Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dylan Wiliam Presentation at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Assessment-Europe, November 2009: Malta
www.ioe.ac.uk
Overview
The evolving definition of formative assessment Three heuristics for scaling up formative assessment Decision-pull rather than data-push Tight but loose Content, then process Putting all this into practice
Relevant studies
Fuchs & Fuchs (1986) Natriello (1987) Crooks (1988) Bangert-Drowns, et al. (1991) Kluger & DeNisi (1996) Black & Wiliam (1998) Nyquist (2003) Dempster (1991, 1992) Elshout-Mohr (1994) Brookhart (2004) Allal & Lopez (2005) Kller (2005) Brookhart (2007) Wiliam (2007) Hattie & Timperley (2007) Shute (2008)
www.ioe.ac.uk
Formative assessment refers to frequent, interactive assessments of students progress and understanding to identify learning needs and adjust teaching appropriately (Looney, 2005, p. 21) A formative assessment is a tool that teachers use to measure student grasp of specific topics and skills they are teaching. Its a midstream tool to identify specific student misconceptions and mistakes while the material is being taught (Kahl, 2005 p. 11)
Assessment for Learning is the process of seeking and interpreting evidence for use by learners and their teachers to decide where the learners are in their learning, where they need to go and how best to get there (Broadfoot et al., 2002 pp. 2-3) Assessment for learning is any assessment for which the first priority in its design and practice is to serve the purpose of promoting students learning. It thus differs from assessment designed primarily to serve the purposes of accountability, or of ranking, or of certifying competence. An assessment activity can help learning if it provides information that teachers and their students can use as feedback in assessing themselves and one another and in modifying the teaching and learning activities in which they are engaged. Such assessment becomes formative assessment when the evidence is actually used to adapt the teaching work to meet learning needs. (Black et al., 2004 p. 10)
Teacher
Clarify and share learning intentions Understand and share learning intentions Understand learning intentions
Peer
Learner
www.ioe.ac.uk
www.ioe.ac.uk
Choice
Belbin inventory (Management teams: why they succeed or fail) Eight team roles (defined as A tendency to behave, contribute and interrelate with others in a particular way.) Company worker; Innovator; Shaper; Chairperson; Resource investigator; Monitor/evaluator; Completer/finisher; Team worker Key ideas Each role has strengths and allowable weaknesses People rarely sustain out of role behavior, especially under stress Each teachers personal approach to teaching is similar Some teachers weaknesses require immediate attention For most, however, students benefit more by developing teachers strengths
Flexibility
Distinction between strategies and techniques Strategies define the territory of formative assessment (no brainers) Teachers are responsible for choice of techniques Allows for customization/ caters for local context Creates ownership Shares responsibility Key requirements of techniques embodiment of deep cognitive/affective principles relevance feasibility acceptability
Small steps
According to Berliner (1994), experts