Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The global oil and gas industry association for environmental and social issues
5th Floor, 209215 Blackfriars Road, London SE1 8NL, United Kingdom Telephone: +44 (0)20 7633 2388 Facsimile: +44 (0)20 7633 2389 E-mail: info@ipieca.org Internet: www.ipieca.org
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior consent of IPIECA. This publication is printed on paper manufactured from fibre obtained from sustainably grown softwood forests and bleached without any damage to the environment.
Cover photographs reproduced courtesy of the following (clockwise from top left): ExxonMobil; Nexen; Photodisc Inc.; iStockphoto; Corbis; Shutterstock.com.
IPIECA
Contents
Introduction What is an EHS management system Understanding EHS management systems Where do EHS management systems fit in the hierarchy of managing EHS issues? How is a management system installed and executed? Assigning and measuring accountability Assigning accountability Measuring accountability Performing a gap analysis Prioritizing the gaps and developing closure plans Implementing a management system Measurement and verification System status measures System effectiveness measures Appendix 1: Sample template elements Elements and expectations
Element 1: Policy and leadership Element 2: Continuous improvement Element 3: Safety and health Element 4: Risk management Element 5: Incident reporting and investigation Element 6: Crisis preparedness Element 7: Environmental protection Element 8: Product stewardship Element 9: Training Element 10: Community relations Element 11: Legal requirements
1 1 1
4 4
4 4
5
5
6
6 6
7
7 7 7 7 8 8 9 9 9 9 10 10
Appendix 2: Definitions
11
ii
Introduction
Each document in the IPIECA Operational, Fuels and Product Issues Committee (OFPIC) Best Practice series provides guidance on defining and achieving best practice in managing environmental aspects of operations in the downstream oil and gas industry. However, examples of best practice alone are not sufficient to drive improvements in operating performance; what is needed are management systems to accompany these best practices, hence, each document is also accompanied by a section giving management system information for the operational area in question. The objective of this document is to give a broad overview of the principles of environment, health and safety (EHS) management systems, as these principles are the foundation for the entire best practice series itself: without the concurrent adoption of these systems, the adoption of even the most sophisticated and leading-edge best practices are of little value. An EHS management system is a cyclical business process for systematically achieving a desired level of EHS performance. EHS management systems involve planning and implementing the necessary systems, programmes and procedures to achieve that level of performance, checking the results and making adjustments, as necessary, to ensure that the desired level of performance is being achieved. It may also be desirable to achieve external certification to an acknowledged management system standard (such as ISO 14001 for example) to provide external verification that the building blocks of an accepted management system are in place. Although this document is concerned primarily with the environmental management aspects of operations, reference is also made to EHS management systems. This is because environmental control is frequently managed as a subset of an overarching EHS management system.
establishes a process to clearly assign accountability for meeting those expectations; provides a common framework for linking together disparate systems that likely already exist in many operating units; and facilitates a culture of continuous performance improvement.
IPIECA
Where do EHS management systems fit in the hierarchy of managing EHS issues?
The historical development of environmental management was characterized by early attempts to improve environmental performance focusing primarily on engineering measures. As programmes matured, it became evident that this was insufficient: even the best designed and built facility or system could suffer incidents occasioned by poor management or human error. Successive interventions therefore relied increasingly on management systems and, eventually, on a better understanding of human culture and behaviour (winning hearts and minds) to reduce incidents to a practicable minimum. Management systems vary, but nearly all are based on the Plan-Implement-Measure-Adjust cycle. To be successful, the individual elements of this cycle must be supported by leadership and commitment from the senior management of the enterprise. Appendix 1 (see page 7) suggests typical activities that might need to take place in a well-run operating entity in order to effectively and efficiently manage EHS concerns. It outlines the various elements and systems that corporate management typically expect their operating entities to have in place, together with their expectations of conduct and activities required to manage this area
effectively. Individual companies will of course have their own set of expectations, but the ones listed in Appendix 1 are relatively common. These expectations are grouped into broad categories called elements. The majority of expectations in the template start with the phrase, A system is in place to This phrase has a defined meaning within the context of an EHS management system. A system is simply a term to describe an organized process to plan activities, carry them out (implement them), measure how well they are carried out and adjust accordingly. Every system has a set of common characteristics. Typically, EHS management systems are a collection of many individual systems and practices that are managed together through an overall system framework. Both the individual systems and the overall system framework consist of the same PlanImplement-Measure-Adjust cycles, as shown in Figure 2 (opposite). Figure 2 shows that, in the outside systems, management drives the entire management systems process by: Planning: developing, identifying and prioritizing needs, and establishing objectives and targets. Implementing: applying the right resources, and demonstrating leadership, commitment and support, as well as ensuring that an appropriate organizational structure is in place.
hardware
Measuring: identifying the key performance indicators (KPIs), and setting up the required audit and review processes.
The inside systems are the individual management systems, e.g. permit to work, environmental
time
where the individual owners (to whom responsibility for managing the individual system has been assigned) need to ensure that their systems are in place and delivering results. It cannot be emphasized strongly enough that it is the combination of management commitment and participation, and employee awareness, involvement and buy-in that makes the overall
Figure 2 The Plan-Implement-Check-Adjust cycle for continuous improvement in environmental, health and safety performance
S L L E HS M F R A M E W O
OV
ER A
PL A N
s
RK
re s
o u rc e
o rg a n i z
a ti o
a u d it r evi e w
process function effectively. The above steps, depicted in Figure 2, apply to the management system cycle as a whole. The process is broadly similar for the individual programme elements and technical components of an EHS management system (shown within the large circle in Figure 2). While these may vary from company to company and facility to facility, each system area should be driven using the principles outlined above. However, to be effective, these individual systems should possess and be documented as possessing, the following five basic characteristics:
systems processes; the inside systems are individual management systems such as permit to work, environmental compliance, health and safety management, etc.
A DJ UST
INDIVIDUAL SYSTEMS
IM P L E M E N T
OV
K P Is
ERA
MEASURE
L L E H S M S F R A ME W
S t a n d a rd s
K OR
There are two components: Verification determines that processes and procedures are functioning and being effectively executed; Measurement confirms the quality of system processes and determines that system objectives and results are being achieved. Ongoing evaluation is essential to make sure that the expectations for the management system are being met. A management system should employ internal and external assessment processes to gauge the degree to which expectations are being satisfied. Such evaluations provide the information needed to further improve both performance and supportive management systems. Both process (status) measures and outcome (effectiveness) measures are required.
Scope and objectives: The scope defines the systems boundaries and identifies interfaces with other systems, organizations and facilities. Objectives clearly define the systems purpose and expected results.
Processes and procedures: Processes address the steps that describe what the system does and how it functions, whereas procedures address the key tasks required by a process.
Responsible and accountable resources: The resource characteristics determine how approvals are authorized, as well as the experience and training requirements that qualify people to carry out their roles and responsibilities. These should be specified for both implementation and execution of the management system.
Feedback and improvement mechanisms: These mechanisms help to ensure that actions are taken to continuously improve the system. They use findings from assessments, and from verification and measurement activities, to enhance system suitability, capability and effectiveness.
3
Verification and measurement: A system must be checked to see whether it is functioning as designed and is achieving its stated purpose.
IPIECA
Managing accountability
The first step in managing accountability is to devise a method to assign individual accountability for managing the stated expectations, at all levels of the business. Various methods are commonly employed. In some companies, a cascading process (where accountability is cascaded down an organizational hierarchy to the most appropriate level) is used. In others, system owners and administrators are centrally assigned for each system (the individual process inside the circle in Figure 2). A review of accountabilities should be carried out after any significant reorganization.
Accountable: The individual who has the authority to say Yes or No to the task and who has the power of veto over all others involved in the task. For any given task, only ONE person is held accountable!
Responsible: The individual(s) who actually perform the task(s) is(are) considered responsible for the action or implementation. The degree of responsibility is defined by the accountable person. There may be more than one person sharing responsibility for the action or implementation.
Clear assignment of responsibilityand accountabilityis a key factor in any management system. Without clear assignment, there will always be the danger that somebody else will be assumed to be responsible for an activity; as a result, it is quite possible that no one will be responsible. In a well-constructed EHS management system, somebody will be held accountable for every action.
IPIECA
(e.g. operators) from other, similar facilities in a group (e.g. functionally similar but geographically and/or culturally remote) can provide significant value and learning for both assessed and assessing parties.
IPIECA
3.1
A system is in place to ensure that safe work practices, including off-site activities and capital project construction, are established, communicated, documented and enforced.
3.2
A system is in place to self-assess the adequacy and enforcement of the facilitys safe work practices.
3.3
A system is in place to maintain facilities, vehicles and equipment to ensure their safe operating condition. 4.1 A system is in place to identify EHS hazards and their potential consequences. 4.2 A system is in place to assess and prioritize risks and manage them in a cost-effective manner.
3.4
3.5
A system is in place to ensure that safety and environmental control equipment and systems are tested and maintained. 4.3 A system is in place to review the design of new and modified facilities to ensure incorporation of appropriate EHS protection measures. 4.4 Risks associated with the acquisition, closure and divestment of facilities and operations are assessed and managed.
3.6
A system is in place to ensure that the EHS implications of temporary or permanent changes in operation and/or facilities are properly managed.
3.7
A system is in place to ensure that design data, drawings and operating procedures are documented, updated, communicated and accessible.
3.8
A system is in place to ensure that employees and contractors are fit for duty and are not compromised by external influences including alcohol and drugs.
3.9
A system is in place to identify, assess and manage occupational health risks. 5.2 A system is in place to ensure that incidents are investigated to determine root causes, and corrective actions necessary to prevent their recurrence. 5.3 A system is in place to select corrective action and track implementation to completion.
3.10 A system is in place to ensure adequate communication to employees and contractors of the hazards associated with jobs. 3.11 A system is in place to ensure that EHS performance is considered in selection of contractors, vendors and service providers,
8
5.4
Lessons learned from incident investigations are shared with appropriate audiences.
7.3
A system is in place to ensure that the control of emissions and the minimization of waste are evaluated in the design and modification of facilities.
A system is in place to prevent spills, leaks, and major loss of containment. A system is in place to manage risks and known instances of soil or groundwater contamination resulting from facility operations. Efficient use of energy and natural resources are a key consideration in business planning, as well as designing, developing and improving products and processes.
8.2
A system exists to ensure that product safety information is accurate and available to employees, customers and the public.
Element 9: Training
Safe, environmentally sound operations rely on welltrained people. Employees and contractors are aware of their EHS responsibilities and are trained to fulfill them. 9.1 A system is in place to ensure that EHS skills and knowledge are defined and documented by job.
9
IPIECA
9.2
A system is in place to provide training to perform jobs in a safe and environmentally responsible manner.
10
Appendix 2: Definitions
Element: a grouping of expectations into a key EHS focus area (e.g. policy and leadership, safety and health, risk management). Expectations: business conduct necessary to achieve a desired level of EHS performance. Each expectation has an assigned owner. Gap: a gap is said to exist when an expectation is not being fully met. Legal requirements: laws, regulations, ordinances, etc. adopted by governments to control the environmental, health and safety performance of facilities, operations, and products marketed by the company. Management system: a cyclical business process for systematically achieving a desired level of performance. Management systems involve planning and implementing the necessary systems, programmes and procedures to achieve that level of performance, checking on results and making adjustments, as necessary, to ensure that the desired level of performance is being achieved. Peer assessment: a periodic review of an expectation owners activities, carried out by a trained co-worker to provide an independent opinion of the status of each expectation. Self-Assessment: a check by a unit or facility to determine how well its programmes and procedures satisfy legal requirements and conform to the expectations of the EHS management system. System: a management tool for meeting an established objective made up of four steps: plan, implement, measure and adjust. Its objectives and scope are defined, responsibilities are assigned, and procedures are in place, all with documentation. Adequate resources and training are provided. Progress is periodically measured, objectives are adjusted and results are reviewed with management. Throughout the process, there is adequate communication among those involved. Procedure: a written description of how a specific task should be accomplished. Practice: the method used to accomplish a specific task. Many practices are not documented and do not require a procedure (see below). Policies: an articulation of company EHS aspirations. They provide direction to line management on implementation, and define the boundaries of acceptable performance.
11
IPIECA is the global oil and gas industry association for environmental and social issues. It develops, shares and promotes good practices and knowledge to help the industry improve its environmental and social performance; and is the industrys principal channel of communication with the United Nations. Through its member led working groups and executive leadership, IPIECA brings together the collective expertise of oil and gas companies and associations. Its unique position within the industry enables its members to respond effectively to key environmental and social issues.
Company members BG Group BP Chevron CNOOC ConocoPhillips Eni ExxonMobil Hess Hunt Oil KPC Mrsk Marathon Nexen NOC Libya Occidental OMV Petrobras Petronas Petrotrin PTT EP Qatargas RasGas Repsol YPF Saudi Aramco Shell SNH StatoilHydro Talisman Total Woodside Energy
Association members African Refiners Association (ARA) American Petroleum Institute (API) Australian Institute of Petroleum (AIP) Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) Canadian Petroleum Products Institute (CPPI) The Oil Companies European Association for Environment, Health and Safety in Refining and Distribution (CONCAWE) European Petroleum Industry Association (EUROPIA) International Association of Oil & Gas Producers (OGP) Petroleum Association of Japan (PAJ) Regional Association of Oil and Natural Gas Companies in Latin America and the Caribbean (ARPEL) South African Petroleum Industry Association (SAPIA) World Petroleum Council (WPC)
IPIECA 5th Floor, 209215 Blackfriars Road, London SE1 8NL, United Kingdom Telephone: +44 (0)20 7633 2388 Facsimile: +44 (0)20 7633 2389 E-mail: info@ipieca.org Internet: www.ipieca.org
IPIECA 2010 All rights reserved.
www.ipieca.org