The religion of Islam in the UK

Umar Farooq Butt

2
About Myself

My field of degree education is Applied Accounting, however during the last 20 years I have worked towards degrees with Major and Minor in Social Psychology, Psychology, Psycho-Social Studies and Islaamic Studies and Cultural Anthropology and Social Anthropology.

Contents 1. Biology 2. Religion 3. Religious practice 4. Religious affiliation 5. 20, 40

1- Biology
Islamic biological replacement theory- A study of UK birth rates The non-Muslim faiths, led by christianism, in the UK, are going down in size of population. They fail within consecutive census periods to reproduce or replace the number of people. This is deemed as due to the break-down of social structures such as prescribed by religious and faith practices. Specifically:

Marriage Kinship and social structures Sexual intercourse as sanctioned by revelatory ethics Heterosexual norms Punishments for sexual deviants
Note that these are anthropological, or biologically anthropological concepts, not strictly sociological but rather closer to biological break-down. For example, punishments and proscriptions (things labelled haram and deserving of punishment in the next life) are not addressed directly, rather it is the break-down of biology we are concerned with. Biological reproduction in its right and wrong ways. With divorce rates, homosexuality, and other non-reproductive sexual forms soaring, reproduction has become impossible for Britons, especially those with a non-replacing biology. The economic argument too is completely separate. The rich may wish to reproduce comparatively less, but in the UK we look at everybody and use a normally representative sample. Everyone is slightly richer, so why would non-Muslims be biologically non-replacing? Non-reproductive sexual activity Courtship is an example of how non-Muslims spend their lives without finding a sexual mate. Celibacy of the priesthood is another. What has happened, to be frank and honest, is that perversions, such as pornography and paedophilia have caused moral decay and demise of the system of reproduction of humanity. Perhaps it is because of the warbent policy of the

5 warmongering armies who war in foreign lands: If they kill innocent fathers of Muslim children, it lends for them to destroy the role of father within families. The death of man/ the father Fathers take care of families of a society. If they lose this place in societies of foreign communities it will have an effect at home, here in the UK too. Fatherless children are already more common in the USA, for example than children with both parents, that is who live with and grow up with both biological parents. In Afghanistan, millions of martyrs have meant for (due to there being family sizes of 5-10) almost tens of millions of orphans. It is no surprise out of under a hundred million American children, in America, similarly tens of millions dont live with both parents. Of just under a million children born in UK hospitals, half will not live with both parents. Biological replacement and reproduction The study looks at both aspects of biological maladjustment, biological non-replacement and biological non-reproduction. First I will deal with non-replacement: We should look at the change from one generation to another. An average age at child-rearing age should be used as a yardstick for the length of study of population change. To calculate this we take the average age of child rearing add the average age of having the last child and divide by two: (28.1+30.1)/2=29.1 so three census periods. We will chose the last three, 1991 to 2011. So, a rate of non-replacement can be studied. This is the change in birth rate or the fertility rate. Specifically, the negativity of our non-Muslim religions birth and fertility rates. Birth rate is defined as number of live births per 1000 of population whereas fertility rate is taken to mean the change in the crude birth rate annual figure. Replacement theory concerns itself with Muslim population having high birth rates and high fertility rates. Conversely, non-replacement is the negativity of other religions birth rate, and non reproduction is the negativity of other religions fertility rates. Here, we deduct from total population, atheist populations, assuming all the rest are of other religions. The growth with Islam is compared, and interestingly, there is a significant difference in all the last three censuses. Over the generation the Muslim ummah outgrows non-Muslim religions by net 13,695 million. Over two million from Muslims born in the period and over eleven million due to decline in kafir religions numbers. The generation after this one (ie the next one after 1981-2011) will no doubt see more Muslims

6 Non Mus dec -1.955 -3.043 -6.38

Year Population Atheists 1981 56.343 4 1991 57.338 6 2001 58.999 9.104 2011 63.285 16.9

PopTot. Ath. Muslims Grow 52.343 0.553 51.338 0.95 0.995 49.895 1.6 1.661 46.385 2.87 4.286

M vs Muslim NM Fertility 0.397 2.352 0.65 3.693 1.27 7.65

Fig 20: Generational change in Islam in Uk versus in other religions collectively

than all other religions combined. So that would be about 2041, there will be more Muslims than non-Muslim religionists. Now, I will deal with non-reproduction: Assuming wedlock is the only appropriate form for marital relations, children born out of wedlock will be taken as a percentage for non-reproduction: So America has a half, Ireland a third and England a quarter of all live births are to unmarried mothers. No doubt in all Muslim countries there is no figure for this and it is deemed inappropriate and therefore insignificant . Muslims are reproducing whereas non-Muslims it would seem are non-reproducing. Birth rates, fertility rates and employment rates In conclusion, to this chapter, we could have taken the fertility rate to mean the rate of change of the birth rate, instead I have deducted the atheists from the total and taken that to mean nonMuslim religions. Including those who say they have no religion would be an unfair estimate to compare for religions. New ideas are there in the sense that Muslim fertility is seen as the total (ie gross) growth in the Muslim population in a year. The ideas of non-replacement and non-reproduction too are new. Combining the two ideas, of non- Muslims being both non-replacing and non-reproducing gives us potentially a ratio of not how many are affiliated with Islam or not, nor how many are married against single-parent families but how many from Islam and from disbelievers collectively excluding atheists, are what I will term reproductive religious believers. This rate is attained by multiplying the rate of Muslims by the rate of legal marriages or the rate of disbelievers by the number of non-single-parent families. By comparing reproductive religious believers in all faith groups it is possible to know, specifically with regard to social convention and the future, which group has surpassed the rest, if it is Islam or not. I will name this ratio the reproductive religious believers ratio. Accordingly, it is very hard to show Islam doing badly as America, as an example, has its Christian figure augmented for Religious and Believer in God as well as having single-parent families taken out. It gives us a figure for religious practice where the 50% of Christians, only 25% are practising, based on

7 attendance (number of congregants). This becomes 12.5% are religious, which becomes 6.25% believers and only 3% reproductive religious believers due to the illegitimacy of half of the children. Muslims then are dominant as of 5% of the population translates into 4% reproductive religious believers in most states, all of whom are living with both parents, believers, religious and who practise. The figure is similar to a productive religious believers percentage where unemployed persons are deducted and employed believers percentage is given. For brevitys sake I will include my calculations for a few countries: Islam vs Christianity UK---4%/0.5% (London)----15%/3% USA----4%/3% Ireland----- 1%/2%

Fig 21: non-replacement and ultimately non-reproduction of non-believers

The figures show how due largely to non-replacement and non-reproduction of Christians, in the

8 UK, as in the US, the number of Muslims is not only growing but doubling very quickly, for example between 1990 and 2010 (twenty years) and again between 2010 and 2030 it is projected to do the same: 1990 United Kingdom United States 1,172,000 1,529,000 % 2.0 0.6 2010 2,869,000 2,595,000 % 4.6 0.8 2030 5,567,000 6,216,000 % 8.2 1.7

Fig 22: Islam in UK and USA

Further, the rate of growth, taken as a percentage is too doubling, in the UK, every twenty years, displaying exponential growth. The American data shows firstly that the non-Muslim birth rates worldwide are lower and secondly that the predicted rates are falling below zero eventually. Non-replacement corresponds to the first point, that the Muslim birth rates are significantly above the non-Muslim ones, and non-reproduction corresponds to the second point, that the overall non-Muslim rate is not only heading below zero but that that means the total population is decreasing. Just to reiterate, non-replacement and non-reproduction of disbelievers means that they have a negative birth rate relatively (to the Muslim birth rate) and absolutely (to their own previous years rates). It also means that their numbers are falling whereas ours are rising and that their rate of decline is rising whilst our numbers increase exponentially. What we then need to look at instead of just birth rates being preferred over population figures as a whole; is the religious practices and how they develop into the future based on current trends.

2 - Religion
Here, in the UK, Muslims are some 35% of the total population in certain London boroughs. As we are (or at least our parents and grandparents were) reproducing at disproportionately higher rates than our Christian counterparts, sometimes we are tripling our population where theirs is levelling off, we expect to become a majority over them within a few decades, in their own eyes. Perhaps, what is not relevant is the monarchy or the official religion of the country (or countries) but that within a few decades, given that the population change (largely due to our population explosion) is going to effect not only schools and so on but the so-called establishment of the church and so on (eg. Universities and so on) is that Islam needs to be mobilised to replace churches with mosques, secular education with religious education and so on as well as Christians with Muslims.

Figure 1: Religious affiliation of Londoners

10

Figure 2: Religious practice of Londoners as per weekly attendees of places of worship

Figure 3: Religious practice of Londoners as per daily worshippers

11 In fact, unless the legal institutions arent replaced with more humane and equal ones, they will not stand as they will fail to bare the weight of a country where people go to mosque more often than church. If children go to madrassa or have a Molvi come home to teach why should we expect them to settle with Jesus or Trinity college in Oxford or Cambridge? If the Muslim population explosion yields a quadrupling within if not 20 years then however many years (30 years then) we must assume that since Catholicism is not allowed ascension to the throne yet churches are often Catholic, due to their presumed higher level of attendance, that Muslims must follow the same path. The 1,500 or so mosques in the UK accommodate a maximum of, (times 500) 750,000 worshippers, congregations have to be doubled per service. Should the population double, will they quadruple? Should mosquebuilding take place so that, like catholics (and church of England established churches) there are tens of thousands? If there are more Muslim congregants in the UK in mosques (Muslim places of worship) there should be more in a daily and weekly basis, than there are Christian congregants in the UK in churches (Christian places of worship), there should be more mosques than churches or at least more mosques should be built than churches. In fact, if Islam is growing at a greater pace than Christianity there should be more Mosque-building. However this is precisely because UK masses and classes are more mosque-going than church-going. The principle that because Muslim congregants exceed Christian congregants means Mosques should be built up until there are as many as there are churches is one of equality and freedom of worship. It assumes only a respect of rights of Muslims in a country where we are told we have both equal rights and freedom of worship. Given that many London Boroughs schools are of a Muslim majority and that congregation numbers are of greater significance in Islam as opposed to christianism (ie. Mosque numbers and sizes exceed church congregation sizes), it is noted that the British Queen has no right to rule her own people let alone those of Canada, West Indies, Australia and New Zealand. If there are 16,000 English churches, there should be 15,000 or 20,000 Mosques, otherwise there is no equal rights. There is no freedom of worship. If we are drawing graphs of religious worshippers with catholic, protestant and Muslim (with Muslim equal to both combined and scheduled to double within 1 census and quadruple within 2), surely there should be more representation at government level, ascension to the throne and more awareness of the facts. All of these will allow for more mosque-building, which is clearly the desire of the people, from its youth to its elderly.

12

Figure 4: 2011 Religious affliation in London boroughs

Figure 5: 2021 Religious affiliation in London boroughs (predicted)

13

Fig 6: 6: 2031 Religious affiliation in London boroughs (predicted)

e Fig. 7: Daily religious practice in the Home Countries

14

Figure 8: Weekly religious practice of home countries

Figure 9: Religious affiliation in UK

15

3- Religious practice
In the battle of humanity versus humanism, antiquity versus iniquity, Islam versus Christianity; the definition of religious practice based on those who say they are religious and that they believe in God, over religious affiliation must prevail. Christians conduct their own surveys showing 40% say they go to Church but when this is surveyed only 20% actually are attending. Also many Christian religion affiliated people deny the existence of God and say they dont believe there is a God and that they are not religious, yet instead of being atheist in the Census, they are down as Christians. This makes no sense at all. If there is one measure for religious affiliation, there are more Christians than Muslims. If there are as well as that two measures for Religious practice, Muslims far out-measure Christians in London and are the true heirs to the throne of England, to the legal institutions and so on. The analysis could go further, by asking firstly, does the respondent believe in God Almighty? Further to this does he admit to being religious? This would give us again, a five-fold scale to determine who is dominant. As this is an even number it will be easy to see to which religion does each borough belong. The UK is now a Muslim majority country, just like France and Germany, have maximum Muslim worshippers, it is dar al Islam. Some ullema, such as ShafiI scholar al-Rafii included in his definition that Dar al Islam once named as such remains Dar al Islam until the day of Judgement. Imam Abu Hanifa is said to have founded the concept based on the gate of Paradise, dar as salam. Dar al-Islam is also known and referred to as Dar al-Salam, or house/abode of Peace. The term appears in the Koran in 10.25 and 6.127 as a name of Paradise:

AND [know that] God invites [man] unto the abode of peace, and guides him that wills [to be guided] onto a straight way

Theirs shall be an abode of peace with their Sustainer; and He shall be near unto them in result of what they have been doing.

16 According to Abu Hanifa, considered to be the originator of the concept, the two requirements for a country to be part of Dar al-Islam are: 1. Muslims must be able to enjoy peace and security with and within this country. 2. It has common frontiers with some Muslim countries. If the former does not apply then physical means such as Jihad can be used to correct the situation and in the latter case, individuals are required to do hijra to where they can practise their religion. Other followers of Hanbali madhab have said: There are only two, Dar al Islam and Dar al Kufr. Any Dar (domain) where Islamic law is dominant is Dar al Islam, and any domain where Kufr law is dominant is Dar al Kufr, there are only these two camps. Ibn Muflih (died 884 AH)

There is not much explanation in the Holy Quran itself, of the concept of Dar Al Islam, nonetheless, the term is used widely by the scholars. Sayyed Qutb, even talks of Dar al Islams opposite being Dar al Harb. Others mention Dar al Hijra, pointing out that this began when Rasulallah (SWS) migrated away from Mecca. As opposed to Dar al Jihad, stands Dar al Ahd. Others have equated Dar al Islam with Dar al Muslimeen. Types of Dar (and ways of judging a land as Muslim or not) 1. Dar al Islam Are muslim religious worshippers in the majority? 2. Dar al Harb Are Muslims struggling militarily and persevering in their fight in the land? 3. Dar al Aman - Is there safety and security? 4. Dar al Hijra Is this a land of immigration? A land for the Muslim Ummah to emigrate to? 5. Dar al Ahd Are covenants kept? Are human rights met? 6. Dar al Muslimeen Is everything from government to social welfare in the hands of Muslims done purely for Allahs sake? 7. Dar al Kufr? Is there still kafirs? The above defintions, concern various Islaamic concepts, Ibadat, Jihad, Salam, Risalat, Muamalat, Islam and finally, kufr. The British Isles are dar al Islam and not Dar al Kufr, because: 1. France and Germany enjoy maximum Muslim worshippers, and they are the nearest to border states. 2. The Islands themselves are enjoying maximum Muslim worshippers, over a million per week in the

17 places of worship. 3. The authority invested in Muslim leaders (ie Sultans) to authorise others behaviour. Eg UN, NATO, IMF, WB etc are often conducted through the British system in some way or another. 4. Dawah in the UK 5. High Muslim birth rates 6. Christian homosexuality and divorce 7. Immigration from Muslim countries Maybe America, one day too, replace its Judeo-Christian ideology with a Muslim one. Ameen. Maybe Judaism will be replaced, in the occupied Palestine, through dawah, reproduction and immigration, of Muslims, if not the jihad fisabilillah in the occupied Palestine. May the conquest of the British Isles serve as a means to ameliorate the condition of the Muslims in the rest of the world. Ameen. It is our sincere prayer that the English language and English literature type culture be replaced, once for all with Arabic Studies and Islamic studies as a mode of salvation for humanitys ills. Having begun a BA degree in Islamic Studies I know how fulfilling and indeed spiritually rewarding it is to study the deen of Allah Subhanahu wa Ta Ala, instead of the poets of the age of perversity and ignorance. May Shirk and Kufr of these Islands be turned into the fulfillment of its majority or maximum religion and our organised religion. Amin Now that it is established that Islam has been present in the now-EU countries, and if we follow Ar Rafis statement that once part of the Muslim Ummah, a nation is always part of the Muslim Ummah, we can draw further conclusions: Firstly that al Andalus (Spain and Portugal) are still Muslim lands. Secondly, that the British Islands, (where it is proved that at the seat of power, the Muslims are the relative religious majority), too are Muslim lands. Boo-e Yemen Aaj bhi us ki hawaoun mein hein, Rang e Hijaz Aaj bhi us ki nawaoun mein hein, Veda e Anjum mein hein teri Zameen, Asmaan, Aah! Ke Sadiyaoun se hein teri fiza be AzaanEven today in its breeze fragrance of Yemen still floats, Even today in its songs echoes live on of He jaz, Under the stars your realm lies like a heaven; alas! Ages are fled since your courts heard their last prayercall sound. The Mosque of Cordoba- Sir Muhammad Iqbal The second assertion, being that London, therefore Britain is, in fact, part of the Muslim lands, holds true due to the fact of the indigeneity of Islam in the land. An indigenous people are those who live naturally inspite of imposition of unnatural (if you like) government, by another people. In this case by Brussels and Westminster (or the system, the machine, the Vikings etc). As Muslims, our marginalisation is both historical, in the sense of radically altering history and is conducted through the state (although not settlers), in this case the so-called British government. These people are in

18 fact pure bruts or brats, and are themselves governed by Brussels and bring into disrepute every civilised law. The proof of this is that while we, Muslims are peaceful and law-abiding in the Muslim British lands, historically Christian Westminster, NATO, EU etc (the establishment) is warmongering, imposing mass murder, mass rape and mass famine throughout this century and the last, at home and abroad. So although the state has not been established in spite of a Muslim territory in Britain, the present British royalty are self- imposed in the sense of having imposed mega- murder, mega- rape, and mega- famine. There is no alternative to recognition of the British Islands as part of the Muslim empire. To do this we must reactivate an Islamic Political Party in Britain, and begin our entrance into the political process. As the system of tyranny founded terrorism as its politics, we must then launch a law suit against the queen and the present British government based in London, through the ICC in Malaysia. Unfortunately, the philosophy of subversion and deviation, the path we have been forced into practicing and will only continue to do so, tells us to hate our religion and to be submissive to other religions. This is complete balderdash and must be discontinued immediately. The following survey would give a clear answer, to how many of the London boroughs still have Christianity being practised in them How are figures for religious affiliation and practice calculated? The two Projections (one of five years from now and the other of 15 years in time), tell us very soon, half of London will enjoy mainly Muslims as the inhabitants and not Christians. They are based on 2.1 birth rate for Christians and 4.25 birthrate for Muslims. They assume a stagnant Christian population against doubling of Muslim population.The figures for practice are, for Islam, and for weekly and daily worship. For Christianity, 5% and a seventh of that are taken for average. The charts show this but the figures have now been changed by being capped at 50% for Muslim majority boroughs. This has meant overall domination has not been shown as in previous versions of the figures. I have already mentioned that by the turn of the next century, the British Isles will, I am sure, will be a Muslim country, with its own place in the Ummah of Prophet Mohammad (Peace be upon Him). The reasons for this are that London already has:

Maximum Muslim religious worshippers Be a Muslim Majority. Have more Muslims than non-Muslims

London will, by 2031, the census 18 years from now:

And it will, in all probability, by the next census from then:

We can put this another way: Islam has grown on the British Isles to the point that for the children born at the beginning of this century: 1. A Muslim majority is statistically probable in their lifetime (Outright 1) 2. Maximum Muslim worshippers have already emerged as dominant in London (Outright 2)

19 What is Outright? 1. The 1st method of outright Muslim domination Evident, in London Boroughs such as Tower Hamlets, there are more Muslims than Christians. In terms of religious affiliation, Muslims outnumber all other religious groups. This concerns the census 2011 question What is your religion? or What religion do you belong to? The next census will see 3/33 London Boroughs Muslim majority included in this is Shariah zone Walthamstow in the borough of Waltham Forest (which as a whole has not been designated a Shariah zone, albeit part of it was, temporarily) 2. Outright 2 By this method most of London is already Muslim and therefore as London is a seat of power, so too are Canada, Jamaica, the Malvinas, Australia and New Zealand (anywhere the Queen has dominion) as are the rest of the British Isles. For outright 2 to be successful, and it has been, religious practice is considered as well as religious affiliation, twice or four times as much. These are the relevant questions to which the answer determines whether a population is considered Muslim or not: 1. To which religion do you say you belong to? 2. Are you a believer in God? 3. Do you consider yourself religious? Outright 1 takes just the first question only into account. Outright 2 may also look at the second and third as well as daily worship and weekly attendance at places of worship in Britain. Muslims have in the London population: 1. Maximum Muslim worshippers already 2. A Muslim majority by 2031 3. More Muslims than unbelievers by, say 2041

What wed really like to see, is the people have some sort of plebiscite for Self Determination for Londoners who are at least by Religious Practice and not just affiliation, Muslim. In terms of religious affiliation, the London boroughs are maximum Muslim by 2031, but by the strict terms of religious practice they are majority Muslim already. We can then assume a Muslim government between 2 and 3. Further to this, Imam Hanifas two points of security and border states, there are Ibn Muflihs arguments. That the two, Dar al Islam and Dar al Kufr are independent. In this case, it is not until all three points are achieved in this country that it is Dar al Islam. This is only a difference in noting the presence of Islam in the country between the maximum religion (now Islam in the major cities) and the majority, or a relative majority and an absolute majority.

20
London Boroughs Average weekly Pop. Muslim M% worshippers in Muslim places of worship (%) 220,338 26,643 12.1% 9.1% 7,375 409 5.5% 4.2% 246,270 34,727 14.1% 10.6% 182,493 18,242 254,926 36,130 206,125 19,521 158,649 15,812 303,086 21,500 275,885 17,759 307,984 98,456 288,283 24,551 254,096 87,696 306,995 24,746 219,396 40,073 185,911 25,520 356,386 36,744 231,997 5,645 311,215 58,036 309,392 7,841 363,378 29,513 338,449 53,198 312,466 52,141 254,557 17,349 239,056 29,881 237,232 4,829 273,936 29,065 253,957 35,666 160,060 9,474 199,693 16,262 278,970 64,999 186,990 6,128 190,146 7,726 258,249 56,541 8,173,941 1,012,823 10.0% 14.2% 9.5% 10.0% 7.1% 6.4% 32.0% 8.5% 34.5% 8.1% 18.3% 13.7% 10.3% 2.4% 18.6% 2.5% 8.1% 15.7% 16.7% 6.8% 12.5% 2.0% 10.6% 14.0% 5.9% 8.1% 23.3% 3.3% 4.1% 21.9% 11.8% 7.5% 10.6% 7.1% 7.5% 5.3% 4.8% 24.0% 6.4% 25.9% 6.0% 13.7% 10.3% 7.7% 1.8% 14.0% 1.9% 6.1% 11.8% 12.5% 5.1% 9.4% 1.5% 8.0% 10.5% 4.4% 6.1% 17.5% 2.5% 3.0% 16.4% 8.9% Average daily worshippers in Muslim places of worship (%) 6.0% 2.8% 7.1% 5.0% 7.1% 4.7% 5.0% 3.5% 3.2% 16.0% 4.3% 17.3% 4.0% 9.1% 6.9% 5.2% 1.2% 9.3% 1.3% 4.1% 7.9% 8.3% 3.4% 6.2% 1.0% 5.3% 7.0% 3.0% 4.1% 11.6% 1.6% 2.0% 10.9% 5.9%

Camden City of London Hackney Hammersmith and Fulham Haringey Islington Kensington and Chelsea Lambeth Lewisham Newham Southwark Tower Hamlets Wandsworth Westminster Barking and Dagenham Barnet Bexley Brent Bromley Croydon Ealing Enfield Greenwich Harrow Havering Hillingdon Hounslow Kingston upon Thames Merton Redbridge Richmond upon Thames Sutton Waltham Forest London

Fig. 10 London boroughs Muslim population and practice

21
London Boroughs Pop. Christians Average weekly C% worshippers in Christian places of worship (%) 34.0% 3.1% 45.3% 4.1% 38.6% 3.5% 54.1% 45.0% 40.2% 54.2% 53.1% 52.8% 40.0% 52.5% 27.1% 53.0% 44.6% 56.0% 41.2% 62.1% 41.5% 60.7% 56.4% 43.7% 53.6% 52.9% 37.3% 65.6% 49.2% 42.0% 52.9% 56.1% 36.8% 55.3% 58.4% 48.4% 48.6% 4.9% 4.0% 3.6% 4.9% 4.8% 4.7% 3.6% 4.7% 2.4% 4.8% 4.0% 5.0% 3.7% 5.6% 3.7% 5.5% 5.1% 3.9% 4.8% 4.8% 3.4% 5.9% 4.4% 3.8% 4.8% 5.0% 3.3% 5.0% 5.3% 4.4% 4.4% Average daily worshippers in Christian places of worship (%) 0.4% 0.6% 0.5% 0.7% 0.6% 0.5% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.5% 0.7% 0.3% 0.7% 0.6% 0.7% 0.5% 0.8% 0.5% 0.8% 0.7% 0.6% 0.7% 0.7% 0.5% 0.8% 0.6% 0.5% 0.7% 0.7% 0.5% 0.7% 0.8% 0.6% 0.6%

Camden City of London Hackney Hammersmith and Fulham Haringey Islington Kensington and Chelsea Lambeth Lewisham Newham Southwark Tower Hamlets Wandsworth Westminster Barking and Dagenham Barnet Bexley Brent Bromley Croydon Ealing Enfield Greenwich Harrow Havering Hillingdon Hounslow Kingston upon Thames Merton Redbridge Richmond upon Thames Sutton Waltham Forest London

220,338 7,375 246,270 182,493 254,926 206,125 158,649 303,086 275,885 307,984 288,283 254,096 306,995 219,396 185,911 356,386 231,997 311,215 309,392 363,378 338,449 312,466 254,557 239,056 237,232 273,936 253,957 160,060 199,693 278,970 186,990 190,146 258,249 8,173,941

74,821 3,344 95,131 98,808 114,659 82,879 86,005 160,944 145,588 123,119 151,462 68,808 162,590 97,877 104,101 146,866 144,093 129,080 187,656 205,022 148,055 167,417 134,632 89,181 155,597 134,813 106,660 84,684 111,993 102,755 103,319 111,086 124,939 3,957,984

Fig.11- London boroughs Christian population and practice

22

London boroughs

Camden City of London Hackney Hammersmith and Fulham Haringey Islington Kensington and Chelsea Lambeth Lewisham Newham Southwark Tower Hamlets Wandsworth Westminster Barking and Dagenham Barnet Bexley Brent Bromley Croydon Ealing Enfield Greenwich Harrow Havering Hillingdon Hounslow Kingston upon Thames Merton Redbridge Richmond upon Thames Sutton Waltham Forest 2021

Average 2,021 weekly Muslim M% C% worshippers in Muslim places of worship (%) 53,286 19.5% 30.3% 14.6% 818 10.0% 43.0% 7.5% 69,454 22.0% 33.9% 16.5% 36,484 72,260 39,042 31,624 43,000 35,518 196,912 49,102 175,392 49,492 80,146 51,040 73,488 11,290 116,072 15,682 59,026 106,396 104,282 34,698 59,762 9,658 58,130 71,332 18,948 32,524 129,998 12,256 15,452 113,082 2,025,646 16.7% 22.1% 15.9% 16.6% 12.4% 11.4% 39.0% 14.6% 40.8% 13.9% 26.8% 21.5% 17.1% 4.6% 27.2% 4.8% 14.0% 23.9% 25.0% 12.0% 20.0% 3.9% 17.5% 21.9% 10.6% 14.0% 31.8% 6.2% 7.5% 30.5% 18.0% 49.2% 39.4% 36.7% 49.3% 49.6% 49.6% 30.3% 48.4% 20.1% 49.0% 37.7% 49.2% 37.4% 60.6% 35.0% 59.2% 52.2% 37.8% 45.9% 49.5% 33.2% 64.3% 44.5% 36.8% 50.0% 51.9% 29.9% 53.5% 56.1% 39.7% 44.0% 12.5% 16.6% 11.9% 12.5% 9.3% 8.6% 29.3% 10.9% 30.6% 10.4% 20.1% 16.2% 12.8% 3.5% 20.4% 3.6% 10.5% 17.9% 18.8% 9.0% 15.0% 2.9% 13.1% 16.4% 7.9% 10.5% 23.8% 4.6% 5.6% 22.8% 13.5%

Average daily worshippers in Muslim places of worship (%) 9.7% 5.0% 11.0% 8.3% 11.0% 8.0% 8.3% 6.2% 5.7% 19.5% 7.3% 20.4% 6.9% 13.4% 10.8% 8.5% 2.3% 13.6% 2.4% 7.0% 12.0% 12.5% 6.0% 10.0% 2.0% 8.8% 11.0% 5.3% 7.0% 15.9% 3.1% 3.8% 15.2% 9.0%

Fig 12- 2021 Muslim population and practice prediction

23
London boroughs Average weekly C% worshippers in Christian places of worship (%) 19.5% 30.3% 2.7% 10.0% 43.0% 3.9% 22.0% 33.9% 3.0% 16.7% 22.1% 15.9% 16.6% 12.4% 11.4% 39.0% 14.6% 40.8% 13.9% 26.8% 21,5% 17.1% 4.6% 27.2% 4.8% 14.0% 23.9% 25.0% 12.0% 20.0% 3.9% 17.5% 21.9% 10.6% 14.0% 31.8% 6.2% 7.5% 30.5% 18.0% 49.2% 39.4% 36.7% 49.3% 49.6% 49.6% 30.3% 48.4% 20.1% 49.0% 37.7% 49.2% 37.4% 60.6% 35.0% 59.2% 52.2% 37.8% 45.9% 49.5% 33.2% 64.3% 44.5% 36.8% 50.0% 51.9% 29.9% 53.5% 56.1% 39.7% 44.0% 4.4% 3.5% 3.3% 4.4% 4.5% 4.5% 2.7% 4.4% 1.8% 4.4% 3.4% 4.4% 3.4% 5.5% 3.1% 5.3% 4.7% 3.4% 4.1% 4.5% 3.0% 5.8% 4.0% 3.3% 4.5% 4.7% 2.7% 4.8% 5.1% 3.6% 4.0% Average daily worshippers in Christian places of worship (%) 0.4% 0.6% 0.4% 0.6% 0.5% 0.5% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.4% 0.6% 0.3% 0.6% 0.5% 0.6% 0.5% 0.8% 0.4% 0.8% 0.7% 0.5% 0.6% 0.6% 0.4% 0.8% 0.6% 0.5% 0.6% 0.7% 0.4% 0.7% 0.7% 0.5% 0.6%

2,021 Christianity M%

Camden City of London Hackney Hammersmith and Fulham Haringey Islington Kensington and Chelsea Lambeth Lewisham Newham Southwark Tower Hamlets Wandsworth Westminster Barking and Dagenham Barnet Bexley Brent Bromley Croydon Ealing Enfield Greenwich Harrow Havering Hillingdon Hounslow Kingston upon Thames Merton Redbridge Richmond upon Thames Sutton Waltham Forest 2021

74,821 3,344 95,131 98,808 114,659 82,879 86,005 160,944 145,588 123,119 151,462 68,808 162,590 97,877 104,101 146,866 144,093 129,080 187,656 205,022 148,055 167,417 134,632 89,181 155,597 134,813 106,660 84,684 111,993 102,755 103,319 111,086 124,939 3,957,984

Fig 13 2021 Christianity population and practice prediction

24
London boroughs Average weekly Pop. Muslim M% worshippers in Muslim places of worship (%) 317,287 106,572 33.6% 25.2% 10,620 1,636 15.4% 11.6% 354,629 138,908 39.2% 29.4% 2,031 262,790 367,093 296,820 228,455 436,444 397,274 443,497 415,128 365,898 442,073 315,930 267,712 513,196 334,076 448,150 445,524 523,264 487,367 449,951 366,562 344,241 341,614 394,468 365,698 230,486 287,558 401,717 269,266 273,810 371,879 11,770,475 72,968 144,520 78,084 63,248 86,000 71,036 221,748 98,204 182,949 98,984 157,965 102,080 146,976 22,580 224,075 31,364 118,052 212,792 208,564 69,396 119,524 19,316 116,260 142,664 37,896 65,048 200,858 24,512 30,904 185,939 3,601,623 27.8% 39.4% 26.3% 27.7% 19.7% 17.9% 50.0% 23.7% 50.0% 22.4% 50.0% 38.1% 28.6% 6.8% 50.0% 7.0% 22.6% 43.7% 46.4% 18.9% 34.7% 5.7% 29.5% 39.0% 16.4% 22.6% 50.0% 9.1% 11.3% 50.0% 30.6% 20.8% 29.5% 19.7% 20.8% 14.8% 13.4% 37.5% 17.7% 37.5% 16.8% 37.5% 28.6% 21.5% 5.1% 37.5% 5.3% 16.9% 32.7% 34.8% 14.2% 26.0% 4.2% 22.1% 29.3% 12.3% 17.0% 37.5% 6.8% 8.5% 37.5% 22.9% Average daily worshippers in Muslim places of worship (%) 16.8% 7.7% 19.6% 13.9% 19.7% 13.2% 13.8% 9.9% 8.9% 25.0% 11.8% 25.0% 11.2% 25.0% 19.1% 14.3% 3.4% 25.0% 3.5% 11.3% 21.8% 23.2% 9.5% 17.4% 2.8% 14.7% 19.5% 8.2% 11.3% 25.0% 4.6% 5.6% 25.0% 15.3%

Camden City of London Hackney Hammersmith and Fulham Haringey Islington Kensington and Chelsea Lambeth Lewisham Newham Southwark Tower Hamlets Wandsworth Westminster Barking and Dagenham Barnet Bexley Brent Bromley Croydon Ealing Enfield Greenwich Harrow Havering Hillingdon Hounslow Kingston upon Thames Merton Redbridge Richmond upon Thames Sutton Waltham Forest 2031

Fig 14 - 2031 Muslim population and practice prediction

25
London boroughs Pop. 2,031 Christian M% C% Average weekly worshippers in Christian places of worship (%) Camden City of London Hackney Hammersmith and Fulham Haringey Islington Kensington and Chelsea Lambeth Lewisham Newham Southwark Tower Hamlets Wandsworth Westminster Barking and Dagenham Barnet Bexley Brent Bromley Croydon Ealing Enfield Greenwich Harrow Havering Hillingdon Hounslow Kingston upon Thames Merton Redbridge Richmond upon Thames Sutton Waltham Forest 2031 317,287 10,620 354,629 262,790 367,093 296,820 228,455 436,444 397,274 443,497 415,128 365,898 442,073 315,930 267,712 513,196 334,076 448,150 445,524 523,264 487,367 449,951 366,562 344,241 341,614 394,468 365,698 230,486 287,558 401,717 269,266 273,810 371,879 11,77047 74,821 3,344 95,131 98,808 114,659 82,879 86,005 160,944 145,588 123,119 151,462 68,808 162,590 97,877 104,101 146,866 144,093 129,080 187,656 205,022 148,055 167,417 134,632 89,181 155,597 134,813 106,660 84,684 111,993 102,755 103,319 111,086 124,939 3957945 33.6% 15.4% 39.2% 27.8% 39.4% 26.3% 27.7% 19.7% 17.9% 50.0% 23.7% 50.0% 22.4% 50.0% 38.1% 28.6% 6.8% 50.0% 7.0% 22.6% 43.7% 46.4% 18.9% 34.7% 5.7% 29.5% 39.0% 16.4% 22.6% 50.0% 9.1% 11.3% 50.0% 30.6% 23.6% 31.5% 26.8% 37.6% 31.2% 27.9% 37.6% 36.9% 36.6% 27.8% 36.5% 18.8% 36.8% 31.0% 38.9% 28.6% 43.1% 28.8% 42.1% 39.2% 30.4% 37.2% 36.7% 25.9% 45.5% 34.2% 29.2% 36.7% 38.9% 25.6% 38.4% 40.6% 33.6% 33.6% 3.5% 4.7% 4.0% 5.6% 4.7% 4.2% 5.6% 5.5% 5.5% 4.2% 5.5% 2.8% 5.5% 4.6% 5.8% 4.3% 6.5% 4.3% 6.3% 5.9% 4.6% 5.6% 5.5% 3.9% 6.8% 5.1% 4.4% 5.5% 5.8% 3.8% 5.8% 6.1% 5.0% 5.0% Average daily worshippers in Christian places of worship (%) 0.5% 0.7% 0.6% 0.8% 0.7% 0.6% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.6% 0.8% 0.4% 0.8% 0.7% 0.8% 0.6% 0.9% 0.6% 0.9% 0.8% 0.7% 0.8% 0.8% 0.6% 1.0% 0.7% 0.6% 0.8% 0.8% 0.5% 0.8% 0.9% 0.7% 0.7%

Fig 15 2031 Christianity population and practice prediction

26 Our gift to the Christians of these Islands, the British Isles is Islam, which we intend to leave in our children and grandchildren. Further to this we will inherit the ethnic minority or silent minority status that they have given us, to them. The very real threat of over a hundred years of war will bear the fruit of Britain. Only megareligiousness, not just inner and outer religiousness can bring this about. When we are allowed to practice and not just practise our religion. I say that knowing that in London, the seat of all British power, religious practice as per weekly attendance of Londons places of worship, daily congregational worship as well as peoples own admissions in the censuses as to their own religious affiliation, has swayed from Christian to Muslim, perhaps 15 years ago. What is described as the outright domination of religious practice is itself a somewhat different matter, as it is not deemed appropriate to define as Muslim, an area where any one of, weekly worship, daily worship or specified affiliation is not under the religion of Islam. The nearest census at this point in time is in fact 2021, as it will be begun to be collated in five years, and so it is of added relevance that outright religious domination belongs to the religion of Islam for 3 of the 33 boroughs. That they have maximum Muslims as opposed to Christians is the difference between them. The philosophy of Outright method What is the philosophy of outright domination? Outright domination is where a part of the Muslim Ummah, a community or nation, is practising the religion of Islam more than practitioners of any other group are practicing their religion. A statistical method of differentiating to some extent a religion having real and practical domination in any population and therefore having the right to rule and govern In this country it is a cold fact that there are more people observing the Islamic religion than Christianity. When we write it up as a percentage sign, we see that the M% is Islam ie. 10% in the general population are Muslim, so Islam is the relative majority. This no doubt reminds us of the Messenger of Islam (SWS) whose name also begins with M Prophet Mohammad (SWS). In the battle of Islam, religion for Allah Alone, versus Christianism, we find jahiliyya (unbelief) represents the strength of Crescent as well C%. I say this because, given the high number of atheists, nones, those who say they have no religion, and the high ethnic diversity of London, the real test of our rule ie Muslim rule over non-Muslims, will be how well we treat others and that includes people of other faiths. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, from where the Blessed Prophet Mohammad (SWS) came from, Iraq from where science came from, Ash Sham from where honourable people came from, Iran from where much of world religion came, Hindustan, from where the father of humanity came, China, the richest country in the world, Egypt, from where much scholarship is done, Turkey, from where many peoples and languages come, Pakistan, from where is the home of Sainthood in Islam, S.E. Asia from where there are many cultures, Mali (Timbuktu) home of spirituality, Azerbaijan, from where scholars of ahadith come and Yemen from where much is learned; all are falling in the Muslim Ummah, in whole or in part. As well as Badakhsha (Afghanistan), Bukhara (Uzbekistan) and Britannia (From where we pray Islamic economics and finance, particularly will be given a world vision). If not by 2031, let it be, may it be, by 2041, or thereabouts.

Allah says in the Qur'an:

27

"O believers, save yourselves and your family from the Hellfire whose fuel is men and stones" Surah e Tahrim, Verse 6

It is He who sent His Messenger with guidance and the religion of truth to manifest it over all religion. And sufficient is Allah as Witness. THQ 48:28 A movement for the Islamic conquest of Britain will seek to answer the question of Muslim political participation as well as rule. Why is it our holiday is not accepted in the public holidays of the public, and yet the matter is not in the public eye? The reason outright domination is twofold is that people do not complain: 1. That Islamic conquest is all-of-a-sudden 2. That the Islamic conquest of UK is relative No, It is a fact! There are scientific, or statistical reasons. So we can make it clear, that over the last 50 years, the incremental 100 and something mosques that have been built are just the beginning. We NEED thousands of more by twenty years time. Otherwise we will pray in the streets! We are going to be millions more Muslims, in London. In 20 years from now, Eid will be (inshallah) observed 4 or 5 times more than xmas or easter on their own. The philosophy of replacement of UK Christianism with Islam comes with the transference of political power from Christianism to Islam (The rise of Islam is helped by the death of Christianity in Britain). What is interesting is that 35-40% is the percentage of UK Muslims who are Pakistani. Surely then UK is itself subject to the philosophy of Pakistaniat. It is itself a little Pakistan. What is this philosophy? It is that, you know when you pick up a musical instrument for the first time and play a wrong note? It reminds us of somehow China or India, or we hope of American music or something? In the enlightened miracle of Pakistan (ie in the future), without the intervention of Pakistani popular music, that off-key chord will remind us of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Wherever they may be in this world. Nay, whoever they may be.

28 Like Mandarin, English, Spanish and Hindi are the most widely spoken languages of the world, Pakistan, India, China and America will, by 2050 (inshallah) the four most populous countries in the world. So, why not? So every drum will beat the rhythm of Pakistan and every instrument will play to its tune....it will grow to being no smaller than America....3.9% of the world. The philosophy of Inteqal (Transference/death/ transmission/ suicide) Inteqal is one means by which English peoples and the English language will be inherited to the Muslim Ummah due to the Muslim Ummahs outright domination of human populations: Death of Diana - Politically, what is relevant is not just the potential ascension to the throne of Muslims, thwarted by the Elizabeth 2, but the political suicide by the English through their debauchery and warmongery. Shame - The Europeans lost their shame a few centuries ago. We now see how they will lose their British Isles. Why? Because in losing their shame they lost all self-respect. Something Muslims value highly. Genocide - Since Christianism is an obsession with genocide and a form of violent extremism (racism) it is of no surprise that suicide is their means of solving their own self-created menace. Catholic terrorism They say terrorism has no religion. Yet I remember clearly it was invented here in the British Isles. In Ireland. The philosophy of the method of outright domination of Islam outlines how between now and some point in the not too distant future, Muslims aim to come to power over Christians in the UK. I have shown convincingly that due to their being more worship (ibadah) in the religion of Islam as compared to Christianism, there is more opportunity for doing worship (ibadah). And because of there being more opportunity for doing worship in the religion of Islam than in Christianism, there are more Muslims in the places of worship in the UK, than Christians, today and for the past 10-15 years, on a daily basis or on a weekly basis. The crucial fact here is simply that if a congregational prayer takes place in a place of worship in London: 1. On any given day there will be more Muslims in Muslim places of worship than Christians in Christian places of worship. 2. In any given week there will be the same above situation and we can assume (given two religious holidays each) the same for any given religious holiday. 3. More Muslims will be recorded in the next census after the coming one, than Christians. Admittedly, situation 3 is one which is still not an absolute majority and so the Monarchy and the legal institutions remain in the hands of the enemy. Nonetheless it has been situation 1 for over a decade now, and situation 2 has recently come true.

29 2050 Rank 1 India 2 China 3 United States of America 4 Pakistan 5 Indonesia 6 Nigeria 7 Brazil 8 Bangladesh 9 Ethiopia 10 Dem. Republic of the Congo 11 Mexico 12 Philippines 13 Viet Nam 14 Russian Federation 15 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 16 Egypt 17 Japan 18 Turkey 19 United Rep. of Tanzania 20 Thailand World total Country Population (in 1,000) 1,528,853 1,477,730 349,318 345,484 311,857 244,311 244,230 212,495 169,446 160,360 146,645 130,893 126,793 121,256 114,947 114,844 104,921 100,664 80,584 74,188 8,909,095 Percentage of world total 17.2% 16.6% 3.9% 3.9% 3.5% 2.7% 2.7% 2.4% 1.9% 1.8% 1.6% 1.5% 1.4% 1.4% 1.3% 1.3% 1.2% 1.1% 0.9% 0.8% 100.0%

Fig. 16: Source: United Nations Population Division, World Population Prospects: The 1998 Revision

30 Most Widely Spoken Languages (from http://www.thelanguageartist.com/category/legal/) Language is somehow the most important tool in the communication and interaction of people with each other in their everyday lives. It is believed that there are approximately 6,912 languages spoken all around the world which are usually used by almost 7 billion people. But out of that large number, only 4 billion uses the following as the most widely spoken languages: Mandarin (Chinese) It is no secret that China has the largest population all around the globe. And of all the many Chinese languages, Mandarin is the largest and most widely spoken language based on its number of speakers. It is usually used by people not just in Peoples Republic of China but also in Singapore, Taiwan, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand and many others. English Although English is the official and universal language nowadays, it is considered as second to Mandarin as the most widely spoken language since it only has approximately 600 million speakers all around the world. Countries which use the language include United States of America, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Africa and many other countries. It is in fact the most used language by people worldwide as the means of communication among other nations. Spanish With an approximately 400 million speakers worldwide, Spanish is ranked to be the third to the most widely spoken language in the world. Countries which use this language include Mexico, Spain, Cuba, Venezuela and others. Hindi-Urdu Hindi and Urdu have almost the same framework when talking about the each others background. In some countries such as that in Pakistan, where the national language used is Urdu, an approximately 160 million of its population are Urdu speakers. While in India, where the dialect is Hindi, the speakers can be calculated to about 340 million. Aside from those mentioned two distinctive countries, there are also some sections of Europe as well as in North America that speak these two languages that brought those as to the top most widely spoken languages in the whole world.
Fig 17: Major languages of the world

What we now await is a situation 4: 4. More Muslims than Non-Muslims in the UK seat of power (London). We expect this to happen by the next census afterwards (ie 2051). The end of genocide

31

Is one whose heart Allah has opened to Islam, so that he has received Enlightenment from Allah, (no better than one hard-hearted)? Woe to those whose hearts are hardened against celebrating the praises of Allah. they are manifestly wandering (in error)! The Holy Quran 39:22 Unfortunately the wicked Christians of these Islands have been falsely claiming that they are children of Abraham, when a cursory look at the Bible reveals Abraham came from Iraq originally so his progeny are the Iraqis. The progeny of his childrens were settled in Palestine, so their children were Palestinians. On what grounds do these unholy warmongers, America, Britain and Israel lay claim to Abraham (PBUH) as their father we might ask? That they, instead of honouring the poor of the respected countries, talk of war instead of peaceful or Islamic reasons for their and anyone elses honour. This has got to stop! Given their megamurder, megarape, megacrippling, megafamine and megadrought, we can see: 1. The Murder of Christ is the cause of their vengeful evil. 2. Genocide has become through this the only legitimisation they seek to obtain. Every other country has suffered millions dying due to the actions of Christianism and its evil: 1. Polluted water or energy shortages (eg. Pakistan) 2. Inadequate food (eg. Somalia) 3. Spasticism (eg. Iraq) 4. Genocidal rape (eg. Bosnia- Herzogovinia) 5. Direct military combat (eg. Afghanistan) In fact when we look at how the world has suffered in the modern world it is due largely to the menace of Judeo-Christianism and its need for committing genocide. Our response is to put right the wrong directly. If we can control the British Kingdom. And by thatI mean if we can infiltrate the institution of royalty and the other legal institutions, there will be no dire need for the acceptance of the spread of the Islamic faith.

32 By the British Kingdom I mean all of the UK and its dominion. And you could say the new commonwealth. If the people are saying out with the Bible in with the Holy Quran then the Monarchy and the other legal institutions MUST be changed in time. Judeo- Christianity is part of history, a legacy, it is of no use. Let us be merciful and not vengeful by committing genocide the way they do. Let us allow UKs Christians to commit p olitical suicide in front of our very eyes on our British Isles. Our by virtue of our being the conquering generation. Allah ta Ala tells us in the Holy Quran:

The Holy Quran Surah Ar Rad Verse 28 "Those who believe, and whose hearts find satisfaction in the remembrance of Allah. for without doubt in the remembrance of Allah do hearts find satisfaction.

Fig.18: London conquered by Islam

33 Inteqaliat (transference or transition) of Uk power from Christian to Muslim hands Given that a Muslims life and property are a sacred trust in every other Muslims hands, Christians are wrongfully assuming the right of life over the Muslim Jesus. For this reason they are all committing a major sin and are like murderers or far worse. For this reason, we as Muslims must: 1. Take the power they have back for ourselves 2. Fight them and their forces with our full effort 3. Realise that a rush and a push and the land that we stand on is ours. Once we are just and mujahideen in the cause of Allah Almighty, we need to adopt a certain effort to have a strategy or policy, whereby we accept that regarding the UK and the British throne, we are nearly there, and regarding political power in the houses of parliament and the houses of Lords, we are getting there. Perhaps the earliest and most crucial sign of Muslims conquering Britain were Britains loss of The European wars of 1914 and 1939, to foreign majorly Islamic forces. This has been a precursor to the loss of the Islands to outright Muslim domination.

34

4 Religious affiliation
Islam in the UK
Muslims 0-4 7,399 10,063 10,342 507 3,702 6,340 3,434 3,982 2,734 24 1,940 3,327 2,028 1,314 2,633 2,108 2,774 2,797 3,937 549 6,636 765 3,243 6,115 5,911 2,182 3,451 3,651 4,095 900 1,596 607 835 111,921 Christians 0-4 5,848 3,134 8,391 6,674 8,284 7,944 6,274 8,908 3,673 79 6,286 7,023 3,975 4,781 10,432 10,230 10,081 10,915 4,643 7,244 8,064 9,673 13,267 9,361 10,754 9,805 4,890 7,232 6,811 5,039 7,352 7,190 5,922 240,179 Total 04 21,666 18,750 25,384 13,661 18,676 20,839 19,149 26,239 13,168 236 11,900 18,112 12,289 9,189 20,701 22,004 20,739 21,670 12,617 15,182 22,446 20,095 27,972 25,426 24,513 20,945 15,916 19,704 19,725 10,964 14,830 14,038 12,750 591,495

Redbridge Tower Hamlets Newham Havering Barking and Dagenham Waltham Forest Hackney Barnet Camden City of London H&F Haringey Islington K&C Lambeth Lewisham Southwark Wandsworth Westminster Bexley Brent Bromley Croydon Ealing Enfield Greenwich Harrow Hillingdon Hounslow K-U-T Merton R-U-T Sutton London
Fig. 19: London IslamSource: nomis 2013

Total 278,970 254,096 307,984 237,232 185,911 258,249 246,270 356,386 220,338 7,375 182,493 254,926 206,125 158,649 303,086 275,885 288,283 306,995 219,396 231,997 311,215 309,392 363,378 338,449 312,466 254,557 239,056 273,936 253,957 160,060 199,693 186,990 190,146 1,768,712

M% 0-4 34% 54% 41% 4% 20% 30% 18% 15% 21% 10% 16% 18% 17% 14% 13% 10% 13% 13% 31% 4% 30% 4% 12% 24% 24% 10% 22% 19% 21% 8% 11% 4% 7% 19%

C% 0-4 27% 17% 33% 49% 44% 38% 33% 34% 28% 33% 53% 39% 32% 52% 50% 46% 49% 50% 37% 48% 36% 48% 47% 37% 44% 47% 31% 37% 35% 46% 50% 51% 46% 41%

0-4% 8% 7% 8% 6% 10% 8% 8% 7% 6% 3% 7% 7% 6% 6% 7% 8% 7% 7% 6% 7% 7% 6% 8% 8% 8% 8% 7% 7% 8% 7% 7% 8% 7% 33%

M% 3% 4% 3% 0% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 0% 2% 0% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 0% 0% 6%

C% 2% 1% 3% 3% 4% 3% 3% 2% 2% 1% 3% 3% 2% 3% 3% 4% 3% 4% 2% 3% 3% 3% 4% 3% 3% 4% 2% 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 3% 14%

Denotes more Muslim children than non-Muslim

35 This table shows how many East London boroughs have more Muslim children, and we can infer more Muslim births than Christian, for example. However as around 19% at that age are Muslim, compared to around 15% overall, there is a higher ratio of Muslim to Non-Muslim than if we measure the overall population. Here, we can see if 6 boroughs have for the last 4 years had more births to Christian families, only one has had more to Muslim families. Nevertheless the greatest religious majority in any single London borough is in Tower Hamlets, a Muslim majority. This evidence from local area authorities suggest to me that my child and other Muslim children attending schools in the area are by no means a minority or an exception to the rule. The table gives us a sample of the children who begin school in the various boroughs of London as Muslim or Christian. It also tells us of the last four years births, are they to, more Christians or Muslim families, approximately. Perhaps it is better to compare the Muslim faith with non-Muslim religions collectively. Noting the fact of Islams populations surge by 2% (from census records) and other religions fall in numbers, we can gauge the matter has historical implications for the Islamic liberation of the United Kingdom. Indeed the question is not one of percentages Muslim or Christian but one of the countries of the UK, also the home countries of the UK, Muslim or Christian? We look at the above data for a historical answer, sociologically (due to the dominance of Islam in the world), biologically (due to the demise of non-Muslims), but the answer is history. If the view of anthropology is taken that the crucial difference is one of culture of the people, then surely it is not the name Jack, that is most popular and most chosen but the name Muhammad.Indeed, it is not the union jack Sir, but the Unity of Divinity taught by the last Messenger of Allah ta Ala, Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), which is the guiding light for the religion of this country, this land, for 10-15 years now. For my generation, for this generation. For generations to come, Inshallah azawajal.

36

5 20, 40 (A philosophy for the future)

Muslim majority rule in the UK We are living and breathing in the 2010's. The next decade is the 2020's, then the 2030's. According to my calculations for London and England (which already practice Islam, although more profess Christianism outwardly) the UK will be, by the 2040's majorly or majority Muslim. London, Birmingham, Luton, Leicester, Bradford and such like already have more Muslims than Christians as per religion. Soon, Manchester, Liverpool, Edinburgh, Cardiff, Dublin and Belfast and so on too will have in a couple of decades time. This is due largely to the so-called "nonreplacement" of British and European families and Muslim families contrasting (much higher) family sizes. So where are our political parties? Why are there anti-Muslim parties in parliament? Where our hundreds of members of the houses of parliament? Where is our representation in the media? Our Muslim English newspapers? What will, no doubt start in 2040, when tens of millions will begin to try and institute our rules in these islands is beginning to crystallise as a vision in the minds of our children. The present respected Muslim peoples, the silent majority, in the parameters of religious action, of 3-4 million will soon grow to 10 million. If, by 2040, it should double we will be able to rule the violent minority, christians being technically the minority as per religious practice. Replacement theory -Biological and religious Replacement theory tells us that the Muslim peoples of the UK must, due to the biological self-replacement of lineages (ie the sociological effect of reproduction and higher fertility rates) as well as the religious desires of the Muttaqun (the pious) to eliminate cultural Islam and create a pure Islamic culture, succeed, in defeating: The so-called "British" empire So-called "American" exceptionalism "White supremacy" Racist Christianism Colonial and neo-colonial oppression If we are to defeat the motif of Islamophobia, rooted as it is in the drive to war against every Muslim country over the past 100 years, we, as residents of these Islands we should realise not just that our past, present and future depends on our Islamic identity but that our children, who are named, more than any other name, Mohammad, the name of the Prophet of Allah (SWS) and of the religion of Al Islam, are growing up witnessing these same atrocities carried out or supported by us in the name of, basically our own ignorance. The indigenity of the respected Muslim peoples of the general population of the UK Generally, followers of religion in the major cities of UK (if a sample is drawn from the

37 general public of, for example London) are Muslim. As a complementary point, worshippers or religious worshippers in UK countries are generally Muslim, that is the indigenous religion in England is Al Islam. 2040 Future religion The principle of 20/40% A population of only 10% of a nation can double and redouble upon which it would nearly succeed in becoming a majority . The philosophy of 20/40 (Absolute majority) Countries are either Dar al Islam or not. If 20 of 40 people are Muslim it rules out there being any other religion which should rule. The rule of Islam by 2040 By 2040 many countries with at present 20 % of our population being Muslim will face their majority turning into a Muslim majority in the country eg UK, France, Germany, Israel, Spain, India. 40% may represent a relative majority only, but assuming other ethnicities constitute 20% it is an unsurpassable majority, so the countries are Dar al Islam by virtue of not not being so. These and other similar countries will find by 2040 they will be, unless they can match Muslim fertility rates, be ruled by Muslims. 20 to 40 million Muslims in the lands Some commentators estimate the true Muslim population of the UK to be 10 million at the present, it would then have to only double to become 20 million. Then should it double muslims will outnumber everyone else. 20 if not 40% Outright 2 is where all three criteria for religion are met and outright 1 is where only the official definition is fulfilled. By these definitions, 1 and 2, only Tower Hamlets in 2011, Tower Hamlets, Redbridge and Newham in 2021 (inshallah), and around half of the London boroughs by 2031 (13 of 33) inshallah, have outright definition. And that is in the Islamic faith. We therefore demand better representation for Muslims in the houses of parliament, more honorific titles bestowed upon us as nobility, as well as legislation to be passed by the Queen of England, legalising our right to ascension to the throne. What this proves is that the Uk countries are not non- Muslim countries in the sense of being Christian countries, but rather (given a minority of people are Christian), they are yet to be Muslim majority countries (albeit in non-Muslim lands).

38 20, 40 teaches us that if in London Muslim births are some 20% of all births, and Christians are only 40something % in the land anyways, Islam has the upper hand biologically.