Cooperative learning rests on the assumption that students learn best in groups. The most common cooperative learning method is STAD (student teams-achievement division) teachers need to help students learn how to work in a group.
Cooperative learning rests on the assumption that students learn best in groups. The most common cooperative learning method is STAD (student teams-achievement division) teachers need to help students learn how to work in a group.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Cooperative learning rests on the assumption that students learn best in groups. The most common cooperative learning method is STAD (student teams-achievement division) teachers need to help students learn how to work in a group.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
cooperative, the summative assessment is generally individual, in order to see whether students have effectively learned from their work and can apply that knowledge on their own. Cooperative learning rests on the assumption that students learn best in groups, able to work with the material themselves, but have peers to help as they get stuck. Regardless of discipline, there are five major components of cooperative learning: 1) Students understand (and teachers enforce) the idea that they sink or swim together 2) Face-to-face interaction to promote progress toward group goals. 3) Individual accountability to achieve group goals. 4) Using interpersonal skills often. 5) Regular group processing to improve effectiveness. How does it work? The most common and well- researched cooperative learning method is STAD (Student Teams-Achievement Division) 1) Teacher introduces subject/concept and why it is important. If the problem(s) need more background information, they present that as well. 2) Students work in heterogeneous (in terms of cognitive ability, linguistic background, funds of knowledge, cultural understandings, etc.) groups with worksheets/answer sheets provided by the teacher. 3) Students individually take a test or assessment applying the concept/skill. 4) Teams are recognized for their contribution to the improvement of members. Cooperative learning is thought to work because of three effects of productive group work. In order for these three effects to occur, though, teachers need to help students learn how to work in a group. Motivation: because the groups success and their peers success depends on each individual, students are more likely to care about and come to school. Cognitive development: Each individual is at a different cognitive stage. So, students can help others expand their thinking, and, in turn, expand theirs by teaching. Cognitive Elaboration: Collaborative learning asks students to connect their previous knowledge in order to explain and explore the new skill/concept, which helps their brain make connections to remember. References Felder, Richard M. and Rebecca Brent. Effective Strategies for Cooperative Learning. Cooperation and Collaboration in College Teaching 10.2 (2001): 69-75. Gillies, Robyn M. The Effects of Cooperative Learning on Junior High School Students during Small Group Learning. Learning and Instruction 14 (2004): 197- 213. Kramarski, Bracha and Zemira R. Mevarech. Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning in the Classroom: The Effects of Cooperative Learning and Metacognitive Training. American Educational Research Journal 40.1 (2003): 281-310. Slavin, Robert E., Hurley, Eric A., & Chamberlain, Anne. Cooperative Learning and Achievement: Theory and Research Educational Psychology 7.0 (2003): 177- 198. Staples, Megan. Supporting Whole-Class Collaborative Inquiry in a Secondary Mathematics Classroom. (To appear in) Cognition & Instruction 25.2 (2007) Whicker, Kristina M., Linda Bol, and John A. Nunnery. "Cooperative learning in the secondary mathematics classroom." The Journal of Educational Research91.1 (1997): 42-48.
Cooperative Learning
In practice possibilities (Mathematics) When learning a concept that involves recognizing patterns, ask the group to work on finding and explaining that pattern. For example, when learning to sketch a polynomial graph from its function, ask students to explore with their group a series of different, yet related, functions and note the similarities and differences. Ask them to find patterns that may help them sketch a graph from an equation or function. o Exponents and logarithms o Algebraic representations of geometry Students work together to learn how percentages function based on different coupons, advertisements, and store signs (provided by the teacher). Students have to agree on which scenario is most cost effective. Groups work to find ways of solving word problems (based in the current unit), and which ways are most effective/efficient.
In practice possibilities (English) To learn the importance and intricacies of punctuation, have groups discuss different ways of punctuating a paragraph to change the meaning of the text. (One example is this letter). This involves some explanation at the beginning of the lesson about the meanings and uses of different punctuation marks. When writing papers or projects, peer editing processes could be done in these groups. When learning about poetry, have groups analyze differences and similarities between popular songs and classic poetry and come to a conclusion how to tell the difference (or why they cant). Ask each group to come up with a topic theyre curious about, and then ask them to determine ways to learn more about that topic (introducing research).
Lessons to bridge math and English Ask students to analyze graffiti art in their community (record types, pictures, language, etc.). Have groups to create a map of the city that shows concentrations/ratios of graffiti in their community, and compare to demographic information of the community. In English class, ask groups to create their own graffiti (in the classroom), responding to the graffiti they found in their community, and addressing demographic information. (e.g. they could decide to put the graffiti in a different area, or use different kinds of language, etc.) Then, students decide how graffiti should/could be used in the community. Prompt students to come up with criteria to decide if informational texts are reliable, focusing on texts that use probabilities and/or percentages. Each student brings in a text that uses a probability, percent, or statistic. Students analyze what the statistic actually says, as well as what the audience is most likely to think it means. Does the common interpretation match the mathematical? Does it match the tone of the piece? What else might readers need to know about the numbers to understand them? Using criteria, decide if the text is reliable. Then, analyze what attitudes these statistics engender. Is this attitude helpful or harmful toward the group/person these statistics are describing? What can they tell us about society in general?