Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Organization
Intransitive verbs: a homogeneous class?
(1) a. eat an apple/see him: direct object b. rely on John: prepositional object c. wait for the train: prepositional object d. fall down __ : no object
(2) a. John is running. b. John is sleeping. c. They danced yesterday. d. She didnt fall down.
(2)
a. John is running. b. John is sleeping. c. They danced yesterday. d. She didnt fall down. one-argument verbs
Intransitive verbs: (i) with one argument/mono-argumental/monadic (ii) with two arguments Today: Intransitives with one argument
Organization
(5)
a. The boys ran to the station. b. A lot of snow melted on the streets. c. The stone rolled down the hill.
The stone fell down the road. The child ran to the fence. The child stumbled down a stone. He fell down. The flowers withered in the garden. John left the country.
the role of Agent to their argument, others assign the role of non-Agent
= a semantic difference
Perlmutter (1978) :
A. Unaccusatives [non-agentivity]
Unaccusatives
Semantically predictable?
Task 2
(unaccusative) They ran to the store. (unergative) He grumbled himself calm. (unergative)
So far.
One more semantic difference: unaccusatives: mainly telic events (6) a. *The ship arrived for 10 hours. b. The flowers withered in 2 days. c. The lake froze halfway. unergatives: mainly atelic events (7) a. They danced for 10 hours. b. *They danced in 10 hours. c. *They danced halfway.
and syntactically encoded? < prototypical subject: Agent the argument of unergatives: subject-like properties
< prototypical object: Patient/Theme the argument of unaccusatives: object-like properties
Unaccusatives:
Unaccusatives:
Unergatives
BUT:
(8) a. ___fell the child .
Burzios Generalization: a verb which has no external argument cannot assign Accusative case (prototypical) unaccusatives do not project an external argument they cannot assign Accusative case, not even to cognate objects:
(10) She smiled a beautiful smile. [unergative +cognate object] (11) *They fell a bad fall. [*unaccusative + cognate object]
Summing up
Unaccusatives their argument:Patient/Th
select an internal argument lack an external argument
Accusative case
mainly telic events
in special configurations
mainly atelic events
unaccusatives
unergatives
VP 3 Spec V 3 V DP
VP 3 Spec V DP 3 V ___
The children all laughed. The stone rolled down the hill. She smiled a beautiful smile. The book fell off the table. The flowers in the garden withered.
Perlmutters list
Perlmutters list
syntactically encoded
Types of diagnostics
(1) Diagnostics which show that the argument was
base-generated in the complement position of V (and then moved to Spec IP) < Q: does the argument have the properties of a constituent which merges in the complement position of V?
Types of diagnostics
(2) Diagnostics which show that the only argument of V occupies the complement position of V (it merged and has remained in a VP-internal position)
a. b. c. d. e.
There developed a problem. There appeared a ship on the horizon. There was a boy in the garden. There melted a lot of snow on the streets. There laughed many children in the park.
Task 4
a. b. c. d.
There developed a problem. There appeared a ship on the horizon. There was a boy in the garden. *There melted a lot of snow on the streets. e. * There laughed many children in the park. Intransitive verbs differ with respect to there-sentences
a. b. c. d.
The river froze solid. The door slid open. John laughed sick. John laughed himself sick. e. The river froze itself solid. f. They ran their shoes threadbare.
Task 5
a. The river froze solid. = a resultative phrase b. The door slid open. c. *John laughed sick. d. John laughed himself sick. e. *The river froze itself solid. f. They ran their shoes threadbare. Intransitives behave differently with respect to resultative phrases
Task 6
rusted pipes decayed vegetation recently arrived guest an existed solution a trembled tree
Task 6
rusted pipes decayed vegetation recently arrived guest *an existed solution *a trembled tree
Intransitive verbs behave differently with respect to the ability of their past participle of being used as a noun modifier
Task 7
In the distance appeared a beautiful ship. In the forest melted a lot of snow. In the attic broke many windows.
Task 7
In the distance appeared a beautiful ship. *In the forest melted a lot of snow. *In the attic broke many windows.
BUT: * In the forest melted a lot of snow. * In the attic broke many windows. Not all intransitives can occur in locative inversion structures
Summing up
one-argument intransitives do not represent a
there-sentences locative inversion resultative phrases the ability of their past participle of occurring as a pre-noun modifier cognate object
So far.
Diagnostic There-sentences Locative inversion Unaccusatives yes yes Unergatives no no
Resultative phrases
yes
Yes if [+telic]
no
yes
There-sentences
(1) a. *There smiled many students. b. *There danced a girl in the street.
(2)a. There was a book on the table. b. There remained two students in the room.
Task 1
(3) a. There melted a lot of snow in the streets. b. There dried all the clothes on the clothes line. c. There burned a flag in a corner of the room. d. There smoldered a flag in a corner of the room.
Task 1
(3) a.*There melted a lot of snow in the streets. b.* There dried all the clothes on the clothes line. c.*There burned a flag in a corner of the room. d.*There smoldered a flag in a corner of the room. Unaccusatives denoting a definite change of state cannot appear in there-constructions.
There-sentences
Only unaccusatives which denote existence and coming into existence ( i.e. existence in a general sense) can appear in thereconstructions.
There-sentences
inside verbals unstressed non-deictic there in sentenceinitial position an intransitive (unaccusative) verb the DP argument is placed in post-verbal position/ adjacent to the verb
There-sentences
There-sentences
There V PP DP
outside verbals The domain of outside verbals is not restricted to unaccusatives (typically: unergatives of motion) Outside verbals : not an unaccusativity test
Task 2
(8)There came to his mind her beautiful and intelligent face. (Quirk et al.) (9)Once upon a time there lived on the other side of the forest a monster who demanded yearly tribute. (10)There walked into the courtroom two people I had thought were dead. (11) There swam towards me someone carrying a harpoon. (12)There danced towards us a couple dressed like Napoleon and Josephine. (13) Late at night there crept into the village a silent band of soldiers.
Task 2
There-sentences: so far..
There-sentences:
(i) Outside verbals : There V PP DP
There-sentences Verbs which can occur in inside verbals: Verbs of existence: be, exist, remain, float, linger, lurk, etc. Verbs of sound existence: echo, resonate, resound, reverberate, sound Verbs of group existence: abound, crawl, creep, swarm (14) There lingered perhaps an echo of grimness, and an echo of something else (15) Through my mind there reverberated the words from Portrait of a Lady, Memories of my dead life, and Paris in the Spring
There-sentences Verbs of appearance: appear, arise, begin, break, burst, dawn, derive, develop, emanate, emerge, flow, follow, gush, happen, etc. (16) a.In 1983, there appeared a new study of the issue by Dr R.E. b.Gradually there arose a faint humming from outside the tent as people gathered to talk . c.In 1542 there began almost a decade of fighting. d.At this moment, up in the wood, there broke out an excited yelping.
There-sentences
+ verbs of sound emission (clink, jingle) (17)There ticked a grandfather clock in the hall. + verbs of light emission (gleam, glitter, glow, shine) (18)There sparkled a diamond on her finger. There shone yet another distant sunlit hilltop.
+ verbs of motion (fall, hang, dangle, lie, stretch, swing) (19) There dangles a shiny new briefcase from his hand. From her right ear there dangled a long silver cascade of tiny orbs.
There-sentences
There-sentences
Unaccusatives fall into two classes: (i) Unaccusatives which have a transitive counterpart
(20) The soup cooled. achievement: BECOME be _ (21) John cooled the soup. accomplishment CAUSE BECOME be _
There-sentences
(22) a. The window broke. b. Pat broke the window. (23) a. The sky cleared. b. The wind cleared the sky. (24) a. The door opened. b. John opened the window.
There-sentences
verbs of existence (25) a. * He appeared a book on the table. b. * Her job lived my mother in Boston. c. *The thief disappeared the bicycle.
There remained three men in the room. There stood six statues of the martyrs on the
lawn. There was a moments silence. There followed a great flood of indignation in the newspaper.
.
Task 4: Which of the following sentences are ill-formed?
finger. There withered all the flowers in the vase. There danced many beautiful girls in that room. There dried all the grapes. There lingered the smell of onion all over the kitchen.
finger. *There withered all the flowers in the vase. *There danced many beautiful girls in that room. *There dried all the grapes. There lingered the smell of onion all over the kitchen.
garden. There talked three policemen to the crowd. There melted all the ice cream in the cup. Once upon a time there lived on the other side of the forest a monster who demanded yearly tribute.
garden. *There talked three policemen to the crowd. *There melted all the ice cream in the cup. Once upon a time there lived on the other side of the forest a monster who demanded yearly tribute.
clothes line. There appeared a man in the valley. There swam three boys to the shore. There barked a dog in the distance.
clothes line. There appeared a man in the valley. *There swam three boys to the shore. *There barked a dog in the distance.
Summing up
There-sentences (inside verbals):
(i) Prototypical unaccusatives, i.e. verbs of
existence and verbs of appearance = OK (ii) Unaccusatives which denote a definite change of state: NO (iii) Unergatives: NO (iv) Transitives: NO
There-sentences
Why can only verbs of existence occur in there-sentences? + why are unergatives excluded? + why are unaccusatives which denote a change of state excluded?
There-sentences
A semantic explanation:
there-sentences (existential sentences) are interpreted as expressing the coming into being of some entity and the location of this entity < some early analyses of there-sentences focused on the idea of location:
(26) There is a God (in the universe).
There-sentences
Lyons (1967) it might appear reasonable to say that all existential sentences are at least implicitly locative the sentences containing there express propositions concerning existence, which means that there is associated with the idea of existence. some linguists have analysed it as an existential operator
There-sentences
A syntactic explanation:
complement position (ii) With unergatives the argument merges in the Specifier position
I There -sentences
Unaccusatives
Unergatives
VP 3 Spec V 3 V DP fall
the child
There-sentences
There remained two students in the room. Case position Theta-role position
There-sentences
There-sentences
A challenge:
(27) a. Once there ruled a king who had no ears. b. *Once there ruled a king with an iron hand. = basically unergative = OK = actually reinterpreted as unaccusative
There-sentences
A challenge
(28) a. *There screamed the panther. b. In this alternate world, millions of years ago, there screamed the panther, there laughed the hyena, all was as if in our own sphere. (Kuno and Takami 2004)
Summing up
Internal verbals, i.e. there-sentences = there V DP (PP) = an unaccusative diagnostic (i) They prefer Vs of existence (ii) Unergatives which occur in such sentences are reinterpreted as unaccusatives
Task
There once lived a king who had three daughters. There has just appeared a new book by Chomsky. There danced a student in the hall. There ate an apple the girl. There laughed several students during the lecture. There occurred a tragic event yesterday. There walked two prison guards into the courtroom. There walked into the courtroom two prison guards. There sang a tall woman on the stage. Suddenly there ran out of a hidden crack a very tiny mouse.
Task
There once lived a king who had three daughters. There has just appeared a new book by Chomsky. * There danced a student in the hall. * There ate an apple the girl. * There laughed several students during the lecture. There occurred a tragic event yesterday. * There walked two prison guards into the courtroom. There walked into the courtroom two prison guards. *There sang a tall woman on the stage. Suddenly there ran out of a hidden crack a very tiny mouse.
Summing up
there-sentences allow only verbs of existence
the there-sentences test suggests that only verbs of existence
as prototypical unaccusatives
Summing up
one-argument intransitives do not represent a
there-sentences locative inversion resultative phrases the ability of their past participle of occurring as a pre-noun modifier.