You are on page 1of 4

Summary of the In Re CYNTHIA CARRSOW FRANKLIN LITIGATION Regarding the WFHM Foreclosure Attorney Procedure Manual

Summary of In Re CYNTHIA CARRSOW FRANKLIN LITIGATION Regarding the WFHM Fore !o"ure Attorney #ro edure Manua!
_________________________________________
$ Article First American Default Technologies Launches VendorScape Loss Mitigation for Mortgage Default Servicing (Debt Collector Perspective
We are aligning the servicer, attorney and all parties involved . . . The system automates processes and enables electronic ordering of third-party loss mitigation services, including . . . documents

% Article !SF" # The "e$t %eneration of Data &nterfacing (Debt Collector Perspective
The following new integration options are now available from VendorScape and !S "es#top. $rom VendorScape% mortgage document download and upload& re'uest or cancel reinstatement(payoff& fees ) costs& enter or remove bidding instructions *receive servicer bidding instructions+& schedule foreclosure or ban#ruptcy hearings. $rom !S "es#top% mortgage document download& real-time invoice management upload& fees ) costs& repro,ection re'uests.

& 'ells Fargo (ome Mortgage )))'F(M))) (* Foreclosure Attorne+ Procedure Manual, Version *#-asis of Terelli.s Fran/lin Litigation Controvers+
P% *0 - WFHM Default Docs Team: .f file was ordered and received, review $/01 notes to determine what entities the attorney needs the note endorsement to reflect. Type the appropriate endorsement directly to the note, and ma#e a copy of the endorsed note to be fa2ed to the W$34 imaging department. 5nter log code FCNRCS *6/T5 05785ST 9/4! 5T5"(S56T T/ :TT/065;+ and mail the attorney the original, endorsed note. 9omplete the ;<< step with the actual date the note was returned to attorney.

' 'ells Fargo (ome Mortgage )))'F(M))) (1 Affida(it #ro e""ing Training and (2 #a# Wor)*oo)###Ancilliar+ Documents 3hich correlate to Attorne+ Procedure Manual
Course Description - Affidavit rocessing This training course is designed to meet the goals that Wells $argo 3ome 4ortgage has set forth to e2ecute =udgment affidavits for court filing in the state of 6ew =ersey. ... .t .s .mportant to note that a =udgment affidavit is a legal document submitted to a court of law. The in depth details of a ,udgment affidavit will be e2plored in this course. When a Wells $argo team member signs the document in the presence of a notary, the document is filed with the court and can be used .n court proceedings relating to a foreclosure.

>?6/T5% The signer *:ffiant+ may be as#ed to appear .n a legal proceeding *deposition+ .f there are any disputes as to the accuracy or validity of the affidavit they have e2ecuted.
_______

#a# Wor)*oo) Introdu tion


oss 9ontrol !lc#-a-!ayment *!:!+ portfolio processing .s different .n some areas from the Wells $argo 3ome 4ortgage *W$34+ portfolio when e2ecuting =udgmemt :ffidavits. The most notable difference between !a! and W$34 .s that !a!?s portfolio consists of mostly :d,ustable 0ate 4ortgage *:04+ loans. The other notable differences are personnel roles and systems of record.

+, "ocument @

.n 0e 9;6T3.: 9:00S/W $0:6A .6 Ban#ruptcy !etition C D@-1@@D@-rdd "oc#et Te2t :9T.V5 .T.E:T./6

-, "ocument -D

.n 0e 9;6T3.: 9:00S/W $0:6A .6 /B=59T./6 T/ !0//$ /$ 9 :.4

16. The Debtor further avers that the assignment presented in this case is of fraudulent nature and of questionable origin. Specifically, John ennerty is not an appropriate party to sign and!or authori"e such assignments on behalf of #ortgage $lectronic %egistration Systems, &nc. as nominee for 'ashington #utual (an), *+ The Debtor calls the ,ourt-s attention to fact that the purported assignment see)s to transfer an asset of an entity, 'ashington #utual (an), *+ +ccording to the *D&, .ebsite 'ashington #utual (an) is an inactive institution since September /001.

., "ocument F-_D .n 0e 9;6T3.: 9:00S/W-$0:6A .6 52hibit : Trial Transcript


!g -G of D-G 4 Q. Well, if there's a problem seeing it, do you want 5 to maybe take a closer look? 6 A. No, I don't -- I don't have a problem seeing it. 7 I pulled the document up and verified it with the actual 8 original note, side by side, it was a six-page document when 9 I pulled it up and reviewed it. 10 Q. But in your loan image viewer system, it says 11 eight pages? 12 MR. DUNN: Objection. She's arguing with the 13 witness, Your Honor. 14 THE COURT: Well, do you have any reason to 15 account for the fact that, as to the number of pages listed 16 here?

/, "ocument FH .n 0e 9;6T3.: 9:00S/W $0:6A .6 5450E569; 4/T./6 T/ 05/!56 :6" $/0


5:V5 T/ !0/!/86" S8!! 5456T: ".S9/V50; T/ "5$56":6T $/0 :"".T./6: 5V."5695 W.T335 " !0./0

/1. The #ovant respectfully requests the court reopen discovery so as to allo. the Debtor additional supplemental discovery regarding the endorsement team, its e2istence, its function and its involvement in

the manufacturing of 3tah4dah3 endorsements in the instant case. +lternatively, the #ovant respectfully requests the ,ourt consider the evidence of the 5ote $ndorsement Team order form submitted under oath and sub6ect to %ule 7011 in the Sanche" case in the instant case for the reasons stated above.

0, &n 4e C5"T(&A CA44S6' F4A"7L&" C 6 M M 8 " T A 4 5 %mail D&4T* 9


3ere is D case .... in which it is alleged, among other things, that an endorsement disappears and 05:!!5:0S

$1, &n 4e C5"T(&A CA44S6' F4A"7L&" C 6 M M 8 " T A 4 5 %mail D&4T1 9


!S converted many of its internal employees into servicer emails and set up location mgmnt agreements ...

!!,

&n 4e C5"T(&A CA44S6' F4A"7L&" C 6 M M 8 " T A 4 5 (o3 to Fabricate 8vidence# 'ells Fargo:s Foreclosure Manual Confirms the 'orst ; The Florida Foreclosure Fraud 'eblog ((omeo3ner D8F8"S8 Perspective
.f there was any doubt in your mind that ban#s have been forging evidence, put it to rest. :ccording to the "e3 5or/ Post, an internal 'ells Fargo manual has now lea#ed confirming the e2act procedures Wells and its attorneys use to fabricate evidence in foreclosure casesIdown to the computer codes they use to order production of falsified documents.

You might also like