Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Overview
N General
introduction to Port State Control N Targeting in the Paris MOU region N PSC tanker inspection results N Mandatory Expanded Inspections N Developments N Conclusion
Substandard ship owner can reduce operational costs 15% Substandard ship owners have little concern for:
! Safety ! Marine pollution ! Working and Living conditions
Paris MOU on Port State Control
Responsibility
N N N N N
State Control is laid down in International Maritime Conventions N Regional agreement is laid down in Paris MOU on Port State Control N Legally binding for EU Members through EC Directive on Port State Control
Organisational structure
Paris MOU on port State control
Maritime Maritime Authorities Authorities Ship Ship Inspection Inspection Services Services of ofParis Paris MOU MOUport port States States European European Commission Commission Co-operating Co-operating Maritime Maritime Authorities Authorities Observers: Observers: ILO, ,, ILO,IMO IMO other otherMOUs MOUs Port PortState StateControl Control Committee Committee SIRENAC SIRENAC Information Information System System
EMSA EMSA
Paris ParisMOU MOUSecretariat Secretariat (The (TheHague, Hague,Neth.) Neth.) MOU MOUAdvisory AdvisoryBoard Board Technical TechnicalWorking Working Groups Groups
Owners/operators Owners/operators flag flagStates Statesand and classification classification societies societies
Targeting
NOperational
database for:
SIRENAC SIRENAC
information about the vessel targeting entering of inspections exchange of messages within the Paris MOU
NStatistical
database for:
ship (not due for Exp. Insp.) TF >50 N Ships due for Exp. Insp. (Annex 1,Section 8.2) in first port after 12 months since last E.I. N Overriding priority N Selection based on Target Factor
Target Factor
The flag State on the Black List N Older (chemical) tanker, bulk carrier, gas carrier or passenger ship N Another class than EU recognized N Age of ship N The first time in the region or after 12 months N Not inspected for 6 months N Detention / deficiencies record N Outstanding deficiencies
N
Paris MOU on Port State Control
Initial Inspection:
N Visit
on board a ship to check certificates and documents (Annex 1, section 2), and N Verify that crew and overall condition of the ship (incl. ER and accommodation and incl. Hygienic conditions) meet international rules and standards. Deficiencies More detailed inspection
Paris MOU on Port State Control
N N N
Other areas at random Check compliance with on-board operational requirements Take into account:
! Annex 1, Section 5 (more detailed inspection) ! IMDG Code ! Section 6 (manning) and 7 (ILO) of Annex 1
Paris MOU on Port State Control
Detention
N With
the first inspection, irrespective the vessels time in port N PSCO should check rectification of serious deficiencies before departure N Report to flag State and class N Inspection(s) costs for the owner N Listed and published
Paris MOU on Port State Control
Banning of vessel
N Jumped
detention N No ISM Code certificates N Failed to call at indicated repair yard N Certain shiptypes (blacklisted flag) with multiple detentions will be banned
NPublished
Ship flying flag State appearing on Black List will be banned when:
! 3 detentions within preceding 24 month period
Ship flying flag regarded as very high risk or high risk on black list will be banned when:
! 2 detentions within preceding 36 months.
N N
Refusal of access applicable immediately after leaving port. Applies only to gas and chemical tankers, bulk carriers, oil tankers and passenger ships.
Paris MOU on Port State Control
C h em ic al Ta nk er 5 2. 9 % 3 4. 4 % 6 4. 0 % 5 6. 7 % 5 7. 0 % 5 9. 5 % 4 3. 3 % 4 6. 1 % rs 5 8. 6 % C a rr ie
B u lk
15% 30% 45% 60% 75% 0%
G as
actual %
G C en a rr er ie al rs D ry P C a a ss rg O en ge the r rs Ty S pe h ip s s R / R F e o f e rig -R r e o ra / te C d o n C ta T a an in rg e ke r rs / V / eh C o m b. C a rr ie
av erage (57,20%)
0%
40% 30%
12 .2 %
19 .7 %
12 .9 %
11 .4 %
10 .9 %
20% 10% 0%
11 .4 %
7 .9 % 7 .7 %
BKR
DNVC
ABS
INSB
RNR
PRS
CRS
HRS
RMRS
LRS
BV
RINA
RR
IS
RS
GL
7 .1 %
TL
average (19,78%)
14 .6 %
are due for expanded inspection after 12 months from the last expanded inspection
Paris MOU on Port State Control
3 Days before the ETA or before leaving the port if the voyage <3 days incl. length of call and planned operations e.g. unloading or repair work. 7 expanded inspection to be completed before ship leaves port. <7 not usually subject to exp. inspection in that port. Notification requirement to subsequent PMOU ports until TF reaches 7. TF calculator tool on the PMOU website.
Target Factor
If not possible for operational reasons: port State passes inspection on to next port of call in PMOU
Paris MOU on Port State Control
of owners/operators on
detentions N Registration of charterers on detentions N Review of disputed detentions N Exchange of information with other parties N ParisMOU Quality Reward System N Responsibilities of others* N Improving selection of ships to be inspected*
Paris MOU on Port State Control
Conclusion
N
actively make use of ISM Code well maintained ships of recent origin motivated, well trained crews choice of Flag choice of Class. soc. Voyage damage Mandatory expanded inspection
Questions ?
Secretariat of Paris MOU on Port State Control, N P.O.Box 20904 2500 EX The Hague The Netherlands N www.parismou.org
N