What they are saying about The Natural Prostate Cure

Hurray, Hallelujah, and Happy Prostate! Finally, someone has taken the years and done the work, so the rest of us no longer need suffer from ignorance as to how to have good prostate health. That someone is oger !ason, and all that one needs to know in order to have a happy prostate has "een distilled down into this one "ook. # would stake the health of my prostate on it, and can tell you as a prostate cancer survivor$ it is the %&'( way to go.) Dirk Benedict, actor *The +,Team$ -attlestar .allactica$ etc.) (Dirk cured his prostate cancer more than 20 years ago, naturally, with no medical treatment. e wrote his story in /onfessions of a 0amika1e /ow"oy.2 This is must,reading for anyone with prostate disease who wants to take responsi"ility for his healing of this epidemic pro"lem. oger !ason has done his homework and this 3cutting edge4 information should "e read "y laymen and professionals alike.) !en "alik, #resident, #rostate $wareness %ociety, %an &rancisco, '$ -y his thorough research of the world4s medical literature, oger !ason has made an outstanding contri"ution to preserving prostate health, using natural therapies. His e5haustive investigations leave no dou"t that prostate disease has "een maltreated, and 6that7 mainstream therapies 6are7 dangerous and ineffective. + void too long ignored is filled, and the natural treatments work "etter) (.W. "cDonagh, "cDonagh "edical 'enter, !ansas 'ity, ") +t 89 # was diagnosed with terminal prostate cancer. -y eating "etter foods, taking natural supplements and raising some of my fallen hormone levels my cancer was cured in less than two years. This was verified "y my physician, with "oth an ! # and a sonogram. #4ve never felt "etter and e5pect to live another twenty .%%: years.) **+obert ,oung, #lain-ield, ./

#f people let the government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their "odies will soon "e in as sorry a state as the souls who live under tyranny.) 01homas /e--erson

THE NATURAL PROSTATE CURE

+ Practical .uide to ;sing :iet and <upplements for a Healthy Prostate

by +oger "ason

ii

The Natural Prostate Cure

by +oger "ason 'opyright 2 2000 +oger "ason $ll +ights +eser3ed .o part o- this book may be reproduced in any -orm without the prior written permission o- the publisher. 4%B. 5*667620*85*5 9ibrary o- 'ongress 'atalog 'ard .umber 00*5:7;<0 'ategories= 5. ealth 2. #rostate :. "en #rinted in the >.%.$. 1hirteenth #rinting, +e3ision Winter 200; The &atural Prostate /ure is not intended as medical ad3ice. 4t is written solely -or in-ormational and educational purposes. #lease consult a health pro-essional should the need -or one be indicated. Because there is always some risk in3ol3ed, the author and publisher are not responsible -or any ad3erse e--ects or conse?uences resulting -rom the use o- any o- the suggestions, preparations, or methods described in this book. 1he publisher does not ad3ocate the use o- any particular diet or health program, but belie3es the in-ormation presented in this book should be a3ailable to the general public. $ll listed addresses, phone numbers, and -ees ha3e been re3iewed and updated during production. owe3er, the data is sub@ect to change without notice. #ublished by %a-e Aoods B85 %hunpike +d. %he--ield, "$ 052B<

iii

Contents
/hapter => :iet????????????????????.. /hapter @> Fats????????????????????. . /hapter C> <upplements???????????????....... =,8 A,=B ==,@B

/hapter 9> The !inerals (ou &eed????????????? @=,@9 /hapter D> The False Hope of !agic <upplements???........ /hapter 8> <cience and -eta,sitosterol??????..? ......... /hapter A> %ther -enefits of -eta,sitosterol????..?......... /hapter E> Prostatitis????????????.???......... /hapter F> Prostate /ancer?????????...???........ /hapter =B> Progesterone???????????..??........ /hapter ==> (our %ther Hormones???.?........................... /hapter =@> Testosterone is (our Friend????..??.......... /hapter =C> Gstrogens????????????.??........... /hapter =9> Home Hormone Testing????..????......... %ther -ooks from <afe .oods?????????.???....... <ome -ooks To ead???????????????..?...... @D,@8 @A,C@ CC,C8 CA,CE CF,9@ 9C,99 9D,DB D=,88 8A,AB A=,AD A8 AA

<even <teps to &atural Health??????????????? AE

i3

1he in-ormation contained in this book should not be considered medical ad3ice. 1he ideas, thoughts and opinions eCpressed herein belong solely to the author, who is not a medical doctor. (Ccept as otherwise noted, no statement in this book has been re3iewed or appro3ed by the &D$.

About This Book

4n 200; doctors are still castrating men and cutting their testicles o--D 1his insanity has to stop. 1here is no reason -or men to continue to be senselessly poisoned, irradiated, and butchered by the medical pro-ession. 'o3ering up, or obliterating, the super-icial symptoms, instead o- dealing with the causes, ne3er has worked, and ne3er will work. #rostate problems can be cured naturally with healthy diet, pro3en supplements, natural hormones, and -asting. ,es, that includes outright prostate cancer. 1his book contains the distillation o- :; years o- prostate re* search, including B# (benign prostate hypertrophy), prostatitis, cancer, prostate metabolism, diet, hormones, beta*sitosterol, and other natural supplements -ound to support good prostate health. )3er 520,000 entries -rom /hemical +"stracts (the E'hemistFs BibleG) were re3iewed -rom 5;<0. 1his @ournal contains basically all the articles published in the worldFs scienti-ic @ournals. 1he research is updated e3ery siC months, and this book is rewritten yearly. .o one else has e3er taken the time and e--ort to do this much needed and necessary @ob. $ll the in-ormation was re-ined and written in plain (nglish. 1his is the only book that has taken this li-e*sa3ing in-ormation out o- the medical @ournals, and put it into the hands o- the general public. 1his is the twel3th time this book has been rewritten and eCpanded in the last nine years. #t is the most researched, informative, accurate, effective, documented, "est selling prostate "ook in the world. )3er one million men in most e3ery country ha3e now read The &atural Prostate /ure. 1his is a completely uni?ue book on prostate health. 1he in-ormation on diet, supplements, hormone testing, and bene-its otestosterone and other hormones has ne3er been taken out o- the medical literature, simpli-ied, and published in a mass*distribution book. 1he doHens o- medical citations are gi3en here only to support these -acts. .ature can cure your health problems * instead o- allopathic (symptom*curing) radiation, surgery, and poisonous drugs. 4t isnFt the disease thatFs the problem* itFs the patient. "en can 1$!( +(%#).%4B4941, -or their condition, and cure themsel3es naturally with the in-ormation herein. 3

Overview
1he prostate is a walnut*siHe gland in men that surrounds the urine tube. /ust a little swelling o- this small gland can cause se3ere urinary problems. 1his can also cause seCual dys-unction, since the prostate is an integral part o- the reproducti3e system. and secretes seminal -luid. "en may encounter three main problems= in-ection (prostatitis), enlargement (benign prostate hypertrophy, or B# ), and cancer. -y the age of DB, three,out,of,four men already have enlarged prostates, and one*in*three men ha3e cancer cells in their prostate. 1his, clearly, is not an, Eold manFs diseaseG at all. By the age ose3enty*-i3e, an astounding three*out*o-*-our $merican men ha3e outright prostate cancer. #t is the leading form of male cancer. B# is the most common male medical complaint. 1he symptoms are 3ery ob3ious* di--iculty in urination, inability to empty the bladder completely, pain during seC or urination, and, especially, the need to urinate in the middle o- the night. $ll these are classic symptoms o- prostate problems. 1he usual symptomatic medical treatments are physical or chemical castration(D), surgery, radiation, microwa3e treatment, toCic drugs, and chemotherapy. 1hese dangerous, ine--ecti3e, allopathic methods merely attack the super-icial symptoms, while ignoring the real underlying causes o- the problem. 1reating the symptoms, instead o- the causes, has 3ery drastic results* including diapers and impotence for the rest of your life. 1he #%$ (prostate speci-ic antigen) test is a 3ery inaccurate indicator o- prostate health. The P<+ doesn4t work, and never has worked. $ biopsy is 3ery harm-ul to the prostate, and should .(I(+ be per-ormed. $n ineCpensi3e sonogram (echogram) is accurate, e--ecti3e, and sa-e, as are color Dopplers, and the more eCpensi3e "+4 (magnetic resonance imaging). 1he real cure comes -rom the results you bring about when you change your diet and lifestyle. 1reat the 3ery '$>%( o- your problem. :iet is everything. .atural health includes proper diet, pro3en supplements, natural hormone balance, weekly -asting, regular eCercise, no prescription drugs, and ending negati3e hab* its (such as alcohol, co--ee, smoking, and o3ereating). olistic medicine treats the whole person, and not @ust the symptoms. %ymptoms re-lect the underlying causes o- our illnesses, and are harbingers o- e3en worse health in the -uture. $lways treat the cause o- your illness, and not @ust the symptoms. 3i

Chapter 1 !iet
:iet is everythingD Diet cures disease. $ wholesome, natural diet is the most important thing you need to do to get well and stay well. :iet and lifestyle cure illness. By eating a traditional whole grain based, low*-at diet you can actually eliminate prostate in* -ection, enlargement, or e3en cancer. 4- you doubt this, read Dirk BenedictFs book, /onfessions of a 0amika1e /ow"oy. Dirk was diagnosed with prostate cancer in his early thirties, and the doctors wanted to castrate him. 1hat didnFt appeal to him much, so he decided to go on a EmacrobioticG (Areek -or o3erall 3iew o- li-e) diet o- whole grains, beans, 3egetables, soups, salads, sea-ood, and -ruits. e ?uit eating red meat, poultry, eggs, dairy products, sweeteners o- all kinds, re-ined -oods, preser3ati3es, and the like. $-ter only se3en months, he knew he was well. e is now siCty* three, healthy, happy, youth-ul, 3ibrant, and the -ather o- two grown sons. 4- he had listened to the doctors, he would ha3e died many years ago as a seCless eunuch in diapers, without testicles. (ating a natural diet o- whole, unre-ined low -at -oods is basic to getting well. :iet is everything. %upplements, hormones, eCercise, and -asting are all secondary. When you are eating well, these additions are 3ery power-ul, and make your reco3ery rapid. Without whole, healthy, natural -ood it doesnFt matter what else you doJ youFre @ust not going to get well. :iet cures disease. WeF3e all heard o- people, like the )kinawans and others, who li3e 3ery long li3es, and ha3e low disease rates. Well, you donFt ha3e to li3e in a remote -arming 3illage, and gi3e up all the con3eniences o- the modern world to do this. (ou just have to change your diet and lifestyle. %uch long*li3ed people eat whole grains, beans, 3egetables, sea-ood, local -ruits, and 3ery little, iany, meat, poultry, eggs, or dairy products. Aenerally, their -at intake is only about 50 per cent (-rom 3egetable oils rather than saturated animal -ats). "ost o- the current diet authors gi3e terrible ad3ice on how to eat. 1heir personal health pro3es this. 1here are only a -ew who really ha3e any idea what theyFre doing, and practice what they preach. Aary .ull, +obert #ritikin, .eal Barnard, 1erry %hintani, %usan #owter, Dean )rnish, and a 3ery -ew others write reas* onable books on eating well. $ny o- the authors o- macrobiotic books such as "ichio !ushi are better. #lease read my book Hen !acro"iotics for +mericans to learn about macrobiotics -or the Western world. &or optimum health, your diet should be based on 3ii

whole grains and beans. Whole grains are the sta-- o- li-e. "ost all 3egetables are -ine, but the .ightshade -amily (potatoes, tomatoes, peppers, eggplant) should be a3oided. $lso a3oid 3egetables containing eCcess oCalic acid (spinach, rhubarb, red chard). $ny bean or legume is -ine, and there are doHens o- 3arieties. Beans are good -ood. 9ocal -ruit can be eaten in moderation. %ea-ood can also be eaten in moderation, i- you are not allergic to it, and do not want to be a 3egetarian. .uts are 3ery high in -at (;0K -at calories generally), and should only be used as a garnish. %oups and salads are good additons to your meals i- made with macrobiotic ingredients. $3oid red meat, poultry, eggs, and dairy products oall kinds. Do not eat re-ined -oods, processed -oods, sweeteners oany kind (including honey), or tropical -oods such as citrus, pineapples, mangos and coconuts (all o- which are meant -or tropical populations in their nati3e en3ironment). 1ropical people in warm areas can and should eat such -oods, o- course. )ne o- the best studies was done back in 5;62 at 9oma 9inda >ni3ersity (+merican Iournal of Gpidemiology 3 520). 8,<:B men were studied -or what they ate. 1he men had a direct relation between the animal -oods they ate and rates o- prostate cancer. 1hey also had the same direct relation with obesity. 1he more meat or poultry they ate the more cancer they got. 1he more milk and cheese they ate the more cancer they got. 1he more eggs they ate the more cancer they got. 1he really interesting thing about their -indings is that men who ate meat, poultry, eggs, and cheese got eCtremely high prostate cancer rates. 1hese work synergistically together to support malignancies. 1his pro3es the basic thesis that an eCcess o- dietary saturated animal -at is the underlying cause oprostate disease. 1he chart on page 6 shows this 3ery clearly. Whole grains are the basis o- your daily -ood. 1his includes brown rice, whole grain breads, whole wheat pasta, corn, barley, rye, millet, oats, spelt, buckwheat and ?uinoa. #eople who eat whole grains are healthier, li3e longer, and get less disease o- all kinds. $mericans only eat about 5K whole grains, when they should be eating at least B0K. 1he -act we eat a mere 5K whole grains says e3erything about our diet. $t the >ni3ersity o'ali-ornia %an Diego (#ntegrative /ancer Therapies 3 B, 2008) progressi3e doctors ga3e prostate cancer patients a low -at, whole grain based diet with lots o- 3egetables -or siC months. 1hese men impro3ed remarkably, did -ar better, and li3ed longer than the ones getting the standard medical treatment. $t >'9$ (+merican Iournal of /linical &utrition 3 68, 200<) men were put on a #ritikin diet o- whole grains and 3egetables. 1heir insulin -ell dramatically, and their risk -actors -or prostate cancer were greatly reduced. $gain at >'9$ ( ecent esults in /ancer esearch 3 3iii

588, 200B) metabolic syndrome (high blood sugar and insulin resistance) was correlated with prostate cancer. "en gi3en a low -at diet and eCercise lowered their insulin le3els greatly and their 4A&*5 le3els -ell. $t LueenFs >ni3ersity in 'anada (#nternational Iournal of /ancer 3 558, 200B) doctors studied the dietary patterns o- men. 1hose who included whole grains and 3egetables in their daily -are had -ar lower prostate cancer rates than the ones who ate meat, milk, sugar, and re-ined grains. Dean )rnishFs #re3enti3e "edicine +esearch 4nstitute ((Iournal of the +merican :ietetic +ssociation 3 50B, 200B) has been working with prostate cancer patients. 1hey ga3e these patients a low -at 3egan diet and got really impressi3e results. 1hey li3ed longer and had much better health. Dean and his associates (Iournal of ;rology 3 5<7, 200B) at >'%& -ed prostate cancer patients a 3egan diet -or one year. 1hey also took a -ew basic supplements and eCercised regularly. 1he men re-used all traditional medical treatments o- surgery, drugs, and radiation. 1his simple regimen slowed down, and e3en re3ersed, the cancer growth. 4- Dean would @ust go a little -urther and adopt macrobiotics, pro3en supplements, natural hormones, and -asting, these men could be cured o- cancer instead o- @ust li3ing longer. $n entire book, Jhole .rain Foods in Health and :isease (2002) was de3oted to the health bene-its o- eating whole, unprocessed, unre-ined grains. 1hey -ound people who eat whole grains get -ar less cancer, especially prostate and breast. !eat, poultry, eggs, and dairy are the main dietary cause of prostate and other cancers due to the saturated -ats they contain. %aturated animal -at is the basic cause o- prostate disease. Iegetable oils should only be used in moderation at 50 to 20K total calories, as they ha3e not been correlated per se with prostate cancer. $t Wake &orest >ni3ersity (Prostate 3 8:, 200B) it was -ound that the phytanic acid -ound in red meat and dairy products de-initely contributed to cancer o- the prostate. E#hytanic acid, which primarily comes -rom dietary intake o- dairy and red meat may be associated with prostate cancer risk.G 1he .ational 'ancer 4nstitute studied the diets o- 2;,:85 men (/ancer esearch 3 8B, 200B) and showed that red meat is de-initely a prostate cancer promoter. $nimal -oods promote disease generally. $mericans eat 3ery -ew -resh (or -roHen) green and yellow 3egetables. $sians in general eat the most 3egetables, and prepare them in the most delicious ways. ,ou want to eat more -resh (or e3en -roHen 3egetables since they actually ha3e more nutrients) e3ery day. 1he -amous /ohns opkins >ni3ersity (+merican Iournal of /linical &utrition 3 6B, 200<) studied o3er :0,000 men. 1hey -ound a strong correlation between how many 3egetables they ate and the less prostate disease they got. $t the .egri iC

4nstitute in 4taly doctors -ound the same phenomena (#nternational Iournal of /ancer 3 50;, 2007). Iegetables and 3egetable -iber protected men -rom prostate cancer. Dairy milk (including low*-at milk) contains large amounts olactose and casein, regardless o- the -at content. 1he protein casein has been shown to promote cancer. "ilk has repeatedly been shown to correlate with prostate disease (Prostate 3 ::, 5;;< and <cience 3 26B, 5;;;). ,ogurt actually has twice the amount olactose, since dried milk powder is added to thicken it. #eople oall races, especially Blacks and $sians, lose their ability to digest lactose a-ter the age o- three (when humans no longer produce lactase* the enHyme necessary to digest dairy). $dding lactase tablets to your dairy -oods, or buying lactose*reduced milk will not sol3e the problem. Iisit the 4nternet websites www.notmilk.com or www.milksucks.com. >se soy, almond, oat, or rice milk instead, as these are now commonly a3ailable in grocery stores, re-rigerated or in aseptic shel- packs. Take dairy out of your life. 1he proo- is o3erwhelming that dairy intake causes prostate disease. $t the &oC 'hase 'ancer 'enter *+merican Iournal /linical &utrition 3. 65, 200B), EDairy intake may increase prostate cancer risk.G $t the .ational 4nstitute oealth (#nternational Iournal of /ancer 3 520, 200<) 1otal dairy intake was also positi3ely associated with risk o- prostate cancer.G $t 4nserm in #aris (-ritish Iournal of &utrition 3 ;B, 2008), E)ur data support the hypothesis that dairy products ha3e a harm-ul e--ect with respect to the risk o- prostate cancer.G $t the >ni3ersity oBristol (-ritish Iournal of /ancer 3. 66, 200:) they -ound intake o- dairy -oods raised 4A&*5, which, in turn, raised the rates oprostate, breast, and other cancers. 4nsulin resistance (high insulin and blood sugar le3els) has been correlated with prostate disease. $mericans eat about 580 pounds o- 3arious unneeded sweeteners in their -ood e3ery year. $sians and $-ricans, with the lowest prostate disease rates, eat only a -raction o- that amount. (Ccess sugar consumption, o- any kind, causes hyperinsulemia, insulin resistance, high blood sugar, and diabetes. Blood sugar dysmetabolism and metabolic syndrome (pre*diabetes) is one cause o- insulin disease. <ugar is sugar is sugar, whether it is honey, maple syrup, brown sugar, ErawG sugar, molasses, sorghum syrup, cane syrup, deCtrose, -ructose, maltose, -ruit syrup, amaHake, -ruit @uice, -ruit concentrate, in3ert sugar, corn syrup, aga3e, dried -ruit, or any other -orm o- sweetener. 1his includes ste3ia, sucralose, and other sugar substitutes, as they act like sugar in our bodies. 4tFs always good -or a laugh to see someone in a health -ood store paying se3eral dollars -or a small C

bag o- ErawG sugar or aga3e nectar, thinking that this is somehow di--erent, not really sugar, and not really bad -or them. Bad habits such as smoking, alcohol, recreational drugs, or co--ee ob3iously make your health worse. %moking ages people dramatically. %moking is clearly correlated with prostate cancer. "ore than one drink o- alcohol a day causes poor health in general. 'o--ee is an epidemic addiction along with ca--einated energy drinks. 1he use o- 3arious recreational drugs, addicti3e or not, is also epidemic. 9ack o- eCercise is another basic cause o- bad health o3erall. %"esity definitely is correlated with prostate con, ditions (;rology 3 B6, 2005). Being o3erweight strongly increases your chances o- prostate disease. (Cercise is 3ital -or good health in general and should always be used to get well. %tudy a-ter study shows being o3erweight causes higher rates o- e3ery known illness (eCcept osteorporosis). Does anything correlate positively with prostate healthM ,es, whole grains, -iber, and 3egetable intake do, as does eating -ewer calories, slimness, and low*-at diets. 4t is 3ery important to eat less calories. $mericans eat about twice the calories, twice the protein, and more than -i3e times the -at they need. ,es, we eat -or two people. /alorie restriction is the most proven and effective way to e5tend your life span. .othing else has been shown to make you li3e longer and li3e better than eating -ewer calories. 9ong term clinical studies with animals, including monkeys, ha3e pro3en this. %hort term human studies also pro3e this, as well as many other health bene-its. 1he only author on this sub@ect was +oy Wal-ord, who wrote The =@B,(ear :iet and !a5imum 'ifespan. *>n-ortunately, he went in a di--erent direction with his -eyond the =@B,(ear :iet.2 1he a3erage man needs only about 5,600 calories a day, and a woman only about 5,200 calories. ,ou can easily eat @ust two meals a day, instead o- three. ,ou can also -ast (-asting means only water) one day a week by skipping break-ast and lunch on a speci-ied day. /ust eat dinner on a gi3en night and donFt eat again until dinner the neCt night. 9onger -asts may be done periodically -or more power-ul e--ects. Doctors at the >ni3ersity o- Wisconsin (Prostate v :8, 5;;6) impro3ed the immunity o- prostate glands in rats by merely lowering their calorie intake. )ther doctors at the uni3ersity showed that lowering the calorie intake o- mice altered their entire genetic*aging pro-ile, and allowed them to li3e much longer, with greatly enhanced immunity. +esearchers in 1akatsuki, /apan (Takeda 0enkyushoho v B:, 5;;7) actually reduced the prostate weights o- rats by simply gi3ing them less -ood. Doctors at the >ni3ersity o- >mea in %weden (Iournal of /ancer 3 B6, 5;68) ga3e rats with prostate cancer less -ood, inhibiting the Ci

growth o- their tumors. 9ong term studies on primates -or calorie restriction show eCcellent results. $t the utchison 'ancer 'enter, (/ancer Gpidemiology v 55, 2002) men who ate the least calories had only hal- the prostate cancer o- the control group. 1his, in addition to eating the right -oods, is the most e--ecti3e means you can use to lengthen and impro3e the ?uality o- your li-e span. %oy -oods are 3ery e--ecti3e in reducing the rates o- 3arious cancers, especially prostate and breast. $sian cultures eat ?uite a lot o- these soy -oods in 3arious -orms. 1he longest li3ed people on earth, the )kinawans, eat more than anyone with a soy intake o52K. 1his is unrealistic and impractical to ask Westerners to do this -or se3eral reasons. %oybeans per se, @ust donFt taste 3ery good. 1o-u is not a whole -ood, nor is it 3ery nutritious. "ost people ha3e ne3er heard o- tempeh, seitan, or annatto, and ha3e little interest in eating them. %oy sauce is merely a condiment. $ little miso goes a long way, and, basically is used only in soup. ow much soy -lour can you really add to your baked goodsM %oymilk is rather high in calories (about 520 per cup), and should be limited to cooking rather than used as a be3erage. %oy iso-la3ones, as a supplement, are really the most practical way to use soy, and are recommended in /hapter C. .ot long ago the $kins, #aleolithin, or EketogenicG diet was popular, until obese and sickly +obert $tkins -ell o3er dead. 1he aw-ul %outh Beach Diet -ollowed and went by the wayside as well. 1his has been replaced by the irrational and ine--ecti3e Eglycemic indeCG. Diets such as these -a3or unlimited meat, dairy, and -at, yet a3oid whole grainsD Whole grains should be the 3ery basis o- your dietD !etosis is, in -act, a pathological state in which the body is literally star3ing -or compleC carbohydrates. 1he Eglycemic indeCG classi-ies whole grains, such as brown rice and oatmeal, as being identical in e--ect to simple sugars such as cake and candy. 1he standard o- re-erence is white breadD 1his is asinine on its -ace. %tart using brown rice instead o- white rice or potatoes. (at whole wheat, or brown rice, pasta instead o- re-ined white pasta. &ind 500 percent whole*grain breads without preser3ati3es. Buy 500 per cent whole grain hot and cold cereals without sugar. !ake whole grains the "asis of each meal. 1he words EcarbohydratesG or EcarbsG are basically meaningless. (ating simple sugars and re-ined grains should certainly be a3oided. Whole grains are literally the Esta-- o- li-e,G and always ha3e been throughout history. Whole grains ha3e been our staple -ood since mankind -irst learned to culti3ate crops, and became independent. "ake whole grains and beans the 3ery basis o- your daily -ood. #lease read my Hen !acro"iotics for +mericans -or a comprehensi3e discussion o- diet and li-estyle. Cii

Chapter " #ats

&atty -oods o- all kinds, especially saturated animal -ats like red meat, poultry, eggs, and dairy products, seem to hold a hyp* notic attraction -or many people. %tudies -or the last -i-ty years ha3e pro3en repeatedly that high*-at diets cause all manner odisease, poor health, and early death. Deep inside, we all know that high*-at diets are bad -or us. 1hey cause obesity, clog our arteries, promote 3arious cancers, and shorten our li3es. +mericans eat 9@K fat calories! "ost all o- these are saturated animal -ats, which are the most harm-ul. &ortunately, the $tkins or ketogenic diet has -aded, but has been replaced with the ridiculous glycemic indeC. 1his emphasiHes animal -oods o3er whole grains and beans, because -ats and proteins cause almost no blood sugar response. (ating all the meat, poultry, eggs, and dairy products you want is ob3iously the road to ell. 4t seems that people @ust want an eCcuse to do what they want to do, and endlessly rationaliHe bad habits. 4n $merica, and most all the (uropean countries, the diet is about 70 percent -ats, most o- which are the saturated animal kind. 1he more a--luent a society is, the richer the diet is in animal -oods and saturated -ats * and the higher the disease rates o- all kinds. #ros* perity brings poor health ironically. %tudy a-ter study shows that high fat intake is correlated with every disease known. 1his is not debatable. $ny diet guru who tells you to eat meat, poultry, eggs, or dairy products is a prima -acie -raud. 1his is especially true with prostate disease and prostate cancer. 1here are @ust too many studies to list that show the relation o- -at intake, especially saturated animal -at, to prostate disease. #lease take a long look at the #rostate 'ancer "ortality chart on the neCt pageJ it will lea3e no doubt in your mind that saturated fat intake is the major cause of prostate cancer deaths. 1he chart is based on the diets o- literally billions o- people, and @ust cannot be contested. "en in countries like Iietnam and +ed 'hina eat about 50 percent -at calories, mostly -rom 3egetables. 1hese people ha3e 5N520th prostate cancer deaths o- those we ha3e in $merica. 1hat means that i- 200 men per million die -rom prostate cancer in a country like Denmark, -ewer than 2 men per million die in Iietnam. #oint made. ydrogenated -ats are the worst, as they do not eCist in nature. 1hese are made in laboratories with hydrogen gas, eCtreme pres* sures, and platinum catalysts. 1he body simply cannot deal with this arti-icial, synthetic -at, so it ends up clogging our arteries. Ciii

(ating 3egetable oils is simply a lesser e3il. 1he idea that there are Egood -atsG and Ebad -atsG is an illusion. )li3e oil, -or eCample, mmust be as limited as any other. 1he less -at you eat, the betterD 1he less -at you eat the healthier you will be, and the longer you will li3e. When $sian or $-rican men mo3e to the >nited %tates, and keep their traditional diets, they still get almost no prostate disease o- any kind. 1his is called a Emigration study,G and the results are inarguable.
Age-adjusted Death Rates (per 100,000) 0 5 10 15 Switzerland Norwa Sweden Den!ar" New #ealand Australia $reland Netherlands %inland &nited States Austria 'ngland (anada %ran)e *er!an +ungar (ze)h Repu,li) Slo-enia Argentina Spain $tal .e/i)o *ree)e Al,ania Russia Singapore 0apan +ong 1ong (hina 20

2rostate (an)er .ortalit

Dietar 3a t inta"e )orrelates e/tre!el )losel with prostate )an)er rates

"editerranean countries that consume oli3e oil rather than butter do ha3e slightly lower prostate disease rates than other (uropean countries, but much higher rates than $sian countries. 1he only eCception to the -at EruleG is when a supplement o- one or Ci3

two grams per day o- -laCseed oil is taken. &laC is a much better choice than -ish oil -or a lot o- reasons. &laC oil contains 3aluable omega*: -atty acids, at a mere ; calories per gram* an insigni-icant daily calorie intake. )ur dietary ratio o- omega*8 -atty acids to omega*:s is too high, and we eat -ew -oods that contain the omega*:s. Buy and keep your -laC oil re-rigerated. .uts can be eaten in moderation as a garnish. .uts are usually about ;0K -at calories, so they cannot be used as -ood per se. 1oasted nuts add much -la3or to your basic -oods. #eanuts are tropical legumes, and one o- the top ten allergenic -oods known. (at temperate nuts like almonds, walnuts, pine nuts, and pecans, rather than tropical ones like cashews and BraHil nuts. 1ropical people in tropical areas certainly can eat these. 1here is no botanical category Etree nutsG, as e3ery one is completely di--erent in species and unrelated to any others. 1he concept o- Etree nut allergiesG is prima -acie ridiculous, and -ood labels that state this are meaningless. #eanuts are the real allergen. 1he $merican ealth &oundation, in Ialhalla, ., has done a -ine @ob o- showing a low*-at, high*-iber diet slows the de3elopment o- prostate cancer. .ati3e %outh $-rican black men ha3e eCtremely low prostate disease rates on their traditional diets. When -ed a typical $merican high*-at diet, their testosterone le3els -ell, estrogen le3els rose (and thus their testosterone*to*estrogen ratio worsened), and they got more prostate disease (-ulletin &( +cademy of !edicine 3 B8, 5;60, and /ancer esearch 3 72, 5;62). $gain, the $merican ealth &oundation did an in*depth re3iew o- the literature to show that omega*8 -atty acids stimulate prostate cancer growth, while omega*: -atty acids (like -laC oil) inhibit it (Iournal of the &ational /ancer #nstitute 3 6B, 5;;:). 1he problem is that the omega*:s are rare in -oods, while omega*8s are all too common. +ed meat contains arachidonic acid, which is generally non*eCistent in plant -oods. 1his is considered to be the single most dangerous -atty acid known, and is a precursor o- the in-lammatory chemical #rostaglandin (2. "ore reason not to eat meat. 1he same result was shown at ar3ard "edical %chool, as well as a long list o- other diseases that are clearly associated with -at intake. %tudies continue at the >ni3ersity o- 1okyo, >ni3ersity o- Wales, >ni3ersity o- "ichigan, .ational 'ancer 4nstitute, >ni3ersity o- )hio, and many other clinics around the world. $ll ha3e come to the same conclusion that dietary saturated -at causes prostate disease. /ust some o- the many studies were published at= 'ipids 3 2<, 5;;2, Proceedings of the <ociety for G5perimental and -iological !edicine 3 258, 5;;<, +merican Iournal of C3

/linical &utrition 3 88, 5;;<, Iournal of the &ational /ancer #nstitute 3 6B, 5;;:, &utrition esearch 3 57, 5;;7, /ancer esearch 3 B7, 5;;7, -ritish Iournal of ;rology 3 << (5;;8), +nticancer esearch 3 58 , 5;;8) /ancer Gpidemiology -iomarkers Preview 3 B, 5;;8, and +nnual eview of &utrition 3 56, 5;;6. 1he -irst study in 'ipids (3 2<, 5;;2), -or eCample, was -rom the $merican ealth &oundation. 1hey clearly said, E4nternational comparisons suggest a relationship between prostate cancer incidence and dietary -at, an in-erence supported by migration studies. .*8 -atty acids stimulate and .*: -atty acids inhibit human prostate cells.G 1hey then presented o3erwhelming e3idence -rom around the world to support these -indings. 4t is ?uite ob3ious that fat intake, especially animal fat, is the "iggest factor in prostate disease. 1he more -ats you eat, especially saturated -ats, the more chance you ha3e o- getting prostate, cancer, B# , and prostatitis. Would you rather eat red meat and dairy products, and die a pain-ul, lingering, premature death, or change your diet and li3e a healthier, happier, longer li-eM (ating -at raises your estradiol and estrone le3els, causes all manner oillness, and makes you obese. 1his is the main reason $merican and (uropean men over the age of fifty have higher estrogen levels than women of the same ageD 1hatFs right, Western men o3er -i-ty generally ha3e more estrogen (estradiol and estrone) in their blood than their wi3es do a-ter menopauseD 1his is -righteningD &at intake also increases the le3els o- damaging E-ree radicalsG in our body. &ree radicals are molecules with unpaired electrons, which damage our health by attacking healthy cells, while trying to balance the electrical charge they carry. 1his is called EoCidati3e damage,G and harms our metabolism and shortens our li-e span. )Cidati3e stress and lowering -ree radicals is central to aging. 1he ideal diet contains only 50 percent -at calories -rom 3egetables (or e3en sea-ood). 1he maCimum is 20 percent -at calories, mostly -rom 3egetables. Gating any more fat than this will simply not "enefit you. ,ou must eat less than one -i-th o- your calories as -ats and oils, and no more than that. 9owering -at intake -rom 70 percent -at*calories to say 2B percent, @ust wonFt do anything at all. 1o bene-it -rom a low*-at diet you must eat less than 20 percent -at calories, and pre-erably about 50 percent. #seudo*scienti-ic EstudiesG will lower human dietary -at calorie intake to around :0 percent, and then claim there were no bene-its -ound no wonderD This is not difficult to do when you simply make "etter food choices. 1aking red meat, poultry, eggs, and dairy C3i

out o- your daily -are will basically sol3e the problem.

Chapter $ Supple%ents
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

$lways remember that continually making "etter food choices is the most 3ital thing we can do -or our health. .atural health is about diet and li-estyle. 1his includes stress, smoking, alcohol intake, eCercise, co--ee, prescription drugs, recreational drugs, and other such -actors. %upplements are important, but 3ery secondary to diet. ,ou recei3e -ar, -ar more bene-its with both diet and supplements than with diet alone. $ll the supplements we are going to discuss are natural, sa-e, and ineCpensi3e. 1hey all ha3e eCtensi3e published clinical studies behind them showing their 3alue to prostate health, and our health in general. 1his chapter is not going to use eCtensi3e re-erences howe3erJ please realiHe that all o- these supplements are based on -our decades o- scienti-ic research, and are empirically pro3en to be e--ecti3e in the internat* ional clinical published literature. Beta&sitosterol is the most important supplement -or prostate nutrition. 1ake :00 mg to 800 mg o- miCed sterols a day. 1he studies on beta*sitosterol are listed in /hapter D. 4t should be emphasiHed that herbal products such as saw palmetto, #ygeum, nettles, etc., contain almost no (i.e. 5N:0th o- 5 percent, generally) beta*sitosterol * which is the acti3e ingredient. 1hey are o- no 3alue. <aw palmetto and similar supplements are useless! $nalytical testing has shown that there are simply no biologically signi-icant amounts o- acti3e ingredients, e3en in the eCpensi3e eCtracts. +ead the label to pro3e this to yoursel-, and you will not -ind beta*sitosterol listed. 1here are no other acti3e ingredientsD "ake sure the label says at least :00 mg o- miCed plant sterols. #la'see( oil is 3ery good -or prostate health, and is the best known source o- omega*: -atty acids. 5 or 2 grams (5N2 tsp) oomega*: -atty acids should be consumed daily. 1his is good -or people o- all ages. 1wo articles in +nticancer esearch show that omega*: -atty acids ha3e important protecti3e properties -or human prostate cells in 3itro. E1he ealth #ro-essionals &ollow*up %tudyG o- B5,B2; men showed that omega*8 -atty acids were positi3ely associated with prostate cancer rates. )mega*: acids, on the other hand, were associated with prostate health. #eking "edical 'ollege ga3e men -laC eCtract -or -our months and dramatically increased their 4nternational #rostate %ymptom %core C3ii

and urine -low. $ study was done at Duke >ni3ersity with prostate cancer patients. 1he men gi3en the -laC supplement slowed down their cancer growth in only thirty*-our days. When sel-*appointed 4nternet authorities tell you that -laC oil is EbadG -or prostate health, you know they walk in darkness. 1wo grams a day o- bene-icial -laC oil is a mere 56 calories. 1he more research done on omega*:s the more bene-its are re3ealed. &laCseed is by -ar the best source. &laC oil supplements are pre-erable to -ish li3er oil supplements -or many reasons. &laC has more omega*:s and is less sub@ect to rancidity. 1he many studies on omega*: -atty acids that used -ish li3er oils, are e?ually applicable to -laC oil. -uy it and keep it refrigerated to pre3ent oCidation. 1here are many good reasons to take it daily, but it is especially bene-icial -or cardio3ascular health. Buy only re-rigerated -laC oil and keep it re-rigerated. So) iso*lavones ha3e -inally seen a lot o- research -or health bene-its in general. 1hese iso-la3ones ha3e shown great 3alue -or your prostate. 1he main constituents in soy that we are concerned with are genestein and daidHein. 1hese are -la3ones (plant pigments), and not Ephytoestrogens,G 1here is no estrogen or any other hormone (testosterone, progesterone, D ($, melatonin, etc.) in plants. %oy does not ha3e estrogenic e--ects There is no such thing as a phytoestrogenD %tudies on soy bene-its -or prostate health ha3e been published in @ournals such as Prostate, +nticancer esearch, Iournal of Gndocrinology, &utrition and /ancer, Iournal of <teroid -iochemistry, /ancer Gpidemiology -iomarkers L Prevention, +merican Iournal of /linical &utrition, /ancer 'etters, #nternational Iournal of %ncology, and many others. 1he proo- here is o3erwhelming. ,ou may see 4nternet sites warning o- the EdangersG o- soy. 1his is simply propaganda -rom the dairy and meat industries, especially the Weston #rice &oundation. Aet a good brand that lists the amount o- genestein and daidHein on the label, and take about 70 mg o- total iso-la3ones daily. %oy -oods generally are an impractical source, especially re-ined -oods such as to-u. %oy iso-la3one supplements are a much more practical and realistic means o- iso-la3one intake. +inerals are 3ital -or prostate health, and we are woe-ully mineral de-icient. .o matter how well you eat, you @ust arenFt going to get all the minerals you need. )ur -arm and crop soils are in such poor condition, and lacking in so many elements. +ll minerals work together harmoniously in concert as a team, so you need all those known to be necessary. "inerals work synergistically, and you need all o- them. We ha3e only begun to study the importance o- minerals on prostate -unction. ,ou will ne3er ha3e good prostate health as long as you are mineral de-icient. &ind a mineral supplement that contains the re?uired C3iii

amounts o- all twenty known elements we need. 1his includes boron, calcium, chromium, cobalt, copper, germanium, iodine, iron, magnesium, manganese, molybdenum, rubidium, cesium, nickel, selenium, silicon, strontium, tin, 3anadium, and Hinc. 1he two most important minerals -or prostate health are Hinc and selenium. owe3er, the real point is to get all twenty minerals you need and not @ust the two most important. 1he multi*3itamin and mineral supplements you see generally ha3e only about ten ele* ments. 9ook -or a mineral*only supplement that contains at least these twenty 3ital minerals in the amounts you need. <earch the #nternet for mineral supplements.) ,ou do not need to supplement sodium, potassium, sul-ur, or phosphorous. $3oid colloidal minerals and coral calcium, as these do not contain any biologically signi-icant amounts. ead the la"el to see which minerals are included, and in what amounts. 4t is important to realiHe that we need $99 the known minerals. 4n the -uture, science will probably show that we may need others such as barium, europium, gallium, neodymium, praseodymium, thulium, lithium, samarium, lanthanum, and yttrium. Vitamins are important. 1here are only 5: 3itamins and there is an +D$ set -or each. Be sure to -ind one with 5 mg omethyl cobalamin instead o- regular 3itamin B*52. Iitamin B*52 is @ust not orally absorbed. We only need about 80 mg a day o3itamin ', which is supplied in our daily -ood. 1aking more than 2B0 mg a day o- 3itamin ' is harm-ul, and will, o3er time, acidi-y your blood (which is naturally alkaline) and cause numerous side e--ects. "egadoses o- any nutrient unbalance the bodyFs metab* olism. D) .)1 1$!( ")+( 1 $. 2B0 mg )& I41$"4. '. 1here is really no reason to take a 3itamin ' supplement other than what is in your daily 3itamin tablet. ,ita%in ! does not occur in our -ood in any meaning-ul amount. Iitamin D: is really a hormone that is produced in our bodies by our eCposure to sunlight. This is THG most important vitamin) for your prostate. 4t is important to take 600 4> total o3itamin D a day (unless youFre out in the sun regularly). 1his is a sa-e amount, especially in wintertime when we get little eCposure to the sun. "ost o- the research on 3itamin D and the prostate has been done only the last ten years. Mitamin : deficiency is epidemic. 1here are many clinical studies pro3ing the importance o- 3itamin D in prostate -unction. 1hese include studies in such @ournals as /ancer esearch, +nticancer esearch, Prostate, /linical /ancer esearch, /ancer 'etters, <urgical Forum, and other respected international publications. )ne study at %tan-ord >ni3ersity treated men with prostate cancer solely with 3itamin D: with 3ery impressi3e e--ects and no other therapy. 1his is -at CiC

soluble, so donFt listen to EeCpertsG who tell you to take more than 600 4> a day. %ickly or elderly people can take up to 5,200 4>. ,ita%in E is a 3ery bene-icial nutrient, especially -or our cardio3ascular health )ur $merican diets are generally 3ery de-icient. 1his is the second*most important 3itamin -or your prostate. Jhole grains are the "est source but we eat only 5K whole grains. %upplement with 200 4> daily o- miCed natural tocopherols, as this is se3en times the +D$. )r you can take a 700 4> capsule e3ery other day. )3erdoses will thin your blood. DonFt use the cheap brands that contain only d*alpha tocopherol. 1here are countless published studies -rom around the world showing the 3alue o- 3itamin ( supplementation -or prostate and other health bene-its. (3ery year more studies are published. ,our daily 3itamin pill will only contain the :0 4> +D$. 1his is a basic and pro3en supplement -or people o- all ages. -lutathione le3els are important -or prostate health. Blood and tissue glutathione le3els -all in most people as they age. Alutathione is one o- our -our basic antioCidant enHymes, and is critical -or immunity and how long we li3e. 1aking glutathione alone is eCpensi3e, as well as somewhat ine--ecti3e. &ortunately, you can take an ineCpensi3e 800 mg capsule o- N-acetylcysteine. or NAC, to enhance your glutathione le3els 3ery e--ecti3ely and sa-ely. .$' is widely a3ailable, so buy any good brand. ,ou will gain many bene-its by maintaining a youth-ul glutathione le3el, especially impro3ing your immunity so you resist disease. 4n the last -ew years, there has been ?uite a bit o- good research published on the 3alue o- .$' supplements. Beta&/arotene is a power-ul, pro3en, and well*known antioCidant. 4n /ancer esearch intake o- beta*carotene showed a strong correlation with reduced prostate cancer in /apanese men. "any other studies ha3e shown similar results. 1his is an important antioCidant with many other bene-itsJ 50,000 4> daily oany brand is good. 1his is a better choice than 3itamin $, since it is a precursor to 3itamin $ and you wonFt o3erload your body, e3en with higher doses. 0uer/etin is a potent and pro3en plant*deri3ed antioCidant, but is not yet well known. ,ou will hear more about this e--ecti3e supplement. %tudies in the Iournal of <teroid -iochemistry, ;rology, and the /apanese @ournal :ai1u Tanpakushitsu 0enkyukai 0aishi show ?uercetin can help promote prostate health. $ new study at the "ayo 'linic, published in /arcinogenesis, showed it may ha3e real 3alue against prostate cancer. $ daily dosage o- 500 mg o- any brand is good, as a normal diet only pro3ides about 50 CC

mg mostly -rom apples and onions. 4t is a bene-icial supplement -or many other reasons besides being an eCcellent antioCidant. 1his is a borderline endogenous supplement as it @ust isnFt -ound in any ?uantity in most common -oods. Beta 1lu/an is the most potent immune,enhancing supplement known to science. 4t has been studied -or its power against tumors and cancer. 4t doesnFt matter whether beta glucan comes -rom yeast and mushrooms (5,:N5, 8 con-iguration), or oats and barley (5,:N5, 7 con-iguration), $ll 5,: con-igurations o- true beta glucan polysaccharides have the same potency. Beta glucan has pro3en power to stimulate our immune system. 4t has only been in the last -ew years that ad3ances in technology ha3e allowed us to eCtract it easily and ineCpensi3ely. 1he power o- beta glucan has been known -or o3er twenty*-i3e years now, showing its amaHing abili* ty to -ight in-ections and ward*o-- illnesses. 1his is de-initely a supplement people o- all ages need to take. 'urrently, yeast is the least eCpensi3e source. (conomical 200 mg supplements are a3ailable -or about P50 -or 80 capsules. 1here is a lot o- ad3er* tising misin-ormation here, especially on the 4nternet, about which is the best brand. #lease read my booklet, Jhat #s -eta .lucanN to learn more about it. Lipoi/ a/i( -alls as we age, and is not -ound in your -ood. ,ou should take 700 mg o- regular +,%*lipoic acid to maintain normal blood sugar le3els. 700 mg and no less. G5pensive ,only lipoic acid is a fraud. .early all the clinical studies ha3e used regular miCed isomer +,%* lipoic acid. 1here is a lot o- good science here -or brain metabolism and coronary heart health, as well as blood sugar metabolism. 4nsulin resistance and diabetes are epidemics in Western society now. )ne in three $merican children will grow up diabetic due mainly to our insane intake o- 580 pounds o- 3arious sugars e3ery year. ,our blood sugar should be 6B mgNd9 or less, and lipoic acid is 3ery bene-icial here. 1his is 3ery important -or anyone o3er the age o- -orty, or anyone with blood sugar o3er 6B. L&1luta%ine is an amino acid with many health bene-its, especially in strengthening digesti3e and intestinal -unction. 1here ha3e been good studies showing how it impro3es our intestinal health. 4t works well in concert with acidophilus and &)%. ,ou should take at least 2 grams (-our B00 mg tablets) o- 9*glutamine a day (2 in the $" and 2 in the #"). 1his will also EspikeG your growth hormone le3el. Aood digestion is central to good health. $gain, 9*glutamine works especially well with acidophilus and &)%. )ur digestion is generally weak -rom li-elong dietary abuse. ,ou can buy bulk glutamine and take 5 tablespoon a day. CCi

A/i(ophilus and other probiotics show no speci-ic bene-it -or prostate health per se, but it is important to add this to your supplements list. )ur bodies work as a holistic system, and our digestion is ob3iously 3ital to our total health. .ood health "egins with our digestion. )ur digesti3e tracts are generally in terrible shape -rom o3ereating and -rom eating the wrong -oods. 'onsuming whole healthy -oods, eating lower calorie -oods, -asting one day a week, and taking a good brand o- acidophilus daily you can impro3e your entire digesti3e system. $ good brand should state that e3ery capsule has at least 8 billion li3e multi* strain organisms and 6 strains at the time o- manu-acture. Do not be misled by Eper gramG counts rather than per capsule. -uy it and keep it refrigerated. ,ou can also -ind the spore*-orm oacidophilus, called Elacto sporeG, that does not re?uire re-rigeration. 1his can be taken in addition to (not instead o-) regular acidophilus. #OS (-ructooligosaccharides, otherwise known as inulin) works well with glutamine and acidophilus. &)% is an indigestible saccharide that is eCtracted -rom 3arious plants (such as chicory), and -eeds the good 9acto and Bi-ido bacteria in our intestines. 1his is called a EprebioticG and works synergistically with probiotics. 1his has been known -or a long time, but it is only recently that the intestinal health bene-its were disco3ered, and good studies were published. <B0 to 5,B00 mg daily is good.. $lways remember that ;0K o- our immune system comes -rom our digesti3e system. DIM, or di*indolyl methane, is the direct metabolite o- 4:' or indole*:*carbinol. 1here are eCcellent human studies on both -or their anticancer e--ects and lowering serum estrogen le3els. 1hese ha3e been published in /ancer esearch, Iournal of the &ational /ancer +ssociation, +nticancer esearch, +nnals of the &( +cademy of <ciences, and other ma@or @ournals. 4:' is -ound in cruci-erous 3egetables (cabbage, broccoli, Brussels sprouts, and cauli-lower). 4t is less eCpensi3e and more practical to take 200 mg a day o- D4" rather than 700 mg o- 4:'. D4" is a much better bargain and twice as power-ul. igh estrogen le3els in our bodies cause many problems as we age, and this is an eCcellent way to reduce them and impro3e estrogen metabolism. 4- your le3els o-ree estradiol and estrone test low normal you do not need to take this. $ low*-at diet and eCercise is the way to keep estrogens low. -lu/osa%ine is a basic supplement -or bone and @oint health. ;BK o- $mericans o3er the age o- 8B ha3e some -orm o- arthritis. 1here is good science behind this i- used properly. Alucosamine does not work alone, and needs co*-actors such as minerals, -laC oil, soy iso-la3ones, 3itamin D, as well as hormones such as CCii

testosterone, D ($, estriol, and progesterone. 1ake B00 to 5,000 mg a day. +emember chondroitin is useless despite its popularity. 1he molecule is too large to pass thru the digesti3e walls into the blood. Alucosamine needs co*-actors to be e--ecti3e. Coen2)%e 01O. 'oL50, is a power-ul enHyme in our bodies, and our le3els -all as we age. %tudies ha3e shown great 3alue -or 3arious -orms o- cancer, especially prostate and breast. ,ou must take at least 500 mg daily. 4- you are sickly, or ha3e cancer, take 200 mg daily -or one year. 1he price o- real /apanese 'oL50 is as low as P2B -or 80 capsules). $t .agoya >ni3ersity in /apan, 6 scientists -ound that 'oL50, added to cells taken -rom B# patients, had a 3ery bene-icial e--ect on their metabolism. 'oL50 has amaHing bene-its -or our heart, brain, kidneys, li3er, and other organs. (3eryone o3er 70 should take this. ,ou must take at least 500 mg a day o- real /apanese ubi?uinone. "ost brands o--er much less than 500 mg because this is so eCpensi3e. $ll Especial deli3ery systemsG are scams. >bi?uinol is also a scam. :o &%T take u"i, Ouinol as it is unsta"le and has no shelf life. 1he label ">%1 say /apanese ubi?uinone. Do not take cheap, unstable ubi?uinol. PS, or phosphatidyl serine, is 3ery important -or brain -unction, memory, and pre3enting $lHheimers and senility. >se this with $9' and pregnenolone. 1ake 500 mg a day. 9ecithin, or phosphatidyl choline, is also a 3ery good time pro3en supplement especially -or heart and artery health. 1ake 5,200 mg. ALC, or acetyl*l*carnitine, is also good -or brain metabolism and memory. 1ake B00 to 5,000 mg a day. $gain, use this with #% and pregnenolone -or synergistic results. 'arnosine is optional, but 3ery good -or heart and artery health. 1ake B00 to 5,000 mg. 1his is not -ound in a 3egetarian diet. Aood science here. 1here are some good temporary, eCogenous supplement you can take i- you want. E(CogenousG means it is not in your body or daily -ood. $-ter about siC months most o- these lose their e--ect. "ilk thistle has been shown to ha3e good potential -or prostate health. 4t is a well*known and time*pro3en herb, with the acti3e ingredient silymarin. %tudies in such @ournals as /ancer 'etters and /ancer esearch ha3e shown great promise. 1his is a 3ery important herb -or li3er health as well. 1wo capsules a day oa good eCtract will gi3e you about 200 mg o- silymarin. $-ter about twel3e months you can stop using it, as all eCogenous herbs lose their e--ect a-ter that time. CCiii

'urcumin is an eCtract o- the culinary herb tumeric, and is a power-ul anti*in-lammatory. $n important study o- curcumin -or prostate cancer, at the 'omprehensi3e 'ancer 'enter in .,' said it, Ehas the potential to pre3ent the progression o- this cancerQG )ther articles on cancer ha3e been in !olecular ;rology, FG-< 'etters, !olecular !edicine, and other @ournals. 1his is a clinically*pro3en anti*in-lammatory, but should only be used -or up to a year because it is eCogenous and not -ound in our bodies or in common -oods. 1ake B00 mg daily. (llagic acid has shown good anticancer acti3ity in many studies. Because it is commonly -ound in walnut hulls, it has been known to herbalists -or years,. "ost o- the a3ailable brands are o3erpriced and their labels 3ery misleading. 1hey list the amount o- eCtract, but not the actual amount o- ellagic acid. &ind one that states 200 mg, or more, o- actual ellagic acid, and not a mere eCtract that doesnFt state the potency. 1ake this only -or a year since it is not -ound in common -ood. ,ou will hear more about the bene-its o- ellagic acid in the -uture as research continues. Areen tea eCtract has pro3en 3alue here. 4n the Iournal of the &ational /ancer #nstitute and in /ancer 'etters. %earch -or a good deca--einated brand, as most contain ca--eine. Areen tea contains 3aluable and power-ul polyphenols and cathechins. ,es, this is the same tea you see e3erywhere, be-ore -ermenting changes its color to black. "any ineCpensi3e brands o- ;0*percent deca--einated green tea are a3ailable. 1his is more practical than trying to drink it daily. ,ou only need this -or about a year since it is eCogenous. &ruit pectin has been shown to ha3e 3alue in actual prostate cancer, and has 3alue in prostatitis and B# as well. %tudies ha3e shown the e--ecti3eness o- -ruit pectin in lowering cholesterol and impro3ing digestion. 4t e3en has general anticancer properties. Do not waste your money on eCpensi3e Emodi-iedG pectin. ,ou donFt need to modi-y pectinD /ust buy the plain, ineCpensi3e regular kind, especially grape-ruit or apple. +egular -ruit pectin is soluble, bio* a3ailable, and 3ery bene-icial in other ways besides lowering cholesterol le3els. 1ake : or more grams a day in caplets, or as powder (itFs tasteless) in -ruit @uice. ,ou take this -or one year. $loe 3era two 500 mg capsules o- a 200=5 eCtract -or one year helps strengthen your digesti3e system. Works well with acidophilus, &)%, and glutamine. $ time pro3en herbal remedy. 1"A (trimethylglycine aka betaine) is the best li3er re@u3enator known and : grams a day can be taken -or a year. ,ou can take 5 gram a day permanently to help maintain lowere CCi3

homocysteine le3els. %odium alginate is a seaweed eCtract that remo3es toCic metals -rom our blood. 1ake : grams a day -or a year. /ust search the 4nternet -or Esodium alginateG. 4n all these years o- research it has become ob3ious that many o- the EWonder %upplementsG so hea3ily promoted simply ha3e no scienti-ic 3alue at all. 1he natural supplement industry is as -lawed as any other business. "ost o- the people in3ol3ed ha3e little or no interest in natural health in the -irst place, and are only there -or the money. %uch products would include res3eratrol, ubi?uinol, saw palmetto, lycopene, chondroitin, #ygeum a-ricanum, noni @uice, policosanol, deer antler 3el3et, B* 1#, homeopathic remedies, bee pro*ducts (pollen, @elly, propolis, etc.), brewers yeast, D"$(, arginine, hoodia cactus, $rtemisia (wormwood), shark cartilage, modi-ied (not regular) citrus pectin, 1ongkat ali, bilberry, pomegranate products, '"), colloidal minerals, coral calcium, salba, #'*%#(%, colostrum, chorella, nattokinase, all A secretagogues, spirulina, oral chelation, hyaluronic acid, mangosteen products, $ '', "A.*:, 1ribulus terrestis, acai berries, go@i berries, astaCanthin, EgreensG, 'atFs claw (una dFgato), colon cleansers, maca root, chrysin, whey protein, suma, muira puama, red rice yeast, oral %.).D., '9$, Aymnema syl3estre, seCual re@u3enation -ormulas, and "%" among others. +es3eratrol is probably the biggest scam e3er to hit the industry. 1here is @ust no science behind this at all, @ust endless promotion and ad3ertising. 'ycopene is a useless fraud. $nyone who recommends it shows they ha3e no idea what theyFre doing. 1his is the only book in the world to eCpose this scam. 1he EstudiesG are basically paid ads in medical @ournals by the lycopene manu-acturers. )ne such study asked men how much piHHa they ate. )thers measure useless plasma lycopene instead o- serum (lycopene is -at soluble.) 1his kind o- pseudoscience is asinine. +ctual "lood serum level studies of lycopene prove there is no correlation at all "etween lycopene levels and prostate health *Iournal of the &ational /ancer #nstitute 3 62, 5;;0), and /ancer Gpidemiology -iomarkersPreview 3 8, 5;;<). 4n 5;<7, at /ohns opkins >ni3ersity (Prostate 3 7<, 2005) the blood o- 2B,602 men was analyHed -or nutrients and matched with their medical records. &o relation was found with lycopene content. 4n 5;;<, at the 'ancer +esearch 'enter in onolulu (#gaku &o +yumi 3 50:, 5;<<), the blood o- 8,6B0 men was analyHed -or nutrients, and no relation with lycopene le3els was -ound either. 4n -act, the tomatoes must be cooked in oil -or their lycopene to be made absorbable. Be CC3

clear that actual blood studies on men show no relation at all between serum lycopene le3els and prostate health. 'ycopene is a fraud. 1here are 20 permanent supplements recommended in this chapter -or men o3er -orty. 1his is the 3ery same list -or women by the way. $ll o- these ha3e been shown to be sa-e, e--ecti3e, natural, and ineCpensi3e. ,ou should take about twenty permanent ones, plus the hormones you need. 1ake as many on the list as you possibly can, as they ha3e many o3erall health bene-its. #oor health in general contributes to your prostate condition. DonFt choose surgery, radiation, and dangerous prescription drugs. ,ou may end up wearing diapers, and losing your seCual ability be-ore you die a tortuous, premature death. Per%anent (ail) supple%ents R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R acidophilus= 8 billion units 5*2 daily acetyl*9*carnitine B00 to 5,000 mg beta*carotene= 50,000 4> beta glucan= 200 mg or more beta*sitosterol compleC= :00 to 800 mg coenHyme L50=500 mg, or more i- you are ill di*indolyl methane (D4")= 200 mg -laCseed oil= 5,000 mg, once or twice daily &)%= <B0 mg 5*2 daily glucosamine B00 to 5,000 mg 9*glutamine= 5,000 mg, twice daily (a.m. and p.m.) lipoic acid 700 mg minerals= a good -ormula with 20 minerals as stated clearly on the label with the amounts contained 3itamins= all 5:, using methyl cobalamin instead o- 3itamin B*52 .*acetyl cysteine= 800 mg phosphatidyl serine (#%) 500 mg ?uercetin= 500 mg soy iso-la3ones= 70 mg o- daidHein and genistein 3itamin D= 600 4> total 3itamin (= 200 4> natural miCed (or 700 4> e3ery other day)

CC3i

Chapter 3 The +inerals 4ou Nee(

%tudies ha3e shown us how important minerals are to prostate metabolism. 1his is true o- our o3erall health in general and all cause mortality. 1hatFs right, good mineral nutrition actually helps us li3e longer as well as better. We ha3e to go way beyond Hinc, selenium, and chromium, which ha3e gotten them most attention. We need all the elements known to be 3ital in human and animal nutrition. Gvery disease and medical condition known is due in part to mineral deficiency. We are all mineral de-icient, no matter how well we eat or where we li3e. 4t must always be emphasiHed we need all the known minerals for human nutrition, and not @ust some o- them. "inerals, like hormones, work together in concert, in harmony, together, synergistically as a team. #lease read my booklet The !inerals (ou &eed to learn more. 1here are at least twenty*-our known elements needed -or human and animal nutrition. We get enough phosphorous, potassium, sodium, and sul-ur in our -ood. We do not need to supplement these. 1he best, most eCpensi3e mineral supplements a3ailable only ha3e about ten di--erent elements. 1here is only one supplement in the world with all 20 minerals in the amounts you need. (,es, your author -ormulated it.) /ust google Emineral supplementG on the 4nternet, and you will -ind it. Iron de-iciency is as common as e3er, e3en with our eCcessi3e consumption o- red meat. 1his irony can only be eCplained by lack o- absorption. 4ron is rarely -ound in high le3els, and this is due to an eCcretion problem and not eCcessi3e intake. 4ron is the EhemeG in hemoglobin, and the basic mineral in our blood. ,ou wonFt be eating red meat, so you wonFt ha3e to worry about o3erconsumpt* ion. $ good supplement will contain the -emale +D$ o- 56 mg. 1he male +D$ is only 50 mg. 'ommon sul-ates, -umarates, and gluconates are good choices. Zinc le3els are generally low in men with prostate illness. "ost people do not get the 5B mg +D$ they need -rom the -ood they eat. Sinc is -ound in whole grains, beans, nuts, and meats. De-ic* iency is especially true -or the poor, elderly, and alcoholics. 1here are about 2.B g o- Hinc in the human body, hal- o- which is in the muscles. Whole grains and beans are the best source. .e3er take in more than B0 mg o- Hinc daily. Sinc has a low toCicity le3el. 1he usual citrates, oCides, and sul-ates all work well. CC3ii

Boron is probably the most deficient mineral in our diet. 1here is no o--icial +D$, but : mg is the suggested daily intake .4t wasnFt until 5;;0 that boron was e3en accepted as essentialD 1he research is o3er* whelming here. )ur soils and -ood are 3ery boron de-ic* ient. ,ou would think all 3itamin and mineral supplements would contain : mg o- this ineCpensi3e and 3ital element, but many do not. 1his pro3es the megacorporations ha3e huge ad3ertising budgets, but no research departments. $mericans probably only take in a mere 5 mg a day. Be sure you get this in your supplement, as boron de-iciency is all too common. 'itrates or common boric acid is -ine here. Boron de-iciency is 3ery common. Manganese is 3ery important, and the +D$ was only recently established at 2 mg. Whole grains are a ma@or source, along with beans and legumes, nuts, and some 3egetables. 1here is an abund* ance o- research about the bene-its -or our health. $ 2 mg supple* ment is good insurance -or such an important element. We only ha3e a total o- about 20 mg o- manganese in our bodies. 1hatFs all, 20 mg. Whole grains, beans, and lea-y green 3egetables are the best sources. %ul-ates and oCides are e--ecti3e. Copper also has an +D$ o- only 2 mg. $mericans probably only take in about hal- this amount. %ome people with hypertension ha3e eCcessi3e le3els, while others are de-icient. Whole grains and beans are the best source. )ur bodies only contain a total about 5B0 mg o- this 3ital element. 1hatFs all. 1aking 2 mg in your sup* plement is good insurance. 4t would take about5B mg a day -or toCicity, which is 3ery unlikely. 'itrates, oCides, and gluconates are all 3ery absorbable. Silicon is the ignored or Eorphan mineralG, and almost ne3er -ound in mineral supplements. "ore proo- that megacorporations ha3e no research departments, only ad3ertising budgets. 1here is no +D$ set -or this, but 50 mg a day is a sa-e and e--ecti3e dose. Do not use horsetail as a source. %ilica le3els in our -oods 3ary so greatly, that it is all but impossible to say which -oods are good sources. Bone and @oint health depend on silica as a basic building block. 1he sci* ence here is most impressi3e. #lain silica gel (silicic acid) is a good, ineCpensi3e source. ,ou arenFt going to -ind this in sup* plements eCcept the one mentioned at the end o- this chapter. 1his is one o- the two non*metallic elements we need. Iodine is 3ery important, and the only other non*metallic element we need to supplement. 1he +D$ is a mere 5B0 mcg. (ating sea 3egetables regularly like kelp, nori, and hi@iki, as many $sians do, is not a good idea surprisingly. $ll seaweeds contain eCtreme amounts o- iodine. )3erdoses o- any mineral unbalance your metabolism, and are not merely eCcreted without e--ect. 1he most important 3alue here is thyroid metabolism. 1here are only about :0 mg in our bodies, and three -ourths o- this is in our thyroid CC3iii

gland. )nly :0 mg. 4odine supplements will .)1 correct low 1: or 17 le3els, or any thyroid problems howe3er. Chromium only recently has an +D$ o- 520 mcg. 1his is o-ten de-icient in our diet to re-ining the grains we eat. 1his is critical -or proper prostate metabolism, and one o- the reasons this is such an epidemic. .e3er eCceed an intake o- more than 700 mcg. Do not listen to ad3ertisements claiming their -orm o- chromium is the Eonly e--ecti3e oneG. +egular chelates (a non*metal ion bound to a metal ion -or better absorbability) are the best source. Vanadium was ignored until 3ery recently, and there is no +D$ -or it, e3en though it is not accepted as essential. 1aking 5 mg (5,000 mcg) a day is good, but almost no supplements contain this 3ital mineral. Do not eCceed one or two mg a day, as this is toCic at 50 mg. Ianadium has been shown to be critical -or our health in general. De-iciency is all too common, due to our intake o- re-ined -oods. 1here is now 3ery good science on the importance o3anadium. 'helates and sul-ates are your best choices here. Moly denum has an +D$ o- <B mcg, but that may not be enough. Be sure to take a supplement here to insure ade?uate intake. $ll common salts are good sources, and you will -ind this in all your supplement -ormulas. "olybdenum is sa-e and non*toCic, e3en though it is a hea3y metal. 1he research is concerned more with soil and plants, rather than animals and humans. &armers and gardeners commonly use this in their -ertiliHer and animal -eed. Selenium -inally has an o--icial +D$ o- <0 mcg, and was also ig* nored until 3ery recently. 1his is 3ery de-icient in our soils and hea3ily re-ined -oods. Do not eCceed a daily intake o- more than 200 mcg, as this is a hea3y metal and will accumulate in your body. Whole grains are the 3ery best source. 'helates are the most absorbable -orm o- selenium. Be sure to take this with 200 4> o3itamin (, as they are 3ery synergistic and work together well. %tudies show people with low blood selenium su--er -rom higher disease rates such as cancer, coronary heart disease, and diabetes. !ermanium is a 3ery important ultratrace element and you will @ust ne3er -ind this in mineral supplements. 9ook -or the only one in the world that has it. ,ou only need about 500 mcg o- ultratrace elements like germanium. Do not eCceed this amount, as 500 mcg is su--icient. 'linical human blood studies pro3e this is a 3ital element we need, but our soils and our -ood are de-icient, and it is not -ound in supplements. Aermanium ses?uoCide and chelates are sa-e, but germanium dioCide is not. Strontium is another 3ery important trace element with 3ery good science behind it. ,ou will not -ind this in mineral supplements, and 5 mg (5,000 mcg) is a good dose. Bone and @oint health de* pend on strontium as a building block, as does calcium absorption. CCiC

.o +D$ has been set, but science -inally recogniHes this as essent* ial. Do not con-use this with the radioacti3e -orm strontium*;0. 'helates and asparates are good choices. 9ook -or the one supple* ment that has 5,000 mcg. Nic"el is an ignored ultratrace element, and 500 mcg is all you need. &ood and blood analysis o- animals and humans show this is an essential element, but there is little research on the bene-its, or -or the problems caused by de-iciency. 1he research is mostly -or soil and crops. .ickel is needed in human and animal nutrition. ,ou wonFt see this in the mineral supplements on the market either. +egular salts such as chlorides and sul-ates are good. #in is also ignored as a necessary ultratrace element. 500 mcg is a good dose. 'ommon -ood and soil studies pro3e this is an essential element. "ost o- the research has been concerned with tin toCicity -rom industrial pollution, instead o- the bene-its. >n-ortunately, the &D$ irrationally limits the dose to :0 mcg. ,ou ne3er -ind this in mineral supplements. uman studies ha3e shown low blood tin le3els in some illnesses, but we need more research here. +egular salts such as chlorides and sul-ates are well absorbed. Co alt in ne3er -ound in mineral supplements, e3en though it is the basic building block -or 3itamin B*52. &ood and blood studies pro3e itFs importance. We are supposed to synthesiHe our own B*52, but cannot without cobalt in our blood. We probably only take in about 2B mcg or less, but that is enough. 1his may not sound like much, but we only need to make about : mcg o- B*52 daily. 1aking B*52 orally @ust doesnFt work, so you must take 5 mg o- methyl cobalamin. 4t must be emphasiHed that su--icient B*52 is @ust not -ound 4n -oods, is orally una3ailable, and a daily 500 mcg cobalt supplement should insure you synthesiHe the : mcg you need. 'obalt is 3ery important. Cesium is an important ultratrace mineral, and 500 mcg is all you need. Do not take more than this. uman blood, common -ood, and soil studies pro3e how 3ital this is -or our health. ,ou will ne3er -ind this in mineral supplements. 4nternational studies show the importance o- cesium in our soil, our -ood, and our blood. 'esium is 3ital -or humans and animals. %oon science will admit this and set an +D$. +egular salts, especially chloride, work well here. $u idium is not an ultratrace element at all, as our intake is about 5 mg (5,000 mcg). 1aking a supplement o- B00 mcg o- this is enough, since common rubidium de-iciency has not been demon* strated. .e3er -ound in mineral supplements (eCcept one), and 3ery ignored by science. &ound abundantly in soil, crops, as well in mammals and humans. 1he -ew studies we ha3e are 3ery positi3e. Brain le3els o- rubidium -all as we age. 1his is de-initely re?uired in human, animal, and plant nutrition. +ubidium is -ound in -ruits, CCC

3egetables, poultry, and sea-ood. 'hloride is a good -orm to use. $ 3ery o3erlooked and ignored element. 4t is 3ery possible we may need other ultra*trace elements such as barium, europium, gallium, neodymium, praseodymium, thulium, lithium, samarium, lanthanum, and yttrium. 4t is 3ery di--icult to determine their e--ects since they are needed in such tiny microgram amounts. 1he mineral supplements sold are woe-ully inade?uate. /ust search -or Emineral supplementsG on the 4nternet and youFll -ind the only complete one in the world.

Chapter 5 The #alse Hope o* +a1i/ Supple%ents

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

(3ery year hundreds o- millions o- dollars worth o- useless "agic #rostate %upplements are sold. ,ou see these on 1I, radio, magaHines, and newspapers. %earch the 4nternet -or Eprostate supplementsG and youFll -ind endless snake oil products. )ne way to determine these are worthless is that personal anecdotal testimonials are used rather than medical @ournal citations. . (3ery year more such spurious supplements are promoted by -irst rate ad3ertising. 1he most in-amous o- these was #'*%#(%. ('olloidal minerals was the second most in-amous.) 4n 2002 it was -inally banned by the &D$, as it was adulterated with cancer causing D(% (diethyl stilbestrol) and war-arin (rat poison)D 1he #'*%#(% herbal miCture costs less than -i3e dollars to make, but a bottle, lasting only ten days, sold -or P500 or more, and would cost o3er P:,000 a year. $ll the cancer patients -aith-ully taking it soon died, including the most ardent, and misguided, supporters and proponents. %ide e--ects -rom this toCic herbal cocktail included deep*3ein thrombosis, leg cramps, and gynecosmastia (breast growth). $n entire book E1he #rostate "iracleG was a best seller. 1his book told people #'*%#(% was a miracle supplement that magically helped men to cure prostate cancer with no change in diet or li-estyle. 1he author was completely discredited o- course. ,our author was the only one in the world to warn people about this popular and dangerous scam. 1hey claimed the #%$ le3el was lowered. The P<+ doesn4t work and never did work and never will work. 1he main thing one notices is that they repeatedly claimed that testosterone le3els were reduced by taking #'*%#(%, and that it had power-ul Eestrogenic acti3ity.G 9ow testosterone le3els and high estrogen le3els are basically the 3ery '$>%( o- prostate disease. #'*%#(%Fs 3ery own claims pro3ed the product made CCCi

your problem worse, not betterD 9ycopene is still a popular hoaC by the tomato processors. ,our author is still the only one in the world eCposing the -act that it is worthless. (3ery year more and more medical claims are being made -or it. $ll the EstudiesG on lycopene are either paid ads, in3alid cell studies, plasma (not serum) results, or o3erdosed lab rats. (9ycopene can only be measured in blood serum since it is -at soluble.) 1here is not one 3alid human study showing any 3alue -or lycopene. 1he published international clinical blood serum (not plasma) studies pro3e beyond any doubt lycopene has no 3alue at all. 4t is only -ound in tomatoes in any ?uantity. 1omatoes are a toCic nightshade 3egetable containing the poisonous alkaloids solanine and tomatine. 1omatoes should not be eaten. &or centuries tomatoes were considered an ornamental plant not -it -or human or animal consumption. 1his is discussed in 'hapter := %upplements. 1he -amous utchison 'ancer 'enter ('ancer (pidemiology 58, 200<) studied hundreds o- men and -ound, Elycopene le3els were unrelated to prostate cancer.G )nly cooked tomatoes in oil are pro3ide any lycopene anyway. %aw palmetto is still sold all o3er the world -or prostate health despite the -act it doesnFt work. Weak eCtracts are sold by prescription in (urope at high prices. 1his is discussed in 'hapter B= %cience and Beta*sitosterol. %aw palmetto only contains about one part in :,000 o- plant sterols. 1here are no other acti3e ingredients. 1his includes other useless supplements like #ygeum a-ricanum, nettles, pumpkin seeds and pollen eCtract. %aw palmetto is ne3ertheless still 3ery popular and widely sold. )ther popular useless supplements include res3eratrol, policosanol, pomegranate products, noni @uice, chondroitin, colloidal minerals, coral calcium, sea sil3er, colostrum, all A secretagogues, homeopathic remedies, deer antler 3el3et, chorella, spirulina, B* 1#, 1ribulus, maca root, chrysin, "A.*:, $ '', 3itamin ' megadoses, red rice yeast, oral %)D, '9$, coconut oil, Aymnema syl3estre, cinnamon eCtract, "%", whey protein, bee products, colloidal sil3er, <*keto D ($, niacin megadoses, 1ongkat ali, modi-ied (not regular) citrus pectin, bilberry, arginine, hoodia cactus, acai -ruit, go@i berries, oral chelation, artermisia (wormwood), mangosteen, and grape-ruit seed eCtract. +es3eratrol is probably the most success-ul supplement scam in history and has eclipsed colloidal minerals. +es3ertarol has been known about -or years and it completely useless as a health supplement. 1he grape skins it comes -rom were -ed to pigs, but now sold at high prices to the gullible. 1here is no science at all CCCii

here. +es3eratrol is eCogenous anyway and would ha3e little 3alue e3en i- it did work. $ 3ery well done scam. ,our author is the only one in the world to eCpose this as well. "enJ diet, li-estyle, and pro3en supplements cure disease, and heal your prostate, not "agic %upplements.

Chapter 6 S/ien/e an( Beta&sitosterol

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O %cience has shown that the most power-ul, pro3en, and e--ecti3e nutritional supplement -or prostate health is a common plant alcohol called beta*sitosterol. This is the most important supplement you need for good prostate health. Beta*sitosterol is -ound in literally all o- the 3egetables you eat, and is the most prominent plant sterol in nature. $ctually, Ebeta*sitosterolG is really a combination o- se3eral additional sterols, including campesterol, stigmasterol, and brassicasterol. %o, we really mean mi5ed sterols when we re-er to beta*sitosterol. $mericans are generally estimated to eat about :00 mg a day o- these miCed plant sterols, and 3egetarians to eat about twice that much. ,our author was the -irst one to o--er a 3alid prostate supplement based on :00 mg doses o- plant sterols. $ny claims -or EsteolinsG is ad3ertising hype, as all beta*sitosterol eCtracts contain about 5K o- these glucosides and they ha3e been shown to ha3e no 3alue (-ritish Iournal of ;rology 3 6:, 5;;;). 1raditionally, such herbs as saw palmetto, #ygeum species, nettles, star grass, and other herbs ha3e been used to treat prostate problems. 1he trouble with using these is that generally they contain about a mere one*part*in*three*thousand o- the beta* sitosterol compleC. $ typical analysis o- saw palmetto shows that it contains a 3ariety o- -atty acids (capric, lauric, myristic, palmitic, palmitoleic, stearic, oleic, linoleic, linolenic, arachic, and eicosenoic), and minute traces o- sterols and other plant chemicals that are biologically insigni-icant. )b3iously, these herbal -ormulas @ust do not contain any effective amounts of active ingredients. 1hat means you would ha3e to eat about a pound osaw palmetto berries to get a basic dose o- :00 mg o- beta* CCCiii

sitosterol. (3en with the most eCpensi3e E50CG (ten times) eCtracts o- these herbs, one would still ha3e to eat about two*hundred B00 mg capsules to get the :00 mg o- beta*sitosterolD %o, it is ob3ious that these herbs are ine--ecti3e, despite their continual promotion by the so*called natural health industry. %aw palmetto, #ygeum a-ricanum, nettles, and other such herbs are simply biologically worthless. (3en when the label says E6B percent -atty acids and sterols,G that really means Enearly all -atty acids and almost no sterols.G %aw palmetto and similar products simply ha3e no 3alue, no matter how much ad3ertising you ha3e read. ,ou wonFt see any saw palmetto or other herbal prostate product with any signi-icant amount o- plant sterols in it. $nalyses ha3e been widely published in @ournals such as Biochemistry 2002, AaHHetta 'himica 4talia 5;66, /ournal o- igh +esolution 'hromatography 5;68, /ournal o- #harmacy %cience 5;<; and 4ndian /ournal o- 'hemistry 5;<< showing only a -raction o- one per cent sterols are contained in any o- these herbs. What about the herbal eCtracts sold by prescription in (uropeM 1hose eCtracts are standardiHed according to beta*sitosterol content, regardless o- its source, by law, and this is prominently and clearly stated on the label. Whether you buy #ermiCon in &ranceJ arHol, 1adenan, or $Huprostat in AermanyJ or #rostaserene in Belgium, they are all based on how much actual beta*sitosterol content they ha3e. They are weak and very e5pensive. $ bottle o- 80 tablets o- (:0 mg sterols) #ermiCon, -or eCample, will cost about PB0 >.%. ,ou would ha3e to take ten a day to get any bene-it, which would cost you about P2B0 a month. $-ter one thoroughly researches beta*sitosterol, it becomes ob3ious that such herbs are a completely uneconomical source, while soybeans, sugarcane pulp, and pine oil (tall oil) are all eC* cellent, natural, ineCpensi3e sources. "any cane*sugar processors now eCtract the 3aluable chemicals -rom the pulp, a-ter the sugar is pressed out. )nly a -ew companies sell actual beta*sitosterol supplements containing :00 mg or more. 1he most popular brand contains a useless amount o- 20 mg and sells -or P2;.;B -or 80 tabletsD &ind one with at least :00 mg. 1here are doHens o- classic double blind studies done with men regarding the e--ects o- beta*sitosterol on B# (benign prostate hypertrophy) or enlarged prostate. WeFll discuss a -ew othese to gi3e you some eCamples o- the -irst*rate research that has been done around the world at leading hospitals and clinics. CCCi3

$t the 4nstitute o- 'linical "edicine at the >ni3ersity o+ome (Guropean ;rology 3 25, 5;;2) Di%il3erio and his colleagues studied thirty*-i3e men with B# -or three months, and ga3e hal- o- them a placebo (inert capsules). 1hey concluded, E)n the basis o- these considerations, monotherapy with a special %. repens eCtract Ta special clinical high potency beta*sitosterol eCtractU may be more -a3orably accepted, on account o- similar clinical results, when compared to the combination therapy cyproterone acetate plus tamoCi-en.G $t the ospital $mbroise in #aris (-ritish Iournal of /linical Pharmacology 3 56, 5;67) 'hampault and two other doctors did a classic double*blind study on one*hundred ten men, hal- o- them recei3ing a placebo. 1hey concluded= E1hus, as predicted by pharmacological and biochemical studies, #$50; T7 tablets o#ermiCon dailyU would appear to be a use-ul therapeutic tool in the treatment o- B# .G 1hey should ha3e used more beta*sitosterol than that. $t the !linische (ndokrinologie in &reiburg, Aermany (0linische Gndokrinologie 3 ;6, 5;60) Sahradnik and other doctors demonstrated that beta*sitosterol taken -rom star grass (and sold as the prescription eCtract arHol) lowered prostaglandin le3els. 4n regard to the de3elopment o- prostate enlargement, it was shown that high prostaglandin le3els supported tumor growth. Doctors at the >ni3ersity o- #ado3a, 4taly (!inerva ;rologica e &efrologica 3 :<, 5;6B) studied the e--ect o- a special, clinical, high potency beta*sitosterol eCtract (-rom #ygeum a-ricanum) on men with B# . Dr. 1asca and his associates measured urine -low and other parameters in men ranging -rom ages 7; to 65, compared to men recei3ing a placebo. 1he men recei3ing beta*sitosterol achie3ed much*impro3ed urine -low. %uch eCtracts are not a3ail* able to non*scientists. $t the 4nstitute o- "edical %ciences in "adras, 4ndia (!edical <cience esearch 3 58, 5;6:) Doctors "alini and Ianithakumari ha3e studied the e--ect o- beta*sitosterol on the prostates o- rats. 4n only siC weeks, impro3ed metabolism and reduced weights o- their prostates was seen. 1his was a uni?ue and thorough study. $t the >ni3ersity o- Dresden, Aermany (-ritish Iournal of ;rology 3 60, 5;;<) Doctors !lippel, ilti, and %chipp studied one*hundred and se3enty*se3en B# men -or siC months. al- the men recei3ed a placebo and hal- recei3ed the prescription eCtract $Huprostat containing 5:0 mg o- beta*sitosterol. 1o substantiate their research, thirty*two re-erences were cited. 1hey care-ully CCC3

screened all the men, who were tested eCtensi3ely during the study. 1hey concluded, E1hese results show that beta*sitosterol is an e--ecti3e option in the treatment o- B# .G $ nine*week double blind study o- -i-ty men was conducted at the >ni3ersity o- Basel, %witHerland (;rolage + 3 27, 5;6B) Dr. Iontobel and his colleagues studied a special eCtract o- nettles containing a high concentration o- beta*sitosterol 1hey said, E1he use o- beta*sitosterol -rom nettles, in the e3aluation o- the ob@ecti3e parameters showed signi-icant di--erencesJ the men who recei3ed the supplement impro3ed signi-icantly.G ,ou cannot buy such eCtracts in stores. $t the >ni3ersity o- Bochum in erne, Aermany ('ancet 3 :7B, 5;;B) Dr. Berges and his associates used pure beta*sitosterol with two*hundred men, o3er the course o- a year, hal- o- whom recei3ed a placebo. 1hey said, E%igni-icant impro3ement in symptoms and urinary -low parameters show the e--ecti3eness obeta*sitosterol in the treatment o- B# .G 1his is clearly one o- the most important and well*done studies on prostate e3er published. Doctor Bassi and others at the >ni3ersity o- #ado3a, 4taly -or two months (!inerva ;rologica e &efrologica 3 :;, 5;6<), studied -orty men who had B# and were gi3en an eCtract o- #ygeum a-ricanum containing a high beta*sitosterol content. al- the men recei3ed a placebo. 1hey concluded, E1he preliminary results demonstrate a signi-icant impro3ement o- the -re?uency, urgency, dysuria Tdi--icult, pain-ul urinationU, and urinary -low in patients treated with the acti3e drug.G $t eight di--erent urological clinics in (urope (Prostate 3 :<, 5;;6) a collecti3e study o3er a two*month period was done o- 28: total patients with B# . 1hey were gi3en either 1adenan (a #ygeum a-ricanum eCtract standardiHed -or beta*sitosterol content) or a placebo. 1his 3ery eCtensi3e study was coordinated among di--erent clinics and di--erent doctors who all agreed, Etreatment with the #ygeum a-ricanum eCtract led to a marked clinical impro3ement. $ comparison o- the ?uantitati3e parameters showed a signi-icant di--erence between the #ygeum a-ricanum group and the placebo group, with respect to therapeutic response.G 1he #ygeum eCtracts you buy in the store are much weaker than this. 1hey concluded that beta*sitosterol is the most promising o- all medical therapies $ study was done on twenty*three patients at the >rological 'linik o- !rankenhauser, in Aermany (Jiener 0linische Jochenschrift 3 22, 5;;0), Dr. %Hutrely ga3e the patients with CCC3i

prostate enlargement either arHol (herbal eCtract standardiHed -or beta*sitosterol content) or a placebo, o3er a two*month period. e measured their prostates with ultrasound e?uipment be-ore and a-ter treatment. $t the end he said, Ewithin the scope o- a controlled double blind study to demonstrate the e--ect oconser3ati3e therapy o- benign prostatic hyperplasia with arHol, ultrasonic eCamination o- the prostate adenoma TenlargementU was carried out on twenty*three patients be-ore and a-ter therapy, with the trial preparation o- a placebo. Within a two*month treatment with arHol there was a signi-icant change in echo structure o- the prostate adenoma. 1his is interpreted as a reduction in the interstitial -ormation o- oedema TswellingU.G $ uni?ue re3iew (!edi1inische 0linik 3 <<, 5;62) o- studies, o3er a thirty*one*year period, used eighteen di--erent international trials in3ol3ing 2,;:; men with B# . 1hey were treated with strong eCtracts o- saw palmetto, standardiHed -or beta*sitosterol content. $-ter re3iewing all these studies, the researchers announced, E1he e3idence suggests that %erenoa repens Tsaw palmettoU eCtract impro3es urologic symptoms and -low measures.G $nother uni?ue re3iew, in a di--erent manner, was done at the Department o- >rology in Alasgow, %cotland (Iournal of the +merican !edical +ssociation 3 260, 5;;6) Dr. Buck did a twel3e*page re3iew o- herbal therapy -or the prostate, including arHol, 1adenan, #ermiCon, %trogen, and %abaluC (all (uropean prescription herbal eCtracts standardiHed -or beta*sitosterol content). e documents his re3iew with -i-ty*nine published, worldwide studies, and discusses the biological basis o- prostate illness. is conclusions o- the e--icacy o- herbal treatment oprescription drugs and therapy are well -ounded. Dr. Braeckman per-ormed a study done at the >ni3ersity oBrussels, Belgium (-ritish Iournal of ;rology 3 <6, 5;;8), using #rostaserene (an eCtract standardiHed -or beta*sitosterol) -or siC weeks. 1his led him to conclude, E1raditional parameters -or ?uanti-ying prostatism, such as the 4nternational #rostate %ymptom %core, the ?uality*o-*li-e score, urinary -low rates, residual urinary 3olume, and prostate siHe were -ound to be signi-icantly impro3ed a-ter only 7B days o- treatment. $-ter ninety days o- treatment, a ma@ority o- patients (66K) and treating physicians (66 percent) considered the therapy e--ecti3e.G $t the Ieterans $dministration in "inneapolis (/urrent Therapeutic esearch 3 BB, 5;;7) doctors did a 3ery thorough re3iew o- the research on beta*sitosterol, going back o3er thirty CCC3ii

years and including thirty*two re-erences. 1hey concluded that beta*sitosterol had Ethe greatest e--icacy amongst phyto* therapeutical substances.G 1hey also concluded that, EBeta* sitosterol impro3es urological symptoms and -low measures.G $ re3iew like this is 3ery impressi3e, as it uses many studies condensed into one comprehensi3e presentation. $t the >ni3ersity o- +ome (-ritish Iournal of ;rology 3 6:, 5;;;) doctors ga3e men with B# (a3erage age o- siCty*eight) #ermiCon -or ninety days. 1his caused a drop o- B0 percent in prostate gland D 1 le3els, and a rise o- <2 percent in testosterone le3els. "ore proo- that testosterone is necessary -or healthy prostate metabolism. 4t is not the serum le3el o- D 1 that is critical, but how much D 1 binds to the prostate itsel-. 4n the same @ournal an eCtensi3e re3iew -rom the Ieterans$dministration 'enter was published. 1hey -ound, Ebeta*sitosterol impro3es urological symptoms and -low measures.G $ -ine re3iew -rom the >ni3ersity o- 'onnecticut (#harmacotherapy 3 22, 2002) on the e--ects o- beta*sitosterol and B# . E4n men with B# , e3idence suggests that the agents impro3e urologic symptoms and -low measures to a greater eCtent than placebo and to a similar eCtent as -inastaeride. Beta*sitosterols also are e--icacious in the treatment o- B# , impro3ing urinary symptoms and -low measures in placebo*controlls clinical trials. #hytosterols impro3ed lower urinary tract symptoms (9>1%) and urinary -low measures in numerous clinical trials.G 1hey were also 3ery concerned with ?uality o- li-e (L)9) measure and -ound EBased on the studies re3iewed, phytosterols are generally well tolerated and potentially e--ecti3e in treating symptoms o- B# and impro3ing ?uality o- li-e.G 1his was de-ined by the 4nternational #rostate %ymptom %core (4#%%) de3eloped in 5;;:, which is considered the gold standard -or urological symptoms. Dr. Berges and his associates at +uhr >ni3ersity in Aermany published another study on beta*sitosterol, in 2000 (British /ournal o- >rology 3 6B). 1his time they wanted to do a 3ery long*term study, o3er an eighteen*month period, to pro3e beyond any doubt the lasting e--ects o- beta*sitosterol therapy on prostate enlargement. 1his was, o- course, a classic double blind study, and they measured many basic indeCes to show in detail how the men -ared. 1he untreated men got worse with time, while the men gi3en beta*sitosterol impro3ed in all measured ways. 1hey concluded, E1he bene-icial e--ects o- beta*sitosterol treatmentQ were maintained -or eighteen months.G 1his lea3es no doubt as to the long*term e--ecti3eness. CCC3iii

1hese are only a -ew o- the many doHens o- studies that ha3e appeared in the ma@or medical @ournals. 1hey show, in -act, that beta*sitosterol is the acti3e ingredient in herbs. $merican herbal products, e3en the most eCpensi3e eCtracts that claim E6B percent -atty acids and sterols,G ha3e almost no beta*sitosterol in them. $nalytical studies pro3e there are no signi-icant acti3e ingredients in any o- these products. 1his is ne3er mentioned on the label, pro3ing that almost e3ery o3er*the*counter natural prostate remedy sold in the >.%. simply has no 3alue.

Chapter 7 Other Bene*its o* Beta&sitosterol

TDue to the hundreds o- published studies in3ol3ed, it is impractical to use endnotes in this chapter.U Beta*sitosterol is one o- the most important nutrients in our diet, is -ound in literally all our 3egetables, and is the most important supplement you can take -or good prostate health. 4t has many other bene-its, and can be used by both men and women (especially to protect against breast cancer). 4tFs estimated that $mericans generally consume about :00 mg a day o- natural beta* sitosterol in their diets, while 3egetarians eat at least twice that much. Western diets are clearly de-icient in this. $ notable bene-it o- this supplement is the promotion ohealthy cholesterol and triglyceride le3els. )3er thirty years ago, studies showed a positi3e e--ect, with no change in diet or eCercise. %ince then, o3er siCty articles ha3e been published in international medical @ournals. 1o reap the bene-its described, you need to take at least :00 mg a day o- miCed beta*sitosterol. 4- you lower your -at intake, and acti3ely eCercise, the results will be much more dramatic. 'ommon sense tells you to cut down on, or cut out, saturated animal -at, dairy, and, especially, unnatural hydrogenated -ats, which are -ound in so many o- our processed -oods. %urprisingly, the intake o- 3egetable oils does not raise cholesterol or triglyceride le3els, but eCcess 3egetable oils can contribute to other illnesses and conditions including cancer. #lease read my book, 'ower /holesterol Jithout :rugs. ,ou would think that doctors would be gi3ing beta*sitosterol CCCiC

to all their patients with high cholesterol le3els. 4nstead, they are prescribing costly, toCic drugs with 3ery serious side e--ects. 1hese drugs do not lengthen li-espan at all, but do harm your health. %urprisingly, beta*sitosterol is 3ery di--icult to -ind in drug stores, health -ood stores, and mail order 3itamin catalogs. (3ery year beta*sitosterol becomes much more popular and well known. 1his is ob3iously a supplement -or women, as well. igh cholesterol and triglyceride le3els are the biggest cause o- clogged arteries, or atherosclerosis. $t the Wistar 4nstitute in #hiladelphia, "c"ater >ni3ersity in )ntario, %umitomo 'hemical in /apan, and the 4nstitute o- (Cperimental "edicine in 9eningrad, atherosclerosis was impro3ed by simply gi3ing beta*sitosterol supplements. %tudies ha3e been done in other areas o- illness that show beta*sitosterol has great potential in areas such as blood clotting, ulcers, cancer pre3ention, tumors, immunity, in-lammation, diabetes, and other diseases. %ince beta*sitosterol is -ound in all common 3egetables, this pro3es it really is an essential nutrient, and will be so recogniHed in the -uture. #lant sterols are not optional, as they are an integral part o- our diet. 1he -ollowing studies show the promising potential o- beta* sitosterol -or 3arious conditions= Doctors at the %tate >ni3ersity o- .ew ,ork ha3e been studying the e--ects o- beta*sitosterol on human prostate and human colon cancer cells in test tubes (in 3itro). 1hey ha3e -ound it to be a potent killer o- cancer cells, but so -ar only in test tubes. 1his is 3ery promising research in -inding e--ecti3e natural supplements that ha3e anti*cancer properties. %oon they will use real people in their studies. $t the -amous %loan*!ettering 'ancer 4nstitute, doctors -ound beta*sitosterol, when -ed to rats, slowed the growth o- colonic adenomas (tumors). Why arenFt they using real men and womenM $t the >ni3ersity o- &rauenklin in Aermany, men with prostate adenomas were gi3en beta*sitosterol, which slowed tumor growth by decreasing their prostaglandin content. $t the .ational 4nstitute o- ealth in "aryland, scientists studied the chemo*pre3enti3e properties o- beta*sitosterol. 1his means that it helps pre3ent cancer when known carcinogens (cancer*causing chemicals) are gi3en to laboratory animals. 1he same chemo*pre3enti3e results were -ound with rats at Wayne Cl

%tate >ni3ersity. ).!., they canFt use real people here. $t %higa >ni3ersity in /apan, and the >ni3ersity o- Ialencia in %pain, high blood*sugar le3els in hyperglycemic rats were lowered by -eeding them beta*sitosterol. Diabetic rats impro3ed their diamine oCidase (D$)) le3els when -ed oral beta*sitosterol. D$) le3els are a basic marker in this condition. 1he same desired results were shown in another study, where glucose*8*phosphatase (A*8*#) le3els were lowered. A*8*# is another basic marker odiabetes and blood sugar disorders. %oon human diabetics will take beta*sitosterol and demonstrate their impro3ements. %tudies ha3e shown that oral beta*sitosterol protects against stomach ulcers in rats. $t West 'hina >ni3ersity in 'hina, it was shown that beta*sitosterol helps protect our stomach linings and pre3ent the -ormation o- ulcers. 4n another study, stomach lesions in test animals were reduced 60 percent with oral beta*sitosterol. $t the >ni3ersity o- 1eCas, the same protection against stomach ulcers in rats was shown by simply adding beta*sitosterol to their -ood. DoesnFt it sound more promising to study a bene-icial, ineCpensi3e substance -ound in all 3egetables -or reducing stomach ulcers, rather than toCic prescription medicinesM %tomach ulcers are epidemic in all the de3eloped countries. 1here are so many studies on the antimicrobial properties obeta*sitosterol it is hard to count them all. 1hese include antibacterial, anti-ungal, and e3en anti3iral. $nti3iral supplements are 3ery rare. 1his is a much better medical road to -ollow than the constant search -or power-ul synthetic antimicrobial drugs that cause more harm than bene-its. $t the 'entral 4nstitute o"edicine in 4ndia, the 4nstitute o- Biotechnology in #eking, the >ni3ersity o- 'ali-ornia, and the &ederal >ni3ersity in BraHil, power-ul antimicrobial properties were shown. 1his broad* spectrum acti3ity is most impressi3e. %tudies ha3e shown beta*sitosterol intake impro3es blood parameters in 3arious ways. $t the (-urt "edical $cademy in Aermany, beta*sitosterol -ed to rabbits impro3ed their -ibrinolytic capacity and plasminogen acti3ity. $t the 1okyo 4nstitute in /apan, the same basic results were -ound in cows. $t $ga !han >ni3ersity in #akistan, blood platelet acti3ity was impro3ed. We ha3e mentioned be-ore that beta*sitosterol lowers cholesterol and triglyceride le3els with no other changes in diet or li-estyle. 1he re-erences to E-ibrinolytic,G Eplasminogen,G and EplateletsG simply mean that blood -unctions were impro3ed due to beta*sitosterol supplementation. Cli

%tudies ha3e been done, especially at the >ni3ersity o%tellenbosch in %outh $-rica, on impro3ing the human immune system by simply adding beta*sitosterol to their diets. +unners ran better under the in-luence o- this supplement. 1*cell acti3ity in the blood was impro3ed, lymphocytes grew -aster, and natural killer* cell (.!*cell) -unction was impro3ed. 1his simply means that the runnersF immune systems were -unctioning better. )ur immunity is central to our health, and low immunity is epidemic. 1aking beta* sitosterol along with beta glucan is a 3ery e--ecti3e combination. #ower-ul anti*in-lammatory properties o- this wondrous substance ha3e been demonstrated. #eople in technological societies su--er -rom -ar too much in-lammation in their systems. 1his is a basic cause o- illness and debility. $t the >ni3ersity o%tellenbosch, doctors are working with people with rheumatism to see i- beta*sitosterol will help them. 1his is certainly more -ruit-ul than dangerous, and ine--ecti3e synthetic chemicals. 1hese are widely promoted e3ery year as arthritis and rheumatism Ebreak* throughs,G but ne3er deli3er what is promised. $t !ing Aeorge "edical 'ollege in 4ndia, arthritic rats were gi3en beta*sitosterol with good results and total sa-ety. $t the >ni3ersity o- .apoli in 4taly, arthritic rats impro3ed signi-icantly when -ed beta*sitosterol. %e3eral rele3ant >.%. and (uropean patents ha3e been granted. When are we going to see humans with arthritis studiedM $t Dhaka >ni3ersity in Bangladesh, doctors -ound that diabetic rats -ed beta*sitosterol reduced their blood sugar signi-icantly. 1his was done by impro3ing li3er -unction and normaliHing sugar metabolism. $t the >ni3ersity o- Ialencia in %pain, the insulin metabolism o- diabetic rats was impro3ed dramatically. 1he same results were -ound at %higa >ni3ersity in /apan. Why arenFt $merican researchers looking at impro3ing the li-e o- diabetics by natural means, instead o- in@ecting them with insulin and gi3ing them toCic drugs -or the rest o- their li3esM )ne in three $merican children born today will grow up diabetic. 1here are many other published studies o- beta*sitosterol, on both humans and animals that ha3e shown a wide range opotential bene-its, including increased le3els o- %)D (superoCide dismutase), which is critical to immunity and li-espan. %)D is the most important o- our -our antioCidant enHymes, and our le3els -all as we age. #eople with many 3arious illnesses ha3e low beta* sitosterol intake. Iegetarians typically eat 500 percent more beta* sitosterol than meat eaters, and are known to be healthier, li3e longer, and ha3e -ar less diseases. 1his includes cancer, coronary heart disease, diabetes, and the many other conditions that a--ect most all $mericans. 1he elderly ha3e been shown to ha3e Clii

eCtremely low phytosterol intake, generally. $mericans @ust donFt eat many green and yellow 3egetables. 1opical uses ha3e been studied -or keratosis, acne, psoriasis, and skin protein synthesis. >n-ortunately beta*sitosterol creams are waCy and lea3e a residue on the skin. Why hasnFt beta*sitosterol been studied moreM Why isnFt it more readily a3ailableM Why isnFt in-ormation like this widely disseminatedM 1hereFs @ust no #+)&41 in selling an unpatentable, non*prescription, ineCpensi3e plant eCtract obtained -rom sugarcane pulp, soybeans, and pine oil. $s time goes on we will see more studies and more real people used in these studies.

Chapter 8 Prostatitis
#rostatitis is simply a chronic in-ection o- the prostate gland, due to weak immunity in that area. 4t can be triggered by 3arious -actors, such as anal intercourse (heteroseCual or homoseCual), urinary tract in-ections (urethritis), bladder in-ections (cystitis), or post*surgery complications. 4t also happens -or no known reason at all. onest doctors admit that little is known about the causes o- or treatments -or this condition. %trong and dangerous antibiotics are the usual medical route. 1he only real answer is natural medicine, and bolstering the immune system with diet, supplements, hormones, eCercise, and -asting* diet and li-estyle in other words. #t takes time and patience to cure prostatitis. 1his is a chronic condition. +ead <even <teps to &atural Health on page <7 to see how you can really adopt a total program o- diet and li-estyle. #rostatitis can also be an acute as well as a chronic condition. 1his can cause symptoms similar to B# , only much more pain-ul. 4n -act, prostatitis can temporarily -alsely raise #%$ le3els 3ery dramatically, and make men -ear that they may ha3e cancer. !ore proof the P<+ is useless for diagnostics. #rostatitis can cause -re?uent urination, pain-ul e@aculation, a sense o- urgency, se3ere pain in the genital area, poor or no seCual -unctioning, and incomplete emptying o- the bladder. 4n acute -orms, the illness can e3en mani-est as -lu*like symptoms, with -e3er, chills, cold sweats, pain, and nausea. 1he medical pro-ession can do little or nothing about this common condition. 1he usual medical treatment is to test the urine and see i- speci-ic bacteria can be -ound. 1hen an antibiotic is prescribed. 1hese medications ha3e serious side e--ects, and the Cliii

patient must be monitored while taking them. $gain, the doctor is treating the symptom, and ignoring the cause o- the in-ection. 1he bacteria are not causing the problem* they are growing because olow immunity and impaired metabolism o- the prostate gland. 1reatment with antibiotics is generally 3ery ine--ecti3e, to say the least. )-ten, e3en i- the symptoms go away during treatment, the impro3ement is unrelated to the antibiotic regimen. 1here is also a type o- in-ection called non*bacterial prostatitis, where no speci-ic harm-ul bacteria can be detected. Doctors may still try to treat this with a succession o- antibiotics, hoping to -ind one that will stop the in-ection. )b3iously this is a classic eCercise in -utility, and is not 3ery success-ul at all. )-ten, patients who get no treatment at all reco3er @ust as ?uickly as those who take antibiotics. Whether it is in-ection, enlargement, or outright cancer o- the prostate, it all comes down to weak immunity. &or the in-ection to take hold, the bodyFs immune system and metabolism must be impaired. 1hus, all o- these conditions can be treated with diet, supplements, hormone balancing, -asting, and eCercise. 4t must be emphasiHed that prostatitis, especially the chronic 3ariety, does not respond well to con3entional medical treatment. ,ou must be 3ery clear that you are going to ha3e to treat yoursel-, and depend on your own e--orts to get well. Doctors ha3e sometimes resorted to alpha*blockers, anti*in-lammatories, physiotherapy, and e3en debilitating surgery in an attempt to deal with this problem. ,ou must deal with your total health and your immune system, and treat this as you would actual cancer. #rostatitis is arduous to treat. ,ou will ha3e to make basic changes in your diet and li-estyle i- you are to get well and stay well. #rostatitis is o-ten literally harder to cure than outright cancer generally, because it is usually chronic and long term. The "est way to cure yourself is to treat your inflammation as if you did have cancer. Ao on a 3ery good diet without meat, poultry, eggs, dairy, sugars, or re-ined -oods. 1ake the twenty recommended supplements e3en i- youFre under 70. 1est and balance your doHen basic hormones. &ast one day a week (on water only) -aith-ully. Aet daily eCercise, e3en i- it @ust means walking the dog. .o prescription drugs. Ai3e up any bad habits such as alcohol, co--ee, or cigarettes that can lower your immunity. ,ou will make regular monthly progress this way. 4t should be noted that the antioCidant ?uercetin has shown some bene-it in cases o- prostatitis, and is discussed in the chapter on supplements. $t the 4nstitute -or "ale >rology in 'ali-ornia (;rology 3 B7, 5;;;2, men with prostatitis were studied. al- were gi3en ?uercetin, B00 mg twice a day (500 times the normal intake), in a double blind study. 4n only one month, two*thirds o- the ?uercetin men showed impro3ements o- at least 2B percent. 1aking Cli3

an ineCpensi3e, o3er*the*counter, natural -ood supplement that o--ers many other health bene-its certainly seems pre-erable to prescription drugs. )ther studies (Iournal+merican &utraceutical +ssocication 3 2, 5;;;) ha3e also shown the 3alue o- ?uercetin -or in-ection o- the prostate. )ne would think much research is being done on such a common and hard*to*sol3e condition, but such is not the case at all. 1here are -ew studies done on -inding the causes and possible treatments o- prostate in-lammation, especially natural cures. We need more human research here. 1he medical pro-ession is really helpless here, and o-ten causes more harm than good with shotgun, in*the*dark approaches.

Chapter 9 Prostate Can/er

,es, prostate cancer can "e cured naturally, without resorting to drugs, surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy. #rostate cancer may actually be cured by diet alone. 1he best book on this sub@ect is /onfessions of a 0amika1e /ow"oy, which should be re*titled and re*edited. 1he author, actor Dirk Benedict *The +,Team), got prostate cancer in his thirties, at the height o- his career. e decided to go on a macrobiotic diet and stopped eating meat, poultry, eggs, dairy, re-ined -oods, tropical -oods, alcohol, co--ee, and sugars o- any kind. e did not ha3e the many supplements and hormones we ha3e now. 1he doctors wanted to castrate him, which meant he would die anyway, with a terrible ?uality o- li-e. e thought about this option, and decided that the whole grain diet, and li3ing another -i-ty years, sounded better than dying a pain-ul, lingering, premature death, with no testicles. e turned his back completely on the doctors and re-used all medical treatments. Within se3en months he knew he was basically well, and would soon be completely cancer*-ree. )3er :0 years later, Dirk is happy, healthy, 3ibrant, youth-ul, and the -ather o- two handsome sons. 1his inspiring book, relating his true*li-e story, is 3itally important to read. 4t is also important to read such books as $nthony %atarilloFs ecalled -y 'ife (out o- print, but at libraries), "ina DobicFs !y -eautiful 'ife, and (laine .ussbaumFs ecovery From /ancer on their healings o- cancer in the same way. 1he most important -actor in curing prostate cancer, or any other cancer, is to change your diet and lifestyle. %top eating eggs, dairy, poultry, meat, sugars o- any kind (e3en honey and maple Cl3

syrup), tropical -oods, hydrogenated oils, preser3ati3es, chemicals, re-ined -oods, co--ee, cigarettes, prescription drugs, and alcohol. $ diet based on whole grains, beans, most 3egetables, some local -ruit, soups, salads, and small amounts o- sea-ood (i- you donFt want to be a 3egetarian), is the way to cure yoursel-. 1here are 3arious books a3ailable on macrobiotics, especially my Hen !acro"iotics for +mericans. 1here are some -ine authors out there who ha3e written books on natural diet, such as %usan #owter, +obert #ritikin, Aary .ull, Dean )rnish, .eal Barnard, 1erry %hintani, and others. 1he 3ast ma@ority o- diet books are not good at all to put it mildly. 1he white (uropean countries ha3e more prostate (and other) cancers largely because o- their high*-at and high*calorie diets. Whole grains are hardly eaten anymore (only 5K o- the diet) in Western countries. Jhole grains such as rice, wheat, "arley and oats are literally the staff of life. 1hey ha3e been the dietary basis o- most cultures -or thousands o- years. (ating well also means eating low*-at, low*calorie -oods. Aenerally, men need only about 5,600 calories per day, and women only about 5,200. 1he utchison 'ancer 'enter */ancer Gpidemiology -iomarkers Preview 3 55, 2002) showed that low*calorie diets help cure prostate cancer in real men. $-ter you ha3e changed your diet, the second most important thing to do is to take the pro3en supplements -or you general health. $lways remember that supplements are always secondary to good diet, and nothing can compensate -or not eating well. 1he supplements recommended in this book are sa-e, natural, ineCpensi3e, e--ecti3e, and pro3en * in medical @ournals around the world * to support good prostate health. 1he third step is hormone balancing. 1he prostate is strongly hormone controlled. %ali3a testing o- hormones is the greatest medical breakthrough in the last decade. "ost o- the public is still completely unaware o- it, as are medical pro-essionals. Doctors rarely test hormone le3els, and ha3e little knowledge o- how to do this properly. ormones are 3ery power-ul, are not to be used casually, and should not be taken without -irst testing your le3els. ormone testing will become 3ery mainstream in the near -uture. D ($, testosterone, pregnenolone, progesterone, melatonin, thy* roid (1: and 17), A (growth hormone), and cortisol le3els are all critical to good prostate health. 4- you wish to maintain the youth-ul hormonal le3els you had in your thirties, you can use a hormone supplement and monitor your le3els annually. &asting is power-ul -or healing cancer. &asting @ust one day Cl3i

per week (supper one day to supper the neCt day on water only2 can change your health completely. Fasting is literally THG most powerful healing method known. %ome -ine books on -asting ha3e been written by #aul Bragg, /oel &uhrman, (3e $damson, .athaniel Bronner, and $lan 'ott. #lease remember that true -asting means nothing "ut water. #rayer is also e--ecti3e i- you ha3e any religious orientation. 4t is the sincerity o- your prayer that counts. &aith is simply trust in the unknown, and trust can and does mo3e mountains. #rayer works. 4- you -eel you canFt -ast and go without -ood, then go on a diet o-, say, only brown rice -or a period o- time. ,ou can also go on a low calorie, soup*only diet. %oon you will be able to -ast one day a week, -rom dinner to dinner, with no problem. #eople think o- -asting as star3ation, depri3ation, and hunger. $ctually, hunger pangs generally go away a-ter the second day, and a -eeling olightness, elation, and @oy take o3er. 1his is the most power-ul healing method, and also de3elops character and spirituality. +ecently, a theory called Ecomplementary medicineG has been populariHed, which uses both traditional allopathic (treat only the symptom) and natural (treat only the cause) medicines. ,ou cannot go north and south at the same time, and you cannot success-ully use opposing methods o- healing. 1he best way to get well is to use allopathic medicine ).9, -or the e--ecti3e diagnostic techni?ues it employs. ,ou then ha3e a choice o- completely a3oiding radiation, chemotherapy, prescription drugs, and surgery. 1hese medical methods merely disguise your symptoms and ignore the causes o- your illness. >se natural treatments to deal with the very cause of your illness. 4- you ha3e already had allopathic treatments it may not be too late -or you to use natural methods to get well and o3ercome the 3ery negati3e and destructi3e e--ects othe pre3ious medical treatments. $ classic success story o- healing prostate cancer naturally comes -rom my -riend 9addie in )regon. e -ound he had prostate cancer in his -i-ties. 4t was 3eri-ied, and the diagnosis was he would probably be dead within -i3e years, no matter how many medical treatments he underwent. e said he would rather die ocancer than undergo such torture. is wi-e, "onica, was determined not to be a widow, and looked into the natural healing o- cancer. %he read up on macrobiotics, and immediately put 9addie on a diet o- whole grains, beans, most 3egetables, local -ruits, and some sea-ood. $ll his li-e, 9addie had eaten meat, eggs, poultry, dairy, sugar, alcohol, co--ee, and re-ined -oods * the usual $merican diet. e decided it was time to change his diet and li-estyle. "onica made his meals e3ery day, packed his lunch, and Cl3ii

made sure he stayed with the diet and didnFt de3iate. 9addie bought all the supplements recommended in this book, and took them e3ery day. 1aking supplements was the easy part. 1hey were a -raction o- the cost o- the toCic prescription drugs he would ha3e used otherwise. e took melatonin and pregnenolone, and used transdermal progesterone cream daily. is thyroid was -ine. With sali3a testing he disco3ered his testosterone and D ($ le3els were both low. 9addie went against the doctors who belie3e testosterone is bad -or the prostate and increases cancer growth. e raised his low le3els o- testosterone, and also took D ($. 9addie had ne3er gone without -ood -or more than twel3e hours in his li-e. e started -asting -or twenty*-our hours, once a week, by skipping break-ast and lunch e3ery %aturday. e also started going on occasional two*day -asts. e knew he was getting well because he &(91 better. Healthy people feel good. ,ou could @ust look at him and see he was getting healthier month*by*month. is -riends and relati3es -elt pity -or him, and thought he was in eCtreme denial. 9addie lost weight, his compleCion was clearer, he had more energy, and he simply looked and felt "etter. is original doctor became 3ery upset as 9addie got healthier and healthier e3ery month, re-using all traditional medical treatments. e told the doctor he had raised his testosterone and was taking -our other natural hormones. 1he doctor became so -rustrated that he stopped seeing 9addie and re-erred him to a colleagueD $-ter less than eight months, 9addie knew in his heart he was well. e had ne3er -elt or looked better in his li-e. %ince the #%$ is useless -or diagnosis, he got a sonogram. 1his showed no more malignancy. 1he second doctor 3eri-ied he could no longer -ind any e3idence o- cancer in 9addieFs body. e tried to tell 9addie that there must ha3e been a Emistake,G and that he ne3er had cancer, but 9addie showed him the original diagnostic results. 1oday, 9addie is a happy, healthy, and thank-ul man. e eats well, takes his supplements and hormones, and -asts once a week to celebrate being ali3e. e eCpects to li3e into his nineties. Bob ,oung is a se3enty*eight year*old, blind @aHH musician who li3es in .ew /ersey. Bob was diagnosed with prostate cancer -ourteen years ago, and re-used the con3entional medical treatments. e heard one o- my radio shows, and -inally tracked me down on the phone. %ince he couldnFt read, 4 sent him some audio tapes to listen to, and spoke with him o3er the phone. is aides also read him my books regularly. e changed his diet and ?uit eating meat, eggs, poultry, and all dairy products. e started eating whole grains and other natural -oods. e took all the Cl3iii

suggested supplements and tested his basic hormones. %urprisingly his medical doctor was 3ery supporti3e o- his natural treatment, and helped him test his hormones. 4t took two years because o- his ad3anced, long*term tumor growth and his age, but he -inally was diagnosed cancer -ree both by "+4 and sonogram. e en@oys his natural -ood diet, still takes siCteen supplements e3ery day, and keeps his hormones in balance. Bob is looking -orward to another good ten years o- li-e, and plays in his @aHH band weekly. 4- an elderly blind man can cure his cancer by changing his li-e then you can, too. Bob is an inspiration to anyone with a serious illness. 1here are many other true li-e stories o- men who cured prostate cancer naturally on my website library. ,ou can do this in only one year @ust by changing your diet and li-estyle.

Chapter 1: Pro1esterone

#rogesterone is thought o- as a -emale hormone, but actually protects men -rom eCcess estrogen. "en need progesterone in their bodies -or li-e itsel-, only in smaller ?uantities than women. 1he estrogens estradiol and estrone are the -eminiHing hormones in men, and it is progesterone that is the natural antagonist to them. (Ccessi3e estrogen le3els in men o3er B0 cause cancer, breast growth, obesity, and other problems. #rogesterone can help inhibit this. Do not con-use real, natural progesterone with the synthetic progestin analogs, like #ro3eraV that ha3e been shown to ha3e serious side e--ects. 1hey do not ha3e the ad3antages o- natural progesterone. .ature has gi3en progesterone to both men and women to balance and o--set the strong e--ects o- estrogen. "en, o- course, ha3e lower le3els o- progesterone than women, so they need less supplementation. !en have specific progesterone receptors on their prostates, yet e3en urologists and endocrinologists are blind to such well*known scienti-ic -acts. (our prostate needs progesterone to "e healthy. ,ou do not ha3e to test your progesterone le3els, and sali3a testing does not work well here as it is -at soluble. ,ou do not need to test here. #rogesterone is 3ery poorly absorbed orally. 4- taken by mouth, it is broken down into unwanted metabolites. &ortunately, it is readily absorbed through the skin into the blood. 1here-ore, transdermal creams are 3ery practical and e--ecti3e. /ust use a good brand that contains 600*5000 mg o- real, natural, >%# (pharmaceutical grade) progesterone per two*ounce @ar (700*B00 mg per ounce). 1his must be stated clearly on the label. $pply 5N6th teaspoon o- the cream directly to your scrotum (testicle sac) -i3e days a week. 1his allows it to penetrate and reach the prostate receptors. 1his small amount pro3ides about < mg daily, o- which CliC

about 2 mg should be absorbed into your system. ,ou can use it on your inner wrist i- you want. #rogesterone has been shown to be completely non*toCic and 3ery sa-e, especially in these amounts. .ow, letFs ?uickly discuss the research that shows progesterone opposes and balances eCcess estrogen, and is a powerful D,alpha,reductase inhi"itor. 1his means progesterone helps stop the con3ersion o- bene-icial testosterone into dihy* drotestosterone (D 1). igh glandular D 1 content is a ma@or cause o- prostate disease. ,our prostate has speci-ic progesterone receptors that no other hormone can attach to. 1he -ollowing studies were published in the most prestigious medical @ournals in the world, including Gndokrinologie, #ndian Iournal of G5perimental -iology, .ynecological #nvestigation, #nternational Gncyclopedia of Pharmacological Therapy, +cta Gndocrinology, Iournal of /linical Gndocrinology and !eta"olism, Iournal of Gndocrinology, Iournal of <teroid -iochemistry, %ncology, +nnals Gndocrinology, +cta Physiologica 'atinoamerica, Prostate, ;rology esearch, Gndocrinology, and +rchives of .erontology and .eriatrics. 1he 'enter -or Drug +esearch in 4ndia did -our di--erent studies showing that progesterone shrank enlarged rat prostates and antagoniHed the stimulating e--ects o- estrogen. #rogesterone stimulates alkaline phosphatase, and depresses acid phosphatase in the prostate, and is generally supporti3e o- proper prostate -unction. %iC di--erent studies in clinics around the world all independently demonstrated progesterone is a power-ul B*alpha* reductase inhibitor that stops the con3ersion o- testosterone into D 1. "en with prostate disease generally ha3e high D 1 binding le3els in their prostates due to low testosterone le3els. 4n -act, at %taten 4sland 'ollege, and "t. %inai "edical %chool, progesterone was shown to raise the le3el o- androstenedione in the prostate gland itsel-. +emember that a healthy prostate needs an a"undance of androgens such as testosterone, androstenedione, and :HG+ to function well. We need youth-ul le3els o- these hormones. $t the >ni3ersity o- 9a3al in Luebec, progesterone inhibited estrogen -rom binding to the prostate, and the presence o- pro* gesterone receptors was clearly demonstrated. $t the 4nstitute -or Biological "edical (Cperiments in Buenos $ires it was shown that progesterone shrank prostate weight in test animals, and reduced B* alpha*reductase acti3ity as well. $t the Biochemical "edical 9aboratory in &rance, the >ni3ersity o- "aryland, and the 4nstitute o- 'linical "edicine in +ome, doctors demonstrated the importance o- prostate progesterone receptors, showing how l

responsi3e the gland is to this hormone. 4n 5;66, a 3ery important study was done at .an@ing "edical 'ollege in 'hina. #rogesterone reduced the prostate weights o- test animals, and the doctors concluded that this therapy should be used on humans. %ince that time there ha3e been almost no published studies on the use o- progesterone -or B# and prostate cancer e3en in animals. We need human studies here, and they arenFt being done. 1hereFs @ust no pro-it in natural hormones used in natural ways. Doctors and urologists arenFt e3en aware the prostate gland has progesterone receptors, nor would they care i- they did know. $ll this in-ormation is in mainstream medical @ournals. What do they do in medical school anywayM 1his is an ineCpensi3e, o3er*the*counter cream, and you donFt need a doctor or a prescription -or it in the >nited %tates.

Chapter 11 4our Other Basi/ Hor%ones

D%&A is the second most important androgen, a-ter testosterone, -or prostate health. D ($ is 3ery important -or male seCual and urological health. "en with erectile dys-unction are commonly low, and need supplementation. D ($ is called the Eli-e eCtension hormoneG -or good reason. "any diseases show o3erall low le3els in patients, especially coronary heart disease. D ($ le3els -all as we age as you can see -rom the chart below.
ng4!l plas!a 8700 8200 2600 2500 2000 1700 1200 600 500 10 20 80 50 50 D+'A S&;%A<' ;'=';S <+R>&*+>&< ;$%' Adult !ale pea"

;e-el de)lines , hal3 at age 50

70

90

60

:0

100 ears

"en with prostate cancer had their blood analyHed, and had decidedly lower D ($ le3els than healthy controls (;rology Times 3 28, 5;;6). $t /ohns opkins >ni3ersity more men were studied. 1he prostate cancer patients (/ancer Gpidemiology -iomarkers 3 2, 5;;:) had 52K lower D ($ le3els than healthy li

men. )ther researchers ha3e -ound higher D ($ le3els helped pre3ent prostate conditions in general. +elatonin has eCtensi3e research -or prostate health, yet we ne3er about this. 4n 5;B6 it was -inally identi-ied as the pineal gland hormone. 4t wasnFt until the mid*5;;0s that it became a3ailable ineCpensi3ely. 1he hallmark o- this research is that the prostate actually contains melatonin receptors. "edical doctors, including urologists, are not aware o- these well*established scienti-ic -acts. .o other prostate books talk about melatonin either. 1his chart shows that melatonin peaks at about age 5:, and then -alls se3erely until it almost disappears at age 80. 1ake this only at night, ne3er during the day. 1he media has tried to portray this as a mere aid -or poor sleep and @et lag, when it is a potent, power-ul, and pro3en anti*aging, anti*cancer, antioCidant, immunity*stimulating hormone. "elatoninFs most important bene-it is in e5tending our life span. 9ab animals gi3en melatonin in their drinking water ha3e li3ed as much as 5N: longer. 4t also boosts the immune system, and may be the most power-ul o- all known antioCidants. $ccording to new research, melatonin promotes good cardio3ascular health, eChibits anti*cancer and cancer*pre3enti3e properties, and is 3ery important to prostate metabolism. $t the >ni3ersity o- 9odH in #oland (&euroendocrine 'etters 3 20, 5;;;) it was shown that melatonin has bene-icial e--ects on cancer in general. 1he doctors
.elatonin (pg4! l) 150 120 100 60 70 50 20 0
New ,orns produ)e !ini!al !elatonin .elatonin pea"s in earl )hildhood 2u,ert o))urs as !elatonin de)lines

.elatonin )ontinues to de)line in !iddle age >lder people produ)e negligi,le a!ounts o3 !elatonin

10

20

80

50

50

70

90

said, E"elatonin may eCert its oncostatic (cancer de-eating) e--ect indirectly, 3ia modulation o- the endocrine and immune systems.G $t the >ni3ersity o- "ilan in 4taly (Prostate, 3 7B, 2000) researchers said, E"elatonin eCerts a direct oncostatic acti3ity on human androgen*independent prostate cancer cells, by a--ecting cell cycle progression.G $gain, your prostate has melatonin receptors and you need to supplement this a-ter 70. lii

Age ( ears)

"ore recently, human studies ha3e been done as a result o- all the impressi3e animal studies. $t the >ni3ersity o- 1uebingen in Aermany, men with both B# and prostate cancer were -ound to ha3e low melatonin le3els (/linica /himica +cta, 3 20;, 5;;2) 4n a later study at the same uni3ersity (Jiener 0linische Jochenschrift 3 50;, 5;;<) they -ound the same phenomenon in men with prostate cancer. 1he doctors suggested using melatonin supplements to treat prostate cancer as a standard therapy. 1he same uni3ersity also did a long re3iew (+dvances in G5perimental and !edical -iology 3 78<, 5;;;) with se3enty*one re-erences that consistently showed low melatonin in breast and prostate cancer patients. 1hey suggested using it as part o- standard therapy. 4n a -ourth study there (#nternational /ongressional <eries G5cerpta !edica 3 505<, 5;;:) the doctors said, E%ince the obser3ed depression o- melatonin in cancer patients may contribute to, or e3en cause, se3ere endocrine aberrations, the use o- melatonin as a substituti3e therapeutic agent in these patients should be considered.G ,et another re3iew (Pineal ;pdate, 5;;8 ed. by Webb) -ound low melatonin in prostate cancer patients, and suggested melatonin therapy be considered. $t the >ni3ersity o9odH in #oland (#nternational Iournal of Thymology 3 7, 5;;8) researchers came to the same conclusion= to use melatonin as a standard means o- treating prostate cancer. E"oreo3er, preliminary results o- use o- melatonin in the treatment o- cancer patients suggest possible therapeutic role -or melatonin in human malignancy.G Why isnFt this standard cancer therapy nowM +esearch turned up ele3en studies done at the >ni3ersity o1el $3i3 in 4srael. 1he >ni3ersity o- ong !ong did three studies showing melatonin has power-ul anticancer acti3ity. E"elatonin inhibited the growth o- 9n'a# tumors,G and Ethe anti*proli-erati3e action o- melatonin on 9n'a# tumor growth was demonstrated in 3i3oQG (Prostate 3 78, 2005). $t the >ni3ersity o- "ilan in 4taly (%ncology eports, 3 <, 2000) doctors again studied the e--ect omelatonin on human prostate cells. 1hey had already published a pre3ious study on the bene-its o- melatonin on prostate cancer. 1hey concluded, E)ur results, together with pre3ious reports on di--erent human neoplasms TtumorsU, seem to suggest that melatonin might be considered as an e--ecti3e cytostatic agent, either alone or in combination with standard anticancer treatments.G $gain, doctors recommending this as a standard. Pre1nenolone is the EgrandmotherG hormone -rom which all the other seC steroid hormones are deri3ed. #t is most important "rain meta"olism regulator, and is largely responsible -or memory, learning, and cognition. #regnenolone can be called the -orgotten, or orphan, hormone, as 3ery little research has been done on this liii

most basic and important steroid. #t is the most potent memory, enhancer known to science. (3en endocrinologists are basically unaware o- the necessity o- measuring and supplementing pregnenolone, especially in people o3er the age o- -orty. Why so little research on such a basic and power-ul hormoneM #regnenolone -alls precipitously a-ter the age o- thirty*-i3e. %ali3a testing o- pregnenolone is a3ailable on the 4nternet, and blood tests can be specially ordered by your doctor. 4t was almost impossible to -ind any in-ormation at all regarding pregnenolone and prostate health in the last three decades, since so little research has been done on it. &ortunately, at the -amous "arie 'urie ospital in #aris (Iournal of <teroid /hemistry and !olecular -iology 3 78, 5;;:) doctors did an eCtensi3e, unusually sophisticated, and 3ery detailed study where they measured -ourteen di--erent hormone le3els in men with prostate cancer and compared them to men with normal le3els. 1hey disco3ered that pregnenolone (and D ($) le3els were generally lower in the patients. $ good dose -or those o3er -orty is B0 mg -or men and 2B mg -or women. Do not eCceed these doses.
Pregnenolone Le'els (combined maleN-emale, 9abrie et al, /. 'lin. (ndoc. "etab., 3.62 (5;;<)

ngNml 8 B 7 :

7.8

7.8 2.6

2 5 age 20 :0

2.5 2.0 5.; 70 B0 80 <0 60

-rowth hor%one (A ) le3els -all as we age, and, as it -alls, the possibility o- de3eloping prostate cancer rises. +aising our A le3el will strengthen our immunity, and allow us to li3e a longer and better li-e. $t &ederico 44 >ni3ersity in 4taly (Iournal of li3

/linical Gndocrinology L !eta"olism 3 66, 200:) a case control study was done on the e--ects o- -alling A le3els -or prostate health. 1hey said, E4n conclusion, A replacement restores prostate siHe to normal in both young and elderly patients with no increase in prostate abnormalities.G +eal human growth hormone (rhA ) costs about P:,800 a year and must be in@ected sub* cutaneously. 1he ineCpensi3e 'hinese A is no longer a3ailable. "any promotional products claim to raise A , but all o- these are scienti-ically ridiculous, especially the Ehomeopathic A G (which contains none at all). Do .)1 -all -or these well* done promotions, no matter how enticing they sound. &%&G of them work, no matter how well the ads are written. ,ou can help maintain a youth-ul le3el o- growth hormone by eating well, eating a low*calorie diet, e5ercising, staying slim, -asting, and a3oiding bad habits. A le3els must be measured by multiple blood drawsJ there are currently no sali3a test kits -or this. 4t is di--icult to accurately measure A because blood le3els may 3ary ?uite a bit during the day. Ao by the real world results you get. A is 3ery o3errated because it is eCpensi3e. 4t is no better than any other hormone, and only those over DB who have "alanced all their other "asic hormones should even consider it. 4A&*5 (insulin*like growth -actor) le3els do .)1 parallel A le3els, despite the con3entional wisdom. 1hose who claim otherwise pro3e their ignorance in the matter. igh 4A&*5 le3els are o-ten associated with prostate disease. ,ou can EspikeG (but not consistently raise) your A le3el by taking a gram o- 9* glutamine in the a.m., and another gram in the p.m., daily. /ust because real A is so eCpensi3e does not mean it is a E"iracle ormoneG* it is eCpensi3e because the pharmaceutical corporat* ions ha3e colluded to make it so. Ieterinary growth hormones are @ust as costly to produce, but are sold cheaply to -armers. :on4t even consider .H until all your basic hormones such as progesterone, insulin, estradiol, estrone, melatonin, D ($, preg* nenolone, testosterone, and your thyroid hormones 1: and 17 are balanced. 1his is the last one to do and only a-ter the age o- B0. ,es, you should test both o- your -ree thyroid hormone le3els since all our hormones work together, in concert, as a uni-ied system. #rostate disease is o-ten associated with thyroid dys* -unction (Iournal of ;rology 3 586, 2002, and Prostate /ancer 3 7, 2005). /ust test your *ree T$ (triiodothyronine) and *ree T3(9* thyroCine), instead o- your 1% or 1: uptake, as your doctor will probably suggest. 1here are no sali3a tests -or 1: and 17 now, but there will be soon. 4t is the free le3els o- 1: and 17 you are interested in. #haarmaceutical 17 (%ynthroid, 9e3oCyl, etc.), and 1: ('ytomel, 'ynomel, etc.) (1:) are bioidentical in e3ery way. l3

1reat your 1: and 17 completely separately and do .)1 use $rmourV 1hyroid (unless both your 17 and 1: are e?ually low). $rmour contains both in a 7=5 ratio. $rmourV pig eCtract can only be used by about BK o- those who are hypothyroid. igh insulin le3els ha3e been correlated with B# as well as cancer (Iournal of >rology 3 586, 2002, ecent esults in /ancer esearch 3 588, 200B, and I&/# 3 ;B, 200:) igh insulin is due to Einsulin resistanceG, where your bodyFs cells donFt properly respond to normal le3els o- the hormone. 4nsulin resistance is another cause o- prostate disease (Hormone and !eta"olic esearch 3 :B, 200:).1he only way you can diagnose -or this is with a glucose tolerance test (A11). ,ou simply drink a small cup o- glucose solution, wait one hour, and test your blood sugar le3el. 4t is an ineCpensi3e test that e3eryone o3er -orty should get. ,our A11 result should be about 500 and not @ust 550 as the medical pro-ession claims. (our fasting "lood glucose should "e ED or less, not 500 or less. 4nsulin resistance (and diabetes) can be cured with a whole grain based diet, proper supplements, hormone balancing, eCercise, and a3oiding $99 sugars including honey, -ruit and -ruit @uice as much as possible. Cortisol is best measured with sali3a at ;=00 $", 5=00 #", B=00 #" and ;=00 #" -or a daily pro-ile, since it 3aries so much during the day. )nly diet and li-estyle is going to lower high le3els. 'orte-V cortisol tablets are a3ailable -or low le3els. 1his pro-ile is optional and does not need to be done. %urprisingly, our th)%us glands are not well understood. 1he thymus does not @ust secrete one or two simple hormones we could use as supplements. 1his important gland in3olutes, or shrinks, until it all but disappears by the time we are -orty. )b3iously, this has a lot to do with aging and illness. )ne cannot simply take thymus hormone or take thymus eCtract. We need a lot more research here on how to re@u3enate thymus acti3ity as we age.

4our Basi/ Hor%ones Testosterone An(rostene(ione !HEA Pre1nenolone

l3i

+elatonin Pro1esterone Estra(iol Estrone Estriol T$ T3 -rowth Hor%one ;nsulin Cortisol

Chapter 1" Testosterone ;s 4our #rien(
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

.early e3ery medical doctor in the world will tell you that testosterone is somehow EbadG -or your prostate and makes prostate cancer grow. 1his is un?uestionable <acred :ogma * e3en though the fall in testosterone as men age almost eCactly parallels the rise in prostate cancer, B# , and prostatitis. 1his insanity started more than eighty years ago, e3en be-ore uggins got the brilliant idea to castrate men to cure their prostate cancerD (unuchs (castrates) had less de3eloped seCual organs and smaller prostates, so this must ha3e seemed like a good idea at the time. 1he 3ictims seemed to get better temporarily, but the cancer soon returned with a 3engeance, and they ?uickly died. $nyone who thinks you cure cancer by cutting o-- a manFs testicles is ob3iously insane in the -irst place. 1his butchery has continued to the present day, and now doctors use both chemicals and scalpels to castrate men. 1here are se3enty*-our (<7) published studies in this chapter to pro3e empirically that testosterone is prostate healthy. (3ery year more such studies are published, yet doctors still physically and chemically castrate men to reduce their le3els to Hero. $ study -rom the -amous )C-ord >ni3ersity was published in the #roceedings o- the +oyal %ociety o- "edicine in 5;:8. 1estosterone was only disco3ered and synthesiHed in 5;:B so it was barely known to doctors, much less a3ailable. 4ronically, se3enty years ago the doctors knew that estrogen was bad -or prostate health, while testosterone was good -or prostate health. 1hey also were aware o- the all important testosterone to estrogen ratio where testosterone should control and limit the E-emale l3ii

hormoneG. )3er eighty studies were ?uoted on the entire sub@ect. $nother study -rom 9ouisiana %tate >ni3ersity was published in the /ournal o- >rology in 5;:6. ere the doctors understood that testosterone le3els -ell as men aged, and the incidence o- prostate disease rose greatly. %ince testosterone had only been 3ery recently disco3ered the patients were gi3en -resh animal testes with good results. 1hey re-erred to other studies using eCtracts oanimal testes as well as the recently synthesiHed testosterone propionate. 1he medical pro-ession inherently knew that Ethe male hormoneG was good -or curing B# a common malady e3en then. ,ou can clearly see -rom this chart that testosterone le3els -all as men age, while estrogen le3els rise. 1estosterone dominance and the testosterone*to*estrogen ratio are re3ersed, and prostate disease increases accordingly. 'ommon sense tells you that testosterone is your -riend, has always been your -riend, and will always be your -riend, as described in my book Testosterone #s (our Friend.
500 850 800 250 200 150 100 50 testosterone estrogen a3ter 50 estrogen do!inates testosterone dangerousl .A;' 'S<R>*'N AND <'S<>S<'R>N' ?;>>D ;'=';S <+R>&*+>&< ;$%'

20

80

50

50

70

90

60

:0 ears

+cta Gndrocnnologica A9 *=FAC2, pp. AF@PEBB, and EB *=FAB2, PP. =ACPAE

1he scienti-ic literature is -ull o- countless studies that pro3e testosterone is necessary -or good prostate health and metabolism. When blood serum -ree testosterone le3els are low, prostate receptors must choose dihydrotestosterone (D 1), which causes disease. D 1 binding (not D 1 blood le3els) to the prostate receptors is a basic cause o- illness. 9etFs take @ust some o- the many doHens o- published clinical studies -rom around the world to pro3e that high, youthful levels of the androgens testosterone, androstenedione, and :HG+ protect you from prostate illness , and l3iii

that supplementing low testosterone and androgen le3els helps you cure your illness. 1here are doHens more in my -iles. $t the >ni3ersity o- Washington5 a progressi3e, inno3ati3e, and pioneering doctor named +ichmond #rehn actually said that we should consider using androgen supplementation to reduce the growth o- prostate cancerD e pointed out that declining testosterone le3els contribute to carcinogenesis, and that supplementing low le3els would reduce cancer rates. e pointed to earlier studies that showed low testosterone le3els in prostate cancer patients indicated a much worse prognosis. 4t is doctors like him that are going to lead us into the medical $ge o(nlightenment, and out o- the $ge o- Darkness. $t the >ni3ersity o- Witwaterstrand in $-rica,2 a study was titled E9ow %erum 1estosterone #redicts a #oor )utcome in "etastatic #rostate 'ancer.G 1hey studied 522 patients and -ound that the ones with the highest testosterone le3els had the least aggressi3e tumors, and li3ed the longest. 1he patients with the lowest testosterone le3els had -ar more aggressi3e growth, and died much sooner. 1hey concluded, E9ow testosterone seems to result in a more aggressi3e disease and a poorer prognosis in ad3anced prostate cancer.G 1his study is 3ery clear. $t the ubei "edical >ni3ersity in 'hina,: doctors studied men with B# and carcinoma (#'$). 1hey -ound that, E1he results showed that serum testosterone in patients with B# and #'$ was lower than that o- the healthy control group,G and -urther, EQthe ratio o- testosterone*to*estradiol is decreased with the rise o- the age. 1he results suggested that the imbalance oserum seC hormones Ti.e. -alling testosterone and rising estrogenU was related to the pathogenesis o- B# and #'$.G #t is low testosterone and high estrogen levels that cause prostate pro"lems. $t the -amous ar3ard "edical %chool7 a study was titled E4s 9ow %erum 1estosterone a "arker -or igh Arade #rostate 'ancerMG 1hey -ound that men with lower testosterone le3els had -aster growing tumors, higher Aleason scores, and shorter li-e spans. (Aleason scores are a measure o- cancer se3erity.) 1he conclusion was, E4n our study, patients with prostate cancer and a low -ree testosterone Tle3elU had more eCtensi3e disease. 4n addition, all men with a biopsy Aleason score o- 6 or greater had low serum -ree testosterone. 1his -inding suggests that low serum -ree testosterone may be a marker -or more aggressi3e disease.G $gain, the lower the testosterone the worse the prognosis. "en, this is directly -rom ar3ard "edical %chool. liC

$t the >ni3ersity o- Iienna,B men with prostate cancer were compared to healthy controls. 1he men with cancer had decidedly lower testosterone le3els than the healthy ones. $gain, we see that the lower the testosterone, the worse the disease and malignancy rates. 1hey also -ound that the other ma@or androgen, D ($, did not negati3ely a--ect cancer. 1hey said, E1hese data are con-irmed by the present studyJ it can be concluded that D ($ or D ($*% serum concentrations represent no risk -actor -or #' Tprostate cancerU de3elopment.G 1his couldnFt be clearer. $gain at the >ni3ersity o- Iienna8 men with prostate cancer were studied -or their serum testosterone le3els. 1he doctors concluded, E9ow serum testosterone in men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer is associated with higher tumor micro 3essel and androgen receptor density Tnote> both o- these make the malignancies grow -asterU, as well as TwithU higher Aleason score, suggesting enhanced malignant potential.G 4n other words, in men with low testosterone the tumors grew -aster, the cancer was more aggressi3e, and the patients died sooner. $ third study -rom the >ni3ersity o- Iienna< was titled, E igh Arade #rostate 'ancer is $ssociated With 9ow %erum 1estosterone 9e3els.G 1hey -ound that, Epatients with high Aleason score prostate cancer ha3e lower testosterone le3els.G 1he men with the lowest Aleason scores and slowest growing malignancies had high testosterone le3els a3eraging 7.5 ngNmlJ the ones with the highest Aleason scores and -astest growing malignancies had low testosterone le3els a3eraging only 2.6 ngNml. The men with almost DBK higher testosterone levels fared much "etter. 1hey also -ound that the power-ul and bene-icial androgen D ($ does not con* tribute to cancer, as mainstream doctors keep preaching. $gain at ar3ard "edical %chool,6 doctors -ound that the cancer patients with the highest le3els o- testosterone -ared the best and li3ed the longest. E$ high pre3alence o- biopsy*detectable prostate cancer was identi-ied in men with low total or -ree testosterone.G 1hey said -urther, E$ low serum testosterone le3el in men is associated with a number o- medical conditions, most notably seCual dys-unction, and is commonly treated with eC* ogenous (eCternally pro3ided) testosterone supplementation.G $t the "emphis Ieterans $dministration ospital; the good doctors -ound that elderly 3eterans -ared much better when they had higher testosterone le3els. E#atients with a pretreatment testosterone le3el o- less than :00 ngN500 ml had shorter inter3als -ree o- progression than patients with pretreatment testosterone lC

le3els o- greater than :00 ngN500 ml.G 1hey re-erred to studies as early as 5;<5 that showed the same pre3ious phenomenon. The higher the testosterone levels the longer the men livedJ the lower the le3els the sooner they died. 4n an impressi3e collecti3e e--ort between siC international clinics,50 including >'9$ and 'olumbia >ni3ersity, scientists used the .orwegian 'ancer +egistry to study the -roHen blood serum and medical records o- approCimately 26,000 men. 1he median age o- the men at blood draw was siCty years old. 1hey -ound that the healthy men actually had higher testosterone levels than the ones who de3eloped prostate cancer. 1hey concluded that the idea o- testosterone increasing the risk o- prostate cancer is completely unsupported in any way. "en, this study is the second largest e3er done on testosterone and prostate cancer. ,ou @ust canFt argue with its conclusions based on 26,000 real men. 1he >ni3ersity o- 'hicago and three other clinics 55 -ound the eCact same results. E$ separate analysis o- serum testosterone le3els re3ealed that the higher the pretreatment serum testosterone le3el, the greater the sur3i3al rate. 'ompared with patients with serum testosterone le3els o- less than 8.; nmoN9, signi-icant di-* -erences in sur3i3al were obser3ed -or patients with serum testosterone le3els o- 50.7 to 5:.;, 5:.; to 5<.:, and those higher than 5<.: nmoN9.G 1his means that the higher the testosterone le3els were, the longer the men li3ed, and the better they -ared. E1hese results ha3e important implications -or the design and analysis o- -uture clinical trials o- hormone therapy.G Doctors should be gi3ing men testosterone therapy, rather than Eandrogen ablation. 1hey actually came out and said this in plain words. $t the -amous /ohns opkins >ni3ersity in Baltimore52 more men were studied. )ne group was healthy, one had B# , and one had prostate cancer. 1heir total testosterone (measured in ngNdl) was measured o3er a -i3e*year period. 1he healthy men had an a3erage le3el o- 8:8.5, the B# group only B2<.7, the men with localiHed cancer a3eraged only 7<2.8, and those with metastatic cancer B8<.<. 'learly, the healthy men had much higher levels of testosterone. %trangely enough, the conclusion was, E1hese data suggest that there are no measurable di--erences in serum testosterone le3els among men who are destined to de3elop prostate cancer and those without the diseaseGDDD 1hese doctors simply did not want to admit that low testosterone was -ound in the B# , low cancer, and metastasiHed cancer patients. $ dramatic di--erence o- :B percent certainly should ha3e pro3ed the case decisi3ely. 1hey actually tried to deny their own results. lCi

$t the >ni3ersity o- >tah5: researchers did a uni?ue study in which they compared 257 sets o- male twins. >sing identical twins is a most e--ecti3e means to demonstrate scienti-ic 3alidity. 1hey -ound that the higher the testosterone levels, the smaller prostate glands were. E#rostate 3olumes correlated in3ersely with age* ad@usted serum testosterone.G 1he men with the smallest prostates had testosterone le3els o- 5<.< N <.; N 5<.; nmoN9, while the men with the largest glands had le3els o- only 57.< N 8.0 N 57.2. 1o pre3ent or cure B# , a man certainly wants to maintain a youth-ul testosterone le3el. $ny man o3er the age o- 70 should know his -ree testosterone le3el, and supplement it as necessary. $t the #etro3 4nstitute o- )ncology in +ussia,57 men (a3erage age about 70) were di3ided into two groups o- high and low blood testosterone. 1he -irst group was gi3en 520 mg daily o- oral testosterone undecanoate, and the second 60 mg. 1heir prostates were reduced in 3olume, generally in siC months. E1hese -indings suggest that eCogenous testosterone in middle*aged and older men with some clinical -eatures o- age*related androgen de-iciency can retard or re3erse prostate growth.G (3eryone knows that the gradual decrease in male testosterone le3els a-ter the age o- about thirty clearly coincides with the abnormal increase in prostate 3olumes (B# ). 1he need -or testosterone supplementation is ob3ious, yet doctors somehow canFt see this. >sing oral test* osterone salts was a 3ery bad idea, the doses were too high, and they would ha3e gotten -ar better results with natural transdermal or sublingual testosterone deli3ering about : mg a day. $t the -amous 1eno3us 4nstitute in Wales5B o3er two hundred prostate cancer patients were studied. $gain they -ound that the men with the lowest testosterone levels had the poorest prognosis and died the soonest. E9ow concentrations o- testosterone in plasma at the time o- diagnosis related to a poor prognosis. #atients who died within one year o- diagnosis had the lowest mean plasma le3els o- this steroid.G 1hey went on to repeat, E1he results o- this study suggest that low plasma testosterone concentrations in men with prostatic carcinoma at the time o- initial diagnosis is associated with a poor prognosis. 1he highest le3els o- plasma testosterone were -ound in those patients who subse?uently sur3i3ed the longest.G 1his study was done almost twenty years ago, and was published in a ma@or @ournal. Why are doctors still castrating men with scalpels and toCic chemicals to destroy their testosteroneM $t the >ni3ersity o- 'onnecticut58 doctors ga3e elderly, hypo* gonadal (low testosterone) men either transdermal testosterone (the natural and correct way) or in@ections o- testosterone salts (the lCii

unnatural and wrong way), -or se3eral months. 1hey -ound, E1here were no ill e--ects on prostate siHe, symptoms, or prostate speci-ic antigen T#%$U le3el.G 4- they had measured more health parameters they would ha3e -ound that the men responded well o3erall, and got many bene-its -rom raising their testosterone. 4- testosterone has negati3e e--ects (as ;;.; percent o- the worldFs doctors belie3e), then they would ha3e enlarged their prostates, raised their #%$s, and gotten high rates o- cancer* since basically all men o3er se3enty already ha3e growing cancer cells in their prostates. 1hese sacred belie-s were -urther dispro3ed with the low*testosterone (hypogonadal), elderly men who were gi3en supplemental testosterone. 1he doctors reiterated, E.o signi-icant side e--ects in prostate tests or symptoms were seen in this study.G $ similar study was done at the Brooke $rmy "edical 'enter in 1eCas5< where older men were gi3en in@ections o- supplemental testosterone salts -or siC months. 1he doctors concluded, E#arenteral Tin@ectionU testosterone replacement in hypogonadal men with normal pretreatment digital rectal eCamination and serum #%$ le3els does not alter #%$ or #%$ 3elocity beyond established non*treatment norms.G 4- testosterone causes prostate problems, ob3iously their #%$ le3els would ha3e gone up dramatically. 1he doctors should ha3e used natural transdermal or sublingual testosterone, but still the men generally bene-ited -rom the therapy. $ ?uarter o- a century ago at the Aranada "edical &acility,56 men with B# were studied and compared with healthy men o- the same age group. 1hey -ound that the men with B# had a 7:K lower testosterone le3el than the normal men. 1he men with B# had an a3erage le3el o- only 2.: ngNml, while the healthy menFs le3els a3eraged 7.0 ngNml. )b3iously 7: percent is a 3ery dramatic di--erence, and pro3es again that low testosterone causes prostate disease. E1he testosterone concentration in the B# group was sig* ni-icantly lower than that o- the healthy control group.G 1he authors were also well aware that estradiol rises strongly in men as they age, and that estradiol supplementation causes abnormal growth in the prostate gland. $ll this twenty*-i3e years ago in a ma@or @ournal, yet ignored today. 1his isnFt recent news. $t the +oyal 9ondon ospital5; doctors did a stunning re3iew o- thirty*-our studies, complete with -i-ty*-i3e re-erences, and re3ealed that the uggins testosterone EdogmaG has been completely unsupported by science -or the last siCty years. E,et there has so -ar been no conclusi3e e3idence, despite thirty*-our studies, that le3els o- circulating testosterone in indi3iduals de3eloping prostate cancer are higher than in controls.G 1hey ?uoted other studies= E1hree o3er3iews pro3ided similar e3idence lCiii

that there is no signi-icant di--erence in mean testosterone le3els between patients and control.G 1hey went on to say, E&irstly, prostate cancers arising in men with low serum testosterone le3els are more malignant and -re?uently unresponsi3e to hormones Te.g. estrogenU.G ,et doctors continue to walk in darkness. $t the .ational 'ancer 4nstitute in "aryland20 men with prostate cancer were studied and compared to healthy controls. )n the sur-ace, the testosterone le3els appeared the same. owe3er, the testosterone*to*estradiol ratios in healthy men were higher, at <.00, compared to 8.86 in the cancer patients (higher is good, since testosterone should dominate estradiol.) 1he testosterone*to* estradiol ratio is @ust as important as the actual -ree testosterone le3el itsel-. $s men age, their testosterone le3els -all, and their estrogen le3els actually become higher than women o- the same ageD (strogen, instead o- testosterone, becomes dominant. $t the Beth 4srael ospital in .ew ,ork 'ity25 researchers studied men -or thirteen di--erent hormones (or their metabolites) to determine which ones contributed to the growth o- their carcinomas. 1hey -ound that the a3erage cancer patient had a low testosterone le3el o- about :B0 ngNdl, compared to the healthy controlsF much higher le3els o- about 7B0 ngNdl. 4n the men under siCty*-i3e, the di--erence was much more dramatic, with le3els o262 ng in cancer patients compared to 7:7 ng -or the healthy controls o3er B0 percent higher testosterone in healthy men without cancer. 1he researchers were 3ery reluctant to admit what they -ound* it contradicted their dogma. They also found that the cancer patients had much lower :HG+ levels as well. 1he estrone le3els were also clearly Emarkedly higherG in cancer patients. "ore proo- that it is estrogens, and not the androgens D ($ and testosterone, that cause malignancy. 1he internationally renowned !arolinska 4nstitute in %weden22 studied 2,700 cancer patients and -ound that the prostate cancer patients had 6 percent lower testosterone than healthy controls. #rostate cancer is the leading cause o- male cancer deaths in %weden, mainly due to high*-at diets. 1he conclusion was, Testosterone levels were lower in patients with cancer than in controls.) $gain, we see that high, youth-ul testosterone le3els help pre3ent cancer. $gain, at the >ni3ersity o- >tah, the same doctors2: studied the brothers o- men with prostate cancer and -ound they had -our times the chance o- also getting cancer. 1hey saw that the high*risk brothers had much lower testosterone le3els than healthy controls. E1he obser3ation o- a lower rather than higher plasma testosterone lCi3

content in men at risk -or the cancer might indicate that tissue responsi3eness is supranormal.G 1hey also -ound a much lower testosterone*to*estradiol ratio, which demonstrated estrogen dom* inance, with rising estradiol and -alling testosterone. 1he controls had a desirable 582.B=5 ratio, while cancer patients had only a 5:2.B ratio. 1his ratio is @ust as important as the -ree testosterone le3el itsel-. 1wenty years ago, at the >ni3ersity o- elsinki27 hormones were measured in men with B# or prostate cancer, against healthy controls. 1he -ree testosterone le3els o- the B# patients a3eraged only :05 pmolN9, the cancer patients @ust 27; pmolN9, while the healthy men had a high :60 le3el. 1he healthy men had low estradiol le3els o- only B:.B pmolN9, while the B# patients had a stunning 5:<.7 pmolN9, and the cancer patients 6:.<. 1he healthy men had testosterone*to*estradiol ratios o- <.5=5 (high is good), while the B# men had 2.2, and the cancer patients only :.0. 1he poor doctors still couldnFt -igure out that eCcess estrogens cause prostate disease, while high, youth-ul testosterone le3els pre3ent and cure it. &i-ty years ago (a hal-*centuryD) at Boston >ni3ersity2B doctors studied men on testosterone therapy to see what e--ect it had on their prostates. 1hese sub@ects had used testosterone propionate in@ections (doctors really didnFt know any better at the time) -or -our years. ealthy controls o- the same age were compared. 1he men who were on testosterone therapy had less palpable irregularities and less hypertrophy than the healthy controls. (3en using the wrong kind o- testosterone resulted in better prostate health, -ewer irregularities, and less B# . 1hey concluded, E4n this study, there was no e3idence that testosterone propionate in the dosage used had initiated carcinoma or acti3ated latent carcinoma o- the prostate gland.G $ctually, they -ound less prostate disease oall kinds in testosterone*supplemented men. 1his is a hal- century agoD $t the .ational #ublic ealth 4nstitute in &inland,28 doctors based their study on 82,770 &innish men to see i- testosterone and its precursor, androstenedione, increased prostate cancer rates. 1hey concluded, E1here was no association TdetectedU between serum testosterone or androstenedione concentrations and the occurrence o- subse?uent prostate carcinoma in the total study population or in subgroups, based on age TorU body mass indeC TB"4U.G 1he actual numbers showed that healthy men had ==K higher androstenedione than the cancer patients. 1hey -urther said, E1he results o- the current study do not appear to corroborate the hypothesis that serum testosterone or androstenedione are lC3

causes o- the subse?uent occurrence o- prostate carcinoma.G 1his is the largest study on record based on 82,770 men. ,ou simply cannot dispute the results o- a study this big. $t the 4nternational $gency -or +esearch on 'ancer, in &rance,2< doctors did a 3ery impressi3e re3iew o- the literature, complete with two*hundred -orty*se3en citations. 1wenty*two ma@or studies -rom around the world were analyHed in great detail. 1hey came right out and said, WG$ -irst conclusion o- this re3iew is that, taken together, epidemiological studies ha3e pro3ided little support -or the hypothesis that prostate cancer risk is increased in men with ele3ated total or bioa3ailable testosterone.G 1hey did, howe3er, -ind that ele3ated 4A&*5 (insulin*like growth -actor) le3els were clearly correlated with prostate disease. $ re3iew otwenty*two other studies pro3es testosterone is prostate healthy. $t >mea >ni3ersity ospital in %weden26 almost :,000 men, both with and without prostate cancer, were studied -or their blood androgen le3els. The men with the highest levels of testosterone had the least rates of cancer, while the men with the lowest le3els o- testosterone had the highest rates o- cancer. 1he doctors were stunned at the results, since they clearly started out to pro3e, Eandrogens stimulate prostate cancer in 3i3o and in 3itro.G 1hey began with a bias against testosterone and had to re3erse themsel3es due to their own -indings. $gain, at ar3ard "edical %chool2; doctors really took a big risk in going against the pre3ailing negati3e 3iew o- testosterone and prostate health. 1hey took <B men with low testosterone, 20 owhom had a precancerous condition called Eprostatic intraepithelial neoplasiaG or #4.. 1hey ga3e all o- these men supplemental testosterone -or one year knowing that the pre3ailing medical opinion is that the twenty men with #4. should be eCpected to get outright cancer o- the prostate. )- course nothing o- the sort happened. 1he men were in much better mental and physical health a-ter raising their testosterone le3els to normal ones and their prostate glands prospered ha3ing the testosterone they needed. Ai3e these doctors a lot o- credit here -or courage. $t 1aipei Ieterans ospital:0 ninety*siC men with ad3anced metastatic prostate cancer were studied -or their hormone le3els including testosterone, 9 , &% , and prolactin. 1hey were di3ided into two groups based on their testosterone le3els. Aroup 5 had << percent higher testosterone le3els than group 2. Aroup 5, who -ared the best, had the highest testosterone le3els. Aroup 2, the ones whose cancer grew ?uickly, had the lowest testosterone le3els. 1he doctors concluded, E igher testosterone and lower 9 , &% and lC3i

prolactin le3els were good prognostic -actors -or patients with metastatic prostate cancer undergoing hormonal treatment, irrespecti3e o- tumor grading.G 1hese same doctors still insisted on using ablation EtherapyG to destroy their testosterone to castrate le3els. 4ncredibleD .one so blind as those who re-use to see. )3er a ?uarter century ago at the -amous 1eno3us 4nstitute -or 'ancer +esearch in Wales:5 doctors -ound out that low testosterone was clearly correlated with "oth -PH and prostate cancer. 1hey actually tried to deny this -act, in spite o- the blood tests they hadD 1his pro3es the medical pro-ession is more interested in keeping the status ?uo than -inding the truth. The healthy men had =A percent higher testosterone levels than the men with prostate cancer, yet they tried to claim these le3els Gwere not signi-icantly di--erent.G 5< percent is 3ery statistically signi-icant in any study ob3iously. 1he men with B# also had signi-icantly lower testosterone le3els. )- course they still poisoned these poor men with stilbestrol (a synthetic estrogen) to destroy all testosterone production and make them worse. (strogen causes cancer. $t ,amagata >ni3ersity in /apan:2 a -irst rate study was done with men su--ering -rom B# compared to healthy controls. 1he men with B# had 5; percent larger prostates and a stunning :;0 percent higher estradiol le3els. 1he healthy men had 7; percent higher -ree testosterone le3els and 78 percent higher total testosterone le3els. 1he healthy men had an eCcellent .;; testosterone to estrogen ratio, while the diseased men had a terrible .5< testosterone to estrogen ratio. $gain, the authors actually tried to deny the testosterone le3els were related to prostate 3olume since this contradicted the accepted medical dogmaD 1ruth @ust doesnFt interest them. Way back in 5;65 at the >ni3ersity o- elsinki in &inland :: doctors studied the hormonal pro-iles o- men with prostate cancer. 1he men who li3ed longest had a -ull :: percent higher testosterone (1) le3el and an impressi3e 8< percent higher progesterone le3el. 1he men who died the earliest had :: percent higher estradiol ((2) and :8 percent higher estrone ((5). 1he men who -ared the best had a 5.5 1 to (2 ratio and a 0.: 1 to (5 ratio, while the sickly men had a poor 0.8 1 to (2 ratio and a 0.2 1 to (5 ratio. 1hey concluded, E1he statistical -indings that patients with higher plasma 1 and lower oestrogens (the (nglish spelling) ha3e a good response to treatment also ha3e a logical basis in the a3ailable literature.G &urther they said, E4n patients with a good response, the mean plasma 1 le3el was signi-icantly higher than in patients with poor response.G lC3ii

$t the ar3ard %chool o- #ublic ealth and other clinics :7 men (a3erage age se3enty*two) with prostate cancer were compared to healthy men. The healthy controls had a full @= percent higher levels *average D9=.E ngQml2 of testosterone *T2 than the cancer patients *average 99A.= ngQml2. 1he authors again tried in 3ain to deny that low testosterone was clearly correlated with prostate cancer despite the results. 1his is a 3ery power-ul human Ecase control studyG headed by the -amous ar3ard >ni3ersity. When supposed scientists are so biased as to try to deny their own data, this shows the entrenched dogma in the medical pro-ession is more interested in dogma and tradition than truth and -acts. 1hey actually tried to say that, E1 was associated marginally positi3elyG to in-er eCactly the opposite o- what they -ound. 4tFs ob3ious that most medical doctors are hopeless. $t elsinki >ni3ersity in &inland:B one hundred and twenty* three men (a3erage age o- se3enty*two) with prostate cancer were studied -or their hormone le3els. E9ow pretreatment 3alues (otestosterone) indicated poorer prognosis,G was their conclusion. 1he lower the -ree testosterone le3el, the higher the Aleason score. 1he lower the -ree testosterone the more aggressi3e and -aster growing were the tumors. The lower the free testosterone the more the cancer metastici1ed. $-ter -our years 60 percent o- the men with the higher testosterone le3els were still ali3e, but only 7B percent o- the men with the lower testosterone le3els were still ali3e. )nly 20 percent dead 3s. a -ull BB percent dead. igh testosterone wins again. $t the "unich >ni3ersity 'linic:8 a case control study was done on actual prostate tissue in healthy men and men with B# . 1hey -ound, E1he mean le3els o- estradiol and estrone were signi-icantly higher in B# .G 1hey -urther said, E)ur results indi* cate that the prostatic accumulation o- D 1, estradiol and estrone is in part intimately correlated with aging, leading with increasing age to a dramatic increase o- the estrogenNandrogen ratio particularly in stroma o- B# .G 1hey -ound low*prostate stroma tissue le3els o- testosterone o- course. Binding o- D 1 and estrogens causes B# , while binding o- testosterone is protecti3e. "en, we can go on with studies like these all day. $t the >ni3ersity o- .orth 'arolina:< healthy men were compared to men with outright prostate cancer. 1he healthy men had 22K higher testosterone le3els. $t the >ni3ersity o- 4owa :6 healthy men were in@ected with completely irresponsible amounts o- testosterone salts up to B00 mg weekly. E.o signi-icant change occurred in the prostate 3olume or serum #%$ le3els at any dose o- eCogenous testosterone.G $gain, at the >ni3ersity o- 4owa:; men were in@ected lC3iii

with ridiculous amounts o- testosterone salts up to B00 mg yet, E%erum #%$ is not responsi3e to ele3ated serum testosterone le3els.G $t the amburg >ni3ersity 'linic in Aermany70, men were studied -or their hormone le3els. 1he healthy men had higher testosterone le3els, while the men with B# and cancer had lower le3els. $t ar3ard "edical %chool75 researchers -ound that men with B# had lower testosterone and androstenedione le3els than healthy men, and that estrogen dominance o3er testosterone, as men aged, was a clear cause o- hypertrophy. $t the -amous Walter +eed $rmy "edical 'enter in Washington,72 hypogonadal men got either testosterone enanthate in@ections or transdermal testosterone. 1hey concluded, E1his study suggests that in hypogonadal men neither #%"$ Tmembrane antigenU nor #%$ eCpression is testosterone dependent.G $t the "oscow "edical 4nstitute,7: they clearly -ound that, E4n normal men o3er siCty years old, the plasma le3els o- &% T-ollicle*stimulating hormoneU and estradiol were higher, and those o- prolactin, testosterone, and estriol Tthe Esa-eG estrogenU were lower than those o- normal men.G 4n mainland 'hina77 doctors -ound, E1he serum le3el o- testosterone was less and that o- prolactin was greater in B# TmenU than in normal sub@ects.G $t $dis 4nternational 9td, in .ew Sealand7B researchers ga3e transdermal testosterone to hypogonadal men -or a whole year. 1his normaliHed their testosterone*to*estrogen ratios, impro3ed their erectile response, and made their o3erall seCual -unction better. E#%$ le3els and prostate 3olumes remained in the normal range during long*term treatment.G $t LueenFs >ni3ersity in 'anada,78 they did a re3iew o- the literature and said, E1he current e3idence does not support the 3iew that appropriate treatment o- elderly hypogonadal men with androgens has a causal relationship with prostate cancer.G $t the 4nstitute o- +eproducti3e "edicine in Aermany7< men were treated with transdermal testosterone -or up to 1(. years, and Eprostate speci-ic antigen le3els were constantly low in all patients.G $t the >ni3ersity o'ali-ornia at 9os $ngeles,76 racial groups o- men a3eraging se3enty years o- age were studied. 1he $sian men with the highest le3els o- -ree testosterone had the lowest rates o- prostate disease. 'aucasians with the lowest le3els o- -ree testosterone had the highest rates o- prostate disease. $t the 4mperial 'ancer +esearch &und in 9ondon7; men were studied -or their hormone le3els. 1he healthy men had higher plasma testosterone le3els than the men with prostate cancer, and much higher le3els than the men with ad3anced metastatic cancer. $t the >ni3ersity o- "edical %cience in mainland 'hinaB0 'hinese men were studied -or their serum testosterone le3els. 1he healthy men had higher le3els than the B# or cancer patients. $t the >ni3ersity o- 'ali-ornia at Da3isB5 cancer patients were lCiC

studied and the doctors said, E"en with prostate carcinoma and low testosterone le3els ha3e a much worse prognosis. $t .i@megen >ni3ersity ospital in the .etherlandsB2 doctors said, E9ow testosterone was -ound to be a 3ery negati3e prognostic -actor at 'hiba >ni3ersity in /apan.B: again, men with prostate cancer had decidedly lower D ($ and D ($*% le3els than healthy controls. $t the $kademy o- "ediHin in #olandB7 men with B# had lower le3els o- testosterone than the healthy controls they were matched with. $t the IeteransF $dministration 'enter in 9os $ngelesBB doctors admitted that they got no bene-it -rom androgen ablation, no matter i- the testosterone was literally lowered to Hero. $t the $merican ealth &oundation in .ew ,orkB8 black men with prostate cancer were compared to healthy black men. 1he cancer patients had lower testosterone, androstenedione, and D ($, while they also had higher estrone and estradiol le3els. $ 3ery long study was done at the >ni3ersity o- 'openhagen lasting almost -i3e yearsB< using two*hundred -orty*-i3e men with prostate cancer. 1he men with the highest le3els o- testosterone li3ed the longest by -ar with the highest ?uality o- li-e and slowest growth o- cancer. 1he men with the lowest le3els died sooner and had a much lower ?uality o- li-e with -aster growing malignancies. E#retreatment le3el o- serum testosterone was con-irmed as ha3ing signi-icant prognostic 3alue on progression*-ree, o3erall and cancer*speci-ic sur3i3al.G $t the +oyal #ostgraduate "edical %chool in 9ondonB6 thirty years ago men with B# were compared with healthy controls. 1he healthy men with an a3erage 7<B ngNml had a signi-icant 6K higher testosterone le3el than the diseased patients with an a3erage 7:6 ngNml le3el. $gain, the authors tried to deny there was any di--erence as the results didnFt -it in with their preconceptionsD Aerman doctorsB; in@ected testosterone salts into hypogonadal men -or o3er three years. (3en though this is the wrong way to raise testosterone, the prostate 3olume did not increase, the #%$ did not rise and there was no increase in rates oprostate disease o- any kind. Luite the contrary, men got dramatic bene-its in many ways. $t the >ni3ersity o- 'ali-ornia in 1orrance80 doctors ga3e natural testosterone transdermal gel to hypogonadal men -or three years. 1he men got dramatic bene-its and, E9e3els o- #%$Q. remained in the normal range.G $t the >ni3ersity o- >tah85 doctors ga3e hypogonadal men both in@ections and transdermal patches o- testosterone and -ound, E#rostate siHe during therapy was comparable to that reported -or normal men. 4n these men treated with transdermal testosterone, #%$ le3els were also within the normal range.G $t the >ni3ersity o- 4owa82 550 men with prostate cancer were studied. 'learly the higher their testosterone the slower the tumor growth and the longer they li3ed. E#atients with a pretreatment lCC

testosterone le3el o- less than :00 ngN500 mlQ. had the most rapid progression.G )3er a ?uarter century ago doctors at the .ational 'ancer 4nstitute8: compared healthy men to ones su--ering -rom B# . 1he healthy men had an a3erage -ull 578 percent higher testosterone le3el than the a--licted men. $t +oswell 4nstitute in .,87 normal men were compared to those with B# . 1he healthy men had 5B2 percent more testosterone on the a3erage than the patients. 1his was also a ?uarter century ago and is hardly news. $t the >ni3ersity o- 1.8B the longe3ity o- men with prostate cancer higher testosterone was Ethe most signi-icant 3ariableG o- all parameters studied in the longest*li3ed patients. $t the !arolinska 4nstitute hypogonadal men were gi3en testosterone patches -or a year. 1heir #%$ stayed the same as did their prostate 3olume as determined by ultrasound88. $t Beth 4srael 'enter8< an re3iew ose3enty*two studies showed there was, Eno causal relationship between testosterone and prostate cancer risk.G $t the 'ross 'ancer 4nstitute in 'anada86 it was -ound that the men with the lowest testosterone le3els died the soonest and their cancer grew the -astest. 1hatFs se3enty published studies to pro3e the point. $t the -amous %loan*!ettering 'ancer 'enter Elow preoperati3e total testosterone was associated with ad3anced pathological stage.G8; $t 'hiba >ni3ersity<0 high testosterone le3els in prostate cancer patients showed -ar less aggressi3e malignancy, and low testosterone was 3ery predicti3e o- cancer occurrence. $braham "orgenthaler at ar3ard<5 -inally called the uggins 1heor a E"odern "ythG. e then goes on to destroy the myth complete with :8 re-erences. 1he 1eno3us 'ancer 4nstitute<2 also said low testosterone is a 3ery negati3e indicator -or prostate cancer. We could go on with doHens o- more such studies but se3enty*two should be enough -or now. (3ery year more such studies are done around the world pro3ing testosterone is prostate healthy. eferences
=. @. C. 9. D. 8. A. E. F. =B. ==. =@. =C. /ancer esearch DF *=FFF2, pp. 9=8=,89 +merican I. /linical %ncology @B *=FFA, pp. 8BD,BE Hu"ei (ike :a5ue Rue"ao =F *=FFE2, pp. @9=,9@ Iournal of ;rology =8C *@BBB2, pp. E@9,@A Prostate 99 *@BBB2, pp. @=F,@9 Iournal of ;rology =8F *@BBC2, pp. =C=@,=D Prostate 9A *@BB=2, pp. D@,DE Iournal of the +merican !edical +ssoc. @A8 *=FF82, pp. =FB9,B8 Iournal of ;rology =99 *=FEF2, pp. ==CF,,9@ /ancer Gpidem., -iomarkers L Preview 8 *=FFA2, pp. F8A,8F Iournal of the +merican !edical +ssoc. @8D *=FF=2, pp. 8=E,@= Prostate @A *=FFD2, pp. @D,C= Iournal /linical Gndocrin. !ed. E@ *=FFA2, pp. DA=,AD

lCCi

=9. =D. =8. =A. =E. =F. @B. @=. @@. @C. @9. @D. @8. @A. @E. @F. CB. C=. C@. CC. C9. CD. C8. CA. CE. CF. 9B. 9=. 9@. 9C. 99. 9D. 98. 9A. 9E. 9F. DB. D=. D@. DC. D9. DD. D8. DA. DE.

#nternational Iournal of +ndrology @D *@BB@2, pp. ==F,@D Guropean Iournal of /ancer @B *=FE92, pp.9AA,E@ Gndocrine esearch @8 *@BBB2, pp. =DC,8E Iournal of ;rology =DE *=FFA2, pp. =AAD,AA G5perientia CD *=FAE2, pp. E99,9D :rugs and +ging =A *@BBB2, pp. 9C=,CF /ancer Gpidemiology -iomarkers L Preview @ *=FFC2, pp. @A,,C@ Prostate C *=FE@2, pp. DAF,,EE -ritish Iournal of ;rology AA *=FF82, pp. 9CC,,9B Prostate 8 *=FED2, pp. =@=,@E$ and Iournal of /linical Gndocrinology L !eta"olism D9 *=FE@2, pp. ==B9,BE Prostate 9 *=FEC2, pp. @@C,@F Iournal of /linical Gndoc. L !eta"olism =D *=FD92, pp. @FA,,CB /ancer E8 *=FFF2, pp. C=@,=D Prostate /ancer C *@BBB2, pp. =DA,A@ #nt. I. /ancer =BE *@BBC2 pp. 9=E,@9 Iournal of ;rology =AB *@BBC2 pp. @C9E,D= -I; #nter. EF *@BB@2 pp. A=B,=C +cta Gndoc. E= *=FA82 pp. 9BF,@8 I. +ndrol. @= *@BBB2 pp. @DE,8= +cta Gndoc. FE *=FE=2 pp. 8C9,9B /ancer /auses and /ontrols E *=FFA2 pp. 8C@,8 Prostate =@ *=FEE2 pp. C@D,C@ I. /lin. Gndoc. !eta". AA *=FFC2 pp. CAD,E= Prostate == *=FEA2 pp. =A=,E@ I. ;rol. =DF *=FFE2 p. 99=,C I. ;rol =D8 *=FF82 pp. 9CE,9@ +cta Gndocrinologica FB *=FAF2, pp. AA,C8 Prostate @8 *=FFD2, pp. 9B,9F Iournal of <urgical %ncology DF *=FFD2, pp. @98,DB +kad. !ed. &auk <<< C *=FEB2, A@,AA Hhonghua (i5ue Ha1hi AC *=FFC2, pp. 9EF,FB :rugs DD*=FFE2, pp. @DC,DE Guropean ;rology 9= *@BB@2, pp. ==C,@B /linical Gndocrinology DB *=FFF2, pp. 8@F,CD /ancer Gpidimiology -iomarkers L Preview 9 *=FFD2, pp.ACD,9= -ritish Iournal of !edicine 9 *=FA=2, pp. CF=,F9 Hejishu =8 *=FFC2, pp. 89F,D@ /ancer EC *=FFE2, pp.==AB,AC /ancer 8D *=FFB2, pp. @ADE,8= Guropean Gurology 9A *@BBD2, pp. DDA,8C +kad. !ed. -ialymstoku <upp. 9@ *=FE92, p. =A Iournal of ;rology FF *=F8E2, p. AEE,F@ /ancer esearch 9@ *=FE@2, pp. CE89,8F <cand. I. ;rol. &ephrol. =DA *=FF92 pp. 9=,A -ritish Iournal of ;rology 9F *=FAA2 pp. D9=,9

lCCii

DF. 8B. 8=. 8@. 8C. 89. 8D. 88. 8A. 8E. 8F. AB. A=. A@.

Iournal of +ndrology @C *@BB@2 pp. 9=F,@D +ging !ale 8 *@BBC2 pp.@BA,== ;rology 9F *=FFA2 pp. =F=,8 Iournal of ;rology =9= *=FEF2 pp. ==CF,9@ <urgical Forum @E *=FAA2 pp. D8E,F %ncology CA *=FEB2 pp. 98,D@ ;rology CC <upp. *=FEF2 pp. DC,8 Iournal of ;rology =DD *=FF82 pp. =8B9,E &ew Gngland Iournal of !edicine CDB *@BB92 pp.9E@,F@ Iournal of ;rology =98 *=FF=2 pp. CA@,8 Iournal of ;rology =AC *@BBD2 pp. =FCD,A Guropean ;rology D= *@BBA2 pp. CAD,EB Guropean ;rology DB *@BB82 pp. FCD,CF Prostate A *=FED2 pp. =C=,9=

Chapter 1$ Estro1ens
"en and women ha3e eCactly the same hormones, only in di--erent amounts. 1here is no EestrogenG per seJ estrogen is merely a con3enient term to use when re-erring to the class ohormones collecti3ely known as estrogens. "en ha3e smaller amounts o- estrogen than women until the age o- -i-ty, when male le3els begin to rise. &emale le3els -all a-ter menopause, so middle* aged men commonly ha3e more estrogen than womenD 1his is a dangerous situation ob3iously, as menFs testosterone*to*estrogen ratio becomes re3ersed. 1he re3ersal o- this ratio is a ma@or key to understanding not only prostate disease, but many other male illnesses, including cardio3ascular health, low immunity, gynecomastia (male breast growth), abdominal -at, cancer, baldness, and many o- the other ills o- aging men. High estradiol and estrone cause prostate disease. 1here are actually three basic estrogens= estradiol or (2 (the most power-ul and most carcinogenic)J estrone or (5J and estriol or (: (the weakest, sa-est, and most bene-icial). (stradiol and estrone comprise about 20 percent o- human estrogen and estriol about 60 percent. )3er the last thirty years there ha3e been doHens o- studies showing the harm-ul e--ect o- eCcessi3e estrogen in aging males caused by the re3ersed androgen*to*estrogen ratio (including androstenedione and D ($, in addition to testosterone) 0 the main key to prostate disease. 4t is beyond the scope o- this book, and would likely bore the reader, to list and discuss these doHens o- studies. We will pick twenty o- them to ?uickly pro3e lCCiii

the point that testosterone is your -riend, and eCcess estrogen is your enemy, and that the re3ersal o- the androgen*to*estrogen ratio is the most important insight we ha3e into prostate disease. 1here are many, many other such studies. $t the >ni3ersity o- Alasgow in %cotland (-iochemical Iournal 3 528, 5;<2) estradiol was added to human B# and cancerous prostate tissue, completely changing the metabolism, clearance, and uptake rates o- testosterone and androstenedione, and also increasing the uptake o- D 1 (dihydrotestosterone). D 1 binding to the prostate is the main concern in prostate disease, and not simply D 1 serum le3els. $t the >ni3ersity o- Iienna (Jiener 0linische Joschenschrift 3 550, 5;;6) twenty*three clinical trials spanning -i-teen years were re3iewed. 1hey -ound that estrogen (not testosterone) suppression was the proper treatment -or B# . E1he estrogen suppression Q is considered as an e--icient pharmacotherapeutic strategy in the medical treatment o- uncomplicated B# .G 1hese good doctors should go a little -urther and realiHe that testosterone supplementation is the neCt step. $t %trangeways +esearch 9aboratories in (ngland (Iournal of Gndocrinology 3 <7, 5;<<) estradiol stimulated the uptake oD 1 in both human B# and cancerous prostate tissue. $gain, at the same lab estradiol was added to human B# and prostate cancer cells. E(stradiol stimulated D 1, but not androstenedione or testosterone uptake by B# cells. 1he e--ects o- estradiol on carcinoma cells were similar to those o- B# cells.G 1he harm-ul D 1 binds to the prostate instead o- the health-ul androstenedione and testosterone. $t the >ni3ersity o- )ulu in &inland (Iournal of. Gndocrin, ology 3 <5, 5;<8) estradiol gi3en to men raised both their % BA (seC hormone binding globulin) and their bound -ree testosterone, thereby lowering a3ailable testosterone in men with prostate cancer. $t the >ni3ersity o- Bonn in Aermany (Hormone !eta"olic esearch 3 55, 5;<;) men with B# were -ound to ha3e high estrone le3els, which eCcessi3ely bound to their prostates. $t %abbatsberg ospital in %weden (<candinavian Iournal of ;rology 3 57, 5;60) estrone was -ound to con3ert into the more dangerous and carcinogenic estradiol, in human B# tissue. 4n studies per-ormed at the >ni3ersity o- amburg in Aermany (Iournal of <teroid -iochemistry 3 5;, 5;6:) men with B# were -ound to ha3e eCcessi3e estradiol in their prostates, high lCCi3

B*alpha*reductase acti3ity, and increased D 1 accumulation. $gain we see that D 1 binding (not serum le3els) to the prostate gland is a central concern. $t the $merican ealth &oundation in .ew ,ork (Prostate 3 B, 5;67) high estradiol le3els character* iHed the prostate -luid o- men with cancer. $t the Bielanski ospital in #oland ( oc1niki +kademii !edicina 3 72, 5;67) men with prostate cancer generally had high serum estradiol and low serum testosterone, showing the classic re3ersed testosterone*to* estrogen ratio. $t the %loan*!ettering 'ancer 4nstitute in .ew ,ork (55. Prostate 3 ;, 5;68) human B# tissue had more than twice the estradiol concentration as healthy tissue, showing that eCcessi3e estrogen production is a -actor in both B# and cancer. $t (rasmus >ni3ersity in olland (Iournal of <teroid -iochemistry 3 77, 5;;:) researchers -ound that estrogen caused EstrikingG growth stimulation in 9n'a# human prostate cancer cells, which are considered androgen*dependent, not estrogen* dependent. $t the %chering $A +esearch 9abs in Aermany (/ournal of <teroid -iochemistry 3 77, 5;;:) the doctors -inally started promoting the therapy o- reducing estrogen in men with prostate disease, using aromatase inhibitors, which pre3ent estrogen -ormation. 1he idea o- lowering estrogen, as therapy, is admirable here. .ow they @ust ha3e to start using testosterone supplementation as the neCt step. $t Bergmannsheil >ni3ersity in Aermany (Iournal of /linical Gndocrinology 3 <<, 5;;:) doctors -ound high le3els o- estradiol and estrone in human B# tissue, and learned that the re3ersed androgen*to*estrogen ratio, as men age, basically accounts -or B# . $t ar3ard "edical %chool in Boston (Iournal of /linical Gndocrinology 3 <<, 5;;:) three*hundred twenty men with B# were compared to :20 healthy men. igh plasma estradiol le3els were clearly related to B# , as well as to the ob3iously re3ersed testosterone*to*estrogen ratio. 9ow androgen le3els were clearly related to B# . $t the Aenoa >ni3ersity "edical %chool in 4taly (Iournal of /linical Gndocrinology 3 <<, 5;;:) researchers -ound that estradiol stimulated the growth o- androgen*dependent 9n'a# human cancer cell lines by up to 520 percent. 1his contradicts the Etestosterone is bad -or youG theory, as 9n'a# cells are supposed to be stimulated by testosterone and androstenedione, and not by estrogens. $t !iel >ni3ersity in Aermany (Iournal of /linical Gndocrinology 3 7<, 5;<6) doctors, o3er 20 years ago, studied men with prostate enlargement -or their plasma and urinary estrogen le3els. 1hey -ound a clear relation between B# and estrogen le3els, especially estradiol. E1here was a highly signi-icant increase o- prostate stroma in association with higher lCC3

indi3idual estradiol concentrations and urinary estrogen eCcretion.G $t the >ni3ersity o- amburg (Prostate 3 :, 5;62) doctors -ound eCactly the same thing in men with prostate enlargement. E4n conclusion, there is a distinct accumulation o- estrogens in the nuclei o- stroma, estradiol concentration being signi-icantly higher stimulating the growth o- B# .G G5cessive estradiol and estrone are the main "iochemical cause of prostate disease among many other illnesses. /apanese doctors (Prostate 3 72, 2000) strongly correlated the re3ersed estradiol to testosterone ratio that comes with age to B# . "ore /apanese doctors ( insho -yori 3 B2, 2007) said, E(strogen may play a pathophysiological role in B# Qdue to increased estrogen and decreased testosterone.G 1he doctors at .orthwestern >ni3ersity (Prostate 3 75, 5;;;) came to the same conclusion. (strogen dominates testosterone a-ter the age o- B0 in men and is a ma@or cause o- prostate growth. Aerman doctors at the >ni3ersity o- amburg said, Ethere is a distinct accumulation o- estrogens in the nuclei o- prostate stroma, estradiol concentration being higher than estrone. (stradiol could play a pre-erential role in stimulating the growth o- the B# stroma.G $t .orthwestern >ni3ersity in 'hicago (Prostate 3 26, 5;;8) doctors -ound that it is estrogen and % BA that promote prostate growth, and 3eri-ied their results with -orty*nine re-erences. $t the >ni3ersity o- #alermo in 4taly (Prostate 3 26, 5;;8) doctors learned that estradiol stimulates 9n'a# lines, and that Ethe current model -or hormone dependence o- human prostate carcinoma should be re3ised.G 4n other words, the current medical dogma that testosterone is the cause o- prostate disease is absolutely wrongJ it is eCcess estrogen* and the re3ersed testosterone*to*estrogen ratio that is the real cause o- prostate disease. >n-ortunately, it is di--icult to lower estrogen le3els. 1he current anti*aromatase drugs (which lower our le3els o- the enHyme aromatase) are generally dangerous andNor ine--ecti3e. $romatase is the enHyme that con3erts testosterone to estradiol, and androstenedione to estrone. 4t is 3ery di--icult to lower aromatase or to pre3ent aromatase acti3ity, eCcept by the diet, eCercise, and li-estyle changes described earlier, as well as taking D4" (di*indolyl methane) and -laC oil. 4t should be noted that there is o3erwhelming animal study e3idence going back o3er -orty years pro3ing that the estrogens estradiol and estrone are basic contributors to B# , prostatitis and cancer. When you ha3e such massi3e e3idence in animals, especially dogs, you know this is -actual e3en be-ore you do human studies. %cientists should do more human studies o- course, lCC3i

and -inally they are being done. +emember, you can only lower estrogen le3els by losing weight, eating a low*-at diet, eating -ewer calories, eating more -iber, a3oiding alcohol, eCercising regularly, taking D4" and -laC oil, raising your testosterone, androstenedione, and D ($ le3els, and using transdermal progesterone cream. 1he most important -actor here is a low*-at diet, especially a3oiding saturated animal -ats. /ust remember that eating saturated animal -at and being o3erweight are the two biggest causes o- high estradiol and estrone le3els.

Chapter 13 Ho%e Hor%one Testin1

#rostate conditions are largely hormone*based. )ur prostates are more a--ected by hormones than any other -actor. 4ronically, e3en urologists almost ne3er test their patients -or hormone le3els, especially testosterone. 4- you demand a hormone test, it re?uires seeing a licensed medical doctor, getting blood drawn, paying up to P200 per hormone tested, a second o--ice 3isit, and then usually an eCpensi3e prescription. 1he results you get back o-ten do not distinguish between bound (una3ailable le3els) and -ree (bioa3ailable le3els). "ost doctors do not know the di--erence between bound and unbound hormones. 4n -act, most doctors are simply unaware o- which hormones to test, how to test them, and how to administer supplemental ones. (3en endocrinologists are surprisingly unin-ormed about hormone testing and administration, e3en though this is their specialty. ,es, this includes naturopaths, holistic doctors, and li-e eCtension specialists generally. #roteins in our bloodstream called % BA (seC hormone binding globulins) bind themsel3es to the ma@ority o- our seC hormones, making them biologically una3ailable. 1estosterone, -or eCample, is about ;6 percent bound. 1his lea3es only about 2K -ree, bioa3ailable testosterone that actually a--ects our metabolic processes. &or o3er twenty years now, scientists ha3e been able to accurately measure hormone le3els by using sali3a samples. 1his has taken place only in clinics and medical studies. .ow, with technological ad3ances, sali3a samples can be collected at home, and sent to a laboratory -or an +4$ analysis (radioimmunoassay), lCC3ii

at a cost o- approCimately P:0 per hormone. 1he World ealth )rganiHation appro3ed this method in the 5;;0s due to its ease, e--iciency, reliability, and practicality. .ow you can test estradiol, estrone, estriol, testosterone, D ($, melatonin, pregnenolone, androstenedione, cortisol, and other hormones by simply putting your sali3a into a test tube and mailing it to one o- se3eral testing labs. (#rogesterone is best tested with a serum blood draw as it is -at soluble.) %oon, weFll also be able to test insulin, our 1: and 17 thyroid hormones, as well as growth hormone. 'ali-ornia and .ew ,ork ban home hormone testing in order to protect the medical pro-ession monopoly. %ali3a testing is a tremendous breakthrough in both traditional medicine and alternati3e, natural medicine, yet 3ery -ew people are aware o- it, much less where to buy the test kits. )ne would think they would be a3ailable in e3ery pharmacy and chain drug store, as well as the mass retailers. 4t may take years -or such a great ad3ance in diagnostic medicine to become widely utiliHed. .o matter what illness you ha3e, medical doctors, naturopaths, and chiropractors, li-e eCtension specialists, and holistic practicioners rarely test -or hormones. 4deally, a complete scan o- your basic twel3e male hormones is needed. )b3iously, our hormones are eCtremely critical to e3ery aspect o- our health, including mental -unctioning. ,ounger people, who are ill, should ha3e their basic hormones tested. (3eryone o3er the age o- 70 de-initely needs to know the le3els o- their basic hormones. ,ou will ne3er en@oy good health and long li-e unless your endocrine system is balanced at youth-ul le3els. 4t is a little*known -act that men and women ha3e eCactly the same hormones, only in di--erent amounts. We all ha3e the eCact same hormones. Women ha3e the androgens D ($, testosterone and androstenedione, while men ha3e progesterone, prolactin (the milk secreting hormone) 9 (luteiniHing hormone), &% (-ollicle* stimulating hormone), and the three basic estrogens. Women e3en ha3e a prostate speci-ic antigen (#%$) e3en though they ha3e no prostate glandD 1he 3ast ma@ority o- people ha3e no idea what any o- their 3ital hormone le3els are, or whether they are too high or too low. ,ou can ne3er know the true state o- your health, or obtain your optimum health, unless you know your basic hormone le3els and balance them to youth-ul ranges. &or women, estrogen de-iciency a-ter menopause is a well* established myth that is dispro3ed by thousands o- clinical studies around the world. "edical doctors and pharmacists know nothing about estriol * the most basic human estrogen. &ortunately men rarely ha3e estriol imbalance. 4n men, estrogen (estradiol and lCC3iii

estrone) rises while testosterone -alls. (striol is rarely out o- line in men. 1his re3erses the traditional testosterone*to*estrogen ratio, and causes serious problems, such as prostate disease, breast enlargement, baldness, weight gain, heart problems, and many other conditions. "ale le3els o- D ($, melatonin, and pregnenolone -all steeply a-ter -orty. "en really donFt need to test their progesterone le3els. 1hey can @ust N6th teaspoon o- transderm* al cream -i3e days a week. (3en though they ha3e no o3aries, men can ha3e rises in 9 , &% , and prolactin, which can cause 3arious health problems. ( igh prolactin le3els, by the way, are 3ery negati3e -or prostate health, and can only be lowered with diet and li-estyle.) What should a man with prostate problems doM 1est all your basic hormones especially testosterone and D ($, as well as estradiol, estrone, pregnenolone, melatonin, cholesterol, -ree 1: and -ree 17 (donFt bother with 1% or 1: uptake), and any other hormones he wants to measure. $ -our sample cortisol pro-ile is optional. ,ou can get a blood test -or -ree 1: and 17 -rom www.healthcheckusa.com without a doctor -or under P500. ,our -asting blood sugar le3el should be 6B or less. 4- not get a glucose tolerance test (A11) to determine possible insulin resistance. 9ook -or a result o- 500 mgNd9 rather than 550. ,ou must monitor those hormones you supplement at least once a year. 4- testosterone is low, you can go to a doctor -or a prescription. >se a compounding pharmacist -or natural transdermal testosterone creamsNgels, or use 7 mg sublingual enanthate (: mg actual testosterone) drops in oil.. Buy 500 g o- a : percent cream and use a hal- gram a day (5B mg) on thin skin. ((Cpect about : mg o- this to be absorbed). 1his will last o3er siC months. $lways use testosterone be-ore noon, as this is the natural cycle, and your le3els -all during the day. .atural testosterone tastes terrible, so use sublingual enanthate drops. .e3er in@ect testosterone nor use methyl testosterone, steroids, or 'A. 1he patches are 3ery eCpensi3e, and ha3e a 3ery poor (about 5BK) absorption. 1he gels sold now in the chain pharmacies also are weak, o3erpriced, and ha3e 3ery poor absorption. ,ou cannot legally buy testosterone in D"%) solution, but you can make this yoursel-. >se : mg a day on thin skin like your inner wrist. %ublingual and transdermal D"%) solutions are the most e--ecti3e ways to use testosterone. ,ou can buy ;; percent D"%) (not gelsD) cheaply 3ia the 4nternet. Do not use androstenedione or its analogs to raise testosterone. $ndrostenedione is now an illegal steroid. 1here is no way to raise testosterone sa-ely and e--ecti3ely other than sublingual or transdermal (nasal spray are illegal) real prescription testosterone. $ll o3er*the*counter, non*prescription EprecursorsG are -rauds. &or men who are Eandrogen resistantG and cannot use testosterone or D ($, there is no answer currently. 4n lCCiC

-act, androgen resistance is not e3en co3ered in the world clinical literature. 1here may be an answer soon* and it wonFt be estrogen blockers. 4- D ($ is low, dosages o- 2B mg daily should be e--ecti3e. D ($ is not orally metaboliHed by some men (androgen resistance), but con3erted to estrogens instead. "onitor your le3els annually. 4- estradiol (the most power-ul o- the three estrogens) or estrone are high, it is 3ery di--icult to lower them. E$nti* aromataseG drugs, which pre3ent the metabolism o- testosterone into estradiol, and androstenedione into estrone, are dangerous and toCic. ,ou can take 200 mg o- D4" and 5 to 2 grams o- -laC oil daily to help lower your estrogen. 1his will impro3e the metabolism o- all your estrogens and their metabolites. ,ou should also lose weight, stop drinking alcohol, consume less -ood, eat two meals a day, -ast weekly -or 27 hours, eCercise 3igorously, eat more -iber, and Ouit eating saturated animal fat. &at intake, especially saturated animal -at, is highly correlated with ele3ated estrogen le3els in both men and women. 4n other words, you can lower your estrogen le3el sa-ely and e--ecti3ely with diet and li-estyle changes, more than any other method. $ll these -actors work together 3ery well. 4t is commonly belie3ed that testing le3els o- 4A&*5 (insulin* like growth -actor) is a dependable indicator o- actual growth hormone le3els. 1his is simply not true, and clinical studies pro3e it repeatedly. "en with prostate disease are o-ten -ound to ha3e relati3ely high le3els o- 4A&*5 and low le3els o- growth hormone. %tudies ha3e shown that 4A&*5 le3els (which can be tested by sali3a) are not dependable indicators o- growth hormone at all. 4A&*5 is o-ten ele3ated in men with prostate and other diseases. A le3els 3ary radically during the day, especially when go to sleep. 4- you want to test your A (human growth hormone, or somatotropin) le3el you must go to a specialty clinic and get a 52 hour pro-ile at ;=00, 5=00, B=00 and ;=00. 1his is not necessary at all. 4- you are o3er B0 and want to use A , just go "y real world results. /ust go by actual physical, measurable bene-its a-ter ;0 days. $s discussed earlier, li-estyle will keep your A le3el up, and 9*glutamine will temporarily EspikeG your le3el. .one o- the o3er*the*counter A supplements ha3e any legitimacy at all, regardless o- their impressi3e claims. .o matter how persuasi3e the ad3ertising, do not listen to the claims that non*prescription supplements raise A le3els. &one of them work! 1o raise your A you must use real prescription rhA daily by in@ection. 1he traditional way to use this is s.c. (subcutaneous) in@ections with a 3ery -ine needle. %ublingual use is a lot more practical and accepted by some doctors, but there is no clinical proo- -or this. lCCC

1he molecule is too large to use with D"%) -or transdermal use. 1he A molecule chain is 3ery long (5;5 amino acids), and will not go thru the skin intact. ,ou cannot shake or shock A , or it will break and be useless. 1he bottom line is A is o3errated simply because it is 3ery eCpensi3e. 4- you are o3er B0 balance $99 your other hormones be-ore e3en considering A therapy. %earch the 4nternet under Esali3a hormone testingG or Esali3a hormone testG. 4- you arenFt on the 4nternet, get a relati3e to help you or go to your local public library -or assistance. 1hese kits @ust arenFt sold in retail stores yet. 'ali-ornia and .ew ,ork do not allow you to use these kits due to the medical lobby. 4- you li3e in one o- these states @ust use the address o- a -riend or relati3e in one o- the other 76 states. #eople outside o- the >.%. can send these using couriers such as (mory or >#%. "ost o- these labs o--er kits that test 5 to 7 hormones, at a cost o- about P:0 per hormone. "elatonin has to be ordered separately, as it must be collected by itsel- at :=00 a.m. in the morning. 1he time o- day when a sample is taken is 3ery important -or many hormones, as le3els rise and -all throughout the day and night. &or consistent analysis collect sali3a samples -or your 3arious hor* mones at, say, ;=00 $" each time. &ollow the directions included in the kits. +e-er to the 3arious graphs in this book and look -or the youth-ul le3els you had at about the age o- thirty. Iegetarians usually ha3e lower le3els o- hormones. ,ou ">%1 monitor your le3els o- e3ery hormone you choose to supplement, at least once a year. ,ou simply cannot take these power-ul hormones without monitoring them.

1(%1)%1(+).( (pmolN9)

700

I$+4$14). )& %$94I$+, 1(%1)%1(+).( W41 $A( 4. .)+"$9 "$9( %>B/('1% (ndoc. +e3. : (5;62) p.:8<*;B

:00

9(I(9% &$99 80K $&1(+ $A( 20

200

500

lCCCi

3ertical bars represent normal ranges

$ge 20

:0

70

B0

80

<0

60

1his chart shows clearly that ;0K o- men o3er the age o- B0 can, and should. bene-it -rom proper testosterone supplements. +ead my book Testosterone #s (our Friend, a -ook for !en and Jomen.

(#%&$ B(()S *$(M SA*& !((DS P+BLIS%IN! ,--.

No .ore +orse 'strogen@ ARoger .ason <he Supple!ents Dou Need A Roger .ason #en .a)ro,ioti)s 3or A!eri)ans- Roger .ason Ehat $s ?eta *lu)anF - Roger .ason ;ower (holesterol Eithout Drugs - Roger .ason <he .inerals Dou Need - Roger .ason <estosterone $s Dour %riend - Roger .ason 6C:5 &S <he Natural Dia,etes (ure - Roger .ason ;ower ?lood 2ressure Eithout Drugs A Roger .ason <he ADD and A+DD Diet '/panded ADD, <he Natural Approa)h ' e (are Naturall (an)er Disar!ed '/panded >-er)o!ing Senior .o!ents '/panded <he Se)rets o3 Sta ing Doung Eorse <han *lo,al Ear!ing

B 9C:5 &S B 5C:5 &S B 9C:5 &S B 5C:5 &S B 7C:5 &S B 5C:5 &S B 6C:5 &S B 6C:5 &S B 6C:5 &S B10C:5 &S B 5C:5 &S B 6C:5 &S B 9C:5 &S B :C:5 &S B11C:5 &S B :C:5 &S B

lCCCii

2012 Air,orne 2rophe) S!art ?rain <rain R/ 3or (o!puter ' es New +ope 3or Serious Diseases 2re-ent (an)er, Stro"es, +eart Atta)" %l ing A,o-e the *lass (eiling 1ids %irstG +ealth with No $nter3eren)e <he =erti)al S ste!

B17C:5 &S B 9C:5 &S B 6C:5 &S B 9C:5 &S B11C:5 &S B15C:5 &S B17C:5&S B :C:5 &S

&or a complete listing o- books 3isit our website= www.sa-egoodspub.com to order or call (666) 826*6<:5 &or a -ree catalog call (666) .$1>+(*5

Other Books to Rea(

Con*essions o* a <a%ika2e Cowbo)PDirk Benedict +) Beauti*ul Li*eP"ina Dobic Re/alle( b) Li*eP$nthony %atarillo ())#) Re/over) *ro% Can/erP(laine .ussbaum +a/robioti/ +ira/lePIirginia Brown ())#) Live Lon1er. Live BetterP.eal Barnard Turn O** the #at -enesP.eal Barnard Health) Eatin1 *or Li*eP#'+" The Hawaii !iet P1erry %hintani The -oo( Carboh)(rate Revolution* 1erry %hintani The Okinawan Pro1ra% PBradley WilcoC Eat +ore. =ei1h Less PDean )rnish The Pritikin Prin/ipleP+obert #ritikin The China Stu()* 'olin 'ampbell Ulti%ate Anti&A1in1 Pro1ra%PAary .ull Stop the ;nsanit) P %usan #owter The 1":&4ear !iet P+oy Wal-ord +a'i%u% Li*espanP+oy Wal-ord 4ou Are All SanpakuPAeorge )hsawa +a/robioti/s an( Can/erP"ichio !ushi Co%plete ;(iot>s -ui(e to #astin1P(3e $damson 0ui/k #astin1P.athaniel Bronner

lCCCiii

#astin1&The Ulti%ate !ietP$lan 'ott #ast 4our =a) to HealthP9ee Bueno +ira/le o* #astin1P#atricia Bragg +ira/le Results o* #astin1PDa3e Williams #astin1 *or Li*eP/oel &uhrman Health) #astin1P.orbert !riegisch ?en +a/robioti/s *or A%eri/ansP+oger "ason

Seven Steps to Natural Health

With these se3en steps you can cure EincurableG illnesses like cancer, diabetes, heart disease, and others naturally without drugs, surgery, or chemotherapy. 1hese are se3en 3ital steps to take i- you want optimum health and long li-e. Do your best to do all o- them. 1he only step to add would be prayer or meditation. t $merican macrobiotic whole grain based diet is central to e3erything. Diet cures diseaseJ e3erything else is secondary. #ro3en supplements are power-ul when youFre eating right. 1here are only about twenty scienti-ically pro3en supplements -or those o3er -orty, and eight -or those under -orty. .atural hormone balance is the third step. 1he -ourteen basic hormones are listed on page B2. ,ou can do this ineCpensi3ely without a doctor. (Cercise is 3ital, e3en i- it is @ust a hal- hour o- walking a day. Whether it is aerobic or resistance you need to eCercise regularly. lCCCi3

&asting is the most power-ul healing method known to man. /ust -ast -rom dinner to dinner on water one day a week. /oin our monthly ,oung $gain two day -ast. 1he -asting calendar is at www.youngagain.org the last weekend o- e3ery month. t .o prescription drugs, eCcept temporary antibiotics or pain medication during an emergency. (1here are rare eCcept* ions such as insulin -or type 5 diabetics who ha3e no oper* ant pancreas.) 1he last step is to limit or end any bad habits such as alcohol, co--ee, recreational drugs, or desserts. ,ou donFt ha3e to be a saint, but you do ha3e to be sincere.

1he only thing to add to this is meditation or prayer.

$uthor= Ro1er +ason

lCCC3

+oger "ason is a nationally known research chemist who studies and promotes holistic health, natural products, and li-e eCtension. e has written eight other uni?ue and cutting edge books on his -indings. e is heard daily on 5,700 national radio stations ad3ocating natural health. +oger has a -ree in-ormational 4nternet site and weekly newsletter at www.youngagain.org. e li3es with his wi-e and dog in Wilmington, .'.

lCCC3i