The World Bank Implementation Status & Results

Indonesia URBAN SECTOR DEVELOPMENT AND REFORM PROJECT (P071296)

Public Disclosure Copy
Operation Name: URBAN SECTOR DEVELOPMENT AND REFORM Project Stage: Implementation Approval FY: Seq.No: 12 2005 Status: ARCHIVED

Report No: ISR10612

Archive Date:

29-Jun-2013

PROJECT (P071296)
Country: Indonesia Product Line: IBRD/IDA Implementing Agency(ies): Region: EAST ASIA AND PACIFIC Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan

Key Dates
Board Approval Date Effectiveness Date

07-Jun-2005 18-Jan-2006

Original Closing Date 30-Jun-2011 Revised Closing Date 31-May-2013

Planned Mid Term Review Date 15-Apr-2008 Actual Mid Term Review Date

Last Archived ISR Date 03-Dec-2012

16-Mar-2009

Project Development Objectives

Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document)

The project development objective is to assist the Borrower to strengthen local governance and improve the provision of selected urban services by participating Urban Local Governments (ULGs) and additional participating ULGs.
Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project?

Yes

No

Component(s)
Component Name Component Cost

Urban Reform and Institutional Support Component Urban Investment Component

5.96 42.35

Overall Ratings
Previous Rating Current Rating

Public Disclosure Copy

Progress towards achievement of PDO Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Overall Risk Rating

Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory

Moderately Satisfactory Satisfactory

Implementation Status Overview

The project has been very successful in strengthening governance in the 10 participating urban local governments (ULGs) and has completed 15 investment sub-projects aimed at improving provision of services. All the ULGs have met, and in some cases exceeded, the projects specific reform and governance objectives related to transparency, participation, accountability, financial management, and procurement management, as reflected in the performance indicators. The project also completed construction or rehabilitation of 13 public markets, 1 bus terminal, and 1 fish auction facility. While the quality of the infrastructure itself is good, final outcome assessment is still underway because about half including three sub-projects that were completed only recently are not yet fully operational. In most cases, those that are operational have been found to have increased local government revenues,

Page 1 of 11

The World Bank

Report No: ISR10612

have allocated operation and maintenance costs, and enjoy good rates of both trader and customer satisfaction. Similar outcomes are anticipated for the rest of the markets as they become fully operational over the next few months.

Public Disclosure Copy

Locations
Country First Administrative Division Location Planned

Actual

Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia

Aceh Not Entered Not Entered Not Entered Central Sulawesi South Sulawesi Not Entered Not Entered West Sumatra Not Entered Not Entered Not Entered South Sulawesi Kalimantan Tengah Not Entered Not Entered Not Entered Not Entered West Java Not Entered Not Entered Not Entered

Banda Aceh Kotamadya Yogyakarta Toboli Propinsi Sulawesi Tengah Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan Kabupaten Sidenreng-Rapang Kotamadya Semarang Sawahlunto Kotamadya Parepare Kota administratip Palu Palopo Palopo Palangkaraya Kabupaten Musibanyuasin Kabupaten Manokwari Mangkang Kota Administratip Cimahi Cimahi Kotamadya Blitar Kemirimuka Kecamatan Gamping

Public Disclosure Copy

Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia

Page 2 of 11

The World Bank

Report No: ISR10612

Country

First Administrative Division

Location

Planned

Actual

Indonesia

Not Entered Not Entered Not Entered Not Entered Not Entered Not Entered

Kabupaten Sleman Desa Umbulharjo Kecamatan Pangkajene Kotamadya Depok Kecamatan Moutong Lakessi

Public Disclosure Copy

Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia Indonesia

Results
Project Development Objective Indicators
Indicator Name Core Unit of Measure Baseline Value Date Comments Current End Target

Increased revenue, operations and maintenance expenditures, and satisfaction rates among users and consumers of selected urban services in at least 70% of ULGs with completed subprojects

Percentage

0.00 18-Jan-2006 Overall ULG target (70%) is based on achievement of four sub-indicators that each have their own targets, and are in turn determined by individual baselines and values achieved for each subproject. At inception of the project, overall baseline is zero as the project investments have not yet taken place. 0.00 18-Jan-2006 Sub-indicator based on individual baselines for each ULG and subproject. Data are collected through municipal records on revenues from each facility or service.

50.00 31-May-2013 Note: Reference to all 10 ULGs. Based on partial results and data. Four ULGs have met revenue, and seven O&M targets, and five met satisfaction targets. (detail see below)

70.00 31-May-2013 Reference to all 10 ULGs. At least 70% of participating ULGs increased revenues at least 10%; increased O&M at least 10%; at least have 50% of traders satisfied; at least have 50% consumers satisfied. Based on 10 ULGs with completed sub-projects. See breakdown indicators for detailed targets. Based on 10 ULGs. 70.00 31-May-2013

Public Disclosure Copy

70% of ULGs increase their local revenue from urban services financed by the project by at least 10%

Percentage
Sub Type

Value Date Comments

40.00 31-May-2013

Breakdown

Sub-projects in some ULGs At least 70% of participating have generates significant ULGs have increased local revenues. For instance, the revenues by at least 10% markets in Sidrap have generates revenues five times than those of the old markets. The new market in Palopo generates new source of

Page 3 of 11

The World Bank

income for the ULG quite significantly.

Report No: ISR10612

Public Disclosure Copy

70% of ULGs increase expenditures for O&M of infrastructure financed by the project by at least 10%

Percentage
Sub Type

Value Date Comments

0.00 18-Jan-2006 Sub-indicator based on individual baselines for each ULG and subproject. Data are collected through municipal records on O&M expenditures for each service infrastructure financed by the project.

70.00 31-May-2013 This includes ULGs whose sub-projects have not been operationalized and newlybuilt sub-projects. The increase level varies among ULGs. For example, Palangkaraya increased the new market's O&M almost 9 times than that of the old market. 50.00 31-May-2013 50% of participating ULGs have 64%-100% of traders who express increased satisfaction with the facilities.

70.00 31-May-2013 At least 70% of participating ULGs have increased O&M by at least 10%

Breakdown

Percentage of ULGs in which at least 50% of users express increased satisfaction in doing business in the improved facility.

Percentage
Sub Type

Value Date Comments

0.00 18-Jan-2006 Baseline is zero because the target is based on percentage of ULGs meeting targets for user satisfaction in facilities that were not yet improved and in some cases not identified. Increased satisfaction for individual subprojects will not include and ex-ante baseline but rather through a survey of current users who also were users of the unimproved infrastructure. "Users" refers to vendors orother stakeholders that use the facilities improved through project investments to conduct business activities and provide commercial services. 0.00 18-Jan-2006

70.00 31-May-2013 At least 70% of participating ULGs have 50% traders satisfied

Breakdown

Public Disclosure Copy

Percentage of ULGs in which at least 50% of consumers express increase satisfaction of using the facilities

Percentage
Sub Type

Value Date Comments

50.00 31-May-2013

70.00 31-May-2013 At least 70% of participating

Breakdown

Baseline is zero because the 50% of participating ULGs target is based on percentage have at 74%-100% of

Page 4 of 11

The World Bank

Report No: ISR10612

of ULGs meeting targets for consumers who express ULGs have 50% consumers consumer satisfaction in increased satisfaction with the satisfied facilities that were not yet facilities. improved and in some cases not identified. Increased satisfaction for individual subprojects will not include and ex-ante baseline but rather through a survey of current consumers who also were consumers of the services before they were improved. "Consumers" refers to customers of vendors or recipients of services provided through the facilities. Intermediate Results Indicators
Indicator Name Core Unit of Measure Baseline Value Date Comments Current End Target

Public Disclosure Copy

Participating ULGs have public feedback mechanisms in place including:(i) the use of at least one type of media(s) for public complaints which is managed by complaint handling unit; (ii) availability

Text

0.00 18-Jan-2006 At the inception of the project, baseline was zero as the project has not started its facilitation and values vary across ULGs. Information is collected during the supervisions missions and recorded in the Aide Memoires with qualitative information on the progress. Indicators were only specified in June 2010 during project restructuring. 0.00 18-Jan-2006

(i) 100.00; (ii) 100.00; (iii) 90.00 31-May-2013 100% of participating ULGs (i) use media, some ULGs use sms; some use sms linked with web; (ii) 100% have unit that manages complaint handling; (iii) 90% ULGs have SOP

80.00 for (i); (ii) and (iii) 31-May-2013 At least 80% of participating ULGs (i) use media; (ii) have unit that manages complaint handling; (iii) have SOP

Public Disclosure Copy

Participatory planning process: (i) allocation of block grants to kecamatan and/or kelurahan from the ULG and/or from at least oneagency with Standard Operating Procedure for the use of block grants

Text

Value Date Comments

80.00 31-May-2013

50.00 31-May-2013 At least 50% of participating ULGs has block grant mechanisms or indicative budgets

At the inception of the project, 80% of participating ULGs baseline was zero as the has block grant mechanisms project has not started its or indicative budgets facilitation and values vary across ULGs. Information is collected during the

Page 5 of 11

The World Bank

supervisions missions and recorded in the Aide Memoires with qualitative information on the progress. Indicators were only specified in June 2010 during project restructuring. Participating ULGs practicing sound Financial Management: (i) issuance of local regulation (PERDA or Decree or Perbup/Perwal) on Principle of Regional Financial Management; (ii) Issuance of local regu Text
Value Date Comments

Report No: ISR10612

Public Disclosure Copy

0.00 18-Jan-2006 At the inception of the project, baseline was zero as the project has not started its facilitation and values vary across ULGs. Information is collected during the supervisions missions and recorded in the Aide Memoires with qualitative information on the progress. Indicators were only specified in June 2010 during project restructuring. 0.00

(i)100.00 (ii)100.00 and (iii) 70.00 31-May-2013 Project Restructuring in 2010 deleted indicator (iii), however, the Project continued to support this activity. Quality of some regulations needs to be improved, implementation of the regulations in consistent manner will have to be monitored

(i) 80.00 (ii) 80.00 and (iii) 60.00 31-May-2013 At least 80% of participating ULGs for (i) and (ii) and 60% of participating ULGs for (iii)

Center of Excellence: (i) Unit Informasi Pembangunan Permukiman dan Bangunan or UIP2B functioned as a Provincial Center of Excellence to support reforms in the ULGs in the province; (ii) Work Plan for

Text

Value

Public Disclosure Copy

Center of Excellence: at least 1 Province has (i) and (ii) Local Economic Development and City Development Strategy: At least 60%of Partic ipating ULGs have (i) and at least 50% of Participating ULGs having the LED-focu sed City Development Strategy achieve (ii) 31-May-2013

Date Comments

18-Jan-2006 At the inception of the project, baseline was zero as the project has not started its facilitation and values vary across ULGs. Information is collected during the supervisions missions and recorded in the Aide Memoires with qualitative

31-May-2013 1 PIP2B has been established. Organizational structure and budget are available, a five-year business plan was prepared; and annualwork plan was issued

Page 6 of 11

The World Bank

information on the progress. Indicators were only specified in June 2010 during project restructuring. Participating ULGs implemented subprojects: (i) Participating ULGs sign Sub- project Loan Agreements (SLAs) with Ministry of Finance for urban investment subprojects; (ii) Participating ULGs complete Text
Value Date Comments

Report No: ISR10612

Public Disclosure Copy

0.00 18-Jan-2006 At the inception of the project, baseline was zero as the project has not started its facilitation and values vary across ULGs. Information is collected during the supervisions missions and recorded in the Aide Memoires with qualitative information on the progress. Indicators were only specified in June 2010 during project restructuring. 0.00 18-Jan-2006 At the inception of the project, baseline was zero as the project has not started its facilitation and values vary across ULGs. Information is collected during the supervisions missions and recorded in the Aide Memoires with qualitative information on the progress. Indicators were only specified in June 2010 during project restructuring. 0.00 18-Jan-2006 At the inception of the project, baseline was zero as the project has not started its facilitation and values vary across ULGs. Information is

(i) 100.00 (ii) 100.00 31-May-2013 Construction of 15 subprojects have been completed in all participating ULGs; 100% of ULGs have signed SLAs

(i) 100.00 (ii) 80.00 31-May-2013 100% of ULGs signed SLAs and at least 80% ULGs completed construction of urban investment subproject

Participating ULGs practicing sound Procurement: (i) Min. 75% of the bids be awarded within the bid validity period, and publicizedin the public domain, e.g. website, local bulletin; (ii) Min 50% of t

Text

Value Date Comments

(i) 100.00 (ii) 100.00 and (iiii) 30.00 31-May-2013

(i) 60.00 (ii) 60.00 and (iii) 60.00 31-May-2013

3 ULGs have implemented At least 60% of participating (iii) -- performance evaluation, ULGs achieve (i), (ii), and (iii) 4 ULGs have prepared criteria for the performance evaluation (partially this indicator is achieved)

Public Disclosure Copy

Transparency, Participation and Accountability: ULGs that post semi-annual updates on websites or in printed media for specified information

Percentage

Value Date Comments

85.00 31-May-2013 On average between 80-90% of participating ULGs have published six specified types of information in websites or in printed media (details are

80.00 31-May-2013 At least 80% of participating ULGs post the specified information at six months intervals

Page 7 of 11

The World Bank

collected during the shown in the following six supervisions missions and indicators below) recorded in the Aide Memoires with qualitative information on the progress. Indicators were only specified in June 2010 during project restructuring. Transparency, Participation and Accountability: ULGs that post semi-annual updates on websites or in printed media for information on local development activities/programs Percentage
Value Date Comments

Report No: ISR10612

Public Disclosure Copy

0.00 18-Jan-2006 At the inception of the project, baseline was zero as the project has not started its facilitation and values vary across ULGs. Information is collected during the supervisions missions and recorded in the Aide Memoires with qualitative information on the progress. Indicators were only specified in June 2010 during project restructuring. 0.00 18-Jan-2006 At the inception of the project, baseline was zero as the project has not started its facilitation and values vary across ULGs. Information is collected during the supervisions missions and recorded in the Aide Memoires with qualitative information on the progress. Indicators were only specified in June 2010 during project restructuring. 0.00 18-Jan-2006

100.00 31-May-2013 100% of participating ULGs of post the information on local development activities/ programs in websites

80.00 31-May-2013 At least 80% of participating ULGs post the information on local development activities/ programs at six month intervals

Transparency, Participation and Accountability: ULGs that post semi-annual updates on websites or in printed media for specified information: Mid-term development Plan (RPJMD)

Percentage

Value Date Comments

90.00 31-May-2013 90 % of participating ULGs published summary RPJMD on the website or printed media.

80.00 31-May-2013 At least 80% of participating ULGs post the information on RPJMD at six month intervals

Public Disclosure Copy

Transparency, Participation and Accountability: ULGs that post semi-annual updates on websites or in printed media for specified information: summary of Local Budget (APBD)

Percentage

Value Date Comments

70.00 31-May-2013

80.00 31-May-2013 At least 80% of participating ULGs post the information on

At the inception of the project, 70% of participating ULGs baseline was zero as the published summary of local

Page 8 of 11

The World Bank

project has not started its facilitation and values vary across ULGs. Information is collected during the supervisions missions and recorded in the Aide Memoires with qualitative information on the progress. Indicators were only specified in June 2010 during project restructuring. Transparency, Participation and Accountability: ULGs that post semi-annual updates on websites or in printed media for specified information: Audited Annual Financial Report Percentage
Sub Type Value Date Comments

Report No: ISR10612

Public Disclosure Copy

budget of the ongoing FY, the summary of APBD at six and published summary of month intervals budget realization of previous FY.

0.00 18-Jan-2006 At the inception of the project, none of the ULGs has published the Audited Annual Financial Report 0.00 18-Jan-2006 At the inception of the project, none of the ULGs has published Procurement Plan for the on-going fiscal year 0.00 18-Jan-2006 At the inception of the project, none of the ULGs has published Contract Awarded in the past six months 0.00 18-Jan-2006 At the inception of the project, none of the ULGs has developed the LED-City Development Strategy

70.00 31-May-2013 70% of participating ULGs post the information on the Audited Annual Financial Report at six month intervals. 100.00 31-May-2013 100% of participating ULGs post the information on the Procurement Plan and bid announcement for the ongoing fiscal year 80.00 31-May-2013 80% of participating ULGs post the information on the Contracts Awarded in the past six month 100.00 31-May-2013 100% of participating ULGs have (i) and all of them are implementing more than 10% of the specified activities in FY 2013 through relevant local agencies.

80.00 31-May-2013 At least 80% of participating ULGs post the information on the Audited Annual Financial Report at six month intervals 80.00 31-May-2013 At least 80% of participating ULGs post the information on the Procurement Plan at six month intervals 80.00 31-May-2013 At least 80% of 10 ULGs post the information on the Contracts Awarded at six month intervals 60.00 31-May-2013 At lease 60% of participating ULGs have (i) and at least 50% of participating ULGs have LED-focus City Development Strategy achieve(ii)

Breakdown

Transparency, Participation and Accountability: ULGs that post semi-annual updates on website or in printed media for specified information: Procurement Plan for the on-going fiscal year

Percentage
Sub Type

Value Date Comments

Breakdown

Transparency, Participation and Accountability: ULGs that post semi-annual updates on website or in printed media for specified information: Contracts Awarded in the past six months

Percentage
Sub Type

Value Date Comments

Breakdown

Public Disclosure Copy

Local Economic Development and City Development Strategy: (i) development of LEDCity Development Strategy by ULGs; (ii) ULGs implemented 10% of activities specified in the Strategy

Percentage
Sub Type

Value Date Comments

Breakdown

Data on Financial Performance (as of 25-Mar-2013)

Financial Agreement(s) Key Dates Page 9 of 11

The World Bank

Project Ln/Cr/Tf Status Approval Date Signing Date Effectiveness Date

Report No: ISR10612

Original Closing Date

Revised Closing Date

P071296 P071296

IBRD-47860 IBRD-77600 TF-53555

Closed Closed Closed

07-Jun-2005 06-Jul-2009 20-Oct-2005

20-Oct-2005 06-Jul-2009 20-Oct-2005

18-Jan-2006 06-Jul-2009 18-Jan-2006

30-Jun-2011 30-Jun-2011 30-Jun-2011

31-May-2013 31-May-2013 31-May-2013

Public Disclosure Copy

P071296

Disbursements (in Millions)

Project Ln/Cr/Tf Status Currency Original Revised Cancelled Disbursed Undisbursed % Disbursed

P071296 P071296 P071296

IBRD-47860 IBRD-77600 TF-53555

Closed Closed Closed

USD USD USD

45.00 45.00 5.00

45.00 38.14 5.00

0.00 6.86 0.00

0.00 36.51 4.39

0.00 1.63 0.61

0.00 96.00 88.00

Disbursement Graph

Public Disclosure Copy

Key Decisions Regarding Implementation

The Ministry of Public Works is finalizing a Project Benefit and Monitoring Evaluation (PBME) Report. Both the Ministry and the Bank are preparing completion reports, and are collaborating to facilitate the orderly closure of the project and make arrangements to help ensure the sustainability of the projects reforms, investments, and outcomes.

Restructuring History
Board/AOB Approval on 04-Jun-2010, Level two Approved on 13-Apr-2011, Level two Approved on 14-Jun-2012

Related Projects

Page 10 of 11

The World Bank

Report No: ISR10612

There are no related projects.

Public Disclosure Copy

Public Disclosure Copy

Page 11 of 11