Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Among the developing countries, India enjoys a very favourable position for
doubling the present status of silk production of 2969 tonnes owing to the low cost
of labour. Sericulture is ideally suited for improving the rural economy of the
country, as it is practiced as a subsidiary industry to agriculture. The export of silk
goods steadily increased from a modest level of Rs.17 million in 1960-61 to a
whopping Rs.22353 million during 2000-02. The export of 611.66 million US dollars
(Rs. 2781.82 crore) has been achieved during April-Jan period of the year 2006-07.
However, Indian exports are mostly in the low unit price category unlike that of
Western Europe or China. The export of high value products from India is dependent
on import of quality raw silk especially from China. Sericulture as one of the
agricultural pursuits is emerging as a premier enterprise, in certain parts of the
Southern states, in recent years. In 1990s, it recorded a rapid area expansion, and
has now established at around 1.72 m ha. In the process, it has receded mostly
from the rain fed areas, and has got intensified under irrigation. New technologies
with higher production potential in mulberry varieties and their rearing technologies
have provided an unprecedented opportunity for the sericulture enterprise to
develop in the future.
Developing a new technology is not the end of any research. The real success
of a technology lies with the dissemination to larger group of farmers. Therefore,
knowledge and adoption of innovations plays a significant role in increasing the
productivity of farm enterprises. Sericulture occupation is proved to be an
important instrument of economic change in the rural India by helping to create
substantial employment while generating additional income. Right now it occupies
an important position in agricultural production system and is the most popular
and widely practiced cash crop enterprise.
The actual experience in the field however, showed that farmers were not as
prompt in adopting improved practices as expected. The time lag between the
introduction of improved agricultural practices in village and their adoption by
farmers was often unexpectedly long. Though the economic profitability of a
practice is a powerful incentive, it does not necessarily motivate large number of
farmers to adopt them. An innovation diffuses within a social system through its
adoption by individuals. The perception of economic advantage of a recommended
practice is often influenced by factors which are personal, situational, social or
cultural.
Andhra Pradesh was purposively selected for the study as the researcher had
been working in the state under Central Silk Board for about 16 years in Chittoor
district of Rayalaseema region in Andhra Pradesh. The state of Andhra Pradesh is
divided into three regions namely Rayalaseema, Telangana and Coastal Andhra. As
Rayalaseema region has the highest area under mulberry cultivation, it was
purposively selected for the study. There are 49 mandals in Chittoor district, out of
which 10 mandals were selected randomly. From each mandal of Chittoor district 5
villages were randomly selected. Thus a total of 50 villages from Chittoor district
were selected. A list of sericulturists in each village was prepared in consultation
with the Sericultural Service Centres of Central Silk Board and Technical Service
Centres of Department of Sericulture, Andhra Pradesh. From each village 2 big, 2
small and 2 marginal farmers were selected purposively based on their total land
holdings. Thus a total of 300 respondents constituted the sample of the study. The
data interview schedule with the scales for measuring the variables of the study was
first developed and pre-tested with a sample size of 50 sericulturists who were not
included in the sample. Before finalizing the interview schedule necessary
precautions were taken through pre-testing to ensure that questions in the
schedules were unambiguous, clear, complete and comprehensive. After pre-testing,
necessary changes were incorporated in the formation of items/ questions in the
sequence. Data were collected from the sericulturists who were included in the
sample through personal interview method. The interview was conducted during
2005-2007 and the questions were explained to the respondents in the local
language i.e. Telugu for easy administration. Keeping the objectives in view the
following dependent variable was selected.
The yield gaps was possibly observed between experimental station and with
that of demonstration farmers and actual farmers field because of environmental
difference technology components may not be directly transferable from the
experiment station to the farmers field. Also the yield gaps arises mainly because of
the sub-optimal use of new technologies, which may be due to inadequate extension
services besides other physical or socio-economic factors operating in the farming
community in the area. In cross breed cocoon production the yield gaps between
experiment station yield and actual farmers yield is further divided in to two distinct
components by including an intermediate yield level respectively. The potential yield
or yield obtained in actual farmers fields when new technologies are adopted.
In the case of mulberry leaf production the yield gap- I was 31.429 per cent in
K2 variety and 48.668 per cent in V1-variety in big, small and marginal farmers
respectively. This yield gap was possibly observed because of environmental
difference between experimental station and demonstration farmers’ field. It was
also observed that some of the technology component may not be directly
transferable from the experimental station and demonstration farmers’ field.
Further it was also observed that some of the technology component may not be
directly transferable from the experimental station to the farmer fields.
The Yield gap-II in the case of big farmers 8.376 per cent, small farmers27.991
per cent and marginal farmers was 9.865 per cent in K2 variety and the Yield gap-II
in the case of big farmers 19.941 per cent, small farmers 37.729 per cent and
marginal farmers was 22.395 per cent in V1- variety, which indicates the yield gap
was more in V1- variety than K2 variety.
The Total Yield gap of big, small and marginal farmers were 37.172 per cent,
50.623 per cent, and 38.193 per cent in K2 variety and 58.905 per cent, 68.035 per
cent and 60.164 per cent in V1 variety in small and large and marginal farmers
respectively.
The average experimental station yield of cross breed cocoon production was
65.09 kg/crop. The potential farm yields of big, small and marginal farmers were
80kg, 78 kg and 80 kg respectively. The Yield gap II of big, small and marginal
farmers were 25.954 kg/crop, 44.006 kg/crop and 26.838 kg/crop respectively has
been observed. The Total Yield Gap between average farmers’ and the potential
farm yield was found to be 8.992 kg/crop, 32.900 kg/crop and 10.079 kg/crop in
big, small and marginal farmers respectively.
This gap arises mainly because of the sub-optimal use of new technologies,
which may be due to inadequate extension services besides other physical or socio-
economic factors operating in farming community in the area. In the case of
mulberry leaf production, FYM, variety, area, fertilizer and irrigation have significant
effect on potential yield realization. FYM and variety have shown the highest
magnitude of influence on potential yield realization. The reasons attributed was,
the cattle’s have been reduced drastically in most of the villages, hence there is
acute shortage of farmyard manure, even otherwise tendency of farmers normally
they give preference of application of farmyard manure to other major crops,
majority of farmers were having K2 variety and only few farmers have V1 variety and
due to less leaf production in K2 variety farmers could not able to take up more Dfls
for their rearings, though area is sufficiently made available with the farmers it is
not been maximized for cultivation of suitable mulberry variety. The other variables
were area, fertilizers and irrigation. The reasons attributed were fertilizer is not
made available in time in certain season; also there is scarcity of water in some
seasons, which were found to be constraints for potential yield realization of
mulberry production. Mulberry leaf, dfls, materials, disinfectant and mountages
were the factors, which have influenced potential yield realization in the case of
cross breed cocoon.
Constraints perceived by the farmers
1. A considerable number of big, small and marginal farmers are lacking adequate
knowledge on certain recommended practices of mulberry cultivation and
silkworm rearing. Hence, the extension agents need to recognize the situation
and arrange suitable extension activities through group discussions, field visits,
training and demonstrations.
2. A considerable proportion of big, small and marginal farmers either partially
adopted or not adopted certain practices of mulberry cultivation and silkworm
rearing. This situations requires efforts on the part of extension and other
concerned agencies to develop strategy for providing the necessary education,
credit facilities, supply of good quality dfls, increasing irrigation facilities through
giving loans and subsidies, supply of new mulberry material, frequent visit of
extension officers to the villages and solving problems through their valuable
suggestions in time, less cost of supply of bed disinfectants, chemicals and
pesticides etc.
3. It is noticed that extension participation along with the habit of visiting
neighbouring sericulture places were found to have positive influence on the
knowledge and adoption level of sericulture technology. Hence, the policy
makers should take note of socio-economic characters and opinion of the
farmers while formulating developmental activities for disseminating the
improved silkworm rearing practices in any area.
4. Efforts should be made to include subject matter related to motivational factors
in farmers, training programs for making the industry sustainable in the long
run and to lighten the burden of the developmental departments in
disseminating the technology.
5. Majority of the farmers planted varieties in traditional method (mixing Local + K2
+ V1) and lacking knowledge on recommended varieties. Hence extension
agencies have to look to the need and work towards plantation of the desirable
mulberry variety.
6. It is further advisable that the extension agencies should induce the farmers
especially small and marginal farmers by teaching them how they could
successfully serve their needs by joining the existing the social organizations in
the villages. Therefore, the extension agency may strive hard in organizing social
institutes like co-operative societies; rural youth etc, and encourage them to join
in large numbers.
7. Self-confidence is one of the important psychological variables, which drives an
individual to take up new practices and also innovate to the methods of farming
for better performance. This can be built and developed in farmers by teaching
them essential skills in mulberry cultivation and silkworm rearing and by
providing sufficient inputs, crop insurance and better marketing facilities etc to
ensure the profits for farmers.
8. High yielding disease resistant cross breeds suitable for different agro climatic
regions to be developed and distributed.
9. Dependence on hired labour should be reduced so as to increase the family
income and the potential for women labour in sericulture should be tapped fully,
so as top increase the family income.
10.Different institutional agencies should enhance the scale of finance to improve
the capabilities of farmers to take up new production technologies and input.
11.Marketing facilities should be improved in cocoon markets to provide better
services to the farmers.
12.As a matter of motivating farmers, introduction of support price concept for
cocoons may be thought of, apart from training and improved credit facilities.
13.State government should be supply good quality dfls of improved breeds and
more number of grainages to be started to supply timely, adequate disease free
layings on subsidized costs.
14.Frequent refreshing training programmes should be arranged for the extension
personnel to abridge their knowledge on the latest sericultural technologies.
15.For improving the process of transfer of technology sufficient conveyance facility
may be created for effective and timely transfer of technology.
16.Incentives and encouragement either in cash or kind is a must to motivate and to
sustain the interest of the extension personnel to work in the field which is not in
practice at present.
17.In villages, training programmes and study tours which are currently not found
effective may be made effective.
18.Infrastructure facilities like quantity and timely availability of credit quality
layings, marketing facilities and transport facilities may be created for the benefit
of sericulturists.
19.The yield gap was less in the case of small farmers than in large farmers in K2-
varietry, whereas in V1-variety the yield gap was less in large farmers than in
small farmers in mulberry leaf production. The reasons attributed were small
land holding and technology adoption (in K2-varierty) by the small farmers.
Management of mulberry garden (V1-variety) by imposing fertilizer and FYM was
added for large farmers, whereas the small farmers could not do it. So,
awareness through extension service is the need of the hour.
20.The small farmers obtained higher yield than the large farmers in cross breed
cocoon production. This may be due to the small rearing capacity, quite high
input rate of technology adoption and use of labour component. These were the
major advantageous factors which have influenced small farmers to achieve
higher yield there by reducing the yield gaps.
21. It was observed that area, FYM, fertilizer, irrigation and variety had significant
effect on potential yield realization in mulberry leaf production. Similarly,
mulberry leaf, Dfls, disinfectants, rearing material, mountages, transport and
marketing were significant in the case of cross breed cocoon production. This
calls for the attention of the policy makers to consider timely and adequate
supply of necessary technology inputs to the farmers, besides educating the
farmers on the optimum use of inputs.
22.The socio-economic factors such as mulberry area, extension guidance and mass
media participation have significantly influenced cocoon production in both small
and large farmers. So it needs more such programs to strengthen the farmers
approach towards yield realization and to bring down the yield gap.
23. The Total Yield Gap between average farmers and the potential farm yield in
Cross Breed cocoon production were found to be 8.992 kg/crop, 32.900 kg/crop
and 10.079 kg/crop in big, small and marginal farmers respectively. The yield
could be increased if the technology packages are adopted by the small farmers.
Exploitable yield gaps are often caused by various factors including physical,
biological, socio-economic and institutional constraints, which can be effectively
improved through participatory and holistic approaches and action by
government (Cornwell, 1996 and IRRI, 1998). The village level extension workers,
NGO’s and quality clubs (self-help groups) may be strengthened in new
technology know how. Also to impart the technical knowledge and skills to the
sericulture farmers to improve their yield and profitability.
24.The farmers perceived labour problem especially the large farmers as one of the
major constraints in realizing the potential farm yield. Hence the availability of
the labour during peak season is equally important factor influencing on the
exploitation of farm yield. Appropriate measures could be adopted to improve the
efficiency of labour, otherwise alternatively mechanization may be thought off.
25. While analyzing the major constraints for bringing down economically recoverable
gaps, it was found that the crucial inputs such as mulberry leaf, disinfectants,
human labour and mountages were significantly influencing the cocoon
production. Jayaram et al., (1996) attributed use of inputs at sub-optimal level
by the farmers for the low productivity and quality in mulberry as well as cocoon
production. This calls for the attention of the policy makers to ensure timely and
adequate supply of necessary technical inputs to the farmers. Further, educating
the farmers on the optimum use of inputs is also necessary.
Abdul Rehman Kunju, Thampi, A.M. and Bhaskaran, C. (1992). Constraints in
evolving spreading and adopting improved rice varieties in Kerala. Agri. Res. J.
Kerala, 20(1): 38-41.
Ansari, M.R and Sethu Rao, M.K. (1987). Reasons for non adoption or partial
adoption of certain recommended practices of varalaxmi Cotton Crop in
Tungubhadra and Malaprabha Command Areas of Karnataka State,
Maharashtra j .Extn.Edn. VI: 125-130.
Aphiphan (2000). Yield gap analysis in soybean production Kasetsart Univ, Bangkok
(Thailand) 30 leaves. 2:1-10.
Arya, S.R and Shaha, S.L. (1984). New technology of rainfed agriculture and
identification of constraints on its adoption in mid-hills. Agricultural Situation
in India 39: 487.
Babu Reddy, D.R. (1997). Dynamics of cropping patterns in the dry zones of
Karnataka, Ph.D., thesis (unpub.), UAS, Bangalore. 1 – 231.
Bedi, I.S. and Saxena, R.P. (1965). Improved agricultural practices behaviouristic
pattern of farmers in Uttar Pradesh. Econ. Rev., 16: 27 – 33.
Bhoite, H.S. and Girase, K.A. (1991). Relationship between farmers’ socio-personal
traits and adoption of improved dry land technologies Maharashtra J. Extn.
Edn, 10 (1): 115-118.
Bisaliah, S., (1977) Decomposition analysis of output change under new production
technology in wheat farming; some implications to returns on research
investments. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 32(4): 193.
Biswas mantu, (1990). A study on the knowledge and adoption of rice production
technology by the farmers in Andaman district. M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis (Unpub.),
APAU, Hyderabad.
Budihal R.A. (1981). A study on Knowledge and adoption opf improved practicesa
among rabi, jowar growers of Dharwar District. Karnataka State M.Sc. (Agri).
Thesis (unpub) University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore.
Byra Reddy, H.N. and Jalihal, K.A. (1974). Differential characteristics of adopters
and non adopters of fertilizer to rain fed ragi in Bangalore North Taluk,
Mysore J. Agric. Sci.,124 – 132.
Chandargi, D.M. and M.B. Channe Gowda, (1990). Extent of reach and influence of
motion picture entitled mixed farming on the knowledge of farmers – A field
study. Mysore J. Agri. Sci., 24: 528-535.
Catedral. I.G. (1982). Biological constraints for increased seed cotton yields in
selected cotton growing areas (study conducted in Philippines), college Laguna
(Philippines) 121 leaves.
Chikkanna, D.M., Aanjaneya Gowda, D.M., Singhivi, N.R., Srinivasa, G., Iyengar,
M.N.S. and Datta, R.K. (1995). Study on adoption behaviour of sericulturists
and their characteristics in Kolar district of Karnataka. Indian. J. Seri. 34 : 10
–14.
Chitniz.D.H and Bhilegaonkar M.G. (1985). Technological gap in dry farming system
an analysis Maharastra. J. Ext. Educ., 4:73-76.
Choudhary, K.R., Prasad, Y.E and Reddy, G.K. (1980). Analysis of yield gaps and
constraints for groundnut crop in Anantapur Region .Food Farming and
Agriculture. 13: 59-64.
Choudry, K.R., Krishna Rao, G.V and Vasudev, N. (1993). Yield gaps in groundnut
crop-A case study of Ananthapur district in Andhra Pradesh .Indian Journal of
Agricultural Economics, 48: 381-382.
Coleman, A.L. (1951). Differential contacts with Extension work in New York, Rur.
Sociology, 16: 201 – 216.
Dakhore, K.M., Mahajan, B.S. and Digraskar, S.U. (1993). Adoption of dry land
technology by farmers. Maharashtra J. Extn. Edn. 12: 215 -218.
Datta, R.K.(1996). Production and demand of silk in India. In “Global Silk Scenario
2001” Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt Ltd., New Delhi, 44-54.
Datta, R.K. (2001). Status paper submitted to CSB on problems of expansion of area
under mulberry in Southern tropics: Silk productivity, target and future
strategies. 1-11.
Dayananda Patel, G.P. (1985). A study on knowledge level and training needs of
sericulturists. M.Sc (Agril.) Thesis, Univ. Agril. Sci., Bangalore.
Deshmukh, S.K., Shinde, P.S., and Bhople, R.S.(1997). Adoption of summer ground
nut production technology by the growers. Maharashtra J. Extn. Edn. 16: 326-
328.
Dilip kumar Pradhan, Shrishail S. Dolli, M.N.S. Iyengar and R.K. Datta, (1996).
Preferential sources of information by sericulturists – A study in Karnataka.
Indian J. Seri., 35 (1) 28-31.
Dolli, S.S. (1991). Bench mark Survey report for the study of effectiveness of
different extension communication systems. Dissertation submitted to
CSR&TI, Mysore.
Dolli, S.S., Kalappa, H.K., Subramanian, R.K., Chikkanna, Singhvi, N.R., Sen, A.K.,
Iyengar, N. and Datta, R.K. (1993). Extent of adoption of improved sericultural
practices by the sericulturists. Indian Silk, 31 (10): 35 –40.
Dolli, S.S., B. Sundaraswamy and P.S. Shinde, (1995). Adoption pattern and
constraints in cultivation of pulse crops in Karnataka. Maharashtra J. Extn.
Edn. XIV 105 – 110.
Dwarakinath, R., Sethu Rao, M.K. and Hanumappa, P. (1994). Guide to sericulture
extension published by Member secretary, Central Silk Board, Bangalore-1. 1-
115.
Dube, S.K. and Sawarkar, S.K.(1990). Knowledge and adoption of rice production
technology among small and marginal farmers. Maharashtra J. Extn. Edn., X:
79-83.
Ekanayake, S.A.B and Jayasuria, S.K. (1987). Measurement of firm specific
technical efficiency: A Comparison of Methods. Journal of Agricultural
Economics 28(1): 115-122.
Fale, J.B., Thakare, G.G and Borude , S.C.(1985). An economic analysis of yield gap
in rice in Ratnagiri district. Agri.Situ.India, 40 (1):925.
Fattah-A, Sarasuttha-1G.P, Rauf. M. (1994). Factors affecting the yield gap of rice in
southeast Sulawesi (Indonesia) Agrikam (Indonesia) 9(2): 39-50.
Farooque, H.F., Khan, S.M. and Mahajan, B.S. (1993) “constraints faced by the
farmers in adoption of recommended water management practices of wheat
and summer groundnut crops”. - Maharashtra J. Extn. Edn., 12: 1993 -213.
Francisco-S.R. (2000). Exploring the yield gap to attain self sufficiency. Some R, D &
E imperatives. Redona–ED Department of Agriculture, quezon city (Philippines)
proceedings of the Philippines ria RD & E scholars forum, Maligaya ,Munoz,
Nueva Eija (Philippines) philerice and DA-BAR. Received August 2000: 25-30.
Geetha, G. S., Srinivasa, G., Jayaram, H., Iyengar, M.N.S and Vijaya Prakash, N.B.
(2001). Socio economic determinants of farmers oriented technology packages
for sericulture – A field study. Indian J. Seri., 40 (1): 96 – 99.
Ghodake, R.D. and Walker, T.S. (1982). Yield gap analysis in dry land agriculture:
Perspective and implications for the eighties. Economics Programs. ICRISAT,
A.P. India.
Girase, K.A., Desai, B.R. and Rade, V.N. (1991). Adoption behaviour of groundnut
growers. Maharashtra J. Extn. Edn., 10(2): 258-260.
Govindaiah, Tomy Philip, A.K. Bajpai, B. Hathi, M. Tirupathi, H. Jayaram and Y.R.
Madhava Rao, (1996). Studies on awareness and adoption of plant protection
measures by sericulturists. Indian J. Seri., 35 (1) 19 – 23.
Gupta B. K. and Y.K. Gupta, (1997). Rearers’ classification, technology adoption and
extension package. Indian Silk, 36 (6): 22 – 26.
Gyanendra.M. and V.K.Pandey, (1990). Cropping patterns and yield gaps under dry
land farming conditions in Uttar Pradesh. Agricultural situation in India,
44:1007-1010.
Hamchival, S.N. (1991). Influence of personal characteristics of farmers on the
adoption pattern of recommended cultivations practices in potato in Dharwad.
Karnataka J. Agri. Sci., 4(1&2): 41 – 45.
Hebbar, B.G. (1984). Input use and production performance under improved and
local varieties of dryland ragi in farmers fields. Curr. Res., 13(4-6): 40.
Herdt, R.W. and Mandac, A.M., (1981). Modern technology and economic efficiency
of Philippines rice farmers. Economic Development and Cultural Change. 29(2):
375.
Holikatti.A.B. (1991). Technical changes, yield gaps and constraints in rain fed
chilies production in Karnataka –An economic analysis M.Sc. thesis
(Unpub.).Univ. Agri. Sci. Dharwad.
Jha, P. N. and Shaktwat, G.S. (1972). Adoption behaviour of farmers towards hybrid
bajra cultivation, Indian. J. Extn. Educ.,8: 24-32.
Jagannatha Rao, R. (1995). A study on the knowledge and adoption level of paddy
farmers in Hospet taluk of Tungabhadra Command area in Karnataka. M.Sc.
(Agri.) Thesis (Unpub.), Univ. Agri. Sci., Bangalore.
Jain.J.P. and Singh.S. (1987). “Yield gap analysis with reference to animal
husbandry”, Jour. Indian Soc. Ag. statistics, 39(1): 74.
Jayaram, H. (1988). ”An analysis of yield gap in paddy and ragi (irrigated) in Mandya
District”, Unpublished M.Sc. (Agri.) thesis, U.S.A., Bangalore.
Jeeta Moza and A. Rashid trag, (1990). Factors associated with the adoption of
sericulture in Kashmir. Indian silk, 29 (3): 34-36.
Joy Oommen, (1999). Technology and its reach. Editorial. Indian Silk, 38 (3): 3.
Juliana, C.S., Annamalai, R. and Somasundaram, S. (1991). Adoption of integrated
pest management practices. Indian J. Extn. Edn. 27 (3&4): 23-27.
Kadam, K.R. and Jagtap, S.S. (1991). Adoption behaviour of potato growers.
Maharashtra J. Extn. Edn. 10 (2): 356-357.
Karamagi Stephen Jack, (1993). Cultivation practices for mulberry in soil moisture
stress areas- constraints and corrections. Dissertation submitted to Central
Sericultural Research and Training Institute, Mysore for the award of Diploma
in specialization in tropical sericulture. 127-128.
Kher, S.K., Mukku, K.N. and Supe, S.V. (1991). Socio economic factors contributing
to the level of adoption of improved cultural practices of Almond. Maha. Jour.
of Extn. Edn., X(1): 81.
Krishna, K.S. (1972). A study of knowledge and adoption of hybrid maize cultivation
by trained and untrained farmers in Bangalore district. M. Sc. (Agril. Extn.)
Thesis, Univ. Agril. Sci., Bangalore.
Kulkarni, V.S. (1993). Yield gap analysis of Bivoltine (NB4D2) Cocoon production in
Mandya district dissertation (unpublished) submitted to Central Sericultural
Training and Institute, Mysore. 1-61.
Kumaresan,P., Boghesha, K., Tsuchiya, H., Vijaya Prakash, N.B. and Kawakami, K.
(2001). An economic analysis of CSR hybrid cocoon production under
Promotion, Popularisation of Practical Bivoltine Sericulture Technology project
in Karnataka. Advances in Indian sericulture Research, 500 –504.
Kunnal, L.B. (1978). Output, factor shares and employment effects of technical in
jowar economy. Unpublished M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, submitted to the University
of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore.
Lakshmanan, S. (1995), Adoption of technological innovation and productivity
behaviour of sericulture in Tamilnadu. An economical analysis. Thesis
submitted to the University of Mysore for the award of Ph.D., in economics. 1-
261.
Lionberger H. F. (1960). Adoption of new idea and practices. Iowa State University
Press, Iowa. 96-101.
Madan Singh and Mathur, P.N. (1984). Constraints analysis in adoption of fertilizers
and plant protection measures in Bajra cultivation, Indian J. Extn. Educ., XX
(4): 53-54.
Mallikarjuna, B., Eugene Egesa, Madhava rao, Y.R. and Shariff, A.A. (2001). Credit
flow to sericulture in Mysore district – An evaluation. Indian J. Seri. 40 (1): 55
–59.
Mehta, P.G., Sawant, V.Y. and Mahadik, R.P. (2000). Knowledge level of the farmers
about PHT for minor fruit crops. Maharashtra J. Extn. Edn. XIX. 178-180.
Misra, J.P and Singh, B.B. (1987).An economic analysis of yield gap in food grain in
Eastern U.P. J. Indian. Soc of Agri. Stat., 29(1): 78-79.
Mohandhas, T.P., B.Ramarao, A.K. Sikdar and H. Jayaram, (1999). Adoption rate of
validated sericulture technologies and its impact on cocoon productivity – A
study. Proceedings of NSTS –99, 168-171.
Mukhopadhyay, S.D, and Das Gupta, D. (1994). Yield gap and technological gap: A
case study of Birbhum district of West Bengal. Maharashtra. J. Ext. Edn.,
13:203-208.
Mundhava, A.B. and Patel, H.L.(1991). Constraints in adoption of rain fed wheat
technology in Bhal area of Gujarat State. Maharashtra J. Ext. Edn., 10(1):23-
29.
Nagabhushanam, K. and Karthikeyan, C. (1998). The differential yield levels and its
influential factors, an analysis on paddy farmers.J.Ext.Edu. 9(2): 2027-30.
Narayana Swamy, B.K. and Jalihal, K.A. (1990). Socio economic characteristics of
farmers who constructed Bhagyalakshmi, a fixed dome type biogas plant.
Mysore J. Agri. Sci., 24: 523-527.
Nikhade.D.M. Bhople, R.S. and Kale, N.P. (1997). Technological gap in cultivation of
red gram, green gram and Bengal gram in Gulbarga district of Karnataka.
Indian. J. Ext, Edn., 33(1-2):72-75.
Panda R.C, (1996). Efficiency and productivity – The case of sericulture farms in
Tamilnadu, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51(3): 355 – 364.
Pandey, R.K. and Shanti Swarup. (1987). Study of production potential and yield
gap in food grains production, Jour. Indian, Soc. Ag. Statistics, 39(1): 73-74.
Pandey, R.K, Swarup. S (1992). On farm investigation in the yield gaps and
constraints in crop productivity. Artha-Vikas 28-29, 30:1-9, 4 tab. ref.
Panghal, B.S. Pandey, R.N and Ganwar, A.C. (1985). An analysis of attainable yield
gaps in important food grain crops in Harayana. Agri. Situation in India, 45(1):
7-11.
Patil, R.P., Desai.B.R. and Kibey, M.B.(1986). Causes of wide yield gaps in Wheat
between yields of National Demonstration and that of farmer’s fields.
Maharashtra. J. Ext. Educ, 5: 113-119.
Patil, H.N. and Deshmukh, M.K. (1995). Impact of Training and Visit System on Rice
Economy .Indian, J. Extn. Edn. 31(1-4):98-101.
Patil, S.M., Kunnal, L.B and Karnool, N.N.(1997). Yield gaps analysis in groundnut
production .Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 10:790-796.
Pimpriker, V.S., Bhatnagar, O.P. and Dahama, O.P. (1975). A study on the
contribution of training poultry farming. Mysore J. Agril. Sci., 9(1): 167 – 175.
Pochaiah Maraty and Ramesh Kumar. (1988).A study on the extent of adoption and
yield gap in Paddy. J. Ext. Educ., 9(1): 1925-27.
Ponnusamy, K.A. and Singh,Y.P. (1981). Yield gaps in India’s crop production.
Management of transfer of farm technology. Published by National Institute of
rural development, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500030. 223-226.
Puttaswamy, T., Venugopal., Venkata Reddy, S., Narayana Swamy, B.K., Dodda
Hanumaiah and Rajanna, H.P. (1978). Bengaluru mattu Kolar Jillegalalli
Reshme Vyavasaya (ondu samukshe in Kannada). Extension Wing. Univ. Agril.
Sci., Bangalore, India.
Rade V.M., Desai B.R. and Girase K.A. (1990). Constraints in adoption of
recommended khariff groundnut production. Maha. Jour. of Extn. Edn. Vol.
IX,146.
Radhakrishnan. S and Ramaiah, P.K. (1990). Yield gap and constraints to potential
productivity in small holder coffee plantation, Indian coffee: 27-31 and 13-19.
Raghavendra, (1979). Relative effectiveness of lecture, folder and lecture plus folder
in communication of dairy management practices to farmers- a field
experiment, M.Sc. (Agril.) Thesis, Univ. Agril. Sci., Bangalore.
Raghu Prasad, K.P. (1992). A study on innovative proneness and silkworm rearing
practices followed by sericulturists of Kolar district. M.Sc. (Agril.) Thesis,
U.A.S., Dharwad, 160.
Rajesh, B. (1995). A study on economics of rain fed sericulture in recurrent drought prone areas of
Karnataka. Dissertation submitted to Bangalore University for the award of M.Sc. 33-99.
Ramachandran P., and K.B. Sripal, (1990). Constraints in adoption of dry land technology for rain fed
cotton. Indian journal of Extension education. XXVI (3&4), 74-79.
Ramajore and Sinha, A.P. (1994). Causes of wide yield gaps in rice and wheat on
sodic soils in progressive and less progressive district in U.P. Agricultural
Situation in India, 49:21-23.
Ramanuja Rao. G., G.R. Shivakumar, K.V. Anantha Raman, S.B. Magadum and R.K.
Datta. (1996). Yield gap of cocoon crops in Karnataka. Indian Silk, 35 (2 &3):
19-22.
Rao, A.N and Prasad, Y.E. (1982). Yield constraints of Kharif groundnut (Spanish
bunch) production in Rayalaseema region of Andhra Pradesh .Indian Journal
of Agricultural Economics, 37:395.
Rastogi, B.K. (1982). Yield gap analysis: Constraints and approaches. Proceedings of
the National Seminar on a decade of dryland agricultural research in India
and thrust in eightes. Organised by AICRPDA, 18 - 20 January, 1982. 139 -
150.
Ravi, S.R. (1986). Field performance3 and variation in cocoon parameters of
commercial hybrids of silkworm, Bombyx mori L. in Karnataka. M.Sc. (Agri.)
Thesis, U.A.S., Bangalore. 105.
Ray.G.L, Chatterjee.P and Banerjee, S.N. (1995). Technological Gap and Constraints
in Agricultural technology Transfer, Naya Prakash, Calcutta. 27.
Ratna Sen and Benchamin, K.V. (1990). Is local variety of mulberry nutritively
inferior to Kanva-2. Indian Silk, 29(3):1990. 35-36.
Rogers, E.M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations, The Free Press New York. 250.
Roy, P., Fliegel, F.C., Kivlin, J.E. and Sen, K.K. (1968). Agricultural innovation
among Indian farmers. National Institute of Community development,
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Russel, M.P. and Young, T. (1983). Frontier production functions and the
measurement of technical efficiency. J. Agric. Econ., 34(2): 139.
Samson, M.V. (2000). Cocoon production and silkworm conference on strategies for
sericulture research and development 16-18 November 2002 at Central
Sericultural Research and Training Institute, Mysore-8. 38 - 48.
Santhi Swarup and Pandey, R.K.(1981). Assessment of region variation in yield gaps
of wheat crops in India, Agric.Sit.in. India. XXXVI (8): 623 - 627.
Sarda, M.K. and G.S. Khurana, (1993). Adoption gap and its modal class in
recommended rice technology, Indian Journal of Extension Education, XXIX:
1&2. 108 -111.
Sarkar, A. (1988). Problems of mulberry cultivation in west Bengal and what can be
done to save them. Indian silk, 27 (1): 14-16.
Sarin, R. and Binswanger, H.P. (1980). Gap analysis in farming systems: Problems
and approaches ICRISAT Economics Program progress Report, 12
Pattancheru, A.P., India.
Sengupta,T. (1967). A simple adoption, scale for selection of farmers for high
yielding varieties programme on rice. Indian J. Extn., 3: 107-115.
Shivalingaiah, Y.N., P.S. Srikantha Murthy, T.N. Anand and S.V. Suresha, (1999).
Constraints and Technology utilization pattern under NARP in central dry
zone of Karnataka. Mysore. J. Agri. Sci., 33. : 169-173.
Shivalinge Gowda, N.S., C.K. Balachandra, MM. Khan and A.B. Uma mahesha,
(1990). Studies on the level of adoption of selected practices in raising
cardamom nursery. Mysore J. Agri. Sci., 24: 121-123.
Siddaramaiah, B.S. and H.C.V. Reddy, (1993). Attitude and adoption behaviour of
farmers towards watershed management. Mysore J. Agri. Sci., 27: 291-296.
Singh, K. and Yadav, J.P. (1989). Gaps and constraints in wheat productivity - A
System analysis. Agricultural Situation in India, 44: 627-633.
Singh, J.B., Jain, B.L. and Nahatkar, S.B.(1988). Constraints analysis of Rabi crops
in Purua-Nala watershed of M.P. Financing Agriculture.20:27-31.
Singh .J, Jha J.N. and Roy N.K. (1992). Adoption Barriers of High yielding varieties.
Maha. Jour. of Extn. Edn. Vol. XI, 339.
Singh, S.N., Singh, K.N., and Likhanda, M.R. (1970). Relative effectiveness of audio
visual in dissemination of information on improved methods of sugarcane
cultivation. Indian J. Extn. Edn., 6: 39 – 45.
Singh, Madan (1997). Factors affecting yield gaps in Bihar, a multivariate approach
J. Ext. Edn, 8(3):1744-47.
Singhvi, N.R., M.K. Sethu Rao, Y.R Madhava rao. M.N.S. Iyengar and R.K. Datta,
(1994). Knowledge level and adoption of new sericulture technology by farmers
in Hunsur taluk, Mysore district, Karnataka state- An evaluation. Indian J.
Seri., 33 (1) 48-55.
Sinha, S.K. and Swaminathan, M.S. (1979). Absolute maximum food production
potential in India. Curr. Sci., 48(10): 425.
Soma Sundaram, D. (1976). A diagnostic study of small farmers with respect to new
agricultural technology and its effective communication for adoption Ph.D
Thesis (Unpub.), Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi.
Soma Sundaram, D. (1976). A diagnostic study of small farmers with respect to new
agricultural technology and its effective communication for adoption Ph.D
Thesis (Unpub.), Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi.
Subba Rao, M., G.R. Shivakumar, S.B. Magdum and R. K. Datta, (1997). Yield gap
studies in TamilNadu. Indian Silk, 36 (4): 16-18.
Subba Rao, D.V and Subramanyam, M. (1987). Analysis of yield gap for crops. J.
Indian. Soc. agric. Stat, 39(1): 76.
Subramanya, S.(1986). Yield gap analysis in ragi. Unpublished M.Sc. (Agric.) Thesis,
submitted to the University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore.
Sudhakara Rao, P. (1993). Perception of sericulturists towards R.K.O. and Uzicide
and their value orientation. A study in Kolar district. STS Dissertation,
CSR&TI, Mysore.
Sudhakara Rao, P., Subramanyam, D., Mogili, T., Rajan, R.K. and Prabhakar, R.
(2002). Improved rearing technologies and cocoon productivity. Indian Silk, 41
(7) : 19-22.
Sundaraj,A.R. (1978). A study of knowledge and adoption behaviour of small and big
farmers growing tomato (Lycopersican esculentum L.) in Bangalore district.
M.Sc. (Agril. ) Thesis, Univ. Agril. Sci., Bangalore.
Suresh,K and Ismath Afshan, (1999). Cost- Benefit analysis of mulberry practices in
sericulture: A Study in Karnataka. Proceedings of NSTS-99, 111-113.
Suryawanshi, S.d. and Gaikwad, N.S.(1984). An analysis of yield gap in Rabi jowar
in drought prone area of Ahmednagar district .Agricultural Situation in India,
39: 147-153.
Thakur, P., Kushwah, R.S and Gour, R.A. (1993). Factors responsible for non-
adoption of the farm practices of wheat .Maharashtra J. Extn. Edn. 12:361-
362.
Veena Sangwan, Shashi Munjal and R.K. Punia, (1990). Participation of women in
Farm activities. Indian J. of. Extn. Edn. Vol. XXVI, Nos. 1&2.
Veeresham,K. G.R. Shivakumar, S.B. Magdum and R.K. Datta, (1997). Yield gap
studies in Andhra Pradesh. Indian Silk, 35 (8&9): 14 -16.
Venkatesh kumar, R., G. Ismath Afshan and Umesh Chandra, (1999). Adoption of
improved Sericultural practices among multivoltine seed cocoon producers in
Magadi taluk of Bangalore rural district. Proceedings of NSTS-99, 160-163.
Young,J.M. and Marsh, P.C. (1956). The adoption of recommended farm practices
and source of information, Kentucky Agric. Expt. Dtn. Progress Report 40,
Ledington, Kentucky.
Mandal: Respondent
Village: Photograph
Season:
1 IDENTIFICATION DATA
2 GENERAL INFORMATION
2.1 Age
20-35 Yrs/36-50 Yrs/Above 50 Yrs
2.2 Qualification
Illiterate /Primary/Middle
Secondary/Degree/PG
2.3 Marital status
Unmarried/Married/Widow
2.4 Family size
Male/Female/Children
2.5Family Nature
Joint/Nuclear
2.6Rearing House
Roof : Thatched/Stone/Mud/
Sheet/Tiled/RCC
Floor : Mud/Stone/Cement/Others
2.7Primary Occupation
Agri./Seri./Dairy/
Poultry/Fishery/Others
3 ECONOMIC STATUS
3.1Land holding (in acres)
Land Details Rainfed Irrigated Total Value(Rs)
Own
Cultivable
Waste land
Leased in
Leased out
3.2Type of soil
Black/Red/Red sandy/Red loamy
4 CLIMATIC CONDITIONS :
Summer Rainy Winter Spring
4.1 Temperature
4.2 Rainfall
5 Training undergone in sericulture
Agency Topic Duration Remarks
6 EXTENSION PARTICIPATION
Participation
Programme Regular Occasional Never Remarks
Field Visit
Group
Discussion
Demonstration
Film Show
Exhibition
Field Day
Lectures
Workshops
Seminars
Farmer's Meet
Any other
(specify)
7 EXTENSION CONTACT
Frequency of contact
Agency Regular Occasional Never Remarks
Sericulture
Department
Central Silk Board
Progressive farmer
Any other [specify]
B. Maintenance of Mul.Garden
13 Rearing operations
No. of Chawki No. Of
Dfls Race / Direct Crops / Y
Labour Materials
Operations Male Female Quantity Amount
Cleaning &
Disinfection
Dfls / Chawki +
Transportation
Formalin
Bleaching powder
Chlorine dioxide
Lime powder
Vijetha / Resham
Jyothi
Uzicide / Uzitrap
Paraffin paper
Polythene sheet
Newspaper
Chawki rearing [No.
of Mandays]
Late age rearing [No.
of Mandays]
Third instar
Fourth instar
Fifth instar
Leaf cost [in case of
purchase]
Mounting [Labour +
Hiring cost]
Harvesting /
Cleaning [mandays]
Transport &
Marketing
[Labour + Transport
+ Commission]
5 Manure 20 tonnes/
hectare
6 Fertilizer 300:120:120
kg/ hectare/
year in 5 splits
for row or
280:120:120
kg/ hectare/
year in 6 split
dose. For pit
350:150:150
kg/ hectare/
year.
7 Triacontanol
8 Compost Converting
making sericultural
farm wastes
into valuable
compost
9 Vermi compost Composting of
making wastes within
50-60 days
using
earthworms
5 Bed cleaning
nets
6 Shoot rearing
7 Bed spacing
13 Egg carrying
box
14 Ventilation Avoidance of
stagnation of air
by proper
ventilation
15 Temp. & 26-28°C& 85-
Humidity 90% humidity
for chawki
worms
24-26°C for late
age worms
16 Mounting care Mounting the
spinning larva
and
maintain24°C
temp. & 60-65%
humidity &
good aeration
17 Cocoon sorting Double and
flimsy cocoons
separation
18 Transportation Method
Mode
Time
19 IPM Pests of
mulberry
Chemical
control
Mechanical
control
Biological
control
Note:
“AK” – For having adequate knowledge about the
particular technology [Adequate Knowledge]
“IK” – For having inadequate knowledge about the
particular technology [Inadequate Knowledge]