Professional Documents
Culture Documents
: : : :
Thickeners, Methods& Systems
Basically there are two groups of thickeners which differ in their rake driving mechanisms: Centrally driven Peripherally driven
The following tree shows the two main thickener groups and their various configurations:
In the bridge type a structure spans across the tank and is subjected vertically to the weight of the mechanism plus any solids that accumulate within the arms truss and horizontally to the twin forces imposed by the density of
the raked underflow. In the column type a central steel or concrete column takes vertically the reaction to the weight of the mechanism and horizontally the torque load. There is a rule of thumb as to the break even between bridge type and column type mechanisms. For tanks up to 25-30 meter diameter the former type is selected and for larger diameters the later type. However, in many instances other considerations determine the selection such as the local cost of steel versus concrete. Also selection may be influenced by process consideration such as the handling of the dense underflow through a central discharge cone, as in the bridge type, or in a circular trough as in the column type thickeners.
The majority of the drive heads are mechanically driven however hydraulically driven units are also in use.
To view the components move the mouse pointer over the menu
Typical bridge type drive heads for small thickeners consist of a worm gear as shown on top and for larger units spur gears as may be seen at the bottom. The drives are always mounted directly on the bridge.
The drive head below is designed for column type thickeners. The main gear consists of a rim with internally machined teeth so that the space in the center is left free for a post that is bolted to the top of the column and supports the walkway. It should be noted that the structure that spans radially on a column type thickener is not subjected to any operational load and serves merely as the inner support for the walkway.
Drive heads for both bridge and column type thickeners may be driven by up to 4 electric motors of hi-slip design which can reach 5-8 percent slip without loss of power nor overheating. This special design is required to ensure that the load on the main gear is balanced so that each primary reducer, and subsequently the entire reduction train, is subjected to an equal strain. The torque capability of a thickener drive is specified as Duty Rating being the maximum mechanism design strength or the 100% setting on the Torque Control Box. The torque, in turn, depends on a K factor and the thickener diameter based on the following formula: Torque (in Nm) = 14.6*K*D2 (in meters) The following table specifies the K factors for different Duty Ratings: Machine Duty Light Medium Standard Heavy Extra Heavy K Factor 3-7 7-12 12-19 19-20 21-40
In general terms the type of thickener and its drive torque rating ranges between the following values: Type of Thickener Drive Bridge with Worm Gear Drive Bridge with Spur Gear Drive Column with Spur Gear Drive Torque Rating 3000-140000 Nm 20000-1440000 Nm 27000-3270000 Nm
There are two types of lifting devices for bridge type thickeners: Small and medium diameter thickeners will normally incorporate a Centrally Mounted Lifting Device supported by the drive head that is fixed to the bridge structure. A screw is attached to the shaft of the raking arms which are raised or lowered depending on the monitored torque. The power to the rotating lifting motor and its control from the micro switches is supplied by a slip ring housing that is stationary and mounted on the lifting screw cover. Larger thickeners incorporate a Platform Mounted Lifting Device. They are normally designed for high torque ratings and consist of a construction with two platforms. A lower platform that carries the entire drive head train and moves up or down and an upper platform that is stationary, supported by the bridge, and carries the lifting motor. The motor turns both ways depending on the torque that is monitored by the control box.
The two platforms are connected by two heavy screws that turn clockwise or counter-clockwise and move the lower platform up or down. Also column thickeners have two types of lifting devices: The Telescopic Cage type where the drive head remains stationary on the column. This device consists of
two cages, an internal cage that is bolted to the rotating drive rim to transmit the torque and an external cage that is raised together with the raking arm by 4 screws driven by a chain and sprockets.
The Telescopic Column where the drive head is mounted on a base so that both are raised or lowered by two screws that are actuated by an electric motor from an upper platform. The torque is transmitted to the raking arms by the reaction between the telescopic column and the main column.
The lifting height of the raking arms depends largely on the application and can vary from 30 cm for feeds with a steady slurry inflow up to 120 cm for thickeners that facilitate storage.
The difference is in the number of times that the tank floor is raked.
In this arrangement and when the volume of solids to be conveyed is low there are two long arms and the blades of each arm overlap so they move the solids twice per revolution.
In this arrangement and when the volume of solids to be conveyed is high two short arms are added in 90 degrees to the two long arms so that the inner circle of the thickener's floor is raked four times per revolution. Rarely also six short arms in 30 and 60 degrees are added to the long arms and rake the inner circle of tank floor six times per revolution.
On light duty applications straight blades are used however curved blades are always attached to arms that are designed for heavy duty applications. On certain heavy duty applications with thixotropic slimes the blades are not directly attached to the arm truss but connected through posts to avoid an effect called "doughnutting" in which the entire mass of solids rotates without being conveyed to the center. The thixo blades as they channel through the slime help in reducing this effect and promote the release of liquid to increase the density of the underflow. On abrasive applications the rakes and blades are subjected to a significant wear so it is good practice to increase their thickness for corrosion allowance.
On some applications, such as thickening downstream froth flotation, a thick scum layer floats on the surface of the liquid. This layer finds its way into the overflow launder and contaminates the clear overflowing liquid with fines. This problem is solved by incorporating a scum baffle that retains the scum layer so that a special rotating scum skimmer pushes the scum into a box for disposal.
Roofs that cover the entire tank are sometimes used for process conditions that require to preserve slurry temperature or to avoid the hazard of corrosive gases emitting from the surface. Such roofs are usually made from fiberglass plates that are supported in the outer circumference by the tank's wall and internally by the bridge. A hydraulic inverted cup seal between the central shaft and the roof ensures that no gases are leaving to the atmosphere. For thickeners with lifting devices the seal should by long enough to retain the gases regardless of the arms position. In another technique that saves the cost of the roof plastic balls are spread to float on the surface to preserve heat but its efficiency is low. The problem with roofs is that special covers on the circumference of the roof are required for accessing the overflow weir and launder periodic cleaning. Likewise, the roof must be strong enough to carry the maintenance personnel. The overflow weir that surrounds the tank ensures that the flow that leaves the thickener is distributed evenly in terms of m3/hr/m weir length. During the first year or so differential settling of the tank foundations may cause an uneven distribution so that the entire flow passes over the lower part of the weir which results in high velocities and drag of fines to the overflow launder. Therefore, it is essential to check from time to time that the weirs are in leveled. Two of the most common overflow weirs are illustrated on the right and show the adjustable leveling clamps. The "V" notch weir is generally more common since the triangular notches are not so sensitive to slight deviations in the level of the tank.
The Feed-well
The purpose of the feed well is to dampen the turbulence of the incoming feed so that the entry into the thickener will be as laminar as possible and will not interfere with the solids that are already settling inside the tank. This effect is achieved by entering the feed well tangentially so that the centrifugal swirl distributes the feed in an even pattern below the liquid level. It is good practice to connect the tangential pipe so that the introduced stream swirls in an opposite direction to the rotation of the raking arm. This will reduce the risk that slow settling solids may "doughnut" as described in the section on the raking arms.
Underflow Pumping
Pumping of dense underflows has always been a problem on thickeners that handle slurries such as metallurgical concentrates, potash or phosphate and the position of the pumps in relation to the discharge cone can be very critical. The principle is to position the slurry pumps so that their suction side will be as close as possible to the cone's outlet and it is also good practice to have two pumps, one in operation and one as stand-by. There are three ways of positioning the pumps: For bridge type thickeners with tanks that are elevated above ground level the positioning is simple since the cone is freely accessible. For bridge and column type thickeners with tanks that are mounted on ground level the access to the slurry pumps is trough a tunnel. For very large column type thickeners the column is constructed as a caisson that is submerged in the slurry so that the pumps are housed at the bottom of the chamber and deliver the underflow upwards.
For small thickeners, which are normally of the bridge type, the pumps are positioned at the periphery of the tank and the suction pipe is buried or runs through a pipe sleeve for replacement if necessary.
There are also other factors to consider: That the floc is sufficiently stable or exhibits good self-reforming properties so that it will not disintegrate inside the thickener tank. That the flocculant solution will be prepared in a mixing ratio that will intimately bring in contact the small solution volume with the large flow of the incoming stream. That the dosage of polymer will be properly controlled by the incoming feed so that an overdose will not cause floc disintegration something that happens in many instances. That the feed launder or pipe will run straight or with long radius elbows that will not break the fragile floc. That the feed-well will reduce sufficiently the incoming stream velocity. That the raking arms will not cause "doughnutting" of the settled solids while being conveyed towards the discharge cone. That the storage of underflow is not required since not all high-rate thickeners are designed to accommodate a raking arms lifting device. That the liquid reporting to overflow and its passage over the weir is quiescent and evenly distributed. That the mass balance of underflow pumping and rake arms conveyance will not cause a "rat hole" in the discharge cone or conversely a sludge pile-up. That the density of the underflow will be as high as possible to reduce the load on the disposal facilities or, if further processed, reduce the size of downstream equipment such as filters or centrifuges.
In most cases, if these requirements are met and proper test work is done, high-rate thickeners may replace conventional thickeners and depending on the application they are capable of delivering a throughput that is 5-10
higher than with a conventional machine of equal size. This prompted a tendency to retrofit existing installations at a substantial saving in capital investment when increased capacity was required.
High-rate thickeners that are built as dedicated machines are available in sizes up to 40 meter diameter but retrofits of conventional thickeners are often larger in size. When viewed from the outside high-rate thickeners look very much like conventional machines except that their tanks have a greater height to diameter ratio. Their height is derived from test work by calculating retention time and the reduced area as obtained for the increased throughput.
Another difference that may be seen externally is the absence of lifting devices since there are designs with internals that do not leave sufficient clearance for the lifting of the arm truss. As to the internals, there are several approaches to the mechanism of hi-rate thickening. There are design options such as deep feed-wells with progressive flocculation along the incoming stream route, direct injection into the feed-well or recirculation of liquid from the clear zone to enhance settling rate by diluting the feed internally. There are also concepts that resemble sludgeblanket clarifiers with feed-wells that are submerged in the sludge bed and provide an additional benefit of trapping the fines to produce a clear effluent.
High-rate thickeners are suitable for processes such as: Slimes from phosphate washing Counter-current washing of red-mud Scrubber water from FGD plants Tailings from coal washing plants Recycled water from aggregate washing
The Feed-well
The basic feedwell design has not changed for many years and the concept was traditionally just to introduce the feed tangentially, let it swirl as it moves down the feedwell, then divert it horizontally and spread it evenly below the surface of the clarified liquid zone in the tank. It is very common to use a slurry velocity of about 2 m/s to maintain the solid particles in suspension as they flow through pipes and launders so these measures are necessary in order to avoid internal currents that may otherwise interfere with the slow settling rate of the solids. The conventional feedwell consisted of a smooth cylinder with no internals but in the early 60's, on a red mud application in an alumina plant in Jamaica, a shelf was introduced at the bottom of the feedwell to improve flocculation. This, named the Jamaican Feedwell, was the first approach to modernizing and creating more favorable conditions for the flocculation process and polymer consumption. The new generation of feedwells is designed to improve the mixing efficiency between the small volume of flocculant solution and the high volume of the main stream by diluting the stock solution and introducing it at a point with maximum shear that will not break the build-up of the gentle floc. A unique design that meets these requirements may be seen in the picture below:
The high velocity feed is split to two compartments with opposite tangential inlets that are positioned in two levels, an upper and a lower one. Between those compartments there is a narrow gap through which the flocculant solution is introduced and the high shear quickly distributes the polymer to a uniform mixture. Simultaneously, the shearing planes dampen the flow velocity to a point where the floc may grow without being interrupted by irregular flow patterns.
Traction thickeners have no lifting devices therefore they cannot be used for storage.