History of Banking Asian Perspective

Disclosure
The following information/disclosures has been collated through interviews, research and
discussions with a few prominent persons; some related to the secret service part of world
finance; some senior citizens who for the last 50 years have lived very simple lives in hiding while
controlling key accounts and gold certificates upon which the world of modern banking has
originated.
This presentation is based on the aforementioned persons version of history that highlights the
ongoing battle between what is perceived as good versus evil. It hopes to present a crystal clear
picture of the machinations of royalty, religious heads and political entities and how they have
directed and controlled the flow of wealth across the world to the detriment of the common people
at large. Their initial intensions were Noble but the current outcome much less so.
It is a simplified story of Gold versus Bankers but as we all know it is usually never quite that
simple. Battles and its players are much more complicated and most of it in a Gray area
somewhere between what is right & what is wrong. Regardless, we deem it important information
for anybody who whishes to know were the world is heading financially and how we actually got to
where we are today where the people who owns/control the banks now OWNS the world.
The revelations contained herein may to some appear as fantasy or mere conjecture. However, it
must be stated that all data has been gleaned from very reliable sources with an inside view of the
secret world of banking and supported/verified by Important historical/present day documents and
ancient artifacts. We hope to be able to publish some of them in a public domain at a later stage.
We do welcome any additional input. E-mail us at cm7818@gmail.com or
Post comments on fourwinds10.com and title it "The Brief comment ....."
Power corrupts. Absolute Power corrupts absolutely.
The History of Banking
+ where did King Solomons treasure go?
An Asian Perspective
Solomon
930 BC
It starts with King
Solomon in
Jerusalem around
930 B.C. A very
successful King who
amasses huge
wealth. Especially
Gold.
He has some 600
wives & concubines
and thousands of
kids.
Considering that, he
knows his country will
fall apart after his
death and selects
one of his most
trusted wives, Queen
Shaba or Balquish, to
protect the assets,
bloodline and
traditions.
History of world Banking
Solo
Jawa
Templar movments
Gold Flows
Gold Certificates
Solomon
930 BC
Sometime after,
she leaves with
everything back to
where she probably
came from.
Jawa.
There she
established the courts
of what later became
known as Solo, Jawa.
There safeguarding
the gold assets, King
Solomon's bloodline
and the religious
traditions of his court.
Solo
Jawa
China
1300
Spice trade
1400 forward
Templar movments
Gold Flows
Gold Certificates
Solomon
930 BC
The Gold pile grows.
There are huge flows
of Gold into Indonesia
from China during the
1300 A.D. China
almost goes broke
buying spices and
wood.
From Europe in the
1400 1600 A.D.
most of the Gold
taken from South
America ends up in
Indonesia as
payment for spices
which are the most
sought after goods in
the world at the time.
The Royal Solo family
ties are expanded to
include Chinese
Royals
Solo
Jawa
China
1300
Spice trade
1400 forward
Templar movments
Gold Flows
Gold Certificates
Solomon
930 BC
9 years@temple
3
rd
King of
Jerusalem (1040)
1000 A.D.
A few knights
spend 9 years in
Jerusalem exploring
the ruins of King
Solomon's Temple.
They discover
something that
makes them very
powerful once back in
Europe.
They get special
privileges from the
Pope and The
Templar Knights
Order is established
with direct access to
the Pope.
Solo
Jawa
China
1300
1060
Europe
Spice trade
1400 forward
1900
Templar movments
Gold Flows
Gold Certificates
Solomon
930 BC
9 years@temple
3
rd
King of
Jerusalem (1040)
Templar Knights
They quickly become
the European
protector of wealth
and the pilgrims to
Jerusalem.
That leads to the
establishment of the
first working Banking
system throughout
Europe.
People of means can
deposit their wealth
with the Templar
Knights and then
draw from it once
they are in the Holy
Land.
1064 A.D.
They first establish a
connection with the
old Solomon
bloodline in Jawa.
Solo
Jawa
China
1300
1060
Europe
Spice trade
1400 forward
1900
Templar movments
Gold Flows
Gold Certificates
Solomon
930 BC
9 years@temple
3
rd
King of
Jerusalem (1040)
Templar Knights
Friday The 13
th
1307
Oct Friday 13
th
1307.
The Templars are
now a very rich,
powerful and
independent from
Church and State
European wide
organization.
The French King
together with the
Pope has conspired
to confiscate their
assets and destroy
their power. All over
Europe on Friday the
13
th
of October 1307
Templars are hunted
down, jailed and
killed. Their assets
and land holdings are
confiscated.
Solo
Jawa
China
1300
1060
Scotland
(Until 1500 1600)
Europe
Spice trade
1400 forward
1900
Portugal
America
1480
Templar movments
Gold Flows
Gold Certificates
Solomon
930 BC
9 years@temple
3
rd
King of
Jerusalem (1040)
Templar Knights
Friday The 13
th
1307
Oct Friday 13
th
1307.
TheTemplars flee and
hide in three main
directions.
One group goes up
into the mountains of
central Europe in
what eventually
becomes
Switzerland.
One group flee North
and established a
safe haven in
Northern Scotland
(and Scandinavia)
while the third group
flee West into
Portugal from where
they travel to America
eventually.
Solo
Jawa
China
1300
1060
Scotland
Europe
Spice trade
1400 forward
1900
Portugal
1480
Templar movments
Gold Flows
Gold Certificates
Solomon
930 BC
9 years@temple
3
rd
King of
Jerusalem (1040)
Templar Knights
Friday The 13
th
1307
America 1500
1400-1500 A.D. The
Scottish Templar
group leaves and
travels all the way to
Indonesia where they
set up a base at
Madura. They unite
with the Solomon
Bloodline in Jawa.
1600-1700 A.D. The
Templars in Jawa
together with their
brothers in the Alps
start issuing Paper
Certificates Backed
by Gold. A piece of
paper that represents
a certain amount of
gold and can be
easily moved and lent
out. Interest is 2-3%
year payable in Gold
Solo
Jawa
China
1300
1060
BoI
Scotland
Europe
Spice trade
1400 forward
1900
Portugal
1480
Templar movments
Gold Flows
Gold Certificates
Solomon
930 BC
9 years@temple
3
rd
King of
Jerusalem (1040)
1
st
Rothshield
Templar Knights
Friday The 13
th
1307
America 1500
1700-1800 A.D.
One German Banker,
backing a local prince
quickly catches on to
this and sees the
HUGE potential.
They eventually
change their name to
Rothschild.
He has five sons
who are sent out
across Europe to
establish Banks, one
in each chosen
country, They
establish in England,
France, Italy,
Germany and Austria.
Where they become
the Kings bank. Or
as we call them now
Central Bank.
Solo
Jawa
China
1300
1060
BoI
BOE
Scotland
Europe
Spice trade
1400 forward
1900
Portugal
America
1500
1480
Templar movments
Gold Flows
Gold Certificates
Solomon
930 BC
9 years@temple
3
rd
King of
Jerusalem (1040)
1
st
Rothshield
Templar Knights
Friday The 13
th
1307
First to be
established was the
Bank Of England.
Instead of lending the
English King gold
bullions to use for
paying for war efforts
they get the right, and
only them, to issue
papers representing
that Gold. (Paper
Money)
The Kings loan will
run at 8% interest for
eternity. Paid in Gold.
No need to pay the
principal. Since
Rothschild in his turn
borrows Gold
certificates at an
interest of 2-4% per
year he is on to a
very good business.
Solo
Jawa
China
1300
1060
BoI
DB
BOE
BOF
Others
Scotland
Europe
Spice trade
1400 forward
1900
Portugal
America
1500
1480
Templar movments
Gold Flows
Gold Certificates
Solomon
930 BC
9 years@temple
3
rd
King of
Jerusalem (1040)
1
st
Rothshield
Templar Knights
Friday The 13
th
1307
The only limit to their
Banking profits is the
need of the King or
Kings to borrow
money.
With a spread of 4-
6% / year it has
HUGE potential.
Now, with his sons
firmly established in
all the important
corners of Europe the
best way to make
money is to make
sure the kings go to
war against each
others and finance all
of them. They Win
either way all the
time*
*Wars always generate huge profits and
debts. Both of which are of interest to the
bankers. See how the USA debt as grown
form 0 in early 1900 when they installed the
FED to what it is now. Each big leap in debt
except the 1930 depression is caused by a
war. WWII, Korea, Vietnam etc. It is a
proven tactic that started with Napoleon.
History of world banking
Solo
Jawa
China
1300
1060
BoI
DB
BOE
BOF
Others
Scotland
Europe
Spice trade
1400 forward
1900
Portugal
America
1500
1480
Templar movments
Gold Flows
Gold Certificates
Solomon
930 BC
9 years@temple
3
rd
King of
Jerusalem (1040)
1
st
Rothshield
Templar Knights
Friday The 13
th
1307
Napoleon
What better person to support for
the purpose of profits & debt than
Napoleon? A small guy with huge
ego and world wide ambitions. The
Napoleonic wars is what really got
the Rothschilds started. For e.g.
The Battle Of Waterloo.
Thanks to their superior network
they knew before anybody else who
won and that alone, put them in
place to clean up on ALL the
financial markets of their day. The
players knew to watch what
Rothschild was doing which they
used to their full advantage. First
sell to get the avalanche going and
when the flock is in full panic mode,
selling at any price they quietly
stated buying it all at rock bottom
prices. That is how they played the
London financial market on the day
of the battle of Waterloo. They
absolutely cleaned up
On top of that there is also what all
the various Kings involved had to
pay in interest on their loans. From
then on the rest is history on how
they managed to put themselves
as key players in the distribution of
funds first throughout the Western
world, later followed by the rest of
the world
They dont necessary own the
funds/assets but they 100% control
the main Banks and its distribution
chain that distributes these assets.
Solo
Jawa
BOC
China BOJ
1300
1060
BoI
DB
BOE
BOF
Others
Scotland
Europe
Spice trade
1400 forward
1900
Portugal
America
1500
1480
Templar movments
Gold Flows
Gold Certificates
Solomon
930 BC
9 years@temple
3
rd
King of
Jerusalem (1040)
1
st
Rothshield
Templar Knights
Friday The 13
th
1307
Bank of China and
Bank of Japan also
eventually gets
established by Asian
counterparts.
In an agreement
signed in 1857 all
Asian territories
agree to have BoE
oversee and control
all macro Banking
aspects in their
territories. And that
agreement still
stands.
Today, 5 out of 7
central banks in the
G7 group are
controlled by
Rothschild interests.
Solo
Jawa
BOC
China BOJ
1300
1060
BoI
DB
BOE
BOF
Others
Scotland
Europe
Spice trade
1400 forward
1900
Portugal
America
1500
1480
Templar movments
Gold Flows
Gold Certificates
Solomon
930 BC
9 years@temple
3
rd
King of
Jerusalem (1040)
1
st
Rothshield
Templar Knights
Friday The 13
th
1307
FED.
The last Central
Bank to be
established was the
FED. The Americans
resisted the central
bank idea for the
longest time and it
took a banking crisis
together with some
very long term
political games to
finally get them to
accept the idea under
the name of Federal
Reserve Act in 1913
It has rightfully been
called the crime of
the century
More on FED
Solo
Jawa
BOC
China BOJ
1300
1060
BoI
DB
BOE
BOF
Others
Scotland
Europe
Spice trade
1400 forward
1900
Portugal
America
1500
1480
Templar movments
Gold Flows
Gold Certificates
Solomon
930 BC
9 years@temple
3
rd
King of
Jerusalem (1040)
1
st
Rothshield
Templar Knights
Friday The 13
th
1307
1950
Iran
1950
Taiwan
1950
People Flows
The Gold that
ultimately backed ALL
Banks can be traced
to a few major
sources.
The Chinese Royal
family, tracing its
roots back to Genghis
Khan, who conquered
the world having his
subjects pay tribute in
Gold.
The Indonesians and
their spices +
Solomons legacy.
The Persians and
other remnants of
ancient Empires.
The Colonial powers
of England, Spain &
Portugal collected
lots but also spent on
spices & exotic
imports.
Solo
Jawa
BOC
China BOJ
1300
1060
BoI
DB
BOE
BOF
Others
Scotland
Europe
Spice trade
1400 forward
1900
Portugal
America
1500
1480
Templar movments
Gold Flows
Gold Certificates
Solomon
930 BC
9 years@temple
3
rd
King of
Jerusalem (1040)
1
st
Rothshield
Templar Knights
Friday The 13
th
1307
1950
Iran
1950
Taiwan
1950
People Flows
The Chinese always
had very close ties
with their Indonesian
relatives. When
mainland China goes
through its upheavals
mid 1900 their assets
are moved first to
Taiwan, later to
Indonesia.
The same goes for
The Shah of Iran. His
main assets are also
held and safeguarded
here after 1950s
Solo also had been
the central point of a
great expansive
Asian Kingdom
(Majapahit) in the
1300s A.D. After
pressures from Islam
they retreat East.
Solo
Jawa
BOC
China BOJ
1300
1060
BoI
DB
BOE
BOF
Others
Scotland
Europe
Spice trade
1400 forward
1900
Portugal
America
1500
1480
Templar movments
Gold Flows
Gold Certificates
Solomon
930 BC
9 years@temple
3
rd
King of
Jerusalem (1040)
1
st
Rothshield
Templar Knights
Friday The 13
th
1307
1950
Iran
1950
Taiwan
1950
Bali
People Flows
900-1000 A.D High
Priests in Jawa gets
direction from Divine
inspiration that they have
to travel to Bali (Little
Jawa) and establish a
successful Colony. First
attempt fails.
Some 100 years later they
receive a second direct
command from The Divine
to do the same. Direction
is given for three nails,
(Gold, Silver & Bronze) to
be nailed down and a
Temple established. Now
they succeed.
By 1500 A.D. the whole
Royal court of Solo have
moved here to safeguard
the traditions and culture
from the pressures of
Islam.
We are going to take a little detour in our banking story here to give you some insight
into interesting cultural and people flows.
Solo
Jawa
BOC
China BOJ
1300
1060
BoI
DB
BOE
BOF
Others
Scotland
Europe
Spice trade
1400 forward
1900
Portugal
America
1500
1480
Templar movments
Gold Flows
Gold Certificates
Solomon
930 BC
9 years@temple
3
rd
King of
Jerusalem (1040)
1
st
Rothshield
Templar Knights
Friday The 13
th
1307
1950
Iran
1950
Taiwan
1950
Bali
People Flows
New Zealand
Maorie
Polynesia
Hawaii
Native America
+ Maya
900 1600 A.D.
Further exploration and
people goes East. There are
really interesting linguistic and
cultural traces indicating close
contact between Jawa/Bali
(=Majapahit) & Polynesian,
Mayan/Americans. A few e.g.
Hawaiikiki, Honolulu,
Maomaori has meaning in old
Javanese language,
Mayan & Bali calendar use
very similar symbols
Majapahit Solo temple &
Mayan temples are identical.
See Photo
Jawa to Bali flow & beyond
The scattered sheep of Israel shall be found
among the islands of the seas
More Info

Legends of a Shadow
Power behind the
scenes called the
Illuminati has long
flourished in the West.
This may be how it
started.
1200-1300 A.D. Queen
Roro Kidul, a beautiful
illuminated being (she
literally shines up a
room and never grows
old) marries the King of
Solo. She promises to
always protect the
Kingdom and return
when needed. Her
descendants takes the
name of Chakra
Ningrat. the
Illuminated
Illuminati breeding program
Back to the banking story
1300 1700 A.D.
Royals marry Royals
and none other. The
Jawa bloodline was
important and Chinese,
European and Middle
Eastern Royals all
intermarry.
In 1700 all major wars
are basically in between
close or distant Royal
family members. They
are all related one way
or other. They fight over
land and wealth. With
advancing technology
wars gets more and
more destructive and in
an enlightened
moment some agree to
try and systematically do
something about it.
The many wars
in Europe was a very
good reason to stop
family inter fighting
and around 1750,
128 of the worlds
most important
Royals agree to a
Breeding plan.
They married or had
kids following a
system, having their
respective first
son/daughter marry
or mate according to
the same plan.
Objective;
Create the King of
Kings , the
enlightened one
A person who would
equally represent
each and every one
of the participating
128 Royal families of
the world.
Over the course of 7
generations they
slowly bring down the
numbers of
participating families
from 128-64-32-16-8-
4-1.
Finally in the year
1900 A.D. The One
is born.
Now,
they have ONE
person who can
honestly say
I represent ALL of
YOU.
Lets call him M1.
Short for Monetary1.
With M1 in existence
it is time to move on
to the next step in the
plan.
In 1920-21 they start
to consolidate (call
back) their combined
wealth with the
intension of placing it
into the hands of M1.
M1 is then to
redistribute the
combined wealth of
the world according
to an agreed upon
plan.
The recall of the 1920s
9 of the most
prominent Royal
families representing
different regions of
the world were driving
this project. Together
with the Chinese
Royal KS, one of
the most active and
respected among
them were PB X
(paku Bueno X). M1s
biological father and
the King of Solo from
the Chaka Ningrat
or The illuminated
Solomon bloodline.
So in 1928 PB X calls
a meeting in Solo,
Jawa, for all the 128
families to attend.
Here they sign a POA
transferring all their
combined assets into
the hands of M1. He
is then supposed to
distribute this wealth
according to an
agreed upon plan
called
The plan of the
experts
The plan of the Experts they feel is divine. Its driven by a genuine attempt to better the fate
of all mankind and bring them all into a material level of comfort after which man is free enough from
daily troubles to pursue mankind's ultimate goal of Unity with God for each and every one.
It is a long worked upon plan of Unifying the World, for as good as possible for as many as
possible That was their basic guiding principle.
M1
How it was supposed to work.
According to The plan of the Experts of 1928
If you have all the
money in the world and
you want to make that a
better and more equal
world, how would you go
about it?
It is a serious question..
The people faced with
that problem/opportunity
planned it along these
lines. All with very good
intensions.
First collect it into one
big pot. Set someone
you trust in charge but
have checks and
balances in place.
M1
One of the primary
objectives was to free
the nations from
Colonialism. These
new nations should
be governed as
Guided democracies
So, up on top of the
world power pyramid
there should be a
forum were every
nation has a voice
and a vote.
When ready, M1
should transfer his
power to that world
government body.
It was called
The United Nations
UN
Power transfer to UN
when world is ready
Future World
Government Body
M1
All these new & old
independent nations
need financing. To
supply that and track
all mayor fund
movements you need
a Central bank to all
the central banks.
BIS.
Bank of International
Settlements in
Switzerland was
planned to be set up
for that purpose
UN
when world is ready
Future World
Government Body
BIS
Government funding
Tracking of all mayor funds
Government side of World Finance
Central bank of the Central banks
M1
To give everybody
access to the best and
the brightest regarding
infrastructure and
financing the
World Bank was
incorporated.
The WB job is to employ
the best in their fields
who then plan projects
and infrastructure
solutions around the
world. They will also
finance projects that can
not meet normal
commercial bank
requirements.
They also approve cash
utilizations from FED
and other Banks. Your
project needs a WB
approval to get financed
UN
when world is ready
Future World
Government Body
BIS
Government funding
Tracking of all major funds
WB
Infrastructure
building and
planning
Approves cash
utilization from
FED and others
M1
To feed the private side
of world finance with
cash you need an outlet.
The FED were to take
this role. It was to be the
cash cow of the world
on the private side of
banking.
They were to supply all
the prime banks with
funding. The top 25
around the world. Not
just American but all
others as well.
Here is where it started
to go all wrong, The
FED became a political
tool to push power
agendas. Its owners
eventually high jacked
the whole system.
UN
when world is ready
Future World
Government Body
BIS
Government funding
WB
Infrastructure
building and
planning
Approves cash
utilization from
FED and others
FED
Private side of
World finance
Cash low of the
world
M1
To help failing
economies and guide
them along the way
they needed the IMF.
Their work was to be
the lender of last
resort. We will help
but
Here is were
Guided democracy
comes into play. All
the planned new
small independent
nations would at
times run into trouble
and the IMF was
supposed to be there
to help fix things.
UN
when world is ready
Future World
Government Body
BIS
Government funding
WB
Infrastructure
building and
planning
Approves cash
utilization from
FED and others
FED
Private side of
World finance
Cash low of the
world
IMF
Controlling organ Lender of last resorts
We Will help but...
First aid to failing economy
M1
Justice.
To solve international
legal cases and
humanitarian issues
across National
borders they needed
an International court.
Of Justice.
The Hague fills that
role.
One off its offspring's
is the Geneva
Conventions
UN
when world is ready
Future World
Government Body
BIS
Government funding
WB
Infrastructure
building and
planning
Approves cash
utilization from
FED and others
FED
Private side of
World finance
Cash low of the
world
IMF
We Will help but...
The
Hague
International court
of Justice
Geneva
Conventions
M1
Later in the scheme
once the new
Nations are firmly
established and
functional you can
join them into bigger
blocks. All for the
purpose of Unity,
Peace and
Togetherness.
The USA could stand
as a good example
and similar solutions
were foreseen for
Europe, Africa & Asia
as well.
UN
when world is ready
Future World
Government Body
BIS
Government funding
WB
Infrastructure
building and
planning
Approves cash
utilization from
FED and others
FED
Private side of
World finance
Cash low of the
world
IMF
We Will help but...
The
Hague
International court
of Justice
Geneva
Conventions
Working Model
for running regions
EU
M1
UN
when world is ready
Future World
Government Body
IMF
FED
WB
The
Hague
BIS
Government funding
Private side of
World finance
Cash low of the
world
Infrastructure
building and
planning
Approves cash
utilization from
FED and others
We Will help but...
2015 - 2020
International court
of Justice
Geneva
Conventions
Working Model
for running regions
These projects are
still on the drawing
board but if you study
todays news you can
see how the seeds
are there.
Just as with the EU it
is quietly there until
suddenly the time is
right and things move
very fast.
The difference from
what was original
planned is that other
forces are now
pushing the same
agenda for control
reasons
Asia Union
& African
Union
EU
M1
UN
when world is ready
Future World
Government Body
IMF
FED
WB
The
Hague
BIS
Government funding
Private side of
World finance
Cash low of the
world
Infrastructure
building and
planning
Approves cash
utilization from
FED and others
We Will help but...
2015 - 2020
International court
of Justice
Geneva
Conventions
Working Model
for running regions
Key Dates:
2015 All trade barriers gone
Before 2020 One Currency
These are very
approximate
timelines. Time will
tell when it all
happens and how it is
implemented.
As it stands today we
will end up with one
of two solutions.
Right now there is a
fight of control going
on.
1.A world paper currency
backed by gold governed by
a multinational assembly.
2.A cashless society
solution were ultimately the
Banks, or its owners control
the money supply and
flows.
Asia Union
& African
Union
EU
Objective
- Break Down Colonialism
- Free the Nations and create equal start
- Control the New Nations through debt
- Unify the world
- As good as possible for as many as possible
Plan of The Experts of 1928
Objectives and what happened
Objective
- Unify the world
A freedom War &
Economic stress on
The colonial powers
Through
Objective
- Unify the world
A freedom War &
Economic stress on
The colonial powers
Through
The US is the first country to get
access to big funding according to
the Plan of the Experts.
FED borrows huge amounts and
funds the new deal in the 1930s.
The US is set to be the great
liberator of nations and the
champion of democracy. To achieve
this, the intention is for the US to;
- Build up military
- Function as World Police
- Control the outcome of the future
WWII
Objective
- Unify the world
A freedom War &
Economic stress on
The colonial powers
Through
- Build up military
WWII
WWII
Frees
The Nations
Objective
- Unify the world
A freedom War &
Economic stress on
The colonial powers
Through
- Build up military
WWII
WWII
Frees
The Nations
Creates
Bases for EU
Creates
Bases for UN
Objective
- Unify the world
A freedom War &
Economic stress on
The colonial powers
Through
- Build up military
WWII
WWII
Frees
The Nations
Creates
Bases for EU
Creates
Bases for UN
Europe
Africa
Asia
In 1946 Three Marshall plans are set up
within the UN to fund the world after WWII
Objective
- Unify the world
A freedom War &
Economic stress on
The colonial powers
Through
- Build up military
WWII
WWII
Frees
The Nations
Creates
Bases for EU
Creates
Bases for UN
Europe
Africa
Asia
Creates the need for a new way to create
cash only partly based on gold
Breton Woods 1942-43
Objective
- Unify the world
A freedom War &
Economic stress on
The colonial powers
Through
- Build up military
WWII
WWII
Frees
The Nations
Creates
Bases for EU
Creates
Bases for UN
Europe
Africa
Asia
Hyper accounts
(trading system within the FED that creates money
out of nothing. Checks and balances do apply)
Objective
- Unify the world
A freedom War &
Economic stress on
The colonial powers
Through
- Build up military
WWII
WWII
Frees
The Nations
Creates
Bases for EU
Creates
Bases for UN
Europe
Africa
Asia
Hyper accounts
Leads to more POWER to the FED/BoE/BIS banking power
triangle at the cost of the people controlling the Gold / M1
(opens the door for the 1963-5 complete banking takeover of the system)
Objective
- Unify the world
A freedom War &
Economic stress on
The colonial powers
Through
- Build up military
WWII
WWII
Frees
The Nations
Creates
Bases for EU
Creates
Bases for UN
Gets everybody
into huge debts
Guided Democracy
Europe
Africa
Asia
Hyper accounts
Gets Done
Objective
- Unify the world
A freedom War &
Economic stress on
The colonial powers
Through
- Build up military
WWII
WWII
Frees
The Nations
Creates
Bases for EU
Creates
Bases for UN
Gets everybody
into huge debts
Guided Democracy
Europe
Africa
Asia
Hyper accounts
Gets Done
Bandung Conference,
1955
MI issues certificates
Objective
- Unify the world
A freedom War &
Economic stress on
The colonial powers
Through
- Build up military
WWII
WWII
Frees
The Nations
Creates
Bases for EU
Creates
Bases for UN
Gets everybody
into huge debts
Guided Democracy
Europe
Africa
Asia
Hyper accounts
Gets Done
Bandung Conference,
1955
FED/BOE/BIS Never follow through.
The SPLIT (between Indonesians & Chinese)
that started in 1928, was triggered in1934( Death of PB.X)
widens and M1looks to USA and JFK for help to lessen the
FEDs POWER.
Objective
- Unify the world
A freedom War &
Economic stress on
The colonial powers
Through
- Build up military
WWII
WWII
Frees
The Nations
Creates
Bases for EU
Creates
Bases for UN
Gets everybody
into huge debts
Guided Democracy
Europe
Africa
Asia
Hyper accounts
Gets Done
Bandung Conference,
1955
FEDs POWER.
JFK
M1
Shared Ideal
3 agreements:
- Tampak Siring (Bali)
- Washington agreement
- Green Hilton Memorial
Objective
- Unify the world
A freedom War &
Economic stress on
The colonial powers
Through
- Build up military
WWII
WWII
Frees
The Nations
Creates
Bases for EU
Creates
Bases for UN
Gets everybody
into huge debts
Guided Democracy
Europe
Africa
Asia
Hyper accounts
Gets Done
Bandung Conference,
1955
FEDs POWER.
JFK
M1
Shared Ideal
3 agreements:
A Transfer from M1 to JFK of
140.000.000 kg of gold
to back a New USD issued by
US treasury (E0.11110. July 1963)
The objective is to replace the FED
with the US Treasury as the issuer
of US dollars. Signed on the 14
th
of
November 1963.
Objective
- Unify the world
A freedom War &
Economic stress on
The colonial powers
Through
- Build up military
WWII
WWII
Frees
The Nations
Creates
Bases for EU
Creates
Bases for UN
Gets everybody
into huge debts
Guided Democracy
Europe
Africa
Asia
Hyper accounts
Gets Done
Bandung Conference,
1955
FEDs POWER.
JFK
M1
Shared Ideal
3 agreements:
140.000.000 kg of gold
th
of
November 1963.
A few days later JFK is killed
Objective
- Unify the world
A freedom War &
Economic stress on
The colonial powers
Through
- Build up military
WWII
WWII
Frees
The Nations
Creates
Bases for EU
Creates
Bases for UN
Gets everybody
into huge debts
Guided Democracy
Europe
Africa
Asia
Hyper accounts
Gets Done
Bandung Conference,
1955
FEDs POWER.
JFK
M1
Shared Ideal
3 agreements:
140.000.000 kg of gold
th
of
November 1963.
M1 1964 Key speech
to build the world anew
He wants to start from scratch.
New UN, new FED etc.
Objective
- Unify the world
A freedom War &
Economic stress on
The colonial powers
Through
- Build up military
WWII
WWII
Frees
The Nations
Creates
Bases for EU
Creates
Bases for UN
Gets everybody
into huge debts
Guided Democracy
Europe
Africa
Asia
Hyper accounts
Gets Done
Bandung Conference,
1955
FEDs POWER.
JFK
M1
Shared Ideal
3 agreements:
140.000.000 kg of gold
th
of
November 1963.
M1 1964 Key speech
to build the world anew
He wants to start from scratch.
New UN, new FED etc.
M1 remove from power by a CIA supported
coupe. Held in house arrest until his death.
All this with silent Chinese approval.
Personal Organization
(Free masonry is built exactly the same. 33 official degrees
followed by 7 more unofficial layers of superiority)
UN
USA
WB EU
FED BIS
Visible Power structure
So,
how have they been
able to pursue an
agenda stretching over
generations?
It is very cleverly
organized.
The Visible power
structure we see in the
news are only part of it.
At the top of each little
pyramid sits people who
were carefully selected
and groomed. You dont
end up there by accident
and you dont have
anywhere near the full
picture.
There is also the internal
conflict within the
system pushing for
different agendas to
consider.
9
13
33
555
All leaders of Nations
+ Org. All up to
33 Free Masons
UN
USA
WB EU
Political Systems
& Modules
FED BIS
Invisible Power structure
555 Top people in the
bottom structure makes
up the base for the next
level.
These people will work
on mainly Political
Systems & Modules.
Experiments like the
Russian Communist
system as well as the
USA Free market
system was and is
discussed and
contemplated here.
Lets see what works?
Both are now deemed
failures with adjustments
to EU being the middle
way.
7
9
13
33
555
M1
5
+ Org. All up to
33 Free Masons
Financial systems
& Asset Control
UN
USA
WB EU
Political Systems
& Modules
M1
Grand Masters. 3 people
Master/commitment. 5 people
Sub commitment holders. 7 people
FED BIS
3
The very Top level
consists of just 16
people total. They
control the finances and
distribution of funds
throughout the system.
They issue and lend out
Gold backed paper
certificates. Terms are
usually no more then 33
years and interest of 2-
3% / year payable in
Gold.
The underlying physical
Gold assets are
safeguarded by a
second group not
mentioned here.
A third group functions
as controllers. They can
block any movements of
funds that do not meet
the agreed upon plan.
7
9
13
33
555
M1
5
+ Org. All up to
33 Free Masons
Financial systems
& Asset Control
UN
USA
WB EU
Political Systems
& Modules
M1
FED BIS
3
How they find the right people to staff and lead various
organizations/nations to pursue their agenda.
To push movements and
agendas you need the
right people in the right
places with the right
intentions.
There is many ways to
find and groom them.
Listed below are a few.
You can be assured that
most if not all people
who ends up in these
positions of power were
at some point picked.
Regardless of if they
themselves realize it or
not. Then to help Their
people get the job done
they will always fall back
to a very effective
method of:
Create the PROBLEM,
Present the SOLUTION
This is how the masses
are pushed along.
Plant schools
Places were peoples values and i ntentions
are explored and f uture leaders picked.
They work as working forums and breeding
ground f or future leaders within pr imarily the
visible power structure
-Free Mason Lodges
-Other similar secret societies
- CFR (counsel of f oreign relations)
- Bilderberg Group
- Bohemian Grove
-College s ocieties like
-Skull and Bones, Thule Society et c
- Lucies t rust (previously Lucifers trust)
- Club of Rome
-Various Round Tables
-etc etc
7
9
13
33
555
M1
5
+ Org. All up to
33 Free Masons
Financial systems
& Asset Control
UN
USA
WB EU
Political Systems
& Modules
M1
FED BIS
3
Removed from
system by Banker
backed Hardline
elements in 65 68
Attempt to replace this function
with the 1995 installation of
The Chairman of
OITC
www.unoitc.org
These 16 top people
were removed by
Banker backed
hardliners around 1965-
1968. Since then the
system has been high
jacked and utilized for
gaining more and more
personal power and
control over the natural
resources and industrial
assets of the planet.
A raping of the planet
has occurred since for
the benefit of a very few
whos ultimate goal is
ultimate control.
Since the mid 1850
there were as can be
expected fractions within
the system that fought
for power. Simplified it is
a fight between the
people controlling the
Gold and Bankers.
Plant schools
They works as working forums and breeding
-Free Mason Lodges
- Bilderberg Group
- Bohemian Grove
-Collage s ocieties like
- Club of Rome
-etc etc
MoreInfo
7
9
13
33
555
M1
5
+ Org. All up to
33 Free Masons
Financial systems
& Asset Control
UN
USA
WB EU
Political Systems
& Modules
M1
FED BIS
3
Removed from
system by Banker
backed Hardline
elements in 65 68
Attempt to replace this function
with the 1995 installation of
The Chairman of
OITC
www.unoitc.org
The Owners of the Banking
Cartel were since the very
beginning making attempts
to highjack the whole plan
and more specifically the
collateral account The big
pot.
The first visible attempt was
in 1910 when the Jekyll
Island Treaty, created the
seed to the FED.
Also along the way The
Bankers used inside
information to exaggerate
the effects of,
for instance the1920s recall,
to consolidate their own
financial positions.
Financing Hitler in WW2 and
funding various other wars
are other examples.
A lot of these would never
have happened had people
stuck to the original
agreements made starting
from mid 1800 A.D.
Plant schools
They works as working forums and breeding
-Free Mason Lodges
- Bilderberg Group
- Bohemian Grove
-Collage s ocieties like
- Club of Rome
-etc etc
MoreInfo
BOE
FED BIS

Vatican
Bank
Holder of records
and a very important
player
Banking Cartel Hijacked the
system in 1965
(Rothshields)
-
So here is how it works.
For any Macro funds to
move within the Banking
system BoE, The FED & BIS
have to sign off.
The Vatican Bank is an
unofficial record keeper and
as such has a big stake in
the game. It has also been
appointed to control one of
three, second layer Master
Gold certificates.
How it has been USED since 1965 when the banking cartel took control and hijacked it all.
BOE
FED BIS

Vatican
Bank
Holder of records
and 1 very important
player
Owns
system in 1965
(Rothshields)
All the Prime
Banks
- Amro
- HSBC
- Chase
- Citibank
- etc
-
BoE actually owns the FED
(or the majority share) and
nothing can be done without
its OK.
The FED funds all the Prime
Banks in the world such as
Amro, HSBC, Citibank etc .
BOE
FED BIS

Vatican
Bank
Holder of records
player
Owns
system in 1965
(Rothshields)
All the Prime
Banks
- Amro
- HSBC
- Chase
- Citibank
- etc
Lends to
Fortune 500 companies etc
Oil/gas
Auto
MedicineFood Building Chemicals
-
Banking
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
These Prime Banks will then
lend to various corporations
around the world. Especially
targeting the multinationals.
They can be grouped
together in areas of interest
and it does not really matter
where they originate from
because ultimately their
source of funds is the same.
BOE
FED BIS

Vatican
Bank
Holder of records
player
Owns
system in 1965
(Rothshields)
Owns
All the Prime
Banks
- Amro
- HSBC
- Chase
- Citibank
- etc
Lends to
Funds
Huge foundations
Invests direct into
Oil/gas
Auto
-
Banking
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
What few people realize is
that the FED also OWNS
huge foundations that will
invest directly into the same
multinationals.
In the financial world these
foundations will be perceived
as being created by
institutional money.
BOE
FED BIS

Vatican
Bank
Holder of records
player
Owns
system in 1965
(Rothshields)
Owns
All the Prime
Banks
- Amro
- HSBC
- Chase
- Citibank
- etc
Lends to
Funds
Huge foundations
Invests direct into
Controls all
through debt
or stocks
Oil/gas
Auto
-
Banking
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Funds & holds
shares in;
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
So through two separate
legs they have a say and
benefit from anything that
happens among these
corporations.
BoE/FED also have the
inside view of what is
required to be able to utilize
the huge M1 funds that were
set up in 1946 to rebuild the
world. Now they can go to
work and start draining those
funds.
BOE
FED
Invests trough
foundations into
Multinationals
+
Industrial /
Military complex
Control/ownership
Money flows
It is now very easy to
understand how
people like John F
Kennedy and his
brother Robert saw it
as their mission to
warn the world of this
dark and growing
power.
They called it The
Industrial/Military
complex who they
perceived were out to
take over control of
USA and the world.
They did the best they
could to limit their
reach and both paid
the ultimate price for it.
BOE
FED
Invests trough
foundations into
Multinationals
+
Industrial /
Military complex
Funds
Prime Banks
L
e
n
d
s

t
o
Military Gov. in
South America
70's
Corrupt Gov.
in Africa
Anti Communist
Reg. in Asia
Control/ownership
Money flows
So the Banks would
systematically lend out
money to regimes they
knew would squander
the loans on products
their companies could
provide.
The intention was to
make sure these
countries ended up
with debts they could
never repay.
Only corrupt and/or
military dictators need
apply.
BOE
FED
Invests trough
foundations into
Multinationals
+
Industrial /
Military complex
Funds
Prime Banks
L
e
n
d
s

t
o
Military Gov. in
South America
70's
Corrupt Gov.
in Africa
Anti Communist
Reg. in Asia
Squanders money on military equipment + luxury goods.
+ Over budgeted infrastructure projects deemed necessary by
squadrons of Economic Hitmen * working for western
Co. By the 80's - 90's. Nations now democratic. Burden by huge
debts they can not pay. Hat in hand they go to the banks.
Control/ownership
Money flows
* Read the book confessions of an economic hitman for a fuller understanding of this process
Buys
Funds set aside for
rebuilding the world in
1946 now ends up in
the pockets of the
owners of
multinational.
In reality the money
borrowed by Nations
never leave New York.
They just move from
one account to the
next leaving a lot of
third world nations in
huge debts.
Read the book
confessions of an
Economic Hitman for
an inside view.
BOE
FED
Invests trough
foundations into
Multinationals
+
Industrial /
Military complex
Funds
Prime Banks
Pay for
Swaps
L
e
n
d
s

t
o
Military Gov. in
South America
70's
Corrupt Gov.
in Africa
Anti Communist
Reg. in Asia
Control/ownership
Money flows
Multinationals
Get the rights
to:
Buys
20-30 years later
military regimes have
been replaced by
democratic ones
wanting to do the right
thing. They can not
repay these debs and
hat in hand approach
the banks with what
can we do?
After some crises and
mulling somebody
presents the concept
of swaps.
That means
multinationals will bid
for & buy anything that
is worth anything in
that country but pay to
the bank for it.
That debt is now party paid off through Swaps
Oil rights
Mineral rights
Logging rights etc
Anything worth anything in that country is sold to multinationals
BOE
FED
Invests trough
foundations into
Multinationals
+
Industrial /
Military complex
Funds
Prime Banks
Pay for
Swaps
L
e
n
d
s

t
o
Military Gov. in
South America
70's
Corrupt Gov.
in Africa
Anti Communist
Reg. in Asia
Buys
OWNERS of BoE
Control/ownership
Money flows
Multinationals
Get the rights
to:
Again, money have never
left New York but just
shifted from account to
account, but all;
Mineral rights
Oil rights
Logging rights
Everything of value in
these countries are now
owned by Multinationals.
All of which are ultimately
owned and controlled by
the owners of BoE/FED.
Using a system where
they can create money
out of nothing to lend out
with interest they now
OWN the world.
But, they still want more
CONTROL
That debt is now party paid off through Swaps
Oil rights
Mineral rights
Logging rights etc
Anything worth anything in that country is sold to multinationals
- The Jewish people and its beliefs have to go!
- The Arians the chosen ones
- Population control (target 1-1.5 B)
- Garden of Eden wrongly perceived
- Lucifer wants to help Humanity and
not keep them in the dark
- Lucifer is the bringer of enlightenment
Very simplified, you can divide today's controllers of the system into Hardliners
and Softliners. Regardless there are some things they agree on. Above is a list
of some of them..
Control To do what?
Objectives and values of SOME of the people now running the World
Hitler
Thule
Society
Picks out
Educates
+ Finance
German
Univ.
Hardliners who knew about the coming freedom war (WWII) used that
knowledge to set up and educate Hitler. The war was unavoidable but it could
have played out very differently. German Industrialists connected to a secret
University society called Thule Society picked out, supported and educated
Hitler. He was their man and their product.
Skull
and
Bones
Hitler
Thule
Society
Copy of
Yale Univ.
Picks out
Educates
+ Finance
German
Univ.
A copy of Thule society can be found in Yale in America. Its called Scull &
Bones. It is interesting to see how the German connections to the ex president
Bush family runs for generations through these secret societies.
Bush 1. Grandfather
2. Ex Pres. Ex CIA
3. 43rd President
Skull
and
Bones
Hitler
Thule
Society
Copy of
Yale Univ.
Picks out
Educates
+ Finance
German
Univ.
Finances & supply materials for
Georg W Bush grandfather was in his day taken to court for supplying materials
and financing Hitler while America was still at war with him. More info
It is amazing to find in today's world that Hitler's values and goals are still very
much alive among the very top levels of our societies. But it is more
understandable when you realize that Hitler did not create those values but
learned them from his Masters. Those Masters are still around in different form.
Bush 1. Grandfather
2. Ex Pres. Ex CIA
3. 43rd President
Skull
and
Bones
Hitler
Thule
Society
Copy of
Yale Univ.
Picks out
Educates
+ Finance
German
Univ.
How?
One common value is the belief that the world can only sustain 1-1.5 Billion
people. The Earth can not handle any more than that. That means that 4.5 5
billion of us will have to go. HOW is were they get divided into Hardliner versus
Softliner.
Bush 1. Grandfather
2. Ex Pres. Ex CIA
3. 43rd President
Skull
and
Bones
Hitler
Thule
Society
Copy of
Yale Univ.
Picks out
Educates
+ Finance
Hardliners
Any way OK! (population control)
Needs to be quick or we will be a
new Atlantis
German
Univ.
How?
Wars
Famine
Disease
DNA manipulation
Food
H
a
r
d
l
i
n
e
r
s
Hardliners will say things like Anyway possible, it just needs to be quick or we
will end up like another Atlantis Let God decide who lives or die but whatever
we decide is OK by him since otherwise He would not have placed us in this
position of Power A scary argument if there ever was one.
On how Georg H.W. Bush ties in with Hard liner elements see

LINK HERE
Bush 1. Grandfather
2. Ex Pres. Ex CIA
3. 43rd President
Skull
and
Bones
Hitler
Thule
Society
Copy of
Yale Univ.
Picks out
Educates
+ Finance
Hardliners
Any way OK! (population control)
Needs to be quick or we will be a
new Atlantis
German
Univ.
How?
Wars
Famine
Disease
DNA manipulation
Food
H
a
r
d
l
i
n
e
r
s
s
o
f
t
l
i
n
e
r
s
Education and
togetherness. Work
torwards Goal
Softliners will say things like We agree on the Goal but we can reach it through
Education and togetherness etc. It will take time but we can get there Recently softliners
within the system have reached out to the Old Gold People (who have stayed
underground since 65) to try and reign in the worst of the hardliner elements.
The Gold people have had no say for a long time but Banks still have old Gold certificates,
ticking at interest payable in Gold, in their vaults as funds. And that is Leverage..
Finance
Agendas
of
ultimate
modules
for
humanity
Shadows within the SYSTEM
Within this old Gold standard System
there are checks and controls in place.
The controls are built as triangles were
the 3 parties should not know or have
direct contact with each other. This
formula is repeated throughout the
system on all levels.
The Banking cartel probably thought
they could highjack the system for good
once they got the Fiat currency system
(paper money with just faith backing it)
fully in place and accepted by all. That
was a gradual process finally finalized
once Nixon effectively took the USD of
its tie to Gold.
It seems as if the Banking world
miscalculated the strength of the control
systems and are only now coming to
the realization that they will need the
cooperation of the Gold people. That is
why we in the future will see a shift in
focus of funds from the West towards
Asia and eventually Africa.
M1
3
5
7
9
13
33
Finance
Agendas
of
ultimate
modules
for
humanity
The M1 position is on one of these
three points.
M1 acts as Holder (H) of the assets. He
will act as the front face of owner but
actually does not have anything to do
with owning underlying hard assets. It is
a management position.
The accounts will be in his name and he
signs for a lot of it. He has the right to
2.5 % (basically the interest) of funds
under his management.
He is supported by a team of 70 people
directly underneath him.
M1
3
5
7
9
13
33
1
3
5
7
9
13
33
Finance
Agendas
of
ultimate
modules
for
humanity
On the opposite side of M1 at the
base of the triangle there is the
OWNER (OW) of the hard assets.
They will sit on and control the
underlying physical assets. These
are the assets that were
Legalized .
Legalized means that a company
came and inspected the asset +
issued a certificate that were
based on said asset. Now the
certificate can easily be moved
and lent out at interest while the
underlying asset never have to.
This certainly makes Banking a
whole lot easier. No need to cart
thousands of tons of Gold around.
M1
3
5
7
9
13
33
1
3
5
7
9
13
33
1
3
5
7
9
13
33
Spiritual
Ultimate
Controller
Finance
Agendas
of
ultimate
modules
for
humanity
The third top level is that of the
Controller (C). Ultimate Green
light for use of any asset. He
can stop anything the others
decide on but rarely instigate
Macro fund movements. It
seems the Chinese Royals
(KS) kept this part within their
bloodline.
All three (H,OW,C) signatories
are required for utilization of
any given asset. The same
controller (C) can sign for
hundreds of different accounts
and their position code within
the system is 3/3/3.
Another position code within
the system is 6/6/6 which is
one of higher authority than
3/3/3. At this point in time that
Master POA paper is still
waiting for a name to be filled
in.
M1
3
5
7
9
13
33
1
3
5
7
9
13
33
1
3
5
7
9
13
33
Spiritual
Ultimate
Controller
Finance
Agendas
of
ultimate
modules
for
humanity
The old Gold people also talks
of these code positions as
periods.
Supposedly the 6/6/6 period
is to be a transition period
leading into a 9/9/9 period of
ultimate peace and happiness
on earth.
They in turn get their
information and prophecies
from among other things an
ancient Gold book that contains
everything from beginning to
end of the human drama on
earth. Its believed to be part of
what King Solomon left here
together with his sword. It can
only be read by selected priests
using a specific tool.
How this all ties in with 2000 year old
scriptural prophecy please see a future
presentation that we are still working on.
the Brief & religious prophecies
33 Grand Master
Freemasons
The Freemasons, which
basically is the more visible
part of the Templar Knights
organization, is built up
much the same as the rest
of the system.
The visible base has 33
levels and you think you
are at the top if you
become a 33 degree
Grand Master Mason.
They do a lot of good
around the world and are a
serious player in allocating
funds for various projects.
It is unclear though what or
who is actually at the very
top and the spirit they
worship.
1
33
1
3
5
7
9
13
33
King of King
Working
with spirit
33 Grand Master
Freemasons
1
33
Above the 33 degree
Mason there are again 7
more layers leading to the
ultimate King of Kings.
At this level there is a lot of
work with spirit. All profess
to be working for God but
perceptions of God will
vary.
Some will say its Christ
that should sit at the top
others will claim Lucifer is
the good one.
If the top is Good the rest
follows but if the top is Bad
the same goes.
Time will tell who ultimately
takes the throne on a
permanent basis.
Whats next?
There seems to be two ways this can go depending who ends up winning the current
struggle for control over the System (Or a compromise that would include bits of both)
1. The Gold people come back in the game. Means we are back on some sort
of Gold standard with a international currency controlled by a multinational
assembly of sorts. More funds available for developing regions.
Whats next?
1. The Gold people comes back in the game. Means we are back on some sort
2. The Bankers continue to rule. A full on Fiat currency system using a cashless
society model. All transactions will have to go through a bank leaving them in
100% control. This will be perceived has having a lot of advantages. No more
theft, terrorists, drugs and such illegal activities. They will know everything
there is about you. You will be paying all your taxes automatically whatever
they are set to be and if you for any reason are not following what THEY
perceive as the right track they will cut you off. With no access to money or
markets there is nowhere else to hide. At first you still have your plastic card
but that would soon be replaced by the implanted, much more personal chip.
This chip they are already in the process of testing in different places around
the world.
Either way, For us to get there you can be rest assured that our current
Economic system will have to fail first. It is still the old proven method of;
Whats next?
1. The Gold people comes back in the game. Means we are back on some sort
2. The Bankers continue to rule. A full on Fiat currency system using a cashless
society model. All transactions will have to go through a bank leaving them in
100% control. This will be perceived has having a lot of advantages. No more
theft, terrorists, drugs and such illegal activities. They will know everything
there is about you. You will be paying all your taxes automatically whatever
they are set to be and if you for any reason are not following what THEY
perceive as the right track they will cut you off. With no access to money or
markets there is nowhere else to hide. At first you still have your plastic card
but that would soon be replaced by the implanted, much more personal chip.
This chip they are already in the process of testing in different places around
the world.
Either way, For us to get there you can be rest assured that our current
Economic system will have to fail first. It is still the old proven method of;
Create the problem, Present the solution.
What to do?
It is of critical importance that you have a backup plan that is not dependent on the
rest of the world working as it is now. Things will CHANGE. Not only on the economic
scene. Nature is also on collision course with how humans live today. Move towards
sustainability, get off credit and limit the use of credit/debit cards so when the chip
idea is presented you are ready to live without it. They wont make it easy so be
prepared to say no to a lot of current comforts in your life.
What to do?
Go back to basics. Live your life as a sovereign being. One that has the opportunity
to decide for him/herself what to do in any given situation. Much like the early
pioneers of America. To do that you need,
What to do?
Land & housing you can call your own. No loans or credit obligations to any
banks.
What to do?
banks.
Control your own food and water supply. If you cant grow it Store it! A three year
supply of essentials will go a long way towards taking care of whatever may
come in the future.
What to do?
banks.
Control your own food and water supply. If you cant grow it Store it! A three year
supply of essentials will go a long way towards taking care of whatever may
come in the future.
Surround yourself with likeminded people and enjoy life as it unfolds. Whatever
we have ahead of us is just like birthing pains, ultimately leading to the next step
of the human drama with us living life in harmony with the universe and closer to
God and our full human potential.
We wish you all the best
&
Enjoy your journey!

MORE ON FED OWNERSHIP & DIRECTORS
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913, has been
termed as "The Crime of the Century" in
one of the great speeches in our
lifetime, by the honorable Louis
Mcfadden, Representative from Canton,
Pennsylvania on June 10, 1932.

Mr . McFadden, due t o hi s havi ng ser ved as
Chai r man of t he Banki ng and Cur r ency
Commi t t ee f or mor e t han 10 year s, was t he
best post ed man on t hese mat t er s i n
Amer i ca and was i n a posi t i on t o speak
wi t h aut hor i t y of t he vast r ami f i cat i ons
of t hi s gi gant i c pr i vat e cr edi t monopol y.

HE DID NOT LIVE LONG AFTER DELIVERING THE
FOLLOWING SPEECH WHICH IS ALSO VERY
RELAVENT TO TODAYS BANKING SITUATION.

All intellectuals by now, understand
that this hideous institution is a credit
cartel, not American but controlled by
international bankers, such as
Rothschild, Warburgs and Schiffs.

I n addi t i on, t o t he speech i n 1932 by
Repr esent at i ve Mcf adden, on May 4t h,
1933, t wo mont hs af t er t he U. S f i l ed f or
bankr upt cy( Publ i c Law 93- 549) , t he
Congr essman f i l ed i mpeachment pr oceedi ngs
agai nst t he Feder al Reser ve Boar d.

Her e i s some passages f r omt he speech:
"Mr Chai r man, t he uni t ed st at es i s
MORE ON FED OWNERSHIP & DIRECTORS
BACK
bankr upt ! I t has been bankr upt ed by t he
cor r upt and di shonest Feder al Reser ve
Banks. I t has r epudi at ed i t s debt t o i t s
own ci t i zens. Its chief foreign creditor
is Great Britain and a British Bailiff
has been at the White House and British
agents are in the united states treasury
making inventories and arranging terms of
liquidity ! Mr . Chai r man, t he Feder al
Reser ve Boar d of f er ed t o col l ect t he
Br i t i sh cl ai ms i n f ul l f r omt he Amer i can
publ i c by t r i cker y and cor r upt i on, i f
Gr eat Br i t ai n wi l l hel p t he Feder al
Reser ve t o conceal i t s cr i mes. . . "

The r ef er enced passage was quot ed f r om
"The Gr eat est Cr i me i n Hi st or y" by Loui s
Mcf adden, cal l no. *C pv 3409, NYC publ i c
l i br ar y

On May 23, 1933, Congr essman, Loui s T.
McFadden, br ought f or mal char ges agai nst t he
Boar d of Gover nor s of t he Feder al Reser ve
Bank syst em, The Cont r ol l er of t he Cur r ency
and t he Secr et ar y of Uni t ed St at es Tr easur y
f or numer ous cr i mi nal act s, i ncl udi ng but
not l i mi t ed t o, CONSPI RACY, FRAUD, UNLAWFUL
CONVERSI ON, AND TREASON. The pet i t i on f or
Ar t i cl es of I mpeachment was t her eaf t er
r ef er r ed t o t he J udi ci ar y Commi t t ee and has
YET TO BE ACTED ON. So, t hi s ELECTRONI C
BOOKLET shoul d be r epr i nt ed, r e- post ed, set
up on web pages and ci r cul at ed f ar and wi de.

BACK
Congressman McFadden's Speech

Quot at i ons f r omsever al speeches made on t he
Fl oor of t he House of Repr esent at i ves by t he
Honor abl e Loui s T. McFadden of Pennsyl vani a.
Mr . McFadden, due t o hi s havi ng ser ved as
Chai r man of t he Banki ng and Cur r ency
Commi t t ee f or mor e t han 10 year s, was t he
best post ed man on t hese mat t er s i n Amer i ca
and was i n a posi t i on t o speak wi t h
aut hor i t y of t he vast r ami f i cat i ons of t hi s
gi gant i c pr i vat e cr edi t monopol y. As
Repr esent at i ve of a St at e whi ch was among
t he f i r st t o decl ar e i t s f r eedomf r om
f or ei gn money t yr ant s i t i s f i t t i ng t hat
Pennsyl vani a, t he cr adl e of l i ber t y, be
agai n gi ven t he cr edi t f or pr oduci ng a son
t hat was not af r ai d t o hur l def i ance i n t he
f ace of t he money- bun. Wher eas Mr . McFadden
was el ect ed t o t he hi gh of f i ce on bot h t he
Democr at i c and Republ i can t i cket s, t her e can
be no accusat i on of par t i sanshi p l odged
agai nst hi m. Because t hese speeches ar e set
out i n f ul l i n t he Congr essi onal Recor d,
t hey car r y wei ght t hat no amount of
condemnat i on on t he par t of pr i vat e
i ndi vi dual s coul d hope t o car r y.
The Feder al Reser ve - A Cor r upt I nst i t ut i on

"Mr . Chai r man, we have i n t hi s Count r y one
of t he most cor r upt i nst i t ut i ons t he wor l d
has ever known. I r ef er t o t he Feder al
Reser ve Boar d and t he Feder al Reser ve Banks,
her ei naf t er cal l ed t he Fed. The Fed has
cheat ed t he Gover nment of t hese Uni t ed
BACK
St at es and t he peopl e of t he Uni t ed St at es
out of enough money t o pay t he Nat i on' s
debt . The depr edat i ons and i ni qui t i es of t he
Fed has cost enough money t o pay t he
Nat i onal debt sever al t i mes over . "

"Thi s evi l i nst i t ut i on has i mpover i shed and
r ui ned t he peopl e of t hese Uni t ed St at es,
has bankr upt ed i t sel f , and has pr act i cal l y
bankr upt ed our Gover nment . I t has done t hi s
t hr ough t he def ect s of t he l aw under whi ch
i t oper at es, t hr ough t he mal admi ni st r at i on
of t hat l aw by t he Fed and t hr ough t he
cor r upt pr act i ces of t he moneyed vul t ur es
who cont r ol i t . "

"Some peopl e who t hi nk t hat t he Feder al
Reser ve Banks Uni t ed St at es Gover nment
i nst i t ut i ons. They ar e pr i vat e monopol i es
whi ch pr ey upon t he peopl e of t hese Uni t ed
St at es f or t he benef i t of t hemsel ves and
t hei r f or ei gn cust omer s; f or ei gn and
domest i c specul at or s and swi ndl er s; and r i ch
and pr edat or y money l ender . I n t hat dar k
cr ew of f i nanci al pi r at es t her e ar e t hose
who woul d cut a man' s t hr oat t o get a dol l ar
out of hi s pocket ; t her e ar e t hose who send
money i nt o st at es t o buy vot es t o cont r ol
our l egi sl at ur es; t her e ar e t hose who
mai nt ai n I nt er nat i onal pr opaganda f or t he
pur pose of decei vi ng us i nt o gr ant i ng of new
concessi ons whi ch wi l l per mi t t hemt o cover
up t hei r past mi sdeeds and set agai n i n
mot i on t hei r gi gant i c t r ai n of cr i me. "

BACK
"These t wel ve pr i vat e cr edi t monopol i es wer e
decei t f ul l y and di sl oyal l y f oi st ed upon t hi s
Count r y by t he banker s who came her e f r om
Eur ope and r epai d us our hospi t al i t y by
under mi ni ng our Amer i can i nst i t ut i ons. Those
banker s t ook money out of t hi s Count r y t o
f i nance J apan i n a war agai nst Russi a. They
cr eat ed a r ei gn of t er r or i n Russi a wi t h our
money i n or der t o hel p t hat war al ong. They
i nst i gat ed t he separ at e peace bet ween
Ger many and Russi a, and t hus dr ove a wedge
bet ween t he al l i es i n Wor l d War . They
f i nanced Tr ot sky' s passage f r omNew Yor k t o
Russi a so t hat he mi ght assi st i n t he
dest r uct i on of t he Russi an Empi r e. They
f oment ed and i nst i gat ed t he Russi an
Revol ut i on, and pl aced a l ar ge f und of
Amer i can dol l ar s at Tr ot sky' s di sposal i n
one of t hei r br anch banks i n Sweden so t hat
t hr ough hi mRussi an homes mi ght be
t hor oughl y br oken up and Russi an chi l dr en
f l ung f ar and wi de f r omt hei r nat ur al
pr ot ect or s. They have si nce begun br eaki ng
up of Amer i can homes and t he di sper sal of
Amer i can chi l dr en. Mr . Chai r man, t her e
shoul d be no par t i sanshi p i n mat t er s
concer ni ng banki ng and cur r ency af f ai r s i n
t hi s Count r y, and I do not speak wi t h any. "

"I n 1912 t he Nat i onal Monet ar y Associ at i on,
under t he chai r manshi p of t he l at e Senat or
Nel son W. Al dr i ch, made a r epor t and
pr esent ed a vi ci ous bi l l cal l ed t he Nat i onal
Reser ve Associ at i on bi l l . Thi s bi l l i s
usual l y spoken of as t he Al dr i ch bi l l .
BACK
Senat or Al dr i ch di d not wr i t e t he Al dr i ch
bi l l . He was t he t ool , i f not t he
accompl i ce, of t he Eur opean banker s who f or
near l y t went y year s had been schemi ng t o set
up a cent r al bank i n t hi s Count r y and who i n
1912 has spent and wer e cont i nui ng t o spend
vast sums of money t o accompl i sh t hei r
pur pose. "

"We wer e opposed t o t he Al dr i ch pl an f or a
cent r al bank. The men who r ul e t he
Democr at i c Par t y t hen pr omi sed t he peopl e
t hat i f t hey wer e r et ur ned t o power t her e
woul d be no cent r al bank est abl i shed her e
whi l e t hey hel d t he r ei gns of gover nment .
Thi r t een mont hs l at er t hat pr omi se was
br oken, and t he Wi l son admi ni st r at i on, under
t he t ut el age of t hose si ni st er Wal l St r eet
f i gur es who st ood behi nd Col onel House,
est abl i shed her e i n our f r ee Count r y t he
wor m- eat en monar chi cal i nst i t ut i on of t he
' Ki ng' s Bank' t o cont r ol us f r omt he t op
downwar d, and f r omt he cr adl e t o t he gr ave. "

"The Feder al Reser ve Bank dest r oyed our ol d
and char act er i st i c way of doi ng busi ness. I t
di scr i mi nat ed agai nst our 1- name commer ci al
paper , t he f i nest i n t he wor l d, and i t set
up t he ant i quat ed 2- name paper , whi ch i s t he
pr esent cur se of t hi s Count r y and whi ch
wr ecked ever y count r y whi ch has ever gi ven
i t scope; i t f ast ened down upon t he Count r y
t he ver y t yr anny f r omwhi ch t he f r amer s of
t he Const i t ut i on sough t o save us. "
PRESI DENT J ACKSON' S TI ME
BACK

"One of t he gr eat est bat t l es f or t he
pr eser vat i on of t hi s Republ i c was f ought out
her e i n J ackson' s t i me; when t he second Bank
of t he Uni t ed St at es, f ounded on t he same
f al se pr i nci pl es of t hose whi ch ar e her e
exempl i f i ed i n t he Fed was hur l ed out of
exi st ence. Af t er t hat , i n 1837, t he Count r y
was war ned agai nst t he danger s t hat mi ght
ensue i f t he pr edat or y i nt er est s af t er bei ng
cast out shoul d come back i n di sgui se and
uni t e t hemsel ves t o t he Execut i ve and
t hr ough hi macqui r e cont r ol of t he
Gover nment . That i s what t he pr edat or y
i nt er est s di d when t hey came back i n t he
l i ver y of hypocr i sy and under f al se
pr et enses obt ai ned t he passage of t he Fed. "

"The danger t hat t he Count r y was war ned
agai nst came upon us and i s shown i n t he
l ong t r ai n of hor r or s at t endant upon t he
af f ai r s of t he t r ai t or ous and di shonest Fed.
Look ar ound you when you l eave t hi s Chamber
and you wi l l see evi dences of i t i n al l
si des. Thi s i s an er a of mi ser y and f or t he
condi t i ons t hat caused t hat mi ser y, t he Fed
ar e f ul l y l i abl e. Thi s i s an er a of f i nanced
cr i me and i n t he f i nanci ng of cr i me t he Fed
does not pl ay t he par t of a di si nt er est ed
spect at or . "

"I t has been sai d t hat t he dr aught s man who
was empl oyed t o wr i t e t he t ext of t he
Al dr i ch bi l l because t hat had been dr awn up
by l awyer s, by accept ance banker s of
BACK
Eur opean or i gi n i n New Yor k. I t was a copy,
i n gener al a t r ansl at i on of t he st at ues of
t he Rei chsbank and ot her Eur opean cent r al
banks. One- hal f mi l l i on dol l ar s was spent on
t he par t of t he pr opaganda or gani zed by
t hese banker s f or t he pur pose of mi sl eadi ng
publ i c opi ni on and gi vi ng Congr ess t he
i mpr essi on t hat t her e was an over whel mi ng
popul ar demand f or i t and t he ki nd of
cur r ency t hat goes wi t h i t , namel y, an asset
cur r ency based on human debt s and
obl i gat i ons. Dr . H. Par ker Wi l l i s had been
empl oyed by Wal l St r eet and pr opagandi st s,
and when t he Al dr i ch measur e f ai l ed- he
obt ai ned empl oyment wi t h Car t er Gl ass, t o
assi st i n dr awi ng t he banki ng bi l l f or t he
Wi l son admi ni st r at i on. He appr opr i at ed t he
t ext of t he Al dr i ch bi l l . Ther e i s no secr et
about i t . The t est of t he Feder al Reser ve
Act was t ai nt ed f r omt he f i r st . "

"A f ew days bef or e t he bi l l came t o a vot e,
Senat or Henr y Cabot Lodge, of Massachuset t s,
wr ot e t o Senat or J ohn W. Weeks as f ol l ows:

New Yor k Ci t y,
December 17, 1913

' My Dear Senat or Weeks:

Thr oughout my publ i c l i f e I have
suppor t ed al l measur es desi gned t o t ake t he
Gover nment out of t he banki ng busi ness. Thi s
bi l l put s t he Gover nment i nt o t he banki ng
busi ness as never bef or e i n our hi st or y. The
BACK
power s vest ed i n t he Feder al Reser ve Boar d
seen t o me hi ghl y danger ous especi al l y wher e
t her e i s pol i t i cal cont r ol of t he Boar d. I
shoul d be sor r y t o hol d st ock i n a bank
subj ect t o such domi nat i ons. The bi l l as i t
st ands seems t o me t o open t he way t o a vast
i nf l at i on of t he cur r ency. I had hoped t o
suppor t t hi s bi l l , but I cannot vot e f or i t
cause i t seems t o me t o cont ai n f eat ur es and
t o r est upon pr i nci pl es i n t he hi ghest
degr ee menaci ng t o our pr osper i t y, t o
st abi l i t y i n busi ness, and t o t he gener al
wel f ar e of t he peopl e of t he Uni t ed St at es.
Ver y Tr ul y Your s,
Henr y Cabot Lodge. '

"I n ei ght een year s t hat have passed si nce
Senat or Lodge wr ot e t hat l et t er of war ni ng
al l of hi s pr edi ct i ons have come t r ue. The
Gover nment i s i n t he banki ng busi ness as
never bef or e. Agai nst i t s wi l l i t has been
made t he backer of hor se t hi eves and car d
shar ps, boot l egger ' s smuggl er s, specul at or s,
and swi ndl er s i n al l par t s of t he wor l d.
Thr ough t he Fed t he r i f f r af f of ever y
count r y i s oper at i ng on t he publ i c cr edi t of
t he Uni t ed St at es Gover nment . "
THE GREAT DEPRESSI ON

"Meanwhi l e and on account of i t , we
our sel ves ar e i n t he mi dst of t he gr eat est
depr essi on we have ever known. Fr omt he
At l ant i c t o t he Paci f i c, our Count r y has
been r avaged and l ai d wast e by t he evi l
pr act i ces of t he Fed and t he i nt er est s whi ch
BACK
cont r ol t hem. At no t i me i n our hi st or y, has
t he gener al wel f ar e of t he peopl e been at a
l ower l evel or t he mi nds of t he peopl e so
f ul l of despai r . "

"Recent l y i n one of our St at es, 60, 000
dwel l i ng houses and f ar ms wer e br ought under
t he hammer i n a si ngl e day. 71, 000 houses
and f ar ms i n Oakl and Count y, Mi chi gan, wer e
sol d and t hei r er st whi l e owner s
di spossessed. The peopl e who have t hus been
dr i ven out ar e t he wast age of t he Fed. They
ar e t he vi ct i ms of t he Fed. Thei r chi l dr en
ar e t he new sl aves of t he auct i on bl ocks i n
t he r evi val of t he i nst i t ut i on of human
sl aver y. "
The Scheme of t he Fed

"I n 1913, bef or e t he Senat e Banki ng and
Cur r ency Commi t t ee, Mr . Al exander Lassen
made t he f ol l owi ng st at ement : ' The whol e
scheme of t he Fed wi t h i t s commer ci al paper
i s an i mpr act i cal , cumber some machi ner y- i s
si mpl y a cover t o secur e t he pr i vi l ege of
i ssui ng money, and t o evade payment of as
much t ax upon ci r cul at i on as possi bl e and
t hen cont r ol t he i ssue and mai nt ai n, i nst ead
of r educi ng i nt er est r at es. I t wi l l pr ove t o
t he advant age of t he f ew and t he det r i ment
of t he peopl e. I t wi l l mean cont i nued
shor t age of act ual money and f ur t her
ext ensi on of cr edi t s, f or when t her e i s a
shor t age of money peopl e have t o bor r ow t o
t hei r cost . ' A f ew days bef or e t he Fed
passed, Senat or Root denounced t he Fed as an
BACK
out r age on our l i ber t i es. He pr edi ct ed:
' Long bef or e we wake up f r omour dr eamof
pr osper i t y t hr ough an i nf l at ed cur r ency, our
gol d- whi ch al one coul d have kept us f r om
cat ast r ophe- wi l l have vani shed and no r at e
of i nt er est wi l l t empt i t t o r et ur n. ' "

"I f ever a pr ophecy came t r ue, t hat one
di d. "

"The Fed became l aw t he day bef or e Chr i st mas
Eve, i n t he year 1913, and shor t l y
af t er war ds, t he Ger man I nt er nat i onal
banker s, Kuhn, Loeb and Co. sent one of
t hei r par t ner s her e t o r un i t . "

"The Fed Not e i s essent i al l y unsound. I t i s
t he wor st cur r ency and t he most danger ous
t hat t hi s Count r y has ever known. When t he
pr oponent s of t he act saw t hat t he
Democr at i c doct r i ne woul d not per mi t t hemt o
l et t he pr oposed banks i ssue t he new
cur r ency as bank not es, t hey shoul d have
st opped at t hat . They shoul d not have
f oi st ed t hat ki nd of cur r ency, namel y, an
asset cur r ency, on t he Uni t ed St at es
Gover nment . They shoul d not have made t he
Gover nment [ l i abl e on t he pr i vat e] debt s of
i ndi vi dual s and cor por at i ons, and, l east of
al l , on t he pr i vat e debt s of f or ei gner s. As
Kemer er says: ' The Fed Not es, t her ef or e, i n
f or m, have some of t he qual i t i es of
Gover nment paper money, but i n subst ance,
ar e al most a pur e asset cur r ency possessi ng
a Gover nment guar ant ee agai nst whi ch
BACK
cont i ngency t he Gover nment has made no
pr ovi si on what ever . ' "

"Hon. L. J . Hi l l , a f or mer member of t he
House, sai d, and t r ul y: ' They ar e
obl i gat i ons of t he Gover nment f or whi ch t he
Uni t ed St at es r ecei ved not hi ng and f or t he
payment of whi ch at any t i me, i t assumes t he
r esponsi bi l i t y: l ooki ng t o t he Fed t o r ecoup
i t sel f . ' "

"I f t hi s Uni t ed St at es i s t o r edeemt he Fed
Not es, when t he Gener al Publ i c f i nds i t
cost s t o del i ver t hi s paper t o t he Fed, and
i f t he Gover nment has made no pr ovi si ons f or
r edeemi ng t hem, t he f i r st el ement of
unsoundness i s not f ar t o seek. "

"Bef or e t he Banki ng and Cur r ency Commi t t ee,
when t he bi l l was under di scussi on Mr .
Cr ozi er of Ci nci nnat i sai d: ' The i mper i al
power of el ast i ci t y of t he publ i c cur r ency
i s wi el ded excl usi vel y by t he cent r al
cor por at i ons owned by t he banks. Thi s i s a
l i f e and deat h power over al l l ocal banks
and al l busi ness. I t can be used t o cr eat e
or dest r oy pr osper i t y, t o war d of f or cause
st r i ngenci es and pani cs. By maki ng money
ar t i f i ci al l y scar ce, i nt er est r at es
t hr oughout t he Count r y can be ar bi t r ar i l y
r ai sed and t he bank t ax on al l busi ness and
cost of l i vi ng i ncr eased f or t he pr of i t of
t he banks owni ng t hese r egi onal cent r al
banks, and wi t hout t he sl i ght est benef i t t o
t he peopl e. The 12 Cor por at i ons t oget her
BACK
cover y and monopol i ze and use f or pr i vat e
gai n- ever y dol l ar of t he publ i c cur r ency
and al l publ i c r evenue of t he Uni t ed St at es.
Not a dol l ar can be put i nt o ci r cul at i on
among t he peopl e by t hei r Gover nment ,
wi t hout t he consent of and on t er ms f i xed by
t hese 12 pr i vat e money t r ust s. ' "

"I n def i ance of t hi s and al l ot her war ni ngs,
t he pr oponent s of t he Fed cr eat ed t he 12
pr i vat e cr edi t cor por at i ons and gave t heman
absol ut e monopol y of t he cur r ency of t hese
Uni t ed St at es- not of t he Fed Not es al one-
but of al l ot her cur r ency! The Fed Act
pr ovi di ng ways and means by whi ch t he gol d
and gener al cur r ency i n t he hands of t he
Amer i can peopl e coul d be obt ai ned by t he Fed
i n exchange f or Fed Not es - whi ch ar e not
money - but mer e pr omi ses t o pay. "

"Si nce t he evi l day when t hi s was done, t he
i ni t i al monopol y has been ext ended by
vi ci ous amendment s t o t he Fed and by t he
unl awf ul and t r easonabl e pr act i ces of t he
Fed. "
Money f or t he Scot t i sh Di st i l l er s

"Mr . Chai r man, i f a Scot t i sh di st i l l er
wi shes t o send a car go of Scot ch whi skey t o
t hese Uni t ed St at es, he can dr aw hi s bi l l
agai nst t he pur chasi ng boot l egger i n dol l ar s
and af t er t he boot l egger has accept ed i t by
wr i t i ng hi s name acr oss t he f ace of i t , t he
Scot ch di st i l l er can send t hat bi l l t o t he
nef ar i ous open di scount mar ket i n New Yor k
BACK
Ci t y wher e t he Fed wi l l buy i t and use i t as
col l at er al f or a new i ssue of Fed Not es.
Thus t he Gover nment of t hese Uni t ed St at es
pay t he Scot ch di st i l l er f or t he whi skey
bef or e i t i s shi pped, and i f i t i s l ost on
t he way, or i f t he Coast Guar d sei zes i t and
dest r oys i t , t he Fed si mpl y wr i t e of f t he
l oss and t he gover nment never r ecover s t he
money t hat was pai d t o t he Scot ch
di st i l l er . "

"Whi l e we ar e at t empt i ng t o enf or ce
pr ohi bi t i on her e, t he Fed ar e i n t he
di st i l l er y busi ness i n Eur ope and payi ng
boot l egger bi l l s wi t h publ i c cr edi t of t hese
Uni t ed St at es. "Mr . Chai r man, by t he same
pr ocess, t hey compel our Gover nment t o pay
t he Ger man br ewer f or hi s beer . Why shoul d
t he Fed be per mi t t ed t o f i nance t he br ewi ng
i ndust r y i n Ger many ei t her i n t hi s way or as
t hey do by compel l i ng smal l and f ear f ul
Uni t ed St at es Banks t o t ake st ock i n t he
I senbeck Br ewer y and i n t he Ger man Bank f or
br ewi ng i ndust r i es? Mr . Chai r man, i f Dynami t
Nobel of Ger many, wi shes t o sel l dynami t e i n
J apan t o use i n Manchur i a or el sewher e, i t
can dr ew i t s bi l l agai nst t he J apanese
cust omer s i n dol l ar s and send t hat bi l l t o
t he nef ar i ous open di scount mar ket i n New
Yor k Ci t y wher e t he Fed wi l l buy i t and use
i t as col l at er al f or a new i ssue of Fed
Not es- whi l e at t he same t i me t he Fed wi l l
be hel pi ng Dynami t Nobel by st uf f i ng i t s
st ock i nt o t he Uni t ed St at es banki ng
syst em. "
BACK

"Why shoul d we send our r epr esent at i ves t o
t he di sar mament conf er ence at Geneva - whi l e
t he Fed i s maki ng our Gover nment pay
J apanese debt s t o Ger man Muni t i ons maker s?"

"Mr . Chai r man, i f a Ger man wi shes t o r ai se a
cr op of beans and sel l t hemt o a J apanese
cust omer , he can dr aw a bi l l agai nst hi s
pr ospect i ve J apanese cust omer i n dol l ar s and
have i t pur chased by t he Fed and get t he
money out of t hi s Count r y at t he expense of
t he Amer i can peopl e bef or e he has even
pl ant ed t he beans i n t he gr ound. Mr .
Chai r man, i f a Ger man i n Ger many wi shes t o
expor t goods t o Sout h Amer i ca, or any ot her
Count r y, he can dr aw hi s bi l l agai nst hi s
cust omer s and send i t t o t hese Uni t ed St at es
and get t he money out of t hi s Count r y bef or e
he shi ps, or even manuf act ur es t he goods. "

"Mr . Chai r man, why shoul d t he cur r ency of
t hese Uni t ed St at es be i ssued on t he
st r engt h of Ger man Beer ? Why shoul d i t be
i ssued on t he cr op of unpl ant ed beans t o be
gr own i n Chi l i f or J apanese consumpt i on? Why
shoul d t hese Uni t ed St at es be compel l ed t o
i ssue many bi l l i ons of dol l ar s ever y year t o
pay t he debt s of one f or ei gner t o anot her
f or ei gner ? Was i t f or t hi s t hat our Nat i onal
Bank deposi t or s had t hei r money t aken out of
our banks and shi pped abr oad? Was i t f or
t hi s t hat t hey had t o l ose i t ? Why shoul d
t he publ i c cr edi t of t hese Uni t ed St at es and
l i kewi se money bel ongi ng t o our Nat i onal
BACK
Bank deposi t or s be used t o suppor t f or ei gn
br ewer s, nar cot i c dr ug vendor s, whi skey
di st i l l er s, wi g makes, human hai r mer chant s,
Chi l ean bean gr ower s, t o f i nance t he
muni t i on f act or i es of Ger many and Sovi et
Russi a?"
THE UNI TED STATES HAS BEEN RANSACKED

"The Uni t ed St at es has been r ansacked and
pi l l aged. Our st r uct ur es have been gut t ed
and onl y t he wal l s ar e l ef t st andi ng. Whi l e
bei ng per pet r at ed, ever yt hi ng t he wor l d
woul d r ake up t o sel l us was br ought i n her e
at our expense by t he Fed unt i l our mar ket s
wer e swamped wi t h unneeded and unwant ed
i mpor t ed goods pr i ced f ar above t hei r val ue
and make t o equal t he dol l ar vol ume of our
honest expor t s, and t o ki l l or r educe our
f avor i t e bal ance of t r ade. As Agent s of t he
f or ei gn cent r al banks t he Fed t r y by ever y
means i n t hei r power t o r educe our f avor abl e
bal ance of t r ade. They act f or t hei r f or ei gn
pr i nci pal and t hey accept f ees f r om
f or ei gner s f or act i ng agai nst t he best
i nt er est s of t hese Uni t ed St at es. Nat ur al l y
t her e has been gr eat compet i t i on among
f or ei gner s f or t he f avor s of t he Fed. "

"What we need t o do i s t o send t he r eser ves
of our Nat i onal Banks home t o t he peopl e who
ear ned and pr oduced t hemand who st i l l own
t hemand t o t he banks whi ch wer e compel l ed
t o sur r ender t hemt o pr edat or y i nt er est s. "

BACK
"Mr . Chai r man, t her e i s not hi ng l i ke t he Fed
pool of conf i scat ed bank deposi t s i n t he
wor l d. I t i s a publ i c t r ough of Amer i can
weal t h i n whi ch t he f or ei gner s cl ai mr i ght s,
equal t o or gr eat er t han Amer i cans. The Fed
ar e t he agent s of t he f or ei gn cent r al banks.
They use our bank deposi t or s' money f or t he
benef i t of t hei r f or ei gn pr i nci pal s. They
bar t er t he publ i c cr edi t of t he Uni t ed
St at es Gover nment and hi r e i t our t o
f or ei gner s at a pr of i t t o t hemsel ves. "

"Al l t hi s i s done at t he expense of t he
Uni t ed St at es Gover nment , and at a si ckeni ng
l oss t o t he Amer i can peopl e. Onl y our gr eat
weal t h enabl ed us t o st and t he dr ai n of i t
as l ong as we di d. "

"We need t o dest r oy t he Fed wher ei n our
nat i onal r eser ves ar e i mpounded f or t he
benef i t of t he f or ei gner s. "We need t o save
Amer i ca f or Amer i cans. "
SPURI OUS SECURI TI ES

"Mr . Chai r man, when you hol d a $10. 00 Fed
Not e i n your hand, you ar e hol di ng api ece of
paper whi ch sooner or l at er i s goi ng t o cost
t he Uni t ed St at es Gover nment $10. 00 i n gol d
( unl ess t he Gover nment i s obl i ged t o go of f
t he gol d st andar d) . I t i s based on l i mbur ger
cheese ( r epor t ed t o be i n f or ei gn
war ehouses) or i n cans pur por t ed t o cont ai n
peas ( but may cont ai n sal t wat er i nst ead) ,
or hor se meat , i l l i ci t dr ugs, boot l egger s
f anci es, r ags and bones f r omSovi et Russi a
BACK
( of whi ch t hese Uni t ed St at es i mpor t ed over
a mi l l i on dol l ar s wor t h l ast year ) , on wi nes
whi skey, nat ur al gas, goat and dog f ur ,
gar l i c on t he st r i ng, and Bombay ducks. "

"I f you l i ke t o have paper money- whi ch i s
secur ed by such commodi t i es - you have i t i n
Fed Not e. I f you desi r e t o obt ai n t he t hi ng
of val ue upon whi ch t hi s paper cur r ency i s
based, t hat i s, t he l i mbur ger cheese, t he
whi skey, t he i l l i ci t dr ugs, or any of t he
ot her st apl es- you wi l l have a ver y har d
t i me f i ndi ng t hem. "

"Many of t hese wor shi pf ul commodi t i es ar e i n
f or ei gn Count r i es. Ar e you goi ng t o Ger many
t o i nspect her war ehouses t o see i f t he
speci f i ed t hi ngs of val ue ar e t her e? I t hi nk
mor e, I do not t hi nk t hat you woul d f i nd
t hemt her e i f you di d go. "

"On Apr i l 27, 1932, t he Fed out f i t sent
$750, 000 bel ongi ng t o Amer i can bank
deposi t or s i n gol d t o Ger many. A week l at er
anot her $300, 000 i n gol d was shi pped t o
Ger many. About t he mi ddl e of May $12, 000, 000
i n gol d was shi pped t o Ger many by t he Fed.
Al most ever y week t her e i s a shi pment of
gol d t o Ger many. These shi pment s ar e not
made f or pr of i t on t he exchange si nce t he
Ger man mar ks ar e bl ow par i t y wi t h t he
dol l ar . "

"Mr . Chai r man, I bel i eve t hat t he Nat i onal
Bank deposi t or s of t hese Uni t ed St at es have
BACK
a r i ght t o know what t he Fed ar e doi ng wi t h
t hei r money. Ther e ar e mi l l i ons of Nat i onal
Bank deposi t or s i n t he Count r y who do not
know t hat a per cent age of ever y dol l ar t hey
deposi t i n a Member Bank of t he Fed goes
aut omat i cal l y t o Amer i can Agent s of t he
f or ei gn banks and t hat al l t hei r deposi t s
can be pai d away t o f or ei gner s wi t hout t hei r
knowl edge or consent by t he cr ooked
machi ner y of t he Fed and t he quest i onabl e
pr act i ces of t he Fed. "

[ Ed. Not e - Pr obl emwi t h next par agr aph i n
or i gi nal ] "Mr . Chai r man, t he Amer i can peopl e
shoul d be t ol d t he t r ut h by t hei r ser vant s
i n of f i ce. I n 1930, we had over a hal f
bi l l i on dol l ar s out st andi ng dai l y t o f i nance
f or ei gn goods st or ed i n or shi pped bet ween
sever al bi l l i on dol l ar s. What goods ar e
t hese on whi ch t he Fed year l y pl edge sever al
bi l l i ons of dol l ar s. I n i t s year l y t ot al ,
t hi s i t emamount s t o sever al bi l l i ons of
dol l ar s of t he publ i c cr edi t of t hese Uni t ed
St at es?"

"What goods ar e t hose whi ch ar e hi dden i n
Eur opean and Asi at i c st or es have not been
seen by any of f i cer of our Gover nment but
whi ch ar e bei ng f i nanced on t he publ i c
cr edi t of t he Uni t ed St at es Gover nment ? What
goods ar e t hose upon whi ch t he 17 Uni t ed
St at es Gover nment i s bei ng obl i gat ed by t he
Fed t o i ssue Fed Not es t o t he ext ent of
sever al bi l l i ons of dol l ar s a year ?"
The Banker s' Accept ance Racket
BACK

"The Fed have been I nt er nat i onal Banks f r om
t he begi nni ng, wi t h t hese Uni t ed St at es as
t hei r enf or ced banker and suppl i er of
cur r ency. But i t i s none t he l ess
ext r aor di nar y t o see t hese t wel ve pr i vat e
cr edi t monopol i es, buyi ng t he debt s of
f or ei gner s agai nst f or ei gner s, i n al l par t s
of t he wor l d and aski ng t he Gover nment of
t hese Uni t ed St at es f or new i ssues of Fed
not es i n exchange f or t hem. The magni t ude of
t he accept ance r acket as i t has been
devel oped by t he Fed, t hei r f or ei gn
cor r espondent s, and t he pr edat or y Eur opean
bor n banker s, who set up t he Fed her e and
t aught your own, by and of pi r at es, how t o
l oot t he peopl e: I say t he magni t ude of t hi s
r acket i s est i mat ed t o be i n t he
nei ghbor hood of 9, 000, 000, 000 per year . I n
t he past t en year s i t i s sai d t o have
amount ed t o $90, 000, 000, 000. 00. I n my
opi ni on i t has amount ed t o sever al t i mes
t hat much. coupl ed t o t hi s you have t o t he
ext ent of bi l l i ons of dol l ar s, t he gambl i ng
i n t he Uni t ed St at es secur i t i es, whi ch t akes
pl ace i n t he same open di scount mar ket - a
gambl i ng on whi ch t he Fed i s now spendi ng
$100, 000, 000. 00 per week. "

"Fed Not es ar e t aken f r omt he U. S.
Gover nment i n unl i mi t ed quant i t i es. I s i s
st r ange t hat t he bur den of suppl yi ng t hese
i mmense sums of money t o t he gambl i ng
f r at er ni t y has at l ast pr oved t oo heavy f or
t he Amer i can peopl e t o endur e? Woul d i t not
BACK
be a nat i onal [ cal ami t y t o] agai n bi nd down
t hi s bur den on t he backs of t he Amer i can
peopl e and by means of a l ong r awhi de whi p
of t he cr edi t mast er s, compel t hemt o ent er
anot her sevent een year s of sl aver y?"

"They ar e t r yi ng t o do t hat now. They ar e
t r yi ng t o t ake $100, 000, 000. 00 of t he publ i c
cr edi t of t he Uni t ed St at es ever y week, i n
addi t i on t o al l t hei r ot her sei zur es and
t hey ar e sendi ng t hat money t o t he nef ar i ous
open mar ket i n a desper at e gambl e t o
r eest abl i sh t hei r gr af t as a goi ng concer n. "

"They ar e put t i ng t he Uni t ed St at es
Gover nment i n debt t o t he ext ent of
$100, 000, 000 a week, and wi t h t he money t hey
ar e buyi ng our Gover nment secur i t i es f or
t hemsel ves and t hei r f or ei gn pr i nci pal s. Our
peopl e ar e di sgust ed wi t h t he exper i ences of
t he Fed. The Fed i s not pr oduci ng a l oaf of
br ead, a yar d of cl ot h, a bushel of cor n, or
a pi l e of cor dwood by i t s check- ki t i ng
oper at i ons i n t he money mar ket . "

"Mr . Speaker , on t he 13t h of J anuar y of t hi s
year I addr essed t he House on t he subj ect of
t he Reconst r uct i on Fi nance Cor por at i on. I n
t he cour se of my r emar ks I made t he
f ol l owi ng st at ement : I n 1928 t he member
banks of t he Fed bor r owed $60, 598, 690, 000.
f r omt he Fed on t hei r f i f t een- day pr omi ssor y
not es. Thi nk of i t . Si xt y bi l l i on dol l ar s
payabl e on demand i n gol d i n t he cour se of
one si ngl e year . The act ual amount of such
BACK
obl i gat i ons cal l ed f or si x t i mes as much
monet ar y gol d as t her e i s i n t he wor l d. Such
t r ansact i ons r epr esent a gr ant i n t he cour se
of one si ngl e year s of about $7, 000, 000 t o
ever y member of t he Fed. "

"I s i t any wonder t hat Amer i can l abor whi ch
ul t i mat el y pays t he cost of al l banki ng
oper at i ons of t hi s Count r y has at l ast
pr oved unequal t o t he t ask of suppl yi ng t hi s
huge t ot al of cash and cr edi t f or t he
benef i t of t he st ock mar ket mani pul at or s and
f or ei gn swi ndl er s? I n 1933 t he Fed pr esent ed
t he st agger i ng amount of $60, 598, 690, 000 t o
i t s member banks at t he expense of t he wage
ear ner s and t ax payer s of t hese Uni t ed
St at es. I n 1929, t he year of t he st ock
mar ket cr ash, t he Fed advanced
$58, 000, 000, 000 t o member banks. "

"I n 1930 whi l e t he specul at i ng banks wer e
get t i ng out of t he st ock mar ket at t he
expense of t he gener al publ i c, t he Fed
advanced t hem$13, 022, 782, 000. Thi s shows
t hat when t he banks wer e gambl i ng on t he
publ i c cr edi t of t hese Uni t ed St at es as
r epr esent ed by t he Fed cur r ency t hey wer e
subsi di zed t o any amount t hey r equi r ed by
t he Fed. When t he swi ndl e began t o f al l , t he
banker s knew i t i n advance and wi t hdr ew f r om
t he mar ket . They got out wi t h whol e ski ns -
and l ef t t he peopl e of t hese Uni t ed St at es
t o pay t he pi per . My f r i end f r omKansas, Mr .
McGugi n, has st at ed t hat he t hought t he Fed
l ent money on r edi scount i ng. So t hey do, but
BACK
t hey l end compar at i vel y l i t t l e t hat way. The
r eal di scount i ng t hat t hey do has been
cal l ed a mer e penny i n t he sl ot busi ness. I t
i s t oo sl ow f or genui ne hi gh f l yer s. They
di scour age i t . They pr ef er t o subsi di ze
t hei r f avor i t e banks by maki ng t hem
$60, 000, 000, 000 advances and t hey pr ef er t o
acqui r e assi st ance i n t he not or i ous open
di scount mar ket i n New Yor k, wher e t hey can
use i t t o cont r ol t he pr i ce of st ocks and
bonds on t he exchanges. "

"For ever y dol l ar t hey advanced on di scount s
i n 1928, t hey l ent $33. 00 t o t hei r f avor i t e
banks f or whomt hey do a busi ness of sever al
bi l l i on dol l ar s i ncome t ax on t hei r pr of i t s
t o t hese Uni t ed St at es. "
The J ohn Law Swi ndl e

"Thi s i s t he J ohn Law swi ndl e over agai n.
The t hef t of Teapot Dome was t r i f l i ng
compar ed t o i t . What Ki ng ever r obbed hi s
subj ect t o such an ext ent as t he Fed has
r obbed us? I s i t any wonder t hat t her e have
been l at el y ni net y cases of st ar vat i on i n
one of t he New Yor k hospi t al s? I s t her e any
wonder t hat t he chi l dr en ar e bei ng
abandoned?"

"The gover nment and t he peopl e of t hese
Uni t ed St at es have been swi ndl ed by
swi ndl er s del uxe t o whomt he acqui si t i on of
Amer i can or a par cel of Fed Not es pr esent ed
no mor e di f f i cul t y t han t he dr awi ng up of a
wor t hl ess accept ance i n a Count r y not
BACK
subj ect t o t he l aws of t hese Uni t ed St at es,
by shar per s not subj ect t o t he j ur i sdi ct i on
of t hese Uni t ed St at es, shar per s wi t h st r ong
banki ng "f ence" on t hi s si de of t he wat er , a
' f ence' act i ng as a r ecei ver of a wor t hl ess
paper comi ng f r omabr oad, endor si ng i t and
get t i ng t he cur r ency out of t he Fed f or i t
as qui ckl y as possi bl e exchangi ng t hat
cur r ency f or gol d and i n t ur n t r ansmi t t i ng
t he gol d t o i t s f or ei gn conf eder at es. "
I var Kr euger , t he Mat ch Ki ng!

"Such wer e t he expl oi t s of I var Kr ueger , Mr .
Hoover ' s f r i end, and hi s r ot t en Wal l St r eet
baker s. Ever y dol l ar of t he bi l l i ons Kr euger
and hi s gang dr ew out of t hi s Count r y on
accept ances was dr awn f r omt he gover nment
and t he peopl e of t he Uni t ed St at es t hr ough
t he Fed. The cr edi t of t he Uni t ed St at es
Gover nment was peddl ed t o hi mby t he Fed f or
t hei r own pr i vat e gai n. That i s what t he Fed
has been doi ng f or many year s. "

"They have been peddl i ng t he cr edi t of t hi s
Gover nment and t he [ si gnat ur e of t hi s]
Gover nment t o t he swi ndl er s and specul at or s
of al l nat i ons. That i s what happens when a
Count r y f or sakes i t s Const i t ut i on and gi ves
i t s sover ei gnt y over t he publ i c cur r ency t o
pr i vat e i nt er est s. Gi ve t hemt he f l ag and
t hey wi l l sel l i t . "

"The nat ur e of Kr euger ' s or gani zed swi ndl e
and t he bankr upt condi t i on of Kr euger ' s
combi ne was known her e l ast J une when Hoover
BACK
sought t o exempt Kr ueger ' s l oan t o Ger many
of $125, 000, 000 f r omt he oper at i on of t he
Hoover Mor at or i um. The bankr upt condi t i on of
Kr ueger ' s swi ndl e was known her l ast summer
when $30, 000, 000 was t aken f r omt he Amer i can
t axpayer s by cer t ai n banker s i n New Yor k f or
t he ost ensi bl e pur pose of per mi t t i ng Kr ueger
t o make a l oan t o Col ombi a. Col ombi a never
saw t hat money. "

"The nat ur e of Kr ueger ' s swi ndl e was known
her e i n J anuar y when he vi si t ed hi s f r i end,
Mr . Hoover , at t he Whi t e House. I t was known
her e i n Mar ch bef or e he went t o Par i s and
commi t t ed sui ci de. "

"Mr . Chai r man, I t hi nk t he peopl e of t he
Uni t ed St at es ar e ent i t l ed t o know how many
bi l l i ons of dol l ar s wer e pl aced at t he
di sposal of Kr ueger and hi s gi gant i c combi ne
by t he Fed, and t o know how much of our
Gover nment cur r ency was i ssued and l ost i n
t he f i nanci ng of t hat gr eat swi ndl e i n t he
year s dur i ng whi ch t he Fed t ook car e of
Kr ueger ' s r equi r ement s. "

"A f ew days ago, t he Pr esi dent of t he Uni t ed
St at es wi t h a whi t e f ace and shaki ng hands,
went bef or e t he Senat e of behal f of t he
moneyed i nt er est s and asked t he Senat e t o
l evy a t ax on t he peopl e so t hat f or ei gner s
mi ght know t hat t hese Uni t ed St at es woul d
pay i t s debt t o t hem. "

BACK
"Most Amer i cans t hought i t was t he ot her way
ar ound. What does t hese Uni t ed St at es owe
f or ei gner s? When and by whomwas t he debt
i ncur r ed? I t was i ncur r ed by t he Fed, when
t hey peddl ed t he si gnat ur e of t he Gover nment
t o f or ei gner s- f or a Pr i ce. I t i s what t he
Uni t ed St at es Gover nment has t o pay t o
r edeemt he obl i gat i ons of t he Fed. "
Thi eves Go Scot Fr ee

"Ar e you goi ng t o l et t hese t hi eves get of f
scot f r ee? I s t her e one l aw f or t he l oot er
who dr i ves up t o t he door of t he Uni t ed
St at es Tr easur y i n hi s l i mousi ne and anot her
f or t he Uni t ed St at es Vet er ans who ar e
sl eepi ng on t he f l oor of a di l api dat ed house
on t he out ski r t s of Washi ngt on?"

"The Bal t i mor e and Ohi o Rai l r oad i s her e
aski ng f or a l ar ge l oan f r omt he peopl e, and
t he wage ear ner s and t he t axpayer s of t hese
Uni t ed St at es. I t i s beggi ng f or a handout
f r omt he Gover nment . I t i s st andi ng, cap i n
hand, at t he door of t he R. F. C. wher e al l
t he j ackal s have gat her ed t o t he f east . I t
i s aski ng f or money t hat was r ai sed f r omt he
peopl e by t axat i on and want s t hi s money of
t he poor f or t he benef i t of Kuhn, Loeb and
Co. , t he Ger man I nt er nat i onal Banker s. "

"I s t her e one l aw f or t he Bal t i mor e and Ohi o
Rai l r oad and anot her f or t he hungr y vet er ans
i t t hr ew of f i t s f r ei ght car s t he ot her day?
I s t her e one l aw f or sl eek and pr osper ous
swi ndl er s who cal l t hemsel ves banker s and
BACK
anot her l aw f or t he sol di er s who def ended
t he f l ag? The R. F. C. i s t aki ng over t hese
wor t hl ess secur i t i es f r omt he I nvest ment
Tr ust s wi t h Uni t ed St at es Tr easur y money at
t he expense of t he Amer i can t axpayer and t he
wage ear ner . "

"I t wi l l t ake t went y year s t o r edeemour
Gover nment . Twent y year s of penal ser vi t ude
t o pay of f t he gambl i ng debt s of t he
t r ai t or ous Fed and t o vast f l ood of Amer i can
wages and savi ngs, bank deposi t s, and t he
Uni t ed St at es Gover nment cr edi t whi ch t he
Fed expor t ed out of t hi s count r y t o t hei r
f or ei gn pr i nci pal s. "

"The Fed l at el y conduct ed an ant i - hoar di ng
campai gn her e. They t hey t ook t hat ext r a
money whi ch t hey had per suaded t he Amer i can
peopl e t o put i nt o t he banks- t hey sent i t
t o Eur ope- al ong wi t h t he r est . I n t he l ast
sever al mont hs, t hey have sent
$1, 300, 000, 000 i n gol d t o t hei r f or ei gn
empl oyer s, t hei r f or ei gn mast er s, and ever y
dol l ar of t hat gol d bel onged t o t he peopl e
of t hese Uni t ed St at es and was unl awf ul l y
t aken f r omt hem. "
Fi at Money

"Mr . Chai r man, wi t hi n t he l i mi t s of t he t i me
al l owed me, I cannot ent er i nt o a
par t i cul ar i zed di scussi on of t he Fed. I have
si ngl ed out t he Fed cur r ency f or a f ew
r emar ks because t her e has l at el y been some
t al k her e of ' f i at money. ' What ki nd of
BACK
money i s bei ng pumped i nt o t he open di scount
mar ket and t hr ough i t i nt o f or ei gn channel s
and st ock exchanges? Mr . Mi l l s of t he
Tr easur y has spoken her e of hi s hor r or of
t he pr i nt i ng pr esses and hi s hor r or of
di shonest money. He has no hor r or of
di shonest money. I f he had, he woul d be no
par t y t o t he pr esent gambl i ng of t he Fed i n
t he nef ar i ous open di scount mar ket of New
Yor k, a mar ket i n whi ch t he sel l er s ar e
r epr esent ed by 10 di scount cor por at i ons
owned and or gani zed by t he ver y banks whi ch
own and cont r ol t he Fed. "

"Fi at money, i ndeed! "

"What Mr . Mi l l s i s f i ght i ng f or i s t he
pr eser vat i on, whol e and ent i r e, of t he
banker ' s monopol y of al l t he cur r ency of t he
Uni t ed St at es Gover nment . "

"Mr . Chai r man, l ast December , I i nt r oduced a
r esol ut i on her e aski ng f or an exami nat i on
and an audi t of t he Fed and al l r el at ed
mat t er s. I f t he House sees f i t t o make such
an i nvest i gat i on, t he peopl e of t hese Uni t ed
St at es wi l l obt ai n i nf or mat i on of gr eat
val ue. Thi s i s a Gover nment of t he peopl e,
by t he peopl e, f or t he peopl e. Consequent l y,
not hi ng shoul d be conceal ed f r omt he peopl e.
The man who decei ves t he peopl e i s a t r ai t or
t o t hese Uni t ed St at es. "

"The man who knows or suspect s t hat a cr i me
has been commi t t ed and who conceal s and
BACK
cover s up t hat cr i me i s an accessor y t o i t .
Mr . Speaker , i t i s a monst r ous t hi ng f or
t hi s gr eat nat i on of peopl e t o have i t s
dest i ni es pr esi ded over by a t r ai t or ous
gover nment boar d act i ng i n secr et concer t
wi t h i nt er nat i onal usur er s. "

"Ever y ef f or t has been made by t he Fed t o
conceal i t s power s - but t he t r ut h i s - t he
Fed has usur ped t he Gover nment . I t cont r ol s
ever yt hi ng her e and i t cont r ol s al l of our
f or ei gn r el at i ons. I t makes and br eaks
gover nment s at wi l l . "

"No man and no body of men i s mor e
ent r enched i n power t han t he ar r ogant cr edi t
monopol y whi ch oper at ed t he Fed. What
Nat i onal Gover nment has per mi t t ed t he Fed t o
st eal f r omt he peopl e shoul d now be r est or ed
t o t he peopl e. The peopl e have a val i d cl ai m
agai nst t he Fed. I f t hat cl ai mi s enf or ced
t he Amer i cans wi l l not need t o st and i n t he
br ead l i ne, or t o suf f er and di e of
st ar vat i on i n t he st r eet s. Women wi l l be
saved, f ami l i es wi l l be kept t oget her , and
Amer i can chi l dr en wi l l not be di sper sed and
abandoned. "

"Her e i s a Fed Not e. I mmense number s of t he
not es ar e now hel d abr oad. I amt ol d t hat
t hey amount t o upwar ds of a bi l l i on dol l ar s.
They const i t ut e a cl ai magai nst our
Gover nment and l i kewi se a cl ai magai nst our
peopl es' money t o t he ext ent of
$1, 300, 000, 000 whi ch has wi t hi n t he l ast f ew
BACK
mont hs been shi pped abr oad t o r edeemFed
Not es and t o pay ot her gambl i ng debt s of t he
t r ai t or ous Fed. The gr eat er par t of our
money st ock has been shi pped t o ot her
l ands. "

"Why shoul d we pr omi se t o pay t he debt s of
f or ei gner s t o f or ei gner s? Why shoul d t he Fed
be per mi t t ed t o f i nance our compet i t or s i n
al l par t s of t he wor l d? Do you know why t he
t ar i f f was r ai sed? I t was r ai sed t o shut out
t he f l ood of Fed Goods pour i ng i n her e f r om
ever y quar t er of t he gl obe - cheap goods,
pr oduced by cheapl y pai d f or ei gn l abor , on
unl i mi t ed suppl i es of money and cr edi t sent
out of t hi s Count r y by t he di shonest and
unscr upul ous Fed. "

"The Fed ar e spendi ng $100, 000, 000 a week
buyi ng gover nment secur i t i es i n t he open
mar ket and ar e maki ng a gr eat bi d f or
f or ei gn busi ness. They ar e t r yi ng t o make
r at es so at t r act i ve t hat t he human hai r
mer chant s and t he di st i l l er s and ot her
busi ness ent i t i es i n f or ei gn l and wi l l come
her and hi r e mor e of t he publ i c cr edi t of
t he Uni t ed St at es Gover nment t o pay t he Fed
out f i t f or get t i ng i t f or t hem. "
Wor l d Ensl avement Pl anned

"Mr . Chai r man, when t he Fed was passed, t he
peopl e of t hese Uni t ed St at es di d not
per cei ve t hat a wor l d syst emwas bei ng set
up her e whi ch woul d make t he savi ngs of t he
Amer i can school t eacher avai l abl e t o a
BACK
nar cot i c- dr ug vendor i n Acapul co. They di d
not per cei ve t hat t hese Uni t ed St at es was t o
be l ower ed t o t he posi t i on of a cool i e
count r y whi ch has not hi ng but r aw mat er i al
and hear t , t hat Russi a was dest i ned t o
suppl y t he man power and t hat t hi s count r y
was t o suppl y t he f i nanci al power t o an
' i nt er nat i onal super st at e. ' A super st at e
cont r ol l ed by i nt er nat i onal banker s, and
i nt er nat i onal i ndust r i al i st s act i ng t oget her
t o ensl ave t he wor l d f or t hei r own
pl easur e?"

"The peopl e of t hese Uni t ed St at es ar e bei ng
gr eat l y wr onged. They have been dr i ven f r om
t hei r empl oyment s. They have been
di spossessed f r omt hei r homes. They have
been evi ct ed f r omt hei r r ent ed quar t er s.
They have l ost t hei r chi l dr en. They have
been l ef t t o suf f er and di e f or l ack of
shel t er , f ood, cl ot hi ng and medi ci ne. "

"The weal t h of t hese Uni t ed St at es and t he
wor ki ng capi t al have been t aken away f r om
t hemand has ei t her been l ocked i n t he
vaul t s of cer t ai n banks and t he gr eat
cor por at i ons or expor t ed t o f or ei gn
count r i es f or t he benef i t of t he f or ei gn
cust omer s of t hese banks and cor por at i ons.
So f ar as t he peopl e of t he Uni t ed St at es
ar e concer ned, t he cupboar d i s bar e. "

"I t i s t r ue t hat t he war ehouses and coal
yar ds and gr ai n el evat or s ar e f ul l , but
BACK
t hese ar e padl ocked, and t he gr eat banks and
cor por at i ons hol d t he keys. "

"The sack of t hese Uni t ed St at es by t he Fed
i s t he gr eat est cr i me i n hi st or y. "

"Mr . Chai r man, a ser i ous si t uat i on conf r ont s
t he House of Repr esent at i ves t oday. We ar e
t r ust ees of t he peopl e and t he r i ght s of t he
peopl e ar e bei ng t aken away f r omt hem.
Thr ough t he Fed t he peopl e ar e l osi ng t he
r i ght s guar ant eed t o t hemby t he
Const i t ut i on. Thei r pr oper t y has been t aken
f r omt hemwi t hout due pr ocess of l aw. Mr .
Chai r man, common decency r equi r es us t o
exami ne t he publ i c account s of t he
Gover nment and see what cr i mes agai nst t he
publ i c wel f ar e have been commi t t ed. "

"What i s needed her e i s a r et ur n t o t he
Const i t ut i on of t hese Uni t ed St at es. "

"The ol d st r uggl e t hat was f ought out her e
i n J ackson' s t i me must be f ought our over
agai n. The i ndependent Uni t ed St at es
Tr easur y shoul d be r eest abl i shed and t he
Gover nment shoul d keep i t s own money under
l ock and key i n t he bui l di ng t he peopl e
pr ovi ded f or t hat pur pose. "

"Asset cur r ency, t he devi se of t he swi ndl er ,
shoul d be done away wi t h. The Fed shoul d be
abol i shed and t he St at e boundar i es shoul d be
r espect ed. Bank r eser ves shoul d be kept
wi t hi n t he boundar i es of t he St at es whose
BACK
peopl e own t hem, and t hi s r eser ve money of
t he peopl e shoul d be pr ot ect ed so t hat t he
I nt er nat i onal Banker s and accept ance banker s
and di scount deal er s cannot dr aw i t away
f r omt hem. "

"The Fed shoul d be r epeal ed, and t he Fed
Banks, havi ng vi ol at ed t hei r char t er s,
shoul d be l i qui dat ed i mmedi at el y. Fai t hl ess
Gover nment of f i ci al s who have vi ol at ed t hei r
oat hs of of f i ce shoul d be i mpeached and
br ought t o t r i al . "

"Unl ess t hi s i s done by us, I pr edi ct , t hat
t he Amer i can peopl e, out r aged, pi l l aged,
i nsul t ed and bet r ayed as t hey ar e i n t hei r
own l and, wi l l r i se i n t hei r wr at h, and wi l l
sweep t he money changer s out of t he t empl e. "

"Mr . Chai r man, t he Uni t ed St at es i s
bankr upt : I t has been bankr upt ed by t he
cor r upt and di shonest Fed. I t has r epudi at ed
i t s debt s t o i t s own ci t i zens. I t s chi ef
f or ei gn cr edi t or i s Gr eat Br i t ai n, and a
Br i t i sh bai l i f f has been at t he Whi t e House
and t he Br i t i sh Agent s ar e i n t he Uni t ed
St at es Tr easur y maki ng i nvent or y ar r angi ng
t er ms of l i qui dat i ons! "
Gr eat Br i t ai n, Par t ner i n Bl ackmai l

"Mr . Chai r man, t he Fed has of f er ed t o
col l ect t he Br i t i sh cl ai ms i n f ul l f r omt he
Amer i can publ i c by t r i cker y and cor r upt i on,
i f Gr eat Br i t ai n wi l l hel p t o conceal i t s
cr i mes. The Br i t i sh ar e shi el di ng t hei r
BACK
agent s, t he Fed, because t hey do not wi sh
t hat syst emof r obber y t o be dest r oyed her e.
They wi sh i t t o cont i nue f or t hei r benef i t !
By means of i t , Gr eat Br i t ai n has become t he
f i nanci al mi st r ess of t he wor l d. She has
r egai ned t he posi t i on she occupi ed bef or e
t he Wor l d War . "

"For sever al year s she has been a si l ent
par t ner i n t he busi ness of t he Fed. Under
t hr eat of bl ackmai l , or by t hei r br i ber y, or
by t hei r nat i ve t r eacher y t o t he peopl e of
t he Uni t ed St at es, t he of f i ci al s i n char ge
of t he Fed unwi sel y gave Gr eat Br i t ai n
i mmense gol d l oans r unni ng i nt o hundr eds of
mi l l i ons of dol l ar s. They di d t hi s agai nst
t he l aw! Those gol d l oans wer e not si ngl e
t r ansact i ons. They gave Gr eat Br i t ai n a
bor r owi ng power i n t he Uni t ed St at es of
bi l l i ons. She squeezed bi l l i ons out of t hi s
Count r y by means of her cont r ol of t he Fed. "

"As soon as t he Hoover Mor at or i umwas
announced, Gr eat Br i t ai n moved t o
consol i dat e her gai ns. Af t er t he t r eacher ous
si gni ng away of Amer i can r i ght s at t he 7-
power conf er ence at London i n J ul y, 1931,
whi ch put t he Fed under t he cont r ol of t he
Bank of I nt er nat i onal Set t l ement s, Gr eat
Br i t ai n began t o t i ght en t he hangman' s noose
ar ound t he neck of t he Uni t ed St at es. "

"She abandoned t he gol d st andar d and
embar ked on a campai gn of buyi ng up t he
cl ai ms of f or ei gner s agai nst t he Fed i n al l
BACK
par t s of t he wor l d. She has now sent her
bai l i f f , Ramsey MacDonal d, her e t o get her
war debt t o t hi s count r y cancel ed. But she
has a cl ub i n her hands! She has t i t l e t o
t he gambl i ng debt s whi ch t he cor r upt and
di shonest Fed i ncur r ed abr oad. "

"Ramsey MacDonal d, t he l abor par t y deser t er ,
has come her e t o compel t he Pr esi dent t o
si gn on t he dot t ed l i ne, and t hat i s what
Roosevel t i s about t o do! Roosevel t wi l l
endeavor t o conceal t he nat ur e of hi s act i on
f r omt he Amer i can peopl e. But he wi l l obey
t he I nt er nat i onal Banker s and t r ansf er t he
war debt t hat Gr eat Br i t ai n shoul d pay t o
t he Amer i can peopl e, t o t he shoul der s of t he
Amer i can t axpayer s. "

"Mr . Chai r man, t he bank hol i day i n t he
sever al St at es was br ought about by t he
cor r upt and di shonest Fed. These
i nst i t ut i ons mani pul at ed money and cr edi t ,
and caused t he St at es t o or der bank
hol i days. "

"These hol i days wer e f r ame- ups! They wer e
dr ess r ehear sal s f or t he nat i onal bank
hol i day whi ch Fr ankl i n D. Roosevel t pr omi sed
Si r Ramsey MacDonal d t hat he woul d decl ar e. "

"Ther e was no nat i onal emer gency her e when
Fr ankl i n D. Roosevel t t ook of f i ce except i ng
t he bankr upt cy of t he Fed- a bankr upt cy
whi ch has been goi ng on under cover f or
sever al year s and whi ch has been conceal ed
BACK
f r omt he peopl e so t hat t he peopl e woul d
cont i nue t o per mi t t hei r bank deposi t s and
t hei r bank r eser ves and t hei r gol d and t he
f unds of t he Uni t ed St at es Tr easur y t o be
i mpounded i n t hese bankr upt i nst i t ut i ons. "

"Under cover , t he pr edat or y I nt er nat i onal
Banker s have been st eal t hi l y t r ansf er r i ng
t he bur den of t he Fed debt s t o t he peopl e' s
Tr easur y and t o t he peopl e t hemsel ves. They
t he f ar ms and t he homes of t he Uni t ed St at es
t o pay f or t hei r t hi ever y! That i s t he onl y
nat i onal emer gency t hat t her e has been her e
si nce t he depr essi on began. "

"The week bef or e t he bank hol i day was
decl ar ed i n New Yor k St at e, t he deposi t s i n
t he New Yor k savi ngs banks wer e gr eat er t han
t he wi t hdr awal s. Ther e wer e no r uns on New
Yor k Banks. Ther e was no need of a bank
hol i day i n New Yor k, or of a nat i onal
hol i day. "
Roosevel t and t he I nt er nat i onal Banker s

"Roosevel t di d what t he I nt er nat i onal
Banker s or der ed hi mt o do! "

"Do not decei ve your sel f , Mr . Chai r man, or
per mi t your sel f t o be decei ved by ot her s
i nt o t he bel i ef t hat Roosevel t ' s
di ct at or shi p i s i n any way i nt ended t o
benef i t t he peopl e of t he Uni t ed St at es: he
i s pr epar i ng t o si gn on t he dot t ed l i ne! He
i s pr epar i ng t o cancel t he war debt s by
f r aud! "
BACK

"He i s pr epar i ng t o i nt er nat i onal i ze t hi s
Count r y and t o dest r oy our Const i t ut i on
i t sel f i n or der t o keep t he Fed i nt act as a
money i nst i t ut i on f or f or ei gner s. "Mr .
Chai r man, I see no r eason why ci t i zens of
t he Uni t ed St at es shoul d be t er r or i zed i nt o
sur r ender i ng t hei r pr oper t y t o t he
I nt er nat i onal Banker s who own and cont r ol
t he Fed. The st at ement t hat gol d woul d be
t aken f r omi t s l awf ul owner s i f t hey di d not
vol unt ar i l y sur r ender i t , t o pr i vat e
i nt er est s, show t hat t her e i s an anar chi st
i n our Gover nment . "

"The st at ement t hat i t i s necessar y f or t he
peopl e t o gi ve t hei r gol d - t he onl y r eal
money - t o t he banks i n or der t o pr ot ect t he
cur r ency, i s a st at ement of cal cul at ed
di shonest y! "

"By hi s unl awf ul usur pat i on of power on t he
ni ght of Mar ch 5, 1933, and by hi s
pr ocl amat i on, whi ch i n my opi ni on was i n
vi ol at i on of t he Const i t ut i on of t he Uni t ed
St at es, Roosevel t di vor ced t he cur r ency of
t he Uni t ed St at es f r omgol d, and t he Uni t ed
St at es cur r ency i s no l onger pr ot ect ed by
gol d. I t i s t her ef or e sheer di shonest y t o
say t hat t he peopl e' s gol d i s needed t o
pr ot ect t he cur r ency. "

"Roosevel t or der ed t he peopl e t o gi ve t hei r
gol d t o pr i vat e i nt er est s - t hat i s, t o
banks, and he t ook cont r ol of t he banks so
BACK
t hat al l t he gol d and gol d val ues i n t hem,
or gi ven i nt o t hem, mi ght be handed over t o
t he pr edat or y I nt er nat i onal Banker s who own
and cont r ol t he Fed. "

"Roosevel t cast hi s l ot wi t h t he usur er s. He
agr eed t o save t he cor r upt and di shonest at
t he expense of t he peopl e of t he Uni t ed
St at es. "

"He t ook advant age of t he peopl e' s conf usi on
and wear i ness and spr ead t he dr agnet over
t he Uni t ed St at es t o capt ur e ever yt hi ng of
val ue t hat was l ef t i n i t . He made a gr eat
haul f or t he I nt er nat i onal Banker s. "

"The Pr i me Mi ni st er of Engl and came her e f or
money! He came her e t o col l ect cash! "

"He came her e wi t h Fed Cur r ency and ot her
cl ai ms agai nst t he Fed whi ch Engl and had
bought up i n al l par t s of t he wor l d. And he
has pr esent ed t hemf or r edempt i on i n gol d. "

"Mr . Chai r man, I ami n f avor of compel l i ng
t he Fed t o pay t hei r own debt s. I see no
r eason why t he gener al publ i c shoul d be
f or ced t o pay t he gambl i ng debt s of t he
I nt er nat i onal Banker s. "
Roosevel t Sei zes t he Gol d

"By hi s act i on i n cl osi ng t he banks of t he
Uni t ed St at es, Roosevel t sei zed t he gol d
val ue of f or t y bi l l i ons or mor e of bank
deposi t s i n t he Uni t ed St at es banks. Those
BACK
deposi t s wer e deposi t s of gol d val ues. By
hi s act i on he has r ender ed t hempayabl e t o
t he deposi t or s i n paper onl y, i f payabl e at
al l , and t he paper money he pr oposes t o pay
out t o bank deposi t or s and t o t he peopl e
gener al l y i n l i eu of t hei r har d ear ned gol d
val ues i n i t sel f , and bei ng based on not hi ng
i nt o whi ch t he peopl e can conver t i t t he
sai d paper money i s of negl i gi bl e val ue
al t oget her . "

"I t i s t he money of sl aves, not of f r ee men.
I f t he peopl e of t he Uni t ed St at es per mi t i t
t o be i mposed upon t hemat t he wi l l of t hei r
cr edi t mast er s, t he next st ep i n t hei r
downwar d pr ogr ess wi l l be t hei r accept ance
of or der s on company st or es f or what t hey
eat and wear . Thei r case wi l l be si mi l ar t o
t hat of st ar vi ng coal mi ner s. They, t oo,
wi l l be pai d wi t h or der s on Company st or es
f or f ood and cl ot hi ng, bot h of i ndi f f er ent
qual i t y and be f or ced t o l i ve i n Company-
owned houses f r omwhi ch t hey may be evi ct ed
at t he dr op of a hat . Mor e of t hemwi l l be
f or ced i nt o conscr i pt l abor camps under
super vi si on. "

"At noon on t he 4t h of Mar ch, 1933, FDR wi t h
hi s hand on t he Bi bl e, t ook an oat h t o
pr eser ve, pr ot ect and def end t he
Const i t ut i on of t he U. S. At mi dni ght on t he
5t h of Mar ch, 1933, he conf i scat ed t he
pr oper t y of Amer i can ci t i zens. He t ook t he
cur r ency of t he Uni t ed St at es st andar d of
val ue. He r epudi at ed t he i nt er nal debt of
BACK
t he Gover nment t o i t s own ci t i zens. He
dest r oyed t he val ue of t he Amer i can dol l ar .
He r el eased, or endeavor ed t o r el ease, t he
Fed f r omt hei r cont r act ual l i abi l i t y t o
r edeemFed cur r ency i n gol d or l awf ul money
on a par i t y wi t h gol d. He depr eci at ed t he
val ue of t he nat i onal cur r ency. "

"The peopl e of t he U. S. ar e now usi ng
unr edeemabl e paper sl i ps f or money. The
Tr easur y cannot r edeemt hat paper i n gol d or
si l ver . The gol d and si l ver of t he Tr easur y
has unl awf ul l y been gi ven t o t he cor r upt and
di shonest Fed. And t he Admi ni st r at i on has
si nce had t he ef f r ont er y t o r ai d t he count r y
f or mor e gol d f or t he pr i vat e i nt er est s by
t el l i ng our pat r i ot i c ci t i zens t hat t hei r
gol d i s needed t o pr ot ect t he cur r ency. "

"I t i s not bei ng used t o pr ot ect t he
cur r ency! I t i s bei ng used t o pr ot ect t he
cor r upt and di shonest Fed. The di r ect or s of
t hese i nst i t ut i ons have commi t t ed cr i mi nal
of f ense agai nst t he Uni t ed St at es
Gover nment , i ncl udi ng t he of f ense of maki ng
f al se ent r i es on t hei r books, and t he st i l l
mor e ser i ous of f ense of unl awf ul l y
abst r act i ng f unds f r omt he Uni t ed St at es
Tr easur y! Roosevel t ' s gol d r ai d i s i nt ended
t o hel p t hemout of t he pi t t hey dug f or
t hemsel ves when t hey gambl ed away t he weal t h
and savi ngs of t he Amer i can peopl e. "
Di ct at or shi p

BACK
"The I nt er nat i onal Banker s set up a
di ct at or shi p her e because t hey want ed a
di ct at or who woul d pr ot ect t hem. They want ed
a di ct at or who woul d pr ot ect t hem. They
want ed a di ct at or who woul d i ssue a
pr ocl amat i on gi vi ng t he Fed an absol ut e and
uncondi t i onal r el ease f r omt hei r speci al
cur r ency i n gol d, or l awf ul money of any Fed
Bank. "

"Has Roosevel t r el i eved any ot her cl ass of
debt or s i n t hi s count r y f r omt he necessi t y
of payi ng t hei r debt s? Has he made a
pr ocl amat i on t el l i ng t he f ar mer s t hat t hey
need not pay t hei r mor t gages? Has he made a
pr ocl amat i on t o t he ef f ect t hat mot her s of
st ar vi ng chi l dr en need not pay t hei r mi l k
bi l l s? Has he made a pr ocl amat i on r el i evi ng
househol der s f r omt he necessi t y of payi ng
r ent ?"
Roosevel t ' s Two Ki nds of Laws

"Not he! He has i ssued one ki nd of
pr ocl amat i on onl y, and t hat i s a
pr ocl amat i on t o r el i eve i nt er nat i onal
banker s and t he f or ei gn debt or s of t he
Uni t ed St at es Gover nment . "

"Mr . Chai r man, t he gol d i n t he banks of t hi s
count r y bel ongs t o t he Amer i can peopl e who
have paper money cont r act s f or i t i n t he
f or mof nat i onal cur r ency. I f t he Fed cannot
keep t hei r cont r act s wi t h Uni t ed St at es
ci t i zens t o r edeemt hei r paper money i n
gol d, or l awf ul money, t hen t he Fed must be
BACK
t aken over by t he Uni t ed St at es Gover nment
and t hei r of f i cer s must be put on t r i al . "

"Ther e must be a day of r eckoni ng. I f t he
Fed have l oot ed t he Tr easur y so t hat t he
Tr easur y cannot r edeemt he Uni t ed St at es
cur r ency f or whi ch i t i s l i abl e i n gol d,
t hen t he Fed must be dr i ven out of t he
Tr easur y. "

"Mr . Chai r man, a gol d cer t i f i cat e i s a
war ehouse r ecei pt f or gol d i n t he Tr easur y,
and t he man who has a gol d cer t i f i cat e i s
t he act ual owner of a cor r espondi ng amount
of gol d st acked i n t he Tr easur y subj ect t o
hi s or der . "

"Now comes Roosevel t who seeks t o r ender t he
money of t he Uni t ed St at es wor t hl ess by
unl awf ul l y decl ar i ng t hat i t may No Longer
be conver t ed i nt o gol d at t he wi l l of t he
hol der . "

"Roosevel t ' s next haul f or t he I nt er nat i onal
Banker s was t he r educt i on i n t he pay of al l
Feder al empl oyees. "

"Next i n or der ar e t he vet er ans of al l war s,
many of whomar e aged and i nf or m, and ot her
si ck and di sabl ed. These men had t hei r l i ves
adj ust ed f or t hemby act s of Congr ess
det er mi ni ng t he amount s of t he pensi ons,
and, whi l e i t i s meant t hat ever y ci t i zen
shoul d sacr i f i ce hi msel f f or t he good of t he
Uni t ed St at es, I see no r eason why t hose
BACK
poor peopl e, t hese aged Ci vi l War Vet er ans
and war wi dows and hal f - st ar ved vet er ans of
t he Wor l d War , shoul d be compel l ed t o gi ve
up t hei r pensi ons f or t he f i nanci al benef i t
of t he I nt er nat i onal vul t ur es who have
l oot ed t he Tr easur y, bankr upt ed t he count r y
and t r ai t or ousl y del i ver ed t he Uni t ed St at es
t o a f or ei gn f oe. "

"Ther e ar e many ways of r ai si ng r evenue t hat
ar e bet t er t han t hat bar bar i c act of
i nj ust i ce. "

"Why not col l ect f r omt he Fed t he amount
t hey owe t he U. S. Tr easur y i n i nt er est on
al l t he Fed cur r ency t hey have t aken f r om
t he Gover nment ? That woul d put bi l l i ons of
dol l ar s i nt o t he U. S. Tr easur y. "

"I f FDR i s as honest as he pr et ends t o be,
he wi l l have t hat done i mmedi at el y. And i n
addi t i on, why not compel t he Fed t o di scl ose
t hei r pr of i t s and t o pay t he Gover nment i t s
shar e?"

"Unt i l t hi s i s done, i t i s r ank di shonest y
t o t al k of mai nt ai ni ng t he cr edi t of t he
U. S. Gover nment . My own sal ar y as a member
of Congr ess has been r educed, and whi l e I am
wi l l i ng t o gi ve my par t of i t t hat has been
t aken away f r omme t o t he U. S. Gover nment , I
r egr et t hat t he U. S. has suf f er ed i t sel f t o
be br ought so l ow by t he vul t ur es and cr ooks
who ar e oper at i ng t he r oul et t e wheel s and
f ar o t abl es i n t he Fed, t hat i s now obl i ged
BACK
t o t hr ow i t sel f on t he mer cy of i t s
l egi sl at or s and char women, i t s cl er ks, and
i t poor pensi oner s and t o t ake money out of
our pocket s t o make good t he def al cat i ons of
t he I nt er nat i onal Banker s who wer e pl aced i n
cont r ol of t he Tr easur y and gi ven t he
monopol y of U. S. Cur r ency by t he mi sbegot t en
Fed. I amwel l awar e t hat t he I nt er nat i onal
Banker s who dr i ve up t o t he door of t he
Uni t ed St at es Tr easur y i n t hei r l i mousi nes,
l ook down wi t h scor n upon member s of
Congr ess because we wor k f or so l i t t l e,
whi l e t hey dr aw mi l l i ons a year . The
di f f er ence i s t hat we ear n, or t r y t o ear n,
what we get - and t hey st eal t he gr eat er
par t of t hei r t aki ngs. "
Enemi es of t he Peopl e They Rob

"I do not l i ke t o see vi vi sect i ons per f or med
on human bei ngs. I do not l i ke t o see t he
Amer i can peopl e used f or exper i ment al
pur poses by t he cr edi t mast er s of t he Uni t ed
St at es. They pr edi ct ed among t hemsel ves t hat
t hey woul d be abl e t o pr oduce a condi t i on
her e i n whi ch Amer i can ci t i zens woul d be
compl et el y humbl ed and l ef t st ar vi ng and
penni l ess i n t he st r eet s. "

"The f act t hat t hey made t hat asser t i on
whi l e t hey wer e f oment i ng t hei r conspi r acy
agai nst t he Uni t ed St at es t hat t hey l i ke t o
see a human bei ng, especi al l y an Amer i can,
st umbl i ng f r omhunger when he wal ks.
Somet hi ng shoul d be done about i t , t hey say.
Fi ve- cent meal s, or somet hi ng! "But FDR wi l l
BACK
not per mi t t he House of Repr esent at i ves t o
i nvest i gat e t he condi t i on of t he Fed. FDR
wi l l not do t hat . He has cer t ai n
I nt er nat i onal Banker s t o ser ve. They not
l ook t o hi mas t he man Hi gher Up who wi l l
pr ot ect t hemf r omt he j ust wr at h of an
out r aged peopl e. "

"The I nt er nat i onal Banker s have al ways hat ed
our pensi oner s. A man wi t h a smal l pensi on
i s a war d of t he Gover nment . He i s not
dependent upon t hemf or a sal ar y or wages.
They cannot cont r ol hi m. They do not l i ke
hi m. I t gave t hemgr eat pl easur e, t her ef or e,
t o sl ash t he vet er ans. "

"But FDR wi l l never do anyt hi ng t o embar r ass
hi s f i nanci al suppor t er s. He wi l l cover up
t he cr i mes of t he Fed. "

"Bef or e he was el ect ed, Mr . Roosevel t
advocat ed a r et ur n t o t he ear l i er pr act i ces
of t he Fed, t hus admi t t i ng i t s cor r upt ness.
The Democr at i c pl at f or madvocat ed a change
i n t he per sonnel of t he Fed. These wer e
campai gn bai t . As a pr omi nent Democr at
l at el y r emar ked t o me; ' Ther e i s no new
deal . The same ol d cr owd i s i n cont r ol . ' "

"The cl ai ms of f or ei gn cr edi t or s of t he Fed
have no val i di t y i n l aw. The f or ei gn
cr edi t or s wer e t he r ecei ver s - and t he
wi l l i ng r ecei ver s - of st ol en goods! They
have r ecei ved t hr ough t hei r banki ng f ences
i mmense amount s of cur r ency, and t hat
BACK
cur r ency was unl awf ul l y t aken f r omt he
Uni t ed St at es Tr easur y by t he Fed. "

"Engl and di scover ed t he i r r egul ar i t i es of
t he Fed qui t e ear l y i n i t s oper at i ons and
t hr ough f ear , appar ent l y, t he Fed have f or
year s suf f er ed t hemsel ves t o be bl ackmai l ed
and dr agooni ng Engl and t o shar e i n t he
busi ness of t he Fed. The Fed have unl awf ul l y
t aken many mi l l i ons of dol l ar s of t he publ i c
cr edi t of t he Uni t ed St at es and have gi ven
i t t o f or ei gn sel l er s on t he secur i t y of t he
Debt paper of f or ei gn buyer s i n pur el y
f or ei gn t r ansact i ons, and when t he f or ei gn
buyer s r ef used t o meet t hei r obl i gat i ons and
t he Fed saw no honest way of get t i ng t he
st ol en goods back i nt o t hei r possessi on,
t hey deci ded by cont r ol of t he execut i ve t o
make t he Amer i can peopl e pay t hei r l osses! "
Conspi r acy of War Debt s

"They l i kewi se ent er ed i nt o a conspi r acy t o
depr i ve t he peopl e of t he U. S. of t hei r
t i t l e t o t he war debt s and not bei ng abl e t o
do t hat i n t he way t hey i nt ended, t hey ar e
now engaged i n an ef f or t t o debase t he
Amer i can dol l ar so t hat f or ei gn gover nment s
wi l l have t hei r debt s t o t hi s count r y cut i n
t wo, and t hen by means of ot her vi ci ous
under handed ar r angement s, t hey pr opose t o
r emi t t he r emai nder . "

"So f ar as t he U. S. i s concer ned, t he
gambl i ng count er s have no l egal st andi ng.
The U. S. Tr easur y cannot be compel l ed t o
BACK
make good t he gambl i ng vent ur es of t he
cor r upt and di shonest Fed. St i l l l ess shoul d
t he bank deposi t s of t he U. S. be used f or
t hat pur pose. St i l l l ess shoul d t he nat i onal
cur r ency have been made i r r edeemabl e i n gol d
so t hat t he gol d whi ch was massed and st or ed
t o r edeemt he cur r ency f or Amer i can ci t i zens
may be used t o pay t he gambl i ng debt s of t he
Fed f or Engl and' s benef i t . The Amer i can
peopl e shoul d have t hei r gol d i n t hei r own
possessi on wher e i t cannot be hel d under
secr et agr eement f or any f or ei gn cont r ol
bank, or wor l d bank, or f or ei gn nat i on. Our
own ci t i zens have t he pr i or cl ai mt o i t . The
paper [ money men] have i n t hei r possessi on
deser ves r edempt i on f ar mor e t han U. S.
cur r ency and cr edi t whi ch was st ol en f r om
t he U. S. Tr easur y and boot l egged abr oad. "

"Why shoul d t he f or ei gner s be made pr ef er r ed
cr edi t or s of t he bankr upt U. S. ? Why shoul d
t he U. S. be t r eat ed as bankr upt at al l ? Thi s
Gover nment has i mmense sums due i t f r omt he
Fed. The di r ect or s of t hese i nst i t ut i ons ar e
men of gr eat weal t h. Why shoul d t he gui l t y
escape t he consequences of t hei r mi sdeeds?
Why shoul d t he peopl e of t hese U. S.
sur r ender t he val ue of t hei r gol d bank
deposi t s t o pay of f t he gambl i ng debt s of
t hese banker s? Why shoul d Roosevel t pr omi se
f or ei gner s t hat t he U. S. wi l l pl ay t he par t
of a good nei ghbor , ' meet i ng i t s
obl i gat i ons' ?"

"Let t he Fed meet t hei r own obl i gat i ons. "
BACK

"Ever y member of t he Fed shoul d be compel l ed
t o di sgor ge, and ever y accept ance banker and
ever y di scount cor por at i on whi ch has made
i l l egal pr of i t s by means of publ i c cr edi t
unl awf ul l y boot l egged out of t he U. S.
Tr easur y and hi r ed out by t he cr ooks and
vul t ur es of t he Fed shoul d be compel l ed t o
di sgor ge. "
Feder al Reser ve Pays No Taxes

"Gambl i ng debt s due t o f or ei gn r ecei ver s of
st ol en goods shoul d not be pai d by
sacr i f i ci ng our t i t l e t o our war debt s, t he
asset s of t he U. S. Tr easur y- whi ch bel ong t o
al l t he peopl e of t he U. S. and whi ch i t i s
our dut y t o pr eser ve i nvi ol at e i n t he
peopl e' s t r easur y. "

"The U. S. Tr easur y cannot be made l i abl e f or
t hem. The Fed cur r ency must be r edeemed by
t he Fed banks or el se t hese Fed banks must
be l i qui dat ed. "

"We know f r omasser t i ons made her e by t he
Hon. J ohn N. Gar ner , Vi ce- Pr esi dent of t he
U. S. t hat t her e i s a condi t i on i n t he
[ Uni t ed St at es such] woul d cause Amer i can
ci t i zens, i f t hey knew what i t was, t o l ose
al l conf i dence i n t hei r gover nment . "

"That i s a condi t i on t hat Roosevel t wi l l not
have i nvest i gat ed. He has br ought wi t h hi m
f r omWal l St r eet , J ames War bur g, t he son of
Paul M. War bur g. Mr . War bur g, al i en bor n,
BACK
and t he son of an al i en who di d not become
nat ur al i zed her e unt i l sever al year s af t er
t hi s War bur g' s bi r t h, i s a son of a f or mer
par t ner of Kuhn, Loeb and Co. , a gr andson of
anot her par t ner , a nephew of a f or mer
par t ner , and a nephew of a pr esent par t ner . "

"He hol ds no of f i ce i n our Gover nment , but I
amt ol d t hat he i s i n dai l y at t endance at
t he Tr easur y, and t hat he has pr i vat e
quar t er s t her e! I n ot her wor ds, Mr .
Chai r man, Kuhn, Loeb and Company now has
cont r ol and occupy t he U. S. Tr easur y. "
Pr ef er r ed Tr eat ment f or For ei gner s

"The t ext of t he Execut i ve or der whi ch seems
t o pl ace an embar go on shi pment s of gol d
per mi t s t he Secr et ar y of t he Tr easur y, a
f or mer di r ect or of t he cor r upt , t o i ssue
l i censes at hi s di scr et i on f or t he expor t of
gol d coi n, or bul l i on, ear mar ked or hel d i n
t r ust f or a r ecogni zed f or ei gn gover nment or
f or ei gn cent r al bank f or i nt er nat i onal
set t l ement . Now, Mr . Chai r man, i f gol d hel d
i n t r ust f or t hose f or ei gn i nst i t ut i ons may
be sent t o t hem, I see no r eason why gol d
hel d i n t r ust f or Amer i can as evi denced by
t hei r gol d cer t i f i cat es and ot her cur r ency
i ssued by t he U. S. Gover nment shoul d not be
pai d t o t hem. "I t hi nk t hat Amer i can
ci t i zens shoul d be ent i t l ed t o t r eat ment at
l east as good as t hat whi ch t he per son i s
ext endi ng t o f or ei gn gover nment s, f or ei gn
cent r al banks, and t he bank of I nt er nat i onal
Set t l ement s. I t hi nk a vet er an of t he wor l d
BACK
war , wi t h a $20. 00 gol d cer t i f i cat e, i s at
l east as much ent i t l ed t o r ecei ve hi s own
gol d f or i t , as any i nt er nat i onal banker i n
t he ci t y of New Yor k or London. "

"By t he t er ms of t hi s execut i ve or der , gol d
may be expor t ed i f i t i s act ual l y r equi r ed,
f or t he f ul f i l l ment of any cont r act ent er ed
i nt o pr i or t o t he dat e of t hi s or der by an
appl i cant who, i n obedi ence t o t he execut i ve
or der of Apr i l 5, 1933, has del i ver ed gol d
coi n, gol d bul l i on, or gol d cer t i f i cat es.
Thi s means t hat gol d may be expor t ed t o pay
t he obl i gat i ons abr oad of t he Fed whi ch wer e
i ncur r ed pr i or t o t he dat e of t he or der ,
namel y, Apr i l 20, 1933. "

"I f a Eur opean Bank shoul d send 100, 000, 000
dol l ar s i n Fed cur r ency t o a bank i n t hi s
count r y f or r edempt i on, t hat bank coul d
easi l y shi p gol d t o Eur ope i n exchange f or
t hat cur r ency. Such Fed cur r ency woul d
r epr esent ' cont r act s' ent er ed i nt o pr i or t o
t he dat e of t he or der . I f t he Bank of
I nt er nat i onal Set t l ement s or any ot her
f or ei gn bank hol di ng any of t he pr esent
gambl i ng debt paper of t he Fed shoul d dr aw a
dr af t f or t he set t l ement of such obl i gat i on,
gol d woul d be shopped t o t hembecause t he
debt cont r act woul d have been ent er ed i nt o
pr i or t o t he dat e of or der . "
Cr i mes and Cr i mi nal s

"Mr . Speaker , I r i se t o a quest i on of
const i t ut i onal pr i vi l ege.
BACK

"Wher eas, I char ge. . . Eugene Meyer , Roy A.
Young, Edmund Pl at t , Eugene B. Bl ack, Adol ph
Casper Mi l l er , Char l es S. Haml i n, Geor ge R.
J ames, Andr ew W. Mel l on, Ogden L. Mi l l s,
Wi l l i amH. Woo W. Pool e, J . F. T. O' Connor ,
member s of t he Feder al Reser ve Boar d; F. H.
Cur t i s, J . H. Chane, R. L. Aust i n, Geor ge De
Camp, L. B. Wi l l i ams, W. W. Hoxt on, Oscar
Newt on, E. M. St evens, J . S. Wood, J . N.
Payt on, M. L. McCl ur e, C. C. Wal sh, I saac B.
Newt on, Feder al Reser ve Agent s, j oi nt l y and
sever al l y, wi t h vi ol at i ons of t he
Const i t ut i on and l aws of t he Uni t ed St at es,
and wher eas I char ge t hemwi t h havi ng t aken
f unds f r omt he U. S. Tr easur y whi ch wer e not
appr opr i at ed by t he Congr ess of t he Uni t ed
St at es, and I char ge t hemwi t h havi ng
unl awf ul l y t aken over $80, 000, 000, 000 f r om
t he U. S. Gover nment i n t he year 1928, t he
sai d unl awf ul t aki ng consi st i ng of t he
unl awf ul cr eat i on of cl ai ms agai nst t he U. S.
Tr easur y t o t he ext ent of over
$80, 000, 000, 000 i n t he year 1928; and I
char ge t hemwi t h si mi l ar t hef t s commi t t ed i n
1929, 1930, 1931, 1932 and 1933, and i n
year s pr evi ous t o 1928, amount i ng t o
bi l l i ons of dol l ar s; and

"Wher eas I char ge t hem, j oi nt l y and
sever al l y wi t h havi ng unl awf ul l y cr eat ed
cl ai ms agai nst t he U. S. Tr easur y by
unl awf ul l y pl aci ng U. S. Gover nment cr edi t i n
speci f i c amount s t o t he cr edi t of f or ei gn
gover nment s and f or ei gn cent r al banks of
BACK
i ssue; pr i vat e i nt er est s and commer ci al and
pr i vat e banks of t he U. S. and f or ei gn
count r i es, and br anches of f or ei gn banks
doi ng busi ness i n t he U. S. , t o t he ext ent of
bi l l i ons of dol l ar s; and wi t h havi ng made
unl awf ul cont r act s i n t he name of t he U. S.
Gover nment and t he U. S. Tr easur y; and wi t h
havi ng made f al se ent r i es on books of
account ; and

"Wher eas I char ge t hemj oi nt l y and
sever al l y, wi t h havi ng t aken Fed Not es f r om
t he U. S. Tr easur y and wi t h havi ng put Fed
Not es i nt o ci r cul at i on wi t hout obeyi ng t he
mandat or y pr ovi si on of t he Fed Act whi ch
r equi r es t he Fed Boar d t o f i x an i nt er est
r at e on al l i ssues of Fed Not es suppl i ed t o
Fed Banks, t he i nt er est r esul t i ng t her ef r om
t o be pai d by t he Fed Banks t o t he
gover nment of t he U. S. f or t he use of t he
Fed Not es, and I char ge t hemof havi ng
def r auded t he U. S. Gover nment and t he peopl e
of t he U. S. of bi l l i ons of dol l ar s by t he
commi ssi on of t hi s cr i me, and

sever al l y, wi t h havi ng pur chased U. S.
Gover nment secur i t i es wi t h U. S. Gover nment
cr edi t unl awf ul l y t aken and wi t h havi ng sol d
t he sai d U. S. Gover nment secur i t i es back t o
t he peopl e of t he U. S. f or gol d or gol d
val ues and wi t h havi ng agai n pur chased U. S.
Gover nment secur i t i es wi t h U. S. Gover nment
cr edi t unl awf ul l y t aken and wi t h havi ng
agai n sol d t he sai d U. S. Gover nment secur i t y
BACK
f or gol d or gol d val ues, and I char ge t hem
wi t h havi ng def r auded t he U. S. Gover nment
and t he peopl e of t he U. S. by t hi s r ot ar y
pr ocess; and

sever al l y, wi t h havi ng unl awf ul l y negot i at ed
U. S. Gover nment secur i t i es, upon whi ch t he
Gover nment l i abi l i t y was ext i ngui shed, as
col l at er al secur i t y f or Fed Not es and wi t h
havi ng subst i t ut ed such secur i t i es f or gol d
whi ch was bei ng hel d as col l at er al secur i t y
f or Fed Not es, and wi t h havi ng by t he
pr ocess def r auded t he U. S. Gover nment and
t he peopl e of t he U. S. , and I char ge t hem
wi t h t he t hef t of al l t he gol d and cur r ency
t hey obt ai ned by t hi s pr ocess; and

sever al l y, wi t h havi ng unl awf ul l y i ssued Fed
cur r ency on f al se, wor t hl ess and f i ct i t i ous
accept ances and ot her ci r cul at i ng evi dence
of debt , and wi t h havi ng made unl awf ul
advances of Fed cur r ency, and wi t h havi ng
unl awf ul l y per mi t t ed r enewal s of accept ances
and r enewal s of ot her ci r cul at i ng evi dences
of debt , and wi t h havi ng per mi t t ed
accept ance banker s and di scount deal er
cor por at i ons and ot her pr i vat e banker s t o
vi ol at e t he banki ng l aws of t he U. S. ; and

sever al l y, wi t h havi ng conspi r ed t o have
evi dences of debt t o t he ext ent of
$1, 000, 000, 000 ar t i f i ci al l y cr eat ed at t he
BACK
end of Febr uar y, 1933, and ear l y i n Mar ch
1933, and wi t h havi ng made unl awf ul i ssues
and advances of Fed cur r ency on t he secur i t y
of sai d ar t i f i ci al l y cr eat ed evi dences of
debt f or a si ni st er pur pose, and wi t h havi ng
assi st ed i n t he execut i on of sai d si ni st er
pur pose; and

sever al l y, wi t h havi ng br ought about t he
r epudi at i on of t he cur r ency obl i gat i ons of
t he Fed Banks t o t he peopl e of t he U. S. and
wi t h havi ng conspi r ed t o obt ai n a r el ease
f or t he Fed Boar d and t he Fed Banks f r om
t hei r cont r act ual l i abi l i t y t o r edeemal l
Fed cur r ency i n gol d or l awf ul money at t he
Fed Bank and wi t h havi ng def r auded t he
hol der s of Fed cur r ency, and wi t h havi ng
conspi r ed t o have t he debt s and l osses of
t he Fed Boar d and t he Fed Banks unl awf ul l y
t r ansf er r ed t o t he Gover nment and t he peopl e
of t he U. S. , and

sever al l y, wi t h havi ng unl awf ul l y
subst i t ut ed Fed cur r ency and ot her
i r r edeemabl e paper cur r ency f or gol d i n t he
hands of t he peopl e af t er t he deci si on t o
r epudi at e t he Fed cur r ency and t he nat i onal
cur r ency was made known t o t hem, and wi t h
t hus havi ng obt ai ned money under f al se
pr et enses; and

sever al l y, wi t h havi ng br ought about a
BACK
r epudi at i on of t he not es of t he U. S. i n
or der t hat t he gol d val ue of t he sai d
cur r ency mi ght be gi ven t o pr i vat e
i nt er est s, f or ei gn gover nment s, f or ei gn
cent r al banks of i ssues, and t he Bank of
I nt er nat i onal Set t l ement s, and t he peopl e of
t he U. S. t o be l ef t wi t hout gol d or l awf ul
money and wi t h no cur r ency ot her t hat a
paper cur r ency i r r edeemabl e i n gol d, and I
char ge t hemwi t h havi ng done t hi s f or t he
benef i t of pr i vat e i nt er est s, f or ei gn
gover nment s, f or ei gn cent r al banks of i ssue,
and t he bank of I nt er nat i onal Set t l ement s;
and

sever al l y, wi t h conni vi ng wi t h t he Edge Law
banks, and ot her Edge Law i nst i t ut i ons,
accept i ng banks, and di scount cor por at i ons,
f or ei gn cent r al banks of i ssue, f or ei gn
commer ci al banks, f or ei gn cor por at i ons, and
f or ei gn i ndi vi dual s wi t h f unds unl awf ul l y
t aken f r omt he U. S. Tr easur y; and I char ge
t hemwi t h havi ng unl awf ul l y per mi t t ed and
made possi bl e ' new f i nanci ng' f or f or ei gner s
at t he expense of t he U. S. Tr easur y t o t he
ext ent of bi l l i ons of dol l ar s and wi t h
havi ng unl awf ul l y per mi t t ed and made
possi bl e t he br i ngi ng i nt o t he Uni t ed St at es
of i mmense quant i t i es of f or ei gn secur i t i es,
cr eat ed i n f or ei gn count r i es f or expor t t o
t he U. S. and wi t h havi ng unl awf ul l y
per mi t t ed t he sai d f or ei gn secur i t i es t o be
i mpor t ed i nt o t he U. S. i nst ead of gol d,
whi ch was l awf ul l y due t o t he U. S. on t r ade
BACK
bal ances and ot her wi se, and wi t h havi ng
l awf ul l y per mi t t ed and f aci l i t at ed t he sal e
of t he sai d f or ei gn secur i t i es i n t he U. S. ,
and

sever al l y, wi t h havi ng unl awf ul l y expor t ed
U. S. coi ns and cur r ency f or a si ni st er
pur pose, and wi t h havi ng depr i ved t he peopl e
of t he U. S. of t hei r l awf ul medi umof
exchange, and I char ge t hemwi t h havi ng
ar bi t r ar i l y and unl awf ul l y r educed t he
amount of money and cur r ency i n ci r cul at i on
i n t he U. S. t o t he l owest r at e per capi t a i n
t he hi st or y of t he Gover nment , so t hat t he
gr eat mass of t he peopl e have been l ef t
wi t hout a suf f i ci ent medi umof exchange, and
I char ge t hemwi t h conceal ment and evasi on
i n r ef usi ng t o make known t he amount of U. S.
money i n coi ns and paper cur r ency expor t ed
and t he amount r emai ni ng i n t he U. S. as a
r esul t of whi ch r ef usal t he Congr ess of t he
U. S. i s unabl e t o ascer t ai n wher e t he U. S.
coi ns and i ssues of cur r ency ar e at t he
pr esent t i me, and what amount of U. S.
cur r ency i s now hel d abr oad; and

sever al l y, wi t h havi ng ar bi t r ar i l y and
unl awf ul l y r ai sed and l ower ed t he r at es of
money and wi t h havi ng ar bi t r ar i l y i ncr eased
and di mi ni shed t he vol ume of cur r ency i n
ci r cul at i on f or t he benef i t of pr i vat e
i nt er est s at t he expense of t he Gover nment
and t he peopl e of t he U. S. and wi t h havi ng
BACK
unl awf ul l y mani pul at ed money r at es, wages,
sal ar i es and pr oper t y val ues bot h r eal and
per sonal , i n t he U. S. by unl awf ul oper at i ons
i n t he open di scount mar ket and by r esal e
and r epur chase agr eement s unsanct i oned by
l aw, and

"Wher eas I char ge t hemj oi nt l y and
sever al l y, wi t h havi ng br ought about t he
decl i ne i n pr i ces on t he New Yor k St ock
Exchange and ot her exchanges i n Oct ober ,
1929, by unl awf ul mani pul at i on of money
r at es and t he vol ume of U. S. money and
cur r ency i n ci r cul at i on: by t hef t of f unds
f r omt he U. S. Tr easur y by gambl i ng i n
accept ances and U. S. Gover nment secur i t i es;
by ser vi ce r ender ed t o f or ei gn and domest i c
specul at or s and pol i t i ci ans, and by unl awf ul
sal e of U. S. gol d r eser ves abr oad, and

"Wher eas t he unconst i t ut i onal i nf l at i on l aw
i mbedded i n t he so- cal l ed Far mRel i ef Act by
whi ch t he Fed Banks ar e gi ven per mi ssi on t o
buy U. S. Gover nment secur i t i es t o t he ext ent
of $3, 000, 000, 000 and t o dr ew f or t h cur r ency
f r omt he peopl e' s Tr easur y t o t he ext ent of
$3, 000, 000, 000 i s l i kel y t o r esul t i n
conni vance on t he par t of sai d accused wi t h
ot her s i n t he pur chase by t he Fed of t he
U. S. Gover nment secur i t i es t o t he ext ent of
$3, 000, 000, 000 wi t h U. S. Gover nment ' s own
cr edi t unl awf ul l y t aken, i t bei ng obvi ous
t hat t he Fed do no not i nt end t o pay
anyt hi ng of val ue t o t he U. S. Gover nment f or
t he sai d U. S. Gover nment secur i t i es no
BACK
pr ovi si on f or payment i n gol d or l awf ul
money appear i ng i n t he so- cal l ed Far mRel i ef
bi l l - and t he U. S. Gover nment wi l l t hus be
pl aced i n a posi t i on of conf er r i ng a gi f t of
$3, 000, 000, 000 i n t he U. S. Gover nment
secur i t i es on t he Fed t o enabl e t hemt o pay
mor e on t hei r bad debt s t o f or ei gn
gover nment s, f or ei gn cent r al banks of i ssue,
pr i vat e i nt er est s, and pr i vat e and
commer ci al banks, bot h f or ei gn and domest i c,
and t he Bank of I nt er nat i onal Set t l ement s,
and

"Wher eas t he U. S. Gover nment wi l l t hus go
i nt o debt t o t he ext ent of $3, 000, 000, 000
and wi l l t hen have an addi t i onal cl ai mof
$3, 000, 000, 000 i n cur r ency unl awf ul l y
cr eat ed agai nst i t and wher eas no pr i vat e
i nt er est shoul d be per mi t t ed t o buy U. S.
Gover nment secur i t i es wi t h t he Gover nment ' s
own cr edi t unl awf ul l y t aken and wher eas
cur r ency shoul d not be i ssued f or t he
benef i t of sai d pr i vat e i nt er est or any
i nt er est s on U. S. Gover nment secur i t i es so
acqui r ed, and wher eas i t has been publ i cl y
st at ed and not deni ed t hat t he i nf l at i on
amendment of t he Far mRel i ef Act i s t he
mat t er of benef i t whi ch was secur ed by
Ramsey MacDonal d, t he Pr i me Mi ni st er of
Gr eat Br i t ai n, upon t he occasi on of hi s
l at est vi si t t o t he U. S. Tr easur y, and
wher eas t her e i s gr ave danger t hat t he
accused wi l l empl oy t he pr ovi si on cr eat i ng
U. S. Gover nment secur i t i es t o t he ext ent of
$3, 000, 000, 000 and t hr ee mi l l i ons i n
BACK
cur r ency t o be i ssuabl e t her eupon f or t he
benef i t of t hemsel ves and t hei r f or ei gn
pr i nci pal s, and t hat t hey wi l l conver t t he
cur r ency so obt ai ned t o t he uses of Gr eat
Br i t ai n by secr et ar r angement s wi t h t he Bank
of Engl and of whi ch t hey ar e t he agent s, and
f or whi ch t hey mai nt ai n an account and
per f or mser vi ces at t he expense of t he U. S.
Tr easur y, and t hat t hey wi l l l i kewi se conf er
benef i t s upon t he Bank of I nt er nat i onal
Set t l ement s f or whi ch t hey mai nt ai n an
account and per f or mser vi ces at t he expense
of t he U. S. Tr easur y; and

sever al l y, wi t h havi ng conceal ed t he
i nsol vency of t he Fed and wi t h havi ng f ai l ed
t o r epor t t he i nsol vency of t he Fed t o t he
Congr ess and wi t h havi ng conspi r ed t o have
t he sai d i nsol vent i nst i t ut i ons cont i nue i n
oper at i on, and wi t h havi ng per mi t t ed t he
sai d i nsol vent i nst i t ut i ons t o r ecei ve U. S.
Gover nment f unds and ot her deposi t s, and
wi t h havi ng per mi t t ed t hemt o exer ci se
cont r ol over t he gol d r eser ves of t he U. S.
and wi t h havi ng per mi t t ed t hemt o t r ansf er
upwar d of $100, 000, 000, 000 of t hei r debt s
and l osses t o t he gener al publ i c and t he
Gover nment of t he U. S. , and wi t h havi ng
per mi t t ed f or ei gn debt s of t he Fed t o be
pai d wi t h t he pr oper t y, t he savi ngs, t he
wages, and t he sal ar i es of t he peopl e of t he
U. S. and wi t h t he f ar ms and t he homes of t he
Amer i can peopl e, and wher eas I char ge t hem
wi t h f or ci ng t he bad debt s of t he Fed upon
BACK
t he gener al publ i c cover t l y and di shonest l y
and wi t h t aki ng t he gener al weal t h and
savi ngs of t he peopl e of t he U. S. under
f al se pr et enses, t o pay t he debt s of t he Fed
t o f or ei gner s; and

sever al l y, wi t h vi ol at i ons of t he Fed Act
and ot her l aws; wi t h mal admi ni st r at i on of
t he h evasi ons of t he Fed Law and ot her
l aws; and wi t h havi ng unl awf ul l y f ai l ed t o
r epor t vi ol at i ons of l aw on t he par t of t he
Fed Banks whi ch, i f known, woul d have caused
t he Fed Banks t o l ose t hei r char t er s, and

sever al l y, wi t h f ai l ur e t o pr ot ect and
mai nt ai n t he gol d r eser ves and t he gol d
st ock and gol d coi nage of t he U. S. and wi t h
havi ng sol d t he gol d r eser ves of t he U. S. t o
f or ei gn Gover nment s, f or ei gn cent r al banks
of i ssue, f or ei gn commer ci al and pr i vat e
banks, and ot her f or ei gn i nst i t ut i ons and
i ndi vi dual s at a pr of i t t o t hemsel ves, and I
char ge t hemwi t h havi ng sol d gol d r eser ves
of t he U. S. so t hat bet ween 1924 and 1928
t he U. S. gai ned no gol d on net account but
suf f er ed a decl i ne i n i t s per cent age of
cent r al gol d r eser ves f r omt he 45. 9 per cent
i n 1924 t o 37. 5 per cent i n 1928
not wi t hst andi ng t he f act t hat t he U. S. had a
f avor abl e bal ance of t r ade t hr oughout t hat
per i od, and

BACK
sever al l y, wi t h havi ng conspi r ed t o
concent r at e U. S. Gover nment secur i t i es and
t hus t he nat i onal debt of t he U. S. i n t he
hands of f or ei gner s and i nt er nat i onal money
l ender s and wi t h havi ng conspi r ed t o
t r ansf er t o f or ei gner s and i nt er nat i onal
money l ender s t i t l e t o and cont r ol of t he
f i nanci al r esour ces of t he U. S. ; and

sever al l y, wi t h havi ng f i ct i t i ousl y pai d
i nst al l ment s on t he nat i onal debt wi t h
Gover nment cr edi t unl awf ul l y t aken; and

sever al l y, wi t h t he l oss of t he U. S.
Gover nment f unds ent r ust ed t o t hei r car e;
and

sever al l y, wi t h havi ng dest r oyed i ndependent
banks i n t he U. S. and wi t h havi ng t her eby
caused l osses amount i ng t o bi l l i ons of
dol l ar s t o t he sai d banks, and t o t he
gener al publ i c of t he U. S. , and

sever al l y, wi t h t he f ai l ur e t o f ur ni sh t r ue
r epor t s of t he busi ness oper at i ons and t he
t r ue condi t i ons of t he Fed t o t he Congr ess
and t he peopl e, and havi ng f ur ni shed f al se
and mi sl eadi ng r epor t s t o t he congr ess of
t he U. S. , and

BACK
sever al l y, wi t h havi ng publ i shed f al se and
mi sl eadi ng pr opaganda i nt ended t o decei ve
t he Amer i can peopl e and t o cause t he U. S. t o
l ose i t s i ndependence; and

sever al l y, wi t h unl awf ul l y al l owi ng Gr eat
Br i t ai n t o shar e i n t he pr of i t s of t he Fed
at t he expense of t he Gover nment and t he
peopl e of t he U. S. ; and

sever al l y, wi t h havi ng ent er ed i nt o secr et
agr eement s and i l l egal t r ansact i ons wi t h
Mont ague Nor man, Gover nor of t he Bank of
Engl and; and

sever al l y, wi t h swi ndl i ng t he U. S. Tr easur y
and t he peopl e of t he U. S. i n pr et endi ng t o
have r ecei ved payment f r omGr eat Br i t ai n of
t he amount due on t he Br i t i sh war e debt t o
t he U. S. i n December , 1932; and

sever al l y, wi t h havi ng conspi r ed wi t h t hei r
f or ei gn pr i nci pal s and ot her s t o def r aud t he
U. S. Gover nment and t o pr event t he peopl e of
t he U. S. f r omr ecei vi ng payment of t he war
debt s due t o t he U. S. f r omf or ei gn nat i ons;
and

sever al l y, wi t h havi ng r obbed t he U. S.
BACK
Gover nment and t he peopl e of t he U. S. by
t hei r t hef t and sal e of t he gol d r eser ves of
t he U. S. and ot her unl awf ul t r ansact i ons
cr eat ed a def i ci t i n t he U. S. Tr easur y,
whi ch has necessi t at ed t o a l ar ge ext ent t he
dest r uct i on of our nat i onal def ense and t he
r educt i on of t he U. S. Ar my and t he U. S. Navy
and ot her br anches of t he nat i onal def ense;
and

sever al l y, of havi ng r educed t he U. S. f r oma
f i r st cl ass power t o one t hat i s dependent ,
and wi t h havi ng r educed t he U. S. f r oma r i ch
and power f ul nat i on t o one t hat i s
i nt er nat i onal l y poor ; and

sever al l y, wi t h t he cr i me of havi ng
t r easonabl e conspi r ed and act ed agai nst t he
peace and secur i t y of t he U. S. and wi t h
havi ng t r easonabl e conspi r ed t o dest r oy
const i t ut i onal Gover nment i n t he U. S.

"Resol ve, That t he Commi t t ee on t he
J udi ci ar y i s aut hor i zed and di r ect ed as a
whol e or by subcommi t t ee, t o i nvest i gat e t he
of f i ci al conduct of t he Fed agent s t o
det er mi ne whet her , i n t he opi ni on of t he
sai d commi t t ee, t hey have been gui l t y of any
hi gh cr i me or mi sdemeanor whi ch i n t he
cont empl at i on t he Const i t ut i on r equi r es t he
i nt er posi t i on of t he Const i t ut i onal power s
of t he House. Such Commi t t ee shal l r epor t
i t s f i ndi ng t o t he House, t oget her wi t h such
BACK
r esol ut i on or r esol ut i ons of i mpeachment or
ot her r ecommendat i ons as i t deems pr oper .

"For t he pur pose of t hi s r esol ut i on t he
Commi t t ee i s aut hor i zed t o si t and act
dur i ng t he pr esent Congr ess at such t i mes
and pl aces i n t he Di st r i ct of Col umbi a or
el sewher e, whet her or not t he House i s
si t t i ng, has r ecessed or has adj our ned, t o
hol d such cl er i cal , st enogr aphi c, and ot her
assi st ant s, t o r equi r e of such wi t nesses and
t he pr oduct i on of such books, paper s, and
document s, t o t ake such t est i mony, t o have
such pr i nt i ng and bi ndi ng done, and t o make
such expendi t ur es as i t deems necessar y. "

Af t er some di scussi on and upon t he mot i on of
Mr . Byr ns, t he r esol ut i on and char ge was
r ef er r ed t o t he Commi t t ee on t he J udi ci ar y.
"At t acks on McFadden' s Li f e Repor t ed"

Comment i ng on For mer Congr essman Loui s T.
McFaddens' s "hear t - f ai l ur e sudden- deat h" on
Oct . 3, 1936, af t er a "dose" of "i nt est i nal
f l u, " "Pel l ey' s Weekl y" of Oct . 14 sai d:

Now t hat t hi s st er l i ng Amer i can pat r i ot
has made t he Passi ng, i t can be r eveal ed
t hat not l ong af t er hi s publ i c ut t er ance
agai nst t he encr oachi ng power s of J udah, i t
became known among hi s i nt i mat es t hat he had
suf f er ed t wo at t acks agai nst hi s l i f e. The
f i r st at t ack came i n t he f or mof t wo
r evol ver shot s f i r ed at hi mf r omambush as
he was al i ght i ng f r oma cab i n f r ont of one
BACK
of t he Capi t al hot el s. For t unat el y bot h
shot s mi ssed hi m, t he bul l et s bur yi ng
t hemsel ves i n t he st r uct ur e of t he cab.

"He became vi ol ent l y i l l af t er par t aki ng
of f ood at a pol i t i cal banquet at
Washi ngt on. Hi s l i f e was onl y saved f r om
what was subsequent l y announced as a
poi soni ng by t he pr esence of a physi ci an
f r i end at t he banquet , who at once pr ocur ed
a st omach pump and subj ect ed t he Congr essman
t o emer gency t r eat ment . "
- Rober t Edwar d Edmondson ( Publ i ci st -
Economi st )

Pr esi dent Andr ew J ackson st at ed i n
r ef er ence t o t he banker s at t he st at e of hi s
admi ni st r at i on: "You ar e a den of vi per s and
t hi eves. I i nt end t o r out you out , and by
t he Et er nal God, I wi l l r out you out . "

END OF SPEACH SECTION.

More on FED. Ownership & Directors
BACK TO PRESENTATION
Links between Bali/Jawa & Polynesia, Hawaii & America.

There is a much respected scholar in Bali, Prof Mertha Sutedja
Mulyadinningrat, who has looked into the traces of early close contact
between these vast areas. He wrote a small book as an introduction to
the topic and showed some of the cultural and linguistic similarities.
One is the near identical calendars and symbols in the calendars of the
Balinese & Maya Indians of Latin America. Names, traditional weaving
patterns and building techniques also correlate to a large extent.
Other examples are names like Hawaikiki (were Polynesian & Hawaiians
supposedly comes from ) that means little Jawa(=Bali) in old
Jawanese language. Other examples are Honolulu meaning eight
islands & Maomaori that means something like the home in the far
corner etc.
For further inquiry into these topics one best start with Prof Sutedjas
little book Dharmayana, Leluhur kepurwa,bumi kamulan America
ISBN 979-722-244-6
One possible explanation to why and how the Javanese/Balinese could
have so extensive seafaring contact with far away places so early is that
they had very close ties and intermarried with the Chinese Royals at the
time. The Chinese were a very advanced seafaring nation with excellent
mapping skills and who sailed the vast oceans on a big scale way before
the Europeans started exploring the world. Some would claim
Columbus actually had access to and used Chinese sea charts when
discovering America. Another interesting book on that subject is
1421 by Gavin Menzies.
CLICK HERE TO GO BACK TO PRESENTATION
1. COMMUNICATION BETWEEN US AND MR WHISTLEBLOWER CONNECTED TO
OITC.
WE ARE ASKING FOR HIS COMMENTS REGARDING THE PRESENTATION.

----- Original Message -----
From: Whistleblower
To: "Bellringer" <bellringer@fourwinds10.com>
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 3:34 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: To Mr. Whistleblower for comments

Dear MrBellringer,

Our response to ConnyMacbean's communication is below.

Response:-

Dear Connie Macbean,

Thank you kindly for your communication and attachments, routed
through fourwinds10.com (Mr. P. Bellringer). Having read the
Powerpoint summary I make the following comments below.
I should also point out that your second attachment, being a .odp
format, we can not open no matter what we do. We would therefore be
obliged if you could notify us of what program you used to create this
particular attachment.
Before you peruse further I must be blunt and say that I don't know
who you are, whereby you could be covert Us Intelligence or Mossad, or
similar, just prying for information. Personally, I don't care who you
are or whether you are connected to any intel operation. The main
thing is that you will be aware, and hopefully learn, from the content
below, together with other publicised content, that the truth of the
Collateral Accounts, its history, etc, is gradually coming out despite
any attempts that the covert rogue intel services have, or will, make
in the future, to prevent this

BACK
The Powerpoint presentation does not state where the information came
from, neither does it support the content of the presentation with
references that can be viewed independently by those viewing same, or
name the author of same.
The presentation is, in my opinion, a summary of a report, but neither
references the report nor the author of such report or even the
presentation.
On this basis, it should be considered and construed as someone's
perception of history referenced to the Collateral Accounts and the
Wealth of the World, not necessarily as an official authority on this
issue, which is a great shame because the presentation is correct in
many ways. However, it does leave out many vital and important facts
which in my opinion would be highly relevant to people making, or
achieving, a far greater understanding of the whole issue. There are
also areas which are built on one's perception and own ideologies,
rather than fact which, in my opinion, are misleading and certainly
would guide people to a completely different perception and
understanding.

Before I continue on the subject of the presentation, I would like to
relate to the factor referred to in your communication, which
commences, "Our source is one of the signatories of the G.H.A. and on

our copy there is no mention of moving physical gold to the US. That
would not have been part of the plan".

In a direct answer to that statement, you are in fact correct, there
has never been any International Treaty, Agreements, or otherwise that
demands, depicts, suggests, implies, or similar, the moving of
physical gold to the US. In fact quite the opposite. All assets shall
remain within their designated depositories, unless there is a clear
and definable situation that indicates, without any doubt, that the
assets are at risk from such factors as war, plunder, theft, political
interference, or similar factors, whereby, and strictly under the
irrevocable orders of the International Treasury Controller, the
BACK
assets considered at risk shall be devolved to another suitable
depository in any other country that is deemed fit and properly
equipped to ensure that said assets are safe and secure at all times.
The decisions on such matters are at the disposition of the
International Treasury Controller at all times, not individual
countries, persons, groups, or otherwise, and whose decisions are
inviolate.
In short, that means the actual physical assets never move, but are
transacted by paper and strictly through the Central Bank Screen
System.
If therefore assets move, or are moved, whether by, or under the
>instructions of a country, group, persons, without such an order from
>the International Treasury Controller, then the assets move because
>they are being stolen, plundered, or similar by persons unknown,
>which, as we are all aware amounts to criminal fraud against the
>Nations of the World.
>Is this the very reasons why several Nations have not ratified the UN
>Treaty relative to the international criminal aspect of law and for
>which the competent court of jurisdiction on same will be the
>International Courts of Justice, The Hague, Holland?????????
>Ratification would allow the offending Nations, persons, groups, or
>otherwise to be brought to justice no mater what their position or
>national status.
>It is very prominent that those Nations that have not ratified this UN
>Treaty are Nations in which substantial deposits are held under
>custodianship rules, and in which plunder and theft are rife, and very
>regular, whether implemented by the people of that Nation or by
>external Nations, persons, or groups, in collaboration with the
>depository Nation, or persons who have privileged knowledge of
same.
>
>As for who has the fake agreement. This is a difficult question. As
>previously stated, we are fully aware of 3 known fake Agreements.
>Having not seen the particular agreement you, or your colleagues hold,
>and not being able to compare this with the agreement held Officially
BACK
>(which is sealed and locked in vaults), I can not state whether you
>have a copy of the original or not. However, I agree with your
>comments that such fake agreements and the removal, transfer of
>physical gold from depositories would be, and is, a major advantage to
>the US under the circumstances.
>This is something I, and my superior, have been stating for many,
many
>years, and also giving my reasons for the statement, but nobody has
>acted on it because it is claimed that "Egmont" a US registered
>organisation, tracks all gold and pre4cious metal movements, whereby
>illegal gold movements would be tracked and confiscated, and where
>proven to be part of the collateral accounts would be returned to the
>accounts and in a safe and secure depository. I am fully aware that
>"Egmont" is as inefficient and inept at their job / purpose, as many
>other organisations incorporated / instituted by, or at the behest of,
>the USA. Personally, and I emphasise personally, "Egmont" is yet
>another "White Elephant" under the control of the USA, and definitely
>not working in the interests of the Nations of the World.
>Having said all what I have above. I now refer back to the
presentation.
>
>There are some perceptions and innuendos within the presentation that
>I, and for 100% certain, my colleagues, do not agree with and refute
>in entirety. That being, that the OITC is part of a "One World Order",
>Illumini, or similar. In fact quite the opposite, if only people would
>realise that.
>We are fully aware of the initial objectives, as was portrayed within
>the "Plan of the Experts" and the "2nd Plan of the Experts", plus many
>other International Treaties, including those of the mid and late
>1800's between Royal Families, but which have been carefully
avoided
>and highly controlled over the decades by, as the presentation
>implies, by the J ews *Rothchilds" and their collective others. This,
>along with Fiat Currencies are what have, or part of what have,
>brought the world to a state of despair and total inequality, and thus
BACK
>heading for a possible WW III.
>We are not part of that, never have been, and never will be. In fact
>if this was the case, I personally would resign my position
>immediately, as would all my colleagues, as we do not support or
>condone such crazy ideologies
>Since 1995 it has been a great burden to us all, fighting and
>overcoming all the barriers and obstacles that have been placed before
>us, but we are still here and are actually achieving what our
>forefathers set out to achieve.
>If you carefully analyse our information, especially our method of
>introducing financial assistance to any one country, you will
>appreciate that the methodology and mechanisms employed by the
OITC
>actually avoid a uni-polar system and allows for each country to gain
>Financial Independence from what is commonly referred to as
>colonialism by one or more of the so-called greater nations.
>
>It is fully appreciated that what is stated within your presentation
>is the aim of the minority, to the detriment of the majority.
>Unfortunately, many Governments have already been "Bought off"
and are
>at this moment in time aligned to the US and its few allies. Another
>example, and as indicated in your presentation, is Europe and the
>European Community. A structure that is rapidly expanding and where
>the present participants can not see any further than their noses on
>their face, only to eventually realise just how they were conned into
>joining. Isn't this what Germany tried to do in the Second World War,
>but were defeated, only for this idea to be miserably resurrected
>under a different guise.
>
>Is this the reason, or part thereof, as to why the particular
>authorities in the US and UN regularly do not, and will not, verify us
>when requested to do so by a Government of any Nation????? Perhaps
>that Government, or Nation, is of strategic importance to these
>minority colonialist and their "One World Order" ideology (Ukraine,
BACK
>Nigeria, Thailand, Philippines, are typical examples of countries
>under the thumb of the greater Nations), and therefore should not be
>allowed to benefit from the Collateral Accounts.
>
>We agree with the premise that the Treasures of King Solomon, are
part
>of the assets of the Collateral Accounts, along with many, many more
>assets belonging to the Royal Families of the World, designated to
>various Trusts, Foundations and held under Legal Decadency for the
>benefit of the Nations and People of the World.
>
>One issue that is not emphasised within the Presentation, is the fact
>that while the people of the world have been wallowing in debt
>creative Fiat Money, those persons or parties that initiated such a
>system have been using their Fiat Money to acquire every possible bar
>of gold, silver, platinum, and other valuable commodities, which
>includes illegal acquisition of assets of the Collateral Accounts, so
>that when the world returns to a "Gold Standard" which it has to
>eventually, they can claim they own all the gold etc and thus maintain
>their power over the people.
>What they did not account for was the dedication and tenacity of the
>people within the OITC who will protect the assets of the Collateral
>Accounts against such people and their ideologies, and ensure,
>wherever possible that every Nation and Person on this earth gains the
>benefit of same.
>
>I have to say that the presentation "Hit" on a subject that does
>embody us. Namely, the introduction of a new International Financial
>System and Monetary Unit. We are currently working on this issue
and
>will in due course announce our ideas, which I have to add allows for
>a totally independent system away from the control of any one
country,
>and existing Financial Oligarchs, and total international involvement
>of every single country, which means fairer international
BACK
>representation for all Nations.
>No longer can the World tolerate, or accept, one Nation's currency as
>being the International Reserve Currency, with all its connotations,
>implications, political manipulations and influences, which allows for
>one or more Nations to suffer from Monetary Warfare applied by the
>Masters, whereas, with the current Global Financial Crisis, the
>majority of Nations are suffering from the crazy ideologies of just a
>few Nations.
>
>I could go on and on with reference to this subject, but I really
>haven't the time to write a book or several volumes of a book.
>However, one subject I have not referred to is Soekarno, which the
>presentation does not refer to in name but implies it. My superior
>happens to hold a certified copy of volume 4, out of a total of 5
>individual volumes, written by Soekarno, which gives names, dates,
>amounts, descriptions, copy certificates, the 4 different signatures
>he used, etc, of the assets held by him under Custodianship rules
>within the Republic of Indonesia. The presentation refers to specific
>figures which are disputable, based upon the volume 4 that my
superior
>holds, so knowing that the copy I hold is "Officially" certified as an
>exact copy, I would prefer to believe what we have rather than the
>presentation which does not reference documentation, treaties,
>conventions, the author, a date, or similar.
>That is not to say that what material evidence you have, whether in
>part or full, is totally incorrect. Far from it, but some facts
>contained within the presentation are not quite correct, or appear to
>be partially incorrect, which may be as a direct result of incomplete
>information, or missing documentation.
>
>Finally, I fully agree with your final statement of publishing the
>information when the content is agreed to be genuine and correct in
>accordance with official documentation. Our view is transparency and
>where such information will allow the people of the World to know,
>understand, and appreciate what has been going on for decades, then
BACK
>and only then will stability, safety, and honesty return to our world,
>whereby this current crisis and problems of the past, for which many
>have suffered, can finally be put to rest.
>
>Thank you once again for your communication and documents, which
are
>much appreciated, whereby I look forward to a continuing dialogue
with
>you.
>
>Yours faithfully
>
>Whistleblower

>

MORE BELOW...

NEXT REPLY. OUR TEXT IS BLACK,
MR WHISTLEBLOWERS REPLY IN BLUE

Dear Mr Whistleblower,
First let me thank you for your quick response and excuse myself
for not getting back earlier. No thanks necessary for the quick
response. The subject matter was one that demanded a quick
response, whereas other more general questions directed at us
were not considered as important at the time.
I had to travel and get some face time with one of my sources
before answering. That will not be necessary going forward. I very
much want to see this through and see if we can come to an
agreement on the historical aspect and what to eventually publish
regarding the material in the presentation. I hope you can help us
in filling in the blanks, correcting the facts and adding more meat
and details to the bone so to speak all in the interest of achieving a
far greater understanding of the whole issue. An understanding we
hope to bring to the general public somehow. Definitely through
Fourwinds.com but eventually also (hopefully) to a wider
audience. I take heart at your comments below and hope that you
can help us clarify some of what is missing.
However, it does leave out many vital and important facts
> which in my opinion would be highly relevant to people
making, or
> achieving, a far greater understanding of the whole issue
For now, lets treat it as "someone's perception of history" and
continue in that spirit.
If we can gain each others trust I see two goals we should be able
to work towards.
1) Get an objective factual history presentation together and work
towards getting that information out in the public domain. This is
step one and should be easy enough to do. All to make it possible
for people to have "a far greater understanding of the whole issue"
BACK
May I refer at this point to your item 1).
What concerns me here, is that your focus is mainly relevant to
one quite small part of the whole subject matter. There are
hundreds, if not thousands of other parts which all make up
the bigger picture. Unfortunately, many of those parts are, or
still remain classified Secret. These could be parts that are
between Government(s) and other Government(s), Allied
Powers and Government(s), and even privately between the
various Royal Families of the World. You will understand that
agreements, or arrangements, between various Royal Families
are Private Arrangements / Agreements, and although some
of these are referred to in a few Treaties, those Treaties are
still held Secret whereby access is extremely restricted even
at the highest level.
To get the correct and illuminating information, in its totality,
out to the public domain under these circumstances is just not
possible. Whatever is released publicly is, and will always
remain a part of all relevant information and could be
misleading to many, as numerous vital and important factors
will, unfortunately, always be missing because of this
ridiculous Secrecy Factor. I say ridiculous because one
reason was the fact that the Royal Families agreed to the fact
that these assets should be used for all Nations of the World,
and not be allowed to be controlled, or taken possession of by
those groups throughout the world that were gradually
eroding and deposing Royal Families, in favour of what they
referred to as Democracy, or groups with the ultimate aims
of replacing (under a false Banner) the Royal Families and
grasping the power for themselves. Again, unfortunately, it is
one specific country that protects the Secrecy factor, which
also allows for Plausible Deniability and the continuing
Theft and Plunder of assets by the very same country.
BACK
We, I believe, are both aware of the various groups I am
referring to, some of which do actually consist of disgruntled
members of Royal Families, or very distant members of Royal
Families, whose allegiances are not to their country, but to
their ideologies and that of the groups they belong to.
Only 2 years ago, we came across a group who referred
themselves as Knights Templar attempting to buy Gold
which was stolen out of the Philippines and Thailand. They
were working with the Federal Reserve and Deutsche Bank in
Germany. Another example happened quite recently with
another general inquiry to us. This one we saw through quite
quickly and as it turns out we are now aware of how, in part,
the Jews control many countries in Africa, utilising such
organisations as the IMF, WB, and even the UN, plus various
Intelligent Agencies.
Step 1 is not, and never will be, an easy one to achieve, not in a
one off situation. In our opinion, this will take years of
gradually Nibbling Away at the situation, which is our
Modus Operandi at this moment in time.
In the 13 years following the appointment of H.E. to the
position of International Treasury Controller, Legal Heir /
Owner / Sole Arbiter, we have expended considerable time
working and correcting the enormous amount of problems
created by the previous Trilateral Trillenium Tripartite Gold
Commission (USA, France and UK). These problems are so
severe and numerous that it will take many more years to
resolve them all, if that is ever possible, because they are so
complex and tend to be linked to other not directly connected
Treaties, Conventions, Agreements etc. of which the Reagan-
Mitterand Protocols is just one
To quickly refresh your memory on the latter, if I may. Two
illegal Presidential Decrees by Reagan that under US law
BACK
legalised what is referred to under International Law and
International Treaty Law, as breaches of International Treaty
Laws and illegal acts against the Collateral Accounts, which
were applied to be used for covert operations against another
country (Russia).
In order to give these illegal acts some visible but not legal
basis / foundation, Reagan and Mitterand put together
numerous countries in these separate protocols, without
actually revealing the monetary source, so that the whole
operation appeared to be of International Treaty Status
supported by many countries of the world, when in fact the
basis of such protocols were derived from the illegal acts of an
American President / Government without any legal basis
whatsoever.
It is this type of situation, of which there are many, which I
refer to as There are hundreds, if not thousands of other parts
which all make up the bigger picture. Deliberate inter-related
activities, but most of which are totally separate and individual
in their form, substance, and relatively to the Collateral
Accounts, but all concocted / structured by the Americans to
allow illegal use of the assets of the Collateral Accounts.
It is for this reason why I state that no one part of all of this
can be taken / considered separately or individually from all
other parts.
I can inform you quite openly that assets held in Indonesia,
Philippines, Thailand, and some held by other countries, do, in
fact carry illegal Liens / Charges imposed by those parties that
are, and have been, illegally using these assets for many years.
The American Banks (many of them) are all guilty of this, as is
the American Government, Federal Reserve, British and
European Banks, IMF and World Bank, UN, plus many
others. This is one reason why the world is in such a mess with
BACK
approximately $3 quadrillion USD in illegal derivatives
floating around in the market that no one is prepared to pay
against.
I do admit that we are partly to blame for this worldly mess, as
we will tolerate the situation no more. The line was drawn by
H.E. many years ago, when these illegal liens were first
recognised. The first step was to stop all legal funding to the
IMF and WB, Strange, but not so strange, that the IMF
records a $400 bill deficit in 2006 and who now wants to sell
gold, recorded under the Collateral Accounts that they hold, to
salvage themselves.
You should also be made aware of the fact that we are working
with several countries that are equally dismayed, and totally
disillusioned by the illegal practices of specific western
countries, whereby in due course, we will, under special and
applicable protocols, call the Nations of the World together to
force the necessary changes that will bring about the real and
original objectives of All Hereditary Owners of the Assets, as
they are the only ones, as far as I am aware that can force the
implementation of the purpose and objectives written by our
forefathers, for the benefit of the world, via H.E. as the Legal
Heir / Owner / Sole Arbiter.
2) Try to work together using the channels/information you
have together with the channels/information we have towards
striving to force BoE/FED to implement the various agreements
that was put in place by our forefathers starting in 1857. For a list
of agreements we see relevant we can communicate at a later date.
This second task may be a bit overwhelming and next to
impossible but worth a try.
Coming on to your point 2).
BACK
Next to impossible, is probably the right wording to use in this
instance? With the majority of this information still held
Secret one has to be ultra careful as to what information is
released, otherwise the person or party releasing such
information would be in direct breach of numerous
International Secrecy Laws, Official Secrets Acts, or similar,
many of which can result, and probably would, in serious
International repercussions, and also place the life of that
person or persons in jeopardy.
Let me explain a little more. Certain International Treaties
(mainly The European Ones) are not actual Treaties but are
Armistice Agreements under the guise of International
Treaties. Such Armistice Agreements have a limited term 20
25 years, some with a 30 year term, which, at term end, could
refer back to the actual situation prior to such Armistice
Agreements being executed. That would, in our opinion,
create war in Europe and possibly other areas of the World,
which no one with any sense, wants to see, or be the cause of.
Better, in these circumstances to maintain the Status Quo for
the sake of World Peace.
Additionally, it would be totally impossible to find a party
(Press, Web Site, Blogs, or similar) to publish anything because
in most cases, the responsible ones would check it out first.
Once establishing the Secrecy factor that surrounds most of
this, they would run a mile, and ask you to leave their offices
immediately, never to return. If the more informal but publicly
dominated areas were explored, such as Private Web Sites,
Blogs, you can be certain that they will be either shut down or
blocked, without any delay, and the operators of such sites
prosecuted on trivial false evidence, but sufficient to allow
them an extra long holiday at the Nations expense.
BACK
The above has happened in the past, and even present day, but
of course it is rarely known because it is undertaken in a
certain way so that the Truth is never revealed or becomes
part of any criminal or civil Court actions, much to our
distaste I add, therefore any information released, whether by
myself or anyone else known to us, or anyone who approaches
us, must be cleared by H.E.
The reason why I state the latter is because H.E. is an
Internationally Protected Person and can never be prosecuted.
He is as adamant as much as anyone else that the truth must
come out, but at the same time, he knows the dangers to all
those persons who are involved in revealing the truth. Such
disclosures must therefore have H.E.s approval and protection
behind it, at all times. No approval, then no disclosure, as it
would endanger all those involved, which is not the objective at
all.
With respect to your good self and your colleagues, you need to
seriously consider this factor before moving forward on same.
Yes, we all want the truth to come out and the World put right,
and as it should be. However, the forces against this are
immensely strong and powerful, and do not hesitate to remove
people from the scene, where necessary.
This is an area that even Presidents of some countries, with all
their security and power, will not become involved as they fear
the consequences.
When any part of this subject is publicised anywhere by
anyone, those people need to be absolutely 100% sure that they
have their facts and figures correct, otherwise more damage
can be done that what one could imagine. There are stories
abound, complete with documents (most of which are fakes),
which all appears to be real and people believe it. This is where
the problem lies because the Truth is never believed because
BACK
their minds have already been programmed with falsities. The
Philippines, Thailand, and Indonesia are typical of many
countries where stories which contain some truth but largely
full of falsities, are numerous and believed by many, to the
detriment of the truth. This is where the damage is caused
because the truth, or what can be revealed at any one time, is
never believed by the public at large.
People who write to various Web Sites and Blogs on this very
subject are generally misinformation specialists, or those who
are using the public to believe what is written, with the intent
of Financial Benefits by those who start this all off.
We get sick of reading all this bullshit, because some truth is
there, but then it is distorted by the falsities. All very plausible
and appearing to be the truth by the innocent minds, but much
of it so far from the truth that it would be easier to catch a bus
to the moon than rely upon what is currently, and in the past,
published on this subject.
Let me introduce myself. I am a private person not connected to
any group, organization or secret service of any kind who finds
himself receiving information and documents from a few different
sources. It is appreciated what you have commented about
yourself, but unless we know you personally and you hold the
relevant security level clearance, we, unfortunately, can not
disclose classified information to you. In due course, over a
period of time, such information will drift out, as and when
H.E. The Chairman deems fit and proper.
One of the sources are Mr Sw who is one of the signatories on
"our" version of G.H.A. Can I assume that the Mr Sw you refer
to is that of Mr Soewarno. If so, you may be heading in the
wrong direction completely. Mr Soewarno is named by former
President Soekarno as a Secondary Holder along with Miss
BACK
Sarinah and others, none of whom held any power over the
assets.
In fact Mr Soewarno was working closely with UBS with
certificates he held following the demise of former President
Soekarno, and although Mr Soewarno is now deceased, UBS
are still issuing false certificates against those Soekarno Gold
Certificates. The latest we have on record is one issued in 2006,
signed by Marcel Ospel and Sir Peter Davies, for 100 mill USD,
against a Gold Bullion Certificate.
Soewarno has always claimed he owns them, but he has no idea
as to the identity of the account signatory and account holder.
Soewarno was just the holder of the certificate and could do
nothing with them unless he and a crooked bank got together
and did things behind closed doors, which is exactly what was
happening.
Unfortunately, Soewarno hasnt got any credibility and the
documents he issued have even less. None of the documents we
have seen hold any genuineness about them, and none match
the Library Copies.
I will be blunt, for which I apologise. If I am correct on this,
you would be better off staying silent, unless of course you can
verify the documents you hold direct with the relevant persons
and the Library Copies.
You can find a copy of that at kebenaran555@gmail.com. Log in
using U7P4Mwaq and find the GHA in G-mail photos +some
additional information in a draftbox mail. In respect of the copy
documents. This is also appreciated, but I have to say that we
would need full certified copies of same, delivered to us by
courier mail so that every little item can be checked. To do this
from e mail copies is not possible because there are certain
security marks that are highly relevant in such documents,
BACK
whereby we would need to verify them against the Library
Copy.
Having stated that, the colouring of your scanned copies does
portray a copy of a security paper print, which actually scans
in the brown colour and not the original colour of the
document. Scanning does not eliminate the security markings
which can be viewed via special equipment.
I send it to you this way since then it does not actually get "sent" =
scanned between two e-mail addresses. As far as I know intel
services are not yet officially allowed to pry into private peoples e-
mail accounts but are free to search sent/received e-mails. Correct
me if I am wrong. Also comments and perceptions regarding these
documents are welcome. In respect of your methodology of
sending communications. What you have implemented does
work, however, the computers, or some of them, of various
agencies look for unusual patterns. Dead End addresses, as you
propose, are unusual patterns and would attract the agencies
like bees around a honey pot. It is far safer using Airmail
addressed to individuals. It may take longer, but safety and
security is paramount.
I have an OK from my sources to expose what I receive so I am
not bound by any confidentiality agreements or break of trust. It
has to be done in as a factual and objective way possible leaving
the reader to make his own conclusions. (and we do realize that
they will differ widely based on preconceived ideas/ideologies)
Whilst we are on the subject of communications, such
communications, or release of information to the public must
be 100% factual and allow very limited room for personal
perceptions. The over-riding premise must always be in
anyones mind. What they perceive about the information that
surrounds the over-riding premise is not controllable, but such
BACK
perceptions can be limited so that the over-riding premise is
always prominent in their minds.
No one can afford to allow any misconception by anyone else.
The truth is the truth and that is how it must always be. Lies
are dissolved by the truth in the average persons mind once
they start their own investigations and commence comparisons
of information.
Having said that, I do apologize for that parts you noted as slanted
and lets try and correct them. No apologies necessary.
We (as in you, me & my sources) share a desire to expose a very
corrupt system now run by a very small elite for the benefit of a
few and the enslavement of many. The few who highjacked a very
noble plan and used it's building blocks (UN, WB, IMF, FED etc)
for power plays and world rape. Let's focus on what we have in
common (expose the system and give people a clear understanding
of history) and not get derailed by what may be our differences.
Yes, we certainly share a desire to expose a very corrupt
system operated by a few to the detriment of the masses. I
certainly like the work Highjacked because that is exactly
what happened over decades, and it is a word we use
occasionally to explain what happened, as people understand
such a word quite easily.
As for total exposure, very difficult because of the Secrecy
factor and the fact that there are far too many fake and
fictitious documents floating around that subordinate the
truth.
The truth can only come out in time, and upon the approval of
H.E. The Chairman, as these fake and fictitious documents are
gradually being remove from the world market place. In fact,
since 2003 no bank other than our own Institutional Bank, can
issue any certificate against any of the old Heritage
BACK
Certificates, or any assets of the Collateral Accounts, whether
under the name of Soekarno, Soewarno, Soenario, Marcos,
Noriega, DeGaulle, Arafat, or others. Since 2003 all the old
certificates, whether invalid on date or not, have been retired
and are no longer valid. New Certificates have to be issued by
our own Institutional Bank.
You have to understand that it is easy to perceive the OITC as
being a creation of the forces behind the BoE/FED to gather up the
last little threads they don't already control. A "sheep in wolfs
clothing" is one description I have heard. In the Asian experience
there are many examples of noble institutions, set up and worked
by noble people with great intentions that have not quite worked
out as planned. UN, WB, IMF being some of them. They put a
whole lot "in the communal pot" and have very little apart from
abuse to show for it. I certainly like your A sheep in Wolfs
clothing statement. Yes, on the surface that how it has been
perceived by many since 1995. In reality, this is so far from the
truth that one has to smile at such statements. It is a general
perception based upon published facts, but an incorrect
perception. If I may at this stage reiterate the fact that if the
truth is to be known then it must be undertaken carefully and
nothing but the truth revealed, otherwise perceptions go wild.
When the truth can be verified, some perceptions disappear
out of sight completely.
Trust has to be earned at this point I guess. Truth is always there.
Respect is what has to be earned, and from respect develops
belief whereby lies disintegrate.
Here is one line of thought..
OITC was set up in 1995. A few years before a large number of
Gold certificates loans were set to run out. Running at 33 year
cycles they were first lent out in 1930-35 to fund the "New Deal"
in the US, re lent in 1963-68 and set to mature in 1996-2001. My
BACK
guess is that the banking world was desperate to have a new M1 in
place before that date or a very large number of banks would find
their vaults sitting on Gold contracts that needed to be re signed. I
make reference here to your Line of Thought. First point
here is that most of these old Certificates carry a 25 year term
or 30 year term only. Your 33 year term doesnt equate. The
Thirty (30) year term, being maximum under International
Law. This may not be visible on the actual old certificates
because dates were usually embedded into numeric codes.
One of the major uses of these certificates came in 1933 / 4 with
the USA, refinancing following the great depression. In return
the USA, as is always the case, issue a series of Obligation
Certificates covering the amount loaned, plus Custodian Fees
and Costs. This is why you have the Federal Reserve Notes,
Federal Reserve Bonds, American Dream Bonds, Wells Fargo
Notes / Silver and Gold Certificates, J.P.Morgan Bonds, plus
many more, secreted away in the Philippines, in various
designs of boxes, safes, crates, etc. Yes, if you are thinking it, it
is probably correct, which are the very certificates that the
America rogue agency have been stealing for many years, and
which many others have attempted to use for personal gain.
The debt to the Collateral Accounts has never been repaid by
America. In fact the debt is now fully collaterised by every
ounce of Gold, Silver, Oil / Mineral wealth, Government
Buildings / Land / Property, or other assets, titled under the
US Government.
Even the Banks who either legally borrowed from the
Collateral Accounts, or illegally used assets, ended up issuing
Bank Debenture Stock guaranteed by the US Government.
Does that ring a bell with what is currently happening and the
Nationalisation / Bail Outs of Banks .. There is always an
alternative reason which is never publicly explained.
BACK
I dont think the dates stated by you have much relevance,
except of course to the long term debt factor agreed with the
Collateral Accounts. However, we could both be wrong on that
because the very dates you state are dates in which the
Trilateral, Trillenium Tripartite Gold Commission (USA,
France and UK) were in charge of the Collateral Accounts
when they appear to have done exactly what they wanted to do
and disregarded all others, so normal circumstances /
procedures were subordinated to the whims and desires of the
TTTGC, as and when they required it.
So a suitable person was found early on to fill the place, educated
and "groomed" by US & western interests and finally "elected by
those qualified to elect" to fill the role. My guess is that the first
actions of the chairman was to re sign a lot of contracts to keep the
stability of the banking world intact upon his appointment. Again,
please correct me if I am wrong. Re: A suitable Person. In
fact the way in which the world portrayed this issue is
incorrect. Please let me explain. It was the Royal Families of
the World who nominated H.E. Dr. Ray C. Dam, not the
Americans as many believe. Dr Ray C. Dam is in fact a
member of a Royal Family and was the over-riding signature
during the time of the TTTGC, whose purpose was to ensure
that the TTTGC did not abuse the accounts? As we are all
aware, Bankers and Governments are very good at finding the
holes and conjuring specific actions out of thin air, so the
presence of Dr. Dam did not prevent abuse. However, it did
allow him to report what he saw, and knew, to the Royal
Families, who decided to stop the rot and not extend the 50
year term of the TTTGC.
It was at this stage that the Royal Families of the 42 Nations
decided to appoint one man as the Legal Heir, Owner, Sole
Arbiter of the Collateral Accounts, much to the despise of the
Americans, French and British establishments. That man was
BACK
Dr. Ray C. Dam, a member of their own clan, so to speak, with
which the Royal Families were very comfortable.
Unfortunately, the hatred of the Americans, French and
British excelled and they ensured that they maintained control
of the mechanism, which was necessary at the time based upon
the US Dollar being the Worlds Reserve Currency. It is that
control which largely prevents proper use of the Accounts for
the benefit of the world.
To give your more insight into Dr. Ray C. Dam, which is
confidential, and hinges mainly upon the personal aspect of his
life.
It was the French who assassinated his Parents, being the
former Sovereign Monarchs of a specific country, for which he
will never forget.
It was the Americans who supported the French throughout
this unfortunate period of time.
The Americans took Dr Dam outside his own country and
placed him under the custodianship of a US Sympathiser in
another country, who treated him as a House Boy, and
apparently very badly. He will never forget that episode in his
life and largely blames the Americans.
When the Americans finally took him to America, having been
partly conditioned by the American sympathiser family, he
was educated to a specific level and then moved to the U.K.
He was being groomed to be something he didnt want to be,
and he knew it, so played along with it.
Following his education, he was sent to Germany to work and
train in the Bundesbank. From there into Russia, to the
Central Bank of Russia. From there back into the U.K. to the
BACK
Bank of England, and then back to America, where he was
employed in the Federal Reserve.
He was soon placed in charge of the Politically sensitive
division and knew an awful amount about the accounts, finally
to become signatory to the accounts.
The Americans believed that they had programmed him
sufficiently to be able to control him, but in fact the opposite
was applicable. Dr. Ray C. Dam developed a negative attitude
to the Americans, French and British, and knew exactly what
these Nations were up to.
Through Royal Family protocols, Dr. Dam alerted the Royal
Families and provided them with evidence to support his
claims.
When the Royal Family intelligence operations finally got to
work and established that Dr. Dam was in fact the Hereditary
Monarch of a specific country. It is at that time that things
started to change.
Dr. Dam is not his real name. It is a name given to him by the
Americans when he first went to America. His real name is
that of the Royal Family of that specific country which many
still recognise today. Neither the Americans, nor the British,
will allow Dr. Dam to enter their countries, nor will they
provide Visas for his children to be educated in either America
or Britain. He removed himself from aligning with the French
as the French still support the family of the elected King whom
they elected way back decades ago.
I, and others in the OITC, have personally experienced Dr.
Dams acrimonious attitude towards the Americans, British
and French, whereby he is determined to ensure, no matter
what it takes, that the Collateral Accounts, or any part thereof,
BACK
are eased away from the Americans and ultimately used, as
assented to by the Nations of the World (Royal Families), for
the betterment of all Nations and People of the World.
What we are doing right now and what we are achieving will
ultimately see this happen. However in the meantime, we have
to operate strategically and slowly, otherwise it may all be
destroyed by the actions of America who are as cunning as a
fox and ultra devious.
Personally I do fully believe that you and your team are fully
committed to pursue the aim of the goals set out in "The plan of
the experts" and make this a better world for all. I applaud your
efforts and commitment in hindering the "hardliners" in their
pursuit of ultimate control. We all agree that if the agreements that
were put in place since 1857 and forward were honored the world
would be a better place.
One of the factors which Dr. Dam implemented was to stop all
legal use of the Collateral Accounts by the IMF, WB, and UN.
This was done on a percentage basis reduction over X years
from the year 2000. Surprisingly, but not so surprising, the
IMF recorded a $400 bill loss in 2006. Also surprisingly the
IMF wanted to sell some gold they hold as custodians, which
was also prevented, as the gold is part of the Collateral
Accounts. It goes on and on, but the main factor is that results
are showing Dr. Dams actions are taking effect. This is why I
earlier state that we may be partly responsible for the
Economic and Financial Crisis in the World today. America
owe to the World, an awful lot more than what is being
admitted, and they have no intention of paying, so in Dr.
Dams opinion, they have to learn a very hard lesson and start
to live within their means, irrespective of the negative effects..
People ask why dont we help America out and let them use
assets to balance themselves up, thus bringing stability to the
BACK
world. Well, the real truth is that it has been attempted before,
back in Roosevelts time, and following the great depression.
America never learned its lesson then as they still went on
spending as if they owed nothing to anyone. They have carried
on like that ever since with an acceleration of their internal
financial and economic policies since the 70s.
In Dr. Dams words, quote We do not finance any country
that uses such finance to go out into the world and attempt to
control it, dictating and enforcing their ideologies, by whatever
means they desire, whether financial warfare, military
warfare, or otherwise. Neither do we finance crooks and
thieves.
I also do hope the "new financial system" you are working on does
not include a cashless society model were every economic
transaction will have to go through a bank since it should be more
about empowering people and less about controlling them. In my
mind a "year of the J ubilee" is in order were people and Nations
are set free from the bondage of debt. This last thought is very
much my own and does not represent any others. Reference to the
new Financial System we have developed. I can assure you that
this is not a cashless society, nor is it based on fiat money. It is
an Asset backed International Monetary Unit, which
automatically, by association, backs the currencies of every
other country in the World. The asset backing is provided by
the Collateral Accounts.
If we take the total world GNP, it is in the region of $55 trillion
USD (If my memory is correct on this, if not please correct
me). This means that the accounts will need to provide $55
trillion in assets (Gold, Silver, Platinum, etc) based upon a
Gold Price standard. However, there is far more to this than
just a new System and new International Monetary Unit.
Control, Administration, Regulation, is also a very big part of
BACK
the new system, whereby maximum leverage will be x 10.
Anything above that will be criminally illegal. Banking and
Corporate Laws need to be amended. Gone will be the IMF
and WB, plus the International Development Banks.
Introduced will be a full international representation through
several Regional committees and one International Committee,
removing the need for the G7 and G20 etc, who are all
politically motivated.
The whole new system will be run by each and every country of
the world, through the International Treasury Control. Politics
and Foreign Policy will not enter into the Financial and
Economic fundamentals of the World anymore.
On that point I will say no more because we are still working
on the intricacies of the system, whereby we do not wish to
release information until we are ready to do so, otherwise those
in power will claim it shows weaknesses which can not be
tolerated within any new system, just to protect their old
dilapidated system which can no longer work, and which is so
far past its Sell By date, that it is no longer fit for human
consumption.
What I hope you can do is read and comment on the presentation
page by page.
For example, Page 1. Don't agree with.. Do agree with $B!D (B
Added detailed info. Not really possible because of the way the
content is presented along with the many questions and
nuances.
For instance detailed info on how at various stages the "bad"
elements tried early on to highjack the system or more details and
meat on the bone regarding how the "banking/Rothshield" side has
played out their agenda over time would be helpful. We do agree
100% with your comments, that if agreements, treaties,
BACK
conventions, etc since 1850 onwards, had been allowed to
operate and function correctly over the years, the world would
not be in such a predicament as it is now, nor would much of
what has happened negatively in the world over the 150 years,
would have happened at all. The world as it should be, never
will be until the people who constantly desire and propagate
civil unrest, and believe they can steal or use these assets freely
for their own purpose: are removed from their positions and
brought to justice with long term incarceration. If the public
have a choice, I personally see court cases and incarceration
being bottom of the list, with Hang them first and ask
questions later taking the number 1 slot.
The problem is with those who have manipulated the whole
system and interpreted such agreements, treaties, conventions,
etc. in a way that benefits them only, and forcing other
countries to apply and be subservient to.
Coming on to the Bad Elements. This actually goes back
hundreds of years, and one can quote the Crusade Wars in
the Middle East. The Jews, Catholics, Christians, Knights
Templar, Knights of Malta, etc, etc, etc.
The target, as with most other wars is the wealth of the
countries involved. King Solomons treasures, The Aztec
Treasure, The Inca Treasures, The Egyptian Treasures, and so
on, are all part of the Collateral Accounts.
Knights Templar, still claim to this very day, title to these
treasures, as does the Knights of Malta, the Christians, and the
Catholics. They all do their utmost to steal back what they
believe are rightfully theirs as War Booty generally, even
though indirectly, they executed the very Treaties, agreements,
conventions, designating all such treasures to the accounts to
benefit the world and its people.
BACK
It was in the mid to late 1800s that the Jews, who controlled
the European Banking industry started to flex their muscles,
which became far more evident in 1907, following the financial
turmoil in America, and the 1910 with the Jekyll Island Treaty.
It was these persons, all Jewish Bankers, that structured the
Jekyll Island Treaty, which was their first visible attempt to
hijack the Collateral Accounts (as they are now known) and
bring them under the control of the Banking fraternity.
This was quickly recognised by the Royal Families of the
world, whereby Emperor Hirohito of Japan designed a scheme
which would isolate the Collateral Accounts from the grasp of
the Banking fraternity. This was assented to by the Royal
Families under the 1920 London Treaty.
I will not go into the actual structuring as it will divulge the
mechanisms to be applied to access the Collateral Accounts,
which are very complex, whereby no one person involved
within the operation of the Collateral Accounts, knew any
other one person, who were all scattered throughout the world,
as indeed the assets were.
From 1920 onwards, even during the years of WW II, the
assets were secreted away in numerous countries under the
terms and conditions of the 1920 Treaty, which included assets
sent to Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines, Cambodia, etc, etc,
etc. No one country was allowed to hold assets that it may have
had a claim to at any time, e.g. Assets in Indonesia are not, and
never have been assets of the Indonesian Country. The same
principle applies with the Philippines, America, United
Kingdom, Russia, etc, etc, etc.
It was in 1944/5 with the Bretton Woods Treaty, again made
up of mainly Jewish Bankers, structured everything which
would allow a final hijack in due course. The United Kingdom
whose currency was at that time the Reserve Currency of the
BACK
World, which was also the heart of the Jewish Banking
Fraternity (Rothschild), had removed the Gold Standard years
prior to 1944/5.
Within the Bretton Woods Treaty, the British Pound was to be
removed and substituted by the US Dollar. Within a Side
Agreement to the Bretton Woods Treaty the Collateral
Accounts were to be operated, Administered, and Controlled
by the TTTGC (America, U.K. France) as the Allied Powers,
but also because the US Dollar was the International Reserve
Currency and therefore operated out of NYC and DC. via the
Federal Reserve and US Government.
Shortly after the Federal Reserve System was introduced. This
is legally a separate entity to the Federal Reserve, and
introduced into various countries in Europe as well as
America. It was this Federal Reserve System that was to partly
utilise the Assets of the Collateral Accounts.
This is where everything started to go wrong, but not
recognised at the time. The fact that power and control rested
entirely in the hands of America, the Federal Reserve System,
and supported by the Allied Powers.
Also involved in the Collateral Accounts was the War Booty
from several countries, which was to be used within the
reparations between countries following the war. Any balances
were to remain with the Collateral Accounts.
Now you should be able to see how the Allied Powers, lead by
America, started to control the world.
As time went on, America borrowed more and more money
from the Collateral Accounts, never having any intention of
paying it back. At the same time, the under-pinning of the USD
by the Collateral Accounts was diminishing. This was supposed
BACK
to be a 10:1 ratio (10 USD to 1 USD value of Collateral
Account Assets) It was in 1963 that President Kennedy
attempted to put right the wrongs of the past and bring the
ratio back to what it should be. This is when the Green Hilton
Agreement came into effect. Its purpose was to allow more
dollars to be printed under the 10:1 ratio rule, to increase
World Trade and World monetary supply.
Needless to say, we all know what happened in Now 1963. The
Green Hilton Treaty was never recognised by America, and
never has been to this day. Various fakes of the GHT (or
Agreement as known by many) began to emerge. So no one
really knows which the real one is. A deliberate attempt to
confuse people and deny legally, etc.
We then go through to August 1971 when Nixon removed
(abolished) the Gold Standard, Fiat currencies were effectively
born and every country in the world were compelled to follow
suit. All of this under the banner of Monetarism, later to be
referred to as Global Economy, Free Trade. At this
juncture one must look at the various advisors around Nixon
at the time. Many were of one specific religion and well
connected to the Banking Fraternity of America and the UK.
Gradually, over the years since 1971, regulation has been
eased, under the pretence of enhancing International Trade
and Competitiveness. How people were fooled, and still are
fooled.
During all this time 1944/5 1995, and even to present date,
the TTTGC totally abused the Collateral Accounts in their
own favour, but also abused the Accounts in a Monetary
Warfare philosophy throughout the World, bringing down
democratically elected Governments in favour of their own
people. Currency raids to enhance their foreign policy, and so
forth.
BACK
The Royal Families of the World, together with some Nations
who were not aligned to the Allied Powers, realised what was
happening but could do nothing as the TTTGC Gold
Commission was effectively written in stone. At the same time
the Royal Families of the World did not desire to create
another serious conflict in the World, so they waited until 1994,
when they unanimously agreed not to extend the 50 year term
of the TTTGC, but to recover their power over the Collateral
Accounts, and remove all traces of dominance by the Allied
Powers, more so America.
Hence the 1995 appointment of H.E. Dr. Ray C. Dam.
Various Indonesians (Filipinos are the same) attempted to
claim the assets held in their country, even to the extent of
lobbying the US Government heavily, and on many occasions
All without success, and a few ending up incarcerated for
many years.
It was in late 2001, that several top people in Indonesia
approached Dr. Ray C. Dam, regarding the assets. Apparently
they were shown absolute proof of ownership under the
Collateral Accounts, and even accessed the accounts to Screen
Print all Account Details.
Recognising the Truth, they acknowledged the various
Treaties, documents, information etc. but then referred to
Heritage Rights (Custodian Fees) over the assets held within
Indonesia. This led to the 2003 Bangkok Treaty (recognising
the Rights), which is legal and effective, and will be honoured.
However, America has illegally applied a lien on the assets in
Indonesia and several other countries, to prevent their use by
others, and thus preventing custodian fees from being claimed,
paid, or payable.
BACK
This lien is where the problem arises today with the enormous
debt accumulated by the American and British Banks, as well
as Governments. To date we have a figure in excess of $3.35
Quadrillion USD, debt factor, made up of illegal use of the
assets by the banks and governments, which are supposed to be
the collateral behind all these derivatives. To give an example,
J.P.Morgan are in for hundreds of Trillions of Debt when they
illegally used Gold Assets held at the Bank under
Custodianship Rules, to produce Over the Counter Gold
Derivatives, sold through Off Shore domiciled corporations.
Citibank are in for approximately $700 billion USD of Debt for
their illegal use of the Assets.
All this debt is guaranteed by the US under the various treaties
since 1944/5, which is something they cannot eliminate or
extinguish. The debt must be paid,. Alternatively, we are using
the assets irrespective of any illegally applied Lien, leaving
America to sort out their self generated problem, as we do not,
neither does any treaty, recognise illegal liens.
It is taking us vast amounts of time to sort all this out. We are
also taking other actions that I cannot disclose at this moment
in time, other than to say changes have been implemented and
are still being implemented, and will continue to be
implemented until the Collateral Accounts are fully under
control and being used as per their original purpose, for the
benefit of ALL Nations of the World and the people of the
World.
I do not desire to focus on the Rothschild factor too much as
they are just part of the problem, along with the Rockefellers,
Kissinger, and many more. The problem itself was
compounded by various other parties, such as Governments,
Foreign Policies, Monetary Warfare, and the like. Thaksin
Shinawatra is another good example. He is not a Jew, but he is
BACK
a puppet of the Bushes. Stealing assets held in Thailand and
Cambodia. Warned 3 times and told to stop and replace
everything which was missing. He didnt and on the Third
occasion it was manipulated to depose him and bring charges
for menial crimes to prevent exposure of the assets and
Collateral Accounts. He is now a fugitive on the run and dare
not return to Thailand. His Wife, an accomplice, has a 5 year
jail term against her, which she is appealing against.
There are others, whereas the routing has started and will
continue, until everything is finally sorted out and the accounts
brought back under proper control and used as intended.
Also if actual figures are off such as 7.5 million metric tones (11 is
also a number that has been mentioned) and you are not in a
position to divulge the correct ones maybe such specifics are best
kept out of the presentation? In respect of the actual MT volume
of Gold held within the Collateral Accounts. You are low with
your figures and you should be working on an absolute
minimum of 20 million MT of Gold alone. In addition, you
have thousands of tonnes of Platinum, Silver, Thousands of
boxes of precious gems, plus Sovereign Certificates which are
collateralised by other mineral wealth such as Oil, Copper,
Bauxite, Uranium, Nickel Babbit, Ancient Treasures, Works of
Art, Sovereign Monarch Treasures, etc, etc, etc.
The wealth is enormous. Far more than anyone would believe,
and at least 100 quinrillion USD more than what is required to
put the world to right.
We understand it is a very "dangerous & murky" world out there.
This side is very traumatized. Last time they stuck their necks out
and came to the bank with all the necessary documents and
signatories was back in 1984. An Asian group showed up at UBS
with all the right papers including "The 3 roses" box. That lead to
Robert Palmer (I believe it was) issuing an order for 7 T to be
BACK
transferred from the FED to Europe within 24 hours. That transfer
order was picked up by CIA hardliners who sent a hit squad to
eliminate the people and confiscate all the documents. That CIA
order was again picked up by MI5 who responded by sending their
"Zulu" group to protect them. The CIA group had support from 7
of the Swiss Kantons so the rescue was a mayor undertaking.
Supposedly 20 people died but the key people and documents were
sent back to Asia secure. You should be able verify some of this. A
mayor gunfight in and around UBS headquarters should be hard to
cover up completely I would think? Dangerous and murky
World out there is an understatement if I may respectfully
say so. So dangerous that even the banks have their own
assassination squads, and these people would go to all lengths
to stop the world gaining from the benefits of the Collateral
Accounts.
The rest of your statement here sounds about right. Move to
far and too fast without all pieces being in place, and you will
end up dead, without any question. Hence why I previously
have stated that you ought to be fully aware of what you are
doing especially if you are not part of the operation and carry
no protectorate or immunity, as you will end up dead. I have
no doubt in my mind that you are probably being watched
right now and monitored. Get too close and you will have
serious problems which we can not assist you with. Others
have tried it before, only to be eliminated or incarcerated on
trumped up charges.
I will try and verify what you have stated here, when I next
meet with H.E. Dr. Ray C. Dam, However, it was before his
appointment as International Treasury Controller, so he may
not have all the information although it will be recorded,
Whether he desires to dig up old bones, so to speak is another
matter. Sometimes it is best to let sleeping dogs lie.
BACK
As for Robert Palmer, definitely rogue See Eye Aye. He has
been at it for years, including attempting to illegal use assets
from the China Foundation, and the Mae Hua Trust. Keep
your distance from this man because he has accomplices, one
of whom we know of very well, who is a mentally deranged
person who was removed from the legal part of See Eye Aye
for illegally assassinating 6 persons without permission. He was
immediately recruited to the rogue element of the See Eye Aye.
There are many more, most of whom you would not recognise
or know if you passed them in the street. At the same time, you
dont really want to know these people. Better to make friends
with a crocodile.
One of the side effects of this 1984 drama was that Ferdinand
Marcos in the Philippines lost his grip on power. Up to that point,
the banking world had guessed/assumed that he was 3/3/3 or "the
man with no name". A signatory for hundreds of key accounts. In
fact the person who showed up was his cousin. They shared the
same grandfather who was the Chinese Royal active with PB X in
the 1920's recall of funds. Their bloodline goes all the way back to
Djengis Kahn. Also a great collector of huge amounts of Gold. Re:
Ferdinand Marcos. No he was not the signatory to many
accounts as stated. He was the senior Custodian on behalf of
the Republic of the Philippines (The same factor applies to the
so-called Soekarno Assets). The real Signatory, who Imelda is
still attempting to use is known to us. This person is (was)
signatory to 849 accounts held in 368 banks throughout the
world. In fact I stated this person IS
These people do not know who I am, but I worked undercover
with them for approximately 2 years. I even had the signatory
held safely in a safe house in Bangkok, but then through a
Filipino Priest, the person succumbed to a massive payment by
the signatory. No, not
anymore. The name has been removed ever since they
attempted to access the Japanese accounts using the Yakusa.
BACK
Imelda and returned unexpectedly to the Philippines. It was
then that the signatory was removed completely from anything
to do with the accounts. I am aware that the signatory died
approximately 1 year ago in a freak accident.
We are aware of the Chinese Royal Family connection of
Marcos, and yes it does go back to Genghis Khan, as well as
Mao Si Dong.
This connection really means nothing as Marcos did not get his
position through the Royal connection. He was in fact See Eye
Aye and Lawyer to St. Romano (See Eye Aye and Vatican
Ambassador), connected to General McArthur and General
Lansdale.
What people who were present at both the signing of G.H.A & the
1984 debacle will tell you is that Soekarno was not always
Soekarno. Other people also signed using his name. Verification of
correct signatory ID is done using blood DNA. We also
appreciate the fact that Soekarno was not always Soekarno,
and his signature was not always that, or one of the four
known and recognised signatures on record. You are
absolutely correct when you state that verification is by DNA.
This is common with all World Leaders, and certainly common
within the Royal Families and the upper echelons of World
Society.
We are aware that DNA is verified with Blood, Hair and Skin
or Bone sample. All three have to match otherwise no one takes
a blind bit of notice. Library copies of ALL Agreements /
Treaties, Conventions, etc are also kept on record, so fakes are
easily recognised., even if the fakes use security paper, some of
which was left in the Philippines many years ago and which the
Filipinos have been using, illegally of course.
BACK
Coming back to Marcos. There was only one other person on
record to succeed Marcos. Again DNA samples were taken. No
other person in the Philippines or anywhere else in the world
should have possession of any certificates, etc other than
Marcos or the known successor. Many have tried and many
have ended up dead or incarcerated. On the World Gold
Council Blacklist many are Filipinos, which is not at all
surprising. Even that successor has relinquished the post,
whereby the assets in the Philippines are now under
Custodianship of a person who is not Filipino and not resident
in the Philippines.
There is a lot of ground to cover. For technical things not suitable
for the public domain please suggest an alternative way of
communicating. But first, let's do our best to try and get the
historical aspect of this as correct as possible and out into the
hands of the public. The safest method is AIR MAIL, or
recorded / registered AIR MAIL Email, no matter if it is
encrypted or not, is not 100% safe and secure.
In the hope of getting an in debt response and lots of future
constructive communication going, Yes, but we really need to
know you and your colleagues before we go too far, and I need
to consult with Dr. Dam on these matters, as he is the one with
the knowledge and access. To give you information which is
not based on fact, or official record, is not my way of doing
things, nor is it the way of the Dr. Dam or the OITC. Some fact
can never be released, some, not so secret fact, has already
been released. The problem I have is that I am now retired,
and although I assist Dr Dam when it is needed I can not be
available all of the time, especially at this moment in time as I
have to go into hospital for a major operation, but I will
attempt to be active from the hospital bed.
Best Regards, M
BACK
P.s I have found all your postings on Fourwinds a very interesting
read. I am not sure I have all of them though. Can you please send
me a copy of all the postings together with any other material you
have written and made public elsewhere? It certainly helps to get
the fuller picture. Thanks. D.s
These will need to be sorted as there are a great many of them,
some of which are irrelevant, some are of a personal nature to
other respondents, some have just been communications with
no publication of same.
I will attend to this in due course, but for the moment this is
something I can not attend to yet
Referring now to your attachment. Your list here is only partly
correct. There are an awful lot more assets, hereditary lines,
origins, National Wealth, etc, within the Collateral Accounts
that what you have listed. You certainly have a reasonable
historical background, indicated by your definitions, which I
find a little unusual considering you claim you are an ordinary
person. Perhaps you would care to explain how you have such
knowledge, when others who are actively involved do not have
the same knowledge.
I apologise for being so direct here, but we do get Spoof
communications from all sorts of intel agents, all trying to
discredit the real information, who then post their manipulated
and disinformation articles (complete with a degree of fact) to
Blogs and various web sites. We therefore are very careful,
whereby we do now insist that full names and addresses are
revealed, which we check out before responding. We will no
longer respond to anonymous or pseudonym communications.
Yours faithfully

BACK
How Bush's grandfather helped Hitler's rise
to power
Rumours of a link between the US first family and the Nazi
war machine have circulated for decades. Now the Guardian
can reveal how repercussions of events that culminated in
action under the Trading with the Enemy Act are still being
felt by today's president
Ben Aris in Berlin and Duncan Campbell in Washington
guardian.co.uk, Saturday 25 September 2004 23.59 BST
Article history
George Bush's grandfather, the late US senator Prescott Bush, was a
director and shareholder of companies that profited from their
involvement with the financial backers of Nazi Germany.
The Guardian has obtained confirmation from newly discovered files in
the US National Archives that a firm of which Prescott Bush was a
director was involved with the financial architects of Nazism.
His business dealings, which continued until his company's assets were
seized in 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act, has led more than
60 years later to a civil action for damages being brought in Germany
against the Bush family by two former slave labourers at Auschwitz and
to a hum of pre-election controversy.
The evidence has also prompted one former US Nazi war crimes
prosecutor to argue that the late senator's action should have been
grounds for prosecution for giving aid and comfort to the enemy.
The debate over Prescott Bush's behaviour has been bubbling under the
surface for some time. There has been a steady internet chatter about the
"Bush/Nazi" connection, much of it inaccurate and unfair. But the new
documents, many of which were only declassified last year, show that
BACK
even after America had entered the war and when there was already
significant information about the Nazis' plans and policies, he worked
for and profited from companies closely involved with the very German
businesses that financed Hitler's rise to power. It has also been suggested
that the money he made from these dealings helped to establish the Bush
family fortune and set up its political dynasty.
Remarkably, little of Bush's dealings with Germany has received public
scrutiny, partly because of the secret status of the documentation
involving him. But now the multibillion dollar legal action for damages
by two Holocaust survivors against the Bush family, and the imminent
publication of three books on the subject are threatening to make
Prescott Bush's business history an uncomfortable issue for his
grandson, George W, as he seeks re-election.
While there is no suggestion that Prescott Bush was sympathetic to the
Nazi cause, the documents reveal that the firm he worked for, Brown
Brothers Harriman (BBH), acted as a US base for the German
industrialist, Fritz Thyssen, who helped finance Hitler in the 1930s
before falling out with him at the end of the decade. The Guardian has
seen evidence that shows Bush was the director of the New York-based
Union Banking Corporation (UBC) that represented Thyssen's US
interests and he continued to work for the bank after America entered
the war.
Tantalising
Bush was also on the board of at least one of the companies that formed
part of a multinational network of front companies to allow Thyssen to
move assets around the world.
Thyssen owned the largest steel and coal company in Germany and grew
rich from Hitler's efforts to re-arm between the two world wars. One of
the pillars in Thyssen's international corporate web, UBC, worked
exclusively for, and was owned by, a Thyssen-controlled bank in the
Netherlands. More tantalising are Bush's links to the Consolidated
BACK
Silesian Steel Company (CSSC), based in mineral rich Silesia on the
German-Polish border. During the war, the company made use of Nazi
slave labour from the concentration camps, including Auschwitz. The
ownership of CSSC changed hands several times in the 1930s, but
documents from the US National Archive declassified last year link
Bush to CSSC, although it is not clear if he and UBC were still involved
in the company when Thyssen's American assets were seized in 1942.
Three sets of archives spell out Prescott Bush's involvement. All three
are readily available, thanks to the efficient US archive system and a
helpful and dedicated staff at both the Library of Congress in
Washington and the National Archives at the University of Maryland.
The first set of files, the Harriman papers in the Library of Congress,
show that Prescott Bush was a director and shareholder of a number of
companies involved with Thyssen.
The second set of papers, which are in the National Archives, are
contained in vesting order number 248 which records the seizure of the
company assets. What these files show is that on October 20 1942 the
alien property custodian seized the assets of the UBC, of which Prescott
Bush was a director. Having gone through the books of the bank, further
seizures were made against two affiliates, the Holland-American
Trading Corporation and the Seamless Steel Equipment Corporation. By
November, the Silesian-American Company, another of Prescott Bush's
ventures, had also been seized.
The third set of documents, also at the National Archives, are contained
in the files on IG Farben, who was prosecuted for war crimes.
A report issued by the Office of Alien Property Custodian in 1942 stated
of the companies that "since 1939, these (steel and mining) properties
have been in possession of and have been operated by the German
government and have undoubtedly been of considerable assistance to
that country's war effort".
BACK
Prescott Bush, a 6ft 4in charmer with a rich singing voice, was the
founder of the Bush political dynasty and was once considered a
potential presidential candidate himself. Like his son, George, and
grandson, George W, he went to Yale where he was, again like his
descendants, a member of the secretive and influential Skull and Bones
student society. He was an artillery captain in the first world war and
married Dorothy Walker, the daughter of George Herbert Walker, in
1921.
In 1924, his father-in-law, a well-known St Louis investment banker,
helped set him up in business in New York with Averill Harriman, the
wealthy son of railroad magnate E H Harriman in New York, who had
gone into banking.
One of the first jobs Walker gave Bush was to manage UBC. Bush was a
founding member of the bank and the incorporation documents, which
list him as one of seven directors, show he owned one share in UBC
worth $125.
The bank was set up by Harriman and Bush's father-in-law to provide a
US bank for the Thyssens, Germany's most powerful industrial family.
August Thyssen, the founder of the dynasty had been a major
contributor to Germany's first world war effort and in the 1920s, he and
his sons Fritz and Heinrich established a network of overseas banks and
companies so their assets and money could be whisked offshore if
threatened again.
By the time Fritz Thyssen inherited the business empire in 1926,
Germany's economic recovery was faltering. After hearing Adolf Hitler
speak, Thyssen became mesmerised by the young firebrand. He joined
the Nazi party in December 1931 and admits backing Hitler in his
autobiography, I Paid Hitler, when the National Socialists were still a
radical fringe party. He stepped in several times to bail out the struggling
party: in 1928 Thyssen had bought the Barlow Palace on
Briennerstrasse, in Munich, which Hitler converted into the Brown
BACK
House, the headquarters of the Nazi party. The money came from
another Thyssen overseas institution, the Bank voor Handel en
Scheepvarrt in Rotterdam.
By the late 1930s, Brown Brothers Harriman, which claimed to be the
world's largest private investment bank, and UBC had bought and
shipped millions of dollars of gold, fuel, steel, coal and US treasury
bonds to Germany, both feeding and financing Hitler's build-up to war.
Between 1931 and 1933 UBC bought more than $8m worth of gold, of
which $3m was shipped abroad. According to documents seen by the
Guardian, after UBC was set up it transferred $2m to BBH accounts and
between 1924 and 1940 the assets of UBC hovered around $3m,
dropping to $1m only on a few occasions.
In 1941, Thyssen fled Germany after falling out with Hitler but he was
captured in France and detained for the remainder of the war.
There was nothing illegal in doing business with the Thyssens
throughout the 1930s and many of America's best-known business
names invested heavily in the German economic recovery. However,
everything changed after Germany invaded Poland in 1939. Even then it
could be argued that BBH was within its rights continuing business
relations with the Thyssens until the end of 1941 as the US was still
technically neutral until the attack on Pearl Harbor. The trouble started
on July 30 1942 when the New York Herald-Tribune ran an article
entitled "Hitler's Angel Has $3m in US Bank". UBC's huge gold
purchases had raised suspicions that the bank was in fact a "secret nest
egg" hidden in New York for Thyssen and other Nazi bigwigs. The
Alien Property Commission (APC) launched an investigation.
There is no dispute over the fact that the US government seized a string
of assets controlled by BBH - including UBC and SAC - in the autumn
of 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy act. What is in dispute is if
Harriman, Walker and Bush did more than own these companies on
paper.
BACK
Erwin May, a treasury attache and officer for the department of
investigation in the APC, was assigned to look into UBC's business. The
first fact to emerge was that Roland Harriman, Prescott Bush and the
other directors didn't actually own their shares in UBC but merely held
them on behalf of Bank voor Handel. Strangely, no one seemed to know
who owned the Rotterdam-based bank, including UBC's president.
May wrote in his report of August 16 1941: "Union Banking
Corporation, incorporated August 4 1924, is wholly owned by the Bank
voor Handel en Scheepvaart N.V of Rotterdam, the Netherlands. My
investigation has produced no evidence as to the ownership of the Dutch
bank. Mr Cornelis [sic] Lievense, president of UBC, claims no
knowledge as to the ownership of the Bank voor Handel but believes it
possible that Baron Heinrich Thyssen, brother of Fritz Thyssen, may
own a substantial interest."
May cleared the bank of holding a golden nest egg for the Nazi leaders
but went on to describe a network of companies spreading out from
UBC across Europe, America and Canada, and how money from voor
Handel travelled to these companies through UBC.
By September May had traced the origins of the non-American board
members and found that Dutchman HJ Kouwenhoven - who met with
Harriman in 1924 to set up UBC - had several other jobs: in addition to
being the managing director of voor Handel he was also the director of
the August Thyssen bank in Berlin and a director of Fritz Thyssen's
Union Steel Works, the holding company that controlled Thyssen's steel
and coal mine empire in Germany.
Within a few weeks, Homer Jones, the chief of the APC investigation
and research division sent a memo to the executive committee of APC
recommending the US government vest UBC and its assets. Jones
named the directors of the bank in the memo, including Prescott Bush's
name, and wrote: "Said stock is held by the above named individuals,
however, solely as nominees for the Bank voor Handel, Rotterdam,
Holland, which is owned by one or more of the Thyssen family,
BACK
nationals of Germany and Hungary. The 4,000 shares hereinbefore set
out are therefore beneficially owned and help for the interests of enemy
nationals, and are vestible by the APC," according to the memo from the
National Archives seen by the Guardian.
Red-handed
Jones recommended that the assets be liquidated for the benefit of the
government, but instead UBC was maintained intact and eventually
returned to the American shareholders after the war. Some claim that
Bush sold his share in UBC after the war for $1.5m - a huge amount of
money at the time - but there is no documentary evidence to support this
claim. No further action was ever taken nor was the investigation
continued, despite the fact UBC was caught red-handed operating a
American shell company for the Thyssen family eight months after
America had entered the war and that this was the bank that had partly
financed Hitler's rise to power.
The most tantalising part of the story remains shrouded in mystery: the
connection, if any, between Prescott Bush, Thyssen, Consolidated
Silesian Steel Company (CSSC) and Auschwitz.
Thyssen's partner in United Steel Works, which had coal mines and steel
plants across the region, was Friedrich Flick, another steel magnate who
also owned part of IG Farben, the powerful German chemical company.
Flick's plants in Poland made heavy use of slave labour from the
concentration camps in Poland. According to a New York Times article
published in March 18 1934 Flick owned two-thirds of CSSC while
"American interests" held the rest.
The US National Archive documents show that BBH's involvement with
CSSC was more than simply holding the shares in the mid-1930s. Bush's
friend and fellow "bonesman" Knight Woolley, another partner at BBH,
wrote to Averill Harriman in January 1933 warning of problems with
CSSC after the Poles started their drive to nationalise the plant. "The
BACK
Consolidated Silesian Steel Company situation has become increasingly
complicated, and I have accordingly brought in Sullivan and Cromwell,
in order to be sure that our interests are protected," wrote Knight. "After
studying the situation Foster Dulles is insisting that their man in Berlin
get into the picture and obtain the information which the directors here
should have. You will recall that Foster is a director and he is
particularly anxious to be certain that there is no liability attaching to the
American directors."
But the ownership of the CSSC between 1939 when the Germans
invaded Poland and 1942 when the US government vested UBC and
SAC is not clear.
"SAC held coal mines and definitely owned CSSC between 1934 and
1935, but when SAC was vested there was no trace of CSSC. All
concrete evidence of its ownership disappears after 1935 and there are
only a few traces in 1938 and 1939," says Eva Schweitzer, the journalist
and author whose book, America and the Holocaust, is published next
month.
Silesia was quickly made part of the German Reich after the invasion,
but while Polish factories were seized by the Nazis, those belonging to
the still neutral Americans (and some other nationals) were treated more
carefully as Hitler was still hoping to persuade the US to at least sit out
the war as a neutral country. Schweitzer says American interests were
dealt with on a case-by-case basis. The Nazis bought some out, but not
others.
The two Holocaust survivors suing the US government and the Bush
family for a total of $40bn in compensation claim both materially
benefited from Auschwitz slave labour during the second world war.
Kurt Julius Goldstein, 87, and Peter Gingold, 85, began a class action in
America in 2001, but the case was thrown out by Judge Rosemary
Collier on the grounds that the government cannot be held liable under
the principle of "state sovereignty".
BACK
Jan Lissmann, one of the lawyers for the survivors, said: "President
Bush withdrew President Bill Clinton's signature from the treaty [that
founded the court] not only to protect Americans, but also to protect
himself and his family."
Lissmann argues that genocide-related cases are covered by international
law, which does hold governments accountable for their actions. He
claims the ruling was invalid as no hearing took place.
In their claims, Mr Goldstein and Mr Gingold, honorary chairman of the
League of Anti-fascists, suggest the Americans were aware of what was
happening at Auschwitz and should have bombed the camp.
The lawyers also filed a motion in The Hague asking for an opinion on
whether state sovereignty is a valid reason for refusing to hear their case.
A ruling is expected within a month.
The petition to The Hague states: "From April 1944 on, the American
Air Force could have destroyed the camp with air raids, as well as the
railway bridges and railway lines from Hungary to Auschwitz. The
murder of about 400,000 Hungarian Holocaust victims could have been
prevented."
The case is built around a January 22 1944 executive order signed by
President Franklin Roosevelt calling on the government to take all
measures to rescue the European Jews. The lawyers claim the order was
ignored because of pressure brought by a group of big American
companies, including BBH, where Prescott Bush was a director.
Lissmann said: "If we have a positive ruling from the court it will cause
[president] Bush huge problems and make him personally liable to pay
compensation."
The US government and the Bush family deny all the claims against
them.
BACK
In addition to Eva Schweitzer's book, two other books are about to be
published that raise the subject of Prescott Bush's business history. The
author of the second book, to be published next year, John Loftus, is a
former US attorney who prosecuted Nazi war criminals in the 70s. Now
living in St Petersburg, Florida and earning his living as a security
commentator for Fox News and ABC radio, Loftus is working on a
novel which uses some of the material he has uncovered on Bush. Loftus
stressed that what Prescott Bush was involved in was just what many
other American and British businessmen were doing at the time.
"You can't blame Bush for what his grandfather did any more than you
can blame Jack Kennedy for what his father did - bought Nazi stocks -
but what is important is the cover-up, how it could have gone on so
successfully for half a century, and does that have implications for us
today?" he said.
"This was the mechanism by which Hitler was funded to come to power,
this was the mechanism by which the Third Reich's defence industry
was re-armed, this was the mechanism by which Nazi profits were
repatriated back to the American owners, this was the mechanism by
which investigations into the financial laundering of the Third Reich
were blunted," said Loftus, who is vice-chairman of the Holocaust
Museum in St Petersburg.
"The Union Banking Corporation was a holding company for the Nazis,
for Fritz Thyssen," said Loftus. "At various times, the Bush family has
tried to spin it, saying they were owned by a Dutch bank and it wasn't
until the Nazis took over Holland that they realised that now the Nazis
controlled the apparent company and that is why the Bush supporters
claim when the war was over they got their money back. Both the
American treasury investigations and the intelligence investigations in
Europe completely bely that, it's absolute horseshit. They always knew
who the ultimate beneficiaries were."
"There is no one left alive who could be prosecuted but they did get
away with it," said Loftus. "As a former federal prosecutor, I would
BACK
make a case for Prescott Bush, his father-in-law (George Walker) and
Averill Harriman [to be prosecuted] for giving aid and comfort to the
enemy. They remained on the boards of these companies knowing that
they were of financial benefit to the nation of Germany."
Loftus said Prescott Bush must have been aware of what was happening
in Germany at the time. "My take on him was that he was a not terribly
successful in-law who did what Herbert Walker told him to. Walker and
Harriman were the two evil geniuses, they didn't care about the Nazis
any more than they cared about their investments with the Bolsheviks."
What is also at issue is how much money Bush made from his
involvement. His supporters suggest that he had one token share. Loftus
disputes this, citing sources in "the banking and intelligence
communities" and suggesting that the Bush family, through George
Herbert Walker and Prescott, got $1.5m out of the involvement. There
is, however, no paper trail to this sum.
The third person going into print on the subject is John Buchanan, 54, a
Miami-based magazine journalist who started examining the files while
working on a screenplay. Last year, Buchanan published his findings in
the venerable but small-circulation New Hampshire Gazette under the
headline "Documents in National Archives Prove George Bush's
Grandfather Traded With the Nazis - Even After Pearl Harbor". He
expands on this in his book to be published next month - Fixing
America: Breaking the Stranglehold of Corporate Rule, Big Media and
the Religious Right.
In the article, Buchanan, who has worked mainly in the trade and music
press with a spell as a muckraking reporter in Miami, claimed that "the
essential facts have appeared on the internet and in relatively obscure
books but were dismissed by the media and Bush family as
undocumented diatribes".
Buchanan suffers from hypermania, a form of manic depression, and
when he found himself rebuffed in his initial efforts to interest the
BACK
media, he responded with a series of threats against the journalists and
media outlets that had spurned him. The threats, contained in e-mails,
suggested that he would expose the journalists as "traitors to the truth".
Unsurprisingly, he soon had difficulty getting his calls returned. Most
seriously, he faced aggravated stalking charges in Miami, in connection
with a man with whom he had fallen out over the best way to publicise
his findings. The charges were dropped last month.
Biography
Buchanan said he regretted his behaviour had damaged his credibility
but his main aim was to secure publicity for the story. Both Loftus and
Schweitzer say Buchanan has come up with previously undisclosed
documentation.
The Bush family have largely responded with no comment to any
reference to Prescott Bush. Brown Brothers Harriman also declined to
comment.
The Bush family recently approved a flattering biography of Prescott
Bush entitled Duty, Honour, Country by Mickey Herskowitz. The
publishers, Rutledge Hill Press, promised the book would "deal honestly
with Prescott Bush's alleged business relationships with Nazi
industrialists and other accusations".
In fact, the allegations are dealt with in less than two pages. The book
refers to the Herald-Tribune story by saying that "a person of less
established ethics would have panicked ... Bush and his partners at
Brown Brothers Harriman informed the government regulators that the
account, opened in the late 1930s, was 'an unpaid courtesy for a client' ...
Prescott Bush acted quickly and openly on behalf of the firm, served
well by a reputation that had never been compromised. He made
available all records and all documents. Viewed six decades later in the
era of serial corporate scandals and shattered careers, he received what
can be viewed as the ultimate clean bill."
BACK
The Prescott Bush story has been condemned by both conservatives and
some liberals as having nothing to do with the current president. It has
also been suggested that Prescott Bush had little to do with Averill
Harriman and that the two men opposed each other politically.
However, documents from the Harriman papers include a flattering
wartime profile of Harriman in the New York Journal American and
next to it in the files is a letter to the financial editor of that paper from
Prescott Bush congratulating the paper for running the profile. He added
that Harriman's "performance and his whole attitude has been a source
of inspiration and pride to his partners and his friends".
The Anti-Defamation League in the US is supportive of Prescott Bush
and the Bush family. In a statement last year they said that "rumours
about the alleged Nazi 'ties' of the late Prescott Bush ... have circulated
widely through the internet in recent years. These charges are untenable
and politically motivated ... Prescott Bush was neither a Nazi nor a Nazi
sympathiser."
However, one of the country's oldest Jewish publications, the Jewish
Advocate, has aired the controversy in detail.
More than 60 years after Prescott Bush came briefly under scrutiny at
the time of a faraway war, his grandson is facing a different kind of
scrutiny but one underpinned by the same perception that, for some
people, war can be a profitable business

BACK
Ownership of Federal Reserve
file:///H|/Ngurah/Ownership%20of%20Federal%20Reserve.html[5/22/2009 7:20:47 PM]

OWNERSHIP OF FEDERAL RESERVE
from MindControlForums Website

REAL ownership of the US Federal Reserve Bank. It is not owned by the
American Government, never was.
Seems to me that the REAL control of the United States is spelled out in these
pages.
Money from nothing and the planet for free.

Chart 1 - Federal Reserve Directors:
A Study of Corporate and Banking Influence - - Published 1976
Chart 1 reveals the linear connection between the Rothschilds and the Bank of England, and the London banking
houses which ultimately control the Federal Reserve Banks through their stockholdings of bank stock and their
subsidiary firms in New York. The two principal Rothschild representatives in New York, J. P. Morgan Co., and
Kuhn, Loeb & Co. were the firms which set up the Jekyll Island Conference at which the Federal Reserve Act was
drafted, who directed the subsequent successful campaign to have the plan enacted into law by Congress, and who
purchased the controlling amounts of stock in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in 1914.
These firms had their principal officers appointed to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Federal
Advisory Council in 1914. In 1914 a few families (blood or business related) owning controlling stock in existing
banks (such as in New York City) caused those banks to purchase controlling shares in the Federal Reserve
regional banks. Examination of the charts and text in the House Banking Committee Staff Report of August, 1976 and
the current stockholders list of the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks show this same family control.
N. M. Rothschild , London - Bank of England
__________________|___________________
| |
| J. Henry Schroder
| Banking |Corp.
| |
Brown, Shipley - Morgan Grenfell - Lazard - |
& Company & Company Brothers |
| | | |
--------------------| -------| | |
| | | | | |
Alex Brown - Brown Bros. - Lord Mantagu - Morgan et Cie -- Lazard ---|
& Son | Harriman Norman | Paris Bros |
| | / | N.Y. |
| | | | | |
| Governor, Bank | J.P. Morgan Co -- Lazard ---|
| of England / N.Y. Morgan Freres |
| 1924-1938 / Guaranty Co. Paris |
| / Morgan Stanley Co. | /
| / | \Schroder Bank
| / |
Hamburg/Berlin
| / Drexel & Company /
| / Philadelphia /
| / /
| / Lord Airlie
| / /
| / M. M. Warburg Chmn J. Henry Schroder
| | Hamburg --------- marr. Virginia F. Ryan
| | | grand-daughter of Otto
| | | Kahn of Kuhn Loeb Co.
| | |
| | |
Lehman Brothers N.Y. --------------- Kuhn Loeb Co. N. Y.
| | ------------------------
| | | |
| | | |
Lehman Brothers - Mont. Alabama Solomon Loeb Abraham Kuhn
| | __|______________________|_________
Lehman-Stern, New Orleans Jacob Schiff/Theresa Loeb Nina Loeb/Paul
Warburg
------------------------- | | |
| | Mortimer Schiff James Paul Warburg
_____________|_______________/ |
| | | | |
Mayer Lehman | Emmanuel Lehman \
| | | \
Herbert Lehman Irving Lehman \
| | | \
Arthur Lehman \ Phillip Lehman John Schiff/Edith Brevoort Baker
/ | Present Chairman Lehman Bros
/ Robert Owen Lehman Kuhn Loeb - Granddaughter of
/ | George F. Baker
| / |
| / |
| / Lehman Bros Kuhn Loeb (1980)
| / |
| / Thomas Fortune Ryan
| | |
| | |
Federal Reserve Bank Of New York |
| | |
______National City Bank N. Y. |
| | |
| National Bank of Commerce N.Y. --|
| | \
| Hanover National Bank N.Y. \
| | \
| Chase National Bank N.Y. \
| |
| |
Shareholders - National City Bank - N.Y. |
-------------------------------------------|
| /
James Stillman /
Elsie m. William Rockefeller /
Isabel m. Percy Rockefeller /
William Rockefeller Shareholders - National Bank of Commerce N. Y.
J. P. Morgan
-----------------------------------------------
M.T. Pyne Equitable Life - J.P. Morgan
Percy Pyne Mutual Life - J.P. Morgan
J. W. Sterling H. P. Davison - J. P. Morgan
NY Trust/NY Edison Mary W. Harriman
Shearman & Sterling A.D. Jiullard - North British Merc. Ins.
| Jacob Schiff
| Thomas F. Ryan
| Paul Warburg
| Levi P. Morton - Guaranty Trust
| J. P. Morgan
|
|
Shareholders - First National Bank of N.Y.
- -------------------------------------------
J.P. Morgan
George F. Baker
George F. Baker Jr.
Edith Brevoort Baker
US Congress - 1946-64
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders - Hanover National Bank N.Y.
- ------------------------------------------
James Stillman
William Rockefeller
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders - Chase National Bank N.Y.
- ---------------------------------------
George F. Baker

The J. Henry Schroder Banking Company chart encompasses the entire history of the twentieth century, embracing
as it does the program (Belgium Relief Commission) which provisioned Germany from 1915-1918 and dissuaded
Germany from seeking peace in 1916; financing Hitler in 1933 so as to make a Second World War possible; backing
the Presidential campaign of Herbert Hoover ; and even at the present time, having two of its major executives of its
subsidiary firm, Bechtel Corporation serving as Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State in the Reagan
Administration.
The head of the Bank of England since 1973, Sir Gordon Richardson, Governor of the Bank of England (controlled
by the House of Rothschild) was chairman of J. Henry Schroder Wagg and Company of London from 1963-72, and
director of J. Henry Schroder, New York and Schroder Banking Corporation, New York, as well as Lloyd's Bank of
London, and Rolls Royce. He maintains a residence on Sutton Place in New York City, and as head of "The London
Connection," can be said to be the single most influential banker in the world.
J. Henry Schroder
-----------------
|
|
|
Baron Rudolph Von Schroder
Hamburg - 1858 - 1934
|
|
|
Baron Bruno Von Schroder
Hamburg - 1867 - 1940
F. C. Tiarks |
1874-1952 |
| |
marr. Emma Franziska |
(Hamburg) Helmut B. Schroder
J. Henry Schroder 1902 |
Dir. Bank of England |
Dir. Anglo-Iranian |
Oil Company J. Henry Schroder Banking Company N.Y.
|
|
J. Henry Schroder Trust Company N.Y.
|
|
|
___________________|____________________
| |
Allen Dulles John Foster Dulles
Sullivan & Cromwell Sullivan & Cromwell
Director - CIA U. S. Secretary of State
Rockefeller Foundation
Prentiss Gray
------------
Belgian Relief Commission. Lord Airlie
Chief Marine Transportation -----------
US Food Administration WW I Chairman; Virgina Fortune
Manati Sugar Co. American & Ryan daughter of Otto Kahn
British Continental Corp. of Kuhn,Loeb Co.
| |
M. E. Rionda |
------------ |
Pres. Cuba Cane Sugar Co. |
Manati Sugar Co. many other |
sugar companies. _______|
| |
| |
G. A. Zabriskie |
--------------- | Emi l e Francoui
Chmn U.S. Sugar Equalization | --------------
Board 1917-18; Pres Empire | Belgian Relief Commission. Kai
Biscuit Co., Columbia Baking | Ping Coal Mines Tientsin
Co. , Southern Baking Co. | Railroad,Congo Copper, La
| | Banque Nationale de Belgique
| | Suite 2000 42 Broadway, NY
|__________________________|____________________________|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Edgar Richard Julius H. Barnes Herbert Hoover
------------- ---------------- --------------
Belgium Relief Comm. Belgium Relief Comm. Chmn Belgium Relief Com
American Relief Commiss. Pres. Grain Corp. U.S. Food Admin.
U.S. Food Admin. U.S. Food Admin. Sec of Commerce 1924-28
1918-24, Hazeltine Corp. 1917-18, C. B Pitney Kaiping Coal Mines
| Bowes Corp, Manati Congo Copper, President
| Sugar Corp.
U.S. 1928-32
|
|John Lowery Simpson
|--------------------
|
Sacramento,Calif Belgium Relief |
Commission. U. S. Food Administration Baron Kurt Von Schroder
Prentiss Gray Co. J. Henry Schroder -----------------------
Trust, Schroder -Rockefeller, Chmn Schroder Banking Corp. J.H. Stein
Fin Commission, Bechtel International Bankhaus (Hitler's personal bank
Co. Bechtel Co. (Casper Weinberger account) served on board of all
Sec of Defense, George P. Schultz German subsidiaries of ITT .
Sec of State (Reagan Admin.). Bank for International Settlements,
|
SS Senior Group Leader,
| Himmler's Circle of Friends (Nazi Fund),
|
Deutsche Reichsbank, president
|
Schroder -Rockefeller & Co. , N.Y.
- ---------------------------------
Avery Rockefeller, J. Henry Schroder
Banking Corp., Bechtel Co., Bechtel
International Co. , Canadian Bechtel Company.
|
|
Gordon Richardson
-----------------
Governor, Bank of England 1973 - PRESENT
C. B. of J. Henry Schroder N.Y. Schroder Banking Co., New York,
Lloyds Bank, Rolls Royce

Chart 3 ** Federal Reserve Directors:
The David Rockefeller chart shows the link between the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Standard Oil of
Indiana, General Motors and Allied Chemical Corporation (Eugene Meyer family) and Equitable Life (J. P. Morgan).
DAVID ROCKEFELLER
-----------------------------
Chairman of the Board
Chase Manhattan Corp
|
|
______|_______________________
Chase Manhattan Corp. |
Officer & Director Interlocks| ---------------------
------|----------------------- |
| |
Private Investment Co. for America Allied Chemicals Corp.
| |
Firestone Tire & Rubber Company General Motors
| |
Orion Multinational Services Ltd. Rockefeller Family & Associates
| |
ASARCO. Inc Chrysler Corp.
| |
Southern Peru Copper Corp. Intl' Basic Economy Corp.
| |
Industrial Minerva Mexico S.A. R. H. Macy & Co.
| |
Continental Corp. Selected Risk Investments S.A.
| |
Honeywell Inc. Omega Fund, Inc.
| |
Northwest Airlines, Inc. Squibb Corporation
| |
Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. Olin Foundation
| |
Minnesota Mining & Mfg Co (3M) Mutual Benefit Life Ins. Co. of NJ
| |
American Express Co. AT & T
| |
Hewlett Packard Pacific Northwestern Bell Co.
| |
FMC Corporation BeachviLime Ltd.(Beachville, Ontario)
| |
Utah Intl' Inc. Eveleth Expansion Company
| |
Exxon Corporation Fidelity Union Bancorporation
| |
International Nickel/Canada Cypress Woods Corporation
| |
Federated Capital Corporation Intl' Minerals & Chemical Corp.
| |
Equitable Life Assurance Soc U.S. Burlington Industries
| |
Federated Dept Stores Wachovia Corporation
| |
General Electric Jefferson Pilot Corporation
| |
Scott Paper Co. R. J. Reynolds Industries Inc.
| |
American Petroleum Institute United States Steel Corp.
| |
Richardson Merril Inc. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.
| |
May Department Stores Co. Norton-Simon Inc.
| |
Sperry Rand Corporation Stone-Webster Inc.
| |
San Salvador Development Company Standard Oil of Indiana

This chart shows the interlocks between the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, J. Henry Schroder Banking Corp., J.
Henry Schroder Trust Co., Rockefeller Center, Inc., Equitable Life Assurance Society ( J.P. Morgan), and the Federal
Reserve Bank of Boston.
Alan Pifer, President
Carnegie Corporation
of New York
-----------------------
|
-----------------------
Carnegi eCorporat i onTrust eeInt erl ocks -----------------------------------------------
-
| |
Rockefeller Center, Inc J. Henry Schroder Trust Company
| |
The Cabot Corporation Paul Revere Investors, Inc.
| |
Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Qualpeco, Inc.
|
Owens Corning Fiberglas
|
New England Telephone Co.
|
Fisher Scientific Company
|
Mellon National Corporation
|
Equitable Life Assurance Society
|
Twentieth Century Fox Corporation
|
J. Henry Schroder Banking Corporation

This chart shows the link between the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Brown Brothers Harriman, Sun Life
Assurance Co. (N. M. Rothschild and Sons), and the Rockefeller Foundation.
Maurice F. Granville
Chairman of The Board
Texaco Incorporated
Texaco Officer & Director Interlocks
Liggett & Myers, Inc.
|
L Arabian American Oil Company
O St John d'el Ray Mining Co. Ltd.
|
|
N Brown Brothers Harriman & Co.
D National Steel Corporation
|
|
O Brown Harriman & Intl' Banks Ltd.
N Massey-Ferguson Ltd.
|
|
American Express
Mutual Life Insurance Co.
|
|
N. American Express Intl' Banking Corp.
M. Mass Mutual Income Investors Inc.
|
|
Anaconda
R United Services Life Ins. Co.
|
|
O Rockefeller Foundation
T Fairchild Industries
|
|
H Owens-Corning Fiberglas
S Blount, Inc.
|
|
C National City Bank (Cleveland)
H William Wrigley Jr. Co
|
|
I Sun Life Assurance Co.
L National Blvd. Bank of Chicago
|
|
D General Reinsurance
Lykes Youngstown Corporation
|
|
General Electric (NBC)
Inmount Corporation

Source:
Federal Reserve Directors:
A Study of Corporate and Banking Influence. Staff Report, Committee on Banking, Currency and
Housing,
House of Representatives, 94th Congress,
2nd Session, August 1976.

FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS
BOSTON - 600 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02106 * * Additional offices of these Banks are
located at:
Lewiston, Maine 04240; Windsor Locks, Connecticut 06096; Cranford, New Jersey 07016; Jericho, New
York 11753; Utica at Oriskany, New York 13424; Columbus, Ohio 43216; Columbia, South Carolina
29210; Charleston, West Virginia 25328; Des Moines, Iowa 50306; Indianapolis, Indiana 46204; and
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202.
NEW YORK * 33 Liberty Street (Federal Reserve P.O. Station), New York, New York 10045
Buffalo Branch 160 Delaware Avenue, Buffalo, New York 14202 (P.O. Box 961, Buffalo, New York
14240)
PHILADELPHIA Ten Independence Mall, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106 (P.O. Box 66, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19105)
CLEVELAND * 1455 East Sixth Street (P.O. Box 6387), Cleveland, Ohio 44101 Cincinnati Branch 150 East
Fourth Street (P.O. Box 999), Cincinnati, Ohio 45201
Pittsburgh Branch 717 Grant Street (P.O. Box 867), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230
RICHMOND * 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 (P.O. Box 27622, Richmond, Virginia 23261)
Baltimore Branch 502 S. Sharp Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201 (P.O. Box 1378, Baltimore, Maryland
21203)
Charlotte Branch 401 South Tryon Street (P.O. Box 30248), Charlotte, North Carolina 28230
Culpeper Communications and Records Center P.O. Drawer 20, Culpeper, Virginia 22701
ATLANTA 104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303 (P.O. Box 1731, Atlanta, Georgia 30301-1731)
Birmingham Branch 1801 Fifth Avenue, North, Birmingham, Alabama 35202 (P.O. Box C-10447,
Birmingham, Alabama 35283)
Jacksonville Branch 515 Julia Street, Jacksonville, Florida 32231
Miami Branch 9100 Northwest 36th Street, Miami, Florida 33178 (P.O. Box 520847, Miami, Florida
33152)
Nashville Branch 301 Eighth Avenue, North, Nashville, Tennessee 37203
New Orleans Branch 525 St. Charles Avenue (P.O. Box 61630), New Orleans, Louisiana 70161
CHICAGO * 230 South LaSalle Street (P.O. Box 834), Chicago, Illinois 60690
Detroit Branch 160 Fort Street, West (P.O. Box 1059), Detroit, Michigan 48231
ST. LOUIS 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63102 (P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166)
Little Rock Branch 325 West Capitol Avenue (P.O. Box 1261), Little Rock, Arkansas 72203
Louisville Branch 410 South Fifth Street, Louisville, Kentucky 40201 (P.O. Box 32710, Louisville,
Kentucky 40232)
Memphis Branch 200 North Main Street, Memphis, Tennessee 38103 (P.O. Box 407, Memphis,
Tennessee 38101)
MINNEAPOLIS 250 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480 Helena Branch 400 North Park Avenue,
Helena, Montana 59601
KANSAS CITY 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198
Denver Branch 1020 16th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202 (Terminal Annex-P.O. Box 5228, Denver,
Colorado 80217)
Oklahoma City Branch 226 Dean A. McGee Avenue (P.O. Box 25129), Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
73125
Omaha Branch 2201 Farnam Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68102 (P.O. Box 3958, Omaha, Nebraska
68103)
DALLAS 400 South Akard Street (Station K), Dallas, Texas 75222
El Paso Branch 301 East Main Street (P.O. Box 100), El Paso, Texas 79999
Houston Branch 1701 San Jacinto Street, Houston, Texas 77002 (P.O. Box 2578, Houston, Texas
77252)
San Antonio Branch 126 East Nueva Street, San Antonio, Texas 78204 (P.O. Box 1471, San Antonio,
Texas 78295)
SAN FRANCISCO 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105 (P.O. Box 7702, San Francisco,
California 94120)
Los Angeles Branch 950 South Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90015 (Terminal Annex-P.O.
Box 2077, Los Angeles, California 90051)
Portland Branch 915 S.W. Stark Street, Portland, Oregon 97025 (P.O. Box 3436, Portland, Oregon
97208)
Salt Lake City Branch 120 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 (P.O. Box 30780, Salt Lake
City, Utah 84125)
Seattle Branch 1015 Second Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104 (P.O. Box 3567, Seattle, Washington
98124)
RULES OF PROCEDURE
The rules of procedure of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System are published in the Code of
Federal Regulations, Part 262 of Title 12, Banks and Banking.

Return

BACK to Presentation
1932 FED speach by House Rep Louis Mcfadden
Within the CIA there is an almost separate CIA unit.
It is sometimes referred to as Rouge CIA. It is perceived that George H
W Bush was and still is a key player within that group and he has
surrounded himself with lots of Bonesmen (People from the secret
Society Scull & Bones from Yale). This Rouge CIA group is very tied up
with the Hard liner elements within the System and maybe even one
of the driving forces. They are the people involved in financing &
organizing adventures like the Bay of pigs (Cuba), the killing of John F
Kennedy & the pushing out of M1 etc.
Groups have had personal talks with very top level CIA operatives who
openly admit to these groups involvement in such operations. This
rouge group is uncontrollable within the normal CIA. The structural part
of CIA prefers to not have any relation with them in any shape or form
due to their dark agenda.
Some hints of how tied up George H.W. Bush personally is can be found
by looking at the failed attempt to invade Cuba using Cuban exiles. This
Cuban CIA mission was called Zapata, two of the support vessels
involved were named Houston and Barbara (Barbara being what
George Bush named all his aircraftduring his service in WWII). At this
time Bush were the Chairman & Director of a company called Zapata
Offshore Oil, headquarter in Houston Texas, and supposedly not part of
the CIA yet. Later it has come forth from more than one reliable source
that Zapata Oil from the start was a cover for top secret rouge CIA
operations. These were also the years that George H.W. Bush was very
active on the South East Asian scene travelling all around Indonesia,
Vietnam & the Philippines.
Other indications that G.H.W. Bush was an active CIA agent in those
early years is that a week after the killing of JFK, a FBI agent on record
reported to a CIA agent named George Bush together with a Captain
William Edwards of the Defense Intelligence Agency on possible Cuban
exiles involvement in this calamitous affair. The problem for CIA is
George Bush was not even supposedly employed by them yet
(officially). The CIA has tried to cover this mishap up by claiming it was
another CIA operative by that name who was briefed. That G.B. on the
other hand has under oath stated that was never the fact. He was only
a low level research and analyst clerk never close to any such action
ever.
For more on the secret Society Scull & Bones and George H.W. Bush
involvement please read the Scull & Bones chapter in John Lawrence
Reynolds book Secret Societies.
BACK to Presentation
BACK to presentation

History of Banking Asian Perspective

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

History of Banking Asian Perspective

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Disclosure

You might also like