Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Veselin Topalov Peter Svidler Sicilian Defense B49 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nc6 5.Nc3 Qc7 6.Be3 a6 7.Be2 b5 . The classical way of handling this position is 7Nf6 8.00 Bb4 9.Na4 Be7 10.Nxc6 bxc6 11.Nb6 Rb8 12.Nxc8 Qxc8, and it is hard to White to prove his advnatage. 8.Nxc6 dxc6?! 8Qxc6 is a more typical Sicilian idea and is way more popular. Here is one of the latest examples: 9.Bf3 Bb7 10.00 Qc7 11.Qd3 Ne7 12.a4 b4 13.Nd5 exd5 14.exd5 d6 15.Rfe1 Rc8 16.Bd4 with strong compensation for a sacrificed piece, Karjakin-Morozevich, Beijing 2012. 9.a4 b4 10.Nb1 Nf6 11.Nd2 c5. 12.f3. A sensible novelty White creates a barrier on the h1-a8 diagonal against the b7-bishop, also restricting the black knight. Earlier White tried 12.Bf3 Bb7 13.Qe2 Be7 14.00 00 15.Bg5 Qe5 16.Bxf6 Bxf6 17.Nc4 Qc7 18.e5 Bxf3 19.gxf3 Be7 with a balanced game Whites structural weaknesses are compensated by passive placement of the black bishop, AcherGofshtein, Cannes 1999. 12Bb7 13.Nc4 Nd7?! (13Rd8!? 14.Qc1 Be7 15.Bf4 Qc8 16.00 00 with the idea Nh5.) 14.Qc1 Be7 15.00 00 16.Bf4 e5 17.Bg3. Black did not equalize his light squares are weak. 17h6. Planning to develop the bishop to g5. 18.c3 a5 19.Qc2 Ba6 20.Rfd1 Rfd8 21.b3 Bg5 22.Bf2 Nf8. Black prepares to transfer the knight to 6 and proceed by bxc3 and Nd4, so White must act quickly. 23.cxb4. 23cxb4?! Probably 23axb4 is stronger 24.h4 Be7 25.Ne3 Bxe2 26.Qxe2 Ne6 27.Nd5 Qa7 28.Qc4 Nd4, and White has a small advantage. 24.Bb6! Forcing Black to trade on d1, thus seizing control over the d-file. 24Rxd1+ 25.Rxd1 Qb8 26.Bf2 Qc7? 26Bd8 is Blacks only option. After 27.Nd6 (27.Rd5 is not as strong due to 27Ne6! 28.g3 (28.Nxe5? Bxe2 29.Qxe2 Nf4) 28Bc7, and Black maintains material balance) 27Bxe2 28.Qxe2 Bb6 29.Qb5 Bxf2+ 30.Kxf2 Qa7+ 31.Ke2 f6 Blacks position looks horrible due to numerous weaknesses, however, it is not easy to find a way to win for White.
GM Evgeny Miroshnichenko
Page 1 of 7
Shakhriyar Mamedyarov Sergey Karjakin Nimzo-Indian Defense E20 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.f3 c5 5.d5 b5 6.e4 00 7.e5. Shakhriyar does not repeat his own game, which continued 7.Bg5 exd5 8.cxd5 Re8 9.Qd2 a6 10.Nge2 d6 11.Ng3 Nbd7 12.Be2 c4 13.00 Bc5+ 14.Kh1 h6 15.Be3 Bxe3 16.Qxe3 Nc5, and Black equalized easily, Mamedyarov-Fressinet, Ohrid 2009. 7Ne8 8.f4 exd5 9.cxd5 d6 10.Nf3 c4 11.a4. 11Nd7. 11Bg4 is not so successful: 12.axb5 Nd7 13.e6 fxe6 14.dxe6 Nb6 15.Be2 Nc7 16.00! (16.Ng5 Bxe2 17.Qxe2 d5 18.00 Qf6 19.f5 Rae8 20.Rxa7 Nxe6 21.Nxe6 Rxe6 22.Qf2 Qe5 23.g4 Rg6 24.Qg2 Rgf6 25.Bf4 Qd4+ 26.Qf2 Qxf2+ 27.Kxf2 d4 28.Ne4 R6f7 29.Rxf7 Rxf7 30.Ra1 h6 31.Be5 d3 32.Bd4 Rb7 33.h4 Bf8 34.Rc1 Nd5 35.Rxc4 Rxb5 36.Rc8 Kf7 37.g5 Ne7 38.Nd6+, 10, Shirov-Kramnik, Shanghai 2010) 16Nxe6 17.h3 Bh5 18.f5 Nc7 19.Nd4!, and
GM Evgeny Miroshnichenko
Page 2 of 7
Page 3 of 7
Levon Aronian Vladimir Kramnik Queens Gambit D36 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 d5 4.cxd5 exd5 5.Bg5 c6 6.Qc2 Be7 7.e3 Nbd7 8.h3. A rare move in this position, but it is well in the spirit of modern theory White implies g2-g4. 8Nh5 9.Bxe7 Qxe7 10.Nf3 Nb6 11.000. White signifies his aggression after castling short Black will face a pawn storm. 11Nf6. More often Black continues 11g6. Kasparov-Smyslov, Moscow 1988 saw 12.g4 Ng7 13.Bd3 Be6 14.Ne2 000 15.Nf4 Kb8 16.Be2 Ne8 17.Nd2 Nd6 18.h4 Bc8 19.Nb3 Ne4 20.Bf3 f5 with
GM Evgeny Miroshnichenko
Page 4 of 7
28Ba6? Vladimir clearly lacks ambition, otherwise he would at least try calculating 28Nb5! 29.exd5 Na5! this intermediate move gives Black an advantage 30.Qd1 Rxd5 31.Bxb5 cxb5 32.Nc3 Rxd4 33.Qe1 a6!, and White has to suffer for a draw.
GM Evgeny Miroshnichenko
Page 5 of 7
Viswanathan Anand Dmitry Andreikin Caro-Kann Defense B18 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 dxe4 4.Nxe4 Bf5 5.Ng3 Bg6 6.h4 h6 7.Nf3 e6 8.Ne5 Bh7 9.Bd3 Bxd3 10.Qxd3 Nd7 11.f4 Bb4+ 12.c3 Be7 13.Bd2 Ngf6 14.000 00.
15.Qf3. Anand deviates from 15.Ne4 Nxe4 16.Qxe4 Nxe5 17.fxe5 Qd5 18.Qxd5 cxd5 19.h5 b5 20.Rh3 a5 21.Rf1 Rac8 22.Rg3 Kh7 23.Rgf3 Kg8 24.Rg3 Kh7 25.Rgf3 Kg8, draw, Anand-Carlsen, Chennai 2013. 15Qc7 16.c4 a5 17.Kb1 Rad8 18.Bc1 a4. A novelty, and probably an unsuccessful one. Topalov-Dreev, New Delhi/Teheran 2000 continued 18Rfe8 19.Ne2 c5 20.g4 cxd4 21.g5 Nxe5 22.fxe5 Nh7 23.gxh6 Qxe5 24.hxg7, and White won in the
19.Rhe1 a3 20.b3 Bb4 21.Re3 c5. The computer approves Blacks play, but it looks very suspect for a human eye Black voluntarily cuts off his bishop from the kingside. 22.d5! exd5 23.cxd5. 23.Nf5!? looks very strong, and Whites concentration near the black king becomes critical: 23dxc4?! (after 23d4 White can continue by 24.Re2 he basically has an extra piece in the attack, because Blacks darksquared bishop is restricted by his own pawns) 24.Rxd7! Rxd7 25.Qg3 Ne8 26.Nxc4! f6 27.Qg6!, and Black is in terrible shape. 23Nb6 24.Red3 Qc8? After this move Whites advantage is already decisive. Black needed to play 24Nbxd5 25.Rxd5 Nxd5 26.Rxd5 Rxd5 27.Qxd5 Rd8 28.Qc4 Rd1, and converting an advantage is hard for White due to numerous weaknesses around his king. 25.d6 Rfe8.
GM Evgeny Miroshnichenko
Page 6 of 7
GM Evgeny Miroshnichenko
Page 7 of 7