Professional Documents
Culture Documents
was given after irradiation. Preparations of Antiradiation Vaccine contained toxoid form of Radiation Toxins was used for immunoprophylaxis. Preparations of Antiradiation Antidote IgG , contained antibodies to Radiation Toxins was used for immunotherapy. Scheme of experiments : I. Control: Group A. Animals with ARS without treatment. Group B. Animals with thermal injury without treatment.Group C.Animals with combined forms of ARS without treatment. II. Specific Immunoprophylaxis with Antiradiation Vaccine (AV). Group C. Animals with immunoprophylaxis by AV. Irradiation provided 24 days after vaccination. Group D. Animals with immunoprophylaxis by AV. Thermal injury was provided 24 days after vaccination. Group E. Animals with vaccination by AV and combined injur. Irradiation was provided 24 days after irradiation. Thermal injury was provided immediately after irradiation. III. Specific Immunotherapy with Antiradiation Antidote IgG (AA IgG). Group E. Animals with ARS and immunotherapy by AA IgG. Group F. Animals with thermal injury and immunotherapy by AA IgG. Group H. Animals with combined radiation thermal injury and treatment by AA IgG. Results: The Lethality Doses (LD) 100/30 of radiation expressed 100 % mortality rate in next 30 days after irradiation with development of different forms of ARS. The thermal injury which induced third degree burns with area of dry necrosis. Mortality rate in group with thermal injury without treatment was almost 90 % in next 30 days. Lethality rate at Combined Radiation and Thermal injury without any treatment demonstrated 100 % in next 30 days. Immunoprophylaxis with specific AV was most effective for animals with ARS and survival rate was up to 70 %. Immunotherapy with specific AA IgG although demonstrated less effectiveness and demonstrated survival rate 50 % -60% in different groups of irradiated animals. For animals with thermal injury Immunotherapy with AV and Immunoprophylaxis AA IgG were significantly uneffective and survival rate do not exceed 15 %. Results of specific immunotherapy and immunoprophylaxis provided at combined radiation thermal injury ( CRTI) demonstrated 30% of survival rate. Conclusion: Effects of Different Biological Response to specific immunoprophylaxis with AV and specific immunotherapy with AA IgG demonstrated effective radioprotection for irradiated animals with different forms of ARS. The recovery phases demonstrated shorter period of reconvalescence . Efffects of specific immunoprophylaxis with AV and immunotherapy with AA IgG provided for animals with thermal and combined injury were less effective. However Immunoprophylaxis and Immunotherapy with Specific Immunomodifiers used at combined and Thermal injury demonstrated prolonged life time after immunoprophylaxis. Demarcation zone of burns and necrotic tissues rejection were more expressed after immunotherapy. Specific Immunoprophylaxis with Thermal Injury Toxins and Specific Immunotherapy with specific anti-thermal injury antibodies ( serum of IgG preparation) could significantly improve results of therapy of thermal and combined injury.