIR 120 DEVONPARK MILLS .................................................................................................................................................................... 140 MIR 126 STIRLING MILLS OUTLET VILLAGE .............................................................................................................................................. 145 MIR 132 COMMUNITY CENTRE SITE ........................................................................................................................................................ 149 MIR 131 UPPER MILL STREET .................................................................................................................................................................... 153 MIR 138 DOLLAR GOLF CLUB .................................................................................................................................................................. 159 MIR 141 KELLYBANK................................................................................................................................................................................ 163 MIR 145 MUCKHART CEMETERY EXTENSION.......................................................................................................................................... 167 MIR 97 GLENOCHIL YEAST ...................................................................................................................................................................... 171 MIR 151 GARVEL FARM ............................................................................................................................................................................ 175 MIR 153 MANOR POWIS .......................................................................................................................................................................... 179 MIR 154 TILLICOULTRY QUARRY ............................................................................................................................................................ 183 MIR 156 FORMER DEVON EQUESTRIAN CENTRE .................................................................................................................................... 187 MIR 50 SAUCHIE WEST/TULLYGARTH ..................................................................................................................................................... 191 MIR 155 SAUCHIE TOWER ....................................................................................................................................................................... 195 MIR 158 BESSIE MINE ................................................................................................................................................................................ 199 MIR 49 ALLOA WEST (ORCHARD FARM) ................................................................................................................................................. 203 MIR 68 TULLYGARTH BRICKWORKS ....................................................................................................................................................... 207 MIR 47 BRAEHEAD GOLF COURSE........................................................................................................................................................... 211
Site reference and location: Size (ha) Size (group) Summary description including site access and public transport connections Overriding constraints to development Site specific investigations Constraints to development Summary of area remaining following mitigation Environmental features Site ownership: Site type: Current land use Surrounding land use Planning policy framework:
MIR 2 ELM GROVE

1.3
Former local authority medium-rise housing site, now cleared and in use as informal open space. Some mature trees survive on site Site is well-served by bus routes and the local path network None Protected species survey (bats) Potential for protected species (bats using mature trees)
Peripheral to forest habitat network Local authority Preferred housing Informal open space (demolished tower blocks) Residential; school; playing fields; greenspace Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
There are no designated sites within the site. The Firth of Forth SPA/RAMSAR is approximately 1.4km away from the site. An area of the Forest habitat network lies adjacent to the site to the site (across a road). There are no other designated sites within 400m of the site. Mature trees, which may be of value to bats, are present on site There are no core paths within the site area. There are two core paths within 400m (250m and 300m away). The development of the site will not have an impact on the existing core path network. It would only have an impact of it includes additional core path links. Alloa and Sauchie include some of the most deprived areas in Clackmannanshire. The site lies within and adjacent to some of the most deprived areas (ranked 608, 92, and 117 respectively, out of 6, 505 1 being the most deprived). Development of the site could have a positive effect on deprivation through regeneration. The site lies adjacent to a large area of safeguarded recreational open space to the south, and within 1km of two others. A very large area of greenspace currently lies to the south of the site, although MIR sites 7,21 and 36 (preferred sites for housing) could remove much of this value There are two core paths within 400m of the site. The development of the site could have a positive effect on health if links were made with these open spaces and the core path network. Development of the site is not expected to increase risk of flooding is neither within nor adjacent to areas of fluvial or coastal flood risk identified by SEPA. There are no water courses within or adjacent to the site. There are water courses within 500m. There are no water courses within or adjacent to the site. There are water courses within 500m which could be affected by increased run-off from the development of the site. No although includes site of former tower blocks No
0/+ Potential creation of green links/stepping stones between different areas of forest habitat network. Safeguarding mature trees Development proposals could include new links to the core path network. Development of the site could be further enhanced by promoting links to core paths, recreational resources and centres of employment.
0/+
Is the site at risk of flooding? Water Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land Soil Is the site prime agricultural land Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport?
0 0 Any increases in runoff should be mitigated wherever possible through the use of SuDS and permeable surface treatment
0/-
0/+
0 Redevelopment should ensure connections are enhanced
The site is well served by the local path network which links it to the town and the wider core path network Yes, Forth Crescent is served by relatively frequent buses
+ 0/+
Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
No data It is likely that redevelopment would result in a small increase in traffic volumes. This would be a more serious cumulative issue should all MIR preferred sites in the area be developed The site is well-placed to allow residents to take advantage of sustainable transport networks No Yes as a previously high-density residential site, necessary services will already be in place The site is well-placed to ensure development can be located to maximise passive solar gain Urban site unsuitable for minerals development No There are no designated features of cultural heritage value within the site. Alloa House, which includes several archaeological sites, lies just over 120m from the site boundary. Development of the site is not expected to have an effect on cultural heritage unless the scale of the buildings affects views from more distant cultural heritage features (such as the Conservation area which lies north of the site). Given the development history of the site, it is unlikely to have any significant archaeological potential No
0/-
+ 0 0 + 0 0 Development of the site should be sensitive to cultural heritage features in Alloa in terms of setting and views particularly Alloa Tower
Material Assets
Cultural Heritage
Landscape
Given the separation distance between the site and the nearest AGLV, the likelihood of visual impacts is minimal
No
View of adjacent social housing, showing extent of open space
Open space currently of relatively poor quality
MIR 3 CLAREMONT
4.5
Site of former Alloa Academy and associated playing fields. Located on the western fringe of Alloa, the site is well served by the local road network with bus routes accessible at a nearby junction.
Significant loss of green/open space; preservation of views to Stirling Castle, the Wallace Monument and the Ochils
Periphery of forest habitat network Local authority Preferred, housing School (redundant); playing fields Residential; golf course (Greenbelt) Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
No
The site includes a small area of forest habitat network (1km dispersal) which could be adversely affected by development although impacts could easily be avoided
0/-
Avoid development of the small area of forest habitat network. Potential to incorporate into landscaping for the site.
0/+
A section of the local core path network runs adjacent to the site, along the south and western edges. The development of the site would not have effect on this network provided construction did not involve temporary or permanent obstruction. The developed site could be linked to this network. Alloa and Sauchie include some of the most deprived areas in Clackmannanshire. The site lies within two of the least deprived areas in Alloa and Clackmannanshire, ranked at 4310 and 4533 (out of 6,505 1 being the most deprived). It lies adjacent to more deprived areas and within 1km of some of the most deprived areas in Clackmannanshire. Development of the site for housing could have a positive effect on this through regeneration. The site is adjacent to a large area of safeguarded open space to the south and the core path network. There is another area of safeguarded open space to the north of the site. However, development of the site would, in itself, result in the loss of a significant area of open space although as the site lies adjacent to open countryside this may be less of an issue The site is not at risk of flooding, it is not within or adjacent to an area identified by SEPA as at risk of fluvial or coastal flooding. No
0/+
0/-
Development of the site could be further enhanced by promoting links to core paths, recreational resources and centres of employment. Compensator y provision of open space should be considered
Is the site at risk of flooding? Water Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
0 0
No
Soil
No No The site lies adjacent to the core path network, with routes following the eastern and southern boundaries Bus routes are accessible at the nearby junction of Gean Road and Claremont No data
0 0 + 0/+
Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
It is possible that development could result in an increase in traffic volumes, particularly at peak times on smaller local routes.
0/-
Climatic Factors
It is possible that the proximity of the core path network and relatively easy access thereon to the town centre and rail station could reduce need for private car journeys No, although redevelopment should ensure levels of runoff are not increased The site is likely to have easy access to necessary services The site stands on a small hill which is relatively open to the southwest (although trees provide some screening). The site of a sufficient size and conducive shape to allow properties to be orientated to maximise passive solar gain Urban edge site unsuitable for minerals development
+ 0 0
Material Assets
No
Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Cultural Heritage Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains?
The Gean House South Lodge C(S) listed building lies across a road from the northern edge of the site. Development of the site would need to be sensitive to the setting of the building. No other designated cultural heritage features would be affected. However, it is unlikely that redevelopment would have a greater visual effect than the existing school facilities The site of the school buildings is likely to be heavily disturbed and of low archaeological potential. The playing fields may have a greater potential for remains although these are likely to have been subjected to considerable groundworks for levelling and drainage. It is therefore likely that development will have no significant impact on archaeological remains
Landscape
Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key
No Development of the site would fill in the edge profile of the settlement, changing the character of the area particularly when viewed from the golf course and Core Path network. Although the site is partly screened by trees, the open hilltop can be seen. Yes - At present, the site affords fine long views (framed by trees) to the Wallace Monument and Stirling Castle. To the north, the Ochils are a strong visual influence
0/-
0/-
transport routes?
on the site. These views should be preserved wherever possible
Demolition of school building in progress; Fine views of Ochils from site
Long, framed, views of Wallace Monument and Stirling Castle afforded by open, elevated location of playing field portion of site.
MIR 5 FORMER COLLEGE

5.5
Site of former Forth Valley College
None
FV College Preferred: housing Further education college (redundant); open space Residential Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
Enhancement and mitigation options Potential for provision of links between different areas of the forest habitat network near to the site.
There are no designated areas within the site boundary. The Firth of Forth SPA is approximately 1.7km away from the site.
The site is currently of relatively low biodiversity value, consisting largely of mown amenity grassland
0/-
Development should incorporate native planting and foster links with wider habitat networks
The site does not include links to the core path network. There are core path network links within 400m of the site Alloa and Sauchie include some of the most deprived areas in Clackmannanshire. The site lies within and adjacent to one of the less deprived areas, to the south, ranked 2658 (20.7 score) 4722 (9.9 score) respectively (out of 6,505 1 being the most deprived). It lies adjacent to more deprived areas and within 1km of some of the most deprived areas in Clackmannanshire. Development of the site for housing could have a positive effect on this through regeneration. There is an area of safeguarded recreational land approx 250 metres north of the site. However, redevelopment of the site itself is likely to result in net loss of publicly accessible open space No No
0/+
Development of the site could include recreational areas on site, as well as connections to existing sites as part of the wider green infrastructure network.
Is the site at risk of flooding? Water Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Air Quality and Transport Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at
0 0
No Not clear from data. Site is not designated as an area of prioritised land, but contains two prioritised features (possibly related to filled in ponds). No The site lies at some distance (by accessible routes) to the core path network A number of bus services are accessible on the nearby B908 No data
Soil
0 0 +
It is likely that redevelopment would result in a minor increase in traffic at peak times
key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
(although is likely that the College itself used to generate traffic)
No No The site is likely to be well provided with necessary services, given its previous use The E-W principal axis of the site should allow development to be orientated to maximise passive solar gain No urban site, unsuitable for minerals extraction
0 + 0
Material Assets
No
Cultural Heritage
There are no designated cultural heritage features within or adjacent to the site.
Development of the site would need to be sensitive to the setting of listed buildings.
The areas of the site overlain by existing buildings are likely to be of low archaeological potential. While the playing fields are likely to have been levelled and drained, they may be of greater sensitivity although no sites are recorded at this location. No It is unlikely that development of the site will result in a significant change in settlement character given the relatively modern. However, the significant area of open space around the college will be lost, changing the relatively open aspect of the surrounding housing Unlikely to result in any impacts on key views
Appropriate archaeological supervision for site preparation works
Appropriate design of new development
Landscape
Entrance to college complex relatively strong feature with structure planting
Bulk of college buildings currently dominates residential street
MIR 6 THE SHORE

4.9
Former industrial site on the banks of the River Forth. It is well served by the local road network and, being adjacent to the new Academy, can take advantage of public transport links. The site is currently vacant, the standing buildings having been cleared (demolition work on final remaining structure was underway at the time of site inspection). Flood risk (fluvial and marine); odour and other bad neighbour issues due to proximity to sewage works (abuts southe rn boundary) Archaeological assessment (check 2007 assessment); contamination assessment Site is wholly within the Old Alloa Conservation Area; potential contamination from previous industrial activities; potential for disturbance from adjacent industrial sites 0ha Adjacent to the River Forth CC/Sterling Stone/SEFV Preferred, housing Cleared former industrial estate and derelict piers School; residential; infrastructure (sewage works); industry Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
There are no designated areas within the site. The Firth of Forth SPA is approximately 466m but upstream from the site.
Given the sites location, impacts on the River Forth is perhaps the most significant risk particularly with the severe risk of flooding.
0/-
The site is not connected to the core path network. There is one link to this within 400m of the site (approx 230m to the east). Alloa and Sauchie include some of the most deprived areas in Clackmannanshire. The site lies within an area ranked at 1962 (out of 6,505 1 being the most deprived) with a score of 26. It lies adjacent to one of the most deprived areas in the council area (ranked at 92 with a score of 70.2), the other lying within 1km of the site. Development of the site could have a positive effect on deprivation through regeneration. The site is adjacent to a safeguarded recreational area and within 1km of another. The development of the site could have a positive effect on health if links were made with these open spaces and the core path network. The site is at significant risk of flooding. Approx 85% of the site falls within the SEPA Coastal area. A further 20% of the site falls within the area designated by SEPA as at risk of fluvial flooding. This should be considered to be an overriding constraint to housing development
0/+
--
Water
There do not appear to be any watercourses on the site, but it is adjacent to the Firth of Forth. This could be affected by pollution from the development of the site. There do not appear to be any watercourses on the site, but it is adjacent to the Firth of Forth. The site is already at significant risk of flooding. Additional flood risk resulting from the development of the site would not significantly alter this but would increase the risk of flooding. Yes - The entire site is covered by areas designated as prioritised sites. There may be issues with contamination stemming from previous industrial uses. Well-planned development could result in significantly improved environmental quality No.
--
Development of the site, including construction and operation, should ensure that any potential risk of pollution of the Firth of avoided.
--
Soil
Mitigation of contaminated land.
Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Air Quality and Transport Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Climatic Factors
The site is located in close proximity to the local path network Bowhouse Road is well served by public transport No data although the proximity to the sewage works is likely to result in nuisance from odour (this was found to be significant on inspection of the site although this will vary with wind strength and direction)
+ + --
It is possible that redevelopment of the site would contribute to higher levels of traffic in the area, particularly at peak times.
There is the potential for ease of access to the town centre and public transport routes to reduce unnecessary car journeys Yes the majority of the site lies within the marine flood risk zone, with a further 20% at additional risk from fluvial flooding. Additional risk from storm surge events as a result of increased frequency of severe weather events (and sea level rise) as a result of climate change. The site is likely to have access to necessary services The size of the site would facilitate orientation of new buildings to maximise the benefits of passive solar gain. However, being next to the river, the site is entirely exposed to the prevailing wind. No site unsuitable for minerals No designated hazard areas although the site is immediately adjacent to a sizeable sewage works and is therefore of limited suitability for housing
0/+
Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
--
Material Assets
0/+
0 -Development of the site would need to be sensitive to the characteristics of the Conservation area. However, the site in its current condition may be regarded as a significant blight on the quality and integrity of the CA appropriate development could result in significant improvement Archaeological investigations may be necessary prior to development to ensure remains are dealt with in according to relevant legislation and
Cultural Heritage
The entire site falls within the Old Alloa Conservation Area, which extends up beyond the site to the north Classified in 2002 as Not outstanding. Development of the site poses as significant risk to the Conservation area and archaeological sites.
--
0/-
Enhancement and mitigation options guidance.
Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
Located on the site of Old Alloa harbour, there is significant archaeological potential although much of this may have already been destroyed given the extensive development history. No As the site lies within the Old Alloa Conservation Area, redevelopment must take into account the townscape character and significant of the area. However, as the site is currently so degraded redevelopment is likely to constitute enhancement Development of the site may cut off views to the river from the neighbouring area and Alloa Academy although these are largely screened by vegetation. The site affords fine views upriver to Stirling Castle and the Wallace Monument these should be safeguarded by any development scheme
-0 Development should take on board guidance provided by the Conservation Area Assessment (if available)
0/+
Landscape
0/-
Extensive areas of hard-standing and dereliction on site
Views up Forth from viewpoint within site boundary
MIR 10 ALLOA CO-OP

0.46
Vacant supermarket and area of carpark. Site is in central Alloa and adjacent to the trunk road network and convenient public transport links
Conservation area close by
Co-Op Preferred site: Housing Supermarket Business Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
There are no designated areas within the site.
Given the location of the site, no impacts are likely
Potential creation of links between different areas of habitat network, though only one section is currently within 400m and it may not be suitable for a mixed use scheme. Development of the site should include links to the Core Path network.
The site is not connected to the Core Path Network. There is a stretch of the network within 200m of the site. Development of the site could have a positive impact on the network if connections were made to it. Alloa and Sauchie include some of the most deprived areas in Clackmannanshire (and Scotland as a whole). The site lies within one of the more deprived areas, ranked at 577(Ranked out of 6,505 1 being the most deprived) with a score of 47.5. It lies within 500m of some of the most deprived areas in the Clackmannanshire and Scotland as a whole (one ranked at 92 with a score of 70.2). Development of the site could have a positive effect on deprivation through regeneration. The site is well located in terms of existing open space resources, with several safeguarded recreational areas within 400m and beyond. No No No Housing development could potentially reduce the current area of hardstanding, reducing runoff No No The site is well served by the local path network The site is located adjacent to several roads that are well served with bus routes and is immediately opposite Alloa rail station No data although the town centre and trunk road location make this a possibility
0/+
Development of the site could be further enhanced by promoting links to core paths, recreational resources and centres of employment. Development of the site could include recreational areas on site, as well as connections to existing sites as part of the wider green infrastructure network.
Is the site at risk of flooding? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Air Quality and Transport Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
0 0 High quality landscaping could dramatically reduce runoff, and development could incorporate rainwater retention for non-drinking applications
Water
0/+
Soil
0 0 + +
0/-
Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
It is possible that redevelopment could contribute to increased traffic levels although the adjacent road network appears robust
0/-
Yes there is significant potential for residents/users to make use of public transport to displace car journeys No Yes The site is backed by existing buildings to the south and west, potentially shading any poorly planned development. However it should be possible to make use of solar gain depending on the nature of the proposal No town centre location precludes mineral extraction This site does not lie within any hazard areas. The site is fairly sensitive in terms of cultural heritage. The site is not within an area designated for cultural heritage and does not contain any designated cultural heritage features. However, it is adjacent to the category B listed Primrose Street and Primrose Place, former public baths and gymnasium, across a road to the north. The Old Alloa Conservation area is approximately 30 metres to the south/west and beyond. There are several listed buildings (mainly category c) within 400m of the study area, the nearest being Former County Offices, 70 Drysdale Street, 30 metres away in the Conservation Area. Despite the sites intensive development history, there is the potential for the preservation of buried archaeology. No The design of development could potentially affect the setting of the Old Alloa conservation area immediately to the west. However, redevelopment may constitute an improvement over the design of the existing buildings which are currently screened from the CA by other buildings fronting on to Drysdale Street No
Material Assets
0/-
Cultural Heritage
Development of the site would need to be sensitive to the listed buildings and nearby Conservation area.
Archaeological supervision would be required during site preparation works
0/-
Landscape
0/+
Former supermarket building makes up majority of site will require demolition
Adjacent car parking important local use proximity to station and town centre
MIR 11 HEALTH CENTRE

1.1
This site is located in the heart of Alloa, not far from the River Forth. It is well connected to the transport network, with the A907 and other main roads close by. It lies within the Alloa Glebe conservation area and is surrounded by several cultural heritage assets, with one listed building within its boundaries.
Protected species survey (bats) of standing buildings and mature trees Main roads on borders of site; located within Conservation Area with standing B-Listed buildings on site
NHS Forth Valley Preferred site: Housing Informal car parking; dumping of waste tarmac and other roadworks related materials. Residential; municipal buildings; railway Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
Does the site impact on designated site? Biodiversity, flora and fauna
There are no designated areas within the site. There are no other designations within 400m of the site. There area several areas of Forest habitat network within 400m of the site, but none within its boundary. It is unlikely that development here will impact on those areas close by. The site is currently of low biodiversity value, although standing buildings and mature trees should be inspected for the presence of bats The site is not connected to the core path network. There are several paths within 400m of the site, with several covering the large open space to the west of the site within 200m. Alloa and Sauchie include some of the most deprived areas in Clackmannanshire. The site lies within an area ranked at 4292 (out of 6,505 1 being the most deprived) with a score of 1.9. It lies 30m of a more deprived area, ranked at 433, and close to one of the most deprived areas in the council area (ranked at 92 with a score of 70.2). Development of the site could have a positive effect on deprivation in adjacent areas through regeneration. The site is well positioned in relation to existing safeguarded recreational open space, with several within 400metres. There is a large open space to the west, which is less than 100m away. The site lies outside the areas identified by SEPA as at risk of coastal and fluvial flooding. No No No areas classed as VDL although much of the site is essentially derelict. No The site is easily accessed by the local path network which connects the site to the wider area of and services within Alloa. The site is easily accessible by the local bus network No data
Development should create links to existing habitats, particularly along the adjacent railway corridor
0/+
Is the site at risk of flooding? Water Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Air Quality and Transport Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are
0/0 0 + 0
Soil
+ 0
It is unlikely that development here would significantly affect traffic flows.
close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes? The site in the heart of Alloa in an area that is easily accessible and therefore does not increase the need to travel. No The site is well positioned to take advantage of the infrastructure and services within Alloa. Given the relatively large size of the site, development could be orientated to benefit from passive solar gain. Urban location precludes minerals development This site does not lie within any hazard areas. The majority of the site lies within the Old Alloa Conservation Area, therefore redevelopment would have to respect the character and significance of the area. Similarly, there is a B-Listed building on site (in relatively good condition) which should be retained on both cultural heritage and sustainability grounds It is unlikely that development at this site will impact on archaeological remains. There are no landscape designations associated with the site. Development could have an impact on the character and significance of the Old Alloa Conservation Area. However, the derelict condition of the open area of the site is currently a blight on the CA and neighbouring Listed Buildings + 0 + + 0 0 Development must retain Listed building and contribute to the character of the Conservation Area
Material Assets
Cultural Heritage
--
0 0
Landscape
No
Listed building and mature trees on site
Site in use as informal carpark backs on to Town Hall and other historic buildings and currently detracts from their setting
MIR 12 ASHLEY TERRACE

0.6
The site is located in the heart of Alloa and is well connected to the existing transport network. The site comprises a fine Edwardian hospital building with more recent (c.1960s) extensions set opposite a row of contemporary villas. None
Character of existing urban area; historic building on site
NHS Forth Valley Preferred site: Housing Redundant hospital buildings Residential Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
There are no designated areas within the site. There area two areas of Forest habitat network within 400m of the site. It is unlikely development here would impact on these. However, given that the hospital buildings have been unused for a considerable period they should be inspected for the presence of bats. The site is not directly connected to the local core path network. However, a National Cycle Route/Core Path runs just over 200m to the east of the site, and there are several other links within 400m of the site. Alloa and Sauchie include some of the most deprived areas in Clackmannanshire. The site lies within an area ranked at 2625 (out of 6,505 1 being the most deprived) with a score of 20.9, and adjacent to a less deprived area ranked at 4722 (score of 9.9). Compared to some of the more southern sites, in the centre of Alloa, this area is slightly less deprived. There are pockets of deprivation throughout Alloa though, and development of the site could have a positive effect on deprivation through regeneration. There are two areas of safeguarded recreational open space across a road to the south of the site although one is a bowling green, while the other (although the size and shape of a bowling green) appears to be in less formal use. The development of the site could have a positive effect on health if links were made with these open spaces and the core path network. No No
0/-
Connectivity could be improved if the proposed development included a link to the core path network.
0/+
0/+
Is the site at risk of flooding? Water Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Air Quality and Transport Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local
0 0
No
Soil
The entire site is within an area of vacant or derelict land. No As the site is within Alloa, it is well connected to the local path network providing the site with a good level of access to local services. The site is in a good position to make use of the existing public transport services. No data It is unlikely that development would contribute significantly to traffic flows.
+ 0 + + 0 0
authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes? The site in the heart of Alloa in an area that is easily accessible and therefore does not increase the need to travel. No The site is well positioned to take advantage of the infrastructure and services within Alloa. The current buildings have a long south-facing aspect, which enables passive solar gain Urban setting inappropriate for minerals development The site does no lie within any hazard areas. The closest area is approximately 240m south of the site. While the Edwardian hospital building is not currently listed, it is a high quality building that could be converted to other uses. (Demolition of the modern extensions would be acceptable) The B-Listed Alloa Co-Operative Sports Pavilion lies outside the site to the south. It is unlikely that development here would impact on archaeological remains. No Demolition of the historic hospital buildings and redevelopment would have a significant impact on the character of the streetscape. Mature planting and boundary walls associated with the hospital are also a strong element of local character and should be retained. No Development retaining historic building and features could make a significant contribution to the quality and character of the local area 0 0 0 + + 0 0 Development of the site should be sensitive to the setting of the sports pavilion. Retention of Edwardian hospital building would safeguard character of the area and would be a more sustainable option
Material Assets
Cultural Heritage
--
++
Landscape
Modern extension to hospital unlikely to be readily converted at odds with townscape
Victorian/Edwardian hospital building in good condition and should be retained on built heritage and sustainability grounds
MIR 13 CENTRAL PARKLAND

1.01
This site is within the south east of Alloa. It is an area of open land within a residential area. It is well connected to the transport network and does not contain any cultural heritage assets or areas of priority habitats. It is not far from the River Forth, although not at risk from flooding, and is close to a large area of open space that expands beyond the nearby town of Clackmannan.
Loss of open space and relict designed landscape features (hedges and mature trees); proximity to Conservation Area
Local Authority Preferred site: Housing Open space Residential; open space Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
Enhancement and mitigation options Potential creation of green links/stepping stones between different areas of forest habitat network.
There are no other designated sites within 400m of the site.
0/+
An area of the Forest habitat network covers approximately 10% of the site, and there are other areas within 400m. Development here may have an impact and increase fragmentation between forest habitat areas.
0/-
The site is not connected to the core path network, but there are links to it within 200 metres of the site. Alloa and Sauchie include some of the most deprived areas in Clackmannanshire. The site lies within and adjacent to some of the most deprived areas (ranked 608, 92, and 117 respectively, out of 6,505 1 being the most deprived). This site is within a datazone that has been allocated a score of 46.53. Development of the site could have a positive effect on deprivation through regeneration. The site is currently open space in a social housing area. The development of the site could therefore lead to a loss of open space. The loss of any of the historic landscape features on site (yew hedges, giant redwoods on site boundary and other mature trees) or development that reduces their legibility would be a significant adverse impact. The site also partly includes a childrens play area
0/+
--
Any development of the site will result in loss of open space - remaining areas should be enhanced or improved, and connections made to nearby recreation areas and the local core path network.
Is the site at risk of flooding? Water Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Soil Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
Development of the site is not expected to increase risk of flooding as it is neither within nor adjacent to areas of fluvial or coastal flood risk identified by SEPA. There are no water courses within or adjacent to the site. There are no water courses within or adjacent to the site. However, as the site is entirely open space at present, any development will significantly increase the amount of runoff. No No The site is easily accessible via the local path network and is close the services within Alloa. The site is relatively well-served by public transport routes No data
0 0
0/-
0 0 + + 0
Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Material Assets Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
It is unlikely that development here would significantly impact on traffic flows.
Climatic Factors
The site is located near the outer edge of Alloa, but still within easy reach of local services and transport links. It is not likely that development here would increase the need to travel significantly. The site is not currently at risk of flooding and is unlikely to be at significantly greater risk if changes occur as a result of climate change. The site is well positioned to take advantage of the existing services and infrastructure of Alloa. A good degree of sunlight is likely to reach the site during daytime hours and it would be well sheltered by the houses around it. It is highly unlikely that development here would reduce future potential for mineral extraction as it is within an urban area. The site does not lie within any hazard areas. It is not within a designated area and does not include any designated or classified features. However, mature trees and yew hedges associated with the former site of Alloa House.
0 + + 0 0
Cultural Heritage
Development must preserve historic plantings and surviving alignments -Development of the site would need to be sensitive to the Conservation Area and the setting of features within it. 0/-
The Old Alloa Conservation Area, which covers much of the town centre, is approximately 100 metres away to the north west of the site. The site may be visible from the Conservation Area. The Alloa House archaeological site lies within 100meters of the site to the north. There is potential for the survival of archaeological remains particularly those associated with the main drive of (now demolished) Alloa House. No The open space that comprises the potential site is a resource with considerable potential for the surrounding community. The relict designed landscape features, if more widely recognised and suitably managed, could serve as an interesting link between the existing social housing and the historic landscape around Alloa Tower. Development would eliminate this opportunity for environmental improvement Development of the site would increase the sense of enclosure in the existing housing area, which currently benefits from the proximity of extensive open space (including play facilities). 0
--
Landscape
View up central axis (west to east) showing historic yew hedging and giant redwood
View to east of hedges and open space. Valuable recreation resource for adjacent social housing could be enhanced
MIR 14 MAIN STREET, SAUCHIE

0.3
Geotechnical survey Land stability; road access to site; loss of habitat/open space
Woodland and scrub vegetation Local Authority Preferred site: Housing Open space Residential Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
No No, but there area several areas of Forest habitat network within 400m of the site. It is unlikely that development here will impact on these. However, the site is potentially a useful habitat resource within the urban area, given the level of tree and vegetation cover. (The presence of priority species could not be confirmed) The site is not directly connected to the core path network, but there are sections in close proximity. The closest is approximately 70m away. Alloa and Sauchie include some of the most deprived areas in Clackmannanshire. The site lies within one of the more deprived areas (ranked 842 out of 6, 505 1 being the most deprived). The datazone the site is within has been allocated a score of 41.5. Other areas in the town centre to the south are more deprived. Development of the site could have a positive effect on deprivation through regeneration. An area of safeguarded recreational land lies across the road from the site to the west. There are other safeguarded recreational sites within 200m (to the south of the site, and a football field to the north east) and an area to Greenbelt to the north west. The site is approximately 120m from a large expanse of open space which is easily accessible via existing transport routes. However, development of the site would result in a net loss of open/greenspace (although it does not appear to have any formal use at present) The site lies outside the areas identified by SEPA as at risk from flooding. The nearest at risk areas are approximately 500 metres to the south of the site. There do not appear to be any watercourses within or adjacent to the site.
0/-
Any development should make provision for retaining woodland boundary features
0/+
How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD? Population and human health
0/-
Water
Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land
However, site inspection indicated that the area is relatively wet with open ground habitat dominated by rushes. Although the source of this water is unknown it should be investigated to eliminate the potential for diffuse pollution of groundwater etc / or upwellings from former mine workings. There do not appear to be any watercourses within or adjacent to the site. The site is not classified as such, but there may be issues related to former industry in the area. (The route of a former mineral railway bypasses the site adjacent to its southern boundary, and historical maps (1st edition of OS 25-inch map) indicate a colliery in close proximity) No. The site is easily accessible via the local path network and is close the services within Alloa.
0/-
Geotechnical and hydrological investigations should be conducted to identify reasons for the sites damp conditions
Soil
0/+
0 +
The site is well positioned to make use of public transport services within Alloa. No data It is unlikely that development here will impact significantly on traffic flows. However, there may be issues with forming new road access into the site as it has a relatively narrow aspect facing onto the A908 and would result in the creation of a new junction onto a main road in very close proximity to other entrances. This could contribute to congestion / risk of collisions at peak times and create issues for the neighbouring school. The site is located within Alloa/Sauchie and is within easy reach of local services and transport links. It is not likely that development here would increase the need to travel significantly. The site is not currently at risk of flooding and is unlikely to be at significantly greater risk if changes occur as a result of climate change. The site is well positioned to take advantage of the existing services and infrastructure of Alloa A good degree of sunlight is likely to reach the site during daytime hours and it would be well sheltered by the houses around it. Urban location precludes mineral extraction resources are likely to have been worked out in any case, given the areas history of mining.
Junction design would have to be carefully managed to ensure smooth traffic flows and public safety
Climatic Factors
Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
0 + 0/+ 0
Material Assets
Cultural Heritage
The site does not contain and is not adjacent to areas or features designated for their cultural heritage value. There are three category C listed buildings within 200 metres.
0/?
It is not clear whether the topography of the area means that the buildings are visible form the site. The development of the site would need to be sensitive to the setting of these buildings.
It is unlikely that development here would impact on archaeological remains. No No
Landscape
No
Western boundary of site limited frontage to develop entrance; mature trees a potential constraint to development
Current site interior tall ruderal/wet grassland vegetation
MIR 18 CARSEBRIDGE ROW

0.7
This site is located in the north of Alloa. It is well positioned to take advantage of existing infrastructure and accessibility is good. It is located on the edge of an industrial estate and is backed by an area of woodland, served by the Core Path network. However, there may be issues of contamination and ground stability relating to the areas i ndustrial history. None
Potential future flood risk
Preferred site: Housing Open space Residential; open space; commercial Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
No
No. There is an area of woodland to the rear of the site, but is not likely that development here will impact on this
The site is well positioned in relation to the core path network, part of which runs parallel to the northern edge of the site. Alloa and Sauchie include some of the most deprived areas in Clackmannanshire. The site lies within one of the slightly less deprived areas (ranked 1149 out of 6, 505 1 being the most deprived), with a score of 36.1. It lies adjacent to a more deprived area, ranked at 842, with a score of 41.5. Other areas in the town centre to the south are more deprived. Development of the site could have a positive effect on deprivation through regeneration. There is a safeguarded recreational open space (allotments), adjacent to the site at the north The core path network facilitates access to open space and countryside resources The site lies outside the areas identified by SEPA as at risk of flooding. The site lies approximately 100 metres to the north of the at risk areas. The adjacent watercourse (see below) means that the development of the site could potentially increase risk of flooding in the area. There is a stream running parallel to the northern edge of the site. The whole site slopes down towards this watercourse, creating the potential for pollution As the site is currently open space, development would result in an increase in hard surfaces, potentially increasing the amount of runoff Approximately 10-15% of the site includes an area of vacant and derelict land. No. The site is easily accessible via the local path network and is close the amenities within Alloa. The site is well positioned to make use of public transport services within Alloa. No data It is unlikely that development here will impact significantly on traffic flows.
++
++
Is the site at risk of flooding? Water
0/-
Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services?
Soil
+ 0 + + 0 0
Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local
authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes? The site is located within Alloa and is within easy reach of local services and transport links. It is not likely that development here would increase the need to travel significantly. The site is not currently at risk of flooding, but as there is a small watercourse within the area, this risk might increase if levels were to be influenced by climate change. The site is well positioned to take advantage of the existing services and infrastructure of Alloa The site is well sheltered by topography, vegetation and surrounding buildings although this may also result in a degree of shading. It should however be possible to orientate buildings to maximise benefits of passive solar gain It is highly unlikely that development here would reduce future potential for mineral extraction as it is within an urban area. The site does no lie within any hazard areas. 0
Climatic Factors
Material Assets
0 0
No
Cultural Heritage
On inspection of the site, the footings of (probable) industrial buildings were visible protruding from the made ground surface. These would have to be recorded prior to / in the course of redevelopment No Two cottage-type dwellings are situated on the northern boundary of the site, which give the area a distinct (if small-scale and quite constrained) character. It may be difficult to reconcile a modern scheme with the vernacular style of these buildings. (However, they are of little architectural / historical merit and have been modified) No
Archaeological desk-based assessment and a watching brief of any development should be specified to protect any extant industrial archaeology on site
0/-
--?
0/-
Landscape
View of core path and open space along eastern site boundary; cottages adjacent to site in background
View from north of site, indicating artificial changes in level relating to former industrial use / site clearance
MIR 22 ALLOA PARK

1.6
This site is located on the fringe of the town of Alloa. It has good transport links nearby and is well positioned to take advantage of the existing infrastructure and services nearby. There are no designated or cultural heritage sites within the boundaries and it is unlikely that development here would impact negatively on the surrounding area. None
Tree preservation order (adjacent to site); proximity to Parkmill Cross Slab Scheduled Monument; adjacent to green belt
Hughes Preferred site: Business Scrap yard; car wash; hardstanding; transport cafe Residential; open space; retail park Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
There are no designated areas within the site. No. There are two areas of Forest habitat network within 400m of the site, but it is unlikely that development here will impact on these. The site is currently of little value for biodiversity being industrial in character The site is well located in relation to the core path network, several links run within 150 metres of the site. Alloa and Sauchie include some of the most deprived areas in Clackmannanshire. The site lies within one of the most deprived areas (ranked 117 out of 6, 505 1 being the most deprived). It has been allocated a score of 68.14. Development of the site could have a positive effect on deprivation through regeneration. The site is adjacent to the Green Belt, and within 500 metres of two areas of safeguarded recreational open space. The site lies outside the areas identified by SEPA as at risk of flooding. Areas at risk of fluvial flooding lie within 150 metres to the north of the site, and 300 metres to the south of the site. No
Does the site impact on priority habitats or species? Is the site connected to the local core path network?
What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? Is the site at risk of flooding? Water Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Air Quality and Transport Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
No
Soil
No No The site is located on the outskirts of Alloa and is in a good position to take advantage of the local path and road network. The site is located on a bus route, serving the new housing development adjacent No data
0 0 + + 0
It is unlikely that development here would have a significant impact on traffic flows.
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) + 0 + + 0 0
Climatic Factors
Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
Yes, as it is located nearby existing development and would be easily accessed. No The site is well positioned to take advantage of the existing infrastructure and services within Alloa. This site is well positioned to take advantage of solar gain and may be provided some shelter from buildings around it. This site would not be ideal for a quarry as it is on the edge of large settlement, therefore development would not reduce future potential for mineral extraction. The site is not within or close to a hazard area. The Parkmill, cross slab Scheduled Monument lies within 45 metres of the site to the east. The current use of the site although apparently relatively well screened by trees is detrimental to the setting of the cross slab. It is therefore likely that new, higher end development would have less of an impact however, sensitive design and landscaping would be necessary It is unlikely that development here would impact on archaeological remains. No Development of the site is likely to improve its contribution to landscape character. (Although this is dependent on the type and design of development)
Material Assets
Cultural Heritage
0/-
Appropriate building and landscape design to avoid adverse impacts on the setting of the SM
0/+
0 0
0/+
Landscape
No
Bulk of site currently in use as a scrapyard; low quality industrial use potentially detracting from neighbouring new residential development (although well screened)
MIR 23 KELLIEBANK/BOWHOUSE
31.9
This area is currently used for mixed business use. It is on the northern bank of the River Forth, included in the town on Alloa. Local roads lead to the site and private roads have been constructed for workers to navigate their way around the area. Flood risk Industrial archaeology; ground contamination; detailed flood risk analysis Firth of Forth Special Protection Area / Wetland of International Importance (Ramsar site) / SSSI; Alloa Glassworks furnace cone Scheduled Monument; Old Alloa Conservation Area (adjacent) 11ha maximum River Forth Local Authority Preferred use: Business Commercial/industry Residential; recreation (River Forth); education (Alloa Academy) Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
Does the site impact on designated sites? Biodiversity, flora and fauna Does the site impact on priority habitats or species? Is the site connected to the local core path network? How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD?
The site is directly adjacent to the Firth of Forth SSSI / SPA / Ramsar site designated for its geomorphological, habitat and species value. Alloa Inch, adjacent to the site, is the largest area of pioneer saltmarsh in the Forth and is of considerable importance. Redevelopment of the site could generate point source and diffuse pollution, increase runoff into the river and, should additional flood defences be required, change sediment and channel dynamics. Development of the site has the potential to impact on a range of priority and protected species and habitats Yes, the north western edge of the site is connected to the local core path network. Alloa and Sauchie include some of the most deprived areas in Clackmannanshire. The site straddles some of the least deprived, and some of the most deprived areas in Alloa. It is close to some of the most deprived areas (ranking 92 out of 6, 505 1 being the most deprived). The site includes areas which rank 4292, 557 and 407. Development of the site could have a positive effect on deprivation through regeneration. There are two areas safeguarded for recreational use within 500 metres of the site, one is a large site adjacent to the school, and the other covers the Academy to the east. The site is at considerable risk of flooding. The entire southern boundary runs along the firth of fourth, which is designated by SEPA as at risk of coastal flooding. Approximately 25% of the site is also included in this at risk area. There do not appear to be watercourses within the site, but its location adjacent to the Firth of Fourth increases the risk of pollution from the development of the site. Redevelopment has the potential to increase runoff to the Forth There do not appear to be watercourses within the site, but its location adjacent to the Firth of Fourth increases the risk of flooding resulting from the development of the site. Yes the majority of the site is designated as a Priority Site No The site can be reached using the local path network and is in easy reach of services within the rest of Alloa. The site is located on a number of bus routes No data
--
Appropriate Assessment under the Regulation 48 of the Habitats Regulations 1994 will be required to demonstrate the effects or lack thereof on the notified features. A comprehensive mitigation and habitat management plan should be prepared
0/-
-++
0/-
0/+
-Redevelopment plans must include provision for runoff management, interception and treatment to avoid discharges to the Forth.
Water
Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
--
Soil
+ 0 + +
Climatic Factors
Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure?
Development at this site could impact on traffic flows if its purpose was changed. If it was simply (as is proposed) upgraded, it is unlikely the level of traffic would change greatly from what its been like over recent years. Yes. It is next to Alloa and easily accessible via the local transport network. It is highly likely that the site will be subject to some degree of coastal flooding, through a combination of sea level rise, the increased risk of storm surge and the increased prevalence of extreme weather events. The site is well positioned to take advantage of the existing infrastructure and services within Alloa. The site would get sunlight for most of the day, with little shelter as the River Forth is on its south side leaving it exposed to the elements. The bedrock in this area consists of limestone. It is unlikely that mineral extraction would take place here due to its close proximity to the river and Alloa. The site is not within or close to a hazard area. Parts of the historic Alloa glassworks are still located on the site. There are several archaeological sites and a scheduled monument associated with the works, some features of which date back to the early 19th century. (The Alloa Glassworks cone is the only surviving site of its type in Scotland reinforcing its national significance)
+/-
+ -Additional flood defence may be required, in addition to improved onsite stormwater management. -
+ 0/+ 0 0
Material Assets
Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
Cultural Heritage
Archaeological works will be necessary before development, and development of the site would have to avoid the disturbance or removal of these areas. Scheduled Monument consent from the Scottish Ministers would be required for any works affecting the integrity of the glassworks cone. Similarly, development should ensure that the setting of this nationally significant monument is improved and provision made to facilitate public access to and appreciation of the cone. The Alloa Conservation area and numerous designated site of cultural heritage value within the town centre lie within a kilometres of the site. The development of the site would need to be sensitive to the setting of the conservation area and features within it.
--
Development would have to be sensitively designed in consultation with Historic Scotland and the Council archaeology service to mitigate impacts on sensitive sites, and convey appropriate enhancement
Development at this site is likely to disturb industrial and other archaeological remains No Redevelopment could affect the setting of the Old Alloa Conservation Area although whether this has positive of negative effects would depend largely on the nature of proposals Redevelopment could enhance the potential for views up the Forth from the viewpoint/carpark at The Shore
--
0/-
Landscape
+/-
0/+
Alloa Glassworks cone is the only remaining monument of its type in Scotland. It is an AListed building and a Scheduled Monument reflecting its national significance. Development should protect the site, enhance its setting and make provision for public access
MIR 24 FORTHBANK
1.07
The site, comprising a former brick and tileworks, is on the southern edge of Alloa and is located near a sewage works on the northern banks of the River Forth. It is currently not in use but, if developed, the site is in a good position to utilise local transport links and infrastructure. Flood risk;
Oil and Gas pipeline hazard safeguarding zone abutting site; Designated as Community and Recreation Development CR2; proxim ity to high voltage pylons (straddling southern edge of site, with lines crossing SW corner) constraints possible uses wayleaves required for access; proximity to sewage works and recycling site (bad neighbours) also potentially constraining viable uses
Preferred site: Business Open space and old tile works - brownfield Open space; residential; industry/commercial; services (sewage works) Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) 0 0 +
Does the site impact on designated sites? Biodiversity, flora and fauna Does the site impact on priority habitats or species? Is the site connected to the local core path network?
There are no designated areas within the site. There are no other designated areas within 400m of the site. There is one area of forest network habitat within 400m of the site, but none within the site itself. The site is within 120 metres of the local core path network. Alloa and Sauchie include some of the most deprived areas in Clackmannanshire. The site lies within one of the relatively less deprived areas (ranked 1962 out of 6, 505 1 being the most deprived), and is adjacent to one of the most deprived areas (ranked 92). Development of the site could have a positive effect on deprivation through regeneration. There are two areas of safeguarded recreational space within 500 metres of the site, one of which is a rugby ground. The site lies partially within the area identified by SEPA as at risk from coastal flooding. Development of the site could have a negative effect on increasing flood risk. There do not appear to be water courses within or adjacent to the site. However, the site lies within 250 metres of the Firth of Forth. There do not appear to be water courses within or adjacent to the site. However, the site lies within 250 metres of the Firth of Forth. The whole of the site is within an area of vacant or derelict land and the area surrounding it categorised as the same. No, the site does not contain and is not adjacent to prime agricultural land. The site can be accessed by the local path network Public transport links are available, but at some distance from the site No data on air pollution Proximity to sewage works (directly downwind of prevailing SW wind)) likely to generate significant nuisance impacts from odours
What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? Is the site at risk of flooding? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Air Quality and Transport Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
0/+
--
Water
Soil
+ 0 0/+ 0/+
--
It is unlikely that development here would have a significant impact on traffic flows.
Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Climatic Factors Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Material Assets Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction?
Some extent of travel would be necessary to reach the site but, as it is on the outskirts of Alloa, it is still easily accessible and would not increase the need to travel significantly. As the coastal flood boundary of the River Forth intersects the site, and there is also a fluvial flood boundary approximately 90m from the site, it may well be faced with a higher risk of flooding as a result of climate change. The site is well positioned to take advantage of the existing infrastructure and services within Alloa. The site is in a good location to make use of solar gain The urban location and proximity to the Forth preclude minerals development There are no hazard areas within the site, but the Oil and Gas pipeline safeguarding zone abuts the eastern boundary of the site. The site is also intersected by a high voltage pylon line, potentially constraining reuse of the site There are no cultural heritage designations within the site. The Alloa Conservation Area is within 150 metres of the site, and there are numerous listed buildings and archaeological sites within the centre of Alloa, within 1km of the site. It is unlikely that development here would impact to archaeological remains. However, the brickworks buildings are of historic value and should be retained if possible (no access available on site inspection). No
--
+ + 0
Cultural Heritage
Retention and reuse of historic buildings
No
Landscape
No
Aerial photograph of site and context
MIR 25 CARSEBRIDGE ROAD NORTH

4
This site is on the outskirts of Alloa. It is mainly open space, containing some historic landscape features relating to the B-Listed Carsebridge House (offsite) and would be well placed to utilise the existing services and transport links that exist in the town. It is situated behind the Diageo cooperage off Carsebridge Road which would require significant upgrading for high quality business use.
Flood risk; Tree Preservation Order; potential presence of protected species (bats); potential impacts on setting of late 18 th century B-Listed building; remnants of Carsebridge House designed landscape
Forest habitat network; small stream/drainage channel.
Preferred site: Business Open space; office building
Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
Enhancement and mitigation options Development of site could impact on the forest habitat (through fragmentation or disturbance) and on protected trees without mitigation. Development of the site would need to avoid these areas and ensure that the tree canopy, root and nutrient zones were protected. Protected species surveys (for bats) would be necessary in advance of any works affecting trees
There are no sites designated solely for their natural heritage significance on site. However: Does the site impact on designated sites? Biodiversity, flora and fauna Tree Preservation Orders cover two areas within the site. Development of the site would need to avoid these areas and ensure that the tree canopy, root and nutrient zones were protected. -
0/-
Does the site impact on priority habitats or species? Is the site connected to the local core path network? How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD? Population and human health
Given the age of the trees and the structure they provide in the landscape, they have considerable potential for roosting and feeding bats Part of the site includes an area of Forest habitat network, so it would be necessary to ensure the development of the site did not result in fragmentation of this network. The site is well connected in relation to the core path network, which runs close to the southern boundary of the site. Alloa and Sauchie include some of the most deprived areas in Clackmannanshire. The site straddles two slightly more deprived sites (ranking 1242, and 842 out of 6, 505 1 being the most deprived). Some of the most deprived areas are within the town centre to the south. Development of the site could have a positive effect on deprivation through regeneration. The Alloa golf club lies within 1km of the site, to the north east. There is an area safeguarded for recreational use within 200 metres of the site to the north west. The site lies on the urban fringe of Alloa and access to open countryside is afforded by the adjacent core path network. Development of the site would result in a net loss of (albeit inaccessible) open space. The site is not within an area identified by SEPA as at risk from flooding. However, there are areas identified as at risk from fluvial flooding less than 100m to the south of the site. There do not appear to be any water courses within the site. However, there is a disused lade (presumably once serving the distillery) close to the site to the north. This is not identified as at risk from flooding but could be vulnerable to pollution. As the site slopes away to the south, flood risk may be an issue during extreme weather events. No. However, development of the site is likely to increase the proportion of hard surfaces, increasing runoff and pressure on drainage infrastructure and potentially increasing flood risk for the vulnerable zone to the South A small area in the south west corner of the site includes an area of vacant or derelict land. + +
0/-
Water
SuDS should be considered for on site management and retention of stormwater SuDS should be considered for on site management and retention of stormwater
Soil
None of the site is designated as prime agricultural land, but a large area lies adjacent to the eastern edge of the site. The site would be easily accessed by the local path network. The main road perpendicular to Carsebridge Road is served by bus routes No data
Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Air Quality and Transport Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Climatic Factors
0/+
This would be largely dependent on the nature of development. Carsebridge Road may require improvement and greater traffic management particularly if the bonded warehouses were to continue in use due to HGV traffic Dependent on nature of development, although relatively close to the centre of Alloa and public transport links The site does not lie within any flood boundaries, but it is only 70m from the fluvial 1in-200year boundary of the Brothie Burn. If this boundary were to expand due to higher water levels as a result of climate change, the site could face a higher risk of flooding. Similarly, as climate change effects take hold, the watercourse to the north of the site may constitute a greater risk, given the increased prevalence of severe weather effects The site is well positioned to take advantage of the existing infrastructure and services of Alloa. The site has a southerly aspect and is sheltered to the north by topography and mature trees therefore development could be designed to accrue considerable benefit from passive solar gain. Urban location precludes mineral extraction
Improvement of junction and road surfacing
0/+
++
Material Assets
There are no hazard areas within the site.
Cultural Heritage
There are no designated features of cultural heritage value within the site boundary. However, number of listed buildings and archaeological remains lie close to the north western edge of the site, and are associated with Carsebridge House (B-Listed late 18th century house). Designed landscape features associated with this building (treelined avenue, parkland and other historic plantings) are also susceptible to adverse --
Landscape structure, planting and the setting of Carsebridge House will be preserved through appropriate design and landscape management
effects and should be protected (TPO in operation for trees on site) Development of the site would need to avoid impacting these sites. Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Since the bulk of the site has been parkland since the 18th century, its level of disturbance is will have been low therefore archaeological potential should be considered to be relatively high No. Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes? However, the designed landscape features relating to the former policies of Carsebridge House are an important aspect of local character and should be preserved Appropriate desk-based research, site assessment and necessary archaeological supervision of works should be specified to protect subsurface assets Appropriate landscape design to preserve features and integrate buildings in the landscape
0/-
0/+
Landscape
No
No
View of Carsebridge House through cooperage yard
Aerial view of site, clearly showing relict designed landscape features and relationship to Carsebridge House (B-Listed building outside site boundary)
MIR 26 NORTH CASTLE STREET

0.45
This site is located within the south of Alloa, close to the River Forth. It has good accessibility to the wider area via local and main transport routes and is in a good position to make use of the services available within Alloa. It is included within a large area of vacant or derelict land on the edge of the Old Alloa Conservation Area None
Proximity to coastal flood boundary
Preferred site: Business Open space within industrial estate. Industrial; residential Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
There are no designated areas within the site. Does the site impact on designated sites? Biodiversity, flora and fauna Does the site impact on priority habitats or species? Is the site connected to the local core path network? Population and human health The Firth of Forth SPA/RAMSAR is approximately 630m from the site. No impacts on biodiversity, flora and fauna area expected as a result of the development of this site as it is a small gap site in an industrial estate with no evident designations. Impacts unlikely The site is well located in relation to the local core path network, a link to which runs along the eastern edge of the site. Development would need to provide links to this and avoid disturbance of the existing route. Alloa and Sauchie include some of the most deprived areas in Clackmannanshire. The site lies within one of the more deprived areas (ranking 557 out of 6, 505 1 being the most deprived). The site is adjacent to areas which vary in rank from 4292 to 407. Development of the site could have a positive effect on deprivation through regeneration. There are several areas of safeguarded open space within 400 metres of the site. The site is outside areas identified by SEPA as at risk of flooding. The marine flood risk zone lies relatively close to the site, approximately 200m SW The site does not appear to contain or be close to any water courses. 0
What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? Is the site at risk of flooding? Water Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Soil Is the site prime agricultural land?
+ 0/-
The site does not appear to contain or be close to any water courses.
The whole of the site lies within an area of vacant or derelict land.
++
No. The site is not within or close to an area of prime agricultural land.
Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Air Quality and Transport Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are
The site would be easily accessed by the local path network. The site is well served by bus links No data It is unlikely that development here would impact on traffic flow to any significant degree.
+ + 0
close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Climatic Factors Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Material Assets Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Yes. The site is located within the settlement of Alloa and therefore people would not have to travel far to get to it. Although the site is not within a flood boundary at present, as it is only approximately 200m from a coastal flood boundary, the level of risk may change if water levels were to be effected as a result of climate change. The site is well placed to take advantage of the exiting infrastructure and services within Alloa. The site will get some degree of sunlight during the day and will be provided shelter from prevailing winds by the buildings that exist in the surrounding area. Urban location incompatible with minerals extraction There are no hazard areas within the site. The site lies adjacent to the Old Alloa Conservation Area. There are numerous listed buildings and archaeological sites within the centre of Alloa, particularly within the Conservation Area. There are two listed features close to the site, both associated with Lime Tree Walk. Given that the site is tucked behind existing buildings, it is unlikely that development would adversely affect the setting of the Conservation Area or designated assets Standard archaeological research and monitoring should be conducted to avoid impacts on previously unrecognised features +
0/-
+ + 0 0
Cultural Heritage
Given the industrial history of the site, archaeological potential is likely to be low
0/-
No
Landscape
No
No
Aerial view of site in context
MIR 20 Fairfield School

0.39 Option site, comprising a former school which is in low-level community use. Lies within a residential area and backs onto playing fields (safeguarded open space, Preferred Site MIR37) None Extant school building
Option site, housing Community use Residential; open space Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
There are no designated areas within the site. The only areas of higher habitat value within 400m of the site are several areas of forest habitat network, and an area of semi-natural ancient woodland. It is unlikely that development of this site will affect their function or integrity There are a few sections of the core path network within 200 metres of the site; two of these are connected to the site along roads. Alloa and Sauchie include some of the most deprived areas in Clackmannanshire. The site lies in a relatively deprived area, surrounded by areas with a similar rank in the SIMD (ranking 1149 out of 6, 505 1 being the most deprived). Development of the site could have a positive effect on deprivation through regeneration, though the impact of any community facilities lost should be mitigated by provision elsewhere. The site is very well located in relation to existing open space. It is adjacent to an area of safeguarded recreational open space an area of playing fields The site is some distance (at least 700 metres) from areas identified by SEPA as at risk from flooding. The site footprint is currently covered in tarmac redevelopment may result in a net increase in permeable area, potentially reducing runoff No.
Necessary to secure compensatory provision for loss of community facilities
What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? Is the site at risk of flooding? Water Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Soil Is the site prime agricultural land?
0/+
No
No
No. The site is currently enclosed by a substantial boundary wall, with access from the south side (Pompee Road) only. However, it is well located to make use of the local path network Yes frequent bus services use both Pompee Road and Fairfield Road(links to the local area, Stirling and the town centre) No data
0 Potential for new access to park through boundary wall provided no impacts on historic interest
Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Air Quality and Transport Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
0/+
0/+
Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
If developed for housing, there is the potential for minor increases in traffic volume, but as the site is relatively small and is situated close to robust local roads this is unlikely to be significant
0/-
Not to any significant level No Yes the site is in a residential area and, as there is development in use already on site, connections to the energy, water and sewerage infrastructure already exist although these may not be fit for intended purpose. The site is relatively sheltered and is orientated N-S, therefore new buildings could be orientated to maximise solar gaim No site is in an urban location and therefore unsuitable for minerals development
0 0 0
Material Assets
0/+ 0
No
Cultural Heritage
There are no cultural heritage designations within or close to the site. The nearest features are two listed buildings more than 200 metres away from the site, to the east and south east. Impacts on setting are therefore likely to be negligible . The Edwardian school building itself appears to be in good condition (appears to have be recently partially re-roofed) and is of good architectural quality although currently unlisted. Retention and conversion should be the preferred option on both cultural heritage and sustainability grounds. Impacts unlikely No If the school building was demolished, the early 20th century character of the east end of Pompee Road would be lost (west end markedly different with less architectural interest) --
High quality residential scheme prioritising retention of school building and enhancement of local character
0 0
Landscape
No
Site is entirely covered in tarmac (former playground) and backs onto open space
School building appears to be in good condition and should be retained on cultural heritage and sustainability grounds
MIR 42 SUNNYSIDE ROAD

5.25
Site of former brewery distribution and warehousing on periphery of Alloa town centre. The site comprises a number of different areas, including a dismantled railway line and cutting (now paths and greenspace), recycling and warehousing sites and public open space. Located adjacent to the B908 a major bus route. The local and Core Path networks run through the site.
Detailed flood risk assessment; access to services Site lies on the edge of the SEPA 1-in-200 year fluvial flood risk zone; Preservation of on-site Core Path network and public open space. c.3.03ha (excluding all public open space)
Option site Disused former industrial site Residential; business Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) 0 0/-
Does the site impact on designated sites? Biodiversity, flora and fauna Does the site impact on priority habitats or species?
No Impacts on priority species and habitats unlikely, given the relatively low on site biodiversity value. However, the former railway corridor is a potentially useful habitat corridor that would benefit from enhancement The site is very well located in terms of connections to the core path network, which runs within the site, parallel to the southern boundary. Development would need to avoid disruption of this route and ensure connections are made to it. Alloa and Sauchie include some of the most deprived areas in Clackmannanshire. The site covers parts of the slightly more deprived and slightly less deprived areas (ranking 488 and 2625 respectively, out of 6, 505 1 being the most deprived). Development of the site could have a positive effect on deprivation through regeneration. There is a safeguarded recreational site adjacent to the southern boundary of the site, and two others nearby. One of these is just across the road to the east (bowling green and informal open space). However, development of the whole site would result in net loss of open space both the multi-court pitch behind Greenfield Street and amenity grassland at the southern end of the site The site does not contain areas identified by SEPA as at risk from flooding. However, an area identified as at risk from fluvial flooding lies adjacent to the site to the south and east. No
Well planned redevelopment and landscaping could boost habitat values of former railway land
Potential to create links through site to Core Path from local paths
Large-scale housing development could increase pressure on relatively scarce open space resource therefore suitable greenspace should be provided in any development options.
Is the site at risk of flooding? Water Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Air Quality and Transport
0/-
No The southern end of the site is identified as having been former railway land although it appears not to be derelict and contains part of the core path network No The site is well located to take advantage of the core path network, as a core path forms a boundary to the site although development could result in loss of the asset The site is adjacent to Alloa railway station, and frequent bus services operate along the main road to the west.
Soil
+ 0 +/-
A small area of the site lies within Community Infrastructure Area T8, identified for a new railway station for Alloa No data
Does the site lie within an area where levels of
air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Climatic Factors Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
Development of the site could increase traffic volumes and pressure on key junctions, particularly with the trunk road network to the south of the site.
If developed for housing, there would be significant potential for residents to make use of public transport links in the vicinity (rail, bus and core path) possibly displacing private car journeys The site is on the edge of the fluvial flood risk area. Although it may not be directly at risk, it could have the potential to increase runoff and contribute to the vulnerability of the surrounding area As a town centre site, necessary services will be easily accessible. However, being relatively large there may be need for reinforcement to avoid adverse effects on infrastructure The site has an NE-SW axis and is not overshadowed, therefore new buildings could be orientated to maximise passive solar gain. Town centre site unsuitable for minerals prospection
0/-
0/-
Enhancements to service infrastructure
Material Assets
0/+ 0
No
Cultural Heritage
To the south of the railway line, the site boundary encroaches slightly on an area that would benefit from environmental improvement (Ring Road) Given the industrial and heavily disturbed nature of the site, it is unlikely that it has significant archaeological value. No
There is the potential for development to convey environmental improvement for the site as a whole
0/+
0 0
No
Landscape
No
View of open space comprising southern extremity of site (from Core Path)
View into site from northern boundary
Aerial view of site, showing multiple current uses Core Path and open spaces visible forming green corridor along southern boundary (note multicourt pitch, trees and other planting)
MIR 43 CARSEBRIDGE
17.6
Option site for housing, comprising an extensive area of bonded warehousing on the edge of Alloa with additional greenfield space adjacent to the B909
Flood risk Detailed flood risk analysis Semi-natural ancient woodland
Ancient woodland, forest habitat network; watercourse Diageo Option site Industrial bonded warehousing; agricultural land Residential; industrial; agricultural land Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
Enhancement and mitigation options Woodland could readily be preserved through development and habitat connectivity improved across the site Development of site could impact on the riparian woodland habitat (through fragmentation or disturbance) and without mitigation. Development of the site would need to that the tree canopy, root and nutrient zones were protected. Trees with evidence of use by bats should be subject to appropriate protection from disturbance and damage
An area of ancient woodland forms the eastern boundary of the southern portion of the site
The site contains some areas of forest network habitat, and semi-natural ancient woodland along the Brothie Burn corridor. There are other areas of forest habitat within 400m of the site. Mature trees should be surveyed for bats
0/-
0/+
The site is adjacent to the B909, and is well located in terms of the core path network. One section of the network which runs along the Brochie Burn connects with the eastern edge of the site. Another connection runs along the northern edge of the site. The network runs along the full extent of the eastern edge of the site. The site is well connected to these features, which is positive for housing, but proposals for the site would need to avoid disruption or fragmentation of these routes. Alloa and Sauchie include some of the most deprived areas in Clackmannanshire, and Scotland as a whole. The site lies on the eastern edge of the settlement and is in a slightly less deprived area than some in the centre, but still relatively deprived (ranked at 1242, out of 6,505 1 being the most deprived). Part of the northern end of the site is within an area identified as slightly more deprived, with a rank of 842. Development of the site may have a positive impact on reducing deprivation though regeneration, particularly if significant provision of affordable housing is included
Redevelopment could create links through new communities, bolstering the access network and encouraging sustainable travel
The site is located on the edge of the urban area and so could potentially have excellent access to the countryside. There are two sites designated as safeguarded for recreational use within 200 meters of the site, both of which appear to be accessible by road. The site is at significant risk of flooding. Most of the site lies within an area identified by SEPA as at risk from fluvial flooding.
--
Water
Yes. The Brothie Burn runs through the southern area of the site however it is unlikely that residential uses will result in greater pollution than current industrial use. Yes. The Brothie Burn runs through the southern area of the site. However, as the majority of the site is currently hard (in the form of warehouse roofs) redevelopment as housing may result in a net increase in permeable surface, reducing runoff
0 Redevelopment should include significant areas of open space, gardens and permeable paving to reduce run-off. Provision of SuDS may further reduce
0/+
Enhancement and mitigation options impact
Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Soil Is the site prime agricultural land?
Part of the site was formerly classified as derelict land (c.11ha)
None of the site is designated as prime agricultural land, but the site lies adjacent to a large area with this designation, adjacent to the eastern edge of the site.
0 Redevelopment could include creation of new links between parts of the network, facilitating increased sustainable travel
Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Air Quality and Transport Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
Yes as noted above, the site is conveniently located adjacent to the core path network, facilitating access to both town and countryside. The site is in relatively close proximity to roads served by bus routes and is less that 1km from Alloa rail station NO data
0/+
0/+
It is likely that, were the entire site developed for housing, significant increases in traffic at peak times would result. However, as the site is conveniently located for access to the trunk road network, this may not be overly severe although it would still increase carbon emissions and levels of air pollution The site is relatively well-served by convenient public transport links and the core path network, creating the potential for sustainable travel to displace unnecessary car journeys Yes the majority of the site lies within the 1-in-200 year fluvial flood zone Transport connections are relatively good, although key services may be lacking given the current function of the land (storage) Given the large size of the site, development could easily be arranged to maximise passive solar gain. No proximity to existing communities precludes minerals development
Climatic Factors
0/+ -0/+ 0
Material Assets
No
Cultural Heritage
Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage
There are no cultural heritage designations within or close to the site. The nearest features are listed buildings and archaeological sites associated with Carsebridge House, approximately 222 metres to north of the site, and Jellyhorn, an
value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Landscape Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
archaeological site approximately 360 metres to the east of the site. Impacts unlikely No The site lies around 1km from The Forest AGLV, with the potential for some intervisibility (although the riparian woodland along the Brothie Burn provides screening) However, it is likely that residential development will be less visually intrusive than the existing warehouses The site is readily visible from the B909 and currently presents a relatively forbidding aspect with tall security fencing and the large, low-slung and regular shapes of the bonds receding towards the Ochils emphasising the size of the site. The long, low proportions of the bonds allow fine panoramic views of the Ochils with mature woodland in the middle distance. Residential development should endeavour to preserve these views although the additional visual clutter of housing is likely to detract somewhat. Brewing and distilling are an important aspect of Clackmannanshires character, and bonded warehouses are a local feature. 0 0 Sensitive landscape design could enhance the character of the urban edge
0/+
Residential development should seek to retain the current separation distance between the road and buildings to preserve the rising views to the Ochils
View from north of current use of site as warehousing and cooperage stores
Southern portion of the site, currently agricultural land
MIR 45 CHURCH GROVE

1.6
This is an area of sloping open space close to main transport routes and is well connected to the wider network within Alloa. It is surrounded by residential development of varying vintages.
None
Loss of greenspace; site topography 0.7ha Amenity grassland; mature trees
Other site: housing Open space Residential Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
No.
The site is currently open space which may have some local biodiversity value and act as a connection in the green infrastructure network. Development could have an impact on this. There are several areas of forest habitat network and an area of semi-natural ancient woodland within 400m of the site. It is unlikely that development here will impact on these. The site is connected to the core path network along secondary roads. The nearest section is 100 metres to the west of the site. Alloa and Sauchie include some of the most deprived areas in Clackmannanshire and Scotland as a whole. The most deprived areas are in the centre of Alloa. Some sites with similar ranks in the SIMD as Alloa centre are located in the Fairfield area, including the site. The site lies within an area ranked at 1149 out of 6, 505 1 being the most deprived. Development of the site could have a positive effect on deprivation through regeneration. There is an area of safeguarded recreational land close to the north of the site The site is currently open space, and so its development would lead to a loss of open space resources and could result in cramming of housing in the area No. The site is not within or near to an area identified by SEPA as at risk from flooding. No No No No. The site is not within or near to an area of prime agricultural land. Yes. It will be able to make use of the existing path and road network links. Bus services are available on nearby Pompee Road and Parkhead Road No data
0/-
--
If development is proposed, only the section parallel to Church Grove and Pompee Road should be built on, with the irregular and steeply sloping area t the west preserved as amenity greenspace
Is the site at risk of flooding? Water Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
0 0 0 0 0 + + 0
Soil
Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Material Assets Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
There may be a degree of impact as a result of development here, but it is unlikely to be significant.
0/-
Climatic Factors
Yes, it is located within Alloa making it easily accessible from other points within the town. The site is not at risk of flooding and therefore, is unlikely to be significantly effected by changes in flood patterns as a result of climate change. The site is well positioned to take advantage of the existing infrastructure and services. The two discrete parts of the site are north and north-easterly facing respectively, significantly reducing the potential to utilise solar gain Urban location precludes minerals development There are no hazard areas within or near the site. There are no cultural heritage designations within or close to the site. The nearest features are two listed buildings more than 200 metres away from the site, to the east and south east. Archaeological potential of the area is likely to be relatively low No Development of the whole of the site would result in a change to local character, creating a much denser pattern of development
0/+ 0 + -0 0
Cultural Heritage
Landscape
No
Trees, shrubs and hedging forming good quality open space at southern end of site
View to south east along Church Grove filling in open space would significantly change character of area
MIR 57 NORTH STREET/MAIN STREET

0.1
This is a relatively small area within Clackmannan which can be accessed directly from North Street and Main Street. The site lies in the heart of Clackmannan and is approximately 2.3km north east of the River Forth. As it is within an already built up area, appropriate development here is unlikely to impact on the nearby cultural heritage sites and landscape designations. Its location also means that any development here can make use of existing transport links and infrastructure, making it easily accessible.
Conservation area status; historic building on site (although appears to be undesignated)
Preferred site: Housing Existing building currently unused formerly business use Residential Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
No There are no designated habitat networks within this site. There are several habitat networks near the site, on the outer edges of the urban area its within. It is unlikely that development here will impact on these. There is potential for the historic building on site to be used by bats it should therefore be survey prior to any work taking place No Core Path runs within the site, however there are several that lead to Clackmannan and link to Main Street and North Street. The closest core path lies 330m west of the site over Kings Seat Hill. The site is not located in an area which has a particularly high SIMD score The site is within easy reach of the core path network which provides links to the wider countryside, areas of open space and nearby town of Alloa. There are also three safeguarded areas for recreational purposes within 300m of the site that can be accessed via the local road network. No There are no water courses within the site and development here will most likely not cause higher levels of water pollution.
0/-
Bat survey and appropriate mitigation
0/+
Water
Development at this site is unlikely to have effect on flooding at nearby water courses.
There are no areas of vacant or derelict land within the site.
No The site is easily accessible by the local path and road network and is well positioned to access services within Clackmannan and Alloa. The site is within easy reach of convenient bus routes No data
Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Air Quality and Transport Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
+ + 0
Would development on the site contribute to
Development at this site is unlikely to have a major impact on traffic flows within and
higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
around the area.
Climatic Factors
The site is within an already built up area of Clackmannan and will benefit from the existing transport infrastructure available here. People will therefore not need to travel far to access services and facilities. However, it is likely that residents will have to travel to access employment This site is not within an area at risk of flooding at present, but as it is close to a water course prone to flooding, there is a chance this might change in more extreme circumstances. The settlement is well positioned to make use of the existing infrastructure present in Clackmannan. The site would be able to take advantage of sunlight reaching it, but may be sheltered slightly by the existing buildings surrounding it, from both sunlight and wind. Urban location precludes minerals development There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site. The site lies within the Clackmannan Conservation Area and redevelopment should therefore safeguard the character and significance of the designated area. This would be best achieved by retaining and refurbishing the historic building on site (former Clackmannan Co-Operative Society building) The site lies within the historic urban core of Clackmannan and therefore archaeological potential may be relatively high. If the building was to be demolished, or extended, archaeological supervision would be necessary No. Development should conserve and enhance the character of the Clackmannan conservation area
0/-
Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Material Assets Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
0/+ 0/+ 0 0
--
Cultural Heritage
0/-
Landscape
No
Site frontage onto Main Street (red building)
Frontage of Clackmannan Co-Op building facing onto North Street
MIR 80 DUMYAT BUSINESS PARK PHASE 2

10.8
This site is an area of agricultural land approximately 1km north of Cambus on the outskirts of Tullibody. There is good access to the site including the A907 and B9140, providing links to nearby towns. It is proposed that the site will be used to expand the existing business park next to the site. Flood risk.
Sites of archaeological interest (Scheduled Tullibody Old Bridge) are located on the boundary of the site. Forest habitat network runs along a stretch of the boundary at the south west.
Agricultural land
Preferred site: Business Greenfield site. The majority of land surrounding the site taken up by housing or for commercial use. Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
The Firth of Forth SPA, SSSI and RAMSAR wetland is located 1.3km south of the site, down the River Devon. While a business park may not have significant impacts, there is potential for increased runoff and pollution directly affecting the SPA particularly during development. Cambus Pools Nature Reserve is approximately 1.1km away from the site to the south.
On site stormwater interception and treatment SuDS Appropriate Assessment under Regulation 48 of the Habitats Regulations 1994 may be necessary 0
Biodiversity, flora and fauna Does the site impact on priority habitats or species?
A stretch of forest habitat network runs along the south west boundary of the site. Development at this site could possibly impact on this habitat. There is potential for the agricultural land to offer important foraging locations for overwintering Annex 1 wildfowl (e.g. Pink-footed goose) the reason for the SPA designation There is also an area of semi-natural ancient woodland situated within 400m of site to the south east. It is unlikely that any development at this site will effect on this area. Is the site connected to the local core path network? How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD? Core paths run along the eastern and northern edges of the site and provide connections to Alloa, Tullibody, Cambus and the wider surrounding area. The site is not located in an area which has a high SIMD. It is within a data zone which has a SIMD score of 15.8, adjacent to one to the east with a score of 45. The site is within easy access of the core path network which provides links to the wider countryside (including the River Forth), areas of open space and nearby towns. What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? There are no areas allocated for recreational open space within 400m of the site. This is not necessarily a negative aspect as the site is anticipated to be used for business purposes. The River Devon runs along the western edge of the site and flows south, joining the River Forth located 1.3km from the site. SEPA have identified this river as being at risk of flooding, and this site lies within the flood boundary. Any development at this site it would be at significant risk of flooding if high water levels were to occur. 0 + --
Appropriate Assessment under Regulation 48 of the Habitats Regulations 1994 may be necessary This should be used to inform appropriate mitigation and habitat management strategies
--
Water
The River Devon runs along the western edge of the site. Development at this site may affect the level of pollution via run-off processes during construction if not monitored correctly. Once established, it is unlikely that an extension to the business park will have a significant impact on pollution levels. According to data from SEPA, this site lies within the flood risk area of the River Devon. The flood boundary covers the majority of the site and development here could increase flood risk.
--
--
Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Soil Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Air Quality and Transport Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains?
No.
No The site is well positioned to access services within Alloa, Cambus, Tullibody and Alva. If it was to be developed, the existing routes would need to be improved to provide appropriate access to the site. Bus services are available on the A907 next to the adjacent industrial estate No data
0 + 0/+ 0
Development at this site could increase traffic flows along major routes, including the B9104 and A907 that connect the site to Causwayhead to the west and Alloa to the east. The site is on the outskirts of an existing urban area and therefore may benefit from the existing transport infrastructure available here. People may not need to travel far to access services and facilities, or travel to the development site. As the site lies within a flood risk boundary, it may be at further risk if water levels are influenced by climate change. The settlement is well positioned to make use of the existing infrastructure present in Cambus and Tullibody. The site is well positioned to make use of solar gain as it is a vast area that is has mainly open land around it. The warehouse nearby to the south will provide some degree of shelter form the prevailing winds. The bedrock in this area consists of passage formation. It is unlikely that development here would reduce future potential for mineral extraction given the proximity to the SPA There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site. The Scheduled Tullibody Old Bridge is situated on the northern boundary of the site. However, it is unlikely that development would affect the integrity of the monument however there could be impacts on its setting. Similarly, a B-Listed doocot in close proximity to the southern boundary of the site could experience impacts on setting Development at this site may have an impact on sites of archaeological interest.
Climatic Factors
0/+
-+
Material Assets
Cultural Heritage
Landscape
No Development of the site would significantly expand the urban edge of Tullibody enclosing more of the landscape and reducing views to the South although these are already constrained by riparian woodland and bonded warehousing. Development of the site would be unlikely to impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes, particularly as it would be viewed as an extension to the existing settlement of Tullibody. It would enclose/backcloth views of Tullibody Old Bridge
0/-
Aerial view of site in context.
MIR 81 STATION ROAD (WEST SIDE)

0.5
This site is an area of hardstanding associated with a bonded warehouse complex located at the interface of Tullibody and Cambus. The site has good links to main transport routes (namely the A907) as well as the local road network. The northern boundary of the site meets the A907 and an area of semi natural ancient woodland. None
Preferred site: Business Brownfield site. The majority of land surrounding the site taken up by housing or for commercial use. Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
Impacts unlikely - The Firth of Forth SPA/SSSI/RAMSAR wetland is located approximately 764m south of the site. Cambus Pools Nature Reserve is approximately 1km away from the site to the south west.
Impacts unlikely
Core paths run close to the site connecting to Tullibody, Cambus and Alloa as well as the wider surrounding area. The site is not located in an area which has a high SIMD. The site is within relatively easy access to the wider countryside (including the River Forth) and areas of open space. The closest area safeguarded for recreational purposes is approximately 30m from the site. The River Devon flows near the site, within 400m to the west. However, the site does not lie within the flood risk boundary. Development at this site would not be at direct risk of flooding.
+ 0
Water
Development at this site is unlikely to effect the level of pollution within any nearby watercourses. No
Soil
This site is wholly within an area of vacant or derelict land. No The site is well positioned to access services within Alloa, Cambus, Tullibody and Alva. Bus services are accessible on the A907 by Cambus No data Development on this site is unlikely to significantly increase traffic flows
+ 0 + + 0 0
Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local
authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Climatic Factors Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Material Assets Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Not to any significant extent, as there are few amenities in the immediate vicinity The site is only approximately 220m from the flood risk boundary of the River Devon, therefore, there is the potential that it may be effected by flooding in the future as a result of climate change if water levels were to rise. The settlement is reasonably well positioned to make use of the existing infrastructure present in Cambus and Tullibody. The site is well positioned to make use of both solar gain and shelter. The bedrock at this site consists of passage formation. It is not likely development here would prevent any future potential mineral extraction as it is unlikely site for such activity. 0
0/-
0/+ +
There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site.
Cultural Heritage
There is a 19th century bridge over the River Devon situated 260m to the south west of the site. This feature has been designated as a scheduled monument, archaeological site and listed building. A few other sites of archaeological interest are located nearby within Tullibody and Cambus. As the site is surrounded by buildings, development at this site is unlikely to impact on the integrity of these cultural heritage sites, Development at this site is unlikely to have any impact on sites of archaeological interest. No Development of the site would be unlikely to have any effect on the setting and identity of the surrounding area as overall it would be viewed as an extension to the existing industrial area No
0 0 0
Landscape
Site is currently an open area of hard standing adjacent to bonded warehousing.
Single building on site (in northeast corner)
MIR 77 THE ORCHARD, TULLIBODY

0.37
This site is located within Tullibody next to a school grounds and safeguarded recreational open space. It can be accessed by the local road network and is close to main transport routes, including the A907 and B9140. There are no designated cultural heritage sites within the site boundary and it is unlikely to have a negative impact the setting and surrounding landscape. None
Surrounding urban development; adjacent to school
Local Authority Option site: Housing Brownfield. Residential; school; open space Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
No There is a short stretch of designated forest habitat network located just south east of the site and another area to the south which covers a large area that runs along the A907. This coincides with an area of semi-natural ancient woodland. Although these areas are close to the site, it is unlikely any development here will have an impact as it is situated within an area that is already built up. The nearest core path is approximately 270m from the site; others are within a 600m radius. Existing transport routes connect to these providing links to Tullibody, Cambus and Alloa as well as the wider surrounding area. The site is located in an area which has a high SIMD score development may contribute to regeneration There is a small area allocated for recreational use adjacent to the west of the site. No There are no water courses that would be affected by development at the site.
Is the site connected to the local core path network? Population and human health How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD? What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? Is the site at risk of flooding? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Air Quality and Transport Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
0/+
0/+ 0/+ 0 0
Water
According to data from SEPA, this site is not within a flood risk boundary therefore development at this site is unlikely to change this. No. No The site is easily accessible by the local path network and is well positioned to access services within Alloa, Cambus, Tullibody and Alva. Local roads run adjacent to the site and main roads including the A907 and B9140 are close by. The site is well located to benefit from bus services
Soil
0 0 +
No data
Development at this site will most likely have very little impact on traffic flows as the site is relatively small.
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) 0/+
Climatic Factors
The site is located within Tullibody and therefore may benefit from the existing transport infrastructure available here. People will therefore not need to travel far to access services and facilities, or travel to the development site. The site is not located within an area at risk from flooding and therefore is unlikely to be effected by any increased flooding as a result of climate change. The site would be expected to utilise the existing infrastructure present in the settlement of Tullibody. The site is well positioned to make use of both solar gain and shelter. There may be some shadowing from buildings nearby, but as an open space, it is likely that sunlight still reaches the site to some degree. Urban location precludes minerals development There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site. There are no designated cultural heritage features within the site. The closest features are two archaeological sites approximately 176m south east of the site. It is unlikely that development at this site would have an impact on the integrity of these sites. Development at this site will not have an impact on sites of archaeological interest. The site does not lie within any areas designated for their landscape value. Development of the site would be unlikely to have any effect on the identity of the area as it is located within an established urban setting.
0 0/+
Material Assets
0/+
0 0
Cultural Heritage
0 0
Landscape
Development of the site would be unlikely to impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes.
Buildings on site garages associated with adjacent housing
Some mature trees and shrubs on site raising local environmental quality
89 ABERCROMBY PLACE
0.5
This site a former bowling green - lies adjacent to a playing field which has been designated as a safeguarded recreational zone. It has good transport links via the local road network and connecting main roads. A temporary planning permission is in place to facilitate use for sports training.
The southern portion of the site lies within an area designated as a safeguarded open space.
Local Authority Other site: Community and Leisure Football training ground Residential Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
It is unlikely that development at this site will have an impact on designated area.
There are no priority habitats located within the area. The nearest is a stretch of forest habitat network located approximately 85m to the west.
There is no core path that leads or connects directly to the site, but there are paths within 300m of the site and can be reached via the local road network. The site lies within an area with relatively low levels of deprivation. It is not anticipate that development will contribute significantly to regeneration Local road networks link the site to the wider core path network and surrounding areas and open space. Access routes provide links to the nearby towns of Tullibody, Cambus, Alva and Alloa. There is an area of safeguarded recreational open space adjacent to the southern boundary of the site (and within the southern portion of the site) The site is at some distance from the nearest flood-prone watercourse, and therefore at low risk of flooding There does not appear to be any water courses that run within the site.
0/+ 0
Is the site at risk of flooding? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Air Quality and Transport Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
+ 0
Water
Any development of the site may result in a marginal increase in runoff although this is unlikely to result in any significant effects No. No As this site is situated within Tullibody and is linked to the local road network, it is easily accessible and is in a good position to utilise existing local services. Bus services are accessible adjacent to the site on School Road No data on GIS Development at this site will most likely have very little impact on traffic flow in the area. It is a relatively small site and is proposed to be used community and leisure activities. There is a carpark immediately adjacent on Abercromby Place at Tullibody Civic Centre
Soil
+ + 0
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) 0 0 0/+ 0/+ 0 0
Climatic Factors
Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure?
Not to any significant extent The site is not located within an area at risk from flooding and therefore is unlikely to be effected by any increased flooding as a result of climate change. The site would be expected to utilise the existing infrastructure present in the settlement of Tullibody. The site is well positioned to make use of both solar gain and shelter. There may be some limited shadowing from buildings nearby Urban location precludes minerals development There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site.
Material Assets
Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
Cultural Heritage
There are no designated cultural heritage features within the site.
The site is likely to have relatively low archaeological potential. Impacts should therefore be minimal The site does not lie within any areas designated for their landscape value. Development of the site would be unlikely to have any effect on the identity of the area as it is located within an established urban setting.
0 0
Landscape
Development of the site would be unlikely to impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes.
99 BEAUCLERC STREET
1.13
This site is located on the northern edge of Alva and backs onto Alva Golf Course and the Ochil Hills, designated as an Area of Great Landscape Value. There is one listed building within the site, but no other sites of cultural interest recognised to date exist. The site is in a good position to take advantage of existing access routes and infrastructure in Alva. There are good links to nearby towns, such as Tillicoultry, and the wider countryside. Flood risk. Standing building survey; Ochil Hills AGLV; historic building on site (C(S)-Listed late 18th/early 19th century house); remnants of printworks still to be cleared; Core Path
Preferred site: Housing Brownfield Residential; open space Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
The Craig Leith and Myreton Hill SSSI is approximately 480m north west of the site at its closest point, however it is unlikely that development here would impact on the site. An area of ancient riparian woodland borders the site to the NE, with transition open ground and scrub habitats across the north of the site to the boundaries of the golf course. However, development should be able to retain these features as this area is currently the carpark for public access to Alva Glen / Alva Golf Club. This site is well connected to the core path network, which follows the eastern boundary of the site The site is not located in an area of significant social deprivation The site backs on to a large area of open space including Alva Glen and the Ochil Hills and is in a good position to provide good access to the wider countryside. Development should preserve the public car park used for access to Alva Glen (any impact would be a significant loss of amenity) The eastern side of the site lies within the 1 in 200year flood boundary for the Alva burn. Therefore, if a flood event was to occur, the site would be at risk of being effected. The Alva Burn flows along the eastern edge of the site. There is a chance that development here could impact on pollution levels. Development at this site could have an effect on flooding at nearby water courses as it is situated along the western bank of Alva burn. Development may increase levels of runoff entering the burn, increasing the downstream effects (although this is likely to be marginal, given the large size and steeply-sloping upland catchment of the Burn) The southern half of the site incorporates an area designated as vacant or derelict land (site of former printworks) No The site is easily accessible by the local path and road network and is well positioned to access services within the rest of Alva and Tillicoultry also. Bus routes are accessible on Stirling Street (Alvas main street) around 400m by foot from the site No data
+ 0
++
Development scheme which preserves and enhances public access to Alva Glen.
++
Is the site at risk of flooding? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Air Quality and Transport Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at
--
Water
On site stormwater management and retention (SUDS)
Soil
+ 0 + 0/+
0 0
Development at this site is unlikely to have a significant impact on traffic flows within
key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Climatic Factors
and around the area. It is unlikely that the location of the development will have a significant effect on the need to travel, particularly as employment opportunities are limited within Alva As this site is within an area at risk of flooding, there is a chance that the level of risk would increase if water levels were affected by climate change. If the area experiences increases in rainfall/snowmelt as a result of climate change, it could also be further affected by surface run-off from the Ochil Hills region. The settlement is well positioned to make use of the existing infrastructure present in Alva. The site is well positioned to make use of both solar gain and shelter. Urban location and adjacent landscape designations preclude minerals development on site There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site. There is one C(S) listed building within the site (Island House on Brook Street). Development has the potential to impact on both the fabric and setting of the building. The building should be retained on both cultural heritage and sustainability grounds Although the site has an extensive development history, it likely to be of interest in relation to possible industrial archaeological remains on site. The site meets the edge of the Ochil Hills AGLV on its northern boundaries; therefore any development should ensure that it protects the integrity of key views and landscape character. However, given that much of the site was previously developed, it would be unlikely to have a significant impact Development of the site would be unlikely to have any effect on the setting and identity of the surrounding area as overall it would be viewed as an extension to the existing settlement of Alva. Development of the site could impact on views from the Ochil Hills, but this would only be to a minor degree in relation to the development that already exists around the site. -
--
+ + 0 0 Development scheme which retains the Listed building and redevelops the site in a manner that conserves and enhances local character Appropriate survey and archaeological supervision during site preparation
Material Assets
Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains?
Cultural Heritage
0/-
Landscape
View along northern boundary of site, Listed building in background.
Listed building on southeastern boundary of site access to Alva Glen in foreground
100 PARK STREET

1.9
This site is located within the settlement of Alva and was formerly the site of a school which could now be developed for housing. The site is well positioned to take advantage of the existing infrastructure and services within Alva and there are good access routes providing links to nearby towns and the wider countryside None
Proximity to Ochil Hills AGLV; neighbouring residential development
Preferred site: Housing Former school, buildings to be demolished (eastern half of site cleared at time of inspection) Residential; open space Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
No
It is unlikely that development at this site would have any impact on priority habitats or species.
Is the site connected to the local core path network? Population and human health How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD? What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? Is the site at risk of flooding? Water Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Air Quality and Transport Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel?
There are no core paths that run within this site. However, local roads and paths lead to ones close by and provide connections to the wider network. This site is not within an area with high levels of social deprivation. It is therefore unlikely that redevelopment will contribute significantly to reducing deprivation in the area. The site is immediately adjacent to an area of safeguarded open space (playing fields) and is around 200m from Alva Glen and the Core Path network, affording easy access to high quality countryside No No Development at this site is unlikely to have an effect on flooding as the site was previously almost entirely covered by building footprint or hardstanding. Residential development is therefore likely to increase water retention capacity on site The site does not include any areas of vacant or derelict land. No The site is easily accessible by the local path and road network and is well positioned to access services within the rest of Alva and Tillicoultry also. The A91 is the closest main road, approximately 125m south of the site. Bus services can be accessed on Stirling Street, around 100m to the south of the centre of the site by foot No data
0/+ 0
++ 0 0 Development could make use of onsite stormwater retention and reuse
0/+
Soil
0 0 +
Housing development on the site could result in increases in traffic levels on the small-scale local road network, particularly at peak times. However, given the towns size, serious congestion is unlikely to be an issue It is unlikely that the location of development will significantly reduce the need for residents to travel particularly given the relative lack of employment opportunities
0/-
in Alva Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes? The site is not within an area at risk from flooding and is therefore unlikely to be effected by changes in relation to climate change. The settlement is well positioned to make use of the existing infrastructure present in Alva. The site is well positioned to make use of both solar gain and shelter. There is development on the southern side of the site, but this is unlikely to shade the sun completely during daylight hours. The site would be sheltered to some degree by the existing development and possibly by the Ochil Hills to the north. Urban location precludes minerals development There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site. 0 +
Material Assets
0 0
Cultural Heritage
No
Development at this site is not likely to have an impact on archaeological remains. The site is 50m from the Ochil Hills AGLV but it does not lie within any areas designated for their landscape value. Development of the site would be unlikely to have any effect on the setting and identity of the surrounding area as it was previously developed. Well planned and designed residential development will attendant open space could enhance the areas character Development will not alter views of the Ochils from transport routes
0 0
Landscape
0/+
Development including high quality landscaping and open space
Western portion of the site demolition of former school building in progress
Eastern portion of the site former school and associated hardstanding demolished and cleared; site prepared for construction
101 BROOK STREET/BACK ROAD

0.3
This site is located on the northern edge of Alva and is close to the Ochil Hills, a designated as an Area of Great Landscape Value. The site is that of a former mill and, given its riparian location, is at significant risk from fluvial flooding Flood risk (NB site does not fall within SEPA flood risk polygon appears to be a digitising/processing error as this does not conform to the river corridor) Detailed flood risk assessment Burn Mill archaeological site. Ochil Hills AGLV
Preferred site: Housing Open space with existing building (not specified) Residential; open space Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
The Craig Leith and Myreton Hill SSSI is approximately 600m north west of the site at its closest point and therefore it is unlikely that development here would impact on the site. There is one area of forest habitat network approximately 100m north of the site, within this, there is an area of ancient and semi-natural ancient woodland. The western boundary of the site includes an area of riparian woodland which could readily be retained Development here would be unlikely to have a significant impact on priority habitats or species according to the data available.
0/-
Development retains and enhances riparian woodland (for biodiversity and flood attenuation)
Is the site connected to the local core path network? Population and human health How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD? What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources?
This site is well connected to the core path network, with the path to Alva Glen passing the NW corner of the site The site is not within an area of significant social deprivation The site is very close to a large area of open space to the north consisting the Ochil Hills / Alva Glen and is in a good position to provide good access to the wider countryside surrounding Alva. Riparian location conveys significant flood risk 0
++
(NB. Site falls outside SEPA-digitised 1-in-200 year flood zone however, this appears to be a GIS digitising/processing error as the risk zone does not conform to the Alva Burn corridor) Alva Burn flows along the western edge of the site. There is a chance that development here could impact on pollution levels. Development at this site could have an effect on flooding at nearby water courses as it is situated along the eastern bank of Alva burn. Redevelopment is likely to reduce the area of hard surface, reducing runoff. However, given the extensive upland catchment of the Alva Burn, any positive impact on water levels is likely to be negligible The former mill on site (now cleared) was identified as a prioritised VDL site No The site is easily accessible by the local path and road network and is well positioned to access services within the rest of Alva and Tillicoultry also. The A91 is approximately 175m south of the site and this provides a main access route. Bus routes are accessible on Stirling Street, some 400m away on foot No data
--
Water
Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
Soil
+ 0 + 0/+
Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Material Assets Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
Development at this site is unlikely to have a significant impact on traffic flows within and around the area.
Climatic Factors
Not to any significant degree As this site is already at risk of flooding, it is likely that the increased prevalence of extreme weather events will heighten this risk The settlement is well positioned to make use of the existing infrastructure present in Alva. The site is well shelter, and shaded, by existing riparian woodland. It should be possible to orientate new housing to benefit from solar gain Urban location precludes minerals development There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site.
0 -+ 0/+ 0 0
No.
Cultural Heritage
Burn Mill was identified as being of archaeological interest, but the site has already been cleared. (Score based on site being recorded prior to clearance otherwise would be --) No It is unlikely that development on this scale would have a significant impact on settlement character or the nearby AGLV
0/-
Landscape
Development is unlikely to affect key views of the Ochils
View from north of site former mill building demolished and cleared
Site ringed by mature trees significant shading likely
103 FORMER ALVA GLEN HOTEL

0.1
This is a site of a former hotel and has been put forward as suitable for housing. It is located within Alva, close to the Ochil Hills. It is well connected to local services and surrounding areas by the existing transport network. The A91 and B908 provide main access routes from the site. It is, however, within an area of significant flood risk Flood risk
Preferred site: Housing former hotel building; car park Residential Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
No
Development here would be unlikely to have a significant impact on priority habitats or species
There are no core paths that run within this site. However, local roads and paths lead to ones close by and provide connections to the wider network. The closest path is approximately 280m north. The site is not located in an area of significant social deprivation The site is very close to a large area of open space to the north consisting the Ochil Hills and is in a good position to provide good access to the wider countryside surrounding Alva. According to data from SEPA, this site lies within an area at risk of flooding. It is within the 1 in 200 year flood boundary of both the Alva Burn And River Devon. The Alva Burn flows to the west of the site on the other side of the B908. There is a chance that development here could impact on pollution levels although given the urban location it unlikely that this would be significantly worse than the existing use The Alva Burn flows to the west of the site on the other side of the B908. There is a chance that development here could impact on pollution levels although given the urban location it unlikely that this would be significantly worse than the existing use No No The site is easily accessible by the local path and road network and is well positioned to access services within the rest of Alva and Tillicoultry also. The A91 and B908 run close to the site providing main access routes to the surrounding areas. The site is well located to take advantage of local bus routes No data
0/+
--
Water
Soil
0 0 + + 0
Development at this site is unlikely to have a significant impact on traffic flows within and around the area although the site is located on a relatively busy junction
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) 0 -+ + 0 0
Climatic Factors
Not to any significant extent. It is likely that residents will still have to travel to reach areas of potential employment As the site is already within an area of identified vulnerability to flooding, climate change is likely to exacerbate this issue and make impacts increasingly likely The settlement is well positioned to make use of the existing infrastructure present in Alva. The site is relatively well positioned to make use of both solar gain and shelter. Urban location precludes minerals development There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site. No. The existing hotel building is undesignated, but should be retained and converted to avoid impacts on townscape character / heritage. Development at this site is unlikely to have an impact on archaeological remains. The site approximately 370m south of Ochil Hills AGLV. Development of the site would be unlikely to have any effect on the setting and identity of the surrounding area. However, the existing hotel building should be retained and converted to avoid impacts on townscape character.
Material Assets
Cultural Heritage
0 0
Landscape
No
Rear of existing hotel building
106 GLENTANA
1.3
This is the site of a former school which was until recently in community use. The western portion of the site is a former mill building in business use. It has no priority habitats within its boundaries, but does contain one site of archaeological interest. The site is well placed to make use of the existing services and infrastructure within Alva and the surrounding area. There is plenty of open space around Alva, including the Ochil Hills, recognised for its landscape value.
Site of archaeological interest. Proximity to Ochil Hills.
Local Authority Other site: Business and Housing Mixed use former school (candidate for listing) and listed mill building Residential; Open space Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
Does the site impact on designated sites? Biodiversity, flora and fauna Does the site impact on priority habitats or species?
No Development here would be unlikely to have a significant impact on priority habitats as there are no recognised sites in close proximity. The school building should be examined for the presence of bats (European protected species), particularly as the site is on
0/-
Bat survey and appropriate mitigation
Is the site connected to the local core path network? Population and human health How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD? What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? Is the site at risk of flooding? Water Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Air Quality and Transport Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel?
The site is well connected to the core path network. There is a path that runs along the northern edge of the site boundary and links the area to the wider network. The site is not located in an area of significant social deprivation The site is very close to a large area of open space to the north consisting the Ochil Hills and is in a good position to provide good access to the wider countryside surrounding Alva. No There are no water courses within this site. Development at this site is unlikely to have an effect on flooding as there are no water courses within the site boundaries. There is an area of vacant or derelict land within the site although this appears to already No The site is easily accessible by the local path and road network and is well positioned to access services within the rest of Alva and Tillicoultry also. The A91 and B908 run close to the site providing main access routes to the surrounding areas. The site is well served by bus routes No data
++ 0
+ 0 0
Soil
+ 0 ++ + 0
Development at this site is unlikely to have a significant impact on traffic flows within and around the area.
Not to any significant extent
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) 0 + + 0 0
Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Material Assets Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
As this site is not within an area at risk of flooding, it is unlikely that the level of risk would increase if water levels were affected by climate change. The settlement is well positioned to make use of the existing infrastructure present in Alva. The site is relatively well positioned to make use of both solar gain and shelter. Urban location unsuitable for minerals extraction There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site. Glentana Mill building is a candidate for Listing. The former school building is also of relatively high architectural quality and makes a significant contribution to townscape character Development should protect and enhance the fabric and setting of these buildings Development at this site may have an impact on industrial archaeological remains. No Provided development retains the historic buildings on site, there will be little impact on townscape character
Cultural Heritage
0/-
Landscape
Development should not result in additional building frontages onto Stirling Street to preserve views through to the Ochils
0/-
Former school in eastern portion of the site should be retained on cultural heritage / townscape and sustainability grounds
Former mill building in business use in western portion of site
108 ALVA CEMETERY

1.3
The site includes The site is well placed to take advantage of the existing infrastructure and services within Alva. The local transport network provides good access from the rest of Alva and surrounding area.
Flood risk (anecdotal); topography
Preferred site: Community and Leisure Open space Residential; Open space; cemetery Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
No
Impacts unlikely site is currently rough grassland of relatively low biodiversity value. Use and landscaping as cemetery could enhance values through planting of native species and retention/enhancement of existing hedgerows
0/+
The site is relatively well connected to the core path network. No paths run directly to or within the site, but there is one approximately 80m away that links the area to the wider network. The site is not located in an area of significant social deprivation (This is of limited relevance given the proposed land use) The site is very close to a large area of open space to the north consisting of the Ochil Hills.
0/+
In itself, the site is currently open space and, although cemetery expansion will limit use, will not result in any net loss of greenspace (This is of limited relevance given the proposed land use)
According to data from SEPA, this site does not lie within an area at risk of flooding. However, topography and onsite vegetation suggests that the site is relatively wet for much of the year. A short, unnamed watercourse rises on the northern boundary, and sinks at approximately the SE corner of the site.
Water
The historic St. Serfs Well is located on the southern edge of the existing cemetery. These factors (and reading of local topography) suggest that the cemetery and proposed extension sit on the boundary of the water table. This raises significant issues with potential pollution associated with leaching of nutrients/pollutants from decomposing human remains.
--
Detailed hydrological survey.
0/-
Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Air Quality and Transport Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services?
Extension of the cemetery in unlikely to reduce the overall water retention capacity of the site. Although designated as a prioritise site the existing cemetery is neither vacant nor derelict No The site is easily accessible by the local path and road network and is well positioned to access services within the rest of Alva and Tillicoultry also. The A91 runs close to the site providing a main access route to the surrounding areas.
Soil
0 0 +
(This is of limited relevance given the proposed land use) Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Climatic Factors Bus services are accessible on Stirling Street, around 200m to the south No data + 0
Development at this site is unlikely to have a significant impact on the traffic flow
(Irrelevant to proposed use) As this site is not within an area identified as being at risk of flooding by SEPA.
However, during extreme weather events there is the possibility of flooding from the small watercourse on the eastern boundary and pooling due to runoff and poor infiltration. Well positioned for transport network. Other considerations irrelevant to proposed use Largely irrelevant to proposed use (although site has an open, southerly aspect which will create a welcoming, pleasant space) Urban edge location and proximity to existing cemetery precludes minerals development There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site. A-Listed Johnstone Mausoleum; Alva Conservation Area Extension of the cemetery will have no impact on the character or significance of either designation Development at this site may have an impact on archaeological remains, given the deep excavations associated with the proposed land use. Appropriate desk-based assessment and, if necessary, field evaluation should be conducted in advance of conversion The northern boundary of the site meets Ochil Hills AGLV No. Although land use will change, the character of the site will remain open space but with improved quality and management
--
Material Assets
Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value?
0 0
Cultural Heritage
Appropriate archaeological assessment and supervision
0/-
Landscape
Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)?
No
Aerial view of site proposed extension to south
View down main axis of existing cemetery to proposed extension

0.23
This site is situated to the south of Tillicoultry, near Devonside. It is a small area of land sandwiched between the A908 and the River Devon. It is not within any area designated for its landscape value.
Flood risk.
Flood risk.
River Devon. Local Authority and Private Preferred site: Housing Mainly open space. Greenfield. The majority of land surrounding the site taken up by housing or for commercial use. There are also areas of forestry nearby. Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
This site is not within or near any designated sites.
There are no priority habitats located within the area. The nearest is a stretch of forest habitat network lies roughly 47m east of the site. Although this is close, it is separated by the A908.
Is the site connected to the local core path network? How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD? Population and human health
Core paths run close to the site and provide connections to the wider surrounding area. The closest one is to the north on the other side of the River Devon. The site is not located in an area which has a high SIMD. It is included in a data zone that has a SIMD score of 19.4.
0 0
Main road networks link the site to the surrounding areas and open countryside. There is a large expanse of open country side not far from all sides of Tillicoultry/Coalsnaughton, including the Ochil Hills to the north. Access routes provide links to the nearby towns of Coalsnaughton, and Tillicoultry. The closest area safeguarded for recreational use is roughly 176m north of the site.
0/+
The site is just outside the flood risk area of the River Devon and therefore could still be at risk of flooding if it occurs. The River Devon is not within the site, but does flow in parallel with the northern boundary line. This may mean that development at this site could effect pollution levels. According to data from SEPA, this site is just outside of the flood risk boundary so development here could effect flooding, but any impact is unlikely to be significant.
0/-
Water
0/-
Yes, the whole site is within an area allocated as vacant or derelict.
++
The site does not lie within an area of prime agricultural land, but there are two areas close to the site. One is 250m to the west and another 313m to the south (these are approximate distances). As this site is situated on the outskirts of Tillicoultry and relatively well linked to the local path network, and is in a good position to utilise existing local services.
Due to the location of the site, it will be easily accessible by the public transport services already available. Need to check buses etc
Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
No data
Development at this site will have little impact on traffic flow in the area. The site has been put forward as one for housing so any additional traffic would only be relative to the number of people moving to the site.
Climatic Factors
As site is located on the outskirts of Tillicoultry it will benefit from the existing transport infrastructure available here and not increase the need to travel within the area. However, people may have to travel to access employment. According to data from SEPA, this site is at risk from flooding and could be further affected by a change in water levels as a result of climate change. The site would be expected to utilise the existing infrastructure present in the settlement of Tillicoultry, Devonside and Caolsnaughton. The site may be sheltered to some degree by the surrounding buildings, but it would still be able to make use of any sunlight that reaches. Urban location precludes minerals development There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site.
0/-
0/+ 0/+ 0 0
Material Assets
There are some designated cultural heritage features near the site. The closest is near the north west corner of the site where a stone axe from the Middle Bronze Age was found. There are four other sites of cultural interest within 400m of the site. These include: Tillicoultry Railway Station to the north, a listed building on Moss Road also to the north, a post medieval coal pit to the west and a wartime trench system to the north west. Overall, it is unlikely that development at this site will have a detrimental effect on these sites, but the attention may have to be paid the site archaeological object site if it imposes on this area.
0/+
Cultural Heritage
Development at this site may have an impact on sites of archaeological interest.
Landscape
The site does not lie within any areas designated for their landscape value. Development of the site would be unlikely to have any effect on the identity of the area as it is located within an established urban setting.
Development of the site would be unlikely to impact on key views to landscape features, but may impact on views from the A908.
Eastern part of site viewed from Alexandra Street (from south)
View of western part of site, indicating steepness of slope and showing mature trees on site
MIR 118 COALSNAUGHTON NORTH

12
This is a large area of land located on the outskirts of Coalsnaughton, south of Tillicoultry. The B91540 runs along the south of the site and it is also well connected the local road and core path network.
None
Loss of open space
Trees. Hazeldene Preferred site: Housing Mainly open space. The site is surrounded by existing urban development, except for the area of open space that the western boundary meets. Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
This site does not lie within any designated sites. The closest one is the Gartmorn Dam SSSI located approximately 1km to the south. There is a small overlap with a stretch of forest habitat network, so development here may have impact on this to some degree.
0/-
The site is well connected to this network. It has three core paths within its boundaries, linking it to the wider network. The site is not located within an area with high SIMD. It is within the lower end of the score range with a score of 19.99.
+ 0
The southern third of the site is currently a playing field and childrens playground development would result in loss of this resource There is an area safeguarded for recreational purposes 270m to the east.
This site does not lie within a flood risk area. There does not appear to be any water courses within this area, and therefore there is little risk of increased pollution. There does not appear to be any water courses within this area.
0 0 0
Water
Part of the site includes an area of vacant or derelict land.
0/+
Approximately half of the site area has been recognised as prime agricultural land. There is also another area roughly 170m north of the site. As this site is situated on the outskirts and within Coalsnaughton and is linked to the local and main road network, it is easily accessible and is in a good position to utilise existing local services. Access to bus services is available on Wardlaw Street, which forms the southern boundary of the site
0/-
0/+
Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Material Assets Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction?
No data
As the site is quite large, it is highly likely to impact on traffic flow in the area. This increase in traffic could effect local and major routes.
0/-
Climatic Factors
As site is located within Coalsnaughton it will benefit from the existing transport infrastructure available here. However, people may have to travel to access employment. The site is not located within an area at risk from flooding and therefore is unlikely to be effected by an increase in flooding as a result of climate change if it was to occur. The site would be expected to utilise the existing infrastructure present in the settlement of Coalsnaughton and Tillicoultry. The site is well positioned to make use of solar gain as it has mainly open countryside on its western side. This factor may also leave it more exposed to the south westerly prevailing winds. The bedrock in this area consists of lower coal measures, but it is unlikely that development here would reduce future potential for mineral extraction. The site is within a settlement and it appears that the area around the site has already been exploited to some extent for its resources. There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site.
0/-
0 0/+ 0
Cultural Heritage
There are no sites of cultural interest within the site, but several close by within 400m.
0/+
Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Landscape Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)?
Development at this site may have an impact on archaeological remains. The site does not lie within any areas designated for their landscape value. An Area of Great Landscape Value is located 383m to the south west. Development of the site would be unlikely to have any effect on the identity of the area as it is located on the outskirts of an established urban setting.
0/0 0
Development on the site would affect views to the Ochils from the road bounding the site to the north (and from the houses lining it). This would significantly change the character of the area, increasing the sense of enclosure
View of southern portion of site from Wardlaw Street (looking northeast) over existing playing fields

0.8
This site is situated to the south of Tillicoultry, near Devonside, between the A908 and the River Devon. The site is well located for access to the A908 and associated public transport services.
Flood risk.
Flood risk.
River Devon.
Preferred site: Business Buildings exist on the site, but use cannot be identified from the map. The majority of land surrounding the site taken up by housing or for commercial use. There are also areas of forestry nearby. Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
There are no priority habitats located within the area. The nearest is a stretch of forest habitat network lies roughly 90m west of the site.
Core paths run close the site and provide connections to the wider surrounding area. The closest one is to the north on the other side of the River Devon. The site is not located within or near an area with a high SIMD score. It is within the mid-range category with a score of 35.9. If the site was developed as a business area as proposed, it may improve the economy of the area and contribute to a better score.
0/0
Population and human health What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources?
Main road networks link the site to the local road network, the surrounding areas and open countryside. There are large area of open space all around Tillcoutry, including the Ochil Hills in the North. Access routes also provide links to the nearby towns of Coalsnaughton, and Tillicoultry.
0/+
The northern section of this site enters the flood risk area of the River Devon and therefore is at risk of flooding The River Devon is not within the site, but does flow in parallel with the northern boundary line. This may mean that development at this site could effect pollution levels. According to data from SEPA, this site is at risk from flooding, therefore, development here could increase this risk.
-0/-
Water
0/-
The whole of the site incorporates an area designated as vacant or derelict land.
++
The site does not lie within an area of prime agricultural land, but there are two areas close to the site. One is 115m to the west and another 227m to the south (these are
approximate distances). Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Air Quality and Transport Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Material Assets Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) No data on GIS As this site is situated on the outskirts of Tillicoultry and is linked to the local and main road network, it is easily accessible and is in a good position to utilise existing local services. 0
0/+ 0
Development at this site will most likely have little impact on traffic flow in the area.
Climatic Factors
As site is located on the outskirts of Tillicoultry it will benefit from the existing transport infrastructure available here and not increase the need to travel within the area. However, people may have to travel to access employment. According to data from SEPA, this site is at risk from flooding and could be further affected by a change in water levels as a result of climate change. The site would be expected to utilise the existing infrastructure present in the settlement of Tillicoultry, Devonside and Caolsnaughton. The site is relatively well positioned to make use of both solar gain. Some shelter will be provided by the buildings around the site, but as there are less on the west side, it may not be as well sheltered from the prevailing winds as it could be. Urban location precludes minerals development. There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site.
0/-
0/+ 0/-
0 0
Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Cultural Heritage
There are two designated cultural heritage features within the site; one is a site where a stone axe from the Middle Bronze Age was found and the other is a post medieval coal pit. There are four other sites of cultural interest within 400m of the site. These include: Tillicoultry Railway Station to the north, a listed building on Moss Road also to the north, a wartime trench system to the north west. And a series of coal pits to the south west. Development at this site may have an impact on the value of designated cultural heritage features within its boundaries.
0/-
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) 0/0
Development at this site will have an impact on sites of archaeological interest. The site does not lie within any areas designated for their landscape value.
Landscape
Development of the site would be unlikely to have any effect on the identity of the area as it is located within an established urban setting.
Development of the site would be unlikely to impact on key views to landscape features
View down central axis of site, showing poor quality surfacing, historic mill buildings (left) and recent additions
Historic mill buildings in use as industrial units
MIR 126 STIRLING MILLS OUTLET VILLAGE

1.9
This site is situated to the south of Tillicoultry, near Devonside. It is a small area of land next to a sewage works with the River Devon flowing in parallel with its southern boundary. Local roads exist that could be used to access the site from the A908 and main area of Tillicoultry. Flood risk.
Flood risk.
River Devon nearby. Low lying land.
Option site: Business Open space. The majority of land surrounding the site taken up by housing or for commercial use. There are also areas of forestry nearby. Old sewage works. Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
FORM 2
SEA /site assessment topic Site appraisal criteria Site issues and discussion Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) 0 Enhancement and mitigation options Potential effect following mitigation
There are no priority habitats located within the area. The nearest is a stretch of forest habitat network which meets the south west tip of the site boundary and there is another located 280m to the east. It is unlikely that development here would significantly impact on this.
Core paths run along the sites boundary line, part from on the eastern side and it is well connected to the wider network. The site is not located within an area with a high SIMD. The site is within an area with a SIMD score of 19.4, but is adjacent to an area with a higher score.
0/0
Main road networks link the site to the local road network, surrounding areas and open countryside that isnt far from the site in any direction. There are two areas safeguarded for recreational use nearby the site the closest approximately 25m north.
0/+
Is the site at risk of flooding? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Water Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site?
Practically the whole site lies within the flood risk area, excluding the very northern tip. Hence, this site is at high risk of flooding. The River Devon is not within the site, but does flow in parallel with the southern boundary line. This may mean that development at this site could effect pollution levels. According to data from SEPA, this site is at risk from flooding. Therefore, development here could increase the risk of flooding.
No.
The site does not lie within an area of prime agricultural land, but there is an allocated area just west of the site on the other side of the sewage works. Access to the site is relatively good, but as the River Devon restricts access to the south, at present, the only access is provided by minor local roads from the A908 and
0/-
Air Quality
Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and
0/-
SEA /site assessment topic and Transport
services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport?
connecting roads leading to Tillicoultry. As the site is within the existing settlement of Coalsnaughton and is close to a large outlet village, it is likely that public transport links would be available to get access to or near to the site. Need to check buses etc 0/-
No data Site is in close proximity to sewage works which may create potential for nuisance odours (no issue noted during site visit) Development at this site may have an impact on traffic flow in the area as there are only two minor access roads within the integrated network that led directly to it at present. 0/-
Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Climatic Factors Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Material Assets Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
As site is located on the outskirts of Tillicoultry it will benefit from the existing transport infrastructure available here and not increase the need to travel within the area. This is providing improved access to the area is established. People may need t travel in order to find employment. According to data from SEPA, this site is at risk from flooding and could be further affected by a change in water levels as a result of climate change. The site would be expected to utilise the existing infrastructure present in the settlements of Tillicoultry, Devonside and Coalsnaughton. The site is well positioned to make use of solar gain. It has little surrounding it meaning that sunlight would probably reach the site with little shadowing. There may be some degree of shelter provided by the forest area to the south (on the opposite bank of the River Devon) and buildings on the east of the site. Urban location precludes minerals development There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site.
0/-
0 0
0 0
Cultural Heritage
A wartime trench pit is located in the centre of the site and would be impacted on if any development were to take place. Four other sites of archaeological interest exist within 400m of the site, but it is unlikely that development here will impact on the value of these as they are separated by other development or the River Devon. Development at this site will have an impact on sites of archaeological interest.
0/-
The site does not lie within any areas designated for their landscape value.
Landscape
Development of the site would be unlikely to impact on key views to landscape features, but may impact on views from the A908.
MIR 132 COMMUNITY CENTRE SITE

0.75
This site is located within the town of Tillicoultry and incorporates an old school building which is now used by the local community. It is well positioned to use the existing local road network and the A91 lies north of the site providing a main route to nearby towns and larger transport links. It is not located within any areas of cultural heritage, landscape of biodiversity interest. None
None
Low lying ground.
Option site: Community and Leisure This site includes a former school that the community now use on an ad-hoc basis. Residential Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
There are no priority habitats located within the site.
There are no core paths within the site. The closest one is 235m to the west. Local roads do however link the site to the wider core path network. The site lies within an area with a mid-range SIMD score of 34.7. It is not located near an area with a high SIMD score.
The local integrated transport network links the site to the local path network and the wider surrounding countryside. Access routes provide links to the nearby towns of Coalsnaughton and Devonside. There are two areas that are safeguarded for recreational purposes, both more than 200m away from the site.
The site does not lie within an area at risk of flooding. There does not appear to be any water courses present within the site. There does not appear to be any water courses present within the site and therefore development is unlikely to have any impact on flooding.
0 0/+ 0
Water
No.
The site does not lie within an area of prime agricultural land, but there is an allocated area approximately 316m south of the site. The site is well positioned to utilise the existing local path network and provide access to the surrounding services within Tillicoultry. The A91 lies approximately 40m north of the site and provides a main route to the wider transport network.
0/+
Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Material Assets Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines)
Bus services are accessible on Tillicoultry High Street, less than 100m to the north No data
Development at this site may have an impact on traffic flow in the area, but as the site is relatively small and proposed for community/leisure use, any impact is not likely to be significant.
As site is located within Tillicoultry it will benefit from the existing transport infrastructure available here and not increase the need to travel within the area. The site is not at risk from flooding. The site would be expected to utilise the existing infrastructure present in Tillicoultry. The site is surrounded by residential buildings which will provide some shelter to the site, but may also result in a degree of shade. However, it is unlikely that the site will not be able to make use of solar gain to some extent. Urban location precludes minerals development There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site.
0 0 0 0/-
0 0
Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Cultural Heritage
There are no sites designated for their cultural heritage value within the site. The closest point of interest is a listed building on High Street, roughly 24m to the north east, also marked as an archaeological site. Another, approximately 54m south west is Tillicoultry Gasworks archaeological site. Tillicoultry Conservation Area is located approximately 103m north of the site. Development at this site is unlikely to have a significant impact on these features.
0/-
Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Landscape Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)?
Development at this site is unlikely to have a significant impact on archaeological remains. The site does not lie within any areas designated for their landscape value.
0 0
No
MIR 131 UPPER MILL STREET

1.09
This site is a brownfield site located on the edge of Tillicoultry, between the town and Tillicoultry Golf Course. Local transport links connect to the site but, at present, travel loads related to the quarry located nearby makes it less suitable for residential development. Tillicoultry Burn flows along the eastern edge of the site and its flood risk boundary overlaps with the site area. There are, however, no constraints on this site related to priority habitats, but the proximity to the Ochil Hills AGLV may need to be taken into consideration. Flood risk
Flood risk. Ochil Hills AGLV. Surrounding urban development.
Other site: Housing Old school. The site appears to be surrounded by urban settlement apart from the western side which meets a large area of open space consisting Tillicoultry Golf Course. Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
There are no priority habitats located within the site.
A core path runs alongside the western boundary line of the site and connects it to the wider network. The site lies within an area with a low SIMD score (10.8) and is not close to an area with a high score.
0 0
The local integrated transport network connects the site to the wider surrounding countryside and open space resources. This includes a golf course to the west of the site and Ochil Hills region to the north Access routes provide links to the nearby towns of Coalsnaughton and Devonside. The closest area safeguarded for recreational use is approximately 107m south west of the site.
0/+
The eastern edge of the site is within a flood risk area. Tillicoultry Burn flows in parallel with the eastern edge of the site and development here could impact on the level of water pollution. Tillicoultry Burn flows in parallel with the eastern edge of the site and development here could impact on the level of flooding.
0/0/-
Water
The majority of the site includes as area of vacant and derelict land.
0/+
The site does not lie within an area of prime agricultural land, but there is an allocated area approximately 560m south west of the site. The site is well positioned to utilise the existing local path network and provide access to the surrounding services within Tillicoultry. The A91 lies south of the site
0/-
and provides a main route to the wider transport network. The site is currently effected by traffic flow related to a quarry located approximately 256 north of the site. Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Relatively infrequent bus services are accessible on Upper Mill Street No data on GIS 0 0
Development at this site may have an impact on traffic flow in the area, particularly in addition to that related to the quarry.
0/-
Climatic Factors
As site is located within the Tillicoultry area it will benefit from the existing transport infrastructure available here and is unlikely to cause and increase the need to travel. However, people may need to travel in order to find employment. According to data from SEPA, this site is at risk from flooding and could be further affected by a change in water levels as a result of climate change. The site would be expected to utilise the existing infrastructure present in Tillicoultry. The site is well positioned to make use of solar gain, but does not have a great degree of shelter from the southwesterly prevailing winds. Urban location precludes minerals development There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site.
0/-
0 0/0 0
Material Assets
Cultural Heritage
The majority of the site lies within Tillicoultry conservation area. Middleton Mills is an archaeological site located within the site and would be effected by any development here. There are several other archaeological sites near the site and two listed buildings to the north east. Development at this site is highly likely to impact on the archaeological site of Middleton Mills., but not on those other sites nearby as they are located within the built urban setting of Tillicoultry. The site does not lie within any areas designated for their landscape value, however, the closest point of the Ochil Hills area of great landscape value (AGLV) is located approximately 50m to the east.
0/-
Landscape
Development of the site would be unlikely to have any effect on the identity of the area.
No
Gateway to former mill complex
Surviving walls of mill complex
Aerial view of site in context note developing woodland on site and position relative to the green belt (golf course to west)
MIR 138 DOLLAR GOLF CLUB

0.08
This is an area of hardstanding / car park to the rear of Dollar Golf Club Clubhouse. It is located to the east of the Dollar Burn and as within the Ochil Hills AGLV. There are good transport links connecting the site to the rest of Alva and surrounding area and open space. Flood risk
Ochil Hills AGLV; Dollar Conservation Area; impact on setting of listed bridge and buildings (negligible)
Option site: Housing Golf clubhouse and associated car parking Recreational/open space (golf course); residential; countryside Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
No
The site is located on the banks of the Dollar Burn, which is shrouded in riparian woodland. Development may result in limited disturbance of this habitat
0/-
Is the site connected to the local core path network? Population and human health How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD? What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? Is the site at risk of flooding? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Air Quality and Transport Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Factors Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel?
There is a core path that runs along the eastern boundary of the site and provides a good link to the wider network. Dollar has the lowest calculated rates of social deprivation in Clackmannanshire The site provides easy access to routes leading to open space and the wider countryside. I The site is within the flood risk zone of Dollar Burn, as determined by SEPA. It may also be susceptible to run off from the golf course. The Dollar Burn flows next to the eastern boundary of the site. There may be potential for pollution of this water course if a new development was to happen here however, it may not increase from the result of the exiting golf course club house. It is unlikely that development would result in significantly heightened flood risk, as the site is already entirely impermeable hardstanding. Given the extensive upland catchment of the Dollar Burn, any changes are likely to be negligible No No The site is relatively well positioned to take advantage of the existing local path network in order to access the services within Dollar and the surrounding area. Bus services are accessible on Bridge Street, some 450m away on foot No data on GIS although unlikely given rural fringe location
++ 0 ++ --
Water
0/-
Soil
0 0 ++ + 0
It is unlikely that development at this site would result in higher traffic flows to the area.
Unlikely that this development will reduce the need to travel
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) -+
Climate change is likely to significantly increase the risk of flooding from the current 1-in-200 year assessment The settlement is well positioned to make use of the existing infrastructure present in Dollar. The site is heavily shaded by the existing Clubhouse (an imposing 2.5 storey villa) located on the southern boundary of the site. It is also shaded by riparian woodland to the east, and by tall Leyland Cypress hedging to the west (between the site and the golf course). Opportunities for solar gain are therefore poor although conversely the site is well sheltered by these features
Material Assets
Location unsuitable for minerals development There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site. Part of the site is within the Dollar Conservation Area. There are a number of listed buildings near the site, but none within its boundaries. The site is approximately 275m south of the Castle Campbell historic garden and designed landscape. However, is unlikely that development here would have a significant impact on the integrity of the designated sites nearby as it is well screened on all side It is unlikely that development here will have an impact on archaeological remains. No The site is so well screened on all sides that development will have negligible impact on townscape or the AGLV
0 0
Cultural Heritage
0 0
Landscape
The site is so well screened on all sides that development will have negligible impact on townscape or the AGLV
View of site from adjacent Core Path network well screened by riparian woodland
MIR 141 KELLYBANK

2.2
This site is on the eastern outskirts of Dollar. At present it is an area of open space beyond the settlement boundary of Dollar. It is relatively well placed to take advantage of the existing transport and local path network, but it is likely that improvements would be needed if the area was developed. There are no sites designated for their cultural heritage or archaeological value within the site boundaries and development is unlikely to impact on priority habitat species.
Expansion of Dollar urban boundary; impacts on local character
Other site: Housing Undeveloped open space. Open space; residential Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
No
The mature trees ringing the site may be of importance for bats, and development could result in disturbance
Appropriate surveys and protection measures should be implemented in advance of any development
The site is relatively well connected to the core path network. There is a core path that runs along the southern boundary of the site and provides a good link to the wider network. Dollar has the lowest prevalence of social exclusion in Clackmannanshire The site backs on to an area of open fields so is well linked to open space and the wider countryside. This area and the wider countryside can be accessed via the core path network, local paths and transport routes. The site is not within a flood risk area The portion of the western boundary is formed by the Kelly Burn, while the northern and eastern boundaries are marked by large land drains. Development would increase the risk of pollution particularly during construction Development is likely to increase levels of runoff to the two downslope watercourses (Kelly Burn and eastern land drain), which could have a limited impact downstream No The site is not within any area of recognised prime agricultural land. The site is relatively well positioned to take advantage of the existing local path network in order to access the services within Dollar and the surrounding area. However, being on the outskirts of the town with fewer local paths leading to it, the site may require access routes to be improved. Bus services are accessible on Muckhart Road, around 420m to the West No data
++
++ 0 -
Water
0/-
Soil
0 0
+ 0
It is unlikely that development at this site would significantly affect traffic flows.
Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Climatic Factors Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Material Assets Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
It is unlikely that development of this site will reduce the need to travel particularly for employment opportunities. If changes to water and run-off levels occur as a result of climates change, this site may be at a higher level of risk from flooding from the Kelly Burn and the sizeable land drains along the northern and eastern site boundaries The settlement is well positioned to make use of the existing infrastructure present in Dollar. The site is well positioned to make use of both solar gain and shelter from mature trees Urban fringe location unsuitable for minerals development There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site.
0/-
+ ++ 0 0
No
Cultural Heritage
As the site is previously undeveloped, it will have some archaeological potential
0/-
Appropriate desk-based assessment and field evaluation if appropriate. Archaeological supervision of ground preparation works
0/-
No Development at this site may have an impact on the setting of the area. It is currently an area of open space on the outskirts of Dollar and development here would lead to an expansion of the existing urban boundary. Development of the site could impact on views from the Ochil Hills from traffic heading east out of Dollar on Muckhart Road from where framed views of the Ochils are afforded
0 0/-
Landscape
MIR 145 MUCKHART CEMETERY EXTENSION

2.2
This area is located on the northern edge of the Pool of Muckhart. It is within the Ochil Hills AGLV and the Pool of Muckhart Conservation Area. It is accessible from the local road network which connects the area to Dollar via the A91 route.
Ochil Hills AGLV; Muckhart conservation area; on-site watercourses
Preferred site: Community and Leisure Open space Open space; residential; woodland; cemetery Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
No There are no priority habitats located within the site, but there is an area of forest habitat network that meets the north east boundary edge and another approximately 30m to the east of the site. There is also an area of semi natural ancient woodland located approximately 320m north of the site. It is unlikely that an extension of the cemetery at this site would not be detrimental as the habitat value of the area would remain largely unchanged
A core path runs alongside the eastern edge of the site and connects it to the wider network. Pool of Muckhart is not an area of significant social deprivation
++
The local integrated transport network and local path network connect the site to the wider surrounding countryside and open space resources. (Largely irrelevant to proposed use) The site does not lie within an identified flood risk area however, the site is bounded on two sides by a small, unnamed watercourse The site is bounded on two sides by a small, unnamed watercourse. The site slopes sharply down to both north and east (away from the plateau on which the existing cemetery and churchyard are situated), which may create/contribute to issues of leaching of nutrients/pollutants from decomposing human remains into the water environment particularly given the relatively small separation distance from the existing cemetery (<85m).
Water
--
SEPA require a minimum separation of 50m from cemeteries to watercourses significantly reducing the available area.
0/-
Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport?
It is unlikely that expansion of the cemetery would increase runoff to these watercourses The site does not include any areas of vacant or derelict land. No The site is well positioned to utilise the existing local path network and provide access to the surrounding services within Muckhart and larger settlement of Dollar to the east. The A91 provides a main route to the wider transport network. Bus services are accessible from the centre of Pool of Muckhart around 300m away on foot
Soil
0 0 ++
Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Material Assets Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value?
No data rural location suggests that this is unlikely
The cemetery extension proposed for this site is unlikely to have an impact on traffic flow within the area as the site will most likely only be used intermittently
Climatic Factors
Development at this site would only reduce the need to travel for those living within Muckhart. For those who wish to use the cemetery from settlements nearby, some element of travel would still be necessary. The lower-lying sections of the site may be at risk of flooding in future, as incidence of extreme weather events increase as a result of climate change. The site would be expected to utilise the existing infrastructure present in Muckhart. The site is largely north and east facing. However, its open aspect affords good access to sunlight, making for a pleasant and peaceful space Location unsuitable for minerals development There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site. The whole of this site is within Muckhart conservation area. The existing cemetery adjacent to the site has three listed buildings and two archaeological sites on its land. As the development would be an extension of this cemetery, it is unlikely that it would have a negative impact on these cultural heritage assets. The site may have archaeological potential, given greenfield location and association with church site. The site lies within the Ochil Hills Area of Great Landscape Value although it would simply expand the neighbouring cemetery with negligible impact on landscape quality or character Development of the may have an impact on the identity of the area as the proposed extension to the cemetery is quite large compared to the size of the cemetery at present. It will reduce the visual prominence of the original churchyard (as has the existing small extension) although this feature will still be legible No
0 SEPA recommended separation distance may obviate this flood risk
0/+ + 0 0
Cultural Heritage
Should be subject to appropriate deskbased assessment and field evaluation given the deep excavations associated with the proposed land use
0/-
Landscape
0/-
Views from NW corner of existing graveyard sequential SW-N, top to bottom
MIR 97 GLENOCHIL YEAST

5.5
This is a Greenfield site located amongst existing industrial and residential developments within the town on Menstrie. The A91 runs close to the site and can be accessed via the local road network that links the site to towns nearby.
Preferred site: Business Greenfield. Residential; industrial; agricultural land Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
No
It is unlikely that development would affect priority species or habitats provided that the mature tree adjacent to the site are undamaged
0/-
Root and nutrient zones should be safeguarded during construction; bat surveys may be required if development has the potential to cause disturbance
There is a core path that runs alongside the west and northern edges of the site, connecting it to the wider network. The site is not within an area of significant social deprivation The local integrated transport network links the site to the local road network and the wider surrounding countryside. Access routes provide links to the nearby towns of Tullibody, Cambus and Alloa. There is also an area safeguarded for recreational use roughly 280m to the west.
++ 0
Is the site at risk of flooding? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
No No
0 0
Water
There does not appear to be any water courses present within the site and therefore development is unlikely to have any impact on flooding. Approximately a third of the site includes an area of vacant or derelict land. The site does not lie within an area of prime agricultural land. The site is well positioned to utilise the existing local path network and provide access to the surrounding services within Menstrie and Tullibody. The A91 lies approximately 160m north of the site and, from the local road network, provides a main route to wider transport routes. Bus services are accessible within Menstrie, at a distance of around 170m from the NW corner of the site No data
Soil
+ 0
++
+ 0
Development at this site may have an impact on traffic flow as the site is relatively large and could potentially be used for a vehicle-intensive industry
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) 0/+
Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Climatic Factors Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Material Assets Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
As the site is located within Menstrie, it will benefit from the existing transport infrastructure available here and not significantly increase the need to travel. The site is not at a high risk from flooding, but if flooding was to increase as a result of climate change, due to the sites proximity to the flooding boundary of the River Devon, this risk may heighten. The site would be expected to utilise the existing infrastructure present in Menstrie and Tullibody. The site is well positioned to make use of both solar gain and shelter. The urban fringe location of the site is inappropriate for minerals development There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site. No
0/-
+ ++ 0 0
Cultural Heritage
Development at this site is unlikely to have a significant impact on archaeological remains. No Development of the site would be unlikely to have any effect on the identity of the area as it is located amongst an already developed area. However, this would be dependent on the ultimate use of the site, as some type of building/land use may appear incongruous. No
0 0
Landscape
0/-
View across site to Ochil Hills AGLV
MIR 151 GARVEL FARM

20.2
This site is proposed for business use. It lies on the northern bank of the River Forth amongst other, existing, industrial buildings. There are access routes that lead to the site which may need improved if development was to take place. The eastern part of the site includes a poultry farm and the remainder appears to be open, disused space. There is a dismantled railway line along the western edge and an area of woodland to the northwest Flood risk;
potential impacts on Natura 2000 site (Firth of Forth SPA), Wetland of International Importance and SSSI (impacts dependent on proposed use) more significant when combined with high flood risk 17.7ha (excluding all 1-in-200 year flood risk)
Preferred option: Business Agricultural land Industrial; open space; open water; industrial-scale agriculture (poultry sheds) Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
The Firth of Forth SPA, SSSI and RAMSAR wetland is located approximately 1.4km south east of the site (but around 5.7km downstream) Does the site impact on designated sites? Biodiversity, flora and fauna Does the site impact on priority habitats or species? Cambus Pools SWT Nature Reserve is approximately 800m away from the site. Impacts will be dependent on proposed land use -
Appropriate Assessment under Regulation 48 of the Habitats Regulations 1994 may be required
Development could have an impact of the River Forth and associated wetland habitat
0/-
Appropriate habitat management planning
0/+
Is the site connected to the local core path network? Population and human health How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD? What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? Is the site at risk of flooding? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Air Quality and Transport Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to
There is a core path that comes into contact with the north east corner of the site, but there are none that run within the site itself. The site is relatively well connected to the wider network. The site is not located in an area which has a high SIMD score The site is within easy access to the wider countryside (including the River Forth) and areas of open space. The River Forth flows along the western edge of the site and this side of the site is within the rivers 1 in 200 year flood risk boundary. Due to the proximity of the site to the River Forth, the result of developing the site could cause increased levels of pollution particularly when combined with significant flood risk and the sensitivity of downstream assets There are no water courses within the site itself, but as it is so close to the River Forth, there is the potential for development here to cause an increase in flooding. As the site is currently greenfield, development will result in a significant reduction in porous surface, increasing runoff There is no vacant or derelict land within the site. The site does not lie within an area of prime agricultural land. The site is well positioned to access services within Tullibody, however, there appears to only be one road that leads directly to the site at present. The site is not currently served by public transport. The closest access to bus routes is on Alloa Road/A907 more than 1km away by foot No data Any business development at this site could increase traffic flows on routes leading to
0 + --
Water
--
Development should make provision for onsite retention and treatment of stormwater
Soil
0 0 0/+ If major employment site, public transport links must be provided
--
0 -
higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Climatic Factors
the area as it is a relatively large site and may attract a large work force. The largest impact is most likely to occur at peak travel times.
Development of the site is likely to increase the need to travel, since no public transport links are provided and the site is at some distance from settlements The site is on the northern bank of the River Forth and within its flood risk boundary. Therefore, there is a strong likelihood that a combination of sea level rise, increased risk of storm surge and more frequent extreme weather events as well as an overall increase in winter rainfall will result in significantly heightened flood risk The site is at some distance from sustainable transport options (although is well placed for the core path network). Services are likely to brought in from the main road and existing industrial areas The site is in a good position to take advantage of solar gain. It is in open area where any development here would still be exposed on the riverside where development is unable to be established. This also means that it is not well sheltered from the west/south westerly prevailing winds. The site lies over bedrock formed of limestone. As it is near the River Forth and other industrial development, it is unlikely that development here would reduce the future potential to extract minerals as it would not be an ideal site for this activity in any case. There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site.
--
0/-
Material Assets
0/+
Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
There are no cultural heritage sites within or near the site.
Cultural Heritage
Given that the site is undeveloped it may have some archaeological potential. However, because of the dynamic nature of the Forth floodplain during history there may be relatively few remains of early date No Development of the site would be unlikely to have any effect on the setting and identity of the surrounding area. Although it is close to the River Forth, the site is within an area where industrial developments already exist and would most likely be viewed as an extension of these. No
Desk-based assessment, field evaluation if necessary and archaeological supervision of ground preparation works
0/-
Landscape
Site currently greenfield with extensive views
Adjacent bonded warehousing is already a strong industrial influence in the landscape as are broiler sheds to east and south
MIR 153 MANOR POWIS

2.06 + 0.65 = 2.71 in total
This site consists of two areas that are not physically connected, but close to one another. It lies within an area of vacant or derelict land and comprises the denuded remains of a colliery bing (the site of the Manor Powis anthracite colliery). The site has been partly reclaimed by nature, through natural regeneration/planting of woodland and development of a path network. It is on the northern bank of the River Forth in an area where several industrial buildings already exist. It is not linked to the existing transport network
Flood risk; asset extends into Stirling Council area
Scrub; woodland; River Forth
Preferred site: Business Open space; informal recreation Industrial and recreation (River Forth) Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
The Firth of Forth SPA/SSSI/RAMSAR wetland is located approximately 2.2km south east of the site (but over 6km downstream). Does the site impact on designated sites? Biodiversity, flora and fauna Impact will be dependent on proposed use, but construction will necessitate the disturbance of significant quantities of colliery waste, which is likely to include potentially polluting substances (hydrocarbons, iron-rich sandstones etc.) Cambus Pools Nature Reserve is approximately 1.5km away from the site Appropriate Assessment under Regulation 48 of the Habitats Regulations 1994 may be necessary 0
There are no recognised priority habitat species within the site boundaries. These is potential for development to have an adverse effect on woodland and the River Forth
Appropriate safeguarding of identified assets and enhancement of existing woodland
Is the site connected to the local core path network? Population and human health How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD? What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? Is the site at risk of flooding? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Air Quality and Transport Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
The site is not connected to the core path network. The closest path is approximately 430m north of the site. The site is not located in an area which has a high SIMD.
0/0 +
Creation of new links to facilitate sustainable access
The site is within easy access to the wider countryside (including the River Forth) and areas of open space. The River Forth flows along the western edge of the site and this side of the site is just outside of the rivers 1 in 200year flood risk boundary. This indicates that at least a portion of the site could be at risk from flooding. Due to the proximity of the site to the River Forth, the result of developing the site could cause increased levels of pollution. There are no water courses within the site itself, but as it is so close to the River Forth, there is the potential for development here to cause an increase in flooding. The whole area of the site is within vacant or derelict land. The site does not lie within an area of prime agricultural land. The site is separated from the existing local path and transport network. Therefore, it is not best placed to access nearby settlement and services, unless links were integrated into the existing infrastructure. There are no roads leading to the site at present and therefore it is not accessible by public transport. No data
Water
--
Soil
++ 0 Public transport links developed in parallel with business use
Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Climatic Factors Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
As the site is relatively small, it is unlikely (if transport routes were developed) that traffic flows would increase significantly.
Development of the site would increase the need to travel although this may be displaced through creation of sustainable links The site is on the northern bank of the River Forth and close to its flood risk boundary. Therefore, there is the potential that an increase in rainfall or flood levels as a result of climate change could cause a heightened risk from flooding. The site is somewhat isolated from existing service and would require new links The site is in a good position to take advantage of solar gain. It is in an open area where any development here would still be exposed on the riverside. This also means that it is not well sheltered from the west/south westerly prevailing winds. It is likely that the local deposits have been worked out, as the site used to be a colliery There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site.
0/-
--
--
Material Assets
0/+
0 0
There are no cultural heritage sites within or near the site.
Cultural Heritage
As development is likely to be located on former colliery spoil archaeological interest is likely to be low. However, there may be industrial buildings on site that should be recorded No
0/0
Landscape
No
No
Aerial view of site in context note proximity to River Forth and parkland habitat to south
MIR 154 TILLICOULTRY QUARRY

10.8
This site is still active as a hard rock quarry on the north west boundary of Tillicoultry and is to be considered for development after use. It is located within the Ochil Hills AGLV Ochil Hills AGLV
Ochil Hills AGLV. Mill Glen SSSI; impact on Tillicoultry Conservation Area; Core Path network
Preferred site: Business Still in use as an active hard rock quarry. The site is surrounded by open space, apart from where its boundary meets the settlement of Tillicoutry in the south east. Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
This site is not within or near any designated sites, but Mill Glen SSSI is adjacent to it to the west.
It is unlikely that after-use development in the quarry will have significant effect (particularly since current use is so disruptive) and may create opportunities for restoring areas or encouraging key species to utilise rock faces (e.g. peregrine falcon)
Is the site connected to the local core path network? Population and human health How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD? What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? Is the site at risk of flooding? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Air Quality and Transport Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Does the location of the development reduce
Core paths run along the southern and eastern sides of the site and connect the site to the wider network. The site lies within an area with a low SIMD score The site is well located to take advantage of nearby countryside, accessible via the core path network The site is not within an area at risk from flooding although it is adjacent to a flood risk area The Tillicoultry Burn flows in parallel with the eastern edge of the site and future development here could impact on the level of water pollution although it is likely to be less significant than current use of the site Development is unlikely to increase levels of runoff from the site Approximately 25% of the site includes vacant or derelict land. This is within the eastern part of the site. No The site is well positioned to utilise the existing local path network and provide access to the surrounding services within Tillicoultry. The A91 lies south of the site and provides a main route to the wider transport network. Bus services are accessible on Upper Mill Street, around 400m from the site boundary No data although unlikely Development at this site may have an impact on traffic flow if it was developed in the future. The road network in the northern extremity of Tillicoultry is fragile and would require upgrading if development were to result in a significant increase in traffic flow. Similarly, this would affect the tranquillity of the Mill Glen core path and onward access to the Ochils (popular route to Ben Cleuch etc.) Unlikely to significantly reduce need to travel unless bulk of workforce for new
+ 0 ++ 0
Water
0/-
Soil
+ 0 + + 0
0/-
the need to travel? Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
business sites live in Tillicoultry There is potential for increased flood risk due to the effects of climate change The site would require reinforcing of existing services to facilitate business use The site is currently a quarry, therefore significant overshadowing may be a problem, along with eddying winds It is unlikely that future development at this site would reduce the potential for mineral extraction as it will have been fully exploited by the quarry works currently taking place there. There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site. -
Material Assets
Cultural Heritage
No
Quarrying has destroyed all sites of archaeological interest in the vicinity The site is incorporated within the Ochil Hills area of great landscape value (AGLV). Development of the site is likely to have an effect on the identity of the area as any change would be significantly different from its current use. However, a new use could convey significant landscape enhancement. Development is likely to be located on the quarry floor and therefore largely invisible from the surrounding area.
0 -
0/+
Landscape
Aerial view of site in context note proximity to riparian woodland
MIR 156 FORMER DEVON EQUESTRIAN CENTRE

24.5
This site is located between Alva, Tillicoultry and Alloa, close to the A91 and B9140 roads. There is only one small road that provides direct access to the site and it is well connected to core path network. The land consists of an old, disused quarry site and incorporates areas of vacant and derelict land relating to mining. The River Devon flows along the north and part of the eastern border of the site of the site making the site at risk of flooding.
Flood risk; potential impact on setting of Scheduled Monuments (Devon colliery pumping engine house; Sauchie Tower) both outside site c. 14ha Open space; woodland; animal rescue centre
Preferred site: Business Disused quarry. Open space. Farming. Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
No Part of the site overlaps with an area of forest habitat network. Development at this site would impact directly on this and possible cause increased fragmentation between habitat network areas. There is also an area of ancient and semi-natural ancient woodland100m south of the site. The River Devon is also sensitive to impact There are two core paths within the site and it is close to an integrated network of paths. These lead to open spaces nearby and the wider surrounding countryside and settlements. The site is not in an area of significant social deprivation The site is surrounded by areas of open space and areas of woodland. There is limited access to these via local roads and core paths. According to data from SEPA, part of the northern section of the site is within the flood boundary of the River Devon. There is a small stream or drainage channel in the east. The River Devon flows along the northern edge of the site and development here may affect pollution levels. There is potential for development here to impact on flood levels due to the proximity to the River Devon particularly if large areas of hardstanding / buildings were required Much of the site includes area of vacant and derelict land which indicates that development here would make effective use of the space. No The site is located between Alva and Tillicoultry, but is not physically linked to either. This makes it relatively well placed to access services in either town, however improvement to transport routes would be necessary. Bus services are accessible in Devon Village, more than 1km away (via the Core Path network) No data
Is the site connected to the local core path network? Population and human health How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD? What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? Is the site at risk of flooding? Water Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Air Quality and Transport Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
++
0 ++ This area should be excluded from development and restored to active floodplain On site retention and treatment of runoff On site retention and treatment of runoff
--
0+
Soil
++ 0 0/-
As a business development site, it is a relatively large area and once established, could increase traffic flow on main routes leading to the area. This would be resultant of the lack of public transport links and the need to travel by private vehicle.
Climatic Factors
The site would increase the need to travel as it is separated from the main urban areas closest by and it is not facilitated by public transport. The site could be affected by changes in precipitation as a result of climate change, increasing the area vulnerable to flooding The site is located between the A91 and B9140, and in between Alva and Tillicoultry, however there is only one minor road that leads to the site itself. Improvements would be necessary in order to connect the site more effectively to the nearest settlement (namely Alva) and benefit from the existing infrastructure there. The site is well positioned to make use of both solar gain and shelter from woodland Former minerals extraction site therefore deposits likely to have been worked out No Two Scheduled Monuments are located in close proximity to the site boundary development could have an impact on their setting (although this is unlikely given the screening provided by existing woodland) The remains of Devon Ironworks are located on site, therefore development could have an adverse effect on extant features No Development of the site may have an effect on the setting and identity of the surrounding area as it is not currently built up. However, the site is currently derelict, disused land so may benefit from a structured development. Development of the site could impact on views from the Ochil Hills and The Forest AGLV. It would also be within view from the A91 and B9140, although heavily screened by woodland
Material Assets
+ 0 0
Cultural Heritage
0/-
Appropriate desk-based assessment and field evaluation
0/-
0/+
Landscape
0/-
Site is extremely large, with extensive and varied panoramic views of the Ochil Hills AGLV and adjacent historic buildings (Devon Colliery pumping house, Scheduled Monument)
MIR 50 SAUCHIE WEST/TULLYGARTH

22.5
This is a large site located between Gubber Hill and Blackmuir Wood. It is on the outskirts of Alloa to the north west, not far from Tullibody and is connected to both towns via the B9096 and other, smaller, more local routes. The site includes Lornhill Academy high school in half of the site and the remaining land is open space surrounded by woodland.
Key view impact
There is a small patch of woodland in the north of the site and along the edge of the south and eastern boundary lines. Low lying ground. Small stream or drainage ditch.
Preferred site: Community and Leisure School building and open space Residential and woodland Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
No An area of Forest Habitat Network lies within the site. Much of the site is bordered by semi-natural ancient woodland (also designated Ancient Woodland Inventory, Forest Habitat Network). Therefore, development here may have a degree of impact on the habitat network. The site is well located in relation to the core path network, one link running though and adjacent to the site. The site lies within a moderately deprived area (ranked 1,854 out of 6, 505 1 being the most deprived). Residential areas to the west and southeast of the site within 1km are more severely deprived. Roughly a third of the site is within a datazone with an SIMD score of 11.85, and the remaining has a score of 27.1. Development of the site could have a positive effect on deprivation through regeneration. The development is almost entirely bounded by greenbelt, therefore access to open space is good, bolstered by good core path links No A small stream or drainage ditch runs through and adjacent to the site. It is unlikely that community use of the site will result in additional pollution risk A small stream or drainage ditch runs through and adjacent to the site. It is unlikely that community use or development will significantly increase runoff There is a small area of vacant or derelict land within the site boundary in the north. No The site can be accessed by the local path network, but only on along the southern and western sides at present. These routes, including the core paths, provide access to the nearby services of Alloa and Tullibody. The school is well served by bus routes No data
0/-
++
What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? Is the site at risk of flooding? Water Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Air Quality and Transport Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Climatic Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel?
++ 0 0
Soil
+ 0 ++ ++
It is possible that development here could increase traffic flows, specifically along the B9096 that runs along the south of the site and acts as a main route connecting Tullibody and Alloa. This site is located on the outskirts of Alloa, approximately 330m from the urban edge of Tullibody. Development here would not significantly increase the need to
travel as it is conveniently positioned making it easily accessible from both settlements nearby. Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? The site does not currently lie within any flood boundaries and this is unlikely to change given the lack of large watercourse in the area The site is well positioned to take advantage of the existing services and infrastructure within Alloa and Tullibody. The site is relatively open to the elements, but the new school building has been designed to maximise solar gain Area unsuitable for minerals development There are no hazard areas within or near this site. 0 + ++ 0 0
Material Assets
Cultural Heritage
No
It is unlikely that development here would impact on archaeological remains, although the greenfield portion of the site is likely to have some archaeological potential Over 50% of the site is designated as greenbelt The new school building is large and striking, but has a smaller overall footprint than its predecessor and, in time, will recede as planting matures
0/-
Appropriate desk based assessment and any necessary archaeological field work
0/-
Landscape
Further development at this site may impact on views from Gubber Hill and the B9096.
0/-
No site photographs taken for child protection reasons (school in active use during field visit); aerial photographs out of date
MIR 155 SAUCHIE TOWER

2.2
This site is located between Alva and Tillicoultry, close to the A91 and B9140 roads. It is the site of the Sauchie Tower, a Scheduled Monument. It is in a rural area, close to the settlements of Alloa and Alva, which has numerous farms and a disused quarry along with sparsely dispersed clusters of housing.
Fabric and setting of Scheduled Monument; potential flood risk
Woodland
Preferred site: Community and Leisure Conservation Residential, farming and woodland. Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
No An area of forest habitat network overlaps with the whole site. There is also an area of ancient and semi-natural ancient woodland approximately 45m from the site.
Plans for the site are to improve the building that already exists so it is unlikely that the impact of future development would be significant. It is possible that the tower is used by protected species (bats and nesting birds) and should be surveyed in advance of any invasive restoration work
0/-
Appropriate bat and nesting bird surveys
There is a core path that travels along the southern edge of the site which connects it to an integrated network of paths nearby. These lead to open spaces and the wider surrounding countryside. The site is not within an area of high social deprivation The site is surrounded by areas of open space and patches of woodland. No. It is around 135m from the River Devon flood zone There is a small stream or drainage channel flowing through the site. The River Devon is approximately 155m from site, but conservation use is unlikely to have a significant impact (although use of lime mortars should be strictly controlled to prevent discharges to watercourses) It is unlikely that conservation of the historic building will result in additional flood risk The northern part of the site includes vacant and derelict land which indicates that development here could make effective use of the space. No The site is located between Alva and Tillicoultry, but is not physically linked to either. The core path network provides convoluted links to amenities at a considerable distance The nearest public transport link is more than 1km away on foot (via the Core Path network) No data
0 ++ 0 Appropriate pollution control measures during conservation work
Water
0/-
0 + 0 -
Soil
It is unlikely that the proposed development for this site would lead to a significant increase in traffic flow.
Climatic Factors
It is unlikely that conservation development would significantly increase or reduce the need to travel Increased precipitation and incidence of extreme weather events could bring the site into the flood risk area The site is located between the A91 and B9140, and in between Alva and Tillicoultry, however there is only one minor road that leads to the site itself. Improvements would be necessary in order to connect the site more effectively to the nearest settlement (namely Alva) and benefit from the existing infrastructure there. The site is well positioned to make use of both solar gain and shelter. However, development will focus on conservation of the tower house No There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site. Sauchie Tower is itself a Scheduled Monument therefore any works require Scheduled Monument Consent from Scottish Ministers. However, professionally planned and executed conservation work should conserve and enhance the character and significance of the monument Development at this site may have an impact on archaeological remains, especially as there are several sites of archaeological interest within and around the site. No
Material Assets
0 0 0
Cultural Heritage
0/-
The development is unlikely to adversely affect the surrounding landscape
Landscape
Conservation work will enhance views of the tower from the adjacent road
Site comprises extensive woodland habitats surrounding Sauchie Tower
Sauchie Tower (a 15th century tower house and later additions) is A-Listed and a Scheduled Monument reflecting its national significance
MIR 158 BESSIE MINE

8.3
This site is an area of woodland located west of the urban boundary of Tillicoultry. At present, there are no transport links to the site, but it is well connected to the core path network.
Flood risk. Lack of vehicular access routes. Small streams/drainage channels.
Woodland. River Devon nearby.
Preferred site: Conservation Woodland. Open space. Woodland. Agricultural land Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
No
Virtually the entire site is woodland proposed uses should not result in net loss of woodland habitat
0/-
Is the site connected to the local core path network? Population and human health How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD? What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? Is the site at risk of flooding? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land?
A core path that runs along the southern boundary of the site and connects it to the wider network. The site is not located in an area which has a high SIMD The site is itself an area of open space in amongst a wider area that is much the same. The northern section of this site enters the flood risk area of the River Devon Conservation use is unlikely to result in pollution
+ 0 ++ 0 Monitoring of mine waste to assess levels of discharge
Water
Conservation use is unlikely to result in increased runoff
Soil
The majority of the site is allocated as derelict or vacant land. No As this site is situated outwith the boundaries of Tillicoultry and is not connected by any transport links it cannot be accessed easily at present, unless the core path network is used. Given the continued conservation use of the site, this could be viewed as a positive advantage No links within easy reach No data
++
0/+
No, as the site is not on any existing or proposed road links
Climatic Factors
As site is located outside of Tillicoultry, the development would increase the need to travel. However, as it is currently only accessible by sustainable transport (i.e. the Core Path network) this is not a negative effect According to data from SEPA, this site is at risk from flooding and could be further affected by a change in water levels as a result of climate change. No. No infrastructure required No built development is planned Site is a worked out mine, therefore no potential for further extraction There are no hazard areas within or nearby the site.
0 0 0 0
Exclude flood risk area from any access or recreation enhancement
Material Assets
Cultural Heritage
No
There is one archaeological site within the site boundary (Tillicoultry Colliery). No built development is planned, therefore impacts are likely to be negligible No
Conservation work could include interpretation of industrial heritage
Conservation work is likely to enhance landscape character
Landscape
No
Aerial photograph of site in context note excellent habitat network connectivity
MIR 49 ALLOA WEST (ORCHARD FARM)

39.5
The site meets the western outskirts of Alloa and lies adjacent to the River Forth and the Firth of Forth SSSI/SPA/RAMSAR site. There is one local path that leads to the site and other private roads that run through it. The site is currently an area of open space located next to a small building associated with Orchard Farm and an area of industrial works on the other side. None
Future flood risk. Firth of Forth SSSI/SPA/RAMSAR.
Agricultural land
Option site: Business Open space Industry; agriculture Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
Enhancement and mitigation options Appropriate Assessment under Regulation 48 of the Habitats Regulations 1994 will be necessary Key habitat areas should be safeguarded
Does the site impact on designated sites? Biodiversity, flora and fauna Does the site impact on priority habitats or species? Is the site connected to the local core path network? Population and human health How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD? What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? Is the site at risk of flooding?
The Firth of Forth SSSI/SPA/RAMSAR borders the site. An area of semi-natural ancient woodland lies within 400 m of the site to the northwest. Development could have a significant effect on the SPA through loss of foraging areas for overwintering wildfowl (reason for designations), such as Pink-footed geese As above: additional impacts on open ground and riverine habitats could result from development The site is well located in relation to the core path network, several links running though or adjacent to the site. The site does not lie within a deprived area (ranked 3,461 out of 6,505 1 being the most deprived) although the area lying approximately 900 m to the east is ranked 577. It has a SIMD score of 15.8. Development of the site could have a positive effect on deprivation through regeneration. The site is on the edge of open countryside, therefore has good access to open space and further access to recreation spaces is provided by the Core Path network The River Forth and its intertidal area lie immediately to the south of the site although only a very small area of the site itself is identified by SEPA as at risk of flooding. The River Forth and its intertidal area lie immediately to the south of the site. A small stream or drainage ditch runs through the northern part of the site. Depending on the use of the site, increased pollution risk may be an issue. Construction is also likely to generate potential impacts Development is likely to reduce the capacity of the site to absorb rainfall, potentially increasing flood risk No The site is not prime agricultural land At present, there is limited access to the site via the local path network. There is a private road that goes to the site which leads off a local road that comes from the main settlement area nearby. It is in a good position to link to the rest of Alloa if improvements/extensions to the road network could be made. Links to Smithfield Loan, around 400m from the site boundary No data If development were to take place here, it is likely that traffic flows would be affected.
--
-++
++
0/-
Water
On site retention and treatment of stormwater using SuDS
Soil
0 0
Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to
0/+ 0 -
Business development should be accompanied by public transport links
higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Does the location of the development reduce the need to travel? Climatic Factors Is the site at risk of increased flooding or instability as a result of climate change? Is the site located close to existing transport, services, water and energy infrastructure? Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value? Would development within the site impact on archaeological remains? Does the site lie within an area designated for its landscape value? Would development within the site impact on settlement setting and identity (drawing on issues of landscape character and capacity for development)? Would development within the site impact on key views to landscape features or from key transport routes?
It is a large site and if business were to become established her, commuter traffic could impact on major routes nearby.
The site is situated on the outskirts of Alloa, near other business outlets that already exist. Development here may help to reduce the need to travel further distance for business purposes. There is a small area of the site within the SEPA flood boundary of the River Forth. It is therefore likely that flood risk will increase significantly in line with projected increases in winter rainfall, more extreme weather, rising sea levels and an increased prevalence of storm surge events Greenfield site, therefore all infrastructure will have to be provided The site is well positioned to make use of solar gain. At present there is open land on either side of the site, meaning that sunlight will reach it throughout the day. Riverside location reduces potential for shelter No proximity to urban area and Natura 2000 sites negates potential for minerals development No.
0/+
--
Material Assets
0 0
No
Cultural Heritage
As the site is greenfield, its archaeological potential is relatively high. At least two mineral railways are known to have crossed the site. Development could therefore have an adverse effect on unrecognised sites There are no areas designated for their landscape value within the site. There is the possibility that a large development here could impact on the character of the floodplain landscape, significantly extending the industrial area
Appropriate desk-based assessment and field evaluation in advance of development; archaeological supervision of ground preparation works
0/-
Landscape
Development at this site could impact on views from the A907 and the River Forth.
Aerial view of site in context note proximity to River Forth SPA
Site is currently an extremely extensive area in arable cultivation (view from Core Path network along northern boundary of site)
MIR 68 TULLYGARTH BRICKWORKS

9.9
The site lies within a vast area of open space not far from Clackmannan. It is the site of an old brickworks with low hills around it and a large area of woodland nearby. It borders The Forest AGLV, but does not contain any designated sites. It also includes a site of archaeological interest related to the brickworks. Although the site is on the Core Path network, vehicular access is limited to a private road.
Future flood risk; habitat values
Option site: Conservation Site of an old brickworks Open space and woodland Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
The site lies within approximately 470 m of the Linn Mill SSSI however, the site is downstream of the SSSI and is therefore unlikely to have an impact Blocks of semi-natural ancient woodland border the site to its west and lie approximately 370 m to its east. The site itself is well wooded, although as the proposed use is Conservation impacts are unlikely The site is well located in relation to the core path network, links running along its northern and western borders. The site does not lie within a deprived area (ranked 4,439 out of 6,505 1 being the most deprived)
Is the site connected to the local core path network? Population and human health How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD? What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? Is the site at risk of flooding? Water Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Soil Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Air Quality and Transport Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
++
The site is situated in open countryside and is itself an open space resource An area bordering the western end of the site is identified by SEPA as at risk of fluvial flooding. The site appears to drain to Black Devon, a river which flows along its western boundary. However, as conservation is the proposed use impacts are unlikely Conservation work is unlikely to increase flood risk
++ 0
The whole of this site includes an area of vacant and derelict land.
++
No The site is accessible only via the core path network and tracks it lies at some distance from settlement No No data
0 0 0
Traffic impacts unlikely, given the proposed use and location of site
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) 0 0 0 0 0
Climatic Factors
No nor will it increase the need to travel As the site is close to a flood boundary, risk is likely to increase as a result of the direct effects of climate change No services required Irrelevant to proposed use Former mineral workings, therefore no potential for further development No
Material Assets
Is the site located to make best use of shelter and solar gain? Would development on the site reduce future potential for mineral extraction? Does the site include any hazard areas? (oil or gas pipelines) Would development within the site impact on the integrity of sites, monuments, buildings or areas designated for their cultural heritage value?
No
Cultural Heritage
Cherryton Brickworks archaeological site lies within the site boundary. Tullygarth Shaft lies on its western boundary and Tullygarth Mine approximately 180 m to the north However, conservation use is unlikely to have an adverse effect on historic assets.
Conservation work could include interpretation of cultural heritage features
There are no areas designated for their landscape value within the site. However, The Forest AGLV meets the northern border of the site.
Landscape
Conservation use will have a positive effect on the areas landscape character
No
Site has fine panoramic views to the Ochil Hills AGLV, enhancing rural setting
While much of the industrial remains on the site have been levelled, the chimney is an important local landmark and maintains an important link to the sites past
MIR 47 BRAEHEAD GOLF COURSE

1.4
This site is within Braehead golf course, but is not an active part of the course it is an area of mature trees and shrubs on the periphery. It is divided into two parts and follows the boundary line between the golf course and settlement of Alloa. The whole site is part of an arc of woodland habitat of considerable value, including several veteran oak trees, which may have implications on any development. Access to and from the site good as the site is located well to take advantage of the transport network in Alloa however, forming vehicular access is likely to be problematic Greenbelt
Veteran trees; woodland habitat; potential for protected species; access issues; topography and site size; interruption of Core Path network; impact on local character and views 0ha
Other site: Housing Open space Open space; woodland; residential; recreation (golf course) Identifies key structure and local plan policies which apply specifically to the site
No An area of Ancient Woodland Inventory borders the site and the whole site is part of the Forest Habitat Network. A large number of veteran trees lie within the site and adverse impacts on this resource would be inevitable as a consequence of development. They are ideal habitat for bats (European protected species) The site is well located in relation to the core path network, with a link running through the site. However, development of these sites would result in interruption of the network and a loss of connectivity
--
Bat and Phase 2 habitat survey
--
Is the site connected to the local core path network? Population and human health
--
Re-route core path at developers expense
How does the site relate to areas with high SIMD? What is the relationship of the site with existing open space resources? Is the site at risk of flooding?
The site does not lie within a deprived area
The site lies on the edge of a golf course and open countryside No No Development on site would reduce infiltration capacity of the area, increasing runoff across the golf course No No Yes good links are available into Alloa No the area does not appear to be accessible by local bus services No data
+ 0 0
Water
Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of pollution from development within the site? Are there water courses within the site or which would be affected by increased levels of flooding resulting from development of the site? Does the site include areas of vacant or derelict land? Is the site prime agricultural land? Is the site easily accessible by the local path network, and provide access to settlements and services? Is the site easily accessible by public transport? Does the site lie within an area where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values? Would development on the site contribute to higher traffic flows along transport routes or at key junctions (potentially outwith the local authority area) where levels of air pollution are close to current limit values?
Soil
0 0 + 0
Development at this site is unlikely to contribute to higher traffic flows.
Summary of Effect of development (++/+/0/-/--) 0 0 + + 0 0
Not to any significant extent Unlikely The site is well positioned to take advantage of the existing infrastructure and services of Alloa. The site is well positioned to take advantage of solar gain, but is not greatly sheltered. Greenbelt location precludes minerals development There are no hazard areas within the site.
Material Assets
Development could have an adverse impact on the B-Listed Arnsbrae House
0/-
Cultural Heritage
No known cultural heritage sites are present however, the golf course preserves an extensive post-medieval rig-and-furrow field system. Given the undeveloped character of the sites, their archaeological potential should be considered to be medium-high development could therefore impact on previously unrecognised sites The site is within the Green Belt, partially wooded and close to other woodland. Development would significantly change the local character of Claremont, since it would close off the open views afforded to the south and create a more enclosed, suburban feel to the road Views across the mature woodland and parkland of the golf course are important for the character of the area, as are longer visual links to the Forth, Stirling Castle and the Wallace monument causing a loss of context and character.
Appropriate desk-based assessment and archaeological supervision of ground preparation works
0/-
--
Landscape
--
Sites comprise an area of rough on edge of golf course high species and habitat value as large number of veteran oak trees; would also disrupt core path network
Veteran oaks lining edge of golf course
End of the document

Proposed LDP Environmental Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Proposed LDP Environmental Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

EnvironmentalAssessment(Scotland)Act2005

ClackmannanshireLocalDevelopmentPlan ProposedPlan EnvironmentalReport

Appendix1: Appendix2: MainIssuesReportEnvironmentalReport

Appendix3: Appendix4: Appendix5: Appendix6: Appendix7: Appendix8: Appendix9:

Appendix10: ListofsitesintheProposedLocalDevelopmentPlan Annex1: Siteassessments(carriedoutforLocalPlanAlterationandLDP MainIssuesReport)

Table2.1: Table2.2: Table2.3:

Table3.1: Table3.2: Table4.1: Table5.1

TheClackmannanshireProposedLocalDevelopmentPlaniscomprisedof: VisionandObjectives ThevisionsetsouttheaspirationforwhattheLocalDevelopmentPlanwillachievein Clackmannanshireby2035;thestrategicobjectivessetouttheframeworkforhowtheplan's policiesandproposalsshoulddeliverthis.

GartmornDam LinnMill MillGlen

SSSI LocalNature Reserve CountryPark SSSI SSSI

SNHNaturalHeritage Trends Clackmannanshire BiodiversityActionPlan.

Population andhuman health

ScottishPublicHealth ObservatoryCommunity HealthandWellbeing Profiles(2008)

Protectionand enhancementof waterstatusand avoidanceofflood riskareasandareas whichwould contributeto increasedfloodrisk.

AirQuality and Transport

HistoricScotlandData Services:ListedBuildings, ScheduledMonuments, GardensandDesigned Landscapes

ASH(1998) Clackmannanshire LandscapeCharacter Assessment

HowcantheLocal DevelopmentPlan contributeto tacklingthe problem?

2.3.3 LikelyevolutionofClackmannanshire'senvironmentwithouttheLocal DevelopmentPlan

Ourcommunitiesaremorecohesiveand inclusive Improvehealthandreducehealth 6a inequalities Encouragepromotionandconnectivityof theCentralScotlandGreenNetwork 7a withinandlinkingbeyond Clackmannanshire Biodiversity,flora,fauna

7k Soil 30 3f Water 3k 3l 3m 3n 3i Air 3j

ClackmannanshireSustainabilityandClimate ChangeStrategySEA SuggestedbySNHandSEPAatMIRstage

WaterFrameworkDirective WaterFrameworkDirective WaterFrameworkDirective WaterFrameworkDirective WaterFrameworkDirective paraphrasedfrom2009Clackmannanshire AirQualityUpdatingandScreening Assessment 18

Materialassets 3p 3q Minimisewastegeneration Maximiserecyclingandcomposting

Betweenthem,thevisionandstrategicobjectivesaddressalloftheSEAcriteria,sodevelopmentin accordancewiththeseislikelytohavebeneficialenvironmentalimpacts.Appendix8containsthe earlierdraftsofthevision,andshowshowthestrategicenvironmentalassessmentinfluencedits development.

SEAoftheearlieriterationofthepolicy foundnolikelynegativeenvironmental impacts.

Thispolicyislikelytocontribute toimprovedhealth,and improvedcommunitycohesion andinclusion.

Supplementary guidance: Affordable Housing Gypsies, Travellersand Travelling Showpeople

Nosignificantenvironmental impactshavebeenidentifiedfor thissupplementaryguidance

SEAoftheearlieriterationofthepolicy foundnolikelynegativeenvironmental impacts.

Nosignificantenvironmental impactshavebeenidentifiedfor thispolicy.

Todirectresidentialcare facilitiestothemost appropriatesitesandensure thatthedesigniscarefully considered

SEAoftheearlieriterationofthepolicy foundnolikelynegativeenvironmental impacts.

Thispolicyislikelytocontribute toimprovinghealthand improvingcommunityinclusion, cohesionandsafety.Itisalso likelytocontributetoreducing theenvironmentalimpactof travelassociatedwithsuch facilities.

Layoutand Design Principles

Tosetoutcriteriathatshouldbe followedinthedesignofallnew residentialdevelopmentsto None ensuretheyaredesignedto highstandardsandcontribute positivelytotheirlocal environmentandcommunity.

Additional Design Information

Tosetoutcircumstanceswhere higherqualitydesignwillbe expectedandthereforethe Councilwillexpectproposalsto besupportedbyadditional designinformation

SEAoftheearlieriterationofthepolicy Policyamendedtoclarifythatadesign recommendedthatthepolicybeamended statementisneededwhenhigherquality toclarifythepurposeofadesign designisexpected statement

Supplementary guidance: Placemaking

TosetouttheCouncil's approachtoplacemakinginthe planningofnewdevelopments inClackmannanshire

SEAoftheearlieriterationoftheSG recommendedthatthesupplementary guidancebeamendedtoaddressclimate changeadaptation,flooding,droughts, waterstatusandsustainablewateruse.

Supplementaryguidanceamendedto includeamentionofclimatechange adaptation.

Considerfloodingand droughtsaspartofclimate changemitigation;consider designandlayoutforwater statusimprovementsand waterconservationthough theWaterSG.

TosetouttheCouncil's expectationswithregardstothe None energyefficiencyofnew buildings. Toprovideadviceandguidance onvariousaspectsofenergy efficiencyandlowcarbon development

SEAoftheearlieriterationofthepolicy foundnolikelynegativeenvironmental impacts. SEAofthedraftoftheSGfoundnolikely significantenvironmentalimpacts.It recommendedthattheSGberevisedto givemoredirectionontheuseof renewables,andtogivemoreguidanceon energyefficiencyrequirements

Nosignificantenvironmental impactshavebeenidentifiedfor thispolicy.

Tosetoutcriteriaforthe assessmentofdomestic developments.

SEAoftheearlieriterationofthispolicy recommendedthatthepolicybeamended Policyamendedtoaddressenergyand toaddressenergyefficiency,water waterefficiency efficiencyandclimatechangeadaptation

Addressclimatechange adaptationpotentialof domesticdevelopmentsin supplementaryguidance

SEAoftheMIRrecommendedthatthe policyshouldbeclearaboutwhat issues(particularlyenvironmental issues)developercontributionswould cover.

SEAoftheearlieriterationofthepolicy identifiedthatthelikelyenvironmental impactsareuncertain,becauseitis unclearhowcontributionswillbe prioritised

Thelikelyenvironmentalimpacts ofthispolicyareuncertain:ithas thepotentialtodeliverarangeof environmentalbenefits, dependingonhowthepolicyis implemented.

Supplementary guidance: Developer Contributions

Thereisthepotentialforpositive environmentalimpacts,butcontributions willbenegotiatedattheplanning applicationstage

Thereisthepotentialforpositive Nosignificantchangestothesupplementary environmentalimpacts,but guidancethroughtheSEAprocess. contributionswillbenegotiated attheplanningapplicationstage.

Education, Community Facilitiesand OpenSpaces

Toretainandenhancethe provisionofeducationfacilities, communityfacilitiesandopen spaces.

SEAoftheMIRrecommendedthat maintenanceofopenspaceshould contributetopromotionand connectivityoftheCentralScotland GreenNetwork;andtakeintoaccount biodiversity,includinghabitat connectivityandinvasivespecies;soil andwaterquality;andcomposting

SEAoftheearlieriterationofthepolicy foundnolikelynegativeenvironmental impacts.

Thispolicyislikelytohave positiveimpactsonhealthandon communityinclusion,cohesion andsafety.

Toensurethattheimpactsof developmentonthewider transportnetworkare considered,andthat opportunitiestoenhancethe networkareidentifiedatan earlystage.

SEAoftheearlieriterationof thispolicyrecommended thatthepolicyprioritise activetravel,requirethe provisionofwalkingand cyclingroutesinnew neighbourhoods,and considerlandscapeimpacts

Development Proposals Accessand Transport Requirements