You are on page 1of 2

FTIR spectroscopy was used to distibetween 1Büsgen-Institut, Abtlg.

Forstbotanik und
beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) trees grown at five Baumphysiologie, Georg-August-Universität
different sites; one in middle Germany close to Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
Göttingen (forest district Reinhausen), three Rumana Rana, 1
located in the southwest (two in Rhineland- 1Büsgen-Institut, Abtlg. Forstbotanik und
Palatinate: forest districts Saarburg and Baumphysiologie, Georg-August-Universität
Hochwald, and one in Luxembourg), and one in Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
North-Rhine Westfalia. Detailed investigation of
the spectra in the fingerprint region (1800–600 2Büsgen-Institut, Abtlg. Forstbotanik und
cm-1) revealed 16 distinct peaks and shoulders, Baumphysiologie, Georg-August-Universität
most of which were assignable to wavenumbers Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
previously shown to represent wood compounds. Günter Müller, 2
Differences in peak heights and peak ratios 2Büsgen-Institut, Abtlg. Forstbotanik und
indicated differences in wood composition of Baumphysiologie, Georg-August-Universität
beech trees from different sites. To determine if Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
the wood of individual trees could be
distinguished, principal component analysis 3Büsgen-Institut, Abtlg. Forstbotanik und
(PCA) and cluster analysis were performed using Baumphysiologie, Georg-August-Universität
FTIR spectra as input data. With both PCA and Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
cluster analysis, trees from four of the five Annette Naumann, 3
different sites were separated. It was not possible 3Büsgen-Institut, Abtlg. Forstbotanik und
to distinguish between trees from Saarburg and Baumphysiologie, Georg-August-Universität
Hochwald, where similar edaphic and climatic Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
conditions exist, while wood spectra from trees
from all other areas clearly segregated. Wood 4Büsgen-Institut, Abtlg. Forstbotanik und
collected at different positions in the stem Baumphysiologie, Georg-August-Universität
(bottom, crown, center and outer year rings) of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
trees grown at the same site was not Andrea Polle, 4
distinguishable. Therefore, FTIR spectral 4Büsgen-Institut, Abtlg. Forstbotanik und
analysis in combination with multivariate Baumphysiologie, Georg-August-Universität
statistical methods can be used to distinguish Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
wood of trees from different growth habitats. Corresponding author. Büsgen-Institut, Abtlg.
Extension of this method to other species may be Forstbotanik und Baumphysiologie, Georg-
of great interest for wood certification, as it may August-Universität Göttingen, Büsgenweg 2,
be possible to distinguish wood, of a given 37077 Göttingen, Germany Phone: +49-551-
species, originating from different regions. 393482 Fax: +49-551-3922705
Citation Information. Holzforschung. Volume 62,
Keywords certification, Fagus sylvatica, FTIR Issue 5, Pages 530–538, ISSN (Online) 1437-
spectroscopy, multivariate statistical method, 434X, ISSN (Print) 0018-3830, DOI:
wood compositionFTIR spectroscopy in 10.1515/HF.2008.104, Available online:
combination with principal component analysis 22/07/2008, September 2008
or cluster analysis as a tool to distinguish beech Publication History: Received: 4/1/2008;
(Fagus sylvatica L.) trees grown at different sites accepted: 30/5/2008; published online:
22/07/2008
Abstract
FTIR spectroscopy was used to distinguish
between beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) trees grown
at five different sites; one in middle Germany
close to Göttingen (forest district Reinhausen),
three located in the southwest (two in Rhineland-
Palatinate: forest districts Saarburg and
Hochwald, and one in Luxembourg), and one in
North-Rhine Westfalia. Detailed investigation of
the spectra in the fingerprint region (1800–600
cm-1) revealed 16 distinct peaks and shoulders,
most of which were assignable to wavenumbers
previously shown to represent wood compounds.
Differences in peak heights and peak ratios
indicated differences in wood composition of
beech trees from different sites. To determine if
the wood of individual trees could be
distinguished, principal component analysis
(PCA) and cluster analysis were performed using
FTIR spectra as input data. With both PCA and
cluster analysis, trees from four of the five
different sites were separated. It was not possible
to distinguish between trees from Saarburg and
Hochwald, where similar edaphic and climatic
conditions exist, while wood spectra from trees
from all other areas clearly segregated. Wood
collected at different positions in the stem
(bottom, crown, center and outer year rings) of
trees grown at the same site was not
distinguishable. Therefore, FTIR spectral
analysis in combination with multivariate
statistical methods can be used to distinguish
wood of trees from different growth habitats.
Extension of this method to other species may be
of great interest for wood certification, as it may
be possible to distinguish wood, of a given
species, originating from different regions.

Keywords certification, Fagus sylvatica, FTIR


spectroscopy, multivariate statistical method,
wood composition
PDF (179 KB) PDF with Links (197 KB)

You might also like