Dyson fan: was it invented 30 years ago?

- Telegraph 23/10/09 11:44 PM

Jobs
Dating
Games
Offers

Dyson fan: was it invented 30 years ago?

The Dyson bladeless fan unveiled last week to great acclaim was first developed 30 years ago by a
Japanese company, according to documents filed at the Intellectual Property Office.

By Harry Wallop (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/journalists/harry-wallop/) , Consumer Affairs Editor

Published: 7:00AM BST 20 Oct 2009
Comments 22 (#comments) | Comment on this article (#postComment)

The desktop fan, costing £200, has won

plaudits both in Britain and America for its
sleek design and clever engineering. The
Air Multiplier works by sucking in air at the
base, and pushing it out at speed through
a thin gap in the fan's ring, meaning there
are no visible blades in the fan.

However, documents indicate that a

Japanese company, Tokyo Shibaura
Electric, developed a nearly identical idea
of a bladeless desktop fan in 1981. It is
understood it was never manufactured.

Left: Dyson patent (2009) and right: Tokyo Shibaura patent (1981) Photo: UK
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE

Related Articles
Dyson bladeless fan: how it works (/technology/news/6314107/Dyson-bladeless-fan-how-it-works.html)
James Dyson's bladeless fan (/technology/news/6306352/James-Dysons-latest-invention-bladeless-fan.html)
Dyson: Britain needs to spearhead new technology (/technology/news/6314206/Sir-James-Dyson-Britain-is-
tremendously-inventive.html)
Dyson's bladeless fan review - Gadget Inspectors
(http://link.brightcove.com/services/link/bcpid1911416382/bctid44553045001)
Dyson fan: why it is a 'novel invention' (/technology/6389354/Dyson-fan-why-it-is-a-novel-invention.html)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/6377644/Dyson-fan-was-it-invented-30-years-ago.html Page 1 of 4
Dyson fan: was it invented 30 years ago? - Telegraph 23/10/09 11:44 PM

Dyson unveils 'world's fastest motor' in new vacuum (/technology/news/5636349/Dyson-unveils-worlds-fastest-motor-

in-new-vacuum.html)

Documents (http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/originalDocument?
FT=D&date=20090312&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_GB&CC=WO&NR=2009030881A1&KC=A1) at the Intellectual Property Office, formerly
the Patent Office, indicate that Dyson re-submitted its application for a worldwide patent last year after the IPO ruled that
its initial design was too similar to the Japanese invention. The Dyson version, "cannot be considered novel or cannot be
considered to involve an inventive step", the initial ruling from the IPO suggested.

Patents expire after 20 years, but even after that date they can not be submitted by a different person or company unless
they have been changed or improved upon.

Dyson's most recent patent applications, which are still pending, have been changed to highlight a key design feature of
the Air Multiplier: a Coanda surface. This is the aerofoil ramp over which the air is pushed out of the ring of the fan.
Because of the angle of the Coanda surface, the air sucks in surrounding air into the air flow, creating a smooth and
powerful blast of air for any office worker using the fan.

Gill Smith, the head of Dyson's patent department, said: "We wouldn't dream of denying that the Japanese arrangement
and our fan look very similar. The difference is all in the technology. We've spent many years developing the Coanda
surface. The Japanese version does not have this feature."

She said that she "absolutely expected" Dyson to be granted a patent for its Air Multiplier. The most recent patent
application has not fallen into the "not novel" category that the initial application suffered from.

Dyson is adamant that its bladeless fan is completely different from the earlier Japanese version, with its design director
Peter Gammack, writing an article for Telegraph.co.uk, defending the Air Multiplier
(http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/6389354/Dyson-fan-why-it-is-a-novel-invention.html) .

Patent attornies said it was quite normal for companies to submit patents and for the IPO to discover similar inventions
when they undertook its "search", a due diligence process the authorities always do before granting patents.

Russell Barton, partner at law firm Withers Rogers, said: "The majority of inventions do take old technology and improve
on them. But you do need to demonstrate novelty to be granted a patent."

Hot topics

Royal Mail (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/royal-mail/)

MPs' Expenses (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/)
Football (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/)
Afghanistan (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/afghanistan/)
Microsoft (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/microsoft/)
Google (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/)
Twitter (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/twitter/)
Tokyo Motor Show (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/motor-shows/tokyo-motor-show/)

News
UK News

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/6377644/Dyson-fan-was-it-invented-30-years-ago.html Page 2 of 4