The Future of Public Data Reception

1
From William E Justin

Jan 28, 2014
WEJ7 ACRROSS THE WEB
https://sites.google.com/site/wej7ac crosstheweb/widget-3/home
Newsletter Title
THE FUTURE OF PUBLIC DATA RECEPTION

SECTIONS: 1-INTRODUCTION 2-7 PROPERTIES OF FUTURE PUBLIC DATA RECEPTION 4-SEALING OFF THE CRIMINALS & PROTECTING THE PRIVACY RIGHTS OF YOU & YOUR PIZZAMAN 6-THE DETRACTORS 7-RANDOM ANONYMOUS
PUBLIC MONITORING OF ITSELF
INTRODUCTION
Both Government and Big Business receive all sorts of data from us. Theres no reason to make a list of that here. Were painfully aware of their needs. The NSA for example, feels it needs to know everything about everything. Companies such as Google would love to know as much about us as was feasible in order to maximize their profit needs. Wall Street, The Entertainment Industrial Complex, Big Pharma, The oil industrythe more of our personal data they can get their hands on, the more they can develop psychological grooming patterns that snare and bind us to their desires.
Caption describing picture or graphic.
The public goes along with much of this for two reasons. The first is that it makes sense to do so. People dont want to go around with a cart holding all of the data they need to supply to Government and business. The second is they have no choicethey must give up some data or suffer the loss of assets or a potential asset loosely termed service. The problem of how our data is exploited and kept to be exploitedalong with Environmental Issues, Crime Issues, and issues of the Saturation of Media and Advertizing constantly being shoved into our eyes, ears, and brainsis itself central in our politics and public discourse. We can bow down or even choose to opt out sometimesbut without great expenditures of time and energy, we mostly go along. The static, manipulative depiction brought forth by the Fascist social controller is: its always been this way, always will be, you can do nothing about it, so conform to existing social order if you know whats good for you. The digital age has stymied this social order and is rapidly changing outcomes at every level. The Future of Public Data Reception promises to align itself much more with the Democratic Ideals of the public, and much less with the Fascist ideals of a weakening, psychologically deformed elite. When once it required a days ride in the buggy to search for public records, today it can be done as quickly as a pot of coffee is brewed. At least for those who know how. And as time accelerates, more and more of this know-how is being infused deep into the masses. Make no mistake about it, the Fascist Elite are under siege from all corners. Two of the startling episodes of recent times has been the ease in which elite data has been drawn from the US Military and State Departments and dispersed like a bowel of candy taken from babies and given to the public. Some of the dataperhaps even proving elite criminal behavior and conduct rising to the status of War Crimeshas no doubt already been shipped off to world courts for legal actions and historical storage and clarification. The future of public data reception promises further forays into the financial sector dealings of
DEMOCRACY
OR INSIDER FACSCIM?
CAN ANY PUBLIC BLOCKAGE OR DELAY BE ALLOWED OUTSIDE OF GIVING VALID SUSPECTED CRIMINAL ENEMIES EQUAL ACCESS TO DATA?

Jan 28, 2014
SECTIONS:

INTRODUCTION THE SEVEN PRIMARY PROPERTIES
1-INTRODUCTION 2-7 PROPERTIES OF FUTURE PUBLIC DATA RECEPTION 4-SEALING OFF THE CRIMINALS & PROTECTING THE PRIVACY RIGHTS OF YOU & YOUR PIZZAMAN 6-THE DETRACTORS 7-RANDOM ANONYMOUS
DEMOCRACY OR INSIDER FACSCIM? CAN ANY PRIVATE COMPANIES BE ALLOWED TO TAKE PERSONAL OWNERSHIP RIGHTS OF OUR DATA WITHOUT CONSENT OR NEGOTIATED COMPENSATION?
Fascist Elitism as well. Swine will be more difficult than ever to disguise with face make-up and perfume. Eventually, the public may fully sicken of the values of corruption and, powerfully, insist on higher standards of leadership.
SEVEN PROPERIES OF FUTURE PUBLIC DATA RECEPTION

All public data belongs to the public. It may be gathered by Government and Big Business but it is owned as a whole by all citizens to the same degree as the coastlines and claimed oceanic spaces surrounding our country are. Individuals and companies cant just show up on this preserve and do as they please. Google may scoop up your images during web crawling and place them for dissemination, but they certainly dont own those pictures which can be ordered taken off their lists. And if your picture appears on a can of some new money-making product called ISoup, the corporation can be made to pay or even be criminally charged if you were not included in the loop. Your medical history is something that is held in even sticker regard. The Public owns all of its data and both the government and the corporations must be extremely careful how they handle this. Reception of Public Data is presorted by various criteria. Some of the various categories in which data is presorted as it arrives, are fairly obvious. Health data goes into the health bin for instance. Health, real estate ownership, family linkagethese are parts of the horizontal spread of the pre-sorting of Public Data. There is also an obvious vertical sectioning in the pre-sorting. Time and Location for instance. There are as many sections available as you can think up. Pre-sorting of the incoming data is essential for the 3rd Property of Public Data Reception. Lucid Publishing of Public Data Reception. It is meant to enhance the public as a whole . What other reason would anybody bother to collect it in the first place? Lucid Publishing of our data becomes nuanced. Security for the public as a whole means that certain data is time delayed. The times and places of police raids for instance should not appear in real time. That would not enhance the public as a whole but accomplish the opposite. Privately used Public Data by individuals and companies for money-making schemes--splits away from Lucid Publishing at this point. In the past this occurred because it did not make sense for government to mail out and deliver all of the data to all of the people. With digital reception and housing of data, the government is forced to provide all data for as close to free as is reasonable in order to

Jan 28, 2014
Newsletter Title

THE SEVEN PRIMARY PROPERTIES
SECTIONS:
inform the public as a whole. Fascist Elitismbe it lodged in government bureaucracy or private sector contractors cannot be allowed any advantage in this regard. It doesnt make sense when publishing the data in a modern digital world is as easy as ringing the old dinner bell or making a local phone call. Individuals that attempt to get between the public as a whole and Its Data, convolute the value of it in favor of insiders and should be rounded up and subjected to penal retaliation (fines based on value factors; jail based on the damages to the public as a whole). Data Mining is at the heart of the primary seven properties. It is well-known that the swell of incoming public data makes it harder and harder to work with. Chatty Cathy and a few hundred million others produce data that pollutes the advantages gained to the public as a whole by fair, intelligent reception methods. Chatty Cathys tweets about pop stars and her favorite garden vegetables need to quickly pass through the right filters and be disposed of. It should be mentioned here that most of the available data received in an intelligent program should be destroyed because it pollutes the value of the enterprise itself. The Chatty Kathy stream mainly needs to be checked as well as possible for planted code by those hostile to the Democratic imperative of the public as a whole. Mining Data through the matrix of pre-sort filters involves having the streams of information readily available to be tapped into. To accomplish this, the right set of filters and switches must be opened and closed in rhythm with the present conditions. When an hour or a days worth of economic data is concluded for instance, the data should be made public without any chance of compromise in order to block advantages harnessed by the forces of Fascist Elitism. Many different examples of this timely opening and closing of sets of filters and switches are available and well known. The force behind future Reception of Public Data is the law itself and the willingness citizens to effect it and empower enforcement of it to insure it serves the public as a whole. Democratically controlled and court sanctified law-making must determine exactly how Reception of Public Data and the lucid publishing of it is handled. With Fascist Elitism and the corruption it sows throughout government and business driving the world toward disaster, the public itself must gain control through a 4th layer institution of government. A Peoples Congress designed to set the stage for law-making and for exploiting its data for its purpose of fair service to itself while also monitoring those who previously were able to shield themselves and the arrangements they made to and with The First Enemy of DemocracyFascist Elitism. This to bring about a method for simple, intelligent laws about how public data is handledbut one with switches ultimately set without special interests and the additional influence this First Enemy of Democracy can bring to bare.
DEMOCRACY
OR INSIDER FACSCIM?
CAN GOV OR OTHERS TWIST OUR DATA TO SUIT THEIR PURPOSES?

Jan 28, 2014
Newsletter Title

The double dippers want more than one vote; more than equal opportunity. Their crimes throughout American history are well-known. With intelligent Reception of Public Data controlled by true Democratic interests as a whole, Influence of Fascist Elitism along with the psychological and physical damage it continues to bring onto the human condition, will be sucked away and processed as sewage is. Input/Output Stations, linked together as an Intranet, must exist as Public Data Centers in each Congressional District and be available for public use 24 hours a day. Basic access and helpful onsite staff should be given to all citizens. Security-level access should Caption describing picture or be given at various levels. The Internet would graphic. have no links to this Intranet except possibly by specialized ports where data requests might be fulfilled. Data requests by the public may be best in limiting onsite use in order to greatly destroy back door hacking attempts by servants of Fascist Elitism. Only forced-entry into Public Data Centers would remain as a weak link. Still, it would be of very low feasibility considering how break points could be fashioned even as they are in nuclear weapon security. Direct-line access from home could be done via phone-lines but through a mirror site to create a firewall of security to protect the Data. Wi-Fi access may be even worst but still be made viableespecially as satellite and other transference stations receive enhance safeguards. It would be in these Public Data Centers for instance that anonymous rotational service units made up by the public would work to monitor all government and big business key strokes for unlawful misuse of Public Data and surveillance of servants of Fascist Elitism that manage to penetrate Government, Military, and National Intelligence Agencies. The regular public could even be allowed a role in this monitoring system by tuning in the various data streams and sending a signal that a flag has been spotted. It is only in this way that the public could keep an eye on the public servants and others in Big Business infected by Fascist Elitism those who would hope to exploit them and commandeer their personal data and secrets in theft, illegal profiteering and control; for maintaining an atmosphere of uncertainty that undermines Public Health. This Nation-wide, publically run Intranet, would likely have a series of deeper level storage to serve as a hedge against the very low possibility that the main Intranet was destroyed. Final holding of Public Data for future reference would require changes in the filters that earmark its relative importance. Much public data is time limited and may be discarded once it has been checked for things such as hidden codes and information that fails to meet legal standards of usefulness and fairness. Also, it is at this massive level that citizens required to perform duty would flag check in large teams to monitor the system. They report the sighting of real and benignly introduced flags indicating entrance to data systems as diverse as ones e-mail as well as legal law enforcement requests. This to protect the public and those working with public data.
SECTIONS 1-INTRODUCTION 2-7 PROPERTIES OF FUTURE PUBLIC DATA RECEPTION 4-SEALING OFF THE CRIMINALS & PROTECTING THE PRIVACY RIGHTS OF YOU & YOUR PIZZAMAN 6-THE DETRACTORS 7-RANDOM ANONYMOUS
DEMOCRACY
OR INSIDER FACSCIM?
CAN PUBLIC DATA BE USED TO SET LOW QUALITY BIAS THAT RESULT IN A FALSE DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH?

Jan 28, 2014
Newsletter Title

SEALING OFF THE CRIMINALS & PROTECTING THE PRIVACY RIGHTS OF YOU & SECTIONS 1-INTRODUCTION 2-7 PROPERTIES OF FUTURE PUBLIC DATA RECEPTION 4-SEALING OFF THE CRIMINALS & PROTECTING THE PRIVACY RIGHTS OF YOU & YOUR PIZZAMAN 6-THE DETRACTORS 7-RANDOM ANONYMOUS
Knowledge that our private conversations are being recorded and listened too is unsettling. In some states there are laws against secret taping of phone calls. Yet, for billing purposes, records that we made and received calls by phones listed in our name, is a standard and necessary practice in the modern world. Should the public be given an option to de-list all records of a particular phones calls in arrangements when they pay service providers lump sums for access? Not many people would want that considering the value that such records have to them personally when going back to figure out times, dates, and parties they spoke with. Knowing your public record also puts the mind at ease in terms of being able to defend yourself against malicious fraud and identity theft. Cue up you record at the service providers website, take a simple screen shot of you records, and drop them into a lock box file you trust. If any mistake is made or criminal fraud invades your spaceyoull have some strong evidence. A future public data reception institution would accomplish this in and of itself. All of the information and records available, sorted and sent to you or into your private lock boxand done so without the knowledge of any insiders programmed by Fascist Elitism working at phone companies or in government. Your phone records, your medical recordsactivated in specialized ways that open switches to that data and record the accessing of it. Your data, your phone conversations, your presence within the traffic gridare each items you would like to know if able to stop others from knowing about it too. After all, should your prospective employer get to know how much pizza you eat and what ingredients you prefer? Should the prospective employer be allowed any access to your data when basic programs provided by a proper Future Public Data Accessing Institutioncould simply mark you as employable to do the job described or not employable to do the job described? Extraneous detail in such a situation feeds bias that are not good for the public as a whole. Prospective employers and others may discriminate against people who will not open the lock box for their perusal, but such as this is likely illegality brought by Fascist Elitism. In the end, such practices could bring lawsuits and add to a companys negative public image. Consumers may hold a grudge. But what about law enforcement needs and oversight of the public by the government? Law enforcement tends to desire all the tools and would really like to know more about you and what exactly you are saying to your pizza man! Its valuable information for building charts of human trends that allow for better service and a greater ability to read and manipulate you. We like the service part and dont like the manipulation aspect. Only sound legal process and public participation should open access streams. Growing knowledge will render the Terms of Service Agreements of today obsolete. Your tracks may be recorded by dumb machines you control , but law enforcement and Intelligence Agencies will have to provide a valid legal argument to the courts and their public rights monitors for entryeven if after the fact.
DEMOCRACY
OR INSIDER FACSCIM?
CAN PUBLIC DATA BE FALSIFIED TO TILT THE U.S. TOWARD CORPORATELED INVASION OF OTHER NATIONS?

Jan 28, 2014
Newsletter Title

SECTIONS 1-INTRODUCTION 2-7 PROPERTIES OF FUTURE PUBLIC DATA RECEPTION 4-SEALING OFF THE CRIMINALS & PROTECTING THE PRIVACY RIGHTS OF YOU & YOUR PIZZAMAN 6-THE DETRACTORS 7-RANDOM ANONYMOUS
SEALING OFF THE CRIMINALS & PROTECTING THE PRIVACY RIGHTS OF YOU & YOUR PIZZAMAN Random, Anonymous Public Monitoring of Itself
to access that information. The President, or the head of The Defense Department, or the head of The CIA, may designate an enemy as a military target to be destroyed, but maybe not that targets wife and children. Not legally if the courts and public rights monitors have a clear understanding of the full implications involved.
When war crimes, mad public beatings, illegal surveillance are done by renegade American Security or criminals, the public as a whole suffers. The Future of Public Data Reception will force everybody to fair and reasonable conclusions and seal off advantages now held by Fascist Elitism. Detractors such as Fascist Elitism are the natural enemy of a reasonable Democratic Public Data Reception scheme. To lesser degrees Anarchism--as something of a perfect world desire for regulation with limited accountability to an overlord such as a Democratic Public Data Reception--would view this as a detriment to the stateless society they envision. Also, the minimalgovernment wishes of Libertarians and their desire for Freedom of Association (along with the freedom to remain aloof from mandatory involvement in such) would spawn fear of being grouped by Big Brother or the overlord. But it is Fascist Elitism that is diametrically opposed to an intelligent, vital data tracking system. Its built-in advantage over the so-called 99% would be dissipated . The Authoritarianism inherent in Fascist Elitism which insures its continual prosperity, is put at substantial risk by a comprehensive Democratic Public Data Reception operation. Exposure of the Emperors New Cloths masking a lack of true talent, would tend to burst the egotistical bubble its dimmed adherents are caught up in. As the national identity aspect in Fascism passes into the mad Capitalism fermenting today in multi-national corporatism, threats by benign Democratic Public Data Reception becomes obvious. The parasite provoking ownership and control of people, property, and the means of production becomes sealed off and starved. The Totalitarian aspect in Fascist Elitism enjoy technological advantage for complete acquisitionstymied as the immoral tactics used by it are exposed and criminalized. When Fascist Elitismby savvy, amoral hired hands--can go into data bases without leaving a trace and change information, the parasite feasts while infecting the public as a whole with something like a highly toxic poison. With insiders under the influence of Fascist Elitism unfairly get the first and sometimes only look at incoming data, the parasite is feasting directly on the public as a whole. When murders, movements of funds, and other secret, immoral deals are plotted and carried out without the possibility of tracking by Democratic Public Data Reception, the parasite is destroying its host.
DEMOCRACY
OR INSIDER FACSCIM?
CAN CRIMINAL GOV, BUSINESS OR OTHERS BE EXCUSED FROM PUBLIC TRACKING OF THEIR ACCESSING OF PUBLIC DATA?

Jan 28, 2014
Newsletter Title

THE DETRACTORS
SECTIONS
Random, Anonymous Public Monitoring of Itself

Fear-mongering, the subliminal mind programming of advertising, fraud, murder these are the core tactics the parasite of Fascist Elitism would attempt to use incrementally to combat the piece-by-piece introduction of right, legal, and correct data reception methods. The Fascist insider slaveholders club will wilt like a clan of soft wax demon figurines once it is clear they are leaving fixed and permanent tracks and will be held accountable for taking unfair advantage of the public as a whole.
The primary tactic Fascist Elitism would use is stalling the future arrival of comprehensive Public Data Reception. Buying officials to forestall reasonable, high Quality changes in the law is as close to an ace in the hole as its hapless adherents possess. Fascist Elitism does not fight fairhow could it? The psychological dilemma prevents this. It spreads fear and pathological need for increasing social power and material gain pushing individuals further toward addiction and a narrow, diminished sense of fulfillment not unlike the chemical master in the sad images of the crack whore. Separate individuals from this addiction and decrease the biological, social fall so far into the pre-hell framework pulling at the public as a whole . Safe building, implementation and use of Modern Public-Data Reception require random, anonymous monitoring by the average citizen. When violations of legally-set switches are flagged, there must be no way for the criminal employees of the Fascist Elite to interfere. No insider option. If non-authorized searches are made, there must be a clear track to the perpetratorin private as well as public systems. Information gathered by Modern Public-Data Reception stays in the dumb machine away from all eyes except those with legal court sanctioned permission. In the case of tracking and rooting out possible criminal activity, the line-out would look something like this: Information crawling programs within the dumb machine bring back suspicious patterns in the data; this information is tapped into like one would tap into their e-mail box. Based on the security level, authorized persons would have access under whatever legal conditions are set by Democratic law that has legal-system backing; all tapping into this data by authorized people would itself be tracked; flagged violations would be spotted by rotating Random, Anonymous Monitoring teams of average citizens whose only connection to the data regard were the flags indicating legal and illegal entry. The Fascist Elite would not know who or what to bribe, extort or attempt to break into and become neutered in their efforts to steal and cover-up their tracks. They would be forced to make their case for this or that in Democratic forums that are more than capable of destroying the parasite of built-in insider advantage.
DEMOCRACY
OR INSIDER FACSCIM?
SHOULD PUBLIC DATA RECEPTION ALSO BE USED TO DESTROY CRIMINAL ATTEMPTS TO BRIBE, EXTORT OR OTHERWISE HARM PUBLIC DATA TRACKERS AND HONEST SECURITY FORCES?

The Future of Public Data Reception

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Future of Public Data Reception

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1

From William E Justin