FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION 1. The phenomenon of market risk management is understood throughout the organization Frequency 1 5 5 2" 1# 50 Percent 2.

0 10.0 10.0 52.0 2".0 100.0

strongly disagree Disagree eutral !gree strongly agree Total

2. The $anks ha%e a market risk treatment plan

Disagree eutral !gree (trongly agree Total #. )esponsi$ility of identifying the risk

Frequency 1 2 #5 12 50

Percent 2.0 &.0 '0.0 2&.0 100.0

management team risk manager +thers Total

Frequency Percent 2* 5".0 21 1 50 &2.0 2.0 100.0

&. The responsi$ility for risk management is documented Frequency # & 2# 20 50 Percent ".0 *.0 &".0 &0.0 100.0

Disagree eutral !gree (trongly agree Total

5. ,ffecti%e risk management leads to the achie%ement of organizations o$-ecti%es Frequency 5 2& 21 50 Percent 10.0 &*.0 &2.0 100.0

eutral !gree (trongly agree Total

". )isk controller has a role in increasing a.areness of the $enefit of risk management Frequency 1 * 22 1/ 50 Percent 2.0 1".0 &&.0 #*.0 100.0

Disagree eutral !gree (trongly agree Total

'. ,ffecti%e risk management can impro%e your organizations performance

Frequency (trongly disagree Disagree eutral !gree strongly agree Total 1 1 2 21 25 50

Percent 2.0 2.0 &.0 &2.0 50.0 100.0

*. The risk controller has a facilitati%e role in organizing training Frequency 2 12 22 1& 50 Percent &.0 2&.0 &&.0 2*.0 100.0

Disagree eutral !gree (trongly agree Total

/. 0ank is a$le to allocate appropriate resources in support of risk management policy and practice Frequency (trongly disagree Disagree eutral !gree strongly agree Total 1 5 * 21 15 50 Percent 2.0 10.0 1".0 &2.0 #0.0 100.0

10. The risk management policy promulgated throughout the department. Frequency distri$ution of the document e%idencing the policy placing the policy on the intranet meetings 1conferencing training courses ne.sletters the annual report performance system Total 10 1* ' 15 50 Percent 20.0 #".0 1&.0 #0.0 100.0

11. Training pro%ided $y the $ank on risk taking risk policy procedures and practices2

Disagree eutral !gree (trongly agree Total

Frequency 5 * 2" 11 50

Percent 10.0 1".0 52.0 22.0 100.0

12. Training $een pro%ided $y the $ank on risk taking policy procedures and practices2 management

disagree neutral agree strongly agree Total

Frequency & " 2' 1# 50

Percent *.0 12.0 5&.0 2".0 100.0

1#. De%eloping risk management processes and de%eloping related plans $ank has e3amined the2 strategic conte3t

disagree neutral agree strongly agree Total

Frequency 1 ' 25 1' 50

Percent 2.0 1&.0 50.0 #&.0 100.0

1&. De%eloping risk management processes and de%eloping related plans $ank has e3amined the2 organizational conte3t

disagree neutral agree strongly agree Total

Frequency # " 2" 15 50

Percent ".0 12.0 52.0 #0.0 100.0

15. De%eloping risk management processes and related plans $ank has e3amined the2 risk management conte3t Frequency # & #1 12 50 Percent ".0 *.0 "2.0 2&.0 100.0

Disagree eutral !gree strongly agree Total

1". Tools and techniques are used $y the $ank for identifying risks2 audits or physical inspection $rainstorming Frequency & 5 2& 1' 50 Percent *.0 10.0 &*.0 #&.0 100.0

Disagree eutral !gree (trongly agree Total

1'. Tools and techniques are used $y the $ank for identifying risks2 (4+T analysis Frequency # / 2* 10 50 Percent ".0 1*.0 5".0 20.0 100.0

disagree eutral !gree (trongly agree Total

1*. Tools and techniques are used $y the $ank for identifying risks2 inter%ie. and group discussions Frequency # 15 25 ' 50 Percent ".0 #0.0 50.0 1&.0 100.0

disagree eutral !gree strongly agree Total

1/. Tools and techniques are used $y the $ank for identifying risks2 past organizational e3perience

disagree neutral agree strongly agree Total

Frequency # / 21 1' 50

Percent ".0 1*.0 &2.0 #&.0 100.0

20. The $ank has a clear and .ell documented policies and guideline relating to market risk Frequency (trongly disagree Disagree eutral !gree (trongly agree Total 1 2 & 25 1* 50 Percent 2.0 &.0 *.0 50.0 #".0 100.0

21. The organization recognizes the need for technical risk management skills Frequency strongly disagree disagree eutral !gree strongly agree Total 1 2 / 25 1# 50 Percent 2.0 &.0 1*.0 50.0 2".0 100.0

22. 5arket risk policy regularly re%ie.ed $y the management in the light of financial results

Frequency strongly disagree eutral agree strongly agree Total 1 / 25 15 50

Percent 2.0 1*.0 50.0 #0.0 100.0

2#. Top management recei%e regular reports on market risk measurements Frequency 2 " 2# 1/ 50 Percent &.0 12.0 &".0 #*.0 100.0

disagree eutral !gree strongly agree Total

2&. 0ank use any model for market risk assessment Frequency 2 12 21 15 50 Percent &.0 2&.0 &2.0 #0.0 100.0

Disagree eutral !gree strongly agree Total

25. There is support system to gather information for risk management

Disagree eutral agree strongly agree Total

Frequency 1 1& 2& 11 50

Percent 2.0 2*.0 &*.0 22.0 100.0

2". )isk analysed in terms of2 consequence Frequency 1 10 2' 12 50 Percent 2.0 20.0 5&.0 2&.0 100.0

Disagree eutral !gree strongly agree Total

2'. )isk analysed in terms of2 financial impact Frequency " 2# 21 50 Percent 12.0 &".0 &2.0 100.0

eutral !gree strongly agree Total

2*. )isk analysed in terms of2 reputation impact

Frequency strongly disagree Disagree eutral !gree (trongly agree Total 1 1 10 2& 1& 50

Percent 2.0 2.0 20.0 &*.0 2*.0 100.0

2/. 0anks response to analysed risks includes an e%aluation of the effecti%eness of e3isting control and risk management responses Frequency 1 12 22 15 50 Percent 2.0 2&.0 &&.0 #0.0 100.0

6alid disagree eutral !gree strongly agree Total

#0. The organization has an up to date disaster reco%ery plan for information technology

Frequency strongly disagree Disagree eutral !gree (trongly agree Total 1 # 12 22 12 50

Percent 2.0 ".0 2&.0 &&.0 2&.0 100.0

#1. 7n the last 5 year the le%el of risk faced $y your $ank has2

increased decreased not changed not sure Total

Frequency Percent #" '2.0 & *.0 1 / 50 2.0 1*.0 100.0

#2. 0ank set aside specific funds from .hich losses are met in case of any disaster

Frequency strongly disagree Disagree eutral !gree strongly agree Total & # 10 1* 15 50

Percent *.0 ".0 20.0 #".0 #0.0 100.0

##. 8o. often is the re%ie. and monitoring undertaken9 Frequency 2/ 1" 1 & 50 Percent 5*.0 #2.0 2.0 *.0 100.0

monthly quaterly (emi annualy annually Total

#&. 0ank has key indicators to routinely monitor the le%els of risk. Frequency * 2" Percent 1".0 52.0

eutral !gree

strongly agree Total

1" 50

#2.0 100.0

#5. 0anks annual report include description of the risks faced $y $ank Frequency 1 10 22 1' 50 Percent 2.0 20.0 &&.0 #&.0 100.0

Disagree eutral !gree (trongly agree Total

#". 5anagement acti%ely in%ol%ed in sketching up strategies for risk management Frequency (trongly disagree Disagree eutral !gree (trongly agree Total 2 2 ' 1/ 20 50 Percent &.0 &.0 1&.0 #*.0 &0.0 100.0