Alternative Models of Cosmology

Rohin Kumar Y

April 17, 2013

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

Figure: Half-Knowledge- the right of a PhD student!

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

All izz not well with CDM

Background Well! not really if u dont think Dark Matter(decel) Dark Energy (accel) Ination (accel) Age problem

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

All izz not well with CDM

Background Well! not really if u dont think Dark Matter(decel) Dark Energy (accel) Ination (accel) Age problem

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

All izz not well with CDM

Background Well! not really if u dont think Dark Matter(decel) Dark Energy (accel) Ination (accel) Age problem

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

All izz not well with CDM

Background Well! not really if u dont think Dark Matter(decel) Dark Energy (accel) Ination (accel) Age problem

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

All izz not well with CDM

Background Well! not really if u dont think Dark Matter(decel) Dark Energy (accel) Ination (accel) Age problem

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

All izz not well with CDM

Background Well! not really if u dont think Dark Matter(decel) Dark Energy (accel) Ination (accel) Age problem

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

Recipes-Assumptions

a(t ) = t and k = 1 in FRW metric implies at space-time and open space. Empirical - Power Law solution a t n Dirac-Milne Model
Antimatter has negative active gravitational mass. Matter and antimatter are separated in domains (ob) No ination - but what about Radiation?

Large scale gravity? We dont know

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

Recipes-Assumptions

a(t ) = t and k = 1 in FRW metric implies at space-time and open space. Empirical - Power Law solution a t n Dirac-Milne Model
Antimatter has negative active gravitational mass. Matter and antimatter are separated in domains (ob) No ination - but what about Radiation?

Large scale gravity? We dont know

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

Recipes-Assumptions

a(t ) = t and k = 1 in FRW metric implies at space-time and open space. Empirical - Power Law solution a t n Dirac-Milne Model
Antimatter has negative active gravitational mass. Matter and antimatter are separated in domains (ob) No ination - but what about Radiation?

Large scale gravity? We dont know

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

Recipes-Assumptions

a(t ) = t and k = 1 in FRW metric implies at space-time and open space. Empirical - Power Law solution a t n Dirac-Milne Model
Antimatter has negative active gravitational mass. Matter and antimatter are separated in domains (ob) No ination - but what about Radiation?

Large scale gravity? We dont know

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

Recipes-Assumptions

a(t ) = t and k = 1 in FRW metric implies at space-time and open space. Empirical - Power Law solution a t n Dirac-Milne Model
Antimatter has negative active gravitational mass. Matter and antimatter are separated in domains (ob) No ination - but what about Radiation?

Large scale gravity? We dont know

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

Recipes-Assumptions

a(t ) = t and k = 1 in FRW metric implies at space-time and open space. Empirical - Power Law solution a t n Dirac-Milne Model
Antimatter has negative active gravitational mass. Matter and antimatter are separated in domains (ob) No ination - but what about Radiation?

Large scale gravity? We dont know

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

Recipes-Assumptions

a(t ) = t and k = 1 in FRW metric implies at space-time and open space. Empirical - Power Law solution a t n Dirac-Milne Model
Antimatter has negative active gravitational mass. Matter and antimatter are separated in domains (ob) No ination - but what about Radiation?

Large scale gravity? We dont know

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

Recipes-Assumptions

a(t ) = t and k = 1 in FRW metric implies at space-time and open space. Empirical - Power Law solution a t n Dirac-Milne Model
Antimatter has negative active gravitational mass. Matter and antimatter are separated in domains (ob) No ination - but what about Radiation?

Large scale gravity? We dont know

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

Supernovae Data
There is a remarkable agreement of data with linear model

Figure: Has better 2 t too :)

Rohin Kumar Alternative Models of Cosmology

Nucleosynthesis

time-Temperature relationship is different t = 1MeV 3.3yrs (1 Sec in SBBN)

1 T0 H0 T

Weak interaction decoupling happens at 90keV Slower production of 4 He and 7 Li Gives correct 9 109 values to eliminate needs for non-baryonic matter such as Dark Matter D and 3 He are produced by photodisintegration of 4 He induced by annihilation photons (in D-M model) Electron screening effects in plain linear coasting

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

Nucleosynthesis

time-Temperature relationship is different t = 1MeV 3.3yrs (1 Sec in SBBN)

1 T0 H0 T

Weak interaction decoupling happens at 90keV Slower production of 4 He and 7 Li Gives correct 9 109 values to eliminate needs for non-baryonic matter such as Dark Matter D and 3 He are produced by photodisintegration of 4 He induced by annihilation photons (in D-M model) Electron screening effects in plain linear coasting

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

Nucleosynthesis

time-Temperature relationship is different t = 1MeV 3.3yrs (1 Sec in SBBN)

1 T0 H0 T

Weak interaction decoupling happens at 90keV Slower production of 4 He and 7 Li Gives correct 9 109 values to eliminate needs for non-baryonic matter such as Dark Matter D and 3 He are produced by photodisintegration of 4 He induced by annihilation photons (in D-M model) Electron screening effects in plain linear coasting

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

Nucleosynthesis

time-Temperature relationship is different t = 1MeV 3.3yrs (1 Sec in SBBN)

1 T0 H0 T

Weak interaction decoupling happens at 90keV Slower production of 4 He and 7 Li Gives correct 9 109 values to eliminate needs for non-baryonic matter such as Dark Matter D and 3 He are produced by photodisintegration of 4 He induced by annihilation photons (in D-M model) Electron screening effects in plain linear coasting

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

Nucleosynthesis

time-Temperature relationship is different t = 1MeV 3.3yrs (1 Sec in SBBN)

1 T0 H0 T

Weak interaction decoupling happens at 90keV Slower production of 4 He and 7 Li Gives correct 9 109 values to eliminate needs for non-baryonic matter such as Dark Matter D and 3 He are produced by photodisintegration of 4 He induced by annihilation photons (in D-M model) Electron screening effects in plain linear coasting

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

Nucleosynthesis

time-Temperature relationship is different t = 1MeV 3.3yrs (1 Sec in SBBN)

1 T0 H0 T

Weak interaction decoupling happens at 90keV Slower production of 4 He and 7 Li Gives correct 9 109 values to eliminate needs for non-baryonic matter such as Dark Matter D and 3 He are produced by photodisintegration of 4 He induced by annihilation photons (in D-M model) Electron screening effects in plain linear coasting

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

Nucleosynthesis

time-Temperature relationship is different t = 1MeV 3.3yrs (1 Sec in SBBN)

1 T0 H0 T

Weak interaction decoupling happens at 90keV Slower production of 4 He and 7 Li Gives correct 9 109 values to eliminate needs for non-baryonic matter such as Dark Matter D and 3 He are produced by photodisintegration of 4 He induced by annihilation photons (in D-M model) Electron screening effects in plain linear coasting

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

CMB

Not the same initial conditions (no ination) No Dark Matter Linear Scale factor Recombination process is almost unchanged (z 1020) but age would be 14 106 yrs. instead of 380000 yrs. Random uctuations in Pressure and density (local) Matter-antimatter collisons in D-M model

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

CMB

Not the same initial conditions (no ination) No Dark Matter Linear Scale factor Recombination process is almost unchanged (z 1020) but age would be 14 106 yrs. instead of 380000 yrs. Random uctuations in Pressure and density (local) Matter-antimatter collisons in D-M model

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

CMB

Not the same initial conditions (no ination) No Dark Matter Linear Scale factor Recombination process is almost unchanged (z 1020) but age would be 14 106 yrs. instead of 380000 yrs. Random uctuations in Pressure and density (local) Matter-antimatter collisons in D-M model

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

CMB

Not the same initial conditions (no ination) No Dark Matter Linear Scale factor Recombination process is almost unchanged (z 1020) but age would be 14 106 yrs. instead of 380000 yrs. Random uctuations in Pressure and density (local) Matter-antimatter collisons in D-M model

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

CMB

Not the same initial conditions (no ination) No Dark Matter Linear Scale factor Recombination process is almost unchanged (z 1020) but age would be 14 106 yrs. instead of 380000 yrs. Random uctuations in Pressure and density (local) Matter-antimatter collisons in D-M model

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

CMB

Not the same initial conditions (no ination) No Dark Matter Linear Scale factor Recombination process is almost unchanged (z 1020) but age would be 14 106 yrs. instead of 380000 yrs. Random uctuations in Pressure and density (local) Matter-antimatter collisons in D-M model

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology

CMB Contd...
Angular scale of the rst peak corresponds to the angle under which is seen sound horizon at decoupling D M dA (z ) 169 CDM dA (z ) (z ) = S dA (z ) t c dt where cs = Remember S = cs a(t ) 3(1 + R ) 0 Matter anti-matter collisons(?) epoch during QGP transition of T 170MeV Acoustic waves then propagate in the plasma as long as matter and antimatter are in contact, i.e. until the gravitational decoupling z 3 104 With these values, the comoving sound horizon is found to be 42Gpc with these values First acoustic peak would be at l 200 which means 10
Rohin Kumar Alternative Models of Cosmology

CMB Contd...
Angular scale of the rst peak corresponds to the angle under which is seen sound horizon at decoupling D M dA (z ) 169 CDM dA (z ) (z ) = S dA (z ) t c dt where cs = Remember S = cs a(t ) 3(1 + R ) 0 Matter anti-matter collisons(?) epoch during QGP transition of T 170MeV Acoustic waves then propagate in the plasma as long as matter and antimatter are in contact, i.e. until the gravitational decoupling z 3 104 With these values, the comoving sound horizon is found to be 42Gpc with these values First acoustic peak would be at l 200 which means 10
Rohin Kumar Alternative Models of Cosmology

CMB Contd...
Angular scale of the rst peak corresponds to the angle under which is seen sound horizon at decoupling D M dA (z ) 169 CDM dA (z ) (z ) = S dA (z ) t c dt where cs = Remember S = cs a(t ) 3(1 + R ) 0 Matter anti-matter collisons(?) epoch during QGP transition of T 170MeV Acoustic waves then propagate in the plasma as long as matter and antimatter are in contact, i.e. until the gravitational decoupling z 3 104 With these values, the comoving sound horizon is found to be 42Gpc with these values First acoustic peak would be at l 200 which means 10
Rohin Kumar Alternative Models of Cosmology

CMB Contd...
Angular scale of the rst peak corresponds to the angle under which is seen sound horizon at decoupling D M dA (z ) 169 CDM dA (z ) (z ) = S dA (z ) t c dt where cs = Remember S = cs a(t ) 3(1 + R ) 0 Matter anti-matter collisons(?) epoch during QGP transition of T 170MeV Acoustic waves then propagate in the plasma as long as matter and antimatter are in contact, i.e. until the gravitational decoupling z 3 104 With these values, the comoving sound horizon is found to be 42Gpc with these values First acoustic peak would be at l 200 which means 10
Rohin Kumar Alternative Models of Cosmology

CMB Contd...
Angular scale of the rst peak corresponds to the angle under which is seen sound horizon at decoupling D M dA (z ) 169 CDM dA (z ) (z ) = S dA (z ) t c dt where cs = Remember S = cs a(t ) 3(1 + R ) 0 Matter anti-matter collisons(?) epoch during QGP transition of T 170MeV Acoustic waves then propagate in the plasma as long as matter and antimatter are in contact, i.e. until the gravitational decoupling z 3 104 With these values, the comoving sound horizon is found to be 42Gpc with these values First acoustic peak would be at l 200 which means 10
Rohin Kumar Alternative Models of Cosmology

CMB Contd...
Angular scale of the rst peak corresponds to the angle under which is seen sound horizon at decoupling D M dA (z ) 169 CDM dA (z ) (z ) = S dA (z ) t c dt where cs = Remember S = cs a(t ) 3(1 + R ) 0 Matter anti-matter collisons(?) epoch during QGP transition of T 170MeV Acoustic waves then propagate in the plasma as long as matter and antimatter are in contact, i.e. until the gravitational decoupling z 3 104 With these values, the comoving sound horizon is found to be 42Gpc with these values First acoustic peak would be at l 200 which means 10
Rohin Kumar Alternative Models of Cosmology

CMB Contd...
Angular scale of the rst peak corresponds to the angle under which is seen sound horizon at decoupling D M dA (z ) 169 CDM dA (z ) (z ) = S dA (z ) t c dt where cs = Remember S = cs a(t ) 3(1 + R ) 0 Matter anti-matter collisons(?) epoch during QGP transition of T 170MeV Acoustic waves then propagate in the plasma as long as matter and antimatter are in contact, i.e. until the gravitational decoupling z 3 104 With these values, the comoving sound horizon is found to be 42Gpc with these values First acoustic peak would be at l 200 which means 10
Rohin Kumar Alternative Models of Cosmology

CMB Contd...
Angular scale of the rst peak corresponds to the angle under which is seen sound horizon at decoupling D M dA (z ) 169 CDM dA (z ) (z ) = S dA (z ) t c dt where cs = Remember S = cs a(t ) 3(1 + R ) 0 Matter anti-matter collisons(?) epoch during QGP transition of T 170MeV Acoustic waves then propagate in the plasma as long as matter and antimatter are in contact, i.e. until the gravitational decoupling z 3 104 With these values, the comoving sound horizon is found to be 42Gpc with these values First acoustic peak would be at l 200 which means 10
Rohin Kumar Alternative Models of Cosmology

So now what?

I dont know!

Rohin Kumar

Alternative Models of Cosmology