You are on page 1of 13

10 88/01/8 14

: : : :


Thickeners, Methods& Systems

The Conventional Thickener


Description
Conventional Thickeners are generally incorporated in heavy duty applications when the underflow density is high and substantial torques are required to convey the settled solids from the periphery to the central outlet for pumping away. Likewise, thickeners are often used for storage to facilitate the continuous feeding of downstream filters or centrifuges. Historically thickeners were introduced to the mining industry in 1905 when the beneficiation of ores by froth flotation was invented in Australia. In 1964 there was a project to reprocess the huge piles of tailings that accumulated over the years and recover the remaining copper . At that time I was employed by Eimco in Salt Lake City, Utah and participated in a team that conducted test work checking the suitability of large diameter thickeners for both concentrate and tailings of the reprocessed ore. The picture on the right shows a 6 meter diameter wooden tank "Dorr" thickener installed back in 1908 in the Kennicott Copper Mill in McCarthy, Alaska and in 2011 I had the thrilling opportunity to fly from Chitina to McCarthy in a six seater plane to visit the abandoned mill.

Basically there are two groups of thickeners which differ in their rake driving mechanisms: Centrally driven Peripherally driven

The following tree shows the two main thickener groups and their various configurations:

The Central Drive Mechanisms


There are two methods of supporting the heavy drive with its shaft and raking arms: The bridge type The column type

In the bridge type a structure spans across the tank and is subjected vertically to the weight of the mechanism plus any solids that accumulate within the arms truss and horizontally to the twin forces imposed by the density of

the raked underflow. In the column type a central steel or concrete column takes vertically the reaction to the weight of the mechanism and horizontally the torque load. There is a rule of thumb as to the break even between bridge type and column type mechanisms. For tanks up to 25-30 meter diameter the former type is selected and for larger diameters the later type. However, in many instances other considerations determine the selection such as the local cost of steel versus concrete. Also selection may be influenced by process consideration such as the handling of the dense underflow through a central discharge cone, as in the bridge type, or in a circular trough as in the column type thickeners.

The Drive Head


The drive head, together with the raking arms, are the heart of the mechanism since the entire operation of the thickener depends on their ability to convey continuously the dense underflows from the periphery of the tank to the center. Hence, they are always of a robust design to meet the most difficult duties such as metallurgical, potash or phosphate applications where densities may reach 55-60% solids by weight. Another important factor is reliability since unlike many other types of equipment, thickeners have no stand-bys so if one goes out of commission it cannot be by-passed. Consequently, if this happens other thickeners have to take the extra load but if the plant incorporates just one thickener then the entire production line must stop. Likewise, to take a thickener out of commission for internal repairs such as repair of damaged blades, or rubber lining may take days since it requires to empty the tank, wash out with hoses the underflow bed, refill the tank and find a suitable storage or disposal site for the very large volumes of liquid.

The majority of the drive heads are mechanically driven however hydraulically driven units are also in use.
To view the components move the mouse pointer over the menu

Typical bridge type drive heads for small thickeners consist of a worm gear as shown on top and for larger units spur gears as may be seen at the bottom. The drives are always mounted directly on the bridge.

The drive head below is designed for column type thickeners. The main gear consists of a rim with internally machined teeth so that the space in the center is left free for a post that is bolted to the top of the column and supports the walkway. It should be noted that the structure that spans radially on a column type thickener is not subjected to any operational load and serves merely as the inner support for the walkway.

To view the components move the mouse pointer over menu

Drive heads for both bridge and column type thickeners may be driven by up to 4 electric motors of hi-slip design which can reach 5-8 percent slip without loss of power nor overheating. This special design is required to ensure that the load on the main gear is balanced so that each primary reducer, and subsequently the entire reduction train, is subjected to an equal strain. The torque capability of a thickener drive is specified as Duty Rating being the maximum mechanism design strength or the 100% setting on the Torque Control Box. The torque, in turn, depends on a K factor and the thickener diameter based on the following formula: Torque (in Nm) = 14.6*K*D2 (in meters) The following table specifies the K factors for different Duty Ratings: Machine Duty Light Medium Standard Heavy Extra Heavy K Factor 3-7 7-12 12-19 19-20 21-40

In general terms the type of thickener and its drive torque rating ranges between the following values: Type of Thickener Drive Bridge with Worm Gear Drive Bridge with Spur Gear Drive Column with Spur Gear Drive Torque Rating 3000-140000 Nm 20000-1440000 Nm 27000-3270000 Nm

The Lifting Device and Torque Control


The lifting device is the element that raises and lowers the raking arms during operation so that the blades follow the interface of the settled solids by monitoring the torque. This ensures that the torque is maintained within set limits so that the arms are raised when the torque increases or lowered when the torque decreases. The control box is mounted on the primary reducer and generally contains 4 micro switches set to the following sequence: 30% to lower the raking arms 50% to raise the raking arms 60% to sound an alarm 90% to cut-out the power supply and close the slurry feed

There are two types of lifting devices for bridge type thickeners: Small and medium diameter thickeners will normally incorporate a Centrally Mounted Lifting Device supported by the drive head that is fixed to the bridge structure. A screw is attached to the shaft of the raking arms which are raised or lowered depending on the monitored torque. The power to the rotating lifting motor and its control from the micro switches is supplied by a slip ring housing that is stationary and mounted on the lifting screw cover. Larger thickeners incorporate a Platform Mounted Lifting Device. They are normally designed for high torque ratings and consist of a construction with two platforms. A lower platform that carries the entire drive head train and moves up or down and an upper platform that is stationary, supported by the bridge, and carries the lifting motor. The motor turns both ways depending on the torque that is monitored by the control box.

The two platforms are connected by two heavy screws that turn clockwise or counter-clockwise and move the lower platform up or down. Also column thickeners have two types of lifting devices: The Telescopic Cage type where the drive head remains stationary on the column. This device consists of

two cages, an internal cage that is bolted to the rotating drive rim to transmit the torque and an external cage that is raised together with the raking arm by 4 screws driven by a chain and sprockets.

The Telescopic Column where the drive head is mounted on a base so that both are raised or lowered by two screws that are actuated by an electric motor from an upper platform. The torque is transmitted to the raking arms by the reaction between the telescopic column and the main column.

The lifting height of the raking arms depends largely on the application and can vary from 30 cm for feeds with a steady slurry inflow up to 120 cm for thickeners that facilitate storage.

The Raking Arms


The duty of the raking arms is to convey the settled solids from the entire area to the discharge cone of bridge type thickeners or the circumferential trough that surrounds the column of column type thickeners. The are two configurations of raking arms: Arms that rake the entire tank floor twice per revolution Arms that rake the outer circle tank floor twice per revolution and the inner circle four times and on extra heavy application six times per revolution

The difference is in the number of times that the tank floor is raked.

In this arrangement and when the volume of solids to be conveyed is low there are two long arms and the blades of each arm overlap so they move the solids twice per revolution.

In this arrangement and when the volume of solids to be conveyed is high two short arms are added in 90 degrees to the two long arms so that the inner circle of the thickener's floor is raked four times per revolution. Rarely also six short arms in 30 and 60 degrees are added to the long arms and rake the inner circle of tank floor six times per revolution.

On light duty applications straight blades are used however curved blades are always attached to arms that are designed for heavy duty applications. On certain heavy duty applications with thixotropic slimes the blades are not directly attached to the arm truss but connected through posts to avoid an effect called "doughnutting" in which the entire mass of solids rotates without being conveyed to the center. The thixo blades as they channel through the slime help in reducing this effect and promote the release of liquid to increase the density of the underflow. On abrasive applications the rakes and blades are subjected to a significant wear so it is good practice to increase their thickness for corrosion allowance.

The Scum Skimmer

On some applications, such as thickening downstream froth flotation, a thick scum layer floats on the surface of the liquid. This layer finds its way into the overflow launder and contaminates the clear overflowing liquid with fines. This problem is solved by incorporating a scum baffle that retains the scum layer so that a special rotating scum skimmer pushes the scum into a box for disposal.

The Tank and Roof


Thickener tanks may be constructed either from steel or concrete and may reach diameters of 120 meters and in earthen basins up to 180 meters. Most of the chemical process industries prefer the steel tanks construction since they may be elevated above ground level, allow inspection of the tank's floor for leakages and bring the underflow slurry pumps nearer to the outlet of the discharge cone. Another consideration in selecting steel tanks is their ready adaptation to corrosive processes by rubber covering the wetted parts of the tank. The bottom of the tanks are sloped and on smaller thickeners there is one continuous slope of 13/4:12. On larger thickeners there are normally two slopes with the external circle at 1:12 and the internal 2:12. The discharge cone's slope is always 1:1 . A great deal of engineering was done on elevated tanks to optimize floor design for steel weight to vertical load ratio and the density of the supporting structure. For many years the floor was constructed of flat steel plates cut in sectors to form the round shape of the thickener's bottom. In this design the each sector was subjected circumferentially to bending stresses and required sufficient thickness to take the vertical load. In the mid 60's the Japanese have proposed for an Alumina Plant in Queensland to form shelled sectors in a Catenary curve that resemble power lines. This curve subjects the sectors to tension without bending and results in a substantial saving in floor weight.

Roofs that cover the entire tank are sometimes used for process conditions that require to preserve slurry temperature or to avoid the hazard of corrosive gases emitting from the surface. Such roofs are usually made from fiberglass plates that are supported in the outer circumference by the tank's wall and internally by the bridge. A hydraulic inverted cup seal between the central shaft and the roof ensures that no gases are leaving to the atmosphere. For thickeners with lifting devices the seal should by long enough to retain the gases regardless of the arms position. In another technique that saves the cost of the roof plastic balls are spread to float on the surface to preserve heat but its efficiency is low. The problem with roofs is that special covers on the circumference of the roof are required for accessing the overflow weir and launder periodic cleaning. Likewise, the roof must be strong enough to carry the maintenance personnel. The overflow weir that surrounds the tank ensures that the flow that leaves the thickener is distributed evenly in terms of m3/hr/m weir length. During the first year or so differential settling of the tank foundations may cause an uneven distribution so that the entire flow passes over the lower part of the weir which results in high velocities and drag of fines to the overflow launder. Therefore, it is essential to check from time to time that the weirs are in leveled. Two of the most common overflow weirs are illustrated on the right and show the adjustable leveling clamps. The "V" notch weir is generally more common since the triangular notches are not so sensitive to slight deviations in the level of the tank.

The Feed-well

The purpose of the feed well is to dampen the turbulence of the incoming feed so that the entry into the thickener will be as laminar as possible and will not interfere with the solids that are already settling inside the tank. This effect is achieved by entering the feed well tangentially so that the centrifugal swirl distributes the feed in an even pattern below the liquid level. It is good practice to connect the tangential pipe so that the introduced stream swirls in an opposite direction to the rotation of the raking arm. This will reduce the risk that slow settling solids may "doughnut" as described in the section on the raking arms.

The Cone Scraper

Underflow Pumping
Pumping of dense underflows has always been a problem on thickeners that handle slurries such as metallurgical concentrates, potash or phosphate and the position of the pumps in relation to the discharge cone can be very critical. The principle is to position the slurry pumps so that their suction side will be as close as possible to the cone's outlet and it is also good practice to have two pumps, one in operation and one as stand-by. There are three ways of positioning the pumps: For bridge type thickeners with tanks that are elevated above ground level the positioning is simple since the cone is freely accessible. For bridge and column type thickeners with tanks that are mounted on ground level the access to the slurry pumps is trough a tunnel. For very large column type thickeners the column is constructed as a caisson that is submerged in the slurry so that the pumps are housed at the bottom of the chamber and deliver the underflow upwards.

For small thickeners, which are normally of the bridge type, the pumps are positioned at the periphery of the tank and the suction pipe is buried or runs through a pipe sleeve for replacement if necessary.

The Peripheral Drive Mechanisms


Some of the largest thickeners in the world with 200 meters diameter are of the Traction type as seen on the left. These thickeners incorporate a central column that serves as a pivot to a rotating raking arm that spans radially towards the periphery of the tank. The outer end of the arm has a carriage with motorized wheels that are guided by a circumferential track and move the entire arm structure in a circular trajectory to convey the settled solids towards the center. The bridge is not subjected to any operational loads and serves merely as a walkway for accessing the column and its pivot point from the outside.

The High Rate Thickener


Description
The High-Rate thickeners became popular in the mid 1980's and are relatively newcomers to the sedimentation line of equipment. As already discussed previously Thickeners are a major component in a plant layout and occupy large spaces which may be saved by introducing high-rate machines. Furthermore, they are normally positioned far away from the center of the plant so to allow gravity feed and thus save pumping costs their distance is influenced by the hydraulic gradient for the large flows. This factor determines the elevation of the entire plant and consequently has a substantial impact on capital investment. Among other advantages is the smaller volume of the tank so it speeds up startups or shutdowns and less volume is required for storing the product in the event that the tank has to be emptied. Likewise, high-rate thickeners consume substantially less flocculants with savings up to 60%. There are operations where the process requires a constant temperature control or eventually indoors installation so the saving in the cost of insulation and roofing of conventional thickener tanks may prove to be another feasible solution in selecting a high rate thickener. The concept of speeding-up settling rates to reduce the size of conventional thickeners is closely associated with an improvement in the efficiency of flocculating agents. Therefore, high-rate thickening is mostly applied to tails and slimes but not so often to metallurgical concentrates such as iron ore where the settling rates are very high and the underflow reaches its ultimate density almost instantaneously. In fact, the entire concept depends on two major factors: That the solid particles respond well to flocculation. That the process sustains a permissible amount of polymer in both underflow and overflow due to uncontrolled over dosage.

There are also other factors to consider: That the floc is sufficiently stable or exhibits good self-reforming properties so that it will not disintegrate inside the thickener tank. That the flocculant solution will be prepared in a mixing ratio that will intimately bring in contact the small solution volume with the large flow of the incoming stream. That the dosage of polymer will be properly controlled by the incoming feed so that an overdose will not cause floc disintegration something that happens in many instances. That the feed launder or pipe will run straight or with long radius elbows that will not break the fragile floc. That the feed-well will reduce sufficiently the incoming stream velocity. That the raking arms will not cause "doughnutting" of the settled solids while being conveyed towards the discharge cone. That the storage of underflow is not required since not all high-rate thickeners are designed to accommodate a raking arms lifting device. That the liquid reporting to overflow and its passage over the weir is quiescent and evenly distributed. That the mass balance of underflow pumping and rake arms conveyance will not cause a "rat hole" in the discharge cone or conversely a sludge pile-up. That the density of the underflow will be as high as possible to reduce the load on the disposal facilities or, if further processed, reduce the size of downstream equipment such as filters or centrifuges.

In most cases, if these requirements are met and proper test work is done, high-rate thickeners may replace conventional thickeners and depending on the application they are capable of delivering a throughput that is 5-10

higher than with a conventional machine of equal size. This prompted a tendency to retrofit existing installations at a substantial saving in capital investment when increased capacity was required.

High-rate thickeners that are built as dedicated machines are available in sizes up to 40 meter diameter but retrofits of conventional thickeners are often larger in size. When viewed from the outside high-rate thickeners look very much like conventional machines except that their tanks have a greater height to diameter ratio. Their height is derived from test work by calculating retention time and the reduced area as obtained for the increased throughput.

Another difference that may be seen externally is the absence of lifting devices since there are designs with internals that do not leave sufficient clearance for the lifting of the arm truss. As to the internals, there are several approaches to the mechanism of hi-rate thickening. There are design options such as deep feed-wells with progressive flocculation along the incoming stream route, direct injection into the feed-well or recirculation of liquid from the clear zone to enhance settling rate by diluting the feed internally. There are also concepts that resemble sludgeblanket clarifiers with feed-wells that are submerged in the sludge bed and provide an additional benefit of trapping the fines to produce a clear effluent.

High-rate thickeners are suitable for processes such as: Slimes from phosphate washing Counter-current washing of red-mud Scrubber water from FGD plants Tailings from coal washing plants Recycled water from aggregate washing

The Thickener Components


As mentioned previously most of the high-rate thickeners subassemblies are similar to those of conventional thickeners except for lifting devices that are not available on all units due to design restrictions. The similar components may be seen in the following links: The Drive Head The Lifting Device and Torque Control The Raking Arms The Tank and Roof The Overflow Weirs

The Feed-well
The basic feedwell design has not changed for many years and the concept was traditionally just to introduce the feed tangentially, let it swirl as it moves down the feedwell, then divert it horizontally and spread it evenly below the surface of the clarified liquid zone in the tank. It is very common to use a slurry velocity of about 2 m/s to maintain the solid particles in suspension as they flow through pipes and launders so these measures are necessary in order to avoid internal currents that may otherwise interfere with the slow settling rate of the solids. The conventional feedwell consisted of a smooth cylinder with no internals but in the early 60's, on a red mud application in an alumina plant in Jamaica, a shelf was introduced at the bottom of the feedwell to improve flocculation. This, named the Jamaican Feedwell, was the first approach to modernizing and creating more favorable conditions for the flocculation process and polymer consumption. The new generation of feedwells is designed to improve the mixing efficiency between the small volume of flocculant solution and the high volume of the main stream by diluting the stock solution and introducing it at a point with maximum shear that will not break the build-up of the gentle floc. A unique design that meets these requirements may be seen in the picture below:

The high velocity feed is split to two compartments with opposite tangential inlets that are positioned in two levels, an upper and a lower one. Between those compartments there is a narrow gap through which the flocculant solution is introduced and the high shear quickly distributes the polymer to a uniform mixture. Simultaneously, the shearing planes dampen the flow velocity to a point where the floc may grow without being interrupted by irregular flow patterns.

The Feed Pipe


Thickeners are almost always operating on slurries in the 3rd category of mass subsidence and hindered settling so high feed solids concentration yields slow settling rates and vice versa. On the other hand slurries in the 1st category of free and unhindered settling exhibit high settling rates of the solids in the suspension. This concept of diluting the incoming slurry feed with clear liquid was adapted in the past on several installations but it had a basic drawback since the additional recirculated liquid increased overflow rate and caused fines to report to the overflow. An interesting design was developed in the early 90's that uses a ventury nozzle to draw liquid from the clear zone and dilute the incoming feed internally without effecting the overflow rate. The principle is shown in the picture to the left: In this design a special compartment dissipates the energy of the incoming feed and its outlet is directed towards the nozzle and from there on to the feed-well after introducing the polymer solution. The design lends itself easily for retrofits of existing thickeners without being committed to major changes except for raising the feed connection to the compartment so that sufficient head is created as required for the nozzle. When this modification is done the new slope of the feed pipe or launder between upstream equipment and the thickener is shallower so it is necessary to check if this milder gradient is sufficient to maintain slurry velocity to keep the solids in suspension.

Traction thickeners have no lifting devices therefore they cannot be used for storage.

You might also like