Geochronology

Hiding History in the Past

Part 1 of the Anthropology Series on the Hidden Origin of Homo Sapiens

--daniel

Introduction
One of the advantages of being a subcontractor for black ops projects is that you often overhear the strangest thingsthings that sound like science fiction or a good Halloween story, but you soon learn are very serious topics and you need to keep your mouth shut, until you are well away from the situation. nd when you are poking around in history with the !hoeni" ### e$uipment, a lot of une"pected things turn up. nd so is the case with the origins of man. %onathan &lassner and 'rad (right,) hold on to your hats* because you were a lot closer than you reali+ed. ,hese papers discuss anthropology, the study of the origins and behavior of homo sapiens, developing a radically different world view that will not only make anthropologists scream in horror, but will make religious folks want to bring back burning at the stake. ,he proposed theory is a common denominator to a lot of other research, mythologies and doctrine. #t is said that there is some truth in everything, but in this case, a lot more truth than anyone ever reali+edjust happens that a few things got lost in the translation- over the generations. nd that is what this paper attempts to correct. (hen .ewey /arson created his Reciprocal System of physical theory,0 he clearly defined what he wanted to accomplishto define the physical universe. He set out using basic deductive and inductive reasoning processes to achieve his goal. (hen finished, he had a very powerful theory of everything that could e"plain the smallest photon to the largest super1gala"y, e"cept there was one problem* there were still things that e"isted and were observed in everyday life, that his theory could not explain. ,hings like biologic life, e"tra1sensory abilities and the realm of ethics. 2o he took all these concepts and threw them into his think tank, removed everything that could be e"plained by his Reciprocal System of physical theory, then took an objective look at what was left. ,he result of those left1over bits became his book, Beyond Space and Time, which discusses the concepts remaining in that think tank that cannot be e"plained directly by his physics. Beyond Space and Time was /arson3s last book 4he died before it was published5 and after he removed the pieces covering biology, basic metaphysics and ethics, there was still stuff remaining in that think tank for future researchers to figure out.6 # am taking a similar approach with these anthropology papers, which is not about digging up old bones but an attempt to put together a theory of origins of mankind using religious, scientific and mythological data under the common framework of .ewey /arson3s Reciprocal System, which has proved to be very effective in e"plaining the ine"plicable over the last half century. #t is my hope that pointing out some alternatives to unquestioned beliefs, we can take a similar approach with our mythological systems that /arson did with the physical universeclean up the misunderstandings, take an honest look at what is left, and develop a theory from that premise as natural consequence. nd what is left in that think tank is going to be the really interesting stuff, for it will provide the opportunity to open an une"pected door to our future.
) 0 6 %onathan &lassner and 'rad (right are the creators of the popular science fiction series, Stargate SG-1. 2ee the books of 7auro 'iglino on the literal translation of the Hebrew 'ible. Reciprocal System of Theory website8 http899rstheory.org The Reevaluation of the Reciprocal System of Theory website8 http899rs-theory.org

Geochronology

Geologic History
(e3ve all been told about the :arth being billions of years old, with mankind not showing his ;ro1 7agnon face until about <=,=== ';:.< >nless you have got a , ?.#2@ or 'ill A ,ed3s phone boothB parked in the garage, who is going to $uestion thatC # wasn3t around back then and neither was anyone # know. 2o we just accept what we3ve been told by the e"perts,D as usual. &uess what* everything you know is wrong. Geologic dating, also known as radiometric dating, gives us our geochronology that is based on radioactive decay rates. 2ounds all well and good with one e"ception, pointed out by our old friend, .ewey /arson,E in his discovery that radioactive decay is actually a temporal explosion, an e"plosion in 0. timenot space as conventionally believed. ,he rotational structure of the atom, e"isting in coordinate time, e"plodes and scatters its pieces around in 0. time. s our clock time proceeds, we just run into the bits and pieces of the atom that physics views as radioactive emission. Same location in space 4the atom5, but different locations in time 4the emission5. rough analogy would be to take a bag of marbles 4rotations in the atomic time region5 and dump them out in a hallway. Fou dumped them in one instantlike an e"plosionbut as you walk down the hallway, you run into the marbles as individual pieces at different clock times. Grom a purely spatial point of view, it looks like you have the bag in your hand all the time, and a marble jumps out of the bag and onto the floor when you get to the position where it came to a stop in coordinate time. (hen a large atom e"plodes in time, many pieces get scattered all over the coordinate time realmH some nearby and some $uite far away. s a result of this distribution, the larger the e"plosion, the larger the error in clock time interpretationwhat is known as the half-life. (hat science believes is millions of years, is in reality, only thousands. ,hat conse$uence, alone, is enough to make most scientist3s hair stand on end. 'ut it is a natural consequence1! of the structure of the atom proposed by /arson in his Reciprocal System. ,he second bad assumption is that once an atom becomes radioactive, it continues to decay until stable. ,hat is not necessarily the case. ,he atom only has to throw off enough rotation to bring it back into the "one of isotopic sta#ility, which it does in a single, temporal e"plosion. ,he basic rotation of the atom is still intact,)) so it can continue to aggregate particles, charged neutrinos,)- that can build its mass back up to the point where another radioactive detonation is re$uired to stabili+e it. ccording to the physics te"ts, >ranium1-0D decays to /ead1-=@ in a mere 6.6B billion years. ,hat is how the age of the :arth is calculated. Iow consider /arson3s e"planation. ,he first time you see a
< Before $ommon %ra, the year ). Gormerly known as ';, 'efore ;hrist. @ , ?.#2 is an acronym for Time and Relative &imensions in Space, a time traveling spaceship from the ''; series, &octor 'ho. B Bill and Ted(s %xcellent )dventure, 7&7, )EDE. 'ill and ,ed time travel through history in a phone booth, a play on the ''; series, &octor 'ho, where the .octor travels the universe in a police telephone bo" called the , ?.#2. D %xpert, definition8 person who knows more and more, about less and less, until they know everything about nothing. E /arson, .ewey '., Basic *roperties of +atter, ;hapter -6, #sotopes. )= >nlike conventional science, the ?eciprocal 2ystem postulates a theoretical universe based on motion, to which /arson derives consequences and compares to observation. 7ost conventional theories are the oppositethe theory is developed to specifically explain an observation, so many things are missed. )) (ith the marble analogy, only a portion of the marbles are scattered on the floorsome remain in the bag. #n the ?eciprocal 2ystem it is called a mass limit. Four marbles can only weigh so much in the bag, before you have to dump some out. )- ,he charged9uncharged state of subatomic particles is not recogni+ed by conventional science, leading to more errors.

Geologic ,istory

particle fly off >1-0D, the atom has thrown off all the particles it needed to, to become a stable atom again. ,hose particles are just scattered down the hallway cross time, and actually have nothing more to do with the atom, itself. ,he atom goes back to behaving like a stable atom and eventually enough particles collide with it to bring it into the unstable +one. #t e"plodes in time, again, and throws off more particles down the hallway. #n the meantime, physicists are sitting around with their stopwatch measuring clock time, waiting for it to stop throwing off particles. 2ince the atom is e"ploding over and over again in 0. timeand they are waiting to stop running across particle debris down the hallwaythey end up sitting around a long time, say 6.6B billion years, even though it only took a few thousand years to run across all the particles from the original e"plosion. ,hose particles with a short half1life are the ones that don3t make a very big temporal bang, so there is a good chance you will run across every marble in the hall and run out, before it reaches the +one of isotopic instability again. 'ut the larger the atom, the less chance there is of that happening and the dating error becomes e"ponential.)0 s we correct for these errors, we find that recent history is a more recent than we thought. (ith that new information, we can now make an accurate correlation to the records provided by mythology and various religious apocryphaH some of which provide enormous chronological detail.

Calendars
Our calendar is based on rotation, the rotation of the :arth around its a"is 4days5, the moon around the :arth 4moonth or month5 and the :arth around the sun 4years5. Historically, different societies record their calendars in different ways. 2ome count days to calculate years, others observe celestial alignments to determine when a year starts and significant events 4planting, harvest5, but don3t really care about individual days. ,hese different systems are all translated to our modern convention of days, months and years.)6 Our current, 0@<1day calendar represents the way rotations and orbits occur now, but was this always the caseC #n order to be that static, rotation or orbit could not have changed over the millennia. ,he mass of the sun, :arth and moon would have to remain constant, despite all the meteoric dust they accumulate every day, and the internal structures would also have to remain constantindicating that nothing much is going on inside the cores* not a very logical conclusion, given the observations. #t makes far more sense that the lengths of the day, month and year have probably changed throughout our history. #f the length of the year was different, millions of years in the past, who caresC But, if it happened only a few thousand years ago, when mankind was alive and well, populating the :arth, he just might have recorded those events in his legends and that could make a significant difference to our account of history, particularly in correlating dates from different cultures. .elving into historical and mythological records one finds that this is the case* everything changes, the length of the day, month and year, and observations of these events are usually associated with
)0 # have run some estimates based on a re1computation of beginning of the ;eno+oic epoch 4the dinosaur e"tinction5, and that @< million year value only came out to be about -./!!! years, curiously matching the start of the 0rd density discussed in the 0aw of 1ne material. )6 # did not include the week as a natural, rotational period of a celestial something, because what it was measuring is no longer there. ,his will be addressed in another paper, e"plaining what does &od need, with a starshipC

Geochronology

global cataclysms.)< ,hese worldwide geologic events indicate that something has shifted and a new :poch, complete with different lengths of days, months, years, and climatic change, has begun. 'ut there is something you should first understand about modern accounts of ancient civili+ations8 7y grandfather once told me a story about archaeologists, out digging in the remains of an ancient city that was the home to a pagan people. 2ome of the people still lived in a nearby town and they had some local helpers to clear away the dust and debris of the centuries. t the entrance to many of these homes they found a blessing bowl, a small bowl that the residents used to sanctify themselves as their entered their homes, very similar to the ;atholic practice of dipping ones fingers in a bowl of Holy (ater and making the 2ign of the ;ross before entering a church. ,his was a major discovery, since it told much of the religion of these ancient people. fter a few weeks they began to run low on food, so they accompanied one of the locals to a nearby town to resupply. (hile walking through the street to the marketplace, they noticed those same, little blessing bowls by the entrances to the homes. Out of curiosity, one of the archaeologists asked their guide if they still practiced that pagan religion of centuries agoC ,he guide looked pu++led at first, looked at the bowl and replied, Io, but the dog still gets thirsty.)@ (ith that in mind, let3s ignore what the e"perts on the 7ayan civili+ation have told us about the calendar and consider the words of an elderly JKicheK 7ayan # met on a bus on the way to ;hichen #t+a, when he offered to e"plain the ;alendar 2tone # had on my ,1shirt. # have long since forgotten his name, so we will just call him, 'ob.)B 'ob told me that at the start of the human world)D there was but a single calendar and countH what we know these days as the T"olk(in12 and 0ong $ount. ,here were -= days in a month and )0 months, making the )0th the last month. )0 was considered an end number, used to indicate the end of cycles.-= (hen man was created, there were only -@= days in a year and the moon orbited the :arth in -= days, not -D. (hen # asked about the ,aa#(,-) 'ob said that it did not come into e"istence until the end of the 6th 'aktun, after another great cataclysm-- that moved the land and water about, fire rained down from the sky and no one knew where anything was any more. ,he sky had so darkened that the sun was not visible for -= years. fter that,

)"tec $alendar Stone )< )@ )B )D )E -= -) --

;ataclysms such as earth$uakes, floods, torrential winds and meteoric bombardment. 2tory from 'ruce !eret, by his grandfather, %oseph !etrone. (ith all due respect to The $hurch of the Su#genius. ,he +ero date of the /ong ;ount, )0.=.=.=.=, is actually the end of the )0th 'aktun of the prior ge. ,he ne"t day, =.=.=.=.), was the first day of the new ge. ,he sacred calendar meaning the division of days, that was provided by the god )hau 4also known as )h 3(in, from where the day name, k(in, originates5. )hau is also )nu, the 2umerian god, )n, from the other side of the planet. 7uch like the common, journalistic and editorial practice of using 0= to indicate a story is finished, originating from the last day of the month when it was due. /ong counts that e"tend beyond the 'aktun are often filled in with )03s, to indicate the end of the prior epoch8 )0.)0.)0.)0.)0.)0.=.=.=.= was .ecember -), -=)-. 42ome say .ec. -05. ,he civil calendar, originally 0@= days. ,his was the -nd cataclysm that occurred at the end of a 'aktun. ,he first was a great flood at the end of the 0rd 'aktun that parallels the Hebrew .eluge. ,he start of a new 'aktun was getting a really bad reputation for disasters.

$alendars

<

the gods gave them a new calendar, the Haab3, having )D months of -= days to match the heavens. Out of respect for hau, they kept the ,+olk3in along with the Haab3 and the dual1calendar system was born. #mportant to note is that there were only 0@= days in a year at this time, for the <1day month of >ayeb was not added until Huracan became angry and added the >ayeb 4translated by 'ob as < evil days5 at the end of the @th 'aktun.-0 Gortunately, the 7aya used the /ong ;ount to count days, so we know e"actly how many days have passed since the creation of the human world. nd we can adjust the number of years using 'ob3s calendar information. 2horter years early on mean more of them, so the calculated start of the 7ayan /ong ;ount was not 0))0 ';:, but a bit further back* some <BB0 years ago8 0B@) ';:. nyone familiar with the ;hristian 'ible or the Hebrew calendar may recogni+e that year8 the year )dam and %ve were created. perfect match to the 7ayan start of the human world. Iow that we have a very close correlation between the 7ayan and Hebrew calendars, from opposite sides of the planet, other information becomes available. Hebrew accounts say the &reat Glood occurred )@<@ years after dam. ;onverting that to a /ong ;ount with the corrected calendar puts us near -.)E.)@.=.=, which is about @ years short of the end of the 0rd 'aktun, the date of the 7ayan flood. ,he adjusted date for the Hebrew :"odus from :gypt is about )<<= ';, with its plagues, volcanoes, earth$uakes and the darkening of the sun. ,he end of the 6th 'aktun was )<6D ';:. lmost a @,=== year period of history and the stories of the .eluge and :"odus match up with their 7ayan e$uivalents to within @ yearsC #Km sure that must be coincidence* (e3ve decoded the blessing bowl at the doorstep, so on to the plates in the kitchen.

Growing a Planet with Expansion Tectonics

,he current geometry of the :arth is an oblate spheroid 4flattened ball5 of fi"ed dimensions, on which e"ist continental plates that slide around and bang into each other, an inch or two a century, creating mountains, valleys, earth$uakes and volcanoes. ,he science is called tectonics,-6 and is the result of the standard, scientific approach of trying to create a theory to e"plain observation. /et3s take /arson3s approach and use the concepts of the ?eciprocal 2ystem to determine the inner structure of a planet, and find the natural consequences of that structure. n initial draft of this research was published in !eret3s )EED paper, )t the %arth(s $ore4 The Geophysics of *lanetary %volution.-< #t proposes a planetary model that is based on the remnants of a white dwarf star, the ' component of the common red giant9white dwarf stellar binary. ,he idea is e"plained in detail by /arson in 5niverse of +otion,-@ where the component, the giant star, reaches its age limit early and e"plodes in a supernova. (hat /arson failed to consider, and what !eret points out, is that the ' white dwarf, sitting in close vicinity to a supernova, is unlikely to survive the e"plosion and will be destroyed in space and accelerated into time, producing a number of small, super1
-0 :"trapolating, 7arch D, B6D ';:, %ulian, or Gebruary -D, B6D ';, &regorian calendar. -6 ,ectonics has now been e"tended to8 e"tensional tectonics, thrust tectonics, strike1slip tectonics, plate tectonics, salt tectonics, neotectonics, tectonphysics, seismotectonics and planetary tectonics. -< !eret, 'ruce, t the :arth3s ;ore, ,he &eophysics of !lanetary :volution, Reciprocity LLM##, N ) 42pring, )EED5. -@ /arson, .ewey '., >niverse of 7otion, ;hapter B, 'inary and 7ultiple 2tars, pp. D01)=-.

Geochronology

dense fragments that evolve into the cores of planets. Iow that we know weKre sitting on a white dwarf core,-B /arson3s research on white dwarf stars provides a road map-D to understanding what is going on beneath our feet. ,he ?eciprocal 2ystem demonstrates that the same processes occur over and over in nature, just at different scales, so knowledge obtained from $uasars 4galactic implosions5 can be used with white dwarfs 4stellar implosions5, planets 4dwarf fragments5, asteroids 4smaller dwarf fragments5* all the way down to an atoms and particles, which are also just motion in time/ located in space. ,he planetary interior, like its stellar parent, is divided into four, distinct layers, based on the concept of motion, and how many dimensions of that motion e"ists in either space or timewhat /arson refers to as the astronomical speed ranges.-E
2i l, 2i7a ;rust sthenosphere 7antle 4)1"5 6nward in Space 8Gravity9 #nner, #nner ;ore 4)1"5 Temporal )ggregate #nner ;ore 401"5 1utward in Space 8)ntigravity9 Outer ;ore 4-1"5 6nverse &ensity Gradient

:ach of these speed +ones has specific attributes that contribute to the behavior of the planet8 ). 1-x8 0ow-speed range of normal matter that comprises the 2ialic 4continental5 crust, 2imatic 4ocean bed5 crust, asthenosphere 4slippery, magma layer5 and mantle. ,he mantle is part of the original dwarf star remnant, whereas the crust is composed of meteoric aggregate. ,he mantle e"hibits the property of inward motion in space, that we call gravity. -. 2-x8 6ntermediate speed range, where two dimensions of motion e"ist in space and one in time. ,his forms the outer core and has an inverse density gradient, where the shell of the outer core contains the densest materials, with a light, gaseous lower region. 2ince gravity re$uires all three dimensions of motion to be inward in space, and the outer core only has two, it e"hibits neutral gravity.0= 'ecause of this presence of motion in time, the outer core produces an intense, scalar magnetic field. 0. 3-x8 5ltra-high speed range, where one dimension remains in space, with two in time. ,his forms the inner core and e"hibits anti-gravity motion, as well as other properties associated with the pulsar. #t is the balance between the gravitation of the mantle and the anti1gravitation of the inner core that keeps a planet in a stable orbit, much like trying to go up the down escalator,
-B ,he analogous astronomical object would technically be a pulsar, which is a white dwarf that has been accelerated in time into the ultra1high speed range. ,he term white dwarf is used to refer to the general class if the star, but the inner core e"hibits pulsar properties. -D 2ee8 5niverse of +otion, ;hapter @, ,he .warf 2tar ;ycle, and /arson3s paper, ,he .ensity &radient of (hite .warf 2tars. -E /arson uses unity 4).=5 for the speed of light and defines his speed ranges based on the idea that the default condition for everything is to move at the speed of light. Gravity is the opposition to that movement, so all his measurements are from the speed of light, downward, which he designates as )1" 4start at the speed of light, and slow down to x5. 0= /arson, .ewey '., Beyond 7ewton4 )n %xplanation of Gravitation, Iorth !acific !ublishers. &ravity re$uires three dimensions in space. 7otion in the intermediate and ultra1high speed ranges only have - or ) dimension in space, and therefore e"hibit neutral, or anti1gravity motion.

Growing a *lanet with %xpansion Tectonics

at the same speed, and end up going nowhere. 6. 1-x8 6nverse low speed range, where all motion is in 0. time. ,his is the inner, inner core that was only recently discovered by geophysicists and named by 7ehran Jeshe as the $aroline core.0) ,his appears as an empty, bubble1like void at the very center of the inner core that creates a link between the spatial and temporal structures of the planet, and when considered in a living aspect, would form the soul:; of the world. 'ecause of the faster1than1light motion involved in a white dwarf star, the core e"hibits conditions that are the opposite to a normal star.00 ?ather than increasing in density and heating up, the white dwarf decreases in density and cools down, creating an inverse density gradient06 in the core of the planet. .ue to the drop in density, the core expands over time, cracking the mantle and the crust sitting on top of it, creating the observed tectonic plates. However, like their stellar counterparts, the white dwarf cores do not just slowly e"pand, they e"pand in discrete stages analogous to the solar transition, remaining $uiet for centuries then when reaching a critical level of compression, fracturing the mantle, e"panding the planet and splitting the crust along the tectonic fault lines. 'ecause of the increased surface area, those plates are free to slide around on the asthenosphere,0< a slippery magma layer that e"ists between the crust and mantle. ,he plates will then come to rest at their least energy configuration, which is usually a E=O rotation, bringing the massive weight of the ice caps to the e$uatorial region, like adjusting the clothes in an out1 of1balance washing machine. Iote that the mantle, inner and outer cores have not movedH the crust just slides relative to the magnetic poles, so it appears that the poles are bouncing around on the surface.0@ simple way to understand this e"pansion is to take a balloon, inflate it, then cover it with mud and let it dry. Iow inflate the balloon some more and watch what happens. ,he cracks in the mud become the ocean bedH the separate pieces of mud become the continents. nd as the balloon gets larger, there is more room for those chunks of mud to slide around on, giving the appearance of plate tectonics. 2o as a natural conse$uence of planetary design, we find not a static sphere, but planets that increase in si+e with time, in sudden steps that rearrange their surfaces, accompanied with a lot of volcanic activity and usually resulting in a crustal rotation. ,hese features are observed on the :arth, planets and moons. #n our ancient history, the planet they describe was physically smaller, the oceans were not as broad as they are now and the continents were arranged differently. #n the earliest of days, prior to any oceans, all the continents fit together like pu++le pieces in one, small, hardened1mud ball!angea was an entire planet of dry land prior to the e"pansion, not a super1continent on a waterworld.
0) Jeshe, 7ehran, 2tatic and .ynamic !lasma ?eactors, Jeshe ,echnologies. 0- ,he life unit in the ?eciprocal 2ystem is an aggregate of material atoms 4spatial, corporal5 and cosmic atoms 4temporal, soul or mind5. nything that is an aggregate of 0. space and 0. time, like a planet, is considered to be a organism. 00 2ince astronomy has stellar evolution backwards, the white dwarf behaves like a normal star for astronomers, which is why they changed the main se$uence stars to be dwarfs to account for observation. >nfortunately it is a common practice in science to change the observation to fit the theory. 06 /arson, .ewey '., ,he .ensity &radient in (hite .warf 2tars. 0< ,he asthenosphere is also the source of crude oil, which is a waste product of a bacteria that lives in magma that was discovered during the 7ount 2t. Helen3s eruption. 7ost oil fields are crude that seeps up from the asthenosphere, so oil fields will eventually refill over time. n unlimited supply of oil e"ists just a few miles below the surface. ,he most accessible point are where the crust is thinnestoffshoreyou know, where those thousands upon thousands of deep hori+on drilling platforms are. nd yes, you are running your car on bacteria poop, not decomposed dinosaurs. 0@ Ioone, ?ichard (., .<.<;!!! 6ce4 the 5ltimate &isaster. Ioone had the right conse$uence, but the wrong cause. #f the polar ice were to melt, by natural or artificial means, the crustal shift would be minimal during an e"pansion event.

Geochronology

Ancient Cartography
(ith what you know now about the si+e of the planet changing over time, look at some of the maps of the ancient cartographers8 Orontius Fineaus Delphinus (1531) Iote that ntarctica e"tends up to the ,ropic of ;apricorn and the map shows mountains on the continent, indicating minimal ice caps. ,he oceans are substantially smaller, and #taly is almost touching frica. ,he continental arrangement makes no sense now, but reduce the si+e of the planet and it tells a story of ancient times, of a smaller world with easily traversable seas, land bridges between continents for the migrations of peoples, and an entirely different climate than we have now. nd this is not the only map of those times to indicate such a structure. 7aps like these are found all over the world, indicating common knowledge among seafarers. Iotes from the ancient mapmakers say that these were copied from even older maps, and how ;hristopher ;olumbus knew there was a Iew (orld out there to find againhe just did not reali+e the :arth e"panded, and the oceans were a lot wider in )6E- than when the maps were originally made.

)#raham 1rtelius( ela#orate dou#le-hemisphere world map records the first %nglish circumnavigation of the glo#e #y Sir =rancis &rake 81.---1.>!9/ as well as that of his countryman Thomas $avendish a few years later 81.>?-1.>>9@ The map portrays the outlines of continents leaving the interiors #lank/ suggesting that the land areas were left unexplored@ The marginalia includes the %li"a#ethan coat-of-arms/ a vignette of &rakeAs ship the Golden ,ind/ and four corner illustrations@ The drawing in the upper-left corner shows &rakeAs landing at 7ova )l#ion in present-day $alifornia@

The %arly Structure of the Solar System

The Early Structure of the Solar System

Gortunately, the gods provided us with some detailed descriptions of the early days8 our mythology. Jnowing what we do about geochronology and the structure of the :arth, these mythological records take on a different meaningone that tends to fit the natural conse$uences of our theoretical development. #n order to understand what mythology is describing, a more detailed picture of the early solar system is neededone that is based on natural, evolutionary conse$uences. s mentioned in my Geoengineering paper, one of the most important discoveries /arson made from the natural conse$uences of his ?eciprocal 2ystem is that astronomy is #ackwards. stronomers work with snapshots of the >niverse, and they lined up their !olaroids from tail1to1head, rather than head1to1 tail, and then tried to make sense of it. 2o the natural flow of evolution of planets, stars and gala"ies was completely missed. /arson3s stellar evolution se$uence proceeds from dust, to a red giant, orange giant, then on to the main stream and up to the blue supergiant, then a ,ype ## supernova e"plosion 4thermal limit5,0B following the spectral class se$uence of I, ?, 7, J, &, G, , ', O. 'ut unlike conventional astronomy, stellar evolution does not stop with the supernova, because the supernova e"plodes its outer shell into space, and the inner core into 0. time. (hereas an e"plosion in time is analogous to an implosion in space, what you end up with is a super1dense, invisible object, emitting L1rays, surrounded by a large $uantity of dust and debris concentrated in a ring 4intermediate speeds58 the black hole and its accretion disk.

2upernova

'lack Hole

?ed &iant 9 (hite .warf 'inary

Iow we know the mechanism, we also know that this black hole isn3t a hole at all. #t is just the spatial location of a temporal explosion. s spatial gravity pulls the dust and rock together to form a new, red giant star, temporal gravity will pull the black hole together in time, e"panding and cooling it in space, moving it from L1rays to visible light, resulting in the formation of the very common red giant 9 white dwarf stellar binary. nd the situation can repeat, ad infinitum, producing stellar triplets, $uadruplets, $uintuplets, etc., or stars with solar systems. /arson refers to this recursion of stars as generations. ,he first generation is a star that has not yet become a supernova, being found primarily in globular clusters. ,he second generation is the stellar binary. ,he third generation can either be a stellar triplet or a single star with a solar system. ,he formation of a planetary system during the 0rd stellar generation occurs when the non1white dwarf star of a binary, what /arson calls the component, e"plodes in a ,ype # supernova. ,he energy accelerates the white dwarf companion into ultra1high 4pulsar5 speed rangesanti1gravity, so it begins to move away from the component, then was broken up into a number of fragments. 2hould the white
0B ,he ,ype ## supernova occurs as a conse$uence of the thermal limitthe star gets too hot to hold itself together. ,ype ## supernova only occur with blue, ;lass O supergiants. ,ype # supernova occur because of the atoms of the star reaching the age limit of matter and can occur in any type of star. ,he controlling factor here is how old the fuel 4matter5 was that the star pulled in to consume in fission.

)=

Geochronology

dwarf component e"plode instead, the mostly gaseous component would just be splattered around, to reform into a star, producing a stellar triplet. )s we saw earlier/ the two linear units from "ero to the one-dimensional limit correspond to eight three-dimensional units@ The constituents of the white dwarf are thus distri#uted to a num#er of distinct speed levels/ with a maximum of seven@0D (hen /arson refers to speeds, he is talking about a scalar speed, not a translational one. 2calar motion increases or decreases in integer steps, not a smooth transition. 2o any internal, scalar speed of a fragment, - PQ n P 0 would be a speed of -. ,here are no fractional parts. 'ecause of this $uanti+ed separation, the fragments fall into tight, discrete orbits and the pieces tend to consolidate in those orbits, into one, large chunk we call a planet. ,his is unnoticed because of all the initial debris from a supernova e"plosion, and by the time the dust settles you just have a single planet in each discrete orbit. 'ut also notice that /arson states a speed limit of eight, three1dimensional units that are linearly distributed from +ero to seven. ,hat means that there are just eight/ sta#le or#its in any solar system. #n the ?2- reevaluation, it was found that there is no preferred direction of a scalar motion in space, so these eight units are e$ually divided 4R65 about the center of the e"plosion, which forms a neutral speed +one. 2o these eight units actually form nine orbitsH four inner, a neutral +one, and four outer, corresponding to the inner planets, the asteroid belt, and the outer planets. ,his is an important conse$uence, in that all solar systems are going to look just like ours does. ,he si+es of planets may be different, and there may or may not be planets in specific orbits, but overall, you3ll have none1to1four hard, inner planets, an asteroid belt, and none1to1four outer, gaseous planets. /ike our solar system, anything beyond that 4!luto, ;haron, :ris, etc5 are in unsta#le orbits, primarily being determined by solar gravity and not by their inner cores. 7ost people are familiar with Secharia 2itchin3s series, the %arth $hronicles and the 2umerian cylinder seal M -60 that he claims to be a depiction of our solar system with an e"tra planet, 7i#iru. However, we know that most solar systems look e"actly like our own, so what if the solar system depicted on this seal is not ours, but another solar systemC !erhaps the solar system the nnunaki originally came fromC .ecember -), -=)- has come and gone, and no Iibiru on our skies* consider the possibilities.

$ylinder Seal B) ;C:

Our early sun is a reconstituted, 0rd generation red giant, a large, relatively cool star with low gravity. ,he planets, being the shattered remains of its former, white dwarf companion, are still strongly displaced in time with the inner cores providing a significant anti1gravity propulsion system to hold the planets into stable orbits fairly far out, but with each planet moving at a substantially faster orbital velocity0E then we now observe.
0D /arson, .ewey '., 5niverse of +otion, p. EB, where /arson derives the ,itius1'ode /aw as a natural conse$uence of the $uantum speeds of G,/ motion of planets. 0E ,he early planetary cores were similar to pulsars in that they have predominant ultra1high speeds in the inner core, producing strong anti1gravityand anti1masseffects that virtually neutrali+e the intrinsic mass of the fragment. s a result of very low net mass, the corresponding orbital velocities are very high, making for short years. Over time, inner core 401"5 degenerates to outer core 4-1"5 and outer core to mantle 4)1"5, increasing the mass of the planet and slowing its orbital velocity, making for longer years.

The %arly Structure of the Solar System

))

,he beginnings of a 0rd generation solar system will initially be a large ring of dust and debris around a dull, red giant sun, with the fragments of the white dwarf maintaining an orbital position in that debris field.6= Over time, gravity will do its job and the bulk of the debris field will be accumulated by the newly forming sun and planetary cores, making the sun smaller, brighter and hotter, moving it towards the main se$uence. ,he planetary cores cool and e"pand, with a Red Giant Sun of %arly *lanetary System slowly1increasing layer of rock accumulating over them. ,he aggregated crust tends to be small, as the anti1gravity motion of the early core will tend to push away the larger fragments that would otherwise substantially add to the mass. #f a space1faring species were to visit the :arth in those early days, after most of the post1supernova debris had been cleared away, they would find eight planets in fairly close orbits, close enough that the rings of 2aturn6) could be observed with the naked eye on near orbital approach, and Ieptune would be the visible in the night sky much as %upiter is now. One of the beautiful parts of .ewey /arson3s Reciprocal System of theory, is that everything works the same wayH there is one set of rules that define structure from the smallest electron to the largest supergala"y, so anything you learn in one, specific field of study is applicable to all others. nd it is simply based on time and space, the yin1yang of the >niverse. #f we apply this basic yin1yang knowledge to the newly forming 0rd generation solar system, we find that there are yin planets and yang planets, distributed around a neutral boundary. /ooking at our solar system, the structure becomes obvious8 this neutral boundary is the asteroid belt, with the small, condensed yin planets being the inner planets and the large, e"pansive yang planets being the outer gas giants. ll the inner planets will have similar propertiesH all the outer planets will have similar propertiesH and the inner and outer will be conjugates of each other.
&ravity

6 #nner Fin !lanets ,emporal 2peed 2tability

6 Outer Fang !lanets

,here are a few other conse$uences of this structure8 ). ,he asteroid belt was never a planet, it was a white dwarf starT #t e"ists in a region where forces are relatively balanced, like a stagnant pool. ?ock accumulates there and forms asteroids, so over time, a planet1si+ed asteroid may form from gravitation, but that planet will not have a planetary core like the other worlds, and as such, would never be able to sustain an ecosystem.6-. ,he early planets had no moons. #t is a reasonable conclusion, as during the post1supernova
6= ,his has been observed in protoplanets, the only difference being is that the ?eciprocal 2ystem places the star in the 0 rd generation, not the )st generation as a newly forming star, as conventional astronomy indicates. 6) ,he development of planetary rings occurs during the cooling down stage of the planetary core, not being formed with the planet. ,he outer planets contain the larger cores, sufficient to e"hibit nova1type e"plosions that result in many small moons 4ultra1high speeds5 and ring systems 4intermediate speeds5. 6- ;eres, now occupying that location, has a rocky core and icy mantle, not an active, planetary core.

)-

Geochronology

aggregation phase, any moons close enough to a planet would be sucked in and add to the planet3s mass. ,he moons are a later stage of solar system formation, a product of outer planet nova activity, or someone dropping them off. 0. ll planets have a scalar magnetic field. 7agnetism is a conse$uence of intermediate speed motion in the ?eciprocal 2ystem, and all planetary cores have intermediate speed motion. However, without something to give the magnetic field an orientation, the field is random and barely detectable by instrumentality. Once oriented, it normally takes the shape of the classic toroid.

6. ,he positioning of the planets is arranged about the neutral, unit speed boundary, the asteroid beltnot the sunT ,he sun controls where this neutral ring sits, in relation to itself. ,he planets adjust relative to the neutral ring. &ravity is still the controlling factor, but there are two kinds of gravity8 spatial and temporal 4gravity in timeH anti1gravity in space5. ,here are a large number of factors that go into the positioning of planets, not just gravity. ,he interaction of the various speed ranges of the planetary core, the electric, magnetic and gravitational effects of the sun, and the effects the planets have on each other, since they share a common, white dwarf core that is still locali+ed in time and distributed across space as planets.60

Sister Worlds: the Inner Planets

Fin is in. Fin planets are compressive, resulting in hard, rocky surfaces that crack over time, as their cores cool and e"pand. ,his is observed as tectonic plates separating continents on :arth, and rills and fracture +ones on the other hard planets and moons. ,hese fracture +ones and areas of upheaval are indications that there is a white dwarf fragment at the core of the structure, that is gravitating in time and due to the reciprocal relation, e"panding in space. However, without an oriented magnetic field, the early planets would be subject to e"posure of all sorts of ioni+ing radiation and mass ejecta from the sun, which tends to inhibit, not stop, the development of life. :arly forms of life on these worlds will either be resistant to radiation or make use of it as a kind of food source, similar to plants eating light through photosynthesis. Once a situation develops where a magnetic field becomes oriented, the resulting strong magnetic field deflects these damaging effects from the sun and an e"plosion of life occurs on the planet, as what occurred on :arth during the ;ambrian period of the !aleo+oic :ra. ,his situation occurs when the planet o#tains a moon.
The San )ndreas =ault

#nitially, the inner planets were in a gravitational lock with the sun. /ike our present1day moon, the same face was always pointed at the sun, providing a light side and a dark side.66 :ven now, 7ercury and Menus barely rotate on their a"esH 7ercury3s day is longer than its year.6< ,his results in a dichotomy of heat and cold, with the face towards the sun getting e"ceptionally hot. ,he dark, shadow side, due to little to no atmosphere, will be almost as cold as the surrounding void of space. ,he thermocline, where hot meets cold, tends to be an area of stress and shear, cracking the young planet
60 ,his temporal locality gives rise to metaphysical effects, such as those documented in )strology. 66 ,his dichotomy of light and dark forms the essence of yang and yinH yang being the sun1side, and yin is the shaded. 6< 7ercury3s year is DB.EB :arth days, whereas one day, sunrise1to1sunrise takes )B@ :arth days.

The %arly Structure of the Solar System

)0

around it3s girth in great and yawning voids* ;onsider this Iorse creation myth8 The first realm to exist was +uspell/ a place of light and heat whose flames are so hot that those who are not native to that land cannot endure it@ Beyond +uspell lay the great and yawning void named Ginnungagap/ and #eyond Ginnungagap lay the dark/ cold realm of 7iflheim@ ;onsider it to be a description of the early, inner planets, with the burning1hot side facing the red giant sun, a temperate region around the edges where the sun is low in the sky and the eternal, black cold and darkness of the side facing away from the sun. gain, the yang1boundary1yin structure, with the Iorse e$uivalents being +uspell 4fire5, Ginnungagap 4the great gap5, 7iflheim 4ice5. ,he sister worlds of 7ercury, Menus, :arth and 7ars originally looked very similar8 dried out balls of rock and volcanoes, cracking their surfaces as the cores e"pand, with an inverse density gradient putting the heaviest elements near the surface. Iot much good for the formation of life. t least not yet. ,he ancient records describe things we could not possibly know about, but the gods did know, relating to us through mythology and apocrypha.

Brother Worlds: the Outer Planets

,he outer planets, being the larger, more energetic fragments, will initially be dark bodies emitting L1ray and gamma radiation 4part of their transition from solar to planetary status5. s they cool, they will produce significant amounts of visible light, like miniature suns, starting with the most energetic, the outermost planet of Ieptune, and moving in $uanti+ed steps inward. #n essence, they behave like their larger cousin, the nova, as the cooling process will produce light elements that gravitate towards their centers, including hydrogen and o"ygenan e"plosive combination.6@ nd eventually S7 12>->) $reating an asteroid they do go off with a bang, scattering dust, rock and planetary #elt@ *lanetary rings form the S)+% chunks into nearby space, typically along the e$uatorial plane, which way and for the S)+% reason@ produce a series of icy moons and rings, much like the supernova Saturn would initially look like this/ with #right/ visi#le/ glowing rings@ that created the planets and asteroid belt. gain, it is the same process, just a different scale. fter their bla+e of a nova subsides,6B they will have large atmospheres of light elements, with a ring system and a number of moons scattered about. #f the e"plosion is energetic enough, some of these moons may reach escape velocity and go wandering to the outer solar system 4anti1gravity motion5, to take up unstable orbits further out.6D ,he se$uence of events in the ancient sky, because of $uanti+ed transition and remembering that all the planets share the same core in 0. time, will be that when one planet drops in energy, the ne"t lights up, a kind of stair1step effect.
6@ /arson, .ewey '., 5niverse of +otion, ;hapter )0, ,he ;ataclysmic Mariables, p. )D-. ,he planetary nova is the same e"plosive process as the stellar nova, which is timed by the change in magnetic ioni+ation levels. 6B ,he nova flare may last for months, due to the smaller si+e of the core as compared to the white dwarf star. ,he higher luminosity can remain for centuries, until sufficient material drops below the G,/ speed range to darken the disk. 6D !luto, Haumea, 7akemake and :ris are likely candidates for this situation.

)6

Geochronology

s a result, there will be a dominance of brilliant, star1like planets in the sky8 t first, no visible planets, but point1source L1ray and gamma ray sources are detectable where the planets will form 4they are already there, just not emitting nor reflecting light5. Ieptune flaresH the other planets are still dark, L1ray bodies. t this time, the planetary orbits of both inner and outer planets are much closer to the unit speed boundary, the asteroid belt, and are just now beginning to spread away from it. Ieptune dies down to a planet with a ring systemH the lower speeds move the planet into a more distant orbit. >ranus flares up and becomes dominant in the night sky, with %upiter and 2aturn still being dark bodies. >ranus dies down from the same conditions and 2aturn becomes active, leaving only %upiter a dark body. 2aturn dies down and %upiter flares up, becoming the dominant object in the sky. %upiter dies down to planetary status. 'y this time, the planets have lost most of their anti1 gravity motion, their orbital velocities have reduced, and they are in orbits much further apart from each other, but also will have moved closer to the sun. ,he sun has been condensing all along and getting smaller and brighter, heading towards the main se$uence dwarf.

,his is the current structure of the solar system. #t has change significantly since its formation. Iote that the se$uence of bright, star1like objects in the sky, a natural conse$uence of ?eciprocal 2ystem astronomy, matches the mythological ges 4or suns as the +tec say5 or the domination of certain ,itans8 !oseidon 4Ieptune5, Ouranos 4>ranus5, ;ronus 42aturn5 and Seus 4%upiter5. ,he changing dominance of these very obvious planetary lights in the sky plays a significant role in mythology, as the planetary orbits also change when the ruler of the sky changes. Gor e"ample, when %upiter became dominant over 2aturn in the sky, the orbit of 2aturn moved further out and the ring system could no longer be seenSeus9%upiter overthrew his father, ;ronus92aturn, whom overthrew his father, Ouranos9>ranus. ,here is a mythological pattern that mimics the conse$uences of ?eciprocal 2ystem astronomy. ,he inner planets have not changed much, other than to slow down and move closer to the sun, as the core si+es are too small to sustain the drastic e"hibitions of the outer planets. ,he occasional core flare will crack their surfaces and cause sudden e"pansion.6E

Magnetic Ionization of Elements

150
Element Number

100 50 0 0 2

?adioactive :lements 4on or above line5 > u /u 2table :lements 4below line5
4 6 8 10 12 14
Magnetic Ionization Level

Ib
16

6E !eret, 'ruce, t the :arth3s ;ore8 the &eophysics of !lanetary :volution, discussion of core flares, a volcanic1like eruption that later looks like a meteor impact crater.

The %arly Structure of the Solar System

)<

7agnetic ioni+ation levels were initially very high because the core is a stellar fragment and decreases as the planetary core ages. ?ather than a solar transition up to a higher magnetic ioni+ation, the planets do a planetary transition down to a lower magnetic ioni+ation. ,his infers that much of the material on the early planets was radioactive, and as the planets age, their minerals become less radioactive. ,he chart indicates the +one of stability for elements at a given magnetic ioni+ation level 4using /arson3s natural units of magnetism5. ll the elements below the line will be stable in the environmentH all the elements above will be radioactive. Gor an e"ample, at a magnetic ioni+ation level of -, the stable elements are from hydrogen 4)5 to platinum 4BD5. ,he radioactive elements would start with &old 4BE, u5 on up to element U))B, which is the ma"imum element<= in the ?eciprocal 2ystem. One of the major conse$uences of the planetary cores having the similar inverse density gradient of the white dwarfs, is that the heaviest elements are on the outside, and the lightest ones are deep underground, until meteoric aggregation covers them up with dirt, and they have to be dug out. ;onsider8 if a bunch of e"tra1terrestrial engineers were out to e"ploit some heavy metal, along with all the gems produced by e"tremely high surface temperatures of the early core, the inner planets of a newly forming solar system would literally be a gold mine.

Using Atlantis to Correct Geochronology

!eople have suspected for a long time that our world has been visited by e"traterrestrial species, as there is a considerable amount of evidence laying about that would indicate visitation by a space1faring race.<) ,he difficulty has been that researchers could not correlate the evidence with a mythological chronology or geography, because of the bad assumptions concerning geologic dating and the belief that the :arth always looked just as it does now. (hen we corrected the interpretation of years for the 7ayan calendar, it matched the Hebrew calendar. ,he same thing happens when the billions and billions of years<- of geochronology becomes thousands and thousands.

$ity of *oseida on the $ontinent of )tlantis

,here are a number of sources that can be used to build a correlation between the accepted geochronology and the corrected calendarH since :dgar ;ayce3s references to )tlantis are fairly well known, # will start with them. ;ayce identified three destructions of tlantis8 ). <=,=== ';<08 a technological attempt to eliminate the giant beasts ravaging the land failed, and resulted in a major upheaval of the land splitting the continent into the three, large islands of !oseid, ryan and Og.
<= :lement ))B, /arsonium, as ?eciprocal 2ystem students call it, is the upper limit of rotational combinations that can be e"pressed in a 01dimensional system. ,his does not preclude elements with a higher number, but there is no way to e"press those combinations in 0. space, so elements are highly unstable, both structurally and chemically. ,hey normally decompose to a lower element within one natural unit of time 4appro"imately )<- attoseconds5. <) Mon .Vniken, :rich, $hariots of the Gods. <- popular phrase used by astronomer ;arl 2agan. <0 ;ayce reading -@-10EH <=,B-- ';:, referring to the time of a gathering, *e"cept in the inner thought or visions of those that have returned or are returning in the present sphere, the ways and means devised were as those that would alter or change the environs which those #easts needed, or that necessary for their sustenance in the particular portions of the sphere, or earth, that they occupied at the time. ,hese returned or are returning souls are probably the ones behind the chemtrail geoengineering.

)@

Geochronology

-. -D,=== ';8 earth$uakes and flooding that resulted in !oseidia3s climate changing for the worse, to the point where the island was evacuated before it fro+e over. 0. )=,=== ';8 the final breakup of the islands of tlantis. (hen a person receives information from a non1sensory source, like channels or dreams, the e"pression of the information is limited to the symbols and motifs that the person is familiar with. ,his has been scientifically demonstrated in situations where primitive tribes describe aircraft as giant birds. ,he same situation works with chronologyH when ;ayce selected these dates, they were based on the information he accepted as truth, the geochronology of the period. #n the case of the final breakup of tlantis, the date was commonly accepted as E@== ';:, which comes from !lato3s recounting of 2olon3s story of the continent, E=== years before his time. 2olon3s time was circa @== ';:, so @==WE=== Q E@==, the accepted time of the fall of tlantis that was known to ;ayce. ,hen along comes one ngelos &alanopoulos, pointing out in his )E@E book, )tlantis4 The Truth Behind the 0egend, that there was a slight error in the :gyptian translation of E=== yearsit was actually E== years, making the time frame of the destruction of tlantis about )<== ';: 4@==WE==5. Grom the prior e"ploration of the calendar, we know that the end of the 6th 'aktun was )<6D ';:, corresponding with the :"odus from :gypt, the plagues, winds, shaking of land and fire falling from the sky. ,he final destruction of tlantis now corresponds with the 7ayan and Hebrew records of the period, and gives us a working point to make an educated guess at the )st and -nd destructions. (e already know the correlation is off by appro"imately )=8), we can estimate that the )st destruction of tlantis was no more than <=== ';:, and the -nd no more than -D== ';:, based on ;ayce3s information. (e also know that the year counts are off due to the number of days per year changing, we can make a $uick estimate of what year <=== ';: is actually referring to, on the corrected calendar. ,he early calendar was -@= days9year, and the final switch to 0@< took place in B6E ';. 2o if we take the pre1B6E '; years and adjust, 4<===1B6E5 " -@= 9 0@< Q 0=-@ years past B6E ';, making the <=== ';: date on our corrected calendar to be around 0BB< ';:. nd right there, at 0B@) ';:, we have the start of the 7ayan and Hebrew calendars, defining the creation of man. #f we apply the same logic to the -D== ';: date, we end up at --=E ';:, corrected calendar, with the 'iblical Glood sitting at -)=< ';:, a very close match. 2o we can now draw the following correlations as a starting point8
Year, BCE 0B@) Year, AM = on! Count =.=.=.=.) A""epte# Year, BCE E$ents

<=,=== 'iblical ;reation of dam A :ve. 7ayan ;reation of Human (orld. Girst destruction of tlantis. -D,=== 'iblical .eluge. 7ayan .eluge, only about <.< modern years from the end of the 0rd 'aktun. 2econd destruction of tlantis. E,@== Hebrew :"odus from :gypt. ,hird destruction of tlantis.

-)=<

)@<@ -.)E.)@.=.=

)<6D

--)0

6.=.=.=.=

,he inference is obviousH mankind was created by &od or gods around 0B@) ';, which we are incorrectly dating as <=,=== ';:. 2o it may be interesting to see what else may have been going on at <=,=== ';: that might be of interest, and we find8 ,hese Xtypes3 of :arly 7odern Humans

5sing )tlantis to $orrect Geochronology

)B

YIeanderthalsZ supposedly evolved into the ne"t step toward actual humansthe ;ro17agnons, living <=,=== to @=,=== years ago.<6 (ith the corrected calendar, <=,=== ';: becomes 0B@) '; and the ;ro17agnons, us, showed up in the geological record at the same time as dam and :ve and the 7ayan creation of man, right after the first destruction of tlantis, and missing a link to the Ieanderthals that were previously overrunning the land, much to the annoyance of the tlanteans. ,his is congruent with the 'iblical accounts of the creation of dam and :ve being the first humans that &od created on :arth. Girst humans, yes, but not the first intelligent species to e"ist on :arth. ,he tlanteans were intelligentDust not humanso they predate the 'iblical accounts. Of course it also begs the $uestion of (ho is this &od1!erson, nywayC<< showing up in mythology all over the planet, creating humansC ,his will be the subject in another paper of this series, but based on my 7ontauk e"periences, # can sum it up in 0 letters8 27s. ,he 2aurians known to the 2umerians as the )nnunaki, to the ;hristians as the %lohim, to the Iorsemen as the Esir, to the #ndians as the )sura, and by many other names, all over the globe.

Planetary Moons
s previously mentioned, the early planets had no moons because all the fragments of the white dwarf destroyed in the supernova e"plosion would have predominant, ultra1high speed motionanti1gravity and therefore would move away from each other. ,he outer planets would e"perience nova1like e"plosions over the course of their cooling down, ejecting both planetary rings and many smaller moons. 'ut what of the inner planetsC 7ercury and Menus have no moons, :arth has an e"ceptionally large one, for the si+e of the planet, and 7ars has a couple of very small moons that don3t behave properly, orbiting in the wrong direction and faster than the planetary rotation. #mmanuel Melikovsky had some interesting perspectives with his rogue planet theories, but the difficulty with them is that planets, containing white dwarf cores and subject to the properties thereof, are not able to leave their orbital positions and go wandering about the solar system. :ven the moon1 si+ed ejecta from the outer planets would be unlikely to get past the neutral +one of the asteroid belt to reach the inner worlds. steroids and comets, containing no intermediate or ultra1high speed matter, operate solely on gravitational principles and can drift all over the solar system, but because they lack those very motions, they can never form a stable orbit around a planet. ,he moons of :arth and 7ars have no apparent, natural origin. #n The $ase for the 5=1, %essup writes8 .ean 2wift was prescient in regard to his astronomy, predicting that 7ars had two small satellites, one of which was close to 7ars3 surface and made two revolutions daily. #t has been pointed out that this inner body is too close to 7ars to be in adjustment with any known postulate of the natural distribution of satellites relative to their parent body. ,his may be an indication that 7arsK inner satellite is artificial.<@ #n the Maro annotations of the book, it is noted that the the 7artian moons are lso an old X.ead1 rk3 217 7 J:.

<6 !ye, /loyd, 6ntervention Theory, p )<0. << dams, .ouglas, The ,itchhikers Guide to the Galaxy. ,he final book of Oolon ;olluphid3s trilogy, (here &od (ent (rong, 2ome 7ore of &od3s &reatest 7istakes, and (ho is the &od1!erson, nywayC <@ 7orris, %essup J., The $ase for the 5=1@

)D

Geochronology

Noah! I Want You to Build an Ark!

ight! What!s an Ark" #$

n rk is a term used by both the /7s and 27s to refer to the large, interplanetary motherships that they use as colonies and transportation between solar systems. ,hey are constructed from asteroids that have intermediate speed motion 4small, planetary cores5 and therefore an inverse density gradient to their structure. (ith all the heavy, hard metals on the outside providing protection from the ravages of space and a soft, chewy center,<D of lighter elements and atmospheric gases at the core, they are essentially a prefab spaceship ready for interstellar travelH being a smaller application of a .yson shell.<E ll that is re$uired is a navigation system to orient the scalar magnetic field, already present from the intermediate speed motion, into either paramagnetic 4attractive5 or diamagnetic 4repulsive5 modes. lso noteworthy in these rk designs is that if ultra1high, anti1gravity motion is still present, as it is in planetary cores, the center of the atmospheric cavity will contain a small, sun1like object representing that inner core constructH a structure that e"actly matches the hollow :arth theories. (hen the intermediate speed motion of the rk finally slows to sub1light speeds, the ark dies and is no longer functional as a spacecraft. ,his is what the Maro annotations are referring to concerning the 7artian moons as .ead rks. 47ontauk had references of there being a large number of dead arks scattered throughout the solar system, as they don3t last forever and are abandoned.5 #f the 7oon were an rk, then there should be references to times when it was not in orbit, or missing altogether, in mythology. #n his paper, ,he :arth (ithout the 7oon,@= Melikovsky cites many sources of a time when there was no moon in the sky8 ,he period when the :arth was 7oonless is probably the most remote recollection of mankind. .emocritus and na"agoras taught that there was a time when the :arth was without the 7oon.@) ristotle wrote that rcadia in &reece, before being inhabited by the Hellenes, had a population of !elasgians, and that these aborigines occupied the land already before there was a moon in the sky above the :arthH for this reason they were called !roselenes.@pollonius of ?hodes mentioned the time when not all the orbs were yet in the heavens, before the .anai and .eukalion races came into e"istence, and only the rcadians lived, of whom it is said that they dwelt on mountains and fed on acorns, before there was a moon.@0 !lutarch wrote in The Roman Fuestions8 ,here were rcadians of :vander3s following, the so1called pre1/unar people.@6 2imilarly wrote Ovid8 ,he rcadians are said to have possessed their land before the birth of %ove, and the folk is older than the 7oon.@<
<B ;osby, 'ill, Bill $os#y is a Bery =unny =ellow4 RightG, (arner 'rothers ?ecords, )E@0, Ioah. <D n old, commercial description of a ,ootsie !op with a hard, candy shell and a soft, chewy center that depicts the inverse density structure. <E spherical shell surrounding a sun, to capture all of its energy output, incorrectly called a .yson 2phere in the Star Trek4 The 7ext Generation episode, ?elics, where they found 7r. 2cott3s shuttlecraft crashed on its surface. @= 2ammer, %an, The Belikovsky )rchives, http899www.varchive.org9itb9sansmoon.htm @) Hippolytus, Refutatio 1mnium ,aeresium M. ii. @- ristotle, fr. <E) 4ed. M. ?ose Y,eubner8,uebingen, )DD@Z 5. ;f. *auly(s Realencyclopaedie der classischen )ltertumswissenschaft/ article 7ond H H. ?oscher, 0exicon d@ griech@ und roemisch@ +ythologie/ article !roselenes. @0 )rgonautica #M. -@6. @6 !lutarch, +oralia, transl. by G. ;. 'abbit, sect. B@. @< =asti, transl. by 2ir %. Gra+er, ##. -E=.

*lanetary +oons

)E

Hippolytus refers to a legend that rcadia brought forth !elasgus, of greater anti$uity than the moon.@@ /ucian in his )strology says that the rcadians affirm in their folly that they are older than the moon.@B ;ensorinus also alludes to the time in the past when there was no moon in the sky.@D 2ome allusions to the time before there was a 7oon may be found also in the 2criptures. #n %ob -<8< the grandeur of the /ord who 7akes peace in the heights is praised and the time is mentioned before Ythere wasZ a moon and it did not shine. lso in !salm B-8< it is said8 ,hou wast feared since Ythe time ofZ the sun and before Ythe time ofZ the moon, a generation of generations. generation of generations means a very long time. Of course, it is of no use to counter this psalm with the myth of the first chapter of &enesis, a tale brought down from e"otic and later sources. ,he memory of a world without a moon lives in oral tradition among the #ndians. ,he #ndians of the 'ogota highlands in the eastern ;ordilleras of ;olombia relate some of their tribal reminiscences to the time before there was a moon. #n the earliest times, when the moon was not yet in the heavens, say the tribesmen of ;hibchas.@E ?eligious apocrypha also relates that during the time of dam in the &arden of :den,B= the sun remained fixed in the eastern sky and the cycle of days and nights only began upon their e"pulsion from the garden, which we now know correlates to the time of the first destruction of tlantissomething big changed. 4,hey did measure a daily cyclethe movement of the celestial chariot across the sky, as is common in many ancient myths. 2even times the /ord crossed the heavens, the seven domas, or he#domas, what we now call a week, was original a measurement of a day, when the :arth had none. 'ut the descriptions refer to a /ord meaning shining star, not something the si+e of the moon. ,he &arden had no nights, but did have an orbital object bright enough to be visible in the light of day.5 ,he observations that the :arth did not have a moon, and did not rotate on its a"is 4tidal lock with the sun5, are supported by the natural conse$uences of ?eciprocal 2ystem astronomy. gain, we find science, religion and myth all saying the same thing. # did some checking of Melikovsky3s references and found that the 7oon actually appeared and disappeared at fairly regular intervals during pre1 damic times, the divine year. Melikovsky attributes this to a wandering 7oon intersecting the orbit of :arth, until it was finally captured. #t sounds good, but for one reciprocal e"ception. 7oons and planets, having motion in time, will behave in the same manner as atoms, having their motion in time. (hen atoms go into stable orbit, we call it chemistry. ,hat chemistry is based on the concepts of valence,B) which is just matching speeds in the ?eciprocal 2ystem. ,he probability against a planet and moon to having e"actly the right chemistry to achieve stable orbit is, shall # say, astronomicalC ,he largest factor is overcoming the unit speed #oundary, the same limit that keeps all the atoms in the >niverse from coming together to form a single, super1molecule of everything. ,he only way a moon could establish orbit around a planet, given the chemical re$uirements of the ?eciprocal 2ystem, would
@@ Refutatio 1mnium ,aeresium M. ii. @B /ucian, )strology, transl. by . 7. Harmon 4)E0@5, p. 0@B, par. -@. @D 0i#er de die natali )EH also scholium on ristophanes3 $louds/ line 0ED. @E . von Humboldt, Bues des $ordillHres 4)D)@5, :nglish transl.8 Researches $oncerning the 6nstitutions and +onuments of the )ncient 6nha#itants of )merica/ 4)D)65, vol. #, p. DBH cf. H. Gischer, 6n mondener 'elt 4)E0=5, p. )6<. B= &arden is derived from guarded, a protected enclosure. :den is :1.#I, the 2umerian abode of the righteous ones. B) /arson, .ewey '., 7othing But +otion, ;hapter )D, 2imple ;ompounds.

-=

Geochronology

be to adjust its motions as it approached to match the new environment. Iot likely for a random fragment of a white dwarf, but very likely for an rk, under intelligent control. ,he natural conse$uences of our theory indicate that the moons of the inner planets are not natural, in the sense of evolving with the associated planets, but are actually rks that were used by the 27 nnunaki, placed in orbit around :arth and 7ars, not very long ago. ,he 7artian rks of !hobos and .eimos are dead, and are now just asteroids in decaying orbit. However, the :arth3s rk, the 7oon, is still running on impulse power with its inverse density gradient, hard shell and gaseous core. ;onsider I 2 3s lunar mysteries in this light8B). 2cientists now tend to lean toward the third theorythat the moon was captured by the earth3s gravitational field and locked into orbit ages ago. Opponents of the theory point to the immensely difficult celestial mechanics involved in such a capture. ll of the theories are in doubt, and none satisfactory. I 2 scientist .r. ?obin 'rett sums it up best8 #t seems much easier to e"plain the none"istence of the moon than its e"istence. Y;aptured, or parkedCZ -. #ncredibly, over EE percent of the moon rocks brought back turned out upon analysis to be older than E= percent of the oldest rocks that can be found on earth. Y,he nnunaki are not from this solar systemH their rks would be much older than the planets.Z 0. ,he mystery of the age of the 7oon is even more perple"ing when rocks taken from the 2ea of ,ran$uility were young compared to the soil on which they rested. Y7eteoric aggregation, just like the crust of the planet over the mantle, is much younger.Z 6. .uring the pollo 7oon missions, ascent stages of lunar modules as well as the spent third stages of rockets crashed on the hard surface of the moon. :ach time, these caused the moon, according to I 2 , to ring like a gong or a bell. On one of the pollo )- flights, reverberations lasted from nearly an hour to as much as four hours. I 2 is reluctant to suggest that the moon may actually be hollow, but can otherwise not e"plain this strange fact. Y#nverse density gradient makes it hollow.Z <. stronauts found it e"tremely difficult to drill into the surface of these dark plain1like areas YmariaZ. 2oil samples were loaded with rare metals and elements like titanium, +irconium, yttrium, and beryllium. ,his dumbfounded scientists because these elements re$uire tremendous heat, appro"imately 6,<== degrees Gahrenheit, to melt and fuse with surrounding rock, as it had. Y white dwarf fragment has an initial surface temperature of )D=,===O G definitely hot enough to do that.Z

@. ,he 2oviets announced that pure iron particles brought back by remote controlled lunar probe Sond -= have not o"idi+ed even after several years on earth. YGrom /arson3s chemistry, Ge<, which cannot o"idi+e.Z B. ,he upper D miles of the moon3 crust are surprisingly radioactive. Y2tarts at a high magnetic ioni+ation, and works down, creating many radioactive elements. ,hough # do wonder how I 2 got D miles of core samples from e$uipment in that tiny lunar module.Z D. 'ut after pollo )<, I 2 e"perts were stunned when a cloud of water vapor more than )== s$uare miles in si+e was detected on the moon3s surface. * ,he water vapor appears to have come from the moon3s interior, according to I 2 . YHollow, gaseous interior leaking out.Z
B- ;hildress, .avid Hatcher, The )nti-Gravity ,and#ook, :leven ,hings ,hat I 2 .iscovered bout ,he 7oon ,hat Fou Iever Jnew. 42ummary of points.5

*lanetary +oons

-)

E. /unar e"plorations have revealed that much of the moon3s surface is covered with a glassy gla+e, which indicates that the moon3s surface has been scorched by an unknown source of intense heat. Y!rior to being an rk, the lunar surface ( 2 a source of intense heat.Z )=. :arly lunar tests and studies indicated that the moon had little or no magnetic field. ,hen lunar rocks proved upon analysis to be strongly magneti+ed. Y#ntermediate speed motion.Z )). #n )E@D, tracking data of the lunar orbiters first indicated that massive concentrations 4mascons5 e"isted under the surface of the circular maria. I 2 even reported that the gravitational pull caused by them was so pronounced that the spacecraft passing overhead dipped slightly and accelerated when flitting by the circular lunar plains, thus revealing the e"istence of these hidden structures, whatever they were. 2cientists have calculated that they are enormous concentrations of dense, heavy matter centered like a bull3s1eye under the circular maria. Y;ore flare from early e"pansion activity.Z ;onsidering the 7oon as a white dwarf fragment that was converted to an rk for space travel, readily e"plains all the observed anomalies, within the conte"t of the ?eciprocal 2ystem. nd as a functional rk, the moon could easily arrive and depart :arth3s orbit at the will of its operators.

Ne% &erusale'
,he Book of Revelations describes the city of &od as 7ew Ierusalem, giving a description of its si+e8 )nd the city lieth foursquare/ and the length is as large as the #readth4 and he measured the city with the reed/ twelve thousand furlongs@ The length and the #readth and the height of it are equal@ ?evelation -)8)@ #f this is an astronomical object, it3s 'org ;ube shape would have undoubtedly been covered in dust and debris over the centuries, turning it into a sphere and giving it the appearance of a celestial body. 2o, let us do the math and see if we can find something matching the description. Girst, we have to determine the si+e of a furlong, in modern measurement. ,he furlong has changed values a few times, but is 4was5 accepted as @== feet, reminiscent of the se"agesimal system used by the 2umerians 4@=[)=5. 'ut how big was a foot, -=== years ago, in 7esopotamiaC Malues on record range from -<=mm to 00=mm 4Grance5, with the accepted value being the 'ritish foot of 0=<mm. ,he bigfoots of Iapoleon3s era seem to be the e"ception to the rule and 7esopotamians are physically smaller people than :nglanders, so let3s split the range difference, 4-<=W0=<59- Q -BDmm, as an estimate of the actual si+e of a 'iblical foot. Iow to some calculations8 -BD90=< Q =.E) of the normal foot si+e. =.E) [ @== feet Q <6B feet per furlong 4ancient values were estimated around <<= feet5. <6B furlongs " )-=== 9 <-D= Q )-60 miles on a side 4not the accepted )<== miles5. ,o find the circumscribed sphere that would account for the dust and rock of centuries, we multiply the side by \0, giving a sphere that is at least -)<0 miles in diameter. ,aking a $uick look at objects in our solar system, we have a potential winner with a mean diameter of -)<E miles, also having some very unusual, physical properties like being hollowour +oon. ;ould it be that Iew %erusalem is already here, parked in orbit around :arthC n rkC

--

Geochronology

Pre Cro Magnon Geochronology

ttempting to calculate the geochronology of the period prior to the creation of man and the first destruction of tlantis is challenging, as the :arth was not rotating on its a"is, was physically smaller, in a different orbit, and the basic intervals of measure are drastically different. ,he 2umerian 3ings 0ist is said to document the initial arrival of the nnunaki some -6),-== years ago but it does not actually say that. (hat it lists are D kings that ruled for a total of @@ sars, @ ners.B0 nd the ancient 2umerians use dates differently. Gor e"ample, there are intervals for ) day, 0= days 4month5 and 0@= days 4year5, but there is no )- months in a year concept. month is a watch 4)9)-5 of a year 40@=9)5 Q month 40=9)5. #3m not an e"pert, but it would seem that sars would be a divine year of 0@== days. #f we make that assumption, the longest reign of a king on the 3ings 0ist was )- sars, which would be 60,-== days or about ))D modern years. s in most ancient cultures, Jings were Jings since birth. ,o $uote &enesis @80, nd the /O?. said, 7y spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh8 yet his days shall be a hundred and twenty years. 2o Jing :n1men1lu1ana just made it in under the wire at ))D. ,hat also means that the reign of the nnunaki gods in tlantis was only about @<0 modern years, not -6),-== years, which again supports the premise of this paper that geochronology has been greatly e"aggerated, to hide the history in the past.

Conclusion
# know #3ve raked a lot of concepts over the coals in this paper, from geochronological time lines, tlantean civili+ation, the formation of solar systems and backwards stellar evolution, showing there was never any planet that made the asteroid belt, disproving Melikovsky3s rogue planet theories and pointing out 2itchin may have had the wrong solar system. Iot only have # turned science upside down 4which is easy, because everything is backwards5, but also rocked the boat on both religions and Iew ge beliefs. 'ut consider this8 now that you have a working understanding of a very advanced, spatio1temporal theory of everything, the Reciprocal System, that corrects errors in modern science, has its roots firmly planted in the ancient traditions of yin1yang and is working in sync with mythology and religion* for the first time you can actually deduce what is out there, as well as know where to look for it. >sing ?eciprocal 2ystem astronomy, we know exactly the stellar conditions to look for, for brave, new worlds for us to coloni+e, or e"actly where worlds with e"tremely advanced civili+ations are likely to be. Io more guesswork, channeling, or trying to translate ancient records. %ust natural conse$uences arising from the way the >niverse was put together. Gor centuries, people have wanted to understand the >niverse to find their place in it. (ell, now you have a map, complete with directions, rest stops and tourist highlights. (e can continue to stick our heads in the sand with wild suppositions, hopes and dreams, or just grab on to this new understanding, learn and teach our brothers and sisters, and become that good neighbor to take our place in the >niverse and pursue our own destiny.

B0 2umerian system of temporal measurementH 0@== sars, @== ners and @= sosses, which are periods, not years. ,he translators just assumed sar e$ualed year because of the large value, and that may not be the case. ;ertainly not a 0@<1day, modern yearT