Original here http://globalpioneering.

com/wp02/uri-geller-and-
sean-carroll-two-visionaries-of-the-occult/

Uri Geller and Sean Carroll: two visionaries of the occult

1. Occult does not exist

I believe that occult does not exist. This is simply proved: Occult means
supernatural. To deny the existence of the occult simply means that nature is
not supernatural.

Principle:

• Nature is not supernatural.

I use the denial of the occult as a principle to prove, for instance, that
Newtonian force does not exist because it is occult.

2. Physicists believe occult exists

For Doctors of Philosophy who call themselves physicists occult does exist.
Physicists believe in the Newtonian force as their faith. Newtonian force, also
known as Newton's Soul, is an occult phenomenon. Therefore, physicists
believe in the occult but they deny that they do. Physicists use their doctoral
sophistry to hide the fact that they believe in the occult. Here's how it's done
by Doctor Sean Carroll of Cosmic Variance.

Sean claims that

there is a regime in which Newtonian [occult] gravity is an effective

approximation, good at least to a well-defined accuracy.

Sean is saying that physics allows an effective approximation of the occult.

Sean is lying.

• Occult does not exist.

• There is no regime where occult exists, effectively or not.
• Occult does not exist and it does not exist as an approximation.

Newton's force is instantaneous action-at-a-distance, therefore, it is occult.

Newton's force is the definition of the occult. Therefore, Newton's force is
occult by definition. Consequently, Newton's force is telekinesis.

PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com

When a scholastic Doctor of Philosophy wants to prove something to you he
would give the concept in question a new label and claim that his label is the
true label. This is what Doctor Sean is doing here. By labeling Newtonian
occult Newtonian gravity Sean attempts to hide the occult in the Newtonian
occult. Then he composes a long post to enforce his label as the true and
genuine label by asserting his doctoral authority.

3. Occult with any name is still occult

We don't need the laws of physics to know that occult does not exist. On the
contrary, the laws of physics allow the occult, as Sean himself declares it
above. And of course, by laws of physics Sean means Newton's laws.

What a nice doctoral sophistry!

Only a Doctor of Philosophy will prove that occult does not exist because
occult laws of Newton does not allow it.

Sean's proof of the non-existence of the occult:

• The occult does not exist because the occult laws of Newton does not
allow it.

Important question:

• If Newton's laws are true, does it mean therefore that occult is a

natural phenomenon proved by Newton laws?

Answer:

• No. Because calling Newton's occult force Newtonian gravity does not
change the fact that it is occult.

4. Physicists' lies are protected by laws of physics

Sean's post reveals that we are up against three centuries old religious
propaganda impersonating science.

Almost everything Sean writes here is a lie. But all his lies are stated in the
well-honed doctoral sophistry that looks like scientific statements to
outsiders.

Everything he says is protected by law. By laws of physics.

So when Sean talks about

PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com

the laws of physics that have been tested by an enormous number of
rigorous and high-precision experiments over the course of many years

you know he is lying. He is invoking the "rigorous high precision

experiments" propaganda to convince you of his Newtonian faith.

How can he get away with such a big lie? ((In the only unregulated
professional industry in the world anything goes. Practitioners can lie freely
and support their lies with their own authority. A physicist is his own judge
and jury.))

5. Academic physics experiments are Newtonian miracles

Let's look at some "rigorous and high-precision" physics experiments.

Coulomb's experiment is one of those "rigorous" experiments of physics that

Sean is talking about. So much so that physicists based a law on this
experiment and called it Coulomb's law.

Coulomb's experiment is said to be an experiments that proved beyond any

doubt one of the fundamental physics laws. Sean wants you to take his
doctoral word for it.

The reality?

Coulomb made only three measurements and in all three measurements

Coulomb himself was part of the experiment because he neglected to ground
himself. No one ever succeeded in duplicating Coulomb's results. Physicists
based a law on three measurements that cannot be duplicated. But they still
want you to believe that physics is an experimental science.

Coulomb's experiment is not an experiment because Coulomb used a gadget

as a false witness to justify his Newtonian faith and called it an "experiment."

Using gadgets as false witness to verify Newton's lies is the oldest

experimental tradition in physics.

Coulomb's experiment is one of many Newtonian miracles faithful physicists

like Sean has been selling to you as impeccable physics experiments.

6. Cavendish experiment is also a miracle

More examples? Take the Cavendish experiment which was based on only 17
measurements spread out over one year.

PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com

Cavendish set up his pendulum in a shed in his backyard and left it there for
a year. He calibrated it once when he first set it up. Anyone who ever worked
with a torsion pendulum knows how sensitive an instrument that is. In one
year the copper wire sagged, the beam bended, the distances between
weights changed, but Cavendish merrily went on making measurements
without calibration.

Physicists labeled Cavendish experiment one of the most precise experiments

ever conducted by the human race and defined it to be the first
measurement of the sacred Newtonian constant G.

If force is occult and does not exist and cannot be measured then physicists
will overrule nature and define an experiment as the proof of its existence.

Physicists are corrupters of experiments in the name of Newton.

Observation:

• Physicists overrule nature to enforce their Newtonian faith.

7. Physics of Uri Geller

Now you see what kind of liars physicists are. You know what type of lies
Sean's article contain. The article is Newtonian polemics written to defend
Newton's sacred authority. Why does Newton's authority need to be
defended? Who is impinging on Newton's authority? Uri Geller.

Uri Geller is someone who claims to possess an occult force just like
Newton's force.

You cannot do that. Occult belongs to Newtonian physics. How can Uri Geller
who is not even a physicist claim to posses the same force invented by
Newton?

8. Question physicists' occult doctrines

Go back and read the post again and question every statement Sean makes.
Don't take his word whenever he repeats three centuries old Newtonian
propaganda as if they were god given truths.

When he says Newtonian force is an experimental quantity ask what

experiment proved it? When he says Cavendish experiment ask how can such
a sloppy experiment prove anything. When he says well it was later proved
by such and such experiment then ask again: Did you repeat the
experiment? Or are you repeating the physics mythology.

PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com

Sean cites an experiment by Eot-Wash group. This is not an experiment
but the opinion of the authors. The faithful measured the oscillations of an
oscillator and then associated the period with a speculation. Yet another
gadget witnessing Newtonian faith.

This is not an experiment but an opinion because no one ever duplicated that
experiment. And no one can. The published article does not include enough
information to duplicate the experiment. This is fraud.

9. Uri and Sean: visionaries of the occult

Why is spoon bending telekinesis but instantaneous action-at-a-distance is

not? Newton's force is action-at-a-distance therefore it must be telekinesis.
Sean claims Newtonian occult was proved experimentally but he chides Uri
Geller for believing in the occult.

Conclusion:

• Telekinesis according to physicists is an experimental fact.

What does it mean to say that the occult Newtonian force works in certain
situations? Or in Sean's Doctoral sophistry, what does it mean to say that the
Newtonian occult works well as "an effective approximation" in certain
"regimes?" Does he claim that the Gellerian occult that bends spoons also
works in certain regimes?

Uri sees non-existing occult forces between himself and the spoon and Sean
sees non-existing occult forces between the spoon and the earth. What is the
difference?

The two species of occult:

• Uri's occult: occult acts between spoon and Uri

• Sean's occult: occult acts between spoon and Earth

The force in both cases is the same occult force. The only difference is that
Sean is a Doctor of Philosophy. Uri Geller is not a Doctor of Philosophy.
Otherwise both are selling the same snake oil.

10. Free science from Doctor's religious doctrines

Sean put together a post to defeat telekinesis by Newtonian occult. Since

both forces are occult Sean uses his Doctoral authority to tell you that his
occult is science but Uri Geller's occult is occult.

PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com

At least Uri Geller is honest. Sean has been actively indoctrinating
American students with an 18th century British occult religion. The British
had been kicked out of these shores just about the time Newton was
designing his occult laws. British re-invaded the continent as the colonizers of
the mind with their Newtonian religion.

It is not a crime to believe in the occult. But it is a scientific crime to use

Doctoral authority to enforce occult Newtonian religion as scientific truth.
This is what Doctor Sean Carroll is doing.

PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com