14

ELECTRI C MACHINES AND CONTROL

2010 8

Vol. 14 No. 8
Aug 2010

PWM
1
2
2
2

1 110004 2 110004

PWM

MATLAB PWM

PWM
TM 85

1007 449X 2010 08 0052 06

Predictive direct power control strategy based on fuzzy

logic for voltage source PWM rectifier
XU Bin1 YANG Dan2 WANG Xu2 WANG Qiu-Shi2
1 Computing CenterNortheastern UniversityShenyang 110004China
2 School of Information Science and EngineeringNortheastern UniversityShenyang 110004China

Abstract Based on instantaneous power theory and the mathematical model of the rectifier in two-phase
stationary coordinatea novel instantaneous power prediction method is proposedand a direct power
control strategy is improved by using fuzzy logic The strategy has a better dynamic performance and faster
response time At the same timea PWM rectifier simulation model based on MATLAB is established
and an experimental prototype is developed The simulation and experimental results verify the feasibility
and effectiveness of the proposed method
Key words power electronics PWM rectifier direct power control predictive control fuzzy logic

PWM

1 5

PWM

PWM

PWM Voltage source rectifierVSR

PWM Current source rectifierCSR

2010 01 20
863 2006AA04Z183

1980
1979
1956

1984 PWM

PWM

PWM PWM

u ru u rv u rw

T1
usa
usb

PWM Direct power

controlDPC

usc

Virtual flux
based direct power controlVF-DPC

8 VF-DPC
9 11
Output regulation subspaces direct power controlORS-DPC

12

13 15
Space vector pulse width modulation
SVPWM

VO-DPC
VO-DPC

PWM

PWM
1 6 T1 T6
u su u sv u sw
i u i v i w L R

C
u dc i L
u no PWM
uvw o

iu

iv

iw

T3

T5

u
udc

RL

w
T2

T4

T6
n

5
Voltage oriented direct power controlVODPC 6

iL

2
3
1983 Akagi
Kanazawa Nabae

Tokuo Ohnishi4

PWM

53

1
Fig 1

PWM

Power circuit of three-phase voltage PWM rectifier

S x
1 u xn = u dc
Sx =
x = uvw
0 u xn = 0

S x
S x = 1
S x = 0

di u
L
+ Ri u = u su u dc S u + u no

dt

di v
L
+ Ri v = u sv u dc S v + u no
dt

di w

L
+ Ri w = u sw u dc S w + u no

dt

du dc
C
= i dc i L = i u S u + i v S v + i w S w i L 3
dt

i u + i v + i w = 0

u su + u sv + u sw = 0

abc

C32
1

C32 = K
0

1
2

3
2

1
2

K = 2 /3
K = 2 / 3

5 PWM

54
di R
dt L

di =
dt 0

du dc S
dt C

S
C

1
L

S
L i

S
i +
L
u
dc
0

1
L

14
1
2
3
0

[i ] =
i

[u ]
u s

1
2
3
2

[i

][ ]

1
2

iu

i v
3 i
2 w

i p

i q

0
u s

0 u s

i
1 L

C

6 PWM

2 PWM

e p e q
S p S q S p S q
S p S q
n

2 PWM

usa
O

usb
usc

uu
uv

RL

usa

uw

iu

iv

Su
Sv
Sw

p
q

*
dc

n Sp

+-

usb
usc

uu

p*

iv
Su
Sv
Sw

q*=0

di
di
di
p = L u i u + v i v + w i w + U dc S u i u + S v i v + S w i w
dt
dt
dt

di u
di w
q = 3L
iw
iu

dt
dt

1
U dcS u i v i w + S v i w i u + S w i u i v

7
8
u s u s
n

Udc*

n Sp

p
q

2 PWM
Fig 2 VO-DPC configuration of three-phase PWM rectifier

Udc

Su%%%Sv%%%Sw

RL

uw

Sq

uv

iu

PI

-+
-+

Udc

Su%%%Sv%%%Sw

+-

PI

Sq
-+

p*

q*=0

-+

Fig 3 Proposed fuzzy logic predictive DPC of PWM recitifer

3. 1

pq

u s
u s
p
=
q
u s u s

[] [

] [ i ]
i

D=

[u

u s

u s

u s

T s

 PWM

u s k + 1 = u s k

10

PWM

di
i
u s
S
dt
L
U dc
R

=
u s
S
i
di
dt

[ ] [ ] []

12

R
12

[ i k + 1 i k ] { [ u k ]
i k + 1 i k

u s k

Ts
L

U dc

[ S k ] }
S k

13
13 11

[ q k + 1 q k ]
p k + 1 p k

{[
[ ]}
Ts
D k
L

u k
u k

[ u

u ] T = U dc [ S

u s k
u s k

18

k
k

3. 2

4 U dc
*

U dc PI
*
p
e p k k e p k
*
q = 0
e q k k

e q k e p k e q k

G p G q
5
e p k e q k N Z P

14

S ] T

[ q k + 1 ] = [ q k + 1 ]

e
p k

Gp

e
q k

p * k + 1

p k + 1

u s k

i k + 1 i k
p k + 1 p k
= D k
11
q k + 1 q k
i k + 1 i k

[ u k ] [ u k ] T uL
p k + e k
D k [
]
e k
u k

u s k + 1 = u s k

55

Gq

15

Sa
Sb
Sc

15 14

[ ] [
u k
u k

u s k
u s k

T s u s 2

Fig 4

[ q k + 1 q k ]

Diagram of the proposed fuzzy logic controller

N

-1

D k

p k + 1 p k
*

16

PWM
*
*
q 0 p
PI
*
p
q * k + 1 = q * k

p * k + 1 = 2p * k p * k 1

17

17 16 k
e p k e q k
16

5
Fig 5

3. 3

Membership function for input variables

6
000 111 V0 V7 V0 000
V7 111

56

12 1 12
V
2 110

12

7
Fig 7

8
6
4
2

10

11

Fig 8
12

101 100 100 110 110 010 010 011 011 001 001 101

100 100 110 110 010 010 011 011 001 001 101 101

100 110 110 010 010 011 011 001 001 101 101 100

101 100 100 110 110 010 010 011 011 001 001 101

111 000 111 000 111 000 111 000 111 000 111 000

100 110 110 010 010 011 011 001 001 101 101 100

001 101 101 100 100 110 110 010 010 011 011 001

111 000 111 000 111 000 111 000 111 000 111 000

Harmonics analysis of source current

650
PWM

600
550

500
450
0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

t/s

L = 3 mHR = 0. 1 C = 4700 FRL = 32

T s = 0. 2 ms

1 kHz THD 3. 53%

IEC 8

PWM

MATLAB / simulink

1 8
3

20

20 ms
100 0. 3 s

15

9
0. 15 s 32 16

110 010 010 011 011 001 001 101 101 100 100 110

10

Simulation waveforms of source voltage and current

0
0

Fuzzy rule switching selection table

3

0.15

10

U/V

0.10
t/s

e p k e q k n
1

-0.5
-1.5
0.05

V
6 101

0
-1.0

11

S u S v S w

e p e q

0.5

Space vector for grid source voltage

Table 1

1.0

I pu

Fig 6

1.5

14

50 Hz
THD = 3. 53%

2 V
1 100

V
5 001

7
V
4 011

10

Upu

V
3 010
5
6

9
Fig 9

DC-bus voltage under dynamic simulation

PWM
100 A IGBT BSM100GB 170DLC
L = 5 mHR = 5 C = 4700 F f s = 2 kHz
T s = 0. 5 ms TI
TMS320F2812 DSP

 PWM

57

10 A
10 a VODPC
10 b

PWM

VODPC

PWM
PWM

220 V

PWM

R L = 120
7. 8 A 0 89THD

PWM
PI

10. 2%

THD 5. 4%
7. 4 A
0 98

U100V/ I/5A/
U200V/ I/10A/

1 PWM
J 200828 21 20 25

WANG JiuheHUANG LipeiYANG Xiuyuan Power control of

three-phase boost-type PWM rectifier based on passivity J Proceedings of the CSEE200828 21 20 25
2 GREEN A WBOYS J T Hysteresis current-forced three-phase
voltage-sourced reversible rectifierJ Electric Power Applica-

a VODPC

tionsIEE Proceedings B1989136 3 113 120

3 PWM

J 200323
11 89 93
WANG YingZHANG ChunjiangCHEN Huiming A new phase
and amplitude control strategy and mathmatics model of three-

phase voltage rectifierJ Proceedings of the CSEE200323

11 89 93

t10ms/
b

VODPC DPC
Fig 10

t5ms/

10

Comparison result of two rectifiers

11
650 V 90
30 11

50 ms 100

4 OHNISHI T Three phase PWM converter / inverter by means of instantaneous active and reactive power controlC Proceedings
IECON'91 Kobe IEEE1991 819 824
5 PWM D
2006
6 MARIUSZ M Sensorless Control Strategies for Three-Phase PWM
Rectifiers D Warsaw Warsaw University of Technology2001
7 PWM
J 200438 12 86 89
HE ZhiyuanWEI Wei Study on direct power control of PWM
rectifier based on virtual flux J Journal of Zhejiang University
Engineering Science200438 12 86 89
8 HADIAN A S R PWM

200V/

J 200727 25 78
84
HADIAN A S RXU DianguoLANG Yongqiang A new direct
power control for PWM rectifier J Proceedings of the CSEE
200727 25 78 84
9 CARRASCO J MGALVAN EESCOBAR Get al Direct active
and reactive power control DPQ for a three phase synchronous

t100ms/

11
Fig 11

DC bus voltage under sudden load change

rectifierC2000 IEEE 31st Annual Power Electronics Specialists

Conference Galway IEEE2000 737 742

62

62

14

6 TADMOR G Dissipative designlossless dynamicsand the non-

linear TORA benchmark example J IEEE Transactions on Con-

trol Systems Technology20019 2 391 398

J 200610 5 541 546

JIANG Z PKANELLAKOPOULOS I Global output feedback

GAO BingtuanCHEN HongjunZHANG Xiaohua Nonlinear

tracking for a benchmark nonlinear system J IEEE Transactions

control design of underactuated mechanical systems a survey J

on Automatic Control200045 5 1023 1027

Electrical Machines and Control200610 5 541 546

8 HUNG L CLIN H PCHUNG H Y Design of self-tuning fuzzy

sliding mode control for TORA system J Expert Systems with

2 ROBERT T BDENNIS S BVINCENT T C A benchmark prob-

Applications200732 1 201 212

lem for nonlinear control design J International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control19988 4 307 310

9 AVIS J MNERSESOV S GNATHAN R Decentralized energy-

3 PANAGIOTIS TMARTIN CMARIO A R An L2 disturbance

based hybrid control for the multi-TORA system C//2009 Ameri-

attenuation solution to the nonlinear benchmark problem J In-

can Control Conference New York IEEE Press2009 895

ternational Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control19988 4

900

311 330

10 BURG TDAWSON D Additional notes on the TORA example

a filtering approach to eliminate velocity measurements J

4 ROBERT T BDENNIS S BVINCENT T C Experimental im-

IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol1997 5 5 520 523

plementation of integrator backstepping and passive nonlinear controllers on the TORA testbed J International Journal of Robust

11 NAZRULLA SKHALIL H K A novel nonlinear output feedback control applied to the TORA benchmark system C// IEEE

and Nonlinear Control19988 5 435 457

Conference on Decision and Control New York IEEE Press

5 JANKOVIC MFONTANIE DKOKOTOVIC P V TORA exam-

2008 3565 3570

ple cascade-and passivity-based control designs J IEEE

Transactions on Control Systems Technology19964 3 292

297

57
10 ESCOBAR GSTANKOVIC A MCARRASCO J Met al A-

13

MALINOWSHKI MJASINSKI MKAZMIERKOWSHI M P

nalysis and design of direct power control DPC for a three

Simple direct power control of three-phase PWM rectifier using

phase synchronous rectifier via output regulation subspacesJ

space-vector modulation DPC-SVM J IEEE Trans on In-

IEEE Trans on Power Electronics200318 3 823 830

dustrial Electronics200451 2 447 454

11 VAZQUEZ SLEON J ISANCHEZ J Aet al Optimized di-

14 RESTREPO JALLER J MVIOLA Jet al A simplified recti-

rect power control strategy using output regulation subspaces and

fier voltage vector selection for direct power control C7th In-

pulse width modulationC32nd Annual Conference on IEEE

ternational Caribbean Conference on DevicesCircuits and Sys-

Industrial Electronics Paris IEEE2006 1896 1901

12 PWM

tems Cancun IEEE2008 1 5

15 RESTREPO J AALLER J MVIOLA J Cet al Optimum

J 200525 16 47 52

space vector computation technique for direct power control J

WANG JiuheLI Huade A new direct power control strategy of

IEEE Trans on Power Electronics200924 6 1637 1645

three phase boost type PWM rectifiersJ Proceedings of the

CSEE200525 16 47 52