You are on page 1of 0

Vol.7 No.

2
Autumn 2006
CONTENTS


Fulcanelli's Most Likely Identity - Part I
By Christer Bke and John Koopmans


ARTICLES
Fulcanelli's Identity
The Alchemical Art
Planetary
Attributions of Plants
FEATURES
New Releases
From the Fire
Announcements
Lectures
EDITORIAL
From the Editor
Submissions
Subscriptions
Resources
Return to Top








The Illustration above was drawn by artist-alchemist Juliene Champagne. It is from a 1926 French edition of Fulcanelli: Mystery of the
Cathedrals
Editors Note: This article is being published in as a two part series. In Part I, the authors summarize what
is known about Fulcanelli based on primary sources of information provided by his trusted confidant,
Eugene Canseliet, establish an approach they will use to review whether or not several proposed
candidates are in fact the true identify of the famous and mysterious Master Alchemist, and attempt to
establish the date of his birth and departure or death. Part II of the article, to be published in the next
issue of the Journal, reveals the authors belief about the likelihood of these candidates actually being
Fulcanelli and presents their proposed answer to the question: Who was Fulcanelli?
Introduction
The 20
th
century Master Alchemist, Fulcanelli, is well-known to the alchemical community through the two
highly regarded books that bear his name: Le Mystre des Cathdrales (1926), and Les Demeures
Philosophales (1930). Both these books, initially published in French by Jean Schemit, have since been
translated into the English language. The actual identity of the intriguing, secretive man behind the name
Fulcanelli has been very well protected by design or fate for 80 years by the very few close associates
who knew him, since his first book was published in 1926.
Many theories have been put forward regarding the possible identity of Fulcanelli (see, for example
Fulcanelli Devoil by Genevire Dubois, Fulcanelli: Sa vritable identit enfin rvle by Patrick Riviere or
Al-Kemi: A Memoir by Andr Vandenbroeck). Some of the more popular possible candidates for Fulcanellis
identity include Jean-Julian Champagne, Ren A. Schwaller de Lubicz, Pierre Dujols, Eugne Canseliet, or
even a committee of three: Pierre Dujols, Jean-Julien Champagne, and Eugne Canseliet. No doubt, all
three of these individuals were closely involved with the arrangements undertaken to publish Fulcanellis
works, but Canseliet himself emphatically stated that Fulcanellis identity was not Champagne, Dujols, or
himself, or a committee, but that of a single individual.
The object of this paper is not to critique the current theories regarding Fulcanellis
identity, many of which are carefully developed, based specifically on the particular
assumptions as selected and presented by the authors. Instead, based on a number
of observations and clues derived from sources closest to Fulcanelli, we are putting
forward an alternative theory which we feel stands alone, not only in addressing
most of the clues, but especially one of the most important of all clues, one which
has consistently been ignored by other researchers to date.
We begin by examining the various pieces of reliable information that are actually
known about the man behind the name, Fulcanelli, followed by an examination of
the year of his birth as well as the approximate year of his possible death or
departure. From the preceding, we then develop a profile of characteristics that we feel must be used to
narrow the choices in selecting a logical candidate for Fulcanellis identity. We then briefly demonstrate why
the choices presented to date by others do not match this profile. Finally we present a possible candidate
which we feel matches the profile almost exactly.
What Is Actually Known About Fulcanelli?
There is very little biographical information available regarding the characteristics of the
enigmatic man, Fulcanelli, primarily because those who knew his identity vowed to
protect it. This they carried out very faithfully. Most of the sparse information that is
known comes from a reliable source, and from one of the few men who actually knew
(and protected) his real identity, Eugene Canseliet (shown at left).
Eugene Canseliet (born December 18, 1899; died April 17, 1982) as a young teenager,
first met Fulcanelli in 1915, and by 1920 he continued to meet with him quite frequently.
Because of this comradeship and sense of trust, in 1923 Fulcanelli entrusted the young
Canseliet with his personal sealed notes for three manuscripts (Le Mystre des Cathdrales; Les
Demeures Philosophales and Finis Gloria Mundi), two of which formed the basis of the two books
subsequently published under Fulcanellis name (Fulcanelli specifically asked Canseliet not to publish the
Some of the reliable
information that we
know about
Fulcanelli comes
from the Prefaces
written by Canseliet,
while other
information comes
from such other
sources as various
interviews that were
later conducted with
Canseliet. It almost
seems as though
Canseliet
deliberately left
behind a number of
tantalizing clues.


ARTICLES
Fulcanelli's Identity
The Alchemical Art
Planetary
Attributions of Plants
FEATURES
New Releases
From the Fire
Announcements
Lectures
EDITORIAL
From the Editor
Submissions
Subscriptions
Resources
Return to Top


third manuscript). Canseliet was given the responsibility for the arrangements that
would see the notes through to the final publication of the two books in 1926 and 1930.
Canseliets other mentor, the artist and practicing alchemist Jean-Julien Champagne
(born 1877; died 1932; shown at right), was given the task of illustrating the two books.
Canseliet wrote the Preface to both books as well as the Prefaces to subsequent
editions of the books.
Some of the reliable information that we know about Fulcanelli comes from the Prefaces
written by Canseliet, while other information comes from such other sources as various
interviews that were later conducted with Canseliet. It almost seems as though Canseliet
deliberately left behind a number of tantalizing clues. Although he kept his promise to
keep Fulcanellis identity a secret throughout his life, in particular, it must have been very
frustrating for him to be continually confronted with the many popular and persistent suggestions that
Fulcanellis identity was Champagne. He often openly expressed his strong disdain for those who continued
to believe this false assumption. Thus he may have subconsciously left the clues behind in the faint hope
that later researchers would finally discard this unfounded theory.
In his Preface to the First Edition of Le Mystre des Cathdrales, Canseliet (in the translated edition by
Mary Sworder) wrote:
For a long time now the author of this book has not been among us. The man has disappeared
and I cannot without sorrow recall the image of this industrious and wise Master, to whom I owe all,
while lamenting that he should so soon have departed.
This was written in October, 1925, so certainly by this time, and actually a long time before, Fulcanelli had
disappeared or departed. Although it is immediately tempting to interpret this as the time of Fulcanellis
death, upon closer examination, we found that Canseliet is not specifically clear on what he actually means
by the word departed. We will have more to say about this interpretation later in this paper when we
discuss Fulcanellis date of death.
In his Preface to the Second Edition of Les Mystre des Cathdrales, Canseliet (in the translated edition by
Mary Sworder) wrote:
We must say, certainly, that this man of another age, with his strange appearance, his old-
fashioned manners and his unusual occupations, involuntarily attracted the attention of the idle, the
curious and the foolish.
Thus we have a partial description of Fulcanellis appearance and mannerisms. He was eccentric in
appearance, was engaged in unusual occupations and was old-fashioned in mannerism.
Further on in the Preface, Canseliet wrote:
Fulcanelli, like most of the Adepts of old, in casting off the worn-out husk of his former self, left
nothing on the road but the phantom trace of his signature a signature, whose aristocratic nature
is amply shown by his visiting card.
Here we are clearly told of Fulcanellis aristocratic background. Thus we can expect the man behind
Fulcanelli to be a man of titles, perhaps even a French Count. Canseliet also hints that Fulcanelli took
measures to erase the traces of his former self in the same manner as the Adepts of old. We will have more
to say about this unusual practice below.
The following quote is from Canseliets Preface to the second edition of Les Demeures Philosophales,
which he wrote in February, 1958:
Then the Master commented, his dignified and noble face bathed in long gray hair
This again indicates Fulcanellis noble and dignified nature, but adds a new physical characteristic: his



Based on the
contents of
Fulcanellis two
books, it is readily
obvious that he was
very knowledgeable
about the practice of
chemistry and that
he had far more than
a passing interest in
and knowledge of,
architecture and its
deeper principles
and symbolism. His
first book was a
hermetic study of
cathedral
construction,
detailing much of the
symbolism hidden in
the construction of
the porches, bas-
reliefs, facades and
other components of
various Gothic
cathedrals in
Europe. This
tradition was
continued in his
second book where
he expanded on his
hermetic and
alchemical
investigation of
architectural features
and symbols.







face bathed in long gray hair. This indicates that he must have had noticeable facial hair, perhaps a long
beard and mustache.
On the following page in this same Preface, Canseliet writes the following:
concluded Fulcanelli, drawing this quotation from his prodigious memory with the benevolence of his
beautiful smile, his hand raised in a habitual gesture where, that evening, the baphometic ring, was shining,
carved in transmuted gold and which had reached him from the Templars of the Commandery of
Hennebont in Brittany.
Thus Fulcanelli possessed a prodigious memory, had a beautiful smile and wore a baphometic ring of
transmuted gold and of Templar origins.
Based on the contents of Fulcanellis two books, it is readily obvious that he was very knowledgeable about
the practice of chemistry and that he had far more than a passing interest in and knowledge of, architecture
and its deeper principles and symbolism. His first book was a hermetic study of cathedral construction,
detailing much of the symbolism hidden in the construction of the porches, bas-reliefs, facades and other
components of various Gothic cathedrals in Europe. This tradition was continued in his second book where
he expanded on his hermetic and alchemical investigation of architectural features and symbols.
Another important piece of information concerning Fulcanellis background is that he participated in the war
between France and Germany (1870-1871) under the commandment of the famous architect, Violett-le-
Duc. This is another very interesting clue that, astonishingly, no other investigator has paid any attention to.
During the time of the war Fulcanelli would have been in his thirties. Canseliet tells us how Fulcanelli made
a return visit to his former commander after the war and it is likely that they had much to share during this
visit as Viollet-le-Duc like Fulcanelli himself had a strong passion for medieval gothic architecture.
But one of the most astonishing clues to the elusive identity of Fulcanelli was given by Canseliet in the
context of Fulcanellis war memorials when he au pass reveals Fulcanellis true profession (our
emphasis):
Trois ans aprs la malheureuse insurrection de la Commune, Fulcanelli, jeune ingnieur qui avait
particip la defense de Paris, sous les ordres de Monsieur Viollet-le-Duc, rendit visite son
lieutenant-colonel. (La tourbe des philosophes, number 11, 1980).
Roughly translated this states:
Three years after the pitiful insurrection of the Community, Fulcanelli, a young engineer who had
participated in the defence of Paris under the commandment of Monsieur Viollet-le-Duc made a
return visit to his colonel lieutenant.
Thus we gather another clue of fundamental importance: Fulcanelli was an Engineer. As we will see later in
this paper, it is a mystery in itself how this most important fact could have been passed unnoticed by the
researchers who claim to have investigated this matter in depth, since it leads to a perfect match with
Fulcanellis identity as both an Engineer and a Chemist, an obviously rare combination.
When Was Fulcanellis Year of Birth?
We realized that if we were able to determine Fulcanellis year of birth and approximate year of death
(within a year or two), we would have a most reliable tool in which to narrow down various possible
candidates who matched some of the other identified characteristics.
We now come to the most important clue of all: when was the year of Fulcanellis birth? Strangely, this clue
has all but been ignored by the many authors who have speculated on who Fulcanelli may have been.
Again, the confirmation of when Fulcanelli was born comes from the most reliable of sources, one who was
trusted by Fulcanelli Canseliet.

ARTICLES
Fulcanelli's Identity
The Alchemical Art
Planetary
Attributions of Plants
FEATURES
New Releases
From the Fire
Announcements
Lectures
EDITORIAL
From the Editor
Submissions
Subscriptions
Resources
Return to Top

We now come to the
most important clue
of all: when was the
year of Fulcanellis
birth? Strangely, this
clue has all but been
ignored by the many
authors who have
speculated on who
Fulcanelli may have
been. Again, the
confirmation of when
Fulcanelli was born
comes from the most
reliable of sources,
one who was trusted
by Fulcanelli
Canseliet.

This clue is found in the interview between Robert Amadou and Eugene Canseliet in Amadous book Le
Feu du Soleil. On page 67 of the 1978 Jean-Jacques Pauvert edition we find:
E.C. - Ah! son ge, j'en tais sr. Alors que je faisais une course auprs de Champagne, de la part de son
pre, j' arrivai avenue Montaigne l'htel particulier des Lesseps. C'tait en 1919. Fulcanelli tait l, sans
que je m'y attendisse. Il m'a dit qu'il tait content, puis il remarqua que je portais, comme c'tait l'usage, un
brassard noir. De qui tes-vous en deuil? , me dit-il. Je lui rpondis que j'avais perdu ma grand-mre que
j'aimais beaucoup. Dommage, me dit-il, mais quel ge avait-elle? Je lui rpondis qu'elle avait
quatrevingts ans, trs exactement. Ah tiens! fit Fulcanelli, juste mon ge. Il n'y a pas de raison de croire
qu'il ait menti. Il est donc n en 1839. C'est ainsi, par exemple, qu'il a pu connatre l'archologue Grasset
d'Orcet.
Roughly translated, this states:
E.C. [Note: Eugene Canseliet] - Ah! I was sure of his age. While I was making a trip with Champagne, on
behalf of his father, I arrived at Montaigne Avenue at the private mansion of the Lesseps. It was in 1919.
Fulcanelli was there, without my expecting it. He told me that he was content, then he noticed that I carried,
as was the custom, a black arm-band. "Who are you in mourning for? ", he asked me. I told him that I had
lost my grandmother whom I loved very much. "What a pity, he told me, but how old was she?" I answered
him that she was exactly eighty years old. "Ah wait! said Fulcanelli, my age precisely". There is no reason
to believe that he lied. He was therefore born in 1839. That is why, for example, he could have known the
archaeologist Grasset d' Orcet.
This is an extremely important clue that cannot be disregarded. Here we have a clear and specific
affirmation that Fulcanellis true identity was born in the year 1839 and not decades later as other
researchers have consistently suggested.
When did Fulcanelli Depart?
Earlier, we mentioned that Canseliet had stated that Fulcanelli had departed a long time before October
1925. Thus we know that his death or departure had occurred some time before this date. To further our
investigation of Fulcanellis identity, we were left with the challenge of establishing a more precise time for
this stated departure. If we could accomplish this goal then, combined with the information that we
discovered earlier concerning his year of birth, we would have the necessary tool that we had been
searching for that would permit us to narrow the scope of several possible candidates matching some of the
other characteristics. In order to find an answer to this question, we turned to several sources, but primarily
to the helpful interview that Robert Amadou conducted with Canseliet.
Based on Eugene Canseliets account in his interviews and, as mentioned by Walter Lang in his
Introduction to Le Mystre des Cathdrales, Canseliet performed a transmutation during September 1922
in a laboratory at Sarcelles (near Paris). We know from his interview and from the Introduction that Julien
Champagne, the chemist Gaston Sauvage and Pierre Dujols were all present during the transmutation, and
that the transmutation was based on instructions by Fulcanelli. This doesnt really confirm that Fulcanelli
was also actually physically present since the instructions could have been given in a written rather than an
oral form. However, from another source we have confirmation that Fulcanelli was indeed physically
present at the transmutation. This is found in the interview between Robert Amadou and Eugene Canseliet
in Amadous book Le Feu du Soleil. On page 64 we find:
R.A. - Donc, en 1922, la transmutation se passe sur les conseils de Fulcanelli.
E.C. - Il tait prsent, puisqu'il me disait ce qu'il fallait faire, et c'est dans une petite chemine, qui tait
excellente, que j'ai excut l'opration.
Roughly translated, this states:
R.A. [Note: Robert Amadou] - Therefore, in 1922, the transmutation occurred on the advice of FulcaneIli.









ARTICLES
Fulcanelli's Identity
The Alchemical Art
Planetary
Attributions of Plants
FEATURES
New Releases
From the Fire
Announcements
Lectures
EDITORIAL
From the Editor
Submissions
Subscriptions
Resources
Return to Top


E.C. [Note: Eugene Canseliet] - He was present, since he told me what it was necessary to make, and it is
in a small chimney, that was excellent, that I have executed the operation.
Thus Fulcanelli was still seen alive near Paris, in September 1922. However, there is additional
confirmation for an even later date which indicates that Fulcanelli was still alive some time during 1923.
Again, this is found in the interview between Robert Amadou and Eugene Canseliet in Amadous book Le
Feu du Soleil. On page 72 we find:
R.A. - Quand Fulcanelli vous a-t-il remis les notes?
E.C. - J'avais trois paquets. Il me les a remis en 1923.
Roughly translated, this states:
R.A. - When did Fulcanelli give you the notes?
E.C. - I had three packages. He gave them to me in 1923.
It is therefore documented that Canseliet received three packages from Fulcanelli in
1923. These packages were sealed in wax and contained the manuscripts for Le
Mystre des Cathdrales, Les Demeures Philosophales and Finis gloriae mundi.
Canseliet alone was responsible for their subsequent publication, with the exception
of Finis gloriae mundi which Fulcanelli later withdrew.
The year 1923 is therefore the latest reliable date that we could find to indicate that
Fulcanelli was at least still alive until then, although he wasnt necessarily seen at
that time by his associates. Further literature research may yet locate a later date, or
at least a specific month during 1923 when Canseliet received the packages.
There is yet another indication that Fulcanelli departed soon after the date of the
transmutation. On page 61-62 of Le Feu du Soleil Amadou asks Canseliet if
Fulcanelli took him on as a pupil. Canseliet replies that he was Fulcanellis student for six years, from 1916
to 1922, not as someone working directly with him in a laboratory, but by receiving advice as well as a
specific selection of alchemical books to study. Canseliet then mentions the transmutation that was
performed in Sarcelles during 1922. Amadou asks Canseliet if that was the year that he was with Fulcanelli
again, and Canseliet replies that 1922 was also the year that Fulcanelli departed. Obviously, Canseliet
received the packages from Fulcanelli during 1923, so what seems to be implied is that after September
1922 Canseliet no longer was in direct contact with Fulcanelli, at least until his official death which we will
return to later in this paper.
Did Fulcanelli Depart or Die?
We now have two extremely important clues. Fulcanelli was born in 1839 and died or departed either in
1923 or 1924 (it should be noted that the early part of 1925 a long time before October - is also possible
but unlikely, since it is difficult to imagine a long time representing something less than 10 months). This
narrows the search considerably, particularly since few men (especially during the early 1900s) lived to the
ripe old age of 84 or 85.
Earlier, we mentioned that Eugene Canseliet was not clear on his use of the word
departed. Ordinarily, one would assume that he meant died, but other curious
documentation seems to imply otherwise. The interpretation of these seemingly
contradictory and unusual findings presented us with some challenge although, in
the end, we feel that they do not necessarily prejudice our overall theory. For
interests sake, we present below some of these findings and offer some possible
explanations.
Earlier also, we mentioned that Canseliet received three packages from Fulcanelli




Canseliet performed
a transmutation
during September
1922 in a laboratory
at Sarcelles (near
Paris). We know
from his interview
and from the
Introduction that
Julien Champagne,
the chemist Gaston
Sauvage and Pierre
Dujols were all
present during the
transmutation, and
that the
transmutation was
based on
instructions by
Fulcanelli.













during 1923 which were the manuscripts for Fulcanellis three potential books and that Canseliet was given
the responsibility of publishing two of them. Before Canseliet published the first book, Le Mystre des
Cathdrales in 1925, he sent the final draft to Fulcanelli, who then made a few corrections. Oddly, Canseliet
admits that he did not see Fulcanelli in person during this time, nor since 1922.
How then did he manage to get in touch with Fulcanelli and exchange the draft document with him? On
page 71 of Amadous Le Feu du Soleil, we find the answer. Canseliet explains that the exchange was made
through the assistance of a certain Mr. Devaux. We will mention this name again later in this paper. What is
important to note at this time is that Canseliet reports having exchanged information with Fulcanelli during
1925 and that it was not direct but through a third party. At the same time, Canseliet seems to contradict
himself by stating, in his Preface to the First edition to Le Mystre des Cathdrales, that Fulcanelli had
departed long before this time.
The timing and nature of Fulcanellis departure becomes even more confusing
when we examine another interview that Frater Achad conducted with Canseliet
on August 17, 1976 (published in Parachemy, Volume IV, Number 4, Fall 1976).
Canseliet said:
Fulcanelli left in 1930, the year when Demeures Phlosophales (Dwellings of the
Philosophers) was published.
This clearly seems to contradict the statement in the Preface to the First Edition
of Le Mystre des Cathdrales in which he stated that Fulcanelli disappeared or
departed, a long time before October 1925. There seems to be an unaccountable five-year discrepancy
between these two years.
How can this discrepancy be explained? For a possible answer to this we must return to the earlier quote in
which Canseliet said:
Fulcanelli, like most of the Adepts of old, in casting off the worn-out husk of his former self, left
nothing on the road but the phantom trace of his signature a signature, whose aristocratic nature
is amply shown by his visiting card.
To understand this statement, it is necessary to know that there is a recurring tradition amongst alchemists
that Adepts who had produced the Philosophers Stone often found it necessary to fake their death and
live a secret, secluded life, free from the avaricious exploits of those who would stop at nothing, including
murder, to wrest the secret from the Adept. Further, according to these traditions, the Adept was able to
use their discovery of the medical properties of the Philosophers Stone not only to extend their own lives by
at least several decades, but to regain a more youthful appearance and demeanor.
Thus it is possible that what Canseliet was saying was that he believed that Fulcanelli, in the tradition of
Adepts, had removed all trace of his former life by actually faking his physical departure. The death of the
person behind the Fulcanelli identity would have therefore been an elaborate and deliberate charade which
would allow Fulcanelli the opportunity to live the protected and healthy life of the reclusive Adept he had
become. This view is supported by another statement made by Canseliet in the interview with Frater Achad:
In 1922 he visited me several times in Sarcelles. When he left in 1930, he was an old man (un
vieillard) but when I saw him again in 1952 he looked hardly 50 years old.
Whether or not there is any validity to this belief by Canseliet does not necessarily affect our argument of
who Fulcanelli may have actually been, but helps explain why Canseliet himself may have believed and
said what he did. He obviously believed it very deeply, and there are other arguments which may support
his extraordinary belief that someone who looked and acted like Fulcanelli may have lived some time after
he disappeared in 1924, give or take a year (for example, the account by the French researcher, Jacques
Bergier in his Morning of the Magicians). It is not our intention to explore the validity of these arguments
within the scope of this paper, nor do we feel that it is necessary in order to defend our theory.
Thus, in summary, Canseliet says that Fulcanelli disappeared or departed within a year or so of 1924, at
ARTICLES
Fulcanelli's Identity
The Alchemical Art
Planetary
Attributions of Plants
FEATURES
New Releases
From the Fire
Announcements
Lectures
EDITORIAL
From the Editor
Submissions
Subscriptions
Resources
Return to Top











least until the first book was published. He then left again in 1930, the year that his second book was
published. Thus he (or someone who looked and acted like him) must have returned to visit or contact
Canseliet again after his orchestrated death, and sometime between October 1926 and 1930. After this,
Canseliet claimed that he didnt see him again until more than twenty years later in 1952 (incredibly,
Fulcanelli would have been about 113 years old at this time). In any event, regardless of whether Fulcanelli
continued to survive after the official death of his identity or not, we can now logically assume, for our
argument, that officially, the real identity behind Fulcanelli likely died in 1924, give or take a year,
possibly in the vicinity of Paris.
... continued in Alchemy Journal Vol.7 No.3
Return to Top


The Alchemical Art
By John H. Reid III
20052006 John H. Reid III
If anything, it is easy to get lost in the tangle of
the voluminous forest of alchemical authors. To
this add the many disparate approaches
heaped upon the art, especially modern
themes, which have nothing to do with alchemy
except its hijacked name, and its no wonder
many feel the art is a riddle wrapped in an enigma.
My concern today is with helping aspiring practicing laboratory alchemist with defining the parameters of
the work so that they may gain a firm mental underpinning with which to gauge their progress and critique
the disparate methods they will undoubtedly come across.
Simplicity is the key to Natures efforts and for me there are only two laws in this art-science, with which I
have built up my entire philosophy and modus operandi. First and foremost it must be understood that the
alchemical art is transcendent, its operations find expression and validity in all three kingdoms of Nature.
The first law of alchemy may well be stated As above so below, as below so above for performing the
miracle of the One Thing (attributed to Hermes Trismegistus). One can expand the first law by
enumerating what I call the five postulates of the First Law.
1) That the entire universe is divine in origin. Therefore Wisdom and Guidance must be sought from the
source from which all creation flows.
2) All organisms, no matter how subtle or gross they are, have within them the divine spark of life and are
interrelated with each other. It is therefore our task to understand this kinship, so that we may utilize
inspired knowledge to aid in our understanding of how to prepare the quintessence of our matter.
3) All organisms are in a state of constant evolution as they continue their synthesis towards unveiling their
inherent perfection. Upon reaching an understanding of postulate two (above), the true work begins, i.e.,
the aiding of nature by the art of alchemy to reach its highest point of perfection.
4) Humans are a part of the universe. Therefore, they are divine in origin and they can affect all organisms
on all spheres of existence by their actions or inaction.








ARTICLES
Fulcanelli's Identity
The Alchemical Art
Planetary
Attributions of Plants
FEATURES
New Releases
From the Fire
Announcements
Lectures
EDITORIAL
From the Editor
Submissions
Subscriptions
Resources
Return to Top



5) Humans, by understanding the basic laws that govern their beings and conversely the entire universe
may learn to recognize the divine spark of vital energy in all organisms, isolate it, purify it, and manipulate it
to speed up the processes of evolution.
The second law of alchemy is one of simplicity and conservnce, in that the alchemical work is circular in
nature; with this I mean it follows the natural life-cycle of a thing and thus the beginning, end, and entirety of
the work is found within the very subject matter itself. The second law of alchemy may be stated succinctly
as: Use only the materials and products obtained from your matter in revealing the glory of the One Thing.
For example, when performing the alchemical work on plants, we use only products from the plant world
which we have generated from the plant itself. This same caveat holds true for the work in the mineral and
animal kingdoms. This is the big riddle in alchemy. How does one de-compound a thing, using only the
matter of the thing itself? The alchemists claim that when done properly the work will produce a
Philosophical Agent from the matter. This Agent holds dominion over the kingdom from whence it was
engendered, and has the authority to call out in a moments notice the true quintessence from any other
subject of that kingdom, without the use of any foreign device or heat.
The Philosophical Agent allows the alchemist to elicit from the matter its quintessence which the alchemists
say contains intact the regenerative germ of the matter. All other methods of acquisition or de-compounding
the subject known to science are incapable of achieving this goal. It is with this Quintessence and the
properly prepared body that the Stone of the Philosophers is made.
The Philosophical Agent of the Philosophers is known by many names, and indeed each kingdom has its
own agent. Some common names are Mercury of the Philosophers, Circulata,, or Alkahest. While
many people claim the ability to make such things, a distinction needs to be made as to what is being
produced when the menstruum is applied to the matter being worked on. The pulling of a tincture, no matter
how quickly it occurs, is not proof of alchemical virility. Only that which causes a true separation of the
quintessence from the matter through its own power, without external heat or device, can be deemed a
Philosophical Agent; all else is simply a spagyric menstruum. To be clear, just as the name implies a
separation is a taking apart of the matter causing its quintessence to become discernibly divided, while an
extraction is a solution or tincture made by steeping or soaking a substance.
Again the cry goes up: This art is circular nonsense; one can never gain entry, without breaching the no
foreign substance code, and no menstruum extant is known to modern science to be able to separate the
so-called quintessence from minerals in the way alchemist have
described, especially from gold.
If alchemy is renowned for one thing, it is the secrecy put forward
by erstwhile Adepts concerning the prized Philosophical Agent of
the mineral kingdom. It is possible though to prove and openly
demonstrate the validity of Our Arts practice and laws using the
kingdom of the plant world. Adepts in the art have cautioned us first
to master the plant kingdom before attempting the mineral work. If
one follows their advice, they will be amazed at the corollary in
practical laboratory procedure and experience that directly
translates to operations in the mineral kingdom. Therefore leaving
for a moment the mineral realm behind, we seek a menstruum of
the plant kingdom capable of separating the quintessence from a
plant at room temperature. Alchemists claim that their circulata of
the plant kingdom will cause the essential oils of a fresh plant to be
separated from its body in a manner so that it may be seen
suspended in the menstruum like iridescent pearls. This separation
of course is carried out with out any outside heat or device; indeed
one winter I did the separation it in my basement. The ambient
temperature of the room at the time was 65 degrees Fahrenheit.
Some may scoff at this excursion into the plant kingdom but I remind them of the first law of the Art. In fact,
does not the separation Circulata Minor accomplish, in the plant kingdom, what we seek to do with one
aspect of the Philosophical Mercury in the Mineral Kingdom? Here we have our first glimpse of the dual




Simplicity is the key
to Natures efforts
and for me there are
only two laws in this
art-science, with
which I have built up
my entire philosophy
and modus operandi.
First and foremost it
must be understood
that the alchemical
art is transcendent,
its operations find
expression and
validity in all three
kingdoms of Nature.
The first law of
alchemy may well be
stated As above so
below, as below so
above for performing
the miracle of the
One Thing
(attributed to Hermes
Trismegistus).











woman enthroned in Binah. In this aspect, she is dark, sterile, and chaotic reducing all things to their first
matter while eliciting the fructifying principle, the regenerative sperm itself, from the matter. Indeed, all
attempts at acquiring the regenerative principle without this substance sterilizes that which is sought, thus
mortifying it. Only her menstrual waters have the ability to call forth that, which lay hidden in an instant while
preserving it.
If there is one stumbling block in the plant work, nay the entire Royal Art, I would have to say it is from the
paving stone that thinks itself a cornerstone, thus occluding the work at its inception. In the mind of many,
the word spagyric means alchemy. The pursuit of its three essentials, alcohol, essential oil, and salt in the
plant kingdom, or acetone, hydrocarbon, and calx produced in a destructive distillation in the mineral
kingdom, has become the end all of the Alchemical work for many modern practitioners. In the frenzy of the
spagyric rapture more and more heat is used, as the big bad wolf huffs and puffs to wrest these fabled
three from the matter and, with hammer and anvil, pounds them together in the hopes of producing a child
diadem. What can such actions hope to produce but an aborting mass of jelly? My God man you took a
hammer to her womb!
So bedazzled have we become with obtaining the mythic Three that no mind is given to the generation of
the Four. How eschewed and troublesome Nature, with her intricacies, has become. Packaged and sterile,
I will take my one pound of herb, steam distilled, essential oil and grain alcohol please. Where are birth,
growth and death in all of this? Where have we seen the differentiation of the spirit from light, fire, air, water
and earth? If you have not seen the elements fold one into another to form matter, how do you suppose to
un-fold them back into chaos? Observe Nature; for the Art begins where Nature ends. Understanding this
art/science lies in the use of analogy and above all, common sense and reason.
Our first task then is to understand the generation of the elements from the universal aspect of the Three
Essentials so that we may use them to go about our philosophical work. The alchemist is above all
interested in generating the vehicles of the Four Elements from his matter using art, not store bought, off
the shelf items. Such things are anathema to the work and, though they come in handy for quick
demonstration of certain principles, what you are truly after is always missing from commercially prepared
items because it has been thrown out in the trash! An alchemist makes his wine; a Spagyricist at worst
buys distilled grain alcohol or, at best, buys commercial wine from the store. You see, in the practice of the
art, we are after much more than mere ethyl alcohol from wine. There are a myriad of substances that can
be gathered from wine made by ones own hand and, depending on how one goes about collecting and
preparing said substances, makes them suitable for use in Our Art.
But back to the generation of the four elements in the plant work, in a very broad sense one could say that
alcohol equates to the fire element while vinegar is the water element. The volatile essential oil and tincture
extracted from a plant are respectively the volatile and fixed portions of the air element, while the water
soluble, and non-soluble salts, are the analogous volatile and fixed aspects of earth. This though is an over
simplification of the matter at hand and, if allowed to become ones sole barometer of the work, will lead to
the same type of tunnel vision suffered by many in connection with the Three Essentials. The simple truth
of the matter is that things evolve and change in the laboratory so that at one point simple water can and is
rightly understood as the fire element and, in another point of the work, a distilled liquid like 190 proof ethyl
alcohol might be. This is why it is so important to understand the generation of the elements throughout our
matters life as it allows us to bring in pre-cursor objects from sources within the kingdom where they are
more abundant.
As an example, let us take what is called plant mercury in spagyrics and, for want of a better term at the
moment, the fire element in plant alchemy, your friend and mine, ethyl alcohol. Many alchemical writers are
interpreted as saying that there is only one material, one matter with which to work with to acquire our
Philosophical Agent; this though flies in the face of reason and the actions of Nature herself. If such a folly
where true, then it would be analogous to one individual male in each species set aside to be the sole
inseminator of all the females. This obviously is not the case, for each male has the capacity to pass on its
genes, though some desired traits are found more readily in certain individuals than others. So too is it with
eliciting what we desire from our matter, when properly fermented, all members of the plant kingdom will
produce an alcohol or something analogous to it; yet the quantity and quality of said production will vary
from plant to plant. This is simply because certain plants have a higher starch or out right sugar content
than other plants do. As was mentioned before though, we are after other substances than just pure ethyl
alcohol in our work and, while each plant will also yield these desired fractions their quantity and quality,




ARTICLES
Fulcanelli's Identity
The Alchemical Art
Planetary
Attributions of Plants
FEATURES
New Releases
From the Fire
Announcements
Lectures
EDITORIAL
From the Editor
Submissions
Subscriptions
Resources
Return to Top




This art is circular
nonsense; one can
never gain entry,
without breaching
the no foreign
substance code, and
no menstruum extant
vary greatly. The ancients, having also been confronted with this problem, found that, in the plant kingdom,
no other substance gave the copious quantity and consistently high quality of all the needed fractions for
the work than the grape which they hold as King, or a root philosophical item. Now, it would be sheer and
utter folly to say that it is only from the grape that alcohol can be gained in the plant kingdom or, for that
matter, any of the other desired fraction,but as to the parameters of our work it is absolutely ideal. Indeed,
there is a specific mineral which product for product yields in quality and quantity the fractions of
substances needed for the philosophical work in minerals with the same lordship the grape shows in the
plant kingdom. Besides the root philosophical item I use, the only other exception I allow for Law Two is
the introduction of water obtained from rain, dew or snow.
The manner in which one works to bring about the decomposition of the matter and engender the
Philosophical Agent and ultimately the Stone are known as the labors of Hercules and they are the 12
Operations of the Art. These 12 operations are the procedures and devices the alchemist uses to carry out
the Art of Nature, for they mimic Natures work; they are, putrefaction, dissolution, distillation, separation,
calcination, fixation, digestion, sublimation, incineration, multiplication, projection and congelation.
The exact when and why a person utilizes one of these operations is, I believe, an intensely personal
matter as no two alchemists are going to operate in the same manner. Each will have his own predilections
and technical slights of hand when it comes to the work of incinerating an herb or ore. What is important is
that one strictly adheres to Law Two in using fractions produced from the matter itself. For a horse cannot
give birth to a man anymore than a grape can give birth to gold. This is why attempts at making the
Philosophical Mercury from acetates is doomed to failure; it matters not if one is using lead, zinc, or
antimony it will not produce the Mercury of the Philosophers. That is not to say that one cannot produce a
rather strong and interesting alkahest, but it is not the Alkahest.
For the sake of argument, let us suppose then that we have prepared our Philosophical Agent correctly and
it gives us a true separation of the essentials from the matter. Mind you, we are not talking about the mere
drawing of a tincture out of the matter but a true separation of the essentials from the matter. If the results
are similar to our experience with circulate, we can expect to have a substance analogous to a plants
essential oil, either floating on top of our menstruum or it will be settled on the bottom of our container. In
either case, this essential will clearly and easily be seen and delineated from our menstruum. Our
menstruum itself will also be tinged by our matter; this colored substance when the menstruum is
removed- along with the remnants of the matters body needs to be processed according to the art to
produce the crystalline body of our diadem.
Again, we come back to Mercury. Terms like water that does not wet the hands, glue of the eagle,
virgins milk, water of chaos, celestial rain, May dew, and sweat of the dunghill, have been used to
denote the Mercury of the Philosophers. Each of these terms is supposed to be referring to a singular
substance but none evoke a singular image or utility in the mind. Glue is meant to hold, or refrain, a thing
from movement, while milk evokes a nutritive and nurturing line of thought, and water of chaos shouts of
dissolution and resolution. But when viewed as a series of events, certain characteristics of the Mercury
can be seen. Again, my mind goes to Binah, which in one case is bright and fertile, and in another corrosive
and dissolving and I know I am dealing with two separate substances. Each of these disparate substances
is essentially from the same fraction of the matter though prepared uniquely and used at different times
during the work. Indeed, what use would one have of a substance capable of causing a separation when
one has entered the bridal chamber?
A modern misconception about alchemy in regards to making either the mineral or plant Stone is that one
combines the three essentials to make the Stone. The truth is there are only two, the white and red
mercury. The latter is of course the Sulphur of the Philosophers, the red oil that carries the regenerative
sperm of the matter hence the need for its acquirement by a specially prepared Philosophical Agent
hailing from the kingdom in question, the former being the body containing the seed. As odd as it may
seem, the Mercury and the Salt are one, because in all cases what is seen as the Philosophical Mercury
comes from and is made from the Philosophically prepared Body. For those enthralled with manage et trois,
we should remember that the old philosophers described a King and Queen entering the bridal chamber;
the third did not show up until after consummation of the union and a period of gestation. It is the
appearance of this neo-substance that announces the birth of a rarified singularity, the One true Stone.
In the proper preparation then of your Philosophical Body, a very interesting thing happens which allows
is known to modern
science to be able to
separate the so-
called quintessence
from minerals in the
way alchemist have
described, especially
from gold.






ARTICLES
Fulcanelli's Identity
The Alchemical Art
Planetary
Attributions of Plants
FEATURES
New Releases
Announcements
Feedback
EDITORIAL
From the Editor
Submissions
Subscriptions
Resources
Return to Top


you to tell it is animated and fertile; it will increase in size and weight even though you have not added
anything to it, not even more of the aforementioned Philosophically prepared body. It accomplishes this
task solely through an act analogous to our respiration, though its inhalations and exhalations are far
longer. Observation of the weight of the matter before and after completing this tedious process will show
an increase of weight by two or three fold; in this way the volatile becomes fixed.
Finally, there is of course the proper preparation of the essential known as sulphur. It is not enough to
merely get this oil, even with the Philosophical Agent, the soul must also be made capable of flight, and
thus the fixed is made volatile. As per Law One, we see this is indeed possible in all three kingdoms; for
can not the soul of a man who is the most disdained among us be changed and ennobled when the true
inner light of divinity is found? Brother Basilius Valentinus speaks of a dexterous distillation wherein the
very tincture of the soul of a mineral or a metal is made to transcend the head of the alembic and condense
in the receiver, not as a clear spirit but the very color of the original oil, only brighter! The plant kingdom
also gives us this phenomenon but it is not solely found in the volatile essential oils of the plant; this
mystery is fully expressed in making the tincture gently ascend also. The mythology surrounding the life
and death of Jesus the Christ is, the Adepts tell us, a record of instruction of the alchemical process;
especially germane to the discussion of the sublimation of the soul/tincture is his resurrection. The
mythology surrounding the event states that when Mary went to the tomb and looked within, she found it
empty of Christ body whereupon she began to weep. A voice from behind her asked: Woman why are you
weeping? With tears still falling, she turned and addressed a man whom she supposed was the gardener
and beseeched him to tell where he had laid the body of her Master. He called her by her name and she
instantly recognized him. We see in the resurrected Christ the power and demonstration of the
Philosophical Agent by its ability to elicit the light from within, but this event also points silently to the matter
concerning the soul/tincture. Mary saw the risen Christ as a man, not a translucent essential spirit, but
rather a flesh and blood man. Thus, we seek in the plant world also the transformation of the soul where its
volatile and supposed fixed colored tincture transcends the alembics head, entwined with the spirit and
body.
Return to Top

Planetary Attributions of Plants:
A Compilation According to Eleven Bibliographic Sources Currently in
Print.
By Johann F. W. Hasler
Introduction to the Series
During the several years in which I have been studying the magical and alchemical properties of plants
according to the Wiccan and Hermetic traditions, I have several times faced at first the confusion, and later
the frustration, of noticing that different sources assign different planetary attributions and correspondences
to the same plants.
One is often faced, while preparing a recipe or determining the components which are more appropriate for
a certain working, with the possibility of a certain plant one wishes to work with being assigned to the
influence of three, four, and sometimes even five different planets, according to different authors. When
these planets are somehow related (like Mars and Saturn being considered in the past as evil or of
detrimental, limiting energy), one might attribute this to the development of astrological understanding
through time and consequently consider them of the same general limiting intention in light of the more
current knowledge. But when the possibilities offered can not be so clearly grouped into one general aura
or type of energy, one is left with no other solution than to make an almost random choice based more on
the preference one might have for a certain author, publisher, tradition or period of the history of magic than



























on any other data, especially if one has limited previous experience in working with the problematic plants
in question.
In time I have come to accept this as a rather typical and actually something to be expected of spiritual
sciences such as the Hermetic or Occult sciences, in which personal insight and individual discoveries
through meditation, contemplation, or actual communion and communication with the spiritual essences or
patron spirits of the plants are considered as valid sources of information as their pharmacological
constituents would be. As a matter of fact several of the sources that cite the planetary attributions of plants
are well aware of this fact and specifically list more than one planetary correspondence in the entries for
some plants, pointing out this fact clearly in their prefaces, footnotes or correspondence tables.
In this series of seven compiled tables of correspondences I do not wish to comment or establish a
judgement over the validity of this and other problematic and strongly criticized epistemological approaches
of the alchemy, magical herbalism, Hermeticism and other occult sciences. Yet as a complement to the
existing qualitative data which such approaches yield, and which exist profusely, I present here some
quantitative data, in this case of a bibliographical nature, so that a decision on the planetary
correspondences of plants may be taken by the practitioner based on his or her preference of certain well-
known authors in the field.
I have gotten a hold of eleven recently printed sources that include if not whole tables at least a mention of
the planetary correspondences of plants. They include a manual of evocation of spirits, a manual on
planetary magic, a commented and edited re-print of Agrippa, a manual on the construction of talismans,
two manuals on practical alchemy and several magical reference works, either specifically devoted to
botanical magic, magical herbalism and magical aromatherapy, or of a wider scope.
Apart from Donald Tysons reprint of Agrippas Three Books of Occult Philosophy (first appeared in Antwerp
in 1531) all of the sources are modern, and most are still in print and easily obtainable through bookstores
or the Internet. I have chosen these types of sources because the intention of this series is to be an aid to
practicing spargyricists, rather than a bibliographical referencing source for historical studies. I have
included the Agrippa not only because it is perhaps the single most important original source of
contemporary natural magic (magia naturalis) but also because, as the rest of the sources I refer to, it is
readily available commercially, having been reprinted by Llewellyn in 2004.
Notes to the Tables
All types, parts and components of plants (trees, shrubs, herbs, seeds, fruits, barks, roots, etc.) have been
included in the same table. Likewise, what authors divide in their books into categories such as trees,
herbs, oils, essences or incenses/perfumes, has been included in the same table.
There is one table for each of the seven ancient planets of alchemy. The plants that different authors assign
to each of the planets are listed here, alphabetically. After the name or variations of the name of plants, a
list of superscript letters appears. The key is the first letter of the surname of author or authors of the
specific books surveyed, listed below under Bibliographic Key. When there are variations in spelling but it
is clearly the same plant, the bibliographic key specifies which author uses what spelling. For example,
CamomileFA, D&Ph, Z, ChamomileW means that Frater Albertus, Denning & Phillips and Zalewski spell the
plant camomile, but Whitcomb spells is chamomile.
When there are variations in spelling, as listed above (camomile and chamomile, hellbore and hellebore
and so forth), all variations have been listed, usually one after the other in the same line of the table, but
sometimes also separately, in alphabetical order. No attempt of correcting possible errors or
inconsistencies in this respect has been attempted; the tables simply refer to which book refers to what in
what way. If Zalewski, for example, writes celadine while most other authors write celandine, this has been
duly noted but not expurgated or corrected in any way.
As these tables are thought as an aid for practicing spargyricists, they are designed as a practical directory
for quick reference. This is why, for easier location of particular plants, some have been entered twice,
always in alphabetical order. For example, black pepper appears both as Black pepper but also as Pepper,
black. The same rule applies to all plants with composite names, or in the case when spelling varies so
ARTICLES
Fulcanelli's Identity
The Alchemical Art
Planetary
Attributions of Plants
FEATURES
New Releases
From the Fire
Announcements
Lectures
EDITORIAL
From the Editor
Submissions
Subscriptions
Resources
Return to Top











greatly as to warrant a different line in the table.
Bibliographic Key
A
Agrippa Von Nettesheim, Henry Cornelius, The Three Books of Occult
Philosophy: A Complete Edition (St. Paul, MN: Llewellyn Publications, 2004)
[1533], edited by Donald Tyson. Book I, chapters 23-29 pp.75-95.

C1
Cunningham, Scot, Magical Aromatherapy: The Power of Scent (St. Paul, MN:
Llewellyn, 1989), p. 166.

C2
Cunningham, Scot, Cunningham's Encyclopedia of Magical Herbs (St. Paul,
MN: Llewellyn, 2002), pp. 271-273.

C&C
Cicero, Chic & Cicero, Sandra Self Initiation into the Golden Dawn Tradition,
pp.281-282, 291.

D&Ph
Denning, Melita and Phillips, Osborne, Planetary Magick: a complete system
for knowledge and attainment (St. Paul, MN: Llewellyn Publications, 1992)

F
Farrell, Nick, Making Talismans: living entities of power (St. Paul, MN:
Llewellyn Publications, 2001) p. 171.

FA
Albertus, Frater, The Alchemist's Handbook: Manual for Practical Laboratory
Alchemy (New York: Samuel Weiser, 1974).

J
Junius, Manfred M., The Practical Handbook of Plant Alchemy: An Herbalist's
Guide to Preparing Medicinal Essences, Tinctures, and Elixirs (Rochester, VT:
Healing Arts Press, 1993) [1979], pp. 102-122.

K
Konstantinos, Summoning Spirits: The Art of Magical Evocation (St. Paul, MN:
Llewellyn Publications, 2002), p.146.

W
Whitcomb, Bill, The Magician's Companion: A practical encyclopedic guide to
magical & religious symbolism (St. Paul, MN: Llewellyn Publications, 2001)
pp. 467-472.

Z
Zalewski, Christine L., Herbs in Magic and Alchemy: Techniques from Ancient
Herbal Lore (Saint Paul, MN: Llewellyn Publications, 1990), pp. 115-124.

Table 1 Solar Plants
PLANT CORRESPONDENCES OF THE SUN

Acacia
D&Ph, W, C&C, C2

Almond
Z

Aloe
Z

Amber
A

Angelica
FA, W, Z, C2, J

Angelica, wild
J

Arabic, Gum
C2

Ash
C2
, Ash Tree
FA, W, Z

Ash
J

Balm
A

Balsam
A

Bay
C1, C2, A, C&C, Z
, Bay Tree
FA, W

Bean
Z







ARTICLES
Fulcanelli's Identity
The Alchemical Art
Planetary
Attributions of Plants
FEATURES
New Releases
From the Fire
Announcements
Lectures
EDITORIAL
From the Editor
Submissions
Subscriptions
Resources
Return to Top





Benzoin
W, Z, C2

Bergamot
C1, J

Blueweed
J

Borage
Z

Bromeliad
W, C2

Burnet
FA

Butterbur
FA

Buttercup
Z

Calamus aromaticus (sweet calamus)
A

Calamus
Z, J

Calendula
C1

Camomile
FA, D&Ph, Z
,

Chamomile
W
,
Camphor
Z

Carline Thistle
Z

Carnation
W, C1, C2

Cashew,
W, C2
Cashew nuts
D&Ph

Cassia
Z

Cedar
W, C1, C2, A

Celadine
Z

Celandine
FA, C2, J

Centaury
Z, C2

Centaury, small
FA
, Centaury,

lesser
J

Chamomile
W, C2
, Chamomile, Roman
J
, Chamomile, German
J
, Camomile
FA, D&Ph, Z

Chicory
W, C2

Chrysanthemum
D&Ph, W, C2

Cinnamon
D&Ph, W, C1, C2 A, C&C, Z
, Ceylon cinnamon
J

Cinquefoil
J

Citron
W, C2

Citrus fruit rind
F

Clove tree
J

Cloves
A, Z

Coconut
Z

Copal
D&Ph, C1, C2

Corn
Z

Daffodil
Z

Dandelion
Z

Date palm
D&Ph

Dittany
A, J

Elecampane
J

Eucalyptus
Z

Eyebright
FA,D&Ph, C2, Z, J

Finger-grass
J

Five-leaf
J

Frankincense
D&Ph, W, F, C1, C2, A, K, Z

Galbanum
Z

Gentian (great felwort)
A, J

German chamomile
J

Ginger
A, J

Ginseng
W, Z, C2

Goldseal
C2

Goto Cola
Z

Grape, grapevine
J

Grapefruit
Z

Ground ivy
J

Gum Arabic
C2








ARTICLES
Fulcanelli's Identity
The Alchemical Art
Planetary
Attributions of Plants
FEATURES
New Releases
Announcements
Feedback
EDITORIAL
From the Editor
Submissions
Subscriptions
Resources
Return to Top





Hazel
W, C2

Heart-trefoil
FA

Helienthus
Z

Heliotrope
D&Ph, W, Z, C2

High Joan the Conqueress
Z

Honewort
Z

Honey
Z

Ivy, ground
J

Juniper
FA, W, C1, C2, Z, J

Larkspur
D&Ph

Laurel
D&Ph, J

Lemon balm
J

Lemon
W, Z
, Lemon tree
J

Libanotis (rosemary?)
A

Lignum aloes
A

Lignum Vitae
Z

Lime
W, C1, C2

Lingwort
J

Liquidamber
C2

Lote-tree

(lotus tree)
A

Lovage
FA, C2

Marigold
FA, D&Ph, FA, C&C, A, Z, C2, J

Marshmallow
J

Mastic
F, A, Z, C2

Mimosa
D&Ph

Mint
A

Mistletoe
D&Ph, W, Z, C2, J

Musk
A

Mustard, black
J

Mustard, white
J

Myrrh
Z

Neroli
C1

Oak
D&Ph, W, Z, C2

Olibanum
C&C, Z

Olive
Z, C2
, Olive tree
J

Orange
W, C1, C2
, Orange tree
J

Palm
C2

Passionflower
J

Peony
W, A, C&C, C2, J

Pepper
A
, Pepper, white and black
J

Petitgrain
C1

Pimpernel
FA, Z

Pimpernel, common scarlet
J

Pine
D&Ph, K

Pineapple
D&Ph, W, C2

Plantain
J

Ribwort
J

Rice
W, C2, J

Roman chamomile
J

Rosemary
FA, W, C1, C2, Z, J

Rowan
W, C&C, Z, C2

Rue
FA, Z, C2
, Rue, common
J

Saffron
FA, D&Ph, W, F, C1, C2, A, C&C, Z

Saint Johns Wort
J

Salendine
A

ARTICLES
Fulcanelli's Identity
The Alchemical Art
Planetary
Attributions of Plants
FEATURES
New Releases
Announcements
Feedback
EDITORIAL
From the Editor
Submissions
Subscriptions
Resources
Return to Top












Sandalwood
C2

Sesame
W, C2

Small Centaury
FA

St. Johns wort
FA,D&Ph, Z, C2

St. Peters wort
FA

Storax
F, Z

Strawberry, wild
J

Sundew
FA, J

Sunflower
D&Ph, W, C&C, Z, C2, J

Sweet marjoram
A

Tangerine
C2

Tea
W, C2

Tormentil
FA, Z, C2

Turnsole
Z

Vanilla
D&Ph

Vervain
A

Vine vipers bugloss
FA

Vipers buglass
Walnut
W, Z, C2
, Walnut tree
FA,D&Ph, J

Witch hazel
D&Ph, W, C2

Yellow rose
D&Ph

Zedoary
A, J


FEATURES
New Releases
Real Alchemy
by Robert Allen Bartlett
Review by Dennis William Hauck
ISBN 978-1-84728-478-5. Quinquangle Press. Pbk. 212 pp. $24.95
<< To order this book online, click on bookcover.

In this important new book on practical alchemy, Robert Allen Bartlett
explains what the ancients really meant when they used the term "Philosopher's Stone" and spoke of the
"Great Work." Bartlett has been a practicing alchemist for over thirty years and was a student of the
twentieth centurys most highly recognized alchemist, Frater Albertus, at Paracelsus College beginning in
1974. After receiving his degree in Chemistry in 1979, Bartlett was appointed Chief Chemist at Frater
Albertus' Paralab.
Bartlett's book is an amazing accomplishment in many ways. He has laid bare the secret processes and
experiments of our discipline with exceptional clarity and openness. He has exposed the Hermetic origins of
alchemy and shown how modern alchemists approach the ancient art. But first and foremost, his book is a
revelation of the genuine craft of alchemy as it was meant to be practiced.
A medieval alchemist brought back to our era would be highly amused at the endless intellectual











Bartlett's book is an
amazing
accomplishment in
many ways. He has
laid bare the secret
processes and
experiments of our
discipline with
exceptional clarity
and openness. He
has exposed the
Hermetic origins of
alchemy and shown
how modern
alchemists approach
the ancient art. But
first and foremost,
his book is a
revelation of the
genuine craft of
alchemy as it was
meant to be
practiced.





discussions among modern theorists as to the nature and depth of alchemy or its sudden blossoming in the
offices of psychiatrists and New Age counselors. Has no one ever tried it? he would ask incredulously.
What good is such understanding without its practical application in the world?
When an alchemist performs a laboratory experiment, it is the culmination of careful planning to find the
right timing and personal purification to create the sacred space in which the transformation can take place.
The alchemist becomes an ingredient in his own experiment, and his intention and passion contribute to the
outcome. He suffers as the essences are teased and tortured from the substance, and he is elated when
the hidden spark of truth brings the dead matter back to life on a new level of being.
Admittedly, this is a strange way of looking at laboratory work in a materialistic, industrialized world, and
there are many prejudices the modern mind must overcome to accept the possibility that alchemy is real.
Yet perhaps, after reading this book with a free heart and open mind, you might find an ancient voice
speaking to you through the drone of appliances, engines, and commercial broadcasts that make up our
everyday environment. The voice will whisper: But have you tried it?
Return to Top

From the Fire by Dennis William Hauck
I think modern corporations and government bureaus can take a clue to becoming "living organizations" by
examining the organizational structure of the International Alchemy Guild (IAG). I have been active in the
group for over 15 years and am now the Solar (or Chokmah) president. My authority is balanced by the
Lunar (or Binah) president, Hans Schimmer. Hans is a private and conservative man, cautious and
practical, and was born under the Water sign Cancer. I am expansive and liberal, ambitious and
imaginative, and born under the Fire sign Aries. We are both complete opposites and stubborn in our traits,
but our individual efforts merge to create something new, something that is not wholly in either one of us.
That energetic pairing and merging of opposites is true throughout the Guild. Both presidents are equal
members of the Board of Governors, which is composed four other members representing the functions of
Geburah, Chesed, Hod, and Netzach in the Kabbalistic Tree of Life. The Geburah person represents the
strategic negative, complaining, or contractive opinions of the membership, while the Chesod person
represent the strategic positive, praising, or expansive opinions of the membership. The Hod person is the
Guild accountant and auditor and also head of marketing and recruitment. The Netzach person is the
membership director and also manages employees and volunteers, who carry out the daily work and
projects of the Guild.
In the overall organization of the Guild, the central pillar is the expression of this balanced guiding force as
it manifests to form the functional Guild body. Kether is the mystical Source of Light that guides Guild
intention and activities. Daath is the accumulated knowledge and archives of the Guild that is part of a
hidden Underground River of wisdom that flows unbroken from ancient times. Tiphareth is the heart of the
Guild, its diverse and dedicated membership. Yesod is the imagination, life force, and determination that
members give the Guild to keep it alive and functioning in the Great Work. Malkuth is the fundamental
requirement of membership dues, donations, sales, and physical buildings and meeting places to create the
physical presence of the Guild in the created world.
The Guild is currently expanding in the United States as a federally tax-exempt, non-profit organization. We
have also opened our membership and are seeking candidates for members of the Board of Directors. If
you would like to become active in this dynamic organization, visit www.AlchemyGuild.org. The next annual
meeting will be held next year in Las Vegas.
Return to Top




























Announcements
Employment Opportunity. Flamel College is looking for a part-time administrative assistant. Most
work will be out of your home on a computer, although we prefer someone living in the
Sacramento, California, area. Contact Andrea Zuckavich or fill in the form at
www.FlamelCollege.org/feedback.htm.
Walk on Water, a controversial new movie on the toxic effects of mercury, is
premiering in December. You can view the trailer at
http://www.awalkonwater.com/trailer
The Celestine Prophecy movie is scheduled to premier in April 2007. Directed by
Armand Mastroianni with screenplay by James Redfield and Barnet Bain. MOVIE UPDATES |
PRODUCTION CREDITS | IMAGE GALLERY | IMDb
Los Visionarios is an intentional community founded in 1999 in south Ecuador, with the goal of
sharing not only material things and comfort but also to help each other find their path to spiritual
advancement, not to preach no one concept nor to force any member to participate, but more so to
attract others wanting to work together in finding the ultimate truth. Websites: Utopian EcoVillage
Network Federation www.uevn.org and Comunidad Los Visionarios www.LosVisionarios.org .
Writers Wanted! The Alchemy Journal is looking for articles on any aspect of alchemy, including
biographies, historical material, practical laboratory work, spagyric recipes, philosophical pieces,
poetry, experiences in personal transformation, spiritual insights, Hermeticism, Gnosticism, book
reviews, film and video reviews, website reviews, artwork, etc. Please submit your material or
queries via email to editor@alchemylab.com.
Send your announcements to the Alchemy Journal.
Return to Top

Lectures & Conferences
November 10-12, 2006. Green Festival in San Francisco, California
This is the premiere event for products, ideas, and networking to support sustainable living at all levels,
attended by over 10,000 people last year. Green Festival brings together community, likeminded leaders
and businesses in celebration of sustainable economy, ecological balance and social justice. Paul and
Micah from Al-Qemi will be sampling and selling their line of tinctures and other products at the event. You
can contact them at (541) 345-3456. Information on the event is at www.greenfestivals.org.

October 5-7, 2007. International Alchemy Conference in Las Vegas, Nevada.
ETX Seminars (in collaboration with the International Alchemy Guild) is currently organizing what we hope
to be the largest gathering of alchemists and alchemical practitioners in 500 years. The event is scheduled
to take place over the Columbus Day weekend, October 5-7, 2007, in Las Vegas. Complete information can
be found at www.AlchemyConference.com .
Return to Top




























EDITORIAL
From the Editor (by Duane Saari)
Alchemy means many different things to many different people. Ask ten people what they believe alchemy
to be and you will be given ten different pictures. While the precise nature of the Art has been obscured for
different reasons during the thousands of years of its existence, the word has nearly lost its ability to
identify, describe or explain, for those of us living in the current culture, what alchemy was in the past and is
today.
Out of curiosity, and to test this belief, I entered alchemy into our cultures Delphic Oracle - Googles News
search engine - and was not surprised at the answer I was given. In the reverse of the order that the search
engine provided, the top ten ways that the word alchemy was used in the news on August 23, 2006 follows:
Number 10 the name of a company Alchemy Enterprises that makes magnesium based
hydrogen-on-demand fuel system.
Number 9 part of the title of an online article: The Midas Bug the bacterial alchemy of gold in
which the role of bacteria in the formation of gold nuggets is described.
Number 8 a new sound track for Goatwhore a New Orleans based band.
Number 7 the name of a technical solution for the centralized management of USB flash drives
KeyPoint Alchemy - announced by RedCannon Security.
Number 6 a second announcement by Alchemy Enterprises that they successfully connected
their Electric Power Cell to existing hydrogen fuel cell technology and produced electricity.
Number 5 a title of an article Seductive Alchemy describing Istanbul in The Hindu, the online
edition of Indias national newspaper.
Number 4 as a comparison to the practice of Bodhicitta in a presentation: Bodhicitta: the
Ultimate Alchemy given by Dzongsar Khyentse Rinpoche at the Herbst Theatre in San Francisco.
Number 3 another announcement of Red Cannons solution for managing flash drives KeyPoint
Alchemy.
Number 2 yet another announcement by Alchemy Enterprises.
And the Number 1 way that the word alchemy was used the name of a project at the Manchester
Museum facilitating the access of artists to the Museum to create new works of art.
The Oracle seems to be saying that the word alchemy is the name of a variety of things in the environment
businesses, songs, technical devices, the experience of a foreign city. Hmmmmy hunch appears to be
confirmed. Yet my inner voice is saying: Yes, but Yes, but be careful of what you ask for; you will
usually get it or, as the Rolling Stones song says, you may just get what you need.
So, I took another step down the path I had begun and stole one more response from the Oracles Temple.
It was easy; I turned the page of the online tome by simply selecting Next Page. And, there it was: an article
in the The New York Sun about the Alchemy Conference held in Philadelphia four weeks ago that was
sponsored by the Chemical Heritage Foundation. Larry Principe, a professor at John Hopkins and chairman
of the conference that organizers believed to be the largest one ever held in America on the history of
alchemy, claimed the field is in flourishing health. Principes attention was drawn to alchemy when he
discovered a note by Issac Newton in which the noted scientist (and alchemist) described a theoretical way




Alchemy means
many different things
to many different
people. Ask ten
people what they
believe alchemy to
be and you will be
given ten different
pictures. While the
precise nature of the
Art has been
obscured for
different reasons
during the thousands
of years of its
existence, the word
has nearly lost its
ability to identify,
describe or explain,
for those of us living
in the current culture,
what alchemy was in
the past and is
today.












of creating the Philosophers Stone. The note is part of the Roy G. Neville Historical Chemical Library
acquired by the Chemical Heritage Foundation in 2004. Conference participants, who included experts in
science and history from the US and other countries, examined the contributions of alchemy to science,
literature and art. I did notice that conference attendees enjoyed alchemy-inspired music played by a
Baltimore based ensemble call Arcanum.
So, how do I resolve this striking difference in the use and understanding of the word: alchemy. Im not
certain. But, I am energized by the thought of scientists studying the alchemical works of Issac Newton and
gathering to present information on the contributions of the Art to our world. And my hope is that this issue
of the Alchemy Journal and others to come will continue to herald and support the emerging understanding
of alchemy as one of the foundations upon which our culture and others is based.
Return to Top

Submissions
Submit your articles on any aspect of alchemy. We are looking for biographies, historical articles, practical
laboratory work, spagyric recipes, philosophical pieces, experiences in personal transformation, spiritual
insights, Hermeticism, Gnosticism, book reviews, film and video reviews, website reviews, artwork, etc.
Please submit your material or queries via email to AlchemyEditor@yahoo.com.
Subscriptions and Archives
The Alchemy Journal is published quarterly at the annual solstices and equinoxes. Issues are posted at the
Alchemy Lab website on the journal archives page at www.AlchemyLab.com/journal.htm. This page also
contains a Directory of Past Issues and an Index of Articles. To subscribe to the journal, simply send a
blank email to AlchemyJournal-subscribe@yahoogroups.com.
Alchemy Resources
Alchemy Website (Original Alchemy Texts) www.levity.com/alchemy/
Alchemergy (Modern Alchemy) www.Alchemergy.com
Alchemy Guild (Membership Organization) www.AlchemyGuild.org
Alchemy Lab (Alchemy Articles, Files, and Gallery) www.AlchemyLab.com
Crucible Catalog (Books, Tapes, Labware, Tinctures, Herbs) www.Crucible.org
Flamel College (Alchemy and Hermetic Courses) www.FlamelCollege.org


2006 All Rights Reserved. Published by the Alchemy Guild.


ARTICLES
Fulcanelli's Identity
The Alchemical Art
Planetary
Attributions of Plants
FEATURES
New Releases
Announcements
Feedback
EDITORIAL
From the Editor
Submissions
Subscriptions
Resources
Return to Top

You might also like