SP22&24-L2-PL-RP-9208 Rev 03

RISER AND EXPANSION SPOOL DESIGN REPORT FOR IN-FIELD PIPELINES
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
CONTRACT NO. PROJECT
: POGC-654-89-35 : SOUTH PARS GAS FIELD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PHASES 22, 23 & 24 OFFSHORE PLATFORMS, IN-FIELD AND SEA-LINES
COMPANY SITE
: NATIONAL IRANIAN OIL COMPANY : AKHTAR/SOUTH PARS GAS FIELD PERSIAN GULF, IRAN
03 02 01 0 Rev 03-01-2012 18-11-2011 26-08-2011 Date APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION ISSUED FOR APPROVAL ISSUED FOR REVIEW Description RNZ RNZ RNZ ORIGINATOR NNS NNS NNS PRPD AK AK AK CHKD JPD JPD JPD APPD Companys APPD
This document is the sole property of N.I.O.C; all information contained herein may neither be reproduced, used, transmitted nor in any way made public without permission of the owner.
South Pars Gas Field Development Project Phases 22-24

rnz integrated (m) sdn bhd (325798 - x)
Page 1 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
TABULATION OF REVISED PAGES

Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Rev. 0 01 02 03 Page 51 52 Rev. 0 01 02 X X X X X X X X X
X X
53 54 55 56
X X X
57 58 59
X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X
X X X X
60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70
X X X X X
X X X X X
71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78
X X
79 80 81
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
82
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
83 84 85 86 87 88
X X X
89 90 ATTACHMENTS A B C D E F X X X X X X X X X

Page 2 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM SUBJECT PAGE NO.
1.0
INTRODUCTION 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Definitions Job Detail Engineering Scope of Work System of Units Abbreviations Symbols
5 5 5 5 6 6 7 9 9 10 11 12 13 13 13 15 16 16 17 18 19 19 20
2.0
DESIGN DATA 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.10 2.11 2.12 Riser Data Platform Displacement Environmental Data Seismic Design Data Spool Piece Protection Marine Growth Hydrodynamic Coefficients Soil Characteristic Pipeline End Expansion Local Buckling Criteria Load Controlled Condition for Seismic Design Assumptions
3.0
METHOD OF ANALYSIS 3.1 3.2 Vortex Induced Vibration (VIV) In Place Stress Analysis

Page 3 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
3.3 3.4 4.0
Seismic Design Load Cases
24 25 26 26 34 40 41 55 55 60 60 60 60 61
ANALYSIS RESULT AND SUMMARY 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 Vortex Induced Vibration Analysis Local Buckling Check Pipe Forces on the Supports Load Controlled Condition for Seismic Static Analysis Loads on Hanger Flange Loads on Subsea Flange
5.0
REFERENCES 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 Codes and Standards Project References Project Documents Other References
ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENT A: Vortex Induced Vibration Calculation And Fatigue Analysis ATTACHMENT B: Soil Characteristics ATTACHMENT C: Pipeline End Expansion ATTACHMENT D: Vortex Induced Vibration Calculation and Fatigue Analysis 20-Inch Riser At Spd23 (Operation Case) ATTACHMENT E: Sample of Input Autopipe File 20-Inch Operating Case ATTACHMENT F: Sample of Output Autopipe File 20-Inch Operating Case ATTACHMENT G: Loads on Supports and Hanger Flange ATTACHMENT H: Load Controlled Condition

Page 4 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
1.0
INTRODUCTION National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) is developing Phase 22-24 of the South Pars Field, located offshore, some 100 km South East of AKHTAR in the Persian Gulf, Iran which will allow a gas production of 2,000 MMSCFD. These phases of the development comprise four wellhead platforms, SPD 22, SPD 23, SPD 24A and SPD 24B, equipped with the required production facilities. Platform design capacity is 600 MMSCFD and platform normal production rate is 500 MMSCFD. The processed gas and condensate from SPD 24A and SPD 24B (satellite platforms) will be directed to SPD 22 and SPD 23 (main platforms) respectively via 18 and 20 infield pipelines. From each main platform, a 32" subsea pipeline will transfer the offshore gas production to the onshore gas treatment plant in AKHTAR.
1.1
Definitions PROJECT : South Pars Gas Field Development Project Phases 22, 23 & 24 Offshore Platforms, In-Field and Sea-Lines COMPANY CONTRACTOR SADRA ENGINEERING GROUP SUB CONTRACTOR : : : : PARS OIL & GAS COMPANY SADRA PIRECO rnz integrated (m) sdn bhd
1.2
Job Detail Project Title South Pars Gas Field Development Phases 22, 23 & 24 Offshore Platforms, In-field and Sea-lines Contract No. PARS OIL & GAS COMPANY-654-89-35
1.3
Engineering Scope of Work The scope of work for South Pars Phases 22, 23 & 24 In-field riser and spool piece covers the basic and detailed design for the 20-inch, 18-inch and 4.5-inch riser and spool piece of the following offshore pipelines: Two 20-inch in-field sea-lines at SPD 24B to SPD 23 and at SPD 23 from SPD 24B

Page 5 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
Two 18-inch in-field sea-lines at SPD 24A to SPD 22 and at SPD 22 from SPD 24A Four 4.5-inch pipelines at SPD 24B from SPD 23, at SPD 24A from SPD 22, at SPD 23 to SPD 24B and at SPD 22 to SPD 24A (piggy-back with 20-inch and 18-inch infield sea-lines)
The riser analysis covers the determination of maximum allowable span and in-place stress analysis to verify the proposed riser configurations. The spool analysis covers the determination of spool piece length to accommodate the pipe expansion due to temperature and pressure. For 20 and 18 riser, the model is extended up to the Hanger Flange. Topside section of the anchor flange should be analysed by platform designer and the result of forces on anchor flange should be added to the reported forces in this document. The riser dynamic span analysis is performed based on DNV RP F105 [Ref. 2]. 1.4 System of Units All dimensional data and results presented shall be expressed in the international system of units (SI). Other units for standard flow rate (SCFD), pipe and piping component size (inch), temperature (C), force (T), pressure (barg), and combinations of the compass directional bases (N, S, E, W) might be displayed in addition to the SI units. 1.5 Abbreviations DNV HAT LAT MSL OD SI SMTS SMYS SWL LBC : : : : : : : : : : Det Norske Veritas Highest Astronomical Tide Lowest Astronomical Tide Mean Sea Level Outer Diameter International Systems of Units Specified Minimum Tensile Strength Specified Minimum Yield Strength Storm Water Level Local Buckling Check

Page 6 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
1.6
Symbols CD, CL,CM E v Ssd Msd Pi Pe Pb c fIL(L) fCF(L) : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Hydrodynamic Coefficients for drag, lift, and inertia respectively Youngs Modulus Poissons ratio Design effective axial force Design moment Internal Pressure External pressure Burst pressure Flow stress parameter First in-line natural frequency, function of span length (L) First cross-flow natural frequency, function of span length (L) Screening factor for in-line Screening factor for cross-flow 100-year return period for the flow velocity at pipe level 1-year return period induced significant wave velocity In-line onset value for reduced velocity Cross-flow onset value for reduced velocity Free span length Pipe outer diameter (including any coating) Safety factor on onset value for in-line VR Safety factor on onset value for cross-flow VR Screening factor for in-line
IL CF
Uc,100 year UW, 1 year V V L D on, IL on, CF IL
IL R, onset CF R, onset

Page 7 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
CF f m F E inc p C SC fab a U
: : : : : : : : : : : : :
Screening factor for cross-flow Screening factor for natural frequency The usage factor for safety class high Material Resistance Factor Functional Load Factor Environmental Load Factor Incidental to Design Pressure Ratio Pressure Load Factor Condition Load Effect Factor Safety Class Resistance Factor Fabrication Factor Anisotropy Factor Material Strength Factor

Page 8 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
2.0
DESIGN DATA Unless otherwise stated, all design data and the limits of design for South Pars Phases 22, 23 & 24 are presented in the Basis of Design for Infield Pipelines [Ref. 5].
2.1
Riser Data The riser data used in the riser design is summarised in Table 2.1.1. The pipe dimensions are as per Offshore Pipe Wall Thickness Report for In-field Pipelines [Ref. 6] and the external and internal corrosion coating is as per the External Corrosion Coating Selection Report [Ref. 8] and Basis of Design for In-field Pipelines [Ref. 5]. TABLE 2.1.1: DESIGN DATA Parameters OD Wall thickness Corrosion Allowance i. Grade ii. 20 Line 517.4 mm 20.6 mm 3 mm API 5L X65 MS PSL2 iii. SAWL (DNV SAWL 450 SF) iv. Expansion Spool 6 mm Hot Bitumen Enamel + 90mm Concrete coating (straight section) 12 mm Neoprene (bends) Riser 12 mm Neoprene (from hanger flange to bottom tie-in flange) 1400 kg/m (Neoprene & Hot Bitumen Enamel) 3 3040 kg/m (concrete)
3
18 Line 466.6 mm 19.1 mm 3 mm API 5L X65 MS PSL2 v. SAWL (DNV SAWL 450 SF) vi. Expansion Spool 6 mm Hot Bitumen Enamel + 90mm Concrete coating (straight section) 12 mm Neoprene (bends) Riser 12 mm Neoprene (from hanger flange to bottom tie-in flange) 1400 kg/m (Neoprene & Hot Bitumen Enamel) 3 3040 kg/m (concrete)
3
4.5 Line 114.3 mm 7.2 mm 10.5 mm - splash zone 1 mm API 5L X52 N PSL2 SMLS (DNV SMLS 360)
Expansion Spool 3 mm Three-Layer Polyethylene
Corrosion Coating
Riser 12 mm Neoprene (from hanger flange to bottom tie-in flange) 1400 kg/m (Neoprene) 3 980 kg/m (Three-Layer Polyethylene)
3
Density of Coating

Page 9 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
Parameters Pressure Hydrotest Design Temperature Ambient Max. Design (Inlet) Product density
20 Line 166.5 barg 151.0 barg 13C (min) 29C (max) 90C Min. 77.9 kg/m
3 3
18 Line 166.5 barg 151.0 barg 13C (min) 29C (max) 90C Min. 77.9 kg/m
3 3
4.5 Line 266.8 barg 231.0 barg 13C (min) 29C (max) 65C
Max. 109.5 kg/m Design Life 25 years
Max. 109.5 kg/m 25 years
1090 kg/m 25 years
2.2
Platform Displacement Platform displacements were taken from the Jacket in Place Static Analysis and Foundation Calculation Note Reports [Ref. 9], [Ref. 10], [Ref. 11], and [Ref. 12]. The platform displacements for Operational, Hydrotest and Seismic Cases for SPD 22 and SPD 24A are summarized in Appendix A. It assumes that platform displacements for SPD 22 and SPD 24A are the same in value with SPD 23 and SPD 24B, respectively.
FIGURE 2.2.1: PLAN VIEW OF THE PLATFORM

Page 10 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
2.3
Environmental Data Unless otherwise indicated, the environmental data presented below are extracted from Basis of Design for In-field Pipelines [Ref. 5]. TABLE 2.3.1: WATER DEPTH
Location SPD 22 Platform SPD 23 Platform SPD 24A SPD 24B Along Route from SPD 24A to SPD 22 Along Route from SPD 24B to SPD 23 Water Depth at LAT, (m) 65.6 64.6 66.8 67.9 67.3 / 65.2 (Max./Min.) 67.8 / 64.8 (Max./Min.) Ref. 17 18 19 20 21 22
TABLE 2.3.2: SEAWATER PROPERTIES Property Density Kinematic Viscosity Salinity Unit kg/m
2 3
Value 1026 1.026x10

-6
Ref. 3 3 3
m /s %
37.75 to 39.50
TABLE 2.3.3: EXTREME YEARLY OFFSHORE TEMPERATURE DATA Parameter (C) Seawater surface Seawater mid-depth Seawater bottom Max 38 33 29 Min 13 13 13
TABLE 2.3.4: EXTREME WAVE DATA CLOSE TO SOUTH PARS GAS FIELD Parameter Hmax Tmax Hs Ts Tp Unit m s m s s 1-year 6.7 8.6 3.6 7.7 8.8 10-year 9.4 9.9 5.1 8.9 10.1 100-year 12.2 11.0 6.6 10.0 11.4

Page 11 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
TABLE 2.3.5: WIND DATA CLOSE TO SOUTH PARS GAS FIELD Wind Speed 1-hr Mean 10-min Mean 1-min Mean 3-sec Gust Unit m/s m/s m/s m/s 1-year 17.4 19.5 22.7 26.5 10-year 22.8 25.5 29.7 34.7 100-year 28.2 31.6 36.7 43.0
TABLE 2.3.6: CURRENT DATA CLOSE TO SOUTH PARS GAS FIELD Velocity U1.0 U0.5 Surface Mid-Depth 1-year 0.68 0.62 10- year 0.73 0.66 100- year 0.78 0.71 1.28 1.28
2.4
Seismic Design Data Persian Gulf is one of the seismically active areas in the world and frequently suffers destructive and catastrophic earthquakes. The following preliminary information on the seismic aspect condition is given for the platform locations. The seismic design data is extracted from Infield Pipeline Basis of Design for South Pars Phases 17&18 [Ref. 3]. Platform Location: The peak ground horizontal accelerations and the associated return periods at the platform locations are summarized in Table 2.4.1.
TABLE 2.4.1: ACCELERATIONS AT PLATFORM LOCATION
Parameter Strength Level Earthquake Ductility Level Earthquake

Note: 1. g = acceleration of gravity
PGHA 0.10g 0.17g
Return Period 200 YEAR 2000 YEAR
As per DNV requirements in DNV Section 4 article C608 in Table 4.2, the 100-years earth quake load has to be used for the pipeline and riser design. The load of 0.1g has been implemented in the analysis.

Page 12 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
2.5
Spool Piece Protection The doglegs will be installed without protection against dropped objects. Protection by mattresses is considered not required because the dogleg section has been coated with 90mm concrete.
2.6
Marine Growth The marine growth shall be considered as follows: 75mm for water depth in between +2m to -6m LAT 50mm for water depth from -6m LAT to seabed
The associate specific density is assumed to be maximal 1.4 times the density of the seawater.
2.7
Hydrodynamic Coefficients The basic hydrodynamic coefficients for calculating the wave and current loads to be used in the pipeline and riser design are given in Table 2.7.1. Note that the drag force coefficient CD is larger for sub-critical and critical flow regime, i.e. dependent on the Reynolds number R e and the current to wave velocity ratio M.
TABLE 2.7.1: BASIC HYDRODYNAMIC COEFFICIENTS Coefficient For On-Bottom Pipeline Section 1.2 for Re < 3 x 10 and M 0.8 else 0.7 0.9 3.29
5
For Riser and Free Spanning Pipeline Section 0.7 for Re > 6 x 10 5 1.3 for Re < 4 x 10 0.0 2.0
5
Drag, CD Lift, CL Inertia, CM
2.7.1
Modification of Hydrodynamic Coefficient For piggy-back section of the pipeline, the modified hydrodynamic coefficients were calculated taking into account the selected concrete coating thickness. Piggy-Back Pipeline The equivalent diameter used in the lift, drag and inertia forces calculation shall take into account the contribution of the 4.5 piggy-back pipeline attached to the 20 and 18 pipeline, including all external coating of the pipe. It is further assumed that the gap between the piggy-

Page 13 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
back pipeline and the carrier pipeline will not affect the hydrodynamics flow around the overall pipeline profile. The contribution of the 4.5 piggy-back pipeline to the hydrodynamic drag and inertia coefficients are assessed using the following method:
C DM C D DA D
CMM CM
Where: CDM CMM A B D CD CM
D2 A 2 D2
= Modified drag coefficient = Modified inertia coefficient = Outside diameter of piggy-back pipe (includes external coatings & marine growth) = Piggy-back block = Outside diameter of carrier pipe (includes external coatings & marine growth) = Drag coefficient, 1.2 = Inertia coefficient, 3.29
A B
FIGURE 2.7.1: PIGGY-BACK TO PIPELINE ARRANGEMENT TABLE2.7.2: MODIFICATION OF HYDRODYNAMIC COEFFICIENTS FOR 20-INCH AND 18-INCH PIPELINE Coefficient Drag, CDM Inertia, CMM Lift, CLM 20-inch pipeline section 1.527 3.534 0.9 (Lift coefficient is not modified) 18-inch pipeline section 1.548 3.567 0.9 (Lift coefficient is not modified)

Page 14 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
The increased accelerations and flow velocities in the flow around jacket leg, can lead to additional forces on the 4.5-inch risers. The following formulas are used for the modified hydrodynamic drag and inertia coefficients:
Where: CDM CMM R z CD CM = Modified drag coefficient = Modified inertia coefficient = Jacket leg radius, 0.8275m = Distance between jacket leg centre and actual riser location, 3.57m / 3.015m = Drag coefficient, 1.3 = Inertia coefficient, 2.0 TABLE2.7.3: MODIFICATION OF HYDRODYNAMIC COEFFICIENTS FOR 4.5-INCH PIPELINE Coefficient Drag, CDM Inertia, CMM Lift, CLM Pipeline Section at SPD 22 & 23 1.443 2.107 0.0 (Lift coefficient is not modified) Pipeline Section at SPD 24A & 24B 1.503 2.151 0.0 (Lift coefficient is not modified)
2.8
Soil Characteristic To model pipeline contact with the seabed soil in AUTOPIPE, the soil stiffness and associate force in lateral, longitudinal and vertical down directions on seabed have to be calculated. An excel spreadsheet has been developed to calculate the soil stiffness and the results are tabulated in Appendix B. The pipe sections coated with 90mm concrete coating are assumed to be in contact with the seabed while the non-concrete coated sections between the concrete coated sections are assumed not to be load bearings.

Page 15 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
2.9
Pipeline End Expansion The pipeline end expansions were calculated for the pipeline at the offshore platform end based on the pipe properties and operational data. This data is extracted from the In-field Pipelines Thermal Expansion Analysis Report [Ref. 7]. The maximum end expansions of the 20-inch, 18-inch and 4.5-inch pipeline end expansions are summarized in Appendix C.
2.10
Local Buckling Criteria For the hydrotest and the operational condition, the load controlled local buckling unity check [Eq. 5.19b, Ref. 1] according to the DNV are performed utilizing the factors contained in Table 2.10.1. TABLE 2.10.1: STRESS CRITERIA FOR 20 GAS PIPELINE [Ref. 1] Definition Material Resistance Factor Functional Load Factor Environmental Load Factor Incidental to Design Pressure Ratio Pressure Load Factor Condition Load Effect Factor Safety Class Resistance Factor Fabrication Factor OD< 16 (seamless) OD=> 16 (UOE) Symbol m F E inc p C SC fab fab a U Operation 1.15 1.10 1.30 1.05 1.07 1.26 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.96 Hydrotest 1.15 1.10 1.30 1.1 1.05 1.07 1.04 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.96
Anisotropy Factor Material Strength Factor
The analysis results should meet the following criteria [Ref. 1]: Combined loading criteria (Load controlled condition, Local buckling check)
Applies for D/t2 45, Pi > Pe

Page 16 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
Where: Msd Ssd Pe Pi Pb c Normalized moment Normalized effective force External pressure Internal pressure Burst pressure Flow stress parameter
2.11
Load Controlled Condition for Seismic For the seismic condition, a MathCAD spreadsheet is prepared to analyze the load controlled condition for pipe members subjected to bending moment, effective axial force and internal overpressure based on DNV OS F101-2010 [Ref. 1] utilizing the factors contained in Table 2.11.1. TABLE 2.11.1: DESIGN FACTORS [Ref. 1] Definition Safety Class Resistance Factor Material Strength Factor (Table 5-6) Material Resistance Factor Condition Load Effect Factor Load Effect Factor Functional (Table 4-4) Load Effect Factor Environmental Load Effect Factor - Accidential Symbol Sc U m c F E A Operation 1.308 0.96 1.15 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
The analysis results should meet the following criteria [Ref. 1]:
Applies for D/t2 45, Pi > Pe


Page 17 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
Where: Msd Ssd Pe Pi Pb Mp and Sp 2.12 Normalized moment Normalized effective force External pressure Internal pressure Burst pressure Plastic capacities for a pipe
Design Assumptions The design assumptions made in the spool piece and riser design are as follows: For the vortex induced vibration (VIV) analysis, the boundary condition between two clamps on the riser is assumed to be pinned-fixed. The pipeline is assumed to be straight with no lateral or vertical curvature.

Page 18 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
3.0
METHOD OF ANALYSIS The riser and spool piece are designed to meet the following design requirements: Vortex Induced Vibration (Screening Criteria) In place stress analysis Seismic Design
The methods of the analysis are described in the following subsections. 3.1 Vortex Induced Vibration (VIV) The screening criteria have been calibrated against full fatigue analyses to provide a fatigue life in excess of 50 years. An excel spreadsheet is used to calculate the three main parameters of Screening Fatigue Criteria. It calculates the allowable riser span length to provide a fatigue life in excess of 50 years, which complies with the DNV RP F-105. A fatigue life in excess of 50 years is obtained when the three main criteria in the expressions below are satisfied:
In-line VIV screening criterion
Cross-flow VIV screening criterion
Wave criterion Where: Fn, IL Fn, CF IL CF Uc,100 year UW, 1 year First in-line natural frequency, function of span length (L) First cross-flow natural frequency, function of span length (L) Screening factor for in-line Screening factor for cross-flow 100-year return period for the flow velocity at pipe level 1-year return period induced significant wave velocity

Page 19 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
V V L
IL R, onset CF R, onset
In-line onset value for reduced velocity Cross-flow onset value for reduced velocity Free span length Pipe outer diameter (including any coating) Current flow ratio
If wave criterion is violated, full fatigue analyses due to in-line VIV and direct wave action is required. However, the in-line VIV screening criterion may still be used provided that a quasi static Morison force calculation shows that the fatigue due to direct wave action could be neglected. The safety factors used with the screening criteria are listed in Table 3.1.1 according to the DNV RF-F105 [Ref. 2]. TABLE 3.1.1: SAFETY FACTORS Definition Safety factor on onset value for in-line VR Safety factor on onset value for cross-flow VR Screening factor for in-line Screening factor for cross-flow Screening factor for natural frequency The usage factor for safety class high Symbol on, IL on, CF IL CF f Value 1.10 1.20 1.40 1.40 Normal : 1.2 High : 1.3 0.25
The analysis case that is considered in the VIV analysis is subjected to operation and hydrotest conditions. Based on the calculated span length for both conditions, the riser clamp elevation is then identified such that the clamp elevation spacing is smaller than the riser maximum span length. 3.2 In Place Stress Analysis In place stress analysis for riser and spool piece is carried out using AUTOPIPE software. Figure 3.2.1 shows the coordinate in AUTOPIPE model and wave direction for analysis purposes.

Page 20 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
FIGURE 3.2.1: WAVE DIRECTION DEFINITION The loading cases which will be considered for this analysis are as follows: GTP = GR + T1 + P1 GTP + U1 GTP + U2 GTP + U3 GTP + U4 GTP + U4 GTP + U5 GTP + U6 GTP + U7 GTP + U8
Where: U1 U2 U3 U4 U5 Wave in (-Z) direction and support displacement Wave in (-X) direction and support displacement Wave in (Z) direction and support displacement Wave in (X) direction and support displacement Wave in (-X 45 -Z) direction and support displacement

Page 21 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
U6 U7 U8 GR T1 P1
Wave in (-X 45 Z) direction and support displacement Wave in (X 45 Z) direction and support displacement Wave in (X 45 -Z) direction and support displacement Gravity Temperature Pressure
There are several steps involved in modelling the riser and spool piece using AUTOPIPE. Detailed explanations are as below: 3.2.1 Defining Coordinates and Geometry AUTOPIPE works on the basis of a global (right-hand) co-ordinate system that can be located at any point along the model. Nodes are established at important locations such as valves, change of pipe geometry and riser clamps. And, it also used to define the length of pipe elements. Since large changes in stress might occur over a very short distance, nodes are placed close together to improve the resolution of the calculated stress profile. 3.2.2 Defining Pipe Components AUTOPIPE has a series of elements used to model the various components of the pipe. Most of the components are lower order beam theory and incorporate stress intensification factors, as appropriate at pipe connections and bends. 3.2.3 Boundary Conditions Boundary conditions can be specified in AUTOPIPE at any of the nodes to restrain either translation or rotation of a particular node in any of the three global (or local) co-ordinate directions. This feature is used to simulate riser clamps and supports.
The boundary conditions for the hanger clamp restrain the riser against lateral, axial and rotation in all directions. Consequently, the weight of the riser (including the fluid inside the riser) is transferred to the jacket at this clamp. Underwater riser guide clamps are assumed to allow movement along the axis of the pipe but restrain the pipe against translation in the other directions.

Page 22 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
Boundary conditions that specify a fixed displacement or rotation can also be applied. This feature is used to apply displacements arising from thermal expansion of the pipeline as well as jacket displacements at the riser clamps and topside supports during the design storm event. 3.2.4 Pipe Soil Interaction In the vertical plane, the seabed soils are assumed to support the pipe with an elastic foundation support and the elastic sub-grade modulus is specified as an input parameter. In the plane of the seabed, the soil is assumed to provide a linear approximation to Coulomb friction.
The calculation of the soil friction forces is based on the soil friction factors multiplied by the pipeline submerged weight per unit length.
To model the soil characteristic in AUTOPIPE, the soil stiffness and associated force in lateral, longitudinal, vertical-up and vertical down directions have to be calculated; see Section 2.8. 3.2.5 Coatings External coatings are considered as part of the overall structural model of the riser. The pipe weight is computed directly by the program. 3.2.6 Fluid Properties Both internal and external fluid properties influence the riser. By specifying the water depth relative to one of the global co-ordinate directions, the external loading is automatically accounted for by AUTOPIPE using the hydrodynamic diameter. 3.2.7 Gravity The specific gravity of the pipe contents can be specified in order to calculate its weight. For this analysis, gravity loads due to each different section of pipe, pipe contents and coatings are captured in AUTOPIPE by specifying the material densities.

Page 23 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
3.2.8
Temperature Constant temperature or variable temperature profiles can be specified throughout the model. For this analysis, a constant temperature is applied to each riser model. The riser temperature is assumed conservatively to be the design maximum temperature.
3.2.9
Pressure Constant internal pressure is applied to the whole model for hoop stress calculations. Internal pressure is applied and results are in both circumferential and longitudinal stresses.
3.2.10 Hydrodynamic Loads Hydrodynamic loads include the forces due to wave action and steady currents. Three wave theories are available in AUTOPIPE: Airy (linear), Stokes (up to 5th order) and Stream function. For this analysis, Stokes function wave theory is used. In AUTOPIPE, the water particle velocities computed with the selected wave theory are combined with the steady current to determine the distribution of instantaneous water particle velocity at the centerline of the submerged pipe body. Inertia, drag and lift forces due to waves and currents are automatically calculated using the Morison equation and the selected hydrodynamic force coefficients. 3.2.11 Platform Displacement Platform displacements as shown in Section 2.2 are specified at each support location in the model for cases that include the environmental loading. The platform displacement at each support location is obtained by linear interpolation as mentioned in Section 2.2. 3.3 Seismic Design The riser and spool piece configurations are checked against seismic loading using the static earth quake method from AUTOPIPE. With this method, the maximum stresses, moments and displacements of the configurations are estimated using the seismic acceleration of 0.1g (Section 2.4). Figure 3.3.1 shows the coordinate in AUTOPIPE model and seismic acceleration direction for analysis purposes.

Page 24 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
FIGURE 3.3.1: SEISMIC ACCELERATION DIRECTION DEFINITION The loading cases which will be considered for this analysis are as follows: GTP = GR + T1 + P1 GTP + E1 GTP + E2
Where: 3.4 E1 E2 Seismic acceleration in (Z) direction and support displacement Seismic acceleration in (X) direction and support displacement
Load Cases The most critical load effect combination for the relevant return period are used in accordance with DNV OS F101 [Ref. 1] requirements. The combinations of characteristic environmental loads in terms of return period are as per Table 3.4.1 below: TABLE 3.4.1: COMBINATIONS OF CHARACTERISTIC ENVIRONMENTAL LOADS IN TERMS OF RETURN PERIOD Case Operation Hydrotest Seismic Waves 100-years 1-years 10-years Current 100-years 100-years 100-years 100-years Earth quake
Note : 1. Available data for surface current is only for 100-years return period.

Page 25 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
4.0
ANALYSIS RESULT AND SUMMARY All eight risers and spool piece at platform SPD 22, SPD 23, SPD 24A and SPD 24B have been analysed for VIV and in-place stress analysis. Based on the results of these analyses, the riser and spool piece configurations shown on the Drawing No. SP22/24-L4-PL-DW-9217, SP22/24-L4-PL-DW-9216, acceptable. SP22/24-L3-PL-DW-9217 and SP22/24-L3-PL-DW-9216 are
4.1 4.1.1
Vortex Induced Vibration Analysis 20-inch Riser The 20-inch riser spans for the platforms SPD 23 and SPD 24B are modelled for the Vortex Induced Vibration analysis as simple supported pipe sections (pinned-fixed) with the loads equally distributed as per the mid span elevation as summarised in Table 4.1.1 and Table 4.1.2. TABLE 4.1.1: RISER SEGMENTS FOR 20-INCH RISER AT SPD 23 Case 1 2 3 4 5 6 Riser Part Between 5.589 and -5.095 Between -5.095 and -13.161 Between -13.161 and -30.161 Between -30.161 and -48.161 Between -48.161 and -57.201 Between -57.201 and -64.600 (Seabed) Riser Span Length (m) 10.767 8.129 17.132 18.140 9.110 17.182 Riser Mid Span Elevation (m) -1.000 -9.128 -21.661 -39.161 -52.681 -60.121
Notes: 1. All positions are referenced to MSL. 2. Riser clamp elevations are extracted from SPD23 riser ISO: SP22/24-L4-PL-DW-9217-1. 3. Span between EL-57.201 and EL -64.600 at the seabed includes a horizontal span of 9.725m.

Page 26 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
TABLE 4.1.2: RISER SEGMENTS FOR 20-INCH RISER AT SPD 24B Case 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Riser Part Between 5.589 and -6.767 Between -6.767 and -13.161 Between -13.161 and -31.161 Between -31.161 and -49.161 Between -49.161 and -55.620 Between -55.620 and horizontal clamp 1 Between horizontal clamp 1 and horizontal clamp 2 Between horizontal clamp 2 and -67.900 (Seabed) Riser Span Length (m) 12.452 6.444 18.140 18.140 6.509 21.806 9.136 9.302 Riser Mid Span Elevation (m) -0.589 -9.964 -22.161 -40.161 -52.391 -61.053 -66.485 -67.193
Notes: 1. All positions are referenced to MSL. 2. Riser clamp elevations are extracted from SPD24B riser ISO: SP22/24-L4-PL-DW-9216-1. 3. Span between EL-55.620 and horizontal clamp 1 includes a horizontal span of 10.856m. 4. Span between horizontal clamp 2 and EL -67.900 at the seabed includes horizontal span of 9.302 m.
The VIV analyses are conducted to confirm that the span lengths are acceptable by the DNV criteria. The results of the VIV analyses for the 20-inch riser are shown from Table 4.1.3 to Table 4.1.6. The fatigue life due to direct wave loading for the span length and the in-line / cross flow allowable span length are presented in these tables as well. Based on the analysis results, all the riser clamp spacings are acceptable. TABLE 4.1.3: VIV RESULTS 20 RISER INCL. MARINE GROWTH AT SPD 23 Riser Span checking screening criteria Operation OK Conditionally OK Conditionally OK OK OK OK Allowable riser span (m) Operation 18.323 20.217 22.692 25.390 27.386 29.487 Fatigue life due to direct wave(year) Operation >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass
Case
Riser Span (m) 10.767 8.129 17.132 18.140 9.110 17.182
Remarks
1 2 3 4 5 6

Page 27 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
TABLE 4.1.4: VIV RESULTS 20 RISER NO MARINE GROWTH AT SPD 23 Riser Span checking screening criteria Operation 1 2 3 4 5 6 10.767 8.129 17.132 18.140 9.110 17.182 OK Conditionally OK Conditionally OK OK OK OK Fatigue life due to direct wave(year) Operation >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass
Case
Riser Span (m)
Allowable riser span (m) Operation 18.364 20.253 22.741 25.435 27.434 29.539 Hydrotest 18.861 20.801 23.356 26.123 28.177 30.337
Remarks
TABLE 4.1.5: VIV RESULTS 20 RISER INCL. MARINE GROWTH AT SPD 24B Riser Span checking screening criteria Operation OK Conditionally OK Conditionally OK OK OK OK OK OK Allowable riser span (m) Operation 18.228 20.396 22.765 25.444 27.101 28.741 31.151 31.873 Fatigue life due to direct wave(year) Operation >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass
Case
Riser Span (m) 12.452 6.444 18.140 18.140 6.509 21.806 9.136 9.302
Remarks
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Page 28 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
TABLE 4.1.6: VIV RESULTS 20 RISER NO MARINE GROWTH AT SPD 24B Riser Span checking screening criteria Operation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 12.452 6.444 18.140 18.140 6.509 21.806 9.136 9.302 OK Conditionally OK Conditionally OK OK OK OK OK OK Fatigue life due to direct wave(year) Operation >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass
Case
Riser Span (m)
Allowable riser span (m) Operation 18.271 20.432 22.808 25.489 27.149 28.798 31.214 31.930 Hydrotest 18.764 20.984 23.424 26.178 27.882 29.576 32.052 32.792
Remarks
4.1.2
18-inch Riser The 18-inch riser spans for the platforms SPD 22 and SPD 24A are modelled for the Vortex Induced Vibration analysis as simple supported pipe sections (pinned-fixed) with the loads equally distributed as per the mid span elevation as summarised in Table 4.1.7 and Table 4.1.8. TABLE4.1.7: RISER SEGMENTS FOR 18-INCH RISER AT SPD 22 Case 1 2 3 4 5 6 Riser Part Between +5.589 and -5.095 Between -5.095 and -13.161 Between -13.161 and -30.161 Between -30.161 and -48.161 Between -48.161 and -57.705 Between -57.705 and -65.600 (Seabed) Riser Span Length (m) 10.767 8.129 17.132 18.140 9.618 15.798 Riser Mid Span Elevation (m) -1.000 -9.128 -21.661 -39.161 -52.933 -60.873
Notes: 1. All positions are referenced to MSL. 2. Riser clamp elevations are extracted from SPD22 riser ISO: SP22/24-L3-PL-DW-9217-1. 3. Span between EL-57.705 and EL -65.600 at the seabed includes a horizontal span of 9.413m.

Page 29 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
TABLE4.1.8: RISER SEGMENTS FOR 18-INCH RISER AT SPD 24A Case 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Riser Part Between +5.589 and -6.767 Between -6.767 and -13.161 Between -13.161 and -31.161 Between -31.161 and -49.161 Between -49.161 and -55.282 Between -55.282 and horizontal clamp 1 Between horizontal clamp 1 and horizontal clamp 2 Between horizontal clamp 2 and -66.800 (Seabed) Riser Span Length (m) 12.452 6.444 18.140 18.140 6.169 21.139 8.979 8.814 Riser Mid Span Elevation (m) -0.589 -9.964 -22.161 -40.161 -52.222 -60.384 -65.485 -66.693
Notes: 1. All positions are referenced to MSL. 2. Riser clamp elevations are extracted from SPD24A riser ISO: SP22/24-L3-PL-DW-9216-1. 3. Span between EL-55.282 and horizontal clamp 1 includes a horizontal span of 10.857m. 4. Span between horizontal clamp 2 and EL -66.800 at the seabed includes horizontal span of 8.814 m.
The VIV analyses are conducted to confirm that the span lengths are acceptable by the DNV criteria. The results of the VIV analyses for the 18-inch riser are shown from Table 4.1.9 to Table 4.1.12. The fatigue life due to direct wave loading for the span length and the in-line / cross flow allowable span length are presented in these tables as well. Based on the results, all the riser clamp spacings are acceptable.

Page 30 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
TABLE 4.1.9: VIV RESULTS 18 RISER INCL. MARINE GROWTH AT SPD 22 Riser Span checking screening criteria Operation 1 2 3 4 5 6 10.767 8.129 17.132 18.140 9.618 15.798 OK Conditionally OK Conditionally OK OK OK OK Allowable riser span (m) Operation 16.572 18.284 20.528 22.945 24.735 26.398 Fatigue life due to direct wave (year) Operation >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass
Case
Riser Span (m)
Remarks
TABLE 4.1.10: VIV RESULTS 18 RISER NO MARINE GROWTH AT SPD 22 Riser Span checking screening criteria Operation 1 2 3 4 5 6 10.767 8.129 17.132 18.140 9.618 15.798 OK Conditionally OK Conditionally OK OK OK OK Fatigue life due to direct wave(year) Operation >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass
Case
Riser Span (m)
Allowable riser span (m) Operation 16.609 18.316 20.561 22.981 24.778 26.443 Hydrotest 17.114 18.873 21.186 23.679 25.531 27.246
Remarks
TABLE 4.1.11: VIV RESULTS 18 RISER INCL. MARINE GROWTH AT SPD 24A Riser Span checking screening criteria Operation OK Conditionally OK Conditionally OK OK Allowable riser span (m) Operation 16.486 18.450 20.599 23.042 Fatigue life due to direct wave (year) Operation >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass
Case
Riser Span (m) 12.452 6.444 18.140 18.140
Remarks
1 2 3 4

Page 31 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
5 6 7 8
6.169 21.139 8.979 8.814
OK OK OK OK
24.553 26.017 28.154 29.543
>1000 >1000 >1000 >1000
VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass
TABLE 4.1.12: VIV RESULTS 18 RISER NO MARINE GROWTH AT SPD 24A Riser Span checking screening criteria Operation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 4.1.3 12.452 6.444 18.140 18.140 6.169 21.139 8.979 8.814 OK Conditionally OK Conditionally OK OK OK OK OK OK Fatigue life due to direct wave(year) Operation >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass
Case
Riser Span (m)
Allowable riser span (m) Operation 16.523 18.480 20.634 23.077 24.595 26.065 28.206 29.596 Hydrotest 17.025 19.041 21.261 23.778 25.342 26.857 29.063 30.495
Remarks
4.5-inch Riser Due to the similarities of the risers and spool piece layouts of the 4.5-inch infield pipelines at the platform SPD22, SPD 24A, SPD 23 and SPD 24B, only the 4.5-inch in-field pipeline for the platform SPD22 has been analyzed for Vortex Induced Vibration. The 4.5-inch riser spans for platform SPD 22 are modeled as a simple supported pipe section with the loads equally distributed as per the current and wave velocities at the mid span elevation that are summarized in Table 4.1.13.

Page 32 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
TABLE4.1.13: RISER SEGMENTS FOR 4.5-INCH RISER AT SPD 22 Case Riser Part Maximum Riser Span Length (m) 3.308 3.532 3.919 4.178 5.656 Riser Mid Span Elevation (m) (Span Analyzed) -1.526 -7.916 -14.926 -32.053 -62.788
1 2 3 4 5
Between +5.639 and -3.151 Between -3.151 and -13.000 Between -13.000 and -30.000 Between -30.000 and -61.475 Between -61.475 and horizontal clamp 1 at -64.100
Notes: 1. All positions are referenced to MSL. 2. Riser clamp elevations are extracted from SPD22 riser ISO: SP22/24-L3-PL-DW-9217-3. 3. Span between EL-30.00 and horizontal clamp includes a horizontal span of 2.757m.
Regarding Table 4.1.13 the following should be noted: The maximum spans in the listed sections have been presented. The section between EL +5.639 and EL 3.151 of the 4.5-inch riser is governed by the increased wall thickness in the splash zone. The maximum length of the riser in the section between elevation EL -30.00 and EL 61.475 has been presented.
The results of the vortex-induced vibration analyses for the risers are tabulated in Table 4.1.14 and Table 4.1.15. Fatigue life due to direct wave for the span length and in-line allowable span length are presented in these tables as well. Based on the analysis results all riser clamp spacings are found to be acceptable.

Page 33 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
TABLE 4.1.14: VIV RESULTS 4.5 RISER INCL. MARINE GROWTH SPD 22 Riser Span checking screening criteria Operation 1 2 3 4 5 3.308 3.532 3.919 4.178 5.656 OK OK OK OK OK
Case
Riser Span (m)
Allowable riser span (m)
Fatigue life due to direct wave(year) Operation >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000
Remarks
Operation 4.884 4.850 5.210 5.923 7.295
VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass
TABLE 4.1.15: VIV RESULTS 4.5 RISER NO MARINE GROWTH SPD 22 Riser Span checking screening criteria Operation 1 2 3 4 5 3.308 3.532 3.919 4.178 5.656 OK OK OK OK OK Fatigue life due to direct wave(year) Operation >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 >1000 VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass VIV pass
Case
Riser Span (m)
Allowable riser span (m) Operation 4.884 4.844 5.204 5.915 7.285 Hydrotest 4.979 4.997 5.368 6.103 7.516
Remarks
4.2
Local Buckling Check The local buckling check is performed as per DNV RP F-101 section 5D600 using the DNV spreadsheet. The resulting functional and environmental loads of the in-place stress analysis are verified to be complying with the local buckling criteria for load controlled condition as per article 605. The load controlled local buckling check results for the 20-inch, 18-inch and 4.5inch riser and spool piece model of AUTOPIPE comprising four cases of environmental loads are presented from Figure 4.2.1 through Figure 4.2.12 for the Hydrotest and Operation case.

Page 34 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
The local buckling unity check values for the riser and spool piece are based on a flat seabed. Unity check values below 1.0 are acceptable. All 20, 18 and 4.5 risers satisfy the local buckling criteria as per DNV RP F-101.
Operation
1.200 1.000 0.800 Value 0.600 0.400 0.200 0.000 0 11 54 69 79 93 133 145 305 Length pipelines System (m) U1 U2 U3 U4 U5 U6 U7 U8 Criteria
FIGURE 4.2.1: LBC CHECK FOR OPERATION 20 SYSTEM (SPD23)
Hydrotest
1.200 U1 1.000 0.800 Value 0.600 0.400 0.200 0.000 0 11 54 69 79 93 133 145 305 Length Pipelines System (m) U2 U3 U4 U5 U6 U7 U8 Criteria
FIGURE 4.2.2: LBC CHECK FOR HYDROTEST 20 SYSTEM (SPD23)


Page 35 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
Operation
FIGURE 4.2.3: LBC CHECK FOR OPERATION 20 SYSTEM (SPD24B)
Hydrotest
1.200 1.000 0.800 Value 0.600 0.400 0.200 0.000 0 12 62 73 93 102 143 155 315 Length Pipelines System (m) U1 U2 U3 U4 U5 U6 U7 U8 Criteria
FIGURE 4.2.4: LBC CHECK FOR HYDROTEST 20 SYSTEM (SPD24B)

Page 36 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
Operation
FIGURE 4.2.5: LBC CHECK FOR OPERATION 18 SYSTEM (SPD22)
Hydrotest
FIGURE 4.2.6: LBC CHECK FOR HYDROTEST 18 SYSTEM (SPD22)

Page 37 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
Operation
FIGURE 4.2.7: LBC CHECK FOR OPERATION 18 SYSTEM (SPD24A)
Hydrotest
FIGURE 4.2.8: LBC CHECK FOR HYDROTEST 18 SYSTEM (SPD24A)

Page 38 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
FIGURE 4.2.9: LBC CHECK FOR OPERATION 4.5 SYSTEM (SPD22)
FIGURE 4.2.10- LBC CHECK FOR HYDRO TEST 4.5 SYSTEM (SPD22)
FIGURE 4.2.11: LBC CHECK FOR OPERATION 4.5 SYSTEM (SPD24A)


Page 39 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
FIGURE 4.2.12- LBC CHECK FOR OPERATION 4.5 SYSTEM (SPD24A)
4.3
Pipe Forces on the Supports The pipe forces on the supports were obtained from the AUTOPIPE analysis at the support location as per the Drawings No. SP22/24-L4-PL-DW-9217, SP22/24-L4-PL-DW-9216, SP22/24-L3-PL-DW-9217 and SP22/24-L3-PL-DW-9216. Figure 4.4.1 through Figure 4.4.6 show the modelled supports for the 20-inch, 18-inch and 4.5-inch risers, whereas Figure 4.4.7 shows the modelled supports for 4.5-inch riser at SPD22 for seismic cases. The details of the supports in AUTOPIPE can be found from Figure 4.4.8 through Figure 4.4.18. The results of the pipe forces on the supports can be found in Attachment D for the 20-inch, 18-inch and 4.5-inch riser. The maximum forces on the hanger flange clamp and guide clamp are presented below in Table 4.3.1 and Table 4.3.2.

Page 40 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
TABLE 4.3.1: MAXIMUM FORCES AND MOMENTS ON THE HANGER FLANGE CLAMPS Pipeline Hanger Flange 20 SPD23 20 SPD24B 18 SPD22 18 SPD24A 4.5 SPD22 4.5 SPD24A Forces Fx 51.396 -56.499 48.994 50.225 10.339 9.810 Fy -285.800 -243.350 -253.101 -212.503 -80.564 -78.061 Fz 64.781 -71.181 57.135 -64.473 10.117 9.818 Mx -142.420 -160.431 -114.732 -141.253 4.801 4.377 Moments My 39.154 -29.324 19.110 -22.360 0.9 -0.727 Mz -129.139 -148.658 -108.718 -128.846 -3.781 -3.391
TABLE 4.3.2: MAXIMUM FORCES ON THE GUIDE CLAMPS Pipeline Guide Clamps 20 SPD23 20 SPD24B 18 SPD22 18 SPD24A 4.5 SPD22 4.5 SPD24A 4.4 Forces Fx -80.723 129.539 -73.123 -70.437 -32.693 -2.957 Fy 39.419 -150.422 -24.068 -90.508 5.753 -10.756 Fz -69.829 -140.370 -62.709 -83.615 -1.949 -25.311
Load Controlled Condition for Seismic Static Analysis The load controlled condition for seismic is performed as per DNV RP F-101 section using the MathCAD spreadsheet. The highest stress location along the 20-inch, 18-inch and 4.5-inch riser is checked against the load controlled equation as per Section 5, Paragraph 605 [Ref. 1]. The load controlled check values are below 1.0 and satisfy the DNV RP F-101 requirement. Table 4.4.1 shows the result of the Load Controlled Check for 32-inch and 4.5-inch riser. Refer Attachment E for the MathCAD calculations.

Page 41 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 03
Class: 2
TABLE 4.4.1: LOAD CONTROLLED CONDITION FOR SEISMIC Pipeline 20-inch at SPD23 20-inch at SPD24B 18-inch at SPD22 18-inch at SPD24A 4.5-inch at SPD22 4.5-inch at SPD24A Load Controlled Condition (Max) 0.49 0.47 0.46 0.47 0.43 0.89 Nodes A15 A16 A19 A30 A28 A20 Locations Spool bend Spool bend Spool bend Spool bend Spool bend Spool bend
All 20, 18 and 4.5 risers satisfy the load controlled criteria as per DNV RP F -101.

Page 42 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 02
Class: 2
FIGURE 4.4.1: INTEGRITY AUTOPIPE MODEL OF 20 PIPELINE-SPOOL-RISER (SDP23)


Page 43 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 02
Class: 2
FIGURE 4.4.2: INTEGRITY AUTOPIPE MODEL OF 20 PIPELINE-SPOOL-RISER (SDP24B)


Page 44 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 02
Class: 2
FIGURE 4.4.3: INTEGRITY AUTOPIPE MODEL OF 18 PIPELINE-SPOOL-RISER (SDP22)


Page 45 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 02
Class: 2
FIGURE 4.4.4: INTEGRITY AUTOPIPE MODEL OF 18 PIPELINE-SPOOL-RISER (SDP24A)


Page 46 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 02
Class: 2
FIGURE 4.4.5: INTEGRITY AUTOPIPE MODEL OF 4.5 PIPELINE-SPOOL-RISER (SDP22)


Page 47 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 02
Class: 2
FIGURE 4.4.6: INTEGRITY AUTOPIPE MODEL OF 4.5 PIPELINE-SPOOL-RISER (SDP24A)


Page 48 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 02
Class: 2
FIGURE 4.4.7: INTEGRITY AUTOPIPE MODEL OF 4.5 PIPELINE-SPOOL-RISER FOR SEISMIC (SDP22)

Page 49 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 02
Class: 2
FIGURE 4.4.8: VERTICAL SUPPORTS (SPD23 AND SPD24B-20INCH)
FIGURE 4.4.9: VERTICAL SUPPORTS (SPD23 AND SPD24B-20INCH)

Page 50 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 02
Class: 2
FIGURE 4.4.10: HORIZONTAL SUPPORTS (SPD23 AND SPD24B-20INCH)
FIGURE 4.4.11: VERTICAL SUPPORTS (SPD23 AND SPD24B-4.5INCH)

Page 51 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 02
Class: 2
FIGURE 4.4.12: HORIZONTAL SUPPORTS (SPD23 AND SPD24B-4.5INCH)
FIGURE 4.4.13: VERTICAL SUPPORTS (SPD22 AND SPD24A-18INCH)

Page 52 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 02
Class: 2
FIGURE 4.4.14: VERTICAL SUPPORTS (SPD22 AND SPD24A-18INCH)
FIGURE 4.4.15: HORIZONTAL SUPPORTS (SPD22 AND SPD24A-18INCH)

Page 53 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 02
Class: 2
FIGURE 4.4.16: VERTICAL SUPPORTS (SPD22 AND SPD24A-4.5INCH)
FIGURE 4.4.17: VERTICAL SUPPORTS (SPD22 AND SPD24A-4.5INCH)

Page 54 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 02
Class: 2
FIGURE 4.4.18: HORIZONTAL SUPPORTS (SPD22 AND SPD24A-4.5INCH) 4.5 Loads on Hanger Flange The results of the forces and bending moment on Hanger Flange for 20-inch, 18-inch and 4.5inch riser are summarized in Attachment D. This data shall be provided to the hanger flange supplier/manufacturer for the flange detailed design calculation and safety factors shall be applied as per appropriate codes. The maximum forces on the hanger clamp are as given in Table 4.3.1. 4.6 Loads on Subsea Flange This data shall be provided to the flange supplier/manufacturer for the flange detailed design calculation and safety factors shall be applied as per appropriate codes. The 20-inch, 18-inch and 4.5-inch subsea tie-in points will be connected by flange connection, in which the types and material properties are listed in Table 4.6.1.

Page 55 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 02
Class: 2
TABLE 4.6.1: SUBSEA FLANGE DATA 20 and 18 Flanges Type Material Rating Class SMYS 4.5 Flange Type Material Rating Class SMYS Welding Neck / Swivel ASTM A694-F52 1500 360 Welding Neck / Swivel ASTM A694-F65 1500 450
From the AUTOPIPE analysis, the maximum axial force and the bending moment are extracted at the following flange locations: Riser spool piece connection Spool piece spool piece connection Spool piece pipeline connection
The forces and moments are tabulated from Table 4.6.2 through Table 4.6.7 for the 20-inch, 18-inch and 4.5-inch system, respectively. TABLE 4.6.2: MAXIMUM AXIAL FORCE AND BENDING MOMENT IN 20-INCH FLANGES (SPD23) Riser / Spool piece Axial Force Bending moment kN kNm Design Condition Operation 42.294 -146.322 Hydrotest 29.453 -126.405
Spool piece / Spool piece Axial Force Bending moment kN kNm
Design Condition Operation 45.520 336.779 Hydrotest 23.634 202.141

Page 56 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 02
Class: 2
Spool piece / Pipeline
Design Condition Operation Hydrotest 41.147 -103.123
Axial Force Bending moment
kN kNm
69.695 -343.646
TABLE 4.6.3: MAXIMUM AXIAL FORCE AND BENDING MOMENT IN 20-INCH FLANGES (SPD24B) Riser / Spool piece Axial Force Bending moment kN kNm Design Condition Operation 98.047 -751.511 Hydrotest 53.77 -243.559
Design Condition Operation 80.356 -276.528 Hydrotest 45.786 -198.136
Design Condition Operation -60.680 381.889 Hydrotest -38.032 92.492
TABLE 4.6.4: MAXIMUM AXIAL FORCE AND BENDING MOMENT IN 18-INCH FLANGES (SPD22) Riser / Spool piece Axial Force Bending moment kN kNm Design Condition Operation -26.650 -100.266 Hydrotest -27.099 -106.371
Design Condition Operation 29.907 145.865 Hydrotest 15.828 144.795

Page 57 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 02
Class: 2
Spool piece / Pipeline Axial Force Bending moment kN kNm
TABLE 4.6.5: MAXIMUM AXIAL FORCE AND BENDING MOMENT IN 18-INCH FLANGES (SPD24A) Riser / Spool piece Axial Force Bending moment kN kNm Design Condition Operation 79.500 -323.507 Hydrotest 38.183 -98.352
Design Condition Operation 55.472 48.553 Hydrotest 32.469 -70.096
TABLE 4.6.6: MAXIMUM AXIAL FORCE AND BENDING MOMENT IN 4.5-INCH FLANGES (SPD22) Design Condition Operation kN kNm 2.256 2.664 Hydrotest 1.829 4.132
Riser / Spool piece Axial Force Bending moment

Page 58 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 02
Class: 2
Design Condition Operation 1.655 3.120 Hydrotest 1.152 -2.534
TABLE 4.6.7: MAXIMUM AXIAL FORCE AND BENDING MOMENT IN 4.5-INCH FLANGES (SPD24A) Riser / Spool piece Axial Force Bending moment kN kNm Design Condition Operation 3.000 -6.978 Hydrotest 2.716 1.969

Page 59 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 02
Class: 2
5.0 5.1
REFERENCES Codes and Standards 1. DNV OS F101, Oct 2010 2. DNV RP F105, Feb 2006 Submarine Pipeline Systems Free Spanning Pipelines
5.2
Project References 3. SP17/18-20-PL-PC-0201 4. SP17/18-20-PL-AN-0212 Infield Pipeline Basis of Design 20 and 18 Riser and Expansion Spool Design Report
5.3
Project Documents 5. SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9201 6. SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9203 Basis of Design for In-field Pipelines Offshore Pipe Wall Thickness Report for In-field Pipelines 7. SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9207 8. SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9116 9. SP22/24-P0-ST-CS-8002 In-field Pipelines Thermal Expansion Analysis Report External Corrosion Coating Selection Report SPD 22 WHP Jacket In Place Static Analysis and Foundation Design Calculation Note 10. SP22/24-P1-ST-CS-8002 SPD 23 WHP Jacket In Place Static Analysis and Foundation Design Calculation Note 11. SP22/24-P3-ST-CS-8002 SPD 24A WHP Jacket In Place Static Analysis and Foundation Design Calculation Note 12. SP22/24-P4-ST-CS-8002 SPD 24B WHP Jacket In Place Static Analysis and Foundation Design Calculation Note 13. SP22/24-L4-PL-DW-9217 Riser Isometric at SPD23 for 20-inch In-field Pipeline from SPD24B 14. SP22/24-L4-PL-DW-9216 Riser Isometric at SPD24B for 20-inch In-field Pipeline to SPD23 15. SP22/24-L3-PL-DW-9217 Riser Isometric at SPD22 for 18-inch In-field Pipeline from SPD24A 16. SP22/24-L3-PL-DW-9216 Riser Isometric at SPD24A for 18-inch In-field Pipeline to SPD22

Page 60 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 02
Class: 2
5.4
Other References 17. GP-PIR-0547 Vol.9 Preliminary Field Survey Report for SPD 22 Wellhead Platform Volume 9 (SPD22) 18. GP-PIR-0547 Vol.10 Preliminary Field Survey Report for SPD 23 Wellhead Platform Vol. 10 (SPD23) 19. GP-PIR-0547 Vol.11 Preliminary Field Survey Report for SPD 24A Wellhead Platform Vol. 11 (SPD24A) 20. GP-PIR-0547 Vol.12 21. GP-PIR-0547 Vol.15 Preliminary Field Survey Report for SPD 24B Wellhead Platform Vol. 12 (SPD24B) Survey Report for 18 Infield Flow Line from SPD 24A to SPD 22 Including Piggy Back Pipelines Vol. 15 22. GP-PIR-0547 Vol.16 Survey Report for 20 Infield Flow Line from SPD 24B to SPD 23 Including Piggy Back Pipelines Vol. 16

Page 61 of 72
Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 02
Class: 2
Attachment A Platform Displacements for SPD 22 & SPD 24A

Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 02
Class: 2
Attachment B Soil Characteristics

Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 02
Class: 2
Attachment C Pipeline End Expansion

Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 02
Class: 2
Attachment D Vortex Induced Vibration Calculation and Fatigue Analysis 20-inch riser at SPD23 (Operation Case)

Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 02
Class: 2
Attachment E Sample of Input AutoPIPE File 20-inch Operating Case

Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 02
Class: 2
Attachment F Sample of Output AutoPIPE File 20-inch Operating Case

Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 02
Class: 2
Attachment G Loads on supports and hanger flange

Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208
Rev No: 02
Class: 2
Attachment H Load Controlled Condition


SP22&24-L2-PL-RP-9208 Rev 03

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

SP22&24-L2-PL-RP-9208 Rev 03

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

RISER AND EXPANSION SPOOL DESIGN REPORT FOR IN-FIELD PIPELINES

Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208

RISER AND EXPANSION SPOOL DESIGN REPORT FOR IN-FIELD PIPELINES

CONTRACT NO. PROJECT

South Pars Gas Field Development Project Phases 22-24

RISER AND EXPANSION SPOOL DESIGN REPORT FOR IN-FIELD PIPELINES

Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208

TABULATION OF REVISED PAGES

South Pars Gas Field Development Project Phases 22-24

RISER AND EXPANSION SPOOL DESIGN REPORT FOR IN-FIELD PIPELINES

Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208

South Pars Gas Field Development Project Phases 22-24

RISER AND EXPANSION SPOOL DESIGN REPORT FOR IN-FIELD PIPELINES

Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208

3.3 3.4 4.0

Seismic Design Load Cases

South Pars Gas Field Development Project Phases 22-24

RISER AND EXPANSION SPOOL DESIGN REPORT FOR IN-FIELD PIPELINES

Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208

South Pars Gas Field Development Project Phases 22-24

RISER AND EXPANSION SPOOL DESIGN REPORT FOR IN-FIELD PIPELINES

Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208

South Pars Gas Field Development Project Phases 22-24

RISER AND EXPANSION SPOOL DESIGN REPORT FOR IN-FIELD PIPELINES

Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208

South Pars Gas Field Development Project Phases 22-24

RISER AND EXPANSION SPOOL DESIGN REPORT FOR IN-FIELD PIPELINES

Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208

South Pars Gas Field Development Project Phases 22-24

RISER AND EXPANSION SPOOL DESIGN REPORT FOR IN-FIELD PIPELINES

Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208

Expansion Spool 3 mm Three-Layer Polyethylene

South Pars Gas Field Development Project Phases 22-24

RISER AND EXPANSION SPOOL DESIGN REPORT FOR IN-FIELD PIPELINES

Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208

Max. 109.5 kg/m Design Life 25 years

Max. 109.5 kg/m 25 years

1090 kg/m 25 years

FIGURE 2.2.1: PLAN VIEW OF THE PLATFORM

South Pars Gas Field Development Project Phases 22-24

RISER AND EXPANSION SPOOL DESIGN REPORT FOR IN-FIELD PIPELINES

Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208

Value 1026 1.026x10

South Pars Gas Field Development Project Phases 22-24

RISER AND EXPANSION SPOOL DESIGN REPORT FOR IN-FIELD PIPELINES

Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208

TABLE 2.4.1: ACCELERATIONS AT PLATFORM LOCATION

Parameter Strength Level Earthquake Ductility Level Earthquake

PGHA 0.10g 0.17g

Return Period 200 YEAR 2000 YEAR

South Pars Gas Field Development Project Phases 22-24

RISER AND EXPANSION SPOOL DESIGN REPORT FOR IN-FIELD PIPELINES

Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208

Drag, CD Lift, CL Inertia, CM

South Pars Gas Field Development Project Phases 22-24

RISER AND EXPANSION SPOOL DESIGN REPORT FOR IN-FIELD PIPELINES

Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208

South Pars Gas Field Development Project Phases 22-24

RISER AND EXPANSION SPOOL DESIGN REPORT FOR IN-FIELD PIPELINES

Doc. No.: SP22/24-L2-PL-RP-9208

South Pars Gas Field Development Project Phases 22-24

RISER AND EXPANSION SPOOL DESIGN REPORT FOR IN-FIELD PIPELINES