Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Page 1
Water Technologies
Getting Started
Water Technologies
The terms can be very confusing and a considerable number of definitions arrived at Aerated-anoxic Anoxic-aeration Anaerobic-aeration Anammox bacteria
Page 3
Water Technologies
Aerated-Anoxic is not limited to Siemens aeration systems but can be included in any activated sludge aeration processes, such as: Multichannel Oxidation Ditch Aeration tanks in series Multi-pass plug flow systems
Page 4
Water Technologies
Influent
Anoxic Reactor
Aerobic Reactor
Secondary Clarifier
Effluent
4Q
Internal Recycle RAS No air added to the anoxic reactor Nitrification achieved in the aerobic reactor Nitrates brought back through internal recycle at 4Q
Page 5
WAS
Water Technologies
Influent
Aerobic Reactor
Secondary Clarifier
Effluent
Internal Recycle RAS O2 supplied to aerated anoxic reactors is less than O2 demand No internal recycle required for total nitrogen removal WAS
Page 6
Water Technologies
A conventional oxidation ditch with aerobic and anoxic zones is not the same as aerated anoxic reactors in series
O2 supply must exceed demand for complete treatment It is difficult to control aerobic and anoxic zones in a single reactor
Page 7
Water Technologies
Result = 0 DO
For single reactor system It means Youre in Trouble! For systems with reactors in a series, it pertains to the conditions desired in the first reactor.
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 O2 Demand O2 Supplied
Page 8
Water Technologies
Complete Mix
Influent
Effluent
Plug Flow
Influent Effluent
Page 10
Water Technologies
Aeration Tanks Converting Plug flow to Complete Mix Option 1: Add some pipes
Page 11
Water Technologies
Discussed the history of activated sludge innovations used over 70 years ago
Page 12
Water Technologies
Early Innovators
Page 13
Water Technologies
Phoenix 91st Avenue WWTP: Aerated-anoxic system Established that anoxic tank could be mixed with course bubble air instead of conventional mixers Anoxic tank equaled 25% of total volume
Page 14
Water Technologies
Aerated Anoxic Nitrification Nitrification Requirements: Adequate oxygen Alkalinity Adequate sludge age Adequate ammonia Immediate source of nitrates for denitrification Simultaneous nitrificationdenitrification takes place A short-cut nitrification/ denitrification pathway is available Advantages of Nitrification in Aerated Anoxic Reactor: Air did not hurt denitrification.
Page 15
Water Technologies
Ive got a problem with what youre saying thats not the way I learned it!
Page 16
Water Technologies
the low DO reactors are the BEST environment for the nitrifiers
0 0.5
The nitrification occurs where the majority of O2 is delivered.
Orbal DO profile in mg/l
Page 17
Water Technologies
Page 18
Water Technologies
Carey, OH WWTP Case Study Overview Challenge: Five rectangular tanks operating in parallel with nitrification problems. Ammonia level was not meeting requirements Solution: Switch operation from parallel to series. Results: Before (Two in parallel): eff. Ammonia 1.7 mg/l After (Three in Series): eff. Ammonia 0.03 mg/l
Page 19
Water Technologies
Reactors in series improve nitrification Carey, OH WWTP case study Challenge: 5 tanks in parallel with nitrification problems
Ammonia not meeting limits
Parallel
Series
Page 20
Water Technologies
Page 21
Water Technologies
Sounds backwards, huh? Wouldnt denitrification be better with no oxygen delivery in anoxic tanks?
Case Study: Hammonton, NJ WWTP Increasing O2 delivery in aerated anoxic tanks improves denitrification
By increasing O2 delivery in outer channel NO3-N dropped from 2.8 mg/l to 1.6 mg/l!
175
150
O2 Demand, lbs/hr
125
100
75
50
25
0 Outer
Page 23
Middle Channel
Q: With 0.3 mg/l nitrate, how much denitrification is due to recycle? Influent N to be nitrified @ 200 lbs/day N denitrified @ 197 lbs/day N in recycle @ 13 lbs/day N denitrified due to simultaneous N-D @ 184 lbs/day A: More than 93% is denitrified due to simultaneous N-D!
Page 24
Water Technologies
Compared nitrifiers from: 1. Orbal plants with aerated anoxic reactors 2. Nitrification plants with conventional upfront non-aerated anoxic tanks
NITROSOMONAS typical ammonia oxidizer for most nitrification plants, including those with non-aerated anoxic reactors NITROSPIREA dominant ammonia oxidizer for plants with aeratedanoxic reactors NITROBACTER dominant nitrite oxidizer
Water Technologies
Dormant Nitrifiers
NITROSPIREA: The dominant ammonia oxidizer in systems where there is simultaneous nitrifcation-denitrification A nitrifier that is very good at going dormant There are a lot of dormant nitrifiers in our BNR designs
Staging with aerated anoxic reactors in front is a good way to increase (even double) the nitrifier population. Nitrifier population does not exclusively depend upon the amount of ammonia entering the plant. Under typical conditions: 10,000 units 50% active 50% inactive With increased dormant population: 25,000 units 20% active 80% inactive
Water Technologies
Page 26
Nine Springs WWTP: Madison, WI Conventional FB plant with upfront anaerobic tank
Anaerobic
Operates at a 10 day SRT side by side test with one side being aerated anoxic Loading MLSS eTN eP CFM/lb of BOD Conventional: 14 2800 15 0.4 1100 Aerated Anoxic: 26 4100 11 0.2 673
Page 27
Water Technologies
Denitrification Shortcut Pathway 5-step pathway: Ammonia nitrite nitrate nitrite nitrogen gas Explains lack of nitrite oxidizers in Orris Albertsons Phoenix study
3-step Shortcut pathway (in aerated anoxic tanks): Ammonia nitrite nitrogen gas
Requires 33% less carbon
Page 28
Water Technologies
Aerated Anaerobic
It sounds too odd But works in designs with LARGE aerated anoxic tanks and limited oxygen
Page 29
Water Technologies
1.52 m.gal. Aeration Volume per basin Four 50 hp Drives 0.07 mg/l eff. P required Designed for 8 day sludge age 0.5 mg/l eff. ammonia required Only 18% of total basin volume is aerobic
Page 30
Water Technologies
McMinnville, Oregon WWTP P-removal Performance Typical Municipal Plant Operates first channel with discs at 29 rpm less than 10% of the total oxygen (aerated anaerobic) Second channel operates with 70% of the air and a zero DO (aerated anoxic) Effluent ammonia at 0.2 mg/l (with 8 day sludge age) Sol. P from Orbal/FC is 0.03 mg/l Total P from Orbal/FC is 0.1 mg/l
Page 31
Water Technologies
System B
SAE @ 3 lbs/hp-hr DO levels 0 - 2 - 4 alpha @ 0.9 power draw @ 444 hp
Page 32
Water Technologies
Case Study @ Little Lower Miami, OH Adding more O2 at Zero DO saves power DO
Aerated Anoxic Optimization Recommendations
800 700 Add more O2 where absorption rate is greatest Add less O2 where absorption rate is less Add less O2 where absorption rate is less
600
Difference
Water Technologies
Anammox Bacteria
Nitrogen Removal Efficiency at Centralized Domestic
Wastewater Treatment Plant in Bangkok, Thailand VLR @ Nongkhaem: I E BOD 32.8 3.8 N 11.8 6.7
Of the several plants (8) in the study, Anammox type bacteria was only present at the Nongkhaem plant
Page 34
Water Technologies
Anammox Bacteria
2.5 mgd Orbal plant with primaries Ratio of BOD:N@ 3.5:1 (105 mg/l BOD 30 mg/l TKN) Effluent ammonia @ 0.1 mg/l Effluent nitrate @ 2 mg/l
Anammox Pathway: 50% of the ammonia oxidized to NO2-N 50% of the ammonia uses NO2-N for oxygen supplier
Page 35
Water Technologies
Water Technologies
Roof Installation
Page 37
Page 38
Water Technologies
Water Technologies
Page 40
Water Technologies
Page 41
Water Technologies
Influent Flow Q Inf = 30 gpm, BOD = 400 mg/L TSS = 375 mg/L
High Solids Loading Conditions Base Case Base Case +10 ppm FeCl3 Base Case + 5 ppm FeCl3
Biosolids TSS Loading /Influent BOD Loading Targeted 2.7 2.7 2.7 Actual 3.5 3.1 3.1 TSS 98 99 97
Half of raw influent was treated by combined primary clarifier and contact tank (CT) + DAF: DAF effluent BOD = 50 mg/L with total removal of 88%: 20% removed by clarifier and 68% removed by CT + DAF DAF effluent TSS = 35 mg/L with total removal of 91%: 44% removed by clarifier and 47% removed by CT + DAF Estimated reduction in aeration required = 0.5*Q*(320-50)/(Q*320) = 42% based on BOD balance
Page 42
Water Technologies
Sand Island WWTP, Hawaii Currently no secondary treatment Upgrade cost estimate: $1.2 Billion Power Cost: $0.21/kW Limited land area for upgrade
Page 43
Water Technologies
Aeration Energy Reduction/Biogas Production Conventional Mode 2700 kW 1800 kW Energy used Energy recovered BE/DR 1300 kW 4800 kW
Page 44
Water Technologies
Remembering Wellington Donaldson He had great ideas. But for the most part they were: ignored neglected forgotten not used Maybe now we are finally back on the right course
Page 45
Water Technologies