Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Basic Idea: Actions are right or wrong by reference to the consequences produced for
everyone involved.
Act Utilitarianism
An action is morally right if and only if no other alternative action would produce
more net intrinsic good.
An action is morally wrong if some other alternative action would produce more net
intrinsic good.
What is happiness?
Pleasure and the absence of pain.
Unhappiness?
Pain and the absence of pleasure.
Objection to Hedonism:
A promising young piano player losses the ability to play.
Taking pleasure in other’s misfortune
Someone you think is a friend ridicules you behind your back
1. These are both bad in and of themselves.
2. Neither is an experience of pain.
3. Therefore, things other than pain are intrinsically evil and hedonism is false.
What is the right thing? That action which maximizes happiness/pleasure, for as many
people as possible.
The theory of value may be rejected without rejecting consequentialism of all types.
To suppose that life has (as they express it) no higher end than pleasure—no better and
nobler object of desire and pursuit—they designate as utterly mean and groveling;
as a doctrine worthy only of swine . . . p66, RT
Mill’s Response:
Some types of pleasures are of a higher quality than others, e.g. intellectual
pleasures are of a higher quality than sensual pleasures.
1. Those who have experienced a wide selection of both types of pleasure
(intellectual and sensual) prefer the intellectual to the sensual.
2. The best explanation of this preference is that the intellectual pleasures are of a
higher quality than the sensual ones.
3. Therefore, the intellectual pleasures are a higher quality than the sensual ones.
It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates
dissatisfied than a fool satisfied. p68, RT
Mill holds that the principle of utility is a statement of the ultimate ends of persons.
1. Act Utilitarianism implies that we are morally obligated to keep promises only if
doing so would maximize utility.
2. Act Utilitarianism implies that if is morally right to ignore someone’s rights if
doing so would maximize utility.
3. These implications are false.
4. Therefore, Act Utilitarianism is false.
. . .I must repeat again, what critics seldom have the justice to acknowledge, that the
happiness which forms the standard of what is right in conduct, is not the agent’s own
happiness but the happiness of all concerned. p70, RT
“consulted”
2 options:
1. Actual questioning? Prevents paternalism.
2. Consider their well-being? Allows paternalism.
Rule Utilitarianism
Problem: Commits us to rule worship. Also, how about this rule: Follow the other
rules except in cases where not doing so is a way to maximize utility.
Separate Components
Principle of maximization.
Theory of value.
Focus of evaluation.
Utility for who?