ELLER DATA REQUIREMENT LIST

1.

SDRL NO:

2.

SDRL TITLE:

LCS-SR-0060B

3.
REFERENCE(S):
Procedure

EQUIPMENT RELIABILITY INFORMATION

IEC-812: Analysis Techniques for System Reliability,
for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
MIL-STD-1629: Procedures for Performing a Failure
Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA)

4.

FREQUENCY:

AS REQUIRED

5.

1ST SUBMITTAL:

90 DAPO

6.

SUB SUBMITTALS:

30 Days after Design Change

7.

DISTRIBUTION TOTAL: 1 copy, electronic

8.

REMARKS & PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

8.1 The Seller shall provide the Buyer the data identified in Table RI-1. However, the
requirements of this DID may be satisfied by updating or revising a previously
generated FMECA or FMEA Report for a similar equipment, providing the
information identified in the Table is provided.
8.2 The data shall be submitted electronically, Microsoft 2000 preferred.
8.3 The Seller shall provide the Buyer the reliability data, identified in Table RI-1, for
the equipment being procured by the Buyer. The data shall be submitted for
the item being provided, and for each of the items repairable
components/subassemblies.
8.4 References cited are for guidance.
Table RI-1: Equipment Reliability Information
DATA
DESCRIPTION
Item Nomenclature
Name/ nomenclature for the equipment or component
Item Reference Number Part number for the equipment or component
Item Function(s)
Identify the function(s) the item is designed to
perform/provide (example: Function 1: Provide 120V, 60
Hz power)
Functional Failure(s)/
Identify the probable failures associated with each
Failure Mode(s)
function (example: Failures: 1.1 Loss of 120V, 60Hz
power
1.2 Power out of phase)
Cause
Identify what could specifically cause the identified

LCS-SR-0060B

Page 1 of 3

Failure Effects
Compensating
Provisions
Failure Detection
Failure Probability

Criticality Level

8.5

Failure(s) (example: Failure Causes: 1.1 Transformer

failed
1.2 Diode failure)
For each Failure Mode, identify the local effect (i.e. the
effect at the items level) and the effect(s) at the next
higher level
For each Failure Mode, identify any design provisions,
such as redundancy, operator actions, or other provisions
that would mitigate/eliminate the effect of the failure.
Identify how the failure would be detected (example:
thermocouple, visual indicator, hidden failure, etc.)
Identify the probability that the failure mode could occur
within the first 5 years of equipment operation. Use one
of the following classifications:
Probability
Classification to Use
Very Low (approximately 0%)
VL
Low (less than 10%)
L
Medium (between 10% and
M
90%)
High (greater than 90%)
H
Identify the probable Criticality of the failure(s) as they
relate to equipment function and/or personnel safety.
Use the following classifications:
Criticality
Classification to Use
Minor or no effect on items
I
functional performance or on
environment; no injury to
personnel
Degradation of functional
II
performance
Possible loss of item function;
III
significant damage to
equipment or environment;
hazard to personnel
Possible loss of life; loss of ship
IV
or significant damage to
environment

Along with the reliability data, the Seller shall provide, as applicable:
Any assumptions made in the analyses
Identification of any single point failures and/or common mode failures, if
applicable, and Sellers recommendations regarding them
Identification of the failures/failure modes that could cause personnel
injury or death, or severe damage to the ship

LCS-SR-0060B

Page 2 of 3

REVISION DOCUMENTATION
REV

CHANGES
Changed Vendor to Seller through out SDRL

Date
3/22/05

Added Compensating Provisions requirements

LCS-SR-0060B

Page 3 of 3

11/18/05