You are on page 1of 6

“Oh Maika, I am but a fool…”

(Sammy Vellu and MAIKA Holdings)


By Hakim Joe
Posted by admin
Tuesday, 25 August 2009 08:20
(Originally published by Malaysia Today)

W
ould you jump at
the chance of
purchasing a GLC
share for RM5.00
if that particular share is
actively trading at the KLSE at
RM6.15? What if you were
offered 10 million of that GLC
company shares?

Let me calculate a bit here.


Every share I take up would
reap me an automatic profit of On 29 September 1990, Maika
RM1.15. If I were to sell the Holdings was specially offered
share immediately at a loss of 10 million Telekoms shares at
5 sen (at RM6.10) at the KLSE RM5.00 per share by the
and after the subsequent Malaysian Government. Then
deduction of the 0.15% Finance Minister DSAI told
remisier’s commission Parliament that Maika informed
(brokerage fee) and 0.05% the Finance Ministry that they
clearing fee, I would still end only had the financial
up earning RM1.028 per share. I resources to take up 1 million
could even negotiate with my shares and proposed that the
remisier as to his commission remaining 9 million shares be
if I were to trade 10 million allocated to three MIC-linked
shares, possibly down to companies of which the
something like 0.05% because he Government acceded to (3
will still be making RM30,500 million shares each).
from these transactions – not a
bad payday from one customer The three companies were
but not as good as the owner of Clear Way Sdn Bhd, a RM2 shell
the 10 million shares who company incorporated in October
potentially could make RM10.28 1988 with two shareholders
million. (Reman a/l Subramaniam and
Muniady a/l Sadayen), S.B.
Management Services Sdn Bhd, a
RM2 shell company incorporated
in December 1989 with two
shareholders (S.
Balasubramaniyam a/l M.S.

1/6
Survei and Sothinathan a/l Finance Minister DSAI in
Sinna Govinder) and Advance Parliament on 6 May 1992 after
Personal Computers Sdn Bhd being questioned by DAP’s Lim
(RM250,000 paid up capital) Kit Siang, nobody knew that 9
with four shareholders (S. million Telekoms shares had
Balasubramaniyam a/l M.S. been diverted to three
Survei, Sothinathan a/l Sinna companies instead to Maika. MIC
Govinder, R. Selvendra and President Samy Vellu
Isphare Kumar). immediately left the country
“on sick leave” to America.
SBMS and APC shares the same (Tun Daim Zainuddin was the
office at Damansara Town Centre Finance Minister in 1990.)
and the same shareholders
whilst R. Selvendra is a On 8 May 1992, the Anti
director of Maika Holdings. Corruption Agency (ACA) led by
Federal Territories ACA
It was also discovered that Director, Nordin Ismail, raided
as on 6 October 1990, the Arab- these three companies.
Malaysia Merchant Banking
Berhad had approved a RM50 On 10 May 1992, Deputy
million loan to finance Maika’s Finance Minister Abdul Ghani
acceptance of the entire 10 Othman said that it was
million RM5.00 Telekoms shares entirely up to these 3
from the Finance Ministry. Two companies “to ensure that the
days later on 8 October 1990, Indian community benefited” and
the Maika Board of Directors that it was Maika that had
decided that they were able and recommended these 3 companies
willing to take up the entire and not the Ministry of
offer of the10 million Telekoms Finance, and henceforth did not
shares. question the status of these 3
companies.
In February 1992, rumors
abounded that Maika did not
obtain the entire 10 million
Telekoms shares that was
allocated by the Finance
Ministry. A journalist from
Watan disclosed that “there
could have been some hanky-
panky in the allocation of
Telekoms shares to Maika
Holdings.” This was followed up
in April 1992 by a Tamil
magazine, Thoothan which
disclosed that there could have
been some discrepancy in the
distribution of the 10 million On 11 May 1992, Maika
Telekoms shares allocated to Chairman, Tan Sri G.
Maika by the Finance Ministry. Pasamanickam held a news
conference to publicly announce
Until the declaration by then that he knew nothing about the

2/6
allocation of the 9 million interest in any of these 3
Telekoms shares to the 3 companies. He also informed the
companies. He also said that he press that these 3 companies
“might bring up this matter” in had pledged to donate the
the monthly Maika board meeting entire net proceeds of the
which was scheduled to be held share sales to Tafe College and
two days later (on the 13 May proceeded to issue documents of
1992). these share sales and the Tafe
College building accounts. When
On 12 May 1992, MIC Working as by the press why he sold
Committee member, Dr K.S. these shares, SV stated for a
Nijhar called for the fact that he panicked after the
resignation of the Maika Board trading price of Telekoms fell
of Directors. to RM5.30. As for the assault
of Maika members, SV declared
On 14 May 1992, Maika members that he would himself have
were assaulted when peacefully “walloped” the Maika
picketing outside Maika shareholders if he had been at
Holding’s HQ in Petaling Jaya. the scene then.
MIC Selangor Assemblyman for
Seri Cahaya, S. Sivalingam, was It was also later discovered
allegedly the leader of a group that all these 3 companies had
of Indians that assaulted the loans from CIMB (through Rashid
Maika members. Hussein Nominees Sdn Bhd) to
purchase the Telekoms shares,
On 15 May 1992, MIC President utilizing these shares as
Samy Vellu held a conference collateral and with conditions
(after his return from the US) that the share prices cannot
and said that Maika has never dip below RM6.50.
recommended that the 9 million
Telekoms shares be allocated to On 7 November 1990, CIMB
the 3 aforesaid companies. invoked this clause and force-
Furthermore, SV said that Maika sale the 3 million Telekoms
was never allocated the entire shares held by Clear Way at
10 million Telekoms shares but RM5.95 per share. Telekoms was
only a part of it due to its trading at RM6.00 at that time.
past dismal performance. SV CIMB did the same for the other
also claimed that as of 5 5.5 million Telekoms shares
October 1990, Maika had held by APC and SBMS at between
abandoned the offer of the RM5.75 and RM5.95 per share.
entire 10 million shares but Wait a minute here! Why only
instead approved the purchase 5.5 million and not 3 million
of only 1 million Telekoms shares each? Well, APC/SBMS
shares. He also said that the managed to hold back 500,000
allocation of 3 million shares Telekoms shares. How it was
each to Clear Way, SBMS and ACP able to do so if CIMB was
were decided by the Ministry of invoking their loan clause to
Finance and that none of these force-sell these shares is
companies belonged to him or unbelievable but Samy provided
any of his family members and no explanation (APC/SBMS sold
that he did not have an another 420,000 of these

3/6
Telekoms shares on April 1992 Telekoms shares. When Rama Iyer
at RM11.20). Another thing, why contradicted SV stating the
did Samy say 6 million shares Finance Ministry letter, SV
and not 3 million shares each? told him that the other 9
Are these supposedly two million Telekoms shares were
companies in fact operating as for allocation to “other MIC
one? bodies” and that he would
contact the Finance Ministry to
On 17 May 1992, Maika clarify the matter.
Managing Director, Tan Sri Rama
Iyer, contradicted Samy Vellu On 6 October 1990, Maika
saying that the latter has not received a letter dated 5
“told the truth” in his October 1990 from AMMBB
explanation of the Maika offering RM50 million to
Telekoms Scandal. Rama Iyer finance the purchase of the 10
said that he had personally million Telekoms shares. On 8
called the Treasury (after October 1990, the entire Maiko
being instructed by Arab- Board had a meeting and
Malaysia Merchant Banking officially approved the
Berhad) and had verbal purchase of the entire 10
confirmation from Munirah million Telekoms shares. A few
Abdullah Ng (Treasury Officer) days later, Maika received a
that Maika has been allotted 10 letter from the Finance
million Telekoms shares by the Ministry stating that the
Finance Ministry and that she initial letter of offer for 10
had a letter to that effect. million Telekoms shares was
Rama Iyer also said that he officially retracted and that
immediately dispatched a senior only 1 million Telekoms shares
Maika officer to collect this were on offer for Maika.
letter which was dated 27
September 1990 and then On 20 May 1992, Opposition
approached AMMBB Managing leader LKS produced evidence
Director Datuk Malek Merican on that Paari Vel was in fact the
4 October 1990 to raise the managing director of APC. In an
loan of RM50 million to finance APC namecard bearing Paari
the share allocation in full. Vel’s name and designation as
the MD, the London office
Rama Iyer also said that then address was listed at K.K.
Maika Chairman, Tan Sri C. Marketing Limited of 12,
Selvarajah concurred with his Whittington Road, Wood Green,
actions and asked him to inform London N22 4YD, England. (K.K
the MIC President to tell him of K.K Marketing stands for
of the share allocation by the Kumar Kandasamy whose son
Ministry of Finance, which he Isphare Kumar is listed as a
did the next day (at 6.10am). shareholder of APC.) BTW, Paari
However, during the telephone Vel is Samy Vellu’s son.
conversation, SV told Rama Iyer
that “there must have been a Also on this day, LKS
mistake as the offer to Maika proceeded to tear apart SV’s
was just for 1 million Telekoms documents on the share sales of
shares and not 10 million the 3 companies. One, Clear

4/6
Way’s accounts did not specify RM9,914,524.27. Simple
the 0.05% clearing fee. Two, subtraction of the two figures
its share financing interest show an outstanding of
was documented at 14.75% when RM8,971,720 and not
CIMB was only charging 11.25%. RM9,914,524.27. If indeed the
On the SBMS cum ACP accounts total outstanding is
(no trouble was taken to RM9,914,524.27, where did the
separate them), it was stated additional RM942,804.27 go?
that some of the proceeds of
the sale of the Telekoms shares
were used to purchase 3 million
Renong shares (no mention at
what buying price) and this
time the share financing
interest was calculated at
14.5%. No reasons were also
given as to why SBMS/ACP was
able to retain 500,000 of the
Telekoms shares.

As for the Tafe College


Building (TCB) accounts, LKS
questioned the validity of
these accounts as simple
arithmetic (like addition) were
done incorrectly (much like the
Home Ministry’s recent poll on
Lastly, the trading price of
ISA). The total income of
Telekoms shares had never fell
RM15,468,003.73 were tabulated
to RM5.30 as stated by SV
as from the Federal Government
during the press conference on
(RM8 million), donations from
15 May 1992. Between November
MIC branches (RM300,000), Clear
7th and November 15th, Telekoms
Way contribution (RM2,318,003)
traded at a low of RM5.85 and a
and from SBMS/ACP
high of RM6.15 and Between
(RM4,850,000). The correct
November 16th and November
figures should be RM15,468,003
27th, Telekoms traded at a low
not RM14,468,003.73 – where did
of RM6.00 and a high of RM6.90.
the 73 sen come from? The total
From December onwards, Telekoms
expenditure is even worse! The
never traded under RM7.00.
TCB accounts stated that a
total of RM24,662,528 were
It must be also noted that
used. The correct addition
the remisier handling these
comes to only RM24,112,528.
transactions was also a
Where did the difference of
director to both SBMS and ACP.
RM550,000 go?
By the way, the brokerage fee
for the 8.5 million Telekoms
Additionally SV stated that
shares came to a total sum of
the total expenditure incurred
RM505,470.00.
was RM24,662,528 and the total
payments made was RM15,690,808
On 24 May 1992, Maika’s
and the outstanding is

5/6
offices were broken into and SV was cleared by the ACA
their offices ransacked. over the Maika Scandal and
Documents in pertinent to the nobody was arrested over it.
Telekoms shares allocation went The 66,000 Maika shareholders
missing. The guard was also are still holding their breath
assaulted. Earlier in the week, waiting for an explanation by
employees of the weekly the Maika Board. As for the
Thoothan magazine were attacked Maika-Telekoms share scandal,
at their Jalan Ipoh office nothing was ever heard of it.
premises (this magazine was S. Sothinathan is now the MIC
giving prominent coverage to vice-president and MP for Teluk
the Maika Telekoms shares Kemang.
Scandal and on one of its
headlines, the magazine called In October 2006, the MIC
SV a liar and a thief). Johor assemblyman for
Tenggaroh, the late S.
In 1994, then chairman of MIC Krishnasamy assaulted the DAP
public claims committee, V. MP for Ipoh Barat, M.
Subramaniam (also known as Kulasegaran at the Maika annual
Barat Maniam) made a startling general meeting at the Legend
public accusation. He charged Hotel in KL. Even though
that the accounts were Kulasegaran lodged a police
fabricated to make it appear as report, no action was taken
if all the profits from the against Krishnasamy.
sale of Telekom shares were
channelled to Maju Institute of A bit about Maika. Maika
Education Development (MIED). Holdings was once touted as the
V. Subramaniam declared, "I miraculous economic vehicle to
have come out with this elevate the Indian poor from
statement to prove that Samy the shackles of poverty.
Vellu is a thief. He has stolen Launched by MIC in 1982 as
(Telekoms) shares from the their investment arm, the
Indian community." original plan was to ensure
that at least RM30 million
In 1999, SV appointed his son worth of shares were subscribed
Vell Paari (of the K. Sujatha to but so successful was the
fame) as CEO of Maika Holdings. promotion campaign that by
From a high of RM106 million in 1984, RM106 million was raised
1984, Maika’s assets fell to from almost 66,400 shareholders
about RM32 million in 1992 with SV being the largest
(after the Telekoms shares shareholder with 2.8 million
scandal) and is in the process shares. From then onwards, it
of selling off all its assets was downhill all the way.
today (due to massive debts).
Vell Paari remained as the CEO Let me continue the song, “Oh
of Maika Holdings until today Maika, I am but a fool, Darling
and said that he would step I love you, though you treat me
down once “he has cleaned up cruel…..”
Maika…” (more like clean out
though). Originally published by:
http://mt.m2day.org/2008/content/view/26061/84/

6/6

You might also like