Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abul Jamaluddin, Ph.D. Production Technology Advisor Business Manager North America NExT Oil & Gas Training and Career Development
Acknowledgement
SPE for organizing this Webinar All clients who contributed to some of the field examples Schlumberger to allow me to participate and thanks to the
following sub segments for providing the contents -
Schlumberger Research Reservoir Sampling and Analysis sub segment Flow Assurance Consulting group of OneSubsea NExT Oil and Gas Training and Competency Development
of Petrotechnical Services
11/19/2013
Presentation Outline
Deepwater & flow assurance Flow hindrance elements A holistic flow assurance workflow Field examples with key technology applications
4 AJ 11/19/2013
compartmentalised,
facilitates deposition
CAPEX versus
Flow Assurance
'ntegrated S"luti"ns
LiquidManagement
Asphaltenes
Hydrates
Wax
Scale
%pera&ility Assessment
11/19/2013
Understanding the fundamentals of these elements are the ke to design management strateg
7 AJ 11/19/2013
Production Engineering
'hermal(h drauli" design and assessment of su)sea multi%hase flo& s stems
Production Surveillance
*rodu"tion o%timi#ation and earl dete"tion of flo& sto%%ages
+ AJ 11/19/2013
11/19/2013
Field Implementat ion Implement a technically sound, cost effective and environme ntal sound solution
10 AJ 11/19/2013
,eed)a"k -oo%
!ourtes of .ne/u)sea
Production Chemistry
6.00E-04 BaSO4 Cal. 5.00E-04 SrSO4 Cal. BaSO4 Exp. SrSO4 Exp. 4.00E-04 3.00E-04 2.00E-04 1.00E-04 0.00E+00 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Mass Fraction of Formation Water
Value of Data
20
45
1 month 6 months 1 year
Samples Analysis
Model calibration
40 35 Temperature (C ) 30 25
Fluid Sampling
Fluid Modeling
Interpretation
15 10 5 0 18000
12 AJ 11/19/2013
Time
11/19/2013
Production Engineering
Importance of Dynamics from Reservoir to Process Facilities
Slug Catcher
/tead /tate .ut"omes *eak %rodu"tion rates !om%letions design *i%eline si#ing 81ui%ment si#ing
Process !acilities
6eser7oir
9 nami" .ut"omes *rodu"tion %rofiles :ell "lean(u% / start(u% %ro"edures !ooldo&n / insulation re1uirements -i1uid surge management / slug "at"her
ECL PSE
13 AJ 11/19/2013
Production Operations
Production surveillance and optimization, operational well and pipeline remediation, prevention and mitigation techniques in order to optimize production
2onitor /ensors and 2* meters 9ata a"1uisition 9ata 7alidation and storage
Process !acilities
6eser7oir
Multiphase meter
ECL PSE
14 AJ 11/19/2013
15 AJ 11/19/2013
!ourtes of .! 2ullins
11/19/2013
Impact Completions
Vertical Compositional Grading (Heavy Ends ! )
Reservoir Fluids are often highly graded and often NOT in equilibrium May have compatibility issues
16 AJ 11/19/2013
!ourtes of .! 2ullins
Production Chemistry
Mercury
Asphaltene Wax
Diamondoids
17 AJ 11/19/2013
Organic Scale
Gas Hydrate
Asphaltenes Asphaltenes
Operationally defined as a portion of crude oil insoluble in nalkanes such as heptane but soluble in aromatics such as toluene or dichloromethane. Source specific. They are the heaviest and the most polar components in crude oil composed of : Polyaromatics carrying aliphatic rings or chains H/C atomic ratio = 1.0-1.2 Heteroatoms: nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur Metals: nickel, vanadium, iron.
S
N H
11/19/2013
Viscosity
Highly NonNewtonian
Mildly Non-Newtonian
Newtonian
15-25 oC
Pour Point
19 AJ 11/19/2013
Temperature
Crystalline solid consisting of gas molecules each surrounded by a cage of water molecules. Hydrate usually forms at high P & low T One volume hydrate can carry 160-180 volumes of methane Hydrate Formers:
C1 n-C4 O2 others C2 N2 Ar C3 i-C4 CO2 H2S cyclo-C3
20 AJ 11/19/2013
21 AJ 11/19/2013
11/19/2013
Field Example: Waxy Crude Management in SPE "#$%"& Deepwater from South East Asia
Field Situation Dual 5-km deepwater subsea line capability with pigging operations Half buried no insulation High pour point waxy crude production at subsea temperature of 4C No wax deposition in early life Challenge Concerned with wax gelling during unplanned shut down. Recommendation by Chemical Vendor Continuous chemical (PAO82004) injection at 300 ppm Operating Company Perspective Independent verification of gelling characteristics & chemical requirements
23 AJ 11/19/2013
Wax Characterization
Thermodynamic Characteristics Compositions C90+ Wax Content Cloud Point/WAT @ Ambient/Line Condition Transport Characteristics < Am)ient/-ine !ondition Gel-Strength Rheology Deposition Measurements (not done for this field example)
24 AJ 11/19/2013
'ransient 2odeling
Phase Behavior
11/19/2013
Recombined fluid
10 8
100000
Concentration (ppm)
wt%
6 4 2 0
N2 C2 C6 CO2 C7 C10 C12 C14 C16 C18 C20 C22 C24 C26 i-C4 i-C5 C28 C2-Benzene o-Xylene Benzene Toluene C30+
n-alkane carbon #
GOR = 1058 scf/sbl API = 37.9 MW = 182.6 g/mol Psat ~ 3660 psia @169.5oF/76.4C
25 AJ 11/19/2013
UOP wax content ~ 4.3 wt% at -31oF/-35C HTGC wax content (n-C18+) ~ 11.16 wt%
Schematic Diagram of Cross Polar Microscope (CPM) Measurement of WAT of Stock Tank Oil
CC D
Hot Stage
Analyzer
4 25 50
Top View
Cooling Gas
High Pressure Cross Polar Microscope (HPCPM) Wax Precipitation Assessment (20,000 psi &
200oC; Resolution ~ 4 micron)
HPCPM
HPCPM
27 AJ 11/19/2013
11/19/2013
1.2E-04
1.0E-04
Power (W )
8.0E-05
HPCPM WAT ~ 15C
6.0E-05
4.0E-05
2.0E-05
0.0E+00 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Temperature (C)
2+ AJ 11/19/2013
Value/Observation
26.8 20 20
WAT (Sim) Pb
P (psia)
29 AJ 11/19/2013
-100
0 T (#)
100
200
Heated Lines
Applications:
30 AJ 11/19/2013
10
11/19/2013
30
Untreated STO
25
80 Time (min)
100
120
140
160
= PYD/4L = 1.988 PY
PY = ungelling or yield pressure D = coil inner diameter L = coil length
31 AJ 11/19/2013
'est = 1 2 3
.il ' %e /'. -i7e ,luid at 2200 %sia /'. @ 300%%m "hemi"al
(*a4
1;0?3 4+?3 Ao gel
STO at 40C
50
250
300
Viscosity Modeling
'est = 1 2 3 .il ' %e /'. -i7e ,luid at 2200 %sia /'. @ 300%%m "hemi"al *>3%si4 +0?; 24?3 (((
(*a4
1;0?3 4+?3 Ao gel
The plastic viscosities for the STO and live oil @ 2200 psia line pressure were obtained from gradients of the shear stress vs shear rate plots
33 AJ 11/19/2013
11
11/19/2013
'he non(Ae&tonian )eha7ior of the fluid 3gel4 &as a%%roBimated ) the Cingham %lasti" model$ &ith the %lasti" 7is"osit and the ield stress o)tained from the rheologi"al and gel strength measurements?
34 AJ 11/19/2013
-200
-400
-600
Elevation (m)
-800
-1,000
-1,200
-1,400
-1,600
Gas filled
Flow-line assumed to be half buried in soil. Recombined reservoir fluid composition was used in simulations.
:A' D 2;!
:A' D 20!
16 hrs
24 hrs
3; AJ 11/19/2013
12
11/19/2013
Re-Starts - STO
/ $&(( psi / $&(( psi
$.hour restart
%.hour restart
$.hour restart
%.hour restart
For live fluid with solution gas, pressures required to initiate flow in
the pipeline is 2200 psia for both ramp-ups, respectively.
3+ AJ 11/19/2013
Summary Results
= Py D /4 L
Case 0LG- predicted pressure 1psia2 2(hour restart /'. -i7e oil < 2200%sia 2500 2200 ;(hour restart 2500 2200 Calculated from force balances 1psia2 using gel. strength data 2100 ;00
,or"e )alan"e "al"ulations &ith an assum%tion of a "ontinuous li1uid gel at the %i%eline inlet %ro7ides "onser7ati7e num)ers
39 AJ 11/19/2013
13
11/19/2013
Transient simulation predicted re-start pressures of ~2500 psi for STO & 2200
psi for live fluid after a prolonged shut-in period. Are these pressures Flowing Wellhead Pressure ~ 2200 psia bigger/smaller than the SIWHPs?
Shut-in Wellhead Pressure = 2600 psia Contingency is the pig-launching pump at subsea
P (psia)
2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Predi*"ed &PS' Arriv%# 0 -100 0 T (#) 100 200 &PS' Arriv%# We##$e%d o!di"io!s
41 AJ 11/19/2013
Concluding Remarks
42 AJ 11/19/2013
14
11/19/2013
Pressure
Facility
Hydrate Curve
43 AJ 11/19/2013
Temperature
15