The Folly of Free Trade and Uncontrolled Globalization & Their Devastating Effects On The American Economy

THE FOLLY OF FREE TRADE AND UNCONTROLLED GLOBALIZATION & THEIR
DEVASTATING EFFECTS ON THE AMERICAN ECONOMY
There is an ingrained belief by those who hold firm to the illusive and harsh doctrine of Lassie
faire Global capitalism, that the invisible hand of the market will correct the economic ails that is
now afflicting the world community due to the economic meltdown. They point with absolute
certainty that the current economic crisis and malaise can be attributed to overbearing
government interference, the out of control welfare states of Japan, Europe and the United States,
and a choking regulatory environment that penalizes entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, and Chief
executives of fortune 500 companies. They condemn the poor, working class, emerging nations,
and those struggling to get by as ignorant, lazy, and not having the drive to improve their
situation.
What we have seen so far is not innovation but rather the three heads of Greed, selfishness, and
arrogance. Like a three-headed hydra it consumes instead of building and wrecking havoc and
destruction in its past. To silence the voices of those who still cling to the notion of outsourcing
of jobs and capitals to destinations unknown, it is now predicted the economic recovery that is
taking place now is a jobless recovery. One where profits takes precedence over rebuilding the
manufacturing and technology sectors which provides jobs that have traditionally sustained the
Middle Class in this country which translates into the purchase of consumer goods which drives
the economy.
This article is for the intended use of educational purposes only. Permission is
granted for citation in academic documents as long as credit is given to the author
as the original source.
By Richard L. Dixon. Email address: rdixon57@gmail.com

“Alongside other economic indications of a stabilizing housing market and rising consumer
confidence, the unemployment figures offered a glimmer of hope that we may be on the cusp of
an economic turnaround and the end of job destruction.
But it’s highly unlikely this economy will produce meaningful job creation anytime soon. The
financial fallout from the biggest recession in 60 years is likely to be so costly and so pervasive
that new-job creation is likely to be virtually nonexistent for years to come, particularly in the
manufacturing and construction industries
It’s going to take five or six years for homebuilders and automakers to fully recover from this
recession, and it may take longer,” says Martin Hutchinson, a Money Morning contributing
editor who has written extensively about the current downturn. “You’re not going to see
aggressive hiring in those industries for a good while.”
Hutchinson says the automobile business is in particular difficulty from outsourcing. “A great
deal of the cutting-edge technology associated with the U.S, automobile business is currently
being outsourced to other countries, which will further hinder product development and sales for
that sector and constrain future hiring,” Hutchinson said.” (Don Miller, June 10, 2009).
I extracted this information from the well-respected investment newsletter Money Morning
because the editors have an uncanny knack for accuracy in pinpointing the shortcomings of the
Global Order. They are capitalists (in most respects I am as well) but intelligent ones who are
realistic in their assessment that the only way to rein in this uncontrolled monster is through

prudent government regulation and oversight. It was the eventual stripping away of these
regulations which caused the economic paralysis that we and the rest of world find ourselves in
today.
In actuality the rise of unregulated free trade and capitalism is contrary to what Adam Smith
wrote in the Wealth of Nations. His treatise focused on the small entrepreneur and was against
the concentration of power in huge Mega-Business Empires that now exist. “It is ironic that
corporate libertarians regularly pay homage to Adam Smith as their intellectual patron saint,
since it is obvious to even the most casual reader of his epic work The Wealth of Nations that
Smith would have vigorously opposed most of their claims and policy positions. For example,
corporate libertarians fervently oppose any restraint on corporate size or power. Smith, on the
other hand, opposed any form of economic concentration on the ground that it distorts the
market's natural ability to establish a price that provides a fair return on land, labor, and capital;
to produce a satisfactory outcome for both buyers and sellers; and to optimally allocate society's
resources. Smith strongly disliked both governments and corporations. He viewed government
primarily as an instrument for extracting taxes to subsidize elites and intervening in the market to
protect corporate monopolies” (David C. Korten).
This little bit of revelation in connection with the true meaning of Adam Smith and his treatise
entitled The Wealth of Nations does not sit well with those who would espouse the virtues of
Global National Corporations in the World economy.

It is an untrue that the economy in the present shape that it is now in will produce the type of
skill level jobs that will enhance the standard of living in this country. The Middle Class as we
know is an endangered species. The types of jobs that you will say will be created are mainly
low-skilled and uninsured in such industries as the hospitality sector (which I am currently a
member of). In Barbara Enhrenreich’s book entitled “Nickel & Dime,” On (Not) Getting Buy in
America,” she attempted to live the life of the low-wage poor to see if they could get by on the
income that they earned. Her prognosis was not very encouraging and represents the state of
economic anarchy that our economy is now experiencing. “I was going to "experience poverty"
or find out how it "really feels" to be a long-term low wage worker. My aim here was much more
straightforward and objective-just to see whether I could match income to expenses, as the truly
poor attempt to do every day. Besides, I've had enough unchosen encounters with poverty in my
lifetime to know it's not a place you would want to visit for touristic purposes; it just smells too
much like fear.” (Barbara Enrenreich, 2001)
The problem that exists is our manufacturing and technology has been decimated by the
outsourcing of jobs to India, China, and Malaysia. Not only have jobs gone overseas but so too
has the capital that is needed in order to invest in new technologies to keep us as a competitive
nation. Budgets are being slashed at our state institutions of higher learning due to the short
windfall in state treasuries around the nation. The Middle Class has taken the brunt of it with the
housing crisis, high food and fuel prices, and layoffs in the hundreds of thousands. These jobs
can never be recouped. In addition, their earning power has decreased in terms of real purchasing
power for the past decade. “Rising middle-class financial insecurity after 2000 is the result of

several factors. Incomes have fallen as a result of the weakest job growth since the Great
Depression, flat wages, and declining benefits. At the same time, prices for necessary items, such
as food, energy, housing, and transportation, have all risen sharply. Finally, personal wealth has
been decimated, first by the mortgage boom, which allowed more families to build wealth by
purchasing homes but also required them to take on higher debt levels, and then by the bursting
housing bubble, which of course depleted the value of those home investments, and then by
much weaker financial markets.” (Christian E. Weller, and Amanda Logan, 2008).
The outsourcing of jobs from the U.S. by multinational corporations in both the manufacturing
and service sectors to countries in the emerging south such as China, India, Malaysia, and
Vietnam has had a negative effect in terms of lost jobs as well lower wages. During the Golden
age of economic prosperity United States, Europe, and Japan during the 1950’s and 60’s, wages
and economic disparity was lessened due to the height of unionization, manufacturing jobs, and
global dominance by TNE’’s based in these countries. With the emergence of Thatcherism and
Reaganomics in the 1980’s, the deregulation of key industries, the pursuit of Free Trade
Agreements, and the advent of technology lessened the need for both unionized and unskilled
jobs. Hence, TNE’s found it cheaper to outsource low or non-skilled jobs to the Global South.
“The most debated issue is the impact of trade with the low-wage economies of the South in
hastening the replacement of low-skilled jobs in the North by work requiring higher educational
levels. At first sight it seems implausible that import of manufactures from low-wage countries
could have played a very important role. After all they took a bit under 10% of the domestic
market for manufacturers in the USA and Europe in 1999.” (Andrew Glyn, 2006).

The outsourcing of low-skilled jobs initially started in the manufactured sector and eventually
migrated to the service sector particularly among white collar clerical, data entry, and customer-
service intense positions. “Its globalization’s next wave-and one of the biggest trends reshaping
the global economy. The first wave started two decades ago with the exodus of jobs making
shoes, cheap electronics, and toys to developing countries. After that, simple service work, like
processing credit-card receipts, and mind-numbing digital toil, like writing software code, begin
fleeing high-cost countries.” (Pete Engardio et al, February 2, 2003).
The outsourcing of jobs has also happened in the White Collars ranks as well. No longer were
white collar jobs guaranteed indicators of long-term job security in this country and in Western
Europe. “Fear of losing one’s job-job insecurity-is widely regarded as having risen in the rich
countries. A comprehensive analysis of survey evidence for the UK, Germany and the USA
concluded that feelings of insecurity do fluctuate with unemployment. Not surprisingly, this
would suggest insecurity recently than during the 1960s and 1970s. Insecurity, which has long
been a feature of blue-collar occupations, became more prevalent amongst white-collar workers
in the US in the 1990s and for finance workers in the US.” (Andrew Glyn).
The flight of middle income blue and white collar jobs to such Global South nations as China
and India from the United States has seen demise in the middle class as well as wages. Even
though wages for top level executives have exploded over 300% since 1970, the wages of the
middle class has either declined or become stagnant. “This family’s income grew by 97 percent
from 1947 to 1973, but by only 11 percent from 1973 to 2005. A family at the eightieth

percentile also has seen a decline in its income growth, but that decline has been much less
severe: from 101 percent growth from 1947 to 1973 to 41 percent growth from 1973 to 2005. So,
while the upper-middle class continues to see solid income growth, the lower middle class is
stuck where it was three decades ago. The majority in the middle, therefore, has experienced the
full range between these two extremes—some families doing well, while others experience very
little improvement.” (Monica Lesmerises, 2007).
Contrary to what has been preached by the adherents of FTA agreements, the American Middle
Class has not prospered and actually has declined. What we find is that not only has jobs been
outsourced by Global Nationals but capital that is essential for seed the start of new business has
gone as well. Companies such as Lucent Technologies, IBM, and Boeing have cut seed money
for R & D significantly and have instead invested in overseas ventures. There is no better
illustration then the planned bankruptcy of General Motors and closing all its North American
Plans with the exception of one and cutting its dealership network by almost 50%. The result will
be the lost of unrecoverable 100,000 jobs. On the other hand, GM is ramping production of its
plants in its lucrative business in China by over 50% in hopes to become the biggest automotive
manufacturer in the country. In essence, they have taken the tax payer money and gone. Adding
to this dilemma is the fallacy of allowing huge numbers of H1BI visas for skilled level from
Asian and European countries that was initiated by the Clinton Administration to off-set the
supposed imbalance of the technology gap that existed between the United States and China in
order to preserve our lead, and to stop the genius drain which has been the Foundation of
American Ingenuity. Thomas Freedman of the New York Times paints a different picture by

stating that we have a shortage of intellectual talent coming to this country. “Other executives
complained bitterly that the Department of Homeland Security is making it so hard for legitimate
foreigners to get visas to study or work in America that many have given up the age-old dream of
coming here. Instead, they are studying in England and other Western European nations, and
even China. This is leading to a twofold disaster.
First, one of America's greatest assets — its ability to skim the cream off the first-round
intellectual draft choices from around the world and bring them to our shores to innovate — will
be diminished, and that in turn will shrink our talent pool. And second, we could lose a whole
generation of foreigners who would normally come here to study, and then would take American
ideas and American relationships back home. In a decade we will feel that loss in America's
standing around the world.” (Thomas L. Freedman, April 22, 2004). In this context Thomas L.
Friedman was incorrect.
In actuality, companies have such IBM forced American software engineers to train their
replacement so that they could export the technology back to India or China or while at the same
time eliminating their jobs in the United States. “IBM isn’t alone as these practices have become
widespread in the American technology sector. An American software engineer (Engineer 2007)
working at a major semiconductor company put it this way, “The basic plan where I worked was
to hire H-1Bs [foreign workers in the United States on temporary work permits], train them, and
use them as a way to outsource and transfer technology to China and India. I trained my
replacement who was here on an H-1B visa from India.” One reason this practice hasn’t received

more attention is that workers are afraid to discuss their cases. When I asked the software
engineer if he would tell his story publicly, he demurred saying, “The company I worked for
required [that] I sign a several page agreement stating I would not discuss company
information.” (Ron Hira, March 11, 2009). This is not to say that foreign students and workers
have not played a pivotal role in the shaping of the U.S. Technology sector as the undisputed
Global leader. As a nation founded by immigrants, their drive, dedication, and innovation has
added to the vibrancy of American society as well as our competitive nature. However, I am
against technology that had designed be allowed to leave the country and used as a deliberate
front to displace American workers.
.The flight of capital by Multinational corporate is a complex web of shell games, dummy
corporations, and tax havens such as the Cayman Islands. What is needed is legislation to curtail
the flight of money by Multinational Corporations especially involves U.S. tax money in cases
like GM and AIG. The Obama Administration is attempting to correct this oversight through
legislation. “U.S. President Barack Obama today (Monday) announced a proposal for new
legislation to pursue American tax evaders by closing loopholes and clamping down on overseas
tax breaks for American businesses and individuals.
Under provisions of the plan, companies would no longer be able to write off domestic expenses
for generating profits abroad, a loophole that Obama says encourages U.S. companies to move
jobs overseas. The plan would drastically reduce incentives for U.S. companies to base all or part
of their operations in other countries.” (Don Miller, May 5, 2009).

Yet trying to capture this flow of money to other countries will be much more difficult them it
seems. Multi-nationals have sought to protect themselves by internationalizing their operations
through mergers, partnerships, and trade agreements through such institutions as the WTO. It is
harder to point a gun at a target that is elusive, cunning, and complicated as the Multi-national
Pyramid schemes. “Worldwide, companies operating outside their home country more than
tripled in number between the late 1960s and the 1990s. By the 1990s, trans-nationals accounted
for about a third of all private-sector capital worldwide. American companies were the most
aggressive in buying overseas manufacturing assets and moving domestic manufacturing
offshore. By the late 1990s, American corporations were producing twice as much abroad as
European and Japanese multinationals combined. But the internationalization ownership also
affected the United States domestically; as the foreign-owned share of U.S. manufacturing assets
grew from 3 percent in 1970 to 19 percent in 1990…The regional agreements provided powerful
new global rights for corporations. Legal mechanisms that allowed a corporation based in one
country to overturn the laws or judicial decisions of a different country. (Ted Nace May 2003).
In order to put to put this maneuvering in its proper perspective, it is necessary to provide a
definition of outsourcing that readily applies to Multi-national corporations and the outsourcing
of jobs, capital, and technology to emerging nations in the throes of Globalization. I would call
this type of outsourcing BPO (Business Process Outsourcing). “What is business process
outsourcing? Business process outsourcing otherwise know as BPO is the process of leveraging

technology vendors in various third world or developing nations for doing a job which was once
the responsibility of the enterprise. Or simply put, it is the process of shifting an internal job
process to an outside/external company which might have a completely different geographical
location.
Generally the processes being outsourcing as part of BPO are backend jobs like call/help centers,
medical transcription, billing, payroll processing, data entry and the like. Most of these jobs are
outsourcing by first world nations like USA and UK to third world nations like India,
Philippines, China, Malaysia and some eastern European countries.” (Bizbrim.com).
The definition is quite accurate because it describes the state of affairs that the U.S. Economy is
in and getting because of jobs going overseas. There is the distinct possibly that unless things
economically within the next 20 years the United States will slide into a second-tier nation status
coupled with huge income disparities, a broken infrastructure, high unemployment, an extinct
manufacturing sector, huge budget deficits, non-existent healthcare, and a failed educational
system. The Middle Class as we know it will cease to exist. In case there are those in this
discussion who does not think a strong Middle Class is not important to the development of a
country, one has to look no further than China, Malaysia, and India where jobs have been
outsourced to see a rise in a vibrant and affluent Middle Class who form the basic foundation of
the catalyst that drives those societies with both technical and entrepreneurial skills. “China and

India share at least two characteristics: their populations are huge and their economies have been
growing very fast for at least 10 years. Already they account for nearly 5 percent and 2 percent of
world gross domestic product (GDP), respectively, at current exchange rates. Arguably, China’s
expansion since 1978 already has been the largest growth “surprise” ever experienced by the
world economy; and if we extrapolated their recent growth rates for half a century, we would
find that China and India—the Giants—were among the world’s very largest economies. Their
vast labor forces and expanding skills bases imply massive productive potential, especially if
they continue (China) or start (India) to invest heavily in and welcome technology inflows.” (L.
Alan Winters and Shahid Yusuf ed. 2007).
Uncontrolled outsourcing in the context of Globalization under the pretense of Free Enterprise
has done more harm then good to the U.S. Economy. We have huge trade deficits with China and
the government holds trillions of dollars in U.S. treasury bills to help leverage our already
bloated federal bureaucracy. In essence, not only has private industry been outsourced but so has
our monetary policies as well. There have been cases made that companies from overseas have
invested in the United States particularly in the South and this has provided competitive wages
and opportunities. That is far from true. Companies from Europe usually invest in Southern
where the rules for employee safety, unfair firing, workman’s compensation, and discrimination
have been relaxed. In addition, such companies pay lower wages and benefits to their workers.
“Cons call this “insourcing” and tell us it’s a good thing. Toyota is giving Americans jobs by
building factories here!” they shout with a smile as they give Toyota another huge tax break

(paid for by its workers) to site a factory. “Your company has been bought by the Saudis and the
ports are owned by the British, but your paycheck is still just as good!” they reassure us.” (Thom
Hartman, 2006).
Another notion that needs to be dispelled is that the money that Foreign Companies make from
profits from the plants that they have built in the United States stays within the communities in
the form of taxes, continuous investments in the plant, community philanthropy, and residual
income to support neighboring businesses in order to stabilize the community. This myth is the
furthest from the truth because foreign capital doesn’t stay in this country but takes flight back to
its home nation of origin. “When foreign-owned companies do business in America, however-
they do so with the express purpose of taking their profits home. Paine Webber’s profits now go
to Switzerland; Amoco’s go to the United Kingdom, and Transamerica’s go to the Netherlands.
Chrysler’s profit go to Germany; ditto for Random House’s and Westinghouse.” (Thom
Hartmann, 2006)
What is sad is that European and Asian companies that invest and built plants here continue the
status quo of low wages, lack of health insurance, and disregard for workers safety. The
outsourcing of jobs, talent, capital, and technology to China and India also represents a
disconnection and separates the CEO’s concern about the plight of his workers and the
community around him in pursuit of profits. It was the same communities that made it possible
for tax credits and abatements with the ideal that the presence of the business would become an

icon or foundation for stability which translates to better schools, safe neighborhoods, homes,
and the emergence of other business to satisfy the consumption needs of the citizens.
Another issued that has failed to be properly addressed by both proponents and opponents
concerning outsourcing of technology, jobs, and capital by American is the issue of security.
"Over the last two decades, security has been breached for proprietary software, hardware
computer imaging, graphics, financial systems, patents, and intellectual property rights.
Corporate espionage is rampant and transcends to National Security especially when it comes to
the militaries of both China and India. America’s nationwide economic espionage crisis is unique
in several respects. It represents the first time a crisis of such mammoth proportions has been
acknowledged to affect every company in every industry group without exception and at the
same time.
Without question, economic espionage is a gargantuan growth industry and one of the biggest
crises to hit U.S. businesses en masse in history. And in an age of globalization economic
espionage gets bigger and easier to commit every day.” (Steven Fink, 2002).
In order to counteract the espionage to American business especially in the technology sector,
President Bill Clinton on October 11, 1996 signed into law the Economic Espionage Act. As I
had mentioned earlier, companies have been able maneuver around laws by consolidating their
operations overseas with other third-party organizations subjecting themselves to that country’s
less restrictive rules under the guise of Free Trade Agreements as mandated by the WTO and

GATT round of Ministerial talks. Hence bypassing the Espionage Act was just another routine
for Multi-national corporations in the outsourcing of technology to emerging nations. “As they
straddled countries, corporations found themselves facing multiple regulatory systems. What to
do? Within the United States itself, a similar problem had been solved a century earlier by
creative interpretation of the commerce clause and by development of new doctrines of corporate
rights. Why not try the same thing on a global scale-develop a new trump card for nixing
unwanted regulation?” (Ted Nace).
In terms of allegiance to country, some Global Nationals have demonstrated over and over again
that the only loyalty they have is in the ruthless profits at the expense of national security. That is
why legislation should be fully enforced in terms in terms of how both technology and
intellectual property rights is transferred without existing trade agreements to emerging nations
such as China. That is not to say that the outsourcing of technology has not been beneficial in the
commercial sector and in helping developing nations to become fully integrated into the Global
economy. Nor am I saying that the U.S. cannot export and sell its technology to other vested
commercial interest which translates to jobs and opportunities for Americans. However, it cannot
be one-sided in that we can never assume that we will continue to be the dominant technological
power in the world without continuous investment, training of workforces, and the investing of
capital in our manufacturing and technological sectors.

What is needed for this country to stay competitive with the governments of India and China
(and not being surpassed in 2025 according to some expects) is the rebuilding and reinvestment
of our manufacturing and technology sector by the government in partnership with private
industry. Such an initiative was done through the Roosevelt Administration to reinvigorate the
machine tool industry through the creation of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation. The
agency lent low-cost loans and expertise to troubled and distressed companies. It was the
rebuilding of this important sector which won the war and made the United State the great
industrial, military, and economic power that it is today.
“A. Under the impact of "globalization," there is a massive and ongoing loss in the machine-tool
capabilities of the U.S. economy. This danger is centered in the accelerating "outsourcing" and
shut-downs of plants in America's most important and versatile machine-tool industry, the auto
industry. 80 million square feet of auto capacity being is closed and machinery auctioned off
over 2006-08, more capacity lost than in the last 30 years combined. 60 million square feet of
aerospace/defense capacity are closed and machinery auctioned off since 1990. U.S.
consumption of machine tools is only 60% of the 1980 level; of that consumption, 60-70% are
imported machine tools; much of this stock, in turn, is being destroyed or sold off overseas as
plants are closed; machining vital to national security, including defense and aerospace
production, has been and is being outsourced.
B. The machine-tool sector is the core of an industrial economy where scientific and
technological ideas are turned into new economic reality. If the U.S. auto-manufacturing industry

is destroyed, the U.S.A. becomes a virtual "Third World" nation overnight. The nation's machine-
tool-design capability, most of which is tied up in the U.S. auto-manufacturing and supply firms,
is lost. The loss of the tool-making and closely related capabilities of that sector of industry
would be a strategic disaster of incalculable, chain-reaction consequences, within our nation, and
also the world at large.
The loss of auto plants means an economic disaster, approaching ghost-town proportions, for
what are already highly vulnerable entire towns, counties, and cities, even states of the union.
The loss of employment of that machine-tool design segment of that part of the labor-force,
means many times that number of skilled and unskilled employees out of jobs.” (LaRouche
Political Action Committee, August 6, 2007).
America is quickly losing its capital edge because our institutions of higher learning have been
forced to cut back because of budgetary constraints due to the dismal shape of the economy.
Money in the form of Research Grants to some of the leading universities in the country coming
from both the public and private sectors has dried up. Meanwhile overseas, the very same Multi-
national has invested an incredible amount of money in both Chinese and Indian educational
institutions.
What is also needed is a technology driver such as the reintroduction of the Space Program and
more R&D grants funneled to our universities. It is interesting to note that the Chinese are
rapidly ramping up their Space Program in their quest putting a man on the Moon and eventually

Mars. They also graduate more students per capital in the fields of science, engineering, and
math then we do in this country.
Therefore it was this responsibility to provide for the General Welfare of its citizens which
transformed the United States from a backward agrarian nation to one of the leading industrial
powers at the turn of 20th century. .What is meant by the General is what we call essential
services which means infrastructure improvement such as water, sanitation, bridges, hospitals,
and schools. In improving the livelihood of its citizens increases the productive capacity in each
citizen. Take for example before the completion of the interstate highway system by President
Eisenhower; it took longer to get commerce to the essential markets on to the East and West
Coast. The completion of the interstate highway system cut that time in half. Another feature of
the American System was the establishment of a national bank for the purpose of building and
enhancing core industries. During the presidency of Lincoln it was the agricultural revolution as
well as the railroad that led the United to Prosperity. This was done through the creation of the
homesteading act which was land grants to small farmers. In addition, the government provided
money, technology, and technical assistance to the small farmer.
“Americans created a system to render farming so successful, so powerful and productive, that
the lie of inevitable poverty was forever dispelled. Since the triumph of Lincoln's agricultural
program, only outright tyranny can enforce hunger and poverty anywhere in today's world.
Millions of new private farms were created, by government direction. Farm families were
educated at government expense. Government scientists supplied them with the latest

intelligence on fertilizers, soil chemistry, and crop management. New farmlands opened up by
government-organized railroads allowed for production economies of scale. Increasingly
sophisticated farm machinery, produced by patent-protected inventors using tariff-protected
American steel, was bought by farmers with cheap government-supplied credit. Diseases of
livestock were conquered and eliminated by the vigorous prosecution of government science and
federal law.” (Anton Chaitkin, April 11, 1986).
It is important that I put this information out because these were the basic economic principles
driving out country all the way up to Roosevelt until his death in 1945. Now is the time for us to
return to the roots that made us an economic powerhouse and discard the false notion that
America was built on the premise of the Free Market.
Endnotes
1. Don Miller “Is the U.S. Economy Headed for a “Jobless Recovery?” Money Morning,
June 10, 2009 http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/10/jobless-recovery/ (accessed
August 23, 2009).

2. David C. Korten, “THE BETRAYAL OF ADAM SMITH Excerpt from When
Corporations Rule the World,” 2nd ed., The People-Centered Forum,
http://www.pcdf.org/corprule/betrayal.htm (accessed August 23, 2009).
3. Barbara Enhrenreich, Nickel & Dime on (Not) Getting By In America. (New York: A
Metropolitan/Owl Book, 2001), 11.
4. Christian E. Weller, and Amanda Logan, “America’s Middle Class Still Losing Ground,”
Center for American Progress, (July 2008), 2.
5. Andrew Glyn, Capitalism Unleashed: Finance, Globalization, & Welfare, (Oxford,
England: Oxford University Press, 2006), 110.
6. Pete Engardio et al, “The New Global Job Shift,” Business Week, February 3, 2003, 1.
7. Andrew Glyn, 115.
8. Monica Lesmerises, “The Basics: The Middle Class at Risk,” A Century Foundation
Guide to the Issues, (New York: The Century Foundation Press, 2007). 7.
9. Thomas L. Friedman Op-ed Columnist, “Losing Our Edge,” New York Times, April 22,
2004.
10. Ron Hira, “A Policy Agenda for Offshoring,” EPI Working Paper (March 11, 2009), 1.
11. Don Miller, “Obama Wants New Law to Tax Overseas Profits and Nail Tax Dodgers,”
Money Morning, http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/05/05/obama-tax-law/ (accessed
August 23, 2009).
12. Ted Nace, Gangs of New York: The Rise of Corporate Power and the Disabling of
America, (Berkeley, CA: Ted Nace, May 2003), 225-226.

13. LaRouche Political Action Committee, “RE-RELEASE: LaRouche's Proposed
Legislation for Retooling the U.S. Auto Industry for EMERGENCY Infrastructure
Development,” August 6, 2007, http://www.larouchepac.com/node/3260 (accessed
August 23, 2009).
14. Anton, Chaitkin, “Abraham Lincoln Imposes Science on American Agriculture,”
Readings from the American Almanac, originally reprinted in the Executive Intelligence
Review, (April 11, 1986) http://members.tripod.com/american_almanac/lincoln2.htm
(accessed August 23, 2009).

The Folly of Free Trade and Uncontrolled Globalization & Their Devastating Effects On The American Economy

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Folly of Free Trade and Uncontrolled Globalization & Their Devastating Effects On The American Economy

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

THE FOLLY OF FREE TRADE AND UNCONTROLLED GLOBALIZATION & THEIR

DEVASTATING EFFECTS ON THE AMERICAN ECONOMY

By Richard L. Dixon. Email address: rdixon57@gmail.com

an economic turnaround and the end of job destruction.

manufacturing and construction industries

aggressive hiring in those industries for a good while.”

By Richard L. Dixon. Email address: rdixon57@gmail.com

protect corporate monopolies” (David C. Korten).

Global National Corporations in the World economy.

By Richard L. Dixon. Email address: rdixon57@gmail.com

much like fear.” (Barbara Enrenreich, 2001)

By Richard L. Dixon. Email address: rdixon57@gmail.com

By Richard L. Dixon. Email address: rdixon57@gmail.com

fleeing high-cost countries.” (Pete Engardio et al, February 2, 2003).

By Richard L. Dixon. Email address: rdixon57@gmail.com

little improvement.” (Monica Lesmerises, 2007).

By Richard L. Dixon. Email address: rdixon57@gmail.com

even China. This is leading to a twofold disaster.

Friedman was incorrect.

By Richard L. Dixon. Email address: rdixon57@gmail.com

front to displace American workers.

tax breaks for American businesses and individuals.

of their operations in other countries.” (Don Miller, May 5, 2009).

By Richard L. Dixon. Email address: rdixon57@gmail.com

seems. Multi-nationals have sought to protect themselves by internationalizing their operations

aggressive in buying overseas manufacturing assets and moving domestic manufacturing

By Richard L. Dixon. Email address: rdixon57@gmail.com

process to an outside/external company which might have a completely different geographical

Philippines, China, Malaysia and some eastern European countries.” (Bizbrim.com).

By Richard L. Dixon. Email address: rdixon57@gmail.com

Alan Winters and Shahid Yusuf ed. 2007).

By Richard L. Dixon. Email address: rdixon57@gmail.com

to Switzerland; Amoco’s go to the United Kingdom, and Transamerica’s go to the Netherlands.

By Richard L. Dixon. Email address: rdixon57@gmail.com

By Richard L. Dixon. Email address: rdixon57@gmail.com

unwanted regulation?” (Ted Nace).

capital in our manufacturing and technological sectors.

By Richard L. Dixon. Email address: rdixon57@gmail.com

industrial, military, and economic power that it is today.

production, has been and is being outsourced.

By Richard L. Dixon. Email address: rdixon57@gmail.com

also the world at large.

Political Action Committee, August 6, 2007).

By Richard L. Dixon. Email address: rdixon57@gmail.com

math then we do in this country.

money, technology, and technical assistance to the small farmer.

By Richard L. Dixon. Email address: rdixon57@gmail.com

government-organized railroads allowed for production economies of scale. Increasingly

sophisticated farm machinery, produced by patent-protected inventors using tariff-protected

federal law.” (Anton Chaitkin, April 11, 1986).

America was built on the premise of the Free Market.

June 10, 2009 http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/06/10/jobless-recovery/ (accessed

August 23, 2009).

By Richard L. Dixon. Email address: rdixon57@gmail.com

http://www.pcdf.org/corprule/betrayal.htm (accessed August 23, 2009).

Metropolitan/Owl Book, 2001), 11.

Center for American Progress, (July 2008), 2.

5. Andrew Glyn, Capitalism Unleashed: Finance, Globalization, & Welfare, (Oxford,

England: Oxford University Press, 2006), 110.

7. Andrew Glyn, 115.

Money Morning, http://www.moneymorning.com/2009/05/05/obama-tax-law/ (accessed

August 23, 2009).

America, (Berkeley, CA: Ted Nace, May 2003), 225-226.