Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chandan Sapkota
Presentation Outline
Economy at a glance
Macro economy
External sector Sophistication of products Binding constrains to growth Investment climate
Economy at a glance
Low growth, low job opportunities, fledging industrial sector, high prices, low savings, high imports and consumption, and remittances-fueled impact-less investment cycles; But, bright spots are emerging
2014-01-12
@csapkota
Pre-reformed panchayat (Import substitution era) Reformed panchayat (Structural adjustment era) Constitutional monarchy (Economic liberalization) Maoist insurgency (Reform policies in paper, WTO accession) Post-revolution (Sweeping changes underway, BFIs growth) Growth below 5%, low employment High consumption High recurrent but low capital expenditure; might have exp growth>revenue growth Low investment, saving, and FDI Trade deficit unsustainable Inflation creeping up, food and fuel insecurity Remittance economy Manufacturing sector going downhill Financial sector troubles Poor investment climate due to load-shedding, labor problems, political instability, policy inconsistency and implementation paralysis Good development: Poverty and inequality down, forex reserves up, investment in infra
2014-01-12
3.91
3 2.60
0 1971-1979 Pre-reformed panchayat 1980-1991 Reformed panchayat GDP 1992-1996 Constitutional monarchy 1997-2006 2007-2010 Maoist Post revolution insurgency
@csapkota
Macro economy
2014-01-12
@csapkota
2
1 0 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012R
2.27
GDP growth rate declining after reaching 6.1% in 2007/08 Expected to increase in 2011/12 , thanks to high agriculture production (particularly paddy, which contributes 21% to agri GDP, production to increase by 13.7%) Per capita GDP is rising; Nominal GNDI is expected to be US$931 in 2011/12 Official unemployment rate is 2.1%. Real unemployment rate estimated to be around to 46% Rural population: 83% of total population
2014-01-12 @csapkota 6
90%
80%
49.7 50.9
51.5
51.2
49.5
47.7
49.4
50.33
16.2
15.3
14.6
14.9
14.3
14.35
32.3
33.5
35.9
37.4
36.3
35.32
FY2008
FY2009
FY2010
FY2011
FY2012R
FY2013P
Agriculture sector
Industry sector
Services sector
Contribution of agri sector coming down (around 40% in 1992/93) Industrial sector , which is the most important in terms of employment and sustainable growth, is weakening Services sector is absorbing labor from agriculture sector (apart from those migrating abroad for work) and is the largest jobs provider. Contributes over 50% to GDP. Structural transformation???
2014-01-12 @csapkota 7
Graduation from LDC category to developing country status by 2022? Stuck in a low growth trap? The decline of agriculture sector is accompanied by the increase of services sector (mostly low-value added activities like real estate, retail and wholesale trade, transport, etc the demand for which is directly related to the remittance-backed consumption demand of imported goods traded in these sectors, implying that employment generation and domestic value addition are pretty low. The intersection between decline of agriculture sector and increase of services sector (circa 1998) occurred at around US$219 per capita GDP.
2014-01-12 @csapkota 8
Contributions to growth
Sectoral contributions to growth
5 4 3 2 1 0 FY2011 FY2012R FY2013P 3.8 4.5 3.6 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2
Manufacturing (Share of GDP) GDP growth rate (basic prices) Manufacturing (growth rate) 7.59 7.48
CBS Agriculture
Services
Industry
GDP growth at basic prices
Manufacturing sectors contribution to GDP declining. It has negative growth rate in 2007/08 and 2008/09 Agriculture sector growth bumped up GDP growth rate. But, its decline didnt have similar effect. Why? Services sector is pretty much providing base for whatever growth we have. Sustainable growth of over 5% is not possible without robust industrial sector (mainly manufacturing) and high value, high productivity agri and services activities. It is also the source of stable employment and income opportunities. Interface between agriculture and industrial sector: agro-processing or linking agri and industrial sector.
2014-01-12 @csapkota 9
Share of GDP
92 91 90 89 88 87 Consumption
25
20 15 10 5 0 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 Gross domestic saving Imports of goods and services FY2012R FY2013P Gross national saving Gross fixed capital formation Final consumption expenditure Exports of goods and services
86 85 84 83 82
Domestic saving is extremely Consistently high investment but output?? Foreign direct investment was about US$103.6 million in 2013. Consumption is very high at around 90% of GDP. Domestic production down; remittances up; imports up
2014-01-12 @csapkota 10
15
-1.0 -2.0
10
-3.0 20
Tax revenue)
11.9 13.4 12.9 13.8 15.3
3.1
5 0
Total expenditure
Recurrent
Capital
FY2006
FY2008
FY2010
FY2012
Total expenditure higher than total revenue Filled by foreign aid (grants and loans) and domestic borrowing Inflation is still high (will rise further due to the impact of high petroleum products and market distortions) Budget surplus in FY2013. Very low capital expenditure.
2014-01-12
@csapkota
11
External sector
2014-01-12
@csapkota
12
Exports is declining, especially after 1996 (so is the contribution of industrial sector and manufacturing sector to GDP). Exports of goods and services was 26% of GDP in 1997. It was 9.75% of GDP in 2010. It is expected to be 9.78% of GDP in 2011/12. Imports are ever-increasing, reaching 37% of GDP in 2010. It is expected to be 32.57% of GDP In 2011/12. Trade deficit is ever-widening reaching around 23% of GDP.
2014-01-12 @csapkota 13
Export Markets
2014-01-12
@csapkota
14
India is the most important trading partner; relatively favorable market access
2014-01-12
@csapkota
15
Major export items: Textiles, iron & steel, agriculture items Major import items: Fuels, electrical machines, transport equipment Income from merchandise exports is less than the total amount of money needed to import petroleum fuel Most of the import items are pretty much price inelastic to demand (thanks to remittances)
2014-01-12 @csapkota 16
10
5.1 0.4 Export (fob) Import (cif) Merchandise trade balance Services balance
6.3
Oil import
Remittances
-10
-20
-27.1
FY2011
FY2012
FY2013
Current account balance negative in FY2010 and FY2011 Remittances is the balancing variable Exports underperforming Imports ballooning
2014-01-12
@csapkota
17
20
250
200 150 100 50 0 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013
15
10
Overseas migrants
Remittances (% of GDP)
Remittance inflows: $4.9 billion in FY2013 (25.5% of GDP) Total number of migrants in FY2013: 453,543 (on average, 1054 each day) Benefits: BoP surplus, decline in poverty and inequality, increase in purchasing power (55.8% of households) Costs: Laxity in real policy reform and implementation, sectoral bubbles, symptoms of Dutch Disease, inflation, consumption binge, high imports, increase in wage premium (or reservation wage) of casual labor
2014-01-12
@csapkota
18
53.13
40
30.8
30 20 10 0
25.2
24.82
2010
2003
1995
Poverty headcount rate at 25.2% (without a change in consumption basket , the decline was even dramatic) Inequality decreased (Gini index 32.94 in 2010/11 from 41.4 in 2003/04) What caused?
Mostly remittances (bumped up income) -- nominal per capita consumption of the poorest households increased by 165 percent while that of richest households increased by 66 percent only Average household income of the poorest and richest 20 percent households increased by 297 percent and 133 percent respectively. Government policies? Roads, Education, Healthcare??? 2014-01-12 @csapkota 19
Product sophistication
2014-01-12
@csapkota
20
The sophistication of production is associated with income level of countries. Sophistication of Nepals production and exports is low. Reasons? Both endogenous and exogenous factors
2014-01-12 @csapkota 21
Product Space
2014-01-12
@csapkota
22
2014-01-12
@csapkota
23
2014-01-12
@csapkota
24
2014-01-12
@csapkota
25
2014-01-12
@csapkota
26
2014-01-12
@csapkota
27
Inadequate supply of infrastructure (road network, communications, electricity, irrigation , storage, etc). During conflict infrastructures were destroyed, which reduced productive capacity of our economy. The poor quality of existing infrastructure and a virtual absence of linkages between production and manufacturing sites in the hilly and mountainous regions has not only stymied structural transformation and impeded a shift to new productive activities, it is also leading to a skewed spatial distribution of agents (firms and labor) and assets in the economy. Clustering of firms in urban centers (Kathmandu, Pokhara, Biratnagar, Birgunj and Terai region) due to conflict. These are also the places with relatively low transportation costs and high potential for economies of scale.
28
Inadequate supply of infrastructure is the most binding constraint to growth at present. But, this does not mean other constraints are irrelevant. Policy to tackle this constraint head-on will create the biggest bang for a buck.
2014-01-12 @csapkota
2014-01-12
@csapkota
29
Investment climate
2014-01-12
@csapkota
30
Political instability is the major constraint to doing business in Nepal. Next biggest constraint is loadshedding, followed by labor problems. Many industries , including MNCs, have closed down. Capacity utilization of firm is 54 percent. Labor productivity growth was negative in manufacturing, retail and services sectors. Number of electrical outages in a typical month averaged 52 (average duration was 6.5 hours), inflicting loss of about 27 percent of annual sales. Approximately 15.7 percent of firms owned or shared a generator, which satisfied 24.6 percent of electricity demand by firms.
2014-01-12 @csapkota 31
2014-01-12
@csapkota
32
2014-01-12
Thank You!
2014-01-12
@csapkota
34