LEVEL 1 PARKING DECK FEASIBILITY STUDY

&

PARKING PROGRAM PLAN

VILLAGE OF PATCHOGUE, NY FINAL REPORT

January 10, 2012

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 5.0 5.1 5.2 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 Introduction .. Introduction Purpose of Study Study Area Field Studies Community and Stakeholder Input Acknowledgements Parking Space Supply ... Municipal Parking Supply On-Street Parking Off-Street Parking Total Municipal Supply Study Area Parking Studies . Parking Space Occupancy Parking Durations Along Main Street Parking Study Conditions Proposed CBD Redevelopment .... Parking Demand Model Swezey's Block Redevelopment Parking Impacts - Swezey's Redevelopment Site Parking Supply & Demand Models Latent Parking Demand Parking Improvement Strategies ... Operational Strategies Physical Strategies Parking Deck Options Site Selection Service Areas 4-site Service Area Illustrations Site Comparison / Pros and Cons Continued 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 2. 2. 3. 3. 3. 3. 5. 6. 6. 8. 9. 10. 10. 10. 11. 12. 13. 13. 16. 19. 19. 19. 20. 21.

7.0 7.1 7.2

Parking Program Plan... A Tiered Approach TABLE 1 Parking Improvement Strategies Recommendations

22. 22. 23. 24.

LIST OF APPENDIXES

APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D-1 APPENDIX D-2 APPENDIX E-1 APPENDIX E-2

Parking Study Area Municipal Parking Supply Occupancy Count Key Map Occupancy Count Summary Parking Demand Model Saturday Condition Parking Demand Model Weekday Condition Parking Supply & Demand Model / Saturday Condition Parking Supply & Demand Model / Weekday Condition

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1

Introduction

The Patchogue Village Business Improvement District (PVBID) has engaged Level G Associates, parking consultants, for the purpose of preparing a Level 1 parking deck feasibility study. A Level 1 feasibility study is not as detailed as a feasibility study needed for bond financing but will provide a basic understanding of local parking conditions and will identify practical parking choices moving forward. 1.2 Purpose of Study

The purpose of this study is to: 1.3 Examine current parking conditions; Prepare recommendations designed to offset parking space deficiencies or irregular parking patterns; Identify and evaluate potential sites for parking deck development in the central business district (CBD); Prepare a parking program plan linking study findings with physical and / or operational changes to the current parking system; Prepare cost estimates and a report summarizing our findings and conclusions. Study Area

Parking studies were generally limited the CBD that is roughly defined by Lake and Oak Streets on the north, Church and Terry Streets on the south, Rider Avenue on the east, and West Avenue on the west. Appendix A is a map of the study area showing the municipal parking supply and certain landmarks in the CBD. As indicated in Appendix A, the study area is roughly divided into four quadrants centered on the intersection of Main Street and North Ocean Avenue and defined by Main Street (Montauk Highway) in the east west direction and North / South Ocean Avenue in the north south direction. 1.4 Field Studies

For the purposes of this report, we conducted a series of field studies including but not limited to: an inventory of the municipal parking supply in the study area; occupancy counts of all municipal parking facilities between noon and 10PM on Thursday 21 July 2011 and Saturday 23 July 2011; spot occupancy counts on Thursday 11 August 2011, and; parking duration recordings conducted along Main Street on Thursday 21 July 2011.

It should be noted that during our field studies the Patchogue Theatre was running the following scheduled events: July 21 July 23 August 11 Monty Pythons Spamalot Monty Pythons Spamalot No Events Scheduled Shows at 2:00PM & 8:00PM Shows at 3:00PM & 8:30PM

The selection of primary study dates that coincided with Patchogue Theatre show dates was done so at the request of the PVBID. The purpose of conducting spot counts on a dark theatre date was done to compare parking volumes between dark dates and show dates. The selection of summertime study dates was also done so at the request of the PVBID reflecting their assertion that that typical peak conditions in downtown Patchogue are likely to occur in the summer season. 1.5 Community and Stakeholder Input

A draft version of this report was submitted on October 24, 2011 and presented in Powerpoint format to: the PVBID and its membership on November 8, 2011; the Patchogue Village Board (public invited) on November 14, 2011; and the Patchogue Village Planning Board on December 1, 2011.

On December 6, we reconvened with the PVBID to discuss feedback from the public and stakeholders and final report preparation. 1.6 Acknowledgements

We are indebted to Mr. Thomas Ford, Mr. Dennis Smith, Mr. Joel Peck, and the remainder of the PVBID for providing input, feedback, and background information that was essential to the preparation of this report.

2.0 PARKING SPACE SUPPLY

2.1 Municipal Parking Supply

As of August 2011, the municipal parking space supply in the study area consisted of 1,733 parking spaces located in parking lots and on the streets of the CBD study area. Parking is free of charge but certain regulations and time restrictions have been instituted over the years to encourage fair and orderly parking patterns in the downtown area. 2.2 On-Street Parking

The on-street parking supply consists of 318 parking spaces composed as follows: Two Hour Limit No Time Limit 15 Minute Time Limit Handicap Parking Loading Zones 30 Minute Limit Total On-Street 191 100 15 5 5 2 318

As indicated, most on-street parking spaces in the CBD are two-hour limit spaces and are intended for use by downtown shoppers and visitors. Also, about one-half of all the onstreet spaces are located on Main Street. There are 156 on-street spaces on Main Street between West Avenue and Rider Avenue. Main Street includes 2 hour limit, 15 minute limit, handicap, and loading zone spaces. The on-street supply includes 17 fifteen minute and thirty minute limit spaces. These spaces are usually established near post offices and popular take-out food destinations where very short parking visits are common. No time limit parking areas are for use by any parking category and are sometimes utilized by downtown residents and employees. No time limit spaces can be found on South Street, Railroad Avenue, Maple Avenue, Church Street, and Terry Street (across from the new Art Space Building). 2.3 Off-Street Parking

The off-street parking supply consists of 1,415 parking spaces composed as follows: No Time Limit Two Hour Limit Handicap Parking 30 Minute Time Limit 15 Minute Limit Total Off-Street 3 996 310 72 22 15 1,415

As indicated, most off-street parking spaces in the CBD are no time limit spaces and many of these are used by downtown employees as well as shoppers and visitors who prefer not to be bound by a two hour time limit. The following chart summarizes the off-street parking supply on a lot by lot basis:

As indicated, there are 12 public parking lots ranging in size from 36 to 213 parking spaces. Parking lots are located in each quadrant of the study area and are generally situated behind businesses and commercial establishments along the Main Street and Ocean Avenue corridors. Please refer to Appendix A for lot numbers and locations. Time limits in the various parking lots have been established over the years in response to the prevailing parking demand in the vicinity of each lot. In addition to time limits, some parking lots contain specially marked spaces where parking is prohibited between the hours of 4AM and 10AM, a restriction intended to keep downtown employees from utilizing parking spaces intended for downtown shoppers and visitors. These parking stalls are marked with red paint. In general, parking spaces in Patchogue municipal lots are readily discerned by the color of paint used to mark the stall: White Paint Red Paint Yellow Paint Blue Paint Short term parking; 2 hours or less 2 Hour Limit; No parking 4AM to 10AM No Time Limit; No Restrictions Handicap 4

It should be noted that the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) only recommends white or blue paint for parking space markings. The MUTCD is a publication of the United States Federal Highway Administrations and is the recognized source for traffic control standards in the State of New York. 2.4 Total Municipal Parking Supply

The following chart is a breakdown of all municipal parking spaces in the Patchogue parking study area: On-Street Parking No Time Limit Two Hour Limit Handicap Parking 15 Minute Time Limit 30 Minute Limit Loading Zones Total On-Street 100 191 5 15 2 5 318 Off-Street Parking 996 310 72 15 22 (Note 1) 1,415 Totals 1,096 501 77 30 24 5 1,733 % of Total 63.3% 28.9 4.4 1.7 1.4 0.3 . 100.0%

Note 1 There are a number of loading areas, dumpster areas, and easements located throughout the offstreet parking supply that are not quantified in this analysis.

3.0 PARKING STUDIES

3.1 Parking Space Occupancy

The number of cars parked in municipal parking spaces and other selected parking areas were counted at 12 noon, 2PM, 4PM, 6PM, 8PM, and 10PM on Thursday July 21 and Saturday July 23, 2011. There were matinee and evening performances of the play Spamalot running at the Patchogue Theatre on both of these count dates. In order to gauge downtown parking space occupancy on a typical non-theatre day, we also conducted spot occupancy counts on Thursday 11 August 2011. Appendix B shows the individual parking facilities that were counted during our field studies and Appendix C is a summary of the results of those counts. In downtown areas, it is generally considered that a parking facility can only be expected to operate at 90% of capacity due to the constant in-flow and out-flow of automobiles and from a planning perspective 90% occupancy is a significant threshold. Parking areas that are observed to be parked at or above the 90% threshold are considered full and clearly represent the highest demand parking zones. During our studies, the highest recorded occupancy in all study area public parking spaces occurred at 2PM on Thursday July 21. At this time, 1,170 cars were parked in 1,733 spaces an overall occupancy rate of 67.5%. The parking facilities that were parked in excess of 90% at this Thursday 2PM peak are highlighted in orange on the following illustration:

Facilities in Excess of 90% at Study Peak (Thursday @ 2PM)

Peak parking occupancies recorded on each of the study dates were as follows: 7/21 8/18 7/21 2PM 1PM 4PM Theatre Weekday Non-Theatre Weekday Theatre Saturday 67.5% 54.4% 43.8%

In CBD parking studies in suburban centers similar to Patchogue it is common to find Saturday occupancy rates that are significantly lower than weekday study dates. This is because Monday through Friday offices and businesses in the CBD are closed. The following illustrations indicate CBD parking facilities occupied in excess of 90% on a non-theatre weekday (below), and; parking facilities occupied in excess of 90% at any time during the study (top of page 8).

Parking Facilities in Excess of 90% on Non-Theatre Weekday

Parking Facilities in Excess of 90% at Any Time During Study

As derived from the previous three illustrations, the areas of downtown Patchogue with the highest parking demand are: Main Street; the Northeast Quadrant and the Southeast Quadrant. 3.2 Parking Durations Along Main Street

The parking time limit along Main Street is two hours maximum, but there are some spaces with shorter time limits, such as 15 minute limit spaces in front of the Post Office. Parking spaces with time limits of two hours or less are considered short term parking and are generally intended for downtown shoppers and visitors. The continued turnover of short term spaces is considered a key component of a healthy downtown parking program. Short term spaces that are occupied beyond the posted time limit by overtime parkers can severely reduce parking volume and availability often in the most convenient parking areas. Consider a block side with 10 two hour limit parking spaces. In theory, this block side should be able to accommodate a minimum of 40 parking visits between 9AM and 5PM (4 turns per space x 10 spaces = 40 parking visits). In practice, the number of parking visits can be much higher as many parking durations will be one hour or less. However, if only three of the ten spaces are occupied by overtime parkers, each occupying his space for six hours, the effective number of parking visits is minimally reduced from 40 to 34, a reduction of at least 15%.

We measured the parking durations of cars parked in 2 hour limit spaces along Main Street on Thursday July 21 between the hours of 12 noon and 6PM. After 6PM the 2 hour parking limit is no longer in effect. The results were as follows: North Side of Main Street: South Side of Main Street: 17.0% of all cars parked longer than 2 hours 24.4% of all cars parked longer than 2 hours

Overall, it is calculated that 21.5% of all cars parking on Main Street park for longer than 2 hours a rate of 1 in 5. 3.3 Parking Study Conditions

Weather - Parking studies should be conducted during periods of time when weather conditions will neither affect nor interrupt the normal flow of automobile traffic. For this reason parking studies should not be conducted during periods of inclement weather. Weather conditions during our field studies were as follows: Low Temp July 21, 2011 July 23, 2011 August 11, 2011 77.0 84.0 66.9 High Temp 82.0 93.9 81.0 Precipitation 0.00 0.00 0.00

As indicated, there was no precipitation and temperatures were typical of the summer season. The temperature on Saturday 7/23 was in the low to mid 90s for most of the afternoon but it is not uncommon to encounter temperatures in the 90s on Long Island in the month of July and the study data is therefore representative of typical conditions. Theatre Event The Patchogue Theatre runs shows and events throughout the year, some more heavily attended than others. During our studies attendance at the Spamalot shows was about 2/3rds of capacity and peaked at about 72% during the Saturday evening performance. It is our understanding that this level of attendance is typical for a Patchogue Theatre show.

4.0 PROPOSED CBD REDEVELOPMENT

4.1 Parking Demand Model Swezeys Block Redevelopment

We prepared shared parking demand models for the Swezeys Block Redevelopment using the following building program provided by the PVBID: 240 Rental Townhouse Units; 51 Apartment Rental Units; 41,100 SF Grade Level Retail; 18,000 SF Offices (31 West Main Street); 5,000 SF Restaurant (31 West Main Street) Alternate models were prepared to reflect a Saturday versus Weekday condition. We have assumed that the Townhouse units will have 1.0 reserved parking spaces per unit as we understand this is part of the developers program. According to the models, peak parking demand and peak demand times are estimated to be: Saturday Peak Weekday Peak 561 car demand @ 8PM 537 car demand @ 2PM

In addition to the new redevelopment uses, the above parking demand estimates include cars that are currently utilizing the 174 space municipal lot that will be displaced by the redevelopment. Copies of the Swezeys Block Redevelopment parking demand models are provided in Appendix D. 4.2 Parking Impacts - Swezeys Redevelopment Site

As indicated in 4.1 above, parking demand in the Swezeys redevelopment block is expected to be in the 537 to 561 space range after completion of the building program. It is important to note that this demand includes cars currently parking in the existing municipal lot within the redevelopment block and patronizing nearby establishments such as the Brick House restaurant and Bank of America. If all the estimated parking demand were to be accommodated on the redevelopment block, the resulting on-site supply would have to be in the 537 to 561 space range. We have heard reports that the redevelopment parking supply is expected to be 492 parking spaces. This suggests a potential redevelopment parking shortfall of 45 to 69 spaces during the weekday and Saturday peak conditions, respectively.

10

4.3

Parking Supply & Demand Models

By their very nature, redevelopment projects occur in areas of towns that are struggling and underutilized and they tend to be efficient because there is existing infrastructure in place to help support the project, including but not limited to roads, utilities, and parking. We have been involved in a number of successful and award winning redevelopment projects, including the much heralded Epsteins redevelopment project in Morristown, NJ, and they all share a common theme. the local government has helped to facilitate the redevelopment process by recognizing a shared parking concept and / or assisting in the planning and development of a practical and efficient parking program. Part of this efficiency comes from crediting a portion of typically vacant public parking to the redevelopment parking supply formula. We have identified four public parking areas that are within a very short walking distance of the Swezeys Block redevelopment that are excellent candidates to act in this capacity (inset right). These parking areas are: the 38 space municipal lot that connects the Firehouse parking lot to N. Ocean Avenue; the southernmost row of 25 parking spaces in the Firehouse parking lot; 15 parking spaces in the north portion of Railroad Avenue; and 85 spaces in the northernmost portion of the Church Street lot. As a result of the occupancy counts performed as part of this study, we are able to accurately estimate the number of typically available parking spaces in these four parking areas during various times of the day and night for both weekday and Saturday conditions. In addition, because these counts were conducted on days with theatre performances, the CBD peak condition is factored in. The following table is a summary of estimated parking supply and demand for the Swezeys redevelopment block using the building program described in 4.1, new parking spaces accompanying the redevelopment, and available spaces in the four public parking areas illustrated above.

11

Weekday Peak (2PM) Saturday Peak (8PM) Redevelopment Spaces1 Available Spaces in 4 Areas Projected Parking Supply Projected Parking Demand Surplus or (Deficit) 492 78 570 (537) 33 492 105 597 (561) 36

Recognizing that the above parking demand projections include a 10% safety factor, we estimate that the redevelopment program as described herein is feasible. A more detailed accounting of the parking supply and demand models can be found in Appendix E. 4.4 Latent Parking Demand

We understand that there is about 45,000 square feet of vacant floor space on the west side of the Patchogue CBD the same side of the CBD as the redevelopment project. If and when these floor areas become occupied there will be some amount of new parking demand associated with the new businesses. This latent parking demand may surface in the future and place stress on the local parking supply. However, until the volume and nature of the new businesses are known it is very difficult to forecast what the actual future impacts will be. It is also difficult to forecast changes that will take place in the areas surrounding these new establishments. For example, if a business is now a restaurant and is replaced by a jewelry store or a bank, the resulting change in the local parking patterns will need to be factored in. This report includes a range of recommendations designed to improve the Patchogue parking experience. The first tier of recommendations are low cost to implement, but may yield significant parking improvements. We estimate that these Tier 1 recommendations will have a material impact on parking conditions and may very well serve the Patchogue CBD quite well for a number of years in the near term. This report also includes Tier 2 (parking lot expansion) solutions to be considered if parking problems resist after the Tier 1 recommendations are implemented and Tier 3 (multi level parking) parking programs that, we recommend, should only be considered after the redevelopment program has been built and occupied for at least 18 months. This measured approach assures that village resources and capital are expended efficiently and on an as needed basis.

293 residential reserved spaces + 108 on-site public spaces + 65 space public lot on Lake Street + 26 new on-street spaces (source: Tritec)

12

5.0 PARKING IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES

This section identifies a number of strategies that can be employed to improve the Patchogue parking experience. Operational strategies are simple and inexpensive to implement but can have a profound positive impact on parking conditions. Physical strategies can range from simple and inexpensive to involved and costly. 5.1 a. Operational Strategies Create more long term parking in Lot 3

Lots 3 and 4 are popular destinations for long term parkers and we suspect that many downtown employees park in these lots while they are at work. During time periods when Lots 3 and 4 were experiencing 90% occupancy rates in the no time limit parking sections, the two hour limit spaces in Lot 3 were largely unused. There are 74 two hour limit spaces in Lot 3 (behind Ralphs) and during our studies the highest observed occupancy in these spaces was 38 cars parked (51.3%) and the average occupancy was 26 cars parked (35.1%). The inset illustration shows a row of 12 two hour limit spaces in Lot 3 that can be converted to no time limit spaces to relieve pressure on the employee parking supply in this area. b. Reduce the parking time limit on Main Street from 2 hours to 60 or 90 minutes

As discussed in section 3.2 our studies have indicated that 1 out of every 5 cars parking on Main Street parks in excess of the posted 2 hour time limit. This is one of the reasons why parking problems persist along this active corridor. But, in many active business districts, time limits for the most convenient on-street parking spaces are 60 or 90 minutes. This makes convenient parking available to the maximum number of shoppers and visitors. There are about 140 two hour time limit spaces along Main Street and the time limit is in effect for the 9 hour period between 9AM and 6PM. In theory, this arrangement will allow for a minimum of 630 Main Street parking visits: 140 spaces x 9 hours 2.0 hours = 630 parking visits.

13

By reducing the time limit from two hours to 60 minutes, the minimum number of Main Street parking visits will double from 630 to 1260: 140 spaces x 9 hours 1.0 hours = 1,260 parking visits. By reducing the time limit from two hours to 90 minutes, the minimum number of Main Street parking visits will increase by over 200 parking visits per day from 630 to 840: 140 spaces x 9 hours 1.5 hours = 840 parking visits. c.1 Create Turnover on Main Street - Enforce Parking Time Limits

During our three days of parking studies, we only noted one parking ticket issued to a parked vehicle on Main Street, even though it was determined that 1 out of every 5 cars was parked illegally. A municipality must walk a fine line when it comes to enforcement too much enforcement can promote bitter feelings from parkers and the village may be perceived as being overly antagonistic. This situation usually does not sit well with downtown merchants either. Not enough enforcement can lead to parking abuses, especially rampant overtime parking violators. A reasonable enforcement routine should be based on a minimum number of checks per day a minimum of three or four checks per day for short-term (2 hour or less limit) parking areas, and a minimum of one or two checks per day for permit parking areas, if applicable. There are several methods to enforce overtime parking for on-street parking, but the most common method employed is chalking tires. Higher technology methods such as entering license plate numbers and wheel positions into handheld computers or vehicle mounted license plate recognition systems may also be employed, although the latter can be quite costly to implement. Because of the high importance of creating parking turnover along Main Street, it is recommended that chalking of tires and subsequent chalk checks be conducted at least three times per day along Main Street and South Ocean Avenue north of Church Street. c.2 Create Turnover on Main Street Install Parking Meters

As discussed above, the enforcement of parking time limits along Main Street and other short term (two hours or less) parking areas is a key component of creating turnover and improving parking conditions in downtown Patchogue. However, this will involve a stepped-up program of chalking tires (or recording license plate numbers and wheel positions) and issuing tickets to all violators. Such programs can sometimes be perceived as unfriendly. An alternate method of creating turnover and reducing the need for an aggressive enforcement program is to use parking meters to control the coveted spaces along Main Street, South Ocean Avenue, and perhaps other areas. The meter will add an element of self-enforcement as parkers will note their parking expiration time at the meter. New 14

meter technologies such as pay by cell phone and credit card options are making metered parking more user friendly. Pay by cell phone customers can even be sent automatic text messages when their meter time is about to expire and can extend their meter time by an appropriate response to the text message. d. Add some 30 minute limit spaces in Lot 2 near the Library

Many library visitors only require a short parking visit because customers are there simply to drop off an expiring book, pick up a specific item, or perform a reference check. For this reason we recommend that about 6 or 8 parking spaces in Lot 2 adjacent to the rear entrance of the library be converted to 30 minute limit parking. e. Develop Parking Lot Designations

In many towns, municipal parking areas are given a series of names or alpha / numeric designations such as Elm Street Lot, Lot 4, or Lot D. This assists motorists in locating parking lots and allows local businesses to direct their customers to the most convenient parking areas. After a naming pattern has been selected signage should be installed at each lot indicating its name and the parking regulations within. An example of such a sign is shown in the inset illustration. f. Prepare and Print a Parking in Patchogue Pamphlet

After the lots have been named and signed, it is recommended that a simple pamphlet be prepared and printed that describes the various on-street and off-street public parking areas in Patchogue. The pamphlet should include the names, locations, regulations, time limits, and fees charged for each parking facility, if appropriate. A simple map of the CBD with the parking areas outlined should also be included in the pamphlet. The pamphlets should be made available to all public facilities, institutions, and local businesses to hand out to customers. They can also be mailed to local residents. g. Prepare and Implement a Wayfinding Sign Program

The inset illustration shows a family of wayfinding signs recently installed in the town of Newton, NJ. These signs were installed to improve awareness and circulation 15

and have been well received by local residents and businesses. The total cost of the program, which included the installation of over 30 signs, was less than $15,000. A similar program in Patchogue would be a natural accompaniment to items (e) and (f) above. 5.2 a.1 Physical Strategies Modify access area between Lots 2 and 3 Version 1

The access area between Lots 2 and 3 organizes traffic flow between Terry Street, Lot 2, and Lot 3. It functions well but its generous dimensions and a planting island displace a lot of potential parking spaces. The following sketch indicates that a net gain of about 40 spaces can be realized by removing the planting island between the two lots.

There are some dumpsters located on the east side of the planting island that would have to be relocated as part of this concept. These dumpsters should be placed in a dumpster enclosure similar to the one in the Church Street lot. a.2 Modify access area between Lots 2 and 3 Version 2

An alternate version of the above plan that does not displace as much of the existing landscaping is shown at the top of the following page. This alternate plan would still yield an additional 25 spaces.

16

b.

New Spaces North Side of Terry Street

We understand that the village is exploring the installation of about 20 new parallel parking spaces along the north side of Terry Street in the area just south of Lots 3 and 4. This is certainly a worthwhile strategy because these spaces will be inexpensive to develop (paint striping and signage) and will be located in a relatively high demand parking area. c. Purchase Land to Expand Lot 8 (behind pork store)

At one of our meetings with the PVBID it was mentioned that one property adjacent to Lot 8 (behind the pork store) may be available for purchase. Adding public parking in this area may be worthwhile because of its proximity to high parking demand areas and the redevelopment block. The inset sketch indicates that a maximum of about 42 additional spaces can be added by 17

purchasing this property and using it to expand the adjacent municipal parking lot. According to zillow.com the value of the subject property, 15 Oak Street, is about $366,000. d. Purchase Land to Expand Lot 1 (Church Street Lot)

We have been asked to estimate how many parking spaces could be gained by purchasing the old bank drive through and adjacent houses along Church Street to expand the existing 213 space Church Street lot. The following sketch indicates that the existing 213 space parking lot can be expanded to a capacity of about 358, a gain of 145 spaces.

Using prices listed on zillow.com it is estimated that the total value of the five properties needed to accomplish this parking lot expansion is about $1.1 million.

18

6.0 PARKING DECK OPTIONS

6.1 Site Selection

There are a number of factors that need to be considered when selecting a parking garage site. For example: the site should have good access for vehicles and pedestrians; the site should be large enough to fit an efficient parking structure; the site should not be overly encumbered with utilities or poor soils; and so forth. One of the most important factors in locating a parking deck is that it should be proximate to areas where high parking demand exists. We reviewed the study area to determine potential sites for future parking deck development. Based on site ownership, site dimensions, and proximity to high parking demand areas, we considered the following four sites: 6.2 Lot 1 Municipal parking lot behind JRs Lot 2 Municipal parking lot behind Library Lot 6 Municipal parking lot behind Congregational Church Lot 7 Municipal parking lot behind Blums

Service Areas

The service area of a parking deck is defined as the 85th percentile distance that users of the deck will walk after parking their cars. In suburban centers like Patchogue, this distance is estimated to be about 725 feet. That is, 85% of the parkers using a parking deck in Patchogue will walk 725 feet or less to reach their destination. Figure 1, next page, is an illustration showing the four selected sites and the estimated areas of Patchogue that each will serve. In developing the estimated service area limits we employed the 725 foot walking distance and used actual customer walking routes taking into consideration the use of cut through walkways, sidewalks and crosswalks. As shown on Figure 1, the site that most closely overlays the high parking demand areas identified on the 90% occupancy maps on pages 6 and 7 and whose service area encompasses all four CBD quadrants, a long stretch of Main Street, the Patchogue theatre, and most of the redevelopment block is Lot 7, behind Blums.

19

20

6.3

Site Comparison / Pros and Cons

The following is a basic comparison of the four parking deck sites: 6.3.a Lot 1 Municipal parking lot behind JRs

Pros: Good size, good vehicular and pedestrian access Cons: Service area does not include the Patchogue Theatre Potential number of cars per level: Net parking gain for a 2-supported level garage: 120 205

6.3.b Lot 2 Municipal parking lot behind Library Pros: Good size, good vehicular and pedestrian access, recent local investments Cons: Service area barely reaches redevelopment block, relocate overhead wires Potential number of cars per level: Net parking gain for a 2-supported level garage: 6.3.c 140 240

Lot 6 Municipal parking lot behind Congregational Church

Pros: Good size, open site, proximity to Patchogue Theatre Cons: Service area does not include southwest quadrant and Main Street west of Ocean Avenue; least convenient alley access to Main Street Potential number of cars per level: Net parking gain for a 2-supported level garage: 120 205

6.3.d Lot 7 Municipal parking lot behind Blums Pros: Service area encompasses all four CBD quadrants, a long stretch of Main Street, the Patchogue theatre, and most of the redevelopment block Cons: Smallest site, relocate overhead wires Potential number of cars per level: Net parking gain for a 2-supported level garage: 6.4 Parking Garage Costs 95 165

According to O&S Associates, parking garage designers, parking garage construction costs in the northeast region were in the $15,000 to $17,000 per space range in 2011. Adding 5% to the high end of the 2011 range, a safe construction budget for 2012 would be about $17,850 per space. Design and construction supervision costs would add another 10% bringing the total all in estimate to about $19,635 per space.

21

7.0 PARKING PROGRAM PLAN

7.1 A Tiered Approach

Sections 5 and 6 of this report contain operational strategies, parking expansion strategies, and parking deck construction strategies that are designed to improve parking conditions in downtown Patchogue. Because parking problems were found to be very localized (with vacant spaces always available within a reasonable walking distance) and not widespread in nature we believe that operational strategies and low cost parking expansion strategies will be sufficient and will significantly improve current parking conditions in downtown Patchogue. Table 1, next page, lists 17 parking improvement strategies that have been explored in this report. We have classified these strategies into three tiers: Tier 1 Low cost management, operational, and physical improvements. 20 new spaces, 325 new visits per day, improved signage, utilization, recognition and circulation 212 to 227 new spaces 165 to 240 new spaces Less than $30,000

Tier 2

Parking lot Expansions Parking deck Construction

About $2.5 million $5.1 to $7.5 million

Tier 3

Table 1 provides greater detail of the 17 strategies and also describes the rationale, impact, estimated cost, and cost per net space gained of each strategy. Recommendations and implementation guidelines for the tiered parking program are included on page 24.

22

TABLE 1 PARKING IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES

PATCHOGUE CBD PARKING STUDY December 2011

REF $300 $1,200 $0 or Install Parking Meters Increases Turnover

LOCATION

DESCRIPTION

RATIONALE

IMPACT

COST

5.1.a

COST PER NET SPACE GAINED $25 N/A N/A

5.1.b Increases Turnover 50 Parking Visits

Improved Balance and Utilization Increases Turnover

12 Spaces Increase Long Term supply 210 Parking Visits

5.1.c1

Lot 3 Behind Ralph's Main Street / South Ocean Avenue Main Street / South Ocean Avenue

Convert (12) 2HR limit spaces to "No Time Limit" Spaces Reduce time limit from 2HR to 90 minute Stepped Up Enforcement of Time Limits

or

T I E R
50 Parking Visits $150,000 per year Income 65 Parking Visits 20 spaces Qualitative Qualitative Qualitative 40 spaces Convert (6) 2HR limit spaces to 30 minute limit spaces Add Parallel Parking Recognition Improved Balance and Utilization Capacity Improvement

5.1.c2

N/A N/A $1,500 $5,000 $2,500 $15,000 $150,000 or $75 N/A N/A N/A $3,750 or

5.1.d

$44,000 / Yr for 5 Years (Lease) $200

5.2.b

5.1.e

Main Street / South Ocean Avenue Lot 2 Behind Library North Side of Terry Street All Parking Lots

5.1.f

Parking System

5.1.g Re-construct / re-stripe for add'l parking - Maximum Plan

Townwide

Name each lot and install entrance signage Prepare and distribute Informational Pamphlet Wayfinding Sign System Improved Awareness and Utilization Improved Awareness and Circulation Capacity Improvement

5.2.a1

Area Between Lot 2 & 3

or Capacity Improvement 25 spaces 42 spaces 145 spaces 205 spaces (net gain) Capacity Improvement Capacity Improvement Capacity Improvement 240 spaces (net gain) 205 spaces (net gain) 165 spaces (net gain)

T I E R

5.2.a2

Area Between Lot 2 & 3

$190,000 $541,000 $1,750,000 $6,400,000 $7,500,000 $6,400,000 $5,100,000

$7,600 $12,880 $12,070 $31,220 $31,250 $31,220 $30,910

5.2.c

5.2.d

6.3.a

Land Banking Capacity Improvement Land Banking Capacity Improvement Capacity Improvement

T I E R

6.3.b

6.3.c

6.3.d

Lot 8 Behind Pork Store Lot 1 Church Street Lot Lot 1 Church Street Lot Lot 2 Behind Libray Lot 6 - Behind Congregational Church Lot 7 Behind Blums

Re-construct / re-stripe for add'l parking - Landscape Plan Purchase 15 Oak Street and expand lot Purchase 5 properties and expand lot Construct Parking Deck (3 Levels - 2 supported) Construct Parking Deck (3 Levels - 2 supported) Construct Parking Deck (3 Levels - 2 supported) Construct Parking Deck (3 Levels - 2 supported)

7.2

Recommendations

It is recommended that Tier 1 parking improvements be implemented in 2012. We believe these changes will have a material positive impact on parking conditions and will serve the Patchogue CBD quite well for a number of years in the near term. It is recommended that Tier 2 parking lot expansions be considered on a case-by-case basis if parking problems persist after the Tier 1 recommendations have been implemented. If the village has the financial capacity, it may be a worthwhile strategy to begin land banking some of the properties identified in Sections 5.2.c and 5.2.d so they may be in a better position to implement Tier 2 parking expansions if and when the time comes. It is recommended that Tier 3 parking deck construction options be considered on a caseby-case basis if parking problems persist after the Tier 1 recommendations have been implemented AND the Swezeys Block redevelopment has been built and occupied for at least 18 months.

24

OFF - STREET PARKING LOT MED OFFICES FIRE DEPT

CAPACITY

10 9

11 8 7 12 NORTHEAST QUADRANT
THEATRE

NORTHWEST QUADRANT

BROOKHAVEN MEDICAL

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

213 167 172 59 109 191 97 36 74 40 83 174

COURT HOUSE

POST OFFICE

LIBRARY

4 2 3

SOUTHWEST QUADRANT

SOUTHEAST QUADRANT

KEY

= ON-STREET PARKING - 2 HOUR LIMIT

= ON-STREET PARKING - NO TIME LIMIT

= MUNICIPAL PARKING LOT WITH DESIGNATION NUMBER

= AREA OF MUNICIPAL LOT WITH 2 HOUR LIMIT PARKING

1
9 6 5 4 3 8 44 30 16 20 38 84 174 44 52 15 176 5 8 5 17 12 14 8 2 16 10

14

9 17b 18 19 20 31 32 25
MED OFFICES FIRE DEPT

17a 22 23 24 25 30 29 28 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 35 59 24 a 12 22 20 21
THEATRE 13

21 27 40

26

39

15 107 8 2 8 98 85 17 43

10

15

11

12

12

13

17

14

7 33 34

12

15

8 15 18 19 17 58 37 38 b 14 16

16

48 36
12 18 14

80

49 50 51

44 98 74

13

BROOKHAVEN MEDICAL

11 36 34

23 30

38

26 29

39 37 35 10 45 1 44 46 5 6 2 3 43 49 51 50 47 48 33 32 31

COURT HOUSE

27
POST OFFICE

28

56 52 55 53

40

42

54

41

8 7

52
102 10 35

46

57 58 59 60 61

53

13

54

N/A

57

55

98

56

11

APPENDIX C - PARKING OCCUPANCY COUNT SUMMARY VILLAGE OF PATCHOGUE, NY

THURSDAY Practical REF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17a 17b 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 # Spaces 14 5 15 12 5 17 12 5 9 6 5 4 3 8 44 30 16 20 38 84 174 44 52 15 176 5 8 5 17 12 14 8 2 16 10 13 12 18 14 15 107 8 2 8 98 85 17 43 80 44 98 74 46 13 45 98 11 102 10 35 2006 Capacity 12.6 4.5 13.5 10.8 4.5 15.3 10.8 4.5 8.1 5.4 4.5 3.6 2.7 7.2 39.6 27.0 14.4 18.0 34.2 75.6 156.6 39.6 46.8 13.5 158.4 4.5 7.2 4.5 15.3 10.8 12.6 7.2 1.8 14.4 9.0 11.7 10.8 16.2 12.6 13.5 96.3 7.2 1.8 7.2 88.2 76.5 15.3 38.7 72.0 39.6 88.2 66.6 41.4 11.7 40.5 88.2 9.9 91.8 9.0 31.5 1805.4 12 3 15 7 4 5 1 2 3 2 2 0 0 4 16 19 11 9 12 19 62 32 51 4 45 1 5 3 13 12 13 3 1 15 11 9 13 16 0 6 23 0 0 2 81 54 17 38 68 34 77 36 42 12 8 35 5 28 6 0 1027 THURSDAY - JULY 21, 2011 12:00 PM 2:00 PM 13 2 14 8 3 6 3 1 3 3 2 0 0 7 27 26 12 13 20 19 71 44 52 8 172 0 8 4 10 7 14 8 2 16 11 13 9 15 0 5 18 0 0 3 88 59 14 38 78 43 78 22 45 9 5 26 3 28 8 21 1237 = 90% Occupancy Or Higher 4:00 PM 11 1 14 6 4 5 3 1 3 2 1 0 1 6 23 20 12 9 11 15 64 43 52 16 172 0 5 3 12 6 13 6 1 14 11 10 6 13 3 5 12 0 0 3 74 49 10 40 76 40 78 27 30 11 7 42 2 29 4 23 1160 6:00 PM 9 3 9 1 4 3 3 3 0 0 5 1 0 3 8 14 8 5 15 12 65 41 47 7 65 0 4 1 4 3 13 5 1 13 10 12 8 14 3 7 3 0 0 3 51 58 2 31 58 40 48 26 6 4 1 85 10 21 7 2 885 8:00 PM 10:00 PM 13 4 15 2 2 8 1 1 0 0 4 0 0 9 2 7 12 13 19 10 73 44 53 11 176 0 4 1 9 0 14 7 2 16 10 10 12 15 9 14 4 1 0 5 42 40 1 28 45 39 52 25 7 6 8 55 7 24 2 22 1015 10 2 4 1 0 9 3 3 0 0 4 2 0 4 0 0 3 3 10 8 97 29 46 8 157 0 4 0 2 0 13 3 0 14 11 9 11 15 8 15 3 1 0 7 21 20 3 2 10 15 30 16 1 2 2 22 3 15 1 23 705 6 2 6 1 2 4 0 3 1 2 2 0 0 1 0 8 14 15 7 8 57 33 30 4 16 0 5 4 11 8 15 7 0 14 11 11 7 13 0 3 4 0 0 3 45 33 3 33 73 39 56 31 22 9 1 41 3 25 5 0 757 SATURDAY - JULY 23, 2011 12:00 PM 2:00 PM 10 2 6 0 2 7 1 2 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 7 13 11 9 8 68 44 47 7 28 0 5 2 9 9 10 6 1 16 9 13 11 16 1 5 8 0 0 4 52 30 3 32 68 42 52 38 23 8 1 30 2 34 5 0 824 4:00 PM 10 2 6 0 2 8 3 1 0 3 2 0 0 2 0 4 13 10 12 11 47 44 49 7 164 0 5 0 10 12 12 8 1 14 11 12 9 12 0 4 4 0 0 4 46 36 2 28 60 38 36 27 15 8 1 26 1 29 6 3 880 6:00 PM 11 2 6 0 1 9 1 2 0 0 4 1 1 2 0 2 10 8 9 9 57 39 38 7 56 0 2 1 6 7 13 5 1 12 13 10 8 12 3 2 4 1 0 6 28 39 2 11 26 20 26 24 6 8 1 20 0 21 6 0 619 8:00 PM 10:00 PM 12 2 3 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 2 7 10 15 11 76 43 51 11 142 0 2 0 6 6 15 7 2 16 12 12 12 18 3 9 4 2 0 5 40 43 2 10 12 19 27 25 2 9 1 18 0 26 6 0 769 8 1 4 2 0 9 3 3 0 4 3 1 0 1 0 1 7 5 13 6 64 41 51 11 143 0 3 2 2 1 13 8 2 16 10 13 10 13 14 9 4 0 0 6 25 29 0 7 9 15 28 18 1 0 1 8 0 15 6 30 699 8/18/2011 1:00 PM 13 2 13 8 2 8 5 2 8 9 2 0 0 3 14 21 11 11 14 18 83 37 50 4 38 0 6 2 11 11 14 7 0 13 10 13 11 16 2 2 15 0 0 0 81 72 13 40 76 40 88 26 43 13 7 38 1 41 3 0 1091

APPENDIX D - 1 PARKING DEMAND MODEL SWEZEY'S BLOCK REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

Run Date: December 28, 2011

SATURDAY CONDITION

1.0 RESERVED SPACE PER TOWNHOUSE / ALL OTHER SPACES SHARED

Peak Factor See Note 1 16.3 2.97 0.50 1.00 0.23 1.05 -10 Note 3 LGA 384 395 410 424 463 35 36 37 39 42 0 -3 -7 -16 -19 -25 45 491 -10 -10 -10 -10 -10 / Unit Note 2 52 50 48 32 38 36 35 -10 -30 47 517 / Unit Note 2 54 52 49 33 39 37 36 / Unit 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 35 34 -10 -32 48 528 / 1000 SF Level G 0 1 5 8 9 9 8 8 9 240 35 34 -10 -31 48 533 / 1000 SF ITE 2 16 33 74 92 110 122 121 120 / 1000 SF ITE 0 0 0 3 5 14 29 37 33 28 107 8 240 38 37 -10 -27 46 511 7-23-11 Counts 10 12 14 20 27 35 39 45 53 42 Unit Source 6am 7am 8am 9am 10am 11am 12n 1pm 2pm 3pm 4pm 30 45 83 7 240 40 39 -10 -26 45 494 5pm 38 55 68 5 240 43 42 -10 -25 46 502 6pm 43 82 89 2 240 44 43 -10 -34 50 549 7pm 52 82 84 1 240 46 44 -10 -33 51 557 8pm 59 82 79 0 240 46 45 -10 -32 51 561 PEAK 9pm 10pm 11pm 12m 55 24 54 0 240 48 47 -10 -15 44 486 50 7 35 0 240 49 48 -10 -8 41 452 48 7 24 0 240 52 51 -10 -6 41 447 46 5 0 0 240 54 52 -10 -1 39 426

Background Demand

5,000 SF Restaurant

41,100 SF Grade Level Retail

18,000 SF Offices

240 Townhouse Units - Reserved

240 Townhouse Rental Units

51 Apartment Rental Units

Adjustment: Removal of Taxis from "Background Demand"

Credit: Internal Trips / Foot Traffic

Safety Factor (10%)

TOTALS

Note 1 - Cars currently parking within the redevelopment footprint estimated to be generated by Brickhouse, BOA, or other uses to remain.

Note 2 - Used factors from ITE and reduced by 15% to account for proximity to rail / transit.

Note 3 - Used 20% of "Restaurant" and "Retail" Demand Totals

LEVEL G ASSOCIATES, LLC

APPENDIX D - 2 PARKING DEMAND MODEL SWEZEY'S BLOCK REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

Run Date: December 28, 2011

WEEKDAY CONDITION

1.0 RESERVED SPACE PER RESIDENTIAL UNIT / ALL OTHER SPACES SHARED

Peak Factor See Note 1 13.3 2.65 2.84 1.00 0.23 1.05 -10 Note 3 Level G 384 386 438 479 511 36 36 41 46 49 52 530 0 -2 -8 -13 -20 -31 -10 -10 -10 -10 -10 -10 -45 53 531 per Unit Note 2 51 44 40 39 36 35 33 per Unit Note 2 53 46 41 40 38 36 34 33 32 -10 -52 54 534 per Unit 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 33 32 -10 -49 54 537 PEAK / 1000 SF ITE 1 8 31 47 51 51 45 47 49 240 / 1000 SF ITE 2 11 42 60 82 98 107 109 107 103 48 240 33 32 -10 -43 53 527 / 1000 SF ITE 0 0 0 1 4 11 24 31 27 23 7-21-11 Count 10 13 20 30 41 48 49 50 53 48 46 37 96 39 240 36 35 -10 -56 53 516 Unit Source 6am 7am 8am 9am 10am 11am 12n 1pm 2pm 3pm 4pm 5pm 49 45 93 26 240 39 37 -10 -63 53 508 6pm 51 67 95 13 240 41 40 -10 -85 55 506 7pm 54 67 98 5 240 43 42 -10 -86 55 508 8pm 57 67 95 3 240 47 46 -10 -85 55 515 9pm 10pm 11pm 12m 70 33 76 2 240 50 49 -10 -48 52 514 83 17 41 1 240 51 50 -10 -25 48 497 78 8 22 0 240 53 51 -10 -12 45 476 68 3 0 0 240 54 52 -10 -3 42 447

Background Demand

5,000 SF Restaurant

41,100 SF Grade Level Retail

18,000 SF Office Space

240 Townhouse Units - Reserved

240 Townhouse Rental Units - Shared

51 Apartment Rental Units

Adjustment: Removal of Taxis from "Background Demand"

Credit: Internal Trips / Foot Traffic

Safety Factor (10%)

TOTALS

Note 1 - Cars currently parking within the redevelopment footprint estimated to be generated by Brickhouse, BOA, or other uses to remain.

Note 2 - Used factors from ITE and reduced by 15% to account for proximity to rail / transit.

Note 3 - Used 20% of "Restaurant" and "Retail" Demand Totals

LEVEL G ASSOCIATES, LLC

APPENDIX E - 1 PARKING SUPPLY & DEMAND MODEL SWEZEY'S BLOCK REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

Run Date: December 28, 2011

SATURDAY CONDITION

1.0 RESERVED SPACE PER RESIDENTIAL UNIT / ALL OTHER SPACES SHARED

Peak Factor Unit Source 6am 7am 8am 9am 10am 11am 12n 1pm 2pm 3pm 4pm 5pm 6pm 7pm 8pm 9pm 10pm 11pm 12m

DEMAND

DEMAND TOTALS FROM TABLE D-1

384

395

410

424

463

491

517

528

533

511

494

502

549

557

561

486

452

447

426

SUPPLY Tritec Tritec Tritec Tritec 7-23-11 Counts 7-23-11 Counts 7-23-11 Counts 7-23-11 Counts 607 223 607 212 10 10 25 25 25 10 607 197 50 50 50 50 25 10 607 183 30 30 30 30 30 50 25 10 607 144 293 293 293 293 293 26 26 26 26 26 26 293 30 50 25 10 607 116 65 65 65 65 65 65 108 108 108 108 108 108 108 65 26 293 31 52 25 12 612 95 108 65 26 293 30 53 25 12 612 84 108 65 26 293 29 55 25 13 614 81 108 65 26 293 27 52 25 12 608 97 108 65 26 293 26 49 25 12 604 110 108 65 26 293 27 47 25 13 604 102 108 65 26 293 29 46 25 15 607 58 108 65 26 293 26 44 25 15 602 45 108 65 26 293 23 42 25 15 597 36 Worst Case Condition 108 65 26 293 24 49 25 13 603 117 108 65 26 293 25 56 25 11 609 157 108 65 26 293 25 55 25 11 608 161 108 65 26 293 25 55 25 11 608 182

Public Lot on Redevelopment Site (108 Spaces)

New Public Lot On Lake Street (65 Spaces)

New On-Street Spaces Created by Redevelopment (26 Spaces)

On-site Residential Reserved Spaces (293 Spaces)

Public Parking Available Within 1 Block

N. Ocean Lot (38 spaces)

Northernmost Portion of Church St. Lot (85 spaces)

Southernmost Row of Fire House Lot (25 spaces)

North Portion of Railroad Avenue (15 spaces)

SUPPLY TOTALS

SURPLUS OR (DEFICIT)

APPENDIX E - 2 PARKING SUPPLY & DEMAND MODEL SWEZEY'S BLOCK REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

Run Date: December 28, 2011

WEEKDAY CONDITION

1.0 RESERVED SPACE PER RESIDENTIAL UNIT / ALL OTHER SPACES SHARED

Peak Factor Unit Source 6am 7am 8am 9am 10am 11am 12n 1pm 2pm 3pm 4pm 5pm 6pm 7pm 8pm 9pm 10pm 11pm 12m

DEMAND

DEMAND TOTALS FROM TABLE D-2

384

386

438

479

511

530

531

534

537

527

516

508

506

508

515

514

497

476

447

SUPPLY Tritec Tritec Tritec Tritec 293 293 293 293 293 26 26 26 26 26 26 293 65 65 65 65 65 65 108 108 108 108 108 108 108 65 26 293 108 65 26 293 108 65 26 293 108 65 26 293 108 65 26 293 108 65 26 293 108 65 26 293 108 65 26 293 108 65 26 293 108 65 26 293 108 65 26 293 108 65 26 293 108 65 26 293

Public Lot on Redevelopment Site (108 Spaces)

New Public Lot On Lake Street (65 Spaces)

New On-Street Spaces Created by Redevelopment (26 Spaces)

On-site Residential Reserved Spaces (293 Spaces)

Public Parking Available Within 1 Block 7-21-11 Counts 7-21-11 Counts 7-21-11 Counts 7-21-11 Counts 582 198 582 196 10 10 25 25 25 10 582 144 30 30 30 25 25 25 25 30 25 10 582 103 25 30 25 10 582 71 25 30 25 10 582 52 26 31 25 10 584 53 22 28 25 10 577 43 18 26 25 9 570 33 Worst Case Condition 22 31 25 10 580 53 27 36 25 10 590 74 25 31 25 12 585 77 23 27 25 15 582 76 21 36 25 15 589 81 19 45 25 15 596 81 24 55 25 15 611 97 28 65 25 15 625 128 25 65 25 15 622 146 25 65 25 15 622 175

N. Ocean Lot (38 spaces)

Northernmost Portion of Church St. Lot (85 spaces)

Southernmost Row of Fire House Lot (25 spaces)

North Portion of Railroad Avenue (15 spaces)

SUPPLY TOTALS

SURPLUS OR (DEFICIT)