Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Some of the large Institutional Investors taking the plunge to in-source Asset Management (partly or fully) in the last six months included: CalPERS approx. $1bn AMP, Australia's largest retail and corporate superannuation provider, brought back ~$6bn of their fixedincome assets in-house to AMP Capital AustralianSuper brought close to $3bn of equity investments in-house The State of Wisconsin Investment Board is moving $3.9bn of externally managed international equity assets in-house
Why is this trend critical? In-sourcing of Asset Management is not new but the rate at which it is increasing has never been higher and the value of Assets brought in-house has never been so massive. Institutional Investors realization of cost adjusted returns heightened when they saw their portfolios dwindle in the wake of the financial markets collapse in 2008. Also, Institutional Investors today know that fund management is largely a fixed-cost business while their current fees structure rises even when costs do not. Case in point -- The Teachers Retirement System (TRS) of Illinois paid more than $1.3 billion for money managers and brokerage firms to handle its $30 billion-plus in financial assets during a 10-year period ending in fiscal 2010. Despite this high fee - TRS 10-year average rate of return during this span was ~ 3.7 percent excluding fees, far below its 8.5 percent annual target return (Source: http://news.heartland.org/newspaperarticle/2012/04/20/big-fees-small-returns-illinois-teachers-retirement-system). Part of this dismal performance is attributed to the market crash of 2008 even though the portfolio recovered in 2010 and 2011. Another example - Australian superannuation fund, AustralianSuper, brought $3 Bn in-house (http://investmentmagazine.com.au/2012/09/australiansuper-brings-it-in-house/). Its head of investment operations stated in September 2012 that the fund spent about $200 million a year in external investment-management costs and predicts that if this was to continue they will end up paying about $500 million a year in a few years. AustralianSuper plans to cut their projected costs by about two-thirds by managing internally. Bottom-line Economics is in force. The differential between the external asset management fees vs. the cost of managing it in-house is driving the latest structural shift. Control over investments as well as governance around the investment management process are also key factors. In part II and III of the series I will cover topics in a 'New Normal' Asset Management industry, including: Factors that the Institutional Investors need to take in to account for the decision to in-source. Which asset classes are most optimal for in-house Asset Management? How to leverage the recent developments in global shared services models (not only for middle office / back office but for Investment Research, Investment decision support and monitoring) to succeed in your in-sourcing strategy.
CLO Newsletter
Comments Great information and analysis. Institutional investors are becoming smarter about the cost of Money Management and the next 5 years will change the economics completely. Writing is on the wall - the share of profits must be fairly distributed between the players over a longer term. It's a matter of next 4-5 years and every large pension fund and Sov. fund will copy the business model, especially with the right support partners / providers in the entire value chain from Custodian, Fund Accounting, Trade settlements, Reporting to Research, etc. Posted @ Wednesday, October 24, 2012 4:57 PM by Anthony Goldman