Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Demographic Situation
Russias population is shrinking
European part of Russian Federation Life expectancy 66 years (born 2007), Source: WHO
Born
Died
Population increase/loss due to natural causes -219,8 -840,0 -958,5 -943,3 -935,3 -888,5 -792,9 -846,5 -687,1 -470,3
1992 1995 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
1587,6 1363,8 1266,8 1311,6 1397,0 1477,3 1502,5 1457,4 1479,6 1610,1
1807,4 2203,8 2225,3 2254,9 2332,3 2365,8 2295,4 2303,9 2166,7 2080,4
Annual increase / loss of population due to natural causes per 1000 persons
Source: Laboratory for Territorial Development of Moscow University, data sourced From Federal State Statistics Service and U.S. Census Bureau.
Demographic Situation
According to statistics, the life expectancy for a Russian male is 58,8 years, while Russian women live on average 72,1 years. For comparison, European men live on average 75 years, and womens average life is about 80,9 years. The major factors contributing to the lower life expectancy in Russia are:
Russians are less educated about health risks and how to prevent them; Russian physicians are neither trained nor motivated to promote a healthy life style Chronic stress Environmental pollution Widespread alcohol and drug abuse, smoking High mortality due to car and other accidents LOW STANDARDS OF LIVING AND PROBLEMS WITH HEALTHCARE IN RURAL REGIONS
Russians die younger than Westerners of worlds most common illnesses: the average age of people dying of cardiovascular diseases is 67,6 years (78,6 in Europe), of cancer 63,6 years (73,8 in Europe). Europeans believe that good health is the result of their own efforts on control and prevention of diseases, while most Russians, according to a survey recently conducted in Russia, believe that good or bad health is determined by nature and it is difficult to do anything about it. For Russians, healthcare is stressful, and many Russians get nervous just thinking about visiting a doctor.
3
1 EURO = 43 RUR
60 % of population - poor - get 25,1 % of all income 10% most poor get 1,9 % of all income 20% are considered to be middle class with 20,7% of all income
78,5
63,2
12,1
10,8
Per capita government expenditure on health at average exchange rate , US $ Per capita total expenditure on health at average exchange rate , US $ Private expenditure on health as percentage of total expenditure on health Private prepaid plans as percentage of private expenditure on health Out-of pocket expenditure as percentage of private expenditure on health
22
46
Number of supplemental medical (nursing) staff (thousands) Number of supplemental medical (nursing) staff per 10 000 inhabitants
46,93
111
108
107
108
109
109
108
109
109
89
Number of hospitals (thousands)* Number of hospital beds (thousands) Number of hospital beds per 10 000 inhabitants Number of outpatient healthcare clinics (thousands)
9,8
9,5
7,5
6,8
1851 1672 1653 1620 1597 1601 1575 1554 1522 126 115 114 113 112 113 111 109 107
Number of children outpatient healthcare clinics and maternity 15,6 16,0 15,9 15,3 15,3 15,2 15,0 13,5 11,5 welfare centres (thousands) Number of hospital beds for pregnant and women in childbirth (thousands) 105 91 88 86 85 84 82 82 82
10
A satiric poster of the Perestroika time. The sign on the locked door of a clinic says: Time is the best healer.
11
12
13
33 %
51 %
8%
Popularity and penetration of private healthcare services can be illustrated by the results of a public opinion survey, conducted in Russia: in case of illness Russians still prefer to go to a public clinic (51%). The share of those who would prefer to consult a private doctor is only 8%. In practice, the percentage of private sectors patients is higher, but this statistics illustrates the attitude. Every third Russian is practicing self! treatment, especially in case of common illnesses and injuries. There are also people 14 who prefer to do nothing or rely on non!traditional medicine.
15
16
Financing
Subsidies & donations
Sources of financing
Federal budget
Regional budgets
Payers
Maternity certificates
Insurance agents
Public insurance companies
Private sector
Private sector
Patients
18
Patients
Sources of financing
Federal and municipal budgets
63,2 % of total expenditure on health
Treatment
Public healthcare ! up to 95% market share Private healthcare institutions ! 5 % market share Occupational healthcare ! under 0,5%
! 2! 5
Private financing
19
According to experts, Moscow accumulates up to 80% of the countrys financial resources. Average salary and income per capita are higher in Moscow than in Saint Petersburg. There are a lot of specialized clinics, departmental clinics, hospitals and medical research institutions in Moscow and all of them provide commercial healthcare services. Thats why the private sector is not so well!developed in Moscow as in Saint Petersburg. There are less private medical centres in Moscow than in St. Petersburg. More than 85% of Moscows citizens use commercial healthcare services, but the share of private clinics in unknown. 13 private clinics of Saint Petersburg enjoy the 70% market share of local private healthcare market. According to The Yellow pages, the number of clinics providing commercial healthcare services is 1391 in Saint Petersburg and 1927 in Moscow.
20
21
Cooperation options
Shortages of healthcare service offering = opportunities for Finnish healthcare organizations
According to the founder of the Association of Saint Petersburg clinics and the executing director of Integrated Healthcare non!commercial partnership, Mr. Anyfriev, there are still annoying shortages in healthcare offering that can be probably covered by foreign suppliers, e.g.: Organization of family medical centres (therapist) Organization of independent expert centres (second opinion, rating of the competence and the appointments of local doctors, examining the quality of treatment, information about possibilities, etc.) Organization of medical tourism (assistance companies) Medical insurance, including those giving a possibility of treatment abroad. Organization of diversified medical centres, willing to follow ethical norms and world standards. Training programs for clinics managers. According to Mr. Anofriev, the public sector as well as city authorities can also be interested in such a cooperation and Finnish experience could be an important factor for further development of private healthcare services.
24
25
PRIVATE MONEY IS BEING FUNNELED TO RUSSIAN HEALTHCARE BUT PRIVATE HEALTHCARE INFRASTRUCTURE IS STILL UNDEVELOPED.
PRIVATE HEALTHCARE SECTOR CANNOT BE TREATED AS A SEPARATE TARGET GROUP FOR FINNISH PROVIDERS
26
Medical Devices
Dental
Health!IT
Hospital Market
Diagn. Devices
Diagn. Centers
Independent Living
high
28
30
31
Euromedika (Moscow)
The Russian!German Healthcare Center Euromedica is one of the oldest private clinics in Moscow. It was established in 1992 and one of the founders was a professor of Hamburg University Rolf Peter Spielmann. Euromedica is known for its comfortable atmosphere and individual approach. The first visit to a doctor last not less than an hour (for comparison: in other clinics they reserve 15!20 minutes for a patient). Euromedica is specialized in dental and gynaecological services.
32
Dr. Francois Najjar Chief dentist and founder of the first French Dental Clinic in Russia
33
34
36
37
2006 (mill. US$) Local Production Import Export Market volume 700 1930 86 2455
Changes 2006/2007 in % 14 98 62 76
38
40
Foreign producer
Regional office
End user
End user
Diagnostic devices
42
Diagnostic devices
Diagnostics is one of the most dynamically developing sectors of private healthcare in Russia, and the share of diagnostic equipment in medical equipment sales is the largest. Diagnostic equipment is currently purchased also by public healthcare institutions within the framework of Healthcare National Project The main factors that influence decision!making of Russian clients are: quick recoupment and cost!efficiency: approved methods and technologies; Russian certificates technical and sales support in Russian language (communication, negotiations, manuals, trainings, service, maintenance)
Diagnostic equipment was supplied to public in-patient clinics in 2006 as follows: x-ray - 3 247 units; ultrasonic - 4 115 units; laboratory - 2 899 units; endoscopic - 3 606 units; electrocardiographic - 8 of 785 units. To buy 22 652 units of diagnostic equipment the government has allocated 14.3 billion rubles (0. 33 bill. ) from federal budget.
The Russian medical device market is growing and the demand for imported devices is high. One of the key factors for foreign companies for succeeding in Russian markets is finding a reliable partner and distributor.
43
Diagnostic devices
Private healthcare centers are currently equipped with all necessary equipment for basic diagnostic and laboratory tests, so this market segment will obviously develop through the implementation of new diagnostic technologies and replacements of out!of!dated devices The most demanded is the equipment for diagnostic visualization: x!ray equipment ! from portable photofluorography units to complex diagnostic x!ray equipment; tomography equipment; Russian clients still prefer traditional RCT (Roentgen computed tomography) and MRI (Magnetic tomography) equipment; ultrasound scanners, which are the most common and popular type of visualization equipment; cartographic equipment (portable cardiographs, cardio analyzers etc.) is used only in cartography, but one must be taken into account that 15% of Russians who are older than 40 have ischemic heart disease and that about 55% of Russians die from cardiovascular diseases. Other equipment, e.g. different types of disease and patient monitoring systems, EEG machines, reographs etc.
44
Diagnostic devices
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)* There are about 130 MRIs in Russia, and this figure is 6 times lower than necessary (for comparison: 4000 units in the United States, 4500 in Japan). Russians produce only low magnetic field named MRIs Ellipse and Diamag, both developed and manufactured by NPF AZ from Moscow. The share of MRIs in all import devices and equipment is more than 5%. Foreign equipment imported to Russia: MRI "SEGNA INFINITY" from "Ge Medical Systems" (U.S.), MAGNETOM CONCERTO and MAGNETOM SYMPHONY from "Siemens AG" (Germany), "HISPEED X / I" from "Ge Yokogawa Medical Systems, Ltd" (Japan), etc. Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus The Russian market of ultrasonic equipment is occupied by imported products (about 90%). The share of ultrasound scanners is about 24% of all imported equipment. The most popular devices are ultrasound scanners "S!2000, diagnostic ultrasound system "LOGIQ", medical ultrasound scanners SSD!1100, SA!6000, "ACUSON ASPEN" with monitors and sensors, digital ultrasound system for diagnostics of cardiovascular diseases and parenchymatous organs diseases, ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus "SUNLIGHT OMNISENSE 7000", sensors for ultrasound scanners, etc. The most popular manufacturers of these products are: "Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc" (USA), "Siemens" (Germany), "Wipro Ge Medical Systems SA" (India), "Esaote S.P.A." (Italy), "Aloka Co., Ltd" (Japan), etc.
45
* Here and below data taken from the study conducted by Remedium research group
Diagnostic devices
Equipment for radionuclide diagnosis There are 4 PET (positron emission tomograph) centres in Russia, but only one of them, located in the Scientific & Research centre of Institute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (St. Petersburg) is partially equipped with domestic equipment. There are more than 200 radioisotope diagnostics laboratories in Russia, equipped with 210 gamma cameras and gamma tomographs, more than 80% ten or more years old, thus requiring upgrading or complete replacement. The shares of planar gamma cameras and SPECTs are 75% and 25% respectively. The share of alpha, beta or gamma radiation equipment for medical, surgical or veterinary use is about 2% of the whole volume of imported medical equipment. Imported products: portable solid gamma cameras DIGIRAD 2020tc, integrated gamma cameras "MILLENIUM" for radiotherapy, radio!surgical systems "NOVALIS", dental x!ray machines "INTRA OS 70" with remote control, gamma radiation detectors NEO2000, "TERAGAM K ! 01 " cobalt radiotherapy machines, etc. Producers: "Neoprobe Corporation" (USA), "Elgems Ltd" (Israel), "Blue X Imaging SRL" (Italy), "General Electric Medical Systems" (France), etc.
46
Diagnostic devices
Roentgenologic diagnostics Russians produce digital X!ray systems of different types and they are widely in use in Russia. Nowadays there is a trend to replace traditional X!ray rooms (designed for three operators) by X!ray cabinets with remote control and multi!positional tables with digital receivers. Russian manufacturers produce basic equipment for roentgenology and fluorography, including digital equipment, as well as all types of X!ray protection equipment, so there is no need to buy it from aboard. As for more complicated and specialized X!ray equipment, such as angiographic units, orthopantomographs, bone densitometers, roentgen!urological devices etc., they are not produced by domestic manufacturers and Russian healthcare organizations have to import them.
Digital radiographic unit ProGraf !7000 produced by CJSC Rentgenprom, the largest manufacturer of roentgenologic medical equipment in Russia.
47
Diagnostic devices
Roentgenologic diagnostics The total share of alpha, beta, gamma or X!ray devices for roentgenologic diagnostics in Russias total imports of medical equipment is about 20!21%. Within this group the largest market share of 61% belongs to X!rays equipment. Russia imports: portable X!ray diagnostic units "SIREMOBIL ISO!C and "APELEM", X!ray diagnostic set "AXIOM. ICONOS for surgery, portable digital X!ray machines, portable X!ray machine for surgery "OPESCOPE", mammographic X!ray machines "PLANMED SOPHIE" for therapeutic purposes, "MODULARIS URO PLUS" systems for shock!wave lithotripsy and endourological procedures, angiographic diagnostic unit "MULTISTAR", angiographic system "ADVANTX LCV PLUS", etc. Importers: "Ge Medical Systems SA" (France), "Villa Sistemi Medicali S.P.A." (Italy), "Applicazione Tecnologie Speciali SRL" (Italy), "Trophy Radiologie" (France), "Siemens AG" (Germany), etc. The share of computer tomographs is 30% of total import volume ("SOMATOM EMOTION" from Germany CT "HISpeed X / i" from Japan and "LIGHT SPEED" from the United States) .
48
Diagnostic devices
Equipment for functional diagnostics As for the functional diagnostics , the largest share belongs to electrocardiographic equipment it is about 62,5%, then come blood pressure measuring devices with 25,5% market share, electronic encephalogram equipment ! 7,4%, reographic equipment ! 1.8%, devices lungs diagnostics ! 0.8%, myographic equipment ! 0,4% and other equipment 1,6%. The share of single!channel ECG machines is about 35% of all electrocardiographs sold in Russia. This market segment is dominated by domestic manufactures who provide an excellent price and quality ratio. Three!channel ECG enjoy 60% share of the total amount. Nowadays the share of domestic three!channel ECG:s is only 50%, but there is a steady upward trend that local clients are buying domestic devices. The share of 12!channel and computer electrocardiographs is only 5%. However, there are no manufactures of 12!channel ECG machines in Russia.
49
Diagnostic devices
Equipment for functional diagnostics Only one company in Russia, Aksion Holding from Izhevsk, produces single!channel electrocardiographs. All other domestic companies produce 3!channel machines, and some of them also manufacture computer electrocardiographs. Of cause, some electrostimulating devices are not produced in Russia, e.g. some types of implantable artificial pacemakers and electro!neuro!stimulators, catheter ablation systems; equipment for physiological heart examinations, therapeutic electrostimulators, which are used widely in private healthcare clinics, cosmetology and plastic surgery. The most popular electrostimulating equipment in Russia is domestic equipment with an average operational lifetime of 10!15 years. The share of modern and multifunctional ES!devices is not more than 8%.
50
Nowadays Russian producers provide ex. technique for hematologic laboratory tests: determination of haemoglobin concentration, microscope analysis of blood cells, identification & scanning, analysis of blood cell images and cell classification. A big problem for Russian healthcare system is a lack of (domestic) low!cost blood analyzers. Quite a big demand for these devices is partially met by imports. However, a Russian company Altonika launched a new semiautomatic haematology analyzer Gemoalt AGP! 01 / 5 in 2005 and it is becoming more and more popular. Russian industry meets 100% the local demand for scarifies that are produced by 8 Russian companies. Instruments for blood sampling like Mikrovet, Monovet, Vakuteyner etc. are not produced by domestic industry.
51
52
53
Summary Diagnostics
Diagnostics is one of the most dynamically developing sector of healthcare market. Private infrastructure in diagnostics is relatively well developed . Russian market is very sensitive for price & service terms. Basic and standard equipment is produced by Russian manufacturers; they are valued by the clients because of a low price, but the quality is rather low High!tech sector is still dominated by imports. Finnish suppliers are not visible in all diagnostic sectors in Russia. There are business opportunities for high!tech components and contract research @ development providers from Finland. There are business opportunities for joint ventures. Electro diagnostic and imaging devices obtain the biggest share in the structure on import of medical devices.
54
Dental Sector
55
Dental sector
Private dentistry is the most developed sector of Russian private healthcare market. Private dental clinics can be found not only in Moscow and St. Petersburg, but also in the depths of the country. At the moment there are more than 1500 officially registered dental clinics in Moscow, and about 800 in St. Petersburg. The supply currently meets the demand, so one cannot expect a rapid growth of the number of clinics in both metropolitan cities in the nearest future. The market has already gone beyond the stage of extensive growth and technical revolution in Russian dentistry has already taken place. We can say that this market has entered its saturation stage, profitability is decreasing and keeping a client happy and loyal becomes a difficult job. The greatest progress is nowadays shown by aesthetic restoration ! the most profitable sector of therapeutic stomatology.
56
Dental sector
Private dental clinics are nearly 100% equipped with imported equipment, instruments and consumables. According to expert estimations, the market share of foreign suppliers is nowadays about 90%. The leading suppliers of filling materials to Russia are coming from Germany, Switzerland and USA. The leading suppliers of dental equipment are Germany, Italy and Japan. Chinese and Korean manufacturers are increasingly active in launching their products to the Russian market. Finnish brands (Fimet, Planmeca) are well known in Russia, but do not occupy leading positions. According to recent statistics, one of the most important factors that influence the decision! making in this market segment is high quality of after!sale services and maintenance (along with a price and a wide range of products) Time of delivery is also a very important factor. Both traditional solutions and advanced technologies are represented in the market and competition is increasing constantly.
57
Dental sector
The main trends in private dentistry development in 2010 ! 2012 are: supply will exceed solvent demand consolidation of private dentistry will continue private will have to enlarge the range of services provided aesthetic dentistry and implantation will be most profitable and fast!developing sectors profitability will go down due to high personnel costs (the share of a dentists fee in service price is nowadays up to 50%), decrease of workload (up to 50!60%) and rising spending for materials and tools more intense competition will make it necessary to invest into long!term customers loyalty The experts believe that private dental care services will remain in demand despite the recession. Until now there has been no significant change in sales. However, the crisis may influence the structure of services provided and increase the share of emergency dental services and dental prosthetics. Pessimistic forecasts suggest the decline of 2!5% in 2010! 1012.
58
59
60
61
62
When selecting MIS, healthcare institutions usually choose either minimal price or the solution developed especially for the certain healthcare sector (according to the information available for them). References are also very important. Experts believe that availability of information on different MIS is a very important factor for decision making, especially when it is necessary to prove advantage of a system in question to hospital administration/owners, funding organizations, inspecting bodies and others.
63
64
More than half (56%) of all respondents evaluate the overall level of informatization in their clinics/healthcare institutions as average. 37% consider it to be high, and only 7% think it to be low. High self!appraisal is more typical for private and departmental clinics, as well as for large public healthcare centres. While leading Moscow clinics and healthcare centres (e.g. The Railway Clinic, the Bakulev Centre for Cardiovascular Surgery, the I.M. Sechenov Medical Academy, Healthcare Centre of the Presidential Executive Office and others) develop telemedicine projects, implement electronic records and begin to use RFID!tags, most of the common, middle!size clinics still associate informatization with nothing but construction of local computer networks.
65
IT budget allocation
For 50% of respondents it was difficult to answer the question about IT budgets. 40% of respondents confirmed that there is such an item in their budgets, while 10% said that there is not. Average expenditure on information technologies, including implementation, support and upgrades, comprises from 1% to 9.8% of a clinics budget. These funds are usually allocated for purchase of consumables, office software and internet payments. Approximately 34% of respondents reported that information technology spending in their healthcare institutions has increased during the last 3 years. 30% believe that it remained on the same level, and 3% of respondents however felt a decline in IT spending. In general 33% of respondents had difficulties with answering this question.
Do you have a special item in your clinics budget for IT costs?
10 % No Yes 40 % Cannot answer
50 %
66
Electronic records
15 %
25 %
Laboratory diagnostics
73 %
Statictics collection
87 %
90 %
Personnel records
97 %
Accounting
97 %
67
7%
10 %
Personnel records
13 %
Accounting
13 %
13 %
Information&puppost
27 %
Electronic records 0%
63 % 20 % 40 % 60 % 80 %
68
IT purchasing criteria
The issue of price When selecting a software supplier, most of the health care organizations take into consideration costs of IT solutions and services (37%). Suppliers experience with implementation of similar IT! projects in health care sector is also very important factor (27%). The other factors that influence the decision making are: maintenance & support (27%) integration simplicity, efficiency, and integration into existing IT infrastructure (20%) usability (7%). In addition, 20% of respondents reported that they did not search for suppliers by themselves but implemented solutions recommended by authorities or colleagues.
Criteria of choosing an IT!solutions supplier
Usability Can be integrated into existing systems Simply and easy to implements Recommended by authorities Price for support
7%
20 %
20 %
20 %
27 %
Experience
27 %
Price 0% 10 % 20 % 30 %
37 % 40 %
69
23 %
IT spending will increase New IT purchases not budgeted at all IT spending will stay on the same level Cannot answer
50 % 7% 3% 17 %
70
71
72
73
Summary Health IT
IT penetration: mainly patient administration systems; Sub systems in use are not integrated; Fragmented IT offering (> 300 solutions/providers) dominated by local IT companies, sector still growing; Lack of legal framework hinders electronic documentation; Lack of standardization of the different SW components; Selective market; Price is the most important factor for about 40 % of clients; Telehealth is not developed at all; Many attractive merger and acquisition candidates for foreign supplier Clinics have a right to select and buy IT solutions and components without an approval from the authorities.
74