Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TRANSPARENCY
EFFECTIVENESS
The 2008 Self Certification Plus Compliance Form must be submitted to InterAction by each member organization no later than December 31, 2008. This
process is mandatory for all InterAction members every other year and noncompliance will result in suspension from InterAction membership.
Copyright 2008 InterAction 1 Questions: Email bwallace@interaction.org
2008 Self –Certification-Plus Compliance Form
Although compliance with PVO standards is a self-regulatory process, it is an important mechanism for demonstrating the integrity and accountability of the
NGO sector with donors, the public, and beneficiaries and also serves as a track record of members’ internal efforts to improve organizational accountability.
Year 2006 witnessed the first mandatory year for InterAction members to comply with the PVO Standards by completing the Self-Certification Plus process.
As we begin 2008 and the second mandatory PVO Standards compliance exercise through Self-Certification Plus, we have made the process more user
friendly and have consolidated all the materials into one document. The only changes from 2006 are in sections II.C.2 of Program Quality and Monitoring and
Evaluation and II. E. 1- 5, a new section of Minimum Operating Security Standards. All other sections remain the same as in the 2006 process.
The actual form which follows is in Microsoft Word table format, with boxes designed in a “word-wrapping” format so that the boxes expand as you fill them
in. For each standard and its related components, the agency must indicate in the third column marked “Compliance” whether or not the standard and each
component of that standard have been met. To check the box, double click on it and a window will open to allow you to change it to a checked box. Should the
agency determine that a program standard does not apply, it must explain (briefly) its reasons for determining the standard is “not applicable” in that section.
The document explains each standard component and proposes documentation to be gathered and reviewed which provides evidence of compliance. Sections
I.A.1 thorough III.B must be completed fully using the information in columns marked “Component’ and “Proposed Evidence”. Check the appropriate box in
column marked “Compliance” and then either indicate your action plan in column four marked “Action Plan if not in Compliance” to address noncompliance
or indicate the documentation you used as evidence of compliance in column five. Each member is required to develop and indicate an action plan to address
areas of non-conformance. It has always been InterAction’s policy that a member is given one year to either come into compliance with non-conformance to a
standard or to demonstrate concerted movement toward coming into compliance in order to avoid possible suspension from membership.
The completed form, including the signature page constitutes a completed certification document. We also ask you to complete the questionnaire to help us
evaluate the process.
We will be using the results of the 2008 process to determine necessary revisions for 2010 and encourage you to give your feedback on the exercise and
suggestions for improving the process. If you have any questions or need additional clarification on how to complete the materials, please contact
bwallace@interaction.org.
I.D.2 – The agency shall have a Copy of the written policy and relevant
written policy that affirms its sections of operational plans. Yes, have policy
commitment to gender equity, to Yes, but lack policy
ethnic and racial diversity, to the Not in compliance
inclusion of people with Not applicable
disabilities in organizational
structures and in staff and board
composition. The policy should
be fully integrated into an
organization’s plans and
operations, with a mechanism
mandated by the CEO for
overseeing implementation.
(Source: § 2.6.1/2/3 and 7.2.1,
7.3.1, 7.4.1)
c) The potential to
strengthen the capacities
of vulnerable groups,
typically women,
children, minorities, the
disabled, and the very
poor;
II.C.3 – For those organizations Gather and review selections from the
with field operations, the following: Yes, have policy
organization shall have the Design monitoring and evaluation Yes, but lack policy
capacity to provide financial and standards and evaluation policy for Not in compliance
performance oversight at the programs and projects; documents which Not applicable
local level, whether through a show adherence to professional
field office structure or through principles and standards, including
partnerships with local entities. encouraging the participation of
communities and partners; an agency-
Note: This component addresses wide M&E system.
internal organizational
mechanisms that assure Material summarizing the organization's
appropriate, ongoing oversight procedures for providing oversight of
of local/regional program program finances and performance at the
performance. This component local level. If any of this oversight
does not address the external responsibility is outsourced, gather and
audits performed annually by an review a copy or summary of the
independent certified auditor. responsibilities to be carried out by the
(Source: § 7.9.14) contractor in this area.
III.A.8 – The organization shall Review payroll and benefit plan records
make financial arrangements to to determine that the organization: Yes, have policy
protect its ability to honor its Yes, but lack policy
obligations to employees. • Has accurate records Not in compliance
(Source: § 6.3.2) • Pays salaries and benefits when due Not applicable
• Properly funds employee retirement
plans
• Pays payroll taxes on a timely basis
• Has corrected any shortcomings in
these areas, if any, and pointed out in
an audit or management letter.
III.A.9 – Staff who is engaged Copies of any policies that address the
in fundraising and public ethical practices expected of staff Yes, have policy
relations shall meet the engaged in fundraising and public Yes, but lack policy
standards of the Association of relations. Not in compliance
Fundraising Professionals and Not applicable
Public Relations Society of
America, respectively. (Source:
§ 5.7)
Copyright 2008 InterAction 21 Questions: Email bwallace@interaction.org
2008 Self –Certification-Plus Compliance Form
INTERACTION
PVO STANDARDS
COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION FORM 2008
SIGNATURE PAGE
Name of Organization
In or der to he lp us struct ur e the pr oces s to of fer the most benefit to the me mbers hip , please answer al l of the
fol lowing qu estio ns.
Na me of the or ganizat ion : __ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _
Did you fin d the Self -Cer ti fic at io n Plus pr ocess usef ul for you inst it uti on al ly? If yes , plea se expla in ho w.
Did t he pro cess lea d to any reco gni ti on to stren gt hen pro cesses, po licies a nd /o r sys tems? If so , p lea se giv e ex amp les.
Who lea d the ef for t a nd wh o where t he ot her ind ivid ua ls an d divis ions en ga ged in Self -Ce rt ifi ca ti on Plus at you r org ani zat io n?
Were t he co mp onen ts help ful? The evide nce of co mpl ian ce defi nit io ns?
Did you dis cov er area s where your org an iz at io n wo uld benefi t from te chni ca l assis ta nc e?
Do you h ave an y rec om mend at io ns on ho w Self -Cer ti fic at io n Plus mi ght be impr oved for 2010?
Di d you agree w it h the ass ump ti on t ha t a ll C at eg or y I an d Ca te go ry I I S tan da rds a re man da tor y? If no t, whi ch Ca te go ry I a nd C at eg or y
II S tan da rds w oul d you no t co nside r to be ma nd at ory ?
Othe r Co mment s