Journal of Modern Agriculture

October 2013, Volume 2, Issue 4, PP.63-68

Application Research of Enhanced in-situ

micro-ecological Remediation for Oil
Contaminated Soil
Sheng Zhang, Li Chen, Cuiyun Zhang, Ze He, MiyinYing, Zhuo Ning, Yaci Liu, Fawang Zhang#
Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, CAGS Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050061
#Email: fawangzhang@sina.com

Abstract
The reduction of the oil content in soil contaminated by the exploitation of oil field in Zhongyuan District that was then recovered
for use has been realized in this paper, through the enhanced in-situ micro-ecological remediation method that is micro-ecological
remediation technique, by which the cultivation of alfalfa is combined with the regulation of soil environmental factors by means
of the enhanced in-situ microbial communities companied with physical and chemical means.

The experimental results showed

that the oil contents in the contaminated soil with the average 2898.25 mg/kg can be reduced to about 99.37% after the in-situ
micro-ecological remediation after the above mentioned recovery for 99 days, which demonstrated the effectiveness of the in-situ
micro-ecological remediation methods for oil contaminated soil in this district, meanwhile, the practical and feasible application of
these methods have been explored in this paper.
Keywords: Zhongyuan District; Oil Contamination; Enhanced in-Situ; Micro-Ecological Remediation

050061

2898.25 mg/kg 99 18.36 mg/Kg

99.37%

Jorgensen
71%[1]
[2]
100 200

[3-6]

[7-10]

2005DFA90200

- 63 www.jma-journal.org

30Km 1991

200m3--300m3 10 30 cm
2m

2--10mm 1.72g/cm316.3%pH 7.4--7.9;

1416mg/kg--18650mg/kg 767.7 mg/kg --5028.8mg/kg
2898.25mg/kg; 25cm--50cm 313.6mg/kgpH:8.5203mg/kg
1 2
1

PT0906--6

(cm)
0--25

(%)
16.3

(g/cm3)
1.72

(g/cm3)
1.48

2 pHECTDS(mg/kg)

PT0906--5
PT0906--6
PT0906--7

(cm)
0--25
0--25
25--50

pH
7.4
7.9
8.5

EC(s/cm)
37300
2846
406

TDS(mg/l)
18650
1416
203

(%)
1.86
0.14
0.02

(mg/kg)
5028.8
767.7
313.6

3 5
1 1 2 0.4 3 0.4 4
0.6 5 0.6 0--25 cm 50cm 4

2.1
MgSO4.7H2O, NH4NO3, CaCl2, FeCl3, KH2PO4, K2HPO4, KCl

MgSO4, NH4NO3, CaCl2, FeCl3, KH2PO4, K2HPO4

QZD--1 KQ218
752N pHB--3 pH DDB--303A

2.2
NO3-NH4+pH pHB--3 pH TDS DDB--303A
- 64 www.jma-journal.org


[11][12][14]

700kg

50L
100kg 50kg

30mm

5
4 pH
NH4+NO3-

4.1
34

2898.25mg/kg 99 18.36
mg/Kg 99.37 %

3 (mg/Kg)
(/)
(d)

2898.25
4

(/)
(d)

7/7
3
159.0

7/15
10
179.4

7/23
18
42.53

8/3
28
40.33

8/11
36
10.05

8/19
44
77.76

9/2
56
-

9/22
76
64.03

10/15
99
18.36

9/2
56
-

9/22
76
97.79

10/15
99
99.37

(%)
7/7
3
94.51

7/15
10
93.81

7/23
18
98.53

8/3
28
98.61

8/11
36
99.65

8/19
44
97.32

4.2
4.2.1

34
95%
25C--30C 1--5
99 99.37%

- 65 www.jma-journal.org


4.2.2

pH(TDS)NH4+ NO3-
5 pHNH4+NO3-

(/)
(d)
pH
(mg/Kg)
NH4+ (mg/Kg)
NO3- (mg/Kg)
(cfu/g)
(cfu/g)

7.4
18650
56.74
28.14
2.5107
1.5106

7/7
3
7.5
1978
631.2
28.3
1.1107
2.8107

7/15
10
7.7
1245
178.49
29.02
1.3106
2.7106

7/23
18
7.7
1030
94.56
29.66
2.0106
2.1106

8/3
28
7.0
1789
142.7
127.71
2.0105
10106

8/11
36
6.9
1080
108.26
503.98
1.1106
3.6106

8/19
44
7.5
943
46.74
52.17
1.4104
5.0105

9/2
56
7.1
445
64.66
82.18
8.5104
1.5105

9/22
76
7.6
848
69.71
68.88
3.3105
1.3105

10/15
99
7.2
92
9.18
322.1
4104
6105

5 pH
pH 6.9--7.7 7.5
pH 6.5--7.5 pH

20%

(TDS)
5

5 NH4+ NO3- 7 5

C:N:P 1mg 3.4mg

1mg 0.056mg
C:N:P
800:60:1100:10:1 70:50:1

(TDS) 5

- 66 www.jma-journal.org

CHONP CH
SKCaMgFe
NPSKCaMgFe

[15-18]

6 pH(TDS)NH4+ NO3-

50cm

(mg/Kg)
2936

pH
78

(mg/Kg)
473

NH4+ (mg/Kg)
14.68

NO3- (mg/Kg)
155.61

(cfu/g)
3.5104

(cfu/g)
6.5104

6 50cm pH(TDS)NH4+NO3-

313.6mg/kg 90%NH4+NO3-

2898.25mg/kg 99 18.36 mg/Kg

99.37 %

REFERENCES
[1]

Jorgensen K S, Puustinen J, Suortti A M. Bioremediation of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soil by Composting in

Biopiles [J]. Environmental Pollution,2000,107(2):245--254.

[2]

Debontj A M. Solvent-tolerant Bacteria in Biocatalysis[J].Trends Biotechnol,1998,16:493--499.

[3]

Sanjee Mishra, Jeevan Jyot. In Situ Bioremediation Potential of an Oily Sludge-Degrading Bacterial Consortium. Current
Microbiology,2001,43 :328--335

[4]

Jose L R Gallego, Jorge Loredo, Juan F L lamas. Bioremediation of Diesel-Contaminated Soil: Evaluation of Potential in Situ
Techniques by Study of Bacterial Degradation. B iodegradation,2001,12 325--335 .

[5]

Widdl E. The Genome Sequence of an Anaerobic Aromatic-degrading Denitrifying Bacterium Strain EbN1 [J]. Archives of
Microbiology, 2005,183:27--36.

[6]

Mar n S, Khodijah Tazaiki. Bioremediation of Coastal Areas 5 Years after the Nakhodka Oil Spill in the Sea of Japan: Isolation and
Characterization of Hydrocarbon-degrading Bacteria [J]. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 2004, 30 (7): 911--922.

[7]

, , . , [J], 2002, No.3, P1315.

- 67 www.jma-journal.org

[8]

, , . , [J], 2000, No.7, P325329.

[9]

, , . , [J], 2001, 20(2):7880.

[10] , , , , [J], 2005, 37(3):338340.

[11] . [M]. :, 1985, 1-353.
[12] , , , [J]. , 2000, No.7, 325329.
[13] , , . [J]., 2001, 20(2):7880.
[14] ,,. [J]., 2006, 25 (6): 1498--1503.
[15] , , . [J], , 2009, Vol, 23(1):P120124.
[16] , , . [J], , 2008, Vol.27(5).
[17] , , . [J], , 2010, P4649.
[18] , , . [J], , 2011, Vol38. No4.
P615620.

1956-

1965-

E-mail: fawangzhang@sina.com

863

30
110 8
2 1 6
Email: zshenghb@sina.com

- 68 www.jma-journal.org