Professional Documents
Culture Documents
t Design
Writing
Clarity of writing
[ ] Sentence structure, word choice, lack of transitions and/or sequencing of ideas makes reading and understanding difficult.
Writing
Demonstration of knowledge 2
[ ] Writer is at ease with content and able to elaborate and explain to some degree.
[ ] No grasp of required subject matter. No understanding of major issues. No interpretation of results. [ ] Sequence of information is difficult to follow. No apparent structure or continuity. [ ] Lack of appropriate sections or many items are in the wrong section. [ ] Work fails to follow required report format.
Organization
Flow of information
[ ] Information is presented in a [ ] Information is presented in logical, interesting way, which is easy a logical manner, which is to follow. easily followed. [ ] All information is located in the appropriate section. [ ] Report format is consistent throughout including heading styles, fonts, margins, white space, etc. [ ] Some information is in the wrong section. [ ] Report format is generally consistent.
Organization
[ ] Many items are in the wrong section. [ ] Many departures from required report format. .
Report
[ ] Departmental format is observed in all figures and graphs. Captions effectively communicate content.
[ ] Minor departures from required format or inconsistencies between figures and graphs. Captions effectively communicate content. [ ] Most figures are properly interpreted and important features noted. [ ] Minor inconsistencies referring to figures. [ ] Minor departures from required format or inconsistencies between tables. Captions effectively communicate content. [ ] Most tables are properly interpreted and important features noted. [ ] Minor inconsistencies referring to tables. [ ] Minor departures from required format or inconsistencies between equations. Minor problems with citation of equations. Some symbols not properly defined. [ ] Minor errors. [ ] Minor errors. [ ] Some instances of noise. [ ] Minor inadequacies in references or inconsistencies in format.
[ ] Many departures from required format or inconsistencies between figures and graphs. Captions are ineffective in communicating content. [ ] Many figures are not interpreted. Important features are not communicated or understood. [ ] Many inconsistencies referring to figures. [ ] Many departures from required format or inconsistencies between tables. Captions are ineffective in communicating content. [ ] Many tables are not interpreted. Important features are not communicated or understood. [ ] Many inconsistencies referring to tables. [ ] Many departures from required format. Many problems with citation of equations. Many symbols not properly defined. [ ] Several errors. [ ] Several errors. [ ] Many instances of noise. [ ] Inadequate list of references or failure to follow required format.
[ ] Work fails to follow required format. Captions are ineffective in communicating content.
Effectiveness 2
[ ] All figures are effectively interpreted and discussed in the report. [ ] Citations consistent with format. [ ] Departmental format is observed in all tables. Captions effectively communicate content.
[ ] Figures are not used effectively. Little understanding of important features or issues. [ ] Citations fail to follow required format or no citation provided. [ ] Work fails to follow required format. Captions are ineffective in communicating content.
Tables
Effectiveness 2
[ ] All tables are effectively interpreted and discussed in the report. [ ] Citations consistent with format. [ ] Departmental format is observed in all equations. Citations consistent with format.
[ ] Tables are not used effectively. Little understanding of important features or issues. [ ] Citations fail to follow required format or no citation provided. [ ] Work fails to follow required format. Failed to use MS Equation Editor. Words used instead of symbols. [ ] Numerous errors. [ ] Numerous errors. [ ] Report plagued with distractions and noise. [ ] No referencing system used.
Tables
Citations 1
Equations
2 3 3 1
[ ] Negligible errors. [ ] Negligible errors. [ ] Report was free of noise issues. [ ] Reference section complete, comprehensive and follows required format.
Total Points
30