Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This article was first published on LexisPSL Construction on 19 March 2014. Click here for a free 24h trial of LexisPSL.
Page 2
o o
the improved UK growth prediction of 2.7% for 2014 and 2.3% for 2015, and the predicted extra 1.5m jobs over the next five years
Some of the new jobs will be in the industry and the improved overall growth should be reflected in growth in the construction sector specifically. However, since last autumn the growth predictions for the longer term (2017 and 2018) have been revised downwards which means the growth is likely to continue to be fairly modest. The Chancellor's specific request to the Bank of England to keep an eye on the possibility of a housing bubble is notable. If what looks like it might be a bubble bursts, then all bets will be off. The balance between trying to get new homes built and not rocking the market remains a fine one. If there are any headline measures for construction, they are likely to be: o the building-related measures aimed at supporting 200,000 new homes, namely: o the 150m made available for self-build the extension of the Help to Buy loan scheme to 2020 the building of the new garden city at Ebbsfleet
transport-related measures, including: the approval of 270m funding for the Mersey Bridge extra spending for road and flood repairs the availability of 200m for pothole repair
On the building front, even if 200,000 new homes are built, it will not happen quickly and there is nothing exciting to report from an infrastructure perspective. So, overall the Budget is more ground-repairing than ground-breaking. A measure of the conservatism of this Budget is that for those construction lawyers who like their beer they will need to be drinking between 300 and 400 pints before the reduction in duty of 1p per pint will buy them a pint. Ann Minogue, partner in the MacFarlanes' construction group: As predicted, some help for house-buyers: o the proposed new 'garden city' (described by the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) as 'really just a garden village') in Ebbsfleet (wasn't planning permission granted for this last decade?) given that the Environment Agency reported in 2009 that the new garden city was in a flood plain, an extra 140m for flood defence repairs and maintenance will be welcome the extension of the 'Help to Buy' scheme until 2020 is intended to help homebuyers on properties up to 600,000 the Builder's Finance Fund of 500m for small house builders to help support the building of more than 200,000 new homes
o o o
So house builders and their construction lawyers should be busy (along with their conveyancing colleagues) but, as the RICS has said, this is 'a drop in the ocean' and doesn't do anything to deliver the right mix of homes. The Chancellor announced some help for infrastructure projects: o o o a 270m guarantee for Mersey Gateway bridge legislation to give the Welsh government tax and borrowing powers to fund infrastructure including improvements to the M4 200m to fix potholes
Will these help increase the workload of construction lawyers acting on infrastructure projects? Maybe, a bit. What about help for construction companies and the 'march of the makers'? The Chancellor:
Page 3
o o o
doubled the 100% annual tax allowance for investment to 500,000 froze the carbon floor price paid by business in a bid to cut energy bills--but not by much, and at the expense of its green policies doubled the amount of government credit available to exporters to 3bn and reduced interest rates by a third
So is this a game changer for construction companies? Maybe the tax allowances for investment will help start-ups in construction manufacturing but the construction industry will continue as a massive net importer of construction products and materials. Are there any surprises? Nick Lane: No. But that equally means that there aren't any nasty surprises. Ann Minogue: Not for the construction industry. Most of this is tinkering around the edges. The British economy may be growing at a faster rate than any other advanced economy (growth forecast up to 2.7% in 2014) but the job of recovery is 'far from done' according to Mr Osborne. Against the backdrop of the base rate at 0.5%, the Chancellor's measures to promote the 'makers' and the 'doers' are paltry. We may be 'building a resilient economy' but it is fuelled by cheap debt rather more than the Chancellor's budget tax changes. There were surprises though for construction lawyers at a personal level: o o o 20% of childcare costs for children up to the age of 12 up to a maximum of 10,000 from September 2015 will certainly help the finances of many construction lawyers they should be investing in new ISAs up to 15,000 a year tax free to reduce their tax bills and, while they are at it, buying a few more premium bonds--up to 50,000 in 2015 changes in restrictions on pensioners access to their pension pots and on taxation of lump sums on retirement will affect the retirement plans of construction lawyers over 45
What actions should construction lawyers be taking as the dust settles? Nick Lane: What limited dust there was has already settled and this Budget will be long-forgotten by this time next year. In the meantime it will be more of the same for construction lawyers. Make mine a pint of bitter please. Ann Minogue: Maybe: o o o whizz off on a long haul flight to celebrate the reduction in air duty visit their pensions adviser go to the pub for a pint--1p cheaper
Page 4
Sir Merrick Cockell, chairman, Local Government Association: 'Much more can be done to build new homes, create jobs and stimulate the economy if local government's hands were untied by the Chancellor to drive this through at a local level. We will continue pressing government to unlock the potential of local areas to solve these national problems through putting local businesses, colleges and councils in control of tackling youth unemployment and giving local authorities greater freedom to invest in new housing and infrastructure.' Chris Temple, UK engineering and construction UK lead, PwC: 'House building needs a significant push, so it is good to see the 500m investment into small house building firms, which has obvious employment connotations too. However, space is at a premium, especially in London and the south-east, where the Chancellor identified a specific need for new housing. To really kick-start the industry, I would like to see greater incentives for public and private landowners to sell sites to developers. The 150m investment for people to build their own homes works well in parallel to the Help to Buy scheme--perhaps now people looking to get onto the property ladder will consider buying a plot at auction and starting from scratch?'