Statement of the Problem This study was conducted to evaluate internal stakeholders on the vision, mission, goals and

objectives of DMMMSU IC !MS" S#ecifically it sought to answer the following$ %" &hat is the #rofile of the res#ondents as to category' (" &hat is the #rofile of the students as to year level' )" !s to category, what is the evaluation of the res#ondents on the *M+, of DMMMSU-IC !MS in terms of $ a" level of awareness on the *M+, b" degree of acce#tability on the *M+, c" e.tent of the im#lementation of the *M+, d" degree of attainment of the *M+, e" level of e.#osure in the identified channels for *M+, dissemination f" degree of effectiveness of the identified channels for the *M+, dissemination /" Is there a significance difference between the level of awareness, degree of acce#tability, e.tent of the im#lementation, degree of attainment, level of e.#osure, and the degree of effectiveness of the identified channels for the *M+, dissemination on the *M+, when the res#ondents are grou#ed according to category' 0" Is there a significance difference between the level of awareness, degree of acce#tability, e.tent of the im#lementation, degree of attainment, level of e.#osure, and the degree of effectiveness of the identified channels for the *M+, dissemination on the *M+, when the res#ondents are grou#ed according as to year level' 1" &hat enhancement strategy can be formulated based from the result of the study" Hypothesis There is a significant difference between the level of awareness, degree of acce#tability, e.tent of the im#lementation, degree of attainment, level of e.#osure, and the degree of effectiveness of the identified channels for the *M+, dissemination on the *M+, when the res#ondents are grou#ed according to category" There is a significant difference between the level of awareness, degree of acce#tability, e.tent of the im#lementation, degree of attainment, level of e.#osure, and the degree of effectiveness of the identified channels for the *M+, dissemination on the *M+, when the res#ondents are grou#ed according as to year level"

Category Students Faculty %otal 2ear 3evel (e)el 1 (e)el $ (e)el # (e)el 4 %otal

Profile as to Category Frequency 189 #4 $$# Profile as to 'ear (e)el 4re5uency 4# *# 44 #9 189

Percentage 84. !" 1!.$!" 1&&" 6ercentage $$. !" ##.##" $#.$8" $&.*#" 1&&"

!wareness on *M+,

6oint 75uivalent 0 / ) ( %

Statistical 8ange (%"9- (9 %1")- (%"1 %<"=- %1"( 0"0-%<"> <-0"/

Descri#tion *ery Much !ware : *M!; Much !ware :M!; Somewhat !ware:S!; ?ot So !ware :?S!; ?ot !ware at !ll :?!!;

!cce#tability, Im#lementation, !ttainment, 7.#osure, 7ffectiveness

6oint 75uivalent 0

Statistical 8ange /"(%-0"<<

Descri#tion ighly !cce#table : !;@ Im#lemented to the 4ullest 7.tent :I47;@ *ery much !ttained :*M!;@ *ery much 7.#osed to

)"/<-/"(<

this Channel :*M7;@ *ery 7ffective Channel :*7C; !cce#table :!;@ Im#lemented to the 4ull 7.tent :I4;@ Much !ttained :M!;@ Much 7.#osed to this Channel :M7;@

("1%-)"/<

7ffective Channel :7C; Undecided :U;@ Im#lemented to a Moderate 7.tent :IM7;@ 4airly !ttained :4!;@ 4airly 7.#osed to this Channel :47;@

%">%-("1<

4airly 7ffective Channel :47C; Unacce#table :U!;@ Im#lemented to a 3ittle 7.tent :I37;@ Somehow !ttained :S!;@ ?ot So 7.#osed to this Channel

%"<<-%"><

:?7;@ ?ot So 7ffective Channel :?S7; ighly Unacce#table : U;@ ?ot Im#lemented at !ll :?I!;@ ?ot !ttained at !ll :?!!;@ ?ot 7.#osed at !ll to this Channel :?7!;@ ?ot 7ffective Channel at !ll :?7C;