1 John Doe

2 2000 Lovely View Lane

3 Wonderland
4 Republic of California
5 Private Attorney
6
7
8 SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
9 COUNTY OF WONDERLAND
10
11 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) Case no. MC-LV-IN-TR-xxxxxxxx
12 )
13 Plaintiff )
14 )
15 Vs. )
16 )
17 )
18 JOHN HENRY DOE )
19 )
20 Defendant )
21 )
22
23 John Doe )
24 )
25 Counter-Plaintiff )
26 )
27 vs. )
28 ) CONTEMPT OF COURT
29 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ) FRUAD UPON THE COURT
30 Et. al. ) DISMISSAL OF CHARGE
31 )
32 Counter-Defendant(s)
33 __________________________________________________________________________________
34 _

35 Court Orders
36 THE COURT COMES NOW to review the facts, record, and process resulting in the
37 rulings dated August 6th 2009.
38
39 The record shows that this court of record entered a ruling on August 6th 2009 wherein
40 the charges of CONTEMPT OF COURT, FRUAD UPON THE COURT, and
41 DISMISSAL OF CHARGE were brought forth.
 1
2 The magistrate, plaintiff, and defendants were invited to each file and serve on all other
3 interested parties a brief no later than August 25th , 2009 to show cause to this court why
4 this order should not take effect or should be modified. No briefs were received by this
5 court.
6
7 COURT. An agency of the sovereign created by it directly or indirectly under its
8 authority, consisting of one or more officers, established and maintained for the purpose
9 of hearing and determining issues of law and fact regarding legal rights and alleged
10 violations thereof, and of applying the sanctions of the law, authorized to exercise its
11 powers in the course of law at times and places previously determined by lawful
12 authority. [Isbill v. Stovall, Tex.Civ.App., 92 S.W.2d 1067, 1070; Black's Law
13 Dictionary, 4th Edition, page 425]
14
15 The COURT is the ‘person and the suit of the soveriegn’,pg 425 Blacks 4th.
16 I, John Doe have stated numerously, and unequivocally that I am a sovereign (one of
17 the People of California), and not once has this been disputed or objected to.
18
19 COURT OF RECORD. To be a court of record a court must have four characteristics, and may have a
20 fifth. They are:

21 A. A judicial tribunal having attributes and exercising functions independently of the

22 person of the magistrate designated generally to hold it [Jones v. Jones, 188 Mo.App. 220, 175
23 S.W. 227, 229; Ex parte Gladhill, 8 Metc. Mass., 171, per Shaw, C.J. See, also, Ledwith v.
24 Rosalsky, 244 N.Y. 406, 155 N.E. 688, 689][Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., 425, 426]
25
26 B. Proceeding according to the course of common law [Jones v. Jones, 188 Mo.App. 220,
27 175 S.W. 227, 229; Ex parte Gladhill, 8 Metc. Mass., 171, per Shaw, C.J. See, also, Ledwith v.
28 Rosalsky, 244 N.Y. 406, 155 N.E. 688, 689][Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., 425, 426]
29
30 C. Its acts and judicial proceedings are enrolled, or recorded, for a perpetual memory and
 1 testimony. [3 Bl. Comm. 24; 3 Steph. Comm. 383; The Thomas Fletcher, C.C.Ga., 24 F. 481;
2 Ex parte Thistleton, 52 Cal 225; Erwin v. U.S., D.C.Ga., 37 F. 488, 2 L.R.A. 229; Heininger v.
3 Davis, 96 Ohio St. 205, 117 N.E. 229, 231]
4
5 D. Has power to fine or imprison for contempt. [3 Bl. Comm. 24; 3 Steph. Comm. 383; The
6 Thomas Fletcher, C.C.Ga., 24 F. 481; Ex parte Thistleton, 52 Cal 225; Erwin v. U.S., D.C.Ga.,
7 37 F. 488, 2 L.R.A. 229; Heininger v. Davis, 96 Ohio St. 205, 117 N.E. 229, 231.][Black's Law
8 Dictionary, 4th Ed., 425, 426]
9
10 E. Generally possesses a seal. [3 Bl. Comm. 24; 3 Steph. Comm. 383; The Thomas Fletcher,
11 C.C.Ga., 24 F. 481; Ex parte Thistleton, 52 Cal 225; Erwin v. U.S., D.C.Ga., 37 F. 488, 2
12 L.R.A. 229; Heininger v. Davis, 96 Ohio St. 205, 117 N.E. 229, 231.][Black's Law Dictionary,
13 4th Ed., 425, 426]

14 Any question as to the adequacy of an order to show cause [see Code Civ. Proc. §
15 1212[Deering's]] and of the adequacy of the affidavit or declaration on which the order to show
16 cause is based should be raised by an opposing affidavit or declaration [Morelli v. Superior
17 (1968) 262 Cal. App. 2d 262, 266, 68 Cal. Rptr. 572] having the effect of a demurrer [see
18 Taylor v. Superior Court (1942) 20 Cal. 2d 244, 246, 125 P.2d 1].

19
20 By Nihil Dicit this court of record so orders:
21
22 1. Judge ROY BEAN is found guilty of CONTEMPT OF COURT and ordered to
23 pay to the clerk of the court one dollar, so ruled with prejudice.
24 2. Judge ROY BEAN is found guilty of FRUAD UPON THE COURT, so ruled with
25 prejudice.
26 3. The Charge of MC-LV-IN-TR-XXXXXXXXX is dismissed with prejudice for
27 lack of lawful cause of action.
28 4. The counterclaim brought forth by John Doe is dismissed without prejudice.
29
30
1
2 THE COURT
3 Witness the Seal of this court, this 31st,day of August, the year of our Lord, 2009
4
5
6
7
8 __________________
9
10 John Doe
11 Private Attorney

12
13
14 Notes: This is an example and not to be construed as legal advice.
15 See my other Common Law examples for notes on how to create these in Microsoft
16 Word. You will note that there was a Declaration of the charges, and a time limit to
17 respond in the original Contempt of Court filing. So in this ‘Court Ruling’ you give the
18 default judgement. Otherwise it’s not done. The result was that the default went in
19 before the trial occurred, I stayed home because to go to trial after it was dismissed
20 would be to give the ‘inferior’ court jurisdiction and would be ‘recontracting’. I heard
21 from the Clerk of the Court 10 days later that the Judge found me guilty by default and
22 ordered me to pay $227. I asked if the Judge signed an order and was told NO. 2
23 months later I have yet to receive a bill from them. They acted somewhat honestly.
24 In another case the court is acting so unlawfully that they have failed to file (after over 2
25 months) and have sent back the originals of: a ‘Notice to the Court’ of my right under
26 the 1879 Constitution Article 6 Judicial Section 1 which states all courts are Courts of
27 Record, among other things., a Revocation of Power of Attorney wherein I revoked any
28 Power of Attorney the State, Counties, Banks, USA, inc., ect. presumed to posses to act
29 on my behalf, and a ‘proof of service’. Unbelievable, the ‘Notice’ was sent in ‘file on
30 demand’ and law requires the court to file it into evidence but obviously they want to get
31 rid of it. You will note the Courts act without honor with impunity. You file and they
32 ignore. Honor and Dishonor are very important concepts in Law. If you don’t have an
33 airtight case you lose. Documentation is key. Everything that you send to the court
34 should be by ‘proof of service’ where someone ‘not a party to the case’ over the age of
35 18, of sound mind swears they put the documents (identify them so anyone reading it
36 will not be able to mistake the intention) in an envelope and applied postage and mail it.
37 If its important send it Certified Mail and include the # on the Proof of service. If it’s
1 very, very important send it Registered Mail with return signature card. Registered Mail
2 is in International jurisdiction and carries some serious consequences for not honoring it.
3 Get a file where you keep regularly used stuff to copy and paste. Go online and look up
4 the Notary handbook from your Secretary of State and copy and paste the correct Notary
5 acknowledgement, and Jurat so you can just place it on any documents where it is
6 necessary. Keep a bunch of Proof of Service fill in forms ready.
7 All Praise to Bill Thornton LAWNOTES