1

IN NEW YORK SUPREME COURT SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

APPELLATE DIVISION
STATE OF NEW YORK

2 3 4 5 6
7

In the Matter of mandatorl,

unconditional relief owed to Kevin Patrick Brady, pro se

I
11

10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

EXHIBITS C Pursuant to Kevin Patrick Brady v People of New York and Craig Doran Administrative Judge and eleven [11]jurisdictionally VOID criminal convictions

20
21

22 23 24

25
26 27 28 29 30
31

32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39

40
41

42
43

44 45 46 47
48

49
50

EF

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

9pp etls te TBibisf 0 n,

DOCKET NO. CA 13-00994

fi ourtls TuDi cf s[ @ ep sr tment

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P. J., SMITH, CENTRA, FAHEY, AND PERADOTTO,

JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF KEVIN PATRICK BRADY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. Index No:2012107593

Appellant having applied for a writ of coram nobis/vobis and a writ of extraordinary
errors, and having moved for permission to merge said application with his appeal from an order

of Supreme Court, County of Monroe, dated November 7,2012, and for other relief,
Now, upon reading and filing the affidavit of Kevin Patrick Brady sworn to May 2,2013,
the statements of Kevin Patrick Brady received May 30, 2013, and the notice of motion with

proof of service thereof, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is hereby ORDERED

that the motion is denied.

Entered: June 20' 2013

Fnc.Ncns E. CAr.tRElr,, Clerk

l[

2 3

SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE DIVISION

4
5

KEVIN PATRICK BRADY

V

PETITION FOR WRIT OF ERRORS

6
7 8

10
11

PE.PLE.FNEWY.RK
ADM|NTSTRATIVE JUDGE CRAIG

DORAN

Kffit'ffi..VKffi
*t\R

12 13

't4
15

't6
17 18

BE tT

KNOWN

t.; # =>fr ', B AFHIF'H'*"'4:F'P; }}{YISHON *'t* --*ryi:g ttt

Uugigr6st'{'MIIF{'T

,;014 0

n*' E
}

&

19 20
21

As to an action to vacate eleven [11]jurisdictionally void criminal conviction. tfrlg.in'$.i" Court on or about February 20,2014, due to circumstances beyond my controTl'musf amend the Notice and affidavit of Service as follows

22 23

24 25
26

This matter is made returnable on March '17,2014. Answers, if any, to be filed in the Court on or before March 14,2014 with simultaneous copies provided to defendant
TO THE COURT
I herby depose that the following parties were each served true and exact copies of the PETITION FOR WRIT OF ERRORS on the dates identified.
February 21,2014 JUDGES CRAIG DORAN, ALEX RENZI, VINCENT DINOLFO MONROE COUNW HALL OF JUSTICE Rochester, NY 14614
Fei.,;'uary 25,2014

27
28

29
30
31

32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39

40
41

NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF LAW 144 Exchange Bvd Rochester, NY 14614 MONROE COUNW DEPARTMENT OF LAW 39 W. Main Street Rochester, NY 14614

42 43
44

45 46 47 48 49
50
KAREN

KEVINPATRICK BRADY 508 Locust Lane

A.

SMITH

NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE

OF NEW YORK

No. 0l SM6241 488 Suolltled ln Monroe CountY

My Commisslon Explres MoY 23, 20'l5

February 19,2414
Judge Joseph Vale s u p re m e c o u runp #i[1" o, u,., o " 50 East Ave Rochester, New York 14604 Judge Valentino and Staff
I am providing

nffinffi
ffi $q fl.: tr; Krufl 'ffi K]
rr,4AR

FEB ? 0 2014

l$or\

? {: i:tl4

^HF,,'FS$ETY
APFfilg,E,,,4oT' H i}{Vfr S$ .$"FI $ $ ) B{?.A$IT'JW tiH-'d-

$N

this record to the Fourth Department and the parties below to verify the merits for unconditional relief I have sought from Monroe County courts from the inception. It is, admittedly, voluminous. However, in the final analysis it will take an experienced legal practitioner no more than twenty [20] minutes to confirm the patently fatal defects I allege. They have been repeatedly confirmed by New York's appellate divisions including the Fourth Dept and Court of Appeals. I also include on point commentary by Eric H. Sills, Esq., Albany Criminal Defense Attorney,
These infinitely offensive and prolonged government intrusions [and others like it], have cost me a twenty [20] year career in financial services, personal and family relationships and nearly two [2] decades of my life. I have consistently tried to attack them in the procedurally correct manner only to be obstructed. As a matter of record I have been cheated, denied, degraded, dismissed, and abandoned by my judiciary at EVERY opportunity that has presented itself.. ln fact, I have been punished unanimously for simply and lawfully exercising my First Amendment right. I now realize that for me there is no procedurally correct manner. My lawful petitions have been exercises in futility.

will not sub;ect myself to anymore abuse. I respectfully request this honorable court to purge these lawless stains from my personal and professional record now bv any means necessary. The only party who can be prejudiced in this matter is me. To make a man live his life knowing he has been serially cheated, criminally convicted, abandoned and destroyed for exercising a fundamental right is cruel and inhuman beyond my ability to articulate.
I

,/
Copies"
NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF LAW

Kevin Patrick Brady

144 Exchange Bvd Rochester, NY L46L4 MONROE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF LAW 39 W. Main Street Rochester, NY 14614
JUDGES CRAIG DORAN, ALEX RENZI, VINCENT DINOLFO MOROE COUNTY HALI OF JUSTICE Rochester, NY

14614

3 4 5
6 7

SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT STATE OF NEW YORK KEVIN PATRICK BRADY

V

APPELLATE DIVISION

PETITION FOR WRIT OF ERRORS

I
11

qFfrESE-ft
\l\AR

10 12 13 14

PEOPLE OF NEW YORK ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE CRAIG DORAN

- b ZS14

^-&"*S|"^Sl;
BE IT KNOWN As to an action to vacate eleven [11]jurisdictionally void criminal convictions filed in this Court on or about February 20,2014, due to circumstances beyond my control I must amend the Notice and affidavit of Service as follows

15
16 17

18 19 20
21

22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31

This matter is made returnable on March 17,2014. Answers, if any, to be filed in the Court on or before March 14,2014 with simultaneous copies provided to defendant
TO THE COURT
I herby depose that the following pafties were each served true and exact copies of the

PETITION FOR WRIT OF ERRORS on the dates identified.

February 21,2014

32 33 34 35 36 37
3B

JUDGES CRAIG DORAN, ALEX RENZI, VINCENT DINOLFO MONROE COUNry HALL OF JUSTICE Rochester, NY 14614
February 25,2014 NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF LAW 144 Exchange Bvd Rochester, NY 14614 MONROE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF LAW 39 W. Main Street Rochester, NY 14614

39

40
41

42 43
44

45
46

/ffilicrL6,,t,
b,q,eq
KAREN

47
48

KEVINPATRICK BRADY 508 Locust Lane New York 14445 585 381 2063

49
50

A.

SMITH

NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE

OF NEW YORK

No' 01SM624.l488 Suollfiad in Monroe CountY

My Commisslon Expires Mav 23' 2015

NEWYORK STATE SI-IPREME COI'KT

APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT M. DOLORES DENMAN COURTHOUSE 50 EAST AVENUE, SUITE 2OO ROCHESTER, NEW YORK 14604 (585) 530-3100 Fax (585) s30-3247
FNENces E. CAFARELL
CLERK OF THB COIJRT

ALAN

L. Ross

DEPUTY CLERK OF THE COI'RT

March 1,2074

Kevin P. Brady 508 Locust Lane East Rochester, New York 14445

Re:

Matter of Brady v Doran

Dear Mr. Brady: Enclosed please find the above-referenced notice of petition and supporting papers, which cannot be accepted for filing for failure to comply with the requirements of 22 NYCRR 1000.9' Moreover, you must obtain prior permission from the Court to commence any proceeding.

www. courts. state. ny. us/ad4

NEWYORK STATE SUPREME COURT APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURIH DEPARIMENT M. DOLORES DENMAN COURTHOUSE 50 EAST AVENUE, SI.IITE 2OO ROCHESTER, NEW YORK 1 4604 (595)i539t100 Fax (s8s) s30 3247
FRANCES

E.

CAFARELL

ALAN L. RoSs
DEPUTY CLERK OF THE COI,]RI

CLERK OF THB COIJRT

March 24,2014

Kevin P. Brady
508 Locust Lane East Rochester, New Yo?k

Re:

Matter of Brady

v-ffi;il

Dear Mr. Brady: Enclosed please find the above-referenced notice of petition and supporting papers, which cannot be accepted for filing for failure to comply with the requirements of 22 NYCRR 1000.9. A notice of petition must include a retwn date of submission, and the filing fee is $315. Moreover, you must obtain prior permission from the Court to commence any proceeding.

Very truly yours,

Appellate Division Clerk's Office LXD/sw

Encl.

Attorney General

www. courts. state.ny.us/ad4

NEW YORK STATE STIPREME COURT APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURIH DEPARTMENT M. DOLORES DENMAN COURTHOUSE 50 EAST AVENUE, SUITE 2OO ROCHESTER, NEW YORK 14604 (585) 530-3100 Fax (585) s30-3247
FRANCES E. CaTARSUCLBRI( OF THE COURT

ALAN

L.

ROSS

DEPUTY CLERK OF THE COURT

March 7,2014

Kevin Patrick Brady 508 Locust Lane East Rochester, NY 14445

Re:

People v Kevin Patrick Brady

Dear Mr. Brady: Enclosed please find your documentation entitled "notice for writ of errors" that was
fonrvarded to the Clerk's Office from the chambers of Justrce Joseph D. Valentino. Please be

advised that the above referenced documentation is being returned to you because your motion fails to comply with this Court's rules.

You have failed to provide an original and one copy of your coram nobis motion papers and supporting exhibits (see 22 NYCRR'1000.13 [a] [5] [iii]). Also, you have failed to provide an affidavit of service establishing when and how you served your coram nobis papers upon the necessary parties (see 22 NYCRR 1000.13 [a] [2]). Furthermore, you have failed to designate a return date. A motion shall be made returnable on a Monday (or if Monday is a legal holiday, the first business day of the week) (see 22 NYCRR 1000.13 [a] t1l).
A formal motion on notice must include an original and one copy of each of the following documents: (1) a notice of motion containing a specific return date (any Monday, orthe first business day of the week if Monday is a legal holiday, after the required notice period); (2) a supporting affidavit and any exhibits; and (3) proof of service of a copy of the motion papers and all exhibits on all parties at least 13 days priorto the selected return date if the copies were served by regular mail (8 days if served personally; 9 days if served by overnight mail). Please be advised that your documentation entitled "notice of petition affidavit of service" has been forwarded to the area of this office that handles this type of documentation for the Court. Enclosed is a copy of this Court's rules to assist you. Vgry truly yours,
l!'!..n" itJ"ti 'r'-:l u"' , t,'

, ta-,1

't

'

" Amy M. Bogardus

AMB:tlb Enclosure pc: Sandra J. Doorley, Esq

Principal Appellate Court Attorney

www. courts. state. ny. us/ad4

[{&ffi1i

rrrcS; D1l
/SNolSSlSS0d

tl
;I

!tl0O80O0O0lt
:: j::a!:;a ! r' ra,t.aS rBsid e.*rt\^J:it{rt q!:rzii

{lilv

S'n lH-i

NII-lN0l'}Evll0Slti " Stiiig$ri 3i

;3F

-A
olenhsErEra i,I'ffiK3
JaqunN lPuas

il

llj

,rl'Ff-;, ;:. -itftfiH I

As per your correspondence of 317i14.

4Tl{ I}EPA}t'itoiG''t

The petition for coram nobis with exhibits was duly served by local US Mail cn the dates indicated on the original Notice and Affidavit of Service AND by the enclosed USPS confirms'^ lnsofar as I have requested a hearing for this matter numerous times below without success, expected this Court would set a date as its earliest convenience and notify the parties.
I amended that expectation approx 13 days later as shown by the attached and notified all
I

parties simultaneously by US Mail. Apparently you had not yet received the amended papers

when we spoke on Monday. The originalwas filed to the attention of Judge Valentino on or about March 5,2414.
I am including here an addition copy of the petition and exhibits.

Regardless of any defect in service, neither I nor apparently this Court has received any objection as of this day. I attribute this, in part, to government attorneys inclination to scoff at
pro se litigants expecting to be taken seriously, AND, contrary to common misinformation,
I

am not prohibited from requisitioning this Court for relief. [Order Judge John Lane]. Note however, that the Department of Law has 'officially' been relieved of responsibility for responding to any of my 'frivolous' challenges by the order of Judge Richard Dollinger. [annexed] despite that ABA Rule 1.6 already mandates the same. Although the service defects at issue here have been corrected they are nevertheless waivable issues. The constitutionaldefects alleged in the petition are not. There is no cognizable defense to fatalfy void prosecutions. I submit that no party has been or could be prejudiced by unilateral rules and breeched CPL mandates, but me.

Sent back with payment and original notice of service

for CA13-02202

March

17

,2014

Amy M Bogardus
Supreme Court/ Appellate Division

50 East Ave
Rochester, NY 14614 Ms. Boyardus

As per your correspondence of 317114. The petition for coram nobis with exhibits was duly served by local US Mail on the dates indicated on the original Notice and Affidavit of Service AND by the enclosed USPS confirms.,
lnsofar as I have requested a hearing for this matter numerous times below without success, expected this Court would set a date as its earliest convenience and notify the parties.
I amended that expectation approx 13 days later as shown by the attached and notified all
I

parties simultaneously by US Mail. Apparently you had not yet received the amended papers when we spoke on Monday. The originalwas filed to the attention of Judge Valentino on or

about March 5,2414.

I am including here an addition copy of the petition and exhibits.

Regardless of any defect in service, neither I nor apparently this Court has received any objection as of this day. I attribute this, in part, to government attorneys inclination to scoff at pro se litigants expecting to be taken seriously, AND, contrary to common misinformation, am not prohibited from requisitioning this Court for relief. [Order Judge John Lane]. Note however, that the Department of Law has 'officially' been relieved of responsibility for responding to any of my'frivolous'challenges by the order of Judge Richard Dollinger. [annexed] despite that ABA Rule 1.6 already mandates the same. Although the service defects at issue here have been corrected they are neveftheless
I

waivable issues. The constitutionaldefects alleged in the petition are not. There is no cognizable defense to fatally void prosecutions. I submit that no party has been or could be
prejudiced by unilateral rules and breeched CPL mandates, but me.

r,/.

t7

As to my docs having been forwarded to the office handling such matters. I reiterate that I am entitled to a hearing by responsible judicial officers of this Court, not merely rubber stamped and dismissed as my pro se papers have unanimously been in the past.

rauBy
Copies to Judges Doran, Renzi, Donofrio NY Department of Law, Monroe County Dept of Law

Kevin Patrick Brady 508 Locust Lane EastRochester 14445

I hereby depose that everything contained herein is correct and truthful except for matters alleged on

information and belief, and I believe those matters to be true. I further depose that nothing alleged here is intended to be frivolous, embarrassing, harassing andlor completely without merit.

TONILC@N
Lic. #01C0050144

Notary Publiestate of New Yorl MONRoE Quallfid My Cornmissbn FalrsB 1onol2o1{

in

At

of the Supreme Court of of the State New York, held in and for the County of Monroe, at the Hall of Justice, Rochester, New York on the 8th day ofNovember, 2013.
a Term

PRESENT: HON. RICHARD DO_LLINGER

Justice Presiding

STATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT: COUNTY OF MONROE

KEVIN PATRICK BRADY,

-vs-

Petitioner,

ORDER Index No.2o13'053

THE PEOPLE OF NEW YORK bY AttorneY General, STEVEN E. FEDER, Esq.,

Respondents.

Petitioner, having instituted a proceeding by a Notice of Petition and affidavit, dated and

filed on June 26, 2013, seeking to render null and void previous judgments;
And Respondents, by their afforney, Eric T. Schneidefinan, Attorney General of the State of New York, Hillel Deutsch, Assistant Attomey General of Counsel, having submitted a Notice

of Motion, Affirmation and Memorandum of Law all dated July 18,2013, seeking to dismiss the
Petition and requesting sanctions; And the Court, having dismissed the Petition with prejudice by Order dated October 7,
2013 and ordered the Petitioner to shoe cause as to why sanctions should not be imposed for his

failure to abide by numerous Court Orders;

And on Noyembcr S, 2013. thc Court having considsrccl the argumcnls of Pctitioncr and
failed Rcspondent. b-v llillel Deursch. Assistant Attorney Gcneral, and lbund that Pctitioner has

tc sho,"v cause

RS

to'rvly sanctions should not be imposetl against hirn fbr his failurc ta abid* b1'

-:
.t; ".

numcrous Court Orclers. with due deliberations.

t

f.'

t*' ':

"' at thc ratc ol'$50.00 per dav. ORDnRI,ID. rhar pctitioner is d{i".i#hpFGteffi4

*'fu: t't

it is heretry
'1 .r

"=. !s a4;'

liorn the commencemcnt olthc aclion to the datc oJ'tlris (lourt's prior'Order of Oetohcr+' 2013'
rvhich is 100 clal's. lbr a total al-$5"(X)0.0(r-

"10_*,

(}RDr,RF.t). ttrar l)ctirioner

t,6f;ffir!*3t"i*"
-1.

r 1_* fl

at thc ratc ot'$50.(x) pcr clal'.

li.nr

the rlatc p{'ths prior (}rclcr ril'Octobcr

201i. until such time as Rcspandcnt rvithrlrai+'s

anii discontinucs with pre.iuilice thc currcnt action: and

ORDdRfi,D, that Peritioncr is held in contcmpt of court and. trpon motion t:1'ths
,., {'-'i

'+*

additional: Itespondents or their counsel. or upon dererminarion of the Court, mal' bc subja+t to
sanclion$ r,p to aiid including '-withour limitation

Iirss of

drivcr's license and a period ol'

incarccration: and

ORI)}]RnD, rhat Respondenrs and their counsel arc nol to rcspond tlr an!' papers f'rled or
served by Petirioner- in this or an). other action hc has previottsly l'ilcd or rna-v unlcss such
t-rl,-'cl

lile in I'uturc.

anti scrvetl papcrs incluclc an Ordcr. signed bv thc Adnrinistrativc Judgu or the

Superlising Juilge lbr thc Civil I'erm in rhe Scvcnth Ju<Jicial l)istrict. dirccting a rcsFotrsc tiotrt
Ilcsponilcnls.

I)atcd;

Novemtler 14" 201i Roclre-stc:r. N crn' York

,i
I

ION. ITICI IARD DOI,LINT}IR Acting Supremc Clourt .lrrstice

,)

l{ rPIlti.\IU CO{,iR"I OF ft{E SI.\IE t]F \UlV YORK C0{,' xTY OF },101\iRi}ii
K-[iVI]\ P;\'l RICK SRAD\'.

vs.

Pr.titioncr,

DgCISlOiq A;r-D ilRDIltt INDEX \O. l(-)r)-1, 1()167

T[{Oh{AS fu{. VA\STRYDONCK, JSC, C..\RLOS RODRIGLIEZ. Assistant Attomey Ceneral, S TEVNN R. SIRKT}I, JSC, n IANA 1RIZ,,\RRY, l{earing Ex am iner, RAY\,1 OND CO Ri\TELruS. JSC, SHFRRI E. WOOD. fulCCSE(-i,I
Rcspondents.

BEFORE: .UIPEARANCIIS:

FIOr{. JOHN P. LANE Justice of the Supreme Court

KEVIN PATRICK BRADY, peritioner pro se

ELIO'T SPITZER, A TTORNEY CEi{EL{L OF -II{E STA IE OI; NEW YORK Attorneys tbr Respondents VanStrydonck, Rodrig'_rez, Sirkin. fri z:r.rr,v,ind Ccrnel ius 111, Robert ;\. Cnlon, Hsq., Assistant Artorncy (iencrnl

Dd\lEL

V{. DEI.AUS, JR., MC}NROE COUNTY ;\'ITOR\,Ty ,\ftorney lor Respondent Woad ily tr{ichael E. Davis, S*nior Deputv Cr:untv ,\rt*nrcv

i'itc

{.-'r_iurt ltrrs

".,,rtr,,ir.l*r*d

Ihc iiriIe;rrIng i)JI)rrs

i " )uoticc {rt'ilctiricn ,iud ;ie titiorr. r{;rtecl -{eptcrn[:er rj, _]i.'rl..l; l. )ii:iicc,rlrippeff;rnce,:n hehailoircsporrdcnt Sherri Il.,.!'ir,rtJ, I \,rtirrs ol';rpllc.irlrlcf (.ur hchrlf oirrsil{)n{1cnts vrilrsirisl,rr:ec.

i',:niclii:c" lrrkitr" uitd ftizzan,:

\'li.'t 5l:1" :ri:rfiJ:i

ir.tr

ilie .\'!rlnrilc

t-'r-r11i1;,

i"'itilti 5rr;:pi;rt i.litirrc*;1,:rri r ,t:t

VanStrl'donck, ct Inrbr r\c. 2fl0"li' 1 i{: 7

13redy

.ri

cntiticri to prosccute iris rtppeals trom pern.:ission {rd., .i.:e itlso ?r*d.v v'

rrrdr-.rs

of tirc \lanrae Caunty Flnrily (lcr.r:'t wi{}rout sccking

i

'l{iller,2:6 AD:d ll,i.1 [1996]). Horvevcr. :u] r]rriclc

L:sed

ll

prac*cdilig in tlte Supretne ('t)urt nlay not he

l{.;-spondr-:nt S}:er-r, F-. ii.)

Io r*r'ierv such

orders.

I
;

Wood nroves to dismiss the petition on grounds that it is moot. f urls

iltt'.1 ,t cause of rction,rnri is rtthenvise trivolotts. ;\llcging that she has uniltrvfirllv,:rrg2u*d in

ti'rud in her eni'orcemcnt activitres, petitioner seeks an orcler directing respondent Wooil, rn
cntploysc olthe I,lCCSEtf. tn uease enlorcemcnt tctivitl,on support orders made in rhe pest ,urd

rcftrnd all

sr"rms

collected i-rom lum rctroactive to Septembcr 2003. Support collection units

iu"e

csiahiisired io collect, ilccount lor and disburse iunds paid pursuant to any r:rder uf chiid support

r-rr

r:liild and spar:sal sLlpport isc:e Social Sen'ices l-ar.v $lil-hIl]). Pctitioner's clairn lgarnst \.\rood
appiu'rn{lv relates to an lpplicatrtrn madc in ,\usust 1004 ta ftrmily court for ln intcnnetliate rppc:rl ol;.t sr-tpport r:rder, '"vhich hatl bcen tleni*d, or to certily th* record tor direct;ippeal to thc ^,\ppcllatc

I,]ivitl..rtt. l.he pctilitlrl d{lcs not :itate rnv cr:gnizabie cu*se of ;:cticn under article 1$
i''J.'l-ri.)lt{ijtil \\rirc,.i.',thr: is Litt.tiilhcnz*d to rclirnd
i'cnrcrl'',,

.rr{*rnsi

lhc iunrls petriioncr sceLs. Priiiidirer's,-rrrl',,

:r*rinst entiirce m*nt rri

rrn ordcr

of contrnuing slipport

is

:rppeal.
i-c,-

In sLtnttttarv, .,''irrl* pctitroncr rnev nr)t prtlSrcutc t[:is artiule 78 prt-rcccriilrg seckrng

icr,, rri

.ii{lt:ii
r;r{

trtil ,j rt'1xr;rrfils r.ii'!lpr,.-'ill* c()ild rlr l;rmil_V'corr11, irc is

r-'')rti'L,i

not

.,vithr:,,Lrt

i*llr:1. {.}rriers .rnti

I{

':ilit;ll:, ol-litiiic

tr; .rtltilil,ritll

tO

ijfc.\nptii.ile i)ir,.i:;icn ;tj,I;t.j"ilidr r:i'i-i,titi i:-c.": l'irl

I 'r r-l.i'1

).t"'tiitcr iilc,tfr.ii::" li'lll.siie e (lcrski itrrr ihll r:i jitstie* !':lrSlnril,itt.k

;irltll:i

-l..ri1 i:,;ir,:il

2 3

SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE DIVISION

4
5 b
7

KEVIN PATRICK BRADY

v PEOPLE OF NEW YORK ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE CRAIG DORAN

PETITION FOR WRIT OF ERRORS

I
't1

10 12 13 14 15 16
17

BE IT KNOWN
As to an action to vacate eleven [11]jurisdictionally void criminal convictions filed in this Court on or about February 20,2014, due to circumstances beyond my control I must amend the Notice and affidavit of Service as follows

18 19

20
2"1

22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31

This matter is made returnable on March 17,2014. Answers, if any, to be filed in the Court on or before March 14,2O14 with simultaneous copies provided to defendant
TO THE COURT
I herby depose that the following parties were each served true and exact copies of the PETITION FOR WRIT OF ERRORS on the dates identified.
February 21,2A14 JUDGES CRAIG DORAN, ALEX RENZI, VINCENT DINOLFO MONROE COUNTY HALL OF JUSTICE Rochester, NY 14614 February 25,2014 NEW YORK DEPARTMENT oF LAW 144 Exchange Bvd Rochester, Ny 14614 MONROE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF LAW 39 W. Main Street Rochester, NY 14014

32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39

40
41

42
43 44 45 46

-[(U CrU Unt // i,tfrrl1yL':$Yfr, I ' ,/

r

KEVrNpArRrcK BRADv
508 Locust Lane Ea3! Rochester, New York 14445 ( t.. 585 381 2063
I
I

47
48

^\ .._,.fu,

\ (

49
50

; {\-'\-t t ),
lF*(ir i,
_)<,

)t

I'

, ,(1 LJ-,''*-\c, 't\'(.' (. "t;j\(i\' ) -/-ilt ' i I ,-'/. *,fnr-,1_If i-.,r *, {_ ,1., , .J= ., \ n ir I -'.1' , [--, KAREN A. sMrIH ' ro'^-t

i .,\- ,[

)l ,,_i\
:.'jtl:-r"',;

:;: rl"t "'

l,'ly Commlsslon Erplres Moy

Cuolltled ln i'vlonroo CountY 23' 20 15

S.coniD - USPS'lrackingrx

lrtqs://tools.usg

E"*. t

Cffi&db

Ug! fco::::::::=:=t j;:::::::=:::::::

<p 'F:
Ouar*

ffiUSPS:COM'
lfil!

PA}IORAI\IA ERANCH

R0CHESIER, Nerl york I 46259998 Stir a Pacleqs

sefd Mal

"ft6l
FId

r*'grA

r,r,s4ish t4!MLillc^lt Trackingn

neK

Lffiiru 81rt &an'i

USPS

FH

r.,6naspy'.',

Ch&r? at

.___ Fina I Description oiv- piice pil; ::Product

Sales Receipt Sale unit
R0CHESTER

ffi8igss38;i?%,or,28 pf,l :::::=::::::=:::::::::::=::=:_:::;;:::

0?/20/2a14

Treching t*rmbsr:

$ra.gOlt69tl$4396g0tt

t-r

Expctsd Dotivory D.y:

Frldt , Foktllry

ll,

2Ola

Zone_t $l ,40 rst-Class l,fail Large Env 2.70 oz. Expmted Deliveryr Fri \ZlZt/14

Ny t4914

Product & Tracking lnformation

PoddPrcq*
Rrtortty

Iszue pVI:
Tredkrr

===:::::
$1.40

FaS.Frt

U* tOar'

i5oinrsprhdudd
sBn roF rEr

USPB

?talF

to(cAllx

F ba,'',n,Ala,'11:B
tm
Fcbrlry

orbrnd
firrffi,iry
Sorlitg CoiDtb

R0CHESTER lly 14604 Zone_l $2.03 trrst-Class Hail Large Env 5, tu 02. Exp.ected Delivery: Fri AZ\ZI/14

RCrllEn,

lryilc

Issue pVI:
R0CHESIER

tn
gll

tl,

z0ta

gt2

$2,03

ROCIfSIER, NY ll6Gr
ROC|{ESTER }tY

F6SnEy2'1,201a

9g

t{xt3

-rrls_l t;3;-:l:.' rrrair Larse Env

Expected

Ny 146.l4

$l,40

Fclruqr 2t, 2o1tl , 8i{a

8m

Afind eaPdOfic. DitutUSPS So.i

Fa<jry

ROCTSTER, NY 1{6Gt

Delivery: Fri 02/21/11

$1 .40

Febnsy zr,201.r
Faba,'rt 2a,2011 , 11:25

RoclfsTER t{Y 1.66

ROCISrE& NY t460tr
ROCHESTR ilY

Issue PVI:

pm

PrGlcddusfis
Orloh So.t Fadlty

-OO
Zone- I
l,le i

ROCHESTER

NY 14614
By

$s,60

Febli/trtm,?Afi,5.n
pm F60.udy At, 201{ , 4:0O pffi

Frcffy

ustcdbsdt

T2'

Priority l'1aiI l*Day

ght

AccslBro

R0C}STERNY l/t@tl

5 lb.

13.50 oz.

5iF3.l:Li?jJT:u'
Track Another Package
wtlrr
yolrtractfrg
{or

Fri oz/zt / 14

9t 14901 I 598 I 5343969019

lnctudes $50 insurance

r.calF, nurnb.r?

Issue PVI:

$9.60

Iotal
Pa
LE6A-

$1

4, 43

id by:
$14,43
XXXXXX)(XXXXXSOOO

FiEt Hctr IrmdL.b)

FOAr
t{c FEAiAct EO

oilt Srtcor

DL

Aroar

9qr Prfr.Ld*tH.t
&4 Srnprtt
S4lica

Gocrrrrt Scra*r

A!o.l L6PS

oxAextruraco lln r ttEatr'

t

Debit Card

I-GPSSmlrAhr

Crdtst1o

Sdndr b

'

tr

Lecl

ilb

Siblrda()

Ctgrt

FmrtArtao-an

sTltSPS.COUf

*: Receiptf:
Transaction
23903620672

Account il; Approval #:

306 0003gg

copyrEt

zor.t r,g's.

AtRr0r6tusd

80 For
USPS
,

il

*t******tr ,+********************* ***********************************t

r,{ArLBox, areeting :f]!fl!l-lglloll,s :ards.available for purchase

cor

or inquiries

go to

t-800-222-1e11.

ai

JSPS.corir@ - USPS TrackinglM

hftps://tools.usps.r
4-te

eng|i'h

C.ttffi. S.nit

ugPg

lloba

rtusPs.c.w'
iu{h Tel3

',.ICH[STER POST OFFIC TIHISIER New yo rk

44459998

Slp
Fird

a Package

Serd Mad

t,,lanage Yo4t Mal

L
_

;5

0290445-0099
:;1 _::=::::

1585)586-2978 03:.iZ:36 ptl

_-_-;_i:--:=:=:::::

F{rC

lrrlPg l-o*ars

riff$Fjb TrackingrM
i.rrlr,?r d i(:dre!s

Description 0ty price 00 -- R0cHEsrER NY 14604

5235{ 3

Product

Saie Unit

price
$5,30

Frnal

Tracking l*rmiler:

911 4I)01{ 8986650'1

Zonefle

Priority |1ail
ight
Expected Delivery Day: Thursday, February 20, 2014

1-Day By

Product & Tracking lnformation

Posal Prodlct

F rarma:
$50 insrance indtr&d
USPS

F'1 L', 9r i"

lb,

12.90 oe,

' Delivery: Thu 02/20/14

ins f
:

;89'16650lEZ3S'13

*iority t,Af t-Oay*

Cert'He d

Maillng

Includes $bU insurance Issue r ,,

Traddng"

OA'E

I TIG 2011,a|8

STATUS OF

flEfl

LOCAIIOn ROCHESTER. NY

Fobrurry 20,
am

OeEyeltd

littol

February 20, 2014 , 8:14

Arhrd al Posl Offic8

Depatt USPS Sqt Factity
Procassod al USPS

ROC|-GSTER. NY 11603

of

Certificate I'lai lins

Domestic I $I .

F6.ua.y 19,201/t

R@HfSTER NY i/l6SE

Total:
Paid by;
Cash

Februaylg,2011 ,7:42
pm Feb{uary 19, 201.1, 5:10 pm February t9,2014. 3:4t pm

Origh Sort Faciny

DispattEd to Sryt

ROCHSTER. MY 1{492

Facry
AccepElce

EAST ROCFSTER, NY 1'.t45

Change Due:

EAST ROCHESTER, l'fY 14,145

00 For trackjng
USPS.com

or

call

or

tr,.,

l-800
.

Track Another Package

Whrfr yorr tr.ckhg (tr rscafll nsmb.r?
Irack lt

Save this receipt as el. insurance, For informatjon orr an insurance claim go to rsps , comlshi p/f i I e-domest j c_c la i rns , htm
I

"-

'amps

at usps,com/shop or 0-Stamp24. Go to

lr

i,l

LEGAT

ora

usPi@r
Sa{c8 t

oiaA$urusPgcor

PnEcy Poicy t -sc ct l,be )

GosrrHt
Pir{
a

Abt
>

I.SPS FbtE

-.ljcknshjp to prjnt rbels with postage. For ,'mat i on ca I I

,JSPS.

d
I

Bry SHrps &

t

Strp,
b tP

flsFmt
l6PS

a()A

is

FEAR Act EEO Daia

Ld {h Pcstag CusbESfl)
DN\strE Sotdsrs

Sg'w

Abrts

Fm& ft.lricatfl,
Last Mile
t

.**************************
r************f ****ji**** t***

Cffsl

slta lndq ,

lj'USPS.CAM'

CopyrqhF 2014 LGPS. Al ftqfs

Rosd
-

najl rqhen and r,rhere you .iith a secure Post Office gn up for a box onl jne at n .*x*f {r*******f ***X***ltf **t<.1*i<.f **;* . *******+ ******x***t ** ***+******:l***"
om/Poboxes,

lr II*:I0001004'l9343
r ^f
r

:rk;09

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COTII{TY OF MONROE

KEVIN PATRICK BRADY,

Petitioner.
VS.

ORDER Index No. 2012107593

THE PEOPLE OF NEW YORK,

Respondent.

The petitioner in the above-captioned action having filed a motion to certif,i the record in the

above captioned action for appeal, said proposed record consisting

of

105 pages, commencing

with

apage entitled "Notice of Action, Demand for Hearing in the Nature of

Writ of Error, Coram Nobis,

or Coram Vobis"; and the motion having been heard before the undersigned on papers; and this
Courl having found that the proposed record which was submitted with the instant motion by the
petitioner, consisting of 105 pages, is not the same set of papers as the "Notice of Action" filed by
the petitioner in the Monroe County Clerk's Office on July 10,2012, in that the Court's copy in its

file does not contain pages delineated "50 - 105" on the copy submitted with petitioner's motion;
and that, fuither the remainder ofthe record which should be contained therein as required by statute

is noi coiiiaineci in the proposed recor'i,

NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED, that petitioner's motion to cerlify the record
hereby denied.
, in its present form, is

Hoff. C
Dated:

J.

pre

Court Justice

April fNew York

*--F

i"'
-

NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT APPELLATE DIVISION, FOIIRIH DEPARTMENT M. DOLORES DENMAN COURTHOUSE 50 EAST AVEN['E, SIJITE 2OO ROCHESTE& NEW YORK 14604 (585) 530-3100 Fax (585) s30-3247
FRANCES
CLERK OF TI{E COURT

E, CATENBII,

ALAN

L.

ROSS

DBPUTY CLERX O? THS COURT

August 22,2A13

Kevin Patrick Brady ""'' 508 Locust Lane E. Rochester, NY 14445

. '::.::

Re:

Brady v Doran

Dear Mr. Brady: ln response to your letter of August 1 B, 2013, please refer to the order of Justice Gorski entered March 5, 1996.
Very truly yours,

Appellate Division Clerk's Office LXD/cat

na'a

/Fj.
a
7

www. cburts. state.ny.us/ad4