Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2006
O. HUBOV
Oga HUBOV, Assoc. Prof., Ing., PhD.
Department of Structural Mechanics Faculty of Civil Engineering Slovak University of Technology Radlinskho 11, 813 68 Bratislava, Slovakia e-mail: olga.hubova@stuba.sk Research field: Static and dynamic wind action on structures
ABSTRACT
Wind action is represented by a simplified set of pressures or forces, whose effects are equivalent to the extreme effects of turbulent wind. In accordance with implementing Eurocodes into our National Standards, it is necessary to take into account differences between the peak velocity pressure at the reference height according to STN, EN and DIN.
KEY WORDS
Wind pressure and forces Mean wind velocity Turbulence intensity Terrain category
1 INTRODUCTION
Certain aspects necessary to determine wind action on a structure are dependent on the location and the availability and quality of the meteorological data and the type of terrain. Wind actions are determined from the basic values of wind velocity, and the response of structures should be calculated from the peak velocity pressure qp . qp depends on the wind climate, the terrains roughness and orography and the reference height and is equal to the mean velocity pressure plus any contribution from short-term pressure fluctuations.
(1) The mean wind velocity depends on the roughness factor cr (z) and the orography factor c0 (z) (2) for for (3) (4)
where vb is the basic wind velocity, zo is the length of the roughness, zmin is the minimum height, zmax is 200 m. The expression (3) is valid when the upstream distance with a uniform degree of terrain roughness is long enough to stabilise the profile. Terrain factor kr depends on the roughness length zo:
28
Hubova.indd 28
2007/4 PAGES 28 31
(8)
(6) An illustration of turbulence intensity is in Fig.1. Tab. 1 Terrain categories and terrain parameters Terrain category 0 sea or coastal area I lakes or flat area with negligible vegetation, without any obstacles II area with low vegetation and isolated obstacles (trees, buildings) III areas regular cover of vegetation or buildings (villages, suburban terrain, permanent forest) IV area in which 15% is covered with buildings; their height exceeds 15 m z0 [m] 0.003 0.01 0.05 0.3 zmin [m] 1 1 2 5 0.156 0.1697 0.19 0.215
1.0
10
0.234 Fig. 2 Peak velocity pressure as a function of height and terrain category
29
Hubova.indd 29
2007/4 PAGES 28 31
Tab. 2 Wind pressure and velocity due to wind area Wind area Wind pressure w0 [kN.m-2] Wind velocity v [m.s-1] III 0.45 26.83 IV 0.55 29.66 V 0.7 33.46 VI 0.85 36.87
The velocity pressure according to STN 75 0035: (9) where: wo is the wind pressure given in Tab. 2 (depends on the wind area ) is the height factor (depends on the terrain category Tab.3) Tab. 3 Height factor Terrain category A open terrain - lakes or flat area and obstacles (trees, buildings) less than 10 m. B areas regular cover of vegetation or buildings (cities, permanent forest) their height exceeds 10 m
Wind pressure for different wind areas is in Figs. 4 and 5. A numerical analysis of a steel stack due to along-wind turbulence according to the EN has been compared with procedures according to STN 73 0035, see Fig. 6 and Hubov, O. (2006). Cantilevered steel stack 25 m height and 1.3 m diameter, equivalent mass per unit length m = 225 kg/m, logarithmic decrement of damping = 0,012:
Fig.6 Wind forces for the whole stack due to different codes
30
Hubova.indd 30
2007/4 PAGES 28 31
4 CONCLUSION
The paper shows that a detailed analysis of peak velocity pressures according to different codes gives us different wind loads. The fluctuating part of pressure, i.e., its dynamic nature, depends on the atmospheric turbulence. The turbulence intensity in Fig.1 gives us bigger values near the ground. The result of these pressures gives
rise to a system of forces (see Fig.6). The differences between EN and STN are more than 40.7% near the cantilevered part.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The presented results were achieved under the sponsorship of the VEGA Grant Agency of the Slovak Republic (Registration No.1/2142/05).
REFERENCES
EN 1991-1-4 (2005) European Standard EN 1991-1-4 Eurocode 1: Actions on structures-Part 1-4: General actions - Wind actions, 2005 Background document of ENV 1991-2-4 (1996) Background document of ENV 1991-2-4: Wind Action, Draft: Feb.1996 Kolouek, V. - Pirner, M. - Fisher, O. Nprstek, J. (1983) Wind Effects on Civil Engineering Structures, Academia Praha 1983 STN 73 0035 Zaaenie stavebnch kontrukci (Load on Building Structures), Slovak Standard STN 73 0035 Petersen, Ch. (1996) Dynamik der Baukonstruktionen, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden, 1996, Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlaggesellschaft mbH, ISBN 3-528-08123-6
Kolouek V. et col. (1967) Stavebn kontrukcie namhan dynamickmi inkami (Dynamic Effects on the Building Structures), Slovensk Vydavatestvo Technickej Literatry Bratislava 1967 (in Slovak). Hubov, O. - Prekop, . (2000) Wind excited response of slender line structures. Proceedings of Int. Conference on Dynamics of Civil Engineering and Transport Structures and Wind Engineering, Vyhne, Sept., 2000 pp. 41-44 Hubov, O. (2006) Dynamick inky vetra s vyuitm noriem. (Dynamic Wind Effects usingStandards), Proceedings of Int. Conference DYNA 2006, Brno 11.-12.5.2006, ISBN 80-2143164-4 pp.107-115.
31
Hubova.indd 31