6 views

Uploaded by Bhargav Bikkani

IEEE paper

- 2007-A Statistical Model of Head Asymmetry in Infants with Deformational PlagiocephalySt´ephanie Lanche.pdf
- MA106 - Linear Algebra
- mm-12
- NAS110 V2001 Dmap Wkshp
- Matrix Lec01 Intro
- Differential Equations
- 0413
- Assignment 1 - MATH2010
- V. Quadratic
- Science - Kopya
- Bathe 1
- The Theory of Linear Prediction
- MATLAB 123
- 613_1393682715_cs_mathematics
- System Identification of Crack-damage in Rc
- 2016-Fall-ME501-03-ODE-Part3.pdf
- Weatherwax Watkins Solutions[1]
- 138-750
- m.tech. Electrical Power Systems Full-time-final
- SYLLABUS 2017.pdf

You are on page 1of 3

1021

antennas. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat.. vol. AP-27. pp. 7278.1979. J. D.Kraus, Anrennas. NewYork:McGraw Hill, 1950,chap 7. J . A.Marsh, Current distributions onhelical antennas, Proc. IRE., vol 39. pp. 668-675. 1951. C. L. Chen. Theory of the balanced helical wire antenna, Cruft Lab., Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA, Sci. Ret. no. 12 AFCRL66-120, (Series 3 ) . H. Nakano and J . Yamauchi, The balanced helics radiating in the vol. 11, pp. axial mode. in 1 9 7 IEEE AP-S Inr. Symp. Digesr, 404-407. E. T. Kornhauser, Radiation field of helical antennas with sinusoidal current. J . Appl. Phps.. vol. 22. pp. 887-891, 1951. D. S . Jones, The Theory of Elecrrotnagnetisnz. New York: Pergamon,1964, p. 175. W. L. Stutzman and G. A . Thiele. Antenna Theory and Design. New York: Wiley, 1981, p. 265. E. A. Wolff, Anrenna Analysis. New York: Wiley. 1966, p. 442. S. Sensiper.Electromagnetic wavepropagationonhelicalconRes.Rept.no. 194. ductors, in MIT Res.Lab.Electron.Tech. May1951. T. S. M. Macleanand R. G. Kouyoumjian, The bandwidth of IRE Trans. Antennas Propagar., vol. AP-7, helical antennas. special supplement.pp.S379-386,1959.

Let C(u) denote the steering vector of an n-element array for a given spatial direction u, given by

where p , is the three-dimensional vector of position coordinates of the jth element, u is a unit vector in a specific direction in the three-dimensional space, and c is the velocity of propagation. The transmitted/received signal isnarrowband with center frequency oorad/s. Let WT = {wl, w 2 ,-, w,} be the vector it is clear that the array reof complex weightsof the array. Then sponse in the direction given by u is given by

F(u) = WTC(U).f(U)

( 2)

where f(u) is the radiation pattern of each element of the ar[ -1 denotestheconjugatetransposeofthe rayandwhere complex matrix [ - 1 . The problem to be considered here is the determination of the weights w, so as to minimize (or maximize) the ratio

SURENDRA PRASAD,MEMBER, IEEE

Abstract--A class of array optimization problems is considered i n which we seek to optimize the array response in a specified angular sector. The optimization of array directivity is shown to be a special limiting case of these problems as the width of the specified angular sector approaches zero. The optimum array patterns are also shown to be related to the well-known prolate-spheroidal functions.

,/

a=

F(u)2du

- EU --

F(u)2du

where U denotesa specifiedconicalregionin the three-di2 is mensional space about the main-beam direction whereas ! the solidangle of ahemispherearoundthe mainbeam e.g., using the spherical coordinates, we may have

we seek to maximize (or minimize) the array response in a specified angular section. The maximization would lead t o an array design thattends to concentratethe largest possible fraction of the total radiated (or received) energy in a specific angular region. The minimization, on the other hand, is likely to yield the formation of an effective response minimum in the specified angular sector. Themethodproposedhere essentiallygeneralizes the directivity optimization technique [ 1 ] -[ 3 ] to incorporate optimization of the array gain over an angular sector, thus yielding a diwhole family of solutions. In fact it is shown here that the rectivity optimum solution becomes a special limiting case of the new family when the width of the specified angular sector approaches zero. The resulting solutions are shown to be related to an important family of functions, for the case of linear [4] . arrays, viz., the prolate spheroidal functions

Manuscript received January 22,198l;revised August 14, 1981 and October 3, 1981. The author i s with the Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian 1 Institute of Technology, Hauz Khas, New Delhi-110016, India. 1 As pointed out by one of the reviewers, the use of these functions to antenna pattern synthesis is not new and haspreviously been reported by Rhodes [ 7 ] .

and

Also E denotes the total power radiated/received by the ray, whereas E , is the power in the sector U. Using (2), we can write

ar-

where B is an n

Similarly we have

E = WTA(U)W

u}Wo/C]

where A is the n

.I

x n matrix

exP

lf(U)l2

[i{(Pk-PI)

du.

(8 )

1022

U is given by

a=-

WTAW WTBW

andtheoptimumsolution problem

is obtainedfromthe

eigenvalue

or, equivalently The optimization problem can thus be formulated as one of choosing W so that the above ratioof the two quadratic forms is maximized (or minimized). It is trivial to verify that A and B are both positive-definite I=-lV,-N+ l;-,Nl , N . (20) Hermitian matrices. According to well-known results in matrix theory, the optimization of the ratio of two quadratic Thus in thiscase the maximizing (minimizing) weight sequence to that of is the eigenvector of (20) corresponding to the maximum (or forms of positive-definite Hermitian matrices reduces finding the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the matrix [ 51 . minimum) eigenvalue. The solution obtained above for the case of a linear array AW = pBW. (10) with d = h/2 is of special significance since (20) is a discrete Let p l > p 2 2 p, bethe eigenvalues of theaboveequaversion of the famous prolate-spheroidal wave functions given tion. It can be easily proved that these are all real nonnegative by the eigenfucntions of the integral equation values, To each eigenvalue.&, there corresponds an eigenvec,, I I 2 = 1, such that tor W' = { w l ' , w2', --,w , ' } ~ C

w,'

AWi = piBW'.

(1 1)

Also by substituting (1 1) in (9), it -follows that the value of the energy ratio ~r corresponding tothe choice of theith eigenvector as the weight vector, is given by

(1 2)

Pollak, and Landau [ 41 . The properand pioneered by Slepian, ties of these functions are well-known and an excellent treatment of these is available in [ 41. Using the terminology of the continuous case, we call the radiation patterns,{Fi(u)} of linear arrays corresponding to the eigenvectors {w,,'} (as these two are related by the discrete Fourier transform), the discrete prolate functions. The weighting coefficients (or the Fourier coefficients of the Fz{u)) will following orthogonality relabe called prolate sequences. tions, similar to the corresponding continuous results 141, can be easily proved for these discrete functions:

The

Thus the solution of the maximization (minimization) problem reduces to that of finding the eigenvector of the system (1 1) corresponding to the maximum (minimum) eigenvalue. 111. THE CASE OF LINEAR ARRAYS Consider now a broadside linear array of n = 2 N 1 elements with uniform spacing d and a real weight tapering with weights w k . The radiation pattern of the array, assuming isotropic elements, is given by the Fourier transform relation

N

1,

i=j

0, and

iS;i

= WTC(u)

(14)

where u = (27rdn) sin 8 , B is the angle measured from the normal to the array, and

It is easy to see now that in thiscase we have Thus the discrete prolate functionsFAu) are orthogonal in the interval (-uo, uo). interval (-7r, n) and in the where uo = 27rd/h sin Bo and (-80 < 8 80) is the angular sector is azimuth wherein the energy is to be maximized (minimized), and that

<

For reasons of computational simplicity, the examples considered here are thoseof linear arrays with h/2 spacing. Results for other lineararrays or for other array geometries can be similarly obtained with some added complexity of computations. Table I summarizesthe maximizingweightvectors for a nine-element array (AT = 4) for various values of eo. The radiation patterns for some of these values are plotted in Fig. l . It

For the special case when d = h/2,the matrix B can be seen to reduce to thescaled identity matrix B = 27rI (1 8)

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. AP-30, NO. 5, SEPTEMBER 1982

1023

TABLE I

MAXIMIZING SOLUTION,Ar = 4

0

W1 = (0.3301, W1 =(0.3207, W1 = (0.2848, W1 =(0.1787, W1 =(0.0518,

0.3325, 0.3300, 0.3191, 0.2787, 0.1602, 0.3342, 0.3368, 0.3452, 0.3566, 0.3267, 0.3353, 0.3409, 0.3614, 0.4145, 0.4716, 0.3356, 0.3423, 0.3669, 0.4351, 0.5302, 0.3353, 0.3409, 0.3614, 0.4115, 0.4716, 0.3342, 0.3368, 0.3452, 0.3566, 0.3267, 0.3325, 0.3300, 0.3191, 0.2787, 0.1662, 0.3301) 0.3207) 0.2848) 0.1787) 0.0518)

k1

[I]

[2]

REFERENCES Y. T. Lo, S. W . Lee and 0. H. Lee, Optimization o f directivity and signal-to-noiseratio of an arbitrary antenna array, Proc. IEEE. vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 1033-1045, Aug. 1966.

IM. T. Ma, The#? and Applicariorz of Amennu Arrays. New York: Wiley, 1974. S. Prasad, Linear antenna arrays with broad nulls with application to adaptive arrays. IEEE Trans. Anrerztzas Propagar.. vol. AP-27, pp. 185-190, Mar. 1979. D. Slepian and H. 0. Pollack, Prolate spheroidal wave functions, Fourier analysis, and uncertainty-I, Bell Sysr., Tech., J . vol. 40. pp. 43-64, Jan. 1961. F. R . Gantmacher, TheTheory of Matrices. vol. I , New York: Chelsea, chap. 10, (Translated by K. A. Hirsch). D. W . Tufts and J . T. Francis. Designing digital low-pass filters-comparison of some methods and criteria, IEEE Trans. Audio Electron., vol. AU-18, pp. 487494. Dec. 1970. D. R . Rhodes, The optimum line source for the best mean-square approximation to a given radiation pattern. IEEE T r a m . Anrenfzas Propagut.. vol. AP-I 1. pp. 4 4 W 4 6 , July 1963.

[3]

I

m n

[71

d = h/2, W =

E. FEUERSTEIN

Abstract-Chebyshev-sense equi-ripple response zeros for uniformly sampled antenna and digital-filter apertures may be obtained through means of a simple geometrical construction. This constructionaffordsinsightintothebehaviorof mappedChebyshev polynomial zeros in the z-plane for both normal and oversampled, equiripple stop-band, super-resolution responses.

I. INTRODUCTION

02

OY 0

01

02

+

03

04

05

Fig. 2.

E ~ .

The zeros of appropriately scaled Chebyshev polynomials may be mapped onto the z-plane unit circle by means of the geometrical constructions illustrated in Fig. 1 121, [ 3 1 . In (z) = 0 brief acircle with its center located on the line Im isinscribedwithin the unit circle; the radius of the interior circle is given by

= 2/@1

is clearly seen that E,, has a direct bearing on the beamwidth of the radiation pattern and, therefore, can be regarded a beamas shapingparameter. The relationship is more clearly brought out in Fig. 2 which shows the maximum power concentration ratio a,,, with eo. It is interesting to observe from Fig. 1, that for small values of e o , we approach the well-known optimum directivity solution [ 21 obtained in this case, by a uniform, cophasal array. This is, of course, as expected and clearly illustrates that the present approach essentially generalizes and imbeds the optimumdirectivitysolutioninto a broader class ofoptimum solutions.

+ X,),

where hT isthenumber ofzeros(equal tothenumberof P l , is the aperture samples or elements minus one), and main lobe-to-peak sidelobe power ratio. For a single main lobe (Le., P, = I ) , X , = 1. Super-resolution is achieved Manuscript received July30, 198l;revised January 5,1982.

E. Feurerstein,deceased, waswith the MITRE Corporation, Bed-

also of MITRE, from recollected discussions with, and incomplete notes in partunderUnited left, by theauthor.Thisworkwassupported

- 2007-A Statistical Model of Head Asymmetry in Infants with Deformational PlagiocephalySt´ephanie Lanche.pdfUploaded byDavid Expósito González
- MA106 - Linear AlgebraUploaded byRebecca Rumsey
- mm-12Uploaded bySomasekhar Chowdary Kakarala
- NAS110 V2001 Dmap WkshpUploaded byPierluigi Romano
- Matrix Lec01 IntroUploaded byadi.s022
- Differential EquationsUploaded byNahush Bapat
- 0413Uploaded byDaianeMoreno
- Assignment 1 - MATH2010Uploaded bybgrin7
- V. QuadraticUploaded bykankirajesh
- Science - KopyaUploaded byUmut Topal
- Bathe 1Uploaded byzwozniak
- The Theory of Linear PredictionUploaded by顏志翰
- MATLAB 123Uploaded bySyed Beeban Basha
- 613_1393682715_cs_mathematicsUploaded byAnish Bhanushali
- System Identification of Crack-damage in RcUploaded byJesus Caballero Valor
- 2016-Fall-ME501-03-ODE-Part3.pdfUploaded byRej O-one
- Weatherwax Watkins Solutions[1]Uploaded bykimssssss
- 138-750Uploaded byKaran
- m.tech. Electrical Power Systems Full-time-finalUploaded bytatyarao
- SYLLABUS 2017.pdfUploaded byRohini Mukunthan
- 22_3_repted_eignval_sym_matxUploaded byDaniel Solh
- 52_HHR06Uploaded bynepalamrit
- 70539_07aUploaded byDan Farris
- Lecture 05Uploaded byNebiye Solomon
- US Federal Reserve: ifdp728Uploaded byThe Fed
- Determinants and eigenvalueUploaded byA
- US Federal Reserve: usingAimBetterUploaded byThe Fed
- CB3A2C3Cd01Uploaded byItalo Chiarella
- 2005_ExperimentalForceIdentificationNaturalOptimizationUploaded bybrucemls
- 316-1586-1-PBUploaded byShafeeq Shabaz

- David M.Pozar-Input Impedance and mutual coupling of Rectangular Microstrip Antennas.pdfUploaded byBhargav Bikkani
- David M.Pozar-Input Impedance and mutual coupling of Rectangular Microstrip Antennas.pdfUploaded byBhargav Bikkani
- Tolerance Analysis of Antenna ArraysUploaded byBhargav Bikkani
- 05383712Uploaded byBhargav Bikkani
- Oblique Projection DOAUploaded byBhargav Bikkani
- A Proximal Decomposition Method for Solving Convex Variational Inverse ProblemsUploaded byBhargav Bikkani
- Antennas-Design,Application and PerformanceUploaded byBhargav Bikkani
- A Plurality of Sparse Representations is Better Than the Sparsest One AloneUploaded byBhargav Bikkani
- Finite Element Method for Eigenvalue Problems in ElectromagneticsUploaded byBhargav Bikkani
- IEEE paperUploaded byBhargav Bikkani
- De-Embedding and Embedding S-Parameter Networks Using a Vector Network AnalyzerUploaded bymagicecstatic
- Theory and Application of RF&Microwave AbsorbersUploaded byBhargav Bikkani
- How to Connect Two or More Signal Generators to Create a Multi-Channel Waveform GeneratorUploaded byBhargav Bikkani
- Aperture AntennasUploaded byBhargav Bikkani
- Compact Integrated AntennasUploaded byPramod Doke
- 01144013Uploaded byBhargav Bikkani

- List of Mathematical Series - Wikipedia, The Free EncyclopediaUploaded bypummykid
- PC235W13 Assignment1 SolutionsUploaded bykwok
- Simplifying Trig ExpressionsUploaded bynishagoyal
- Ring-mathematics.pdfUploaded byMohammmed Farooq
- FunctionsUploaded byHimraj Bachoo
- Differentiation of Trigonometric Functions - WikipediaUploaded byjagannivas
- Transforms and Partial Differential EquationsUploaded bypradeepa
- An Introduction to Optimization 4th Edition Solution ManualUploaded byFaraz Hassan Khan
- Combinatorics - proposed problemsUploaded byIon Dumitru Petrescu
- Laplace_Table.pdfUploaded byAkash Fury
- Linear Algebra- Paul DawkinsUploaded bysumeet1417
- 0.1 LogarithmsUploaded bySantosh
- Fractional Integration OperatorUploaded byHenrique Lima
- WorldWide Integral Calculus with Infinite SeriesUploaded byAndrew Knueven
- abstrct algebra6Uploaded byWilfrido Guerrero Palacio
- Exponential Log Functions Paper 2 2015Uploaded byRajat Arora
- Penrose SolutionsUploaded byAcis Ace
- dm-gcombUploaded byKostas Konstantinidis
- Master TheoremUploaded bySrinivas Rau
- Jom Tanya Sifu :15 Days Programme Part 1Uploaded byHayati Aini Ahmad
- 4.1--4.2 math hwUploaded byJets Campbell
- Stirling's FormulaUploaded byAnnisa Zakiya
- Computer Oriented Numerical Methods (CONM)2620004Uploaded bymcabca5094
- ExerciseUploaded bykian13
- Nth Roots ComplexUploaded bySplattttttt
- MATH204_4_10Uploaded byandrewaoun7687
- I. Mezic: Spectral Theory of Nonlinear Fluid Flows Based on the Koopman OperatorUploaded byIgor Mezic Research Group
- Vieta's Formula _ Brilliant Math & Science WikiUploaded byasax57
- l06Uploaded byElisa Romero
- RevisionUploaded byrainbow