Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kay Kim,
Plaintiff, )
)
v. )
) Cause No. 1:09-cv-0829-DFH-JMS
George F. Parker, M.D., IU Psychiatrist & )
as an Officer capacity power given by the State,)
Special Judge Judith S. Proffitt, )
Indiana University, employer of Dr. G. F. Parker,)
Defendants. )
1 I am Charles Chuang and sworn under the penalty of perjury the affidavit below.
2 I have lived with Kay Kim since 1996. Kay Kim has lost her knee many years ago. She is
handicapped and need a walking stick or wheel chair to move around. She has never been
violent or convicted of any criminal offence. I understand her very well and am
3 There are more than 200 families living in my condominium community. We have been
staying there for more than 10 years and apart from the few neighbors who are against
her the other people do not have any problems with her.
4 In 2000 she was alleged to have threatened Chris Meloy over the phone. While in
custody the Honorable Judge Baker ordered a psychiatric observation to be done. The
5 In 2005 the Police arrested her for trespassing on her common property. She was sent to
the psychiatric ward for observation. All the psychiatric reports state that she is normal
and does not exhibit any signs of insanity. She filed a federal lawsuit against the accusers
Page 1 of 7
FED2 AFFIDAVIT of Charles Chuang 02 iSupp ofPlantiff MotForFOJ & DenyDefMOTtoDISMISSoDismiss 09SEP2009-
Fnl1
and police but the civil suit was dismissed even the criminal case of interest is still
6 In 2006 she was arrested and charged with trespassing in the Marion County and City
Building. A few days before the arrest Kay and I were thrown out of the city and county
building while she was filing court papers in the Indiana Superior Civil Court. In the
initial pretrial hearing the Honorable Judge wasbelittling her for representing herself. He
claimed that she does not know the rules and procedures of the court. She then requested
for a change of Judge. The Honorable Judge claimed that she is crazy and choose not to
randomly assign a new Judge for her. Instead he illegally assigned her case to Judge
7 In 2007 the Police arrested her again for trespassing on her common property but
subsequently changed the charges to disorderly conduct. She was sent to the psychiatric
ward for observation and blood and urine test for substance abuse. The hospital report
states that she is normal and tested negative for substance abuse.
8 In spite of the numerous previous immediate detention and jail’s psychologists and
psychiatrists reports on record and her ability to conduct her defense in courtJudge
Collins ordered Dr. Parker and Dr. Olive to advice if she can represent herself. Dr. Parker
concluded with medical certainty that she is able to understand and represent herself.
Judge Collins relieved herself and assigned a new Judge to her cases.
9 The new Judge asked her to be evaluated by Dr. Parker the second time. Judge Collins
discussed her case with Dr. Parker while he was in court on other unrelated business. On
the second evaluation Dr. Parker changed his evaluation and concluded with medical
Page 2 of 7
FED2 AFFIDAVIT of Charles Chuang 02 iSupp ofPlantiff MotForFOJ & DenyDefMOTtoDISMISSoDismiss 09SEP2009-
Fnl1
10 During the competency hearing Dr. Parker and Dr. Olive provided their views but she
was able to question them because she was representing herself . The Court did not rule
that she cannot represent herself. All her cases has been stayed for a few months and
subsequently a magistrate judge concluded that she can represent herself and proceed to
11 After a week the magistrate judge suddenly reversed his initial order. All her cases were
postponed and she was told to wait for further instructions from the Court. While
researching for another case she accidently learned that the Indiana Supreme Court has
12 In 2007the Honorable Judge Proffitt illegally asked a private attorney to tell her to check
into Winona Women Hospital for inpatient treatment. She told the attorney that she will
not comply unless the Judge issues a court order to compel her to go.
13 She did not hear from the court for three years. The statue of limitation for all her
misdemeanor cases has run out. In 2008 the Police arrested her for resisting arrest and
allegedly causing bodily injury. Suddenly all her previous cases became alive and
attached to the new case. No judge in Marion County wanted to take her case. Judge
14 The Indiana Supreme Court ordered Special Judge Proffitt to trial the last case. In the
pretrial hearing she asked the Judge to rule on her request for evidence. The Prosecutor
claimed that the statue of limitations has not run out because all delay has been charged
to her account. The Judge decided to take on the second case out of any logical
chronologicalorder. She was annoyed and wanted the Judge to rule on the statue of
limitation on the first three cases. The Judge allowed to voice her complaints and at no
time try to stop her. At the end of the session she ordered the prosecutor to file a motion
Page 3 of 7
FED2 AFFIDAVIT of Charles Chuang 02 iSupp ofPlantiff MotForFOJ & DenyDefMOTtoDISMISSoDismiss 09SEP2009-
Fnl1
to test her competency. The Prosecutor, the Public Defenders and Judge Collins then
went into the Judge Chambers to plan for the action to be taken.
15 Judge Proffitt then issued an order for her to be evaluated by Dr. Parker and Dr.
Callaway. In her order she did not ask for an evaluation but told the Doctors
unambiguously that she is incompetent to stand trial and asked for their advice of the
16 Dr Callaway and Dr. Parker gave identical evaluations concluding that she is incapable of
that since there is no cure for her state of mind she should not be put in an impatient
facility. Dr. Callaway also violated her doctor and patient confidentiality when she shared
her documents and comments with Dr. Parker. Even though she did not agree with Dr.
Callaway’s evaluation she did not take any legal actions against her because her
evaluation would be superseded by Dr. Parker. Dr. Parker came up with an identical
evaluation but added a recommendation that if the court concurred she should be put in
an inpatient facility even though there is no cure because she is a threat to the community.
Dr. Parker does not have any evidence to the threat and he is asking the Judge for
permission to put her in an inpatient facility. If Dr. Parker is worth his salt, he is required
recommendations. Dr. Parker maliciously added the inpatient treatment when there is no
cure without any evidence. Dr. Parker knows and understands the ramifications of his
times Dr. Parker has committed innocent people to inpatient facilities before?
17 The Judge then decided to strip her of her rights to self representations without a
competency hearing. If the Judge has her way she will not be allowed to defend herself
Page 4 of 7
FED2 AFFIDAVIT of Charles Chuang 02 iSupp ofPlantiff MotForFOJ & DenyDefMOTtoDISMISSoDismiss 09SEP2009-
Fnl1
and have to abide by any rulings the Public Defender, the Prosecutors and Judge agreed
on. I am no rocket scientist but I can see the writings on the wall because once admitted
to an impatient facility and there is no cure by Indiana Law she will be remain in the
facility permanently.The Judge intended to proceed with the competency hearing even
18 I wonder how Dr. Parker and Dr. Callaway can come to the same conclusions. In my
simple mind a crazy person will be committing the offences many times a month and
thousand of times in the five years span. Why was Dr. Parker allowed to make three
similarevaluations on her? Don’t she deserve a second and third opinion from different
doctors? I believe the Indiana Law on competency is to protect the insane who is
incapable of understanding their actions and punishments if proven guilty. This law
should not be used by any Judge to prevent anyone from due process and a fair trial. If
the prosecutor has any evidence in any of the four cases why the delay in proceeding with
the trials. Why is the State spending so much resources and money when the offences in
the four cases are so minor? Why is the Indiana Supreme Court appointing a special
character to head one of its department and refuse to do anything about the situation then
the state institution should not be protected and be equally responsible for the criminal
20 Dr. Parker claimed immunity from prosecution because he is appointed by the court.
Dr.Parker is protected by law so long as his evaluation is fair and consistent with standard
acceptable in psychiatric practice. When Dr. Parker willfully and maliciously gave an
Page 5 of 7
FED2 AFFIDAVIT of Charles Chuang 02 iSupp ofPlantiff MotForFOJ & DenyDefMOTtoDISMISSoDismiss 09SEP2009-
Fnl1
evaluations without any evidence to appease the court to take away a person rights to self
representations he is not immune for his careless evaluation and can be sued for medical
malpractice.
21 The honorable Judge Proffitt refused to dismiss the three previous cases with expired
status of limitations. She also obstructed justice by not allowing a person to get
evidences for the last case. She collaborated with the prosecutor and public defendant to
strip a person the right to self representation. She gave Dr. Parker the format of the
evaluation she desired before the person was sent for evaluation. Since the honorable
judge has violated the rules of the court on so many occasions she can no longer claims
22 English is Kay Kim’s second Language and many people misunderstood and
misconstrued her arguments. Although Kay Kim does not have any law background she
is conversant with the Rules and Procedures of the Court and do her own research of
cases in the law library. I affirm that Kay Kim is capable of representing herself in her
trials and be accorded the due process under the law. It is unconstitutional to deprive Kay
I affirm under the penalty for perjury that the representations contained in this
Respectfully submitted,
Page 6 of 7
FED2 AFFIDAVIT of Charles Chuang 02 iSupp ofPlantiff MotForFOJ & DenyDefMOTtoDISMISSoDismiss 09SEP2009-
Fnl1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I do hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing to the counsels were either mailed by first
class U.S. Mail, postage prepaid or hand delivered no later than September 12, 2009.
____________________
Kay Kim, Pro Se-Plaintiff
4250 Village Pkwy c e apt. 2
Indpls., IN 46254, Ph# 317-641-5977
e-mail: retypeunitedstates@gmail.com
n/a: Robert G. Weddle & Elizabeth A. Schuerman (Attornies for G.F.Parker, M.D.)
TABBERT HAHN EARNEST & WEDDLE, LLP
One Indiana Square, suite 1900
Indianapolis, IN 46204-2032
telephone: 317-639-5444
facsimile: 317-639-5232
em: rweddle@tabberthahn.com, eschuerman@tabberthahn.com
n/a: David J. Mallon, Jr. & Jennifer M. Johnson (Attornies for Indiana University)
ICE MILLER LLP
One American Square, Suite 3100 & 2900
Indianapolis, IN 46282-0200
t317-236-2100
em: jenniferjohnson@icemiller.com
Corinne Gilchrist
Deputy Attorney General
Office of the Indiana Attorney General
Indiana Government Center South, 5th Floor
302 W. Washington Street
Indianapolis, IN 46204-2770
tel: 317-234-2237
fax: 317-232-7979
em: Corinne.Gilchrist@atg.in.gov
____________________
Kay Kim, Pro Se-Plaintiff
Page 7 of 7
FED2 AFFIDAVIT of Charles Chuang 02 iSupp ofPlantiff MotForFOJ & DenyDefMOTtoDISMISSoDismiss 09SEP2009-
Fnl1